|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20216H5141999-09-24024 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 209 to License DPR-16 ML20195C8141999-06-0202 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 208 to License DPR-16 ML20206U9511999-05-18018 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 207 to License DPR-16 ML20206P0241999-05-13013 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 206 to License DPR-16 ML20206P0881999-05-12012 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 205 to License DPR-16 ML20205A7451999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 204 to License DPR-16 ML20195C4271998-11-0606 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed Ocnpp Mod to Install Core Support Plate Wedges to Structurally Replace Lateral Resistance Provided by Rim Hold Down Bolts for One Operating Cycle ML20155G9311998-11-0404 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 201 to License DPR-16 ML20154M6311998-10-15015 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 200 to License DPR-16 ML20154L3051998-10-14014 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request to Defer Insp of 79 Welds from One Fuel Cycle at 17R Outage ML20237B7331998-08-13013 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 196 to License DPR-16 ML20248L1611998-06-0404 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 195 to License DPR-16 ML20217A4631998-03-23023 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Use of Three Heats/Lots of Hot Rolled XM-19 Matl in Core Shroud Repair Assemblies Re Licenses DPR-16 & DPR-59,respectively ML20197B4971998-02-11011 February 1998 Corrected Safety Evaluation for Amend 194 to License DPR-16.Page 2 of SE Was Incorrectly Numbered as Page 3 ML20199E4561997-11-13013 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Ampacity Derating Analysis in Response to NRC RAI Re GL-92-08, Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers, for Plant ML20217Q6581997-08-26026 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 192 to License DPR-16 ML20149F9961997-07-18018 July 1997 Safety Evaluation Re Gpu Nuclear Operational Quality Assurance Plan,Rev 10 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station,Unit 1 & Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML20140H7761997-05-0808 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 191 to License DPR-16 ML20137X1071997-04-14014 April 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 190 to License DPR-16 ML20137D6111997-03-24024 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 189 to License DPR-16 ML20136D6001997-03-0606 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 188 to License DPR-16 ML20133E1681997-01-0707 January 1997 Safety Evaluation Re Third 10-yr Interval ISI Plan,Rev 1 to Relief Request R11 for Plant.Proposed Alternative to ASME Requirements Authorized ML20128L1601996-10-0303 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Accepting Third 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Plan Request for Relief R15 ML20128F4791996-10-0101 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Accepting Rev to Inservice Testing Program Re Leakage Testing of Containment Isolation Valves ML20117K5371996-06-0404 June 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 184 to License DPR-16 ML20087D0531995-08-0707 August 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 181 to License DPR-16 ML20087J2831995-05-0101 May 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 180 to License DPR-16 ML20081G9711995-03-21021 March 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 178 to License DPR-16 ML20080D9851994-12-29029 December 1994 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Requesting to Change TS to Establish Addl Requirements for Availability of LPRM Associated W/Aprm Sys ML20077E7441994-12-0707 December 1994 Revised Page 18 of SE in Accordance W/Actions Described in Section 8.1.3 of OCNGS IPE Submittal Rept ML20077F7081994-11-30030 November 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 174 to License DPR-16 ML20076H7361994-10-19019 October 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 172 to License DPR-16 NUREG-0619, SE Approving Licensee Request for Relief from NUREG-0619 for Feedwater & Control Rod Drive Line Nozzle Insp for Plant1994-10-0404 October 1994 SE Approving Licensee Request for Relief from NUREG-0619 for Feedwater & Control Rod Drive Line Nozzle Insp for Plant ML20071M8121994-07-29029 July 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 169 to License DPR-16 ML20029E6021994-05-11011 May 1994 SER Recommends That Licensee Monitor Conditions of Dsw & Bsw at Periodic Intervals to Ensure Continued Functions ML20056H2651993-08-24024 August 1993 SE Re Inservice Testing Program Requests for Relief ML20056E0911993-08-0404 August 1993 SE Re Util 930614 Response to Bulletin 93-03, Resolution of Issues Related to Reactor Vessel Water Level Instrumentation in Bwrs. Util Justification for Not Implementing Addl Short Term Actions Acceptable ML20046B2301993-07-13013 July 1993 SER Concluding That Licensee pipe-support Anchorages Are in Conformance W/Requirements of NRC Bulletin 79-02 ML20035E4171993-04-0707 April 1993 Safety Evaluation Re Reg Guide 1.97 Involving post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Instrumentation for BWRs ML20128P4651993-02-18018 February 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Justification for Cancelling Commitment on Five Plant Control Room Human Engineering Discrepancies Re Relocation of Shift Supervisor Ofc ML20128F1361993-02-0505 February 1993 Safety Evaluation Re Leak on Core Spray in-vessel Annulus Piping.Plant Can Be Safely Operated for One Fuel Cycle W/O Repairing Observed Leak at Listed 1/4-inch Fillet Weld ML20125C3901992-12-0707 December 1992 Safety Evaluation Re Upper Reactor Bldg & Nonsafety Architectural Components Subjected to tornado-wind Loading ML20127P2251992-11-23023 November 1992 Safety Evaluation Accepting Response to SBO Rule ML20094J2821992-03-0909 March 1992 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-16 ML20086U2411991-12-27027 December 1991 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 156 to License DPR-16 ML20082Q4851991-09-0505 September 1991 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 153 to License DPR-16 ML20077E9361991-06-0505 June 1991 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 152 to License DPR-16 ML20070G5011991-03-0606 March 1991 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 150 to License DPR-16, Revising Tech Specs to Permit Removal of Seven Main Steam Safety Valves W/Two Highest Setpoints ML20029B3901991-03-0404 March 1991 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 149 to License DPR-16 NUREG-0822, Safety Evaluation Documenting Findings of Staff Review of Util Responses to Drywell Penetration & Reinforcement of Openings & SEP Topic III-7B, Design Codes,Design Criteria, Load Combinations & Reactor Cavity Design Criteria1991-02-20020 February 1991 Safety Evaluation Documenting Findings of Staff Review of Util Responses to Drywell Penetration & Reinforcement of Openings & SEP Topic III-7B, Design Codes,Design Criteria, Load Combinations & Reactor Cavity Design Criteria 1999-09-24
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEAR05000219/LER-1998-011, :on 980914,three Small Bore Pipe Lines Did Not Meet Design Bases for Seismic & Thermal Allowables.Caused by Inadequate Structural Piping Analysis.Two 1/2 Sdcs Lines Were Modified During 17R RFO & 3rd Was Modified During 19991999-09-30030 September 1999
- on 980914,three Small Bore Pipe Lines Did Not Meet Design Bases for Seismic & Thermal Allowables.Caused by Inadequate Structural Piping Analysis.Two 1/2 Sdcs Lines Were Modified During 17R RFO & 3rd Was Modified During 1999
ML20217K4451999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With ML20216H5141999-09-24024 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 209 to License DPR-16 ML20211P6731999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With ML20211A7051999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Station.With 05000219/LER-1999-001, :on 990208,prolonged Operation of TB with Condenser & Heater Bay Pressure Less than Design Was Noted. Caused by Lack of Clearly Documented Design Description. Placed Alternate Exhaust Fan in Service.With1999-07-29029 July 1999
- on 990208,prolonged Operation of TB with Condenser & Heater Bay Pressure Less than Design Was Noted. Caused by Lack of Clearly Documented Design Description. Placed Alternate Exhaust Fan in Service.With
ML20209G0631999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With 05000219/LER-1999-004, :on 990510,determined That Configurations of Two Pipe Supports in Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Sys Do Not Meet Design Requirements for Deadweight Loads.Caused by Inadequate Analysis.Pipes Upgraded.With1999-06-22022 June 1999
- on 990510,determined That Configurations of Two Pipe Supports in Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Sys Do Not Meet Design Requirements for Deadweight Loads.Caused by Inadequate Analysis.Pipes Upgraded.With
ML20212H5491999-06-18018 June 1999 Non-proprietary Rev 4 to HI-981983, Licensing Rept for Storage Capacity Expansion of Oyster Creek Spent Fuel Pool ML20195C8141999-06-0202 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 208 to License DPR-16 ML20195E7961999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With ML20206U9511999-05-18018 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 207 to License DPR-16 ML20206P0241999-05-13013 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 206 to License DPR-16 ML20206P0881999-05-12012 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 205 to License DPR-16 ML20206N7431999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With 05000219/LER-1999-003, :on 990402,cable Trays Did Not Meet Separation Criteria.Caused by Inadequate Engineering Review.Fire Watch Was Stationed Immediately Upon Discovery.With1999-04-30030 April 1999
- on 990402,cable Trays Did Not Meet Separation Criteria.Caused by Inadequate Engineering Review.Fire Watch Was Stationed Immediately Upon Discovery.With
05000219/LER-1999-002-01, :on 990330,fire Protection Deluge Sys Isolation Valve Was Found Out of Position.No Root Cause Determined. Technical Assessment Was Performed.With1999-04-29029 April 1999
- on 990330,fire Protection Deluge Sys Isolation Valve Was Found Out of Position.No Root Cause Determined. Technical Assessment Was Performed.With
ML20205P5401999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With ML20205A7451999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 204 to License DPR-16 05000219/LER-1999-001-02, :on 990208,noted Prolonged Operation of TB with Condenser & Heater Bay Pressure.Caused by Loss of Integrity of Ventilation Envelope (Physical Boundaries).Alternate Exhaust Fan Was Placed in Service.With1999-03-0808 March 1999
- on 990208,noted Prolonged Operation of TB with Condenser & Heater Bay Pressure.Caused by Loss of Integrity of Ventilation Envelope (Physical Boundaries).Alternate Exhaust Fan Was Placed in Service.With
ML20204C8201999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With 05000219/LER-1998-016, :on 981028,single DG Start,Occurred.Caused by Loss of One Source of Offsite Power.Generator Relay Surveillance Revised to Eliminate Possibility of Inadvertent Procedural Breaker Trips.With1999-01-0505 January 1999
- on 981028,single DG Start,Occurred.Caused by Loss of One Source of Offsite Power.Generator Relay Surveillance Revised to Eliminate Possibility of Inadvertent Procedural Breaker Trips.With
ML20195E8321998-12-31031 December 1998 10CFR50.59(b) Rept of Changes to Oyster Creek Sys & Procedures, for Period of June 1997 to Dec 1998.With ML20199E4671998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With 05000219/LER-1998-019, :on 981118,missed TS Required Surveillance Test.Caused by Inadequate Administrative Controls.Revised Related Surveillance Task Descriptions to Provide Improved Ref.With1998-12-18018 December 1998
- on 981118,missed TS Required Surveillance Test.Caused by Inadequate Administrative Controls.Revised Related Surveillance Task Descriptions to Provide Improved Ref.With
ML20198D2091998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With 05000219/LER-1998-017, :on 981027,discovered That Station Battery Racks Did Not Comply with Seismic Design Basis.Caused by Inadequate Engineering Review.Restored Battery Rack Retainer Plates to Appropriate Configuration.With1998-11-25025 November 1998
- on 981027,discovered That Station Battery Racks Did Not Comply with Seismic Design Basis.Caused by Inadequate Engineering Review.Restored Battery Rack Retainer Plates to Appropriate Configuration.With
05000219/LER-1998-018, :on 981023,DG 2 Failed to Start from App R Local Shutdown Panel During Functional Test.Caused by Incorrectly Designed Wiring.Incorrect Wiring Was Modified & Demonstrated by Testing to Be Correct.With1998-11-23023 November 1998
- on 981023,DG 2 Failed to Start from App R Local Shutdown Panel During Functional Test.Caused by Incorrectly Designed Wiring.Incorrect Wiring Was Modified & Demonstrated by Testing to Be Correct.With
ML20195J8591998-11-12012 November 1998 Rev 11 to 1000-PLN-7200.01, Gpu Nuclear Operational QA Plan ML20195C4271998-11-0606 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed Ocnpp Mod to Install Core Support Plate Wedges to Structurally Replace Lateral Resistance Provided by Rim Hold Down Bolts for One Operating Cycle ML20155G9311998-11-0404 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 201 to License DPR-16 ML20155J3021998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With 05000219/LER-1998-014, :on 980928,noted Failure of Isolation Condenser Tube Bundles.Caused by Thermal Stresses/Tgscc Due to Leaky Valve.Replaced Failed Tubes Bundles & Repaired Condensate Return Valve.With1998-10-29029 October 1998
- on 980928,noted Failure of Isolation Condenser Tube Bundles.Caused by Thermal Stresses/Tgscc Due to Leaky Valve.Replaced Failed Tubes Bundles & Repaired Condensate Return Valve.With
05000219/LER-1998-015, :on 980929,SDC Isolation Occurred Due to Equipment Failure.Caused by Damaged Conduit That Appeared to Have Been Damaged by Personnel Error.Instrument Was Repaired & Bypass Was Removed.With1998-10-28028 October 1998
- on 980929,SDC Isolation Occurred Due to Equipment Failure.Caused by Damaged Conduit That Appeared to Have Been Damaged by Personnel Error.Instrument Was Repaired & Bypass Was Removed.With
05000219/LER-1998-013-01, :on 980926,LLRT Results Indicated That MSIV NS03B Exceeded TS Leak Rate Limit.Caused by Component Wear. Maint Was Performed on Subject Valve to Restore Seat Integrity & as-left LLRT Was Acceptable.With1998-10-26026 October 1998
- on 980926,LLRT Results Indicated That MSIV NS03B Exceeded TS Leak Rate Limit.Caused by Component Wear. Maint Was Performed on Subject Valve to Restore Seat Integrity & as-left LLRT Was Acceptable.With
ML20154R4981998-10-20020 October 1998 Core Spray Sys Insp Program - 17R 05000219/LER-1998-012-01, :on 980916,unplanned Actuation of Esfs Occurred.Caused by Written Communication.Procedure Revised to Include Signature Verifications to Install & Subsequently Remove Ohmmeter1998-10-16016 October 1998
- on 980916,unplanned Actuation of Esfs Occurred.Caused by Written Communication.Procedure Revised to Include Signature Verifications to Install & Subsequently Remove Ohmmeter
ML20154M6311998-10-15015 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 200 to License DPR-16 05000219/LER-1998-011-01, :on 980914,discovered That Three Small Bore Piping Lines Did Not Meet Design Basis Seismic &/Or Thermal Allowables.Caused by Design Deficiency.Subject Lines Will Be Modified During Present Refueling Outage.With1998-10-15015 October 1998
- on 980914,discovered That Three Small Bore Piping Lines Did Not Meet Design Basis Seismic &/Or Thermal Allowables.Caused by Design Deficiency.Subject Lines Will Be Modified During Present Refueling Outage.With
ML20154L3051998-10-14014 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request to Defer Insp of 79 Welds from One Fuel Cycle at 17R Outage ML20154Q3371998-09-30030 September 1998 Rev 8 to Oyster Creek Cycle 17,COLR ML20154L5571998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With ML20151V6311998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.With ML20237D5691998-08-31031 August 1998 Rev 0 to MPR-1957, Design Submittal for Oyster Creek Core Plate Wedge Modification 05000219/LER-1998-010, :on 980724,DG Switchgear Was Found Beyond Design Bases.Caused by Inadequate Installation During Original Construction.Evaluated Temporary Mod to Determine If It Should Be Reclassified as Permanent Mod1998-08-24024 August 1998
- on 980724,DG Switchgear Was Found Beyond Design Bases.Caused by Inadequate Installation During Original Construction.Evaluated Temporary Mod to Determine If It Should Be Reclassified as Permanent Mod
ML20237D5711998-08-18018 August 1998 Rev 0 to SE-000222-002, Core Plate Wedge Installation ML20237B7331998-08-13013 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 196 to License DPR-16 ML20237B0131998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station 05000219/LER-1997-013, Has Been Canceled1998-06-30030 June 1998 Has Been Canceled ML20236R0511998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
...
. p ruuq
[
t UNITED STATES g
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666-0001
.....,o SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 180 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-16 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION AND JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-219
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated February 28, 1995, the GPU Nuclear Corporation (the licensee)n-submitter a request for changes to the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Statio (OCNGS) itchnical Specifications (TSs). The requested changes would revise TS Section 6.5.1.12 to delete the requirement to render determinations in writing with regard to whether or not activities listed in TS Sections 6.5.1.2 and 6.5.1.5 constitute an unreviewed safety question. These activities are proposed changes to Appendix A TS (6.5.1.2) and investigations of all violations of the TS (6.5.1.5).
This change is consistent with NUREG-1433 Standard Technical Specifications General Electric Plants, BWR/4 Revision 0, dated September 28, 1992.
2.0 EVALUATION The proposed TS change removes the requirement to render determinations in writing with regard to whether or not proposed changes to the TSs and investigations of violations of the TSs constitute an unreviewed safety question. Both of these activities involve submittals to the NRC.
Proposed changes to the TSs cannot be implemented until approved by the NRC.
Investigations of violations of TSs require a docketed response to the identified violation and are subject to NRC review and acceptance. Therefore, the requirement to determine whether or not either of these activities constitute an unreviewed safety question, in terms of 10 CFR 50.59 criteria, is not relevant to the activity. The existing OCNGS TS Section 6.5.1 and 6.5.2 requirements to perform Technical Reviews and Independent Safety Reviews of these activities are not affected by this change. Therefore, the level of assurance that these activities do not adversely affect nuclear safety or safe plant operations is maintained.
The proposed change is also consistent with the Revised Standard Technical Specifications (NUREG-1433) Administrative Controls for Review and Audit (STS 5.5.1.1.c).
9505080177 950501 DR ADOCK 050 29
.* Based on the above, the staff has concluded that the proposed change is acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Comission's regulations, the New Jersey State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment.
By letter dated April 5,1995, Mr. Kent W. Tosch, of the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection comented that they concur with GPU Nuclear's rationale that these unreviewed safety question reviews serve no value since these activities specifically require NRC review and approval. The State official had no other coments.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendment relates to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative procedures or requirements. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance -
of the amendment.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The Comission has s' ncluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Comission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the comon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor.
A. Dromerick Date:
May 1, 1905
.