ML17299A952

Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Util 831103 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 2.1,2.2.1.1,2.2.2 & 4.5.3 Re Vendor Interface Program & Online Functional Testing Intervals. Response Requested by 860228

ML17299A952
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	01/09/1986
From:	Licitra E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
References
GL-83-28, TAC-59163, TAC-59164, TAC-59173, NUDOCS 8601210639
Download: ML17299A952 (6)

Text

~ 0 J

Docket Nos.:

50-528, 50-529 and 50-530 Mr. E.

E.

Van Brunt, Jr.

Executive Vice President Arizona Nuclear Power Project Post Office Box 52034 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034

Subject:

Request for Additional Information - Palo Verde Responses to Items

2. 1, 2.2. 1. 1, 2.2.2 and 4.5.3 in Generic Letter 83-28 Your response to Generic Letter 83-28 was provided by letter dated November 3, 1983.

As a result of the staff's review of.your responses to Items 2. 1, 2.2. 1. 1, 2.2.2 and 4.5.3 in the generic letter, we require additional information to complete our evaluation of these items.

The specific information required is identified in the enclosed request for additional information.

We ask that you respond to this request by February 28, 1986.

If you have any questions regarding this letter,,you should contact me.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely,

Enclosure:

As stated gg@ghAL. SLG8 FO 5Y E. A. Licitra, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate No.

7 Division of PWR Licensing-8 cc:

See next page DISTRIBUTION 50-525252j5 520'RC PDR EJordan LPDR BGrimes PBD-7 Rdg JPartl ow FMiraglia EALicitra

Attorney, ELD JLee ACRS (10)

OParr JCal vo PBD7 EALicitr yt 1/I /86

. hton

/86 ebpipiOb39'bO~io~~a pDR ADOCK 0 pD p

1

d "I

IIF r

~ ll, I

t II I

I F

t F

I I

I I

rt II' II

'Il

-rrlf ttl rr I

ft II ))ltrrt trII 7,

r I

II 1

I r

1 I I I

~'t

. I t

r I ~ I J

kr r

8',I Ir II, I

\\

I ~

I II

~ r, II rIf'I r

r F

'I ~

F II r

I I ~

r" r A FII'

,Mr. E.

E.

Van Brunt, Jr.

Arizona Nuclear Power Pro,iect Palo Verde CC:

Arthur C. Gehr, Esq.

Snell

& Wilmer 3100 Valley Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Mr. James M. Flenner, Chief Counsel Arizona Corporation Commission 1200 West Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Charles R. Kocher, Esq. Assistant Council James A. Boeletto, Esq.

Southern California Edison Company P. 0; Box 800

Rosemead, California 91770 Mr. Mark Ginsberq Energy Director Office of Economic Planninq and Development 1700 West Washington - 5th Floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Mr. Wayne Shirley Assistant Attorney General Bataan Memorial Building Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503 Mr. Roy Zimmerman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.

Box 239 Arlington, Arizona 85322 Ms. Patricia Lee Hourihan 6413 S. 26th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Reqional Administrator, Reqion V

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Y

Kenneth Berlin, Esq.

Winston

& Strawn Suite 500 2550 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Ms.

Lynne Bernabei Government Accountabi 1 ity Project of the Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 Ms. Jill Morrison 522 E. Colgate Tempi, Arizona 85238 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washinqton Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.

7910 Woodmont Avenue Suite 1310

Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Mr. Ron Rayner P. 0.

Box '1509

Goodyear, AZ 85338

v

~

g

~

Enclosure Palo Verde Units I, 2 and 3

Request or strong n ormation GL 83-tems an 4.5.3 1

Item 2.1

( art 2)-

Submit detailed information describing your vendor interface program for reactor trip system components.

Information supplied should state how the program assures that vendor technical information is kept complete, current and controlled throughout the life of the plant and should also indicate how the program will be implemented at PALO VERDE 1, 2

8 3.

Item 2.2.1.1 Discuss how your revised classification procedure complies with the position presented in Generic Letter 83-28.

Item 2.2 The staff found the NUTAC program fails to address the concerns about establishing and maintaining an interface between all vendors of safety-related equipment and the utility. Accordingly, supplement your response to address this concern.

This'dditional information should describe how current procedures will be modified and new ones initiated to meet the elements of this concern.

Item 4.5.3 Provide the results of your review of the on-line functional testinq intervals considering the concerns of 4.5.3. 1 to 4.5.3.5 in the generic letter.

Proposed Technical Specification changes resulting from this review shall be submitted for review.

1

~

1 a

r

~l

, II

• l, II la

'I I'

I r'

l F

1 II II

~

r

~

I