|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20196G4021999-06-18018 June 1999 Comment on FRN Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy NUREG-1600, Rev 1 & Amend of 10CFR55.49.Concurs with Need to Provide Examples That May Be Used as Guidance in Determining Appropriate Severity Level for Violations as Listed ML20206H1881999-05-0606 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App K Re ECCS Evaluation Models. Commission Grants Licensee Exemption ML20206H2221999-05-0404 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 That Would Allow STP Nuclear Operating Co to Apply ASME Code Case N-514 for Determining Plant Cold Overpressurization Mitigation Sys Pressure Setpoint.Commission Grants Exemption ML20206M5111999-04-30030 April 1999 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1083 Re Content of UFSAR IAW 10CFR50.71(e). Recommends That Listed Approach Be Adopted for Changes to Documents Incorporated by Ref CY-99-007, Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-0071999-02-22022 February 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-007 TXX-9825, Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps ML20195C7541998-11-0505 November 1998 Order Approving Application Re Proposed Corporate Merger of Central & South West Corp & American Electric Power Co,Inc.Commission Approves Application Re Merger Agreement Between Csw & Aep ML20155H5511998-11-0202 November 1998 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Re Submission of Revs to UFSAR ML20154C4101998-09-30030 September 1998 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Comanche Peak Electric Station Endorses NEI Comment Ltr & Agrees with NEI Recommendations & Rationale ML20248K5051998-06-0909 June 1998 Confirmatory Order Modifying License (Effective Immediately).Answer for Request for Hearing Shall Not Stay Immediate Effectiveness of Order ML20216E1051998-04-0707 April 1998 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1029 Titled Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic & Radio-Frequency Interference in Safety-related Instrumentation & Control Sys NOC-AE-000109, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to 10CFR50.55a, Industry Codes & Standards.South Texas Project Fully Endorses Comments to Be Provided by NEI1998-03-30030 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to 10CFR50.55a, Industry Codes & Standards.South Texas Project Fully Endorses Comments to Be Provided by NEI ML20217H3611998-03-26026 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft GL 97-XX, Lab Testing of Nuclear Grade Charcoal, Issued on 980225.Advises That There Will Be Addl Implementation Costs ML20198Q4851998-01-16016 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by P Crane That Requests NRC Amend Regulations Re Emergency Planning to Require Consideration of Sheltering,Evacuation & Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public ML20211A4871997-09-12012 September 1997 Changes Submittal Date of Response to NRC RAI Re Proposed CPSES risk-informed Inservice Testing Program & Comments on NRC Draft PRA Documents ML20149L0311997-07-21021 July 1997 Comment on Draft Guides DG-1048,DG-1049 & DG-1050.Error Identified in Last Line of DG-1050,item 1.3 of Section Value/Impact Statement.Rev 30 Should Be Rev 11 ML20140A4871997-05-27027 May 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Safety Conscious Work Environ.Util Agrees W/Nuclear Energy Inst Comment Ltr ML20137U3531997-04-0808 April 1997 Order Approving Application Re Formation of Operating Company & Transfer of Operating Authority ML20133G5411996-12-0505 December 1996 Transcript of 961205 Meeting in Arlington,Tx Re Comanche Peak Thermo-Lag Fire Barriers. Pp 1-111 ML20135B7881996-11-29029 November 1996 Order Approving Corporate Restructuring of TU to Facilitate Acquistion of Enserch Corp ML20128M8011996-10-0303 October 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Generic Communication, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations ML20116B8871996-07-19019 July 1996 Transcript of 960719 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Re Apparent Violations of NRC Requirements at Plant ML20097D7321996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re CPSES Request for Amend to Its Regulations Dealing W/Emergency Planning to Include Requirement That Emergency Planning Protective Actions for General Public Include Listed Info ML20094Q6421995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for RM PRM-50-62 Re Amend to Regulation Re QAPs Permitting NPP Licensees to Change Quality Program Described in SAR W/O NRC Prior Approval If Changes Do Not Potentially Degrade Safety or Change TSs ML20094H4801995-11-0808 November 1995 Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Proposed Rules 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel or high-level Radwaste TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20091M6441995-08-25025 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Believes That NRC Should Reconsider Need for Ipap or SALP in Light of Redundancy ML20086M7921995-07-0707 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed GL Process for Changes to Security Plan Without Prior NRC Approval ML20084A0181995-05-19019 May 1995 Comment Suporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Containment Leakage Testing.Supports NEI Comments ML20077M7311994-12-30030 December 1994 Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20077L8711994-12-22022 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50,55 & 73 Re Reduction of Reporting Requirements Imposed on NRC Licensees ML20073B6951994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Authorizing Signing & Filing W/Nrc OL Amend Request 94-016 ML20073B6731994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Re License Amend Request 94-015 ML20072P5441994-07-13013 July 1994 Testimony of Rl Stright Re Results of Liberty Consulting Groups Independent Review of Prudence of Mgt of STP ML20092C3911993-11-15015 November 1993 Partially Deleted Response of Rl Balcom to Demand for Info ML20092C4031993-11-15015 November 1993 Partially Deleted Response of Hl&P to Demand for Info ML20058E0561993-11-10010 November 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule Re Staff Meetings Open to Public. Believes That NRC Has Done Well in Commitment to Provide Public W/Fullest Practical Access to Its Activities ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process ML20045D8321993-06-11011 June 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54, FSAR Update Submittals. ML20044F3271993-05-21021 May 1993 Comments on Draft NRC Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp, Fr Vol 58,Number 52.NRC Should Use EPRI Definitions for Critical Characteristics ML20044D3311993-05-0404 May 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Mod of TS Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans ML20056C0831993-03-19019 March 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Petitioners Motion to Stay Issuance of Full Power License.* Licensee Urges NRC to Reject Petitioners Motion & to Deny Petitioners Appeal of 921215 Order.Motion Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056C1881993-03-17017 March 1993 Order.* Directs Util to Respond to Motion by COB 930319 & NRC to Respond by COB 930322.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930317 ML20128F6221993-02-0303 February 1993 Transcript of 930203 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote Public Meeting in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-2.Related Info Encl ML20128D9651993-02-0303 February 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Stay Request Filed by Petitioners Denied.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930203 ML20128D3391993-02-0202 February 1993 Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioners Specific Requests Listed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D4651993-02-0202 February 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioner Request Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Meet Heavy Burden Imposed on Party.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D6321993-01-29029 January 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Denies Citizens for Fair Util Regulation for Fr Notice Hearing on Proposed Issuance of OL for Facility.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930129 ML20128D3461993-01-29029 January 1993 NRC Staff Notification of Issuance of OL for Facility.* Low Power License May Be Issued by 930201.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127L9181993-01-26026 January 1993 NRC Staff Reply to Cfur Request for Publication of Proposed Action Re Licensing of Unit 2.* Cfur Request That Notice Re Licensing of Unit 2 Be Published Permitting Parties to Request Hearings Should Be Denied 1999-06-18
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20056C0831993-03-19019 March 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Petitioners Motion to Stay Issuance of Full Power License.* Licensee Urges NRC to Reject Petitioners Motion & to Deny Petitioners Appeal of 921215 Order.Motion Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D4651993-02-0202 February 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioner Request Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Meet Heavy Burden Imposed on Party.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D3391993-02-0202 February 1993 Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioners Specific Requests Listed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127L9091993-01-25025 January 1993 Tx Util Electric Response to Citizens for Fair Util Regulation Request of 930113.* Request Fails to Raise Worthy Issue & Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G9441993-01-19019 January 1993 TU Electric Brief in Opposition to Petitioners Appeal of ASLB Memorandum & Order.* Requests That Petitioners Appeal Be Denied & Licensing Board 921215 Memorandum & Order Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G7451993-01-14014 January 1993 NRC Staff Response to Motion of Petitioners RM Dow & SL Dow, (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station),For Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G7941993-01-12012 January 1993 Opposition of TU Electric to Motion for Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station) & RM Dow.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A6131993-01-0707 January 1993 Motion for Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief.* Petitioners Did Not Receive Order in Time to Appeal & Requests 15 Day Extension from Motion Filing Date to Respond.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A7911992-12-31031 December 1992 Petitioner Amended Motion for Continuance to File Appeal Brief.* Petitioners Requests Until C.O.B. on 930108 to File Appeal Brief.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A7641992-12-30030 December 1992 Petitioner Motion for Continuance to File Appeal Brief.* Counsel Requests That Petitioners Be Granted Until 930109 to File Brief in Support of Notice of Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128C9751992-12-0303 December 1992 NRC Staff Response to Motion to Compel Disclosure of Info Secreted by Restrictive Agreements & Notification of Addl Evidence Supporting Petition to Intervene by B Orr,D Orr, J Macktal & Hasan.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20128B8721992-11-27027 November 1992 NRC Staff Response to Motion for Rehearing by RM Dow, Petitioner.* Motion for Rehearing Should Be Denied for Reasons Explained in Encl.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128A0271992-11-25025 November 1992 Texas Utilities Electric Co Answer to Motion to Compel Disclosure of Info Secreted by Restrictive Agreements.* Util Requests That Petitioners 921118 Motion to Compel Be Denied in Entirety.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127P8181992-11-25025 November 1992 Texas Utilities Electric Co Answer to Notification of Addl Evidence Supporting Petition to Intervene.* Petitioners Notification Procedurally Improper & Substantively Improper & Should Be Rejected by Board.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116M4591992-11-19019 November 1992 TU Electric Opposition to Motion for Rehearing by RM Dow.* RM Dow 921110 Motion for Rehearing Should Be Denied.W/ Certificate of Svc ML20127M4271992-11-15015 November 1992 Motion to Compel Disclosure of Info Secreted by Restrictive Agreements.* Petitioners Bi Orr,Di Orr,Jj Macktal & SMA Hasan Requests That Board Declare Null & Void Any & All Provisions in Settlement Agreements.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116M3181992-11-10010 November 1992 Motion for Prehearing by RM Dow,Petitioner.* Requests Period of Ten Days to File Supplemental Pleading to Original Petition.Certificate of Svc & Statement Encl ML20106D8881992-10-0808 October 1992 Opposition of Util to Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow Doing Business as Disposbale Workers of Plant & RM Dow.* Request for Extension of Time & to Become Party to Proceeding Should Be Rejected.W/Certificate of Svc ML20106D2821992-10-0505 October 1992 Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow Doing Business as Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station & RM Dow.* Petitioner Requests 30-day Extension.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101P5891992-06-30030 June 1992 Response of Texas Utils Electric to Comments of Cap Rock Electric Cooperative,Inc. Dispute Strictly Contractual Issue Involving Cap Rock Efforts to Annul Reasonable Notice Provisions of 1990 Power Supply Agreement ML20101K1131992-06-29029 June 1992 Motion for Leave to Suppl Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas & Supplemental Info.* OI Policy Unfair & Violative of Subpoenaed Individuals Statutory Rights & Goes Beyond Investigatory Authority.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101G2041992-06-18018 June 1992 Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas.* Requests Mod of Subpoenas Due to Manner in Which Ofc of Investigations Seeks to Enforce Is Unreasonable & Fails to Protect Statutory Rights of Subpoenaed Individuals.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127K8141992-05-19019 May 1992 Request to Institute Proceeding to Modify,Suspend or Revoke License Held by Util for Unit 1 & for Cause Would Show Commission That Primary Place of Registration for Organization Is Fort Worth,Tarrant County,Tx ML20096A6281992-05-0707 May 1992 Applicants Reply to Opposition cross-motions for Summary Disposition & Responses to Applicants Motion for Summary Disposition.* Applicants Conclude NRC Has No Authority to Retain Antitrust Licensing Conditions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20095C4691992-04-17017 April 1992 TU Electric Answer to Application for Hearings & Oral Argument by M Dow & SL Dow.* Concludes That NRC Should Deny Application for Oral Argument & Hearings on Petition to Intervene & Motion to Reopen.W/Certificate of Svc ML20091E2561992-04-0606 April 1992 Application to Secretary for Hearings & Oral Argument in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene out-of-time & Motion to Reopen Record Submitted by SL Dow Dba Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station & RM Dow.* ML20094K4161992-03-16016 March 1992 TU Electric Answer to Petition to Intervene & Motion & Supplemental Motion to Reopen by M Dow & SL Dow & TU Electric Request for Admonition of Dows.* Concludes That Motion Should Be Dismissed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20091A0461992-03-13013 March 1992 Suppl to Motion to Reopen Record.* Requests That NRC Reopen Record & Suspend License Pending New Hearings on Issue. W/Certificate of Svc ML20090C4241992-02-24024 February 1992 Motion to Reopen Record.* Requests That NRC Reopen Record & Suspend OL for Unit 1 & CP for Unit 2,pending Reopening & Final Decision.W/Certificate of Svc ML20090C4431992-02-21021 February 1992 Petition for Leave to Intervene Out of Time.* Requests That Petition for Leave to Intervene Out of Time Be Granted for Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116F2671992-02-19019 February 1992 Requests NRC to Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility ML20094E9511992-02-10010 February 1992 Requests That NRC Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility & to Adequately Train All Util Employees in Use of Rev 3 to Work Process Program ML20086Q3121991-12-26026 December 1991 Case Motion for Leave to File Response to Portions of Motion of R Micky & Dow to Reopen Record.* Requests That NRC Recognize J Ellis as Case Representative for Filing & Pleading Purposes.W/Limited Notice of Appearance ML20086Q3811991-12-26026 December 1991 Case Response to Portions of Motion of R Micky & Dow to Reopen Record.* Submits Responses to Motions to Reopen Record ML20091G2511991-12-0202 December 1991 Licensee Answer to Motion to Reopen Record by M Dow & SL Dow.* Requests That Petitioners Motion Be Denied for Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc & Notices of Appearance ML20086G7381991-11-22022 November 1991 Motion to Reopen Record.* Requests That Licensing Board Reopen Record & Grant Leave to File Motion to Intervene. W/Certificate of Svc ML20006C4811990-02-0101 February 1990 Applicant Answer to Request for Stay by Citizens for Fair Util Regulation (Cfur).* Cfur Failed to Satisfy Burden to Demonstrate Necessity for Stay & Request Should Be Denied. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20006B1691990-01-27027 January 1990 Second Request for Stay Citizens for Fail Util Regulation.* Requests That NRC Stay Fuel Loading & Low Power Operation of Unit 1 Until 900209.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20006A0281990-01-0808 January 1990 J Corder Response to NRC Staff Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Requests Protective Order Until NRC Makes Documents Available to Corder by FOIA or Directly.W/Certificate of Svc ML20005G1431989-12-11011 December 1989 Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Protective Order Requested on Basis That Subpoena Will Impose Undue Financial Hardship on J Corder ML20248J3601989-10-15015 October 1989 Request for Stay Citizens for Fair Util Regulation.* Requests That Commission Retain Authority to Order That Fuel Loading & Low Power License Not Be Immediately Effective,Per Util Intent to Request License.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20246B8671989-08-17017 August 1989 Motion for Reconsideration of NRC Memorandum & Order CLI-89-14.* NRC Should Excuse Itself from Consideration on Matters Re Jj Macktal & Should Refer All Issues on NRC Requested Subpoena to Independent Adjudicatory Body ML20248D6291989-08-0202 August 1989 Jj Macktal Statement Re Motion for Recusation.* Macktal Motion Considered Moot Due to Commission No Longer Having Jurisdiction to Consider Motion Since Macktal Not Party to Proceeding Before Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247Q3851989-07-26026 July 1989 Withdrawal of Motion to Reopen Record.* Withdraws 890714 Motion to Reopen Record.W/Certificate of Svc ML20245J7331989-07-26026 July 1989 Request of Cap Rock for Reevaluation of Director'S Determination That No Significant Changes in Licensee Activity Warrant Antitrust Review at OL Stage.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20247B5901989-07-19019 July 1989 Motion to Reopen Record.* Requests Board to Reopen Record & Grant Leave to Renew Earlier Motion for Intervention Status. W/Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc ML20248D5541989-07-0303 July 1989 Motion for Recusation.* Requests That NRC Recuse from Deciding on Macktal Cases on Basis That NRC Will Not Be Fair & Impartial Tribunal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20248D5731989-07-0303 July 1989 Motion for Reconsideration.* Requests Reconsideration of NRC 890122 Order on Basis That NRC Subpoena Filed for Improper Purposes & NRC Lacks Jurisdiction Over Matters Presently Before Dept of Labor ML20245J9411989-06-30030 June 1989 Response of Texas Utils Electric Co to Request of Cap Rock Electric Cooperative,Inc,For Order Enforcing & Modifying Antitrust License Conditions ML20248D4891989-06-13013 June 1989 Motion for Protective Order.* Requests That Jj Macktal Deposition Be Taken at Stated Address in Washington,Dc & That Testimony Remain Confidential.W/Certificate of Svc 1993-03-19
[Table view] |
Text
-
- ~ f UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BF? ORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER ) Docke t Nos. 50-4 98A COMPANY, ~et al. ) 50-499A
)
(South Texas Project, Units )
1 a nd 2 ) )
)
TEXAS UPILITIES GENERATING ) Docke t Nos. 50-4 4 5A COMPANY, -et al. ) 50-445A
)
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric )
Station, Units 1 and 2 ) )
COMMENTS AND REQUEST OF CERTAIN FLORIDA CITIES IN RESPONSE TO HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND DEPOSITION TESTIMONY BY THE PUBLIC UPILITIES BOARD OF BROWNSVILLE'S EXPERT WITNESS, JOHN W. WILSON Certain Florida Cities 1/ hereby respond to the April 3, 1980 motion of Houston Lighting & Power Company (" Houston") insofar as Houston moves to compel the production of documents and deposi-tion testimony by the Public Utilities Board of Brownsville's
(" PUB") expert witness John W. Wilson concerning a nuclear power market in Florida. Florida Cities do not oppose such discovery if it is subject to a protective order that rigorously protects Cities' rig hts .
1/ The City of Gainesville, the Lake Worth Utilities Authority, the Utilities Commission of New Smyrna Beach, the Sebring Utilities Commission, and the Cities of Alachua , Bartow, Ft.
Meade, Homestead , Kissimmee , Mt. Dora, Newberry, St. Cloud, Starke , and Tallahassee , Florida.
80042pn E
Florida Cities are plaintiffs in Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority et al. v. Florida Power & Light Company, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 79-5101.
In that case the Florida Cities allege tha t , among other thing s ,
there is a nuclear power market in Florida. Florida Cities have -
notified defendant Florida Power & Light Company ("FP&L") that Dr. Wilson is an expert for the Cities in the Florida case and !
they are considering presenting Dr. Wilson as an expert witness in that case.
Florida Cities are also intervenors in Florida Power & Light Company (St. Luc ie Uni t No . 2 ) , NRC Docke t No. 50-3 89A, along witn L three other interve nors . The issue of whether there is a nuclear power market in Florida may also arise in the NRC's St. Lucie Unit No. 2 proceeding.
Discovery of exper' Wilson in Ft. Pierce et al. v. FP&L remains subject to t' d limitations of Rule 26(b)(4 ) of the Federal Rules of C.vil Procedure, unless and until the Court orders otherwise or the parties in that case agree to other discovery procedures. It wou1J be unf air and potentially preju-dicial to Florida Cities if FP&L achieves early discovery of Wilson's views about Florida through Houston's examination of Wilson in this Texas proceeding, especially if FP&L's experts are not subject to corresponding discovery.
Houston's motion recites that co-counsel for Houston of fered to have the sought-af ter testimony taken under an appropriate
protective order. Florida Cities request that any order granting Houston's motion to compel include protective provisions that will limit disclosure of Florida-related answers by Wilson.
Disclosure should be limited to (1) Florida Cities, (2) counsel, consultants and their staf fs who do not also represent FP&L, (3) the NRC and its staff, (4) the Department of Justice, and (5) the reporter. Disclosure to others might lead to premature disclo-sure to FP&L. We attach a proposed protective order, which follows and generally paraphrases the Board 's protective order of March 31, 1980 in this case. The proposed protective order pro-vides that any party may move for termination of the protective order if and when the matter under protection is disclosed through other proceedings.
Respectfully submitted, George Spiegel Robert A. Jablon Alan J. Roth Daniel Guttman of the law firm of Spiegel & McDiarmid 2600 Virginia Avenue N.W.
Washingto n, D.C. 20037 Joseph C. Jacobs Robert K. High, Jr.
of the law firm of Ervin, Varn, Jacobs , Odom
& Kitchen P.O. Box 1170 Tallahassee, Florida 3 02 By ,
Alan J. Roth ({,/
Attorneys for Florida Cities
- Draft Order Proposed by Florida Cities UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER ) Docke t Nos. 50-498A COMPANY, et al.
~
) 50-499A
)
(South Texas Project, Units )
1 a nd 2 ) ) '
)
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING ) Docke t Nos . 50-4 4 5A COMPANY, ~et al. ) 50-446A
)
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric )
Station, Units 1 and 2 ) )
ORDER TO COMPEL AND PROTECTIVE ORDER On April 3, 1980, Houston Lighting & Power Company filed Houston Lighting & Power Company's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Deposition Testimony by the Public Utilities Board of Brownsville and Its Expert Witness, John W. Wilson, concerning nuclear power markets. On April 9, 1980 certain Florida Cities filed comments. They requested that any discovery of Dr. Wilson, who is an expert for Florida Cities in other proceedings con-cerning power markets in Florida, be subject to a protective order so that Florida Cities will not be prejudiced by unfair or premature disclosures that might reach parties adverse to the Cities in the other proceedings. !
l l
l l
The Board finds that there is good cause for granting HL&P's [
motion to compel, subject to the protective order requested by Florida Cities.
WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the aforementioned motion of HL&P is granted, subject to the following protective provisions: .
- 1. Documents produced pursuant to this order by John W. Wilson and deposition testimony by John W. Wilson concerning Florida shall not be disclosed to any pe,rson other than (a)
Florida Cities; (b) counsel for parties to this proceeding and those assisting counsel for such parties, including necessary 1
secretarial, paralegal and clerical personnel, but excluding any who are also counsel to Florida Pvwer & Light Company ("FP&L")
and those assisting counsel to EP&L; (c) indepeadent consultants and technical experts and their staff who are ass sting counsel in connection with this litigation but excluding ary who are also (
consultants or advisors to FP&L or their staffs; (d) qualified court reporters involved in reporting matters in this litigation; j i
and (e) the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (" Commission"), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (" Board"), the presiding officer or Commission's Staff.
- 2. Protected documents, information contained therein, and protected deposition testimony shall not be made available to any person de'signated -in paragraph 1(c) unless they shall have [
first read this Order and shall have agreed in writing (a) to be bound by the terms thereof and (b) not to reveal such protected a
i
. . documents, information and testimony; provided , however, that nothing in this Order shall p: ' ant any party from disclosing documents or testi aony produced under the terms of this Order that indicate any violation of law or statute to the agency of the Federal Goi ernment authorized to prosecute such violation; but further p'ovided, that Florida Cities be given ten (10) days written notice prior to the disclosure of such documents or testimony, outside of the NRC Staff, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, or the Office of the Attorney General.
It is understood that before seeking judicial relief, the fur-nishing party will consult Justice in an effort to reach an agreement concerning the appropriate protection of such i
materials.
- 3. If the Commission or the Board orders that access to or dissemination of protected documents, information, and testimony defined above shall be made to persons not included in paragraph 1 above, such matter shall only be accessible to, or disseminated to, such persons based upon the conditions per-taining to , and the obligations arising from this Order, and such persons shall be considered subject to it.
- 4. Any portion of a transcript in connection with this proceeding containing any protected documents, information con-tained therein, or protected testimony shall be bound separately and filed under seal. When-any protected documents, info rma tion
contained therein, or protected testimony are included in an authorized transcript of a deposition or exhibits thereto, arrangements shall be made with the court reporter taking the depositions to bind such confidential portions and separately label them " Florida Cities, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER." Before a court reporter receives any such document or information, he or she shall have agreed in writing to be bound by the terms thereof.
- 5. Any protected document, information therein, or protected testimony defined above is to be treated as such within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. S552(b)(4) and 18 U.S.C. S1905, subject to a final ruling , after notice, by the Commission, Board, the presiding of ficer, or the Commission's Freedom of Information Act Officer to 'he c contrary, or by appeal of such a ruling, interlo-cutory or otherwise.
- 6. If protected documents, information therein, or protected testimony are disclosed to any person other than ir. the manner authorized by this Protective Order, the person respon-sible for the disclosure must immediately bring all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure to the attention of counsel for Florida Cities and the presiding of ficer and , without prejudice to other rights and remedies of Florida Cities, make every effort to prevent further disclosure by counsel or by the person to whom the document or information was communicated.
- 7. Nothing in this Order shall affect the admissibil-ity into evidence of protected documents, information therein, or protected testimony defined above, or abridge the right of any person to seek judicial review or to pursue other appropriate judicial action with respect to any ruling made by the Commission, its Freedom of Information Act Officer, the Board of the presiding of ficer concerning the issue of the status of pro-tected information.
- 8. Upon final termination of this procedure, each per-son that is subject to this Order shall assemble and return to counsel for Florida Cities all protected documents, info rma tion taken therefrom, and protected testimony including all copies of such matter which may have been made, but not including copies containing notes or other attorney's work-product that may have been placed thereon by counsel for the receiving party. Copies containing attorneys ' work-product shall be destroyed or the pro-tected material obliterated. This paragraph shall not apply to the Commission, the Board, the presiding of ficer or the Commission's Staf f, which shall retain such material pursuant to statutory requirements and for other record keeping purposes, but may destroy those additional copies in its possession which regards as surplusage.
- 9. This order shall not apply to any document, info r-mation contained therein, or testimony that becomes available to i
l
others without restriction and without violation of this order.
l
- 10. Any person may move that the protective provisions of this order be terminated if discovery in other proceedings causes unrestricted disclosure of the matter protected herein, or for other good cause shown. -
1 A copy of this Order shall be served on all parties. [
< r It is so ordered. I
, FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY {
AND LICENSING BOARD [
l i
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland !
' this day of , 1980 ;
l t
I t
1 j
l I
i t
I 5
i
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER ) Docke t Nos. 50-498A '
COMPANY, et al.
) 50-499A (South Texas Project, Units )
1 and 2) )
)
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING ) Docke t Nos . 50-445A COMPANY, et al. ) 50-446A (Comanche Peak Steam Electric )
Station, Units 1 and 2 ) )
NOTICE OF SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY CERTAIN FLORIDA CITIES Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney herewith enters a special appearance on behalf of certain Florida Cities in the captioned matter, to raspond to an April 3, 1980 motion of Houston Lighting and Power Company af fecting those Cities. In accordance with S 2. 713 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, the .
following information is provided:
Name: Alan J. Roth Address: Spiegel & McDiarmid 2600 Virginia Avenue N.W.
Wa shing to n, D.C. 20037 Telephone Number: Area Code 202-333-4500 Admission: District of Columbia Name of Party: The City of Gainesville, the Lake Worth Utilities Authority, the Utilities Commission of New Smyrna Beach, the Sebring Utilities Commission, and the Cities of Alachua, Bartow, Pt. Meade, Homestead, Kissimmee, Mt. Dora, Newberry, St. Cloud , Starke , and Tallahassee ,
Florida.
Ala'n J. Roth (,/
Attorney for Florida Cities Da ted : April 9, 1980 e
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER ) Docke t Nos. 50-498A COMPANY, et al. ) 50-499A
)
(South Texas Project, Units )
1 and 2) )
)
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING ) Docket Nos. 50-445A >
COMPANY, -et al. ) 50-446A
)
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric )
Station, Units 1 and 2) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have caused copies of the foregoing Notice of Special Appearance and Comments and Requests of Certain Florida Cities to be made on the following parties listed hereto this 10th day of April 1980, by depositing copies thereof in the United States mail, first class, postage paid.
Marshall E. Miller, Chairman Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esquire i Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Panel Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission '
Washing to n, D. C. 20555 Wa shing to n, D. C. 20555 Michael L. Glaser, Esquire Joseph Rutberg , Esquire 1150 17th Street, N. W. Antitrust Counsel Washing to n, D. C. 20036 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wa shing to n, D. C. 20555 Fredric D. Chanania, Esquire Michael B. Blume, Esquire R. Gordon Gooch, Esquire Ann Hodgdon, Esquire John P. Mathis, Esquire Nuclear Regulatory Commission Baker & Botts Washing ton, D. C. 20555 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washing to n, D. C. 20006 Jerome E. Sharfman, Esquire U.S. Nuclear Reglatory Commission Washing to n, D.C. 20555
2-Jerome Saltzman, Chief Robert Lowenstein, Esquire I Antitrust & Indemnity Group J. A. Bouknig ht , Jr., Esquire Nuclear Regulatory Commission William J. Franklin, Esquire Washington, D. C. 20555 Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad & Toll !
Chase R. Stephens, Chief 1025 Connecticut Avr.ue , N. W.
Docketing & Service Section Washington, D. C. 20036 office of the Secretary Nuclear Regulatory Commission Frederick H. Ritta, Esquire Washing ton, D. C. 20555 Law Offices of Porthcutt Ely Watergate 600 Luilding David M. Stahl, Esquire Washing to n, D. C. 20037 Sarah F. Holzsweig, Esquire Isham, Lincoln & Beale Robert O'Neil, Esquire 1120 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Wheatley & Wolleson Suite 325 1112 Watergate Office Building Wa sning to n, D.C. 20036 2600 Virginia Avenue, N. W.
Washing ton, D. C. 20037 Susan B. Cypher t , Esquire Robert Fabricant, Esquire Rof f Hardy, Chairman and Kenneth M. Glazier Chief Executive Officer Antitrust Division Central Power & Light Company Department of Justice P. O. Box 2121 P. O. Box 14141 Corpus Christi, Texas 78403 Washing ton, D.C. 20444 G. K. Sprucc, General Manager Joseph Knotts, Esquire City Public Service Board Nicholas S. Reynolds , Esquire P. O. Box 1771 Debevoise & Liberman San Antonio, Texas 78201 1200 17th Street, N. W. ,
Washington, D. C. 20036 Jon C. Wood, Esquire W. Roger Wilson, Esquire Douglas F. John, Esquire Matthews, Nowlin, Macfarlane McDermott, Will & Emery & Barrett 1101 Connecticut Avenue , N.W. 1500 Alamo National Building Suite 1201 San Antonio, Texas 78205 Washing to n, D.C. 20036 Perry G. Brittain, President Joseph I. Worsham, Esquire Texas Utilities Generating Co.
Merlyn D. Sampels, Esquire 2001 Bryan Tower Spencer C. Relye a , Esquire Dallas, Texas 75201 Worsham, Forsythe & Sampels 2001 Bryan Tower Robert C. McDiarmid, Esquire Suite 2500 Robert A. Jablon, Esquire Dallas , Texas 75201 Spiegel & McDiarmid 2600 Virginia Avenue N.W.
Washing ton, D.C. 20037 s
. , R. L. Ha ncock, Director G. W. Oprea, Jr.
City of Austin Electric Utility Executive Vice President Department Houston Lighting & Power Co.
P. O. Box 1088 P, O. Box 1700 Austin, Texas 78767 Houston, Texas 77001 Jerry L. Harris, Esquire W. S. Robso n , General Manager Richard C. Balough, Esquire South Texas Electric Coop. , Inc.
City of Austin Route 6, Building 102 P. O. Box 1088 Victoria Regional Airport Austin, Texas 78767 Victoria, Texas 77901 Dan H. Davidson Michael I. Miller, Esquire City Manager Isham, Lincoln & Beale City of Austin One First National Plaza P. O. Box 1088 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Austin, Texas 78767 Donald Clements, Esquire Do n R. Butler, Esq. Gulf States Utilities Co.
Sneed , Vine, Wilkerson, Selman P. O. Box 2951
& Perry Beaumont, Texas 77074 P. O. Box 1409 Austin, Tbxas 78767 Knoland J. Plucknett Executive Director Morgan Hunter, Esquire Committee on Power for the McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore Southwest, Inc.
900 Congress Avenue 5541 Skelly Drive Austin, Texas 78701 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135 Kevin B. Pratt, Esquire Jay M. Galt, Esquire Linda Aker, Esquire Looney, Nichols, Johnson & Hayes P. O. Box 12548 219 Couch Drive Capital Station Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101 Austin, Texas 78767 Somervell County Public Library E. W. Barnett, Esquire P. O. Box 417 Charles G. Thrash, Jr., Esquire Glen Rose , Texas 76403 J. Gregory Copeland, Esquire Theodore F. Weiss, Jr., Esquire Maynard Human, General Manager Baker & Botts Western Farmers Electric Coop.
3000 One Shell Plaza P. O. Box 4 29 Houston, Texas 77002 Anadarko, Oklahoma 73005
7 James E. Monahan Robert M. Rader, Esquire Executive Vice President Conner, Moore & Corber and General Manager 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. ,
Brazos Electric Power Coop., Inc. Washing to n, D. C. 20006 P. O. Box 6296 Waco, Texas 76706 W. N. Woolsey, Esquire ;
Dyer and Redford Mr. G. Holman King 1030 Petroleum Tower West Texas Utilities Co. Corpus Christi, Texas 78474 P. O. Box 841 Abilene, Texas 79604 W
t O a . _ , >j Alan J. Rothv /
Attorney for Certain Florida Cities I
1 i
!