ML20062K496
| ML20062K496 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1982 |
| From: | BECHTEL GROUP, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062K487 | List: |
| References | |
| 7597, NUDOCS 8208170228 | |
| Download: ML20062K496 (147) | |
Text
'
l l ADDENDUM TO "THREE-YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE REPORT" B
l B
1 E
RESURVEILLANCE REPORT '
E ON g THREE-YEAR SilRVEILLANCE TENDONS I
FOR E CONTAINMENT POST-TENS 10NING SYSTEM E
B JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR UNIT 1 l ALABAMA POWER COMPANY JOB NO. 7597 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND JUNE 1982
$$0*kEOSEo!$0S a
l 0 s
- E CONTENTS Section Pam LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES _
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 2.0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS 3 3.0 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES S 4.0 RESULTS 6 4.1 TENDON LIFTOFF FORCES 6 4.2 END ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 7 4.3 SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS 9 4.4 TENDON RESEALING 10 4.5 ODIER OBSERVATIONS 11 E
Appendix Appendix 1 Farley Nuclear Plant Test Procedure FNP-1-STP-609.0 Containment Tendon Surveillance Test l Appendix 2 Laboratory Report on Sheathing Filler Sample Analysis Appendix 3 Ram and Load Cell Calibration Appendix 4 Tendon Liftoff Force Calculation E
E E
i
1 E l l
5 5 List of Tables and Figures ,
Page No.
Table No. 1 1 Laboratory Analysis of Sheathing Filler 13 2 Tendon End Anchorage Inspection Results 15 3 Summary of Liftoff Data 17
!E l
Figures l
1 Tendon Wire Force Versus Time - Hoop Tendons 19 Tendon Wire Force Versus Time - Dome Tendons 20 2
Tendon Wire Force Versus Time - Vertical Tendons 21 3
E E
E E
E E
E E u
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Wis report doct.ments the resurveillance of three-year surveillance tendons for the containment building of J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. Since the calibrations of the hydraulic rams used during the 3-year surveillance were in question, this resurveillance was performed.
% e resurveillance was performed during the period from June 1981 through I April 1982; and was in accordance with Farley Nuclear Plant Surveillance Test Procedure, FNP-1-STP-609.0, Containment Tendon Surveillance Test, which incorporates requirements of USNRC Regulatory Guide ~1.35 (Revision 2),
and the J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Technical Specifications. The three-year resurveillance was performed in conjunction with the five-year I surveillance using the new equipment procured by Alabama Power Company.
E n e hydraulic rams used to measure the liftoff forces were calibrated seven times at the Farley Nuclear Plant during the combined surveillance period.
The load cell used for ram calibration was calibrated at the University of I
Washington before and af ter the combined surveillance period, using a testing machine traceable to the National Bureau of Standards (See Appendix 3).
%is resurveillance consisted of anchorage assembly inspection, tendon l
liftoff force measurement, sheathing filler analysis, and replacement of
! lost tendon sheathing filler (resealing). We original ten hoop, six dome, 5 and five vertical tendons from the 3-year surveillance were resurveyed.
i
,E l
5
I l
All twenty-one tendons had liftoff forces within predicted limits. Chemical analyses of the filler material showed acceptable levels of chemical l concentrations. All anchorage assemblies were found to be acceptable.
!5
!B l
4 lE h
t E
l E
i i
l5 i
i I,
i5
!E
, 2 l 'l l
~
l 5
2.0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS 2.1
SUMMARY
E Visual inspection of the anchorage assemblies showed no cracking and only minor evidence of corrosion. Bearing plate corrosion beyond level "C" is actually discoloration which is attributed to the rust transferred from B. the steel gasket retainer ring to the bearing plate. Small areas of level "C" corrosion were confirmed, but these are limited to the outer edges of the bearing plates and are not considered detrimental to anchorage integrity.
Level "E" corrosion reported on one shim from the shop end of H26AB, four shims from the field end of H29AB and one shim from the shop end of H39AB was evaluated as having been in that condition when installed.
The concrete surrounding the field end of H12AB has a crack exceeding 0.01 inch attributable to a construction joint. Concrete surrounding the field end of D107 also has two cracks exceeding 0.01 inch. In all cases these cracks are not progressing and are not considered detrimental.
Laboratory analyses of filler material sampics from this resurveillance show all samples to be well within acceptance limits. The field end of tendon H25CA and both ends of H29AB yielded low neutralization numbers close to the minimum acceptance limit of 0.0. A chemical analysis of two sampics from these tendons performed by Viscosity 011 Company shows both
.I samples to be VISCONORUST 2090-P2, an earlier generation filler having a neutralization number of approximately 5. VISCONORUST 2090-P2 was the approved filler material used until VISCONORUST 2090-P4 was approved as the acceptable substitute in August, 1974.
E E >
E Every tendon in the resurveillance group had a measured liftoff force per wire within the predicted limits specified in Figure 1 of the Surveillance Procedure. Lift off force data from, this resurveillance indicates that the actual three-year lockoff values as a group were higher than reported in the three-year surveillance report (based on July 1980 calibration). Since the original three-year lif toff values were measured with the same equipment as the lockoffs, there is every reason to believe that the actual tendon forces are higher than indicated in the three-year report (based on July 1980 calibration).
2.2 CONCLUSION
S I
While liftoff values from the resurveillance of the three-year tendons do not directly relate to the lif toff values from the three-year surveillance because of the increment of force added to the tendon as a procedural part of the surveillance process, they do indicate that the calibration methods and their resulting equations used to derive the three-year lif teff values (based on the July 1980 calibration) were most probably yielding lower liftoff force values than actually existed in the tendon. Results from the resurveillance of the three-year tendons combined with the results from the five-year surveillance strongly support the conclusion that as a group, the three-year liftoff values (based on the July 1980 calibration) are unrealistically low. Therefore, it is concluded that the postensioning system is sound and fully capable of supporting its designed function.
5 E
E E
- l l
3.0 SURVEILLAhCE PROCT RES Detailed procedures for tendon surveillance operations are included in Appendix 1. _jpical surveillance activities are summarized below:
Immed lately following the removal of the tendon anchorage cap, a visual inspection of the filler material coating the anchorage compoenents was performed and a representative sample of filler material was taken for chemical analysis. The anchorage components were then cleaned and inspected.
The inspection included a count of missing, split, deformed, and unseated buttonheads; examination of the stressing washer, shims, and bearing plate for cracks and other apparent deformation; examination of all metal parts for corrosion; and the measurement of visible cracks in the concrete surrounding the bearing plates. Data from each step was recorded on appropriate data sheets.
i Following completion of the anchorage inspection, a tensioning ram was
,5 l screwed on the stressing washer and the liftoff force was measured by pressurizing the ram and recording the pressure at which the shims moved l
under force using pry bars. Liftoff was the average of three consecutive l
measurements falling within the range specified in the surveillance procedure.
l l
Following the measurement of liftoff, the ram was removed and the anchorage assembly visually inspected for any change from the conditions existing prior to the measurement of liftoff. The anchorgae end cap was then replaced using a new gasket. New filler material was pumped into the tendon replacing that which was removed.
E Samples of filler material were sent to a laboratory for analysis of chlorides, nitrates, sulfides, water content, and neturalization numbers.
E E 3 l
E 4.0 RESULTS 4.1 TENDON LIFTOFF FORCES E
Liftoff forces were measured at both ends of all tendons examined in the resurveillance. All tendon liftoff forces exceed the predicted lower limits of 6.64 kips per wire for dome and hoop tendons, and 6.94 kips per wire for vertical tendons. No tendon exceeded its predicted upper limit of 7.77 kips per wire for hoop and dome tendons, or 7.94 kips per wire for vertical tendons.
I For comparing liftoff forces measured during this resurveillance with lockoff forces measured during the three-year surveillance, the comparison indicates:
a) The current force in each tendon is within the predicted limits. The three-year resurveillance shows that the i
twenty-one tendons were within the predicted tendon force limits at the time of the resurveillance and it can be concluded that there is a strong probability that the three-year liftoff values reported were low (based on July 1980 calibration).
b) The three-year lockoff values (based on July 1980 calibration) i are not consistent with resurveillance lif toff values.
The mean liftoff force for each group (hoop, dome, and vertical ;
tendons) as measured during this resurveillance was higher than the mean lockoff for the same tendon group fourteen months earlier, i
exactly the opposite of what would be expected. Since the documented calibration program supporting this resurveillance has demonstrated good repeatability, it is concluded that the actual liftoff values (based on July 1980 calibration) reported in the three-year surveillance are unrealistically l'ow. This conclusion is 6
E E further supported by results from the five-year surveillance performed from September 1981 through April 1982.
4.2 TENDON END ANC110 RAGE INSPECTION E
Prior to the 3-year resurveillance, anchorage assemblies were last inspected from Wrch to June 1980. During this resurveillance the end anchorage was reinspected to evaluate corrosion level, buttonhead condition, and for broken or missing wires.
E Corrosion beyond level "C" was observed on the bearing plates of following tendons: 1129AB, ll39AB, H30CA, H36CA, ll36BC, V27, V86, V105 and V126. This level of corrosion results frora the transfer of corrosion from the uncoated steel gasket retainer plate to the bearing plate paint and is not detrimental to the integrity of the bearing plate in any way. The state of preservation and protection on all bearing plates is acceptable. Four shims on tendon H29AB and one shim each on the shop ends of H26AB and H39AB had a small area of level "E" corrosion. This corrosion apparently occurred prior to in-sta11ation of the shims since adjacent shims showed no corrosion. The corrosion is not progressing and poses no threat to the integrity of the shim stack.
I Following cleaning, the anchorage components were visually re-examined for corrosion, cracking, and buttonhead condition. No evidence of significant deterioration or unacceptable conditions were found. Table 2 shows one more missing buttonhead on the field end than on the shop end for tendons H12AB and H26AB. As reported in the three-year surveillance for each end of these tendons, the shop end of the broken wire was lef t in place with the buttonhead visible. Tendon H39AB is missing one additional buttonhead on each end beyond I
7
E E the number noted in the three-year report. During an aborted attempt to withdraw a test wire during the 3-year surveillance, the shop end buttonhead was clipped and the field end buttonhead failed by some means due to wire removal methods, which resulted in the buttonhead inventory difference between the two reports.
Evaluation of visual insepetion results indicates that no unusual change is considered to have taken place in the condition of the anchorage assemblies since the three-year surveillance.
Three cracks exceeding 0.01 inch were observed in the concrete surrounding l 5 the bearing plates. The field end of H12AB has a crack resulting from the inters etion of a construction joint with the bearing plate. The field end j l of tendon D107 has two cracks 0.01 and 0.02 inch wide respectively at the l
lower parting line between the bearing plate and concrete. None of the cracks are considered detrimental and none adversely affect the structural integrity of the containment structure. l l
A visual inspection of the filler material was conducted as each anchorage end cap was removed. All tendons contained the normal dark brown filler l I
E except the field end of H12AB which contained light brown material. Since l l
the chemical analysis results for all tendons were well within specifications set forth in Section 7.1 of the surveillance procedure, it is concluded that there is no degradation potential to the filler quality.
E E
E E e
4.3 SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS Samples of sheathing filler were taken from the end of each tendon being resurveyed. The samples were identified and analyzed by a laboratory for chlorides, nitrates, sulfieds, water content, and neutralization number in accordance with Section 7.1 of the Surveillance Procedure. Results from the analysis show all samples to be within acceptable limits. Samples from the field end of H25CA and both ends of H29AB yielded lower neutralization numbers (ranging from 0.6 to 1.1) than the usual figure of 20 to 30 expected from VISC0dORUST 2090-P4. A laboratory test performed by the manufacturer, Viscosity 011 Company, determined that the filler found in the samples for H25CA and H29AB was VISCONORUST 2090-P2, an earlier generation filler having a lower netralization number of approximately 5. ihe filler VISCONORUST 2090-P2 was an acceptable filler for original use but was replaced by VISCONORUST 2090-P4 as the approved filler in August of 1974. Since more VISCONORUST 2090-P4 was added to each tendon than was removed (approximately 28 gallons more to H25CA and approximately 23 gallons more to H29AB),
protection against acidity is substantically reaised. A visual inspection of these tendons did not indicate any abnormal condition or contamination.
l Tendon V105 yielded approximately one-half pint of free water from its lower end. Results of the chemical analysis performed on the filler from that end show 0.5% mositure, which is acceptable. The presence of small amounts of clear free water, especially from vertical tendons is a common finding lE and when not accompanied by evidence of deterioration, is not significant.
E E
E E e
, l 1
E E 4.4 TENDON RESEALING E Following measurement of liftoff for each resurveillance tendon, the tendon anchorage end cap and gasket retainer plate were installed with a new gasket.
Heated filler material was pumped into the tendon sheath to replace filler removed during the surveillance. Dome and hoop tendons were filled by venting at one end and pumping filler from the other until hot filler flowed from the vent. If filler did not flow from hoop tendon vents after main-taining a pumping pressure of 150 psi, pumping was performed on both tendon ends. Vertical tendons were vented at the top and filler pumped in from the bottom (tendon gallery) until fresh filler flowed from the vent. In all cases more filler was replaced in each tendon than was removed. A summary of the amounts of filler removed and replaced appears in Table 2.
E lE I
l E
E l l
l l
l l
10
l I
4.5 OTHER OBSERVATIONS I Certain conditions were identified during the three-year surveillance
- i which were considered ongoing in nature. The following comments address those items which were specifically mentioned in the three-year report as needing future attention.
i Five tendon ends were identified in the three-year report as hav'ing nitrate ion concentration.
i i H25CA Buttress A and C H29AB Buttress B l
HilAB Buttress B H13AB Buttress B
- Filler material from three of these tendon ends (H25CA and H29AB) was
}-
analyzed during the resurveillance. Nitrate concentrations for the three I
tendon ends were below the threshold test level of 1 ppm. Based on the favorable results of the above three tendon ends, the resurveillance of H11AB and H13AB was not considered necessary.
i I
Five of the tendons in the three-year surveillance had condition which f have been considered as on-going since the one-year surveillance. Their i status as of this resurveillance follows:
l is 3
3 l
3 u I-___ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ .___ _ .__
E E E E E E E E E E Tendon One - Year Three - Year Ihree - Year No. Surveillance Surveillance Resurveillance Comments D-309 1 gallons of water drained pint of water in field No free water found No ongoing from the field end end cap. Corrosion problem.
levels acceptable in-side 0-ring H12AB 6 buttonheads and 1 wire No additional failure No additional button- Buttonheads show failure observed initially, but head or wire failures many small 1 buttonhead failed at (sc 0.060) splits 80% ultimate load, and slips. No Buttonheads have many ongoing problem severe slips. Adjacent tendons exhibited slips.
to a lesser extent.
a) one buttonhead Wire with unseatec H25CA a) 15 buttonheads were a) Buttonheads remained unseated af ter retension- unseated. remains unseated buttonhead is E ( field end ) considered ing. b) No additional b) 2 buttonhead failures failures b) No additional e f fec tive. No failures ongoing problem.
H36CA 8 field end buttonheads and 11 field end buttonheads 18 buttonheads with No change in 9 shop end buttonheads with and 7 shop ends with cracks = 0.06 in, number of button-0.06 in, buttenhead cracks heads with crack cracks 3-
> 0.06 in, a .06 in.
No ongoing problem H39CB 9 buttonheads were unseated No change No change Considered following retensioning. ef fective wires.
No ongoing problem.
TABLE 1 SHEATHING FILLER ANALY3IS (RESURVEILLANCE)
WATER WATER WATER SOLUBLE SOLUBLE SOLUBLE NEUTRAL-TENDON CHLORIDE NITRATE SULFIDES WATER IZATION NUMBER (ppm)* (ppm)* (ppm)* (%) NUMBER S 2 1 1 0.8 33.7 H6AB l E F 2 1 1 0.4 35.3 S 2 1 1 0.4 31.4 H12AB 1 1.6 34.2 F 2 1 S 2 1 1 0.3 37.6 f H26AB F 3 1 1 0.1 36.5 5 3 1 1 0.2 1.1 H29AB 1 0.2 0.6 F 4 1 l
S 2 1 1 0.5 37.0 H39AB 1 0.3 37.0 t
F 2 1 S 2 1 1 0.2 52.2 H25CA 1 0.2 0.6 F 5 1 S 2 1 1 0.1 36.5 H30CA 1 0.3 42.6 F 3 1 S 2 1 1 0.4 33.1 H36CA 1 0.4 34.8 l F 3 1 l S 1 1 1 0.7 35.3 H36BC 1 0.2 34.2 F 1 1 S 1 1 1 0.6 30.3 E H39CB F 1 1 1 0.2 29.2 S 1 1 1 0.4 23.0 0107 0.5 12.3 E F 1 1 1 S 1 1 1 0.4 28.0 0122 1 1 0.3 14.6 F 1
'S 1 1 1 0.5 10.7 D277 1 1 0.4 19.1 F 1 S 1 1 1 1.7 16.8 D231 1 1 0.2 20.2 F 1 E
(Continued)
E 13 5
B TABLE 1 (Cont.)
SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS (RESURVEILLANCE) i3 WATER WATER WATER
!B 1
SOLUBLE SOLUBLE SOLUBLE NEUTRAL-TENDON CHLORIDE NITRATE SULFIDES WATER IZATION 1 NUMBER (ppm)* (ppm)* (ppm)* (%) NUMBER
!E 5 1 1 1 1.9 31.4
' D309 F 1 1 1 0.2 33.1 5 1 1 1 0.4 35.9 D324 F 1 1 1 0.2 23.0 5 2 1 1 0. 5 21.9 V16 F 3 1 1 0.7 22.4
' 5 2 1 1 0. 5 21.9
! V27 F 3 1 1 0.04 19.6
!E iB V86 5
F 2 1 1 0.4 24.1 2 1 1 0.7 23.0
- S 2 1 1 0.04 27.5 V105
- F 2 1 1 0.5 16.8 S 3 1 1 0.5 25.3 126 F 1 1 1 0.5 28.6 ACCEPThNCE -
LIMITS 10 ppm 10 ppm 10 ppm 10% 0
- Max Max Max Max Min l
1 means equal to or less than 1 ppm S: Shop end F: Field end 1
- g m
TABLE 2 TE WON ANCHORAGE INSPECTION RESULTS (RESURVEILLANCE) 8UTTON HEADS ANCHOR HEAD SHIMS BEARING PLATE CONCRETE FILLER MATERIAL CRACKS SHOP DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE EXCEED-OR OF BROKEN CRACKS / IM- 0F OF OF ING EFFEC-TENDON FIELD CORRO- NISSING SPLITS PROPERLY CORRO- CORRO- CORRO- 0.010 TIVE REEVE 0 REPLACE 0 NUMER END SION DAMAGED (>-06) FORNED UNSEATED SION CRACKS SION CRACKS SION CRACKS INCH WIRES (GALLONS) (GALLONS) 5 A 4 0 1 0 A 0 A 0 A8 0 0 11.2 H6AB F A 4 0 1 0 A 0 A8 0 ABC 0 0 100 10.4 30.4 S A 7 0 0 0 A 0 A 0 A8 0 0 11.6 H12A8 A 8 2 5 0 A8 0 A8 0 0 162 7,g 27
, F A8 1 i
j M6A8 5 A 3 2 0 1 A 0 A-E 0 A 0 0 166 7.2 47 ,
F A 4 10 0 2 A8 0 8 0 A 0 0 4.7 5 A 0 0 0 2 ABC 0 A8 0 ASE 0 0 170 10.1 40 F A 0 0 0 2 A 0 ABCE O ACE O 0 6.7 s
H39AS S A 1 0 0 1 A8 0 ABCE O A-E O 0 164 9.7 47 u F A 6 0 0 5 AC 0 AC 0 AC0EF 0 0 8.3 M5CA S A8C 3 0 0 0 ABC 0 A8 0 A 0 0 167 4.5 38 l' F A 3 0 0 1 M 0 M 0 MC 0 0 5.0 H30CA S A 1 0 0 0 A8 0 A8 0 W 0 0 169 6.8 M* 5 F. A8 1 0 0 2 A8 0 A-0 0 A-D 0 0 7.0 H36CA 5 A 0 11 0 0 A8 0 AB 0 A8 0 0 5.0 48*0 170 F A8 0 7 2 2 AC 0 ABC 0 A0 0 0 5.7 H368C S A 0 2 0 0 AC 0 A8 0 ACD 0 0 170 8.1 $y F A 0 4 1 0 ABC 0 AB 0 ABC 0 0 10.0 H39C8 5 A, 0 1 0 9 AB 0 BC 0 BC 0 0 170 47 F A; O 4 0 0 ABC 0 A8 0- ABC 0. 0 11.0 5 A 1 0 0 0 A8 0 A8 0 A8 0 0 I4*I 0107 169 36 l
F A 1 0 0 0 A8 0 8 0 BC 0 2 11.0 0122 S A 0 0 0 0 A 0 8 0 BC 0 0 11.0 23 170 F A 0 1 0 0 A8 0 A8 0 ABC 0 0 11.0 0227 5 A 0 0 0' 0 A8 0 AB 0 AB 0 0 9.0 24 170 F A 0 0 5 0 BC 0 8 0 BC 0 0 12.5 0231 S A 0 0 0 0 A8 0 A8 0 A8C 0 0 10.2 28 170 F A 0 0 .4 0 B 0 8 0 8 0 0 11.8 (Continued)
TABLE 2 (Cont.)
TEM 00N ANCHORAGE INSPECTION RESULTS (RESURVEILLANCE)
BUTTON HEADS ANCHOR HEAD SHIMS BEARING PLATE CONCRETE FILLER MATERIAL
' CRACKS SHOP DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE EXCEED-OR OF BROKEN CRACKS / IM- 0F OF OF ING EFFEC-TENDON FIELD CORRO- MISSING SPLITS PROPERLY CORRO- CORRO- CORRO- 0.010 TIVE REMOVED REPLACED NUMBER END SION OAMAGEO (>.0 6~) FORMED UNSEATED SION CRACKS SION CRACKS SION CRACKS INCH WIRES (GALLONS) (GALLONS) 5 A 1 0 0 0 - AB 0 AB 0 ABC 0 0 8.0 23 169 0309 F A 1 0 0 0 AB 0 AB 0 AR 0 0 10.0 A 0 0 0 0 AB 0 AB 'O AB 0 0 10.0 38 0324 S 170 F A 0 2 1 0 B 0 8 0 BC 0 0 10.0 5 AB 0 0 0 0 B D AB 0 AB 0 0 2.0 OI V16 170 68.3 F A 0 0 0 0 AB 0 AB 0 ABC 0 0 5 A 1 0 0 0 A 0 AB 0 ABC 0 0 2.0 93 169 V27 F AB 1 0 0' 0 AB 0 AB 0 ABCD 0 0 67.0 cn 5 ABC 0 0 0 0 AB 0 ABC 0 AB 0 0 10.0 89 170 VB6 F A 0 0 0 0 AB 0 AB 0 A-0 0 0 76.0 5 A 0 2 0 0 B 0 A 0 A-0 0 0 170 6.6 92 V105 0 0 0 0 A 0 A 0 A-C 0 0 73,3 F A S A 0 0 0 0 A 0 B 0 A-D 0 0 2.7 87 V126 170 F A 0 0 2 0 A 0 AB 0 ABC 0 0 67.6 Degrees of Corrosion A: Bulk filler saterial intact and bright metal, no visible oxidation.
B: Metal reddish brown color, no pitting.
~
C: Metal h'aving patches of red oxide, removable but ready to start pitting.
0: Metal having patches of red oxide, not removable and/or leaving noticeable pits.
E: Metal having heavy rusting, dark red, and about to fore an extremely hard crust which, when removed, leaves very noticeable pitting.
F: Condttions more severe than category E.
TABLE 3
SUMMARY
OF RESURVEILLANCE LIFT-OFF FORCE TENDON AVERAGE AVERAGE E LIFT-0FF LIFT-0FF FORCE /
WIRE TENDON SHOP OR EFFECTIVE FORCE FORCE NUMBER FIELD END WIRES (KIPS) (KIPS) (KIPS)
H6AB E
166 5;8 1248.5 7.52 3
.9 1196.1 7.38 H12AB 162 f2 3 ,
166 1165.2 7.02 H26AB 3 121 8 '.
H29AB 170 ;8 1190.6 7.00 3 ,
H39AB 164 ; 1130.3 6.89 h
1 7.13 1190.2 l H25CA 3
167 $0 H30CA 169 ;6 1241.0 7.34 3
H36CA F
170 h7;g4 1255.9 7.39 1231.3 7.25 H36BC
( 170 h419'.
l H39BC 170 ;8 1249.7 7.35 3
D107 169 ;g 1217.5 7.20 j 3 l
D122 170 ; 1176.1 6.92 3
170 1175.0 6.91 D227
[ l3 1
0231 170 ;O 1191.7 7.01 3
(Continued) 17 1
TABLE 3 (Cont.)
SUMMARY
OF RESURVEILLANCE LIFT-OFF FORCE TENDON AVERAGE AVERAGE LIFT-0FF LIFT-0FF E TENDON SHOP OR EFFECTIVE FORCE FORCE FORCE /
WIRE NUMBER FIELD END WIRES (KIPS) (KIPS) (KIPS)
~
D309 h 169 Jh8 0 y 1265.6 7.49 l D324 170 ;8 1184.6 6.97 3
V16 3
170 ;f 1251.2 7.36 V27 169 ;8 1281.1 7.58 -
3 V86 170 1234.5 7.26 h l6 f
V105 170 ;g 1239.1 7.29 3
V126 .8 h 170 1183.3 6.96 l
l l
l
\
18
. . _ _ . . = - _ _ . . ._ _ .-. . . ..
. .- ._. _. - _. -. ~ _ . . . _ . . .- - . ___. .. .
i 9
l ,
8.70 KIPSNIRE , , , _ _
-PREDICTED UPPER LIMIT ! '
_ _. l' . ___. l _i g ._ .. . . _ , _
._ g .
__. t l
l
% 3-YEAR SURVEILIANCE _ 3-YEAR RESURVEILIANCE l . .. %, a i-
% t l , .
8 -__}. ---+-.- -- _ -. . -
l E N 4 l !
s - -
, .rN : l A 7.37 KIPSNIRE g '%
7.57 KIPSNIRE -
q
,,, N e d IDCKOFFl CROUP MEAN ;k i ,
7.16 KIPS / WIRE l .
l l j h 7.67ItiPS51RE ' %
I
'{} ,\
o l % l .o % l 4 l
7 --_._ _ . _ _ .
.. h . . - _.
l l <> .. - -- .- _ - _
! I ~ 7.23 KIPS / WIRE f '
l
- bEDICTED LOWER LIMIT % ,,
l l l l N ! '
6.19 KIPS / WIRE
_ j .. .
, h MARCH 1980 CALIBRATION ;
h JULY 1980 CALIBRATION i j
' I 6
O.1 1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 40 Time In Years From Initial Tensioning FIGURE 1 TENDON WIRE FORCE VERSUS TIME HOOP TENDONS I
l 1 E E
- R R I ' I W W
/
/
- S S P ~ P k I K
K ~ 9 7
' 1 I!{i ' !;i ;
7!f 3 7 l(
.~ 6 0 4
- .L _
i u l
!lt]tl, N{
- 0
%,'i 3
k E E .
ll'C ,ii,l t R !}i '
N L T A OW I R/ 0 L -CS P 2 d_IE p I p K
-V R
' U ;* ' I E
S E
p0 I
M L7 I R T R
A 0 g S E
Y q
" 1 f
r n
U S
3 1 ,:'!
!hl g 1
.la o i_
I x.
t T
o n
s e
o Fi ll l
% k ' 5 a RE OT 4j,',
i
, t F
- E i n E 4 I EM
_N
_C I
- I LNA
- .
m o
RO I D
_A.L
.I ,RMR E E E I N
O N 3 r W I I I O F E
.V WP W T I s N
- ' tR / U/ A R
T A ' r O S OS D 1
T U B R a I S P R P I B e N M
IG K
I KI L I 5 Y E
.R ,i '
lIl L tAE 7F F
0 A
C L
A n T I
R E
Y. 3. OK 7C 7 0 T I 0 C
e l
P 3 f D
M I
8 9 f P m 2 P 1 9 i N
I U L 1 T E D R H R E C Y U E W R T A i G lC D M I
,l fII F lI D
%' D lR E
P. %
E T
C I
h
~
- ~ s % - D E
R
/ '
s P T5 l'
,/(
- if!ll l !
E l E ' ' ij.
E R N I R
\l, II - W W - /
!/ S' S ,f' ; '
P
.IK P
I I
K 7'
N ,
0 7
- 6 N' -
- 7' lj;),f
. 8 ) I I !
l ;
[N;~l I.
O 8 7 6 9
0DU i h&
e
- l i I ! l l
, i e i i , ,
' 8.81 KIPSNIRE I , j i
' i 9__ j . .
pPREDIC1TD UPPER LIMIT j ' '
/ ~' ~
3- EAR 'S itVETI1ANCN i~'
- ~^
_' '3-5E E ii5S titV51LIAN E ~
l % i I l
l %
- . I-I l l
_d .. . . _ ._-__ .
g
~
7.79 KIPSNIRE
- E %
I 7.'$5 'kI'PS / WIRE
$ I 6 .--. .
... . _v . - i t. . . . . .
N E N
" 5 7.66 KIPS NIRE < >.
l l N.
f IDCKOFF CROUP MEAN i I l ,'% 7.25 KIPSNIRE ! '
- i. l N g as U !
g i
-f -
l I
r-f}Ik .
. LIFTOFF GROUP MEAN -*--. -- - -- -
7.29 KTPSNIRE ! l l l l 7-._ i I 4 ,
l,
-PREDICTED IDWER LIMIT g% Q
- j I I
}
NN (
.i -
l l. . . ._ .J_. _
)- MARCH 1980 CALIBRATION i
'f JULi1980CALIBitATION j
! , ; ! ! l 1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 40 Time In Years From Initial Tensioning i
FIGURE 3 TENDON WIRE FORCE VERSUS TIME j
VERTICAL TENDONS i
4
1 1
~
4 E
1 4
i I,
i i
i APPENDIX 1 1
l Farley Nuclear Plant Surveillance Test
! Procedure FNP-1-STP-609.0 Containment Tendon Surveillance Test l l
l E
I E
E E
E E
E VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 5 February 19, 1982 Revision 9 E
E FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT SURVEILLANCE TEST PROCEDURE FNP-1-STP-609.0 S
l l
A F
E E T Y
CONTAINMENT TENDON SURVEILLANCE TEST R
A E
D E
Approved:
E
~
Y -
JeuV SystemsPerformance&flanningSuperintendent Date Issued: ,2. - 28 '[2_.
Diskette #STP-103
IMP-0-AP-5 l
FARIIT NUCIZAR PLuiT 5 -
SURVEILLLNCE TEST BEVIEW SHEET SURVEILLANCE TEST NO. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REFF.RENCE EMP- t- STP- GC9.0 4.G. I. (o. la, f I b Aw h 4.G.l.(o.4-l TITLE 50DE(S) REQUIRING COMTAtuMEMT TGMt>OM SueNEILLANCE I,2.,3 3 4 -
TEST RESULTS (To be completed, by test performer) l PERFOR! FED BT DATK/ TIME COMPONENT OR TRAIX TESTED (if applicable)
I2 ENTIRE STP PERFORMED O PARTIAL STP PERFORMED: a For Surveillance Credit c Not for Surveillance Credit REASCN FOR PARTIAL:
TEST ColfPI25l'D: c Satisfactory a Unsatisfactory
- O The following deficiencies occurred: j E
c Corrective action emken or initiated:
1
- l E
PERFolciING GROUP REVIEW REVIEWED BY DATE O Procedure properly completed and satisfactory l
., O Comments:
l SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE SCREENED BY DATE GROUP REVIEW REV EnE BY DATE C Satisfactory and Approved 3 Comments:
FIGURE 3 Gen. Rev. 4 i 1
LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES FNP-1-STP-609.0 l
REVISION NO.
PAGE NO. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X l
5 X 6 -
X 7 X 8 X j 9 X 10 X 11 X 12 X 13 X 14 X 15 X 16 X 17 X l
FIGURE 1 X' TABLE 1 X DATA SHEET 1 1 X T l 2 l X l.
Page 1 ot 3
- LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES FNP-1-STP-609.0 PAGE NO. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 l7 8 9 10 11 3 : , X E
DATA SHEET 2 X E
DATA SHEET]
E 3a X
-,, 3 b X DATA SHEET 4 4a X 4b X DATA SHEET 5 X I I E APP'MDIX A A-1 l X A-2 X l l A-3 X l
A-4 1 X l 5 A-5 X i i
A-6 X A-7 l Xl A-8 x
! I i i i I I I !
E I i i l l l l i Page 2 of 3 E
\
LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES FNP-1-STP-609.0 PAGE NO. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 l9 10 11 APPENDIX B B-1 X B-2 X B-3 X B-4 X B-5 X B-6 X APPENDIX C C-1 X C-2 X ,
C-3 X C-4 l X
C-5 X C-6 j X l l t APPENDIX D +
E D-1 X
X D-2 X
D-3 X
D-4 l D-3 l l l f fX l
I I I E i l ; i ; i Page 3 of 3
i VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 1 PROCEDURE FOR l CONTAINMENT TENDON SURVEILLANCE TESTING l I
FOR FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT NO. 1 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure provides instructions to perform the testing, analysis and data reporting of the containment I post-tensioning system.
The containment structure, designed by Bechtel Power Corporation, has a shallow domed roof on cylindrical walls designed with a tendon arrangement of three (3) families of dome tendons 60* apart, three (3) families of hoop tendons encompassing 240* with buttresses 120*
E apart and vertical tendons equally spaced in two groups on either side of the concrete wall centerline.
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide 1.35, Revision 2, " Inservice Inspection of E ,
Ungrouted Tendons in Prestressed Concrete.Contain-ment Structures".
2.2 Prestressing Report Unit 1 Containment Structure of Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant.
2.3 U-201851H Field Installation and Quality Control I Manual, INRYCO No. 00312.
2.4 U-202216B Post Tensions Sequence, Inland-Ryerson Dwg. 505-48, Rev. C.
2.5 Farley Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications 4.6.1.6.1.
2.6 Final Safety Analysis Report Section 3.8.
2.7 FNP Unit 1 - First Tendon Surveillance Test Report of the Reactor Containment Building, ;
prepared by VSL Corporation, June 1978.
2.8 FNP Unit 1 - Containment Structure Post-Tensioning System Three-Year Surveillance Report, Bechtel Power Corporation, August 1980. (
3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT 3.1 Mechanical Equipment (a) Two temporary access platforms with overhead support structures. This 1 Gen. Rev. 6
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 provides access to the tendons being E inspected and supports the jacks during tensioning and detensioning operations.
(b) Two (2) hydraulic stressing jacks (rams) having a loading capacity of 1,000 tons with stressing pumps, gauges, controls and adjustable ram support device.
Jacks and gauges to be calibrated as matched sets. Gauges used must have at least 1/4% of full scale accuracy and 20 psig dial increments.
(c) Portable metal scaffolds as required.
(d) Grease pump, transmission lines, various fittings, etc. , mounted on a st orage tank or drum equipped with heating l system to heat grease.
Containers, such as 55-gallon drums, to (e) hold bulk filler grease removed from end I anchorages during inspection.
- Electrical Equipment
- 3.2 (a) Electrical cables or heavy duty extension cords as necessary for lights, hydraulic-
'g stressing jack pumps and other miscell-3 aneous power tools.
(b) Portable lights as necessary for illumin-ating tendon anchorage assemblies during check for corrosion and defects.
(c) Communications equipment for crews at each end of the tendon being inspected.
.E l
3.3 Measuring Devices
- (a) Feeler gauges i
(b) Optical comparators for measuring crack 1
- I widths in concrete.
1 (c) Temperature gauge (or gauges) which will cover a range from 140*F to 210*F.
3.4 Portable Tools l
l (a) Suitable wrenches to remove hold-down l studs and nuts.
2 Gen. Rev. 6 i
i
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0
~
E (b) Extraction tool suitable for removing 1 wires subject to tensile tests.
(c) Come-along hoist, or similar device. l Small portable power tools, e.g., electric !
(d) drill, saw, etc., as required. ,
I (e) Wire cutters to cut wires 3/8 inch in '
E diameter, max. l (f) Bristle brushes.
I 3.5 Miscellaneous Material (a) Bulk filler grease (Viscono-rust 2090-P4, or latest compatible formulation, by Viscosity Oil Co.) to replace grease as necessary.
I (b) Solvent for removing grease from around tendon anchorage and cleaning any stained concrete (Viscosity #16 solvent by I .
Viscosity oil Co., or equal as approved).
(c) Split increment shims of various thicknesses.
(d) New "O" Rings for tendon end caps.
(e) Clean rags for cleanup.
(f) Device suitable to scoop out bulk filler grease from around the anchorage assembly.
(g) Any other miscellaneous material and tools as required.
4.0 PREREQUISITES AND INITIAL CONDITIONS Check that the following conditions exist:
4.1 All applicable equipment listed in Section 3 is available and ready to be used. Verify references listed in Section 2.0 are available for use.
4.2 The representative sample of tendons for the
.I i
surveillance have been identified and listed on Table 1.
4.3 There is adequate access to all tendon end caps that are to be tested.
3 Gen. Rev. 6 i
}
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 4.4 A testing laboratory has been contracted to perform the wire tensile tests and is prepared to receive the wires.
4.5 A testing laboratory has been contracted to perform the filler grease tests and is prepared I to receive the grease samples.
4.6 All data sheets are properly completed with tendon number, anchor head number, location, last date stressed, previous shim thickness and lift-off force.
4.7 The rams and gauges have been calibrated per approved procedure and are in good working condition.
5.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR TENDON INSPECTION 5.1 General (a) These instructions are typical for any given hoop, dome or vertical tendon inspection.
. (b) Data results for the tendons inspected shall be documented on the data sheets 5 as applicable.
(c) If the tendon inspection is not completed
,E during a work shift, the anchorage area and the end caps shall be protected.
(d) During the testing program, the Test
, 5 Coordinator shall be immediately-notified of any significant defects.
5.2 Prerequisites and Initial Conditions are complete.
/
Initial Date 5.3 Ram Calibration i
Hydraulic Ram Calibration shall be in accordance with Appendix B.
NOTE: Reference Appendix A for load cell I calibration frequency and procedure.
E 4 Gen. Rev. 6
E VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 5.4 Preparation and Initial Inspection (a) Position platforms, where required, at each end of the tendon to be inspected.
(b) Place collector can and/or protective cover under the tendon end cap to protect the adjacent areas from dripping of the sheathing filler.
NOTE: The entire column of grease may drain from a vertical I tendon conduit. Sufficient receptacles shall be available to contain the drained grease.
If the grease is to be re-used, take sufficient precaution to prevent contamination.
(c) Remove the bolts and washers holding the end cap to the bearing plate. End cap must be fully supported as the bolts are E being removed. Care should be taken when removing the.end cap since the bulk filler may drop off or drip as a medium I viscous liquid.
(d) Remove the end cap and place it down with the open end up to help reduce E spillage of the bulk filler.
(e) Visually examine the condition of bulk E filler grease. Note any variation in color, signs of moisture, evidence of voids or any other signs of deterioration.
Standard of comparison will be fresh bulk filler grease. Any deterioration of the grease will be noted on Data
! Sheet 1.
Look for any missing buttonheads in the bulk filler material and document findings.
l (f) Obtain a sample of sheathing filler from each end of the tendon for laboratory l
examination per section 6.1.
(g) Remove any remaining bulk filler from tendon anchorage area and clean up by
,I using bristle brushes, solvent and rags
' as necessary. Care should be taken to neither increase the effects of corrosion nor damage the steel (for instance, E scratch it).
Rev. 9 '
I
I d
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 (h) Record the amount of bulk filler grease 5 removed.
(i) Inspect the anchorage assembly for any buttonhead problems such as corrosion, missing, broken, damaged, or unseated buttonheads, cracks or splits, or improperly formed buttonheads (e.g., double buttonheads).
The width of~all buttonhead splits shall be measured with a feeler gauge. Document individual buttonheads with splits totaling greater than .06".
Inspect the anchor head, shims and bearin~g plate for corrosion and cracks.
Document the results on Data Sheets 2, 3a, 3b, 4a and 4b as applicable.
(j) Visually examine the concrete in the area surrounding the tendon anchorage assembly. Using an optical comparator or feeler gauges, as necessary, measure and record on Data Sheet 2 the width, 1sngth and location of any cracks wider than 0.010 inches. Use grid paper as necessary to identify crack patterns and widths.
(k) Using the criteria in Section 7.5, determine if an inspection of the adjacent tendons is required.
(1) Complete Part A of the applicable Tendon Surveillance Checklist per Appendix D.
E E
Rev. 9 6
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 ,
II -
l 5.5 Lift-Off Verification (a) Move the stressing jack into position for installation and place the stressing pump at a convenient place for operation.
(b) Attach the stressing jack to the anchorage head and the bearing plate.
CAUTION:
Jack is being operated at extreme force and pressure levels. Strict adherence to all safety regulations as contained in the. operating manual should be exercised by every member of the crew. DO NOT stand behind hydraulic jack while stressing a tendon. Visually examine the jack prior to each use for damage or deformation.
Exercise extreme caution if fingers or hands are required near the tendon anchorage head during testing.
(c) Record the thickness of the shim pack on '
Data Sheet 1.
r ,
I (d) Begin applying pressure to the jack. I Continue increasing pressure until lift-off is achieved. Lift-off force is the minimum force at which:
E (1) All shims can be moved by pounding with a hammer (approximately 24 on. ) or prying with a bar.
QR (2) A change in sound can be heard while hammering shims.
Whichever method is chosen, it will be used throughout the surveillance. Circle which of the above methods is used.
WARNING:
DO NOT exceed 80% of the ultimate tendon tensile stress. If lift-off has not been achieved at this maximum force, the jack shall be unloaded and the Test Coordinator shall be notified for resolution E of the condition.
(e) Read and record the gauge pressure and 5 ram extension at lift-off 7 Gen. Rev. 6
11 .
VOLUNE 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 (f) Slowly decrease the pressure on the jack to allow the anchorage head to reseat E onto the shims. No additional shims are to be added at this time. Repeat steps d and e until three (3) consecutive lift off readings within a range of i 1% of the average of the maximum minimum value i
' are obtained. Calculate and record average gauge pressure and ram extension.
(g) Calculate and record the lift-off force for each end of the tendon using the
'3 appropriate ram calibration constants.
i3 Calculate and record the average lift-off force for the tendon and average force i
per effective wire. The number of l effective wires shall be determined by subtracting from the total possible number of wires (170) those which are broken, l5 missing or not buttonheaded.
(h) The above lift-off readings may be performed for each end of the tendon, 5- - -
simultaneously or separately as necessary.
However, neither end shall be d& tensioned until lift-off has been recorded for -
B both ends. .
(i) Verify that the value of the wire forces required to achieve lift-off of the
! I tendon is neither less than the lower limit forces nor greater than the upper limit forces predicted from Figure 1.
l (j) Determine if an inspection of the adjacent tendons is required.
l j 5.6 Tendon Detensioning 1
j3 (a) While holding the pressure on the jacks at both ends of the tendon, begin applying Ig pressure to the jacks and continue increasing pressure until shims can be removed.
WARNING:
DO NOT exceed 80% of the ultimate tendon tensile stress. If lift-off has not been achieved at this maximum force, the jack shall be unloaded and the Test Coordinator shall be notified for resolution of the condition.
11 8 Gen. Rev. 6
)
ll VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 (b) Remove the split shims from the shim stacks. Then slowly decrease the pressure on the jacks to detension the tendon.
NOTE:
- 1. Both ends of a tendon should be detensioned in unison, (t 1000 psig ram pressure) holding at 1000 psig increments to equalize jack pressures. This will assist in correct positioning of the stressing washer.
- 2. During uncoupling of the jack twisting of the tendon shall be limited to one-half (1/2) of a revolution.
(c) Carefully inspect the tendon anchorage area again for corrosion, signs of deterioration or deformation. Special attention should be given to bearing plates and shims. All buttonheads should be inspected again fo'r mis-shaped, s? lit and missing buttonheads. Fill in tie Data Sheet for the appropriate tendon. Visually inspect the tendon anchorage assembly for missing, bent, broken and/or damaged wires protruding from the anchorage head.
(d) If the tendon is among those selected for physical condition test, remove one random wire from the tendon, using an extraction tool. Wrap the wire into approximately a 6 foot diameter coil and attach an identification tag to one end of the wire. (Tag shall indicate the tendon number -- shop or field end).
Visually inspect the wire and record findings on Data Sheet 1. Refer to section 6.2 for testing.
WARNING:
As some tendons may not be completely detensioned on each end, personnel should not stand directly in front of either end of the tendon when a wire is being cut.
(e) Prepare for tendon restoration. Complete Part B of the applicable Tendon Surveillance Checklist per Appendix D.
Rev. 9 9
11 VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 5.7 Tendon Restoration (a) The tendons shall be retensioned using the following steps.
- 1. Calculate and record 80% of the minimum ultimate strength,(excluding unseated, broken and missing wires).
- 2. At the opposite ends of the tendon, simultaneously stress the tendon to 1000 psig, measure and record the distance between the bearing plate and inside face of the anchor head.
- 3. Stress the tendon holding at 1000 psig increments to equalize jack l pressures until the average wire stress is 80 +0%, -l% of the specified minimum ultimate strength (0.8 f's) of the wire (9.43 kips per effective wire).
- 4. Measure and record gauge pressure, ram extension and elongation. ,
Reduce force to level of lift-off.
- 5. New shims may be added or existing shims may be removed if required to obtain a lock-off force between
- minus zero or plus eight percent l (8%) of the lift-off force (deter-mined in 5.5.g). Record lock-off force per paragraph 5.5 d - f.
Record the final shim thickness on the data sheet.
- 6. Record number of unseated wires.
l (b) Reinstall end caps, using the following
! steps:
- 1. Remove the "O" rings from the end caps, clean the end caps and bearing plate surfaces with rags and solvent and wipe dry.
- 2. Install new "0" rings and secure them in place to the end cap flanges.
Use grease if necessary to hold E the "0" rings in the grooves.
- 3. Install bolts and tighten. (Use new bolts,-if required). Exercise caution to minimize or avoid bulk Rev. 8 10
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 filler spillage. Install washers and bolts, tighten keeping even distribution of pressure on the gaskets.
(c) The tendon sheathing shall be refilled with sheathing filler. The sheathing filler shall be Viscosity Oil Company Visconorust 2090P-4.
- 1. The temperature of the filler in the drum or other heated container shall be between 140 F and 210*F (150 F is recommended). Record actual temperature.
- 2. The Test Coordinator shall determine if the filler which has been removed from the tendon may be re-used or if new grease is required. Document which type is used.
- 3. If five gallons or more have been removed from each tendon end, filler material shall be replaced by pumping through a hose attached to the grease cap filler plug.
All available valves, vents and drains shall be used during this operation to avcid the entrapment of air in the sheath. Pumping shall continue until filler without any air bubbles or visible foreign sWastances have come out of the outlet or vent farthest from the pump.
- 4. If less than five gallons of filler have been removed at each tendon end, filler may be replaced by pumping or pouring into each end provided each end is vented to bleed out air.
- 5. Record amount of grease replaced.
- 6. The elapsed time between removal and replacement of sheathing filler from a tendon shall not exceed three weeks to avoid unnecessary exposure of the anchorage head.
(d) Move equipment to the next tendon to be inspected.
11 Gen. Rev. 6
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 i
6.0 SHEATHING FILLER AND WIRE TESTING 6.1 Sheathing Filler (a) The sample of bulk filler taken from the ends of each tendon shall be placed in a one-quart, clean container (care should be taken not to contaminate the sample).
Attach an identification tag to the container. The samples will be shipped to the testing laboratory for testing.
The samples should be packaged and
- shipped to prevent physical damage to the container which could result in contamination or loss of identification of the samples.
(b) One sample shall also be taken and tested per section 7.1 from each opened drum of fresh bulk filler grease.
(c) The testing laboratory shall test each sample for chlorides, nitrates, sulphides, moisture content and neutralization
~
number per Section 7.0 and record this 1 .. information.
6.2 Wire Testing s (a) The coiled wire sample and cut end shall be protectively wrapped and shipped to the testing laboratory for additional visual inspection and tensile testing.
.I The wire should be packaged and shipped in such a way that the condition of the wire is not altered.
(b) The testing laboratory shall take three (3) samples from each wire: one from each end and one from the middle. The samples shall include areas representative of significant corrosion or pitting IF they exist on the removed tendon wire.
The length of each sample shall be the maximum length acceptable for the test apparatus to be used. The diameters of each sample shall be measured at the 1/4-points between the chucks of the testing machine, and these shall be recorded on data sheets.
12 Gen. Rev. 6
1 VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 11 The location along the wire where samples were taken shall be shown and recorded B on a wire diagram. If any section of the wire shows significant pitting or corrosion (condition D, E, F) a sample of the corroded / pitted section shall be cut out and tested.
(c) The testing laboratory shall perform a
- E tensile test on the wire samples to determine their yield stress, ultimate
. stress and percentage of elongation, and shall record this information. This test shall be in accordance with ASTM A421-76.
NOTE: Yield stress shall be defined as stress at 1% elongation.
7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 7.1 Sheathing Filler Testing Samples of sheathing filler will be taken from each surveillance tendon and each opened drum of fresh bulk filler material for visual and laboratory examinations. The filler material samples shall
'R be analyzed in accordance with this specification.
If the following criteria are not met, an engineering i
2 5 evaluation shall be conducted to determine if corrective measures are necessary.
(a) Chlorides (Cl) - 10 ppm max. (5 ppm for 1 new material) when tested in accordance l with ASTM D512-67,i Procedure for Determ- ;
ination of Water-Soluble Chlorides (Cl). 1 (b) Nitrates (NO,) - 10 ppm max. (5 ppm for new material 7 when tested in accordance with ASTM D-992 Brucine Method for Determination of Water-Soluble Nitrates (NO3)* i (c) Sulfides (S) - 10 ppm max. (5 ppm for new material) when tested in accordance with American Public Health Association
( APEA) Standard Method 428 for the Determination of Water-Soluble Sulfides (S).
1 Water (H 9 0) - 10% dry weight max. when I (d) tested in accordance with ASTM D-95.
lIl 13 Gen. Rev. 6
- Il
5 VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 E
(e) Neutralization Number - base number greater than zero when tested in accordance B with ASTM D-974 modified for 7isconnorust 2090 P4. Contact Viscosity Oil Co. for the modified test procedure.
7.2 Tendon Lift-Off Force All surveillance tendons are to have a lift-off E force within the allowable limits, defined as not less than the predicted lower bound force nor greater than the predicted upper bound force 5 per wire at the time of the test as shown in Figure 1.
If the average value of the forces required for E lift-off fails to meet these allowable limits, the tendons on each side of the deficient tendon must be checked. If both adjacent tendons satisfy the acceptance criteria as indicated,
'E and if no more than one tendon out of the original selected tendons is deficient, then the single deficiency shall be considered unique and acceptable.
NOTE: If instances where an adjacent tendon is -
not accessible or acceptable for lift-off E test,the closest neighboring tendon shall be tested. .
If either adjacent tendon or more than one E tendon in the surveillance sample set have lift-offs falling outside the allowable limits, an engineering evaluation will be performed to B determine what, if any, corrective measures are necessary.
7.3 Corrosion Inspection (a) Anchorage assembly components in category a, b or c are acceptable.
Wire in category a, b, or c is acceptable.
Anchorage assembly components and wire E in category d, e or f should be further evaluated.
(b) If there is rejectable corrosion or pitting on the wire, or if the number of l missing, broken and/or damaged wires B, does not meet the acceptance criteria, 3 and subsequently has been rejected by l
the Owner or its authorized representative, I each case shall be treated as an indication 14 Gen. Rev. 6 lE
E VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 l
of possible abnormal degradation of the 5 containment structure and shall be reported to the NRC.
I Definitions
- 1. Pit - a pit is defined as in l indentation visible to the naked 5 eye.
- 2. Degrees of Corrosion i
- a. Bulk filler material intact and bright metal, no visible oxidation.
E b. Metal reddish brown color, no pitting.
- c. Metal having patches of red oxide, removable but ready to start pitting.
- d. Metal having patches of red oxide, not removable and/or
, leaving noticeable pits.
i
- e. Metal having heavy rusting, l dark red, and about to form an extremely hard crust which, when removed, leaves very noticeable pitting.
- f. Conditions more severe than I
category (e).
7.4 Tendion Physical Condition Test l
l (a) The acceptance criterion for the wire tensile test shall be no failure below l
the minimum guaranteed ultimate stress of 240,000 PSI .
7.5 Missing, Broken and/or Damaged Wires l
(a) Missing, broken and/or damaged wire l
criteria is based on original quantity l
of 170 wires per tendon.
(b) All misshaped (~ improperly formed) and/or split buttonheads will be evaluated by
' 5 the Owner or its authori::ed representative for any possible effect on the wire load-carrying capacity. The misshaped 15 Gen. Rev. 6 5
VOLUME 7 FNr '-STP-609.0 buttonheads and buttonheads with splits AEV 7 summing to greater than .06 inches, l which are determined to have effect on the load-carrying capacity, will be identified as defective buttonheads.
(c) The discontinuous and missing wires will
> be treated as ineffective wires for system evaluation. Discontinuous wires will be removed for examination and laboratory testing if conditions are feasible.
(d) If the total number of discontinuous and missing wires from 7.5.c plus defective buttonheads from 7.5.b exceed 8, the two adjacent tendons will be inspected.
If either adjacent tendon or more than 5 one tendon in the surveillance sample set have more than 8 missing and/or defective buttonheads, an engineering evaluation will be performed to determine
'5 what, if any corrective mcasures are necessary. ,
8.1 Upon completion cf all testing required by this procedure, a final report of the test program B shall be prepared. The report shall include, but not be limited to:
(af Lift-off force and lock-off force test results.
(b) Tendon tensile and elongation test results.
(c) Wire visual inspection results.
(d) Sheath filler analysis results.
(e) Tendon end anchor inspection results.
(f) Equipment calibration data.
The final report shall be submitted to the Systems Performance Supervisor within 60 days after completion of the testing program.
8.2 Failure of a tendon or parts of a tendon to meet the criteria set forth shall be evaluated by the l
i Rev. 7 16
!B VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 1 1
l5 l l
Owner or its authorized representative. If the failure is determined to be an indication of
' possible abnormal degradation of the containment structure, the tendon shall be reported to the NRC within 10 days of receipt of the completed l 7
engineering evaluation of subject deficiency. ;
{
The final report may follow within 90 days of j the completion of the tests in accordance with
- Regulatory Guide 1.16, Revision 1, " Reporting of Operating Information."
1 1
!B 1
I lE
!s
- a .
,5 ls i
- g a
!s 1
3 1
1 17 Gen. Rev. 6 5
1 5 FNP-1-STP-609.0 E
TENDON WIRE LIFT-OFF ACCEPTANCE LIMITS FORCE VERSUS TIME E ,-
n.1 nLu:w =w v .
2
.- 5. . . . .u.u- ..a - .at 9
9*-- ..
i / /
E n p . . . . . . . . .
j . predic ed upper-limit,.
,a, ....- ,
E M g - -n 8 f . '*.. . . . . . . _ . . . . .. . . .
..j... _ .. ... . . _
3 . . , . .
E . . . . ...._.~.. .. {. . . . . . . _ . . . . . . .. . . .
m . . . . . . . _. . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . ... .... .
M .. .. _ .; . _......... .
Y w ..
.._..p .. . . . . . t.rodicted Iower'.li.e.it" t) * . . . - . . . . . . - . . . . . 4.........,.....
E m . ...... -
g< ._ _ ... E IL... aar.a c...Lo.-.
ar.3. . w. . . _ ..u _
_..........i.._...... . ......:.....i_....
7 t... ; .
3, . . ._. . .. : .. .. 5. . .;. 3. . 7_ .
E
, ; , . t.... ,
.a ; ,
..q
.q ,
- i i !
'6 5
' ' ' +
6 0.1 0.5 1 5 10 20 40 TIPl. API'ER INITIAL TE:3IONII0 (YEARS)
E VERTICAL TENDONS E 9 r, .m -
' ....f .. . . [.. . ..;. _ .
f.- 9,'/.0.. ,- n..L.LC'.'A212.t'PITR. LIP.!'l'. _.--
- ... .t-- - ' SQO, 9
~~
E ^O s
7.- % _ x
..i.......
x ...... . . . ... .. .
v 7. 4 . .. . __
.. ..,. ... . .. predicted uoner. lir.it..
.E m m
m 8
.-je- .
yI
, 1
.L i
.....}..
e
.4..........}-.--_-..
Ew
- ~~ . . . . _ . . . . . . - - . . .
}
. . . . . . . . . . .._....s.......
r
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... j g __ .
-_..~....e . . . . . . .
.y
- - ~ "p4g' g - ,' '%g g .
7 7
.. .. N .
. _ . . . A_.u,, ...IL a a s ,,._
. .:.c.. .LI ...A.
x ~ .s' -~~ .
y - .. . . . . .
6 19.,.
B -......... . .. . .
. - _ . . . . ; . .. . )
. e n' 0.1 to 20 1
g 0.5 1 5 to "W TIME AcTER I.NITIA! '"'E:QIC:'I C (YEA?S)
HORIZONTAL AND DOME TENDONS
.E FIGURE 1 Gen. Rev. 6
E FNP-1-STP-609.0 5 TABLE 1 FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT TENDON SURVEILLANCE YEARS AFTER S.I.T.
E TENDON NO. START DATE COMPLETE GREASE ADJACENT TENDON INSPECTION YES/NO TENDON' TYPE INITIAL /
(5.4.c) (5.7.b) (5.7.c) NOS. INSPECTION DATE Hoop (Select 10)
- 2. -
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
I 15.
E Dome (Select 6)
- 1. _
- 2. !
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
l l
5 Vertical (Select 5) 1.
2.
3.
E t
_6.
Gen. Rev. 3 5
E FNP-1-STP-609.0 DATA SHEET 1 E PAGE 1 0F 3 DATA SHEET 1 TENDON NO.
FIELD / SHOP END (Circle One)
- 1. Location (Buttress, Elevation / Azimuth, and T, B or C).
3 2. Last Date Stressed
- 3. Record Previous Shim Thickness
- 4. Record Previous Force (Kips)
E 5. Remove Tendon End Cap Initials
/
Time
/
Date
- 6. Visual Examination of Bulk Filler Grease E '
/
Initial /Date
- 7. Grease Sample Taken /
- Initial /Date
- 8. Bulk Filler Removed (Gal). /
Initial /Date
- 9. Record Anchorage Assembly Inspection Results on Data Sheets 2, 3 and 4 as applicable. (Attach Data Sheets)
/
Initial /Date
- 10. Lift-Off Data:
Shim Thickness As Found Gauge Pressure (psig)/ Ram Extension (inches) (1) /
- Ram # (2) /
Gauge # (3) /
Average /
l Calculated Force (Kips)
/
Initial /Date 5
Rev. 7 E
I FNP-1-STP-609.0 DATA SHEET 1 PAGE 2 0F 3 TENDON NO. w. 7 E FIEI.D/ SHOP END (Circle One)
- 11. Data for Tendon:
Average Force (Kips)
Force per Effective Wire (Kips)
- 12. Adjacent Tendon Inspection Required O YES O NO If YES, why? /
Initial /Date
- 13. Tendon Detensioned /
Initial /Date
- 14. Inspection of Tendon Anchorage Area. Document any differences from inspection, performed in Item 9.
B.
l l
B I
/
E
, Initial /Date
- 15. Wire Sample Removed O YES O NO /
(Identify on Data Sheet 3b or Initial /Date '
l 4b which wire was removed.)
If YES, record visual examination results.
y . - - -
l B
- 16. Calculate 807,of minimum ultimate strength (excluding unseated, broken and missing wires).
(psig) Initial Date B
a a
Rev. 7
5 FNP-1-STP-609.0 5 DATA SHEET 1 PAGE 3 0F 3 E TENDON NO.
FIELD / SHOP END (Circle One) 1
- 17. Tendon Retensioning Data:
1000 psig measurement of distance between inside face of anchor head & bearing plate Stress Tendon to +0% -1% of Item 16
-- Gauge Pressure (psig)
-- Ram Extension (inches) l -- Distance between bearing plate and anchor head
-- Elongation (inches)
/
I Initial /Date
- 18. Lock-Off Data:
- Gauge Pressure (psig)/ ham Extension (inches) (1) /
(2) /
(3) /
Average /
I Calculated Force (Kips) l Final Shim Thickness No. of Unseated Buttonheads l /
Initial /Date
- 19. Tendon End Caps Re-installed /
- 20. Tendon Re greasing:
l Date Temperature of Grease in Bulk Container l
t Type Grease (New/Used)
Amount of Grease Replaced (Gal.)
5 1<14~
Rev. 8 5
- - . . _. l FNP-l-STP-609.0 ANGORAGE ASSEMBLY INSPECTION -
j .~~' TENDON NO.
FIELD / SHOP END (Circle One) ;.
BUTTONHEAD BEARING PLATE Degree of Corrosion Degree of Corrosion 5
Number missing ,
broken or damaged: Cracks Cracks or splits ANGORAGE AREA CONCRETE 5
Number not Cracks (width >0.01 in. )
r properly formed:
= ANGOR BEAD Number Degree of Corrosion Cracks
, il i SHIMS REMARKS-
') Degree of Corrosien
_.- i Cracks I t
l
- l SKE"'G '
1 I
O O i l
a~!^.
f .tM2,%
E . ( %5I@
l c=
1
, O O l CD Signature l ..
Date l 1 >
E .
1 ora sazzT 2 em. a v. e l _ . _ . .
(
i e- - EsjE-1-STP-609.0 l . ..
ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY INSPECTION
. FIELD END OF TENCON NO.
I E .
e B .
E o o -
F 3 E e
,/ , =,, ,
ce ((5((b#:Io E
V=y:_:it.?::::::7 E.
I i
\. '975924:Y i
\ /i E '
'g-
/p '
. . /
E O O E
_ Data Signature DATA SHE. 3a Gen. Rev. Co
FNP-[-STP-609.0 LEGEND FOR BUTTONHEADS JOSIPE 1 FA2IZT NU" E 77 E UNIT I
$ Missing Buttonhead or Wire
~~
[UnseatedButtonhead FIZI3 END
%ImproperlyFormed/ Misshaped Buttonhead N
O Buttonhead with Split (Document the split size)
/
SIGuTU2s DAIZ l
I O000000 I C0000000 00000000000 C0000000C000 O00000000000O I .
0000000000000O O000000O00000 000000000O0000 0000000000000 I C0000C00000000 0000 OCC O O 000 O 00000000000O 00000000000 I 0000000O 000000O I\ % J -
COF2INTS: .
l I
I 5
g __ , _ . . s l
FIIP- L-STP-6 0 9. 0
. ANCHORAGZ ASSC4BLY INSPECTION .
i 5 --
.s c
SHOP DTD OF TINDON NO. .
E ' \;
E E
O O .
e ye9??????-: L:3.03,
\
. 4,0f.f.:.:.:2.~..~.~..*s.
- .s
- ,sg-s.
. =. . .~. . ;
- s WJ"c:Y:~: p V544 E
I a.=,=.as
- 55!!!ii!!!!$hI
- 3;33.:.:Ji
- 'a.-.~.-
Tiffff?~
W t++
/
E *
?
l L E
O O
E. t. ..J i
I l
E l
l l b l
E g cxe St.m=e ae.n. g.e, . s DATA $*EET 4a J
l ..
FNP-l-STP-609.0 l LEGEND FOR BUTTONHEADS JOSI?H M. FAE.ZT NUC.ZA.1 Pt. ANT UNIT I
$ Missing Buttonhead or Wire -
"^
%UnseatedButtenhead SECP m .
E %ImproperlyFormed/ Misshaped
. Buttonhead hButtonheadwithSplit CN (Document the split size)
/*
SIGNA ~. TRE DATI O000000
- 00000000 00000000000 000000000000 B 000000000000:0 0000000C000000 )
000000C000000.'
000000CC000000 E 00000C0000000 0000000000000O C000000000000 00000000000O E 00000000000 O000000O 000000O COECS:
.5
.V -s- .
1 LCA Sr :.c . ab- Gen Rav. ec 1
E FNP-1-STP-609.0 ADDITIONAL REMARKS Tendon No.
Field / Shop End (Circle One)
Continued from Data Sheet Page : 1 E
E E L E
E i
I ,
i 1
E )
E E i E
DATA SHEET 5 Gen. Rev. 6 5
FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX A JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT E UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT TENDON SURVEILLANCE LOAD CELL CALIBRATION PROCEDURE 1.0 SCOPE AND SCHEDULE This procedure covers calibration of the load cell used in the field calibration of the tendon surveillance stressing rams. The cell shall be calibrated prior to E and following the initial surveillance and within one (1) year of beginning all subsequent surveillances.
In addition, calibration shall be verified at any time 5 that the cell indicates a significant zero shift or erratic output or, is thought to be damaged.
2.0 CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT AND SET-UP l The load cell shall be calibrated in a universal or compression testing machine having a capacity of at least 2000 kip (2400 kip for the initial calibration).
The testing machine shall be,one owned and operated by a recognized testing organization and shall have been balibrated using an NBS traceable standard not more E than one year prior to the date of cell calibration.
The dynamometer used to calibrate the testing machine
) shall have been calibrated not more than two years E
l prior to the date of load cell calibration. Testing machine absolute accuracy shall be within 1% of the I reading in the 1000-2000 kip load range. APCo shall obtain the testing machine's calibration documentation 5 prior to load cell calibration.
I During calibration the cell shall be centered on the testing machine base plate and connected to a suitable strain inoicating device. The same strain indicating l device shall be used during both cell calibraticr. and ram calibration.
3.0 INITIAL CALIBRATION l
Three end loading distributions will be used during the initial calibration to evaluate the sensitivity of the cell to wall bending. If the change in all output due to changes in load distribution is 1% of full E scale or less, subsequent calibration will be done using only the uniform distribution.
3.1 Overload Exercise Center the load cell in the testing machine with loading plates arranged per Figure 1 and connect i
l A-1 Gen. Rev. 6 3
FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX A the strain indicator. Cycle the testing machine load three times from 0 to 2200 kip and record I the strain indications on Data Sheet 1 a' t both zero and maximum loads. If zero and/or maximum load strain data indicate an increasing or decreasing trend, continue cycling until the trend is no longer observable.
3.2 Uniform Load Distribution Calibration Leave the load cell set-up per Figure 1. Record~
load cell zero on Data Sheet 2. Increase testing machine load a minimum of three times from 0 to I 2000 kip and record (on Data Sheet 2) strain indicator output at test machine loads of 0, g 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800 g and 2000 kip.
3.3 Small Radius Load Distribution Calibration Install the small radius load ring above the top adapter plate per Figure 2. Increase testing machine load a minimum of three times from 0 to E.
2000 kip and record strains at test machine loads of 0; 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800 and 2000 kip.
3.4 Large Radius Load Distribution Calibration Install the large radius load ring above the top E adapter plate per Figure 3. Increase testing machine load a minimum of three times from 0 to 2000 kip and record strains at test machine loads of 0, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, E 1400, 1600, 1800 and 2000 kip.
3.5 Cell Output Evaluation
.E Calculate the slopes and intercepts of straight lines fitted to the data recorded in Pars. 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 by the method of least squares.
I .
Calculate the strain at a 2000 kip load for the uniform load case. Using this strain, calculate the load for the small and large radius load 5 cases. If these loads fall between 1980 and 2020 kip, subsequent load cell calibrations will be done using only the uniform distribution per Par. 4.0. If either load falls outside the I range 1980-2020 kip, the effect of the actual stressing ram load distribution on cell output shall be evaluated. Calculate the standard I deviation of the uniform load case calibration
- - data. The standard deviation shall not exceed l 15 kip.
A-2 Gen. Rev. 6 5
E FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX A E
4.0 SUBSEQUENT CALIBRATIONS 4.1 Perform subsequent calibrations per Par. 3.2.
4.2 Calculate the slopes and intercepts of straight E
i lines fitted to the data recorded in Par. 4.1 by the method of least squares. Calculate the standard deviation of the calibration data. The standard deviation shall not exceed 15 kip.
E E
E E
4 .
E I
I 1
E l
l l
l E
.E i
E A-3 Gen. Rev. 6 5
' i FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX A DATA SHEET 1 E
LOAD CELL NO.
DATE OF EXERCISE LABORATORY & TESTING MACHINE IDENTIFICATION CALIBRATION SUPERVISOR E
INDICATED STRAIN AT LOAD CYCLE O KIP o 2200 KIP E
2 a .
4 5
E _ ___ ____
8 9
10 B LOAD CELL OVERLOAD EXERCISE E
lE l
A-4 Gen. Rev. 6 lE
5 FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX A E
DATA SHEET 2 LOAD CELL NO. DATE OF CALIBRATION TESTING LABORATORY TESTING MACHINE IDENTIFICATION lE TESTING MACHINE CALIBRATION DATE LABORATORY TEMPERATURE F LOAD CYCLE (KIPS) 1 i 2 3 5
200 400 , ,
600 E 800 1000 g m0 1400 1600 5 1800 5 2000 INDICATED STRAIN AT LOAD DATA TAKEN BY /
Signature Date 5 APPROVED BY Signature
/
Date Gen. Rev. 6
E - -
I ffb a CALCULAIluN SHtti ~
B' cat.c. E n Ev. uo.
E' O WATOn !~! // - DATE !T# !M( ! CHECKED DATE rnoncf W C6"N ' dl 0*h'Y l cM.I L .21.NT* soa no. T ' '/~/ - & l b '
d SU5 JECT - 'i ') ~O d Is! I T/C SHE ET NO- EU *d
(). viro:l.vl A.OdC7 D/ST:://luT/0Y 2 1 FNP-1-STP-609.0' APPENDIX A E- S 9 ,
10 yQ,T).U $ ablA CW/*N0 '%.,
1
' ' i }/d",47
\
12 1
E3
.a E
) ypg; -
firMPTG.Q e ,ti.vo n
/dU dl A. h0W G"*(
r , Q.);WG.'k 2'
(k/616' 2* G o TTO f.QAi7 .&lh6 lb TC7*l e00 /.\,la L6 QQ % l[ /,%f, 27 / g, , f /A/,s l ..
I i
/
N Io k
- i
\
%, Na~7N6 //,/2"///V6 E'3
% QQ f(" j'-k. ) 7ti g,, . . _ _
. , ~
,i s *P.2o7saa tensi go,g g ,,,.
E Gen. Rev. 6
E . - - - - - . . _ . - - - . . . . . _
C
.- LMI.LU I.A l l u tW u t s cc i CA LC. NO. REV.NO.
cniciNaron
[-/./,/ c [/,'<.' /. o,7, /t,~fffff g cy,cK,,
- noncr WCrPN A C;,*sy A)ia-seger ;8y.9,- 9, 7.-.y_gyf'
.- susacr d.:M ;' d{.^44.6 t&.n.; ,er.,./ ,H ,,, N O _ q, ,, = , g 0I 441. IfOtue, kw Ds77!)at.ortoJ FNP-1-STP-609.0 3 APPENDIX A s
E ,
, a S %, -
. s,
,a
" . TG*m,UG st Acut.4 l,
Cruu. awiv.cgoaa sus bl&lP
TU = 9,5* W. -
- i* O 27
- Il. 'T ld w
... "T~% . 2 5 /W. I E
is 9
(.)PATIQ tQl:APTGll. ~
E
(RIAJG-
.o
'5 -
l /Al7 $44 /,,ncyp(
' tii7.itW'El,
=g .
(Qlbl&-
- M
Go rToy A. oar 7 (?tNG .
TM = 10. 00 1.0.
'E
' O O h / 5 /W.
Tb . 5 /bl.
.a '
m l-
.o x E 't 7 Us' 7N6 ,&/./c/,4v6
, ~
2 K QA[G ( dd.17L-'
l Q
./
.. \. ' . v %, .- --
~ ,~.,* ,.~~*'
,W i
SP P.20798 me ,16/74D
~
Gen. Rev.'rS'" "
- I g ,sr , un a.w w a.n e s w s u w e e a a. e j
-[kc 1 cat.C. NO. R EV. NO.
- CRI INATOR DATE !b $7 CHECKED CATE pro;ECT 6 F/'d M[b7F dC(Il r#/,N / ;oe No,.
~
W'7-S.[b suaatCT b^ U $~~~A l-. b't. lC'Y. 7/0 suEET no- - U '~~ I
' b /I M E ' fB OJ('t A. cap Of tTdt.lurto 2
FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX A E: 6 1
^
so /.
./
/
E , '
fsy24G (2AT7/v1 ACAO AIA*6 / W CT)h6 juAcWin<
con )*3. G~ IW.
r y - l]. 5* 'd.
.l' 77, . 2.r /~'-
l "
. g. ;
p -
E,. % Ul'N' L.
1
/1riAPre q lo g w e-f22
/w Gu A. swat tiTI.4W(El
.3
$/A/6
- s (1orTo A oat 7 (EING h h *[O : JO.00 /A). ,
.e O O % / 5 /W. '\
?r ~~I">;. $~ //}. ~.
r
.' 8 l,'
n .<
'O s
nc us sucu~e j ru ra- Rari E iO
. rv* '
a
, ... ..... . ...... ng ........
{
Gen. Rev. 6 5 . . . _ . -- --
ll FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX B !
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT E UNIT 1 TENDON SURVEILLANCE l
l STRESSING RAM CALIBRATION PROCEDURE 1.0 SCOPE This procedure delineates the details and requirements for calibration of the stressing rams to be used during the periodic surveillance of the containment post-tensioning system.
2.0 CALIBRATION SCHEDULE.
The stressing rams shall be calibrated not more than one month prior to the first tendon lift-off force
- measurement and not more than one week following the completion of the surveillance. Additional calibra-tions during the surveillance may be performed at the discretion of the APCo Test Supervisor.
,5 NOTE: Rams may sit idle for up to five (5) years
~
between surveillances, possibly allowing seals
- W E to deteriorate. Therefore, replacement of said seals is advisable prior to recalibration and use.
3.0 CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT The following equipment is required for ram calibration:
3.1 Load cell and readout device with calibration documentation.
3.2 Load cell adapter rings.
3.3 Ten foot calibration pull rod.
3.4 Two pull rod nuts.
3.5 Two stressing ram alignment dowels.
W 3.6 Hydraulic pump used during surveillance operations.
3.7 Small (1.5 HP) hydraulic pump (electric).
i 3
..8 Hydraulic hose and fittings as required.
4.0 PROCEDURE E The method of calibration requires that two rams be used with the load cell. Both rams may be calibrated without modification to the setup.
B-1 Gen. Rev. 6 11
FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX B 4.1 Setup.
4.1.1 Remove chairs, pull rods and couplers from the rams. Connect the large hydraulic I pump to the ram, purge air and old hydraulic fluid from the ram and hoses and cycle the piston three times from the fully retracted to fully extended positions.
. 4.1.2 Mount the two rams horizontally on timbers or other slightly elevated
- supports with the closed ends of the cylinders touching. Use alignment dowels.to keep the rams in line and wooden wedges to prevent rolling.
4.1.3 Feed the ten foot calibration pull rod through both rams.
4.1.4 Slip the load cell and adapter rings over one end of the calibration pull rod. Fit the inner ring into the ram piston and load cell. Fit the outer adapter alignment ring into'the load
.E cell. Dnring this operation the load 3 cell must be supported from below by blocking or hung from a hoisting device.
(See attached sketch.)
4.1.5 Install the nuts on both ends of the calibration pull rod.
4.1.6 Connect pressure gages to the ram auxiliary ports. Verify that each ram / pressure gage combination'is the same as used (or to be used) during surveillance operations.
4.1.7 Connect the load cell to the readoat device.
4.2 Calibration.
Each ram will be calibrated at piston extensions of 5, 10 and 14\ inches. At each extension the ram pressure will be increased three times from
=ero to 8000 lb/in 2 . During each loading cycle, pressure gage and load cell readout indication will be recorded at pressure increments of approximately 1000 lb/in 2 (increasing load
,M g only).
B-2 Gen. Rev. 6
FNP-1-STP-609.0
- APPENDIX B E NOTE: Readings shall be taken on increasing
- W loads only. Readings taken on decreasing loads may provide erroneous data thereby invalidating the' calibration.
E 4.2.1 Slacken the pull rod nuts as necessary and, using the large hydraulic pump, extend the piston to the required setting 1 0.5 inch (do not exceed 15 inch extension).
Hand tighten the nuts, insuring that all alignment rings are properly seated.
- 4.2.2 Disconnect the hydraulic lines from the large pump and connect these to the small pump. The large pump should be used only for extending the piston to its desired setting. The small pump is, therefore, used only for pressurizing the ram during calibration.
NOTE: The small hydraulic pump is used during calibration to maintain close control of ram pressure. The large pump is used during lift'off measurement operations. In order to demonstrate that the ram calibration constants do not depend on pump size and flow rate, one ram will be calibrated using both pumps. The calibration using the large pump will be
- done at one piston extension and will probably be performed in the manufacturers shop at
, the same time as ram acceptance testing.
l 4.2.3 Retract the piston 0.2 - 0.3 inch. Then i extend the piston and increase ram pressure to 500 - 600 lb/in 2. Measure l and record piston extension to the nearest 0.1 inch.
4.2.4 Increase pressure in steps to 8000 t 100 lb/in 2 . Stop pump and record pressure and load cell readout indication at 1000 t 100 lb/in2 pressure increments.
Do not reduce pressure at any time
!g during the increasing load cycle.
'g Record data during 3 consecutive load cycles, retracting piston 0.2 - 0.3 inch between each cycle.
B-3 Gen. Rev. 6
FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX B NOTE: Insure calibration personnel E do not stand behind rams during pressurization.
4.2.5 Convert load cell readout indications to piston force and plot force / pressure data on coordinate paper. Examine plots for excessive data scatter which may E indicate the need for ram repair.
3 4.2.6 Using the method of least squares, fit a l
i straight line to the data points for nominal pressures of 4000, 5000, 6000 l
l and 7000 lb/inz and calculate the standard l deviation of the points from the line.
l If no point deviates from the straight line by more than 2%, the ram is acceptable for surveillance use.
l l
l I
t l
I l
i t
lIl l
II B-4 Gen. Rev. 6 ;
l FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX B l l
STRESSING RAM CALIBRATION DATA SHEET RAM NO. PRESSURE GAGE NO.
PUMP NO.
DATE OF CALIBRATION AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ADJACENT TO RAM RUN NUMBER STRAIN INDICATOR GAGE FACTOR Rav.~7 PISTON EXIT.NSION INCat.S PRESSURE LOAD CELL CALCULA1w (PSIG) INDICATIONS (COUNTS) PISTON FORCE
! NOTE: Attach Load Cell Calibration Record.
1 DATA TAKEN BY /
Signature Date APPROVED BY /
Signature Date Rev. 7 B-5 E
CALCULATION SHEET g;;t;g;6 S-
$ly 3
CALC.NO. REV.NO.
DATE CHECKED DATE ORIGINATOR JO8 NO.
PROJECT SHE ET NO-SU8 JECT l
' a o dF d e
3 f j > b 4 a eq r 3
O l
/ k v v' 3
g.
l~' %
j 2~ 4f t ( l
- :' ? . a.
o ? 8- j i
s 1 *a t, 3 $
W o
t.
M- ., L _L y
4
's
..-- s i -14 s y d
7 AQ fy$ -
a y q ,*, j\ j l 7 J w
^
w N /
/
3 l
l9 3
}q. .i N s\
! s b N .N 10
( N
{\'
l
- '} *v
\.a N
.L
] i s *
\" 1 .!./ 4 * )'
l ta - xf 'Q 13
'I ! l!b
'3 y l."
3 hec li
~
8 d -n .
.: s., i a '
I f .
E & Q -
- \ q. .
~ c n .
J. ',
s! u a -1 31 '
l -
22 ,
); ~
E 23 '
20 -
4 .}
E23 -
K '
k
- s 27 j
s is - ,
? .'. $ ^'
M d '; '
C i-
' ~
30 s?y h ~
ub 3 33~ -
e
\J
C --
32 -
c .
3 J4 35 36 3-6 Gen. Rev. 6 ED 6015/761 SFP 20768 Rev. (6/76)
5 VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ,
TENDON SURVEILLANCE STRESSING EQUIPMENT LOAD TEST PROCEDURE 1.0 SCOPE This procedure describes the detail requirements for the set up, erformance and acceptance of the Stressing Equipment Fu 1 Load Test.
2.0 LOAD TEST SCHEDULE TheStressingEquipmentFullLoadTestshallbekerformed prior to the start of the periodic tendon survei lance, or at the discretion of the Test Director whenever the following occurs:
- 1) Major modification, replacement or repair of critical components.
- 2) Equipment was subjected to abnormal operating conditions.
- 3) Eguipment was stored for more than 12 months without use.
3.0 LOAD TEST EQUIPMENT 3.1 1000 Tons Rams
- 3.2 Ram Chairs * - - - - - - -
3.3 Chair Collars 3.4 Pull Rods
- 3.5 Couplers
- with Bushings
- 3.6 Pull Rod Nuts
- 3.7 Test Stubpiece* (Figure 3) 3.8 Gages (Heise 12")
3.9 Hydraulic Pump (Regular) 3.10 Hydraulic Pump (Small Test)
E 3.11 Hoses l
C-1 Rev. 9
5 VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 E APPENDIX C 3.12 Steel Tape 3.13 Black Magic Marker or White Out 3.14 Allen Wrench Set Test prerequisites. Certification of Compliance or material certification for items marked (*) is complete.
/
4.0 PROCEDURE AND CHECKLIST 4.1 Cycle rams 3 full strokes to remove air from lines.
/
Test Director /Date 4.2 Assemble rams complete with chairs, pull rods, and couplers as shown on Figure 1.
/
Test Director /Date 4.3 Lightly grease coupler bushing and thread it into coupler until the coupler nose and the end of the bushing are flush. Insert bushing locking plate and s~ecure with allenhead screw. Repeat for remaining couplers.
l Test Director /Date 4.4 Using the normal stressing pump extend / retract E rams to allow threading the coupler onto the end of the stubpiece, screw coupler on until nose of coupler meets the shoulder of the stubpiece and I back off 1/2 turn.
/
Test Director /Date 4.5 Place rams on timbers with chair faces in contact as shown in Figure 2. Place aligning bolts through opposing chair aligning holes and tighten.
/
Test Director /Date B
C-2 Rev. 9
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 lI APPENDIX C 4.6 Repeat step 4.4 for second coupler.
/
Test Director /Date CAUTION
'B ASSURE FIRST COUPLER DOES NOT CHANGE POSITION WHEN
'W THREADING / ADJUSTING THE SECOND. CHECK BY MEASURING GAP BETWEEN COUPLER AND STUBPIECE SHOULDER. GAP NOT TO EXCEED 1/4 INCH.
/
Test Director /Date 4.7 Couple rimary and backup gauges to the test ram. P ace the remaining ram in the fully retracted position to act as an idler.
/
Test Director /Date 4.8 Inspect load test assembly for the following specific items:
! a. Chair faces are mated and bolted together.
f b. Ram bodies are aligned to chairs.
15
- c. Couplers are screwed down to normal working position. (1/4 inch from stubpiece shoulder each side).
- d. Coupler bushing locking plates tight.
- e. Hose fitting caps on idle ram are firmly screwed down.
- f. Pull rod nuts are fully engaged (one or more threads extending beyond nut).
!E C-3 Rev. 9
5 VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 5, APPENDIX C 1
- g. All hose connections have been checked I E .
for close-up fit.
I h. Pull rod and nut retaining device are in place.
Test Director Date 4.9 Bleed system to O sig and change to small hydraulic pump. B eed and re-Zero gauges.
/
Test Director /Date 4.10 Clear persons not necessary for the test from the area.
/
Test Director /Date 4.11 Slowly increase pressure in 1000 psig increments to 5000 psig (t 50 psig).
/
E Test Director /Date 4.12 Re-inspect test hook-up per step 4.8.
/
Test Director /Date 4.13 Routine load tests will be performed in accordance with step 4.13.1. Each critical component will be tested, loadone only,intoaccordnce timetons), 15% above with maximum step 5 design 4.13.2.
(1000
/
Test Director /Date 4.13.1 Slowly increase pressure in 1000 psig increments to 8000 psig 50 psig. Hold B
test pressure for 5 minutes making up pressure as required. Bleed pressure slowly back to 0. Full load test complete.
. Re-inspect test hook-up per step 4.8.
/
Test Director /Date C-4 Rev. 9
E .
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX C 4.13.2 Slowly increase pressure in 1000 psig increments to 9800 psig, +0 psig, -50 psig. Hold test pressure for 5 minutes making up pressure as required. Bleed 5 pressure slowly back to 0. Load test complete.
5 W
/
Test Director /Date 4.14 Perform complete visual inspection of equipment.
lE Document test results on Load Test Results Form.
/
I Test Director /Date 5
5 E
E E
E E
E C-5 Rev. 9 E
5
, VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0
'E APPENDIX C STRESSING EQUIPMENT LOAD TEST RESULTS Date of Test EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS RAM NO. IDLER RAM NO.
GAUGE NO.
BACKUP GAUGE NO.
CHAIR NO. IDLER CHAIR NO.
E , COUPLER NO. IDLER COUPLER NO.
PULL ROD NO. IDLER PULL ROD NO.
PULL ROD NUT NO. IDLER PULL ROD NOT NO.
STUBPIECE NO.
PUMP NO.
TEST CONDITIONS Full Load Test Pressure PSIG Test Pressure Tolerance + PSIG, - PSIG Length of Hold at Load Test Pressure Ambient Temperature Adjacent to Ram Initial Test Ram Piston Extension Post-Test Visual Examination Results
.E The stressing system equipment listed above was tested to M the test pressure designated above and held at that pressure for the period described. Having satisfactorily passed this
. test, the components were visually inspected and found to be acceptable for use within the parameters described in FNP-1-STP-609.0.
VISUAL INSPECTION BY /
5 Signature /Date APPROVED BY /
Signature /Date C-6 Rev. 9
E
- VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX D JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT
~5 UNIT 1 TENDON SURVEILLANCE CHECKLIST PROCEDURE 1.0 SCOPE The checklists described in this procedure will be used to document the completion of essential steps prior to the detensioning and retensioning of each tendon as described in paragraphs 5.4, 5.5, 5.6 and 5 5.7 under Instructions For Tendon Inspection.
2.0 PURPOSE .
This procedure and the applicable checklist define the essential prerequisites for detensioning and retensioning each tendon and documenting their completion prior to pressurization of the tendon stressing equipment.
3.0 APPLICABILITY Two different checklists are utilized in tendon surveil-lance; one for hoop and dome tendons and one for vertical tendens. Two copies of the appropriate E checklist (one for the field end and one for the shop end) will be maintained for each tendon. Uaon completion
's of the stressing work, the checklists will se filed g with the tendon shop or field end data sheets.
4.0 PROCEDURE 4.1 Identify the tendon on the a?propriate checklist by writing in the tendon numaer and circling the
" SHOP" or " FIELD" end.
4.2 Enter the date of the lift off in the space provided.
4.3 Complete paragraph 5.4 under Instructions For Tendon Inspection.
4.4 Complete part A, " PRIOR TO LIFTOFF", of the check list.
NOTE: The Technical Representative on each 5 platform must insure that each item in part A is satisfactorily completed, and that the adjacent space is initialed prior to proceeding with paragraphs 5.5 5 and 5.6 under Instructions For Tendon Inspection. If any items are unsatisfactory, immediate corrective action must be D-1 Rev. 9
E t
. VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX D completed prior to proceeding with work.
E Contact the Test Director as required for implementation of corrective action. .
4.5 Complete paragraphs 5.5 and 5.6 under Instructions For Tendon Inspection.
4.6 Enter date of tendon restoration.
4.7 Complete part B, " PRIOR TO RESTORATION" of checklist.
NOTE: The Technical Representative on each platform must insure that each item in E part B'is satisfactorily completed, and W that the adjacent space is initialed prior to proceeding with paragraph 5.7 j under Instructions for Tendon Inspection.
If any items are unsatisfactory, immediate 5 corrective action must be completed prior to proceeding with work. Contact g the Test Director as required for imple-mentation of corrective action.
5 >/
4.8 Complete paragraph 5.7 under Instructions For 5 Tendon Inspection.
File completed checklist forms with the data 4.9 sheets.
E E
E D-2 Rev. 9
. VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX D TENDON SURVEILLANCE CHECKLIST E FOR HOOP AND DOME TENDONS TENDON NO.
E ACTIVITY FIELD / SHOP END (CIRCLE ONE)
INITIALS A. PRIOR TO LIFTOFF LIFTOFF DATE
- 1. General visual inspection of ram rigging has been made by the craft I platform spokesman to check for general integrity of cables, shackle pins, winch drive chains and other essential components.
- 2. Platform grip locks have been actuated.
B. PRIOR TO RESTORATION RESTORATION DATE
- 1. Coupling is positioned on anchor E head so that the washer extends no more than 1/4 inch beyond coupler nose.
- 2. Removable bushing on shop end is flush with washer face. (Not applicable for field end.)
E 3. Maximum ram pressure required to attain 80% of ultimate tensile strength is calculated for each ram / gauge combination by the formula:
Max Pressure = 9.43 Kips / Wire X (No. of effective wires) + (Constant)
_\
E (Adjustment Factor)
- a. Maximum pressure = psig
- b. Maximum pressure is written on the gauge face, or other readily E visible place.
WARNING: If coupler spins when tension is I applied to the tendon, stop and recheck extension of washer beyond coupler. One full turn of the coupler equals 1/4 inch of travel I of the coupler on the anchor head.
D-3 Rev. 9
E
- .. VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX D TENDON SURVEILLANCE CHECKLIST E FOR VERTICAL TENDONS TENDON NO.
I FIELD / SHOP END (CIRCLE ONE)
ACTIVITY INITIALS A. PRIOR TO LIFTOFF LIFTOFF DATE
- l. General visual inspection of ram rigging has been made by the craft platform spokesman to check for general integrity of cables, shackle pins, winch drive chains and other
':5 essential components.
(Not applicable for field end. )
- 2. Tendon gallery surrounding the work
- area is reasonably clean. Excess water, grease and mud have been removed.
.. 3. Manipulator hoist chain anchor pins have been removed and inspected with the following results: (Check one) l '
No visible indications of unacceptable wear Pins replaced (For 2nd and 4th vertical tendons,
- field end only. Not applicable for field end of 1st, 3rd and 5th or any shop end vertical tendons.
B. PRIOR TO RESTORATION RESTORATION DATE
- 1. Coupling is positioned on anchor
~5 head so that the washer extends no more than 1/4 inch beyond coupler nose.
- 2. Removable bushing on shop end is flush with washer face. (Not applicable for field end.)
- 3. Maximum ram pressure required to attain 80% of ultimate tensile strength is calculated for each ram / gauge combination by the formula:
D-4 Rev. 9
E
VOLUME 7 FNP-1-STP-609.0 APPENDIX D i
Max Pressure = 9.43 Kips / Wire X (No. of effective wires) * (Constant)
' +
(Adjustment Factor)
- a. Maximum pressure = psig
- b. Maximum pressure is written on the gauge face, or other readily visible place.
WARNING: If coupler spins when tension is applied to the tendon, stop and recheck extension of washer beyond
.E coupler. One full turn of the coupler equals 1/4 inch of travel of the coupler on the anchor head.
E 5.
E l
E 1
l l
l 5
1 E
D-5 Rev. 9
1 m
E l
l 1
l s
B E
Am.1x 2 LABORATORY REPORT OF SIIEATilING FILLER ANALYSIS I
E B
B E
9 1
I C O N S U LTIN G AND AN ALYTICAL CHEMISTS r.O.somsese ATLANTA.GA.30300 Chemical Report An mA. cr. 4/6/82 763 '
Number 825394 Sample of Received i 3/22 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company E P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description H6AB Shop End, Buttress A, Sample A, 3/17, P0 #75318 Wa ter Sol uble Chlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ppm E Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) -
I PP*
Water Soluble Sulfides (S) .. .. .. . *1 ppm water . .
. ... .... 0.8 %
5 tJeutralization fJumber:
. .... .. .. 33.7 Strong base number .
- None found if present less than Methods:
1 Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
5 Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Wa te r ,
ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM 0-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama i Power Company purchase order #75318.
i Inv. to Bimingham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, g .
/J *'.
u m a m a ss a CONSULflNC AND AN ALf flCAL CHEMISTS ATLANTA. G4. 30309 Chemical Report AruunA.GA.4/b/02 763 825398 Sample of Reeeived i 3/22 Number Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company lg
- g P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marks l Description H6AB, Buttress B, Field End, 3/17, Sample A, P0 #75318
!E Wa te r Sol ubl e C hl ori de (C1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) * * * * * * * * * ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' *I PPS Water Soluble Sulfides (S) .. ... ....... *1 ppm
]
0.4 %
Water . . .. ................................
).
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number . ............ .. . . . .. . 35.3
'
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428 Methylene Blue on water extract. Water,
.E ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
E *****
Inv. to Bimingham, AL 5 5 8750ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY 5 4 b.y By lie
l
)
I ESSVJ Bh C@MLWi.W.DZ
- l CONSULTING AND AN ALYTICAL CHEMISTS m L*i2*".'. L .
!E Chemical Report
, 763 Anura. cA. 4/6/82 Number 825401 Sample of Received i 3/22 J
For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 f Marks Description H12AB, Shop End, Buttress A, Sample A, 3/17, P0 #75318 lE Water Soluble Chiaride (Cl) .. . . . ............... 2 ppm
. Water Soluble tiitrate (fl03 ) - - - *1 PPS Water Soluble Sulfides (S) .. . . .. . . *1 ppm Water .. ............ ...............'. 0.4 %
tieutralization fiumber:
Strong base number .
31.4
- fione found if present less than i
Methods:
- g Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. flitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
lg Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, tieutralization number ASTM D-974.
- E The above analyses were perfomed in conformance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
i l
Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, I
g .
,, JALb.h iA
JLa.gg LE Ene_;&gypgggy CONSULf!NC AND AN AL YTIC AL CHEMIST 3 ATL AN T A G A. 0308 Chemical Report !
l 763 ArumA. CA. 8/31/81 f Number 8 22 450 Sample of Received' 8/14 For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description H36CA, Buttress C (' Shop), Sample #1 P.O. #75316 Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) ...................... .. 2 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) - *1 PPD Wa ter Sol ubl e Sul fides (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppu E Water ..... ........................................ 0.4 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number -
33.1
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
l The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
,g Inv. to Binningham, Al lN 5 8750 jy Respectfully submitted, l
LAW & COMPANY By --b on lE -
l CONSULTlHC AND ANALY7ICAL CHEMIS7S P. o. so m s ee s ATLANTA. CA. 30309 5 Chemical Report 763 ArumA. cA. 4/6/82 Number 825396 Sample of Received! 3/22 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marko Description H12AB Field End, Buttress B, Sample A, 3/16, P0 #75318 Water Sol uble Chloride (C1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ppm E Wa ter Soluble Ni t ra te (NO 3 )***
- * * * * * * * * * *l PP*
Wa te r Sol uble Sul fides (5 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water .. . ....... ................................. 1.6 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number . . ... . . ..... ......... 34.2 None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to 8imingham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By
$$h
- a E
um a emma CONSULTING AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS A TL AN T A. G A. 3 0 3 0 8 Chemical Report l AnAmA. cA. G/31/81 763 Number 8 22 451 Sample of Received' 8/14 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company E P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description Grease Sample A, Tendon H26AB, Shop End, 8/4 P.O. #75313 Wate r Sol ubl e C hl ori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) - - *1 PPS Water Soluble Sulfides (S) ........ .... ..... . . *1 ppa E Water . ...... ... .. .............................. 0.3 S Neutralization Number:
Strong base number . ............................. 37.6
- None found if present less than Methods:
f Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
l t
The above analyses were performed in confomance with Alabama I Power Company purchase order #75318.
E g Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750 jy Respectfully submitted, M
LAW & COMPANY l E '
By L).k' E
18.
E um s emmm CONSULTING AND AN ALYflC AL CHEMISTS e o. .on iss.
E ATLANTA G A. 30308 Chemical Report .
!g AUJUGA. GA. 8/31/81 763 8 22 452 Sample of Received 8/14 Number E For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer 470 E Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description Grease Sample A, Tbndon, il26AB, Field End, 8/4 P.O. #75318 5 Wa te r Sol ubl e Chl o ri de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ppm Wa te r Sol uble fli trate (i10 ) *3* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *1 PP" Water Sol ubl e Sul fides ( S) . .. . . . . . . . . ...... ;. ..... . *1 ppm uater..............................................
0.1 :.
lieutralization llumber:
Strong Base flumber ................................ 36.5
- ilone found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract, flitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 423, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water ASTM D-95, fleutralization number ASTM D-974 The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama -
Power Company purchase order #75318.
I ****,
E, Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPAt4Y
,, & b. &
Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750 jy 116
E um s cwam CONSULTING AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS I . o. som iss.
ATLANT A. G A. 30309 Chemical Report g
' AU.AMA. GA. 8/31/81 763 Number a 22 456 Sample of Received 8/14 For fir. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company l
P.O. Drawer 470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marks
'E Description Sample #1, H29AB, 8/5, Shop End, Buttress A P.O. #75318
!E' ,
Wa te r Sol ubl e Ch l ori de ( Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ppm 11ater soluble lii trate 3 (110 ) """'"""""""" *1 PP" llater Soluble Sulfides (S) ......................... *1 ppm
!!ater.............................................. 0.2 'A lB fleutralization flumber:
S t ro n g B a s e flumb e r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1
- flone found if present less than liethods :
Chloride, ASTri D-512, thrcurimetric titration on water extract. liitrates, ASTil D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APilA 423, liethylene Blue on water extract. Ilater ASTf1 D-95, fleutralization number ASTf4 D-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in conformance with Alabama E Power Company purchase order il75313.
I Respectfully submitted, l
i LAU a C0!iPAllY CY l'L).% ;
l Inv. to Bimingham,. AL 5 8750 jy
E um a cmm I CONSULTING AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS
- r. o. non s ee.
ATL A N T A. G A. 3 0 3 0 0 Chemical Report g 763 ATLAMA. G A. 8/31/81 Number 8 22 460 Sample of 'Receivedl 8/14/81 For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 I Ashford, AL 36312 Marka .
i Description Sample #1, H29AB, Buttress B, Field End, P.O. #75318 Wa ter Sol uble Chloride (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ppm g Wa te r Sol ubl e Ni t ra te (NO3) . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water Soluble Sulfides (S) .... ................. .. *1 ppm Water ............. .... ... ........................ 0.2 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number .... .......................... 12.3
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, I ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750 jy Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By n' .
f I
I g L 4 M F B h G P_J M P O W E R COMBULTING AND ANALYTICAL CNIMISTS l P.o.sesesse ATLANTA. SA. 30301 REPORT OF ANALYSIS l -
763 Number 822823 Atlanta, Ga., 9/23/81 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli I For Alabama Power Company P.O.' Drawer 1470 Ashford, AL 36312 Sample of Roosived 9/8 Marks 29AB Field End, Test #2 P0 #75318 l .
Neutralization Number:
Strong Base Number .......... 0.6 Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric I titration on water extract. Nitrates.
ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
. Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, I Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analysis was pprformed'in conformance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318 Inv. to Birmingham, Al Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By h. NY' - -
,u
8 lL Aw] Bh Cr3_a) M 2hi CONSULTING AND AN ALYTICAL CHEMISTS 5 e o.somses.
ATLANTA.GA.30309 Chemical Report 5, Anx m a. ca. 8/31/81 763 Number u 22 454 Sample of Received 8/14 For Mr. Dou91as Urcilioli l I
Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer 470 E Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description Tendon ll39AB, Grease Saraple A, Buttress , FiELO E V ( A P.O. #75318 8
lla te r Sol u bl e Ch l o ri de ( Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ppm ua te r Sol ubl e rii tra te ( r103) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm u aer Soluble Su m des (S) ......................... n ppm
, 0.3 :
uater ..............................................
E lieutralization tiuaber:
S tron g Ba s e fluinb e r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7.0
- llone found if present less than E liethods:
Chloride, ASTr4 D-512,11ercurimetric titration on water extract. liitrates, ASTl4 D-992, Brucine on water extract.
I Sulfide, APliA 428, liethylene Blue on water extract. Water AST!4 D-95, lieutralization number ASTri D-974.
1 The above analyses were perforned in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75313 E
Respectfully submitted, LAu & C0f4PAliY
. 9 l
A 4 l\
E BY Inv. to Birminghau, AL 5 8750 jy
- B its I
b C O N S ULTIN G AND aN ALYTIC AL CHEHis?S
..o.sess.s.
ATLANT A, C A. 3 0 30 9 E,
Chemical Report ATUUffA. GA. 8/31/81 763 8 22 457 Sample of Received 8/14 Number For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer 470 Ashford, AL 36312 8
Description H39AB, Sample #1, U/10, luttress A, Shop End 8 P.O. #75318 8 Wa te r Sol u bl e Ch l o ri de ( Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ppm g ua te r Sol ubl e ni tra te (110 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1
- 1 ppm ppm Wa te r Sol u bl e Sul fi des (S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water .............................................. 0.5 's fleutralization fiumber:
Strong Base lluuber ................................ 37.0
- ilone founu if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTI1 D-512, fiercurimetric titration on water extract, liitrates, AST!! D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, liethylene Blue on water extract. Water ASiM D-95, lieutralization number AST!1 D-974 8 The above analyses were perfarned in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75310.
l Respectfully submitted,
' LAW & C0ftPAllY j .
BY Inv. to Binaingham,. AL l 5 8750 jy g
l m '
~ _ _ . . _
E Lgny as g gfgeasy CONSULTING AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS I, ATL ANT A, G A, 30309 Chemical Report I 763 An.ANTA. GA. 8/31/81 Number 8 22 459 Sample of Received l 8/14 For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli ,
Alabama Power Company l P.O. Drawer #470 5 Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description H25CA, Sample #1, Buttress C, Shop End P.O. #75318 B Wa te r Sol ubl e C hl ori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) -
- 1 ppm Wa te r Sol ubl e Sul fi des (S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water............................................- 0.2 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number ............................... 52.2
- Non; found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, I ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750 Jy Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By m ,
E-um a amm C ON S U LTIN G AND AN ALTTIC AL CHEMISTS I r o. oos sees ATLANTA,GA.30308 Chemical Report g 763 AnAmA. c A. 8/31/81 Number 8 22 458 Sample of Received' 8/14 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 B Ashford, AL 36312 li trko De..icription H25CA, Buttress A,'(Field), Sample #1 P.O. #75318 I Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) ......................... 5 ppm Wa ter Sol ubl e Ni t ra te (NO ppm 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 Wa te r Sol ubl e Sul fi des (S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm I Water ........ ...............................'....... 0. 2 ".
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number ............................... 1.1
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, B
ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama l Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Birmingham, AL Respectfully submitted, 5 8750jy LAW & COMPANY By i6 ,
!E l
Les a enem-consotrino ano anastricas entwists l.
.,==...
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
~
763 Number 822824 Atlanta, Ga., 9/23/81
- 5 i For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company 3 P.O. Drawer #470 lg Ashford, AL 36312 Sample of Received 9/8
!E Marks 25CA, Field Erid, Test #2 E P0 #75318
\g _1 Neutralization Number:
Strong Base Number .......... 0.6 s +
Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, j ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
iW Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on j water extract. Water, ASTM D-95,
"*"t"* i'*ti " number ASTM D-974.
!E
!W The above analysiis was perfortned :in
! conformance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318 5 2000 ej Inv. to Binningham, Al Respectfully submitted, i
LAW & COMPANY By h. NY'- -
g .
'E
i
{
O US$ 8h C@)MlWM&E CONSULTINC AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS ATLANT A. G A. 30308 j Chemical Report An.AnrA. cA. 8/31/81 763 Received ! 8/14 Number 8 22 461 Sample of Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company
,8 P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marka 5 ,
Description H30CA, Buttress "A" (Field), Sample #1 P.O. #75318
.I Water Sol ubl e Chl ori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ppm
- 1 ppm Wa ter Sol ubl e Ni t ra te (NO 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water Soluble Sulfides (S) ........... ..... . ... . *1 ppm 0.3 f, Water .................. ............................
5 Neutralization Number:
Strong base number ............................... 42.6
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Water, 5 Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract.
ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfonned in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
E t *****
I Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 5 8750 jy Respectfully submitted, l LAW & COMPANY l-n .
B ,l.
E l M37 Sh C@M@YMBT I CONSULTING AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS ATLANTA GA. 0308 g Chemical Report ArumA. GA. 8/31/81 763 Number b 22 455 Sample of Received 8/14/81 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli
~
For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer 470 B Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description H30CA, Sample #1, Buttress C, Shop End, 8/12 P.O. #75318 Wa te r Sol ubl e Chl ori de ( Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ppm B Wa te r Sol u bl e fli tra te (l103 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Wa te r Sol ubl e Sul fi des ( S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm llater.............................................. 0.1 h I fleutralization fluuber:
Strong Base llumber ................................ 36.5
- itone found if present less than B
flethods :
Chloride, ASTM U-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. flitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water ASTM D-95, fleutralization number ASTM D-974 The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabaua Power Company purchase order #75318 Respectfully submitted, LAW & C0ftPAliY BY Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750 jy lie
! ILs;w & D._assAmm CO N SULTIN G AND QMQLY?tC AL CHEMIS?S P O .0Et...
ATLANTA.GA.30301 I
/31/81
^TLANT^ G^-
763 0 Received 8/14/81 Number . Samole.of For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer 470 Ashford, AL 36312 B
Marks Description H36CA, Buttress A, Field End, Sauple el P.O. #75318 5 Wa te r Sol uble Chl or i de ( Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ppra "ters'"'ie =<teo'o) 1 " o<>
B 3 t! ate r Sol uble Sul fi ces (S ) . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . *1 ppm Water .............................................. 0.4 m fleutralization lluraber:
Strong Base llumber ................................ 34.0
- llone found if present less than liethods :
Chloride, ASill U-512, fiercurinetric titration on water extract. liitrates, ASTil D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, itethylene Blue on water extract. Water ASTit D-95, lieutralization nunber ASTil D-974.
The above analyses were 'aerformed in conformance with Alabaraa Power Company purchase rrder #75310.
Respectfully submitted, LAll f, C0liPAllY DY Inv. to Birminghara, AL 5 8750 jy lie
11 u m a c w a nse C O N S U LTIN G AND AN ALTTIC AL CHDel373 I p.o.oousees ATLANTA.GA.30300 g Chemical Report 763 An.Am. cA. 9/23/81 Number 822719 Sample of Received i 8/31 Fo2 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 B Ashford, AL 36312 Marks I Description H36BC, Sample #1, Buttress C, Shop End P0 #75318 5 Water Sol uble Chloride (Cl) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) *I PP*
E Wa ter Sol ubl e Sul fides (S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water ................................. ... ....... 0.7 %
Neutralization Number:
35 3 Strong base number ........... .
I
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, I ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfonned in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY
. i
~
A ..
By lie
B use a cwram C O N S U LTIN G AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS ATLANTA.GA.30309 Chemical Report g An.ANTA. G A. 9/23/81 763 822720 Sample of Received' 8/31 Number Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 B Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description H36BC, Buttress B, (Field), Sample #1 P0 #75318 I Wa ter Sol uble C hlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm
~
- 1 Ppm Water Soluble flitrate (fiO3 ) - -
Water Sol uble Sul fides (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water . ...... ................ .................. 0.2 %
8 fieutralization fiumber:
34.2 Strong base number ..............................
- fione found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM 0-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order !75318.
Inv. to Birmingham, AL Respectfully submitted, 5 8750 ej LAW & COMPANY By O.h '
Stb
~
E umacomme C O N S U LTIN G AND AN ALYTICAL CHEMISTS B P. O. SOE $ $90 ATLANTA. G A. 30300 g Chemical Report 763 nuuna. cA. 9/23/81 Number 822718 Sample of Received! 8/31 For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 B Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description H39BC, Sample #1, Buttress C, Shop End P0 #75318 Wa te r Sol ubl e C hl ori de (C1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 pptr.
Wa ter Sol ubl e Ni t ra te (NO3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 ppm Wa ter Sol ubl e Sul fides (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 ppm Water ... .......................................... 0.6 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number .............................. 30.3
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, B ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfonned in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318. j eses, 1
Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By ll6
m k
b_\.,7 M M h).F M 33Y CON 3ULTING AND AN ALYTICAL CHEMISTS E
P . O. DOEtete ATL ANTA. G A. 30309 763 ^"^. ca. 9/23/81 Number 822717 Sample of Receivedl 8/31 For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 8 Ashford, Al. 36312 Marks Description H39BC, Buttress B (Field), Sample #1 P0 #75318 5 Water Sol ubl e Chlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (t103 ) *1 PPS Wa ter Sol uble Sul fides (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm l
l Water .............................................. 0.2 s Neutralization flumber:
Strong base number ............................... 29.2
- None found if present less than l
Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, 8 ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were performed in conformance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
l Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By
E um a cwsmm CONSULTIFC AND AN ALYTICAS Cif EM1373 l
5 ATL ANTA. C A. 30309 Amurra. cA.
9/24/81 763 Receivedl 9/2 Number 822757 Sample of Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 5 Marko Ashford, AL 36312 Description Tendon D1-07, Sample A, Shop End , P0 #75318
- 1 ppm Water Sol ubl e Chlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water Soluble Nitrate (NO ) ***************'''** *I PPS 3
5 j
Wa ter Sol ubl e Sul fi des (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 1 ppm i
Water ...............................................
0.4 %
l l
Neutralization Number:
23.0 Strong base number ...............................
f
- None found if present less than l
Methods:
= Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract. Water, Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract.
ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfonned in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
l Inv. to Birmingham, AL Respectfully submitted, 5 8750 ej LAW & COMPANY By i
Its
5 LasBhEmmm"AMM
~ ~ - ' - -
E n:1~;::" ..
chemical Report E 763 Arwrra. cA. 9/24/81 822758 Sample of Received! 9/2 Number For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470
'E Ashford, AL 35312 Marks Description D1-07, Sample #1, Field End, 339 39'55", P0 #75318 5
l 1
Water Sol ubl e Chl ori de (C1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water Soluble Ni trate (NO )3* * * * * * * * * * - " * * * * * * * * * *I PPS Water Sol ubl e Sul fides (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,. . . . . . *1 ppm Water ............................................... 0.5 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number .............................. 12.3
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992 Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, 5 ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
l The above analyses were performed in conformance with Alabama l
Power Company purchase order #75318.
E I Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750ej Respectfully submitted, f LAW & COMPANY
.-) * 'I ..
By E ll6 ,
B um a camsa CONSULTtHC AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS
- e. o. som see.
I ATLANTA. C A. 30309 chemical Report I 763 AD.ANTA. G A. 9/24/81 822765 Sample of Received! 9/2 Number Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 B Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description D1-22 (Shop End), Sample #1, P0 #75318 I Water Sol ubl e Chl ori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm
- ......... *1 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 )
- Water Sol uble Sul fides (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water ............................................... 0.4 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number .............................. 28.0
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
-The above analyses were performed in conformance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Birningham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY
!- t By W ~. ld. M
\tb _
E um a cwmm CONSULTING AND AN ALTTIC AL CHEMIST 3 P.O. DOI 9999 I ATL AN T A. G A. 30309 AnANTA. GA. 9/24/81 763 822766 Received i 9/2 Number Sample of Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 I Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description D1-22, Sample #1, Field End, 21 43'57", P0 #75318 I Wa te r Sol ubl e Chl ori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Wa te r Sol ubl e Ni tra te (NO ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm 3
Water Sol ubl e Sul fides (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water............................................... 0.3 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number ............................... 14.6
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, B ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were performed in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
l Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY 9,
806
A4W Eb C@PEB%2Er CONSUL 71NC AND AN ALYTICAL CHEMISTS P.O.ses,s,e I ATLA N T A. C A. 3 0 3 0 9 Chemical Report 763 AU.ANTA. GA. 9/23/81 Number 822716 Sample of Received! 8/31 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 35312 t
Marks I Description D2-27, Top Sample #1, Shop End, 213 45'11" P0 #75318 Wa te r Sol ubl e C hl ori de (C1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (tiO3 ) ' ~~ *I PP*
Wa te r Sol ubl e Sul fides (S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water ..................................... ... . . 0.5 %
tieutralization Number:
Strong base number ............................... 10.7
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The asove analyses were perforTned in conformance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Binningham, AL Respectfully submitted, 5 8750ej LAW & COMPANY 184
l 5 umacmwam CONSULTING AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS P. o. oos t es e ATLANT A. GA. 30301 1 Chemical Report 763 An ANTA. cA. 9/23/81 Number 822715 Sample of Received! 8/31
'E For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli f Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 !
1 Marko Description D2-27, (Field End), Sample #1 P0 #75318 5 '
Wa te r Sol ubl e Chloride (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Wa te r Sol ubl e Ni t ra te 3(NO ) ' ' ' ' ' " ' ' ' * " " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' *1 PP*
Wa te r Sol ubl e Sul fides (S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water ......... ..................................... 0.4 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number ...... - 19 1
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, E ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfonned in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order !75318.
Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY m .
E A4.gf & .Cgyap3.ggrf CONSULTING AMD AN ALYTICAL CHEMISTS 5
ATL ANTA. C A. 30309 Chemical Report 5 763 ArtAnrA. cA. 9/23/81 822714 Sample of Received! 8/31 Number Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 E Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description D2-31, Top 201 11'00", Shop End, Sample #1 P0 #75318 l
= Water Sol ubl e Chlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm
.........................*1 ppm g Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 )
Water Soluble Sulfides (S) ..........,...............*1 ppm l
1.7 %
Water ...............................................
tieutralization Number:
16.8 Strong base number
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract. Water, Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract.
ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
i I
. The above analyses were performed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order 175318.
Inv. to Bimingham, AL Respectfully submitted, 5 8750 ej LAW & COMPANY By 114 _
E um aca msa COMSULTIMc AMD AM ALYTICAL CHEMISTS ATL NTA C A. 0308 763
^ " ^.ct 9/23/81 Number 822713 Sac:ple of Received ! 8/31 For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 E Ashford, AL 36312 Idarks Description D2-31 Bottom, Field End, Sample #1,108*49'00" P0 #75318 Wa te r Sol ubl e Chlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 ppm Wa te r Sol ubl e Ni t ra te (NO ) *3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **l EP*
Wa te r Sol ubl e Sul fides (S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 ppm Water..............................................0.2%
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number ............................... 20.2
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By Ile
I um a emues.m C O N S U LTIN G AND AN ALTTICAL CHEMISTS B ATL ANT A. G A. 30300 Chemical Report E 763 AruunA. GA. 9/23/81 Number 822711 Sample of Received i 8/31 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 B Ashford, AL 36312 Marko Description D3-09, (Shop End), Sample #1 P0 #75318 E Wa te r Sol ubl e C hl ori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Wa ter Sol ubl e flitra te (NO3 ) * * ' * * * * * * * ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' *I PP*
Wa ter Sol ubl e Sul fides (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1 ppm Water ............................................... 1.9 %
tieutralization Number:
Strong base number ..... ........................ 31. 4
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428. Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY A .
By lie
1 CONSULTIMC AND AN ALYTIC A L CHEMIST 3 P.O.90599,9 E ATLANT A. G A. 30300 Chemical Report j 763 mAnn. cA. 9/23/81 Number 822712 Sample of Receivedl 8/31
.E Mr. Douglas Urcilioli
- W For Alabama Power Company
!g P.O. Drawer #470
- 3 Ashford, AL 36312 Marko
- 7531[, Sample #1, Field End, 324 43'21" D3-09 Description P0 Wa te r Sol ubl e C hlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) * *I PP*
Wa te r Sol ubl e Sul fi des (S ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 ppm Water .............................................. 0.2 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number ............................... 33.1
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
.g Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
3
.The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750 ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By R
, 114
JL 4 PJ Eh @ @ F M.LW.M C ON S ULTIN G AND aN ALYTICAL CHEMISTS I
- e. o, eos sees ATLANT A. C A. 30300 Chemical Report anAnTA. CA. 9/23/81 763 Number 822709 Sample of Received I 8/31 Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description D3-24, Sample #1, Shop End, 282 3'43" P0 #75318 ppm Wa te r Sol ubl e Chl ori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) .........................*1 ppm ppm Water Sol ubl e Sul fides (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 Water ......... ....................................
0.4 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number .............................. 35.9
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, I
ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were perfonned in conformance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
l Inv. to Binningham, AL I 5 8750ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY e
By 886
llaS%7 Bh C@MLW9.W CONSULTING AND AN ALY?lC AL CHEMIST 9 P.o.ses ,ese A TLANT A. G A. 30 3 01 I
AnAmA. GA. 9/23/81 763 822710 Sacple of Received i 8/31 Number Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 B Marks Description D324, (Field End), Sample #1 P0 #75318 ppm Wa ter Sol ubl e C hlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*1 Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) *I PP*
Water Soluble Sulfides (S) ..........................*1 ppm Water ... .......................................... 0.2 %
Neutralization Number:
Strong base number .............................23.0
- None found if present less than Methods:
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were performed in confomance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
Inv. to Sirmingham, AL Respectfully submitted, 5 8750 ej LAW & COMPANY By lie
TLmas Bh Gran@mn? \
CON SU LTIN G AND AN ALYTlC AL CHEMISTS f . . ... ....
A T L as t a. G A. 30300 l Chemical Report lg
.63
- AnAM A. C A. 8/17/81 l 822119 Received' 7/15 tiu=b e r Sample of Mr. Douglas Wcilioli For Alabama Power Company
!g P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 4
5
!/ arks Description V-16 (Top) . Shop End, Sample #.1, P0 #75318 1
l __
Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) . ... ... .... .... 2 ppm l
'later Soluble flitrate (fl03 )
. . . ... *1 ppm Water Sciuble Sulfides (S) . *1 ppm Water .!. . ...' O.5 %
ficut rali z a ti or. Number:
21.9 Strong base nt:nber
- fiane f ound i f present less than l
Metnacs.
Chloride, A$iM 0-512, Mercurimetric titration on water tiitra tes, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
extract.
l Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, l
ASTM D-95, fleutralization number ASTM 0-974.
The above analyses were perfonned in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
E
. s Inv. to Birmingham, AL 5 8750ej Respecttully submitted, LAW & COMPANY .
s ls. .
yl h
By 5
5 ... .
1 I CONSULTINC AND AN ALYTIC AL CHEMISTS
- o eos stee AYLANTA. Ca.3030s Chemical Report 4
A n.Am A. c r. 8/17/81 j 763 7/15 t
Nu=ber 822111 Sc=ple of Received Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 36312 lE Ashford, AL i Marks Description V-16 Ecttom, Field End, Sample' #1, P0 #75318 Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) .. ..... ...... .. .. 3 ppm
]
Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) ' '' ' ' *1 PP*
Water Soluble Sulfides (S) . . . *1 ppm
~
Water ( . . .. ... . 0 . 7 ,
Neutralization Numcer:
Strong base number . . . 22.4
- Ncne fcund if present less than Me t r.cas :
Chler:de , ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric . titration on water extract. Ni trates , ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, 5
ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974.
The above analyses were performed in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
E
- e,+as I
Inv. to Birmingham, A'l 5 8750ej ., Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY Ela A By E lie ,
5 TL Q W Oh @ @ Mig q 2 W CO NSU LT IN G AND AN ALTTIC AL CHEMISTS 5 ..t. .. ......., Chemical Report 1 E ?63 A n m A. c a. 3/17/81 822112 Secple of Reccited 7/15 Nucber Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer 4470 B Ashford, AL 36312
'L a r k u Descriptio:: Top V 27, Shop End, Sample =1,'P0 #75318 =_----_-----...
l 2 ppm W Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) .. . ....... .. Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) ... . *1 ppm
' ater Solutie Sulfides (S)
. *1 ppm I, 0.5 ",
..a te r . . .
.';e u t ra l i : a t t or. ;omu r :
O rang bese number . . 21.9
- None found i f present less than
- e t r.c as .
Chlor;de, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water e n ra c t . Nitra tes , ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract. Sulfice, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM 0-974. The above analyses were perfomed in confomance with Alabama
-awer tomoany purchase order 875318.
***** t Iliv. to Eimingham, AL 5 87ECej Respectfully submitted, L A'r.' & COMPANY By Ile
l B 1 LasEhCNEPAEr l C O N S U LTIN C AND AN ALTTIC AL CHEMISTS B ATLANTA,GA.30301 l Chemical Report AU.AMA. G A. 8/17/8l i /63 - Received i 7/15 Nuc:ber 822110 Sa:::ple of For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 Marks Description '!-27 Bottom, Sample il, Field End , P0 #75318
.----- _ = -
Wate r Sol ubl e Chlori de (Cl ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ppm Water Solutie Nitrate (fl03 ) * **** * ****** * ' EE*
'later Soluble Sulfides (S) . . ... ... ... . .. *1 ppm
. Water . . . .. ............. ..'.... .0.04 %
Neutralization tiumber: 19.6 Strong base number .. . . ...... ... .....
- tbne found if present less than Methods: ,
Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. flitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract. Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, fieutralization number ASTM D-974. I The above analyses were perfomed in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318. Inv. to Bimingham, AL S 8750 Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By A ens l
_m.__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ YF \ - CONSULTING AND AN A LTTIC AL CHEMISTS
.o aos seee A TL a pe f A . GA. 30301 ) ; Chemical Report 8/17/81 AnAm^ GA.
763 Number 82211~/ Secple of Received' 7/i5 l l For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli l Alabama Power Company ' P.O. Drawer #70 Ashford, AL 35312 Marks i Description V-86 Top Shop End, Sample "1, P0 #75318 Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) , . ............. ... 2 ppm Water Soluble thtrate (fiO3 ) ... . ... *1 ppm
'latcr Scisble Su!' ides (S)
.- .. *1 ppm
~
U + . : .- . /. . . 0. 4 ^; Neut ai i :i cr. *;umcer: i 1 I Strcng ba:e nte:1De e . - 24.1 1 4
* !!ane found if present less than I ::e t r.cc s .
1 t i Chloride, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract. l Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, fleutrali: ation number ASTM D-974. The above analyses were performed in conformance with Alabama 5 Power Company purchase order "75318. as,,, _ Inv. to Binningham, AL ' 5 8750ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPAfiY B Y' - E ...
l
.I_LMV1 Eh CE&!LM 2BY l
COM 50 LTIN C AND ANALTTICAL CHEMISTS ! A T L A e4 F A . GA. 30308 l l Chemical Report ! ,;63 - Amun^. C A. 8/17/81 Number 822121 Sacple of Received 7/15 l l For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli j Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 l Ashford, AL 36312 4 i Marks Description V-86 Bottom Field End, Sample #1, P0 #75318 i Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) ............... ... 2 ppm W ter Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) - - * *I PP* j ::ter Sci ale 3uifices (S) . . *1 ppm ua . .- 0.7 x } .i. .. . .. Neutrali z ation Numoer: 5trcng base r.tmlber - - -- 23.0 j None found i f present less than
- . t.nces.
~
- hlorice , 2STM D-512, Mercurimetric ti tration on wa ter
) Ni tra tes, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract.
- extract.
j Sulfide, APHA 428. Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM 0-974.
)W 1
The above analyses were performed in conformance with Alabama j Pcwer Company Durchase order #75318.
,,,,s l Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750ej Respectfully submitted, i LAW & COMPANY k.
l" .
)li kl By
L IL49 Dh C W yggig E CON 3DLTlHC AND A N A LTTIC AL CHEMISTS e o aos sese ~ A Y L a *e , A . C. A . 30206 Chemical Report g - An nTA.cA. c/17/81 763 Nu=ber 022114 Sa=ple of Received' 7/15 For Mr. Douglas Urcilioli Alabama Power Company I P.O. Drawer =470 Ashrorc. AL 36312 Marks I Description Top V 105 Shop, Sample il, PO'#75318
'Ac*.er Soluble Chloride (Cl) . ......... . . 2 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) . . .. . . *1 ppm
't- .C bie Su!' ides (S) *1 ppm I
40 .e r ./. . . .. O.04 %
;et.;rai;;ation cmber:
Strong base number . .. .... 27.5
- Ncne f ound if present less than tu t ncc s .
cpl + ice. ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract. Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, AST!i D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974. The above analyses were performed in confonnance with Alabama Power Comrany purchase order #75318. t
~ .....
1riv . to Birminghain, AL 5 8750ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPANY By N
- lie _
i 4
.ILggy ah ge_pyggggy C O N S U LTIN G AMD AN ALTilC AL C H E MIS T S l . . .......
a T L a m. 7 A . C. A. 3 0 3 01 i l Chemical Report An AM A C A. 2/17/31 763 i 822116 Se:ple of Received 7/15 j Uu=ber I Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 l 2 Marks i D e u c r i p t i c., V-105 Bottom, Sample #1, 6/17, Field End, P0 475318 i i ig 2 ppm IN Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) . ..... .. ... ... .
'4 ate r Soluble fli t rate (fiO3 )
. .. ... *1 opm i ':c:cr Scluble Sulfides (S)
*1 ppm l ~
Water . .i. .. . . 0.5 % i .
.eut raliz ati on Number:
Strong base number . 16.8 l 'l
- tiene found if present less than l
Mc ;r.cc s : Chlorice , ASTM D-5;2, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. tiitra tes , ASTM D-992, Brue fne on water extract. Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, B ASTM 0-95, tieutralization number ASTM 0-974 The above analyses were perfonned in confonnance with Alabama Power Company purchase order #75318.
..s++
Inv. to Binningham, AL 5 8750ej Respectfully submitted, LAW & COMPAtiY By 16
h I Leav Ba Ca@s m BY CONSULTINC AND AN ALT TIC AL CHEMISTS A F L. a me t a GA. 30300 i Chemical Report ArtAm A. G A. 8/17/81 l f 763 Sa=ple or Received' ~//lb 822120 lg lic=ber Mr. Douglas Urcilioli M For Alabama Power Company l P.O. Drawer #470 Ashford, AL 36312 l Marko V-126 Top (Shop End), Sample #1, P0 #75318 Description , t 3 ppm Water Soluble Chloride (Cl)
*I PP*
Water Soluble Nitrate (NO3 ) - ** - - - E ':ater Soluble Sulfides (S)
*1 ppm
.: .. 0.5 %
dater . .:.
\
1 Wu:relization Nur.ber: Strong base number 25.3 l
- None found if present less than N tnocs :
thlorice, ASTM 0-512, Mercurimetric titration on water extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract. ! Water, Sulfide, APHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. lg STM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974. 3 The above analyses were performed in conformance with Alabama Pcwer Company purchase order #75318. J 3
- j Inv. to Birminghan, AL Respectfully submitted, 5 8750ej LAW 3 COMPANY e
By i n.
l I toy as e--w CONSULTING AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS E 4 Y L A ,e t a . G A . 30301 Chemical Report lg ,, 6 3
- AnA.W A. G A. 8/17/8}
) ! Received' 7/15 Nucber 822113 Sacple of j Mr. Douglas Urcilioli For Alabama Power Company ] j ; P.O. Drawer #470
*shford, AL 36312 Marke !
lE Deecription V-126 Bottom Field End, Sample'#1, 6/17, P0 #75318 1 I ppm Water Soluble Chloride (Cl) . . ..... .. . l
*1 ppm Water Soluble Nitrate (fl03 ) . . . .
*1 ppm i
e ter Soluble Sulfides (S)
~
..'a . s r ./. . .. 0.5 %
i 1 7,eutre::: nior. Numcer: 28.6 % atrang bese nu"ber .
,5
- f!cne found if present less than i
Me :r.ac s : Chlor:de, ASTM D-512, Mercurimetric titration on water 1 extract. Nitrates, ASTM D-992, Brucine on water extract. Sulfide, AFHA 428, Methylene Blue on water extract. Water, 5 ASTM D-95, Neutralization number ASTM D-974. The above analyses were performed in conformance with Alabama Power Company purchase order f75318. j. fnv . to Binningham, AL Respectfully submitted, 5 8750ej LAW 3 COMPANY S
/
' !\\ble-,
By l l i lle
E AffM VISCOSITY OIL CO. (Jgg 3200 5. WESTERN AVENUE Twx 910 221-0245 [ CHICAGO.lL 60608 U.S. A. April 6, 1982 I Mr. Doug Urciuoli Alabama Power Co. Farley Power Plant P.O. Box 470 Ashford, AL 36312
Subject:
Farley I Samples: Tendon Sheathing Filler
Dear Mr. Urciuoli:
We have completed testing the samples submitted to us and report the following results: Total Base Sample Number Product (TBN)
- 1. Drum #50 44.2 2090P-4
- 2. Drum #53 44.2 2090P-4 B 3. Drum #56 48.2 2090P-4 2090P-2
- 4. Field End #25CA 0.0
- 5. Field End #29AB 0.0 2090P-2 Enclosed is a copy of a revised procedure for testing for the Total Base Number and Water Soluble Ions.
Happy to be of service. E VISCOSITY OIL COMPANY E C U AB:M ' C.W. Novak Enclosure E CWN/gm W
a s APPENDIX 3 , RAM AND LOAD CELL CALIBRATION 1 3 ) /
F i 1 l Stressing Ram Calibration B The stressing rams used during this surveillance were calibrated at the J. M. Farley Plant using a calibrated load cell. Calibration procedure was according to FNP-1-STP-609.0 Appendix B (see Appendix 1). Each ram was calibrated at piston extensions of 5, 10, and 14 inches. At each extension, ram pressure was increased three times from 0 - 8000 psi in 1000 psi increments. Load cell readings were converted using the equation: Force = 0.991 x Cell reading + 21 Using the method of least squares, data from the nominal pressure points 4000, 5000, 6000, and 7000 psi were reduced to obtain the equation for the best fit straight line. The standard deviation of the data points from this line was calculated. A summary of these calibrations is included. The maximum allowable deviation of any data point from the ram equation (best fit) straight line expressed as a percent i s 2 . 0*/. . All calibrations i produced results well within this specified percentage. Two full pressure tests were performed on the rams during the surveillance. In neither case did the test alter ram performance by any detectable amount.
l 1 11 Summary of Ram Calibrations, I P = Field Gauge Pressure in PSI. F = Force in Kips RAM / GAUGE DATE CALIBRATION PERCENT COMBINATION CALIBRATED EQUATION DEVLSTIO : F= (27. M ) 100590/36409 2/5/82 0.2351P-25 0.32 Alternate-Not Used 3/29/82 0.2330P-22 0.26 100590/36412 6/11/81 0.2315P-28 0.57 Primary-Used 7/15/81 0.2333P-32 0.30 9/2/81 0.2355P-18 0.20 10/8/81 (1) 0.2356P-29 0.36 10/8/81 (2) 0.2354P-29 0.43 I 2/5/82 (3) 0.2361P-29 0.2355P-30 0.22 1.22 3/29/82 100591/36413 6/11/81 0.2324P-34 0.70 Alternate-Not Used 7/15/81 0.2336P-35 0.50 9/2/81 0.2357P-19 0.30 10/8/81 (1) 0.2351P-22 0.44 10/8/81 (2) 0.2355P-21 0.26 2/5/82 (3) 0.2361P-32 0.44 1 3/29/82 0.2334P-29 0.79 100591/36414 6/11/81 0.2322P-32 0.98 I Primary-Used 7/15/81 0.2343P-38 0.40 9/2/81 0.2355P-18 0.30 10/8/81 (1) 0.2360P-27 0.22 10/8/81 (2) 0.2361P-30 0.30 2/5/82 0.2363P-31 0.35 3/29/82 0.2339P-34 0.70 I (1) Calibration prior to overload pressure test after September incident. (2) Calibration following overload pressure test af ter September incident. (3) Calibration following 1157. full load test.
l l 5 RAM / GAUGE DATE CALIBRATION PERCENT COMBINATION CALIBRATED EQUATION DEVIATION F= (27. MAX) ; 10592/36409 7/15/81 0.2360P-26 0.90 Primary-Used 10/8/81 0.2362P-27 0.33 { 2/5/82 0.2351P-22 0.43 3/29/82 0.2335P-31 0.22 100592/36412 2/5/82 0.2360P-28 0.26 Alternate-Not Used 3/29/82 0.2360P-39 0.33 B E E B B B B
( l I .I l Load Cell Calibration The stressing rams used during this surveillance were calibrated using a calibrated load cell. This load cell was calibrated before the three-year resurveillance and af ter the five-year surveillance using a Baldwin Universal type testing machine at the University of Washington. During the initial calibration, the load cell was calibrated for uniform load distribution, for small radius load distribution, and for large radius load distribution to evaluate the sensitivity of the cell to wall bending.- B The cell was found not sensitive to load condition. In accordance with FNP-1-STP-609.0 Appendix A, the final load cell calibration was performed using the uniform load condition. B The testing machine accuracy is checked annually. In the load range of concern during the surveillance (800 kips - 1600 kips), *he testing machine has demonstrated an accuracy within 0.7*/. of the indicated load. Copies of the two machine calibration certificates which are traceable to National Bureau of Standards are included. Three loadings from 0 to 2000 kip in 200 kip increments were made. The
\
load cell was calibrated using the same field adapters as were used during field ram calibration. Following the third loading run the data was reduced by standard linear regression methods and the slope and intercept of the best straight line fit determined as was the standard deviation. The results are as follows:
I B Summary of Load Cell Calibration l E O - 2000 Kips (Calibration Range) Standard B Calibration Date Equation for Force Deviation F= (Kips) 5 27 May 1981 0.99535C + 13.4 3.6 E 9 April 1982 0.99635C + 13.5 3.1 5 600 - 1600 Kips (Surveillance Range) B 27 May 1981 0.991C + 21 1.15 9 April 1982 0.993C + 20 1.83 E In all cases the standard deviation was well within the 15 kip maximum allowed standard deviation. 5
P=E. J .E <> Pa CIFIC SCIE nTIPlc LOS ANGELES. S AN FRANCISCO. PORTL AND, SEATTLE, PHOENIX. DALLAS, HOUSTON CEP.TIFICATE OF VERIFICATION I c No. zz-s-770% This is to certify that the _ fbM]_ ' b Testing Machine, Serial Number 2 D'iNr1 Located at dOMii{/ V CF 4 /M, SEATTLG, idh ,Gyle. EU G._ . sas been ealibrated sy D E s* T . C??\ 6 ST A TE Pacific Scientific Company personnel on /b 'b ! and verified to be accurate over the following ranges: B H-- - -- --- - -- 466000LB &;0000-6C000 a
.Z.Nfs2O_G 60000LB WZC-E'/000 6000~6000O.
l2'Y00000920ccc-213g-0000 Lg l /2OODOLE iCCDo-l20C_00 l 2900 COLE t/0Co-73@D\ Method of verification and listed data are in accordance with ASTM Designation E 4 other applicable specifications.or manufacturers recommended procedures. For verifica - tion details, refer to the Testing Machine Calibration Data and Report. PACIFIC SCIENT!FIC By $lL h /f$$$ T G K f N "h a ' E M l { d)IKE To}d.usod
5
- G CIFIC sCienT!FIC ScATTLc S AN FR ANCISCO Los ANCcLc5 No.F ? -S - 77 C9 I TESTING /AAClllNE CAllBRATION REPORT pact / or /
CUdTOMER MAME- h/Yh [ f-~ h[ 4 loc ATION (of PT. 40 h [~ fpg M(, . Aooness- tS6MMjdft AT T c N T i oN. % . 0 6 p T- P.o. No.* uACn\NeurG- D/1LI)_4)& Tvec: Ujdfj/fffSff- t,,. C A e ACIT v- [Yh[hM C h MFG scnt AL No. d b'Yb 9 b C ALIDR ATION EQUIPMENT DATA s e ai a t o coo,
- a,o v ',~ 5 $ 'A = ;' o = " ' U 'e'. " "7 ' ' " "C'U *" t a = ~o 'oaoaa~Gt
.- l--- G2/3/. - 7l0< A/WL EE/-BC LD/LS~3 ' Z C W ' '3
_ E. ._ ..i 2GC !!! M S E _ TL_ _jp)HL._[_6,_Y8:
/-15:F0 __jmx3_9_;;;ca I
E $ L!BMS 7EbW ZEOa XCs A A/SrL.L'/~/c-R O G/ JC/_b/_7 Wc & DD_<- y ,
/ C(_Gy R rcC_C_:. DM l A_ cS/4dt_GlJ M TL_{B 6 / Jois_tB +6_c_ctcL a G e/G.s15~ ^5TM_L M6TJ _L6-/ 9 8/ LGh52 V&dMD L.:.
E '7 I Uf17 ! YPI
!RwadCL d 12-1TS/ ! E/Sh.V h V 0 C C.6 E C.Ll l venirico etn: Mos tcT Ten No. e22. Asru c 74 O oTHcR METHOD OF VERIFIC ATION s.r.u c4 0 orsen:
TEST DATA E vit COOc v t aie c a t ion ataD NG unc iNo a E A D i** G vac -~t Les. l saaoa uit CoDt v r airic a tion a c a OING ua cm a at acaNG wac Les, t taaoa g g I qv3 c, Tf/RO I -4 I /. 5 E R'y_220 c yf eo I--2/c ! . F 7
/ YSEO 9800 !*2_O 4/ 2 97tV/ 'EECCCl+6't!./2.
/ 7/2O3 _.7_ 6_ 0_ O I - 3 .03 'E 9&SZ6 W CC Ob' V 2'/! . "/ '
E /
./S$1.7_1_'Y3 0_CL P 3 o l_ _.S MJ80_%/_YSCO '4/ 9'6l ./ 1
/
/_ff/_6 / 9_EO_Ol --A .68 3 . / P/dL3]/_P2 CCol+ 337 ./ 7
_2. tYCT.6_2fLAD l S'C l .23 'S l 239303 l 8'YCCC CM V? 7 . 2_o l __] 6058 6 CD D ! -S'S . 94 3 \ CCS'G 0 l C C cc c' -S's_C ._?_3 l / l7035 ./20.0_oI-35 21 2 / EW202Locco!-lew . in. l ._B E392ZLC_90_c_O!+78 .1L 3 G7 /5 C'YCCC 0 'Gsf - l6 K M ! GWr33ESAb CCCOW679 M _C 3RT123 3 6KOD l+ ? 7 ! _E R2?M 9800Ol t E5'; .c5 3dl5'207C / A'E0000; + 70 I .lV l E. ic 0)T_O !(4 000 0 l-/ 90 ! . 31 5 \ t;CLC_s3' 1 CCCCO W6S3 .:? __2__L2./J_D /Leoo l-// C) ' ?/ _3 !E'/SEZ6 ! TTC_cA_CH3976 /. c, /
- 2. E.Q(o_[._2NG C_O l+/3 't ' 57 32_l@BGS3? 'YSOCC O;-SK .!!
l _E <-
*s_O! ' WOOD + sol .!o A 35EE3.1Hf G Geo*!!67 ' ./2
_2 '. 3_'P_.!_Z206 0 ! ~2._3 % 52_ .d',A'/15 0 6 ??]EC20; -' ? ? c': '/
?- % _.7_E ! 9 &6 O' 3 7 7- 51- QiLL?CSROD3ke_cD_C"5%I ' %
E'
.-S R.e_o 3BlLEDo O 0 ~36 ' 3.L_M725L_s 2 sci t 3socco~ian . C. ~i g oATe 12-ZSiS_L_ smice e~w M. $ T2 ylLI..... m oen_y G m % /
g to et covet t'r e os e c a r t 6 cat ct cas, *.v- w :,uc= Nc x T nE c ER T ir ic A Tio N cus-
5 .CERTIR W E kame sacnrisc PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY se4True . sAs enAscisco . Los asoctes N o. 22-6-?C / 7 TESTING /AACHINE CALIBRATION REPORT pacc / or / CUSTOMER
, Olli lit 'ASC I T Y ar ASfl/A}C T O A I t% ATeoN sotat no i: 6 1;chfAJggAjjjt, 1AR
& A 77-4E l<)A E Aooptss (., o D B A f2 D ATVENTeoN: 14 f_ eo No ~787bdC unc sent ura b Al.D_tQM) T vo c- YM UG AS A < ,
ca pac lT Y-VOOCOO (5 urc sca'At ~o E2. v6 4/ E. C ALIDR ATION EQUIPMENT DATA [o'o'a * ". ;'J' 5 '
. o l :?M C N 'w*. "'Y' N.' .'." ' ' 'a=~o 'o'o"~c<
! SD/3/\ \ T o. I LIS Tt I1-21-ep n ici s s3 I eocec_w e 3ser// \ I Af/tsSe ! AT3s I v 7-7& ain m
- Gcrc c c3 E __A_
//6'L n R l RO, ! AN$T! ! ^/-/0_-90 ' /o}A98 '3_o c c_c_cw
_S /0/ss- f PET l NGrl l L-EE-Sn /mAv2 VY M ==:~G 6~ RO3_L T ! 1.b5 r L. 10_-n-7? s o/ & G_O I YDe eo c ca C J 'Rcca ' */00 CC CL C
'7 l 'n'b 9 ! FT l Rocgw_cwi
_stuLC-M b Ro-@l_/U7
! A)7;3_9a ?3 vc9 5 IEcccco La venirico aca: y oes tcTven no 822. AsTu e 74 O oTsea E METHCD OF VERIFIC ATION h G.s T.M. c4 0 orsca:
- h. Mw yys v-wgma
.c .~
iesi
..c.
D^r^ n'pii>e a c c^ rio^)
, .c . .. .
i coot a c .o,~ a l .t.o,~. u.,_ l s ecot l ...e, 4 .c . o.~ c l u., i s l
/ Moo es m I + Ja l +43. _a i EYeoo EVE 26!-22 6! -M
/ 9900 4RI? l .- / *7 l r 3s* 2 l ^/e oco 98.4B el-3S L .7'1 l/ 9'600 9GY/ I - v/ I W3 3 96 coo *t6829 I 4/7 / + /J_
l / ^P/ 0 0 /+/95 -85 l ,s9 3 / *f 40 c O l / 9CZGj-I +123Si +,85* l8 - l /9E00 /93CG I-/05 '65 2 */DO D ! 239/ A
'**o 'o3" ' ~ 3 " ' ~' ' 7 I+8E 7,54 3 _ / ic, L000l / 90 ? E3 h/077 i +.S'-c 3 l 2.4/ O cc o! E 3 8 76 6+/SJE l-r ,63 E'/ /2000_/?CSG l- 56 l ,R. 3 l / accooi / ao3Eci-320 ?_6
'o' '
2 2.4 00 O l 2 </08 4 i ~ 8 'l I . 3 S* _3 l 2+/0C0 0125'r 079 \ +92 I !+< 3E_
- 2. 36_00 n l 3 6/1LS I-/E5 l 3 T % f_]D_60000 _qs-9Sf- 5~' + 43E & , / 2._
__2 YROo of'/8/00 l-Je_O I . 2. 1 S~ l'V9Q0 00 N 7 7 90 0 '8/0 0'+,'0 s $__E 60000l 60097 l-9 7 i ,/G t o' ! Go occo Goo 46 / f -u / : ,/ / l / / 200 o ! / 2 / o 6 l-/06_IM6 'tXC#_YRCo O_2Y161P__!-3577-l -/ if _ lE2 e'o oo ! ?"!ze :-"s~ ~ 2e- ueh'eo ~
. i e s s ' s~'-' ' ' s
' t l -
T 8 D_oL Q l 'l 7 8 '/'l % l0 C, ! h3 ?. 't.'%.3(,, o o o o . 26 6 5 25 l- L.s~25 .G 7 o 7Eoo o! 72 09/ '-9I l LE WA72'LY000 0 ^143XE8 E. "'6il8' .3 5-. 3 96 0 0 o l 9 b GS 9 l-G59 ' ,S& 'ip.t 7 i> q 2.0 oo o 1_]j_C1't e 7 '+ 956 ' + .50. 3 / EO o00! )2J 035 l-/035% 86_ MQe516 C>CO 232 7z71 y207L9 +,g8_ oArc 6-30-90 scav.cc c ca TP,dT,llM .. , css co o- B,e t con cA Rm -
,>s- a.
'd DRESSEA u wmm -
.>.1
I... ,
.v
*- .h.>.s/ > . .eg. . '
INDUSTAIES Y Jr:s m n a.fEx 4 4NOUGTFUAL VALVE r. INS f HUMENT DeveS10N O NEWTOWN. CONNECTsCUT 00470 . s I,., . . . p . . . . .; ' . HEIGE PL ANT [] T EL. PO3/420-4400 0 TWX 710-48 7-Os. s7 CERTIFICATION REPORT, n of s . "i - HEISE GAUGE No. Od7. 36.f[Q.2. t This gauge hos been col.broted with a piston gouge which kan been compared with moster pisjon govges whose eRettive creas were dete'. ' I. mined wifts on estemeied occuracy of 3 parts in 100.000 by the Nat onot Sureau of $tondords *=tif. cation No. P6744 and No. P6743. The weights for those dead weight piston gauges have ofso been certined by the Bureau of Sten ords to have on overage occurocy of within one part in 33.000. DEAD WilGHT GAUGE READING
. READING OR (Deviation from *.
NUMtta Ho COL Dood WI. or I ;." S READING h 0h f D Y fy r Hg Col.)
.o 2 /060 > '
[ 3 /600 *
. s oco .
s 2 6d6 - II ' o $. 000 ' 7 'B R O O - e C/O O o . ; .[ .,' Ei q * - - 4 ..
.f, 9 Vf(0 ' ' '* ' . , ' . -
10 6C dd -
~.1 r : $ 6(b _
I' '2 6dd o '
,.s..
is 6 <5'00 -
- p. .
I ns % v6 , g i' l0 h.{[y
,. . . f
- I .
17 is WQ)0 9()ct) f . o - _ y.
~
. 3. ,.
;. 19 c) W o " '
20
/kAda l'15 % Cr -
- J . ;*
Room Temperature at Test ... . . . . . .
~ ~ - '+
!" m oEimom ny toro,1,.. & ., .. d M . G I Remorks:
. .C. 0.l. .C'.C.b. 0A! 2.. . (.0[.. ..ta.C. 2...C.0f.0. ..!.&. .?.C.C..?
..c:..C.co.c.. ..L; .r... .l.d 1% .c.G....c c....n.w...c.a... .. ...
- s. -. . . . - . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ;
ooi. T. t.a . 5 . 6..:.E:.... ... -
/
t
^
s sianea . . d..... 2.(.... .s1.u..:.; C... ...
.. O ,
ASHCHOFT U HANCOCK Il CO N G O LIG AT E D il HEIDE
.hL- .,
sms me., s. oaes. e . ne c e
hyg--'. }j
. ' .; '? ~. '
DAESSGA
. y ..-d e .h ~%. lN D U S'YRIES ~
E,.
~
. t
$NOUSTRIAL VALVE G INSTHUMENT OrvissON (I NEWTOWN. CONNECTICUT 00470
* ,, HEIGE PL ANT (.) TEL RO3/4.78-4400 Cl TWsc 710 487-0817 '
;. .s , . CERTIFICATION REPORT .
~
Of I . HEISE GAUGE No. .Ol223.6..t.l.O i This 9999* has been col;brated with a piston govee which has beeni compared w;th moster pi,ston gouges whose effect;ve crees were deter. mined with on estimated occutory of 3 ports in 100.000 by the Not.onal Bureau of StandardssJdentifcation No. P6744 ond No. P6743. The weights for those dood weight piston govges have also been certafled by the Bureau of Stondores to have on gueroge occuracy of within one port in 35,000. READING DEAD WilGHT GAUGE t!.ADING
. 03 (Deviation from NUM8ta HoCOL Dood Wf. ee READING Hg Col.)
I ,
' 6D0 Pdf G .
3 J Cod o 3
/DOO _
4 ,ACOO
8
,9 660 '
o 80o0 ,
~
7 2600 - .,~ n ~ 8 l/()() <) - M' I ,'
.) 9 V507) '
v ,. s 80 6T000 _ . F :: 6 SO() - 12 [f) () , - > . I n g oo 84
-7 Coo 7
E . 1s b
- yef o ()
'. n . :' .
. . .e .
a 0 (_) ()
("
_ ~ E' 17 to
'9 53 #>c) f)
C)()()i; 4)$00
. . f, '-
3-
.l?'
/ b OO_A_f)S [r ~
. e i
e l , Room Temperature at Test .M' u... ... . .[...... '. Monimum Hysteresis .. 2..k.c.. 36.75.h. l Remarkst
~
..Q.C.C..CE.b..OAG.. . 8.{..(..../.t.Y.! . 5.(.]..f... ....{.h .C{..&
~
.$1.Y.G.C.....b&... ..l.0!.....[.NS.(I.. . 0.C.... 0.Q..Q.{.[.t.. .
i . st4 .. l <9. e. Date Tested ..d . 6...i.. 2./.. . . ,M / l $10 ned . .[...........>..... < ..l.u.b[ f .. g), l ASHCAOFT [l HANCOCK TI CONSOL ID AT E D U HEIGE . g)s.t b4 5 88 8%l'USI'8 4 &* 8NC g e
1 1 I 1 l
. '*****.*g...
DAESSEA '
/p . ' INDUSTAIES v4 %wm.ea m.2.. .
(
. INQUSTRIAL VALVE r. INSTRUMENT Devas 40N O NEWTOWN. CONNECT 6 CUT 00470 HEl6E PL ANT C TEL. 20T420-4400 D TWX 710-dG 7-Om 7 l.,: .
CERTIFICATION REPORT ' l, ' of HEISE GAUGE No.009.9.6.M/.t'. . l E. l This gouge has been cof;broted with a piston gauge wh.ch has been compared w.th sposter piston e govges whose effechve oreos were deter. mined with on enfimoted occvrocy of 3 parts in 100.000 by the Nat.onal Bureow of Standard:Hdeni;fIcotion No. P6744 ond No. F6745. The weights for those dead weight piston gewges he.e also been cert.ned by the 8 vroom of Standards to have on o'ernge occuracy of within one port in 35.000. Ik DEAD WEIGHT GAUGE READING , .
.', READING og go,,tos;,, gro.
NUM8gg Ho COL Dead Wt. or < Hg Col.) READING . 60o rMrs - s / (1 0 0 - 'E 3 / 6 /V) . . e S U() O . f, . a... s A bon - c.r.. - , E e a,O O ty
.- 'is: . .~ b.
...~....
7 ?>_ a O c - 1.y,x.y
* </od o l y...
1.t
, er5c o -
; . i'{>,t a .c
-~-
e. io Scd o - ii Me - it /C 0cc - . p. is Mon . - a y.3 i 5 i4 is
-2 o cro
-3600 ~ ,
,n 7.....
ie yaao .-
- ? i.:r. ."
a s;;60 o . is QOcg
~ - f , " $.:
l 'g
~
19 95dd . o: ^ \ E to /8 Od6 f.'GrG -
., c.
d 3-g- Room Temperature at Test .2..O.. Q.( . f
. Maximum Hysteresis .. .4 ..[nIfh
- Remarks:
......C..C. C..C.C b i& w D ..... d [ .C.... !.(b.C8..t..@.d...h .!a..CJ~.L
...Q...CC..Q.C~.. ..!.$. ../.0.: ..L156.6. ..Q..C.....O.'?.b.E.C...:... -
- \.
l
,) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
~
'. oor.Tesred....I..:.6..r..3.2...
IIQ 238 - sioned ..h. .. .. ... .. 2A..L.:zz.h.C. - ABMCROFT L) t4 A NCOC K ,j,C f ONSOLID AT E D O *HEISE
'. i ,m,. - ~v .
' ' i. . .- . DAESSEA (
.E '.
'.4'I @ .T.e
e INDUSTAIES ,w.
. ~, s ...N, .
tNOUST HI AL VALVE fa 4NST HUMENT DIVaStON O NEWTOWN. CONNECTICUT 00470
, ' HEISE PL ANT O TEL PO3'4Pn-4400 O T Wac 710-4437 0017
'~ '
J - - CERTIRCATION REPORT. . .
.' ~ ' 'E .
HEISE GAUGE No. 0/?:2E.fl.[2-t this Douge hos been cohbroted with a piston gowge which hos been compored with monter p?rton gowges whose ePect;ee arcos were deter. , mined with on estimated occuracy of 3 ports in 100.000 by the National Bureau of Standorispcet.6 cot ori No P6744 and No. P6745 The weights for those dead weight piston gouges have also been cert.Aed by the 8vreow of $tonderds to have on overage cccuracy of withlm one port in 35,000. DEAD WilGHT CAUGE tt ADING . READING on (ooviot;on from
- Dood Wt. et
.I NUMBER Ho COL . .
READING , Hg Col.) , , , . , n . 60 0 W71:C, - 2 /On0 - - E 3 4
)60o
- () d O e_
( s 2 WDD J 6 3d00 -- ', 7 36Oo - s '/() df) -
^
,{.'
- E W ' ' .o ' 9 4[6C()
_ 9, 10 7_3 OOO _ F ti 's 65A/) ~ e E 13 (, O () O . ai - 83 $$dd - 4
.n 14 7 dd() - 'E .
88 76()d , . . ,
! to Kdd 6 -
! 17 8r, C')
- i to 9()00 s -
.-}. '.
I9 f6do -_ .. to l0, d 60 /W(f , Room Temperature at Test .. .. .. E . Maximum Hysteresls ...t....o....<.. ..w...c..c.&.. j Remarkst
~
.Q..o.cc.c..d2a.ts....dc.c.. ..m!c.b..c.r21.c.d...W 1..ec..c= ~
- g E ... c. c o... c ...c.c a ..../.. A . .. d ::K 6 .. .c. c .... m .r z .f..,... .
. .g.gln . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~
- 2 Date Tested ...b." ..d.7../b....
. soa.a ..... 4..
... ...... d.juedr... .. .
,JL l ,
ADHCHOFT U -H AN C OCec p , . , . ous CONSOLID AT L D L1, HEisE
- u. t .. .r.t
l B - ' - ~ --'- --- l E .i--
.- - ' DAESSER
'.. -__,,y
( INDUSTRIES >
.36.U-
+
. _9e. .
d, hW".Th . ' (.W* t'NDUST54LAL VALVE E. INSTisuMENT DIVtSiON ' NEWTOWN. CONNECTICUT 084 70 3 HEISE PL ANT o TEL. 203/428-4400 Il TWK 710-48 7-0017
,..,,- ,- ', CERTIFICATION REPORT y l l Of g HEISE GAUGE No.Cl?2M.f?'.@
This gauge has been col.broted with a p ston govge which hos been compared with moster piston gouges whose erect.ve areas were deter. mlned with on estimated occuracy of 3 ports in 100.000 by the Not.onal Burcou of $tonderdpdententot on No. P6744 ond No. P6745. The weights for those deod weight piston go6ges have also been cert. fled by the Bureow of Standards to have on overage occurocy of within I ene port in 35.000. DEAD WEIGHT GAUGE READING (Deviation from lE EEADINO NUMBtg ot HoCOL READING . Dead Wt. or Hg Col.) ' 6 oo Mr6 - 1 / C>o n 3 /6(> 0 - d 9 066 e. p oo ,. - s
. <"_S(){10
.l n, 7 e m vnoo - C:- 9 tr6r) f, ' 'l "' goao io
,, 86co .e 6 600
,1
" ,~
' 13 [ _6 0 0 ~ s ad 9 Oc) c - is 96oc - , '
~
l
- i. scoe *
% 6 06 l 17
! e {f'6()L)
~'
[ 19 QG(.I{) r 20 l h_(h__O k$h " L r - Room Temperature at Test ....2.[ye.. . .I Maximum Hysterests .I. ..[8.bb. Remarksi '
~
..G.c.c.c.c.c.t2.a.a6... ..t2.CC.. .bic 3..cr?..!c..d'...lO .1x.c=<
l
. ... 0...C..C.QC. ..!. .Q.. ..b 0..l... 5. . .. .$.C...$:S2.$E..$ s - .
ll sg Date Teited ...n....... ..pi.... ..eh...t.. A j Signed .. . .Y.. .. :. 2 .W-_ 238 - .s d I
15
.y DAESSEA !p E ?. s,s s.'D.
. f,,.
INDUSTAIES - wnmin
~ a INQUST AIAL VALVE G IN97 AUME NT OlviS40N O NEWTOWN. CONNECTICUT 004 70 HEISE PL ANT CJ TE L. 203/428-4400 M T Wx. 710-4G7-0617 '
,; . . CERTIFICATION REPORT HEISE GAUGE No. .dn'2.M.M/..'l. ~
t This gevge hos been col.broted with a piston govge which nos been compared with monter piston gauges whose effective oreos were deter. miaed with on estimated occuracy of 3 parts in 100.000 by the Norional Bureau of Standards,sedeni Acolion No. P6744 ond No. P6745. The weights for those dead weight piston go6ges have also been cert. Red by the Bureow of $tonderds to have on enerage occuracy of within one port in 35,000. DEAD WilGHT CAUGE READING READlHO on (Deviation from ( NUMBER HgCOL Dead Wt. or RfADING , Hg Col.) '
' A c> o (Gr6 1
/ c 'O O
,E-2 3
/6 00 -
4
.P O c t ) -
A 6 d(> 5 - rB 6 . 3 ci o o '
~
7 3 6 (Jr) --- m I L/(t() 0 . - - -
) 9 (f W C [) ~
l0 6(10 () ~
- p. Il N 53d(/ '
M 12 6 d C.0 - 84 ll Or j)v - . lM 1s 7Xc, o -
~,
'1 5 5c) n -
~
19 Crfi Q () - sE _ to nc
/ o00
/ HCG -
. ROOM TemperOfuTO Of IOst .2. .?.. . . umum ay.r.,..i. .. 2<1.. .. dss 6 - Remotkss
~
.Gff..CC..bd'.02h. ..,l.Sf.ff.....N.1.'[ <.Cd.bd.. .... ...{..(. C ll ,
..e.c.c..n.c. ..<.a. . 2cL.....C6.f..G ...ac.....m. 4.c.s..:....._... ..
Date Te.ted ...I~~d:. ..b2...
. *I.
3 l s,..ee . 4'.uc.C.c. ... ..
'a'2A.. .
ASHCAOFT [] HANCOCK i. C O N GO LID A T E D li HEISL ~
. us.e s e e e. e*.ous r **-s n.. '*.c
]
i I I I APPENDLX 4 I TENDON LIF10FF FORCE CALCULATION I I I I I I I I l l
l l Tendon Liftoff Force Calculation This appendix is included to show how liftoff values used in this report were calculated. Since the rams were calibrated intermittently throughout the surveillance, the calibrations immediately preceding and following surveillance of a given tendon were used to calculate the lif toff values. Then the mean of the two calculated values was used as the reported liftoff force. Since the post-test calibration equation was not available during the actual portion of the surveillance concerned, liftoff values as reported in the report may vary slightly from those on the field data sheets. I B I E k I
E CALCULATION OF 3 YEAR RESURVEILIANCE 1.IFTOFF VALUES SHOP OR EQUATION USED FIELD TENDON FORCE FIELD PRESS. MIPS) O. FND PRE TEST POST TEST (PSI) PRE TEST POST TEST AVE RACF F .2361P-29 .2355P-30 5408.3 1247.9 1243.7 1245.8 H6AB 5 .2363P-31 .2339P-34 5460 1259.2 1243.1 1251.2 F .2361P-29 .2355P-30 5336.7 1231.0 1226.8 1228.9 H12AB S .2363P-31 .2339P-34 5086.7 1171.0 1155.8 1163.4 F .2333P-32 .2355P-18 5277 1199.1 1224.7 1211.4 H26AB S .2343P-38 . 2 355 P-18 4880 1105.6 1131.4 1118.5 F 2333P-32 . 2 35 5P-18 5146.7 1168.7 1194.0 1181.4 H29AB S .2343P-38 .2355P-18 5227 1186.7 1213.0 1199.8 F .2333P-32 .2355P-18 5110 1160.1 1185.4 1172.8 H 39AB S .2343P-38 . 2 3 55P-18 4750 1 074.9 1100.6 l 1087.7 F .2343P-38 .2355P-18 5400 1227.2 1253.7 1240.4 H25CA S .2333P-32 .2355P-18 4970 1127.5 1152.4 !! 40. 0 F .2343P-38 .2355P-18 5473 1244.3 1270.9 1257.6 H 30CA S .2333P-32 .2355P-18 5330 1211.5 1237.2 1224.4 F 2343P-38 . 2 35 5P-18 5303 1204.5 1230.9 1217.7 5 H36CA S F
.2333P-32
.2343P-38
. 2 355 P-18 2 3 55P-18 5627 5410 1280.8 1229.6 1307.2 1256.1 1294.0 1242.8 H36BC S .2333P-32 . 2 3 55P-18 5310 1206.8 1232.5 1214.7 E F .2343P-38 . 23 55 P-18 5460 1241.3 1267.8 1254.6 H39CB S .2333P-32 . 2 3 5 5P-18 5417 1231.8 1257.7 1244.8 F .2343P-38 .2355P-18 5220 1185.0 1211.3 1198.1 D107 S .2333P-32 .2355P-18 5383.3 1223.9 1249.8 1236.9 F .2343P-38 .2355P-18 5293 1202.1 1228.5 1215.3 D1'2 S .2333P-32 .2355P-18 4957 1124.5 1149.4 1137.0 E F .2333P-32 . 23 55P-18 4990 1132.2 1157.1 1144.7 D227 S .2343P-38 .2355P-18 5250 1192.1 1218.4 1205.3 F .2333P-32 .2355P-18 5213 1184.2 1209.7 1197.0 D231 S .2343P-38 . 235 5P-18 5170 1173.3 1199.5 1186.4 F .2343P-38 . 2 35 5 P-18 5390 1224.9 1251.3 1238.1 D309 S .2333P-32 .2355P-18 5623 1279.8 1306.2 1293.0 F .2333P-32 .2355P-16 5190 1178.8 1204.2 1191.5 D324 S .2343P-38 .2355P-18 5133 1164.7 1190.8 1177.8 F .2315P-28 .2333P-32 5470 1238.3 1244.2 1241.3 V16 S .2322P-32 .2343P-38 5557 1258.3 1264.0 1261.2 F .2315P-28 .2333P-32 5647 1279.3 1285.4 1282.4 V27 s .2322P-32 .2343P-38 5637 1276.9 1282.7 1279.8 F .2315P-28 .2333P-32 5350 1210.5 1216.2 1213.4 V86 S .2322P-32 .2343P-38 5533 1252.8 1258.4 1255.6 F .2315P-28 .2333P-32 5423 1227.4 1233.- 1230.3 V105 S .2322P-32 .2343P-38 5500 1245.1 1250.7 1247.4 F .2315P-28 .2333P-32 5257 1189.0 1194.5 1191.8 V126 S .2322P-32 .2343P-38 5187 1172.4 1177.3 1174.8 E}}