Information Notice 2018-02, Testing and Operations-Induced Degradation of 3-Stage Target Rock Safety Relief Valves.

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML18029A741)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Testing and Operations-Induced Degradation of 3-Stage Target Rock Safety Relief Valves.
ML18029A741
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/26/2018
From: Mcginty T, Chris Miller
Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs, Division of Inspection and Regional Support
To:
Govan T
References
CAC 11008, EPID l-2017-CRS-0058 IN-18-02
Download: ML18029A741 (8)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 February 26, 2018 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2018-02: TESTING AND OPERATIONS-INDUCED

DEGRADATION OF 3-STAGE TARGET ROCK

SAFETY RELIEF VALVES

ADDRESSEES

All holders of an operating license or construction permit for a nuclear power reactor under

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Domestic Licensing of

Production and Utilization Facilities, except those that have permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

All holders of and applicants for a power reactor early site permit, combined license, standard

design certification, or manufacturing license under 10 CFR Part 52, Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants. All applicants for a standard design certification, including such applicants after initial issuance of a design certification rule.

PURPOSE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to make

addressees aware of recent operating experience related to Target Rock Model 0867F 3-stage

safety relief valves (SRVs). Operating experience has shown that limited flow testing of these

valves can result in damage to internal valve components. This damage can be exacerbated

when the valves are re-installed in the plant following testing and subjected to normal plant

operating conditions, including steam flow-induced vibrations. The resultant internal damage

has affected valve operability at low steam pressure. It is expected that addressees will review

the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid

similar problems. Suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements. Therefore, no

specific action or written response is required.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station

On February 8, 2013, and January 27, 2015, severe winter storms caused loss of offsite power

(LOOP) events at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim). These LOOP events resulted in

complicated reactor trips, with operators using various systems to lower plant pressure. In each

event, operators noted an unexpected plant response from one of the plants four main steam

SRVs (Target Rock Model 0867F 3-stage valves) while using the valves to reduce pressure.

During the 2013 event, the A SRV did not properly open when it was manually actuated at low

plant pressure (i.e., below 300 psig). Similarly, during the 2015 event, the C SRV did not

properly open when manually actuated at low plant pressure. In each case, operators were

able to control plant pressure by manually cycling the B and D SRVs.

ML18029A741 Subsequent to the plant reaching cold shutdown following the 2015 event, the licensee removed

SRVs A and C from the plant and sent themalong with a third valve which had been

removed from the plant in 2013to an offsite testing facility for limited flow testing. The valves

were replaced with spare Model 0867F SRVs, and the plant restarted on February 8, 2015.

During limited flow testing at the offsite test facility, the valves consistently opened when

exposed to steam pressure at the lift setpoint (approximately 1100 psig) but did not fully close.

The valves were disassembled to allow inspection of the main stage internal components. This

inspection revealed: (1) damage to the threaded connection between the valve stem and the

main piston caused by axial displacement of the main piston; (2) fretting damage to the walls of

the main cylinder caused by impingement of the main piston rings; (3) loss of torque on the lock

nut and deformation of its locking tab; and (4) shortening of the free height of the main valve

spring. The damaged threads and axial displacement of the main piston created a gap between

the stem and piston shoulders, allowing the piston to wobble and/or rotate within the cylinder.

During operation, plant vibrations caused the rings on the loose piston to fret against and

eventually wear grooves in the walls of the main cylinder. These grooves affected piston

movement and valve operation at low plant pressure during the 2013 and 2015 Pilgrim events.

On March 16, 2015, Curtiss Wright, parent company of Target Rock, issued a report in

accordance with 10 CFR Part 21, Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance (Part 21),

indicating that Model 0867F 3-stage SRVs are susceptible to internal damage that is caused by

limited flow testing (Agencywide Document and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No.

ML15077A422).

The NRC chartered a special inspection team in February 2015 to evaluate the licensees

performance in response to the LOOP event on January 27, 2015. Following the inspection, NRC staff issued a finding of low to moderate (White) significance for the licensees failure to

take appropriate corrective actions for a significant condition adverse to quality associated with

the A SRV during the 2013 LOOP. The licensees failure to take corrective action to preclude

repetition resulted in the failure of the C SRV during the January 27, 2015, LOOP event. The

NRC staff subsequently published a special inspection report on May 27, 2015 (ADAMS

Accession No. ML15147A412). On September 1, 2015, the NRC staff issued the final

determination and a notice of violation to Pilgrim (ADAMS Accession No. ML15230A217).

During an April 2015 refueling outage, Pilgrim replaced all four of their Model 0867F 3-stage

SRVs with Model 7567F 2-stage Target Rock SRVs. Curtiss Wright issued interim

10 CFR Part 21 reports for Model 0867F SRVs on May 1, 2015 (ADAMS Accession

No. ML15134A017), and June 30, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15187A172). In these

reports, the vendor described how valve internals could be damaged by excessive velocities

and impact forces resulting from limited flow testing. In the June 2015 report, Target Rock

described the root causes of internal valve damage, along with its plan for redesigning the valve

and its testing requirements in order to limit future testing and operations-induced damage.

Target Rock also indicated that three other nuclear plants at two sites had Model 0867F 3-stage

SRVs installed. The two facilities are the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (Hatch), Units 1 and 2, with 11 Model 0867F valves installed in each unit, and the James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power

Plant (Fitzpatrick), with three Model 0867F valves installed out of a total of 11 SRVs.

Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2

During a February 2016 refueling outage, Hatch, Unit 1, removed its 11 3-stage SRVs for lift

setpoint testing required under technical specification surveillance requirement 3.4.3.1 and the

licensees inservice testing program. The valves were tested at the NWS Technologies testing facility on March 30, 2016. All of the valves properly opened during limited flow testing, but

three of the 11 valves failed to properly close following their second cycling on the test stand.

Two of the three valves that failed to properly close were disassembled, at which time

inspectors noted severe internal degradation similar to that found in the SRVs removed and

tested by Pilgrim. The licensee for Hatch contracted an independent engineering firm to

evaluate any impact of the damage on valve operability. The engineering analysis concluded

that the potential for valve binding in the open direction was low despite the damage noted in

the Hatch, Unit 1, SRVs. The analysis noted that the fretting wear grooves created by the main

piston rings in the main guides of the Hatch, Unit 1, valves were not as steep and deep as those

in the Pilgrim valves. Based on the valve condition and analysis, the licensee determined that

the Hatch, Unit 1, SRVs would have been able to perform their design function to open and

close over their operational range (down to 150 psig) when installed in the plant, and that the

SRVs still installed in Hatch, Unit 2, were operable but in a degraded/nonconforming condition

due to the potential for in-service vibration wear.

The NRC dispatched a special inspection team to Hatch on April 4, 2016. The team reviewed

all aspects of the Hatch operating experience, as well as the licensees rationale for the actions

it took following review of the Pilgrim events and the vendors Part 21 reports. The NRC

inspectors identified no significant performance deficiencies. Hatch Unit 2 performed a six day

mid-cycle maintenance shutdown on May 21, 2016, (14 months into their 24-month operating

cycle) to replace, test, and inspect the 11 SRVs. Both Hatch Units 1 and 2 were returned to

operation with refurbished 3-stage Target Rock SRVs that had undergone the vendor

recommended modified testing and inspection requirements discussed in the June 30, 2015, Part 21 interim report. This included removing the requirement to perform a final limited flow

cycling of the valve upon reassembly and checking installed valves for evidence of

de-shouldering by measuring the gap between the stem and main piston shoulders. The

special inspection report was published on June 10, 2016 (ADAMS Accession

No. ML16162A631).

James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant

The licensee for Fitzpatrick removed two of its three Model 0867F 3-stage Target Rock SRVs in

June and July of 2016. One of these valves exhibited degradation similar to that seen at Pilgrim

and Hatch, although the fretting wear in the main cylinder was not as severe. The third 3-stage

SRV was replaced in January 2017 and did not exhibit any degradation similar to Pilgrim and

Hatch. All three 3-stage SRVs were replaced with 2-stage Target Rock SRVs.

Vendor Corrective Actions

In its June 30, 2015, interim Part 21 report, Target Rock recommended that licensees with

Model 0867F 3-stage SRVs installed in their plants assess the valves for the potential of

fretting-induced damage and inspect valves as needed. The impacted licensees (Hatch and

Fitzpatrick) responded as described above. The interim Part 21 report also recommended a

revised method for performing limited flow testing on Model 0867F 3-stage SRVs intended for

installation at a plant. The revised method involved additional verifications of the integrity of

valve internals following limited flow valve cycling. Valves are to be checked for thread damage, stem to piston shoulder gap, main spring height, and lock nut torque. Following satisfactory

inspection and retorqueing of the valve internals, the valve can be leak checked, then reinstalled

in the plant without the need to cycle the valve again via limited flow testing. Much of the

previous valve damage that led to operational challenges was initiated by this final valve cycling prior to installation, which could cause the main piston and lock nut to lose torque and become

loose on the stem. Valves were being reinstalled in this condition without any further inspection, creating the conditions for fretting-induced damage to the main cylinder wall.

On February 3, 2017, Target Rock issued a final Part 21 report (ADAMS Accession

No. ML17039A569) to inform its customers of design changes to the Model 0867F 3-stage

SRV. Target Rock evaluated the effectiveness of the changes during limited and full-flow

valve testing between August and November of 2016. Target Rock recommends this new

design as a long-term solution to all utilities that currently have installed or plan to install Model

0867F 3-stage SRVs in their plants.

BACKGROUND

Valve Design and Actuation

Figure 1 of this document shows a Target Rock Model 0867F 3-stage SRV in the closed

position. Additional arrows and labels have been added to show location of the lock nut, lower

piston ring, stem shoulder, and gagging device.

Figure 1: Target Rock Model 0867F 3-Stage SRV

When installed in the plant, the SRV actuates in the pressure relief mode by sensing system

pressure at the pilot valve. When pressure reaches the valve setpoint, the metal sensing bellows expands against the pilot preload spring and opens the pilot valve. This allows steam

from inside the bellows to act on top of the second stage piston. The steam pressure causes

the second stage piston to compress the second stage preload spring, which unseats the

second stage disc. This relieves steam pressure from the top of the main piston through a vent

path to the SRV outlet. When pressure is relieved from the top of the main piston, system

pressure acting on the underside of the piston through orifices drilled in the main guide is

enough to overcome the closing force of the main valve spring. The main piston is threaded

onto the stem of the main disc. As the piston pulls the stem upward in its cylinder, the main disc

unseats and pops open, thus relieving main steam pressure through the SRV tailpipe (outlet).

During the Pilgrim events, SRVs were being used at lower plant pressures in pressure control

mode. In this mode, operators manually open the valves from a switch in the control room, as

needed, to lower plant pressure. The switch sends a signal to the solenoid, which moves the

remote air actuator to unseat the second stage disc, causing the main piston to reposition and

open the main disc, as described above.

Root Cause and Method of Damage

In its initial and interim Part 21 reports, Target Rock concluded that valve internal degradation is

initiated during limited flow testing at offsite testing facilities. Limited flow testing of the Model

0867F 3-stage SRV exposes the valve internals to excessive velocities and impact forces. The

dynamic loads during testing can far exceed those which the valves experience during an

in-plant actuation. This is mainly due to the presence of the gagging device, which is a plate

with a small orifice inserted just downstream of the main disc to block off most of the steam flow

(see Figure 1 of this document). The gag is necessary to ensure sufficient inlet pressure to fully

open the valve in testing. It also minimizes the amount of potentially radioactive steam

exhausted from the valve during testing. However, by blocking the exhaust path through the

valve outlet, the gag causes a reaction force with the underside of the main disc as the valve

begins to open. The added force caused by differential pressure across the main piston creates

a higher than normal opening force on the main valve assembly. This extra opening force

causes the main piston to reach a higher velocity upon valve actuation, which results in

excessive impact force when the main spring becomes fully compressed and arrests valve

motion. The impact force leads to damage to valve internal components, such as that

discovered when valves from Pilgrim, Hatch, and Fitzpatrick were disassembled.

Degradation to valve internalssuch as plastic deformation of valve threads, loss of lock nut

torque, and de-shouldering of the stem and main pistonallows the piston to wobble and/or

rotate inside its cylinder. When a valve in this condition is reinstalled in the plant, steam

flow-induced vibrations can cause the main piston rings to fret against the cylinder liner and

form grooves over time. If these grooves become deep enough, and develop a steep ramp

angle, they can impede valve motion when the damaged valve is actuated (see Figures 2 and 3 of this document). The likelihood of impeding valve motion is greater at low plant pressures, where the differential pressure across the main piston is less. Fretting can also cause wear on

the piston rings themselves, allowing steam to leak, which further impacts valve actuation.

Finally, a shortened main spring can lead to lack of sufficient driving force to reseat (close) the

SRV following actuation. Main

Piston

Piston

Ring Grooves formed

by Piston Rings

Cylinder Wall

Figure 2: Expanded Diagram of Groove Figure 3: Photo of Grooves Caused by

Formed by Piston Ring Fretting Fretting of Cylinder Wall

Description of Valve Redesign

In 2016, Target Rock implemented design changes on its Model 0867F 3-stage SRVs that

reduce main piston velocity and impact forces during limited flow testing. The design changes

slow the rate at which steam flows into the underside of the main piston upon valve actuation.

This, in turn, lowers the driving force behind the main piston, which slows its velocity during

actuation and subsequently reduces impact forces when valve motion is arrested. The design

changes also include a modification to the primary pilot seat in order to ensure that valve

actuation times continue to satisfy American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and

Pressure Vessel Code requirements.

DISCUSSION

In the design of boiling water reactors, main steam SRVs support safety functions of both the

pressure relief system and the emergency core cooling system (ECCS). In the pressure relief

system, SRVs lift at their design setpoints to prevent overpressurization of the nuclear system.

This protects the nuclear system process barrier from failure, which could result in the

uncontrolled release of fission products. In the ECCS, certain SRVs will lift upon failure of the

high pressure coolant injection system in order to reduce plant pressure and allow the low

pressure ECCS to protect the reactor during a small break loss of coolant event.

Target Rock SRVs have been in use in the nuclear industry in the United States for several

decades. The original SRV was a 3-stage model introduced in the early 1970s. Reliability

issues with this model led to the introduction of a 2-stage model in the mid-1970s. The 2-stage

SRVs were susceptible to setpoint drift caused in part by corrosion bonding of the pilot valve

seat and disc. Target Rock reintroduced the 3-stage SRV in 1998, and modified the design

again in 2008 with the expectation that users of the valve would convert back to the 3-stage

model based on improved setpoint performance.

Since 2011, there have been anecdotal instances in which Model 0867F valves were inspected

during testing and found to have internal damage, such as grooves worn into their main

cylinders. However, the primary cause of operability issues for Model 0867F valves between

2011 and 2015 was pilot valve leakage, which is a well-known and monitored phenomenon. Increased scrutiny following inoperability of Pilgrims C SRV during the plants complicated

scram in 2015 led to the discovery of more severe internal degradation of valve internals.

Target Rock took action to notify the industry of the operating experience at Pilgrim using the

process defined in 10 CFR Part 21. As they identified the root cause of valve damage and

operational failures, Target Rock updated stakeholders with interim reports which recommended

improved limited flow testing techniques, and notified industry of the availability of an improved

valve design.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this

matter to the technical contact(s) listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation or Office of New Reactors project manager.

/RA/ (Paul G. Krohn for) /RA/

Timothy J. McGinty, Director Christopher G. Miller, Director

Division of Construction Inspection Division of Inspection and Regional Support

and Operational Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Office of New Reactors

Technical Contacts: Eric Thomas, NRR/DIRS

301-415-6772 E-mail: Eric.Thomas@nrc.gov

John Billerbeck, NRR/DE

301-415-1179 E-mail: John.Billerbeck@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, https://www.nrc.gov, under NRC Library.

ML18029A741 *concurred via e-mail CAC/EPID: A11008/L-2017-CRS-0058 OFFICE Tech Editor NRR/DIRS/IOEB NRO/DEI/MEB NRR/DE/EMIB/BC NRR/DIRS/IOEB/BC

NAME JDoughtery EThomas TScarbrough SBailey RElliott

DATE 11/13/2017 11/30/2017 01/16/2018 02/01/2018 02/01/2018 OFFICE NRR/DIRS/IRGB/LA NRR/DIRS/IRGB/PM NRR/DIRS/IRGB/BC NRO/DCIP/D NRR/DIRS/D

NAME ELee TGovan HChernoff TMcGinty (PKrohn for) CMiller

(w/comment)

DATE 02/06/2018 02/06/2018 02/20/2018 02/22/2018 02/26/2018