ML20054C816

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Insp Rept 50-047/71-01.Facility Should Be Reinspected within 1 Yr
ML20054C816
Person / Time
Site: 05000047
Issue date: 05/06/1971
From: Stohr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Robert Carlson
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML17298A033 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-81-311, FOIA-Z81-311 NUDOCS 8204210717
Download: ML20054C816 (1)


See also: IR 05000047/1971001

Text

.

.

UNITZ3 STATES

9

^

,

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

2o1"645-3962

2/

owision or coneU ANCE

l *l

  • ,

'

l

REGloN I

97o SRCAD STREET

NEWARK. NEW JERSEY 071o2

May 6, 1971

.

O

R. T. Carlson,. Senior Reactor Inspector

Y

/f

Region I, Division of Compliance

U. S. ARMY MATERI.M.S & MECFXIICS RESEARCH CE' ITER

CO REPORT NO. 47/71-1

Most of my pertinent co=ments are made in the Management Interview.

As the facility has been deactivated, we might as well handle items of

noncompliance other than the missing liquid effluent records by a

no reply required 592

Mr. O'Connor had an interesting comment that he didn't think it was a

good idea to have a reactor licensed for an extended period of time

after the personnel involved had become aware that the facility was to

be shut down.

I'd suggest that we go back to the facility within a year and then, if

there are no problems or changes, extending the interval between inspections

to as long as possible.

M

Stohr

( ) Radiation Specialist

.

,

?r. ;

=

e

V.

II

[.T.

-

%

.

N

8204210717 811005

PDR FOIA

KABAT-ZB1-311

PDR

..

.

-

_

Pr

r

--