|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20206H2221999-05-0404 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 That Would Allow STP Nuclear Operating Co to Apply ASME Code Case N-514 for Determining Plant Cold Overpressurization Mitigation Sys Pressure Setpoint.Commission Grants Exemption ML20195C7541998-11-0505 November 1998 Order Approving Application Re Proposed Corporate Merger of Central & South West Corp & American Electric Power Co,Inc.Commission Approves Application Re Merger Agreement Between Csw & Aep ML20155H5511998-11-0202 November 1998 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Re Submission of Revs to UFSAR ML20248K5051998-06-0909 June 1998 Confirmatory Order Modifying License (Effective Immediately).Answer for Request for Hearing Shall Not Stay Immediate Effectiveness of Order NOC-AE-000109, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to 10CFR50.55a, Industry Codes & Standards.South Texas Project Fully Endorses Comments to Be Provided by NEI1998-03-30030 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to 10CFR50.55a, Industry Codes & Standards.South Texas Project Fully Endorses Comments to Be Provided by NEI ML20137U3531997-04-0808 April 1997 Order Approving Application Re Formation of Operating Company & Transfer of Operating Authority ML20116B8871996-07-19019 July 1996 Transcript of 960719 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Re Apparent Violations of NRC Requirements at Plant TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20072P5441994-07-13013 July 1994 Testimony of Rl Stright Re Results of Liberty Consulting Groups Independent Review of Prudence of Mgt of STP ML20092C3911993-11-15015 November 1993 Partially Deleted Response of Rl Balcom to Demand for Info ML20092C4031993-11-15015 November 1993 Partially Deleted Response of Hl&P to Demand for Info ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process ML20044D3311993-05-0404 May 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Mod of TS Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans ST-HL-AE-4162, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 50 Re Reducing Regulatory Burden on Nuclear Licenses1992-07-22022 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 50 Re Reducing Regulatory Burden on Nuclear Licenses ST-HL-AE-4146, Comment Supporting Draft Reg Guide DG-1021, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of EDG Units Used as Class 1E Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Draft Reg Guide DG-1021, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of EDG Units Used as Class 1E Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ST-HL-AE-4145, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Rule1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Loss of All Alternating Current Power & Draft Reg Guide 1.9,task DG-1021.Supports Rule ML20101K1131992-06-29029 June 1992 Motion for Leave to Suppl Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas & Supplemental Info.* OI Policy Unfair & Violative of Subpoenaed Individuals Statutory Rights & Goes Beyond Investigatory Authority.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101G2041992-06-18018 June 1992 Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas.* Requests Mod of Subpoenas Due to Manner in Which Ofc of Investigations Seeks to Enforce Is Unreasonable & Fails to Protect Statutory Rights of Subpoenaed Individuals.W/Certificate of Svc ML20087L3301992-04-0202 April 1992 Affidavit of RW Cink Re Speakout Program ML20087L3491992-04-0202 April 1992 Affidavit of JW Hinson Re ATI Career Training Ctr ML20087L3651992-04-0202 April 1992 Affidavit of Rl Balcom Re Access Authorization Program ML20087L3561992-04-0202 April 1992 Affidavit of Wj Jump Re Tj Saporito 2.206 Petition ML20116F2671992-02-19019 February 1992 Requests NRC to Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility ML20094E9511992-02-10010 February 1992 Requests That NRC Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility & to Adequately Train All Util Employees in Use of Rev 3 to Work Process Program ML20066C5041990-09-24024 September 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Fitness for Duty Program.Urges NRC Examine Rept Filed by Bay City,Tx Woman Who Was Fired from Clerical Position at Nuclear Power Plant Due to Faulty Drug Test Administered by Util ML20006A0281990-01-0808 January 1990 J Corder Response to NRC Staff Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Requests Protective Order Until NRC Makes Documents Available to Corder by FOIA or Directly.W/Certificate of Svc ML20005G1431989-12-11011 December 1989 Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Protective Order Requested on Basis That Subpoena Will Impose Undue Financial Hardship on J Corder ML20005G1451989-12-0505 December 1989 Affidavit of Financial Hardship.* Requests NRC to Provide Funds for Investigation & Correction of Errors at Plant Due to Listed Reasons,Including Corder State of Tx Unemployment Compensation Defunct ST-HL-AE-3164, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components1989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20244C9131989-03-28028 March 1989 Transcript of 890328 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Discussion/ Possible Vote on Full Power Ol.Pp 1-65.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20055G7801988-11-10010 November 1988 Investigative Interview of La Yandell on 881110 in Arlington,Tx.Pp 1-13.Related Info Encl ML20055G7831988-11-0909 November 1988 Investigative Interview of R Caldwell on 881109 in Arlington,Tx.Pp 1-27.Related Info Encl ML20055G7881988-11-0909 November 1988 Investigative Interview of AB Earnest on 881109 in Arlington,Tx.Pp 1-90.Related Info Encl ML20055G7151988-11-0909 November 1988 Investigative Interview of J Kelly on 881109 in Arlington, Tx.Pp 1-35.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20205T7001988-11-0101 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Initiation of Fitness for Duty Program at Facility.Need for Program Based on Presumption That Nuclear Power Activities Require That Personnel Be Free from Impairment of Illegal Drugs ML20151M2071988-07-25025 July 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Fee Schedules.Principal Objection to Rules Relates to Removal of Current Ceilings on Collection of Fees ML20196A3701988-06-17017 June 1988 Notice of Receipt of Petition for Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 & Issuance of Director'S Decision Denying Petitioners Request DD-88-09, Decision DD-88-09 Denying 880317 Petition by Earth First, Gray Panthers of Austin,Lone Star Green,Public Citizen,South Texas Cancellation Campaign & Travis County Democratic Women Committee for Commission to Delay Util Licensing Vote1988-06-17017 June 1988 Decision DD-88-09 Denying 880317 Petition by Earth First, Gray Panthers of Austin,Lone Star Green,Public Citizen,South Texas Cancellation Campaign & Travis County Democratic Women Committee for Commission to Delay Util Licensing Vote ML20148K0271988-03-21021 March 1988 Transcript of 880321 Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power License for South Texas Nuclear Project,Unit 1 (Public Meeting) in Washington,Dc.Viewgraphs Encl.Pp 1-73 ML20150D1401988-03-21021 March 1988 Appeal of Director'S Decision on Southern Texas Project.* Requests That Commission Consider Appeal & Stay Licensing Decision Until Sufficient Evidence Acquired to Support Final Decision ML20150D0411988-03-17017 March 1988 Petition Of:Earth First!,Gray Panthers of Austin,Lone Star Green,Public Citizen,South Texas Cancellation Campaign, Travis County Democratic Women'S Committee.* Withholding of Issuance of License Requested ML20196H4661988-02-29029 February 1988 Receipt of Petition for Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206.* Gap 880126 Petition to Delay Voting on Full Power OL for Facility Until Investigation of All Allegations Completed Being Treated,Per 10CFR2.206 ML20148Q9531988-01-26026 January 1988 Petition of Gap.* Commission Should Delay Vote on Licensing of Facility Until Thorough Investigation of All Allegations Completed & Public Rept Issued.Exhibits Encl ML20237C2751987-12-13013 December 1987 Director'S Decision 87-20 Denying Petitioners 870529 Motion That Record in Facility Licensing Hearings Be Reopened & Fuel Loading Be Suspended Pending Resolution of Issues. Petitioner Failed to Provide Any New Evidence ML20236H3751987-10-29029 October 1987 NRC Staff Consent to Motion to Quash Subpoena Filed by E Stites.* Staff Concedes Possibility of Deficiencies in Svc of Subpoena to Stites & Therefore Does Not Oppose Motion to Quash.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236E0111987-10-23023 October 1987 Order.* Grants NRC Request for Addl Time to Respond to Motion to Quash Subpoena of E Stites,Per 871008 Order. Response Should Be Filed by 871029.Served on 871023 ML20235T3891987-10-0808 October 1987 Motion to Quash Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Subpoena Issued by Rd Martin on 870922 Should Be Quashed Due to Stites Not Properly Served,Witness Fees & Transportation Costs Not Provided & Issuance in Bad Faith ML20235T4171987-10-0808 October 1987 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Quash or in Alternative in Support of Motion for Protective Order.* Martin 870922 Subpoena of Stites Invalid & Improper.Decision to Subpoena at Late Date Form of Harassment.W/Certificate of Svc ML20195D8561987-09-22022 September 1987 Subpoena Directing E Stites to Appear on 871008 in Arlington,Tx to Testify Before NRC Personnel Re Allegations Made Concerning safety-related Deficiencies &/Or Records Falsifications at Plant IA-87-745, Subpoena Directing E Stites to Appear on 871008 in Arlington,Tx to Testify Before NRC Personnel Re Allegations Made Concerning safety-related Deficiencies &/Or Records Falsifications at Plant1987-09-22022 September 1987 Subpoena Directing E Stites to Appear on 871008 in Arlington,Tx to Testify Before NRC Personnel Re Allegations Made Concerning safety-related Deficiencies &/Or Records Falsifications at Plant 1999-05-04
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20101K1131992-06-29029 June 1992 Motion for Leave to Suppl Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas & Supplemental Info.* OI Policy Unfair & Violative of Subpoenaed Individuals Statutory Rights & Goes Beyond Investigatory Authority.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101G2041992-06-18018 June 1992 Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas.* Requests Mod of Subpoenas Due to Manner in Which Ofc of Investigations Seeks to Enforce Is Unreasonable & Fails to Protect Statutory Rights of Subpoenaed Individuals.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116F2671992-02-19019 February 1992 Requests NRC to Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility ML20094E9511992-02-10010 February 1992 Requests That NRC Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility & to Adequately Train All Util Employees in Use of Rev 3 to Work Process Program ML20006A0281990-01-0808 January 1990 J Corder Response to NRC Staff Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Requests Protective Order Until NRC Makes Documents Available to Corder by FOIA or Directly.W/Certificate of Svc ML20005G1431989-12-11011 December 1989 Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Protective Order Requested on Basis That Subpoena Will Impose Undue Financial Hardship on J Corder ML20150D1401988-03-21021 March 1988 Appeal of Director'S Decision on Southern Texas Project.* Requests That Commission Consider Appeal & Stay Licensing Decision Until Sufficient Evidence Acquired to Support Final Decision ML20148Q9531988-01-26026 January 1988 Petition of Gap.* Commission Should Delay Vote on Licensing of Facility Until Thorough Investigation of All Allegations Completed & Public Rept Issued.Exhibits Encl ML20236H3751987-10-29029 October 1987 NRC Staff Consent to Motion to Quash Subpoena Filed by E Stites.* Staff Concedes Possibility of Deficiencies in Svc of Subpoena to Stites & Therefore Does Not Oppose Motion to Quash.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20235T3891987-10-0808 October 1987 Motion to Quash Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Subpoena Issued by Rd Martin on 870922 Should Be Quashed Due to Stites Not Properly Served,Witness Fees & Transportation Costs Not Provided & Issuance in Bad Faith ML20235T4171987-10-0808 October 1987 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Quash or in Alternative in Support of Motion for Protective Order.* Martin 870922 Subpoena of Stites Invalid & Improper.Decision to Subpoena at Late Date Form of Harassment.W/Certificate of Svc ML20216D1111987-06-25025 June 1987 Reply of Bp Garde to NRC Staff Opposition to Motion to Quash & De Facto Opposition to Petition Per 10CFR2.206.* NRC Has Not Established That Garde Assertions Not Sustainable.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20215D6471987-06-11011 June 1987 NRC Staff Answer Opposing Motion to Quash Subpoena Filed by Bp Garde,Esquire.* Gap Has Not Provided Sufficient Basis on Which Commission Could Conclude That attorney-client Privilege Protects Info Sought by Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc ML20214P3101987-05-29029 May 1987 Petition of Gap.* Requests That NRC Initiate Special Investigative Unit Complying W/Nrc Chapter Manual 0517, Excluding Region IV & V Stello from Participation,To Investigate Employee Allegations.Supporting Matl Encl ML20237G5981987-05-29029 May 1987 Motion to Reopen Record of Licensing Hearing to Determine Whether ASLB Conclusions Should Be Altered Due to Evidence of Undue Influence Exercised Over NRC Personnel by Util Mgt. Related Documentation Encl ML20214P2851987-05-29029 May 1987 Motion & Memo to Quash Subpoena.* Bp Garde Motion That Commission Quash V Stello 870520 Subpoena ML20203E1851986-07-22022 July 1986 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Affidavit of Jn Wilson Re Design of Nonconforming Structures to Withstand Hurricanes & Tornados in Order to Correct Erroneous Statements Made in 860714 Affidavit.Related Correspondence ML20207E1131986-07-17017 July 1986 Statement of Views on Questions Re Design of Nonconforming Structures to Withstand Hurricanes & Tornadoes.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20210E2071986-03-21021 March 1986 Motion to Compel Production of Documents Re Alleged Illegal Drug Use in Response to Applicant 860306 Response to Second Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20154Q1391986-03-19019 March 1986 Response Opposing Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, Inc 860228 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record:V & for Board Ordered Production of Documents.Motion Not Timely Filed. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154Q3341986-03-19019 March 1986 Response Supporting Applicant Motion for Leave to Reply to Portions of Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power,Inc Partial Response to Show Cause Order.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20138B0161986-03-17017 March 1986 Response to Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power,Inc 860228 Motion to Compel Further Answers to Second Set of Interrogatories.Disclosure of Info Constitutes Invasion of Employee Privacy.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138A8781986-03-14014 March 1986 Response Opposing Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power,Inc 860221 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record.Affidavit of JW Briskin Encl ML20141N8461986-03-12012 March 1986 Motion for Summary Disposition of Issue F.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists & Applicant Entitled to Favorable Decision.Affidavit of Je Geiger Encl ML20154B6111986-02-28028 February 1986 Response Opposing Portions of Concerned Citizen About Nuclear Power 860221 Partial Response to ASLB 860207 Show Cause Order.Further Arguments on Motion to Reopen Should Be Rejected.W/Certificate of Svc ML20154B4791986-02-28028 February 1986 Response Opposing Applicant 860218 Motion for Protective Order,Instructing Applicant Not to Answer 860204 Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20154B5781986-02-28028 February 1986 Motion for Leave to Reply to Portions of Concerned Citizen About Nuclear Power 860221 Partial Response to ASLB 860207 Show Cause Order.Proposed Reply Encl ML20154B8471986-02-28028 February 1986 Motion to Compel Applicant Response to Second Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205K6151986-02-21021 February 1986 NRC Position in Response to ASLB 860207 Memorandum & Order Requesting Addl Info to Resolve Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power,Inc Motion to Reopen Phase II Record:Iv. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20141N2131986-02-21021 February 1986 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record to Admit Encl Deposition of JW Briskin,For Order to Produce Documentation Re Quadrex Corp & to Schedule Hearings at Conclusion of Ordered Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20137W8841986-02-18018 February 1986 Motion for Protective Order to Direct Util to Respond to Only Interrogatories 12a,b & C in Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power 860204 Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20151T7131986-02-0606 February 1986 Response Supporting Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, Inc 860117 Motion to Withdraw Contention Re Overpressurization of Westinghouse Reactors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20151T6861986-02-0606 February 1986 Response Opposing Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power,Inc 860117 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record for Discovery & to Suspend Further Activity in Phase III ML20151U6731986-02-0303 February 1986 Response to Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power,Inc 860117 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record.Motion Supported to Include Addl Discovery & Hearings.Discovery Previously Limited by Board Contentions 9 & 10.W/Certificate of Svc ML20151T5841986-02-0303 February 1986 Response Opposing Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power 860117 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record:Iv;For Discovery & to Suspend Further Phase III Activity.Util Withholding Quadrex Rept W/Intent to Deceive ASLB ML20198H2791986-01-29029 January 1986 Response Supporting Applicant 860109 Motion to Incorporate Corrections Into 851205 & 06 Transcripts.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20137J0971986-01-17017 January 1986 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record:Motion IV for Discovery & to Suspend Further Activity in Phase Iii.Encl EA Saltarelli Oral Deposition & Overview of Facility Engineering Should Be Entered Into Phase Ii.Related Correspondence ML20140B6191986-01-17017 January 1986 Motion for Withdrawal of Contention Re Overpressurization of Westinghouse Reactors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20137A8731986-01-0909 January 1986 Motion to Incorporate Proposed Corrections to Transcript of 851205-06 Hearing ML20151T5291986-01-0303 January 1986 Response Supporting Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power 860114 Motion to Withdraw Pending Contention on Overpressurization of Westinghouse Reactors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20137L9501985-11-27027 November 1985 Motion to Sequester Witnesses to Be Called in Reopened Phase II Hearings on 851205 & 06 Re Issues of Credibility. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20210A4581985-11-13013 November 1985 Response Supporting Applicant 851014 Motion to Establish Schedule for Phase III of Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205G5251985-11-0808 November 1985 Response to Applicant 851014 Motion to Establish Schedule for Phase III Hearings.Proceeding Activities Re Phase III Should Be Suspended Until After Issuance of Partial Initial Decision Phase Ii.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20198B7991985-11-0505 November 1985 Motion Opposing Intervenor 851016 Motions to Reopen Phase II Record.Stds for Reopening Record Not Met.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20198B8431985-11-0404 November 1985 Motion to Strike Reckless Charges in 851029 Withdrawal Motion from Record.Intervenor Should Be Warned That Repetition of Behavior Will Not Be Tolerated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138N2431985-10-31031 October 1985 Response Opposing Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power Motion to Reopen Phase II Record:Ii.Exhibits 2 & 4 Barren of Any Info on Quadrex Review or Results.W/Certificate of Svc ML20138N0291985-10-29029 October 1985 Motion to Withdraw 851016 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record & for Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138H9981985-10-24024 October 1985 Response to Applicant 851004 Motion to Incorporate Transcript Corrections.Offers No Objection Except for Listed Proposed Changes.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133J1521985-10-16016 October 1985 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record to Admit Four Encl Exhibits.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133J3501985-10-16016 October 1985 Motion to Reopen Phase II Record & Extend Right to Discovery Set Forth in ASLB 850618 Memorandam & Order to All Parties. Certificate of Svc Encl 1992-06-29
[Table view] |
Text
. /.; ; RELATED CCREF.S?qcf.N.,Q D' KE7r-
- %['
UN1iED S14iEb OF AMEH1CA
'84 JIR -8 .o3:00 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
~
~ 1EFORE THE A10NIC SA141 Y AlJD LICEN51NS B05RD.C"r . < > . .c .
. EM: f' In-ths Mcttee of- (
)
H N d T o n *. !'3 H 'I N G - A N D ( Docket Noc. bO-49e oL t'Ut.a h C D.M P A N i , ET AL. .)59-499 OL (Soutn To::as Pro.}ect. (
i Units 1 and 2) (
Ci t i c en r, Concerned About . Nuclear Powas- (CCANP) Motion for
.Pcconsiderction of. ASLB's Memorandum and Order (Reling on CCANP Mctions for Additional Discovery and Applicants' Motion- for
__.._ . _ ___.. _ __S. enc.KL9asl dukec! t!er 221 12&l___ __________ __-
un Msy 22, 1904, the Atomic Saf ety and Licensing Board in.
this proceeding issued a memorandum and order ruling on two-CCANP
( mc'irns for ackli ti onal ditc.overy and on a motion f o* sanctions by A;: n ' i en t 3. j 1
Anonc the rulings of the floard was a ruling .that the Partial Init191-Cecision in Phase 1 oF this proceeding hed feroclosed any; further inquiry into either the past lack of charactor or lack of competence on .the part of HL&P as a-basis for . license denial, c:rceot insofar ne the failure of'HLhP to provide ^ the 'Quadrex .!
Roccrt to the Board and Conmission: might be probative of - lack of v
ch2ractcr. Memorandum and Order at Il 6.
, ' 85 en.: "
CCGNP .believnu that thin Memorandum - and Orderf in; entirely, Mo of. d i ni.over y , . ovi denc e ,
em
.;wcep 2 nq i n i tu -e::cl ut ion crosc- +
- n. o
~ 8g -
2
- ci: smi nati on , and -findinas?on the assence of.the.Duadrenl Report.
r- 3 g
, 1at o 'he only reat on Quadren . was c:tcluded f rom Phase I : was ' to permit - a g.
~
ctmpreh'enuive discussien-of what happened af ter ; HLbF' had : ti me' to-
$n.&-
develop ' remedial meanurcsif or.. the f indir!gs of : deficiency- in ' the n
K LOuadrer Report; the (findings' themselves wereEnever consider.ed Sl
1 irrelevar. Oc the deci sion to be ma-;- in Phct.2 !. Now that delay hes becorc ' b3r !o discovery, 2nt 0:.'ction of evidence, and tr.e mal:ing of ~;rdincs.
In . : t F ; ' a r l Init:d ecci n 2 0 . , the Eos,rd did consider the possibili:. that a lack o+ c on d eu cr trothfulness could be a
. chc.racter -ic f ec t so cevere as to s;&rrant license denial. PID at
'2 3 . Yet tnc Ecard faceclose; ans/ inquiry as to charactor stemming fron the "evel ati ons of thc Duadr e: Ftport, other than the c:icumstsac;s surrounding noti f i c a t; on of NRC and the parties eab o u t t r. c. repcrt. The possibilltv that evi dence would be c c-ve l op e c t .a t cver a long parlod ci time, not just from May 7, 1981 f er m - d , HL?P i-ept the Commi r,si on in the dark about Brown and Ront's and HL6F*s inabilities to design and engineer the project . ionored er ra;rcted. C JJJ? - urgns the Board to reconsi de - p.n c ;h a r in lighL of the SID this possibility can really Le ;gnored or, if rejetttd. whether the Bocrd hac any c.vi denti a . bsc;s for rejecting this connibility.
I n v .M i n g cuch a ruling, the Poc;rd it cito a:1.uming that the some cn ses the Board found to be the roanon for earlier lack of coa.n ple.n _ c . i.e. inm.perience and Icng linen of communication, ar ce r.: :c u m 1, . the name cannec fcr the lack of competence c'em n r d r i. . 1 r" t h t; Du - dr e.' report. The Board reaches this ar.clusic, t 3 sed on no evidcnce whatrE?.wcr. The Board annumes
- t no e.idence could be develc;ec tc demonstrate any other russon. Cn what basis does the Boa.rc deny this possibility? The Doard's s s zus.pti cnc and conclusi ons t;ithout bencfit of evidence are unu.ar inted.
The TcErd's approach s,c cms, i l l c ol cal in light of the Board's u
,s interont in pursuing the " corrective actior.n" : sten on the ,
Quedrex findinos. Preci sely how are we colny tc j.dc e whether the correctivt actions f olloual currently r e s c '. v e any safety.
cignificent de f i c i enc i es tv.aal ed by the Ousdre: :-:: ort if wo are not contemplating t.ny inquir's i nt o whether er wh. t.c particular deficiency occurred? If we do not I:now whether t e deficiency in 4act occurred and if'so why, how precisely docE trs Board propose v'e judae the adequacy of corrective action? F- e:: amp l e , if Du adr e:. said comething was a problem and Bechtcl s ai d it was not and therefore no corrective action was taken are we to take Occhtc1';. wcrd for the truth?
Even un the ono questi en the Board will s. t i l . entertain -
the notificst:an and reportability questic, .he swoopinq e.:cl uti on of evidence by the Dor.rd could have s:ma effect on the ,
i natero of the inquiry and conclusions. Presumab l y . the Board does contsider it possible ta mal:e a f i ndi ng that HLt :' chould have notifiud the flRC and the parties of the Quadrex Rr:c -t either in i t s crkti ret y or in its particular findincs and ' the al leest some of the Quadre>: findings were ultimately reportecla. Exactly how ui11 the Oundre" Repor L tse pr t.,of of nntifioh,2e cC reporte.ble f i ndintas if the report itself is not. arimitted int: c-vi d enco 'for the t. ruth of what it contains" hou c att the Eoced determine i-F a finding war, ul timately repor tablea unless the E: art cnows whether the finding documents. comething that in fact "
..ap:ened? Is the L> card . making an assumption about the willingr.cs s of HLLP to ciipolate 4. h a i the Duodre:. Poput t ui11 be'adm1t.tE ;nto evidence for the truth of what it contains? If co, on what c:resentations
l l by the Applicant cca the L' car d ma! r auch an as sump t i on'.'
Does the 1-:o t r t; ccnrider an fjRC 12ndino cf saf cty-ci gni f i cI nt Lo be relevant tc the notiilability or reportability of a
! 1 nrii no" 11 ce: . f .c t, can t h e ! " d.. ,
f i r: ding bc p r ob i- t : .c Unicss it 1 E; a02emed the finding document: something that happened?
, Thesc are only a few ct thr: problems and questions raised cy the Paard's Memorandum and Order af May 22.
The timino of the discovery provided by the Board ir anotner ccocern. CCANP is given enLil August 31 to complete its dinrevcry. CCANP's repreventative will be preparing for the har examination which cccurs in the last weel: of July through much of i ha! period, but erm Ls no r c< l i e f on that point. There is, hr,we,or, the proble.n that th9 Staff i r, given until Au';ust 24 to fi1c a bricf en t. h a c p ot i. c Lo 11 ti of the Dundre: Rcpcrt and thc individual f i nsti ngs. The partien uill then have 20 days to rc, pond to thct Lrlef.
CCef!P will therefore h a v t. t.o porcibility of conduc t i ng discovery knowing the pc2itionc of the parties on the only issue the 17aard cccmn willing to cuplorr (other than remedi al ) . The Ar.pltrants ha n a i r c aW, refoced to answer State of Tenas i n i r,rt rme t ar J f.c ca the repor ability question, citing the ftrt.!acomiro br1af: a .= a n c,:" u ,0.
t ;t. Al H - (nom- t t.o l'o,a d io i cconsidN ile Memorantium and Ord:r of M arc 22 and alter that Memorandum and Order to provide One rollowing:
- 1. Dicccvery not IiniLed as to any a s p ec. L of tne Duadre: Repor t.
- 2. Such di scovrery to canoncoce af ter the filing of tnc
e r
briefn on not2fication i..id reporti.tility by t.1 1 parties or ,
a l t t-r n a t i vel y an order to the A.pplicants that such ouestions are to be ancutrcci regacrdlecs et uhethcr the brie +n base been filed, or not.
- 2. !!o defining of the iscues to be litiacted unti) after the discovery and the prehcaring conference, i.e. recission of the Ltoard 's li mi tati cn on the icsues set forth in the Ma.aorandum and Ordor.
CCAtJP can appreci alc the Boar d 's desire to cut short this r:r oc c edi ng . Certainly there is no enjoyment f c:- CCANP in proloncing thic procen. H: Wycr, the Memorandum and Order of May 22 is so restrictive as le the scope of the Phase II proceeding i t c.ru c!i s c o ur '. t c1 conclit inn t h i, t CU Atji ' feels compc!1ed to protest and c ou l: reli e f .
Recpecti ul ! y cubmitted.
Lanny Sinkin tid W. 7th, Suito 220 Austin, lexas 78701-(S12) 478-7197 Representative fcr
'intervenor Li: irens Concerned About Huc l ear Poutr. Inc.
~'
IMtod: i!une S. 1004
' ' , y- -
- it y li!PL' t it t- . t e u i t (, .
9; .
C
!!ULLI nN 1:H4UE
UM* H ' Alum 1 li U!i li!L (*1 UM j ' 6(.! 6 Y ;!!D L ICEN3 !!Ki !!OliHD Inxthe Mattor of (
)
NOUSTON LIGHTINO'AND < Occhet Non.50-49G OL POWER COMPANY, ET AL. ) 5(.*-499 OL E cuth Texas Project, ,'i Units 1 and- 2) (
GE811EICOJE OE ME8 MICE I hereby certify-that copies of CITIZENS . CONCERNED. ABOUT:
. NUCLEAR POWER, INC. (CCANP) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF'ASLB MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (RULING ON CCANP'S MOTIONS FOR LADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AND APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS) DATED MAY 22, 1984 were served by deposit in the U.S. Mail,.fitst class postago paid .
to the following individuals and cntitics on.the 6th day of. June 1 N34 ;.
Chr.rics Bechhoefer, Esquire Brian Berwick, Esquire Ch si rrnan Aust. Atty. Gen.
- At.wie Safety and Licensing Duard State of Tenas Lt . L . Nuclear Regulatorv Commission Environmtl. Protection Washinoton, D.C. 20555 P. O. Bon 12540, Capitol Sta.
Dr. James. C. Lomb, III
(.dmini strati ve Judge ~ Robert G. Per1ic,-Ecquire-31:3 Woodhaven Road Office of.the-Exec. Leg..Dir.
Chapel Hill , North Carolina 27514- U.S. . Nuclear 1 Regulatory Comm.
Washington, D.C. 20555 Ernest E. Hill Admini strative Judge Jack R. Mewman, Ecquire Hill Associate =; 1025 Connecticut: Avenue, N.W.
210 Monteco Drive Washington, D.C. 20936 Danville, California 94026 .. ,
Molbert Schwarr', Esquire.
Bal:or and Botts Nrt. .Pecqy Ouchorn 300 One'Ehel1 P1ana D:ecutive Director, C.E.U. . Houston, Tenan- 77002
'Poute 1 .- Don 1684 Ur ator 1 a , ' l en ar, 77422.. LAtomic.Sofety pnd Licensing'iBd. ~
U.S. Nucieir Regulatory ~Comm..
Mi t I f am t-i. Jardan._.III, Esq. Wo sh i n g t on",c . D . C . 20555- ,
tinrcon, Weine biJordan %-
- v01 3 Street',.N.W., Butte--430 e dtomic Safety andJLicensing;-
EAppeal-_ Doord1
~
Wa sh i n g t on ,- 1 D . C. ;20007-U. S.; Mut1 ear ' Regul a tory Wonim. '
' Pat Co'/. .
-Moshington', D.C.- 20555 -
S106 Casa Oro-
, San Antpnio,;Tm ac 78233 : Docketing-and. Service Section.-
.Of fica of the;Socretary .
. U. B. Nuc1 car.f Regul atery "Comm. g Wsshingtcn, D.C. 20555?
/ l en-clis quis .e ens ese seen ese ese ye eoe e op w 3 suo me esp est ese e.
og n aoss e esa
,;Lanny- inkinL c, . . _ _ _ _ _ __ -. _ _