Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: 05000346/LER-1981-055-03, /03L-0:on 810925 & 1001,detergent Waste Drain Tank & Pump Room Door Was Found Open.Caused by Personnel Fears That Broken Door Handle Would Prevent Exit from Room. Personnel Reinstructed & Door Latch Repaired, ML20004D033, ML20008F566, ML20010A368, ML20011A873, ML20011A937, ML20011A941, ML20031H265, ML20050C739, ML20050D880, ML20050D960, ML20052C129, ML20052C189, ML20063N628, ML20069C717, ML20072C529, ML20078P696, ML20079R894, ML20085K605, ML20263R472, ML20263R474, ML20263R475, ML20263R477
|
MONTHYEARIR 05000266/19810041981-03-16016 March 1981
IE Insp Rept 50-266/81-04 on 810224-25.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Control Rod Drive & Position Indication Checks,Control Rod Worth Measurement & Reactor Shutdown Margin Determination
Project stage: Request
ML20008F5661981-04-14014 April 1981
Submits Comments on Emergency Response Facilities Implementation,In Response to NRC on post-TMI Requirements.Description of Instrumentation Sys & Design of Physical Structures Will Be Submitted by 810601
Project stage: Other
ML20004D0331981-06-0101 June 1981
Forwards Conceptual Design for Interim Emergency Response Facilities Expected to Be Operational by 821001,in Response to NRC .Outline of Requirements & Design Encl for Preimplementation Review
Project stage: Other
ML20010A3681981-08-0303 August 1981
Notifies That Permanent Emergency Offsite Facility Will Be Located Adjacent to Util Headquarters Bldg.Location of Facility in Proximity to Util Headquarters Outweighs Disadvantages Resulting from Being 23 Miles from Plant Site
Project stage: Other
ML20031H2651981-10-21021 October 1981
Advises That Joint Powers Agency Representing Counties of Amador,Sacramento & San Joaqin Concurs W/Proposed Location of Emergency Operations Facility
Project stage: Other
05000346/LER-1981-055-03, /03L-0:on 810925 & 1001,detergent Waste Drain Tank & Pump Room Door Was Found Open.Caused by Personnel Fears That Broken Door Handle Would Prevent Exit from Room. Personnel Reinstructed & Door Latch Repaired1981-10-23023 October 1981
/03L-0:on 810925 & 1001,detergent Waste Drain Tank & Pump Room Door Was Found Open.Caused by Personnel Fears That Broken Door Handle Would Prevent Exit from Room. Personnel Reinstructed & Door Latch Repaired
Project stage: Other
ML20011A9411981-10-23023 October 1981
Advises That Ofc of Emergency Svcs Finds Proposed Emergency Offsite Facility Acceptable.Addl Work Needed on Remodeling & Refurbishing Facility
Project stage: Other
ML20011A8731981-10-23023 October 1981
Advises of Acceptance of Proposed Location for Emergency Offsite Facility.Proposed Location Will Provide Ready Access by State Personnel & County Officials
Project stage: Other
ML20263R4721981-10-26026 October 1981
General Office Annex
Project stage: Other
ML20263R4751981-10-26026 October 1981
Smud Headquarters Building
Project stage: Other
ML20011A9371981-10-26026 October 1981
Submits Addl Info Requested in 810924 Telcon W/Nrc for Approval of Proposed Emergency Offsite Facility,Per NUREG-0737,Item III.A.1.2.Four Oversize Drawings Encl. Aperture Cards Are Available in PDR
Project stage: Other
ML20263R4771981-10-26026 October 1981
Location Sketch & Vicinity Map EOF and Office Buildings
Project stage: Other
ML20263R4741981-10-26026 October 1981
Training and Storage Building
Project stage: Other
IR 05000266/19820021982-02-11011 February 1982
IE Emergency Preparedness Appraisal Repts 50-266/82-02 & 50-301/82-02 on 820104-15 & 20.Major Area Inspected:Special Appraisal of Emergency Preparedness Program
Project stage: Request
ML20041B4911982-02-22022 February 1982
Discovery Progress Rept 5,per ASLB 811003 & 1105 Orders.Nrc Reviewed Wi Environ Decade 820118 Answers to Interrogatories.No Discovery Requests Received from Licensee or Intervenor.Certificate of Svc Encl
Project stage: Request
ML20050D8801982-03-26026 March 1982
Confirms 820326 Telcon Requesting 1-wk Extension to 820405 of Response to NRC Re Emergency Preparedness Appraisal.Extension Requested for Further Mgt Review of New Proposal
Project stage: Other
ML20050C7391982-03-31031 March 1982
Discusses Util Response Re Emergency Plan Training, Emergency Plan Implementing Instructions,Meteorological Instrumentation & Unusual Event Notification Procedures. Response Appears Acceptable
Project stage: Other
ML20050D9601982-04-0606 April 1982
Forwards Responses to NRC Discussing NRC 820104-15 Emergency Preparedness Appraisal.Requests That Item 7 of Encl 1 Be Reviewed by 820501,per Requirements of NUREG-0696
Project stage: Other
ML20052C1891982-04-23023 April 1982
Requests Extension of 821001 Deadline for Completion of Emergency Operations Facility Per TMI Action Plan Item III.A.1.2.Extension Requested Due to Delay in Obtaining NRC Approval
Project stage: Other
ML20052C1291982-04-29029 April 1982
Ack Receipt of Cw Fay to Jg Keppler Re 820121 Emergency Preparedness Confirmation of Action Ltr.Matter to Be Reviewed at Future Insp
Project stage: Other
ML20069C7171982-07-15015 July 1982
Forwards Revised Description of Proposed Mods for Emergency Operations Facility for Review.Requests Date NRC Will Present Review to Commission
Project stage: Other
ML20058E0091982-07-16016 July 1982
Provides Solutions to Issues Arising in 820623 & 0708 Meetings Re Acceptance of Proposed Emergency Operations Facility Location Per TMI Action Item III.A.1.2
Project stage: Meeting
ML20063N6281982-09-30030 September 1982
Forwards Addl Info Re Proposed Mods for Emergency Support Ctr
Project stage: Other
ML20079R8941983-03-30030 March 1983
Requests to Be Advised of Date & Time Commissioners Will Consider 820406 Request to Relocate Emergency Operations Facility at Corporate Headquarters Beyond Guideline Distance Contained in NUREG-0696
Project stage: Other
ML20071L4641983-05-20020 May 1983
Requests Info Re Date,Time & Location for Commission Meeting on Emergency Operations Facility Location.Leave to Address Commission Requested
Project stage: Meeting
ML20072C5291983-06-16016 June 1983
Responds to Advising of Status of Util Request to Locate Emergency Operations Facility at Corporate Headquarters in Milwaukee,Wi.New Communication Apparatus & Revised Procedures Enhance Emergency Capabilities
Project stage: Other
ML20076B4491983-07-20020 July 1983
Forwards Draft Exercise Scope & Basic Senario Per 10CFR50,App E.Detailed Scenario Will Be Provided During Second Wk of Aug.Exercise Planned for Sept 1983.W/o Encl
Project stage: Draft Other
ML20085K6051983-10-14014 October 1983
Responds to Denying Concurrence W/Util Plans to Move Emergency Support Ctr from Two Creeks,Wi to Corporate Headquarters in Milwaukee,Approx 100 Miles from Facility. Potential Problems Overstated by NRC
Project stage: Other
ML20078P6961983-10-31031 October 1983
Response Opposing Atty General Bellotti 831007 Motion for Summary Disposition of State of Ma Contentions I-IV,Seacoast Anti-Pollution League 5 & New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution 3,4,5,7,12 & 13.Certificate of Svc Encl
Project stage: Other
1982-04-23
[Table View] |
Text
IMSCORSin Electnc eowca courany 231 W. M!CHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 October 14, 1983 Mr.
D. G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS1GM Washington, D. C.
20555
Dear Mr. Eisenhut:
DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301 EMERGENCY SUPPORT CENTER POINT T'ACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 This is in response to your letter of September 14, 1983 which denied concurrence with Wisconsin Electric's plans to move the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Emergency Support Center from Two Creeks, Wisconsin to our Corporate headquarters in Milwaukee, approximately one hundred miles couth of Point Beach.
By letter dated April 6, 1982 to Mr.
J. G. Keppler, NRC Region III, Wisconsin Electric requested NRC approval of this relocation and provided our reasons in support of the relocation.
We were advised by Region III in a letter dated May 4, 1982 that if we wished
.o meet with the Commissioners regarding this matter, we should so advise the NRC Staff in Washington.
We made this request in a letter to Mr. Chilk dated March 30, 1983 and also requested a copy of the Staff's recommendation regarding our proposal.
We were subsequently advised that we would not be furnished a copy of the Staff's recommendation prior to consideration by the Commissioners.
We once again, in a letter dated May 20, 19G3 to Mr. Chilk, requested permission to present our views to the Commissioners.
As you know, we were not accorded the opportunity to discuss the matter with the Commission 3rs nor have we been provided with a copy of the Staff's recommendations.
Your September 14 letter presents two bases for denial of our proposed relocation of the Emergency Support Center:
1.
Lack of availability for " face-to-face" contact with the NRC Director of Site Operations and other Federal and local officials.
2.
Perceived communications problems during the March 1982 exercise.
O
\\D B310210044 831014 PDR ADOCK 05000266 F
PDR
_1_
e Mr.
D. G. Eisenhut October 14, 1983 Regarding the latter, we do not agree that the problems were as significant as might be interpreted from your comments and were not generally related to Emergency Support Center location.
In any case, corrective action has been taken to improve communications.
These steps have been effective, as was demonstrated during the September 1983 exercise.
Regarding the first consideration, we believe you have over-emphasized the need for " face-to-face" contact.
The State of Wisconsin emergency response facility is in Madison, which is closer to Milwaukee than to Two Creeks; and the county centers are in the cities of Manitowoc and Kewaunee, which are also physically separated from the present Emergency Support Center at the plant site.
Only the State of Wisconsin has authority to order protective action, and only the counties can compel the public to take the ordered action.
During the crucial first hours or days of a serious accident, the responsible officials will be in their response centers where_they have personnel, facility, and logistic support.
Any " face-to-face" discussions near Point Beach Nuclear Plant are, therefore, not likely to include senior state or ' local officials.
Finally, in an attempt to understand better the technical basis for the twenty-mile statement contained in Footnote 1 of Table 2 of NUREG-0696, we submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Director, Office of Administration, on June 21, 1983.
We have received some material in response to that request, but it provides no information which would lead us to believe that the twenty-mile limit is other than arbitrary limitation.
We understand that additional documents will be provided by the NRC, in accordance with our Freedom of Information Act Request; perhaps some technical basis for the limit will be contained therein.
We will await receipt of such further information before taking any additional action.
In the meanwhile, we will be moving i
our Emergency Support Center from the Energy Information Center at Point Beach Nuclear Plant to the newly constructed Site Boundary l
Control Center, which is also located on the Point Beach Nuclear l
Plant site.
l l
I would be pleased to discuss our proposal further if you wish to do so.
Very truly yours, q
L) S
^
1 Q"
1 Execu ive Vice President Sol Burstein l
Copy to NRC Resident Inspector l
1
