ML20149J043
| ML20149J043 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1987 |
| From: | BECHTEL POWER CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149J047 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8802220249 | |
| Download: ML20149J043 (79) | |
Text
O Alabama Power Company
\\
J..M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2 O
Primary Reactor Containment Integrated Leakage Rate Test Final Report November 1987 ggS223gg;%%,g4 P
C)
Bechtel Western Power Company
'\\ \\
~...
O ALABAMA POWER COMPANY J. M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 4
h r
i SECOND PERIODIC REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST NOVEMBER 1987 i
FINAL REPORT
?
i i
Prepared by l
Bechtel Western Power Corporation San Francisco, CA O
f a
6
-e-+
.%.-e-ev--.-- - - - --- - - - - - --,- - - -, - - -- -- - -, - -- - - -=
--m = m v -w ww ew-er vve --
w-
'e'*-
- -v--r*M*
T"*'"*
-r
a
_.e-m 4--
2 2a.
2 s
S...._
m am_u_
a.
g.*
1 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Pace 1.
INTRODUCTION 1
2.
SUMMARY
2 3.
TEST MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATION METHODS 3
4.
TEST CHRONOLOGY 5
5.
TEST RESULTS 7
6.
TABLES AND FIGURES 10 7.
REFERENCES 39 Accendices A.
BECHTEL ILRT COMPUTER PROGRAM SUMM ARY A-1 i
B.
LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST DATA B-1 t
O t
t I
d I
t lC e
i SUM 054 i
f
[~]
1.
INTRODUCTION
%J The Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP) Unit 2 Second Periodic Integrated Leakage Rate Test (ILRT) was performed on November 18-21, 1987.
The test was conducted to demonstrate that leakage from the containment at design accident pressure does not exceed the limit specified in the Technical Specifications (Ref. 1).
The ILRT was done under Procedure F N P S T P-117. 0, Rev. 5 (Ref. 2) which follows the requirements of Appendix J to 10 CFR 50 (Ref. 3) and the FSAR (Ref.
4).
The leakage rate was calculated using the methods described in BN-TOP-1 (Ref. 5) and ANSI /ANS -5 6.8-1987 (R ef. 6).
The total time calculations of Ref.
5, which are based on the m ethodology outlined in AN S I.N 4 5. 4 - 19 7 2 (Ref.7), were used to e st a blish acceptance as required by Ref.
4.
The mass point calculations of Ref. 6 were included in the test program to provide technically complete d ocu m entation of containment leakage integ rity.
The following sections of this report describe the test program and document the results.
These sections are ordered as listed below, o
The Summary provides a synopsis of test results.
o Test Measurements and Calculation Methods d escribes the in stru mentation used to measure containment atmospheric conditions and the algorithms used to determine leakage rate.
o Test Chronology defines the scope and time frame for the sequential test activities, o
Test Results provides a discussion of ILRT data and calculated leak rate.
o Tables and Figures contains all numerical data and plots cited in the preceding sections.
o References lists all supporting documents cited in this report.
o The Appendices contain a description of the Bechtel ILRT computer program and tables which list local (Type B and C) leakage rate test results since the first periodic ILRT.
1 i
l SUM 054 l l
fl 2.
SUMMARY
V A 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> integrated leakage rate (Type A) test and a four hour verification test were conducted on November 18-21, 1987.
T est results met all acceptance criteria as tabulated below.
Total Time 95% UCL Leakage Rate 0.0 6 3 wt. %/ Day Penalty Addition 0.0002 wt. %/ Day Net Leakage Rate 0.063 wt. %/ Day Acceptance Limit 0.113 wt. %/ Day Verification Test Lower Acceptance Limit 0.172 wt. %/ Day Verificaticn Test Calculated Leakage Rate 0.224 wt. %/ Day Verification Test Upper Acceptance Limit 0.248 wt. %/ Day The penalty addition is the sum of the minimum pathway leakages determined for those containment penetrations which were isola *. 3d by other than normal post-LOCA barriers.
The penetrations with non-standard isolation barriers, reasons for the non-standard barriers and measured minimum pathway leakages are listed below.
Function / Reason for As-Left Penetration Non-Standard Barrier Leakace 28 Seal Injection /In Service 1.5 SCCM 32 Service Water from RCP Motor Coolers 33.9 SCCM 46 CCW from letdown /RCDT HX 6.6 SCCM O
60 Service Water to RCP Motor Coolers 0.78 S CCM 61A ILRT Pressure Sense Line 1.6 SCCM 71 ILRT Pressurization Line 171.9 SCCM 72 ILRT Pressurization Line 150.7 SCCM Total Leakage in Std. Cubic Centimeters /Mir.ute 366.98 SCCM Equivalent in Std. Cubic Feet / Day 18.7 SCFD Quantity of Air in Containment 6
at 64.4 PSIA and 543.6
'R**
8.3 8x 10 SCF 6
Equivalent Leakage Rate = 18.7/ 8.3 8x10 0.0002 wt.%/ Day Containment Air Quantity = Volume x Absolute Pressure x x Std. Temp Std. Pressure x Mean Temp.
3
= 2,000,0 00 Ft x 64.4 PSI x 520
'R 14.7 PSI x 543.6
'R SUM 054 3.
TEST MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATION METHODS V
3.1 Test Measurements The calculation of containment leakage rate is based on the variation of containment atmosphere pressure and temperature with time.
Data for the calculation are obtained by measuring containment absolute pressure, temperature and dewpoint temperature at 15 minute intervals.
The measurement system is described below.
The change in pressure during an ILRT is quite small relative to absolute pressure.
A precision quartz tube mpnometer having sen sitivity and rep eatability of 0.001 lb/in was used to accurately measure the small change.
Some part of the pressure variation may be due to evaporation and/or condensation of water within the containment boundary.
Pressure variation caused by water phase change is independent of containment leakage and must be accounted for in the leakage rate calculation.
Dewpoint temperature was measured using 6 chilled mirror bygrometers installed in the containment at the locations shown in Table 1.
The saturation pressure corresponding to each dewpoint temperature was extracted from a steam table.
The volume weighted mean (per the assigned volume f raction s listed in Table 1) saturation pressure was subtracted ps from total pressure to obtain the partial pressure of dry air.
(j Dry air partial pressure was used in the leakage rate calculation.
Containment atmosphere temperature was measured using 18 platinum RT D 's installed at the locations shown in Table 1.
Volume weighted mean temperature is calculated using the assigned volume fractions listed in the Table.
Calculated leakage rate is verified by imposing a known additional leak on the containment and computing the combined leakage.
The imposed leak was measured with a float type flowmeter.
The RTD, hygrometer and pressure sensors were wired to a data acquisition system (scanner, analog to digital converter) which was, in turn, interfaced to a desk top computer.
The computer performed all leakage rate calculations.
All in stru m entation was calibrated p rio r to the ILRT.
Pertinent instrumentation characteristics and calibration dates are listed in Table 2.
Calibration documents are maintained in permanent plant records.
SUM 054 b("'i 3.2 Calculation Methods Leakage rate was calculated using both the total time (Ref. 5) and mass point (Ref. 6) methods.
The total time method was used to demonstrate containment acceptance.
Mass p oint calculations were performed to provide additional information.
Appendix A describes the computer program used to calculate the leakage rates.
The total time method is based on the premise that leakage rate varies linearly with time.
The end of test rate is determined by fitting a straight line to a series of measuted leakage rates and calculating the ordinate of the lin e at a time corresponding to the end of the test.
A measured leakage rate is a rate determined using only the initial and a subsequent data set.
It is computed as follows.
Lmi = (1 - PiTl/PlTi)/ti Where:
Lmi = measured leakage rate at ti Pi
= pressure at ti P1
= initial pressure (t=0)
T1
= initial temperature Ti
= temperature at ti ti
= elapsed time from the start of the test The 95% upper confidence limit (UCL) on calculated leakage rate A
rather than the calculated rate itself is the number used to
()
determine acceptance.
The 95% UCL is larger than the calculated rate by a factor which increases with the magnitude of scatter of the measured rates about the fitted straight lin e.
The masa point method is based on the premise that leakage rate is constant.
The calculated rate is the slope of a straight line fitted to the containment air mass vs. time data.
The 95%
UCL on calculated slope is the number used to determine acceptance.
As in the total time case above, the 95% UCL is larger than the calculated rate by a factor which depends on scatter.
A (v)
SUM 054 l
b
(]
~
4.
TEST CHRONOLOGY G'
4.1 Prerequisite Activities The following test prerequisites were completed prior to the start of containment pressurization.
o Isolation valves, except those in systems required to maintain the plant in a safe condition and those in systems used in the conduct of the ILRT, were placed in the specified (Ref. 2) p7st-LOCA positions.
o Piping penetrating containment was vented and drained as specified in Ref. 2.
o Sources of high pressure (greater than test pressure) gas were removed from the containment or vented.
External sources connecting to containment penetrations were isolated and vented.
o The accessible exterior and interior surfaces of the containment were examined to verify surface integrity.
The examined surfaces were found to be in sound condition.
o Test instrumentation was installed and verified operational.
o The equipment opening, fuel transfer tube, personnel airlock and emergency airlock were sealed.
The completion of the above prerequisites and others not related to ILRT outcome is documented in the Official Test Copy of Ref. 2.
4.2 Pressurization The containment was pressurized using oil free air compressors discharging through an after cooler / moisture separator and refrigerated air dryer.
Aggregate compressor capacity was 12,000 SCFM.
Pressurization commenced at 2:30 a.m. on November 19, 1987.
Pressurization line valves were shut at 12:29 p.m.
on November 19th when containment pressure had reached 50.0 PSIG.
The allowable range for containment pressure is specified in Ref. 2 at 48 to 51 PSIG.
Since containment air temperature rises during pressurization, pressure was taken close to the upper limit to compensate for subsequent air cooling and pressure drop.
Containment ventilation fans were run to circulate the pressurizing air.
The fans were shut off when pressure reached 50 PSIG.
Containment lighting was turned off at 10 psig to eliminate radiant heating of the temperature sensors.
SUM 054 4
O 4.3 Stabilization V
As the containment is pressurized with relatively cool air, i
temperature falls in the well ventilated lower levels.
.The higher levels experience less air circulation and, therefore, temperature in the upper zone rises due to adiabatic compression.
As a result, the temperature gradient at the end of pressurization is substantially different from that which p rev ails under equilib rium conditions.
Temperatures change rapidly during the initial hours at test pressure and, under these conditions, it is not possible to determine a reasonably accurate mean air temperature with 18 RT Di s.
Deviation between calculated and actual mean temperature is manifested by non-linearity of the air mass
- vs. time graph.
Figure 1 shows the relationship between air mass and time for the entire period at test pressure.
The graph was determined to have attained linearity by 9:00 p.m.
on November 19th and the 24-hour leakage rate test was started at this time.
The numerical temperature stabilization criteria specified in Ref.
2 had been satisfied much earlier as shown in Table 3.
Figure 2 is a plot of calculated mean temperature vs. time for the entire period at test pressure.
This plot attains linearity at about the same time as the mass plot.
4.4 Type A Test fm Results are discussed in the following section.
Containment Q
gage pressure during the Type g test did not vary outside the limits of 49.8 and 50.0 lb/in The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Type A test commenced at 9:00 p.m.
on November 19 and was successfully completed (without incident) at 9:00 p.m. on the following day.
4.5 Verification Test A 9.18 SCFM verification flow was established immediately following the completion of the Type A test.
The containment atmosphere was allowed to stabilize for one hour following the initiation of the verification flow as required by Ref.
4.
The four hour verification test commenced at 10:15 p.m.
and was successfully completed (without incident) at 2:15 a.m.
Results are discussed in the following section.
The mass of the air within the containment is calculated as m = PV/RT where:
m = air mass, LBM.
2 P = absolute pressure, lb/ft 3
V = containment volume = 2,000,000 ft R = Gas constant for air = 53.35 ft-lb/LBM-
'R T = mean absolute temperature,
'R SUM 054,
i e
O 5.
TEST RESULTS Q/
5.1 Synopsis Leakage rates calculated using data recorded during the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Type A test period and those calculated using the verification test data are listed with penalty additions and acceptance limits in Table 4.
As shown in the Table, all acceptance criteria are satisfied.
The 0.113 wt. %/ day acceptance limit on Type A leakage rate is 75% of the 0.15 wt. %/ day maximum allowed by Ref.
1.
The difference between the acceptance lini't and maximum allowable leakage rate providcs a margin for decreases in the leak tightness of the various containment boundary components over time.
Since the test data contain some scatter, calculated leakage rate provides only a best estimate of the true value.
To provide added assurance that the true value does not exceed the acceptance limit, the 95%
upper confidence limit on the calculated value is the number which must meet that limit.
5.2 Test Data Figures 1-4 show, respectively, calculated air mass, calculated mean temperature, calculated mean water vapor pressure and measured absolute pressure for the entire period between the start of stabilization (12:30 p.m.
on November 19th) and the f
end of the verification (2:15 a.m.
on November 21st).
As
(
discussed in Section 4,
the air mass plot is distinctly non-linear during the first few hours of stabilization.
This indicates that calculated mean temperature is not accurately tracking true mean temperature.
The temperature plot shows that this is a period of rapid temperature change.
Over the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Type A test period, the air mass varies linearly with time as must be the case for a constant leakage rate.
The temperature plot shows a relatively slow change in calculated mean temperature over the same period.
Table 5 lists calculated mean temperatu re, dry air pressure, calculated mean vapor pressure and calculated air mass for each data set from the start of stabilization to the end of the verification test.
Data for individual temperature and dewpoint temperature sensors show a relatively smooth variation in these quantities with time over the Type A and Verification Test periods.
Tabulations and plots of data for the individual sensors are retained in permanent plant records.
SUM 054
[])
5.3 Leakage Rate Calculations Table 6 lists the parameters used in the calculation of total time leakage rate as well the end of test calculated rate and 95% upper confidence limit.
The right hand column of the table lists the measured rates calculated at 15 minute time increments.
The initially determined measured rates show considerable fluctuation.
This results from data scatter.
Air masses (or P/T ratios) calculated for data recorded at closely spaced times may change positively or negatively by amounts which are large relative to the change in the ordinate of the trend lin e.
Consequently, measured leakage rates determined for the initial data sets can attain large positive and negative values.
Measured leakage rates determined for the later data sets tend to fluctuate little and are generally quite close to leakage rates calculated by the mass point method.
The total timo calculated leakage rate may differ significantly from the mass point calculated rate.
The size and sign of the difference depends, principally, on the variation in the measured rates determined for the first few data sets.
Because of this, the total time calculated rate is not always a good measure of true rate.
However, since the initial scatter of measured rates has a major impact on the calculated confidence limit, the total time 95% UCL is almost always larger, and p
therefore more conservative, tnan the mass point 95% UCL.
V Table 7 lists the parameters used in the calculation of mass point leakage rate and the calculation results.
As is typical for mass point calculations using data with reasonably low scatter, the calculated rate and 95% UCL are quite close together.
The linear mass plot along with the close agreement between mass point calculated rate and UCL confirms that the true leakage rate is about 0.063 wt.
%/ day.
The 0.063 wt.
%/ day total time UCL is therefore an accurate value to use for demonstrating test acceptance.
Figure 5 contains a plot of air mass vs. time over the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Type A test period, shows the trend line (fit to the calculated air masses using the method of least squares) with a slope equivalent to 0.063 wt. %/ day and shows the line which represents the maximum allowable mass loss (starting with the initially calculated mass) of 0.113 wt.
%/ day or 75% of the maximum allowable leakage rate.
5.4 Verification Test Following the completion of the Type A test an additional leak was initiated by venting 9.18 SCFM from the containment through a calibrated flowmeter.
The added leakage rate was equal to the maximum allowable leakage rate of 0.15 wt. %/ day.
The results of the verification test are acceptable if the leakage rate calculated after imposition of the additional leak falls within the limits of Lam + Lo 10.25 La, where:
Lam is the O'
SUM 054,
i
'N (d
previously calculated leakage rate; Lo is the imposed leakage; and, La (=Lo) is the maximum allowable leakage rate.
Limits for the total time and mass point verification test results are as given below in wt.%/ day.
Total Time:
New calculated rate
= 0.2 2 4 Acceptance Limits
= 0.17 2 to 0.2 4 8 Mass Point:
New calculated rate
= 0.214 Acceptance Limits
= 0.17 6 to 0.2 5 2 Table 8 and 9 list the parameters and results for the total time and mass point, respectively, verification test leakage rate calculations.
The results of both calculations satisfy the criteria.
Figure 6 contains a plot of the air masses calculated for the verification test data, the trend line (slope equivalent to the mass point leakage rate) fitted to the air mass data and lines representing the limits of air mass change based on the Type A test mass point leakage rate of 0.063 wt. %/ day.
5.5 Local Leakage Rate Test Results Leakage through containment penetrations is measured during each refueling outage.
Penetration leakage measured since the 1985 Type A test is tabulated in the Appendix B.
i 1
l l
SUM 054 e
- 6. TABLES AND FIGURES
(
The following Tables and Figures are included in this report:
Table Title Pace No.
1 TEMPERATURE AND DEWPOINT TEMPERATURE SENSOR LOCATIONS 11 2
INSTRUM ENT ATION C.' LIBRATION SUMM ARY 12 3
TEMPERATURE STABILIZ ATION 13 4
TEST RESULTS 14 5
SUMMARY
DATA 15 6
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS (ILRT) 19 7
MASS POINT ANALYSIS (ILRT) 22 8
TOT AL TIME AN ALYSIS (VERIFICATION) 25 9
MASS POINT ANALYSIS (VERIFIC ATION) 26 (n) 10 TREND REPORT (ILRT) 27 Ficure Title Pace No.
1 AIRMASS PLOT 29 2
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE PLOT 30 3
VAPOR PRESSURE PSIA PLOT 31 4
PRESSURE PSIA (DRY AIR) PLOT 32 5
AIRMASS AND REGRESSION LINE PLOT 33 6
AIRMASS AND REGRESSION LINE VERIFICATION TEST PLOT 34 7
TOTAL TIME ILRT LEAKAGE RATE PLOT 35 8
MASS POINT ILRT LEAKAGE RATE PLOT 36 9
TOTAL TIME VERIFICATION LEAKAGE RATE PLOT 37 10 MASS POINT VERIFICATION LEAKAGE RATE PLOT i
38 n
SUM 054 TABLE 1 TEMPERATURE AND DEWPOINT TEMPERATURE SENSOR LOCATIONS TEMPERATURE SENSORS SENSOR ELEVATION AZIMUTH DISTANCE FROM VOLUM E NO.
(FT)
(DEGREE)
CTMT CENTER (FT)
FRACTIONS TE-1 240 300 40 0.0586 TE-2 265 60 30 0.0586 l
TE-3 180 120 50 0.0586 TE-4 210 60 40 0.0586 TE-5 190 150 30 0.0586 TE-6 210 300 5
0.0586 TE-7 200 250 40 0.0586 TE-8 235 240 40 0.0586 TE-9 190 250 35 0.0586 TE-10 165 30 62 0.0563 TE-11 165 120 62 0.0563 TE-12 165 210 64 0.0563 TE-13 165 323 63 0.0563 TE-14 135 0
62 0.0637 TE-15 135 180 62 0.0637 TE-16 110 20 42 0.0400 TE-17 110 120 42 0.0400 TE-18 110 250 42 0.0400 1.0000 DEWPOIMT TEMPERATURE SENSORS ME-1 235 300
-10 0.1758 ME-2 210 60 40 0.1758 ME-3 185 200 0
0.1758 ME-4 165 30 62 0.2252 ME-5 135 130 60 0.1274 ME-6 110 250 40 0.1200 1.0000 l
\\
O TABLE 2 INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION
SUMMARY
Eqjtgriotion D_gt,a Absolute Pressure 6
Precision Pressure Gauge Range:
0-100 psia Accuracy:
+/ - 0. 015 % of reading l
Sensitivity:
0.001 psia Repeatability:
0.001 psia Resolution:
0.001% FS Calibr. Date:
11/8/87 Drybulb Temperature a
100 OHM Platinum Range:
0-150 F Resistance Temperature Accuracy:
+/-0.1 F Detectors Sensitivity:
0.01 F Repeatability:
0.01 F Calibr. Date:
10/15/87 Dewpoint Temperature l
Chilled Mirror Hygrometers Range:
40-212 F 1
EG & G Model 660-CI Accuracy:
+/-0.54 F Sensitivity:
0.10 F Repeatability:
0.10 F Calibr. Date:
10/14/87 Flow Brooks Rotameter Range:
0-10 scfm Model 1110 Accuracy:
+/- 1. 0 % FS Calibr. Date:
10/15/S7 I
s i
i i
I l
O TABLE 3 FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION FROM A STARTING TIME AND DATE OF:- 1230 1119 1987 TIME TEMP ANSI BN-TOP-1 MS-021-5 j
(HOURS)
(OR)
AVE A T AVE AT DIFF AVE 4T AVE 6 T 2
(4 HRS)
(1HR)
(2 HRS)
(2 HRS)
.00 538.002
.25 538.087
.50 538.285
.75 538.380 1.00 538.417 1.25 538.441 1
1.50 538.457 a
1.75 538.471 2.00 538.485
.241*
.163*
I 2.25 538.486
.199*
.450*
2.50 538.483
.099*
.223*
i 2.75 538.496
.058*
.057*
l 3.00 538.499
.041*
.046*
3.25 538.520
.039*
.011*
f
3.50 538.520
.031*
.033*
4 r
3.75 538.536
.032*
.005*
4.00 538.537
.134
.038
.095*
.026*
.000*
4.25 538.543
.114
.023
.091*
.029*
.022*
)
4.50 538.543
.064
.023
.042*
.030*
.029*
l 4.75 538.543
.041
.008
.033*
.024*
.006*
5.00 538.547
.032
.010
.022*
.024*
.040*
l 5.25 538.565
.031
.021
.010*
.022*
.039*
5.50 538.566
.027
.023
.004*
.023*
.033*
5.75 538.581
.027
.037
.010*
.022*
.032*
6.00 538.572
.022 025
.003*
.017*
.' 3 3 5
- i 6.25 538.580
.023
.016
.008*
.018*
.020*
6.50 538.579
.024
.013
.011*
.018*
.003*
6.75 538.584
.022
.003
.019*
.020*
.003*
7.00 538.585
.022
.013
.008*
.019*
.038*
j 7.25 538.589
.017
.009
.008*
.012*
.007*
7.50 538.598
.020
.019
.000*
.016*
.013*
7.75 538.595
.015
.010
.004*
.007*
.012*
l 8.00 538.593
.014
.008
.006*
.010*
.023*
8.25 538.605
.015
.015
.000*
.012*
.030*
8.50 538.604
.015
.005
.010*
.012*
.014*
- INDICATES TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION HAS BEEN SATISFIED 4
-i I
1 !
l l
r,
- W w
4 r,:
ik
'l.
.a N
,N,
3 A,'
-s
^
N N
-4 TABLE 4
+
o
' TEbT RESULTS
' ' ~ '
/ '* -
s'+
s
, \\ 4,p N
\\
~
g Total h _Ady ggig
,/
Sk
CSiculated Leakage Rate o.0519 wt. %/ day
, s 95% UCL 0'.063 vt. %/ day Penalty Additions
- 0.0002 wt. %/ day UCL Plus Additions 0.063 wt. %/ day 4
s Acceptance Lj.mit 0.113 wt. %/ day Verification.T,est Lower Limit 0.172 wt. %/ day Verification, Test Calculated Rate 0.224 wt. %/ day Verification' Test Upper Limit O.248 wt. %/ day
\\
}f ass Point Analysis V
N
,6.
Calculated Leakage Rate 0.063 wt. %/ day
'C' y 95% UCL 0.064 wt. %/ day
^
'\\Pcnalty Additions *
.O.0002 wt. %/ day s
UCL Plua Additions
- 0. 0 64 wt. %/ day Acsptance Limii 0.113 wt. %/ day
~
4 x
- s Verification Test Lower Limit:N 0.176 wt. %/ day "s,
- Verification Test,qalet11ated' Rate 0.214 wt. %/ day
'A Verific ation Test Opper Limit' O.252 wt. %/ day
.A u~-<
.~ ' See S ection 2 u
i.
b a
h, sy 4
g M
N g e.
s b^
T e
\\
~
w,
4 so
- s y
y 4
/
+
en
- we O
s h.wi
\\
o I
(
. ~
i s..
s 14e s.
J:
~
h.
e p
'w-TABLE 5 FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987
SUMMARY
DATA
.150 VOLUME =
2000000.
ALMAX
=
VRATET =
.210 VRATEM =.214 TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME AIRMASS 1230 1119 538.002 64.4115
.3314 2000000.0 646304.9 1245 1119 538.087 64.4302
.3284 2000000.0 646389.8 1300 1119 538.285 64.4362
.3324 2000000.0 646212.2 1315 1119 538.380 64.4353
.3333 2000000.0 646090.4 1330 1119 538.417 64.4361
.3325 2000000.0 646052.8 1345 1119 538.441 64.4353
.3322 2000000.0_ 646017.4 1400 1119 538.457 64.4343
.3~18 2000000.0 64S987.1 1415 1119 538.471 64.4306
.3314 2000000.0 645933.5 1430 1119 538.485 64.4292
.3299 2000000.0 645902.3 1445 1119 538.486 64.4256
.3304 2000000.0 645865.3 1500 1119 538.483 64.4235
.3310 2000000.0 645847.7 1515 1119 538.496 64.4226
.3314 2000000.0 645823.6 1530 1119 538.499 64.4201
.3328 2000000.0 645795.8 1545 1119 538.520 64.4174
.3346 2000000.0 645743.1 1600 1119 538.520 64.4160
.3355 2000000.0 645728.3 1615 1119 538.536 64.4165
.3345 2000000.0 645714.0 1630 1119 536.537 64.4154
.3350 2000000.0 645702.8 O.
1645 1119 538,543 64.4147
.3348 2000000.0 645687.3 1700 1119 538.543 64.4142
.3348 2000000.0 645682.6 1715 1119 538,543 64.4137
.3348 2000000.0 645677.4 1730 1119 538.547 64.4125
.3349 2000000.0 645660.9 1745 1119 538.365 64.4125
.3349 2000000.0 645640.5 1800 1119 530.566 64.4123
.3347 2000000.0 645635.8 1815 1119 538,581 64.4110
.3349 2000000.0 645605.9 1830 1119 538.572 64.4108
.3351 2000000.0 645614.8 1845 1119 538.580 64.4106
.3348 2000000.0 645602.9 1900 1119 538.579 64.4093
.3356 2000000.0 645590.7 1915 1119 538.584 64.4086
.3353 2000000.0 645577.4 1930 1119 538.585 64.4090
.3349 2000000.0 645580.4 1945 1119 538.589 64.4085
.3349 2000000.0 645570.3 2000 1119 538.598 64.4072
.3352 2000000.0 645546.7 l
2015 1119 538.595 64.4078
.3347 2000000.0 645556.6 2030 1119 538.593 64.4065
.3349 2000000.0 645545.9 2045 1119 538.605 64.4065
.3349 2000000.0 645531.6 l
2100 1119 538.604 64.4065
.3349 2000000.0 645532.8 P
s' TABLE 5 (Continued)
TARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 l
SUMMARY
DATA
.150 VOLUME =
2000000.
ALMAX
=
VRATET =
.210 VRATEM =.214 TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME AIRMASS 2100 1119 538.604 64.4065
.3349 2000000.0 645532.8 2115 1119 538.611 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645529.6 2130 1119 538.619 64.4060
.3354 2000000.0 645509.6 2145 1119 538.622 64.4J65
.3349 2000000.0 645511.3 2200 1119 538.630 64.4065
.3349 2000000.0 645500.5 2215 1119 538.633 64.4062
.3352 2000000.0 645495.2 2230 1119 538.642 64.4064
.3350 2000000.0 645486.1 2245 1119 538.639 64.4066
.3349 2000000.0 645490.8 2300 1119 538.647 64.4066
.3348 2000000.0 645481.9 l
2315 1119 538.665 64.4066
.3348 2000000.0 645460.6 2330 1119 538.664 64.4064
.3350 2000000.0 645459.4 2345 1119 538.668 64.4063
.3351 2000000.0 645453.9 0 1120 538.670 64.4065
.3349 2000000.0 645453.5 15 1120 538.670 64.4064
.3350 2000000.0 645452.8 30 1120 538.678 64.4066
.3348 2000000.0 645445.5 45 1120 538.681 64.4068
.3346 2000000.0 645442.7 100 1120 538.678 64.4064
.3350 2000000.0 645442.8
(
115 1120 538.688 64.4066
.3348 2000000.0 645433.5 130 1120 538.692 64.4065
.3349 2000000.0 645427.2 145 1120 538.700 64.4072
.3342 2000000.0 645424.2 200 1120 538.706 64.4067
.3347 2000000.0 645412.6 215 1120 538.711 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645409.4 230 1120 538.718 64.4065
.3349 2000000.0 645396.0 245 1120 538.724 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645394.4 300 1120 538.723 64.4068
.3346 2000000.0 645393.7 315 1120 538.717 64.4069
.3345 2000000.0 645400.3 330 1120 538.732 64.4068
.3346 2000000.0 645382.6 345 1120 538.739 64.4069
.3345 2000000.0 645375.1 400 1120 538.742 64.4068
.3346 2000000.0 645370.2 415 1120 538.748 64.4066
.3348 2000000.0 645361.3
(
430 1120 538,752 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645361.4 i
445 1120 538.747 64.4066
.3348 2000000.0 645362.1 i
500 1120 538.759 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645352.1 515 1120 538.761 64.4073
.3341 2000000.0 645352.2 530 1120 538.767 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645342.5 545 1120 538.776 64.4073 3341 2000000.0 645334.9
[
600 1120 538.776 64.4069
.3345 2000000.0 645330.4 615 1120 538.779 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645327.6 630 1120 538.784 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645321.6 l
645 1120 538.783 64.4067
.3347 2000000.0 645320.5 l
700 1120 538.794 64.4069
.3345 2000000.0 645308.6 I
715 1120 538.789 64.4073
.3341 2000000.0 645318.8 i
730 1120 538.794 64.4069
.3345 2000000.0 645308.8 745 1120 538.794 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645310.9 l
800 1120 538.797 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645306.6 815 1120 538.807 64.4069
.3345 2000000.0 645294.2 830 1120 538.809 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645293.1 845 1120 538.814 64.4073
.3341 2000000.0 645289.0 t
l
" L
(\\
TABLE 5 (Continued)
FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987
SUMMARY
DATA ALMAX
.150 VOLUME =
2000000.
=
VRATET =
.210 VRATEM =.214 TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME AIRMASS 900 1120 538.812 64.4072
.3342 2000000.0 645291.4 915 1120 538.821 64.4073
.3341 2000000.0 645281.1 930 1120 538.825 64.4073
.3341 2000000.0 645276.3 945 1120 538.823 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645276.1 1000 1120 538.826 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645272.6 1015 1120 538.834 64.4078
.3336 2000000.0 645270.2 1030 1120 538.838 64.4069
.3345 2000000.0 645257.1 1045 1120 536.845 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645250.0 1100 1120 538.848 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645245.8 1115 1120 538.840 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645256.4 1130 1120 538.849 64.4070
.3344 2000000.0 645243.8 1145 1120 538.842 64.4072
.3342 2000000.0 645254.7 1200 1120 538.860 64.4073
.3341 2000000.0 645233.5 1215 1120 538.847 64.4071
.3343 2000000.0 645247.6 1230 1120 538.854 64.4073
.3341 2000000.0 645240.7 1245 1120 538.856 64.4075
.3339 2000000.0 645240.9 1300 1120 538.869 64.4078
.3336 2000000.0 645228.3 1315 1120 538.868 64.4075
.3339 2000000.0 645226.1
(_,
1330 1120 538.871 64.4078
.3336 2000000.0 645226.1 1345 1120 538.872 64.4080
.3334 2000000.0 645226.4 1400 1120 538.872 64.4057
.3337 2000000.0 645204.3 1415 1120 538.871 64.4057
.3337 2000000.0 645205.4 1430 1120 538.873 64.4054
.3340 2000000.0 645199.8 1445 1120 538.873 64.4056
.3338 2000000.0 645201.1 1500 1120 538.887 64.4053
.3341 2000000.0 645181.4 1515 1120 538.887 64.4054
.3340 2000000.0 645183.2 1530 1120 538.884 64.4059
.3335 2000000.0 645190.9 1545 1120 538.889 64.4053
.3337 2000000.0 645178.8 1600 1120 538.893 64.4055
.3334 2000000.0 645176.7 1616 1120 538.898 64.4053
.3336 2000000.0 645168.9 1630 1120 538.898 64.4054
.3335 2000000.0 645169.6 1645 1120 538.901 64.4052
.3337 2000000.0 645163.5 1700 1120 538.904 64.4058
.3331 2000000.0 645166.9 1715 1120 538.903 64.4051
.3338 2000000.0 645160.9 1730 1120 538.902 64.4050
.3334 2000000.0 645160.9 1745 1120 538.892 64.4047
.3337 2000000.0 645169.5 1800 1120 538.908 64.4046
.3338 2000000.0 645149.6 1815 1120 538.909 64.4050
.3334 2000000.0 645152.4 1830 1120 538.909 64.4051
.3333 2000000.0 645153.2 1845 1120 538.907 64.4044
.3335 2000000.0 645147.9 1900 1120 538.901 64.4039
.3335 2000000.0 645151.6 1915 1120 538.917 64.4037
.3337 2000000.0 645130.6 1930 1120 538.918 64.4036
.3333 2000000.0 645126.8 1945 1120 538.915 64.4032
.3337 2000000.0 645126.4 O
2000 1120 538.918 64.4036
.3333 2000000.0 645127.4 2015 1120 538.922 64.4032
.3337 2000000.0 645118.0 2030 1120 538.919 64.4027
.3332 2000000.0 645116.8 2045 1120 538.917 64.4023
.3336 2000000.0 645115.5 2100 1120 538.923 64.4022
.3332 2000000.0 645107.8 (D
(_,/
TABLE 5 (Continued)
FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987
SUMMARY
DATA ALMAX
.150 VOLUME =
2000000.
=
VRATET =
.210 VRATEM =.214 TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE NPRS VOLUME AIRMASS 2215 1120 538.917 64.3960
.3328 2000000.0 645052.3 2230 1120 538.917 64.3955
.3329 2000000.0 645047.4 2245 1120 538.920 64.3939
.3329 2000000.0 645027.8 2300 1120 538.914 64.3923
.3330 2000000.0 645018.9 2315 1120 538.909 64.3908
.3331 2000000.0 645009.1 2330 1120 538.924 64.3899
.3329 2000000.0 644983.3 2345 1120 538.917 64.3883
.3325 2000000.0 644976.1 0 1121 538.921 64.3864
.3328 2000000.0 644952.4 15 1121 538.908 64.3854
.3323 2000000.0 644957.5 30 1121 538.916 64.3835
.3333 2000000.0 644928.4 45 1121 538.918 64.3825
.3327 2000000.0 644916.8 100 1121 538.921 64.3812
.3325 2000000.0 644899.8 115 1121 538.914 64.3790
.3327 2000000.0 644886.8 130 1121 538.911 64.3785
.3323 2000000.0 644883.6 145 1121 538.908 64.3762
.3325 2000000.0 644865.5 200 1121 538.920 64.3742
.3325 2000000.0 644829.9 215 1121 538.910 64.3726
.3326 2000000.0 644826.1 O
t a
q)
O h
O-TABLE 6 FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987
[
LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2100 1119 1987 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS I
TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R)
(PSIA)
LEAKAGE RATE
[
2100 538.604 64.4065 2115 538.611 64.4070
.047 2130 538.619 64.4060
.173 2145 538.622 64.4065
.107 2200 538.630 64.4065
.120 2215 538.633 64.4062
.112 2230 538.642 64.4064
.116 2245 538.639 64.4066
.089 2300 538.647 64.4066
.094 f
2315 533.665 64.4066
.119 2330 538.664 64.4064
.109 i
2345 538.668 64.4063
.107 O
538.670 64.4065
.098 15 538.670 64.4064
.091 t
30 538.678 64.4066
.093
()
45 538.681 64.4068
.089 100 538.678 64.4064
.084 115 538.688 64.4066
.087 130 538.692 64.4065
.087 i
145 538.700 64.4072
.085 200 538.706 64.4067
.089 215 538.711 64.4070
.087 l
230 538.718 64.4065
.092 l
245 538.724 64.4070
.089 1
300 538.723 64.4068
.086 j
315 538.717 64.4069
.079 i
330 538.732 64.4068
.086 j
345 538.739 64.4069
.087 400 538.742 64.4068
.086 2
415 538.748 64.4066
.088 430 538.752 64.4071
.085 3
445 538.747 64.4066
.082 t
500 538.759 64.4070
.084 4
j 515 538.761 64.4073
.081 530 538.767 64.4070
.083 a
545 538.776 64.4073
.084 600 538.776 64.4069
.084 1
615 538.779 64.4070
.082 l
630 538.784 64.4070
.083 i
645 538.783 64.4067
.081 O
700 538.794 64.4069
.083 i
715 538.789 64.4073
.078 l
730 538.794 64.4069
.079 745 538.794 64.4071
.077 i
]
800 538.797 64.4071
.076 i.-
r --
O'~
TABLE 6 (Continued)
FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2100 1119 1987 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R)
(PSIA)
LEAKAGE RATE 815 538.807 64.4069
.079 830 538.809 64.4071
.077 845 538.814 64.4073
.077 900 538.812 64.4072
.075 915 538.821 64.4073
.076 930 538.825 64.4073
.076 945 538.823 64.4070
.075 1000 538.826 64.4071
.074 1015 538.834 64.4078
.074 1030 538.838 64.4069
.076 1045 538.845 64.4071
.076 1100 538.848 64.4071
.076 1115 538.840 64.4071
.072 1130 538.849 64.4070
.074 U-s -
1145 538.842 64.4072
.070 1200 538.860 64.4073
.074 1215 538.847 64.4071
.070 1230 538.854 64.4073
.070 1245 538.856 64.4075
.069 1300 538.869 64.4078
.071 1315 538.868 64.4075
.070 1330 538.871 64.4078
.069 1345 538.872 64.4080
.068 1400 538.872 64.4057
.072 1415 538.871 64.4057
.071 1430 538.873 64.4054
.071 1445 538.873 64.4056
.069 1500 538.887 64.4053
.073 1515 538.887 64.4064
.071 1530 538.884 64.4059
.069 1545 538.889 64.4053
.070 1600 538.893 64.4055
.070 1615 538.898 64.4053
.070 1630 538.898 64.4054
.069 1645 538.901 64.4052
.070 1700 538.904 64.4058
.068 1715 538.903 64.4051
.068 1730 538.902 64.4050
.067 1745 538.892 64.4047
.065 1800 538.908 64.4046
.068 O
1815 538.909 64.4050
.067 1830 538.909 64.4051
.066 1845 538.907 64.4044
.066 1900 538.901 64.4039
.064
('i
\\-)
TABLE 6 (Continued)
FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2100 1119 1987 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R)
(PSIA)
LEAKAGE RATE 1915 538.917 64.4037
.067 1930 538.918 64.4036
.067 1945 538.915 64.4032
.066 2000 538.918 64./036
.066 2015 538.922 64./032
.066 2030 538.919 64.9027
.066 2045 538.917 64.4023
.065 2100 538.923 64.4022
.066 MEAN OF THE MEASURED LEAKAGE RATES
.080
=
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE
.150
=
g.
()
75% OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE
.113
=
THE UPPER 95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT
.063
=
THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE
.059
=
v O
TABLE 7 FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2100 1119 1987 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R)
(PSIA)
MASS (LBM)
(LBM)
LOSS (LBM/HR) 2100 538.604 64.4065 645532.8 2115 538.611 64.4070 645529.6 3.2 12.6 2130 538.619 64.4060 645509.6 20.1 46.5 2145 538.622 64.4065 645511.3
-1.7 28.7 2200 538.630 64.4065 645500.5 10.8 32.3 2215 538.633 64.4062 645495.2 5.3 30.1 1
2230 538.642 64.4064 645486.1 9.2 31.2 2245 538.639 64.4066 645490.8
-4.7 24.0 2300 538.647 64.4066 645481.9 8.8 25.4 2315 538.665 64.4066 645460.6 21.4 32.1 2330 538.664 64.4064 645459.4 1.1 29.3 2345 536.668 64.4063 645453.9 5.5 28.7-0 538.670 64.4065 645453.5
.4 26.4 15 538.670 64.4064 645452.8
.7 24.6 I
30 538.678 64.4066 645445.5 7.3 24.9
, ()
45 538.681 64.4068 645442.7 2.8 24.0 100 538.678 64.4064 645442.8
.1 22.5 115 538.688 64.4066 645433.5 9.3 23.4 130 538.692 64.4065 645427.2 6.3 23.5 145 538.700 64.4072 645424.2 3.0 22.9 200 538.706 64.4067 645412.6 11.6 24.0 215 538.711 64.4070 645409.4 3.2 23.5 230 538.718 64.4065 645396.0 13.4 24.9 245 538.724 64.4070 645394.4 1.6 24.1 300 538.720 64.4068 645393.7
.7 23.2 315 538.717 64.4069 645400.3
-6.7 21.2 330 538.732 64.4068 645382.6 17.7 23.1 345 538.739 64.4069 645375.1 7.5 23.4
.400 538.742 64.4068 645370.2 5.0 23.2 4
415 538.748 64.4066 645361.3 8.9 23.6 430 538.752 64.4071 645361.4
.1 22.8 445 538.747 64.4066 645362.1
.6 22.0 500 538.759 64.4070 645352.1 10.0 22.6 515 538.761 64.4073 645352.2
.1 21.9 530 538.767 64.4070 645342.5 9.7 22.4 545 538.776 64.4073 645334.9 7.5 22.6 600 538.776 64.4069 645330.4 4.5 22.5 615 538.779 64.4070 645327.6 2.8 22.2 630 538.784 64.4070 645321.6 6.1 22.2 645 538.783 64.4067 645320.5 1.1 21.8 l
700 538.794 64.4069 645308.6 11.9 22.4 i
715 538.789 64.4073 645318.8
-10.1 20.9 730 538.794 64.4069 645308.8 10.0 21.3 745 538.794 64.4071 645310.9
-2.2 20.6 t
800 538.797 64.4071 645306.6 4.4 20.6 __ _
TABLE 7 (Continued)
FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
MASS POINT ANALYSIS i
TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2100 1119 1987 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS
' TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R)
(PSIA)
MASS (LBM)
(LBM)
LOSS (LBM/HR) 815 538.807 64.4069 645294.2 12.3 21.2 830 538.809 64.4071 645293.1 1.1 20.8 845 538.814 64.4073 645289.0 4.1 20.7 900 538.812 64.4072 645291.4
-2.3 20.1 915 538.821 64.4073 645281.1 10.2 20.5 930 538.825 64.4073 645276.3 4.9 20.5 945 538.823 64.4070 645276.1
.1 20.1 1000 538.826 64.4071 645272.6 3.5 20.0 1015 538.834 64.4078 645270.2 2.5 19.8 1030 538.838 64.4069 645257.1 13.1 20.4 1045 538.845 64.4071 645250.0 7.1 20.6 1100 538.848 64.4071 645245.8 4.2 20.5 1115 538.840 64.4071 645256.4
-10.5 19.4 1130 538.849 64.4070 645243.8 12.6 19.9 O-1145 538.842 64.4072 645254.7
-10.9 18.9 1200 538.860 64.4073 645233.5 21.2 20.0 1215 538.847 64.4071 645247.6
-14.1 18.7 1230 538.854 64.4073 645240.7 6.9 18.8 1243 538.856 64.4075 645240.9
.2 18.5 1300 538.869 64.4078 645228.3 12.7 19.0 1315 538.868 64.4075 645226.1 2.1 18.9 1330 538.871 64.4078 645226.1
.0 18.6 1345 538.872 64.4080 645226.4
.3 18.3 1400 538.872 64.4057 645204.3 22.2 19.3 1415 538.871 64.4057 645205.4
-1.2 19.0 1430 538.873 64.4054 645199.8 5.6 19.0 1445 538.873 64.4056 645201.1
-1.3 18.7 1500 538.887 64.4053 645181.4 19.7 19.5 1515 538.887 64.4054 645183.2
-1.8 19.2 1530 538.884 64.4059 645190.9
-7.7 18.5 1545 538.889 64.4053 645178.8 12.1 18.9 1600 538.893 64.4055 645176.7 2.1 18.7 1615 538.898 64.4053 645168.9 7.7 18.9 1630 538.898 64.4054 645169.6
.7 18.6 1645 538.901 64.4052 645163.5 6.1 18.7 1700 538.904 64.4058 645166.9
-3.4 18.3 1715 538.903 64.4051 645160.9 6.0 18.4 1730 538.902 64.4050 645160.9
.1 18.1 1745 538.892 64.4047 645169.5
-8.7 17.5 1800 538.908 64.4046 645149.6 19.9 18.2 1815 538.909 64.4050 645152.4
-2.8 17.9 0
1830 538.909 64.4051 645153.2
.8 17.7 1845 538.907 64.4044 645147.9 5.3 17.7 1900 538.901 64.4039 645151.6
-3.7 17.3
-2 }-
t g
TABLE 7 (Continued)
FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2100 1119 1987 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS i
TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE HASS
(
(R)
(PSIA)
MASS (LBM)
(LBM)
LOSS (LBM/HR) 1915 538.917 64.4037 645130.6 21.1 18.1 1930 538.918 64.4036 645126.8 3.7 18.0 1945 538.915 64.4032 645126.4
.4 17.9 2000 538.918 64.4036 645127.4
.9 17.6 2015 538.922 64.4032 645118.0 9.4 17.8 2030 538.919 64.4027 645116.8 1.2 17.7 2045 538.917 64.4023 645115.5 1.3 17.6 2100 538.923 64.4022 645107.8 7.7 17.7 l
FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.)
=2000000.0 REGRESSION LINE INTERCEPT (LBM)
= 645499.6 O
SLOPE (LBM/HR)
-16.9
=
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE
.150
=
75% OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE
.113
=
THE UPPER 95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT
.064
=
THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE
.06'l
=
I i
I 6
4 e
t i
i 24 l
i
I TABLE 8 FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS T7ME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2215 1120 1987 TEST DURATION:
4.00 HOURS l
TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED t
(R)
(PSIA)
LEAKAGE RATE 2215 538.917 64.3960 J
2230 538.917 64.3955
.072 2245 538.920 64.3939
.182 2300 538.914 64.3923
.166 2315 538.909 64.3908
.161 l
2330 538.924 64.3899
.205 2345 538.917 64.3883
.189 0
538.921 64.3864
.212 15 538.908 64.3854
.176 I
30 538.916 64.3835
.205 I
45 538.918 64.3825
.202 100 538.921 64.3812
.206 l
115 538.914 64.3790
.205 130 538.911 64.3785
.193 i
i 145 538.908 64.3762
.199 200 538.920 64.3742
.221 215 538.910 64.3726
.210 MEAN OF THE MEASURED LEAKAGE RATES
.188
=
VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE UPPER LIMIT =
.248 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE LOWER LIMIT =
.172 j
THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE
.224
=
?
i f
- 2 5-i I
f
2>
O TABLE 9 FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2215 1120 1987 TEST DURATION:
4.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R)
(PSIA)
MASS (LBM)
(LBM)
LOSS (LBM/HR) 2215 538.917 64.3960 645052.3 2230 538.917 64.3955 645047.4 4.8 19.4 2245 538.920 64.3939 643027.8 19.7 49.0 2300 538.914 64.3923 645018.9 8.9 44.5 2315 538.909 64.3908 645009.1 9.8 43.2 2330 538.924 64.3899 644983.3 25.8 55.2 2345 538.917 64.3883 644976.1 7. ?.
50.8 0
538.921 64.3864 644952.4 23.8 57.1 15 538.908 64.3854 644957.5
-5.2 47.4 30 538.916 64.3835 644928.4 29.1 55.1 45 538.918 64.3825 644916.8 11.6 54.2 100 538.921 64.3812 644899.8 17.0 55.5 115 538.914 64.3790 644886.8 13.0 55.2 130 538.911 G4.3785 644883.6 3.2 51.9 145 538.908 64.3762 644865.5 18.1 53.4
/
200 538.920 6 4. 3 '< 4 2 644829.9 35.5 59.3 s-215 538.910 64.3726 644826.1 3.9 56.5 FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.)
=2000000.0 REGRESSION LINE INTERCEPT (LBM)
= 645050.9 S LOPE (LBM/NR)
- 57.5
=
VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE UPPER LIMIT =
.252 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE LOWER LIMIT =
.176 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE
.214
=
]
l i
I l
l I f
i TABLE 10 FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 TREND REPORT i
TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2100 1119 1987 NO.
END TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS MASS POINT ANALYSIS PTS TIME MEAS. CALCULATED UCL CALCULATED UCL 2
2115
.047
.047 99.000
.047 99.000 3
2130
.173
.173 99.000
.173
.795 4
2145
.107
.139
.898
.126
.250 5
2200
.120
.135
.429
.123
.181 6
2215
.112
.127
.320
.116
.151 7
2230
.116
.125
.272
.116
.139 8
2245
.089
.111
.238
.100
.125 9-2300
.094:
.104
.215
.095
.114 10 2315
.119
.110
.208
.104
.123 11 2330
.109
.110
.198
.106
.120 12 2345
.107
.109
.190
.105
.118 13 0
.098
.106
.181
.102
.113 14 15
.091
.102
.173
.097
.108 15 30
.093
.099
.166
.094
.104 16 45
.089
.096
.159
.091
.100 17 100
.084
.092
.153
.087
.096 18 115
.087
.090
.148
.086
.093 19 130
.087
.088
.144
.084
.092 20 145
.085
.086
.140
.083
.090 i
21 200
.089
.085
.137
.083
.089 I
22 215
.087
.085
.135
.083
.088 23 230
.092
.085
.133
.084
.089 24 245
.089
.084
.132
.084
.088 25 300
.086
.084
.130
.083
.088 26 315
.079
.082
.127
.081
.086 27 330
.086
.081
.125
.081
.085 28 345
.087
.081
.124
.081
.085 29 400
.086
.081
.123
.081
.085 I
30 415
.088
.081
.122
.082
.085 l
31 430
.085
.080
.120
.082
.085 32 445
.082
.080
.119
.081
.084 33 500
.084
.079
.118
.081
.083 34 515
.081
.079
.116
.080
.083 35 530
.083
.078
.115
.080
.082 36 545
.084
.078
.115
.080
.082 37 600
.084
.078
.114
.080
.082 38 615
.082
.077
.113
.080
.082 39 630
.081
.077
.112
.079
.081 40 645
.081
.077
.111
.079
.081 41 700
.083
.077
.111
.079
.081 L
42 715
.078
.076
.110
.078
.080 43 730
.079
.076
.109
.078
.080 44 745
.077
.075
.108
.077
.079 l
45 800
.076
.074
.107
.077
.079 I
46 815
.079
.O.4
.106
.076
.078
[
47 830
.077
.074
.105
.076
.078 48 845
.077
.073
.104
.076
.077
[
I TABLE 10 (Continued)
FARLEY UNIT 2 ILRT NOVEMBER 1987
-(
TREND REPORT TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 2100 1119 1987 NO.
END TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS MASS POINT ANALYSIS PTS TIME MEAS. CALCULATED UCL CALCULATED UCL 49 900
.075
.073
.104
.075
.077 50 915
.076
.072
.103
.075
.076 51 930
.076
.072
.102
.074
.076 52 945
.075
.072
.101
.074
.076 53 1000
.074
.071
.101
.073
.075 54 1015
.074
.071
.100
.073
.075 55 1030
.076
.070
.099
.073
.074 56 1045
.076
.070
.099
.073
.074 57 1100
.076
.070
.098
.073
.074 58 1115
.072
.070
.098
.072
.074 59 1130
.074
.069
.097
.072
.073 60 1145
.070
.069
.096
.071
.073 61 1200
.074
.069
.096
.071
.073 62 1215
.070
.068
.095
.070
.072 63 1230
.070
.068
.094
.070
.072 64 1245
.069
.067
.094
.069
.071 1
65 1300
.071
.067
.093
.069
.071 i
66 1315
.070
.066
.093
.069
.070 1
67 1330
.069
.066
.092
.068
.070 0
68 1345
.068
.066
.091
.068
.070 69 1400
.072
.065
.091
.068
.069 70 1415
.071
.065
.091
.068
.069 71 1430
.071
.065
.090
.067
.069 72 1445
.069
.065
.090
.067
.069 73 1500
.073
.065
.090
.067
.069 74 1515
.071
.064
.089
.067
.069 75 1530
.069
.064
.089
.067
.068 76 1545
.070
.064
.088
.067
.068 77 1600
.070
.064
.088
.067
.068 78 1615
.070
.064
.088
.066
.068 79 1630
.069
.063
.088
.066
.068 80 1645
.070
.063
.087
.066
.067 81 1700
.068
.063
.087
.066
.067
[
82 1715
.068
.063
.087
.066
.067 j
83 1730
.067
.062
.086
.066
.067 84 1745
.065
.062
.086
.065
.066 85 1800
.068
.062
.085
.065
.066 l
86 1815
.067
.062
.085
.065
.066 L
87 1830
.066
.061
.085
.064
.066 i
88 1845
.066
.061
.084
.064
.065 l
89 1900
.064
.061
.084
.064
.065 90 1915
.067
.061
.084
.064
.065 91 1930
.067
.061
.083
.064
.065 3
92 1945
.066
.060
.083
.063
.065 93 2000
.066
.060
.083
.063
.064 i
O 94 2015
.066
.060
.082
.063
.064 95 2030
.066
.060
.082
.063
.064 j
96 2045
.065
.060
.082
.063
.064 1
97 2100
.066
.059
.063
.063
.064 j l
-. _. ~ _ _.
l O
O O
I FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOVEMBER 1987 AIRMASS LBM X 1000 646.39r i
STABILIZATION I
646. 08 i,s
\\,.
v i
i
\\
645.76
's s'
l y
N.
M l
~
t ILRT 645.45 s_,
__ -.s._._
a.
645.14"
'~' -,
N.
I UERIFICATION '
644.83
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,),,
.230 1119 TIME HOLIES 215 1121 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE I
l O
O O
l 1
FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 TEMPERATURE DEGREES F 80.000
)
79.600 l
I,
_ - _ _ _ i.
79.200 2
a, c
v a
l
~
.c 78.800" f-i l
78.400" j
78.000
_.230 1119 TIME HOUFS 215 1121 i
START TIME DATE END TIME DATE l
I O
O O
FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 UAPOR PRESSURE PSIA
.336
\\t.<,t 4)' ^-6).YL"d,\\qRuq(.r,\\r, '
I
(
I
.334" v
'wi,'d g8g f
I ll "f
.332- \\
s
?
I i
l w
i 1
.330-l l
.328-
.326
_.230 1119 TIME HOURS 215 1.1.21 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE
i O
O O
FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 PRESSURE PSIA (DRY AIR) 64.460 l
i i
64.440"s.
i h
1
't l.,
2 64.420" y
i
~
~~. -
.-/'.
"a"-"--"""--""-M a
64.400 b
b.
64.380-g 64.360
.230 1119 TIME HOURS 2.15
.1.12.1.
START TIME DATE END TIME DATE i
f
O O
O FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 AIRMASS LBM X 1000 AND REGRESSION LINE 645.53 '-.
wd..
_ - 7.~,Q
'.~~
l l
645.38~
~_
~
% r % __
" ~
l
" y-
~ ~ ~,
ds-645.23-3
.~_
8 g
_~
Y 0.75 La
-^ - 7 t,._
t 645.08-~
)
~__
i
?
~
l 644.93-
~
l
(
644.77
,,,,,,,,1-2100 11.1.9 TIME HOUFS 2100 1120 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE I
l
O O
O I
l FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 AIRMASS LBM X 1000 AND REGRESSION LINE i
UERIFICATION TEST 645.06 %.41; _.
"%g.___
- %.,..r l
%.,., fR'?.
645.01 V.
~.[.l"g LONER
. N. ~.._.~
LIMIT
.:7~~-\\,~
s 2
644.95
~~,%,
~
l C
~,
k,
~_,
I 1
m
~~~
644.90 UPPER
~
l
~~.~x LIMIT
~~
.g3
. v.
~~
D3
(
l 644.84-
~...._,.
....~
(
644.79 2215 112O TIME HOUES 2 1 5
.1.1.2 1 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE
O O
O 1
1 FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 i
TOTAL TIME LEAKAGE RATE AND UCL X/ DAY i
i
.250 1
I I
I i
l
.200
~
3 i
t
~.
l
.150
\\
s I
s.
g i
t.
n l
?
\\
~-_
0.75 La l
l
. 1. 00-v s.' s.
95% UCL i
RATE
.050-
.000 2100 1119 TIME HOUES 2100 1120 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE i
O O
O I
FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 l
MASS POINT LEAKAGE RATE AND UCL X/ DAY l
.250 1
.200 l
1
-l I
I i
.150 i
s g
!?
'.5.v..
0.75 La
\\, -q..
.100
= =
95x UCL
.050
.000 t
2100 1119 TIME HOURS 2100 1120
]
START TIME DATE END TIME DATE l
1
~.
O O
O i
FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 i
TOTAL TIME LEAEAGE RATE X/ DAY
.300 UPPER LIMIT l
.240 1
l
_/
RATE
.180 s
is LONER LIMIT g
1
.120 i
.060"
.000 2215 1120 TIME HOUES 215~1121 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE l
l
O O
O FARLEY UNIT 2
ILRT NOUEMBER 1987 i
MASS POINT LEAEAGE RATE X/ DAY UERIFICATION TEST l
.300 l
UPPER LIMIT l
.240 RATE
.18 0~
~
/
a i
~
a
-s LOWER LIMIT
[
l
.120~
~
i i
.060"
.000
'2215 1120 TIME HOURS 215
.1.121 START TIME DATE END TIME DATE l
i i
I
7.
REFERENCES
(,)
v 1.
Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit One, Technical Specification 3/4.6.1.
2.
Farley Nuclear Plant, S u rv eilla n ce Test Procedure FN P-2-STP-117.0, Containment Integrated Leakage Rate Test, Revision 5.
3.
Appendix J to 10CFR50, Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water Cooled Power Reactors.
4.
Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2,
Final Safety Analysis Rep ort.
5.
Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-1, Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Tasting of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 1.
56.8-1987, Containment System Leakage Testing 6.
ANSI /ANS Requirerents.
7.
A N S I-N 4 5.4 - 19 7 2, Leakage Rtste Testing of Containment Structures for Nuclear Reactors.
pL) bq
_m, a
_ - a a
w A-4 4
. _ -.J a
g.---
s...-_.A
.m-
.a--
e Ja.,
A 1
l 4
I s
d k
I L
i i
M4YNDIX A Dettel IIRT Ctztuter Pawtam 3rmy e
a
/
i f
IESQtIPTIC34 CF perprTL IIRE 03EURR MCG4AM A. Prturma ard 9-t Wcm The Bechtal IIRr cacputer program is used to determine the integrated 1.
leabge rate of a rmclear primary containrent stzw:ture. The prcgram is used to cceputa leakage rata had cn input values of time, free air volume, contalment atzes5here total pressure, drytulb temperature, ard dowpoint tacperature (watar vapor pressure).
Isakage rate is emputed using the Absoluta Method as defined in MGI/NE 56.8-1981, "Ccutairment System Isakar;e Test!Jn ?49uirtments" and Bi-TCP-1, Rev 1, "resting Critaria for Integrated Isabge Rate Testirq of Primary Ccntainment Structures for Nuclear Pcver Plants".
The program is designed to allow the user to evaluata centalrment leakage rata test results at the jobsite ducirq contairussit leakage testirg. Current leakage rata values may be chtained at arr/ time dur tbs testire period using one of two cx:rputatienal nethcds, yiel three ditferunt report printouts.
t
- 2..In the first printout, the Total Time Peport, leakage rate is
[-
cceputed frca initial values of free air volume, containment atrosphere datulb teeterature and partial pressure of dry air, the latest values of the same parameters, ard elapsed time. These iniividually ccrputed leakage rates are statistically averaged usirq linear regression 1:y the methcd of least squares. The Total Time Methcd is the ccrputaticr.al technique upon which the short duration test criteria of Bi-TCP-1, Fev 1, '% Critaria for Integrated Isakage Rata Testirq of Primuy Containment Structures fcr Nuclear Power. Plant," are Fa mi.
3.
The se:ord printcut is the Miss Point Psport ard is based on the Miss Point Analysis Technique described in MGI/MG 56.8-1981, "Containment Systen Isakage Testing Requirement *. The mass of dn' air in the containment is' cxrputed at each data point (time) usirg the Equation of State, frus current values of containment atmogtere dntulb terverature ard partial pressure of dry air. Containcd asss is "plotted" versus time ard a ro7ression line is fit to the data r
usirg the method of least squares. Isakaga rate is determined fren the statistically derived slepe ard intercept of the resyression line.
4.
The third printcut, the Trerd Paport, is a sumary of leakage rate values ba=i on Total Time and Nass Point ccrputations presented as a functicn of ructer of data points ard elapsai time (tast duratien).
The Trerd Pepert prwides all leakage rato values required for corpsrison to the acceptance critaria of RI-TCP-1 for corduct of a shurt duration test.
A-1 L
- r y.
-, y.
\\
[ j\\
y
-,. 1 1
,s
^
Y y.. \\
^
~-
y
.g..
s, f
z.
s kj
'Ihe P4uycs generates a predictor report based on "Suygested Criteria s.
5.
for a Short D1 ration IIRr", Ted' Brown and Louis Esterd, sore, Pr& bas of the First Workchoo on Containment Yogitig, i
18, 1982. Se "predictor" is an estimate of the upper bourd Jsralary en the change in mass point calculated leanage rate which will occur during the next four hcors. 'Ihe esti,mte is basat en the mass point calculated leakage rates and 95% UCLs during the prie/ icds four hours.
'Ihe program is written in a high level language aid is designed for 6.
use on a micro-ecrguter with diiucs data input fran the data '
acquisiticn system. brief descriptions of program use, for=ulae used for leakage rate crrputations, aid program logic are provided in the
~
followEng parsgraphs.
i*
B. Explanaticm pf Procram 1.
The Becdtsl IIRT ccuputer program is written, for use by experienced IIRf perschnel, to determine containment integratai leakage rates based on the Absolute Method described in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 ard DNIOP-1.
2.
Information leaded into the program prior to or at the start of the test:
a.
Number of containment atrosphere dryt:ulb te=perature sensors, dewpoint teqxtrature (water vapor pressure) sensors ard pressure gages to be used in leakage rate ccrputations for the sycific test b.
Volume fractieris assiigned tci each of the above sensors c.
Calibraticn data for abcn"sansors s
d.
Test title Maximumallcwableleakage'rateatteskpressure e.
3.
Cata received frcu the data accpisition syste.<n during the test, ard used_ to ccupute leakage rates:
F a.
Time and date Containment atrosphere drytulb' beeratures b.
c.
Containment atmsphere pressure (s) s d.
Containment atmsphere dewpoint teparaturk.1-e.
Containment free air volume.
x
- 4. 'zArtog all data at a given ti:ne are received, 'l,Surrary of Masured 3
Cata report (reter to "Program Irgic," Pangraph D, "Data" option
\\
carnard) is printed.
A-2 f
/
O d
-\\
-A wa-2m -
C\\
If drybulb and dewpoint tenperature sensors should fail during the
()
5.
test, the data frta the sensor (s) are not used. The volume fractions for the remaining sensors are recuputed and reloaded into the program for use in ensuing leakage rate cuputations.
C. Emkaae Bate Ponm11gg 1.
Caputations Using the Tbtal Tire Method:
a.
Measured leakage rate fran data:
(1)
PV11 = W El 1
(2)
P vi = W Ei i
i 2400 (Wj, - W )
i (3)
W ati 1 Solving for W, and Wi and substituting equations (1) and (2) into (3) yields:
T P vi
[1 -
2400 1i (4)
L
=
i at i
(
TPVi11 /
'here W,Wi = Weight of centained rass of dry air at times ti 1
and t, reWively, liza.
i T,Ti = Containment atresphere drybulb teqerature at 1
i and t, respectively,
'R.
times t i
P,Pi = Partial pressure of the dry air ccponent of the 1
centainment atrosphere at times ti and t,
i respectively, psia.
and V,Vi = Containment free air volume at times t i 1
respectivgly(constantorvariableduring test), ft th t,ti = Time at 1st and i data points resyctively, hr.
i to t, hr.
ati = Elapsed time frcn ti i
R = Specific gas constant for air = 53.35 ft.lbf/lbs. *R.
Li = Measured leakage rate cceputed during tire to t, W.%/ day.
interval t i
i A-3
d
'Ib rarha truncation error, the emputer program uses the following equivalent fornulation:
-2400 [ aW g i
4-i ati (W1) where W1-W1 aW1
=
N W
1 1
api avi api avi aTi
+
+
P V
PV T
1 1
1i 1
=
aTi T1 api =Pi-P1 avi=vi-v1 aTi=Ti-T1 O
b.
Calculated leakage rate frt:n regression analysis:
E=a+ bat (5)
N
% tere L = Calculated leakage rate, %t.%/ day, as deteredned frem the regression line.
a = (ILi-bIat)#
(6) i N(IL at ) - (IQ)(Iat )
i i
i b=
(7)
N(Iati ) - (! A t )2 2
i N = th.::ier of data points.
N I=
I i=1 95% upper confidence limit on the calculated leakage rate:
c.
UCL = a + b a tg + S-O A-4
(\\
where UCL = 95% upper confidence limit wt.%/ day, at elapsed tiIne a t.
g For a tg < 24 i - b IL a t )/(N-2)]W
-AIL ts[(ILi i
i S-
=
/
2 - (Iat )2jy)y /2 (9a) 1 (1 + 1 + ( a tg - AE)2 (Iati i
N stere t = 1.95996 + 2.37226 + 2.82250 ;
s N-2 (N-2)d For atg 2 24 i - b 5 L at )/(N-2)]1/2
- AIL S-
=t I(ILi i
i s
1/2 (9b)
/
2 - (It )2/N)]
(1 + (ati-at)2 (Sati i
N 1.6449(N-2)2 + 3.5283(N-2) + 0.85602
[j3
\\
stere ts" (N-2)2 + 1.2209(N-2) - 1.5162 i = C-lculated leakage rate cceputed using equation (5) at
~L a
at, %/ day.
total elapsed ti:ne i
aE. Ilti N
2.
Ccq:utaticn usirsy the Pass Point Method:
a.
Centained :-ass of dry air fzun data:
Wi = 144 P vi l
i I
Rri (10) stere i
All sy:tols as previcusly defined.
!O A-5 j
l
O b.
Calculated leakage rate frun regression analysis, W = a + b a t E = -2400 b (11) a ubexe calculated leakage rate, wt.%/ day, as determined fran E
=
the regressicn line.
(IW1 - bIat )/N (12) i a
=
N(IW at ) - (IW )(Eat )
i i
i i
N(I a ti ) - (I at )d d
i th ati= Total elaH time at time of i data point, hr.
}L% of data points.
N
=
th 6 mass of dry air at i data point, lhn, Wi
=
as cmputed fran equation (10).
I
=
i=1 lb reduce truncation error, the cx21puter program uses the following equivalent forrulation:
b aWi
-S at )/N (14) a = W 1 + (I i
1 W
W 1
1 AWi AWi at)-I Iati N (I i
N W
1 1
(15)
= W b
i
!!(Ia ti ) - (Iat )2 2
i where is as previously defined.
W1 c.
95% upper confidence limit.
-2400 UCL =
(b - S )
(16) b a
O A-6
O'w/
~
where UCL = 95% upper confidence limit, wt.%/ day.
SN1/2 2 - (Iat )2g2 (17)
(NIati i
1.6449 (N-2)2 + 3.5283 (N-2) + 0.85602 where t
=
3 (N-2)2 + 1.2209 (N-2) - 1.5162
' I [wi - (a + b at ) )2 y2 i
N-2 I
1 w d I ( awig1)2 _ g 3 ( 3 gig 1))2g_
=
1
'N-2 I(aW N )(Iat )/N]2 W
(I(aW M ) ati-i 1 i
i 1 (18)
Cj%
2 I
I(a ti ) - (I a t )2/N i
d.
Predictor:
2((UCL-L) + 4 (I AI + 2 S ) )
A Praiic*ar
=
100 Ia khere UCL = 95% upper confidence limit of rass point calculated leakage rate at end of test.
L
= Mass point calculated leakage rate at end of test.
A
= Value of linear regressien aralysis slepe of rass point calculated leakage rate vs. tine for last 4 hcurs of test
- data, i
S
= Linear regressien analysis standard deviation of slepe.
3 Ia = A11cwable leakage rate.
rate Irai calculated at the end of ig point calculated leakage In tens of elapsed time, a t ard r ti.e interval.
~
l0 A-7 l
l
\\
O.
mi-BI att 1
I (19)
A M
4 hr 4 hr M I miati-I mi I ati 4 hr 4 hr 4 hr (20)
B
=
2 2
-I Ati M I ati 4 hr 4 hr I
Irai - A I mi-B I miati 4 hr 4hr 4hr (21) sg
=
I at )2) i - (4 hr
}
(M-2] (M I at i
4 hr i
Uni m point calculated leakage rate evaluated usirs data
=
up to time a t.
i 4 hr = su:: ration over last 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of test data, r
I
=
I p
N-M+1 y
nt=ber of data points for last 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of test.
M
=
4 O
4 A-8 1
4
..-..__-..,..._.....-.,.m
--- -.-mc-..
,s -
I
)
D. Pruna Irnic 1.
'Ihe Bechtel IIRT cceputer program logic flow is controlled by a set of user options. We user options ard a brief description of their associated furrtion are presented below.
OFFION CCNMAND FUNCTION After starting the prcgram execution, the user eitner enters the rame of the file containing previously entered data or initializes a new data file.
DATA Enables user to enter raw data. hhen the system requests values of time, volume, temperature, pressure and vapor pressure, the user enters the appropriate data. After ccepleting the data entry, a sumary is printed out. 'Ihe user then verifies that the data were entered correctly. If errors are detected, the user will then be given the cppertunity to correct the errors. After the user verifies that the data were entered correctly, a Corrected Data Sumary Paport of time, data, average terperature, partial pressure of dry air, and water f]
vapor pressure is printed.
V TFEID A Trerd Report is printed.
'IUIAL A Total Time Report is printed.
MASS A Mass Point Report is printed.
TEFM Enables user to sign-off te::porarily or permanently. All data is saved on a file for restarting.
CDRR Enables user to correct previously entered data.
LISr A Su=ary Enta Report is printed.
READ Enable the ccrputer to receive the next set of data frcn the data acquisition system directly.
PIDI Enables user to plot sumary data, irdividual sersor data or air rass versus tire.
DEIfrE Enables user to delete a data point.
INSERI Enables user to reirstate a previously deleted data point.
VOIERA Erable user to charge volume fractiers.
L A-9
9 (y
()
OPTICN CEtHAND FUNCTION PRED A predictor report is printed.
TIME Enable the user to specify the time interval for a report or plot.
VERF Enable the user to input i::p~ced leakage rate ard calculated IIRT leakage rates at start of verification test.
E. N Reoort and Data Printcut MASS m ntr REPORT The Mass Point Report presents leakage rate data (wt%/ day) as determined by the Mass Point Method. The "Calculated I.eakage Rate" is the value determined frca the regression aralysis. The "Containment Air Mass" values are the masses of dry air in tra containment (lhn). These air masses, determined frcn the Equation of State, are used in the regression analysis.
TUTAL TIME REFCRP The Total Time Report presents data leakage rate (wt%/ day) as determined by the Total Thne Method. The "Calculated Leakage Rate" is the value determined from the regression analysis. The "Measured IsaPage Rates" are the leakage rate values determined using Total Time calculations.
These values of leakage rate are used in the regression analysis.
TRHID REMRT The Trend Report presents leakage rates as determined by the Mass Point and Tbtal Time methcds in percent of the initial centained mass of dry air per day (wt%/ day), versus elapsed time (heurs) and nu:rber of data points.
FREDICICR REFCRT The predictor reports presents a predicted upper bound en the change in calculated mass point leakage rate over the next four hours.
l SWMARY DATA REPORT The Su=ary Data report presents the actual data used to calculate l
leakage rates by the various methcds described in the Ccrputer Prcgram" section of this report. The seven colurns are TIME, DATE, TE4P, FRESCRE, VPRS, VOILKE, and AIPMASS and contain data defined as follcus:
l 1
\\
('
1 1
A-10 l
\\
/
Time in 24-hour notation (hours and minutes).
v\\
1.
TIME:
2.
DATE:
Calendar date (mcrith and day).
Containment weighted-average drytulb ter:perature in 3.
TDT:
absolute units, degrees Rankine (*R).
4.
MESSURE:
Partial pressure of the dry air cxmponent of the containment atmos @ ere in absolute units (psia).
5.
VPRS:
Partial pressure of water vapor of the containment atmosphere in absolute units (psia).
6.
VOILEE:
Containment free air volume (cu. ft.).
7.
AIBMASS:
Calculated dry air mass (lbu).
F. Stu-siiry of Mmamri Data and Serv of Cvuected Data The Summary of Measured [hta presents the individual containment atW.ere drytulb terperatures, dewpoint ter:peratures, absolute total pressure anti free air volume measured at the time and date.
1.
TEG 1 thrugh TDG N are the drybulb ter:peratures, where N = No. of 6
RID's.
The values in the right-hand column are te@eratures (*F),
n11tiplied by 100, as read frun the data acquisition system (DAS).
f The values in the left-hand column are the corrected ter:peratures expressed in absolute units (*R).
2.
PRES 1 through FRES N are the total pressures, absolute, were N = No.
of pressure sensors. The right-hand value, in parentheses, is a number of counts as read frcin the DAS. This count value is converted to a value in psia by the cxxputer via the instrument's calibration table, counts versus psia. The left-hand colu=n is the absolute total pressure, psia.
3.
VPRS 1 thrcugh VMS N are the dewpoint temperatures (water vapor pressures), where N = No. of de% point sensors. The values in the right-hand column are terperatures ('F), multiplied by 100 as read frcan the DAS. The values in the left-hand colu=n are the water vapor pressures (psia) frczn the steam tables for saturated steam cou==irgaiing to the despoint (saturation) temeratures in the cen+ar colu=n.
The Sumt:ary of Corrected Cata presented corrected terperature ard pressure values ard calculated air mass detamined as follcws:
1.
TDGEPATURE ('R) is the volume weighted average containment atmosphere drytulb te::perature derived frcxn TE91 through TE9 N.
O A-11
2.
wtum.u.v IRESSURE (psia) is the partial pressure of the dry air
+==it of the containment at:mosphere, absolute. 'Ihe volume wighted average containment atmosi ere water vapor pressure is t
subtracted fran the volume weighted average total pressure, yielding the partial pressure of the dry air.
VAMR PRE 5SURE (psia) is the volume weighted average mntainment 3.
atmosphere water vapor pressure, absolute, derived fran 7 PRS 1 thrtugh VPRS N.
4.
VOILEE (cu. ft.) is the containment free air volume.
COTIADOE27f AIR MASS (lbn) is the calculated mass of dry air in the 5.
containment. 'Ihe mass of dry air is calculated usirq the containment free air volume and the above TDE'EPAIURE and CORRECTED PRESSURE of the dry air.
O i
1 l
O A-12
_.,,,, _f
APPENDIX B O
LOCAL LEAKAGE TEST DATA I
O 1
1 0
8"" "
- . V
~)- s.. c ~
f, ;~ '..e - z,:.
.r.
'. *n. f.
. ', *.--.. ;.-:.g.-
D ICCAL LEAK RATE TEST C J Outage.
"As round" (Min)
Electrical Penetration Total 26.95 SCCM TypeBTest(lessklec.Pene.) Total (Hatches,etc.)
4820.21 SCCM Type C "As round" Min. Path Leakage per Penetration 1349.40 SCCM
'10IAL 6196.56 SCCM Max. Allowable Leakage (.6 La) - 150,975 SCCM
~
"As round" Min. 6196.56 x 100 - 4.10% of Allowable Leakage i
- 150975
[
"As Left" (Min)
Electrical Penetration Total 24.12 SCCM
~ '
~
216.61 SCCM
,,_.J
~
Type B Test (less Elec. Pene. ) Total (Hatches, etc. )
.:. ~
Type C "As Left" Min. Path Leakage 1911.90 SCCM
~-
7 2152.e3 SCcM
.O 1UIAL
~
"As Left" Min. 2152.63 X 100 - 1.43% of Allowable Leakage 150975 "As Left" (Max) 24.12 SCCM Electrical Penetration Total Type B Test (less Elec. Pene.) Total (Hatches, etc.)
216.61 SCCM Type C "As Left" Max. Path Leakage 4712.86 SCCM
'IUIAL 4953.59 SCCM "As Left" Max. 4953.59 X 100 = 3.28% of Allowable Leakage 150975 DEC LLRT02/6 f']
(pg. B 1 )
~
tNIT 2 TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
- 4th REFUELING l
AS FOUND AS LEFT NOZZLE TPNS NO.
DM'E LEAKAGE DATE LEAKAGE NO.
(SCCM)
(SCCM)
EA01 Q2TS24003-A 04/06/86 0.63 0.63 EA02 Q2T52A004-A 04/06/86 0.23 0.23 EA03 02T52B014-A 04/06/86 0.63 0.63
- EA05 Q2TS28001-A 04/06/86 0.68 0.68 EA06 Q2TS28005-A 04/05/86 0.23 0.23 EA09 Q2TS28002-A 04/06/86 0.59 0.59 EA10 Q2T52A001-A 04/05/86 0.23 0.23 EAll Q2TS2A002-A 04/05/26 0.45 0.45 EB01 Q2T528019-A 04/06/86 0.27 0.27 EB05 Q2T528007-A b4/06/26 0.63
- 0.63 0.54 EB09 Q2T528006-A 04/05/86 0.54
~
Q2T52E013-1 04/06/86 0.73 0.73
~
~
Ecol EC03 02T528012-3 04/06/86 0.23 0.23 EC07 Q2T528009-A 04/05/86 0.05 0.05 EC08 Q2TS28010-4 04/05/86 0.23
- 0.23 EC10 Q2T52B008-4 04/05/86 0.45 0.45 EC12 Q2T528052-A 04/05/86 4.54 04/11/86 3.12 WA02 Q2T528015-B 04/06/36 0.14 0.14 WA03 Q2T52B023-B 04/06/86 0.23 0.23 NA05 02T528046-B 04/06/86 0.68 0.68 HA06 Q2T528047-B 04/06/86 0.36 0.36 NA07 Q2T52A005-B 04/06/86 1.00 1.00 MA08 Q2T52A006-B 04/06/86 0.45 0.45 NA09 Q2TS28018-B 04/06/86 0.18 0.18 DEC LLRT01/3 PAGE 1 (pg. B 2 )
I
I UNIT 2 TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
- 4th REFUELING
\\
(^
AS FOUND AS LEPT Nozzt.s m S No.
mTe umas mTs t.rmaz No.
(SCCM)
(SCCM)
MA10 Q2T52,8016-B 04/06/86 0.50 0.50' 0.18
~
Wall 02T528017-B 04/06/86 0.18 l
~~ ~ ~NA21 Q2T528032-N 04/06/86 0.09 04/23/86 0.03,
I WA22 Q2T52B033-N 04/06/86 0.68~
04/23/36 0.68; 1
MA23 Q2T528034-N
_ 04/06/86 0.05 04/09/86 _ 0.00 l _,
WA24 Q2T52B035-N 04/06/86 0.45 04/12/86 0.10 I
WB03 Q2T528020-B 04/06/B6 0.54 0.54 WB05 Q2T528054-N 04/23/86 0.47 04/26/36 0.00
's NB06 Q2T52B055-N 04/23/86 0.00 04/26/86
__0.00 ;
WB07 02T520022-B 04/06/86 0.73
- 0.73 '
~-~
[
WB09 Q2T52B025-B 04/06/86 0.54 0.54 7
WB10 Q2T528053-B 04/06/86 3.04 04/11/86 3.51 i
WB11 Q2T528038-B 04/06/B6 0.54
- 0.54:.
~
WB21 Q2T52B037-N 04/06/86 0.50 04/09/86 0.05-WB24 02T52B039-N 04/06/86 0.50 04/11/86 0.00; 0.54f WC01 Q2T528026-3 04/06/86 0.54 WC03 Q2T528024-N 04/06/86 0.36 0,36!
WC05 Q2T52B028-3 04/06/86 0.50 0.50 WC06 Q2T52B056-N 04/23/86 0.00 04/26/86 0.00:
WC07 02T52B030-2 04/06/86 0.45 0.45:
WC08 02TS28011-B 04/06/86 0.14 O.14 WC09 Q2T52B042-2 04/06/86 0.68 0.68 NC11 Q2T52B031-2 04/06/86 0.18 0.18 ~
o DEC LLRT01/3 PAGE 2 (pg. 8 3 )
LNIT 2 TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
- 4th REFUELING nCY ~-
AS FCLND AS LEFT NOZZLE TPNS NO.
DATE LEA 10GE DATE LEAKAGE NO.
(SCCM)
(SCCM)
WC21 Q2T52SO40-N 04/06/86 0.23 0.23 WC23 Q2T528041-N 04/06/86 0.68 0.68 14.38 12.96 TorAL PAGE 1
~
~
TorAL PAGE 2 11.66 10.25 IUIAL PAGE 3 f 0.91 0.91 SUM TOIAL PAGES 1 DIRU 3 26.95 -
24.12 t
.J s
l l
f O
DEC LLRT01/3 PAGE 3 (pg. B 4 )
t
~
~
d_
TYPE B 11!:ST
SUMMARY
FOR 4th REfU!: LING DATE:
05-07-86 i
~
DATE DATE PENE.
DESCRIPTICN LEAKAGE WR LEAKAGE RATE NO.
AS ICUND (SCCM)
AS LErr 14 Fuel Transfer Tube -
04-25-86 04-25-86 i
riange Double "O"Ring 7.5
- 7. 5
~ 14 l
Fuel Transfer Tube -
04-11-86 04-29-86
' ' Bellows 4670 66.4 84 Equipnent Hatch -
05-06-86 05-06-86 Between O Rings 13.0 13.0
- 86 Personnel Lock Outer Door - Between O Rings 0
0 (V
'~'s 86 I
Personnel Lock -
05-30-86 05-30-86 I
volume Between Doors 30 30 87 Auxiliary Access Lock Outer Door - Between 0
0 0 Rings 87 Auxiliary Access Lock-05-01-86 05-01-86 s
Volume Between Doors 99.71 99.71 DiJ LLRT01/3 PAGE 4 (pg. B 5 )
t O
TYPE C TEST St.w /.RY 4th REFUELING J
i
~
PENE.
VALVE NO.
DME LEAKAGE AS EUlN PER PENE.
DATE LEAKAGE AS LEFT PER PENE.
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MAX.
. MIN.
10 02E11V026B 04/17/86 7.8*
04/17/86 7.8*
Q2EllV025B 04/17,B6 7.8*
3.9 04/17/86 7.8*
7.8 3.9 11 02E11V026A 04/13/86 3.6*
04/14/86 9.16*
Q2E11V025A 04/13/86 3.6*
1.8 04/14/86 9.16*
9.16 4.58 12 02P13V301 04/06/86 298.0*
05/06/86 681.0*
02P13V302 04/06/86 298.0*
05/06/86 681.0*
681.0 340.5 Q2P13V281 04/06/86 298.0*
05/06/86 681.0*
Q2P13V282 04/06/86 298.0*
149.0 05/06/86 681.0*
1 13 Q2P13V283 04/06/86 216.0*
05/06/86 687.0*
Q2P13V284 04/06/86 216.0*
05/06/86 687.0*
687.0 343.5 02P13v303 04/06/86 216.0*
05/06/86 687.0*
O2P13V304 04/06/86 216.0*
108.0 05/06/86 687.0*
16 02E11V001A 04/13/86 1.6 1.6 04/13/86 1.6 1.6 1.6 18 02E11V001B 04/17/86 4.6 4.6 04/17/86 4.6 4.6 4.6 04/18/86 16.0*
23 02E21V253A 04/10/86 139.6*
04/18/86 16.0*
Q2E21v253B 04/10/86
-139.6*
Q2E11V253C 04/10/86 139.6*
04/18/86 16.0*
16.0 13.3 02E21V254 04/10/86 13.3 13.3 04/10/86 13.3 1
24 02E21V119 04/15/86 8.8 04/15/86 8.8 i,
04/16/86 0.3 02E21V258 04/15/86 0.6 0.3 0.6 04/15/86 1.3 8.8 02E21V257 04/15/86 1.3 5
- 25 02E21V115B 04/08/86 28.8 28.8 04/08/86 28.8 28.8 28.8 b
26 Q2E21V115C 04/08 36 0.5 0.5 04/08/86 0.5 0.5 0.5 f
t t
i i
- Values represent total leakage frosa group sets of valves as physically tested.
DEC LLRT01/2 PAGE 1
/
PENE.
AS FOUND
'AS LEFT no.
VALVE no.
mm I m AGE AS POUND PER PENE.
(SCOT)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MAX.
MIN.
27 Q2E21V115A 04/08/86 0.4 0.4 04/08/86 0.4 0.4 0.4
~
28 Q2E21v213 04/08/86 1.2*
04/10/86 0.6*
Q2E21v249A 04/08/86 1.2*
04/10/86 0.6*
1.0 0.6 Q2E21v249B 04/08/86 1.3 1.2 04/12/86 1.0 l
29 02E21v049 04/08/86 0.5 04/08/86 0.5 2.4 0.5 I
02E21v050 04/08/86
". 4 0.5 04/08/86 2.4 0.3 04/25/86 0.4 0.4 0.3 30 Q2813v038 04/25/86 0.4 02B13v040 04/25/86 0.3 04/25/86 0.3 04/18/86
.5 31 Q2c21v006 04/11/86 158.0 04/10/86 44.0 02c21v005 04/10/86 44.0 04/18/86 8.6 44.0 0.5 Q2c21vo64 04/10/86 45.8
- 44.0 32 Q2P16v072 04/09/86 7.9 04/16/86 7.0 7.9 04/09/86 240.0 240.0 7.0 02P16v081 04/09/86 4240.0 i
33 02c21v204 04/25/86 316.0
' 66.4 04/26/86 33.1 66.4 33.1 02G21Hv3380 04/25/86 66.4 04/25/86 66.4 42 Q2P17v083 04/08/86 93.4 04/08/86 93.4 93.4 12.7 Q2P17v082 04/08/86 12.7
,12.7 04/08/86 12.7 43 Q2P17Hv3184 04/08/86 15.8*
04/06/96 15.8*
Q2Pl7HV3045 04/08/86 15.8*
7.9 04/08/86 15.8*
15.8 7.9 44 02P17v097 04/08/86 78.5*
04/08/85 78.5*
l
?
Q2P17V099 04/08/86 78.5*
39.3 04/08/86 78.5*
78.5 39.3 O'
45 02P17V159 04/08/86 74.0 04/08/86 74.0 Q2P17HV3095 04/08/86 1.6 1.6 04/30/86 339.0 339.0 74.0 t
- Values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physica ly tested.
PAGE 2 DEC LLRT01/2
TYPE C 'IEST
.tY 4th REFUELING
/
i l
PENE.
VALVE NO.
DATE LEAKAGE AS FOUND PER PENE.
M'IE LEAKAGE AS LEFT PER PENE.
a
{
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MAX.
MIN.
h 2.1 46 02P171N3067 04/08/86 1466.0 04/17/86 02Pl7HV3443 04/08/86 4.6 4.6 04/08/86 4.6 4.6 2.1 47 Q2P18V001 05/01/86 25.0 12.0 05/01/86 25.0 25.0 12.0 Q2P18V002 05/01/86 12.0 05/01/86 12.0 48 Q2P19V002 04/16/86 117.0 04/16/B6 117.0 Q2P19HV3611 04/16/86 2.5 2.5 04/16/96 2.5 117.0 2.5
{
49 02E21v091 04/07/86 0.6 04/20/86 1.2 1.2 0.7 Q2E21V052 04/07/86 0.7 0.6 04/07/86 0.7 50 02P15HV3766 04/08/86 0.3 04/20/86 2.1 2.1 0.5 j
Q2P15EN3334 04/08/86 0.5 '
O.3 04/08/86 0.5 l
54 02E14V002 04/08/86 2.7 04/23/86 14.0 l
02E14fw3658 04/08/86 126.6 2.7 04/23/86 33.9 33.9 14.0 55 N2E141N3657 04/07/86 287.0 04/09/86 10.67 1
02E14V001 04/08/86 72.5 72.5 04/09/86 72.5 7;.5 10.67 56 02P151N3331 04/07/86 10.5 04/07/86 10.5 02P15fN3104 04/07/86 20.2 10.5 04/07/86 20.2 20.2 10.5
{
57 02P15HV3103 04/07/86 1.5 04/07/86 1.5 02P15fN3332 04/07/86 2.9 1.5 04/07/86 2.9 2.9 1.5 58 02P15tN3333 04/18/86 1.2 04/18/86 1.2 3
Q2P15fN3765 04/18/86 0.9 0.9 04/18/86 0.9 1.2 0.9 S
' values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
PAGE 3 DEC LLRT01/2
TYPE C E ST St 4th REFUELING
/
PENE.
VALVE NO.
DATE LEAKAGE AS EOLND PER PENE.
DA'IE LEAKAGE AS LEET PER PENE.
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MAX.
MIN.
59 02E11v039B 04/08/86 8.1*
04 16/86 0.7*
j O2E21v263A 04/08/86 8.1*
04/16/86 0.7*
J O2Ellv039A 04/08/86 8.1*
04/16/86 0.7*
02E11v040 04/08/86 8.1*
04/16/86 0.7*
02E21v263B 04/08/86 8.1*
04/16/86 0.7*
02B13v054 04/07/86 86.0 8.1 04/16/86 0.5 0.7 0.5 60 02P16v071 04/08/86 13.3 04/17/86 2.1 2.1 0.7 02P16v075' 04/08/86 0.7
, 0.7 04/08/86 0.7 l
l 61A 02E23v022D 04/07/86 3.3*
04/10/86 0.5*
l 02E23v022C 04/07.86 3.3*
04/10/86 0.5*
l 02E23v023B 04/07/86 3.3*
1.7 04/10/86 0.5*
0.5 0.25 61B 02E23v025B 04/07/86 1.2*
04/07/86 1.2*
02E23v024B 04/07/66 1.2*
0.6 04/07/86 1.2*
1.2 0.6 i
04/09/86 0.9 62 Q2G21v082 04/09/86 0.9 02G21v001 04/09/86 0.0 0.0 04/09/86 0.0 0.9 0.0 63 Q2E21v059 04/09/86 52.0 04/09/86 52.0 '
02E21v058 04/09/86 off Scale
',52.0 04/18/86 12.5 52.0 12.5 64B 02B13v026B 04/07/86 0.2 04/07/86 0.2 Q2B13v026A 04/07/86 0.5 0.2 04/07/86 0.5 0.5 0.2 04/08/86 2.0 64A 02B13v037 04/08/86 2.0 a
2.0 04/08/86 2.9 2.9 2.0 02B13v039 04/08/86 2.9 h 66 02E23v025A 04/07/86 1.1*
04/07/86 1.1*
O2E23v024A 04/07/86 1.1*
0.6 04/07/86 1.1*
1.1 0.6 i
- Values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
PAGE 4 DEC LLRT01/2 i
TYPE C E ST SL RY 4th RERJELING
/
PDE.
VALVE NO.
DATE LEMAGE AS F0l2O PER PENE.
DAE LEMAGE AS LErf PER PDE.
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCG)
MAI.
MIN.
67 02E23v0228 04/07/86 1.2*
04/07/86 1.2*
O2E23v022A 04/07/86 1.2*
04/07/86 1.2*
O2E23v023A 04/07/86 1.2*
' O.6 04/07/86 1.2*
1.2 0.6 70 02E14v003 04/09/86 9.8 04/09/86 9.8 02E14v004 04/09/86 40.9
. 9.8 04/09/86 40.9 40.9 9.8
~
71 02P23v002A 04/06/86 10.3 10.3 05/02/86 74.5 74.5
'74.5 72 02P23v0028 04/06/86 102.0 102.0 05/02/86 280.2-280.2 280.2 78 02G21HV3376 04/25/86 0.2 04/25/86 0.2 s
- t ;-
04/25/86.
0.5 O
02G21HV3377 04/25/86 0.5 i
0.2 04/25/86 0.2 -
0.5 0.2 ' >.
j O2G21v291 04/25/86 0.2 79 02v18v005 05/01/86 293.0 05/01/86 293.0 Y
'. 26.0 05/01/86 26.0-293.0
-t 26.0 02vi8v004 05/01/86 26.0 a.
t i,
', 7, 82 02P11v002 04/27/86 19.2
]
04/27/86 19.2 i
i 02P11v001 04/27/86 84.0 19.2 04/27/86 84.0 84.0 19,2 u
04/07/86 979.5*
l 93 02E13v004B 04/07/86 979.5*
02E13v003B 04/07/86 979.5*
(,
489.8 04/07/86 i 979.5*
979.5 489.8,
94 02E13v003A 04/07/86 7.9*
it 04/19/86 3.5* -
02E13v004A 04/07/86 7.9*
4.0 04/19/86 3,5*.
3.5 1.8
,a
[
- 95 02G31v012 04/09/86 9.8
]
04/09/86 9.8.-
249.0 249.0 9.8. ~-
3 02G31v013 04/09/86 249.0 9.8 04/09/86 97B O2P19HV2228 04/09/86 19.6 04/09/86 19.6 02P19v004 04/09/86 0.4 O.4 04/09/86 0.4 19.6
'3.4
~
s
'g
?
b.
.t evalues represent total leakage front group sets of valves as physically tested.
1 i
DEC LLRT01/2 PAGE 5
, 1c c n..,
. U ';.. ;...,;,,.; -
,. 7 f, Ms. )
2.,
/
PDE.
VALVE NO.
DME LEAKAGE AS FOLND PER PDJE.
DME LEAKAGE AS LEFT PER PEPE.
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MAX.
MIN.
j l
~
103 02E23v002 04/07/86 17.9*
04/07/86 17.9*
Q2E23v003 04/07/86 17.9*
9.0 04/07/86 17.9*
17.9 9.0 1
\\
1
'IOrAL PAGE 1 312.1 1445.26 '
741.58
'! DEAL PAGE 2
,182.2 i.
881.3 176.30 i
l I
t,1 p
e 108.1 l
280.6 55.37
'IUTAL PAGE 3 61.9 17,35 65.9
'IUPAL PAGE 4
. 672.1 7
2025.9 912.30
'IUrAL PAGE 5
'IUIAL PAGE 6 9.0 t'
17.9 9.00.
' t _.
r
?
4712.86 1911.90,..
SUM 'IUIAL PAGES 1 "IERU 6 1349.4
', F s
s.
.i
~'
i...
t
[5
- s 3
i 91 e
- [.
i h
.s 2
i
. r; 8
n, i
t g
. I-
, c. ' -
- , t
,'. s -
~
- Values represent total leakage from group sets' of valves as physically tested.
- .. ' p
..,, 7 a.
' PAGE 6 DEC LLRT01/2 5
2 v.
s.
L"-
.. :,W; n ; &..
.. e t
I4 CAL LEAK IUJE 'IEST _
The following data is a sumary of the leakage for Unit 2 5th Refueling Outage.
"As round" (Min) 116.79 SC m Electrical Penetr4 tion Total
- .i.>~.
1400.00 SCCM
' '!',1 2 Typs B Test (less Elec. Pene.) Total (Hatches, etc.)
>>.Wje
~
_.. c. :.,,., -
~.,.. "
Type C "As round" Min. Path Leakage per Penetration 1122.19 SCCM
, 6 '. '"
7tnAL
- 2639.78 SCCM
~
Max. Allowable Leakage (.6 La) = 150,975 SCCM "As Found" Min. 2639.78 x 100 = 1.75% of Allevable Leakage 4
. a.
150975
.a
.4-
"As lef t" (Min) a._.
- y, Electrical Penetration Total t.;
45.65 SCCM
, ' t i."...
1412.30 sCCM Type B Test (less Elec. Pene.) Total (Hatches, etc.).
- _.t. -.
1633.58 sCCM Tfpe.C "As Left" Min. Path Leakage
. : _.: &C ' '
~
- ItnAL 3091.53 sCCM "As Left" Min. 3091.5} x 100 - 2.05% of Allowable Leakage 150975 "As Left" (Max)
'~
~
s Electrical Penetration Total
~45.65 SCCM 1412.30 SCCM Type B Test (less Elec. Pene.) Total (Batches, etc.)
4366.00 sCCM Type C "As Left" Max. Path Leakage
^
5823.95 sCCM nnAL "AsTIft"Max. 5823.95 K 100, = 3.86% of Allowable Leakage
}"150975 l
DEC LLRT02/9 (pg. 8 12 )
I
INiT 2 TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
- 5th REFUELING AS FolND AS LEFT NOZZLE TPNS NO.
DATE LEAKAGE EATE LEAKAGE (SC01)
(SCCM)
NO.
EA01 Q2T524003-A 10-07-87 5.60 5.60 EA02 Q2T52A004-A 10-11-87 0.40 0.40 EA03 Q2T528014-A 10-05-87 0.14 10-21-87 0.60
~
EA05 Q2T528001-A 10-05-87 0.59
'O.59 EA06 Q2T528005-A 10-05-87 0.05 0.05
~
EA09 Q2T52B002-A 10-05-87 0.09 0.09
,EA10 Q2T52A001-A 10-11-87 0.40 0.40 EAll Q2T52A002-A 10-07-87 2.40 2.40 EB01 02T528019-A 10-05-87 0.05 10-10-87 0.20 EB05 Q2T528007-A 10-05-87 0.05 11-4-87 1.50-
~- EB09 Q2T528006-A 10-05-87 0.14 11-1-87 0.60 EC01 Q2T528013-1 10 05-87
~' O.05
~
0.05
~ '
~
~
- 0.09
~
~
EC03 Q2T523012-1 10-05-87 0.09 EC11 Q2T528009-A 10-06-87 O.02 10-15-87 1.00 EC08~
Q2T528010-4
'.0-05-87 0.09 0.09 EC10 Q2T523008-4 10-05-87 0.05 0.05 EC12 Q2T528052-A 10-09-P7 12.4 12.4 n02 02T528015-B 10-05-87 0.14 0.14 2 03 02T528023-B 10-05-87 0.05 0.05 2 05 Q2T528046-B 10-05-87 0.14 10-22-87 0.60 2 05 Q2TS28047-B 10-05-87 0.14 10-22-87 1.20 m07 Q2T52A005-B 10-10-87 1.90 1.90 m08 02T52A006-B 10-10-87 1.20 1.20
=o9 o2r52=ota-a to-os-87 o 27 o 27 O
D' DEC LLRT02/8 PAGE 1
~
INIT 2 TYPE B MST
SUMMARY
- 5th REFUELING AS FOUND AS LErr NOZZLE TPNS NO.
DATE LEAKAGE DAE LEAKAGE NO.
(SCCM)
(SCCM)
NA10 Q2T524016-B 10-05-87 0.09 0.09 Mall Q2TS2B017-B 10-05-87 0.09 0.09
.wA21 Q2T528032-N 10-06-87 0.00 0.00
~
NA22 Q2TS2B033-N 10-06-87 0.00 0.00 NA23 02T528034-N 10-06-87 0.19 0.19 MA24 Q2T52B035-N 10-06-87 0.19 0.19 WB03 Q2T52B020-B 10-05-87 0.09 10-31-87 0.60 WB05 Q2T528054-N 10-06-87 0.16 0.16 WB06 Q2T528055-N 10-06-87 0.16 0.16 WB07 Q2T52B022-B 10-05-87 0.23 0.23 WB09 Q2h528025-B 10-05-87 0.23 0.23 WB10 Q2T528053-B 10-11-87 8.30 8.30 WB11 Q2T528038-B 10-05-87 0.23 10-31-87 0.40
~
~
WB21 Q2T52B037-N 10-06-87 0.00 0.00 WB24 02T52B039-N 10-06-87 0.00 0.00 WC01 Q2TS2B026-3 10-05-87 0.00 0.00 WC03 Q2T52B024-N 10-05-87 0.23 0.23 WC05 02T528028-3 10-05-87 0.18 0.18 WC06 Q2T52B056-N 10-06-87 0.00 0.00 WC07 Q2T52B030-2 10-05-87 0.14 0.14 WC08 Q2TS28011-B 10-05-87 0.04 10-15-87 2.00 WC09 02T528042-2 10-05-87 0.18 0.18 WC11 Q2T528031-2 10-05-87 0.27 0.27
(" ' ' " '
M P
2
UNIT 2 TYPE B TEST SUt9%RY - 5th REFUELING
..,9 - - -
AS FOUND AS LETT N0ZZLE TPNS NO.
DME LEAKAGE DME LEAKAGE (SCCM)
(SCCM)
No.
WC21 Q2T528040-N 10-05-87 0.14 0.14 WC23 Q2T52B041-N 10-11-87 79.20 11-9-87 0.40 26.45 31.47 ErIAL PAGE 1 ETIAL PAGE 2 11.00 13.64
'It7IAL PAGE 3 79.34 0.54 SUM ErrAL PAGES 1 neu 3 116.79 45.65 I
eee e
e-e
,O m...,,,
TYPE B TEST
SUMMARY
FOR 5th REFUELItG
(]
DATE:
11-18-87 DATE mTE PENE.
DESCRIPTION LEAKAGE 754R LEAKAGE RATE NO.
AS FOUND (SCCM)
AS LEFT I
14 ruel Transfer Tube -
10-05-8'7 11-15-87 Flcnge Dcuble "O"Ring 0.9 4.1 14 ruel Transfer Tube -
10-12-87 10-12-87 Bellows 6.6 6.6 84 Equipnent Hatch -
10-05-87 11-18-87 Between O Rings 9.8 18.1 86 Personnel Lock Outer Door - Between O Rings 0
0 4
86 Personnel Lock -
11-18-87 11-18-87 volume Between Doors 1338 1338 87 Auxiliary Access Lock Outer Door - Between 0
0 O Rings 87 Auxiliary Access Lock-11-12-87 11-12-81 Voltune Between Doors 45.5 45.5 O
DEC LLRT02/8 PAGE 4
%,, g 3
TYPE C TEST St.
5th REFUELING y
/
?
PENE.
NO.
VALVE NO.
DM1!:
LEMAGE AS FOIDO PG.PENE.
51N. i,
- 3, (SCCM)
MN.
(OCCn)
{ MP.X. -
19 Q2E11v0268 10/22/87 24.0*
10/22/87 24.0*
Q2E11V025B 10/22/87 24.0*
12.0 10/22/87 24.0*
24.0 12.0 Il Q2E11V026A 10/13/87 23.4*
l0/13/87
,23.4 e
23.4 19.3 1
02E11VC25A 10/13/87 23.4*
11'.7 11/16/87 19.3 12 Q2P13v301 10/05/57 1.7'r 11/21/87 22.2*
/.
- i
'I 13/21/87 22.2*
7 02P13v302 10/05/d7 1.7*
j o.4 11/21/87 22.2t 22.2 '
.,.11.1 fl O2P13v281 10/05/87 1.7 + '
11/21/87 22.7*
02P13v282 10/05/87 1.7*
i 2
11/23/87 258.0*
13 02P13v283 10/05/87 8.46,
j 11/23/87
.258.0*
Q2P13v284 10/05/87 8.4*
11/23/87 258.0*
i' Q2P13v303 10/05/87 8.4*
4.2' 11/23/87
, 268.0*
258.0 129.0 Q2P13v304 10/05/87 a.4j f
16 02E11v001A 10/13/87 125.2' 125.2 10/13/87 /
125.2 125.2
?25.2 18 02E11v001B 20/22/87 5.9 5.9 11/14 M 37.8 37.8 37.8
~!
b l
j 10/C3/97 1.3*
23 02E217252A 10/08/97 1.0*
Q2E2172538 10/08/87 1.0*
10/J8/87 Z. 0*
02E11V253C 10/08/87 1.0*
10/98/87 '
'1.0*
l i
Q2E21V254 10/08/87 0.8 0.8 10/08/87 0.8 1.0 0.8 24 02E21V119 10/16/87 33.8 10/16/37 33.8 i
Q2E21V258 10/16/87 8.1 11/08/87 19 7 i
_~
g Q2E21V257 10/16/87 10.6 8.1 11/0C,97 15.7 33.8 15.7
~
'k
" 25 Q2E21V115B 10/07/87-121.9 121.9 10/07/87 121.9 121.9 121.9
[
a I
8 26 Q2E21v115C 10/07/37
,1.7 1.7 10/07/87 1.7 1.7 1.7 8
s i
G
- valtes represent total leakage free group sets of velves m' pfE sically tested.
/
DEC LLRT02/7
' ??=2 1
TYPE C E ST 5 Sth REFUELING PENE.
VALVE NO.
DAM LEAKAGE AS FOLDO PER PENE.
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MAX.
MIN.
27 02E21v115A 10/07/87 1.7 1.7 10/07/87 1.7 1.7 1.7 28 02E21v213 11/03/87 1.5*
11/03/87 1.5*
O2E21v249A 11/03/87 1.5*
11/03/87 1.5*
02E21v249B 11/03/87 84.6 1.5 11/03/87 84.6 84.6 1.5 29 02E21v049 10/06/87 0.5 11/12/87 19.1 02E21v050 10/06/87 0.6 0.5,-
11/03/87 7.6 19.1 7.6 30 02B13v038 11/09/87 3.0 11/09/87 3.0 02B13V040 11/09/87 14.0 3.0 11/09/87 14.0 14.0 3.0 31 02G21v006 10/08/87 1.0 10/08/87 1.0 02G21v005 10/08/87 0.9 11/09/87 12.5 02G21vo64 10/08/87 1.1 0.9 11/14/87 8.1 20.6 1.0 32 02P16v072 10/08/87 133.3 10/08/87 133.3 33.9 10/08/87 33.9 133.3 33.9 02P16v081 10/08/87 33.9 33 02G21v204 11/08/87 395.0 11/08/87 160.1 02G21HV3380 11/08/87 149.9 149.9 11/08/87 149.9 160.1 149.9 42 02P17V083 10/08/87 11,800.0 10/13/87 6.5 Q2P17v082 10/08/87 0.5 0.5 10/08/87 0.5 6.5 0.5 43 02P17HV3184 10/08/87 '
10.1 10/08/87 10.1 10.1 02P17HV3045 10/08/87 10.5 10.1 11/05/87 208.0 208.0 e
$ 44 Q2P17V097 10/08/87 0.6 11/24/87 661.0 l
?
02P17V099 10/08/87 1.4 0.6 10/08/87 1.4 661.0 1.4 s
45 02P17V159 10/08/87 172.1 10/08/87 172.1 02Pl7HV3095 10/08/87
.1).9 0.9 11/05/87 407.0 407.0 172.1
- Values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
DEC LLRT02/7 PAGE 2 i
a
~
O
're= c '=s' 4 "' sta== u=ao O
i PENE.
AS FTXN)
AS LEFT NO.
VALVE NO.
DME LEMGCE AS FtXM) PER PENE.
DME LEMUGE AS LEFT PER PDE.
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MNC.
MIN.
46 02P17HV3067 10/09/87 6,960.0 10/12/87 7.5 Q2P17HV3443 10/08/87 6.6 6.6 10/08/87 6.6 7.5 6.6 47 02P18V001 11/17/87 18.6 11/17/87 18.6
~
50.8 18.6 02P18V002 11/17/87 50.8 18.6 11/17/87 50.8 48 Q2P19V002 10/18/87 316.0 11/05/87 79.9 Q2P19HV3611 10/18/87 13.0 13.0 10/18/87 13.0 79.9 13.0 49 02E21V091 10/06/87 0.9 10/06/87 0.9 i
0.8 0.8 10/06/87 0.8 0.9 0.8 02E21V052 10/06/87 50 u2P15HV3766 10/06/87 1.0 10/06/87 1.0,
02P15HV3334 10/06/87 0.8 0.8 l 10/08/87 0.8 1.0 0.8 10/07/87 1.5 54 Q2E14V002 10/07/87 1.5 i
O2E14W3658
,10/07/87 14.4, 1.5
,, 10/07/87,,,,,, _ 14.4,,, _
14.4
.1.5 55 N2E14HV3657 10/07/87 10.81 11/22/87 4.5 10.81 10/07/87 80.0 80.0 4.5 Q2E14V001 10/07/87 80.0 10/07/87 1.3 56 02P15HV3331 10/07/87 1.3 02P15HV3104 10/07/87 1.5 1.3 10/07/87 1.5 1.5 1.3 10/07/87 1.4 57 02P15Hv3103 10/07/87 1.4 i
02P15HV3332 10/07/87 1.5 1.4 10/07/87 1.5 1.5 1.4 58 02P15HV3333 10/20/87 1.0 10/20/87 1.0 y
Q2P15HV3765 10/20/87 1.1 1.0 10/20/87 1.1 1.1 1.0
?
3
~
d I
- Values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
8 P10E 3 DEC LLRT02/7
1 PDE.
VALVE ro.
DATE LEAKAGC AS EUJtO PER PD1E.
DATE LEAKAGE
_AS LEFT PER PENE.
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MAX.
MIN.
59 02E11v039B 10/18/87 14.4*
10/18/87 14.4*
O2E21V263A 10/18/87 14.4*
10/18/87 14.4*
Q2EllV039A 10/18/87 14.4*
10/18/87 14.4*
O2E11V040 10/18/87 14.4*
10/18/87 14.4*
02E21V263B 10/18/87 14.4*
10/18/87 14.4*
02B13v0S4 10/18/87 65.7 14.4 10/18/87 65.7 65.7 14.4 60 02P16vo71 10/07/87 0.78 10/07/37 0.78 02P16V075 10/07/87 1.7 0.78 10/07/87 1.7 1.7 0.78 61A 02E23V022D 10/05/87 3.2*
10/05/87 3.2*
02E23v022C 10/05/87 3.2*
10/05/87 3.2*
Q2E23v023B 10/05/87 3.2*
1.6 10/05/87 3.2*
3.2 1.6 61B 02E23v025B 10/05/87 5.1*
10/05/87 5.1*
02E23v024B 10/05/87 5.1*
2.6 10/05/87 5.1*
5.1 2.6 62 02G21v082 10/08/87 0.8 10/08/87 0.8 02c21v001 10/09/87 0.9 0.8 10/09/87 0.9 0.9 0.8 63 02E21V059 10/08/87 85.2 11/24/87 2.3 02E21v058 10/08/87 118.4 85.2 11/22/87 105.1 105.1 2.3 64B O2B13v026B 10/05/87 10.0 10/05/87 10.0 02B13V026A 10/05/87 2.8 2.8 10/05/87 2.8 10.0 2.8 64A Q2B13v037 10/06/87 1.8 10/06/87 1.8 2.4 2.4 1.8 02B13v039 10/06/87 2.4 1.8 10/06/87 '
3 66 02E23v025A 10/06/87 2.1*
10/06/87 2.1*-
s 02E23v024A 10/06/87 2.1*
1.1 10/06/87 2.1*
2.1 1.1 (values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
DEC LLRT02/7 PAGE 4
9 (o
TYPE C TEST
.RY Sth IEEUELING
/
PDE.
VALVE NO.
DAE LEAKAGE AS EtXND PER PDE.
DAE TEAKAGE AS LEFT PER PDE.
(SCCM)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MAX.
MIN.
67 Q2E23v022B 10/06/87 1.1*
11/08/87 21.4*
Q2E23v022A 10/06/87 1.1*
11/08/87 21.4*
O2E23v023A 10/06/87 1.1*
0.6 11/08 B7 21.4*
21.4 10.7
/
s 70 02E14v003 10/06/87 5.4 11/17/87 19.2 O2E14v004 10/06/87 13.4 5.4 11/7/87 1.5 19.2 1.5 71 02P23V002A 10/03/87 42.4 42.4 11/25/87 171.9 171.9 171.9 4
72 Q2P23v002B 10/03/87 210.4 210.4 11/25/87 150.7 150.7 150.7 6.7*
11/08/87 6.7*
78 Q2G211N3376 11/08/87 O2G11v291 11/08/87 6.7*
11/08/87 6.7*
O2G211N3377 11/08/77 98.5 6.7 11/08/87 98.5 98.5 6.7 10/05/87 211.0 79 02v18v005 10/05/87
.211.0
.;.,' '4.7 10/05/87 4.7 211.0 4.7 Q2V18v004 10/05/87 4.7 5-10/18/87 8.1 g -
82 Q2P11v002 10/18/87 8.1 1~. 8 10/18/87 1.8.
8.1 1.8 Q2P11V001 10/18/87 1.8 m
11/15/87 677.0*
677.0 338,5 93 Q2E13v004B 10/07/87
.314.0*
314.0*
157.0 11/15/87 677.0*
02E13V003B 10/07/87 g
94 02E13V003A 10/07/87 22.5*
11/15/87 2.4*
Q2E13v004A 10/07/87 22.5*
11.3 11/15/87 2.4*
2.4 1.2 8
95 02G31v012 10/18/87 3.9 10/18/87 3.9 3.9 10/18/87 177.0 177.0 a.9 177.0 4
?
02G31v013 10/18/87 N 97B Q2P191N2228 10/07/87 8.1
':'n 11/23/87 15.0 02P19V004 10/07/87 818.0 8.1 11/23/87 0.0 '
15.0
, 0.0 4
i
- values represent total leakage from group sets of valves as physically tested.
fq. _
c
.c
'_ 73
.PAGE 5 i.
DEC LLRT02/7 I
w 4
g
,g
s TYPE C M5T Rr 5th REFUELING i
AS LEFT PENE.
AS F0tPO NO.
VALVE 10.
DPL18:
LEMUGE AS FolPO PER PDE.
DfL'11!:
LENUGE AS 12FT PER PERE.
(SC04)
MIN.
(SCCM)
MPLK.
MIN.
103 02E23v002 10/06/87 14.1*
10/06/87 14.1*
O2E23v003,,
10/06/87 14.1*
7.1 10/06/87 14.1*
14.1 7.1
'lf 292.'40 649.0 474.50
'rUmL PAGE 1 1UML PAGE 2
.i.
203.50 1715.9 382.70 ri.
i 238.6 49.50
- 'r..'.
55.81 1 URAL PAGE 3 a
s 196.2 28.18
.,-111.08 10mL PAGE 4
'IUmL PAGE 5
~p.
452.30 1552.2 691.60 l,
7.10 14.1
- 7.10 10mL PAGE 6 l
SUM 10mL PAGES 11HRll 6
- 1,122.19 4366.0 1633.58 i
r
's l
~
.l j
5 i g
, a.
i
=
=
t s
t k ' *. !'
. e.
i.
- values represent total leakage from group sets of valves.as physically tested.'
,- ', C.,
~...
DEC LIRr02/7 PAGE 6
,. g.
M'
_ _,