ML20054C790

Submits Evaluation of IE Insp 50-047/75-01 on 751125. Principals Responsible for Administration of License Are Assigned Primary Functions in Other Areas & Appear to Devote Minimal Time to Reactor

ML20054C790
Person / Time
Site:	05000047
Issue date:	12/12/1975
From:	Norrholm L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:	Caphton D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML17298A033	List: IR 05000047/1971001 IR 05000047/1972001 IR 05000047/1974001 IR 05000047/1975001 IR 05000047/1976001 IR 05000047/1976002 IR 05000047/1977001 ML17298A032 ML20054C422 ML20054C424 ML20054C425 ML20054C427 ML20054C432 ML20054C440 ML20054C441 ML20054C442 ML20054C444 ML20054C447 ML20054C450 ML20054C505 ML20054C507 ML20054C511 ML20054C517 ML20054C534 ML20054C548 ML20054C554 ML20054C562 ML20054C565 ML20054C570 ML20054C571 ML20054C573 ML20054C574 ML20054C578 ML20054C580 ML20054C582 ML20054C587 ML20054C590 ML20054C591 ML20054C595 ML20054C599 ML20054C668 ML20054C672 ML20054C681 ML20054C685 ML20054C691 ML20054C696 ML20054C702 ML20054C704 ML20054C707 ML20054C709 ... further results
References
FOIA-81-311, FOIA-Z81-311 NUDOCS 8204210656
Download: ML20054C790 (1)

See also: IR 05000047/1975001

Text

.

. . . . .

.-....

. . . . -

..

. .,

.

)

r3

'

o

s

DEC 121975

D. L. Caphton, Section Leader 2 RO&NS Branch

AMMRC

DN 50-47 LIC R-65

INSPECTION 50-47/75-01

INSPECTOR'S EVALUATION

1.

On November 25, 1975, I conducted an inspection of the licensed

AMMRC reactor facility at Watertown, Massachusetts which has been

in " Standby" status since 1970. Findings are included in the

Inspection Report.

2.

There are no current plans to change the f acility status due pri-

marily to a lack of funding for dis =antling. One unsolicited pro-

posal to dis =antle, set the price at approx 1=ately Six106

~

3.

The principals responsible for administration of the license are

assigned pri=ary functions in other areas and, as a result, appear

to devote mini =al attention to the reactor.

Surveillance activ-

ities have been delegated to the Post Engineer and are receiving

little supervisory attention. The RSC had not =et for 18 =enths

and has conducted no Technical Specification required audits.

4.

Due primarily to the above indications of lack of attention and, in

keeping with a previous evaluation made by the Project Inspector in

July 1974, I plan to continue at least annual inspections for this

facility.

,

'1

O

'

k

.

y

'L.[J.Norrholm

Reactor Inspector

l

i

I

i

-

l

.

I

l

,

8204210656 011005

,

PDR FOIA

i

KADAT-Z81-311

PDR

^

---

-

_

. _ .

_

. . - ,

-

-

- - ~