ML20010C113

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commits to Amend Safeguards Contingency Plan by 810930.Amend Will Address Revised Compensatory Action for Guard Strike Contingency Event.Addl Comments for Resolution of Guard Training/Qualification Plan Will Be Submitted 810930
ML20010C113
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1981
From: Baynard P
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
3-081-13, 3-81-13, TAC-48450, NUDOCS 8108190133
Download: ML20010C113 (2)


Text

. _ _. -.

h Florida Power C O A 7 0 M A T 8 0 P6 h$N b2 I

g fj

  1. 3-081-13
h. y ) J /3 JN b

p AUs 181981m Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director

d. 3 8 MT" 5'

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

\\g 4e#Q7 I r a \\f U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, 0.0.

20555 y-

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 Docket No. 50-302 License Nc. DPR-72 Changes to Security Documents

Dear Mr. Denton:

Pursuant to the correspondence referenced below, verbal comunication and request by your staff, and the need to upgrade items in the security area, Florida Power Corporation (FPC) provides the following information.

Florida Power Corperation hereby comits to supply by September 30, 1981, an amendment to the Safeguards Contingency Plan for Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Power Plant which will address the revised compensatory action for a guard strike contingency event.

Florida Power Corporation will be providing additional coments for resolution of the Guard Training and Qualification Plan by September 30, 1981.

Ti.cse coments are as a result of further clarification by your Mr. R. B. Manili on the Staff's concerns as identified in your letter dated March 6, 1981, (Reid to Hancock) and responded to by our letter dated May 26, 1981, (Baynard to Stolz).

Also, pursuant to 10 CFR 73 5, an exception of 25% (13 months) to 10 CFR 73 Appendix B.II.E. is hereby requested by FFC to resolve an issue identified in the abe"e correspondence.

The proprietary justification for this exce request is submitted via reference to FPC response to coment number six (i)' ion 6 in our letter dated ' May 26, 1981, (Baynard to Stolz) and a non-proprietary justification is as follows.

Soo3 s

/o 0108190133 810814 PDR ADOCK 05000309 F

PDR General Office soi ininy-founn street soutn. P O Box 14042. St Petersburg. Flonda 33733 813-866-5151

i f-Mr. Harold R. Denton Pas 2 Auf3mt 14,1981 Prior to the program development and development of the Plan, FPC was of the opinion that the comitment to +3 months was acceptable.

Consequently, Plan development and materials that have already been formulated for training implementation under the Plan ant Appendix B were formulated around the concept of requalification on the basis of once every 12 +3 months.

The FPC training program has necescitated the reconfiguration of the Crystal River Security Force into a shift operation to ensure adequate requalification of the security force members.

Schedul ng requalification for all members of the security force in all facets of the training program on the basis of a 12 month cycle, utilizing the present shift configuration while meeting normal operation requirements, does not allow the desired flexibility which may be necessary to meet contingencies, such as outags or after unforeseen circumstances, which would require augnentation of the normal security force.

The +3 months allows the flexibility to train the personnel who may miss required training in a given cycle and must wait for the scheduled instruction to be given again.

Should there be any question concerning these three items, ple C e contact us.

Very truly yours, W

a Dr. P. Y. Baynard Manag r Nuclear Support Services DVH:mm cc: Mr. Victor Stello Director of Inspection & Enforement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection & Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta St., Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30303