ML20009D062

Requests Extension Until 811108 to Submit re-evaluation of Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment,Due to Lack of Info & Analyses

ML20009D062
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	07/17/1981
From:	Baynard P FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
3-071-24, 3-71-24, TAC-42512, NUDOCS 8107230078
Download: ML20009D062 (2)

Text

,

A J&

%u %pl CQg g

\\ bk@/

oar Roricia

.Po...w..e...r.

.g, July 17, 1981 W

hr' q Nq g' g O File:

3-0-3-a-4 L)

1. 3-071-24 He. John F. Stolz, Chief 2 '3 OU

• Operating Reactor Branch #4

'; " 8%*fym h )

Division of Licensing Q'

J/

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

[/

\\

Washington, D. C.

20555 yJ \\) '

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment

References:

(1) NRC Letter from Mr. J. F. Stolz to Mr. J. A.

Hancock, " Cry 3tal River Unit 3, Environmental Qualification of Safety-related Electrical Equipment Safety Evaluation Report," Dated June 5, 1981 (2) NRC Handout, " Expected Licensee Response to the Equipment Qualification SERs" by Zoltan R. Posztc.rczy, NRC's Equipment Qualification Meetin3, Dated July 7-10, 1981

Dear Mr. Stolz:

On June 8, 1981, Florida Pow %poration (FPC) received the Crystal RDier Unit 3, Environmental Qualifliacion of Safety-related Electrical Equipment Safety Evaluation Report (Reference 1).

This SER requested FPC to provide to the NRC by September 8, 1981, item by item reevaluation of environmental qualific.ation of electrical equipment included in our submittal of April 21, June 30, and October 31, 1980, to comply with the Order of Modification of License, dated October 24, 1980.

This letter is being submittM to request an extension on the 90-day subraittal.

Since the receipt of the SER, FPC has been working with Gilbert Associates, Inc., (GAI) on the required 90-day submittal.

Also, FPC and GAI personnel attended the NRC's Equipment Qualification meeting, July 7-10, 1981, held in Bethesda, Maryland.

Following this meeting, a detailed review of the SER and the " Expected Licensee Response to the Equipment Qualification SERs" [see Reference (2)] was made to identify the scope of work and schedule to develop the required response.

The scope of work as identified in Reference (2) will require until November 8,1981, for completion for the followinS reasons:

[g3 i

, 8107230078 810717 PDR ADOCK 05000302 P

PDR>

j6 General Office 3201 Thirty-fourth street souin. P O Box 14042. St Petersburg, Flonda 33733 813-866-5151

.4 V

Mr. John F. Stolz Page 2 July 17, 1981 1)

The amount of information and analysis required cannot be properly gathered in the allotted time, since analysis is required on an item by item basis f.a order'to make the required commitment for correction action.

2)

The SER response work will be coincidental with significant design work in progress as a result of 1NI-2 Action Plan items, Fire Protection Modifications, and preparation for a 1981 refueling outage (September 19 until December 4, 1981).

Therefore, our response to the SER will be submitted on or before November 8, 1981.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact this office.

Very truly yours, e

Dr. P.

. Ba nard Manager Nuclear Support Services WGL:m

-