|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20106J8711985-02-15015 February 1985 Notification Concerning Site redress.Near-term Planning for Site Redress Predicated Upon Commencing Redress by May 1985. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20107M9411984-11-0808 November 1984 Response to Motion to Dismiss Proceeding Re Revocation of Lwa.Authorization of Revocation of LWA & That Proceedings Be Dismissed W/O Prejudice Recommended.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20106J7951984-10-30030 October 1984 Response to Applicant 841019 Motion to Dismiss Proceeding. Motion Acceptable Subj to Conditions Set Forth in Redress Plan & NRC .Certificate of Svc Encl ML20093M2611984-10-19019 October 1984 Motion to Dismiss Proceeding.Applicable Conditions of Existing Federal Water Permit & State Water Quality Requirements Will Remain in Effect.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098F9571984-09-28028 September 1984 Notice of Change of Address & Telephone Number.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20098F7391984-09-28028 September 1984 Notice of Change of Address & Telephone Number.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097G9671984-09-19019 September 1984 Notice of Change of Address & Telephone Number.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20087F4701984-03-15015 March 1984 Answer to Applicant Petition for Review of ASLB 840229 Memorandum & Order Re Crbr LWA Proceedings on Site Redress Plan.Intervenors Main Concern Is That Redress Be Rapid & Effective.W/Certificate of Svc ML20086T0141984-03-0505 March 1984 Petition for Review of Appeal Board 840229 Memorandum & Order Readmitting Intervenors to Proceedings.Intervenor Participation Will Protract Proceeding for Project Which Is Terminated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080N0471984-02-21021 February 1984 Answer Opposing NRDC & Sierra Club Appeals to ASLB Decisions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080C6411984-02-0606 February 1984 Brief of Intervenors in Support of Appeal of ASLB 840120 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080C6121984-02-0606 February 1984 Notice of Appeal of ASLB 840120 Notice Denying NRDC Motion to Intervene ML20080C6021984-02-0606 February 1984 Brief in Support of Appeal of ASLB 840120 Order Re NRDC Motion to Intervene ML20083J4351984-01-0909 January 1984 Response to NRDC Reply Per ASLB 831228 Order.Contentions Raised in NRDC Motion to Intervene Moot.Motion Should Be Denied.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083E4231983-12-27027 December 1983 Notice of Project Termination.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082S4471983-12-12012 December 1983 Request to Reply to Util 831205 & NRC 831208 Responses to NRDC Motion to Intervene ML20082S4541983-12-12012 December 1983 Reply to Util 831205 & NRC 831208 Responses to NRDC Motion to Intervene.Appropriate ASLB Course of Action Is Termination of Proceedings on Grounds of Mootness. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082Q6841983-12-0909 December 1983 Amended Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082M5401983-12-0505 December 1983 Response Opposing NRDC 831123 Motion to Intervene.Proceeding Moot Due to Project Cancellation.Cp Partial Initial Decision Should Be Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082M5271983-12-0505 December 1983 Response Supporting Intervenor 831123 Motion to Terminate Appeal Proceedings,Vacate Partial Initial Decision & Authorize Revocation of Lwa.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082E1261983-11-23023 November 1983 Petition of NRDC for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Effect of Crbr Termination on CP Proceedings. Contentions Listed ML20081D7931983-10-31031 October 1983 Confirmation of Info Re Legislative Status Discussed W/Aslb in 831028 Telcon.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20081A5041983-10-25025 October 1983 Supplemental Citations Supporting Thesis That Following Hydrodynamic Core Disruptive Accident,Reactor Vessel Closure Head Is More Susceptible to Failure than Reactor Vessel Head.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078B9771983-09-26026 September 1983 Response Opposing NRC 830913 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Affidavit of Lg Hulman.Affiant Revised Testimony Incorrect,Misleading & Irrelevant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076C9811983-08-22022 August 1983 Motion to Correct Transcript of Aug 1983 CP Evidentiary Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076A7871983-08-17017 August 1983 Motion to Reschedule 830929 Oral Argument to 830928. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20077J5051983-08-15015 August 1983 Proposed Initial Decision,Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Cp.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20077B6661983-07-22022 July 1983 Response Opposing Intervenor 830518 Exceptions to ASLB 830228 Partial Initial Decision on Lwa.Aslab Should Affirm ASLB Decision.Site Suitability Arguments Incongruous. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20024C3641983-07-0808 July 1983 Limited Appearance Statement of TB Cochran Re Issues Raised in CP Proceeding.Discusses Radiological Consequences of Crbr Core Disruptive Accident & Site Suitability.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20072F2651983-06-22022 June 1983 Response to Intervenor 830621 Motion to Withdraw Contentions 1,3,9(c),9(f) & 9(g) from Consideration at Jul 1983 CP Hearings.Intervenors Should Be Dismissed as Parties. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079R2631983-06-21021 June 1983 Response Opposing Applicant 830519 & 23 Motions for Summary Disposition of Contentions 9(g),9(c) & 9(f).Motions Moot Since Intervenors Moved to Withdraw Contentions from Consideration ML20079R2491983-06-21021 June 1983 Motion to Withdraw Contentions 1,3,9(c),9(g) from Consideration at Jul 1983 CP Hearings & Request for Leave to Submit Written Statement on Issues Raised.Limited Resources Prohibit Continued Full Participation ML20071M3191983-05-27027 May 1983 Notification of Pending Litigation Re NRDC 821001 Motion to Expedite Consideration of Emergency Motion to Amend Us District Court of Appeals Remand & to Review EPA Regulations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071H0321983-05-23023 May 1983 Motion for Summary Disposition of Intervenor Contentions 9(c) & 9(f) Re Adequacy of Evacuation Time Analysis in Psar. No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists & Applicant Entitled to Favorable Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071H0461983-05-23023 May 1983 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue Re Contentions 9(c) & (F) on Emergency Plans ML20071H0911983-05-23023 May 1983 Motion for Extension Until 830722 to File Response to Intervenors 830518 Brief in Support of Exceptions. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076D0191983-05-19019 May 1983 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue Re Contention 9(g) on Emergency Planning.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076C9801983-05-19019 May 1983 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 9(g) Re Emergency Plans.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists ML20023D1761983-05-18018 May 1983 Notification Re PRA Status Rept.Encl Phase I PRA Rept Not Submitted to NRC for Review.Results of Rept Insignificant to Proceeding.W/O Phase I Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071H2211983-05-18018 May 1983 Brief Supporting Exceptions to ASLB 830228 Partial Initial Decision Re LWA ML20023D0951983-05-17017 May 1983 Third Set of CP Interrogatories & Request to Produce. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20074A8791983-05-13013 May 1983 Response to 830425 Eleventh Set of Interrogatories & Request for Admissions.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20074A8621983-05-13013 May 1983 Response to 830427 Second Set of CP Interrogatories & Request for Admissions.Related Correspondence ML20023C2071983-05-0909 May 1983 Certifies Svc on 830509 ML20079Q3021983-05-0909 May 1983 Corrected Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Request to Produce.Requested Documents Will Be Made Available for Insp & Copying ML20079Q3001983-05-0909 May 1983 Responds to Second Set of CP Interrogatories.Aerosol Plateout & Fallout Calculations Discussed.Affidavit Encl. Related Correspondence ML20079Q2781983-05-0909 May 1983 Response to First Set of CP Interrogatories & Request to Produce.Requested Documents Will Be Made Available for Insp & Copying.Related Correspondence ML20079P9141983-05-0909 May 1983 Response Opposing Intervenor 830429 Motion for Extension of Time.Good Cause Not Demonstrated ML20023C1961983-05-0606 May 1983 Certifies Svc on 830506 of Intervenor Supplementary Response to Applicant Eighth & Ninth Set of Interrogatories Dtd 830401 & 08 & Intervenor Response to Applicant Tenth Set of Interrogatories Dtd 830421 ML20079P6971983-05-0606 May 1983 Supplementary Response to Eighth & Ninth Set of Interrogatories & 08.Review of SER & Related Documentation Incomplete,Hindering Response to Certain Interrogatories.Related Correspondence 1985-02-15
[Table view] Category:OTHER LEGAL DOCUMENT
MONTHYEARML20106J8711985-02-15015 February 1985 Notification Concerning Site redress.Near-term Planning for Site Redress Predicated Upon Commencing Redress by May 1985. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098F7391984-09-28028 September 1984 Notice of Change of Address & Telephone Number.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098F9571984-09-28028 September 1984 Notice of Change of Address & Telephone Number.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20097G9671984-09-19019 September 1984 Notice of Change of Address & Telephone Number.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20086T0141984-03-0505 March 1984 Petition for Review of Appeal Board 840229 Memorandum & Order Readmitting Intervenors to Proceedings.Intervenor Participation Will Protract Proceeding for Project Which Is Terminated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080C6021984-02-0606 February 1984 Brief in Support of Appeal of ASLB 840120 Order Re NRDC Motion to Intervene ML20080C6121984-02-0606 February 1984 Notice of Appeal of ASLB 840120 Notice Denying NRDC Motion to Intervene ML20080C6411984-02-0606 February 1984 Brief of Intervenors in Support of Appeal of ASLB 840120 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083E4231983-12-27027 December 1983 Notice of Project Termination.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082Q6841983-12-0909 December 1983 Amended Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20081D7931983-10-31031 October 1983 Confirmation of Info Re Legislative Status Discussed W/Aslb in 831028 Telcon.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20081A5041983-10-25025 October 1983 Supplemental Citations Supporting Thesis That Following Hydrodynamic Core Disruptive Accident,Reactor Vessel Closure Head Is More Susceptible to Failure than Reactor Vessel Head.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071M3191983-05-27027 May 1983 Notification of Pending Litigation Re NRDC 821001 Motion to Expedite Consideration of Emergency Motion to Amend Us District Court of Appeals Remand & to Review EPA Regulations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20023D1761983-05-18018 May 1983 Notification Re PRA Status Rept.Encl Phase I PRA Rept Not Submitted to NRC for Review.Results of Rept Insignificant to Proceeding.W/O Phase I Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20023C2071983-05-0909 May 1983 Certifies Svc on 830509 ML20023C1961983-05-0606 May 1983 Certifies Svc on 830506 of Intervenor Supplementary Response to Applicant Eighth & Ninth Set of Interrogatories Dtd 830401 & 08 & Intervenor Response to Applicant Tenth Set of Interrogatories Dtd 830421 ML20070M0721983-01-11011 January 1983 Response to State of Tn Atty General 821110 Position Paper & City of Oak Ridge,Tn 821112 Statement on Socioeconomic Impact of Crbr.Significant Adverse Impacts Unlikely. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069Q4641982-12-0808 December 1982 Notification of Pending Litigation.Court of Appeals,Dc Circuit,Remanded Case Re Exemption to Allow Site Preparation Activities to Commission to Reconsider 10CFR50.12 Availability.W/Certificate of Svc ML20069P6681982-12-0707 December 1982 Suggestions for Procedures & Scheduling Re Court of Appeals, DC Circuit,821202 Remand of Applicant Exemption Requests to Commission.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20067B2731982-12-0303 December 1982 Notification of Pending Litigation.Cases Include Petition for Review & Application for Stay of Commission 820817 Order,Epa & NRC Crbr Project Ofc Agreement Issue & LMFBR Program Statement.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028A0471982-11-12012 November 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028A3491982-11-12012 November 1982 Statement on Socioeconomic Impact of Crbr.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20027E7151982-11-10010 November 1982 Position Paper of State of Tn Atty General on Socioeconomic Impact Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20066C3671982-11-0505 November 1982 Notice of Intent to Introduce Natl Security Info Re Design Basis Threat Levels of Various Federal Agencies for Various Categories of Threat.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20027D6551982-11-0404 November 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071P2071982-10-29029 October 1982 Notice of Change of Counsel & Address as of 821101. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20065P9891982-10-21021 October 1982 Statement of Qualification for Intervenor Expert Witnesses TB Cochran & C Johnson.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063P4691982-10-0707 October 1982 Notice of Pending Litigation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20065H5691982-09-29029 September 1982 Corrected Notification of Pending Litigation,Including Omitted Sentence from 820924 Notice.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069F9311982-09-24024 September 1982 Notification of Pending Litigation.Nrdc & Sierra Club Filed Petition for Review & Application for Stay of Commission 820917 Order & Filed Suit Alleging Violation of NEPA & EPA Regulations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20065A0071982-09-0909 September 1982 Notice Re Pending Litigation.Nrdc & Sierra Club Filed Petition for Review & Application for Stay of Commission 820817 Order Granting Exemption to Allow Site Preparation in Us Court of Appeals,Dc Circuit.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063M2861982-09-0101 September 1982 Certifies Svc of Encl JB Gelin & Attached Jr Longenecker on 820901 ML20063M2691982-08-31031 August 1982 Notice of MD Pearigen Appearance in Proceeding Substituting for L Breckenridge.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062J6231982-08-12012 August 1982 Notice of Aslab Reconstitution.Sf Eilperin,Chairman & WR Johnson & Gj Edles,Members ML20058E3751982-07-21021 July 1982 Responses to Commission 820721 Order Posing Questions Re NRDC 820714 Petition for Investigation.Commission Should Attempt to Discover Whether Memoranda Represent Isolated Incidents or Reflect Broader Practice.W/Certificate of Svc ML20055B0951982-07-19019 July 1982 Notice of 820823 Evidentiary Hearing & Prehearing Conference in Oak Ridge,Tn ML20054L8321982-07-0202 July 1982 Notification & Recommendations Re Hearing Schedule. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0391982-03-19019 March 1982 Amended Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A3831982-03-19019 March 1982 Statement of Position Re Discovery Matters Upon Which No Agreement Can Be Reached,Per ASLB 820211 Prehearing Conference Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040H2941982-02-11011 February 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040F8741982-02-0808 February 1982 Prehearing Conference Statement.Discovery Should Continue, Commencing at Prehearing Conference & Should Conclude No Sooner That Dec 1982,scheduled Date for Release of Fes. Lists New Info.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040H2991982-02-0505 February 1982 Notices of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040D5721982-01-29029 January 1982 Notices of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M4811981-12-15015 December 1981 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding ML20010F8791981-09-0404 September 1981 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010F8881981-09-0303 September 1981 Notice of Change of Counsel & Change of Address.Ar Tomplin & Az Roisman Should Be Removed from Svc List & Replaced by B Finamore & Er Weiss 1985-02-15
[Table view] |
Text
'
I . . ,
e.
L C00:rTED y -
Feb garg 6_,5 1 8401 rE -:cw UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UCC$iFd Mt -
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
Gary J. Edles, Chairman Dr. W. Reed Johnson Howard A. Wilber
)
In the Matter of )
)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY )
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ) Docket No. 50-537 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY )
)
(Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant) )
)
NATURAL RESOURCES DEPsWSE COUNCIL, INC.
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL This orief is filed in support of the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (NRDC) notice of appeal of the CRBR Licensing Board's January 20, 1984 Order Regarding NRDC Motion to Intervene.O BACKGROUND On June 29, 1983, NRDC and the Sierra Club, intervenors in the CRBR construction permit (CP) proceedings, requested withdrawal of their CP contentions because limited resources N This order was served upon NRDC by mail on January 24, 1984.
'N h
8402080149 840206 PDR ADOCK 05000537 Q
PDR _V
r-e_
prohibited their continued full participation in the CP evidentiary hearings. Transcript of Conference With Counsel, j June 29, 1983, at 7307. Intervenors did not, however, request withdrawal as parties from the CRBR proceeding, since the issues raised in the ongoing LWA appeal could af fect the validity of both the Limited Work Authorization (LWA) and the CP. Id,. at 7308-09. The Licensing Board nevertheless dismissed Intervenors as parties to the construction permit proceeding, but held that the dismissal was "neither with prejudice nor without prejudice." Id,. a t 7 3 32- 33.
In October, 1983, Congress refused to appropriate any further funds for the CRBR, and Applicants began CRBR termination proceedings in November.2/ Based on these new circumstances, NRDC filed a Motion to Intervene in the CP proceedings on November 23, 1983. In its Motion, NRDC demonstrated that termination of the CRBR Project constituted good cause under 10 C.F.R. $2.714(a)(1) for allowing NRDC's renewed intervention to raise the issue of the effect of the CRBR termination upon the CP proceedings.3/
2/ The CRBR project has since been completely terminated.
Notification Concerning Project Termination, December 27, 1983.
3/ NRDC also filed with the Appeal Board on November 23, 1983 a Motion of Intervenors to Terminate Appeal Proceedings, Vacate Partial Initial Decision, and Authorize Revocation of Limited Work Authorization, which was granted in part and denied in part on December 15, 1983.
s s, In response, Applicants admitted that the CP proceeding was moot, withdrew their request for a CRER construction permit, requested instead that the Licensing Board issue a Partial
- Initial Decision, and claimed that NRDC had no cognizable interest in how the Board resolved the issues in the Partial Initial Decision.S In its reply, NRDC reiterated its interest in the CP proceedings and in the requested Partial Initial Decision. NRDC noted that termination of the CRBR LWA appeal proceedings (which raised many issues closely related to the CP proceeding), while allowing issuance of the CP decision itself, would place Applicants in a better position than they would otherwise have been, and wculd irreparably harm NRDC 5[ NRDC suggested that the CRBR proceedings be teeminated as moot before issuance of an opinion, since the standard for issuance of an advisory opinion
-- the existence of "the most compelling circumstances" -- was not met.S/ In the alternative, NRDC requested that the Licensing
. Doard grant its motion to intervene in order to consider the impacts of the issues raised by NRDC on the propriety of issuing a Partial Initial Decision in a proceeding that is admittedly moot.2[
$! Applicants' Response to Motion of Natural Resources Dcfense Council, Inc. to Intervene, December 5, 1983.
5/ Reply of Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. to Applicants ' and Staf f 's Response to Motion to Intervene, December 12, 1983, at 3-4, 7-8.
f S/ Id at 2-6.
2/ Id at 8.
On January 20, 1984, the Licensing Board denied NRDC's Motion to Intervene.8/ The sole reason given by ths Licensing Board for its denial was that NRDC's attempt to re-intervene after withdrawing its remaining CP contentions is "not conducive to orderly practice," and that " parties cannot be permitt'ed to float in and out of proceedings at will."S/ The Board explicitly refused to determine whether NRDC's motion to intervene meets the late filing criteria set forth in 10 C.?.R. $ 2.714(a). Id.
On the same day, the Licensing Boe ld issued a so-called Memorandum of Findings (Construction Permit Phase), containing its analysis and conclusions regarding the issues raised in the CRBR Construction Permit proceedings. The Licensing Board refused to determine whether "the most compelling circumstances" exist to justify an advisory opinion, claiming that it was not issuing an:advicory opinion. Yet the Board admitted that its
" memorandum" does not constitute a license or license authorization, but is instead issued only "for whatever assistance it may provide to the NRC now or in the future."1S/
The Appeal Board had vacated the February 28, 1983 CRBR Limited Wbrk Authorization Partial Initial Decision (LBP-83-8, 17 NRC 158 (1983)) on December 15, 1983, over a month before the Licensing Board issued its Memorandum of Findings. Yet the S/ Order Regardina NRDC's Motion to Intervene, January 20, 1984.
9/ Id,at 5.
AS/ Id. at 2, 4-5.
Memorandum of Findings cites to the vacated LWA decision as evidence that the CRBR is environmentally acceptable, and that it meets the site suitability criteria of 10 C.F.R. $50.10(e) and Part 100. Id_. at 73, 158-59. The Memorandum of Findings also reached conclusions regarding Whether core disruptive accidents should be considered design basis accidents, which now stand as precedent, without any mention of Intervenors' LWA arguments to the contrary, Which were based on Applicants' and staff's own probability estimates.
ARGUMENT As stated above, the only reason given by the Licensing Board for denying NRDC's motion to intervene is that it would "not be conducive to orderly practice," since "(p)arties cannot be permitted to float in and out of proceedings at will."11/ In support of this ruling, the Licensing Board cites three NRC cases,12/ none of which is apposite here. In Prairie Island, an intervenor forfeited party status with respect to future proceedings on the issues of steam generator tube integrity because he had not participated in several earlier evidentiary 11/ Order Regarding Motion to Intervene at 5.
12/ Northern States Power Co. (Prairie Is',and Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-288, 2 NRC 390, 393 (1975);
Public Service Co. of Indiana (Marble Hill Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-493, 8 NRC 253, 269 (1978); Gulf States Utilities Co. (River Bend Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB- 358, 4 NRC 558, 560 (1976).
~
~
^
=i hearings or Board rulings on the tube integrity issue.12/ s Similarly, in Marble Hill, intervenors were excluded from addressing on remand the issue of a State boundary dispute, since ,
at the initial hearing they had submitted no contentions, .;
evidence, findings of fact or conclusions of law respecting the 1 ~d boundary's location.1d/ Finally, in River Bend, the Appeal Board dismissed the intervention of one party Who had originally been i
_e granted intervenors status on the basis of his residence's =
proximity to the facility, but who had since moved across the country and had never participated significantly in the [
proceeding.15/ --
In the first two cases, intervenors were not permitted to : _
address a cartain issue in later proceedings, when they had ii
'. ?
declined to address tts identical issue when it was raised in numerous earlier proceedings. These cases cannot be read to -]
prohibit a former intervenor from raising entirely new gr;
- ' 4. "
contentions based on extraordinary circumstances Which arose after the intervenor was originally dismissed, Unlike the is. f intervenors in the cited cases, NRDC has demonstrcted a present -
interest in the proceeding, and has raised contantions Which meet _ ;_ [ _
E the late filing criteria of 10 C.F.R. 2.714(a), on issues which l _
were never considered previously by any party or the Licensing _
12/ 2 NRC at 390-393. -
Ad/ 8 NRC at 268-69. ]
15/ 4 NRC at 558-560.
- 1. i _
- i 1: i l
Board. The need for orderly practice should not serve as a pretext for completely barring NRDC from participation under any circumstances, especially since the Board 's dismissal of NRDC's original intervention was not with prejudice.
Thus the Board 's reason for denying intervention is without merit, and, as a result, the Board has erred in completely failing to address the question whether NRDC's motion meets the 10 C.F.R. $2.714 late filing criteria. NRDC's motion and reply demonstrate that these criteria have been inet, and that intervention should be granted.
CONCLUSION For reasons stated above and in NRDC's Motion to Intervene and Reply to Applicants' and Staf f 's Response to NRDC 's Motion to Intervene, NRDC's Motion to Intervene should be granted.
Respectfully submitted, p arbara A. Finamore S. Jacob Scherr Attorneys for Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Dated: February 6, 1984
-.