ML20062L230

Rev 2 to Speakout Program Instruction SPI-08, Speakout Review Committee

ML20062L230
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	03/02/1993
From:	HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20062K985	List: ML20062K983 ML20062L146 ML20062L158 ML20062L169 ML20062L176 ML20062L186 ML20062L210 ML20062L230 ML20062L254 ML20062L268 ML20062L276 ML20062L284
References
SPI-08, SPI-8, NUDOCS 9312290245
Download: ML20062L230 (3)

Text

STP 724 (02/90) '

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING-STATION 7

SPEAK 0UT PROGRAM INSTRUCTION SPI-08 SPI-08 2

i PAGE OF i

SPEAK 0UT Review Committee y

3 EFFECTIVE DATE 3/2/93 1.0 PURPOSE This instruction establishes the duties, responsibilities and composition of the SPEAKOUT Review Committee.

2.0 SCOPE This instruction applies to concerns processe.d through the SPEAKOUT Review Committee.

3.0 DEFINITIONS None 4.O REFERENCES 4.1 SPEAKOUT Program Instruction

Manual, SPI-09, Recommendations / Suggestions.

5.O RESPONSIBILITIES i

5.1 The Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT, is responsible for the maintenance and

' implementation of this instruction.

5.2 The

Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT, is the designated chairman of the SPEAKOUT Review Committee (SRC).

5.3 The Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT, is responsible for determining what material requires SRC review.

This will normally include all Class 1 concerns.

5.4 The Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT, is responsible for scheduling and conducting SRC meetings when required.

i 5.5 The Macager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT, is responsible for preparing and signing all SRC correspondence and transm?tting recommendations as required.

5.6 The SRC is responsible for the review and final approval of all Investigation Reports and Response-Letters forwardet by the chairman.

(NOTE:

Response letters are included only if a reply was requested by the concernee and an address was provided.)

i 9312290245 900921 PDR ADDCK.05000498 P

PDR

i STP 724 (02/90)

'* 8" SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION 7

SPEAK 0UT PROGRAM INSTRUCTION SPI-08 SPI-08 2

SPEAK 0UT Review Committee PAGE OF 2

EFFECTIVE DA*

3/2/93 5.6.1 The SRC is responsible for verifying that the substance of the Investigation Report is responsive to the

concern, that the report clearly identifies facts supporting the conclusions, that the details of the investigation are technically 4

accurate, and that potentially generic situations are addressed.

?

5.6.2 The SRC is responsible for reviewing STEAKOUT Response Letters to ensure the results of SPEAKOUT investigations are incorporated into the letters and the concerns are i

answered.

5.6.3 The SRC is responsible for reviewing and concurring with, or modifying, 7

recommendations to HL&P Management.

5.7 The Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT, is responsible for determining when additional reviews by persons other than the SRC members is appropriate.

5.8 The Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT, is responsible for determining when review by a member of the SRC would not be appropriate.

6.O REQUIREMENTS 6.1 The SRC shall be comprised of the Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT and representatives from Nuclear

~ Assurance Department, Nuclear Licensing Department, and Human Resources (legal).

6.2 Copies of designated Investigation Reports and Response Letters may be forwarded to the SRC for review.

If all participants agree that the criteria of Section 5.6 are met, a formal meeting need not be conducted.

I

~

STP 724 '(02/90)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION 7

1 SPEAK 0UT PROGRAM INSTRUCTION SPI-08 SPI-08 2

PAGE OF SPEAKOUT Review Committee 3

3 j

DATE 3/2/93 l

6.3 The SRC members prepare

comments, when approriate, l

i concerning Investigation Reports and Response Letters.

Editorial or typographical corrections, and corrections which do not materially affect the report,will not I

require another review by the SRC.

l 6.4 The SRC will meet to review, approve, or comment on Investigation Reports and Response Letters when comments l

cannot be resolved by a review of documentation; or when deemed appropriate by the

Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT.

l 6.5 The SRC approves, approves with comments, requests further investigation, or rejects Investigation Reports and Response Letters.

6.6 Recommendations or suggestions approved by the SRC are forwarded by the Manager, Quality Performance /SPEAKOUT to the appropriate department for consideration and action.

7.O DOCUMENTATION See Appendix IV, Appendix D 8.0 Attachments None l

l i

J e