ML20125D094
| ML20125D094 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1985 |
| From: | BECHTEL GROUP, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20125D076 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8506120245 | |
| Download: ML20125D094 (102) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:< O Alabama Power Company J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2 O l Primary Reactor Containment i Integrated Leakage Rate Test Final Report l March 1985 l O secniei pc.er corgere11on p ,= isa. L . _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - - -_
F O ALABAMA POWER COMPANY J. M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 O REACTOR CONTAINNENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST March 1985 FINAL REPORT Prepared by Bechtel Power Corporation San Francisco, CA SU-080
TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections P, age,
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 2.0 TEST SYNOPSIS 2 3.0 TEST DATA
SUMMARY
5 4.0 TEST METHODOLOGY AND INSTRUMENTATION '9
5.0 REFERENCES
13 Appendices A. Description of Bechtel ILRT Computer Program B. ILRT Stabilization Summaary Data C. ILRT Sununsry Data and Mass Point Analysis D. ILRT Plots: Temperature, Pressure, Vapor Pressure and Air Mass E. Verification Test Sununary Data and Analysis F. Instrument Selection Guide Calculations G. Local Leakage Rate Test Data H. Tendon End Anchorage Concrete and Liner Surveillance I. Modifications to Containment J. BN-TOP-1 Test Results O SU-080 11
} l t !
1.0 INTRODUCTION
, The first periodic integrated leakage rate test (ILRT) on the Joseph M. ! Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 containment building was conducted March 2-3, 1985 during the third refueling outage. This test was performed to demonstrate that outleakage from the containment system at the specified loss of coolant accident pressure does not exceed the maximum allowed by the Plant Technical Specification (Ref. 5.2). The ILRT was done in , accordance with the requirements of a Farley Nuclear Plant Surveillance , Test Procedure (Ref. 5.1), and had a duration of 24 hours not including t-the temperature stabilization and verification test periods. Tendon end anchorage and liner plate surveillances required by Ref. 5.1 l and the FSAR (Ref. 5.7) were performed in conjunction with the ILRT. The results of these surveillances are reported in Appendix H. During the i initial phase of the tendon end anchorage surveillance a post-tensioning system structural failure was found. While the investigation of the failure and assessment of its impact on containment structural integrity did delay the start of the ILRT from late January to early March, the problem did not directly affect either the tendon end anchorage concrete surveillance results or the leak tight integrity of the containment. An engineering evaluation of containment structural integrity was performed prior to start of the ILRT. It was concluded that the condition of the containment tendon system would not reduce the structural integrity O beyond an acceptable level and the ILRT could proceed. The following bases were established upon which the ILRT could proceed without affecting
- the containment integrity, and were presented in the meeting with the NRC
- staff in Bethesda, Maryland on March 1,1985.
J o Results of the posttensioning system inspection (as of March 1, 1985). , o Margin available in the posttensioning system design. 4 o Effect of pressurization on the posttensioning system. I i
- e i
L i t jO J SU-080 1 1
)
. - - - . _ _ . - - - - . .1
r 2.0 TEST SYNOPSIS 2.1 Synopsis The integrated leakage rate test is performed to verify that outleakage from the containment system (steel liner, mechanical / electrical penetrations and accessways) at calculated accident pressure does not exceed the specified limit. The containment is prepared for the test by closing all accessways and aligning valves in specified post-accident positions *. All items which could be damaged by test pressure or which contain gasses at pressures higher than the test pressure are either removed from the containment or vented. The test objective is accomplished by pressurizing the containment with clean, relatively dry air, cicsing the pressurizing line valves, measuring containment atmosphere parameters and using those measurements to determine air mass loss over a specified time period. Af ter the leakage rate has been determined, the calculational method is verified by a supplemental test during which an additional known outleakage is imposed on the containment. The test is performed using the absolute method described in ANSI N45.4-1972 (Ref. 5.5). Leakage rate calculations are performed using the methods outlined in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 (Ref. 5.4) and BN-TOP-1 (Ref. 5.6). The leakage rate listed in section 2.2 below is obtained using the the mass point calculational method of Ref. 5.4. The NRC requires this
.s type of calculation for all tests regardless of duration and does not require additional calculations for tests with durations of at. least 24 hours. The leakage rate obtained using the total time calculational method of Refs. 5.6 and 5.5 is included in Appendix J. Total time computations are required by the NRC when test duration is less than 24 hours and BN-TOP-1 is cited as governing document for the test.
2.2 Chronology Test prerequisites specified in Ref. 5.1, including the containment exterior and interior inspections mandated in Ref. 5.3, were completed on March 2, 1985. Completion of prerequisites, containment systems status and inspection results are documented in the Official Test Copy of i Ref. 5.1, which is maintained as a part of permanent plant records. Containment pressurization commenced at 0018 hours on March 2 and was I stopped at 1035 hours on the same day when containment pressure had reached 50 psig, which is 2 psig above the minimum test pressure of 48.0 ' psig. Pressurizing equipment concisted of oil free air compressors with , an aggregate capacity of approximately 12,000 SCFM, after cooler / moisture ) separators and refrigerated air dryers. This equipment maintained an almost constant pressurization rate of just under 5 psi /hr. Containment ; fan coolers and dome air circulators were run during pressurization to minimize temperature stratification. Service water was run through the j 1
- Certain valves were not in specified positions during the ILRT.
g () Measured leakage through these valves was added to the calculated leakage rate to account for the non-standard lineup as described later
]
i in this report. SU-080 2
f- . (h O fan cooler coils to control containment air temperature. The water to fan cooler unit B was shut off at 0812 hours due to a suspected tube leak. The resultant temperature rise extended the subsequent stabilization period by approximately 15 minutes. Fan coolers, done air circulators and service water were shut off immediately following the completion of pressurization. Containment lights had been previously turned off. Temperature stabilization criteria specified in Ref. 5.1 were satisfied at , 1500 hours, four hours and 15 minutes af ter the start of the stabilization pe riod. However, a malfunction of the dew cell electronics delayed the start of the test to 1515 hours. The 24-hour test was concluded at 1515 . hours on March 3 with the following results: Calculated 95% Upper Con- Acceptance Limit Leakage Rate fidence Limit on UCL wt %/ day vt %/ day vt %/ day Mass Point Calculated 0.052* 0.053* 0.1125 Leakage Rate l Local Leakage Rate N/A 0.00011 N/A Additions for Nonstandard Valve Lineups (from Section 3.0)
' Total N/A 0.053 0.1125 l The end of test containment pressure was 49.3 psig.
The data recorded at 1345 and 1400 hours on March 3 showed that another dew cell electronics malfunction had occurred between these two times. Since mean vapor pressure had been constant at 0.337 psia between 1000 and ' 1345 hours, dewpoint temperature data recorded from 1400 to 1515 hours were replaced with the 1345 values. The replacement increased calculated
- leakage rate slightly, and was justified on the dual bases of conservatism and prior evidence of stable vapor pressure.
In order to verify the leakage rate computational method, a supplemental l test was conducted af ter imposing a known containment outleakage through a
- flow meter. The outflow of 9.18 SCFM (equal to the allowable containment
- leakage rate, La) was initiated at 1520 hours. The supplemental test was conducted for four hours following a 70 minute stabilization period, with the following results:
Lower Acceptance Mass Point Calculated Upper Acceptance Limit Leakage Rate Limit vt %/ day vt %/ day wt %/ day 0.164 0.200 0.240
- Pressurizer water level dropped slightly during the test. Correcting
- for the drop would decrease leakage rate. Since the correction would be nonconservative, it is not made.
i -SU-080 3
F ,
' 2.3 Results Analysis A plot of the calculated containment air mass versus time for the 24-hour test' period is contained in Appendix D. The plotted mass points follow a linear trend which is expected if the leakage rate is constant and if there are no significant perturbations caused by diurnal temperature , changes and other external (or internal) phenomena. The individual mass points show some scatter about the mean. The width of the scatter band is on the order of 30 lb. mass. The scatter associated with a pressure sensor output fluctuation of _+0.001 psi is approximately equivalent to 20 lb. mass. That associated with an indicated mean temperature fluctuation 40.005"F is greater than 10 lb. mass. An indicated mean vapor pressure Tluctuation of _+0.0005 psi results in an equivalent scatter of about 10 lbs. Thus, the overall scatter is consistent with the specified instrumentation performance limits.
Instrumentation, data recording, computational methods and local leakage rate additions are discussed in subsequent sections. Summary data are included in the Appendices. O O SU-080 4
r- I rs 3.0 TEST DATA
SUMMARY
The following technical data from Ref. 5.2 (and documents cited therein) establishes test limits and parameters needed to calculate leakage rate. A. Plant Information: Owner: Alabama Power Co. Docket No: 50-364 Plants: Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Containment Type: Shallow done, three buttress, post-tensioned concrete, PWR, dry containment without enclosure building. NSSS Supplier, Type: Westinghouse, PWR Date Test Completed: March 3, 1985 B. Technical Data e Containment Free Air Volume: 2,025,000 cu. f t. Calculated Loss of Coolant Accident Pressure: 48 psig Containment Design Pressure: 54 psig Containment Design Temperature: 280*F Test Pressure Limits: 48 --51 psig Limits on Containment Air Temperature During Test: 40 - 120*F Maximus Allowable Leakage Rate, La: 0.15% of Contained Air Mass per Day (24 hrs.) Acceptance Leakage Rate as Determined During the Test: The upper 95% confidence limit on calculated leakage rate plus local leakage rate additions shall not exceed 0.75La = 0.1125wt %/ day O SU-080 5 L
r' f. Flow Imposed During Supple-mental Test: Lo 0.15vt %/ day Minimum Test Duration: 8 hours (increased to 24 hours by management directive) Leakage rates expressed in wt %/ day are converted to mass or volume rates using containment free air volume, pressure and temperature data and the ideal gas law. C. Test Result - Type A Test Test Method: Absolute Data Analysis Techniques: Mass Point Leakage Rate per ANSI /ANS-56.8-1981 Test Pressure: 50 psig Integrated Leakage Rate Test Results: Leakage Rate UCL* Mass Point Analysis: 0.052wt %/ day 0.053vt %/ day
.()
- UCL 95% upper confidence limit Imposed Verification Leakage Rate: 0.15vt %/ day (9.18 SCFM)
Verification Test Results: Mass Point Analysis: 0.200wt %/ day Verification Test Limits: Upper Limit (Lo + Las + 0.25 La) 0.240wt %/ day Lower Limit (Lo + Lam - 0.25 La) 0.164wt %/ day Report Print Outs: The report printouts, summary data and plots for the ILRT and verification test are provided in Appendices B through E. D. Local Leakage Rate Test Data and ILRT Additions Local leakage rate tests on isolation valves and other penetrations utilizing resilient seals were performed under a separate procedure, but the results are included in this report to add completeness since both the local tests and the ILRT are mandated by Ref 5.2. The as found and as left local leakage rate test results for the first three refueling outages for Unit 2 are tabulated in Appendix G. O. SU-080 6
E
. During the ILRT, 5 penetrations were not in the specified post-accident lineup. The local leakage rates measured for these penetrations are added to the 95% upper confidence limit on the mass point calculated leakage rate to insure disposition of the nonstandard lineup in a conservative manner. . These pencerations and local leakage rate test results are listed below:
Penetration Function Measured Local Leakage 28* CVCS Seal Return- 20.0 SCCM 58* RHR/RCS Hot Les Sample 1.8 SCCM 61A** Post-Accident Containment Sample /Out 1.8 SCCM 71** Containment Leak Test Connection 72.1 SCCM 72** Containment Leak Test connection 97.2 SCCM TOTAL 192.9 SCCM Leakage Rate Addition = 192.9 SCCM = 0.0068 SCFM = 9.81 SCFD Containment Air Volume = 2,025,000 cu. ft. x 64 psia Test Pressure / 14.7 psi STD. Pressure
= 8,816,327 SCF Leakage Rate Addition = 9.81/8,816,327 = 0.0000011/ day = 0.00011 we %/ day E. Information Retained at Plant The following information is available for review at the facility:
- 1. Access control procedures that were established to limit ingress to containment during testing.
- 2. A listing of all containment penetrations, including penetration size, and function.
- 3. A listing of normal operating instrumentation used for the leakage
- rate test.
I
- 4. A system lineup (at time of test), showing required valve positions and status of piping systems.
- 5. A continuous, sequential log of events from initial survey of containment to restoration of all tested systems.
- 6. Documentation of instrumentation calibration and standards.
- Penetration 28 and 58 were in use to satisfy plant operating and
. maintenance requirements.
** Penetrations ' 61A, 71 and 72 were used in performing the ILRT.
SU-080 7 2 4
,,,m,
r 7 The Official Test Copy of the procedure which includes signature sign-off of procedural steps. 8 The procedure and all data that verifies completion cf penetration local leakage testing (type B&C tests).
- 9. Computer printouts of Integrated Leakage Rate Test Data.
- 10. A listing of all test exceptions including changes in containment system boundaries instituted to conclude successful testing.
- 11. Description of method of lcnk rate verification of instrument measuring system (superimposed leakage), with calibration information on flowmeters.
- 12. The P& ids of pertinent systems penetrating the containment or affected by ILRT.
O SU-080 8
F
.s 4.0 TEST METHODOLOGY AND INSTRUMENTATION Containment leakage rate was determined by the absolute method using mass point computations as described in Ref. 5.4 The mass of dry air in the containment was calculated using drybulb temperature, dew point i temperature and pressure data recorded at 15 minute intervals. The j leakage rate in lb. mass per day is the slope of a straight line fitted to l' the mass and time data using the method of least squares. The leakage l
rate in weight % per day is the rate in lb. mass per day divided by the mass at the start of the test. The 95% upper confidence limit on rate is determined from the variance of the individual calculated masses about the fitted line. Containment dry bulb temperature was measured using 18 platinum resistance temperature detectors (RTD) placed at specified locations. The mean dry bulb temperature was calculated as the sum of products of individual temperatures and associated volume fractions. Table 4.1 lists RTD locations and volume fractions. Containment dew point temperature was measured using 6 chilled mirror dew cells placed at specified locations. Dew point temperatures were used to calculate water vapor partial pressures. Mean water vapor pressure was calculated as the sum of products of individual pressures and associated volume fractions. Table 4.1 also lists dew cell locations and volume fractions. Containment total pressure was measured using an absolute pressure quartz bourdon tube capsule with a servocontrolled optical tracking system coupling the capsule to the readout. Leakage imposed on the containment for the supplemental test was measured using a sight glass type flow meter. Temperature, dew point and pressure sensors were coupled through signal conditioning units to a multiplexer and analog to digital converter (ADC). The ADC output was interfaced to a desk top computer which performed the test computations. Flowmeter scale readings were manually recorded. Performance specifications for the above instrumentation are listed in Table 4.2. A description of the computer program is given in Appendix A. O SU-080 9
r1 J
~\
) Containment dry air masses were calculated using the ideal gas law af ter first subtracting water vapor pressures from total pressures. The expression for dry air mass is:
M = 144 ( t - v) V RT , Where M= Dry air mass, LBM P = Total pressure, psia Py = Mean water vapor pressure, psia 3 V = Containment free air volume = 2,025,000 TT R = Gas constant for air = 53.35 FT-LB/LBM*R T = Mean dry bulb temperature, 'R Dry bulb _and dew point temperature sensors were distributed throughout the containment in a manner which was deemed best for determining the true mean temperature and vapor pressure. The responses of the dry bulb and dew point temperature sensors were checked, following installation in the containment, using certified standards. These checks were performed to assure that all components of the measuring system were functioning Os properly. Following final placement of these sensors, a containment temperature survey was performed to verify that the RTDs and dew cells were located at points which measured dry bulb and dew point temperatures representative of the associated volume fractions. The responses of the pressure sensor and flowmeter were also checked against certified standards to assure proper functioning following shipping from the calibration facility. The RMS instrumentation error (Instrument Selection Guide - ISG) must be,
, per Refs. 5.1 and 5.4, less than 0.25 La. The actual value, as calculated in Ref. 5.1, for a 24-hour test is 'O.003wt %/ day = 0.02 La. The ISG calculations are presented in Appendix F.
O SU-080 10 i t
r O- Table 4.1 Dry Bulb and Dew Point Temperature Sensor Location and Volume Fractions
- Radius in ft.
- Azimuth in Sensor Type /
- Elevation from Containment Deg. CCW from Volume No in ft. Centerline South = 0 Fraction RTD 1- 270 15 340 0.0586 2 250 30 355 0.0586 3 185 40 10 0.0586 4 220 20 120 0.0586 5 195 50 70 0.0586 6 200 40 170 0.0586 7 210 40 260 0.0586 8 235 30 240 0.0586 9 190 35 300 0.0586 10 170 50 30 0.0563 11 165 50 120 0.0563 12 175 55 210 0.0563 13 170 60 320 0.0563 14 125 55 350 0.0637 15 130 55 180 0.0637 16 115 44 20 0.0400 17 110 44 120 0.0400 18 115 44 250 0.0400 Dew Cell 1 235 30 240 0.1758 2 210 40 210 0.1758 3 190 35 300 0.1758 4 170 50 30 0.2252 5 130 60 180 0.1274 6 115 44 250 0.1200 4
- Visual Estimates O
l SU-080 11 , l l
.p Table 4.2 ILRT Instrumentation Number Used Function / Description Specifications Absolute Pressure 1 Precision Pressure Gauge Range: 0-100 psia Texas Instrumant Accuracy: 0.015% of reading Model 145-02 Sensitivity: 0.001 psia Repeatability: 0.001% FS Resolution: 0.001% FS Calibe. Date: 12/17/84 Drybulb Temperature 18 100 Ohm Platinum Range: 0-150*F Resistance Temperature Accuracy: 0.1*F Detectors Sensitivity 0.01*F Repeatability: 0.01'F Calibr. Date: 11/19/84 Dewpoint Temperature 6 Chilled Mirror Range: 40-212*F Dewpoint Detector, Accuracy: 0.54*F EG&G Model 660-C1 Sensitivity: 0.10*F Repeatability: 0.10*F Calibr. Date: 11/21/84
, Flow 1 Brooks Rotaaeter Range: 0-10 sefa Model 1110 Accuracy: 1.0% FS Calibr. Date: 12/17/84 The Bechtel DAS was utilized for data acquisition. All instruments except the flowmeter were directly connected through the DAS to the computer.
O SU-080 12
^
5.0 REFERENCES
5.1 Farley Nuclear Plant, Surveillance Test Procedure, FNP-2-STP-117.0, Revision 3. 5.2 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, Technical Specification 3/4.6.1. 5.3 Code of Federal Regulations Title 10, Part 50, Appendix J - Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water Cooled Power Reactors. 5.4 ANSI /ANS-56.8-1981, Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements. 5.5 ANSI N45.4-1972, Leakage Rate Testing of Containment Structures for Nuclear Reactors. 5.6 Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-1, Revision 1, Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants. 5.7 Farley Nuclear Plant Final Safety Analysis Report. O SU-080 13
l APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF BECHTEL ILRT COMPUTER PROGRAM i l l i i i i ?
! SU-080 P
5
, , , - - - - - - - - + - ,--n,-- -w.-~----,- __nn_ - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - -
O APPENDIX A DESCRIFfl0N OF BECHTEL ITAT COMPITIER PROGRAM A. Program and Report Description
- 1. The Bechtel IIAT computer program is used to determine the inte-grated leakage rate of a nuclear primary containment structure.
The program is used to compute leakage rate based on igut values of time, free air volume, containment acaosphere total pressure, drybulb temperature, and dowpoint temperature (water vapor pressure). Leakage rate is computed using the Absolute Method as defined in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, "Contaitaient System Leakage Testing Requirements" and BN-TOP-1, Rev 1, " Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants". The program is designed to allow the user to evaluate containannt leakage rate test results at the jobsite during containment leakage testing. Current leakage rate values may be obtained at any time during the testing period using one of two computational methods, yielding three different report printouts.
- 2. In the first printout, the Total Time Report, leakage rate is com-puted from initial values of free air volume, containment stacephere drybulb temperature and partial pressure of dry air, the latest values of the same parameters, and elapsed time. These individually computed leakage rates are statistically averaged using linear re-gression by the method of least squares. The Total Time Method is the computational technique upon which the short duration test criteria of BN-TOP-1, Rev 1, " Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Contairment Structures for Nuclear Power Plant," are based.
i
- 3. The second printout is the Mass Point Report and is based on the Mass Point Analysis Technique described in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981,
" Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements." The mass of dry air in the containment is computed at each data point (time) using l the Equation of State, from current values of containment atmosphere drybulb temperature and partial pressure of dry air. Contained mass
- is " plotted" versus time and a regression line is fit to the data ; using the method of least squares. Leakage rate is determined from j
- the statistically derived slope and intercept of the regression line.
i
- 4. The third printout, the Trend Report, is a summary of leakage rate values based on Total time and Mass Point computations presented as a function of number of data points and elapsed time (test dura-l tion). The Trend Report provides all leakage rate values required i for comparision to the acceptance criteria of BN-TOP-1 for conduct j of a short duration test.
!O SU-043 A-1
- 5. The program generates a predictor report based on Reference 7. The
" predictor" is an estimate of the upper bound on the change in mass point calculated laakage rate which will occur during the next four hours. The estiaste is based on the mass point calculated leakage rates and 951 UCLs during the previous four hours.
- 6. The program is written in a high level language and is designed for use on a micro-computer with direct data input from the data acquisition system. Brief descriptions of program use, formulas used for leakage rate computations, and program logic are provided in the following paragraphs.
B. Explanation of Program
- 1. The Bechtel IIAT computer program is written, for use by experi-enced IIAT personnel, to determine containment integrated leakage rates based on the Absolute Method described in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 and BN-TOP-1.
- b. Information loaded into the progran prior to or at the start of the g teat: N
. a. Number of containment atmosphere drybulb temperature sensors, dewpoint temperature (water vapor pressure) sensors and pressure gages to be used in leakage rate computations for the specific test
- b. Volume fractions assigned to each of the above sensors
- c. Calibration data for above sensors
- d. Test title
- e. Test pressure
- f. Maximum allowable leakage rate at test pressure
- 3. Data receiv.ed from the data acquistion system during the test, and used to compute laakage rates:
- a. Time and date
- b. Contairment atmosphere drybulb temperatures
- c. Containment atmosphere pressure (s)
- d. Containment atmosphere dewpoint temperatures
- e. Containment free air volume.
- 4. Af ter all data at a given time are received , a Summary of Measured Data report (refer to " Program Logic," Paragraph D, " Data" option O command) is printed.
i , , M 43 ' A-2
- 5. If drybulb and dewpoint temperature sensors should f ail during the test, the data from the sensor (s) are not used. The volumn frac-p) g V
tions for the remaining sensors are recomputed and reloaded into the program for use in ensuing leakage rate computations. C. Leakage Rate Formulae
- 1. Computation Using the Total Time Method:
- a. Measured leakage rate from data:
PV1 i = W 1RT1 (1) PVi i = WiRTi (2) 2400 (W1-W) i L i
= (3) a ti W1 Solving for W1 and Wi and substituting equations (1) and (2) into (3) yields:
2400 ( TPV) 1ii Li = l 1- l (4) 6i t ( TPVi 1 i) where W,Wi 1 = Weight of contained mass of dry air at times ti and d ti, respectively, iba. T,Ti 1 = Containment atmosphere drybulb temperature at times ti and ti, respectively, *R. P,Pi 1 = Partial pressure of the dry air component of the con-tainment atmosphere at times ti and ti, res pe ct ively, psia. V,Vi 1 = Containment free air volume at times ti and ti, res pe c-tively (constant or variable during the test), f t 3. ti, ti = Time at 1st and i ch data points respectively, hr. ati = Elapsed time from ti to t i, hr. R = Specific gas constant for air = 53.35 f t.lbf /lba.*R. Li = Measured leakage rate computed during time interval ! ti to t i, wt.%/ day. l l To reduce truncation error, the computer program uses the following equivalent formulation: i 1
-2400 aWi 1 b
i" St i( W1 ) l l SU-043 A-3 l
O .s.re AWi W1-W1 W1 W1 AgP V Ai a Pg Vi aTi e v - Pt V1 PVti T1 g , AT i Ti Ai=Pi-P1 P aVi=Vg-V1 T Ai=Ti-T1
- b. . Calculated leakage rate from regression analysis:
L=a+batN (5) where L = Calculated leakage rate, vt.%/ day, as determined from the regression line. a = (gLi-b 2 ti)/N (6) N(gLg ti) - (gLi )(m ti) N(h it ) - (E ti) N = Number of data points N g=g
- i=1
- c. 95% upper confidence limit on the calculated leakage rate:
UCL = a + b atN + S_ (0) L where UCL = 95% upper confidence limit wt.%/ day, at elapsed time atN -
- O SU-043 A-4
, , . . _ . , - , . - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
For atN < 24 S, = t 0.025;N-2 [(ILg 2 - agLg - bgLg atg)/(N-2)]1/ 2 x [g + g + (bg _ N ~ )I (98) (gt g2 (ggi)2/N)] N where to.025;N-2 = 1.95996 + 2.37226 + 2.82250 ; N-2 (N-2)Z For atN 2 24 S =t0 025;N-2 [(ILg2 - agLt - bgLget)/(N-2)]1/2 x [1 +(acN - 3) / (9b)
.I N (mti 2 _ (g gt )2f y)ji/2 1.6449(N-2)2 + 3.5283(N-2) + 0.85602 where t0 025;N-2 =
(N-2)2 + 1.2209(N-2) - 1.5162 I -t Calculated leakage rate computed using equation (5) at total elapsed time 3 tg, %/ day. ga t i O -
- 2. Computation using the Mass Point Method
- a. Contained mass of dry air from data:
Wg = 144 P,V, RTg (10) where l All symbols as previously defined. l l
- b. Calculated leakage rate from regression analysis, W = a + b at l
l b l _L = -2400 - (11) a where E = Calculated leakage rate, we.%/ day, as determined f rom the regression line. l0 SiJ-043 A-5
a = (twi-bm cz)/N (12) N(IWg it ) - (IW i)(m eg) ( N(m tg2 ) . (gg gi)2 l at g = Total elapsed time at time of iCh data point, hr l N = Number of data points l ! Wg = Contained mass of dry air at ich data point, iba, as computed from ! equation (10). l l W I=E i=1 7 To reduce truncation error, the computer program uses the following equivalent formulation: AWi b . a= Wg 1 + (I - E ae g)/N (14) W1 W1 _
. aWi AWi .
N (I at g) - I I at g Wi Wi N(Iatg2 ) _ ( gei)2 aWi where is as previously defined. W1
- c. 95% upper confidence limit.
-2400 UCL = (b - Sb) (16) a where UCL = 95% upper confidence limit, we.%/ day.
O
- SU-043 . A-6
SN Sb"20 025;F2 [NM tg3 - (M eg)*]* (17) where t0.025;N-2 .1.6449(N-2)2 + 3.5283 (N-2)2 + 0.85602 (N-2)2 + 1.2209 (N-2) - 1.5162 E[Wg - (a + b A tt)] N N-2 l 1 -
=W1 E4 W g /W g )2 _ [gg iy jy 1
)j2/N -
j N-2 1/2 IE O"i/ "1) A ti - EIA"i/ "l)(E t i)/N]2 / ! (18) E(a t g2 ) _ (g ag i)2/N -
- d. Predictors 2[(UCL-L)+4(lAl+2S)} A s 100 La where
-UCL = 95% upper confidence limit of mass point calculated leakage rate at end of test La = mass point calculated leakage rate at end of test A = value of linear regression analysis slope of mass point calculated leakage rate vs. time for last 4 hours of test data SA = linear regression analysis standard deviation of slope La = allowable leakage rate In terus of elasped time, a e and mass point calculated leakage rate Lag calculated at the end of ith time interval.
I i O U-043 A-7
-- - - , , - ..n- , - , - - - , . .- _ . _ . . . - _ _ _ _
1, I lag - B I att A = M 4 hr 4 hr (19) , NI Laga tg - g Img I atg (20) 4 hr 4 hr 4 hr B = MI atg 2-E atg 2 4 hr 4 hr I Lag - A I Lai - B g lag a ti
=
4 hr 4 hr 4 hr (21) S A [M-2] [M g atg - (g at g)1] i 4 hr 4 hr Lag = mass point calculated leakage rate evaluated usirig data up to time att. I 4 hr = summation over last 4 hours of test data. N
=
z N-lH 1 M = number of data points for last 4 hours of test. i r f l SU-043 A-8 J
- ~ - . - - , - - - - - ,
l l
, j D. , Program Logic '
I l T
- 1. The Bechtel IIAT computer program logic flow is controlled by a set 1 of user options. The user options and a brief description of their associated fssiccion are presented below.
l OPTION COMMAND FUNCTION After starting the program esecution, the user either enters the name of the file containing previously entered data or initializes a new data file. [ DATA Enables user to enter raw data. When the system requests values of time, volume, temperature, pressure and vapor pressure, the user enters the appropriate data. After completing the data entry, a summary is printed out. The user then verifies that the data were entered correctly. If errors are detected, the user will then be given the opportunity to correct the errors. After the user verifies that the data were entered correctly, a Corrected Data Summary Report of time, data, average temperature, partial pressure of , dry air, and water vapor pressure is printed. TREND A Trend Report is printed. TOTAL A Total Time Report is printed. MASS A Mass Point Report is printed. i TERM Enables user to sign-of f temporarily or permanently. All data is saved on a file for restarting. CORR Enables user to correct previously entered data. l LIST A Summary Data Report is printed. ' l \ h READ Enable the computer to receive the next set of data l from the data acquisition system directly. PLOT Enables user to plot summary data, individual sensor l data or air mass versus time. l l DELETE Enables user to delete a data point. l INSERT Enables user to reinstate a previously deleted data point. VOLFRA Enable user to change volume fractions. PRED A predictor report is printed. SU-043 A-9 i l
, l i
OPTION C0tefAND FUNCTION TIls Enable the user to specify the cias interval for a report or plot. VERF Enable the user to input imposed leakage rate and calcaluted IIJLT leaka s rates at start of verification tes t. E. COMPUTER REPORT AND DATA PRINTOUT MASS POINT REPORT The Mass Point Report presents leakage rate data (wt%/ day) as deter-ained by the Mass Point Method. The " Calculated Leakage Rate" is the value determined from the regression analysis. The "Contairment Air Mass" values are the masses of dry air in the containment (lba). These air masses, determined from the Equation of State, are used in the regression analysis. TOTAL TIME REPORT The Total Time Report presents data leakage rate (wt%/ day) as deter-O mined by the Total Time Method. The " Calculated Leakage Rate" is the V value determined from the regression analysis. The " Measured Leakage Rates" are the leakage rate values determined using Total Tina calcu-la tions. These values of leakage rate are used in the regression analysis. TREND REPORT The Trend Report presents leakage rates as determined by the Mass Point and Total Time methods in percent of the initial contained mass of dry air per day (wt%/ day), versus elapsed time (hours) and number of data points. PREDICTOR REPORT The predictor reports presents a predicted upper bound on the change in calculated mass point leakage rate over the next four hours.
SUMMARY
DATA REPORT i The Summary Data report presents the actual data used to calculate leakage rates by the various methods described in the " Computer Program" section of this report. The six colum headings are TIME, DATE, TEMP, PRESSURE, VPRS, and VOLUME and contain data defined as follows: O SU-043 A-10
-------n
w
.1. TDE: Time in 24-hour notations (hours and minutes).
- 2. MTE: Calendar date (month and day).
- 3. TEMP: Contairment weighted-average drybulb temperature in absolute units, degrees Rankine (*R).
- 4. PRESSURE: Partial pressure of the dry air component of the con-tainment atmosphere in absolute units (psia).
- 5. VPRS: - Partial pressure of water vapor of the contairment staosphere in absolute units (psia).
- 6. V0 LIME: Contairment free air volume (cu. f t.).
F.
SUMMARY
OF MEASURED DATA AND
SUMMARY
OF CORRECTED DATA i f The Summary of Measured Data presents the individual containment atmosphere drybulb temperatures, dowpoint temperatures, absolute total pressure and free air volume measured at the time and date.
- 1. TEMP 1 through TEMP N are the drybulb temperatures, where N = No. of RTD's. The values in the right-hand column are temperatures (*F), multiplied by 100, as read from the data O acquisition system (DAS). The values in the lef t-hand column are the corrected temperatures expressed in absolute units t
(*R).
- 2. PRES 1 through PRES N are the total pressures, absolute, were N = No.
of pressure sensors. The right-hand value, in parentheses, is a number in counts as read from the DAS. This count value is converted to a value in psia by the computer via the instrument's calibration table, counts versus psia. The lef t-hand column is the absolute total pressure, psia. I i l
- 3. VPRS 1 through VPRS N are the dewpoint temperatures (water vapor pressures), where N = No. of dewpoint sensors. The ,
values in the right-hand column are temperatures (*F), multi-plied by 100 as read from the DAS. The values in the left-l hand column are the water vapor pressures (psia) from the ! steam tables for saturated steam corresponding to the dewpoint i (saturation) temperatures in the center column. The Summary of Corrected Data presents corrected temperature and pressure values and calculated air mass determined as follows:
- 1. TEMPERATURE (*R) is the volume weighted average containment
- atmosphere drybulb temperature derived from TEMP 1 through TEMP N. O DH-165 A-11
* ~-+-----en-- ..,.nne. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- 2. CORRECIED PRESSURE (psia) is the partial pressure of the dry air component of the containannt atmosphere, absolute. The volume weighted average containment atmosphere water vapor pressure is subtracted from the volume weighted average total pressure, yielding the partial pressure of the dry air.
- 3. VAPOR PRESSURE (psia) is the volume weighted average contain-r.ent atmosphere water vapor pressure, absolute derived fra VPRS 1 through VPRS N.
- 4. VOLUME (cu. f t.) is the containsent free air volues.
- 5. CONTAIl0ENT AIR 1ESS (1ba) is the calculated asse of dry air in the containment. The mass of dry air is calculated using the containannt free air volume and the above TEMPERATURE and CORREECTED PRESSURE of the dry air.
O l t i a i I i O W-043 A-12
e - A a O APPENDIX B
- 1 ILRT STABILIZATION
SUMMARY
DATA 4 O i O SU-080 e --s- - . ~. - . . - __ -,. . - -,, _ , . - _ , _ , , _ ,
FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT
SUMMARY
DATA
- (% ))
STABILIZATION PERIOD CORRECTED TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 1045 302 539.707 64.3343 . 3493 2025000. 1100 302 538.587 64.2220 . 3483 2025000. 1115 302 538.002 64.1560 . 3482 2025000. 1130 302 537.605 64.1067 . 3485 2025000. 1145 302 537.298 64.0690 . 3481 2025000. 1200 302 537.053 64.0389 . 3482 2025000. 1215 302 536.842 64.0146 . 3475 2025000. 1230 302 536.662 63.9925 . 3475 2025000. 1845 302 536.510 63.9752 . 3468 2025000. 1300 302 536.379 63.9595 . 3464 2025000. 1315 302 536.271 63.9444 . 3465 2025000. 1330 302 536.162 63.9317 . 3462 2025000. 1345 302 536.074 63.9205 . 3464 2025000. 1400 302 535.990 63.9106 . 3453 2025000. 1415 302 535.915 63.9001 . 3458 2025000. 1430 302 535.845 63.8913 . 3455 2025000. 1445 302 535.784 63.8833 . 3455
- 2025000.
1500 302 535.723 63.8752 . 3455
- 2025000.
1515 302 535.663 63.8732 . 3405 2025000. A
- 1430 DATA (SEE SECTION 2.2) a B-1 m- - _,--,,.w, -. , , . _ - , , , . . . ,--,,,c , _..e-n, . .
FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION x FROM A STARTING TIME AND DATE OF: 1045 302 1985 TIME TEMP ANSI (HOURS) ( R) AVE T AVE T DIFF (4 HRS) (1HR)
.00 539.71
.25 538.59
.50 538.00
.75 537.61 1.00 537.30
-1.25 537.05 1.50 536.84 1.75 536.66 2.00 536.51 2.25 536.38 2.50 536.27 2.75 536.16 3.00 536.07 3.25 535.99 3.50 535.91 3.75 535.85 4.00 535.78 .981 .291 .69 4.25 535.72 .716 .267 .45*
4.50 535.66 .585 .252 .33*
- INDICATES TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION HAS BEEN SATISFIED e
b L B-2
_ - .. _ _ . _ _ . . . _ ._. m. __ _ _ _ . . - _ . . - - _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ . . _ . . . _ . _ _ . -
- i. ,.
FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT
"~
TEMPERATURE DEGREES F
- STABILIZATION PERIOD h
75.993 76.330- 76.667 '77.004 77.341 77.678 78.015 78.352 78.689 79.026 79.363 79.700- 80.037 l- ... . .., .. .. . ...... . .....,.... ,...... .. . . .. .... , . ..., . ., 1045 ! 3 8 5- + 1100 + ) 11115.t. + ! 1130 : + f ' 1145 1. + 4 1200 : + 1215 : + 1230 : +
~1245 : +
1300: +
- 1315! +
1330 : + P 1345 ! + 1400 : + 1415 +< l ! 14!0 1 -+
~1445 : +
i 1500 +-
; 1515 + 3-2-85
. ...+. + .+ . .... . ... ....., _ ...... .,... .. .+ .+ +
75.993 76.330 76.647 77.004 77.341 77.678 78.015 78.352 78.629 79.026 79.363 79.700 80.037- : W t t i i
+
f J
< g b I
t i 1 i B-3 1
- - - _L __- - -. _ _.. - _._ _.. _ .. _ ._ _ _ _ _ - - ... - . -
.4 , - . mL m 4 -_e_ _ ,_m. .a E
APPENDIX C ILRT
SUMMARY
DATA AND MASS POINT ANALYSIS i 5 J j i i l i 5 h SU-080
~ . -. . .--..- _ . -...-._ _ _ ......
~ FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT Y~'h
SUMMARY
DATA L) CORRECTED TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 1515 302 535.663 63.8732 .3405 2025000. 1530 302 535.617 63.8659 .3408 2025000. 1545 302 535.571 63.8589 .3408 2025000. 1600 302 535.522 63.8535 .3412 2025000. 1615 302 535.481 63.8490 .3407 2025000. 1630 302 535.447 63.8444 .3404 2025000. 1645 302 535.423 63.8385 .3412 2025000. 1700 302 535.387 63.8342 .3405 2025000. 1715 302 535.354 63.8296 .3411 2025000. 1730 302 535.325 63.8260 .3406 2025000. 1745 302 535.293 63.8219 .3408 2025000. 1800 302 535.271 63.8190 .3406 2025000. 1815 302 535.253 63.8165 .3402 2025000. 1830 302 535.226 63.8128 .3399 2025000. 1845 302 535.210 63.8094 .3403 2025000. 1900 302 535.195 63.8075 .3401 2025000. 1915 302 535.167 63.8045 .3402 2025000. 1930 302 535.151 63.8029 .3398 2025000. 1945 202 535.139 63.7994 .3403 2025000. 2000 302 535.118 63.7977 .3399 2025000.
/~'\ 2015 302 535.107 63.7958 .3399 2025000.
1 ,) s 2030 302 535.086 63.7941 .3396 2025000. 2045 302 535.076 63.7918 .3399 2025000. 2100 302 535.072 63.7899 .3397 2025000. 2115 302 535.055 63.7878 .3399 2025000. 2130 302 535.036 63.7862 .3394 2025000. 2145 302 535.036 63.7833 .3393 2025000. 2200 302 535.017 63.7822 .3394 2025000. 2215 302 535.020 63.7802 .3394 2025000. 2230 202 535.008 63.7791 .3395 2025000. 2245 302 534.994 63.7786 .3390 2025000. 2300 302 534.984 63.7768 .3388 2025000. 2315 302 534.975 63.7744 .3392 2025000. 2330 302 534.968 63.7728 .3388 2025000. 2345 302 534.961 63.7716 .3390 2025000. 0 303 534.955 63.7694 .3392 2025000. 15 303 534.952 63.7698 .3388 2025000. 30 303 534.935 63.7687 .3389 2025000. 45 303 534.932 63.7680 .3386 2025000. 100 303 534.940 63.7682 .3384 2025000. 115 303 534.938 63.7670 .3386 2025000. 130 303 534.935 63.7658 .3388 2025000. 145 303 S34.927 63.7649 .3387 2025000. 200 303 534.924 63.7638 .3388 2025000. 215 303 534.906 63.7631 .3385 2025000. 230 303 534.917 63.7633 .3383 2025000.
}
x ,- 245 300 303 303 534.919 534.901' 63.7621 63.7623
.3385
.3383 2025000.
2025000. 315 303 534.903 63.7612 .3383 2025000. C-1
f-~s FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT ( )
SUMMARY
DATA --- (CONTINUED) CORRECTED TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 330 303 534.898 63.7606 .3380 2025000.. 345 303' 534.907 63.7599 .3387 2025000. 400 303 534.903 63.7596 .3380 2025000. 415 303 534.883 63.7595 .3381 2025000. 430 303 534.901 63.7588 .3378 2025000. 445 303 534.900 63.7582 .3383 2025000. 500 303 534.900 63.7580 .3386 2025000. 515 303 534.891 63.7575 .3381 2025000. 530 303 534.895 60.7567 .3379 2025000. 545 303 534.891 63.7567 .3379 2025000. 600 303 534.893 63.7564 .3382 2025000. 615 303 534.893 63.7565 .3381 2025000. 630 303 534.892 63.7566 .3380 2025000. 645 303 534.893 63.7559 .3377 2025000. 700 303 534.903 63.7560 .3376 2025000. 715 303 534.901 63.7556 .3380 2025000. 730 303 534.896 63.7558 .3378 2025000. 745 303 534.904 63.7548 .3378 2025000. 800 303 534.904 63.7550 .3376 2025000. 815 303 534.896 63.7549 .3376 2025000. 830 303 534.909 63.7552 .3374 2025000. 845 303 534.910 63.7547 .3378 2025000. j- 900 303 534.909 63.7554 .3372 2025000. I i 915 303 534.924 63.7551 .3375 2025000.
\2 930 303 534.915 63.7553 .3373 2025000.
945 303 534.918 63.7551 .3375 2025000. 1000 303 534.926 63.7552 .3374 2025000. 1015 303 534.921 63.7555 .3371 2025000. 1030 303 534.927 63.7553 .3373 2025000. 1045 303 534.927 63.7552 .3374 2025000. 1100 303 534.925 63.7554 .3372 2025000. 1115 303 534.930 63.7543 .3373 2025000. 1130 303 534.932 63.7542 .3374 2025000. 1145 303 534.943 63.7543 .3373 2025000. 1200 303 534.932 63.7542 .3373 2025000. 1215 303 534.944 63.7547 .3368 2025000. 1230 303 534.949 63.7543 .3373 2025000. 1245 303 534.954 63.7546 .3370 2025000. 1300 303 534.942 63.7543 .3373 2025000. 1315 303 534.965 63.7544 .3372 2025000. 1330 303 534.954 63.7542 .3374 2025000. 1345 303 534.960 63.7547 .3368 2025000. 1400 303 534.972 63.7547 .3368* 2025000. 1415 303 539.961 63.7548 .3368* 2025000. 1430 303 534.963 63.7548 .3368* 2025000. 1445 303 534.979 63.7548 .3368* 2025000. 1500 303 534.974 63.7548 .3368* 2025000. 1515 303 534.984 63.7548 .3368* 2025000. p d
- 1345 DATA (SEE SECTION 2.2) c-2
, FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT
-(w/,} LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY) MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1515 302 1985 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R) (PSIA) MASS (LBM) (LBM) LOSS (LBM/HR)
- - - - - - - - - - _ = - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - -- . - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1515 .535.663 63.8732 651750. 1530 535.617 63.8659 651731. 19.0 76.1-1545 535.571 63.8589 651715. 15.2 68.5 1600 535.522 63.8535 651720. -4.6 39.6 1615 535.481 63.8490 651724. -3.9 25.8 1630 535.447 63.8444 651719. 5. 2 24.8 1645 535.423 63.8385 651687. 31.5 41.6 1700 535.387 63.8342 651687. .2 35.8 1715 535.354 63.8296 651681. 5. 7 34.2
'1730 535.325 63.8260 651680. 1. 7 31.1 1745 535.293 63.8219 651676. 3. 7 29.5 1800- 535.271 63.8190 651674. 1. 8 27.5 1815 535.253 63.8165 651669. 5.1 26.9 1830 535.226 63.8128 651665. 4. 0 26.1 1845 535.210 63.8094 651649. 15.8 28.7 1900 535.195 63.8075 651648. .9 27.0 1915 535.167 63.8045 651652. -4.0 24.4
[ 1930 535.151 63.80'29 651655. -2.5 22.3 ' V] 1945 535.139 63.7994 651634. 20.6 25.7 2000 535.118 63.7977 651642. -8. 2 22.6 2015 535.107 63.7958 651636. 6. 4 22.8 2030 535.086 63.7941 651644. -7.9 20.2 2045 535.076 63.7918 651633. 10.5 21.2 2100 535.072 63.7899 651618. 15.1 22.9 2115 535.055 63.7878 651618. .7 22.0 2130 535.036 63.7862 651624. ~6. 7 20.1 2145 535.036 63.7833 651596. 28.3 23.7 2200 535.017 63.7822 651607. -11.3 21.1 2215 535.020 63.7802 651583. 24.5 23.9 2230 535.008 63.7791 651586. -3. 5 22.6 2245 -534.994 63.7786 651598. -11.6 20.3 2300 534.984 63.7768 651592. 5. 7 20.3 2315 534.975 63.7744 651578. 13.7 21.4 2330 534.968 63.7728 651571. 7. 8 21.7 2345 534.961 63.7716 651567. 3. 8 21.5 0 534.955 63.7694 651552. 15.2 22.6 15 534.952 63.7698 651560. -8.0 21.1 30 534.935 63.7687 651570. -10.0 19.5 45 534.932 63.7680 651564. 5. 5 19.5 100 534.940 63.7682 651558. 6. 0 19.6 115 534.938 63.7670 651547. 11.2 20.3 130 534.935 63.7658 651540. 7. 2 20.5
,_ 145 534.927 63.7649 651539. .6 20.0
( 200 534.924 63.7638 651532. 6. 7 20.2 N 215 534.906 63.7631 651547. -14.2 18.5 230 534.917 63.7633 651535. 11.5 19.1 245 534.919 63.7621 651521. 14.2 19.9 C-3
n FARLEY-UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT ( ) LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY) MASS POINT ANALYSIS --- (CONTINUED) TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R) (PSIA) MASS (LBM) (LBM) LOSS (LBM/HR) ______= - - - - - _ _ _ - - .__ _____________ -- 300 534.901 63.7623 651544. -23.5 17.5 315 534.903 63.7612 651532. 12.6 18.2 330 534.898 63.7606 651530. 1. 7 17.9 345 534.907 63.7599 651514. 16.5 18.9 400 534.903 63.7596 651515. -1.4 18.4 415 534.883 63.7595 651538. -22.8 16.3 430 534.901 63.7588 651508. 29.4 18.2 445 534.900 63.7582 651504. 4. 3 18.2 500 534.900 63.7580' 651503. 1. 4 18.0 515 534.891 63.7575 651508. -5.5 17.2 530 534.895 63.7567 651495. 13.5 17.9 545 534.891 63.7567 651499. -4.6 17.3 600 534.893 63.7564 651494. 5. 6 17.4 615 534.893 63.7565 651495. -1.1 17.0 630 534.892 63.7566 651498. -3.5 16.5 645 534.893 63.7559 651489. 9. 0 16.8 700 534.903 63.7560 651477. 11.9 17.3 715 534.901 63.7556 651476. 1. 2 17.1 730 534.896 63.7558 651485. -8. 4 16.3 s 745 534.904 63.7548 651465. 19.6 17.3 ( ) 800 534.904 63.7550 651466. .8 17.O V 615 534.896 63.7549 651476. -10.3 16.1 830 534.909 63.7552 651463. 13.2 16.6 845 534.910 63.7547 651457. 5. 9 16.7 900 534.909 63.7554 651464. -6.7 16.1 915 534.924 63.7551 651443. 20.5 17.0 930 534.915 63.7553 651456. -13.1 16.1 945 534.918 63.7551 651450. 5. 9 16.2 1000 534.926 63.7552 651442. 8. 8 16.4 1015 534.921 63.7555 651451. -9.3 15.7 1030 534.927 63.7553 651441. 9. 9 16.0 1045 534.927 63.7552 651440. 1. 3 15.9 1100 534.925 63.7554 651445. -5.4 15.4 1115 534.930 63.7543 651427. 18.1 16.1 1130 534.932 63.7542 651424. 2. 9 16.1 1145 534.943 63.7543 651412. 12.2 16.5 1200 534.932 63.7542 651425. -12.7 15.7 1215 534.944 63.7547 651415. 9. 4 15.9 1230 534.949 63.7543 651404. 11.3 16.3 1845 534.954 63.7546 651402. 2. 6 16.2 1300 534.942 63.7543 651413. -11.9 15.5 1315 534.965 63.7544 651386. 27.0 16.5 1330 534.954 63.7542 651397. -10.7 15.8 1345 534.960 63.7547 651396. 1. 3 15.7 1400 534.972 63.7547 651382. 14.1 16.2
. 1415 534.961 63.7548 651395. -13.0 15.4 1430 534.963 63.7548 651392. 2. 2 15.4 V 1445 534.979 63.7548 651373. 19.5 16.0 1500 534.974 63.7548 651379. -6.0 15.6 1515 534.984 63.7548 651368. 11.2 15.9 C-4
FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT [~' -
~\
LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY) MASS POINT ANALYSIS --- (CONTINUED) TIME TEMP PRESSURE. CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS
-(R) (PSIA) MASS (LBM) (LBM) LOSS.(LBM/HR)
- - - - - - - - - - ==------------ _ _
FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.) =2025000. REGRESSION LINE INTERCEPT (LBM) = 651707.
-SLOPE (LBM/HR)- = -14.2 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE = .150 75% OF' MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE = .113 THE UPPER 95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT = .053 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE = .052 O
s C-5
APPENDIX D ILRT PLOTS
- 1. Temperature
- 2. Pressure
- 3. Vapor Pressure 4 Air Mass L
l i SU-080 i
FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT TEMPERATURE DEGREES F' TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1515 .302 1985
/"~S '
75.000 75.100 75.200 75.300 75.400 75.500 75.600 75.700 75.800 75.900 76.000 76.100 76.200
+.. .. +. _ ., +. _ +. + .,. , ..+. +, ,
.1515 : 3-2-85 +
1530 : + 1545 : + 1600 : + 1615 i + 1630 : + 1645 : + 1700 : + 1715 : + 1730 : + 1745 : + 1000 : + 1815 : + 1830 i + 1845 + 1900 : + 1915 + 1930 l- + 1945 : + 2000 : + 2015 + 2030 : + 2045 : + 2l00 i + 1 2115 : + 2130 i + 2145 : + 2200 : + 2215 : + 2230 : + 2245 : + 2300 : + 2315 : + 2330 : + 2345 3-2-85 + 0 3-3-85 + 15 : + 30 : + 45 : + 100 : +
!!5 : +
130 : + 145 : + 200 ! + 215 i + 230 : + 245 : + 300 : + 315 : + 330 : + (j 345 1 3-3-85 +
+... .., . _ . ... ...+.... .. ........... . ..... ....+. . ..... .. , ........ .. + . ..,
75.000 75.100 75.200 75.300 75.400 75.500 73.600 75.700 75.000 75.900 76.000 76.100 76.200 D-1 e
m- -7 i 4 i FARLEY: UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT TEMPERATURE DEGREES F --- (CONTINUED)
, 75.000 75.100 75.200 75.300 75.400 15.500 75.600 75.700 75.000 75.900 76.000 76.100 76.200
- g :+.+_+_. . .,_ .., .. .+.., -
+
400 i 3 8 5 +
.- 415 1 '+
430 i +
'441 i +
N0: +
$15 l' +
530 i + 545 i + 600 l +
.615 i +
630 I' + 645 l + 100 1 +' 715 i +
'730 l- +
745 : + 000 t + 815 t. 1- .+ 830 : + M5 i + 900 i + 915 1 + 930 i + ' 945 1 +
- D'..
'1000 I '
1015 i +
+ 3 ?
'd$
t(' , g"{', i 1030 1 + 7 s- i !,+ .' 1045 t + a.,<
; ( f.
!!00 1 +
', , . , f le, ' .,
1115 : + f' 1130 i + 1145 + 12001- + 1215 : + 1230 1 + 1245 i +
.1300: +
1315 1 + 1330 i + 1345 i + 1400 1 + 1415 1 + 1430 i + 1445 1 + 1500 i + 1515 i 3 8 5 +
+ . .. . ... ......................+.........+.. .....+. ......+. ........ ...... .....+ .. + . ..+
75.000 75.100 75.200 75.300 75.400 75.500 75.600 75.700 75.800 75.900 76.000 76.100 16.200 D-2
e - FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT PRESSURE PSIA
*N s TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1515 302 1985 63.700 63.720 63.740 63.760 63.700 63.800 63.820 63.840 63.860 63.I00 63.900 63.920 63.940
+ - +. _ . _ .+- -+ +.._.+. +.. + +.. + . + ,
1515 i 3 8 5 , 1530 1 + 1545 1 + 1600 1 + 1615 I + 1630 1 + 1645 1 + 1700 1 + 1715 1 + 1730 i + 1745 1 + 1000 1 + 1815 I + 1830! + 1845 I + 1900 1 + 1915 1 + 1930 1 + 1945 1 + 2000 1 + 2015 ! + 2030 1 + 2045 1 + 1 2l00 1 + [/2115i
\ +
2130 I + 2145 i + 2200 1 + 2215 1 + 22301 + 2245I + 2300 1 + 2315 1 + 23301 + 2345 3-2-85 , 0: 3-3-85 + 15 1 + 30 1 + 45 i + 1H I + 115 1 + 130 1 + 145 1 + 2M I + 215 I + 2301 + 2451 + 300 1 + 315i +
/ 7 '30
- l +
V 34$ 3-3-85 +
+.. ....+._. +.. . +. .... ..+.............+ .. .+. . +.....+.....+. .+
63.700 63.720 63.740 63.760 63.700 63.800 63.120 63.140 63.060 63.000 63.900 63.920 63.940 D-3
.A
FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC.ILRT PRESSURE PSIA --- (CONTINUED) 1 63.,700 63.720 63.740 63.7H 63.7N 63.000 63.820 63.M0 63.060 63.000 63.900 63.920 63.940
+ . + - . + + .+ + - + . + ~.+ ++ + .+
too1 3-3-85 + 415i +
' 4M I +
MS I + 500 1 - +
$15 1 +*
530 t .+ M5 I . + 600 1 + 615 i + 6M I + H5 8 + 1M I + 715 i + 730 1 + 745 1 + 800 i + 115 1 + 830 1 + MS I + 900 1 + 915 i + 9M I + 9451 + ( 1000 1 + 10151 + 1034 1 + 1945 1 + 1100 1 +
!!!5'l +
!!30 1 +
1845 1 + 1200 8 + 1215 1 + 1230 1 + 1245 1 + 1300 1 + 13151 + 1330 1 + 1345 1 + 1400 1 + 1415 i + 14301 + 1445I + 1500 1 + 1515 1 3-3-85 +
+. ... +. . ..+... +. ..,.........+......... .. . +.... ... ...... .+. . ...... .. .. .+
63.700 63.720 63.740 63.760 63.700 63.000 63.820 63.140 63.860 63.000 63.9H 63.920 63.940 s D-4 . ._ m
P FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT VAPOR PRESSURE PSIA . g, TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1515 302 1985 I .
\ . 230 .250 .270 .290 .310 .330 .350 .370 .390 .410 .430 .450 .470
+.... ~ +- +-+-+. + + . .,.. +. ., .+ ,
1515 1 3-2-85 , 15341 + 1545 i + 1600 1 + 1615 1 + 1630 1 + lHS I + 1700 1 + 1715 1 + 1730 1 + ! 1745 i + 1000 1 + - 1815 i + 7 1934 1 + i 1945 1 + 1900 1 + 1915 1 + ; 1930 i + 1945 i + 2000 8 + i 2015 1 + 2030 1 + 6 2HS : + 2l00 1 + d 2115 i + 2130 1 + 21451
- F 2200 1 +
2215 i + 22301 + , 2245 i + 23001 + 2315i + l 23301 + 2345 1 3-2-85 + ,. OI 3-3-85 + - 15 I + 301 + 45 I + 100 1 + 115 1 + 130 1 +
~
145 1 +
' 2H I +
215 1 + 230 1 + 245 1 + 3001 + 315 1 + 3301 + 345 1 3-3-85 +
,.........+....+.......+... . . . +.........+.........+.....+....+.....+..-..+..-.....,
.230 .250 .270 .290 .310 .330 .350 .370 .390 .410 .430 .450 .470 D-5
_ __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ __ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . - _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_=__. __ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT VAPOR PRESSURE PSIA --- (CONTINUED)
- n. .
(,v) .230 s.
.250 .270
...+
.290 .310
+. .. .+
.330 .350
.+
.370 .390 .410 .430 .450 .470
. .. +. + +. + +... +. .+
gog 3-3-85 + ,
'415 1 +
430 i + 445i + 500 1 + 515 i +
.530 1 +
545 1 + 600 1 + 6151- + 634 1 + M5 I . + 7W l + 7151 + 130 I + 745 1 + 000i + 015 1 + 030 1 + H51 + 900 I + 915 I + 930l + M5 i + 10001 + 10llI + 1930 1 + 1945 1 + 1100 1 +
!!!$ I +
1830 1 +
!!451 +
1200 1 + 1215 l + 1330i + 1245 i + 1300 1 + 1315 l + 13301 + 1345 1 + 1400 l + 1415 1 + 14301 + 1445 I. + 15001 + 15151 3-3-85 ,
$....... 6.. .....t....... +. .. ,.... . +..... .4 .......+ ... +... ....+.... ..+.........+ ... .t
.230 .250 .210 .290' .310 .330 .350 .370 .390 .410 .430 .450 .470 D-6
FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT AIRMASS LBM X 1000 m TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1515 302 1985 650.925 651.000 651.075 651.150 651.225 651.300 651.375 651.450 651.525 651.600 651.675 651.750 651.825
+.
. + . ~ . + . + + +. + .+ ___.+.. .___.+ ____. _ +. .__+. _+
1515 : 3-2-85 + 1530 : + 1545 : + 1600 : + 1615,: + 1630 : + 1645 : + 1100 : 1715 : + 1730 1745 : 1800 : + 1815 i + 1830 : + 1845 : ,
, +
~
1900I + 1915 : + 1930 : + 1945: + 2000 : + 2015 :
' +
2030'I + 2045 : + O 2100 : + 2115 : + . 2130 : + 2145'i , '
+
2200 : + 2215 : + 2230 : + 2245 e + 2300 : 2315 : A [ +
+
2330 : C' + 2345 : 3-2-85 + 0i 3-3-85 + 15 : + 30 ': +
.# 45 : +
100 : + 115 : +
-130 : +
145 : + 200 : + 215 . + 230 : + 245 : + 300 : + 315 1. + 330 i- +
\ 345 : 3-3-85 +
+ . ___+ _ .+ 7 r + _ _+ .__. +. ___ .+ _ .__+ ___ + __ .__+ - __ +.. +__ +
650.925 651.000 651.075 ~ 651.150 651.225 651.300 651.375 651.450 651.525 651.600 651.675 651.750 651.825 D-7
4 FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT AIRMASS LBM X 1000 --- (CONTINUED) i f3 650.925 651.000 651.075 651.150 651.225 651.300 651.375. 651.450 651.525 651.600 651.675 651.750 651.825
+ .+ . + . +... + _ + _ ... + .+ + ....+ . + _ +. __+
400 : 3-3-85 + 415 : + 430 : + 445 : + 500 : + 515 : + 530 : + 545 i + 600 : + 615 : + 630 : + 645 : + 700 : + 715 : + 730 : +
-745 : +
800 : + 815 : + 830 : + 845 : + 900 +
. 915 : +
930 : + 945 : + (m ' 1000 : + 1015 :- er + 1030 :
" +
1045 : O + 1100 i C' +
!!!5 : +
!!30 : +
!!45 i +
1200 : + 1215 : + , 1230 : + 1245 : .+ 1300 : + 1315 : + 1330 l- + 1345 : + 1400 : + 1415 : + , 1430 : +
-1445 :
+
1500 : + 1515 : 3-3-85 +
+.... + . + + + + .. .+.. + + ... +.- , _+ . .,
650.925 651.000 651.075 651.150 651.225 651.300 651.375 '651.450 651.525 651.600 651.675 651.750 6 O D-8 j.
- - a -u- - . -..
O . APPENDIX E VERIFICATION TEST
SUMMARY
DATA, AND ANALYSIS O O SU-080
., - - . . . - . .. . ~ . . . . . . _ ..- . . . .- . . . . . . - . _ , . . . ..
4 i
.h FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT '
SUMMARY
DATA VERIFICATION STABILIZATION TIME'DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS
~1530 303-VOLUME
- 534.977 63.7561 .3355 2025000.
1545 303 534.991 63.7562 > 1600 303
.3354 2025000.
534.979 63.7565 .3351 2025000. 1615 303 534.991 63.7553 1630 303
.3353 2025000.
534.987 63.7554 .3352 2025000. i i e i-4 1 E 9 1 l. 1 E1
FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT
SUMMARY
DATA
, VERIFICATION
. CORRECTED TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 1630 303 534.987 63.7554 .3352 2025000.
1645 303 534.998 63.7540 .3355 2025000. 1700 303 534.996 63.7530 .3355 2025000. 1715 303 534.999 63*.7520 .3355 2025000. 1730 303 535.009 63.7513 .3352 2025000. 1745' 303 535.015 63.7502 .3354 2025000. 1800 303 535.009 63.7492 .3354- 2025C00. 1815 303' 535.011 63.7479 .3356 2025000. 1830 303 535.012 63.7471 .3355 2025000. 1845 303 535.020 63.7462 .3353 2025000. 1900 303 335.021 63.7462 .3353 2025000. 1915 303 535.026 63.7442 .3354 2025000. 1930 303 535.023 63.7435 .3350 2025000. 1945 303 535.020 63.7424 .3351 2025000. 2000 303 535.031 63.7416 .3350 2025000. 2015 303 535.039 63.7413 .3353 2025000. 2030 303 535.069 63.7411 .3354 2025000.
.,r h G
E-2
n i ( FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT . LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY) MASS POINT ANALYSIS VERIFICATION TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1630 303 1985 TEST DURATION: 4.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R) (PSIA) MASS (LBM) (LBM) LOSS (LBM/HR) __ _ _ _ =--_______ ___ _ __ 1630 534.987 63.7554 651369. 1645 534.998 63.7540 651342. 27.5 109.9 1700 534.996 63.7530 651334. 7. 6 70.2 1715 534.999 63.7520 651321. 13.7 65.1 1730 535.009 63.7513 651301. 19.6 68.4 1745 535.015 63.7502 651282. 18.7 69.7 1800 535.009 63.7492 651280. 2. 4 59.7 1815 535.011 63.7479 651264. 16.1 60.4 1830 535.012 63.7471 651254. 9. 2 57.4 1845 535.020 63.7462 651236. 18.3 59.2 1900 535.021 63.7462 651234. 1. 7 53.9 1915 535.026 63.7442 651207. 27.5 59.1 1930 535.023 63.7435 651204. 2. 6 55.0 O 1945 535.020 63.7424 651197. 7. 6 53.1 2000 535.031 63.7416 651174. 22.5 55,7 2015 535.039 63.7413 651162. 11.8 55.2 2030 535.069 63.7411 651124. 38.8 61.4 FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.) =2025000. REGRESSION LINE
' INTERCEPT (LBM) = 651361.
SLOPE (LBM/HR) = -54.2 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE UPPER LIMIT = .240 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RA1E LOWER LIMIT = .164 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE = .200 9 se V E-3
[(, FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT AIRMASS LBM~X 1000 VERIFICATION 651.124 651.144 651.165 651.185 651.206 651.226 651.246 651.267 651.287 651.308 651.328 651.349 651.369
+_....+... .+ .+. .+ . +.....+ + ..__.+.__ ....,.. .. .+. ..__.+.___.. ,
1630 1 3-3-85 ,
+
1645 : + 1700 : 1713 i 1730 1743 1900 t 4,t.19 + 9p 1813 :
- llf5! # ' O. *
/ '0 l'", l *, s ** e
/**
l;; . 2000 : + S, 2015 . + 2030 +
+ _ .+_ _ _. +. .+ _ + .__..__+ . .+_.___.+ + ___+ .+ + _ _ +
651.124 651.144 651.165 651.185 651.206 651.226 651.246 651.267 651.287 651.308 651.328 651.349 651.369 e O E-4
h O APPENDIX F ISG CALCULATIONS , O J l O SU-080
r ISG CALCULATION 24-HOUR TEST La = 0.15%/ day P.. = 64-psia T = 535*R Vap Pres = 0.172 psia, @70*F, A l'F = 0.012 psia change VPRS t = 24 hours Pressure ep = ((0.001)2+(0.0005)23 =0.00112 h Vapor Pressure e v
=[(0.1)+(0.1) 3 (0.012) = 0.00069
\ 5 /
Temperature e T=[(0.01) + (0.01)2] 1/2 = 0.0033 Q 18 ISG = 2400 2[0.00112 2+2 0.00069 +2 0.0033)2-24 ( 64 64 535/ TSG = 0.003%/ day O - SU-080 F-1
(} APPENDIX G LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA AS FOUND LLRT
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS FOR THIRD REFUELING ELECTRICAL PENETRATION TOTAL 15.80 SCCM TYPE B TEST (LESS ELEC. PEN.) TOTAL (HATCHES, ETC.) 795.40 SCCM TYPE C TEST TOTAL 8,821.80 SCCM TOTAL LLRT LEAKAGE 9,633.00 SCCM Maximum Allowable Leakage (.6 La) = 151,058.9 SCCM 9,633.0 SCCM = 6.38% of Allowable Leakage AS LEFT LLRT
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS FOR THIRD REFUELING ELECTRICAL PENETRATION TOTAL 7.91 SCCM TYPE B TEST (LESS ELEC. PEN.) TOTAL (HATCHES, ETC.) 795.40 SCCM TYPE C TEST TOTAL 4,658.00 SCCM TOTAL LLRT LEAKAGE 5,461.31 SCCM Maximum Allowable Leakage ~(.6 La) = 151,058.9 SCCM 5,461.31 SCCM = 3.61% of Allowable Leakage Appendix I lists local leakage rates for penetrations modified just prior to the first periodic ILRT. CJS/gri-D2 f O
f'T d APPENDIX G LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA AS FOUND LLRT SUtNARY ANALYSIS FOR SECOND REFUELING ELECTRICAL PENETRATION TOTAL 37.95 SCCM TYPE B TEST (LESS ELEC. PEN.) TOTAL (HATCHES, ETC.) 1,266.70 SCCM
~ TYPE C TEST TOTAL *3,663.81 SCCM TOTAL LLRT LEAKAGE 4,968.46 SCCM Maximum Allowable Leakage (.6 La) = 151,058.9 SCCM 4,968.4 SCCM = 3.29% of Allowable Leakage
- Penetration No. 32 Leakage was off-scale (i .e. > 20,000 SCCM) on instrumentation available at the time of the test. Subsequent to the Unit 2 Second Refueling Outage, instrumentation has been ordered to detect leakage up to 300,000 SCCM. Assuming that penetration number 32 was leaking at 3 times the instrument reading capacity of 20,000 SCCM, the penetration leakage rate would equal 60,000 SCCM. The new total leakage would be 64,968.4 SCCM, which would be 43.01% of the Allowable Leakage.
AS LEFT LLRT SUlHARY ANALYSIS FOR SECOND REFUELING ELECTRICAL PENETRATION TOTAL 9.62 SCCM TYPE B TEST (LESS ELEC. PEN.) TOTAL (HATCHES, ETC.) 1,266.70 SCCM TYPE C TEST TOTAL 3,364.89 SCCM TOTAL LLRT LEAKAGE 4,641.21 SCCM - Maximum Allowable Leakage (.6 La) = 151,058.9 SCCM 4,641.15 SCCM = 3.07% of Allowable Leakage CJS/gri-D2
7 APPENDIX G (V LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA
.AS FOUND LLRT
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS FOR FIRST REFUELING ELECTRICAL PENETRATION TOTAL 22.30 SCCM TYPE B TEST (LESS ELEC. PEN.) TOTAL (HATCHES, ETC.) 2,375.50 SCCM TYPE C TEST TOTAL *4,281.70 SCCM TOTAL LLRT LEAKAGE 6,679.50 SCCM Maximum Allowable Leakage (.6 La) = 151,058.9 SCCM 6,679.5 SCCM = 4.42% of Allowable Leakage
- Penetration Nos. 27 and 63 were off-scale (i.e. > 20,000 SCCM) on instrumentation available at the time of the test. Subsequent to the Unit 2 first refueling outage, instrumentation has been ordered to detect leakage up to 300,000 SCCM. Assuming that penetration 27 and 63 were each leaking at 3 times the instrument reading capacity of 20,000 SCCM, the penetration's leakage rates would be 120,000 SCCM. The new total leakage would be 126,679.5 SCCM, which would be 83.85% of the Allowable Leakage.
AS LEFT LLRT
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS FOR FIRST REFUELING ELECTRICAL PENETRATION TOTAL 12.52 SCCM TYPE B TEST (LESS ELEC. PEN.) TOTAL (HATCHES, ETC.) 2,375.50 SCCM TYPE C TEST TOTAL 5,990.46 SCCM TOTAL LLRT LEAKAGE 8,378.48 SCCM Maximum Allowable Leakage ( .6 La) = 151,058.9 SCCM 8,378.48 SCCM = 5.55% of Allowable Leakage CJ S/gri-D2 O
l o . TTFs C TsST ,,, 33rd REFINI,ING o
~~
As 70Es3 # l Pale. AS 70835 NIN. PATE As I2ff NAI. AS ' NO. VALVE No. BsTg imm gaasagg agtg ggagagg gary gangang ' (sccN) (scoo (ecco ras raus. . Io 02stive264 el/23/ss 3.so* et/23/ss 3.see ., gastlVo254 el/23/s5 3.so* 1.9e sI/23/ss 3.se* 3.so il g2stivo26s et/16/s5 27.9e* st/16/as 27.9e* g2suVo25s el/16/ss 27.9e* 13.95 el/14/s5 27. set 27.90 12 02P13V3el et/22/s5 576.50* et/22/ss 576.5e* Q2PI3V302 61/22/s5 576.50* ol/22/s5 576.5e* 02r13v2sl el/22/ss 576.50* et/22/ss 576.5e* Q2r13V2s2 el/22/s5 576.50* 2ss.25 el/22/s5 576.5e* 576.50 I 13 02r13V2s3 e1/22/85 909.0e* e8/22/s5 ses.es* l 42r13V2s4 el/22/ss 909.0e* el/22/ss ses.es* . i 42r13V303 el/22/s2 90s.0e* al/22/ss pas.co* . 42r13V3o4 ol/22/ss 9e9.00* 454.50 al//22s5 9es.eet ses.oo 9
~ 16 g2suVoota et/Is/ss 3.40 3.4e el/Is/as 3.4e 3.4o la g2stlVools el/14/ss 101.9e lol.9e et/14/s5 let.9e 101.9e 23 02:2tV2534 ol/es/a5 off scale
- el/le/s5 26.4e*
.I 02x21v253s ol/os/as off scale
- st/lo/ss 26.4e*
g2s21V253c el/os/ss off scale
- st/te/as 26.4e* l Q2s21V254 et/es/s2 15.50 15.5e et/0s/s5 22.68 26.40 ,
I 24 Q2:21Vils el/21/s5 off scale et/22/s5 17.54 02:21V25s el/21/s5 11.1o et/21/s5 ll.le : 42 21V257 OI/21/s5 5.30 5.3o et/21/s5 5.3e 17.50 . 25 Q2:21Vll5s ol/0s/s5 46.00 46.00 et/os/s5 46.00 46.00 26 01/os/s5 21.60 21.60 al/,0s/s5 21.60 21.60 Q2:21Vll5C 27 ol/0s/s5 21.9o 21.90 ol/os/s5 21.9e 21.9e Q2:21VI154
*V: lues represent total leakage from aroup sets of valves as physically tested.
#Maxinamn leakaae fran inside to outside containment throuch a penetration with all contairunent isolation valves for that penetraticm closed by normal operation.
s
- O '
O O i TYPE C TEST Sis. .sf 3rd sEF ELING
. AS F0 s3 f PEIE. AS FolsID HnN. PATN As 15T MAX. AS ,
VAs.vE No. DATE LEAEAGg tra m a DATE MAEAGE 1. EFT LEAEAGE No. (Scen) (scoO (sccu) pen PENE. 2s g2E2iv2:3 on/is/ss o.7e* on/is/s5 a.7e* q2E2nV249A on/is/s5 o.7e* on/Is/s5 o.7e* q2E217249s on/Is/s5 20.00 .7o on/Is/ss 2o.0e 20.00 29 g2E2ivo49 on/o7/s5 4.co on/o7/ss 4.co Q2E2nvo5e on/o7/s5 3.3o 3.3o on/o7/s5 3.3o 4.00 so q2si3vo3s on/24/s5 2.9o on/24/s5 2.9e ' Q2sn3vo40 on/24/s5 7.90 2.9o on/24/s5 7.9e 7.90 si g2c2nvoo6 on/no/s5 26s.co on/lo/ss 26s.co 02c2tvoo5 on/no/ss 27.no on/no/s5 27.1o q2canvo64 on/lo/s5 133.co 27.no on/no/as 133.o0 26s.co 32 42P16Vo72 on/19/s5 Off Scale on/29/s5 15.6e Q2Pi6vosi on/19/s5 27.00 27.00 on/n9/s5 27.ao 27.00 33 q2s2iv2o4 on/24/s5 is.20 on/24/ss is.20 Q2G2iuv33so on/24/s5 29.3o is.2o on/24/s5 29.30 29.3o , 42 Q2P 7Vos3 on/no/s5 44.9o on/lo/s5 44.9e 42Pi7vos2 on/no/s5 12.30 12.3o on/lo/ss 12.3e 44.90 43 g2Pn7Nv31s4 on/16/s5 . 12.so on/n6'/s5 12.so 02Pn7Nv3o45 01/es/as 7. 2o 7.2o on/09/ss 15.se 15.so 44 Q2Pn7Vo97 on/st/s5 363o.00 01/n4/s5 3.4o l 5.40 j 02P17vo99 on/12/s5 5.4o 5.4o en/12/ss 5.4o 45 02Pi7vn59 on/no/s5 55.7o on/no/s5 55.7e Q2Pi?NV3095 on/no/s5 7.3o 7.3o enf.no/s5 7.3o 55.7o
- 46 Q2Pn7NV3067 on/09/s5 2.4o on/o9/s5 2.4e on/o9/s5 2s.40 2.40 en/o9/s5 2s.4o - 2s.4o
) Q2Pi7NV3643 CValues represent total neakage from group sets of valves as physically tested. 4mxinun leakage fran inside to outside containment throuah a penetration With all contairunent isolation valves for that Penetration closed by nornal operation.
i O . O O i TYPE c TEST SIBonnRY 3rd REFMLluG AS 70435 f l, PEM. AS Fotam ulu. PATu . As EEFT HAE. AS no. VALVE no. DaTE LEAEAGg imarar2 DATE IAAEAGE IAFT rearace (scon) (scon) (secu) ran pr.ut. l 47 02risvool on/22/s5 5.to* en/22/ss 5.no on/22/s5 5.lo* 2.55 ot/22/ss 5.1o 5.no i 42rtsvoo2 9 i 4s 02r:9voo2 on/19/s5 123.so on/19/ss 123.so on/19/s5 21.20 21.2o on/19/s5 21.2o 123.so l 42rl9W3611 l 49 Q2E2nvo91 ol/os/s5 5.40 . on/os/s5 5.4e - q2E2tvos2 on/os/ss off scale 5.4o on/lo/s5 n.5o 11.50 so g2rl5uv3766 on/o7/s5 1.4o os'/o7/ss 1.4e on/07/s5 1.30 1.3o on/o7/s5 n.3o 1.4e 42rasuv3334 54 02n4voo2 on/15/ss so.no on/ns/s5 so.no 01/15/s5 5.3e 5.3e on/I5/s5 5.3o 30.1o 02n4Nv365s
? 55 m2Ei4sv3657 on/ns/s5 s.4o on/15/s5 s.4e ,
u4.4o g2E14voca on/15/s2 n4.4o s.4e on/ 5/s2 114.4e 56 Q2rl5mv3331 on/o9/s5 1.3o ol/09/s5 1.3o on/o9/s5 1.50 1.3o ol/o9/s5 I.So 1.5e Q2rl5W3no4 ol/o9/s5 1.6o ol/o9/s5 1.6o 57 Q2rl5sv31o3 1.7e on/o9/s5 1.7o 1.6o ol/o9/ss 1.7o 42r 5mv3332 on/os/as 1.se on/o9/s5 1.so 5s 02r15mv3333 n.so g2715mv3765 on/os/ss 2.50 1.so en/o9/s5 1.5e g2Envo39s on/23/s5 n.4o* on/23/s5 11.4o* 59 11.40* en/23/s5 s1.4o* 02E21v263A on/23/ss 13.4o* Q2Ellve394 ol/23/s5 11.40* en/23/s5 ol/23/s5 11.40* 'ol/23/s5 II.4o* Q2Einvo4o it.40* Q2E2nv263s 01/23/s5 .40* c1/23/s5 49.40 11.4o on/21/ss 49.40 49.4o l 02st3vos4 ot/21/ss .
"pNenetlanNfo*sDN1*op"er$El$. mtairment through a penetration with all catalment isolatim valves for that l
*Vonnes represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
TYPE C Test e marimu. amu As Folm f AS Felse Mill. PATE As I2FT MAX. AS PEIE. IRAEACE 1877 12AKAGE DATE IAAKAGE DATE IAAEAGE uo. VAIvE No. esa raus. (scon) (sccu) (ecao , 01/15/s5 6654.00 Ol/Is/s5 60.se 6e 42P16vo11 12.2e so.so 42P16vo75 01/ns/s5 off scale 6654.oo en/ns/as et/15/s5 1.se* OI/15/s5 1.se* 61A 42E23vo223 , ol/ns/s5 a.so* en/15/ss 1.so* 42:23vo22c .se 1.so* 1.so q2:23vo23s et/15/s5 1.se* . en/35/s5 on/14/as 4.4o* st/14/s5 4.4e* sia 02:23vo25s 4.4o* 4.4o q2:23vo24s on/14/s5 4.4o* 2.2e os/14/s5 q2stivos2 et/es/ss s.7e en/es/s5 9.7e 62 17.so g2c2nvoet en/os/s5 17.6o 9.7e en/os/s5 17.so .
.d/22/ss 9.6e et/22/s5 9.6e 63 42:2Ivo59 129.se 129.so 42s2lvo5s et/22/s5 129.se 9.6e et/22/s5 .
S 6es g2s13v026s on/se/as 2.le et/os/ss 2.te 2.20 2.lo st/es/as 2.2e 2.20 42sisvo26A on/os/as g2st3vo37 el/es/s5 6.7o el/es/s5 6.70 644 e.4e 6.70 -
.4e es/es/ss 42an3vo39 et/es/as o.4e q2s23vo25A el/I3/s5 3.6o* el/13/s5 3.det 66 3.60* 3.6o 42E23vo244 el/13/s5 3.60* 1.se en/13/s5 I
5.60* et/13/ss 5.6e* 67 g2t23vo22s en/13/ss 5.60* g2a23vo22A SI/I3/s5 5.6o* OI/13/s5 5.6o* 2.se SI/13/s5 5.6e* 5.60 42E23vo234 ol/13/s5 isis.oo . en/34/ss 51.3e 70 42 14voo3 on/13/s5 19.4e 5s.3e ! q2st4voo4 on/ns/as 19.4o 19.40 es/as/ss 9.0e o3/04/s5 72.14 72.1o 71 q2P23voo2A el/27/s5 9.o0 s
- Values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
IFhximan leakane frun inside to outside containnent through a penetration with all containment isolation valves for that penetration closed by normal operation.
1 TYPE C TasT sisk.JY 3rd REFiRI.IIIs AS Fonem I - PE15. AS F0sm nan. PATE As IEFT 184X. AS NO. VALVE NO. D45 12AKAGE 4AKACE DATE ISARAGE 18f7 12AKAGE , (scoo (scon) (scca) Fan ranE. 72 qar23voo2s en/31/ss 444.oo 444.co on/31/s5 97.2e 97.2o 7s g2ctiuv3376 en/24/s5 7.50* en/24/ss 7.5e 02s2nuv3377 on/24/s5 20.6o on/24/ss 2e.6e ccanympt. en/24/s5 7.50* 7.se on/24/ss 7.5e 20.6e 79 q2Visvoo5 41/22/s5 292.co on/22/s5 292.to ' q2VisVoo4 e1/22/s5 2.10 2 1o on/22/ss 2.no 292.o0 s2 42rnivoo2 on/ns/ss 32.so on/15/ss 32.so q2r:1voca on/is/ss 6.9o 6.se on/n5/s5 6.9e 32.so 93 02:13voota on/ns/as 2.co* an/is/ss 2.se* 42E13voom on/ns/s5 2.oo* 1.co on/ns/as 2.co* 2.00 94 42:13voo3s on/ns/ss 969.oe* on/15/s5 969.ao* g2st3voons on/s/sss 969.0e* 484.50 01/15/ss 969.co* 969.00 95 Q2s3nve 2 on/23/s5 7.2o 01/23/s5 7.20 02ssivons on/23/ss 270.00 7.20 en/23/s5 27e.oe . 270.00 97s Q2Pn9Nv222s on/es/s5 5.4o on/es/s5 5.40 Q2Pi9voo4 on/os/s5 3.40 3.4e et/es/s5 3.4e 5.40 103 Q2E23Voo2 on/15/s5 10.no* en/15/s5 no.io* Q2E23voo3 on/15/s5 no.no* 5.o5 on/n5/s5 ne.no* 10.10
#Mixinn leakage frca inside to outside containment through a penetration with all contairment isolation valves for that penetraticm closed by normal operation.
j CValues represent total neshage from group sets of valves as playsically tested. l l
UNIT 2 TYPE B-TEST
SUMMARY
- 3rd REFUELING AS FOUND AS LEFT N0ZZIE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE NO. TPitS NO. DATE (SCCM) DATE (SCCM)
-EC07 Q2T52B009-A 01/08/85 0.0000 0.0000 EC08 Q2T523010-4 01/10/85 0.4800 0.4800 EC10 Q2T52B008-4 01/10/85 0.2400 0.2400 EC12 , Q2T528052-A 01/11/85 0.0000 0.0000 WA02 Q2T523015-B 01/07/85 0.0000 0.0000 WA03 .Q2T52B023-B 01/07/85 0.0680 0.0680 WA05 Q2T52B046-B 01/07/85 0.0680 0.0680 WA06 Q2T523047-B 01/07/85 0.1700 0.1700 EB09 Q2T523006-A 01/06/85 0.0700 0.0700 WA07 Q2T52A005-B 01/07/85 0.3400 0.3400 WA08 Q2T52A006-B 01/09/85 0.2000 0.2000 m
WA09 Q2T528018-B 01/06/85 0.0000 0.0000 WA10 Q2T523016-B 01/10/85 0.0000 0.0000 Wall Q2T523017-B 01/06/85 0.0300 0.0300 WA22 Q2T52B033-N 01/06/85 0.0000 0.0000 WB03 Q2T32B020-B 01/07/85 0.0000 0.0000 WB05 02T528054-N 01/11/85 1.4000 1.4000 WB06 Q2T52B055-N 01/11/85 1.3000 1.3000 3 WA21 Q2T523032-N 01/21/85 0.1000 0.1000 WA23 Q2T523034-Pr 01/20/85 0.0300 0.0300 WA24 Q2T523035-N 01/07/85 7.9900 01/26/85 0.1000 WB10 Q2T52B053-B 01/11/85 0.0300 0.0300 EA01 Q2T52A003-A 01/08/85 0.1000 0.1000 EA02 Q2T52A004-A 01/08/85 0.1000 0.1000 G-6
UNIT 2
~; TYPE B TEST SUlefARY - 3rd REFUELING
{d AS FOUND AS LEFT N0ZZLE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE No. TPNS NO. DATE (SCC!f) DATE (SCC 2f) EA03 Q2T525014-A 01/08/85 0.1000 0.1000 EA05 Q2T523001-A 01/08/85 0.2700 0.2700 EA06 Q2T523005-A 01/08/85 0.0000 0.0000 EA09 Q2T523002-4 01/10/85 0.1000 0.1000 EA10 Q2T52A001-A 01/10/85 0.0000 0.0000 EAll Q2T52A002-A 01/08/85 0.0000 0.0000 EB01 Q2T525019-A 01/10/85 0.0300 0.0300 EB05 Q2T52B007-A 01/08/85 0.0000 0.0000 EC01 Q2T523013-1 01/07/85 0.0000 0.0000 ECO3 Q2T525012-1 01/08/85 0.0000 0.0000 []
%J WB07 Q2TS23022-B 01/07/85 0.0000 0.0000 -
WB09 Q2T523025-B 01/06/85 0.0300 0.0300 WB11 Q2T523038-B 01/06/85 0.0700 0.0700 WB21 Q2T52B037-N 01/05/85 0.2400 0.2400 WB24 Q2T52B039-N 01/05/85 0.0000 0.0000 l WC01 Q2T528026-8 01/05/85 0.0300 0.0300 l Wc03 Q2T52B024-3 01/07/85 0.0000 0.0000 WC05 Q2T528028-3 01/07/85 0.3400 0.3400 WC06 Q2T528056-N 01/11/85 1.6000 1.6000 WC07 Q2T523030-2 01/06/85 0.0000 0.0000 WC08 Q2T52B011-B 01/06/85 0.0779 0.0779 L WC09 Q2T52B042-2 01/06/85 0.0300 0.0300 WC11 Q2TS2B031-2 01/06/85 0.0000 0.0000 0 Wc21 e2rs2 o'o-* ot'os/8s o.17ao 0.0000 o 17ao 0.0000 WC23 Q2T52B041-N 01/05/85 l C-7
i 4 i UNIT 2 TYPE B RST SERGIARY - MD BFUELING , AS FOUR AS12FT PERTRATION ggggggg gggggg W. TFNS MIR (90lM) SAIR (80CN) l 14 Feel Treaefer 01/28/85 361.00
- 361.00 ftste - Flasse seente "0 asm8 14 Feel Treaefer 01/28/85 77.50 77.50 Tube - Bellowe
. I 84 Equipment Esteh 01/27/85 1.10
- j1.10 Between "0" Rin8s ,
;- 86 Ferseasel Lock 02/06/85 347.00 347.00 :
Volume Between ' i Doore i 86 Perseasel Lock 03/02/85 0.00 0.00 O. Outer Door Between Seals 1 87 Aan Access Lock 05/02/85 0.00 0.00 Outer Door Between Seals 1 4 87 Aus Access imek 01/28/85 8.80 03/15/85 8.80 volume Between Doors
- Ais fourd Isakage for theindicated items does not represent .
leakage at the and of the cycle. Items were not tested until the and of the outage after they had been opened and reclosed. S O
~
i O O O TYet c TEST 84thmRY 2nd sEFUELINo AS FOUND 5 PEM. AS FOUS MIN. PATE As 12FT MAX. AS i HD. VALVE No. DATE IAAEAGE 12AEAGE DATE IRAEAGE 1277 IRAEAGE - (scoO (sccu) (sccM) pea PEuE. 10 g2Entve26A 09/30/s3 2.o6* 09/30/s3 2.06* g2nive25A og/30/s3 2.o6* 1.o3 os/3o/s3 2.o6* 2.06 11 02ntve26a 09/30/s3 4.so* - 09/3o/s3 4.se* Q2Einvo25s os/30/s3 4.se* 2.4e os/30/s3 4.se* 4.so 12 02r:3v3cn to/os/s3 2s.50* no/es/s3 2s.50* g2r 3v302 no/os/s3 2s.50* 20/os/s3 2s.50* g2r 3v281 no/es/s3 2s.50* 10/es/s3 2s.50* q2r:3v2L2 no/es/s3 as.50* 14.25 no/os/s3 2s.5e* 2s.50 is q2r:3v263 no/os/s3 32.60* no/os/s3 32.6o6 Q2r:3v2s4 no/es/s3 32.60* no/es/s3 32.60* g2r:3v303 no/os/s2 32.6o* no/es/s3 32.60* 42r 3v304 10/os/s3 32.60* 16.3o to/es/s3 32.60* 32.60
? 2s.70 28.7o 09/30/s3 2s.7o 28.7e
- 16 Q2niveolA 09/30/s3 is 42nivools og/29/s3 30.50 30.50 09/29/s3 3o.50 3o.50 23 Q2E2tv2534 09/23/s3 45.4o* os/23/s3 45.40*
02E2nv253s et/23/s3 45.40* og/23/s3 45.4e* 02E21v253c 09/2s/s3 45.40* os/2s/s3 45.40* q2E2iv254 et/23/s2 12.30 12.3e ot/23/s3 12.3G 45.4e ! 24 Q2E21vil9 lo/ol/s3 Off Scale 1o/13/s3 380.2o , 02E2nv25s no/on/s3 off scene no/n3/s3 269.so ! g2E2tv257 to/on/s3 off scene its. cot no/ 3/s3 19s.co 3so.20 25 Q2E21vl15s 09/23/s3 24.90 24.9o o9/23/83 24.90 24.9o
# Maxima leakage fran inside to outside cmtainment through a penetration with all cmtainment isolation valves for that penetratim closed by normal operation.
tvalues represent total leakage free group sets of valves as physically tested. s noundary valve had excessive leakage, therefore, Minimum rath Leakage was determined after boundary valve was worked.
O . O O ( TYPE C TEST Sl80 NARY 2nd SEFERLING . I AS F0885 f l FENE. AS F0tSS NIN. PATN AS IAFT NAX. AS No. VALVE NO. .DATE IAAEAGE LEAEAGE DATE 12AEAGE 12FT raract (SCCN) (SCCN) (SCOI) PER PENE. , 26 Q2E21Vil5C 09/23/83 27.30 27.30 09/23/83 27.30 27.30
. 27 Q252tVil5A 09/23/83 2.20 2.20 09/23/83 2.20 2.20 [
28 Q2E21V213 09/23/83 29.20* 09/23/83 29.20* Q2E21V249A 09/23/83 29.20* 09/23/83 29.20* Q2E21V249B 09/23/83 9.90 9.90 09/23/83 9.90 29.20 29 Q2E21V049 09/21/83 2.50 09/21/83 2.50 Q2E21V050 09/21/83 2.70 2.50 09/21/83 2.70 2.70 30 Q2813V038 09/24/83 7.20 09/24/83 7.20 l Q2813V040 09/24/83 11.70 7.20 09/24/83 11.70 11.70 - 31 Q2G21V006 09/23/83 21.60 09/23/83 21.60 P Q2G21V005 09/23/83 24.60 09/23/83 24.60 - 8 15 Q2G21V064 09/23/83 21.90 21.60 69/23/83 21.90 24.60 32 Q2P16V012 09/22/83 Off Scale 10/I3/83 2.16 l , Q2P16V001 09/22/83 Off Scale Off Scales 30/13/83 2.16 2.16 1 l 33 Q2G21V204 09/24/83 12.50 09/24/83 12.50 4 Q2G21NV3380 09/28/83 59.70 12.50 09/28/83 59.70 59.70 42 Q2Pl7V083 09/21/83 11.50 09/21/83 11.50 l Q2PI7V082 09/28/83 2.00 2.00 09/28/83 2.00 11.50 . 43 Q2PI7NV3184 09/28/83 12.62 09/28/83 12.62 , Q2PI7NV3045 09/23/83 2.20 2.20 09/21/83 2.20 12.62 ftturi== leakage from inside to outside cmtainment through a penetratim with a,11 contaiment isolatim valves for that
, penetratim closed by normal operation. '
i j
- Values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
2 5ff Scale means valve was leaking beyond the range of the leak rate monitor, > 20,000 SCCN. ,
O . O O TYPE c Test sm. .dT 2nd atriaLINs
~
As F0138 f PEM. AS 70125 MIN. PATN As LEFT MAX. AS NO. VALW No. D413 sme amm DATE IAAEASE IAFT LEAKAGE (sccN) (sccN) (accN) Psa PsNE. 44 Q2Pl7ve97 09/21/s3 3.74 09/23/s3 3.74 02Pl7ve99 09/21/s3 2.s4 2.s4 09/21/s3 2.s4 3.74 45 Q2Pl7V159 09/21/s3 5.70 09/21/s3 5.70 Q2Pl75V3095 09/21/s3 2.36 2.36 09/21/s3 2.36 5.70 46 Q2Pl7NV3067 09/21/s3 11.00 09/21/s3 11.00 Q2Pl?NV3443 09/21/s3 23.50 11.00 09/21/s3 23.50 23.56 47 Q2PIsv00: 10/10/s3 4.70 10/10/s3 4.70 42PIsv002 10/le/s3 4.70 2.35 10/10/s3 4.70 4.70 4s Q2Pl9V002 10/Os/s3 236.20 10/es/s3 236.20 42P19NV3611 10/Os/s3 34.30 34.30 10/0s/s3 34.30 236.20 y 49 Q2E21V091 09/2s/s3 7.90 09/2s/s3 7.90
- q2E21v052 09/20/s3 s.50 7.90 09/20/s3 a.50 s.50 50 Q2P155V3766 09/20/s3 2.60 09/20/s3 2.60 i
g2rl5NV3334 09/2s/s3 2.30 2.30 09/2s/s3 2.30 2.60 - l 54 g2ss4v002 09/22/s3 Off scale 10/06/s3 39.30 g2EI45V365s 09/22/s3 u .40 13.40 09/22/s3 11.40 39.30 55 N2 14NV3657 09/2s/s3 1.21 09/as/s3 1.21 g2Ei4v001 10/12/s2 195s.00 1.21 10/12/s2 2.40 2.40 ! 56 Q2P15NV3331 09/21/s3 1.70 09/21/s3 1.70 l 42P15NV3104 09/28/s3 1.40 3.40 09/23/s3 1.40 1.70 l 57 g2Pl5NV3103 09/23/s3 4.50 09/23/s3 4.50 Q2P15NV3332 09/23/s3 2.60 2.60 09/23/s3 2.60 4.50 ithximan leakage frcan inside to outside containment throuch a penetration .with all contairunent isolation valves for that ! penetration closed by nornal operation.
*Velmes represent total leakase from aroup sets of valves as physically tested.
l
i o . o . o TYPE C TEST SIS 0hutY 2nd SEfMI.ING AS 50EMD 5 - PER. AS 7048E5 NIN. PATE AS IEFT uAE. AS NO. VAI.VE NO. MTE 12AEAGE IRAEAGE DSTE IRAEAGE IEFT 12AEAGE (secu) (sccu) (Secu) PEm rEuE. 58 Q2PI5NV3333' 09/26/83 4.70 09/26/83 4.70 Q2rl5NV3765 09/23/83 2.30 2.30 09/23/83 2.30 4.70 59 Q2E11V039B 09/30/83 4.90* 09/30/43 4.906 Q2E21V263A .49/30/83 4.90* 09/30/83 4.906 Q2EllV039A. 09/30/83 4.90* 09/30/83 4.906 Q2EllV040 09/30/83 4.90* 09/30/83 4.90* Q2E2iV263a 09/30/83 4.90* 09/30/83 4.90* Q2sI3V054 09/30/83 29.30 4.90 09/30/83 29.30 29.30 60 Q2P16V071 09/28/83 I.86 09/28/83 3.86 Q2P16V075 09/23/83 32.50 1.86 09/21/83 32.50 32.50 61A Q2E23V022D 09/19/83 3.20* 09/19/83 3.20* , Q2E23V022C 09/19/83 3.20* 09/19/83 3.20* , Q2E23V023s 09/19/83 3.20* 1.60 09/19/83 3.20* 3.20 ?. j 615 Q2E23V0255 09/19/83 11.71* 09/19/83 II.71* Q2E23V0248 09/19/83 11.71* 5.86 09/19/83 II.71* 11.71 62 Q2C21V082 09/22/83 9.90 09/22/83 9.90 Q2c21V001 09/22/83 9.90 4.95 09/22/83 9.90 9.90 63 Q2E21V059 09/24/83 21.20 10/08/83 23.20 Q2E21V054 09/24/83 178.60 21.20 09/24/83 178.60 178.60 648 Q2st3V026 09/19/83 1.10 09/19/83 1.10 . Q2513V0264 09/19/83 1.20 1.10 09/19/83 1.20 1.20 i 64A Q2813V037 09/22/83 5.30 09/22/83 . 5.30 i Q2B13V039 09/22/83 1.20 1.20 09/32/83 1.20 5.30 ) #Maxinun leakage frca inside to outside containment through a penetration with all containment isolation valves for that penetraticm closed by normal operation. JCValuesrepresenttotalleakagefromgroupsetsofvalvesasphysicallytested.
Tyre c TEsf sa. Atf 2nd atrial.Imo ; l l As 700MD f i PEM. AS FOUM MIN. PATE As IEFT MAX. As ' No. VALVE No. DAM 12AEAGE 12AEAGE DAM IEAEAGE 12FT 12AEAGE ! (sccN) (accu) (scom) ran raNE. l' 66 g2E23V0254 09/28/83 5.40* , 09/2s/83 5.40* q2E23ve244 09/2s/s3 5.4o* 2.7o - og/2s/s3 5.4e* 5.4o 67 02E23ve22s e9/19/83 9.0e* e9/19/s3 9.co* i g2E23v022A e9/19/s3 9.00* 09/19/s3 9.se*
- g2E23ve234 09/19/s3 9.oo* 4.so og/19/s3 9.se* 9.00 -
7e 02aI4voo3 o9/28/s3 4.3o 09/2s/s3 4.3o g2E14voo4 og/2s/83 2.7o 2.7o e9/2s/s3 2.7e 4.3o 71 02r23vo02A 09/27/s3 51.00 51.00 09/27/83 51.00 51.co 72 42r23voo2s o9/27/s3 70.00 70.00 09/27/s3 7o.es 7o.co 78 Q2021Nv3376- og/24/s3 17.le* 09/24/83 17.18 09/24/s3 19.60 le/07/83 5.58 p 02G21NV3377 . 17.le 17.le 17.lo
; 42G21V291 09/24/83 17.le* e9/24/83 i 79 02Vlavoo5 lo/lo/83 23.3e* 1e/lo/s3 23.se* i 02vlsvoo4 lo/le/s3 23.3o* 23.30 le/le/s3 23.3e* 23.30 i a2 02rlivoo2 09/23/s3 4.40 e9/23/s3 4.4e Q2rtiveel 09/23/s3 1.5o 1.50 09/23/s3 1.50 4.4o 93 Q2E13voo4A 09/19/83 9.80* 09/19/s3 9.0e*
Q2sl3voo34 09/19/s3 9.so* 4.9e 09/19/s3 9.se* 9.so 94 02E13voe3s 09/19/43 5861.oe* 09/23/s3 14s3.6e* 09/19/83 5861.0e* 2930.50 09/23/83 14s3.60* 1483.60 Q2E13v004s 95 02G3tvol2 10/06/s3 4.75 10/06/s3 4.75 02G31vol3 10/06/s3 2st.2o 4.75 10/66/s3 2st.2e 281.20 4Maxintsu leakage fran inside'to outside containment through a penetration with all contalment isolation valves for that penetration closed by normal operation.
- Values represent total leakage free group sets of valves as physically tested. ,
g O . O O l TYPE c TEST StathnAY 2nd MMELIM AS FOUNDf PEM. AS FOUW MIN. PATH As IMT MAX. AS NO. VALVE NO. D43 param Iraram m3 - gagagg IEFT marace . (sccM) (sccM) (sccu) pea Peut. 97a g2risNV222s os/2e/s3 4.2o og/2o/s3 4.2o l 02r 9voo4 os/22/s3 off scale 4.20 os/22/s3 22.7o 22.7o i
- los 42E23voo2 se/2e/s3 12.5o* os/2o/s3 12.5e* -
l 42E23Vos3 ot/2e/s3 12.5o* 6.25 og/2o/s3 12.50*. 12.5o l l i i
! E l
i i 1 ]
)
#Maximm leakage from inside to outside containment through a penetration with all contairunst isolation valves for that penetration closed by nornal coeration.
- Values represent total leakase from group sets of valves as physically tested.
UNIT 2 TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
- 2nd REFUELING AS FOUND AS LEFT N0ZZLE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE NO. TPNS NO. DATE (SCCM) DATE (SCCM)
EA01 Q2T52A003-A 09/20/83 0.240 0.240 EA02 Q2T52A004-A 09/20/83 0.000 0.000 EA03 Q2T523014-A 01/21/83 0.140 0.140 EA05 Q2T52B001-A 09/20/83 0.370 0.370 EA06 Q2T52B005-A 09/21/83 14.200 10/08/83 0.000 EA09 Q2T52E002-A 09/20/83 0.170 0.170 EA10 Q2T52A001-A 09/20/33 0.170 0.170 EAll Q2T52A002-A 09/21/83 0.240 0.240 EB01 Q2T523019-A 09/20/83 0.140 0.140 EB05 Q2T52B007-A 09/21/83 0.140 0.140 , EB09 Q2T52B006-A 09/21/83 0.070 0.070 Ecol Q2T523013-1 09/20/83 0.102 0.102 EC03 Q2T52B012-1 09/20/83 0.000 0.000 EC07 Q2T52B009-A 09/21/83 0.040 0.040 EC08 Q2T52B010-4 09/21/83 0.000 0.000 EC10 Q1T52B008-4 09/21/83 0.140 0.140 WA02 Q2T52B015-B 09/20/83 0.204 0.204 WA03 Q2T52B023-B 09/20/83 0.238 0.238 WA05 Q2T52B046-B 09/20/83 0.240 0.240 WA06 Q2T52B047-B 09/20/83 0.170 0.170 WA07 Q2TS2A005-B 09/19/83 0.510 0.510 WA08 Q2T52A006-B O'9/20/83 0.170 0.170 WA09 Q2T523018-B 09/19/83 0.952 0.952 WA10 Q2T52B016-B 09/19/83 0.102 0.102 G-15
UNIT 2 E- TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
- 2nd REFUELING AS FOUND AS LEFT N0ZZLE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE NO. TPNS NO. DATE (SCCM) DATE (SCCM)
Wall Q2T52B017-B 09/19/83 0.544- 0.544 WA21 Q2T528032-N 09/19/83 0.340 0.340 WA22 Q2T528033-N 09/20/83 14.290 10/04/83 0.170 WA23 Q2T523034-N 09/19/83 0.240 0.240 WA24 Q2T523035-N 09/19/83 0.170 0.170 WB03 Q2T523020-B 09/19/83 0.510 0.510 WB07 Q2T523022-B 09/19/83 1.190 1.190 WB09 Q2T52B025-B 09/19/83 0.102 0.102 WB11 Q2T523038-B 09/19/83 0.070 0.070 VB21 Q2T52B037-N 09/19/83 0.374 0.374 i WB24 Q2T52B039-N 09/19/83 0.476 0.476 WC01 Q2T523026-3 09/20/83 0.000 0.000 WC03 Q2T523024-3 09/20/83 0.170 0.170 WC05 Q2T523028-3 09/21/83 0.000 0.000 WC07 Q2T52B030-2 09/20/83 0.136 0.136 WC08 Q2T52B011-B 09/21/83 0.040 0.040 wc09 Q2T52B042-2 09/19/83 0.170 0.170 WC11 Q2T523031-2 09/19/83 0.170 0.170 WC21 Q2T52B040-N 09/19/83 0.034 0.034 WC23 Q2T523041-N 09/19/83 0.170 0.170 0 G-16 _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
i O UNIT 2 TYPE E TEST staalART - 2nd EDMLING As avuuu As Lars PERTRATIM 12AEME ZEAEME
- 30. TFNS DATI (SCG) DATI (SCCH) '
14 Feel Transfer 10/11/83 20.10
- 20.10 Tube - Flange Double "0" Ring 14 Fasl Transfer 10/11/83 17.90 # 17.90 #
Tube - Bellows 84 Equipment Estch ~10/17/83 503.30
- 503.30 metsum "o" Rimes 86 Personnel Lock 10/19/83 0.00 0.00 Between "0" Rings -
86 Personnel Lock 10/18/83 658.00 658.00 Volume Between Doors I l 87 Aux Access Lock 10/19/83 0.00 0.00 Outer Door - Between "0" Rings e 87 Aus Access Lock 10/16/83 67.40 67.40 Volume Between Doors [
- As found leakage for the indicated items does not represent leakage at the and of the cycle. Itans were not testad mtil the end of the outage after they had been opened and closed.
. # See LER 84-010-00, dated thy 4,1984, for trore detailed information.
l - i T: .
~
O - - - - -- Y e e G-17
O - G TYPE C TEST Sl8' 1Y let SEFIELING O AS 70W 6 PENE. AS FOUND MIN. PATN AS IEFT MAX. AS No. VALVE NO. DATE LEAKAGg usaranz DATE vaarace LEFT LEAKAGE (SCCN) (SCCN) (SCOI) PER PENE. 10 Q2E11V026A 11/01/82 6.87* 11/01/82 6.87* - Q2EllV025A 11/01/82 6.87* 3.43 11/01/82 6.87* 6.87 11 Q2EllV0268 11/08/82 16.23* 11/08/82 16.23* 42E11V0258 11/08/82 16.23* 8.12 11/08/82 16.23* 16.23 12 Q2P13V301 -11/21/82 535.00* 11/2I/82 535.00* Q2P13V302 11/21/82 535.00* 11/21/82 535.00* Q2PI3V281 11/21/82 535.00* 11/21/82 535.00* QP13V282- 11/21/82 535.00* 267.50 31/21/82 535.00* 535.00
, 13 Q2PI3V243 11/21/82 309.00* 11/21/82 309.00*
l Q2P13V284 11/21/82 309.00* 11/21/82 309.00* 309.00* Q2P13V303 11/21/82 309.00* 11/21/82 j Q2PI3V304 11/2?/82 309.00* 154.50 11/21/82 309.00* 309.00 i Q2EllV001A 10/27/82 18.30 18.30 10/27/82 18.30 18.30
! { 16 18 Q2EllV0018 11/08/82 89.30 89.30 11/08/82 89.30 89.30 23 Q2E21V253A 10/27/82 39.50* 10/27/82 39.50*
Q2E21V2538 10/27/82 39.50* 10/27/82 39.50* ' Q2E21V253C 10/27/82 39.50* 10/27/82 39.50* ' Q2E21V254 10/27/82 11.80 11.80 10/27/82 11.80 39.50 24 Q2E21VI19 10/29/82 425.20 10/29/82 425.20 Q2E21V258 10/29/82 384.50 10/29/82 384.50 . Q2E21V257 10/29/82 342.60 342.60 10/29/82 342.60 425.20 25 Q2E21Vil58 10/27/82 25.50 25.50 10/27/82 25.50 25.50 ' l 26 Q2E21Vil5C 10/27/82 19.50 19.50 10/27/82 19.50 19.50 CValues represent total leakage from Scoup sets of valves as physically tested.
#Haxinun leakage frcm inside to outside ccntainment through a penetration with all containment isolation valves for that penetration closed by normal operation.
i O O O j TYPE C TEST sist JT Ist REFMLING
- As 70m i PEM. AS F0tsID Min. PATE As IEFT HAI. AS ,
no. VALVE NO. DATE 12AEACE IAANAGE BsTE IRAEAGE IAFT naarar.m i (sccu) (scm) (secu) pea rEnE. l 27 02E21Vil5A 10/27/s2 off scale off scale 8 11/07/s2 30.20 3o.2o j 2s g2E2nv213 se/27/s2 22.54* 1e/27/s2 22.54
- 02E2nv249A ne/27/s2 22.54* no/27/s2 22.54 l
42E2tv249s to/27/s2 21.50 21.50 to/27/s2 21.50 22.54 l 29 42E21Vo49 10/29/s2 7.30 le/29/s2 7.30 g2E2tVo50 lo/29/s2 3.3o 3.30 10/29/s2 3.30 7.30 so g2si3vo3s io/2s/s2 s.s1 ne/2s/s2 s.si 02st3vo4o to/2s/s2 s.90 s.st no/2s/s2 s.9e s.90 31 42c21voo6 10/2s/s2 23.5e se/2s/s2 23.5e 02canvoos no/2s/s2 45.3e to/2s/s2 45.3e { g2c2nvo64 to/2s/s2 45.30 , 23.50 to/2s/s2 45.30 45.30 32 02ri6vo72 11/s2/s2 25.19 11/15/s2 12s7.oe 92r:6vosi in/o7/s2 1034.40 25.19 is/e7/s2 1o34.4o 12s7.co 33 g2G2tv204 to/29/s2 94.60 se/29/s2 94.6e g2c2nuv33so se/29/s2 50.10 so.no no/29/s2 se.no 94.6e 42 Q2Pl7Vos3 lo/2s/s2 140.20 to/2s/s2 34e.20 02F17Vos2 lo/29/s2 6.70 6.70 to/29/s2 6.7e 14o.20 43 02Pl7xv314 lo/2s/s2 14.51* 10/2s/s2 14.51* g2F17xv3045 lo/2s/s2 14.51* 7.25 10/2s/s2 14.51* 14.51 44 g2r 7vo97 no/2s/s2 10.21 lo/2s/s2 no.21 02PI7Vo99 lo/2s/s2 10.13 10.13 lo/2s/s2 lo.13 lo.21
- Values represent total leakage free aroup sets of valves as physically tested.
sCff Scale is greater than 20,000 SccN, which is the limit of Leak Rate Nooitor.
# Maxima leakage frcan inside to outside ccntainment through a penetration with all contairment isolation valves for that penetration closed by normal operation.
O . O O TYPE c TEST Slas..dY Ist NEf MI.ING As scuNo 4 PEM. AS FOUS HIN. PATE As IAFT MAX. AS NO. VALW No. DATE 12AKAGE IRAEACE DAM IAAEAGE IEFT 12AEAGE , (sccn) (sccn) (sccu) pea PENE.
*g i 45 Q2Pl7VI59 10/2s/s2 9.54 10/2s/s2 9.54 q2Pl7p3095 10/29/s2 7.20 7.20 10/2s/s2 7.20 9.54 46 Q2Pl7Ni3067 10/26/s2 35.40 10/26/s2 35.40 Q2Pl7p3443 10/26/s2 41.45 35.40 10/26/s2 41.45 41.45 47 Q2PIsV001 II/09/s2 17.20* 11/09/s2 17.20*
q2PisV002 II/09/s2 17.20* s.60 11/09/s2 17.20* 17.20 48 Q2Pl9V002 II/12/s2 off Scale . II/12/s2 39.34 q2PisNV3611 11/12/s2 4.50 4.50 II/12/s2 4.50 39.34
~
49 Q2E21V091 10/26/s2 46.00* 10/26/s2 16.00* Q2E21V052 10/26/s2 19.6e* 16.00 10/26/s2 19.60* 19.60 p 50 Q2Pl5NV3766 10/26/s2 24.60 10/26/s2 24.60 23.30 23.30 10/26/s2 23.30 24.60 g Q2P15NV3334 10/26/s2 54 Q2El4V002 10/26/s2 9.s4 10/26/s2 9.s4 Q2El4NV365s 10/26/s2 10.37 9.s4 10/26/s2 10.37 10.37 55 N2E14p3657 10/26/s2 16se.00 10/2s/s2 0.00 42E14V001 10/26/82 off scale 1680.00 . II/09/s2 4.40 4.40 56 Q2P15p3331 II/02/s2 6.90 11/02/s2 6.90 Q2P15NV3104 II/02/s2 5.60 5.60 II/02/s2 5.60 6.90 57 Q2P15NV3103 10/27/s2 20.se 10/27/s2 20.80 10/27/s2 19.90 19.90 10/27/s2 19.90 20.80
- Q2P15NV3332 -
5s Q2PI5NV3333 10/27/s2 14.36 10/,7/s2 2 14.36 15.20 14.36 10/27/s2 15.20 15.20 Q2PI5NV3765 10/27/s2
- Values represent total leakage free group sets of valves as physically tested.
l iMwi== leakage frm inside to mtside cmtainment through a penetration with all containment isolation valves for that penetraticri closed by normal operation. I
t. O " O ' O Tyrs c Tsst sin. ar ist manaums ,
- As nom . .
l rEIE. AS Felse MIN. PATN As LEFT IIAX. AS l uo. VALyn me. am izAKAGE LEAEAGE BATE 13AKAGE 1877 12AKAGE , l (scca) (scon) (secn> ranens. 59 Q2Elivo39s 11/11/s2 56.35* 11/in/s2 56.35* gananv263A n/u/s2 56.35* in/ I/s2 56.35* 02Einve39A 11/ne/s2 15.44* II/ne/s2 15.44* grainvo4s al/se/s2 15.44* 11/no/s2 15.44* g2:2iv263s 11/10/s2 15.44* in/no/s2 15.44* q2ss3vese 11/lo/s2 32.50 15.44 n/lo/s2 32.5e 56.35 6e Q2r:6vo7: 11/o7/s2 437.so II/07/s2 437.so . 02r:6vo75 II/e6/s2 96.2o 96.2e 11/o6/s2 96.2e 437.so snA g2:23vo22e ie/25/s2 an.se* se/25/s2 11.50* - 02E23vo22c no/25/s2 u.se* 1e/25/s2 11.5e* 02:23vo23s no/25/s2 n.se* 5.75 to/25/s2 n.5e* si.50 61s 02t23ve25s lo/25/s2 9.3e* lo/25/s2 9.3e* 9.3e* 02:23vo24s no/25/s2 4.65 se/25/s2 9.3e* 9.3o N y 62 02c2 vos2 n/os/s2 25.4o 11/es/s2 25.4e l 02c2nvool n/es/s2 24.50 24.5e 11/os/s2 24.se 25.4o I 63 02:21ve59 10/29/s2 off scale n/os/s2 27.6e j g2stivoss to/29/s2 off scale off scale 8 11/o9/s2 199.5e 199.5e : ) 64s 423:3v0265 10/29/s2 2.90 to/29/s2 2.90 l l 42ss3vo26A lo/29/s2 n.no 2.9e le/29/s2 17.3e 17.3o : 64A Q2st3vo37 H/o2/s2 21.2o in/o2/s2 21.2e f
; q2si3vo39 n/o2/s2 29s.40 21.20 II/o2/s2 e.ee 21.2e ;
i 66 ' j 42123ve254 10/25/s2 12.5e* no/25/s2 12.5e*
; Q2E23vo24A lo/25/s2 12.5e* 6.25 no/25/s2 12.50* 12.50 i
- Values represent total leakage free group sets of valves as physically tested.
sOff Scale is greater than 20,000 ScCM, which is the limit of Lest Rate Noaitor.
! Whximan leakage from inside to outside ccntainment through a penetration with all containment isolation valves for that penetration closed by nornal operation.
4i
i O - O O { TYPE C TEST stehAsY let sEFlRLING As M t esE. AS FoHND MIN. PATE As IEFT HAI. AS i no. VALVE MO. DATE 12AKAGE LEAEASE MTE ISAEAGE 12FT vmaar (sccu) (sccu) (secu) ran PEus. 67 42E23vo223 10/25/s2 10.25* 18/25/s2 10.25* g2E23vo22A le/25/s2 1o.25* no/25/s2 1o.25* q2:23vo23A ne/25/s2 1o.25* 5.13 to/25/s2 1o.25* 10.25
- 7e 02E14voo3 se/2s/s2 2o.5e to/2s/s2 2o.se 02E14voo4 ne/2s/s2 29.55 20.5e no/2s/s2 29.55 29.55
- 71 Q2P23voo2A 11/20/s2 761.6o 761.60 11/2o/s2 761.6o 761.6e 72 Q2F23voo2s 11/2e/s2 147.90 147.9o 11/2e/s2 147.9e 147.9o 7s Q2G2 NV3376 lo/29/s2 off scale so/3e/s2 4.4o
- Q2G21NV3377 lo/29/s2 2e9.0e lel29/s2 2et.Go j 02G2nv291 to/29/s2 4.40 4.4e so/29/s2 4.4e 209.co l? 79 q2visvoos ll/es/s2 2s.4o*
2s.4e* 14.2e 31/es/s2 11/es/s2 as.4o as.4e 2s.4o in 02visvoo4 11/es/s2 s2 02rinvoo2 no/3e/s2 33.s3 to/3o/s2 33.s3 , 02Piavoot lo/3o/s2 34.00 33.so lo/3o/s2 34.es 34.co I 93 Q2E13voo4A lo/31/s2 o.co* 1e/31/s2 e.00 j g2En3voo3A no/31/s2 c.00* o.co lo/31/s2 e.oo , o.co 94 42E13voo3s le/31/s2 76.co* no/31/s2 76.0e*
! 02E13voo4s to/3s/s2 76.0e* ss.co no/31/s2 76.ao* ' 76.co
! 95 Q2G31 von 2 lo/26/s2 2o.le lo/26/s2 20.1o 42G3svens ne/26/s2 off scale 20.1o se/26/s2 2sa.2o 2s2.2o i
- 97a 42risuv222s le/29/s2 o.oo lo/29/s2 e.co 4
Q2Pn9voo4 lo/29/s2 1.35 o.co lo/29/s2 1.35 1.35 i i i
- Values represent total leakage from aroup sets of valves as physically tested.
; pwi== leakage frun inside to outside contaiment through a penetration with all containment isolation valves for that penetration closed by normal operation.
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ :m - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
1' TYPE c TEST Stk. .RY let RErmLING I AS 90635 # PEM. AS F0 TBS MIN. PATN AS MFT NAI. AS No. VALM JIO. MM MAKAGE LEAEAGE DAM MAEAGE LEFT LEAKAGE (sccN) (accM) (acts) ran Psut. los 42s23Voo2 le/25/s2 265.co* lo/25/s2 265.ao* Q2E23V003 10/25/82 265.00* 137.50 10/25/82 265.00* 265.00 l - i t:
#Maxinamn leakage fran inside to outside containment through a penetration with all containment isolation valves for that penetraticn c1wed by normal operation.
- Values represent total leakage free group sets of valves as physically tested.
l T!N 3 S ST sraceast - 1st E D E LING j A8 avues 48 Lans FEETRATIM IIADS 1EAEAR ' i
- 30. 2N3 D425 (SCGD DATE (SCQO 14 Fasl Treasier 11/20/82 19.30
- 19.30.
/ Tune - rianos Double "0" Ring 14 Insel Treasier 11/20/82 26.50 # 26.50 #
l Tone - senee. ! S4 Equipment Natch 11/23/82 1762.00
- 1762.00 Between "0" Bians
( 86 Perseensi Lock 11/27/82 0.00 . 0.00 l Between "0" Rings l l l 86 Perseemel Lock 11/26/82 2.70 2.70 volume netween Doors 87 Ann Access lack 11/27/42 0.00 0.00 Oster Door - 0 1 Between "0" Rings 87 Aas Access Zack 11/25/82 565.00 565.00 Volume Between Doors
- As found leakage for the indicated itams does not represent leakage at the end of the cycle. Items were not tasted until the end of the outage after they had been opened and reclosed.
l l # See LER 84-010-00, dated Ity 4,1984, for more detailed i infonraticn. i 1 -- O .
UNIT 2 TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
- MAINTENANCE OUTAGE (1/29/82 - 2/26/82)
AS FOUND AS LEFT N0ZZLE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE NO. TPNS NO. DATE (SCCM) DATE (SCCM) EA01 Q2T52A003-A 02/04/82 0.48 0.48 EA02 Q2T52A004-A 02/03/82 0.00 0.00 EA03 Q2T523014-A 02/04/82 0.00 0.00 EA05 Q2T52B001-A 02/04/82 0.54 0.54 EA06 Q2T523005-A 02/04/82 0.00 0.00 EA09 Q2T523002-A 02/05/82 0.00 0.00 EA10 Q2T52A001-A 02/05/82 0.34 0.34 EAll Q2T52A002-A 02/05/82 0.17 0.17 EB01 Q2T523019-A 02/03/82 0.00 0.'00 EB05 Q2T523007-A 02/04/82 0.00 0.00 EB09 Q2T523006-A 02/05/82 0.17 0.17 EC01 Q2T52B013-1 02/03/82 0.03 0.03 EC03 Q2T523012-1 02/04/82 0.00 0.00 EC07 Q2T52B009-A 02/05/82 0.00 0.00 EC08 Q2T52B010-4 0.00 02/04/82 0.00 EC10 Q1T52B008-4 02/04/82 0.40 0.40 WA02 Q2T52B015-B 02/03/82 0.00 0.00 WA03 Q2T52B023-B 02/03/82 0.07 0.07 WA05 Q2T52B046-B 02/03/82 0.00 0.00 WA06 Q2T523047-B 02/03/82 0.48 0.48 WA07 Q2T52A005-B 02/02/82 0.34 0.34 WA08 Q2T52A006-B 02/02/82 0.68 0.68 WA09 Q2T52B018-B 02/02/82 0.00 0.00 (] WA10 Q2T523016-B 02/02/82 5.10 02/05/82 0.00 G-25
UNIT 2 TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
- MAINTENANCE OUTAGE (1/29/82 - 2/26/82)
_\"p) AS FOUND AS LEFT l N0ZZLE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE NO. TPNS NO. DATE (SCCM) DATE (SCCM) Wall Q2T52B017-B 02/02/82 0.10 0.10 WA21 Q2T52B032-N 02/02/82 0.68 0.68 WA22 Q2T52B033-N 02/02/82 10.60 02/05/82 5.95 WA23 Q2T52B034-N 02/01/82 0.17 0.17 WA24 Q2T523035-N 02/01/82 0.07 0.07 l WB03 Q2T523020-B 02/03/82 0.41 0.41 WB07 Q2T523022-B 02/02/82 0.00 0.00 WB09 Q2T52BC25-B 02/02/82 0.07 0.07 VB11 Q2T52B038-B 02/02/82 0.07 0.'07 WB21 Q2T52B037-N 02/02/82 0.17 0.17 WB24 Q2TS2E039-N 02/01/82 0.00 0.00 WC01 Q2T52B026-3 02/03/82 0.00 0.00 WC03 Q2T523024-3 02/03/82 0.48 0.48 WC05 Q2T52B028-3 02/03/82 0.00 0.00 WC07 Q2T52B030-2 02/02/82 0.17 0.17 02/02/82 0.00 0.00 WC08 Q2T52B011-B Wc09 Q2T52B042-2 02/02/82 0.00 0.00 WC11 Q2T52B031-2 02/02/82 0.17 0.17 WC21 Q2752B040-N 02/02/82 0.14 0.14 WC23 Q2T52B041-N 02/01/82 0.17 0.17 0 0 G-26
s O APPENDIX H TENDON END ANCHORAGE CONCRETE AND LINER SURVEILLANCE i O i l O SU-080
f l^ APPENDIX H 2 CONTAINMENT TENDON END ANCHORAGE CONCRETE AND LINER SURVEILLANCE
- 1. .
H-
1.0 INTRODUCTION
i j The Plant Technical Specification requires that certain tendon end anchorage concrete and liner plate locations be examined during the first periodic ILRT to determine whether or not degradation has occured since the previous examination. These Technical Specification requirements are
- incorporated in FNP-2-STP-117.0, Appendices L and M.
1 H-2.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Appendix L (FNP-2-STP-117.0) specifies the requirements for the 4 ~ examination of tendon and anchorage concrete areas and-liner locations which were previously examined at the time of the containment structural integrity test (SIT). End anchorage concrete examination is required at 10 anchorage locations where grid lines (on 1 f t. centers and enclosing areas of at least 40 sq. f t.) had been marked on the containment surface prior to the SIT. These locations are shown on Figure H-1. Examination , consists of visually scanning the gridded areas for cracks on the concrete surface, measuring crack widths and recording length, width and trajectory !-{ data for cracks having widths of 0.01 in or greater. The examination is performed prior to the start of ILRT pressurization, at maximum pressure , i and following the completion of depressurization. Liner examination consists of measuring the offsets from 9 positions on each of 4-6 f t. long
- horizontal chord bara to the liner surface and visually scanning 4 grid areas (each 4 ft. square) for evidence of liner degradation. The chord bars and grid lines are located as listed in Table H.1 and were installed i prior to the SIT. The examination is performed prior to ILRT pressurization and following depressurization.
Appendix M (FNP-2-STP-117.0) specifies the requirements for the !. examination of the concrete surrounding tendon and anchorages which were previously examined during the one year or the 3 year tendon ,' surveillance. The examination consists of visually scanning the concrete. out to a distance of 2 ft. from the anchorage bearing plate and recording crack information as descrf bed above. The examination is done prior to
, ILRT pressurization, at maximum pressure and, following the completion of l depressurization only at those anchorages where crack widths / lengths had increased between the first two examinations. The tendons included in this anchorage surveillance program are listed in Table H.1. The
, anchorage areas at both ends of each tendon are inspected. i-i ) lO j SU-080 H-1 - i o- -,.- ~ .-- .,_._-.,.-_m_ . . _ _ . - _ - _ - - . . ~ ~ . . _ . - _ -. , - - , . - ~
H-3.0 SURVEILLANCE RESULTS H-3.1 Appendix L Anchorage Areas No cracks having widths of 0.01 in. or greater vere found in any of the 10 areas during any of the three examinations. The three areas on the top shelf of the ring girder are covered with an elastomer coating making crack width measurement impossible. However, examination of the coating surface did not yield any evidence of significant cracking in the underlying concrete. The area at the base of the cyliner wall is covered with a hard epoxy decontamination coating. While this coating might mask minor cracking in the underlying concrete, the epoxy is brittis and it is expected that crack growth of 0.01 in. or more in the concrete would be evident on the epoxy surface. Examination data sheets are included in the Official Test Copy of FNP-2-STP-ll7.0. H-3.2 Appendix M Anchorage Areas No cracks having width of 0.01 in, or greater were found in any anchorage area during the prepressurization and maximum pressure examinations. For this reason, no examination was required following depressurization. Those anchorage areas below the auxiliary building roof on buttresses F and D are also covered with the hard epoxy decontamination coating mentioned above. The same conclusions as discussed in 3.1 apply. Examination data sheets are included in the Official Test Copy of ' FNP-2-STP-117.0. H-3.3 Appendix L Liner Visual Examination Areas No evidence of liner degradation was observed in any of the 4 examination areas during either examination. Examination data sheets are included in the Official Test Copy of FNP-2-STP-ll7.0. H-3.4 Appendix L Chord Bar Offsets Chord bar offs,ets measured before and af ter the SIT and before and af ter the first periodic ILRT are tabulated in Table H.2. The largest before to af ter difference found at the time of the SIT was 0.046 in at position 1 on Bar 3. With three exceptions, Bar 1/ Position 3/ Stage 3, Bar 1/ Position 6/ Stage 3 and Bar 2/ Position 1/ Stage 3, all before to af ter differences found at the time of the first periodic ILRT were 0.011 in. or less. Also, the maximum differences found between any two of the four measurements at each Bar/ Position were 0.086 in, or less with the three exceptions cited above. Since the exceptions result from the recorded Stage 3 (pre-ILRT pressurization) data, it is possible that these measurements are not correct due to either a reading or recording error. If the Bar 1/ Position 3/ Stage 3 offset is actually 3.539, that for Bar 1/ Position 6/ Stage 3 is actually 3.460 and that for Bar 2/ Position 1/ Stage
~
3 is actually 3.450, then the Stage 3 to Stage 4 differences for these locations are 0.008 in., 0.009 in, and 0.035 in., respectively. Since no evidence of liner distortion was found at either location, it is assumed O that ' the recorded data are incorrect. SU-080 H-2
Y , On the basis of that assumption it is concluded that the results of the liner surveillance are acceptable, for the following reasons: o The maximum Stage 1 to Stage 2 difference of 0.046 in, was deemed acceptable as documented in the containment structural integrity test report. Therefore, the maximum Stage 3 to Stage 4 difference of 0.035 in. is acceptable, o The maximum difference between any of the four stages of 0.086 in. is less than twice as large as 0.046 in. Since an offset change of 0.046
) in. due to a short duration pressure cycle is acceptable, a change of i
. 0.086 in. due to 2 short duration pressure cycles and a 5 year time span is also acceptable.
4 i I J i s e SU-080 H-3 4 (
- - . - - - , . . _ . . . . , . . . . . . ~ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
O S A E R) AL 5 EX 8 CI 1 ND
// \ AN LE LP I P EA V
1 R , U0
/ H E
S E1 7 R C1 U A - G RP I 0T F 1 1 S C - N2 5 A - i l P 6 DN NF N E O M I NO T OR A DF V N( E E L T E R 0 O I R E l T l 3 X 5 l
]
I 1 l l E 0l
@ l
_. D O 3 l E [ (4 4 P O
" 1 1 L I 7 2 x E I
' l ' V C 7 l 7 E T 2 r D A l
)
l F 4 " E 6 T R 2 6 N 0 ( E 9
'0 M K P C 7
2 I U A9 A T Q S E T N 0 E 1 V _ 9 t 0 8 _ ' 0 1 N A L P E M O D TN NO "5 II OT 0 A@ 1 P A "8 ' 0 5 V 4 7 2 D E '7 0 2 IL7 1 1 O 1 ME1 T R O N
TABLE H.1-
- 1. Liner Surveillance Location (Appendix L)
Azimuth - Deg. CCW Elevation - Ft. From South = 0
. Chord Bar 1 161 87 2 161 269 3 160 220 4 135 52 Grid Area 1 159 65 2 159 258 3 133.5 138 4 159 335
- 2. Tendons Included in End Anchorage Surveillance (Appendix M)
V16 V116 2EF 2FD D123 D302 V20 V127 7EF 8FD D130 D308 V39- 4DE 18EF 14FD D202 D309 V47 9DE 19EF 18FD D225 D310 V66 12DE 25EF 24FD D227 D317 V76 33DE 29EF 34FD D229 D322 V95 43DE 39EF D107 D230 V103 44DE 1FD D114 D231 l I O SU-080 H-5
TABLE H.2 O
\j Liner Chord Bar Offsets Offset Liner Surface Rigid Standoff /
l 7 hl l l l l l l l l l l l
\ Flexible Standoff 1" sq x 72" hhhhhhhhh Steel Bar Position number (9 8 7") - hold drilled through bar at each position to allow measurement with dial depth indicator.
OFFSET IN INCHES AT POSITION NUMBER Bar Stage
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 3.255 3.426 3.503 3.613 3.591 3.488 3.317 3.432 3.280 2 3.253 3.425 3.511 3.621 3.599 3.499 3.329 3.438 3.287 3 3.243 3.414 3.439 3.604 3.575 3.560 3.243 3.421 3.272 4 3.244 3.417 3.547 3.609 3.584 3.469 3.249 3.423 3.277 2 1 3.423 3.707 3.876 3.948 3.985 3.955 3.792 3.520 3.192 2 3.401 3.706 3.880 3.959 3.994 3.956 3.798 3.523 3.198 3 3.350 3.685 3.851 3.920 3.962 3.926 3.776 3.506 3.182 4 3.415 3.692 3.860 3.931 3.971 3.937 3.780 3.508 3.184 3 1 3.379 3.598 3.754 3.871 3.876 3.80.7 3.678 3.514 3.290 2 3.333 3.600 3.762 3.878 3.882 3.813 3.685 3.520 3.292 3 3.321 3.586 3.743 3.856 3.864 3.796 3.666 3.506 3.280 4 3.320 3.590 3.749 3.866 3.873 3.803 3.673 3.509 3.281 4 1 3.289 3.492 3.666 3.778 3.755 3.706 3.542 3.316 3.115 2 3.279 3.499 3.670 3.780 3.763 3.707 3.551 3.325 3.121 3 3.265 3.484 3.646 3.756 3.736 3.684 3.528 3.306 3.109 4 3.267 3.487 3.655 3.764 3.743 3.690 3.534 3.306 3.103
- Stage 1 pre SIT 26 May 1980
\ Stage 2 post SIT 30 May 1980 Stage 3 pre ILRT 28 Feb 1985 Stage 4 post ILRT 4 Mar 1985 SU-080 H-6
k I l i i i 4 4 3 APPENDIX I MODIFICATIONS TO CONTAINMENT 1 J s I i b ) 1 4 i 1 4 1 i f 4 i.
. t J ! SU-080
_ - _ - ~ . ._ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _
. - = _.
'd Modification to Containment: Two electrical penetrations and three temporary flanges were added to the containment directly prior to performance of the ILRT so that the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix J, section IV.A would be met. These penetrations and their local leak rate results are reported in Appendix G and are repeated here. Elec. Pene. Nozzle Leakage Rate TPNS No. Location Date in SCCM Q2T525052-A EC12 1/11/85 0.0 Q2T525053-B WB10 1/11/85 0.03 Q2T525054-N WB05* 1/11/85 1.4 Q2T52B055-N WB06* 1/11/85 1.3 Q2T523056-N WC06* 1/11/85 1.6 O
- Temporary flanges added to the penetration nozzle.
O SU-080 1-1
. - * . _ _ _ _ ~ . -m_ _.--_ s=.L. a- .A6.._._. _m a _ . _4s_.4- .
g__ E I i + t APPENDIX J BN-TOP-1 TEST RESULTS 4 4 4 I f I r 4 i i I I 4 l l . t ( i 4 I SU-080 - l 1
*Q . -
BN-TOP-1 TEST RESULTS The results of . Total Time Leakage Rate Calculations, as defined in BN-TOP-1, (Ref. 5.6) are summarized below and listed in the following tables. Leakane Rate for the 24-Hour Test Period Total Time Calculated Total Time 95% UCL Acceptance Limit on UCL 0.040 wt%/ day 0.049 wt%/ day 0.1125 wt%/ day Total Time Verification Calculated Verification Lower Acceptance Limit Leakage Rate Upper Acceptance Limil-0.153 wt%/ day 0.181 wt%/ day 0.227 wt%/ day () The Trend Report (table J.2) shows that the calculated leakage is tending to stabilize at a value less than 0.040 wt%/ day. In addition, the mean of the measured leakage rates (from Table J.1) over the last 5 hours of test (21 data points) is less than La. Therefore, the results of the Total Time calculations satisfy all BN-TOP-1 acceptance criteria. If a short duration (less than 24 hours) test had been conducted from a start cine of 1515 hrs on 2 March 85, the Trend Report shows that both Total Time and Mass Point results would have satisfied the acceptance criteria at 0415 hrs on 3 March 85. The test duration would have been 13 hours. Due to the relatively small differences between the 13- and 24-hour leakage rates, it is probable that the verification test results would have been acceptable had this test started following a 13-hour leakage rate test. The last UCL listed in the Trend Report is approximately one half of the preceding values. This His a standard result since the Total "is confidence limit changes from a 95% band to a 95% UCL at the 24-hour data point. For this reason, Total Time calculated confidence limit is almost always conservative with respect to the Mass Point UCL for short duration tests. O SU-080 J-1
m
, TABLE J.1 FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1515 302 1985 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R) (PSIA) LEAKAGE RATE
'1515 535.663 63.8732 1530 535.617 63.8659 . 280 1545 535.571 63.8589 . 252 1600 535.522 63.8535 . 146 1615 535.481 63.8490 . 095 1630 535.447 63.8444 . 091 1645 535.423 63.8385 . 153 1700 535.387 63.8342 . 132 1715 535.354 63.8296 . 126
'1730 535.325 63.8260 . 115
/,\ 1745 535.293 63.8219 . 109 x- 1800 535.271 63.8190 . 101 1815 535.253 63.8165 . 099 1830 535.226 63.8128 . 096 1845
- 535.210 63.8094 . 106 1900 535.195 63.8075. . 100 1915 535.167 63.8045 . 000 1930 535.151 60.002Y . 082 1945 535.139 63.7994 . 005 2000 535.118 63.7977 . 030 2015 535.107 63.795G . 084 2030 535.086 63.7941 . 074 0045 535.076 $3.7919 . 978 2100 535.072 63.7899 . 084 2115 535.055 63.7878 . 081 2130 535.036 63.7862 . 074 2145 535.036 63.7833 . 087 2200 535.017 63.7822 . 078 2215 535.000 60.7902 . 089 2230 535.OOE 63.7791 . 083 2245 534.994 63.7786 . 075 2300 534.984 63.7768 . 075 2315 534.975 63.7744 . 079 2330 534.968 63.7728 . 080
- 2345 534.961 63.7716 . 079 0 534.955 63.7694 . 083
((_/} 15 30 534.952 534.935 63.7608 63.7497 078 072 ~'
- ~ , - - - - , - . - - > - . , . . . , , -.-,n_. ,,,,n--- . . - - - - ,
?
/^N
( I TABLE J.1-(cont'd) 45 534.932 63.7680 .072 100 534.940 63.7682 .072 115 534.938 63.7670 .075 130 534.935 63.7658 .075 145 534.927 63.7649 .074 200 534.924 63.7638 .074 215 534.906 63.7631 .068 230 _534.917 63.7633 .070 245 534.919 63.7621 .073 300 534.901 63.7623 .064 315 534.903 63.7612 .067 330 534.899 '63.7606 .066 345 534.907 63.7599 .070 400 534.903 - 63.7596 .068 415 534.883 63.7595 .060 430 534.901 63.7588 .067 445 534.900 63.7582 .067 500 534.900 63.7580 .066 515 534.891 63.7575 .063 530 534.895 63.7567 .066
/ 545 534.891 63.7567 .064
( 600 615 534.893 534.893 63.7564 .064 63.7565 .063 630 534.892 63.7566 .061 645 534.893 63.7559 .062 700 534.903 63.7560 .064 715 534.901 63.7556 .063 730 534.896 63.7538 .060 745 534.904 63.7548 .064 900 534.904 63.7550 .062 315 534.896 63 7549 .059 830 534.909 63.7552 .061 945 534.910 63.7547 .062 900 534.909 62.7554 .059 915 534.924 63.7551 .063 930 534.915 63.7553 .059 945 534.918 63.7551 .060 1000 534.926 63.7552 .060 1015 534.921 63.7555 .058 1030 534.927 63.7553 .059 1045 534.927 63.7552 .059 1100 534.925 63.7554 .057 1115 534.930 63.7543 .059 1130 534.932 63.7542 .059 l 1145 534.943 63.7543 .061 1200 534.932 63.7542 .058 (} ( ,, 1215 1230 534.944 534.949 63.7547 63.7543
.059
.060 4
,e
-( TABI.E J.1 (cont'd) 1245 534.954 63.7546 .060 1300 534.942 63.7543 .057 1315 534.965 63.7544 .061 1330 534.954 63.7542 .058 1345 534.960 63.7547 .058 1400. 534.972 63.7547 .060 1415 534.961 63.7548 .057 1430 534.963 63.7548 .057 1445 534.979 63.7548 .059 1500 .534.974 63.7548 .057 1515 534.984 63.7548 .059 MEAN OF THE MEASURED LEAKAGE RATES = .078 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE = .150 75% OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE = .113 THE UPPER 95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT = .049 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE = .040 9
p I n . s [ v (n t-l (xsJ TAB 12 J.2 i- FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT TREND REPORT TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1515 302 1985
,NO . END- TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS MASS POINT ANALYSIS j PTS TIME MEAS. CALCULATED UCL CALCULATED UCL 4 1600 .146 .159 .469 .154 .322 5 1615 .095 .094 .208 .092 .206 r 6 1630 .091 .066 .181 .072 .144 g 7 1645 .153 .086 .272 .107 .170 8 1700 .132 .090 .261 .113 .158 9 1715 .126 .090 .247 .113 .148 l
10 1730 .115 .087 .231 .109 .137 11 1745 .109 .084 .216 .104 .127-12 1800 .101 .079 .203 .098 .118 13 1815 .099 .076 .193 .094 .111 14 1830 .096 .072 .184 .090 .105 15 1845 .106 .073 .181 .092 .105 , 16 1900 .100 .072 .177 .091 .102 ! 17 1915 .090 .069 .170 .087 .098 r 18 1930 .082 .066 .162 .082 .093 (m) 19 20 1945 2000
.095
.083
.065
.063
.160
.155
.083
.080
.092
.089 21 2015 .084 .061 .151 .078 .086 22 2030 .074 .059 .146 .074 .082 23 2045 .078 .057 .142 .072 .080 24 2100 .034 .056 .140 .072 .079 25 2115 .081 .056 .138 .072 .078 26 2130 .074 .054 .135 .070 .076 27 2145 .087 .055 .135 .071 .077 28 2200 .078 .054 .133 .070 .076 29 2215 .088 .055 .1~4 .072 .077 30 2200 .083 .055 .133 .072 .077 31 2245 .075 .054 .131 .071 .076 32 2000 .075 .053 .129 .070 .074 33 2315 .079 .053 *.129 .070 .074 34 2330 .080 .053 .128 .070 .074 I 35 2345 .079 .053 .127 .070 .074 36 0 .083 .054 .128 .071 .075 37 15 .078 .054 .127 .071 .074 38 30 .072 053 .125 .070 .073 l 39 45 .072 .053 .124 .069 .072 40 100 .072 .052 . 12 *.; .068 .071
! 41 115 .075 .052 .122 .068 .071 42 100 .075 .052 .121 .068 .071 , 43 145 .074 .052 .121 .068 .071 44 O 200 .074 .052 .120 .068 .070 ( 45 215 .068 .051 .119 .067 .069 l
' 46 200 .070 .051 .118 .066 .069 l 47 245 .073 .051 .117 .066 .069 l 48 300 .064 .050 .116 .065 ,068 i
t t
I' J i I L/ TABLE J.2 (cont'd) ' 49 315 .067 .050 .115 .064 .067 50 330 .066 .049 .114 .064 .066 51 345 .070 .049 .113 .063 .066 52 400 .068 .049 .113 .063 .066 53- 415 .'060 ~'.048 .111 .062 .065 54 430 .067 .048 .111 .062 .064 55 '445 .067 .047 .110 .061 .064 56 500 .066 .047 ,.10?
.061 .063 57 515 .063 .047 .108 .061 .063 58 530 .066 .047 .108 .060 .063 59 545 .064 .046 .107 .060 .062 60 600 .064 .046 .107 .060 .062 61 615 .063 .046 .106 .059 .061 62 630 .061 .045 .105 .059 .061 63 645 .062 .045 .104 .058 .060 64 700 .064 .045 .104 .058 .060 65 715 .063 .045 .103 .058 .060 66 730 .060 .044 .103 .057 .059 67 745 .064 .044 .102 .057 .059 68 800 .062 .044 .102 .057 .059 69 815 .059 .044 .101 .056 .058 70 830 .061 .043 .101 .056 .058 71 845 .062 .043 .100 .056 .058
.056 .057
[} 72 .043 .100 - 900 .059
\_s 73 915 .063 .043 .099 .056 .057 74 930 .059 .043 .099 .055 .057
-7B- 945 .060 .043 .098 .055 .057 76 1000 .060 .042 .098 .055 .057 77 1015 .058 .042 .097 .055 .056 78 1030 .059 .042 .097 .054 .056 79 1045 .059 .042 .097 .054 .056 80 1100
.057 .042 .096 .054 .055 81 1115 .059 .041 .096 .054 .055 82 1130 .059 .041 .095 .054 .055 93 1145 .061 .041 .095 .054 .C55
- 84 1200 .058 .041 .095 .053 .055 85 1215 .059 .041 .095 .053 .055 86 1230 .060 .041 .094 .053 .055 87 1245 .060 .041 '.094 .053 .054 88 1300 .057 .041 .094 .053 .054 89- 1315 .061 .041 .094 .053 054 90 1330 .059 .041
.093 .053 .054 91 1345 .058 .041 .093 .053 .054 92 1400 .060 .041 .093 .05 .054 93 1415 .057 .040 .093 .053 .054 94 1430 .057 .040 .092 .052 .054 95 1445 .059 .040 .092 .052 .054 96 1500 .057 .040 .092 .052 .053 97 1515 .059 .040 .049 .052 053 o
/
i L n
s i
' /~N ~
?
'.{ }' TABLE J.3 *
'm / ,
l- ! I t l i FARLEY UNIT 2 FIRST PERIODIC ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY) , TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS l TIME AND DATE'AT START OF TEST 1630 303 1985 TEST DURATION: 4.00 HOURS- ' TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED i (R) (PSIA) LEAKAGE' RATE \ 1630 .534.987 63.7554
- 1645 534.998 63.7540 .405 1700 534.996 63.7500 .259 1715 534.999 63.7520' .240 ,
1730 535.009 63.7513 .252 1745 535.015- -63.7502 .257
-(_, /} 1900 1815 535.009 535.011 63.7492 63.7479
.220
.222 1830 535.012 63.7471 .212
+
1845 535.020 63.7462 .218 s 1900 535.021 .63.7462 .199 1915 535.~O26 63.7442- .219 ! 1930 535.023 63.7435 .203 ! 1945 535.020 63.7424 .196 I 2000 535.031 -53.7416 .205 I
'2015 535.039. 63.7413 .203 2030 535.069 63.7411 .226 ;
i MEAN OF.THE MEASURED LEARAGE' RATES = .230 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE UPPEFi LIMIT = .227 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE LOWER LIMIT = .153 THE CALCULATED ~ LEAKAGE RATE ~ e .181 i I O f i 6 l 1 ; ,') t '
.-,_m_.}}