ML20055G783

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Investigative Interview of R Caldwell on 881109 in Arlington,Tx.Pp 1-27.Related Info Encl
ML20055G783
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 11/09/1988
From: Caldwell R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20055C208 List:
References
FOIA-89-540 NUDOCS 9007240172
Download: ML20055G783 (29)


Text

-

UNITED STATES m

NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSI0N INVESTIGATIV3 INTERVIEld 0F

)

)

RONALD CALDifELL

)

4'j

/

'j',*

j.

DATE:

November 9, 1988

... ; i. ', ; )

e.r :

'41..] ;< '

, ^

3*'.

?'

,!$\\Nl?i-)!

LOCATION:

Arlington, Texas

.., ; f..' ' " >

M 'l' PAGES:

1 through 27 t.:

~shw:a:s w

.r v.

,e....n..

?,: x.,:t N3 HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION' i':m. $'g

,7 yam

i. ; :

a g g g g4 m g

$8g72 g 2 900720 PDR gg gg,g GARDE 89-S40 i

(18@62S4088

-1

\\

]

e i

i i

BEFORE THE 2

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3

.............x 4

Interview oft 5

RONALD CALDWELL t

a 6

..............x t

7 Conference Room 807 1'

611 Ryan Plaza 8

Arlington, Texas 9

Wednesday, l

November 9, 1988 10 la The Interview of Ronald Caldwell commenced i

12 at 1:55 p.m.,

puruuant to agreement.

f 33 APPEARANCES:

a 14 For the Nuclear Regtilatory Commissions t

15 SHARON CONNELLY, Director DONNA ROWE, Investigator 16 Office of Inspector and Auditor i

Nuclear Regulatory Commission L

17 Bethesda, Maryland 18 For the Witness, RONALD CALDWELL:

[

19 WALTER DRESSLAR, Attorney 3636 Executive Center Drive, Suite 201 30 Austin, Texas 78731 t

21 l

22 23 i

24 l

25 Heritage Reporting Corporation cae..

t m

. ~..

4 8

2 4

l, P R 0 C E_E D I N G S 2

MS. ROWEt Today is November the 9th, 1988.

3 The time is now 1:55 p.m.

4 My name is Donna M. Rowe.

I am a Criminal Investigator for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 6

Office of Inspector and Auditor.

7 other parties present include Mr. Ronald 8

Caldwell, Mr. Walter Dresslar, NTEU representative, and 9

Ms. Sharon Connelly, Director of the office of Inspector 10 and teuditor.

11 We are seated in Region IV regional office 12 and the purpose of this interview is to address some concerns 13 regarding the allegations made against Mr. Caldwell from 14 the initial South Texas investigation; to clarify some is additional concerns.

16 Before we ask any questions, Mr. Caldwell, 17 I would like to read into the record the CIA Rights Advisement 18 and I would ask you to follow along with me.

At such time 19 I will ask you if there are no problems with this, would 30 you please sign it at that time.

21 I am an Investigator with the office of 22 Inspector and Auditor.

One of my functions is to investigate w

23 the possibility of criminal violations of federal statutes.

24 You have a right to remain silent if your 25 answers may tend to incriminate you.

Anything you say Herttoge Reporting Corporation mn sn

3 4

ay be used as evidence, both in an administrative proceeding I-m r any future criminal proceeding involving you.

I 1

o 1

If you refuse to answer the questions posed to you on the ground that the answers may tend to incriminate 4

you, you cannot be discharged solely for remaining silent.

5 However, your silence can be considered in an administrative 6

proceeding for its evidentiary value that is warranted 7

8 by the facts surrounding your case.

9 Mr. Caldwell, do you understand the OIA 10 Rights Advisement?

Il MR. CALDWELL:

Yes.

12 MS. ROWE Do you have any problems with 13 signing it?

I4 MR. CALDWELL:

No.

15 MS. ROWE I would ask you to do so at this 16 time. 'Mr. Dresslar, you could witness it for him, if you 17 might.

18 Thank you.

19 MS. ROWEt Mr. Caldwell, I'd like to turn 30 your attention to --

21 MR. DRESSLAR:

If I might, just at the beginning 22 here.

23 MS. ROWE Sure.

24 MR. DRESSLAR:

We would like to clarify 25 for the record exactly the issues that you're going to Heritoge Reporting Corporation n.n.a

l' 4

I be discusshg today, as I had spoken with Ms. Connelly 2

this morning.

3 Mr. Caldwell has already giver at least--

i 4

one statement under oath and we, the union, would like 8

to ensure that we're not in a fishing expedition or witch 6

hunt type situation.

We'd like to know what the issue 7

is at this point because he's already given a statement 8

If it's just a continuation of the old investigation, over --

he's probably given a statement over almost every issue 10 that he's aware of and maybe for the record we'd like to il know exactly what we're going to be talking about today.

q l

12 MS. ROWE:

I will be glad to do that.

1 l

13 MR. DRESSLAR:

And, also, what is the criminal

.i l

14 aspect of it or what is the potential criminal aspect of it.

15 MS. CONNELLY:

Let me just generally explain i

h I'

what has happened.

We did issue our Investigation Report l

17 to management.

Management reviewed the report and raised l

l 38 some questions based on their knowledge of normal day-i 39 to-day operations within the NRC.

l 20 The question that was specifically raised 21 was whether you would have any involvement with the South 22 Texas plant prior to your actually assuming responsibilities 23-for conducting inspections at that plant.

24 So what we're going to talk about today, 25-one of the things we're going to talk about is what involvement l

Heritoge Reporting Corporation w us.

5 4

ou had with South Texas prior to the time that you applied i

y 2

for a position there.

3 And then there are some other followup issues 4

on some of the other things we have in the report.

I believe 5

that Ms. Rowe can address those more specifically.

6 In terms of the reading of the criminal rights, you have told us that there was no -- you told 7

8 us, I believe, on the record, and correct me if I'm wrong, Donna, but I believe you told us that your inspections H) were the first involvement you had with South Texas.

Il MR. CALDWELL I don't know if I told you 12 that on the record or not, but I think I told you at some 13 time.

I don't know if it was on the record or not.

f*,

14 MS. ROWE Probably during a phone conversation.

15 MR. CALDWELL:

Yes.

16 MS. CONNELLY:

All right.

At this point management's view is that you may have in f act been involved 17 is prior to that.

If that's so, then you would have made 19 a false statement to us.

Therefore, potential criminal 20 implications.

21 MS ROWEt Let me just expound on that or 22 verify that.

13 Do you remember the documentation that Martin 24 asked you and Mr. Kelly to find as far as your employment 25 inquiry with the utility?

Your time frame, I believe, Heritogo Reporting Corporation snn sn.eee

l j

6 j

l.

was 198 Remember, he asked you to document it?

1 MR. CALDWELL:

Yeah, I think I sent him 1

Have you got a copy of thatWbge# f Ib WMA 3

something.

4 MS. ROWEt Yes, I do.

5 MS. DRESSLAR:

If potential perjury is what 6

I just heard you say, he didn't give that statement under 7

oath, apparently.

So what's the perjury?

1 8

MS. CONNELLY:

If the statement wasn't given under oath, then there would still be a Title 18, Section 10 1001 violation, false statement to a federal employee, il MR. CALDWELL:

I don't remember any involvement whatsoever,unlessthy;;p(4+L teqq y

something to ask me specific. 4M 12 MUA tb44 13 Did I do something with thain that I can't remember?

Do pg 14 you have something specific?

15 I don't remember any involvement, what I've 16 told you in there, anyway, so unless you've found something 37 that I don' t know cf C.;.:. I can ' t remember.

I 18 MS. CONNELLY Well, the whole point of

}

19 this interview today is just to come back and get some 30 additional facts.

We just want to make sure that you are 21 totally protected and that's why we've given you your rights.

22 MR. DRESSLAR:

Can we go off the record 2

23 a second?

l 24 MS. ROWE Yes, let's do that.

25 MS. CONNELLY:

Let's go off the record.

.a Herttoge Reporting Corporation I

mm

'h

)

7 l

I (Discussion off the record.j l

i 2

Whereupon, 1

3 RONALD CALDWELL, j

i 4

the witness hereinbefore named, having been first duly 1

I 8

sworn to testify the truth, the whole truth and nothing

.I 6

but the truth, was examined and testified on his oath as 7

follows:

)

8 EXAMINATION l

BY MS, ROWE:

I le O

Mr. Caldwell, for the record would you please 11 state your full name?

12 A

Ronald A. Caldwell.

13 0

And your home address, sir?

~

14 A

15 0

And your position?

~

16 A

I am a security inspector in the Emergency Preparedness and Safeguards Section of Division of Reactor 17 18 Safety and Safeguards.

l 19 0

How long have you been employed in that i

20 capacity?

21 A

Approximately eleven years.

22 0

Is that the length of your employment with 23 the NRC in total?

g 1

gU A

Yes. fIu.6 7 /Auf M M *A k 47

  • '4 [6m f

v o

sa+ w.

2s 0

Thank you.

Hertfoge Reporting Corporofton n.n.a

g 1

MS. ROWE:

I'll turn the questioning now d

3 over to Ms. Connelly.

a 3

BY MS. CONNELLY:

4 0

Mr. Caldwell, when did you join the NRC?

t 8

A March the 26th, 1978.

6 0

Have you ever applied for a position at 7

the South Texas Nuclear I'lant?

8 A

Applied

  • I sent a resume #6 ;.ti L O. r-M W C a da L,,...

2 n.t i. to the Houston Lighting i

Poweroffice, Houston, Texas;notSouthTexash' 10 il 0

When was that?

(d

'O '

\\

Some me in '

kn II'

/(*MU d4 A

. ~$ k Ne &

$ $4,

~

k)'

13 0

What position were you applying for?

fmb 4

~

14 A

Any security position.

No position.

It 18 was wide open.

/ ! [

J 16 0

Were you applying for a position at any fg c-17 paaticular plant?

18 A

yo, 19 0

What were your duties and responsibilities 5,

s(

20 with the NRC at that time?

21 A

I was a security inspector at that tima-l 22 0

Did you have any involvement with Houston j

y 23 Lighting & Power at that time?

24 A

Not to my knowledge.

The first inspection, (Yb 25 to my remembrance, was

, but we can go pull the Heritoge Reporting Corporotion > /$g

)

"*Wa71 i

<wn.n an i

I -

e w

~ -..

.m

9-I report and get the exact date,-

// 2/ h 3

0' And that inspection was where?

=.

3 A

That was at South Texas Project.

et e 4

0 Does Houst >n Lighting & Power have any other i

8 nuclear platte?

m

+

6 A

No.

7

'O Did you have any involvement with the securityj 4

p he of the South Texas plant?

Whb U

$I:N I had any A

r W

0 involvement wh m gu gJatsoe er. bk bud 4 srnus,im

~

W

.r ll 0

At what point did you know you would first 12 be working-on assignments involving the South Texas plant?

13

's a good question.

About M weekp

~

,, 6 A JTh

-before I weert de h the first time, and I kept saying dWI dy 15 they're.not ready.

All the information I % was thak fg l' '

it was going to be another year before ggas going to 17-be ready.

Not because of security; for g),MI various -

18 problems they had h o MO b

19 So I had no knowledge at all until about theee kp before I went down there.

I probably overheard 21 conversations that had gone on.

I think 11y and Bruce.

3Qu Bnet doneef esps An5% se(

/98Ifd4' AI8 OM NI #

N 23 0

a that the only time that you had applied 24-for a position or discussed employment with the people 25 at South Texas?

Heritage Reporting Corporation m.m

~h1 10 I

A No, not until the~one in September of --

3 to the best of my -

September of -- September of what~

l 3

date?

This is '88.

'87.

4 MS. CONNELLY:

Those are all the questions 8-

'I have about the first issue, 6

BY MS. ROWE:

i 7

Q Mr. Caldwell, I'd like to call your attention a

to the employment inquiry which you may around or about the time f rame of August 1987, at which time you contacted 10 Mr. Gerald Vaughn, if I'm correct, regarding a position 13 with the utility.

12 At that time you were inspecting South Texas

,],

13 Project, were you not?

('.

14 A

At that time I was inspecting it, yes, that is is corrnet.

16 q

could you recall the events'that led up 17 to that particular inquiry?

18-A The date I can't recall.

I don't know.

l' I absolutely don't know.

20 0

But it was in that August 1987 time frame?

121 A

I thought it was September, August or September, 22 but I don't know.

23 0

Okay, August or September.

24 A

I don't know when it was.

I sort of am 25 surmising now that it was on a Monday.

I don't know that Heritage Reporting Corporation n.n. a

,,,,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,7,,,,,,,

-i..

=..

11--

1, to be true.

2 It was di---

2, O. M at about 8:00 o' clock 3 -

in the morning.

I can tell you the time.

I went through

-4 and I pulled out the 10 CFR and I read Part O to familiarize 5

myself with it.

I also picked out the three items-in thess./d W.

6-4o -

7 I wanted to make sure that I incorporated in my conversation a

when I did talk to Mr. Vaughn.

9' O

Let me interject here.

10 A

Before you do, let me finish this one, il Q

okay.

I also took the book and marked in pink [ p/

A 12 A

83-right-on 0.735.22, carried-it in to Larry Yandell, and W-g 21-n

~

hl4 asked Larry to read andtomakeadecisionif-Idad Mt#W-call Mr. Vaughn C. #p.

[b h 073U M

  • ISQ I

W w-

-l/- R/- @ 16 Larry

. read that particular paragraph o.7J5',2.N-j 17 marked in pink p-f_

aat I told b hat if Mr.

'k 8

Vaughn was willing to consider me, that he would disqualify me totally. h 4W M N (Oh f

A41 4

20 Larry said okay.

21 At approximately.9:00 o' clock in the morning 22 I made thA3. phone call.

As far as I know, in Mr. Vaughn's

~

23 office he was the only one there.

I don't know.if anybody 24 else heard it.

25 At that point in time I even told Mr. Vaughn r

Herttoge Reporting Corporation imn.

D

sw 12 e

$4 8-about 0.735.22, but I also J-the other two paragraphs, 2

in order to be faire I pointed out.to him that there was Al Al N Mb 4 h-restrictions ganen if he did consider me, that he shoult, 3

4 read both of those.

gg t have As available agd I read k 5

d M-

'hi to him over the phone verbatim.

He listened W and M"

7 told me that he would not consi.er me.

8 I said, and there seems to be some conflict here that he would not consider me because of the salary e said it was n/e salary

&hp ot th 10 range.

I understand from his N

11 but ad not prior employment in the industry.

12 So who's right,-I don't know.

13 hPar__th- " =, $fter I hung up the phone, 14 I walked back into Larry Yandell's offic and 0

2 15 what had occurred. 4 ad also 4ebel M. Vaughn to tell H

I l'

Larry Yandell we was going to be on.a conference call, W

_ k dklaldn/eLA BMrlhe conferen'ce call 4441 start about 15 or 30' minutes 17 Wk 18 later.

The exact time frame I can't tell you.

To inform %

UM Adl J

.hha]that I was not being r.n sidered.

19 A

eaglese em!F 20 During the course of iggre cony rsation of S N N MM. &

kQ~

f h 21 that conference call didn't specifically c8me out, g

MhY M dL 22 so I asked spri -- 113 t $ Mr. Vaughn tell Larry the 23 substance of our c versat on, and Ps W M a Y 77 1s 24 That terminated it.

That was it.

It was fg, (j fg, p

L W W

25

oyer, ni yri...geportin, corporo, ion w &a)-

ad m/

~

s t

x,3 4.: '.;

3-4-

I Q

'So there was -no: followup is what you're 2<

telling me, as a-result of that conversation?

3 A

Hone whatsoever.

4 O

Did you leave your --

Let's go back to, 5

this t'igure.

6 You stated to us that you offered Vaughn 7

a figure.

I'm quoting.

8 A

Yes.

9 Q

And Vaughn responded that your figure was 10 too high?

11 -.

A Yes.

12 O

And you replied that you would not consider 13 anything less?

14 A

Yes.

That's what I thought I told Vaughn.

15 In his' reply he thought he told me that.he wouldn't consider 16 me -- I believe --

Have you got his there?

What did he 17 tell me he said?

18 Q

Ho does not recall discussions about-salary 19 quotations or any negotiation on that level.

20 A

There was no negotiation.

21 Q

He did not recall discussing a figure or 22 any mention of a figure.

~

23 A

I thought he said that I didn't have any 24 experience or something like that.

I don't know.

I knew 25 there was a conflict in what I said and what he said, but Heritage Reporting Corporotton

<me <e

..t 14.

+

,1 I thought well, maybe he didn't.

2 0;

Well, what I want to clarify here is did 3

you or did you not leave an open offer?

For instance.---

4 A

No.

5 0

-- to say, "We',1, this is my' quote.

If 6'

you want to think about - "

u 7-A No.

Why would I do that and have him.tell 8

)d1I r f '.1 7 Larry R i1 '.is, et1K, 10 minutes later,-15 g)QN minutes later --

10 0

It was not an open offer, then, that - -

II A

No.~7 / %

M$4v. 'lh AW-12 0

-- he could get back to you later --

13 -

A No.

14 0

-- if he wanted to make the price, that 18 you were available?

16 -

A

~No.

-17 0

Now, about recusing yourself'from your is responsibilities, you talked to Yandell before you made l'

the call to Vaughn?

y g

g*

20 A

Yes and had ead.the paragraph. d,'4 6 '

21-

-0 Now, Mr. Yandell -- there is some concern 22 as to what took place, the horse or the carriage on.this 23 issue.

24 Did he or did he not try to talk you out 25 of pursuing this?

Did he tell you he thought it was crazy?

Heritage Reporting Corporation mn mm

?

)

,.4,

- c.

15 L4

~l-A' I don't think he tried to talk me out.'of 2

it.

3 0-He read the chapter ard just said, "Okay"?

?

l 4

Was that his blessing, that, "Okay, I'm your supervisor, l=

'8 I remove you trom the responsibilities of 'any further f'.

IL1 6

inspection activities - "

h p

7 MR. DRESSLAR:

You might let him answer l^

r 8

the question, Ms. Rowe.

You asked him a question. ~ He i

D 1

s 9

was starting to answer.

You interrupted.

i-L 10 MS. ROWE:

I'm trying to explain my -- I'm i.

Il trying to --

12 MS. CONNELLY:

Just a minute.

You're here l

13 --

as a union representative and Ms. Rowe is here to ask the o

I 34 questions.

+

15 MR. DRESSLAR:

I understand that a hundred' l;

l.

L 16 percent, but she asked a question, he tried to answer-it u

17 and then she tried to confuse him.

That's how I saw it,

-t i

is and he has the right to have me have her clarify her questions 19 at least.

20 MS. ROWE I thought that's what I was doing, t

21 but I'm so.cy if it was perceived as --

22 MR. DRESSLAR:

I'm sorry, too, if that's 23 what you were doing.

24 MS. CONNELLY:

Can we go off the record 25

a. moment.

Heritage Reporting Corporation om suae

.o n :,.

.16 t

'3 (Discussion off the record.)

l i

3~

BY MS. ROWE:

3 Q

I was asking about.the scenario upon which 4

your conversations with Mr. Yandell took place and in relation

~

5 lt'o the phone call to Mr. Vaughn.

If I' haven't confused 6

the issue, could you answer the question, if we know what i

7 the question is at this point?

s A

I think what you're saying is what did I approach' Larry with.

I approached him with the idea that j.-

l 10 I was-aware that there was an opening down there, that l

11 I was aware that multiple people had gone down there, and

-i 1:

\\

It-12 I wanted to put myself in for it.

I think that's-what 13

'I approached him.

'l 34 His response, I don't know what it was.

1' l

15 I-did tell him that in all fairness, as I said before, Mk 10 C./1K &,7H. W j

to read this particular t[_.;;.,y nd it was marked clearly L

16 ju 17-in pink.

It was highlighted.

There was no o435r way --

p 18 n@

to miss it.

Now, if-there p something else l'

he was supposed to read, I didn't show it to him and I'm s

20 not aware of it, but~thrt ;.e I was aware of Ng4fg 21 Q

But you are clear that you talked ~to Mr.

<Q r

-22 Yandell prior to making the phone call?

l",

q 1 n 23 A

I'm absolutely clear.

24 Q

And to your knowledge, he did not voice 25 any concern or any -- he did not direct you or guide you Heritage Reporting Corporation om sua i

L.

.. ' 3,. ;

j j

e g

8-not to do that*/

2.

A No, he gave me the permission to M i g l

i After I-left that office, I --

s 0

[i 4

0 He gave you the permission to do it'/

i

/44.f To make b phone call.

M A

I walked from

.L d'19 6

office -- if you're familiar with where offices being f fice, my of fice b^ ' n;;. Ifn. where.

I 7

are

% Wh4 y-a it is now, I walked out the door, walked down to

office, MW WW

'?

turned ound, s'^nt L

, L-..,

went

[

g snade the request 3 f'

to my office, sat'down at my desk, made the phone call, turned.

N$

A4h6f around, went back down to gts$o!

f fice and told hden that il

nsidered,

&" n:l4ll;=d and went back '

12 I was not bei c..

13 i

I to my of fice,p'-itre deut '^ f n L 14 Ten minutes later, a phonetcall, a

]

(

15 conference call -- I'm saying " ten minutes."

Don't quote

'I 16 me on the time.

h (S*1* b W i

',$ HCL s

A But that phone call was made 17. l. - and 19 during the course of that conversation Mr. Vaughn told

/7(

3 20 him.thet, because it didn't look like it was coming f

  • u. h u. & 4 21 out clear, I asked htm toTmake it clear in the course of /4/.p.,

g 22 conversation that.jpt was not considering me for the 0

23-job.

-24 So I said 15 minutes, it was over and done.

1 T-1-

"'-6 it i n /g

'en foot walk ' "Y

& ) y-25 It's about a i'

fWM M CMtSA E

erltage Reporting orpor

\\Pg p g

ven.m m

t

. i i,

-o ti"'

13 If G

And so he recused you for that:10 or 15 2

minutes?

3

-A-Well, if I was not going to be considered, 4-it was going to be forever, I guess.

You're using the-8 word " recuse. '

Disqualified me forever on it.

6 Men I made the inquiry, the inquiry did YW

(\\-N Y yx.ME.further,2egme back a d that use it.

p 7

not p r.;:

4 8

on the record, just for the h'eck of-it, it should be pointed out, this had nothing to do with the le prelicensing at this time.

Everyone does recognize that.

Vh Y y $ V4W

\\y lih Prelicensing was over.

A license had been= issued.

We 12 do recognize that.

13 Dates are very important there because 14 no meaning in that sense.

i 15 0

In other words, you were not conducting 14 inspections is what you're sayiw /

Your duties and 17 responsibilities had come to-an end?

18 A

Well, not an end, because at that time there 19 would have been --

It would have' been a continuing forever

.20 and ever.

As you are well aware, I have been pu off.

21 Jim Kelly and I have been pulled.of f of thag n there, 22 which has caused a hardship here in the Region, " a d.

23 In fact, I just = -

-*-to'Diablo Canyon 24 just to help Region V out ming over here to help us.

25 It's not a hardship on me.

It's a hardship on the Region.

Heritage Reporting Corporation i

n.n.

a

v l L.

i g_

g-Tl Personally, I don't care to_ eve'r go back 2

down there.

You can putlthat on the record,-too.

t' 3

MS. ROWE Do you have any: questions with 4

regard-to this issue, Sharon?

E 5

MS. CONNELLY:

Yes, I do.

6 BY MS. CONNELLY:

7' Q

Mr. Caldwell, did you discuss with Mr. Kelly-8 that you were going to inquire about employment at South

-i Texas prior to making the inquiry?-

10 A,

Prior to making the inquiry.

There might

ll be a possibility'that we discu sed that particular jo 1

4 -qh NWg indeed,jotherpeoplewhohad 12 down there and, Q

n 13 it.

14 Now, whether I discussed with him what I j

15 was going to do, I couldn't'say.

I do know that at'some' 1

1 16 point in time.I did discuss it with him, but I' don't know l

NA/'VV As4 17 if it was prior to or after :: :nythin;.

But again',:1.

R 18 don't know what date I made the phone call, either, so 1

-Q M49)Tf 19 I can't answer that because I don't know what rior

.g 4% bed:

If we could establish the date, we-mig %ht-20 M

W0 W

be able to know, but I don't.even harma ifg hatK) ould keep-k h p 21 t

1 n.

'NJ-to establish a date.4u ff! 2~

dME 23 So I don't know.

I absolutely don't know.

24 Q

But you do recall there was a discussion, 25 whether it was prior to the inquiry or after the inquiry?

Heritage Reporting Corporation

^

twn n a i

1 b

' 2 1,,; :. ;;

V to; I-A, There was a discussion.

2 0

There was a discussion.

Do you remember 3

specifically what-you discussed?-

4-I would like to ask:that specifically, Mr. --

~

5.

4R. DRESSLAR:

I'm. going to insist on clarifying 6

that question for him.

7 MS. CONNELLY:

Since you were present with 8

the interview this morning, I would like to have Mr. Caldw 11 --

l 9

MR. DRESSLAR:

I'm going to talk to him.

10-

-MS. CONNELLY:

-- answer this question.

Il MR. DRESSLAR:

I'm going to talk to him.

12

.If you want an answer, you're-going to have to allow me 13 totsay something to him.

- You already said all the questions were 15 voluntary.

16 MS CONNELLY:

Are you saying'he refuses 17 to answer this question?

Is MR. DRESSLAR:

-No.

-I'm saying if you want g

19.

an answer, I'm going to talk to h:.m.

He may want to answer.

- 20 THE WITNESS:

May I consult with him?

I 21 dont know what it's about.

Let him advise me.

I don't 22 know where it's headed one way or the other and I don't g

' 23 know where you're headed.

24 I'm not here to confuse you or anything.

25 MS. CONNELLY:

The difficulty we have is Heritage Reporting Corporation mm

+

3

__._._.m ij;'

c.n e,--.

1 21 1)'

l.-

'a possible conflict.here.

Mr. Dresslar was present during g

2 the questioning this morning and I would like to know your 3

answer to this question.

4 MR. DRESSLAR:

One of the problems is that

~

l:

5 I'm here as a union representative and I have the right 1

6 to-represent every employee in the bargaining unit and' B

7 I have the right to sit in in every investigatory interview.

8 And-as a union representative, I represent those employees in whatever may.come up.

10 MS. CONNELLY:

Can we go off the record.

(Discussion off the record.]

12 MR. DRESSLAR:

Your question is on the record.

I 13 There's a big blank.

Maybe he should answer what heitold

,~

g a

14 you what we were off the record.

-15 THE WITNESS:

Which is simply.thatLI don't-16 -

remember any' specifics'on'anything.

If-I had the'date, 17 I'd give it to you.

I' don't.

18

'BY MS. ROWE:

l' Q

Do you remember talking to Mr. Kelly about a

20 making the phone call to Vaughn and he may have or may

-i

- 21 not have cautioned you against it?

Do-you-remember any

. 22 discussions with Mr. Kelly about this issue?

23 A-Any specific discussion, no, but as I said-earlier, in the context of wh dt/

q: -w e h_ at we probably N

w 24 err 610 25 discussed it.

probably discussed it with Earnest prebril,.

Heritage Reporting Corporation au-

)

r

,e.

}

1 22 I'

probably. discussed it with Yande(1 even 1Mdu4d4 before then,_ but not in the specific eh when I went in%.g 3

Awt 0 L

with the informatio to request the phone call.

/O*/fgrf 4

I don't know.

0 Did_you talk-to Mr. Brown or seek any ouer 6

legal --

7 A

No.

8 0

-- advice on this before you --

9 A

No.

No, I thought wasveryclearMn to the

, jin the. 22 asut nte out with the permission il of your supervisor, and I thought supervisor meaning.first-12 line' supervisor,_which Larry Yandell was at the time.

13 0

Okay.

I'd like to go on to the flame retardant 14 material in the area above the control.

15 A

Good, I love this one.

TM - 1: cr.i : 1; 1

b i

16 0

Could you give us a little background on 1

17 that particular piece of material, where it came from in l

18 relation to the whole area above the control room?

Was 19 it a piece off the side or where did that piece come from 20~

and how-did that happen?

21 A

We're going to enter into records now, a 22 piece of information which is considered safeguards information Qv 23 2%ttds going to be entered into this record and you must /04) 24

$ treat it so.

25 MS. CONNELLY:

Let's go off the record.

Heritage Reportingr Corporation non..

(,5

.j i

u... - ;. ~irW5 = ;e-c~

-- e. :..-A~o sm v

....u. y,..

,,...... +.

.. i f..

e 23 1

(Discussion off the record.]

2 MS. ROWE Back on the record.

~

3-BY MS, ROWEt 1

4

-Q Mr. Caldwell, it had come to our attention 5

that -- and you can correct me if the information is faulty, 6

but somewhere within the July '87. time frame, I believe, 7

there was a conversation held regarding a Mr. Horace Woodard, e

a black TWC that's Wackenhut security officer, in which the conversation was witnessed by Andy Hill, Mike Powell 10 and yourself.

Il There was some discussion about the members 12 of the security force not having had received a proper 13 education.

The quote was " poor education."

14 Do.you recall any conversations about the-45 lack of training or the lack of-writing and reading type-16 skills about the security guard force?

I know it was a 17 concern because it probably was an open item which the 18 NRC was also looking at.

19 A.

Yeah, but I don't recall the conversation b

ud.Y" 0

you're talking about, but f.ep help fpsr clarification on-2 21 all this, there was multiple discussions on that 22 The man we're talking about here, for the 23 record also, Horace Woodard, was retired from the Army.

24 He had spent some time in the Army and all, and I don't k.pfk why his namc. kept popping up,jgfr ferhaps it popped 25-Heritage Reporting Corporation

- e,.,7 7 24-l up more than anybody else's name Ms.

Maybe he was just

.e 2

the focal po' int of interest on M

~

3 But as a result of that particular thing, 4

they did do a testing'somewhere in there in which one of p'.yp.

the things they did on their test was to have them writ g l

m g.

5 R

e r

6.

something c '

n.

I don't remember what had 7

them-write down but it was just to get a flavor for how I

8 well they -- get an-idea how well they.could write, et cetera.

1 10 0

Was it perhaps, "Why I want to be a nuclear H

la security officer at South Texas"?

12 A

I don't don ' t -)wnfw w g

\\

gY I

13

_t.

Maybe it was because there was one they got a= crazy

~

W.

14 t.

The individual who answered the thing, he was l

15 wanting to shoot them up and it was really-interesting.

16 I.just call him a crazy.

I don't know whether l

17 he's crazy.or not.

They let him go because of instability.

38 So maybe that was the question.

l' l

19 -

O Do you remember Mr. Kelly making a statement, 20 "The old boy'couldn't read or write"?

There may.have been 21 other individuals that possibly fell in that category, 22 for that matter.

23 A

-I don't remember him making the statement.

s..

24.

Again, there any discussions on this at many different 25 times h.

Heritage Reporting Corporation twn **==

, i ~ i. : e 25 L

4 -

0-Did you feel that way?

2 A-About what?

3 0

That the members of the security---

You 4

interfaced with-them, did you not?

5 A

, I interfaced with them.

6 0

Did you feel that:some of these adult 7

individuals were not capable of meeting their duties and 8

. responsibilities?

-A Well, there wereLsome aspects of it.

Now to you're asking me to phil'osophy here somewhat.

II -

0 No.

I'm asking you if you felt that way 12 as a physical-security inspector who was there dealing 13 v,

with the people at the time.

Would you have knowledge, 14 if that were the case, to be true?

15-A That they couldn't read or write?

I would l'

have. knowledge, because I sft for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> without sleep 37' while I watched these people take the test.

So I watched 18 themasEtheyfinishedwritingwhateverthisque M

Yes, I would have knowledge of it.

I watched 21

'those that could write and those who-couldn't.

This 22 particula individual did have difficulty writing an answer 23 on-that whatever it was they wrote 44.

24 I had a lot of empathy for this individual 25 because I thought that here was a grown man that's been Heritoge Reporting Corporation om man

,m n u e.

M aj-A\\ $

/6o(

y*

8 through.a-lot, regardless of what' his education ) ppd' There -

2-was a position there for him, maybe not'as a person who-3 has to write reports or something, but a position therg, 4

and he'd already proved himself.

He had retired-fromithe 8-Army.

So I did have empathy for him.

6 I don't think they fired him, though.

I 7-don't know what ever happened to him one way or the other.

8 But his name was the one most often that was used in this context.

10 0

I understand that Mr. Woodard had-attended

.ll a black college in the Houston area.

Did you have' knowledge 12 of that?

13 A

Not that I remember.

I don't know.

14 0

Okay, that's fine.

15 MS. ROWE:

I have no other' questions to l

ask at this time.

If you have no other issues that you 17 would like to have on the record or bring forward at.this 18 time, I think we can conclude the interview, l'

THE WITNESS:

I'm trying to think was there 20 anything that I was going to write about or respond txt 21 that was in that report when I read it.

I was going to 22-f.

respond to the Bisco thing.

I think several people was 23 going to respond.

I don't know if they did or not.

24' MS.-ROWE:

That's probably why we're asking 25 those questions now.

Heritage Reporting Corporation n.n..

._.__.__.m

___m._.._._.___-__.__-._m_.______..

1

- a 1,

.0-.

i 27 i

THE WITNESS:

Everybody was sort of thinking.

2:

og that Bisco _ thing because it was nothing.

3 MS. ROWE:

Right.

How do you spell that.,

4 Bisco?

THE WITNESS:

I'm spelling it B-i-s-c-o, 6

but'I may be spelling it wrong,-too.

7 MS.-ROWE All right.

I-have no other issues a

so I think we can conclude the interview.

Thank you, Mr. Caldwell.

10 (Whereupon, at 3:01 p.m.,

the interview 11-ceased.]

12 13 14 15

.16 17 isi 19 20 21 22.

4

.?

23 24 25 Heritage Reporting Corporation

< = m.,

i

la; fw e I'

CER-TIFICATE 2

3 I hereby certify that this is the transcript 4.

of the proceedings held before the NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO9' 5-on November 9,1988, Interview of RONALD CALDWELL, 'and that 6

this is a full and correct transcription of the proceedings.

7 1

8 O'(dd/A)

Betty (4 organ' O

Heritage Reporting Corporation il 12 7'

13-14 15 16 17 la 19 20 21 y..-

~ 22 23 24 25 Heritage Reporting Corporation

.. m. n....