ML20063P469

Notice of Pending Litigation.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20063P469
Person / Time
Site:	Clinch River
Issue date:	10/07/1982
From:	Bergholz W, Edgar G ENERGY, DEPT. OF, PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORP.
To:
References
82-1962, NUDOCS 8210130435
Download: ML20063P469 (9)

Text

f k

h 1%664 QED USHRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2 OCT 12 PI2:i3 bbbhih{Ch?b BEFORE THE s

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD W Ncs In the Matter of

)

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

)

)

PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

)

Docket No. 50-537

)

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

)

)

(Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant)

)

)

APPLICANTS' NOTIFICATION CONCERNING PENDING LITIGATION The United States Department of Energy (" DOE") and Project Management Corporation ("PMC"), for themselves and on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the Applicants),

i hereby file this Notification Concerning Pending Litigation.

l The Applicants are providing this Notification for the purpose of keeping the Board currently informed as to l

matters potentially affecting the above-captioned proceeding, as follows:

1.

Section 50.12 Case -

On August 19, 1982, NRDC and the Sierra Club ("Intervenors")

filed, in the United States Court of Appeals for the District a Petition for Review and an Application of Columbia Circuit, for Stay of the Commission's August 17, 1982 Order granting s

• B210130435 B21007 DR ADOCK 05000 l

i b3

.m

. V Applicants' July 1, 1982 request to conduct site preparation activities pursuant to 10 C.F.R.

S 50.12.

As of August 30, 1982, all responsive pleadings concerning the Application for Stay had been filed with the court.

On October 4, 1982, the court issued a temporary stay of the Commission order under review in order to afford the court an opportunity to more fully consider the pending Application for Stay and responses thereto.

Site preparation activities were halted as a result of the temporary stay.

On October 6, 1982, the court issued an order denying the Application for Stay, and establishing an expedited schedule ror review on the merits (copy attached).

Site preparation activities have now been resumed.

2.

40 C.F.R.

$ 122.66(c)(4)(i) Agreement Case -

On August 23, 1982, Intervenors filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against DOE, DOE's CRBRP Project Office, and the Environmental l

Protection Agency (" EPA"), alleging that an Agreement, executed by EPA and the CRBRP Project Office under 40 C.F.R.

5 122.66(c)(4)(i) to allow site preparation activities, violated NEPA and the aforementioned EPA regulation.

On September 3, 1982, the District Court issued an injunction restraining DOE from undertaking site preparation until the FES Supplement is completed and the final NPDES permit is issued for CRBRP.

NRC contemplates issuance of the Final FES Supplement on November 1, 1982, and EPA contemplates issuance l

l w

y,,.

iO r of the final permit on December 1, 1982.

On September 7, 1982, PMC and the Federal defendants filed Notices of Appeal in the District Court and filed Motions for Expedited Appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

These Motions requested that briefing be completed by September 15, 1982, oral argument be held on September 17, 1982, and that a i

decision be rendered on the merits by September 18, 1982.

On September 8, 1982, the Eleventh Circuit issued an Order granting PMC's Motion, requiring completion of briefing I

on September 14, 1982, and scheduling oral argument for September 15, 1982.

On September 21, 1982, the Eleventh Circuit issued a decision finding that the Agreement complied I

with EPA regulation 40 C.F.R. _ $ 122.66(c)(4)(1), reversing the District Court, dissolving the injunction, and taxing costs against NRDC.

Thereafter, site preparation activities commenced.

3.

LMFBR Program Statement Case -

On September 22, 1982, NRDC filed a complaint, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against DOE in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and alleging a failure to comply with the requirements of the National Env' onmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 5 4321 et seq., with respect to DOE's LMFBR Program Environmental Statement.

NRDC seeks to enjoin all LMFBR Program commercial demonstration activities, f

including construction of CRBRP, until completion of an i

adequate LMFBR Program Environmental Statement.

DOE's Answer to the complaint is due within 60 days after September 22, 1982.

. 1 4.

Consolidated Permit Regulation Case -

On October 1, 1982, NRDC filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit a Motion to Expedite Consideration of Emergency Motion, an Emergency Motion to Amend the Court's Remand and to Review EPA Regulations, and a Brief on the EPA Construction Prohibition in NRDC v. EPA, No. 80-1607

• /

(and consolidated cases).-

In this regard NRDC sought:

a) modification of the D. C. Circuit's August 6, 1982 Order which, inter alia, remanded 40 C.F.R. $ 122.66(c)(4)(1) back to EPA for implementation of a June 7, 1977 settlement agreement which j

~

would eliminate the 40 C.F.R. S 122.66 (c)(4)(i) prohibition on construction prior to issuance of an NPDES permit; and b) expedited review and a decision concerning the validity of EPA regulation 40 C.F.R. $ 122.66(c)(4)(i) as interpreted by EPA and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Responses to the Motions are due on October 12, 1982.

Respe ully submitt eg+

George"L. Edggg5s' Attorney for Project Management Corpo ion

/M

~Wafr&n E. Bergholz/

Attorney for theM.

DATED:

October 7, 1982 Department of Energy

• /

These cases, which have'been pending before the D. C. Circuit since the summer of 1980, involve Petitions for Review filed by numerous parties, including NRDC, in connection with EPA's promulgation of the so-called " consolidated NPDES permit regulations".

See 45 Fed. Reg. 33290 (May 19, 1980).

The consolidated NPDES permit regulations include 40 C.F.R.

5 122. 66 (c) (4) (1).

n 9

l' hitch # fates G:aurt of Appeals l

FOR THE DISTdlCT OF COLUMDI A CIRCUIT 1

NO. 82-1962

[.

September Term,1982 Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

and The Sierra Club, ah Petitioners ggg SBBS n Cttst g

.WJ 65 YM k

United States Nuclear Regulatory A FISHER Commission and the United States GEORGEg of America, Respondents l

i Project Management Corporation, Tennessee Valley Authori".y, Intervenors BEFORE:

Bazelon, Senior Circuit Judge; Ginsburg and Bork, Circuit Judges 2RREE On consideration of petitioner's motion for a stay pending review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's decision to psrmit commencement of site preparations activities for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor, the opposition thereto, and petitioner's

~

reply, it is ORDERED by the Court that the motion is denied.

Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v.'FPC, 259 F.2d 921 (D.C. Cir. 1958);

l Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm'n v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841 (D.C. Cir. 1977).

It is

\\

i i

r L

I L

9 O

hitch diEtates 6anet of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT NO. 82-1962

$eptember Term,19 82 FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte that the Clerk shall schedule l

this case for argument on the merits during the November-December,1982 sitting of this Court.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the following briefing schedule is established:

l Petitioners' Brief October 14, 1982 Respondents' and Supporting October 28, 1982 Intervenors' Briefs Petitioners' Reply Brief, if any November 5, 1982 The Joint Appendix of the parties shall be filed either with the Petitioners' Initial Brief on October 14, 1982, or on November 1, 1982.

j No enlargement of time of the foregoing schedule will be granted.

Per Curiam

--e.D*

=p gg e

e O

l l

, y. y,.y rv

^

w; e,,

.w.

l j.

(

UNITED STATES OF. AMERICA i

l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

l

)

In the Matter of UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

))

PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

)

Docket No. 50-537

)

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

)}

(Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant)

)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Service has been effected on this date by personal delivery or first-class mail to the following:

Marshall E. Miller, Esquire Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U:

-S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20545 (2 copies)

Dr. Cadet H. Hand, Jr.

Director Bodega Marine Laboratory University of California P. O. Box 247 Bodega Bay, California 94923 l

Mr. Gustave A*. Linenberger Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wa.shington, D. C.

20545

' Daniel Swanson, Esquire

-Stuart Treby, Esquire Office of Executive Legal Director

_U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20545 (2 copies) f.-.

. 8 Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20545 Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20545 Docketing & Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20545 (3 copies)

William M. Leech, Jr., Attorney General William B. Hubbard, Chief Deputy Attorney General Michael D. Pearigen, Assistant Attorney General State of Tennessee Office of the Attorney General 450 James Robertson Parkway Nashville, Tennessee 37219 Oak Ridge Public Library Civic Center Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37820 Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Esquire Lewis E. Wallace, Esquire W. Walter LaRoche, Esquire James F. Burger, Esquire Edward J. Vigluicci, Esquire Office of the General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority 400 Commerce Avenue Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 (2 copies)

Dr. Thomas Cochran Barbara A. Finamore, Esquire Natural Resources Defense Council 1725 Eye Street, H. W., Suite 600 Washington, D. C.

20006 (2 copies)

Ellyn R. Weiss, Esquire Harmon & Weiss 1725 Eye Street, N. W., Suite 506 Washington, D. C.

20006

~ - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,

Lawson McGhee Public Library 500 West Church Street Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 William E. Lantrip, Esq.

Attorney for the City of Oak Ridge Municipal Building P. O. Box 1 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Leon Silverstrom, Esq.

l Warren Bergholz, Jr., Esq.

U. S. Department of Energy i

1000 Independence Ave., S. W.

Room 6B-256, Forrestal Building Washington, D. C.

20585 (4 copies) l Eldon V. C. Greenberg Tuttle & Taylor W shing on Dl 5b0 6 Commissioner James Cotham Tennessee Department of Economic i

and Community Development Suite 1007' Andrew Jackson Building,219 Nashville, Tennessee 37 i

W r=

George L/Adgar Attornef for Project Management Corporation DATED:

October 7, 1982 e

l l

. - --.... -