Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: 05000346/LER-1981-055-03, /03L-0:on 810925 & 1001,detergent Waste Drain Tank & Pump Room Door Was Found Open.Caused by Personnel Fears That Broken Door Handle Would Prevent Exit from Room. Personnel Reinstructed & Door Latch Repaired, ML20004D033, ML20008F566, ML20010A368, ML20011A873, ML20011A937, ML20011A941, ML20031H265, ML20050C739, ML20050D880, ML20050D960, ML20052C129, ML20052C189, ML20063N628, ML20069C717, ML20072C529, ML20078P696, ML20079R894, ML20085K605, ML20263R472, ML20263R474, ML20263R475, ML20263R477
|
MONTHYEARIR 05000266/19810041981-03-16016 March 1981
IE Insp Rept 50-266/81-04 on 810224-25.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Control Rod Drive & Position Indication Checks,Control Rod Worth Measurement & Reactor Shutdown Margin Determination
Project stage: Request
ML20008F5661981-04-14014 April 1981
Submits Comments on Emergency Response Facilities Implementation,In Response to NRC on post-TMI Requirements.Description of Instrumentation Sys & Design of Physical Structures Will Be Submitted by 810601
Project stage: Other
ML20004D0331981-06-0101 June 1981
Forwards Conceptual Design for Interim Emergency Response Facilities Expected to Be Operational by 821001,in Response to NRC .Outline of Requirements & Design Encl for Preimplementation Review
Project stage: Other
ML20010A3681981-08-0303 August 1981
Notifies That Permanent Emergency Offsite Facility Will Be Located Adjacent to Util Headquarters Bldg.Location of Facility in Proximity to Util Headquarters Outweighs Disadvantages Resulting from Being 23 Miles from Plant Site
Project stage: Other
ML20031H2651981-10-21021 October 1981
Advises That Joint Powers Agency Representing Counties of Amador,Sacramento & San Joaqin Concurs W/Proposed Location of Emergency Operations Facility
Project stage: Other
05000346/LER-1981-055-03, /03L-0:on 810925 & 1001,detergent Waste Drain Tank & Pump Room Door Was Found Open.Caused by Personnel Fears That Broken Door Handle Would Prevent Exit from Room. Personnel Reinstructed & Door Latch Repaired1981-10-23023 October 1981
/03L-0:on 810925 & 1001,detergent Waste Drain Tank & Pump Room Door Was Found Open.Caused by Personnel Fears That Broken Door Handle Would Prevent Exit from Room. Personnel Reinstructed & Door Latch Repaired
Project stage: Other
ML20011A9411981-10-23023 October 1981
Advises That Ofc of Emergency Svcs Finds Proposed Emergency Offsite Facility Acceptable.Addl Work Needed on Remodeling & Refurbishing Facility
Project stage: Other
ML20011A8731981-10-23023 October 1981
Advises of Acceptance of Proposed Location for Emergency Offsite Facility.Proposed Location Will Provide Ready Access by State Personnel & County Officials
Project stage: Other
ML20263R4721981-10-26026 October 1981
General Office Annex
Project stage: Other
ML20263R4751981-10-26026 October 1981
Smud Headquarters Building
Project stage: Other
ML20011A9371981-10-26026 October 1981
Submits Addl Info Requested in 810924 Telcon W/Nrc for Approval of Proposed Emergency Offsite Facility,Per NUREG-0737,Item III.A.1.2.Four Oversize Drawings Encl. Aperture Cards Are Available in PDR
Project stage: Other
ML20263R4771981-10-26026 October 1981
Location Sketch & Vicinity Map EOF and Office Buildings
Project stage: Other
ML20263R4741981-10-26026 October 1981
Training and Storage Building
Project stage: Other
IR 05000266/19820021982-02-11011 February 1982
IE Emergency Preparedness Appraisal Repts 50-266/82-02 & 50-301/82-02 on 820104-15 & 20.Major Area Inspected:Special Appraisal of Emergency Preparedness Program
Project stage: Request
ML20041B4911982-02-22022 February 1982
Discovery Progress Rept 5,per ASLB 811003 & 1105 Orders.Nrc Reviewed Wi Environ Decade 820118 Answers to Interrogatories.No Discovery Requests Received from Licensee or Intervenor.Certificate of Svc Encl
Project stage: Request
ML20050D8801982-03-26026 March 1982
Confirms 820326 Telcon Requesting 1-wk Extension to 820405 of Response to NRC Re Emergency Preparedness Appraisal.Extension Requested for Further Mgt Review of New Proposal
Project stage: Other
ML20050C7391982-03-31031 March 1982
Discusses Util Response Re Emergency Plan Training, Emergency Plan Implementing Instructions,Meteorological Instrumentation & Unusual Event Notification Procedures. Response Appears Acceptable
Project stage: Other
ML20050D9601982-04-0606 April 1982
Forwards Responses to NRC Discussing NRC 820104-15 Emergency Preparedness Appraisal.Requests That Item 7 of Encl 1 Be Reviewed by 820501,per Requirements of NUREG-0696
Project stage: Other
ML20052C1891982-04-23023 April 1982
Requests Extension of 821001 Deadline for Completion of Emergency Operations Facility Per TMI Action Plan Item III.A.1.2.Extension Requested Due to Delay in Obtaining NRC Approval
Project stage: Other
ML20052C1291982-04-29029 April 1982
Ack Receipt of Cw Fay to Jg Keppler Re 820121 Emergency Preparedness Confirmation of Action Ltr.Matter to Be Reviewed at Future Insp
Project stage: Other
ML20069C7171982-07-15015 July 1982
Forwards Revised Description of Proposed Mods for Emergency Operations Facility for Review.Requests Date NRC Will Present Review to Commission
Project stage: Other
ML20058E0091982-07-16016 July 1982
Provides Solutions to Issues Arising in 820623 & 0708 Meetings Re Acceptance of Proposed Emergency Operations Facility Location Per TMI Action Item III.A.1.2
Project stage: Meeting
ML20063N6281982-09-30030 September 1982
Forwards Addl Info Re Proposed Mods for Emergency Support Ctr
Project stage: Other
ML20079R8941983-03-30030 March 1983
Requests to Be Advised of Date & Time Commissioners Will Consider 820406 Request to Relocate Emergency Operations Facility at Corporate Headquarters Beyond Guideline Distance Contained in NUREG-0696
Project stage: Other
ML20071L4641983-05-20020 May 1983
Requests Info Re Date,Time & Location for Commission Meeting on Emergency Operations Facility Location.Leave to Address Commission Requested
Project stage: Meeting
ML20072C5291983-06-16016 June 1983
Responds to Advising of Status of Util Request to Locate Emergency Operations Facility at Corporate Headquarters in Milwaukee,Wi.New Communication Apparatus & Revised Procedures Enhance Emergency Capabilities
Project stage: Other
ML20076B4491983-07-20020 July 1983
Forwards Draft Exercise Scope & Basic Senario Per 10CFR50,App E.Detailed Scenario Will Be Provided During Second Wk of Aug.Exercise Planned for Sept 1983.W/o Encl
Project stage: Draft Other
ML20085K6051983-10-14014 October 1983
Responds to Denying Concurrence W/Util Plans to Move Emergency Support Ctr from Two Creeks,Wi to Corporate Headquarters in Milwaukee,Approx 100 Miles from Facility. Potential Problems Overstated by NRC
Project stage: Other
ML20078P6961983-10-31031 October 1983
Response Opposing Atty General Bellotti 831007 Motion for Summary Disposition of State of Ma Contentions I-IV,Seacoast Anti-Pollution League 5 & New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution 3,4,5,7,12 & 13.Certificate of Svc Encl
Project stage: Other
1982-04-23
[Table View] |
Text
_
o lMsconsm Electnc MWER COMPANY 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046, MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 June 16, 1983 Mr. Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.
S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C.
20555 j
Dear Mr. DeYoung:
l DOCKETS 50-266 and 50-301 l
LOCATION OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 and 2 l
Thank you for your letter of June 3, 1983 advising us of the status of our request to locate the Emergency Operations l
Facility (EOF) for Point Beach at our Corporate headquarters in l
Milwaukee.
As you suggested, we have called Mr. Chilk to request a meeting with the Commissioners on this matter.
l In response to the Staff position as summarized in your letter, we would note the following:
i 1.
The Staff's assertion that past difficulties with coordination and communications are related to the divided EOF concept is incorrect.
These difficulties which related to radio-communication problems with field survey teams, to turn-over responsibilities, and to emergency personnel-work loads have already been resolved by new communication apparatus, revised procedures, and assignment of additional l
staff.
More importantly, it should be noted that j
the divide 1 EOF concept itself has never been an I
issue with NRC to date.
This concept constitutes an enhancement rather than liability of our emergency response capabilities by providing site-access control for both health physics and security purposes.
We believe this feature to be highly desirable, although it is not specifically addressed in the existing regulations nor in related guides.
The other primary reason for our request is to enhance our response, coordination, and communications capabilities.
6 8306210100 830616
//
PDR ADDCK 05000266 F
PDR
_1_
=-
s'
-r i
Mr.
R. C.
DeYoung June 16, 1983
^
2.
We would emphasize that our proposed location of the EOF is consistent with Emergency Government operations in Wisconsin at both the state and county levels.
The approach in Wisconsin is based
.on headquarters' communications and management, i
as opposed to personal management in the field.
This emergency management method has proved successful in Wisconsin, based on actual experience in non-nuclear emergency situations, such as in tornadoes.
3.
Experience with our existing on-site EOF during drills and exercises leads us to'the observation that the EOF functions proposed to be located in our Milwaukee headquarters are unrelated to location.
The Emergency Director and the Radcon Waste Manager functions remain the same in any I
room, regardless of its geographic position.
The
. proposed Corporate headquarters location affords substantially reduced mobilization time, enhanced communications capability, and the ease and convenience of operations that are part of familiarity with the everyday working environment.
h 4.
Finally, we' note that electronic data displays will be located at the Technical Support Center, Site Boundary-Control Center (site portion of EOF), and Emergency Support Center (Corporate headquarters portion of EOF).
Sufficient space is available to accommodate NRC personnel at any of these locations as desired.
Again, thank you for your' interest in our request.
We a
look forward to meeting with the Commissioners.to assure that the advantages of our proposed-EOF location are understood.
Very truly yours, h
Vice Presi en( - Nuclear Power i
i C. W.
Fay Copies to Messrs. W.
J.
Dircks Victor Stello D. G. Eisenhut S.
J. Chilk J. G. Keppler NRC Resident Inspector 4
h f
.. ~,.. -,,
,,--.n
,n n-.--n.-
,.,,,
