Similar Documents at Byron |
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20094D4401984-08-0606 August 1984 Request for Suppls to Util Amended Responses to Interrogatories 11 & 12.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20093G1391984-07-19019 July 1984 Answers to Third Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20090C3051984-07-10010 July 1984 Answers to Intervenor Second Set of Interrogatories Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20090C3571984-07-10010 July 1984 Third Set of Interrogatories Re Documents of Meetings & Contractor & Consultant Correspondence.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20092P2521984-06-28028 June 1984 Second Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20092N1771984-06-25025 June 1984 Response to First Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20197H5221984-06-15015 June 1984 Second Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20197H6891984-06-14014 June 1984 Second Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20091M2711984-06-0606 June 1984 Response to Applicant First Set of Interrogatories & First Request for Production of Documents.Certification of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20090L1981984-05-18018 May 1984 First Request to Intervenors for Production of Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20090L2061984-05-18018 May 1984 First Set of Interrogatories to Intervenors,Requesting List of Witnesses to Be Presented on Intervenors Behalf at Reopened Hearings & Summary of Testimony.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20084K6751984-05-0909 May 1984 First Request to Comm Ed for Production of Documents Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20084K4931984-05-0909 May 1984 First Set of Interrogatories to Comm Ed for Production of Documents Re Reinsp Program ML20079J3571982-12-22022 December 1982 Answers to NRC Second Set of Interrogatories Re Contention 1A.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066J2511982-11-18018 November 1982 Page 16 of Util Response to Rockford League of Women Voters First Interrogatories & Request for Documents,Inadvertently Omitted ML20066J2631982-11-17017 November 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20065R6911982-10-25025 October 1982 Answers to NRC Amended First Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20065P9521982-10-22022 October 1982 Proposed First Set of Interrogatories.Proposed Motion for Production of Documents by NRC & Proof of Svc Encl ML20065M7281982-10-15015 October 1982 First Interrogatories & Request for Documents.Proof of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20065M4781982-10-15015 October 1982 Reply to Amended First Request for Production of Documents. Proof of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20065M4761982-10-15015 October 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories,Pursuant to ASLB 821020 Memorandum & Order.Verification & Proof of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20063N7511982-10-0505 October 1982 Answers to Amended Second Round of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069D5621982-09-10010 September 1982 Request for Info Re D4-D5 Model Steam Generators at Byron & Krsko Plants & for Documents.Related Correspondence ML20063M3371982-09-0303 September 1982 Amended Second Round of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents,Pursuant to 820818 Stipulation. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20062B0821982-07-30030 July 1982 Response to First Round of Interrogatories Re Financial Qualifications,Need for Power & Alternative Energy Sources ML20062B0671982-07-30030 July 1982 Response to First Request for Production of Documents Re Financial Qualifications,Need for Power & Alternative Energy Sources ML20054J5301982-06-24024 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories,Originally Served on 800312. Proofs of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20053D2641982-05-20020 May 1982 Interrogatories on SER & Supplemental SER to Be Answered by Util & Nrc.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E3851982-03-0202 March 1982 Supplemental Response to Util Request for Addl Info on Contention 8.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20049H8941982-02-24024 February 1982 Supplemental Response to Util Request for Addl Info Re Contention 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040D5771982-01-21021 January 1982 Response to Util First Round of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20010B1771981-08-0505 August 1981 Objections to Util First Round of Interrogatories. Interrogatories Are Premature & Not Presently Applicable. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20009B7031981-07-0808 July 1981 First Round of Interrogatories Directed to Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy & Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20009B7041981-07-0808 July 1981 First Round of Interrogatories Directed to Rockford League of Women Voters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19345G8761981-04-13013 April 1981 Response to Applicant Second Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML19309C7081980-03-12012 March 1980 First Set of Interrogatories.Includes Questions Re Intervenors' Revised Contentions & Deviations Occurring Since Issuance of Cp.Proof of Svc Encl ML19322E6331980-03-12012 March 1980 First Interrogatories Directed to Nrc.Includes Request for Specific Description of Deviation,Nonconformity or Change Occurring After CP Issuance.Proof of Svc Encl ML20039E6261980-01-0101 January 1980 Response to NRC First Request for Production of Documents. Related Correspondence 1984-08-06
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20149M2951996-11-29029 November 1996 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 Re Safety Margins Recommended in ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Case N-514 TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20059C2351993-12-17017 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20044A8111990-06-27027 June 1990 Comment Opposing Closure of Lpdr of Rockford Public Library ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20214X1871987-06-11011 June 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Based on Four Severity Level III Violations Noted During 860721-0808 Insp ML20205Q1711987-04-0202 April 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000. App Re Evaluations & Conclusions Encl IR 05000812/20100311987-02-26026 February 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $100,000 Based on Violations Noted During Insps on 850812-1031 ML20210T7321987-02-11011 February 1987 Unexecuted Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-97 Substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Indemnity Agreement in Entirety W/ Listed License Numbers,Effective 870130 ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20213G4381986-10-24024 October 1986 Unexecuted Amend 5 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Agreement in Entirety W/Listed License Numbers,Effective on 861106 ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 IR 05000506/20070221986-05-0202 May 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 for Violations Noted During Insp on 850506-0722.Violations Noted:Failure to Establish Radiological Safety Procedures & to Adequately Train Personnel ML20138C7301985-12-0909 December 1985 Order Imposing Civil Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Per 850606 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.Licensee May Request Hearing within 30 Days of Date of Order ML20205E8741985-10-28028 October 1985 Exemption from GDC 4 of 10CFR50,App a Requirement to Install Protective Devices Associated W/Postulated Pipe Breaks Primary Coolant Sys.Topical Rept Evaluation Encl ML20102A2981985-01-0707 January 1985 Petition Requesting Aslab Grant Intervenor Appeal & Order Further Hearings on Safety of Plant ML20099L2581984-11-27027 November 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20099G5381984-11-23023 November 1984 Supplemental Appeal Brief in Response to Intervenor 841106 Supplemental Brief on Appeal & in Support of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ol. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20100K0411984-11-22022 November 1984 Submits Concerns Re Safety of Local Residents in Event of Accident & Excessively High Cost of Projected Operation of Facility ML20107H7841984-11-0606 November 1984 Supplemental Brief on Appeal of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Granting Authority for Issuance of Ol. Decision Should Be Reversed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140E4081984-10-31031 October 1984 Executed Amend 1 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,deleting Items 2A & 3 in Entirety ML20098G8841984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of RW Manz & W Faires Re Findings 3-11 Through 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098G8681984-10-0202 October 1984 Answer to Intervenor Motion to Reopen Record Re Bechtel Independent Design Review.Motion Should Be Denied ML20098G8901984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Kj Green & RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8911984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Cw Dick & EM Hughes Re Independent Design Insp ML20098G8821984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Kj Green Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Mechanical Engineering Work ML20098G8741984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Br Shelton Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8881984-09-29029 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Structural Design ML20098G8831984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of W Faires Re Findings 3-15 & 3-16 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept ML20098G8811984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of Cw Dick Re Independent Design Review ML20098G8791984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RP Tuetken Re Readiness for Fuel Loading ML20098G8781984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Manz Concerning Findings 3-11 Through 3-14 & 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Re Westinghouse ML20098G8871984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of EM Hughes Re Idvp ML20098G8851984-09-27027 September 1984 Affidavit of Rl Heumann Re Costs of Delay in Startup & Operation of Unit 1 ML20098E2371984-09-24024 September 1984 Reply to Intervenor 840918 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097E7221984-09-13013 September 1984 Agreed Motion for Time Extension Until 841101 to File Petition for Hearing Re Emergency Planning Commitment W ML20097C5311984-09-12012 September 1984 Motion to Reopen Record to Include Plant Design as Issue. Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097B7791984-09-10010 September 1984 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision Re Reinsp Program. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6441984-08-28028 August 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Related Correspondence ML20112D5271984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-4,consisting of Feb 1984 Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D5031984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-5,consisting of June 1984 Suppl to Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D7441984-08-23023 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-1,consisting of Undated List of Teutken Safety Category Insp Types ML20112D7511984-08-21021 August 1984 Staff Exhibit S-R-1,consisting of 840813 Instruction for Walkdown of Cable Tray Hanger Connection Welds ML20112D4641984-08-21021 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-11,consisting of Undated Chronological Date Listing of Util Responses to Interrogatory 12.VA Judson to Mi Miller Re Interrogatory 12 & Supplemental Responses Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] |
Text
, ~
8%I? D Colu;Ewuxyg3gg NC l %
,f'5% -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA /'e .;
r NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM*1ISSION !! i, '" 44 l' . 7 G; i
\
\ ....:
- ,~' ~Uh* h
- ::::, r In the Matter of ) 9 ' O.Tl:2
) A },EJn. ) -
/
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., Docket Nos. STN ->/ j g g #
Byron Station ) 50-454 and 50-455
)
(Units No. 1 and No. 2) ) Operating License LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS' FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2.740b, the League of Homen Voters of Rockford, Illinois (" League") requests that Commonwealth Edison Co., by an officer with knowledge, answer the following interrogatories separately and fully in writing, under oath or affirmation, within 14 days after service.
PLEASE OBSERVE the definitions and instructions contained in I below. These definitions and instructions are an essential part of these Interrogatories and have been provided to you in order to describe with resonable particu-larity the information requested herein.
I DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS The following definitions and instructions snall be used and applied by you in connection with your answer to
~
these Interrogatories. ,
G se*E"
- 1. " Communication" shall mean and include all
" documents" as hereinafter defined and all written, oral, tele-phonic or other inquiries, discussions, conversations, negotiations, agreements, understandings, meetings, letters, notes, telegrams, advertisements, press releases, publicity releases, trade releases, and interviews.
- 2. As used herein, " document" includes, but is not limited to, written " communication" (as defined), in any form, papers, photographs, films, recordings, memoranda, books, records, accounts, communications, writings, letters, telegrams, mailgrams, correspondence, notes of meetings or of conversations or of phone calls, interoffice memoranda or written communica-tions of any nature, recordings of conversations either in writing or upon any mechanical or electronic or electrical recording devices, notes, accountant's statements or summaries, budgets, exhibits, appraisals, work papers, reports, projects, tabulations, purchase orders, invoices, cancelled checks or check stubs, receipts, studies, surveys, legal opinions, affi-davits, interrogatories, legal briefs, legal motions, judgments, complaints, legal complaints, answers, legal answers, counter-claims, vouchers, minutes of meetings, designs, drawings, plans, manuals, notebooks, worksheets, contracts, agreements, letter agreements, bills of lading, warehouse receipts, timesheets, promissory notes, diaries, desk calendars, circulars, charts, logs, ledgers, schedules, transcripts, news releases, advertise-ments, press books, advertising materials, publicity releases, trade releases, press releases, teletype messages, licenses, permits, financial statements, appointment books, payment records, stenographers' notebooks, punchcards and computer printout sheets, computer data, telecopier transmissions, articles of incorporation, articles of association, by-laws, rules, expense records, criteria, regulations, directives, hotel charges, stock transfer books, proposals, prospeccuses, offers, orders, logs, objections, brochures, films, rictures, video tapes, video cassettes, inquiries, contracts, evalua-tions, promotional material, production and sales or license material, whether formal or informal; and all drafts, revi-sions, and differing versions (whether formal or informal) of any of the foregoing, and also all copies of any of the fore-going which differ in any way (including handwritten notations or other written or printed matter of any nature) from the original.
- 3. The term " relate to" or " relating to" shall mean: consist of, refer to, reflect or be in any way logically or factually connected with the matter discussed.
- 4. The words "and," and "or" shall be read herein in the conjunctive or disjunctive or both, as the case may be, all to the end that the interpretation be applied which results in the more expansive answer.
- 5. If you claim privilege regarding (or advance any reason or objection for not providing) any information requested herein, please set forth with particularity all underlying reasons therefor, and identify and maintain all related documents and communications for possible inspection and/or ruling by a Licensing Board or Court.
II INTERROGATORIES Interrogatory No. 1 Under date of March 10, 1980, the League filed its Revised Contentions in this proceeding. A substantial number of the contentions raised safety issues, applicable to Byron, which have been identified by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff both generically and specifically as a result of many
~
separate NUREGS and the Three Mile Island accident and subse-quent investigations thereof. Generically by definition means applicable to all reactors (of a certain class, e.g. , PWRs) ;
yet often Commonwealth Edison and the NRC Staff take the circular position that one must prove that such " generic" issues apply to a power plant, even though the Staff has admitted they do, both specifically and by labeling the issue
" generic". ricreover, other of these Revised Contentions raise substantial and important environmental issues.
In order to avoid any controversy and to avoid procedural arguments which tend to obscure the merits and seriousness of the request to license for operation the Byron l
Units, you are directed to provide the following information l
in writing, under oath, and separately with respect to each Revised Contention set forth in the " Revised Contentions of Intervenor Rockford League of Women Voters" filed under date of, and served upon you on, March 10, 1980. Your answers shall specifically address itself to each of the 146 Revised Contentions and shall include the following information:
A. Separately with respect to each Revised Contention filed by the League under date of March 10, 1980, state in writing, under oath, and in specific detail:
(i) Do you agree that each Revised Conten-tion is related or applicable to, in whole or in part, a consideration of continued construction and/or permission to operate each or both of the Byron Units? If your answer to this question with respect to any Revised Contention is yes, please explain your answer in detail. If your answer to this question is no with respect to any Revised Contention, please explain your answer in detail, including all factual and other reasons why you believe each such Revised Contention is unrelated or inapplicable to the Byron Units; (ii) With respect to each "no" answer in (i) above regarding the Revised Contentions, state, answering in specific detail, whether it is your position that the problem or issue raised by each such Revised Contention is totally inapplicable and unrelated to the Byron Units, in the sense that no consideration of any kind need be had concerning each such Revised Contention's relation or applica-bility to the Byron Units; (iii) If any part of your answer to (i) or (ii) above relating to any Revised Contention is based in whole or in part upon the position that the subject matter of a Revised Contention is ,
inapplicable (or unrelated) because (1) the subject matter has been considered at the construction phase hearing of the Byron Units; (2) the subject matter is barred from consideration at the operating hearings herein by a NRC regulation, rule, criteria, policy or convention; or (3) a Revised Contention has not specifically set forth a sufficient nexus (within the meaning of the River Bend Decision, ALAB-444, 6 N.R.C. 760 (1977)) regarding the Byron Units, then with respect to each such answer regard-ing each such Revised Contention, please also state in specific detail, giving reasons for your position:
(a) Regarding (iii) (1) above, have any facts or events occurred subsequent to the issuance of the construction permits herein, which present a sufficient ground for re-examining the subject matter of the Revised Contention at the operating stage _herein; l
l 1
(b) Regarding (iii) (2) above, what NRC regulation, rule, criteria, policy or conven-tion bars consideration of the subject matter of the Revised Contention, and does there exist any reason for waiving the applicability of any such regulation, rule, policy, criteria or convention to this proceeding; and (c) Regarding (111) (3) above, what fact, opinion, or other analysis of which you are aware (specifically and in detail exp.laining such fact, opinion or other analysis) which can form the basis for a sufficient nexus to the Byron Units; in connection with your answer to this subpart, if you state you are unaware of any facts, opinions, or analyses which can form such nexus, please also state in detail whether you believe it is impossible, as a matter of scientific or environmental application, for any nexus to be supplied whatsoever. -
Interrogatory No. 2 Please describe in specific detail each instance of which you have knowledge which relates to any deviation or non-conformity or change occurring or taking place since the issuance of the construction permits for the Byron Units (believed to be December 31, 1975) , whether approved or nonapproved by any applicable authority (but in such case state whether approval has been requested of or granted by any such applicable authority) by Commonwealth Edison Co. relating to the Byron Units in each or any of the following categories:
A. The construction permit applications; B. The Construction permits; C. Actual Construction; D. Any commitment by Commonwealth Edison made, whether before or after issuance of the construction 1
permits, but in connection with construction; E. Design or redesign of any safety related item; F. Design or redesign of any non-safety related item; G. Any rule, regulation, criteria, guide, convention, policy, or suggestion by the NRC or any component thereof; H. Design bases and/or margins of safety; I. Quality assurance or quality control; J. Research and development programs which will be, have been, or are being conducted to resolve any safety or environmental questions; K. The construction budget; L. The total cost of construction (including all amounts spent in purchase of any item);
M. Any of the specific matters set forth in 10 C.F.R.
S 50.34 (b) (6) (7) and (9), and 10 C.F.R. S 50.34 (d);
N. Any of the specific matters set forth in 10 C.F.R.
S 50.55;
- o. The financial qualifications of Commonwealth Edison Co.; and P. The technical and managerial qualifications of Commonwealth Edison Co.
Interrogatory No. 3 Identify.with specific particularity (including dates, addressor, addressee and subject matter) each document and communication which you either:
A. Have consulted or in any way reviewed in connec-tion with any of your answers to these interrogatories; and/or B. Beli. eve should be considered or reviewed in connection with any such answer, in both cases specifying also in detail which and in what manner each such document and communication relates to any of your-answers herein.
ROCKFORD LEAGUE OF WOMEN. VOTERS l
e- . .
/ C1 By: , hM / IU its Attorney D
1.
Myron M. Cherry CHERRY, FLYNN & KANTER ,
One IBM Plaza -
Suite 4501 Chicago, Illinois 60611 (312) 565-1177
C,0pyESPONDENCE PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was served, postage prepaid and properly addressed, on counsel of record, members of the Licensing Board, and the Secretary-Docketing Section of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission this 12th day of March, 1980.
~' l I f
, oi l b5i. / // '
MYRoN . CHERRY p fc [
, c=m3 e v -
USIG.;
p f.'AR 17 geg, d 0$9..cfes se::eq OJ - ir.:ce:-::e D.-
e Cy d b
(
.