ML20210T889

Jm Farley Unit 1 Third Periodic Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leakage Rate Test, Final Rept

ML20210T889
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	11/30/1986
From:	BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20210T864	List: ML20210T859 ML20210T889
References
NUDOCS 8702180334
Download: ML20210T889 (68)

Text

--

O Alabama Power Company

.T.M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 1 O

Primary Reactor Containment Integrated Leakage Rate Test Final Report November 1986 O

Bechtel Western Power Corporation x

0 ADO

[

=

i i

i i

)

AIABAMIL RM!R CGERNY J. M. FARIEY 10CIEAR PIANE IMIT 1 t

'IHIRD PfRIODIC REACitR CIND.DGENE INJrinTE i

INIERA'ITD IEARAGE RATE 'IESP IUVEMEER 1986

]

FINAL REFGE i

s

?

Prepared by Bechtel Western Power Corporation San Francisco, CA SUM 054

.=.

4 e

'INEE OF CGrHNIS Sections g

1.

INIBODUCTION 1

1 2.

SulEARY 2

4 3.

TEST MEASURDENIS AND CAIGIATION MET 10DS 3

t 4.

TEST OIRONOIDGY 5

4 5.

TEST RESULTS 7

6.

TABIES AND FIGURES 10 7.

REFERENCES 33 Acceniices A.

BECHIEL IIRT CDEUTER PROGRAM SUMARY 1

B.

IDCAL IEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA 4

i 4

I i

i i

e i

SUM 054 4

.._,__,,_,-,__.-...._.,,,,......,,-.-.,.m_-.

l

$f 1.

INIBOGXTIGi

'Ihe Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP) Uhit 1 'Ihird Periodic Integrated Isakage Rate' Test (IIRE) was performed on November 10-11, 1986. 'Ihe test was cordv*ad to demonstrate that leakage frcza the containment at design wh=1t pr===wn does not exceed the limit specified in the Tactinical' Specifications (Ref.1). 'Ihe IIRT was done under Prrv,sdire FNP-1-STP-117.0 i

(Ref. 2) whicit follows the requia._A of Appendix J to 10 CFR 50 (Ref. 3) and the ESAR (Ref. 4). 'Ihe leakage rate was calculated using the Hr:Guls da=,-ibed in IN 'IDP-1 (Ref. 5) and ANSI /ANS-56.8-1981 (Ref. 6). 'Ihe total time calculations of Ref. 5, which are haama on the methodology outlined in ANSI.N45.4-1972 (Ref.7), were used to establish acceptance as required by -

Ref. 4.

'Ihe mass point calculations of Ref. 6 were included in the test i

program to provide technically couplete himentation of containment leakage integrity.

'Ihe following sections of this report describe the test program and l

h= ant the results. 'Ihese sections are ordered as listed below.

e

'Ihe Sunmary provides a synopsis of test results.

e Test Measurements and calculation Methods daacribes the instrumentation used to measure containment ani-paic conditions and the algorithms used to determine leakage rate.

I e

Test Chronology defines the scope and time frame for the sequential test activities.

e Test Results provides a di== ion of.IIRT data and calculated leak rate.

l e

Tables and Figures contains all numerical data and plots cited in the prar,ading sections.

e References lists all supporting h= ants cited in this report.

e

'Ibe Appendices contain a description of the Bectitel IIRT ccmp1ter program and tables whicts list local (Type B and C) -leakage rate test results since the e.ar,r,nd periodic IIRP.

4 I

SUM 054,... - - _

2.

SGGERY A 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> integrated leakage rate (Type A) test and a four hour verification test were conv*v+ari at Nov.. 10-11, 1986. Test results met all a%6 m.= criteria as tabulated below.

Total Time 95% UCL Isakage Rate 0.054 wt. %/ Day penalty Mdition.

O wt. %/ Day Net Isakage Rate 0.054 wt. %/ Day W 6 m Limit 0.113 wt. %/ Day Verification Test Icwer W6m Limit 0.144 wt. %/ Day Verification Test Calculated Isakage Rate 0.157 wt. %/ Day Verification Test Upper Avvi. arm = Limit 0.218 wt. %/ Day

'Ibe penalty addition is the sum _of the mininum pathway leakages determined for those containment pii:r kations which were isolated by other.than normal post-IOCA barriers. 'Ihe per=kations with rarr =6m3ard isolation barriers, reasons for the non-standard barriers and measured minhunn pathway leakages are listed below.

Function /Paaarvi for As-Isft Penetration Non-Standard Barrier IsakaQe 23 Istdown/ Check Valve Removed 25 SCCM 28 Seal Injection /In Service 4 SOCM 46 OCW/Not Vented 1 SOCM 56 Pressurizer Steam Sanple/Mditional 4 SCCM -

Valve Closed During IIRT*

57 Pressurizer Liquid Sanple/Mditional 5 SCIM Valve Closed During IIRr*

61A IIRT Pressure Sense Line 3 SCCM 71 IIRT Pressurization Line 19 SCCN 72 IIRE Pressurization Line 175 SCCM Total Isakage in Std. Cubic Centimeters / Minute 234 SOCM Equivalent in Std. Cubic Feet / Day 11.9 SCFD Quantity of Air in Containment at 64.4 PSIA and.

6 543.6

'R**

8.38x10 SCF 6

Equivalent Ieakage Rate = 11.9/8.38x10

.0001 wt. %/ Day Instrument air to containment was isolated during the IIRP.

Valve fails closed on loss of air.

i

• • Containment Air Quantity _= Volume x Absolute Pressure x x Std. Tenp i

Std. Pressure x Mean Tenp.-

3

= 2,000,000 Ft x.64.4 PSI x 520 *R O

14.7 PSI x 543.6 'R i

SUM 054....

l 3.

'IEST 1EASUREMENIS NE) ChIIIIIATIN ME5H00S 3.1 Test Measurenents 2 e calculation of containment leakage rate is based on the variation of contalment ah--jere praamma and % -rahlre with time.. Data for the calculation are obtained by inaamiring containment absolute pressure, temperature and dewpoint temperature at 15 minute intervals.

Se measurement systen is hibed below.

he change in pressure during un IIRE is quite small relative to '

]

absolute pr - ire.

A precision quartz tube -- mm=ter having sensitivity and repeatability of 0.001 lb/in was used to accurately inanaure the anall change.

i Some part of the pr-we variation may be due to evaporation and/or wialeisation of water within the containment boundary. Pressure variation caused by water phase change is li %--r kt. of contaiment a

leakage and nust be accounted for in the leakage rate calculation.

Dewpoint t==Wature was measured using.6 chilled mirror hWtuisters installed in the containment at the locations shown.in Table 1.

Se saturation pressure cou. a naling to each dewpoint tenperature was r

extracted frcan a steam table. De volume weighted mean (per the assigned volume fractions listed in Table.1) saturation pressure was subtracted frcan total pressure to obtain the partial pressure of dry i

air. Dry air partial. pressure was used in the leakage rate calculation.

Cbntainment athm= pere tenperature was measured using 18 platinum RID's installed at the locations shown in Table 1.

Volume weighted mean tenperature is calculated using the assigned volume fractions listed in the Table.

Calculated leakage rate is verified by inposing a known additional leak on the containment and ocmputing the cmbined leakage. Bei W leak was measured with a float type flowmeter.

1

'Ihe RfD signal conditioning and hyp.uister control unit outputs were wired to a data acquisition system (scanner, analog to digital converter) which was, in turn, interfaced to a desk top computer. Be couputer performed all leakage rate calculations. Precision manometer data was manually entered at the cxmputer keyboard.

All instrumentation was calibrated prior to the.IIRP.

Pertinent instrumentation characteristics and calibration dates are listed in Table 2.

Calibration th,-its are maintained in permanent plant records.

O SUM 054 !

i

d i-l 3.2 Calculation Methods Isakage rate was m1mlated using both the total time (Ref. 5) and maan point (Ref. 6) methods. The total time methof was used to demonstrate contalment a%Larm. Mass point calculati'.ms were performed to provide additional information. Appendix A daar-ribes the ocuputer program used to calculate the leakage rates.

The total time method is hamad on the preuniam that leakage rate varies linearly with time. The sui of test rate is determined by fitting a i

straight line to a series of maamwed leakage rates and calculating the I

ordinate of the line at a time um.m agn. ling to the end of the test.1 A manaured leakre rate is a rate determined using only the initial and a.

su%=nt data set. ~It is otsputed as follows.

j Iai = (1 - pit 1/P1Ti)/ti Where: Imi = inaamwed leakage rate at ti pressure at ti Pi

=

Pl. = initial pressure (t=0) initial tenpprature T1

=

A -+sture at ti Ti

=

s elapaad time fra the start of the test ti

=

The 95% upper confidence limit (UCL) on calculated leakage rate rather than the calculated rate itself is the nunber used to determine acceptance. The 95% UCL is larger than,the calculated' rate by a. factor-which incraanan with the magnitude of scatter of the manaured rates 1

about the fitted straight line.

The mass point method is hanad en the premise that leakage rate is u.n =t. ant. The calculated rate is the slope of a straight lina fitted to the pit 1/P1Ti vs. time data. The 95% UCL cn calculated slope is the j

number used to derarmine a %Larn e.

As in the total time case above, the 95% UCL is larger than the calculated rate by a factor which i

depends on scatter.

f i

b i

SUM 054.

--wv.-

i y.-

er e--

-er-wye-

+

---n-i

-e,---*

e-mw p-------e^-

--w---

+-

-,-r-

-t e

4

-t*

?

4.

TESf OREIDEIXN f

4.1 Prerequisite Activities.

The followirg test prerequisites were ocapleted prior to the start of-containment pr=== wization.

e Isolation valves, except those in systems required to maintain the.

3 plant in a safe condition and those in systems used in the conduct i

of the IIRP, were placed-in the specified (Ref. 2) post-IDCA posities.

p Piping pi:r Lat.ing containment was vented and drained as specified e

in Ref. 2.

o Sources of high pressure (greater than test pressure) gas were reaved from the contalment or vented. External scurces mu=cting to ocritainment W Lations were isolated and vented.

e The ama=aible exterior and interior surfaces of the containment were examined to verify surface integrity. The examined surfaces 4

were found to be in sound condition.

l e

Test instrumentation was installed and verified operational.-

i e

The agii==qt opening, fuel transfer tube, p==4.=1 airlock and emergency airlock were sealed.

The coupletion of the above prerequisites and others not related to IIRP cutocune is h==1ted in the Official Test copy of Ref. 2.

4.2 Pressurization 4

The containment was pra==wized using oil free air crmpressors di*rging through an after moler/ moisture aaparator and refrigerated l

air dryer. Aggregate comprpaane capacity was 12,000 SGM.

Pressurizaticr1 otmimenced at 4:30 p.m. on Nov.- 9,1986. Pressurization line valves were shut at 3:55 a.m. on Nov.10' when contaiment pressure had reached 50.5 PSIG. The allcWable range for contaiment pressure is specified in Ref. 2 at 48 to 51 PSIG. Since contairunent air tenperature rises during pr===rization, pressure was taken close to the upper limit to ocupensate for 9'h=a?=nt air cooling and pressure drop.

Containment ventilation fans were run to circulate the pressurizing.

air. The fans were shut-off when pressure reached 42--PSIG.

Containment lighting was turned off prior to the start of the test to eliminate radiant heating of the tengab.tre sensors.

4 5

4 SUM 054 l 1

4

{

4.3 Stabilization As the containment is pmirized with relatively cool air, tarpesture falls in the well ventilated lower levels.,'Ihe higher levels experience less air circulation and,'-therefore, tanparature in the upper zone rises due to adiahatic compression. 'As a result, the tan-=rature gradient at the end of pressurization is sut.iartially different fran that whicti prevails under arniilibrium conditions.

Tenparatures change rapidly during the initial-hours at test pressure and, under these ocxxiitions, it is not possible to determine a reasonably amirate mean air temperature with 18 RID's.

Deviation between calculated and actual mean taTarature is manifested by non-linearity of the air mass

• vs. time graph. Figure 1 shows the relationship between air mass and time for the entire period at test pressure. 'Ihe graph was detamined to have attained.linearity by 4:00 '

p.m. on Nov.10 and the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> leakage rate test was started at this time.

'Ihe' numerical temperature stabilization criteria specified in Ref. 2 had been satisfied much earlier'as shown in Table.3. - Figure 2 i

is a plot of calculated mean temperature vs. time for the entire period at test pra==ive.

'Ihis plot attains linearity at about the same time 1

as the mass plot.

4.4 Type A Test Results are dic< m aad in the following section. Containment gage i

pra== ire during the Type A. test did not vary outside the limits of 49.5 l

and 50.0 lb/in. 'Ihe 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Type A test commenced at 4:00 p.m. on Nov.10 and was==,racufully coupleted (without incident) at 4:00 p.m.

on the following day.

4.5 Verification 'Iht A 9.1 SGM verification flow was established inmediately tollowing the cmpletion of the Type A test. 'Ihe containment atmosphce was allowed to stabilize for one hour following the initiation of the verification flow as required by Ref. 4.

'Ibe four hour verification test 6 am=1 at 5:00 p.m. and,was snma== fully ocmpleted (without-incident). at 9:00 p.m.

Results are diarmaad in the following section.

'Ihe mass of the air within the containment is calculated as m = PV/RT where:

m = air mass, IDi.

2 P = absolute pressure, lb/ft 3

V = containment volume = 2,000,000 ft R = Gas constant for air = 53.35 ft-lb/IDf

• R T = mean absolute tenperature,

'R i

l l

1 SUM 054.

J

5.

'IEST RESUIET 5.1 Synopsis Isakage rates calculated using data recorded during the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Type A test period and those calculated using the verification test data are listed with penalty additions and arnptance limits in Table 4.

As shown in the Table, all acceptance criteria are satisfied. 'Ihe 0.113 wt. %/ day a%L:ssi limit on Type A leakage rate is 75% of the 0.15 wt. %/ day =v4== allowed by Ref.1. 'Ibe difference between the acceptan limit and =vl== allowable leakage rate provides a margin for decr== in the leak tightness of the various containment boundary u.mpa:uts over time. Since the test data contain scxne scatter, calculated leakage rate provides only a best estimate of the true value. To provide addad assurance that the true value does not exceed the acceptance limit, the 95% upper confidence limit on the calculated value is the number which nust meet that limit.

5.2 Test Data Figures 1-4 show, respectively, calculated air mass, calculated mean temperature, calculated mean water vapor pressure and measured absolute pressure for the entire period between the start of stabilization (3:55 a.m. on Ncv.10) and the end of the verification (9:00 p.m. on Nov.

11). As dic= = ad in Section 4, the air mass plot is distinctly non-linear during the first few hours of stabilization. 'Ihis indicates O

that calculated mean tenperature is not accurately tracking true mean tenperature. 'Ibe tenperature plot shows that this is a period of rapid tenperature change. Over the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Type A test period, the air mass varies linearly with time as nust be the case for a constant leakage rate. 'Ibe tenperature plot shows a relatively slow change in calculated mean temperature over the same period.

'Ihe calculated mean water vapor pressure and the measured absolute pressure closely track the tenperature during the stabilization period. 'Ihis is expected since rapidly. changing tenperature results in rapid changes in the partial pressures of both the dry air and water vapor constituents of the containment at=,=nhare.

Table 5 lists calculated mean tenperature, dry air pressure, calculated mean vapor j

pressure and calculated air mass for each data set frun the start of 1

stabilization to the end of the verification test.

Data for individual tenperature and dewpoint tenperature sensors show a relatively smooth variation in these quantities with time over the Type A and Verification 'Ibst periods. Tabulations and plots of data for the individual sensors are retained in permanent plant records.

\\

O SUM 054 e.

~.

4 1

-l l

l 5.3 Isakage Rate Calculations l

Table 6 lists the parameters used in the calculation'of total time i

leakage rate as well the end of test calculated rate and 95% upper i

confidence limit. 'Ihe right hand colum of the table lists the maaanui rates calculated at 15 mimte time irma_ito. 'Ihe initially debmined ma==wed rates show considerable fluctuation. 'Ihis results fr a data scatter. Air maaaam (or P/T ratics) calculated for data recorded at closely apanari timaa may dange positively or negatively by i

amounts which are large relative to the dange in the ordinate of the trend line. Consequently, measured leakage rates determined for the initial' data sets can attain large positive and negative values.

Maa=wed leakage rates determined for.the later data sets tend to

'. fluctuate little and are generally quite clorme to leakage rates =

j

' calculated by the mana point method.

'Ihe total time calculated leakage rate may differ'significantly frm

'the mass point calculated rate. !!he size and sign of the difference i

depends, prijv inally, on the variation in the maa=wed rates determined for the first few data sets. Because of this, the total time calculated rate is not always a good maamwe of true rate. However, i

a since the initial scatter of measured rates has a major impart on the calculated confidence limit, the total time 95% UCL is almmat always larger, and therefore more conservative, than the mass point 95% UCL.

Table 7 lists the parameters used in the calculation of mass point j

leakage rate and the calculaticm results. As is typical for mass point calculations using data with reasonably low scatter, the calculated rate and 95% UCL are quite close tgler. 'Ihe linear mass plot along with the close i g==:u=:=d. between mass point calculated rate and UCL confirms that the true leakage rate is about 0.04 wt. %/ day. 'Ihe 0.054 j

wt. %/ day total time UCL is then a very conservative p=har to use for d=:hu=Lating test acceptance. Figure 5 contains a plot of air mass vs. time over the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Type A test period, shows the trerd-line (fit i

to the calculated air ma==a= using the method of least squares) with a j

slope equivalent.to 0.040 wt. %/ day and shows the line which repic::sonts the maximum allowable mass loss (starting with the initially calculated mass) of 0.113 wt. %/ day or 75% of the maxinum allowable leakage rate.

l 5.4 Verific'.ttion Test Following the ocupletion of the Type A test an additional leak was initiated by venting 9.1 SCFM fr a the containment through a calibrated I

flowmeter. '1he aMari leakage rate was equal to the maxinn allowable leakage rate of 0.15 vt. %/ day. 'Ihe results of the verification test are acceptable if the leakage rate calculated after inposition of the

}

f

~

SUM 054,

d5

. - -, = _ -. -,. - -

..-~.-,,--_, -

.. ~ - _

i

-i O-aMitional leak falla within the limits of Iam-+ Io'i 0.25 Ia, where:

J Iam.is.the previously calculated leakage rate; Io is the inposed.

leakage; and, Ia (=Io) is the maxi== allowable leakage rate..- T.imits for the total time and mass point verification test results are as

' given below.

Total Time: New calculated rata = 0.031 + 0.15 1 0.150/4 Wiaisis Limits

= 0.144 to 0.218 Mass Point:- New calculated rate = 0.040 +.150 i.150/4' l

Wiarmis Limits

= 0.153 to 0.227 Table 8 and 9 list the parameters and results for the total time and-mass point, r-;-+11vely, verification test -leakage rate calculations.

i

'Ihe results of both calculations satisfy the criteria. Figure 6 7

contains a plot of the air manaam calculated for the verification test data, the trend line (slope equivalent.to the mass point leakage rate) t I

fitted to the air mass data and lines representing the limits of air mass change ha d on the Type A test maan point leakage rate of 0.040 wt. %/ day.

1 5.5 Incal Isakage Rate Test Results 1

Isakage through containment permitaations is maamwed during each 1

refueling outage. Penetration leakage measured since the 1983 Type A' test is tabulated in the Appendix D.

a

O 1

I 1

1

]

1

=

4 l

i, i

j 9

1 1

1 4

SUM 054,

-m-.m,

,_.-._w_

...-..--r.

y

_3

-m-.

6. 'DEMS AND FIGGtES

'Ihe following Tables and Figures are' included in this report:

Table Title Pace No.

1 TEMPERA'IURE AND DEHEOINT TDfPERATURE SENSOR IOCATIONS 11 2

INSTHJMENIATION CAIlBRATION SLMERY 12 3

TDfPERATURE STABIIZZATION 13 4

TEST RESULTS 14 5

SLM ERY DAIA 15 6

'IUIAL TIME ANAINSIS (IIRF) 19 7

MASS ICINE ANAIXSIS (IIRT) 22 8

TUIAL TIME ANAIXSIS (VERIFICATION) 25 9

MASS ICINI ANALYSIS (VERIFICATION)

,26 O

Fiaure Title Pace No.

i 1

AIRMASS PIDF 27.

2 AVERAGE TDTERATURE PIDF 28 3

VAPOR PRESSURE PSIA PIUr 29 4

muts PSIA (IRY AIR) PIDF 30 5

AIRMASS AND REGRESSION LINE PIDF 31 6

AIRMASS AND REGRESSION LDIE VERIFICATION TEST PIDI 32

'l O

SUM 054.n r

-~-

'D H E 1 TDTERATURE SENSORS SENSOR ELEVATION AZINJIH DISTANCE EBCM VOIDE NO.

(ET)

(DEuKtri CIMP CENTER (FT)

IT@CTIONS TE-1 270 300 30 0.0586 TE-2 250 120 30 0.0586 TE-3 185 120 16 0.0586 TE-4 220 120 8

0.0586 TE-5 195 120 39 0.0586 TE-6 200 300 4

0.0586 TE-7 210 300 50 0.0586 TE-8 235 300 30 0.0586 TE-9 190 300 23 0.0586 TE-10

' 170 30 64 0.0563 TE-11 165 120 64 0.0563 TE-12 175 210~

64 0.0563 TE-13 170 320 64 0.0563 TE-14 125 0

60 0.0637 TE-15 130 180 60 0.0637 TE-16 115 20 55 0.0400 TE-17 110 120 44 0.0400

/

TE-18 115 250 44 0.0400 1.0000 DEWPOINT TEMPERATURE SENSORS ME-1 235 300 30 0.1758 ME-2 210 120 8

0.1758 ME-3 190 300 0

0.1758 ME-4 165 30 64 0.2252 ME-5 135 180 60 0.1274 l

ME-6 110 250 44 0.1200 1.0000 j

i e

O',c,

i TMEE 2 INEMUENINFION CEIIRATION SLEGERY Descriotion Data Absolute Pressure Precision Pressure Gauge Range:

0-100 psia.

Texas Instruments Accuracy:

+/-0.015%.of reading Model 145-02 Sensitivity:

~ 0.001 psia Repeatability: 0.0005% FS Resolution:

0.001% FS Calibr. Date:

9/12/86-Drybulb W ture 100 GM Platinum Range:

0-150 F Resistance W ture Accuracy:

+/-0.1 F

)

Detectors Sensitivity:

0.01 F Repeatability: 0.01 F Calibr._Date:

9/12/86 Dewpoint Tenperature Chilled Mirror Hygwsters Range:

40-212 F EG&G Model 660-CI Accuracy:

+/-0.54 F Sensitivity:

0.10 F Repeatability: 0.10 F Calibr. Date:

9/12/86 Flw Brooks Rotameter Range:

0-10 scfm Model 1110 Accuracy:

+/-1.0% FS -

l Calibr. Date:

9/12/86 I

i il0 l

~

TABLE 3 I

O FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 IIRT TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION FROM A STARTING TIME AND DATE OF:

800 1110 1986 TIME TEMP ANSI BN-TOP-1 (HOURS)

(OR)

AVEA T AVEAT DIFF.

AVEAT (4 HRS)

(1HR)

(2 HRS) i

.00 545.73

.25 545.63

.50 545.54

.75 545.45 1.00 545.37 1.25 545.34 1.50 545.27 1.75 545.20 2.00 545.11

.306*

2.25 545.07

.279*

q

~

2.50 545.00

.268*-

2.75 544.94

.255*

3.00 544.93

.220*

3.25 544.85

.244*

O 3.50 544.79

.237*

3.75 544.74

.230*

4.00 544.72

.253

.212

.04*

.199*

• INDICATES TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION IIAS BEEN SATISFIED i

a O - - _. -

.~.

M4 Total Time Analysis calculated Isakage Rate 0.031 wt. %/ day 95% UCL 0.054 wt. %/ day Penalty. Additions

• O wt. %/ day UCL Plus Additions 0.054 wt. %/ day Acceptance Limit

-0.113 wt. %/ day Verificaticn Test Iower Limit 0.144 wt. %/ day.

Verification Test Calculated Rate 0.157 wt. %/ day Verification Test Upper Limit 0.218 wt. %/ day Mass Point Analysis Calculated Isakage Rate 0.040 wt. %/ day 95% UCL 0.042 wt. %/ day N nalty Additions

• O wt. %/ day UCL Plus Additions 0.042 wt. %/ day Acceptan Limit 0.113 wt. %/ day Verification Test Iower Limit 0.153 wt. %/ day Verification Test Calculated Rate 0.169 wt. %/ day Verification '1h-t Upper Limit 0.227 wt. %/ day

• See Section 2 4

4

.1 i

7 lO i

i

! l

. =

TABLE 5 j

FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT j

SUMMARY

DATA i

R PSIA PSIA 1BM i

• TIME DATE TEMP.

PRESSURE VPRS

'AIRMASS 400 1110 549.245 64.6748

.4714 635663.8 415 1110 548.599 64.5948

.4701 635624.6 430 1110 548.119 64.5401

.4660 635642.9 445 1110 547.782 64.4956

.4643 635594.9 i

.500'1110 547.474 64.4572

.4650- 635574.6 515 1110 547.199 64.4228

.4648 635555.4 530 1110 547.009 64.3907

.4678 635458.9 545 1110 546.825 64.3699

.4630- 635467.8 600 1110 546.644 64.3480

. 4633 635461.4 615 1110 546.494 64.3230

.4682 635389.0 630 1110 546.376 64.3029

.4702 635327.4 645 1110 546.241 64.2832

.4708 635289.7 700 1110 546.120 64.2682

.4698 635282.4 715 1110 545.984 64.2530-

.4689 635290.6 730 1110 545.905 64.2361

.4708 635214.4 745 1110 545.820 64.2241

.4697 635195.6 l

800 1110 545.727 64.2111

.4692 635175.1 l

815 1110 545.631 64.2010

.4677 635186.6 830 1110 545.540 64.1866

.4691 635150.6 845 1110 545.447 64.1771

.4675 635164.6 900 1110 545.369 64.1648

.4678 635133.8 O

i 915 1110 545.343 64.1556-

.4664 635072.3-J 930 1110 545.268 64.1450

.4670 635054.6 i

945 1110 545.198 64.1358

.4662 635045.6 1000 1110 545.114 64.1277

.4657 635062.7 l

1015 1110 545.072 64.1191

.4653 635026.7

)

1030 1110 545.003 64.1111

.4652 635028.8 l

1045 1110 544.937 64.1044

.4639 635039.6 1100 1110 544.928 64.0969

.4644 634975.2 1115 1110 544.855 64.0890

.4637 634981.7 j

1130 1110 544.794 64.0832

.4636 634994.8 1145 1110 544.738 64.0767

.4635 634996.0 1200 1110 544.716 64.0697

.4640 634952.7 1215 1110 544.672 64.0639

.4637 634946.4 1230 1110 544.647 64.0587

.4634 634923.8 j

1245 1110 544.588 64.0544

.4622 634949.9 1300 1110 544.571 64.0492

.4623 634918.8 1315 1110 544.544 64.0431

.4625 634889.3

{'

1330 1110 544.486 64.0384

.4621 634910.1 1345 1110 544.474 64.0342

.4613 634882.2 1400 1110 544.434 64.0281

.4624 634868.4 t

1415 1110 544.395 64.0250

.4615-634883.2 1430 1110 544.388 64.0202

.4617 634844.4 1445 1110 544.342 64.0162

.4612 634858.4 1500 1110 544.297 64.0114

.4620 634862.8 1515 1110 544.282

.64.0082

.4612 634848.2 1530 1110 544.254 64.0039

.4615 634838.9 l ()

1545 1110 544.243 64.0009

.4605 634822.1 '

TABLE 5 (Cont'd)

FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT j

SUMMARY

DATA OR PSIA PSIA

-LBM TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS AIRMASS 1600 1110 544.196 63.9964

.4614 634832.0 1615 1110 544.216 63.9941

.4608 634785.9 1630 1110 544.137 63.9910

.4604 634846.8 1645 1110 544.118 63.9879

.4600 634838.6 1700 1110 544.119 63.9849

.4599 634807.7 1715 1110 544.090 63.9812

.4601 634804.8 1730 1110 544.080 63.9791

.4592 634795.8 1745 1110 544.040 63.9753

.4605 634805.0 1800 1110 544.024 63.9734 t.4598 634804.3 1815 1110 544.010 63.9719

.4588 634806.1 1830 1110 544.011 63.9679

.4598 634765.2 1845 1110 543.984 63.9651

.4606 634768.6 1900 1110 543.960 63.9635

.4597 634781.1 1915 1110 543.977 63.9611

.4590 634737.4 1930 1110 543.925 63.9589

.4593 634775.8 1945 1110 543.924 63.9574

.4588 634761.8 2000 1110 543.906 63.9559

.4583 634768.5 2015 1110 543.895 63.9532

.4584 634755.3 2030 1110 543.889 63.9504

.4582 634734.6 2045 1110 543.848 63.9479

.4587 634757.6 s

2100 1110 543.845 63.9463

.4583 634745.0 2115 1110 543.816 63.9446

.4585

.634761.2 2130 1110 543.818 63.9416

.4595 634729.5 2145 1110 543.790 63.9406

.4585 634752.1 2200 1110 543.792 63.9390

.4580 634734.2 2215 1110 543.764 63.9379

.4582 634755.0 2230 1110 543.768 63.9355

.4585 634727.1 2245 1110 543.752 63.9336

.4585 634726.4 2300 1110 543.737 63.9326

.4579 634734.9 2315 1110 543.741 63.9316

.4574 634719.7 2330 1110 543.711 63.9292

.4578 634731.6 2345 1110 543.710 63.9273

.4588 634713.7 0 1111 543.705 63.9271

.4570 634716.8 15 1111 543.659 63.9245

.4576 634745.4 30 1111 543.691 63.9238

.4573 634700.8 45 1111 543.691 63.9218

.4582 634681.3 100 1111 543.691 63.9210

.4576 634672.7 115 1111 543.658 63.9204

.4571 634706.4 130 1111 543.657 63.9181

.4579 634683.6 145 1111 543.643 63.9168

.4577 634687.3 200 1111 543.637 63.9156

.4574 634682.4 215 1111 543.664 63.9161

.4569 634656.1 230 1111 543.616 63.9139

.4575 634690.6 245 1111 543.623 63.9138

.4567 634680.6 300 1111 543.628 63.9128

.4567 634664.4

)

lO

, i

_.-_-.,---1

~.

-~

TABLE 5 (Cont'd)

FARLEY NUCLEAR ~ PLANT UNIT.1 ILRT

SUMMARY

DATA-O O

PSIA' PSIA LBM R

TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS AIRMASS 315 1111 543.597 63.9123

.4561

'634696.4 330 1111 543.633 63.9112

.4563 634642.8 345 1111 543.609 63.9095

~.4569 634654.9 400 1111 543.586-63.9083

.4571 634670.1' 415 1111 543.598 63.9036

.4559 634657.8 430 1111 543.614 63.9071

.4563 634625.7 445 1111 543.569 63.9063

.4561 634670.1 500 1111 543.567 63.9054

.4560 634663.6

'.4566 634648.8' 515 1111 543.570 63.9043 530 1111 543.550 63.9029

.4566 634657.6 545 1111 543.570 63.9035

.4560 634639.8 600 1111 543.552 63.9023

.4562 634649.5 1

615 1111 543.565 63.90111

.4564 634622.3 j

630 1111 543.547 63.9005

.4564 634637.0 645 1111 543.541 63.9005

.4554 634644.5 700 1111 543.539

-63.8999

.4555 634641.1 715 1111 543.556 63.8979

.4570 634601.1 730 1111 543.515 63.8973

-.4561 634643.3 745 1111 543.532 63.8969

.4565 634618.6 800 1111 543.519

'63.8973

.4551 634637.8 815 1111 543.534 63.8961

.4553 634609.6 O-830 1111 543.518 63.8940

. 4564 634607.1 l

845 1111 543.522 63.8948

.4556

-634610.6 900 1111 543.513 63.8938

.4556 634609.9 915 1111 543.517 63.8939

.4555 634606.9 930 1111 543.475 63.8939

.4550 634656.4 945 1111 543.498 63.8933

.4551

'634623.8 1000 1111 543.497 63.8912

.4562 634602.9 1015 1111 543.489 63.8924

.4545-634624.8

?

1030 1111 543.484 63.8921'

.4548 634627.3 1045 1111 543.493 63.8895

.4564

'634591.3 l

1100 1111 543.480 63.8913

.4541 634623.5 j

1115 1111 543.484 63.8892

.4552 634598.4 1130 1111 543.485 63.8884

.4555 634589.6 1145 1111 543.479 63.8880

.4554 634592.6 1200 1111 543.490 63.8869

.4560 634568.8 1215 1111 543.490 63.8874

.4549 634573.6 1230 1111 543.481 63.8865

.4549 634575.3 1245 1111 543.470 63.8862:

.4547 634585.1 1300 1111 543.472 63.8863

.4540 634584.2~

1315 1111 543.450 63.8853'

.4546 634599.8 l

1330 1111 543.439 63.8848

.4545 634607.6 l

1345 1111 543.'455 63.8841

.4542 634582.2 j'

1400 1111 543.462 63.8831

.4547 634564.8 0 - -

TABLE 5 (Cont'd) j FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT g-

SUMMARY

DATA b].

R PSIA PSIA IBM TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS AIRMASS 1415 1111 543.452 63.8825

.4543 634569.7 1430 1111 543.449 63.8821

.4548 634568.4-1445 1111 543.445 63.8814

.4545 634567.3 1500 1111 543.422 63.8799

.4549 6345.79.6 1515 1111 543.434 63.8804

.4539 634569.6 1530 1111 543.402 63.8788

.4550 634591.7 1545 1111 543.407 63.8795

.4543 634592.4 1600 1111 543.438 63.8786

.4547 634547.8 1615 1111 543.422 63.8786

.4537 634565.9 1630 1111 543.433 63.8755

.4543 634522.0 1645 1111 543.437 63.8745

.4543 634508.3 1700 1111 543.423 63.8742

.4541 634521.2 1715 1111 543.433 63.8727

.4536 634494.9 1730 1111 543.416 63.8721

.4532 634507.8 1745 1111 543.422 63.8699

.4539 634478.8 1800 1111 543.407 63.8694

.4534 634491.6 1815 1111 543.409 63.8662

.4546 634457.6 1830 1111 543.405 63.8654

.4548 634455.6 1845 1111 543.432 63.8653

.4534 634423.0 1900 1111 543.411 63.8634

.4528 634427.9 1915 1111 543.395 63.8606

.4546 634418.6 O

1930.1111 543.411 63.8596

.4542 634389.'5 l

-1945 1111 543.414-63.8598

.4530 634'388.1 2000 1111 543.405 63.8579

.4533 634379.6 2015 1111 543.389 63.8560

.4522 634379.6 2030 1111 543.373 63.8531

.4531 634370.4 2045 1111 543.374 63.8518

.4529 634356.4 2100 1111 543.377 63.8501

.4531 634335.1 i

l 1 -

TABLE 6 FARLEY NUCLEAR' PLANT. UNIT.1 ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)_

TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST:.1600'1110 1986 i

TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS-

}-_

TI ~.E '

TEMP PR8SSURE MEASURED

.(R)

(PSIA).

LEAKAGE RATE j

1600 544.196-63.9964 4 _

1615 544.216 63.9941.

.697.

1630 544.137 63.9910

.112 1645 544.118 63.9879

.033 1700 544.119

'63.9849

.092-I 1715 544.090 63.9812 2082 1730 544.080 63.9791

.091 1745 544.040 63.9753

.058 1800 544.'024

-63.9734

.053 1815 544.010 63.9719

.043 1

1830 544.011 63.9679

.101 1845 543.984 63.9651

.087 1900 543.960 63.9635

.064 1915 543.977 63.9611

.110 1930 543.925 63.9589

.061 1945 543.924 63.9574-

.071 2000 543.906 63.9559

.060 2015 543.895 63.9532

.068 2030 543.889 63.9504

.082 2045 543.848 63.9479

.059 2100 543.845 63.9463

.066 2115 543.816 63.9446

.051 i

2130 543.818 63.9416

.070 2145 543.790 63.9406

.053

)

2200 543.792 63.9390

.062 2215 543.764 63.9379

.047 2230 543.768 63.9355

.061 2245 543.752 63.9336

.059 1

2300 543.737 63.9326

.052 2315 543.741 63.9316

.059 2330 543.711 63.9292

.051 2345 543.710 63.9273

.058 O

543.705 63.9271

.054 15 543.659 63.9245

.040 30 543.691 63.9238

.058 j

45 543.691 63.9218

.065 100 543.691 63.9210

.067 115 543.658 63.9204

.051 2

130 543.657 63.9181

.059 145 543.643 63.9168

.056 200 543.637 63.9156

.057 215' 543.664 63.9161

.065' 230 543.616 63.9139

.051 245 543.623 63.9138

.053 1

300 543.628 63.9128

.058.

m.

TABLE 6 (Cont'dl FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)

TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1600 1110 1986 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS

' TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASUREDI (R)

(PSIA)

LEAKAGE RATE

~ 3I ~~ E 35'59Y~~ E5Y12Y~~~~

i I'~~

3 330 543.633 63.9112

.062 345 543.609 63.9095

.057 400 543.586 63.9083

.051 415 543.598 63.9086

.054 430 543.614 63.9071

.062 445 543.569 63.9063

.048 500 543.567 63.9054

.049 515 543.570 63.9043

.052 530 543.550 63.9029

.049 545 543.570 63.9035

.053 600 543.552 63.9023

.049 615 543.565 63.9011

.056 63G 543.547 63.9005

.051 a

4 645 543.541 63.9005

.048 s

700 543.539 63.8999

.048 715 543.556 63.8979

.057 730 543.515 63.8973

.046 745 543.532 63.8969

.051 800 543.519 63.8973

.046 815 543.534 63.8961

.052 830 543.518 63.8940

.052 845 543.522 63.8948

.050 900 543.513 63.8938

.049 915 543.517 63.8939

.049 930 543.475 63.8939

.038 945 543.498 63.8933

.044 1000 543.497 63.8912

.048 1015 543.489 63.8924

.043 1030 543.484 63.8921

.042 1045 543.493 63.8895

.049 1100 543.480 63.8913

.041 1115 543.484 63.8892

.046 1130 543.485 63.8884

.047 1145 543.479 63.8880

.046 1200 543.490 63.8869

.050 1215 543.490 63.8874

.048 1230 543.481 63.8865

.047 1245 543.470 63.8862

.045 1300 543.472 63.8863

.045 1315 543.450 63.8853

.041 l

g-w

( f 1330 543.439 63.8848

.039 1345 543.455 63.8841

.043 1400 543.462 63.8'331

.046-

-a v

.a-w,.,,,--s--,,

e.-

w--.-n,-.e

-w,

TABLE 6 (Ccnt'd)

O FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)

TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1600 1110 1986 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R)

(PSIA)

LEAKAGE RATE 1415 543.452 63.8825

.045 1430 543.449 63.8821

.044 1445 543.445 63.8814

.044 1500 543.422 63.8799

.041 1515 543.434 63.8804

.043 1530 543.402 63.8788

.039 1545 543.407 63.8795

.038 1600 543.438 63.8786

.045

.059 MEAN OF THE MEASURED LEAKAGE RATES

=

.150 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE

=

.113 75% OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE

=

0 THE UPPER 95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT

=.

.054

.031 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE

=-

O

! l-

TABLE 7-O FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)

MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1600-1110 1986 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS 7

TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE NASS (R)

(PSIA)

MASS (LBM)

(LBM)

LOSS (LBM/HR) 1600 544.196 63.9964 634832.0 1615 544.216 63.9941 634785.9 46.1 184.5 1630 544.137 63.9910 634846.8

-60.9

-29.5 1645 544.118 63.9879 634838.6 8.3

-8.7

> sa'.

1700 544.119 63.9849 634807.7 30.9 24.3 1

1715 544.090 63.9812 634804.8 2.9 21.8 1730 544.080 63.9791 634795.8 9.0 24.1 1745 544.040 63.9753 634805.0

-9.2 15.5 1800 544.024 63.9734 634804.3

.8 13.9 1815 544.010 63.9719 634806.1

-1.9 11.5 1830 544.011 63.9679 634765.2 41.0 26.7 1845 543.984 63.9651 634768.6

-3.4 23.1 1900 543.960 63.9635 634781.1

-12.4 17.0 1915 543.977 63.9611 634737.4 43.6 29.1

> f 1930 543.925 63.9589 634775.8

-38.3 16.1 1945 543.924 63.9574 634761.8 13.9 18.7 2000 543.906

-63.9559 634768.5

-6.7 15.9s

?

2015 543.895 63.9532 634755.3 13.3 18.1 2030 543.889 63.9504 634734.6 20.7 21.7 2045 543.848 63.9479 634757.6

-23.0 15.7 2100 543.845 63.9463 634745.0 12.5 17.4 2115 543.816 63.9446 634761.2

-16.2 13.5 2130 543.818 63.9416 634729.5 31.7 18.6 2145 543.790 63.9406 634752.1

-22.6 13.9 s

2200 543.792 63.9390 634734.2 17.9 16.3 2215 543.764 63.9379 634755.0

-20.9 12.3 l,

2 2230 543.768 63.9355 634727.1 28.0 16.2 2245 543.752 63.9336 634726.4

.7 15.6 ys

~7;

_H 2300 543.737 63.9326 634734.9

-8.5 13.9

\\

j 2315 543.741 63.9316 634719.7 15.2 15.5 2330 543.711 63.9292 634731.6

-11.9 13.4 4

2345 543.710 63.9273 634713.7 17.9 15.3-i 0

543.705 63.9271 634716.8

-3.1 14.4 l

15 543.659 63.9245 634745.4

-28.6 30.5 j

30 543.691 63.9238 634700.8 44.6 15.4 j

45 543.691 63.9218 634681.3 19.4 17.2 100 543.691 63.9210 634672.7 8.6 17.7 115 543.658 63.9204 634706.4

-33.7 13.6 130 543.657 63.9181 634683.6 22.8 15.6 145 543.643 63.9168 634667.3

-3.8 14.8' I) 200 543.637 63.9156 634682.4 4.9 15.0 215 543.664 63.9161 634656.1 26.3 17.2 230 543.616 63.9139 634690.6

-34.6 13.5 245 543.623 63.9138 634680.6 10.1 14.1 300 543.628 63.9128 634664.4 16.1 15.2,. - _ ~ _

h ^

l

.. }

^

~

~%:

e s.

7 TABLE 7 (Cont'd)

V

-)

u t

FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT ~ UNIT 1 ' ILR'I LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)

MASS POINT ANALYSIS c

TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1600 1110'1986 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS-TIME TE!!P FRESSURE CTMT. AIR-MASS ~IDSS AVERAGE MASS

'(R)"

(PSIA)

MASS (LBM)

_(LBM) y IDSS?(LBM/HR) 1,

^315 543.597 63.9123 634696.4

-32.0

[y 12.1

-330 543.633 63.9112 634642.8 53.6

': 16.5 345 543.609 63.9095 634654.9

-12.1 3 15.'1\\

400 543.586 63.9083 634670.1

-15.2 13.'5

_s

'i 415 543.598

.63.9086 634657.8 12.3 14.2yi g' 430 543.614 63.9071 634625.7 32.2 16.5' t

ps q 445 543.569 63.9063 634670.1

-44.4 12.7 500 543.567 63.9054 634663.6 6.4 13.0 515 543.570 63.9043 634648.8

.14.8 13.8' f530 '543.550 63.9029 634657.6

-8.8 12.9 545-543.570 63,9035 634639.8 17.~9 14.0 600 543.552 63.9023 634649.5

-9.8 13.0

&l5' 543.565

6'.'.9011' 634622.3

_. 2 7.-3 314.7' 630 543.547 63.9005 634637.0 i

-14.8

'D13.4

. ()

645. 543.541 63,9005-634644.5

-7.4 12.7 ??-

700 543.539 63.0999 634641.1 3.4

-12=.7 s

715 543.556 63.897.9 634601.1 40.1

-15.1 730 543.515 63.8973 634643.3

-42.3 12.2' 745 543.532 63.8969'-

634618.6 24.7 13.6 800 543.519 63.8973' 634637.8

-19.2 12.1 815 543.534 63.8961 634609.6 28.2 13.7 830 543.518 63.8940 634607.1 2.5 13.6 845 543 522 63.8948 634610.6

~3.5 13.2 900 543.513 63.8938 634609.9

.6 13.1 915 543.517 63.8939 634606.9 3.1 13.1 930 543.475 63.8939 634656.4

-49.6

-10.0 i

945 543.498 63.8933 634623 8 32.7 11.7 1000 543.497 63.8912 634602.9 20.9 12.7 j

1015 543.489 63.8924 634624J s

-21.9 11.43 1030 543.484 63.8921 634627.3

-2.5 11.1 j

1045 543.493 63.88955 634591.3 36.0 12.8-i 1100 543.480 63.8913 624623.5

-32.2 11.0 1115 543.484 63.8832 634598.4 25.2-12.1 s

1130 543.485 63.8884 634589.6 8.7 12. 4 - CE 1145 543.479 63.8880 634592.6

-3.0 12.1

,f 1200 C43.490 63.88694 634568.8 23.8

- 13.2 2

1215 543.490 63.88742 634573.6

-4.8 12.8 is' 1230 543.481 63.8885 634575.3

-1.6 12.5 l

1245 543.470 63.8862-634585.1

-9.9 11.9 1300 543.472 x 6].8863' 634584.2 1.0' 11.8 i

- g 1315 543.450gN63.8853 G34599.'8

-15.6 10.9 Ni 1330 5434439

'u3.8848 634607.6

-748 10.4 1

4

'1345 543'.~455 163.8841 634582.2' M5.4 11.5 m.

t

^

.\\11400 543.'462 63.8831 634564.8 17.4 12.1 t

c.tc;,

s

.y

^*-

',g

~ _ - -. _. _ _

TABLE 7 (Calt'd)

O FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)

MASS POINT ANALYSIS ~

TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1600 1110 1986 s

TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS r

TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R)

(PSIA)

MASS (LBM)

(LBM)

LOSS (LBM/HR) 1415 543.452 63.8825 634569.7

-4.9 11.8 1430 543.449 63.8821 634568.4 1.3 11.7 1445 543.445 63.8814 634567.'3 1.2 11.6 1500 543.422 63.8799 634579.6

-12.3 11.0 1515 543.434 63.8804 634569.6 10.0 11.3 1530 543.402 63.8788 634591.7

-22.1 10.2 1;545 543.407 63.8795 634592.4

.6 10.1 2600 543.438 63.8786 634547.8 44.6 11.8 FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.)

=2000000.0 REGRESSION LINE INTERCEPT (LBM)

= 634802.3 SLOPE (LBM/HR)

-10.7

=

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE

.150

=

75% OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE

.113

=

THE UPPER 95%' CONFIDENCE LIMIT-

~

=

.042 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE

.040

=

1

}

l t

l i

_~_.

TABLE 8' O

FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 IIhT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)

TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 1700 1111 1986 TEST DURATION:

4.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R)

(PSIA)

LEAKAGE RATE 1700 543.423 63.8742 1715 543.433 63.8727

.397 1730 543.416 63.8721

.101 1745 543.422 63.8699

.214 1800 543.407 63.8694

.112 1815 543.409 63.8662

.192 1830 543.405 63.8654

.165 1845 543.432 63.8653

.212 1900 543.411 63.8634

.176 1915 543.395 63.8606

.172 1930 543.411 63.8596

.199 1945 543.414 63.8598

.183 i

2000 543.405 63.8579

.178 2015 543.389 63.8560

.165 O

2030 543.373 63.8531

.163 2045 543.374 63.8518

.166 2100 543.377 63.8501

.176 MEAN OF THE MEASURED LEAKAGE RATES

.186

=

VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE UPPER LIMIT =

.218 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE LOWER LT T=

.144 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE

.157

=

a

.~

TABLE 9 FARLEY NUCLICAR PLANT UNIT 1'ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)

MASS POINT ANALYSIS a

]

TIME'AND DATE AT. START OF TEST: 1700 1111.1986 TEST DURATION:

4.00 HOURS i

4 TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R)

(PSIA)

MASS (LBM)

(LBM)

LOSS-(LBM/HR).

---

.--3 1700 543 42 63.8742 634521.2 1715 543.433 63.8727.

634494.9 26.3 105.0 j

1730 543.416 63.8721 634507.8

-12.9 26.7 1745 543.422 63.8699 634478.8 29.0 56.5 1800 543~.407 63.8694 634491.6

-12.7 29.6 1815 543.409 63.8662 634457.6 33.9 50.8 1830 543.405.

63.8654 634455.6 2.0 43.7 l

1845 543.432 63.8653 634423.0 32.6 56.1 l

1900 543.411 63.8634 634427.9

-4.9 46.6 1915 543.395 63.8606 634418.6 9.2 45.6 1930 543.411 63.8596 634389.5 29.1 52.7 1945 543.414 63.8598 634388.1 1.4

.48.4-2000 543.405 63.8579 634379.6 8.5 47.2 2015 543.389 63.8560 634379.6

.1 43.6 O.

2030 543.373 63.8531 634370.4 9.1 43.1 2045 543.374 63.8518 634356.4 14.0 43.9 2100 543.377 63.8501 634335.1 21.4 46.5 j

j FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.)

=2000000.0 REGRESSION LINE INTERCEPT (LBM)

= 634516.9 SLOPE (LBM/HR)

-44.8

=

VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE UPPER LIMIT'=

.227 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE LOWER LIMIT =

.153 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE'

.169

=

t 8

d O

\\

i i i

I

O O

O i

FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1

ILRT i

AIRMASS LBM X 1000 636.00

' STABILIZATION A

i 635.60 2

l i

l 635.20 3

~

j ILRT q

634.80' N

634.40" UERIFICATION i

634.00

.....................................i 4EIO 1110 TIME HOURS 2100 1111 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE

O d

O FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT TEMPERATURE DEGREES F (AUERAGE) 90.800 i

88.900 B

l 86.000 3

T

~

N 84.000 1

82.000 l

80.000 4E0 1110 TIME HOURS.

2100 1111 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE i

O O

O

~

FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT UAPOR PRESSURE PSIA

.475 i

.470" h O

>,f

s

.465" g

q l

h84

.460" T

i Mg by

.455'

.450 4EIO 1110 TIME HOURS 2100 1111 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE

O.

O O

l FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT ~ UNIT 1 ILRT PRESSURE PSIA (DRY AIR) t 64.800 64.600' S a

l 64.400 l-3 e

64.200"s

64. BOO" 63.800 4EIO 1110 TIME HOHRS 2100 1111 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE

O O

O FARLEY HUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT i

AIRMASS LBM X 1000 AND REGRESSION LINE 635.00 B

634. 80'Ox-s g

k

~~~

M 634.60" l

-._~.

0.75 La

~-

634.40"

~ ~ ~ -

l 634.20"

~~~ _

l 634.00

.600 111El TIME HOURS 1600 1111 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE i

-.. -. ~.. -

O O

O FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 ILRT AIRMASS LBM X 1000 AND REGRESSION LINE UERIFICATION TEST I

634.52

,N~~ 6.

634.47 y_

LOWER

-Q LIMIT

~

~. _

634.42

~ ~.

Y UPPER

~'

LIMIT _'_

i l

634.37" i

j l

g l

634.33" j

634.28

.700 1111 TIME HOURS 2100 1111 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE i

7.

REEERENCES 1.

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit One, Technical Specification 3/4.6.1.

2.

Farley Nuclear Plant, Surveillance Test Prrvwhim ENP-1-STP-117.0, Containment Integrated Isakage Rate Test, Revision 6.

3.

Appendix J to 10GR50, Reactor Containment Isakage Testing for Water Cooled Power Reactors.

4.

Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Final Safety Analysis Report.

5.

Bechtel Topical Report M @ P-1, Testing Criteria for Integrated Isakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 1.

6.

ANSI /ANS - 56.8-1981, Containment System Isakage Testing Requirements.

7.

ANSI-N45.4-1972, Isakage Rate Testing of Containment Structures for Nuclear Peactors.

O O. -

.,..-~ _. - _.

, m 2

m

)

i 1

I I

l i

i e

APPDOIX A Bechtel IIRP Ccapiter F1.up.am Sumnary d

i t

i I

l l

l l

t i

I i

__...m_,,-._,-._ye._

1 APPEMEX A G!EQtIPTIGt OF 1erymtr lIRF CGEUIER PEGRAM A. Fxwma-arxi Damt nwviction 1.

'Ibe Bechtel IIRT caputer pt% tam is used to determine the integrated leakage rate of a nuclear primary containment structure. Se ytwtam is used to cxmpute leakage rate haamd on input values of time, free air volume, containment ah--f are total pressure, drybulb temperature, and dewpoint tenperature (water vapor pressure).

Isakage rate is couputed using the Absolute Method as defined in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, "Contalment Systm Isakage Testing Requix_ _-n" ani D'IOP-1, Rev 1, " Testing Criteria for Integrated Isakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants".

'Ibe etwtam is designed to allow the user to evaluate contaiment leakage rate test results at the jobsite during contalment leakage testing. Current leakage rate values may be obtained at any time durirg the testing period using one of two computational methods, yieldirg three different report printouts.

2.

In the first printout, the Total Time Report, leakage rate is C8 computed frm initial values of free air volume, mntainment atmosphere drybulb temperature and partial pressure of dry air, the latest values of the same parameters, and elapsed time. 'Ihese individually caputed leakage rates are statistically averaged using linear regression by the method of least squares. 'Ihe Total Time Method is the cceputational technique upon which the short duration test criteria of BN40P-1, Rev 1, " Testing Criteria for Integrated Isakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plant," are hac:ad.

3.

'Ihe semnd printout is the Mass Point Report and is hac:ad on the Mass Point Analysis Technique described in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981,

" Containment System Isakage Testing Requirements". 'Ihe mass of dry air in the containment is caputed at each data point (time) using the Equation of ' State, frm current values of containment atmosphere drybulb tenperature and partial pressure of dry air. Contained mass is " plotted" versus time and a regression line is fit to the data usirg the method of least squares. Isakage rate is determined from the statistically derived slope and intercept of the r%te:ssion line.

4.

'Ihe third printout, the Treni Report, is a sumary of leakage rate values based on Total Time and Mass Point omputations presented as a function of number of data points and elapsed time (test duration).

'Ihe Treni Report provides all leakage rate values required for

{

comparison to the acceptance criteria of BN 'IOP-1 for conduct of a

,]

short duration test.

A-1 t

i S*I

~

t i

O-

. 5.

'Ihe progran generates a pr=iidrw twt Maad on "Suggestad Criteria for a Short Duration IIRE", Ted Brown and Icuis Estenssoro, F1 - ="is of th First Aam on G.=hi-it Tedm, Jamary 18,*1982. 'Ihm "pr=d4*

a is an estimate of the upper bound on the change in mass point calculated leakage rate idlich will emn-1 during the next four hours. 'Iha estimate is based mi the' mass point calculated leakage ratas and 954 IXIs during the previous four hours.

4

'Ihe program is written in a high level language and is designed for 6.

use on a miw.v--->-- *ar with direct data input fremt the data acquisition system. Brief daac'iptions of program use, formlaa used for leakage rate computaticrs, and p%ia logic are provided in the tollowing paiw s g s.

B. Explanatial of Proaram 1.

'Iha Bechtel IIRE caputer program is written, for use by experienced IIRE personnel, to determine containment integrated leakage rates haamd on the Absolute Method daarribed in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 and i

H FIOP-1.

2.

Information inadad into the piwtam prior to or at the start of the test:

a.

Number of containment a' Ware drybulb tenperature sensors, dewpoint tenperature (water vapor pressure) sensors and pressure gages to be used in leakage rate ocmputations for the specific test i

b.

Volume fractions assigned to eacts of the above sensors c.

Calibration data for above sensors d.

Test title 4

t e.

Maxinmi allowable leakage rate at test pressure 3.

Data received from the data acquisition system during the test, and used to ocmpute leakage rates:

a.

Time and date 1

n b.

Containment adosphere drybulb tenperatures I

c.

Containment atmosphere pressure (s) i d.

Containment atmosphere dewpoint tenperatures e.

Containment free' air volume.

4.

After all data at a given time are received, a Sunmary of Measured Data report (refer to " Program Iogic," Patwicq.h D, " Data" option comand) is printed.

A-2 i

.&&v

...-n.

_n._.,--

a - --,

,v--.

If drybulb and dowpoint tasperature sensors should fail durirs the j

V 5.

test, the data frtaa the sensor (s) are not used. '1he volume fractions

)

for the reuninirs sensors are Im*M and rel* into the prtgram for use in ensuirq leakage rata ocmputations.

C. rm*== pem P-1 =

1.

W*mtions Usirg the Total Time Method:

a.

Measured leakage rate frtan data:

f (1)

PV11 = W M1 i

(2)

PVii=WEi i

2400 (W1-W) i (3) q W

ati 1 i and MW ptions (1) and (2) and W Solvirs for W1 into (3) yields:

TPV 1ii\\

2400

[

O At T'i 1 1 /

i

(

PV where W,Wi = Weight of contained mass of dry air at times t 1

i and t, r%-t.ively, Iba.

i T,Ti = containment aW drybulb tenperature at 1

i and t, respectively, 'R.

timaa t i

i P,Pi = Partial pressure of the dry air hg uit of the 1

centainment atmosphere at times ti ard t,

i respectively, psia.

V,Vi = Containment free air volume at times ti ard 1

t ra=Iwti ly (constant or variable ing th t,ti = Time at 1st and i data points respectively, hr.

i to t, hr.

Ati = Elapsed time frtan ti i

R = Specific gas constant for air = 53.35 ft.lbf/1hn.*R.

i = Measured leakage rate cxxuputed during time L

i to t, wt'.%/ day.

interval t i

i l

A-3 i

.e n

.1

O To reduce truncation error, tra m*=v p1.ws== uses the' V

following equivalent ferm11ation:

-2400 [ aW )

i ati (W1) wher.

Wi-W1 aWi W

W 1

1 aTi aP aVi AV aP i

i+

i +

P Y

PV T

1 1

1i 1

ATi 1 +

T1 api =Pi-P1 a vi = vi - v1 aTi~= Ti-T1

~

O b.

Calculated leakage rate fran regression analysis:

E = a + b at (5)

N where L = Calculated leakage rate, wt.%/ day, as determined frun the rep.ession line.

a = (ILi - b Iat )/N (6) i N(IL at ) - (IQ)(Iat )

i i

i b=

(7)

N(I a ti ) - (I at )2 2

i N = Number of data points.

N I=

I i=1 95% upper confidence limit on the calculated leakage rate:

c.

UCL = a + b a tN + 6-A-4

.6

_ _d

o 4

in41ere IXL = 95% upper ocrifidanos limit wt.%/ day, at elapsed time at

• N For a tN < 24 i - bIL at )/(N-2)]1/2 2 - AIL s- = t,[(I L1 i

i fg33ei _ (33ei)2jy))v2 gg.)

2-

[1 + 2 + ( a tg - at) 2 N

where t,= 1.95996+2.37226+2.8225g; N-2 (N-2) 4 For atN 2 24 i - bIL at )/(N-2)]1/2 2 - AIL l

s- = t, [(IL1 i

i n

i - a t)2 (33ei - (I t )2jg)) v2 (9b) 2 7

i i

[1 + ( a t N

I 1.6449(N-2)2 + 3.5283(N-2) + 0.85602 where ts" lI (N-2)2 + 1.2209(N-2) - 1.5162 l

i = Calculated leakage rate ocarguted using equation (5) at L

.i total elapsed time at, %/ day.

i

)

i Iati at

=

N 2.

CCEputation Using the Mass Point Method

• i a.

Contained mass of dry air from data:

i l

Wi = 144 P Vii (10)

Ei l

i i

where l

l All symbols as previously defined.

ll O

4 A-5

.+>.

I I

)

O.

Calmlated leakage rata fmn regression analysis, W = a + b at b.

b

-2400 -

L

=

-(11) a where calculated leakage rate, wt.4/ day, as deemruined fmn i,

=

the regression line.

(IWi - bIat )/N (12) i a

=

N(IW at ) - (IW )(Iat )

i i

i i

N(Iati ) - (I at )d d

i th ati= Total elapsed time at time of i data point, hr.

Number of data points.

'N

=

th contained mass of dzy air at i data point, lha, Wi

=

as ocmputed frt:st equatica (10).

'O N

I I

=

i=1 To rarhv,a truncation error, the ocaputer program uses the I

following equivalent fom21ation:

b AWi

-Iat )/N (14)

W 1 + (I a =

i y

W W

1 1

AWi aWi at)-I Iati N (I i

W W

i 1

1 wi (15) b

=

N(Iati ) - (Iat )2 2

i where is as previously defined.

.W1 c.

95% upper confidence limit.

2400 l

UCL =

(b - S )

(16) b lO A-6

O' where

- UCL = 95% upper confidence limit,' wt.%/ day.

SN1/2

[NIati - (Iat )2)W (17) 2 i

1.6449 (N-2)2 + 3.5283 (N-2) + 0.85602 where ts" (N-2)2 + 1.2209 (N-2) - 1.5162

' I [Wi - (a + b at )]2 - W i

S

=

1 N-2 1

L 1

I ( a W /W )2 _ g 3 ( 3wijg ))2fg _

qN-2 W

i 1 1

=

1 4

I( a W /W ) (I at )/N]2' 1/2

[ I( a W /W ) a ti-i 1 i

i 1 (18)

O 2

(

I(a ti ) - (I a t )2jp i

d.

Predictor:

2[(UCL-L) + 4 (l Al + 2 S ) 3 A

I 100 Ia where UCL = 95% upper confidence limit. of mass point calculated leakage rate at end of test.

L

= Mass point calculated leakage rate at end of test.

A

= Value of linear r % =551on analysis slope of mass point calculated leakage rate vs. thne for last 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of test data.

S

= Linear regression analysis standard deviation of slope.

A La = Allowable leakage rate.

In terms of elapsed time, a t and yi point calculated leakage rate Imi calculated at the end of time interval.

O A-7

3 I

mi-BI ati (19)

A M

4 hr 4 hr

=

M I Imi ati-I mi I ati 4 hr 4 hr 4 hr (20)

B

=

2 2

-I ati M I ati 4 hr 4 hr Mi-AE Di-B I miati hr 4hr 4hr (21)

~

s

=

I at )2]

A i - (4 hr i

[M-2) [M I at i

1 4 hr Imi mass point calculated leakage rata evaluated usi g data

=

up to time a t.i 4 hr = sumation over last 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of test data.

N I

O I

=

N-M+1 number of data points for last 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of test.

M

=

O A-8

D. P w Isnic 1.

'Ihe Beditel IIRI' ocuputer sws logic flow is controlled by a set of user options. 'Ibe user options ani a brief description of their wiated function are presented below.

OPTIN 02fGND FUNCTIN After starting the s w s - execution, the user either enters the name of the file containing previously entered data or initializes a new data file.

IRTA Enables user to enter raw data. When the system requests values of thne, volume, tenperature, pressure and vapor pr-ire, the user enters the aw&vsiate data. After ocupleting the data entry, a sumnaq is printed out. 'Ihe user then verifies that the data were entered correctly.- If errors are detected, the user will then be given the vwvdanity to correct the errors. After the user verifies that the data were entered wu.ctly, a 3

Corrected Data Sinnrnary Report of time, data, average t-yareture, partial pressure of dry air, and water vapor pr==unire is printed.

l TREND A Trend Report is printed.

'IOTAL A Total Time Esport is printed.

MASS A Mass Point Report,is printed.

TERM Enables user to sign-off tenporarily or permanently. All data is saved on a file for rentitrting.

i CORR Enables user to correct previously entered data.

)

LIST A Sunmary Data Report is printed.

READ Enab]e the conputer to receive the next set of data i

- fran the data acxtuisition system directly.

PIUT Enables user to plot sunmary data, individual sensor data or air mass versus time.

DEIETE Enables user to delete a data point.

INSERT Enables user to reinstate a previously deleted data point.

l VOLEPA Enable user to change volume fractions.

i A-9

1 i

A U

OPIT N CG9tAND FUNCTIN PRED A predictor report is printed.

TIME Enable the user to specify the time interval for a report or plot.

VERF Enable the user to irput 4==d leakage rate and calculated IIRE leakage rates at start of verification test.

E. h*ar D=r-t ard Data Printout MASS POINT REPORT The Mass Point Report presents leakage rate data (wt%/ day) as determined by the Mass 1bint Method. The " Calculated Isakage Rate" is the value determined fran the regression analysis. The "Ceainment Air Mass" values are the masses of dry air in the containment (1hn). These air manu===, determined from the Equation of State, are used in the regression analysis.

O TUIAL TIME REIORP The Total Time Report presents data leakage rate (wt%/ day) as determined by the Total Time Method. The " Calculated Isakage Rate" is the value determined from the regression analysis. The " Measured Isakage Rates" are the leakage rate values determined using Total Time calculations.

1hese values of leakage rate are used in the r%sassion analysis.

TREND REPORE The Trend Report presents leakage rates as determined by the Mass Point and Total Time methods in percent of the initial contained mass of dry air per day (wt%/ day), versus elapaari time (hours) and number of data points.

PREDICIOR REEORE The predictor re:ru.Ls presents a predicted upper bound on the change in calculated mass point leakage rate over the next four hours.

SUIEARY DMA REEORT The Sumary Data report presents the actual data used to calculate leakage rates by the various methods hibed in the Couputer Pw3taih" section of this report. The seven aslumns are TIME, DATE, TENP, ERESSURE, VPRS, VOIINE, and AIRMASS and cantain data defined as follows:

O A-10

1.

TIME:

Time in 24-hour notation (hours and minutes).

2.

DATE:

Calendar date (month and day).

3.

TENP:

Containment weighted-average drybulb tenperature in abanlute units, degrees Rankine (*R).

4.

PRESSURE:

Partial pressure of the dry air +mut of the contaiment ahnnaphere in absolute units (psia).

5.

VPRS:

Partial pressure of water vapor of the containment aLa.= pere in absolute units (psia).

6.

VOIllME:

Containment free air volume (cu. ft.).

7.

AIRMASS:

Calculated dry air mass (lbn).

F. 9 w of ;-- rn==1 Data and 9 vv of Cuurumi Data The Sumary of Measured Data presents the individual mntaiment atmosphere drybulb tenperatures, dewpoint tenperatures, absolute total pressure and free air volume measured at the time and date.

1.

TEMP 1 through TENP N are the drybulb tenparatures, where N = No. of RID's. The values in the right-hand column are tenparatures (*F),

O nultiplied by 100, as read fr m the data acquisition system (DAS).

The values in the left-hand colum are the corrected tenperatures expressed in absolute units (*R).

2.

PRES 1 through PRES N are the total pressures, absolute, were N = No.

of pressure sensors. The right-hand value, in parentheses, is a number of counts as read frat the DAS. This count value is converted to a value in psia by the caputer via the instrument's calibration table, counts versus psia. The left-hand column is the. absolute total pressure, psia.

4 3.

VPRS 1 through VPRS N are the dewpoint taperatures (water vapor pressures), where N = No. of dewpoint sensors. The values in the right-hand column are tauperatures (*F), alltiplied by 100 as read from the DAS. The values in the left-hand column are the water vapor pressures (psia) frm the steam tables for saturated steam cou==pmiing to the dewpoint (saturation) tenperatures in the center column.

The Sumary of Corrected Data presented corrected tenperature and pressure values and calculated air mass determined as follows:

1.

TEMPERATURE (*R) is the volume weighted average containment atmosphere drybulb tenperature derived frm TEMP 1 through TEMP N.

O

, V A-11

2.

OCRRBCIED PRESSURE (psia) is the partial pressure of the dry air

+-it of the containnent atmosphere, absolute. 'Ihe volume wighted average contaiment aW wter vapor pr===we is subtracted fraa the volume mighted average total pressure, yielding the partial pressure of the dry air.

VARR PRESSURE (psia) is the volume mighted average ccmtainment 3.

ahnnaphere wter vapor pressure, absolute, derived fran VHts 1 through VPRS N.

4.

voIDME (cu. ft.) is the ocmtaiment free air volume.

5.

OJtfIADMENI AIR MASS (lbn) is the calculated mass of dry air in the containment. 'Ihe ness of dry air is calculated using the containment free air volums and the above TEMPERAIURE and 00RRECIED PRESSURE of the dry air.

t i

1 r

i f

(

l 1

i A-D

.._.-..._. -...,,._.. _.... - _. -,.,. ~. _,. _ _.

. _.. -.. _,.... _,. _...., -..,,. _. _.. ~ _ _.,,

u a

s-

-.u

.a a

n s

i I

i i

APPDGX B IOCAL IEAIGGE 'IET DMA l

i l

1 i

i l

I i

l J

l l

1

+

l i

---.--we.e-

-,,---, -~ -- - - - ' - - ~ - --'-~ -'-- ~ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ' "

' ' ' ' ' ' " * ' ' ' " " ' ' ' " ~ ' ' ~

' ' ' " ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

" " ~

T f'

' O

- L- - -

'Ihe following data is a sunmary of the leakage for Unit i 6th Refueling Outage.

AS FOUND (Min.)

Electrical Penetration Total 47.343 SCCM Type B Test (Less Elec. Pene.) Total (Hatches, etc.)

238.500 SCCM

. Type C "As Found" Min. Path Leakage per Penetration.

'2556.936 SCCM

'!OTAL 2842.779 SCCM "As Found" Min. 2842.779 x 100 - 1.88% of allowable leakage 150975 AS LEFT (Min.)

Electrical Penetration Total 9.176 SCCM Type B Test (Less Elec. Pene.)~ Total (Hatches, etc.)

238.500 SCCM:

Type C Min. Path Leakage 1963.773 SCCM

'IOTAL 2211.449 sCCM.

"As Left" Min. 2211.449 x 100 = 1.46% of allowable leakage 150975 f

AS LEFT (Max )

Electrical Penetration Total 9.176 sCCM Type B Test (Less Elec. Pene.) Total (Hatches, etc.)

238.500 SCCM Type C Max. Path Leakage 3531.680 SCCM

' TOTAL 3779.356 SCCM "As Left" Max. 3779.356 x 100 - 2.50% of allowable leakage 150975 O

4 UNIT 1 TYPE B TEST

SUMMARY

- 6th REFUELING AS FOUND AS LETT.

'PENE.

LEAKAGE LEAKAGE NO.

TPNS NO.

DATE (SCCM)

DATE (SCCM)

- EA01-

-Q1T52A003-A 04/07/85 0.14

'04/07/85-0.14-

)

EA02 Q1T52A004-A-04/07/85 0.54 04/07/85 0.54 EA03' Q1T52B014-A' 04/07/85 0.068 04/07/85 0.068 EA05 Q1T528001-A 04/07/85 1.2 04/09/85 0.14 EA06 Q1T528005-A 04/07/85 1.088' 04/07/85 1.088 EA09 Q1T528002-A 04/08/85 0.17 04/08/85 0.17 EA10

.Q1TS2A001-A 04/08/85 0

04/08/85 0.

EAll Q1T52A002-A 04/08/85 0.54 04/08/85

'O.54 EB01 Q1T528019-A 04/07/85-0.068 04/07/85 0.068 EB05 Q1T528007-A 04/07/85 0

04/07/85 0

-EB09 Q1T528006-A 04/08/85 0

04/08/85 0

EC01-Q1T52B013-1 04/07/85

'0.14 -

04/07/85 0'.14 EC03 Q1T528012-1 04/07/85 0

04/07/85 0

I EC07 01T528009-A 04/08/85 0.09 04/08/85 0.09 EC08 Q1T528010-4 04/08/85 0.209 04/08/85 0.209 i

EC10 Q1T52B008-4 04/08/85 0.209 04/08/85 0.209 WA02.

Q1T52B015-B 04/07/85 0

04/07/85 0

i E03 Q1T52B023-B 04/06/85 0.136 04/06/85 0.136 i

WA05 Q1T528046-B 04/07/85 0.204 04/07/85 0.204 i

l WA06 Q1T52B047-B 04/07/85 1.2 04/09/85 0.136 1

WA07 Q1T52A005-B 04/07/85~

0.952 04/07/85 0.952 WA08 Q1T52A006-B 04/06/85 0.272 04/06/85 0.272 WA09

-Q1T528018-B' 04/06/85 0.068 04/06/85 0.068 NA10 Q1T528016-B 04/07/85 0.578 04/07/85 0.578 O

^

~

1 i.

-,,.._.._m,m,

,.m

,.,,s m...

._m-,,

UNIT 1 TYPE B TEST

SUMMARY

6th REFUELING AS FOUND AS LETT PENE.

LEAKAGE LEAKAGE NO.

TPNS NO.

DATE (SCCM)

DATE (SCCM) i Wall Q1T525017-B 04/06/85 17.48~

05/02/85 0.104 NA21 Q1T528032-N' 04/06/85 0

04/06/85 0

NA22 Q1T52B033-N 04/06/85 0.544 04/06/85 0.544 NA23 Q1TS28034-N 04/06/85 0.068 04/06/85 0.068 NA24 Q1T52B035-N 04/06/85 17.07 04/25/85 0.068 WB03 Q1TS2B020-B 04/06/85 0

04/06/85 0

WB07 Q1T52B022-B 04/06/85 0.272 05/03/85 0

WB09 Q1T528025-B 04/06/85 0.748 04/13/85 0.204-WB11 Q1T528038-a 04/06/85.

0.408 05/01/85 0.035 WB21 Q1T528037-N 04/06/85 0.238 04/06/85 0.238 WB24 Q1T52B039-N 04/06/85 0

04/06/85 0

WC01 Q1TS2B026-3 04/07/85 0.068 04/07/85-0.068 WC03 01T52B024-3 04/07/85 0.748 04/07/85 0.748 WC05 Q1T52B028-3 04/08/85 0.136 04/08/85 0.136 WC07 Q1T528030-2 04/06/85 0.068 04/24/85 0

WC08 Q1TS28011-B 04/08/85 0

_04/08/85 0

WC09 Q1T52B042-2 04/06/85 0.238 04/06/85 0.238 WC11 01TS2B031-2 04/06/85 0.272 04/06/85 0.272 i

WC21 Q1TS2B040-N 04/06/85 0.408 04/06/85 0.408 i

j.

WC23 Q1T52B041-N 04/06/85 0.476 04/12/85 0.068 WC02 Q1T52B053-B 04/07/85 0.034 04/07/85 0.034 EB10 Q1T52B052-4 04/08/85 0.195 04/08/85 0.195' i

4

-M

-mgy w-.-

p-w

-w v-m.r-w-

--ege.

syw..,---

--.4%.

gy w-

-we w-w e

(--y e+.-

v w

--wa--

y

J l

UNIT 1 TYPE B TEST

SUMMARY

FOR 6Di REFUELING I

AS FOUND AS LEFT PENE..

LEAKAGE RATE LEAKAGE RATE NO.

DESCRIPTION DATE (SCCM)

DATE' (SCCM)'

l 14 Fuel Transfer 04/27/85 7.6 04/27/85

~ 7.6 Tube - Flange Double "O" 1

Ring 14 Fuel Transfer 04/11/85 46.4 04/11/85

-46.4 4

Tube - Bellows t

84 Equipment 05/14/85 3.1 05/14/85 ~

3.1 Hatch -

Between 0 Rings 86 Personnel 05/17/85 0

05/17/85 0

Lock Outer Door - Between O Rings i

s t

86 Personnel 05/14/85 2.8 05/14/85 2'. 8 Lock Volume l

Between Doors 1

E 87 Auxiliary Access 0

0 Lock outer Door -

Between O Rings 87 Auxiliary Access 05/06/85 178.6 05/06/85 178.6 Lock Volume Between Doors 1

i F

lO i

-,-,,,,,,--.ww--

re-re.--,nw-----

-e---z--re -

-s--w.

2

---

em-----.-+-,-r s

-r,-,,

--r--r--r.,,ve

..,y-r--w--

--.--r-w-,-,-,--

-g

-~---e.

+r--,--v---r.--r---

O O

O UNIT 1 TYPC C TEST SUMARY FTR 6th REFUELING AS FOUND PENE.

AS FOtRO MIN. PKIN AS LEFT AS IEFT NO.

VALVE NO.

DATE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE DME IEAKAGE PER PENC.

(SccM)

(SccM)

(SccM)

MIN.

MAX..

10 01E11V025A 04/22/85 54.0*

27.0 04/22/85 54.0*

27.0 54.0-Q1EllV026A 04/22/85 54.0*

04/22/85 54.0*

11 Q1E11V0258 04/14/85 5.4*

2.7 04/14/85 5.4*

2.7 5.4 Q1E11V026B 04/14/85 5.4*

04/14/85 5.4*

12 Q1P13V282 04/17/85 43.8%

43.8 04/30/85 43.8*

21.9 43.8 Q1P13V281 04/17/85 43.84 04/30/85 43.8*

Q1P13V301 04/17/85 43.8#

04/30/85 43.8*

Q1P13v302 04/17/85 55925 04/30/85 43.8*

13 Q1P13v283 04/17/85 3864 386.0 04/18/85 386*

193.0 386.0 Q1P13V284 04/17/85 3865 04/18/85 386*

QlP13V304 04/17/85 Off Scalet 04/18/85 386*

Q1P13V303 04/17/85 3865 04/18/85 386*

16 Q1E11V001A 04/22/85 765.0 765.0 04/22/85 765.0 765.0 765.0 18 Q1E11V0013 04/16/85 1.8 1.8 04/16/85 1.8 1.8 1.8-23 Q1E21V253A 04/11/85 105*

16.2 04/11/85 105*

17.3 105.0 Q1E21V2538 04/11/85 105*-

04/11/85 105*

Q1E21v253C 04/11/85 105*

04/11/85 105*

Q1E21V254 04/11/85 16.2 05/22/85 17.3 24 Q1E21V257 04/22/85 1.4 1.4 04/22/85 1.4 1.4 18.0 Q1E21V258 04/22/85 18.0 04/22/85 18.0 Q1E21V119 04/22/85 14.0 04/22/85 14.0 25 Q1E21V1158 04/12/85 11.9 11.9 04/12/85 11.9

-11.9 11.9 26 01E21v115c 04/12/85 2.7 2.7 04/12/85 2.7 2.7 2.7

• values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.

BValves were tested in group sets. After one valve was worked the "As Found" Minimm Path teakage was determined.

PACE 1

_ _. _. _ _ _.. - _. _. ~. _ _. - - _. - _.... -. _.

UNIT 1 TYPE C TEST SUPMARY FOR 6th REFUELING l

AS F0 LAO

{

PENE.

AS FtXRO MIN. PKIH AS LEFT AS LEFT fo.

VALVE 20.

DATE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE DAE LEAKAGE PER PENE.

1 j

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM) l MIN.

MAX..

l 27 Q1E21V115A 04/12/85 14.1 14.1 04/12/85 14.1 14.1 14.1 i

l-28 Q1E21v213 04/23/85 4.6*

3.2 04/23/85 4.6*.

3.2 4.6

}

ole 21V249A 04/23/85 4.6*

04/23/85 4.6*

)

ole 21V249B 04/23/85 3.2 04/23/85 3.2 29 ole 21V049 04/12/85 2.4 2.4 04/12/85 2.4 2.4 3.0

]

ole 21V050 04/08/85 3.0 04/08/85 3.0 30 OlB13V040 04/09/85 14.1 14.1 04/26/85 11.3 -

11.3 22.3 OlB13V038 04/09/85 22.3 04/09/85 22.3-l 31 OlG21V005 04/19/85 62.0 1.5 04/19/85

-62.0 1.5 376.0 OlG21V006 04/19/85 1.5 04/19/85 1.5 8

I

.Q1G21V064 04/19/85 1515.0 04/25/85 376.0

}-

32 OlP16V081 04/09/85 76.3 20.6 04/09/85

-76.3 20.6 76.3 ~

l OlP16V072 04/09/85 20.6 04/09/85.

20.6 i

33 Q1G21HV3380 04/25/85 2.2 2.2 04/25/85 2.2 2.2:

.2.6 Q1G21V204 04/25/85 2.6 04/25/85 2.6 j

42 QLP17V083 04/16/85 48.0 1.4 04/16/85 48.0 1.4' 48.0 Q1P17V082 04/16/85 1.4 04/16/85 1.4 i

)

43 QlP17HV3045 04/09/85 15.3 13.3 04/09/85

'15.3 13.3 15.3 QlP17HV3184 04/09/85 13.3 04/09/85-13.3

{

44 01P17V097 04/09/85 46.0 31.6-04/09/85 46.0 31.6 146.0 l

OlP17V099 04/09/85 31.6 04/09/85 31.6 1

j 45 QlP17HV3095 04/16/85 36.1 30.1 04/16/85 36.1' 30.1 - 36;1, l

OlP17V159 04/16/85 30.1 04/16/85 30.1 1

~11.7

~16.8 46 OlP17HV3443 04/09/85 16.8 11.7 04/09/85 16.8 i

QlP17HV3067 04/09/85 11.7 04/09/85 11.7-1 1

PAGE 2

?

I 3

~.

_ - ~. -... - -.

. ~.. -

i O

O O

l UNIT 1 TYPE C TEST SUf9tARY EDR 6th REFUELING l

i AS FOLDO

]

PENE.

AS FOUND MIN. PA1H AS LEFT AS LEFT NO.

VALVE NO.

DATE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE DATE LEAKAGE PER PENE.

}

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

-)

i MIN. MAX.

47 Q1P18V001 04/22/85 146.0 90.0 04/22/85 146.0 90.0 146.0 01P18V002 04/22/85 90.0 04/22/85 90.0

,i 4

48 Q1P19HV3611 04/17/85 52.0 52.0 04/17/85 52.0 52.0 101.0 i

Q1P19V002 04/17/85 101.0 04/17/85 101.0 49 Q1E21v052 04/08/85 3.8

' 1.9 04/08/85 3.8 1.9 3.8 i

01E21v091 04/08/85 1.9 04/08/85 1.9 i

50 01P15HV3766 04/10/85 2.7 2.1 04/10/85 2.7 2.1 2.7 j

Q1P15HV3334 04/10/85 2.1 04/10/85 2.1 54 01E14V002 04/10/85 5.4 3.4 04/10/85-5.4 3.4 5.4 Q1E14fw3658 04/10/85 3.4 04/10/85 3.4 55 Q1E14HV3657 04/10/85 2.97 2.97 04/10/85~

2.97 1.9:

2.97 01E14v001 04/10/85 406.0 04/13/85 1.9 i

56 01P15HV3104 04/18/85 22.2 18.4 04/18/85' 22.2 18.4 22.2

.i j

Q1P15HV3331 04/18/85 18.4 04/18/85 18.4 57 Q1P15HV3103 04/18/85 19.8 19.8 04/18/85 19.8 6.4 19.8

}

Q1P15HV3332 04/18/85 44.7 05/14/85 6.4 5",

Q1P15HV3765 04/10/85 5.2 5.2 04/10/85 5.2 5.2 5.6-i Q1P15HV3333 04/10/85 5.6 04/10/85 5.6 1

59 Q1E11V0398 04/29/85 11.3*

2.9 04/29/85 11.3*

2.9

.3

-11 01E11V039A 04/29/85 11.3*

04/29/85 11.3*

i 01E21V263A 04/29/85 11.3*

04/29/85 11.3*

Q1E21V2638 04/29/85 11.3*

04/29/85 11.3*.

'l Q1813V054 04/29/85 2.9 04/29/85 2.9 01E11V040 04/29/85 11.3*

04/29/85 11.3*

• Values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.

1 PAGE 3 3

O O

~

G-

~

LNIT 1 TYPE C TEST SUPetARY FOR 6th REEUELING AS ETXMD PENE.

AS FOlMD MIN. PAlli AS LEFT AS LEFT NO.

VALVE NO.

DATE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE DATE LEAKAGE PER PENE.

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

MIN. MAX.

60 OlP16v075 04/12/85 3.8 3.8 04/12/85 3.8 3.8 5.0 OlP16v071 04/11/85 5.0 04/11/85 5.0 i

61A QlE23v022C 04/07/85 165*

82.5 04/13/85 51.5*

25.75 51.5 ole 23v022D 04/07/85 165*

04/13/85 51.5*

Q1E23V023B 04/07/85 165*

04/13/85 51.5*

618 ole 23v024B 04/12/85 1.6*

0.8 04/12/85 1.6 1.6 2.0 01E23v025B 04/12/85 1.6*

05/16/85 2.0 62 OlG21v082 04/12/85 3.6 2.7 04/12/85 3.6 2.7 3.6 Q1G21v001 04/12/85 2.7 04/12/85 2.7 63 ole 21v058 04/08/85 27.2 21.1 04/08/85 27.2 21.1 27.2 ole 21v059 04/08/85 21.1 04/08/85 21.1 64A QlB13v037 04/20/85 3.7*

1.85 04/26/85 6.9*

3.45 6.9, Q1813v039 04/20/85 3.7*

04/26/85 6.9*

648 Q1813v026A 04/08/85 4.7 3.1 04/08/85 4.7

.3.1 4.7 QlB13v026B 04/08/85 3.1 04/08/85 3.1 66 Q1E23v025A 04/07/85 2.7*

1.35 04/07/85 2.7*

1.35 2.7 ole 23v024A 04/07/85 2.7*

04/07/85 2.7*

67 ole 23v022A 04/07/85 3.2*

1.6 04/07/85 3.2*

1.6 3.2 Q1E23v0228 04/07/85 3.2*

04/07/85 3.2*

Q1E23v023A 04/07/85 3.2*

04/07/85 3.2*

7r QlE14V004 04/08/85 4.8 4.8 04/08/85 4.8

• 4.8'.-98.0 QlE14v003 04/07/85 98.0 04/07/85 98.0 71 OlP23v002A 05/12/85 47.7 47.7 05/12/85 47.7 47.7 47.7 avalues represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.

PAGE 4

O O

O UtjIT 1 TYPE C TEST SUMWlY EUR 6th REFUELING As EtUND PENE.

AS FOl20 MIN. PA'IH AS LEFT AS LEFT.

NO.

VALVE NO.

DATE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE DA'IE LEAKAGE PER PENE.

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM) j MIN.

MAX.

l 72 OlP23v0028 05/12/85 60.19 60.19 05/12/85 60.19 60.19 60.19 78 01G21HV3377 04/26/85 2.0 0.083 04/26/85 2.0 0.083 '2.0 f

Q1G21v291 04/26/85 0.083*

04/26/85 0.083*

I Q1G21HV3376 04/26/85 0.083*

04/26/85 0.083*

82 Q1P11Hv3659 04/17/85 3.72 0.8 04/17/85 3.72 0.8 3.72 OlP11V002 04/17/85 0.8 04/17/85 0.8 93 Q1E13v003A 04/15/85 753.1*

376.55 04/15/85 753.1*

376.55 753.1 Q1E13v004A 04/15/85 753.1*

04/15/85 753.1*

94 01E13v003B 04/15/85 50.3*

25.15 04/15/85 50.3*

25.15 50.3 l

01813v0048 04/15/85 50.3*

04/15/85 50.3*

l 95 01G31v012 04/11/85 5.6 5.6 04/11/85 5.6 5.6 16.8 Q1G31v013 04/11/85 16.8 04/11/85 16.8, l

l 97B Q1P19v004 04/12/85 5.9 5.9 04/12/85 5.9 5.9 17.1 Q1P19tN2228 04/12/85 17.1 04/12/85 17.1 103 Q1E23v003 04/07/85 0.5*

0.25 04/07/85 0.5*

0.25 0.5 i

.QlE23v002 04/07/85 0.5*

04/07/85 0.5*

e

• • .41ues represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.

s PAGE 5 I

e

(

p-LOCAL LEAK RATE TEST l

The following data is a summary of the leakage for Unit 1 7th Refueling Outage.

J "As round"'(Min)

J l

Electrical Penetration Total 18.624 Type B test (less Elec. Pene.) Total (Hatches, etc.)

991.000 Type C "As round" Min. Path Leakage 31,313.170 Total 32,322.794 3

l Max. Allowable Leakagw ( 6 IA) = 150,975 SCCM "As round" Min. 32,322.794 x 100 - 21.41% of allowable' leakage j

150,975 "As Left" (Min) i Electrical Penetration Total 18.909 i

Type B Test (less Elec. Pene.) Total (Hatches, etc.)

1382.700 Type C Min. Path Leakage 2205.460 Total 3,607.069 "As Left" Min. 3607.069 x 100 - 2.39% of Allowable Leakage 4

j 150,975 i

i "As Left" (Max)

Electrical Penetration Total 18.909 Type B Test (Less Elec. Pene.) Total (Hatches, etc.)

1382.700 l

Type C Max. Path Leakage 4899.900 I

Total 6,301.509

)

i l

"As Left" Max. 6301.509 x 100 - 4.17% of Allowable Leakage 1

150,975 I

k 4

f 6

t I

i 1

M*f** b!

k

UNIT 1 TYPE B TEST

SUMMARY

- 7th REFUELING AS FOUND AS LEFT PENE TPNS NO.

DATE' LEAKAGE DATE LEAKAGE j

NO.

(SCCM)

(SCCt!)

l EA01 Q1T52A003-A 10/06/86 1.290 10/29/86 0.374 I

EA02 Q1T52A004-A 10/06/86 0.612 10/29/86 0.102 l

EA03 Q1T528014-A 10/05/86 0.204 10/05/86 0.204 EA05 Q1T525001-A 10/05/86 0.204 10/05/86 0.204 EA06 Q1T525005-A 10/06/86 0.810 10/29/86 0.408 EA09 Q1T528002-A 10/06/86 0.204 10/06/86 0.204 I

l EA10 Q1T52A001-A 10/06/86 0.272 10/06/06 0.272 EAll Q1T52A002-A 10/06/86 0.714 10/29/86 0.075 l

EB01 Q1T528019-A 10/06/86 0.442 10/31/86 0.5 EBOS Q1T528007-A 10/06/86 0.102 10/06/86 0.102 EB09 Q1T525006-A 10/06/86 0.075 11/03/86 0.4 EC01 Q1T525013-1 10/06/86 0.140 10/31/86 0.1 EC03 Q1T528012-1 10/05/86 0.135 11/03/86 0.2 EC07 Q1T528009-A 10/06/86 0.071 10/06/86 0.071 EC08 Q1TS28010-4 10/05/86 0,.578 11/03/86 0.4

]

EC10 Q1T528008-4 10/06/86 0.238 10/06/86 0.238

]

WA02 Q1T525015-B 10/06/86 0.510 10/06/86 0.510 i

WA03 Q1T528023-B 10/06/86 0.102 10/06/86 0.102 i

WA05 01T528046-B 10/06/86 0.340 10/06/86 0.340 j

WA06 Q1T528047-B 10/05/86 0.238 10/05/86 0.238 1

WA07 Q1T52A005-B 10/05/86 0.442 10/05/86 0.442 WA08 Q1T52A006-B 10/05/86 0.340 10/05/86 0.340 WA09 Q1T528018-B 10/05/86 0.102

• 10/05/86 0.102 i

WA10 Q1T528016-B 10/05/86 0.340 10/05/86 0.340 O

PAGE 1

.+ v 4

... ~ _

UNIT 1 TYPE B TEST

SUMMARY

'- 7th REFUELING i

O AS FOUND AS LEFT PENE.

TPNS NO.

DATE LEAKAGE DATE LEAKAGE i

NO.

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

I 1

Wall Q1T528017-5 10/06/86 0.17 10/06/86 0.17 l

WA21 Q1T525032-N 10/04/86 0.102 11/03/86 0.6

)

WA22 Q1T523033-N 10/04/86 0.442 11/03/86 0.4 WA23 Q1T525034-N 10/04/86 0.17 10/31/86 0.9 i

WA24 Q1T525035-N 10/04/86 0.510 11/03/86 0.9 j

WB03 Q1T528020-B 10/05/86 0.442 10/05/86 0.442 i

1 WB07 Q1T525022-5 10/06/8'6 2.041 10/31/86 0.9 WB09 Q1T525025-B 10/05/86 0.102 10/05/86 0.102 1'

WB11 Q1T528038-B 10/04/86 0.135 11/03/86 0.7 t

WB21 Q1TS28037-N 10/04/86 0.204 10/31/86 0.7 r

~

Ws24 Q1T525039-N 10/04/86 0.17 10/31/86 0.9 WC01 Q1T528026-3 10/05/86 0.544 10/05/86 0.544 l

WC03 Q1T528024-3 10/05/86 0.510 10/05/86 0.510 WC05 Q1T525028-3 10/06/86 0.408 10/31/86 0.8 WC07 Q1TS28030-2 10/05/86 0.476 10/05/86 0.476

{

WC08 Q1TS2B011-B 10/05/86 0.035 10/05/86 0.035 l

WC09 Q1T525042-2 10/05/86 0.075 10/05/86 0.075 WC1'1 Q1T528031-2 10/04/86 0.17 10/31/86 0.6 WC21 Q1T52B040-N 10/05/86 0.476 10/31/86 0.7 WC23 Q1T528041-N 10/04/86 0.34 10/31/86 1.0 WCO2 Q1T528053-B 10/06/86 0

10/11/86 0

EB10 Q1T528052-4 10/06/86 1.98 10/10/86 0.57 EB02 Q1T528055 10/16/86 0.15 10/16/86 0.15 j

ECO5 01T52B056 10/17/86 0

10/17/86 0

EB04 Q1T525054 10/17/86 0.467 10/17/86

'0.467 i

PAGE 2 7

e.,

i

b UNIT 1 TYPE B TEST

SUMMARY

FOR 7TH REFUELING l

I' i

l AS FOUND AS LETT i

PENE DESCRIPTION DATE LEAKAGE DATE.

LEAKAGE NO.

(SCCM)

(SCCM) 4 i

14 Fuel Transfer 11-7-86 7.0 11-07-86 7.0 j

Tube - Flange q

Double 0 Ring i

14 Fuel Transfer 10-21-86

'43.7 10-21-86 43.7 j

Tube - Bellows i

i 84 Equip Hatch 11-09 5.' 3 11-28-86 397.0 j

Between 0 Rings I

86 Personnel Lock 11-09-86 0

11-09-86 0

i Outer Door -

]

setween O Rings 4

86 Personnel Lock 11-05-86 700.0 11-05-86 700.0 i

volume Between j

Doors i

j 87 Aux Access Lock 11-09-86 0

11-09-86 0

Outer Door -

Between O Rings 1

'87 Au'x Access Lock 11-06-86 235*.0 11-06-86 235.'0 Outer Door -

Between O Rings

)

i i

I E

^

TOTAL 1

1 i

I, i

I s

l PAGE 3 1

I l

=

j re w i

W%

m-N.J Y

.)

(RJIT 1 - TYPE C TEST StMMARY FOR 7DI REFUELING AS FOl2D PE2;E.

AS ftXRD MIN. PAtt AS LEFT AS LEFT PER PENE.

FO.

VALVE FO.

DATE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE DATE LEAKAGE MIN.

MAX.

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM) 10 Q1E11V025B 10-13-86 72.0*

36.0 10-17-86 698.0 349.0 698.0 01E11V026B 10-13-86 72.0*

10-17-86 698.0 11 ole 11V025A 10-17-85 360.4*

180.2 10-26-86 3.97*

1.99 3.97 Q1E11v026A 10-17-86 360.4*

10-26-86 3.97*

12 Q1P13V282 10- 5-86 21.3*

-10.65 11-14-86 0.6

• 0.3 0.6 Q1P13V281 10- 5-86 21.3*

11-14-86 0.6

• QIP13V301 10- 5-86 21.3*

11-14-86 0.6

• 01P13v302 10- 5-86 21.3*

11-14-86 0.6 a 13 OlP13V283 10- 5-86 333.0 166.5 11-14-86 0.9

• 0.45 0.9 OlP13V284 10- 5-86 333.0

• 11-14-86 0.9

• OlP13V304 10- 5-86 333.0

• 11-14-86 0.9

• Q1P13V303 10- 5-86 333.0

• 11-14-86 0.9

• 16 01E11V001A 10-17-86 429.0 429.0 10-31-86 148.4 148.4 148.4 18 ole 11V001B 10-13-86 167.0 167.0 10-13-86 167.0 167.0 167.0 23 Q1E21V253A 10- 9-86 134.0

• 17.7 11-14-86 122.0 25.0 122.0 Q1E21V253B 10- 9-86 134.0

• 11-14-86 122.0 ole 21V253c 10- 9-86 134.0

• 11-14-86 122.0 ole 21V254 10- 9-86 17.7 11-14-86 25.0 24 ole 21V257 10-15-86 4.6 3.6 11-14-86 2.7 2.7 5.5 QlE21V258 10-15-86 3.6 11-13-86 5.5 01E21V119 10-15-86 3.8 10-15-86 3.8 l

25 01E21V115B 10- 7-86 18.7 18.7 10- 7-86 18.7 18.7 18.7 2e Q1E21v115C 10- 7-86 12.0 12.0 10- 7-86 12.0 12.0 12.0 l

l

• 7alues represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.

PARE 1 l

O O

O

[FJIT 1 - TYPE C "IEST

SUMMARY

EDR 7DI REEUELItG AS FOtJO PE7E.

AS FOL2JD MIN. PADI AS LEFT AS LEFT PER PmE.

20.

VALVE 70.

DATE LEAKACE LEAKAGE DATE LEAKAGE MIN.

MAX.

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM) 27 01E21V115A 10- 8-86 29000.0 29000.0 10-14-86 70.6 70.6 70.6 28 Q1E21V213 10- 7-86 3.6*

3.6 10- 7-86 3.6*

3.6 4.0 ole 21v249A 10- 7-86 3.6*

10- 7-86 3.6*

ole 21v2498 10- 7-86 4.0 10- 7-86 4.0 29 ole 21V049 10- 7-86 5.4 4.0 10- 7-86 5.4 3.4 5.4 QlE21V050 10- 7-86 4.0 10-28-86 3.4 30 01813V040 10- 9-86 9.0 9.0 10-28-86 17.2 10.1 17.2 01813v038 10- 9-86 10.1 10- 9-86 10.1 31 OlG21v005 10-10-86 7.3 53.1 10-10-86 7.3 8.9 53.1 OlG21v006 10-10-86 53.1 10-10-86 53.1 OlG21V064 10-10-86 73.4 11-1-86 1.6 32 OlP16V081 10- 9-86 79.41 79.41 10- 9-86 79.41 2.6 79.41 01P16v072 10- 9-86 115.9 10-20-86 2.6 33 01G21tN3383 10-30-86 3.5 3.5 10-30-86 3.5 3.5 120.5 OlG21V204 10-30-86 6680.0 11-1-86 120.5 42 OlP17V083 10- 8-86 54.0 0.43 10- 8-86 54.0 0.43 54.0 OlP17V082 10- 8-66 0.43 10- 8-86 0.43 43 OlP171N3045 10- 8-86 96.8 7.4 10- 8-86 96.8 7.4 96.8 QlP171N3184 10- 8-86 7.4 10- 8-86 7.4 44 OlP17V097 10- 9-86 186.8 11.89 10- 9-86 186.8 11.89 186.8 OlP17V099 10- 9-86 11.89 10- 9-86 11.89 45 OlP17tN3095 10- 8-86 0.17 0.17 10 86 0.17 0.17 24.4 01P17V159 10 86 24.4 10- 8-86 24.4 46 OlP171N3443 10- 7-86 2.2 1.2 10- 7-86 2.2 1.2 2.2 QlP171N3067 10- 7-86 1.2 10- 7-86 1.2 l

PACE 2 l

.. ~

O O

O IMIT 1 - TYPE C TEST SupWIARY EOR 71H REFUELING AS FOUND PDE.

AS FOIDD MIN. PA1H AS LEET AS 1 EFT PER PENE.

ID.

VALVE NO.

DA1E LEAFAGE LEAKAGE DA1E LEAKAGE MIN.

MAX.

(SCCM)

(SCOT)

(SCCM) 47 Q1P18v001 11-4-86 197.0 98.5 11-4-86 197.0 98.5 197.0

~l I

Q1P18V002 11-4-86 197.0 11-4-86 197.0 48 Q1P19HV3611 10-17-86 72.5 72.5 10-17-86 72.5 72.5 164.3 Q1P19V002 10-17-86 164.3 10-17-86 164.3 49 Q1E21v052 10- 8-86 1.5 1.5 10- 8-86 1.5 1.5 4.3 Q1E21V091 10- 8-86 4.3 10- 8-86 4.3 50 Q1P15HV3766 10- 7-86 1.5 1.5 10- 2-86 1.5 1.5 11.3 Q1P15HV3334 10-27-86 11.3 10-27-86 11.3 54 Q1E14V002 10- 9-86 6.2 3.2 10- 9-86 6.2 3.2 6.2 Q1E14Hv3658 10- 9-86 3.2 10- 9-86 3.2 55 Q1E14HV3657 10- 9-86 66.52 13.5 10- 9-86 66.52 13.5 66.52 Q1E14V001 10- 9-86 13.5 10- 9-86 13.5 I

56 Q1P15HV3104 10- 7-86 4.3 4.0 10- 7-86 4.3 4.0 4.3 l

Q1P15HV3331 10- 7-86 4.0 10- 7-86 4.0 i

57 Q1P15HV3103 10- 7-86 5.1 5.0 10- 7-86 5.1 5.0 5.1 Q1P15HV3332 10- 7-86 5.0 10- 7-86 5.0 58 Q1P15HV3765 10- 8-86 5.5 3.4 10- 8-86 5.5 3.4 5.5 Q1P15HV3333 10- 8-86 3.4 10- 8-86 3.4 i

59 Q1E11V0398 10-10-86 19.5*

19.5 10-10-86 19.5*

19.5 41.0 I

Q1E11V039A 10-10-86 19.5*

10-10-86 19.5*-

01E21V263A 10-10-86 19.5*

10-10-86 19.5*

Q1E21V2638 10-10-86 19.5*

10-10-86 19.5*

Q1813V054 10-10-86 41.0 10-10-86 41.0 Q1E11V040 10-10-86 19.5*

10-10-86 19.5*

PAGE 3 e

---aw

+y-

-re-m--

rs,se%=~r--

-w

-ye-

-m---m--

-~'w---+4 O+-

--Io-

O O

O tr1IT 1 - TYPE C EST

SUMMARY

FOR 7111 REFUELItG AS EEUtJD PCJE.

AS E0l1JD MIri. PNill AS LEFT AS LEFT PER PDJE.

TD.

VALVE FO.

DATE LEAhAGE LEAKAGE DAE LEAKAGE Miti.

MAX.

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM) 60 Q1P16V075 10-06-86 170,000.0 140.0 10-20-86 374.0 140.0 374.0 OlP16V071 10-10-86 140.0 10-10-86 140.0 61A QlE23v022C 10-06-86 3.0*

1.5 10-06-86 3.0*

1.5 3.0 Q1E23v022D 10-06-86 3.0*

10-06-86 3.0*

Q1E23v0238 10-06-86 3.0*

10-06-86 3.0*

61a QlE23v024n 10-06-86 0.5*

0.25 10-06-86 0.5*

0.25 0.5 ole 23v0258 10-06-86 0.5*

10-06-86 0.5*

62 Q1G21v082 10-08-86 0.4 0.4 10-08-86 0.4 0.4 7.0 Q1G21v001 10-08-86 7.0 10-08-86 7.0 63 ole 21V058 10-07-86 125.0 12.8 10-07-86 125.0 12.8 125.0 Q1E21V059 10-07-86 12.8 10-07-86 12.8 64A Q1b13v039 10-09-86 91.0 2.4 10-09-86 91.0 2.4 91.0 01813v037 10-08-86 2.4 10-08-86 2.4 648 01813v026A 10-06-86 0.6 0.6 10-06-86 0.6 0.6 1.5 01813v026B 10-06-86 1.5 10-06-86 1.5 66 ole 23V025A 10-08-86 4.3*

2.15 10-08-86 4.3*

2.15 4.3 ole 23v024A 10-08-86 4.3*

10-08-86 4.3*

67 Q1E23v022A-10-08-86 7.7*

7.7 10-08-86 7.7*

7.7 7.7 01E23v022B 10-08-86 7.7*

10-08-86 7.7*

Q1E23v023A 10-08-86 7.7*

10-08-86 7.7*

70 01E14V004 10-08-86 13.2 13.2 10-08-86 13.2 13.2 95.9 Q1E14V003 10-07-86 95.9 10-07-86 95.9 71 Q1P23v002A 5-12-85 47.7**

47.7 11-16-86 19.4 19.4 19.4 These valves wre tested during the last refueling outage and reaained closed and blind flanged until this outage.

PAGE 4

LUIT 1 - TYPE C TEST

SUMMARY

FOR 7TH REFUELI?C AS FOL%.

PCE.

AS FtXIm MIN. PATil AS LEFT AS LEFT PER PETE.

FO.

VALVE PC.

DATE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE DATE LEtJ' AGE MIN.

!%X.

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM) 72 01P23V002B 5-12-85 60.19**

60.19 11-13-86 175.0 175.0 175.0 78 Q1G21HV3377 10-30-86 3.8 3.8 10-30-86 3.8 Q1G21V291 10-30-86 29.0 10-30-86 29.0

• 3.8 29.0 01G211r/3376 10-30-86 29.0 10-30-86 29.0

• 82 01P11HV3659 10-26-86 46.7 C.7 10-26-86 4G.7 0.7 46.7 Q1P11V002 10-26-86 0.7 10-26-86 0.7 93 Q1E13V0038 10-06-86 856.0 428.0 10-06-86 856.0 428.0 856.0 01E13V0048 10-06-86 856.0 10-06-86 856.0 94 Q1E13V003A 10-06-86 291.0 145.5 10-16-86 634.0 317.0 634.0

=

Q1E13V004A 10-06-86 291.0 10-16-86 634.0 95 Q1G31V012 10-10-86 6.68 6.68 10-10-86 6.68 6.68 25.8 01G31V013 10-10-86 25.8 10-10-86 25.8 97B Q1P19V004 10-08-86 0.4 0.4 10-08-86 0.4 0.4 4.0 01P19HV2228 10-08-86 4.0 10-08-86 4.0 103 Q1E23v003 10-06-86 3.1

• 10-06-86 3.1

• 1.55 3.1 Q1E23V002 10-06-86 3.1 a 1.55 10-06-86 3.1

• 1 R

PAGE 5

4 UNIT 1 - TYPE C TEST

SUMMARY

FOR 7Til REFUELItG AS FOUtm PCJE.

AS ET)UND MIN. PKn!

AS LEFT AS LEFT PER PENE.

PD.

VALVE NO.

DATE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE DATE LEAKAGE MIN.

MAX.

(SCCM)

(SCCM)

(SCCM) 72 Q1P23v002B 5-12-85 60.19a*

60.19 11-13-86 175.0 175.0 175.0 78 Q1G21HV3377 10-30-86 3.8 3.8 10-30-86 3.8 5

Q1G21v291 10-30-86 29.0 10-30-86 29.0

• 3.8 29.0 01G211N3376 10-30-86 29.0 10-30-86 29.0

• 82 01P111N3659 10-26-86 46.7 0.7 10-26-86 46.7 0.7 46.7 01P11V002 10-26-86 0.7 10-26-86 0.7 93 01E13V0038 10-06-86 856.0 428.0 10-06-86 856.0 428.0 856.0 01E13v0048 10-06-86 856.0 10-06-86 856.0 94 Q1E13v003A 10-06-86 291.0 145.5 10-16-86 634.0 317.0 634.0 01E13V004A 10-06-86 291.0 10-16-86 634.0 95 01G31V012 10-10-86 6.68 6.68 10-10-86 6.68 6.68 25.8 01G31v013 10-10-86 25.8 10-10-86 25.8 97B Q1F19v004 10-08-86 0.4 0.4 10-08-86 0.4 0.4 4.0 Q1P191N2228 10-08-86 4.0 10-08-86 4.0 103 Q1E23v003 10-06-86 3.1

• 10-06-86 3.1

• 1.55 3.1 01E23V002 10-06-86 3.1

• 1.55 10-06-86 3.1

• 4 PAGE 5 r

s