ML14189A287

TMI 40TH Year Tendon Surveillance, Tendon No. 1-146-34, Tendon End Buddress 4

ML14189A287
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	11/12/2013
From:	Exelon Generation Co, PSC
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML14189A283	List: ML14189A284 ML14189A285 ML14189A286 ML14189A287 TMI-14-061, 40th Year Tendon Surveillance Engineering Report (Topical Report 213), Precision Surveillance Corporation in-Service Inspection Quality Control Procedure, Monitoring Tendon Force (Lift-Offs)
References
TMI-14-061
Download: ML14189A287 (404)

Text

REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 290 of 348 Project: TMI 40T" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE.

Tendon No.: ..I 41 34- Tendon End: , / Shop Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA BEARING PLATE SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GREASE CAP SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GASKET MATING SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: STUD/BOLT HOLES PROPERLY PREPARED: FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCLUSION CONTROLLED:

YES YES KYES KYES gYES CI NO INO EJNO EJNO EINO COMMENTS CREW FOREMAN SIGNOFF 4/~~SZ ~Date: I~I QC Reviewed:

4 z 6L Level: Date:. /1//2463 30 SQ.12.0 TMI:13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 331 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 291 of 348 I N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 2.1 GREASE REPLACEMENT.NData Sheet 12.1b -Hand Pumping: EEL 09103113 Revision"r Project: TMI 40"" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tenldon No.: ILIA& GREASE REPLACEMENT QC SIGNOFFS: (0.4) Grease Used CR NEW 'IOLD -TEST DATE: 0] ACCEPTABLE El APPROVAL LETTER ,Z/.-P 8.0 PREREQUISITES DATED: (8.5) Total Grease LosS from Data Sheet 6.0 for 4 tendon end: A-.75 gal.(8.6) Total Grease Loss from Data Sheet 6.0 for tendon end: gal.(8.7) Estimated grease losses from leaks for & tendon end: .0 gal.(8.8) Estimated grease tosses from leaks for _ tendon end: 0 gal.(8.9) TOTAL Tendon Grease Loss: gal.13.0 POURING AND HAND .PUMPING -FIRST END (1 3.6) Ambient Temp.: ,5 "F Thermometer I:_. Racal Date:.(13.7). Grease Temp.: ?ZO oF Thermometer ID: Recal Date: (13.9) !nia Grease Height (a) 22 Y1* in. (13.12) Final Grease Height (b)(13.14) Total amount of Greaseadded: g0l (a-b)xl.77 into the (13.16) Quantity of Waste Grease: g) gal. (13.15) Poured (13:17) Total Grease Replaced this end: 5,j I gal..i4 end O Hand Pumped 1J'PVA-t1i a 13.0 HAND PUMPING -SECOND END (13.6) Ambient: Temp.: SJ& 'F Thermometer Io: /0/j Recal Date: -." (13.7) Grease Temp..: -ZZ F Thermometer ID: Recal Date: (139) Initial Grease Height (a) y,.in. (13,12) Final Grease Height (b) 17 in.(13.14) Total amount Of Grease added: gal. (a-b)x1.77 into the g end (13.16) Quantity of Waste Grease: ) gal. (1315) " Hand Pumped (13.17) Total. Grease Eeelaced this end: .3 gal.14.0.CALCULATION OF PRESSURE PUMPING.(14.1) Total Tendon Grease Replaced:

g (13.17 + 13.17)(14.2) Net Tendon Duct Grease Volume: j 0, gol. tf22-the Frondan&oat ocwvU (14.3) Percent Difference:

Total Tendon Replaced (14.1). Total Tendon Loss.(8.9) 100= %Net Tendon Duct Grease Volume (14.2) '1 =

• oDee*(14.4) Grease Leaks: 5 Yes K No (14.5) Refill Acceptable.

Yes gess thanw iw) C3 No (greater than 10%) /If No -Customer Notified NCR No.: ... -, (14.6) Comments:, c Reviewed:

64 Level: Date: w 0 31 SQ 12.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 332 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 292 of 348 Project: TMI M 4 0 THYEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 1 (7.3) Tendon No.: #,51 Tendon End: Ru./4'eS I : [ Shop El Field Grease Cap Removal (7.6) Date Removal Started: Z 3- zs -(7.7) Dry Ice Used on Grease Cap and/or Anchorage 0'Yes J No (7.8) Temp.°of Concrete; 6j OF Thermometer No.: Re-Callate:

/O .l/f Ambient Temp.: SS OF Thenrometer No.: ReTCal Date: /t 1- _(8.4) Anchorhead I.D.: Anchorhead Verification:

PkMatch 0 No-Match (8.5) Grease Coating .Grease Cap Complete V Partial Uncoated Buttonheads' Complete Partial Uncoated %Anchorhead

-Complete Partial .Uncoated %Shims -Complete Partial Uncoated %Bearing. Plate -Complete Partial Uncoated %_ _-Limited within the inside diameter of the grease cap.(8.6) UnusualConditlons:

).je-....(8.7) Grease.C61or Match. zYes 0 No Grease Colors Comments:

,/N-.(8.8) Quantity of Samples .Quart -Samples Identified per Step 8.8,17: ( Yes LI No Location of j AH. Li B.P. [I Shims. Cap El Duct Removal I (8.9) Qty. of Grease lost during removal of cap: o gal.(8.9.1) Grease from cap to be reused? 0 Yes [] No Qty. of Grease removed from cap: : , gal (9.6) Qty, of Grease removed from anchorage:

0. ?6 gal.(9.7) Damage during cap removal or anchorage cleaning?

El Yes 14 No Describe:

A/l.,, (10.3) Method of Tendon Protectionw.

(10.4) Amount of Grease Loss:from.Tendon duct: (10.5) Total quantity of lost grease (below): (8.8) _j,.+ (8.9).,D-

+ (8.9. 1) Z.L5 + (9.6) &.11 + (10.4) 3, TOTAL (11.1.2) Document TOTAL grease lost on Data Sheet 12.1, GREASE REPLACEMENT, &Yes C No QC Reviewed: le.51- Level: .Date: L313 .I .I (-I I w 13.SQ 6.OTMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 333 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 293 of 348 Project: TMI 40T YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 1 (7.3) Tendon No.: 1/ -Tendon End: A u,4-s' S r- Shop ER. Field Grease Cap Removal (7.6) Date Removal Started: /0 .e Q.C. Signoff (7.7) Dry Ice Used on Grease Cap and/or Anchorage 17 Yes 91 No (7.8) Temp. of Concretew

.¶ 'IF Thermometer No.: S Re-Cal Date:/D-/

-/ 4 Ambient Temp,: *. 0 F Thermometer.No.:

PKA Re-CalDate:

joq/.q'J (8.4) Anchorhead I.D. : 71 Anchorhead Verification:

DMatch 0 No-Match , (8.5) Grease Coating: /Grease Cap -Complete_/

Partial Uncoated %Buttonheads

-Complete Partial Uncoated %Anchorhead

-Complete.

.Partial Uncoated %Shims -Complete%

Partial Uncoated %Bearing. Plate -( Complete Partial .Uncoated %-Limited within the inside diameter of the grease cop.(8.6) Unusual Conditions:

Jladez (8.7) Grease Color Match: Yes C1 No Grease Color , Comments: (8.8) Quantity of.Samples.

Quart Samples identified per Step 8.8.1? I Yes [i No Locatlon of RA.H. 0 B.P. Shims zCap E) Duct Removal (8.9) Qty, of Grease lost during removal of cap: g. gal.(8.9.1) Grease fromrcap to be reused? [] Yes 5 No Oty. of Grease removed from cap: a .., 3 (9.6) Qty. of Grease removed from anchorage: , , 6 gal.(9.7) Damage during-cap removal or anchorage cleaning?

C1 Yes 0 No Describe:

__________O_*'15 J~~C __ y-i - -I-( 1 0 .3 ) M e t h o d o f T e n d o n P r o t e c t i o n : _ o w _, ,4J 4 4 .1WIA , J ' &1q i 3 L cg,4 (10.4) Amount of GreaseLoss from Tendon duct: -gal.(10.5) Total quantity (A lost grease (below): (88 D,25 (96 (8.,-St +(10.4) -~4.5 TOTAL W *(11.1.2) Document TO'AL grea; lost on Data Sheet 12.1, GREASE REPLACEMENT.

ayes C] No w 10, QC Reviewed: rJLevel' -t Date:.t 0... -0 0 13 SO 6,0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 334 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 294 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER.p~i 2 Data Sheet 6,1 09103/13 PRECISION ANCE Page I of I<= Revision 0 Project TMI 4 0 TH YEARTENDON SURVEILLANCE ( UNIT I (8.1) Tendon No.:: I,4 I- Tendon End: E.Shop 0l Field (9Z5.1) DURING REMOVAL OF GREASE CAP Water Detected:

E] Yes El No Quantity:

C, Sample. Taken: E0 Yes El-No 29 N/A Moisture

Description:

-].,Observable Moisture 5 Significant Moisture { Not Applicable Comments:

Q NAlp -t /, -,% -J5 (9.6.1) INSIDE GREASE CAP Water Detected:

El Yes I0No Quantity:

.Sample Taken: C] Yes E] No gg N/A Moisture

Description:

C] Observable Moisture .- Significant Moisture ICNot Applicable Comments: ,A.,104_ , /D-Z. ..(9.7.1) AROUND TENDON:ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Water Detected:

C] Yes [3 No Quantity:

C) Sample Taken: E] Yes C] No 4.N/A vIuV olUILIr JUl:Ib l I~lIIUIh I. I 'UJ !.I IVlUl~tUil U i .~II l II.d ll lGllIVlrIsUIlUf (JI' lU Comments:

/J ,e,, O-- J3 (9.9.1) DURING DETENSIONING Water Detected:

[I Yes [ No. Quantity: (f Sample Taken: 0l Yes El No aNIA Moisture

Description:

E] Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture JKNot Applicable Comments: (11.1) NOTIFICATION N/A_Exelon Notified:

l Yes Individual Name: Date: SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND STORAGE Al/k (12.2) Samples adequately identified:

El- Yes (12.3). Samples stored at: QC Signoff...

Level: u Date: 2 L, QC Reviewed: Level: _____Date14 SQ 6.1.TMI13.

ISI: Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 335 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 295 of 348 Project: TMI 4eT YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE l UNIT 1 (8.1) Tendon No,: 11 : -Tendon End: &..4Z .5. C' Shop [ Field (9.5.1) DURING REMOVAL OF GREASE CAP Water Detected:

El Yes t] No Quantity:

• Sample Taken: [] Yes El No [ NIA Moisture

Description:

[] Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture Not Applicable Comments:.

(9.6.1) INSIDE GREASE CAP Water Detected:

El Yes No Quantity:

0 Sample Taken: [E Yes E] No (Z N/A Moisture

Description:

E] Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture KNot.Applicable Comments:

4 _(9.7.1) AROUND TENDON ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Water Detected:

E] Yes 5Q No Quantity: Sample Taken: E] Yes El No 5Q N/A Moisture

Description:

E] Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture I(.Not Applicable Comments:

-,e (9.9.1) DURING DETENSIONING Water Detected:

E_] Yes §4No Quantity: ) Sample Taken: El Yes El No N/A Moisture

Description:

E] Observable Moisture E Significant Moisture ýNot Applicable Comments:

AA e-(11,1) NOTIFICATION P Exelon Notified:

El Yes Individual Name: Date: SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND STORAGEN/(12.2) Samples adequately identified:

E] Yes (12.3) Samples stored. at: QC Siwoff: .ie -.Level: Date:. /?9 -/QC Reviewed:

Level: i LDate:. ______"3 _V i4 SQ 6.t.TMI.13 ISI: Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 336 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 296 of 348 PRCSO fiSICNE.N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION DATASHEET 7.1 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI -4 0 m YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: Anchorage ID.:-H 51 *ýLip__Tendon End/Buttress No.:_ _ _7 _.. _ _ _ Adaptor ID: EQUIPMENT MICROMETER WIRE SHIMS Thread Mic ID Recal Date ID No. Recal Date ID.No. Recal Date Ext.Major QC6Z 71 Pitc 2 2-'7"-It O*1# /i0-/I-ft.'

=f" /{ Ext.Minor 6,-5-- S--u /3 4-,26- N*MajorN/NA Int.Minor NN MEASUREMENTS THREAD Aveag Wire Wire Shim Average Thread Read 3( 9 Average Constant Diameter Size Diameter Major 2 4_370 , c £t N Pitchn(1) 2 N NAN3A Ext. 1 q0 Minor (2) 2 yIel4/Zo "3-q1r Ii.1 N/A N/ýA.Major 2. N/A NIAI Irt. 1 N/A N/A N/A Minor 12. N/A :N/A N/A Int.Pitch Go Gauge ID: N/A Recal. Date: N/A RecalIDate:

NIA Result: NIA..Result.. NIA*No-Go Gauge ID: NIA Note__es: (1) External Pitch Diameter = (Average]

-[Wire.Constant)

-(Shim Sizel (2) External Minor Diameter = [Average]

-[2 X Wire Diameter]

-[Shim Size]DISPOSITION

..Trial .1I Trial 2 .Trial 3 trial 4 Adaptor Mark Jb ,3 Min. Minor Diameter from Adaptor Table 1, 36.... .Acceptable?

.(Yes. or No) kg5.CO Signofft QC Reviewed: Level: Date: Level: .Date:.jopre.- r5 1401 j!,3-17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 tel Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 337 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 297 of 348 00" RECýISION~~Et AN CM N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION DATA SHEET 7,1 09/03/13.Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI -40? YEAR: TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: P- IL AD AtAe.vi gui Tendon End/Buttress No.: If Anchorage ID.:_ I _3 Adaptor ID: r2-I EQUIPMENT MICROMETER WIRE SHIMS Thread MIc ID Recal Date ID No. Recal Date ID No. Recal Date Ext.Major _____ 2_-_7_1 Ext.Pitch -5? 7-.t Al;!!' 1/ 4P -p -4 Sip4z-1 Ext. 0 MajorNANA IntN Minor MEASUREMENTS THREAD Wire Wire, Shim Average Thread Read 3 d 6th 9th Average Constant Diameter Size Diameter* Ext.Ia 1, L347 1.37S q-9 MajOr _ N2 N,3a4 Ext. I1 'jm5Z. ___* Pitch(1)*

2 $.31 ________ Z, '~ 5 Ext. 1 147 Minor (2) 2 1 ,4 710Z67- 1 Int. 1 N/A N/A N Major 2 N/A N/A Int. I NIA N/A N/A Minor 2 NaI N/A NIA Int. Go Gauge ID: .N/A Recal Date: N/A Result: N/A Pitch No-Go Gauge N/A Recal Date: N/A Result: N/A ID: Notes: (1) External Pitch Diameter = (Average)

-[Wire Constant]

-[Shim Size](2) External Minor Diameter = [Average]

-[2 X Wire Diameter]

-(Shim Size]DISPOSITION I Trial. 1 1. Trial 2 1 Trial 3 1 Trial 4 1 Adaptor Mark e--I I:1 Min. Minor Diameter from Adaptor Table %57 Acceptable? (Yes or No) ye.$0C Signoff:_w Level; : Level;Date: l Date: QC Reviewed: n :~z-I -10 17 SO 7.1 TMIA.i3lSI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 338 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 298 of 348 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE

[UNIT I (7.3)Tendon No.: J4 .1 -Z10, Tendon End: j....... Shop 1 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA As-Found 0l Post De-Tensioning I Pre-Wlre Removal C] Post Re-Tensioning 9.0 & t100 .-CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9,2) Buttonheads Level: :A M (10;1) Cracks 0 Yes (i2 [I N/A (9.2) Anchorhead Level: A (10.1) Cracks :Yesl ) V 5 Ng, [I NIA (9.2) Bushing Level: A (10.1) Cracks 0l Yes 2 t) RI N/A (9.2) Shims Level' A .L (1001) Cracks 0I Yes(2) FN N/A (9.2) Bearing Plate: Level: A (10.1) Cracks -] Yes 1 2 1 No N/A-1 1_Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. 12)- Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and initiate a NCR.ii f I n IBTTONI-PAf W1.qP~rTifnm Offsize (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated wire/buttonheads

• Broken/missing wire/buttonheads Previously identified as missing Discontinuous , removed this, surveillance wire(s) being removed during this surveillance for testing/ " 70000-00c>

000000000000 (0 000000000000, 900000300000000

ý'00ý00(01%(00 0 00 00 a0 00000000000000

\oooo00oooo000o 00000000000 K00000000(",.OOOOO t/( 12) Anchorhead .I.D. V26 Located~on Sketch; 4 Yes E- No Bushing 1.0; _ _Located on Sketch: 0ý Yes El No (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: Cl Yes C] No Quantity: Additional Informalion:

• 2. V... ....-I -ft 7 (12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0 .: (12 4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Bultonheads:.

(12.5) Total N of Effective Buttonheads Seated: 0 6 (8.3) Illumination source (12.6) Continuity Test Requested

? C] Yes (9 No Wires identified?

1 aes El No (12.7) Overall Results 'eAcceptable I"1Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: QC Reviewed: f1P Level: Date: //.C l-I I (IT I.18 SQ 8,0.TMI.113 ISt Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 339 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 299 of 348 Project TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PUNIT 1 (7.3)Tendon No.: *f 5/A-4) Tendon End:& 44w I Shop ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA C' As-Found Post De-Tensioning i Pro-Wire Removal C1 Post Re-Tensioning O.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: A (40.1) Cracks 0J Yes(2)(9.2) Anchorhead Level: _ 00.1) Cracks CElYes()}

[I N/A (9.2) Bushing. Level: (10.11) Cracks 0l Yes 1 2) O-VN/A (9.2) Shims Level: (10.1) Cracks El Yest" t El NIA (9.2) Bearing Plate Level' A '1 (10.1) Cracks C1 Yes (2) EC N/A I" Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. '_-Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and initiate a NCR;S111. BLUTTONHEAD INSPECTION I Offsize (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated vwire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/buttonheads SPreviously identified as missing Discontinuous

-removed this_ surveillance wire(s) being removed during this surveillance for testing LIZII " N---00000000/. /ooooooooooo~o\

\00000000000 0 00'00000000.0 0000000o 00 000 0 0000000000.00 00000000000000

\ ",..oooooo02,ooc/

0000000000000 10000000 000 0 0 0000.0000.00 0000000000 0',,. "oobooodo2/ "0-,,; /0()o00 q"- P (11.2)1 Anchorhead I.D. S164 Located on Sketch: i.Yes 0l No Bushing I.D.Located on Sketch: ,Yes 0l No (.11.4) Missing Buttonheads El Yes C] No Quantity:

Ac Additional Information:

' .-bl _A.Ji -4 Aq4bf, A ,al.. .. ....... "If .......... ...(12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, g): (12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads:

(12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: S(8.3)lltumination source ocIt ' ___(12.6) Continuity Test Requested

? El Yes I2.No Wiresldentified?!91kes C3 No (12.7) Overall Results (4 Acceptable 5 Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: /., QC Reviewed:~a~9 Level: Date: I I 40 18 so 8,0.TrMI;13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 340 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 300 of 348 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE .UNIT 1 (7,3)Tendon No.: , Tendon End: ,_Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA , As-Found U Post De-Tensioning I Pre-Wire Removal, [I Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoif 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION,&

CRACKtNSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level', (10.1) Cracks 0 Yes"' ["No U1 N/A (9.2) Anchoihead Level: 4 1 j (10.1) Cracks 1I Yes. (2) j o 0 N/A (9.2) Shims Level Z2m (10.1) Cracks n Yes (2) 9,3" C0 N/A (9.2) Bearing Plate Level: (10.1) Cracks C3 Yes (2 [ teNo C3 N/A 13 1 1 1_Conoslon Level of C eQuirese a NCRP. (2) Composwa~sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and initate a NCR.J 1 ( -RUTTONI-IAD INSPECTIOM 3' Offsize (Malformed)

Protrudinglunseated W wiro/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wlre/butionheads Previously identified as missing Discontinuous -removed this surveillance.

wire(s) removedduring this surveillance for testing 000/ oc 000 0000 0 0 00 0000 0000 0000..0 o 0~ (D..000.0 00 00*.000(000* .\ o<till']()((1 1.2).Anchorhead t.0. S(".'Located on Sketch: KYes 0 No (114A) Missing Buttonheads Found: p 0di Yes' [INf o ra uantity:n Additional Information; p0000O 0.X 000000 DOOOOO.00 00000000 D00000000 00.0000000 OOOO.000 000000000-0 00)0 0 00 0.000000000)ooo~oo~oo 00000000)o0.0 0 00 00 0 10.0 0 t, L.- .<4 &,& L4 --e ý v 9 (12.2) Number o! Protruding Buttonheads (w): .__ j (8.3) Illumination source c(o' Uoe_ _*(12:3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0 ,: g: (12.4) Total of Protrudingg+

Missing Buttonheads:, (12,6) Continuity TestRequested? ( Yes .NO" (12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads'Seated:

'Wires Identified?

Yes O.No (12.7) Overall Results VAcceptabte U1 Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: QC Reviewed: P.- a.Level: 'WI.Date: /'QL 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 341 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 301 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8,0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Sheet 8,0A 09103113 Page 1 of i Revision 0 I.Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE

[ UNIT I (7.3)Tendon No.: 14c )/- / Tendon End: , 'S []Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA[1 As-Found Post De-Tensloning I Pro-Wire Removal LI Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoff S9. &10.0 -CORROSION

&CRACK INSPECTION (9,2) Buttonheads Level: (0.1) Cracks fYes. (it 0 N/A:_ ~ ~~~(10G1)

Cracks LI Yes ]NP (9.2) Anchorhead Level: (s NIA (9.2) Shinis* Level: 0(0.1) Cracks C[ Yes 6, [1oa [I N/A (9,2) Bearing Plate Level:. 0 (10.1) Cracks .O.Yes.li (2) NIA_ Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and initiate a NCR.11.0 -BUTTONHEAD INSPECTION 111 Off'size (Malformed)

--' -...- -,-Prottuding/unseated " r..-wire/buttonheads,/

.0 B~roken/miissing wire/buttortheads.

S*

• 0000000 Previously identified as missing / 0 000000 00o../ ~00000000000

.1 Discontinuous-removed this / 000000000000

• surveillance. , 0000000000000 wlre(s) removed duringtis

'. 00.000000000000 surveillance for testing 00000000000000 1 (1 1,2) Anchorhead I.D. ()" () 0 () O 0 00 ') 0 () 0 0 11)0000000000000, Located on Sketch: WYes C1 No 0 0000 00000 0 0o0,0 0.00000000 (1,1oA)MissingBuotonoads Foud:oo 0 o 00 00/0 Yes [ No Quantity:

0000000 Additional.

Information:

.*,, ¶4Aekk4,-

t$.4 i- """-- .N (12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads

(.w): 6, 8,3) Illumination source (CC_ -o4. _(12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, g: C)(12.4) Total of Protruding:+

Missing Buttonheads:

___ (12.6) Continuity Test Requested?, l Yes Is-No (12.5) Total # of Effective ButtonheadsSeated-

. Wires Identified?

es L No (12.7) Overall Results QAcceptable I- Un-Acceptable:

Customer Notified NCR#: Al.d Q00 Reviewed:

0Level: Date:,.tA , /o, .:o. i r 18"SQ .O.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 342 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 302 of 348 ISON LANCE N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Sheet 8,OA 09103113 Page 1 of I Revision 0........ .1 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON: SURVEILLANCE .UNIT1 (7.3)Tendon No.:, Tendon End: tPField ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA .... ...[M As-Found 0" Post De-Tensloning I Pre-Wire Removal 1KPost Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signolf 9,0 & 10.0 .CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: (10.1) Cracks [I Yes (V1 [dN0 [CI N/A (9,2)Anchorhead Level: A (10.1) Cracks C' Yes (2) o E] NA (9.2) Shims Level: A J) (10.1) Cracks LI Yes V tdNNo 0I NWA (9.2) Bearing Plate Level: (,10.1) Cracks [I Yesn z [LI NIA-Corroslon:Level of C requires a NCR. 2 Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and Initiate a NCR.44 In 1 I1 t'lMUCAfl IM nflC TII'tE , Offtize (Malformed)

Protrudinglunseated W wire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/buttonheads

• Previously identified as missing 1__-_]00000000 Discontinuous -removed this surveillance.

m 0 wire(s) removed during this surveillance for testing (11.2) Anchorhead I.D. I &-Located onSketch:

[NYes, "1 No (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: N /[L Yes [L No Quantlty:/A

~~00.( 0:0"00 00 00.00000.0000(000000000000 000000000000(0000000000000 O000000000000c 00 0o~oooo~oo OO" 0000000000000 0000-000010000(0000000,00,000(0000000000000 0000.00C 0 0.C)I Additional Information:

k:., .44Ak -L-. -9,.7~~'Iiiz (12.2) Number of Protruding.

Buttonheads (w): .(8.3) Illumination source C441' _0 _(12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0 , :: I (12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads:

I (12.6) Continuity Test Requested?

LI Yes X No (12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: 61 Wires Identified?

I ,Yes [] No (12.7) Overall Results [ Acceptable EL Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCRI: QC Reviewed:.

LDi Level: Date: lohoh' i-18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 343 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 303 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.3 BEARING PLATE INSPECTION DATA SHEET SQ 8.3 09103/13 Page 1 of I Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 1 Tendon No.: /S, , Tendon End: d-j i lShop [].Field (7.4) Bearing Plate Identification

1. 4 A L. r /ieA 4 d.......t. Orient the bearing plate with the sketch below.2. Locate the bearing plate identification and documentithe location on the sketch.3. Sketch all cracks, including other defects, existing on the concrete in the area surrounding the tendon anchorage for a distance of 24 inches from the edge of the bearing plate.4. For cracks equal to or wider than 0.010 Inches, document condition, on an Nonconformance Report in accordance with Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES%

for Exelon approval.On Hoop and dome this edge is ,.yh 4'up. l Cbv riOA/Vertical Tendon, this is toward the center of the containment.

E t Auxiliary Light Source used: 0 YesQ No*(7.3) Illumination source: e__ __.i-(7.5) Cracks.a 0.010" C] Yes No Quantity; , Max. Width: Max Length: A/4- NCR#: QC Inspector:

.Level: Date:.IC Reviewed:

Level: T:' Date: /0 3 0A3 I .I .,. ..t9 SO 8.3 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 344 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 304 of 348 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 1 Tendon No.: .14[!5, t Tendon End.: , Shop Field (7.4) Bearing Plate Identification

1. 1AAJA 4 l (brA 4 ,..1. Orient the bearing plate with the sketch below.2. Locate the bearing plate identification and document the location on the sketch.3. Sketch all cracks, including other defects, existing onthe concrete:in the area surrounding the tendon anchorage fora distance of 24 inches from the edge of the bearing plate;4, For cracks equal to or wider than 0.010 inchesdocument condition on an Nonconformance Report in accordance with.Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES, for Exelon approval.On Hoop and dome this edge is up.Vertical Tendon, this is toward the center of the containment.

A40~ Pw-kvs zewere-4-k stm#cmr MAi #Q4,- e.,-m rn Aehq Auxiliary Light Source used' [I Yes.No (7.3) Illumination source: (7.5) Cracks > 0.010" 0-Yes No Quantity:;

Max. Width: MaxLength'.

NCR#: QC Inspector:

~ Level:. Date: /0-23.JC Reviewed: k'6L Level: Date: I, 19 SO 8.3 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 345 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 305 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 9.0 MONITOR TENDON FORCE DATA SHEET 9.0**09103113 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project' TMI 4 0 TH YEAR.TENDON SURVEILLANCE N Unit 1 2]Shop (7.6)Tendon No.: Tendon End' ,4/, /0 Field LIFT-OFF INSPECTION CRITERIA (9.3) Temp. of Concrete:

OF Thermometer No.: _J 2 Recal Date: __-6qL Ambient Temp.: SS F Thermometer No.: PK4 Recat Date: 1O8-l-(9.4) Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Threads -, R Acceptable E] Unacceptable

.(9,5) Number of Effective Wires: (9.6) Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Engagement/Alignment:

R Acceptable 0l Unacceptable:

(9.7) RAM ID: c .Recal Date: end ofjob RAM Area: 2, =Gauge ID: Recal Date: Dally Check: e& .(9.8) Shim Stack Height: #1 qi 2 Ruler ID: I Recal Date: , Individual Shims: Stack #11: i..0. in. Stack #2:, j!41 4 (9.9)Liftoff Overstress Force.(LOSF):

.2 kips Pressure:

___ ,_(9.10) PF: J1g. kips 95% PF:: g43/ kips 90% PF: lb 71"_0, 1S1.4 2. psi k94qq4.1 69q psi_____7£14~14,-In.j psi kips.-Psi (9,11.5) As-Found Lift-Off Stack #l: 1) 9gE psi S 2) .0 psi.3) .5110 psi (9.11.13)

End Average Force (this end): 1 (9.11.14)

End Avg. Force (other end): i (9.11.16)

Liftoff (ALV) Acceptance Criteria:r a) [ Acceptable

-ALV is > 95% PF.b) El Adjacent Tendons to be stressed c) El Unacceptable

-ALV Is < 90%PF.tack #2: 1)2) ips%2&48 kips (9.11.13)

Circled Values.psi 1) psi pi2) amt psi psi 3) psi h i Average:. psi (9.11.15)

Average Liftoff (ALV) /, 3,1, 4 kips-ALV is < 95%PF but _ 90%PF. Document on a NCR.Document on a NCR.es g No Customer Notified NCR No.: ,Ni NCR Required El Y (9.11.17)

A.dacent Tendon Lift-O r Adj Tendon: _a) This Tendon: Adj Tendon: EXELON Notified: ffs (Note: Use a separate.Data Sheet 9.0 to document Liftoff forcesj El Acceptable

-ALV > 95% of PF, The original scope tendon SHALL be.restored to within -01+69% of PF, but in no case,. no greater than 0.70 GUi determined for the number of effective wires. " El Yes C] No Name/Date:

b) _C Adj Tendon: ,_....Adj Tendon: El Unacceptable

-ALV < 95% of PF for either tendon- Document the condition on a NCR. I J Customer Notified NCR No.: C) AdJ Tendon: __ ol Unacceptable

-ALV < 90% of PF for either tendon. Document the condi Customer*Notified NCR No.: I QC Reviewed: kýf-1-1-41 Level: J1 Date:"06 I a 21 SQ 9.0 TMI.13 ISla Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 346 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 306 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQg9.0 MONITOR TENDON FORCE P :DATA SHEET 9.0 P 09/03113 PRECO .Ace Page 1 of i Revision 0 Project: TMI 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE

".Unit 1 (7.6)Tendon No.: .. I Tendon End: ; OShop I Field LIFT-OFF INSPECTION CRITERIA :Q,C. Signoff (9.3) Temp. of Concrete:

,, .F ThermometerNo.:

!T-IrX5. Recal Date.: .! 1/(/-i 4 Ambient Temp.: (.3 OF ThermnmeterNo.:

PK<"A Recal Date: io I-i4 ad o 01Z 3 (9.4):Anchorhead and Stressing.Adapter Threads.:

[EAcceptable

[],Unacceptable (9.5) Number of Effective Wiresw.(9.6) Anchorheadand Stressing Adapter Engagement/Alignment

@3 Acceptable 0 Unacceptable t6lS-J (9.7) RAM ID C: 40 Recal Date:. end ofjob RAM Area: .23(,%47 K- -.,Zt Gauge OID: Recal Date: _ Daily Check: D9 n43 (9.8) Shim Slack Height: #1..,3 in. #2 in. Ruler ID: L Recal Date: /1.//./4 Individual Shims: Stack #1: 4t, 1/* in. Stack #2:.., .4.2 -(9.9) Lift-off Overstress Force (LOSF): 1 -., kips Pressure: 7/ psi (9.10) PF: jJ13 kips 950% PF: 113S kips 90% PF: jh7". kips 5142,34 Psi 4909,57 psi 415'6,78 Psi (9.11.5) As-Found Lift-Off .(g. 1..13) Circled Values Stack.#1:

1.) 6 psi Stack #2: 1) rps. 1).sýo psi psi 2) 5500 psi 2) f.g!rj ) psi 2) psi I5ob3) !A psi. 3) \5.9 Ipsi 3): S6$0 psi (9.11.13)

End Average Force (this end)' kips'-'--' " Average: -; 55C psi .3 (9.11.14)

End Avg. Force (other end): .6 kips .(9.1.1. 15) Average Liftoff (ALV) ,3/* kips (9.11.16)

Liftoff (ALV) Acceptance Criteria: a) [MAcceptable

-ALV is -95% PF.b) El Adjacent Tendons to be stressed -ALV is 95%PFbut._

90%PF. Document on a NCR.c) El Unacceptable-ALVis

<90%PF. Document ona NCR./ NCR.Required 0I Yes 0 No Customer Notified NCR No.: AL, (9. 1.17) Adiacent Tendon Lift-Offs. (Note: Use a separate Dala Sheet 9.0 to document Liftoff foicea)Adj Tendon: _ Acceptable

-ALV > 95% of PF, The original'scope tendon SHALL be a) This Tendon: _restored to within -01+6% of PF, but in no. case, nogreater than 0.70 GUTh a Adj Tendon: __ determined for. the number of effective wires. ..EXELON Notified:.

0] Yes [] No NamelDate:

{ -b) -- AdI Tendon: _ _ Unacceptable -ALV < 959/% of PF for either tendon. Document the condition*.. AdJ Tendon: on a NCR. C R.*.Customer*Notified NCR No,: _____________

c) rAdJdTendon:

.oI Unacceptable

-ALV < 90% of. PFfor either tendon.. Document the condition LAdj Tendon: ____ on a NCR.AA Customer Notified.NCR No.: / _/_QC Reviewed:.

Level:_ _ Date: /3 21 SQ9.0 TMI:13 ISla Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 347 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 307 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ10.2 TEST WIRE REMOVAL Data Sheet 10.2 or Pag09103113 PRECISION LANCE: Pae ofIl Revision 0 Project: TMI 40Tm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE

[ UNIT 1 Tendon No.: _Aj -z r> Tendon End: 4 p'.$ I' Shop 0 Field Removal Date: ./,l Inspection Date: /bZ -i.WIRE REMOVAL INSPECTION CORROSiON INSPECTION A LENGTH INTERVALS (8.5.4.1.

1) Documentthe Corrosion Category for eath 10' of wire in the increments below. Use Categories descnbed:in PSC SQ 8.0.For Corrosion Level C document condition on an NCR. NCR Req'd: .NO 0 YES NCR# gt/A (8.5.4,3.

1) Document thetotal:length of the wire on the diagram below. Completed:

-NO .YES GyA Suttonhead End.. .... .., ...

p. 20 30' 40' .60'0 60'0 10020 1110' 1 120'120' 130'~ A AXAAAA..aaasa-a-a-ft .aaaa.as.

KA 180? 190' 200' 210'210' 220' 230' 240'240' 250' 260W 270'270' 280' 290 300'300' 310'= 32 .0' 330'Cut End (8.5.4.6.2)

Was the wire cut for samples: 0 NO YES document the area of removal above using symbol k, (8.7) Document the location of wire removed on Data Sheet 8.0, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION: Completed (8,8) Measuring Device: SVe., I1 0 6e- ID Number: .q Recal Date: /5- II- 1'!(8.8) Wire Pull Ram ID Number. a!A Inspector:

W, _ Level: Date: ,, _.. QC [)/leviewed Cc' JNJ/ý Level: 7IDate: 25 SQ 10:2 TMI.13 ISi Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 348 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 308 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 11.0 RETENSION TENDONS DATA SHEET 8Q 11.0 0910311 3 Page 1 of 2 Revislon 0 Project TMI40Tm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE 9 UnitW1 C Unit 2 (9.3)Tendon No.: p. t1'- Tendon End.: , .Shop .'Field (9.4) Temp. of Concrete:

.'IF Thermometer No.: ir- 0 Recal Date: /- 1/- /14 Ambient Temp.: OF Thermometer No.: 8KA. Recal Date: /0 v/-14 (9.5) Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Threads: 1R Acceptable 0 Unacceptable RETENSIONING DOCUMENTATION QC Signoffs (9.6) Number of Effective Wires: 1 (from Data Sht, 8.0)(97) Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Engagement/Alignment:

[I Acceptable (I Unacceptable (9.7.3) RAM ID: 4o Recal Date: 'RAM Area:. K -5. 1j.Gauge ID: Recal:Date:

Daily Check:, e~ M -13 Calculated Force for Elongation Measurement and Retensioning using formula below*O.OT : Stress dudng Lift-Off should not exceed. 9.425 kips per effective wire or 1592 kdps tor a 169 wire tendon.(9.8.4) PTF = k ' Hips Pressure: ,. 2 psi Step1= 1 00 kips. Pressure:

4-L.4LLpsi" Elongation:

in.Step.2= j, 6 kips* Pressure: psi Elongation:

-7, 6 in.LOF= 1 ,I kips Pressure:

-, 75 1 psi OSF= .../, j kips Pressure:

psi, 7., Elongation:

Lb. 75 in. 1/-2,!-3 P =(F K) x 1000 Key: F = Force (kips)A A = Ram Area (in?)P = Gauge. Pressure (psi)K:= Constant factor (kips)(CAUTION: "K constants can be either positive or negative.).

QC Reviewed: aL Level:.Date: ./.3 I (7/28 SQ 1.1.0 TMI;13 ISi~doc Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 349 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 309 of 348 Project: TMI 40' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE

{ Unit I C Unit 2 (9.3)Tendon f " I Tendon End: Shop 0 Field Actual Observed Force and Elongation Measurements using formula below QC Signoffs (9.9.4.1)

PTF = kips Pressure: ( 76 psi () Elongation:

4,7 in (9.9.5.1)

Step 1 SZ11kips Pressure:

3M0 :psi Eloangation:A3jn (9.9.6.1)

Step 2 kips Pressure:

s 168 psi Elongation:

7,.' in, 3O/01" (9.9.7.1)

OSF = 1J.7,Skips Pressure:

(0,71t" psi () Elongation:

qji_ _AxP 1000 (9.9.8) 0 -0= 4,,% in. Elongation Value (this end)(9.9.9) L Elongation Value (opposite end)(9.9.10) o in. TOTAL Tendon Elongation Value (9.9.12.1)

Elongation

% Ruler ID: .Recal~ate:

,6}t'/-.(9.9;12.3)

Elongation Results [ Acceptable

[I Unacceptable Customer Notified NCR No: IV Options Original Lift-off.Values from Data Sheet SQ 9.0 A Lift-off ý; Predicted Force r- Use Predicted Force -0 + 6%B Lift-off > Predicted Force l] Use Lift-off -0 + 6%, 4 4 767-0 C Lift-off > 67% GUTS 0l Use 70% + 0-3% GUTS (effective wires)D Lift-off > 70% GUTS I] Use 70% + 0 -3% GUTS (effective wires)/0/3011`5

.0 (9.10,5) LOF Acceptable Range Min As found lift-off/or predicted (highest):

-3.41.3, kips From: !57,S, I Z, psi.Max To: .o kips To:. slA1: s I (9.10.6) Actual Lift-Off Stack.#1:

1) r,!J36 psi St-2). ,!SOq psi 3) !5,83t) psi (q.108) Force (this end): !354A,23 kip&(9.10.9) Force (opposite end): 1 M,16 kips, (9,10m11)

ALV Acceptable:

& Yes 0I No (9.1'ack #2: 1 S83t psi psi Actual Average: (9.10.10)Tendon ALV Force Customer Notified NCR No.: 0.8) Circled Values I1) 5%30 psi 2) $%So psi 3) _SJA2' psi 5l~b psi 3 0.347 kips/0 (9.10.15)

Additional broken/missing wires: : Noe [I Yes Amount: (9.10.16)

Additional Protruding/Unseatedwires:

I4 No El Yes Amount:: I Yes -Customer Notified NCR No.: ( Fm zi (9.10.17)

Final Shim :Stack Height: #I: .in. #2: .OC Reviewed:

.........Level: Date: 26 SO I1 .0 TMI 13 1SI-doc Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 350 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 310 of 348 I I I i PRMS109AEB N1691 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 11.0.RETENSIONTENDONS DATA SHEET SQ 11.0 09103113 Page 1 of 2 Revision 0 I.i .. .,, ' i ... ...i .....l -...Project: TMI4eTh YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Unit 1 unit 2 (9.3)Tendon No.: /4 51 -. *Tendon End: .i Li.i .0lShop I Field (9.4) Temp. of Concrete:

6,-Z .F Thermometer No." 5 J-. ( Recal Date: 5 Ambient Temp,.-. 5 I F Thermometer No.: PK' .Recal Date: /0).//-/l.

(9.5) Anchorhead and Stressing.

Adapter Threads: R Acceptable

[I Unacceptable RETENSIONING DOCUMENTATION QC Signoffs (9.6) Number of Effective Wires: ___ (from Data Sht. 8.0).(9.7) Anchorheadand Stressing Adapter Engagement/Alignment:

J@ Acceptable 0] Unacceptable (9.7.3) RAM ID:. Recal Date: RAM K -Gauge ID; eC Recal Date: jj/_1 Daily Check: /d.D -1 Calculated Force for Elongation Measurement and Retensloning using formula below&M.,: Stress during Lift-Off should not exceed 9.425kipspereffective wire or 1592 Wfps fore 169 wire tendon.(9.8.4) PTF = / j kips Pressure:

I q,4psi Step I = SOD kips Pressure:

395 1, 71 psi Elongation:

4.,9 it, Step 2=: 1,260 kips Pressure:

.. psi Elongation:

-7., Ir LOF- , 341.34 kips Pressure: 1 psi.S 7q kips Pressure:

1l,'1psi Elongation:.

10M7 ir I.I.rI,~~eeib-z~?-

/3 P = fE-KL x 1000 A Key:. F = Force (kips)A = Ram Area (inW)P= Gauge Pressure (psm)K= Constant factor (kips)(caunoN: 'W constants can be either positive or negative.)

tJ o e.r.uLM4At Lt Z -.-4 5 -~~s~s.HT -"' 2- C 1-4r, -303L4UIs~o

'5 i< a Level: QC Reviewed: 1ET Date: /013(ol /3/.28 S0 11.0 TMI.13 ISI.doc Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 351 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 311 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 11.0 RETENSION TENDONS DATA-SHEET SQ 11.0 P09/03/13 PR C S O N FP age 2 O ~f 2 Revision Project: TMI 4 0 TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE CK Unit 1 El Unit 2 (9;3)Tendon -JL Tendon End: C Jl Shop 19 Field Actual Observed Force and Elongation Measurements using formula below I QC Signoffs (9,9.4.1)

PTF =

Pressure:

1'raO psi (D Elongation:

(9.9.5.1)

Step 1

• 7,6kips Pressure:

10SO psi Elongation:

4fln (9.9.6.1)

Step 2 1200,ldkips Pressure:

I Elongation:

'&Zin.(9.9.7.1) 0SF = .51..STkips Pressure:

I 21r) psi Elongation:q.,5 in, ye 64.49-1 .3 F-A xPK 1.000 (9.9.8) (P- S&S, in. Elongation Value (this end)(9.9.9) 4- in. Elongation Value (opposite end)(9.9.10) .)_ , Z, in. TOTAL Tendon Elongation Value (9.9.12.1)

Elongation

.% RulerrlD:

1.9Z Recal Oate:..//-/4~

(9.9.12.3)

Elongation Results ZA Acceptable Cl Unacceptable Customer Notified NCR No: L._A Options Original Lift-off Values from Data Shoot SQ 9.0 A Lift-off < Predicted Force El Use Predicted Force -0 + 6%a Lift-off>

Predicted Force Use Lift-off -0 +6% u44 4a eXCC0 4 76%C Lilt-off > 67% GUTS El Use 70% + 0- 3% GUTS (effective wires)D Lift-off > 70% GUTS Cl Use 70% + 0 -3% GUTS (effective wires)(9.10.5) LOF Acceptable Range MIn Max As found lift-offlor predicted (highest):

134 1 S4 kips X 0,4, 60 kips From: psi To: Z.t.J24 psi. AtXD-9-I-(9.10.6) Actual Lift-Off (9.10,8) Circled Values Stack #1: 1) ... 0t psi Stack #2: 1 5%q94 psi 1) sq6. psi 2) qod psi.2 '& Dpsi 2) !t40 psi 3) S406 psi 3 si 3). 9 psi (9.10.8) Force (this end): 137(0,94):

kips Actual Average; .5140 psi (9.10.9) Force (opposite end): kips (9.10.10)TendonALVForce

/3,69 7 kips (9.10.11)

ALV Acceptable:

[9 Yes 0 No Customer Notified NCR No.: 'VA (9.10:15)

Additional broken/misSing wires: (&No El Yes Amount:-(9.10.16)

Additional Protruding/Unseatedwires:

&No 0l Yes Amount: If Yes -Customer Notified NCR No.: A (9.10.17)

Final Shim Stack Height: #1: in. #2: 1 __ __an, QC Reviewed:

Level: ii- Date: 1/ .0//'3 28 SQ 11.0 TIVIL 13 ISI.doc Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 352 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 312 of 348<'PWRE C SO~~18 M" AN1CF N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 12.0 REPLACE GREASE CAP Data Sheet 12.0 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 40T YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: H 51 140 Tendon End: -Shop C] Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA BEARING PLATE SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GREASE CAP SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GASKET MATING SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: STUD/BOLT HOLES: PROPERLY PREPARED: FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCLUSION CONTROLLED:.YES* YES* YES* YES I YES F1 NO M NO E NO C1 NO E3NO COMMENTS Al td~~c/(oui~&;

fc/~~CREW FOREMAN SIGNOFF __,,__-_-__,_,,_.___Date:

_____/_QC Reviewed: Level: V Date: 30 SO 12.0 TMIL13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 353 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 313 of 348 Project: TMI 4 0 TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: Tendon End: 6,,44f_!5

" 0.Shop ZI Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA BEARING PLATE SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GREASE CAP SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GASKET MATING SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: STUDIBOLT HOLES PROPERLY PREPARED: FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCLUSION CONTROLLED:

3Y/ES YE-S YYES n NO EINO ONO LJNO El NO COMMENTS CREW FOREMAN SIGNOFF ~ *& ~ Z ~Date: t94 QC Reviewed:

.... .6 Level: Dae: OA-te 30 SQ 12.0 TMI.13ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 354 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 314 of 348 Project: TMI 40& YEAR TENDON*SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.:- g'9, GREASE REPLACEMENT QC SIGNOFFS.(8:4) Grease Used NEW [I OLD -TEST DATE: 0 ACCEPTABLE

[ APPROVAL LETTER 8.0 PREREQUISITES, DATED:.(8.5) Total Grease Loss from Data*Sheet 6.0 for tendon end: 4,25 got.(B.6) TotalGrease Loss from. DataSheet 6.0 for tendon end: gal.(897) Estimaektedgrease losses from leaks for, A tendon end: gal.(8.8) Estimated grease losses from leaks for tendon end: Q gal.(8,9) TOTAL Tendon Grease Loss: 7, .gal.13.0 POURING AND HAND PUMPING -FIRST END 1... ...0 POU ING AND HAND PUMP......

IN FIRS.T ....(13.6) Ambient Temp.: OF Thermometer ID: PK g)! Recal Date:. tD (13.7) Grease Temp,: ."F ThermometerlD:

PKID: Recal Date: .. -U... 1 (13;9) 1ti Grease Height(a)

"(, 5 in. (13.12) final Grease Height (b). in.(13.14) Total amount of Grease added: ga., gal. -bW:x 1.77 into the: , end (13.16) Quantity of.Waste Grease: -gal. (13115) -Poured Hand Pumped (13.17) Total Grease Retlacedthis end: ss gal.4Jgem4n*I3

-I 13.0 HAND PUMPING- SECOND END 13.0,T HAND.... IN.... .... .EN (13.6)Ambient Temp.: 5jF Thermometer ID: Recal Dale:, -1/-1'f (13.7) Grease Temp.: zr.c *F Thermometer ID: 'Iw Recal Date: (13.9)tBlGreaseHeight(a) 2 , in. (13.12) Final Grease.Height (b): ,,S in.(ti3.14) Total amountofGreaseadded:.

S gal. (a-b)x 1.77 into the end (13.16) Quantity oftWaste Grease: 0 gal. (13.15) &Poured El Hand Pumped (13.17) Total Grease end'.: r ,TS gal.AIAP 1A.7-11 14.0 CALCULATION OF PRESSURE PUMPING (14.1) Total Tenon Grease Replaced.

I, O, gal. (13.17 + 13.17)(14.2) Net Tendon Duct Grease Volume: 01, I gal. FPr M SO 2- , .threww,%,c

(,14.3) Percent:Difference: -Total TendonReplaced (14.1).- Total Tendon Loss (8.9)(143) erc nt iffre*e:xl 100 -- % .Difference Net Tendon Duct Grease Volume (14.2)ý(14.4) Grease Leaks: C3 Yes No (14.5) Refill Acceptable: (tess than to%) [] No (greaterthan t,%) ,,, 3 If No -Customer Notified NCR No.: A,1/(14.6) Comments: QC Reviewed: v -k Level:.Date:/03/poz I -_ -r a I 31 SQ 12,.1 TMI.13 ISt: Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 355 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 315 of 348 IPREcI I o11 LANCE N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL.Data Sheet 6.0 09/03/13 Pagel of 1.Revision (Project: TMI 4 0 1H YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Q UNIT 1 (7.3)*Tendon No.: V, Tendon End: , f Shop El Field I Grease Cap Removal (7.6) Date Removal Started: g .. -3, (7.7) Dry Ice Used on Grease Cap and/or Anchorage El Yes I, No icalh i (7.8) Temp. of Concrete:

"2 2 F Thermometer No.: S" \ Re-Cal Date: =Ambient Temp.: I .F Thermometer No.: ,Ipj Re-Cal Date: l- 1/ tL1 (8.4).Anchorhead I.D, : 7 3 Anchorhead Verification:

N Match l] No-Match (8.5) Grease Coating Grease Cap -Complete / Partial Uncoated 01.Bultonheads-Complete / Partial Uncoated %a Anchorhead

-Complete Partial Uncoated %Shims -Complete 77 Partial Uncoated %Bearing Plate -Complete j Partial Uncoated %0) -Limited within theinsidediameter of the grease cap.(8.6) Unusual Conditions;

10/ZE (8.7) Grease Color Match: 03 Yes 9 No Grease Color: / E -P p, A.Comments:

N 0 NE (8.8) Quantity of Samples cj Quart Samples identified per Step 8.8.1? [ Yes £3 No Location Of I A.H, 11 B.P. (&Shims C[ Cap [I Duct Removal.(8.9) Qty. of*Grease lost during removal of cap: & gal.(8.9.1) Grease from cap to be eused? £] Yes [ No Qty. of Grease removed from cap: .' gal.(9.6) Qly. of Grease removed from anchorage:

14 .5 gal.(9.7) Damage during cap removal or anchorage cleaning?

£' Yes [@ No Describe:

,//A (10.3) Method of Tendon Protection:

i rp-LLWTl)

C kV)/NtruJ

&A S 14S (10.4) Amount of Grease Loss from Tendon duct: 9 gal.(10.5) Total quantity of lost grease (below): (8.8) .5 + (3s. )+(10.4) -TOTAL (11.1.2) Document.TOTAL grease lost on Data Sheet 12.1, GREASE REPLACEMENT.

AYes El No QC Reviewed:

&so6.o T~i. 3It 0 Level: Date: q-95-1.3.13 SO 8.0 TMI..13 1 I.I Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 356 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 316 of 348 Project: TMI 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT I (7,3) Tendon No.; V/ .. Tendon End: o-' r']Shop jjField Grease Cap Removal (7.6) Date. Removal Started' 2-- 701: QC. Signoff (7.7) Dry Ice Used on Grease Cap and/orAnchorage 0 Yes N No (7.8) Temp. of Concrete:

.b 0 F Thermometer No.: Re-Cal Date:./0 .zt-t3 Ambient Temp.: .p OF Thermometer No.: ReCaol Date: /b-2'4 (8.4) Anchorhead I.D. 717 Anchorhead Verification: ,Match 0 No-Match (8.5) Grease Coaling.Grease Cap -Complete yj Partial Uncoated ._ .Buttonheads

-Complete Partial "Uncoated

%Anchorhead

-Complete _ Partial Uncoated %.Shims -Complete Partial Uncoated W_Bearing Plate -Complete Partial Uncoated _________( Limited within the inside diameter of the grease cap.(8.6)Unusual Conditions:

AQAi -..(8.7) Grease Color Match: C1 Yes No Grease.Color 7%A4 &6xim Comments: (8.8) Quantity of Samples .Quart Samples identified per:Step 8.8.1? N Yes, 0 No Location of R.A.H. 0 B.P. 91 Shims KCap J Duct Removal (8.9) Qty. of Grease lost during removal of cap: .gal.(8.9.1) Grease from cap to be reused? LI Yes KNo. Qty. of Grease removed from cap:: 4. gal. , J (9.6) Qty. of*Grease removed from anchorage:

.K gal. -)y (9.7) Damage during cap:removal or anchorage cleaning?

LI Yes E No Describe: ,IkJNe_..

44 (10.3) Method of Tendon Protection:

&454J4AI ~ 1ft 1tAE.c4i A -dJ-tV qAzkr5 (10.4) Amount of GreaseLoss from Tendon duct; gal.(10.5) Total quantity of lost grease (below):, (8.8) Q.j+ (8.9) -& + (8.9.1) } + (9.6) + (10.4) 6 TOTAL .-7 (11,112) Document*TOTAL grease lost on Data Sheet 12.1, GREASE REPLACEMENT.

KYes LI No QC Reviewed:

n/L/ i /A Level: Date*13 SQ.6,0 TMI.13 ISl Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 357 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 317 of 348 N1091 PSC.PROCEDURE SQ .1J INSPECT FOR WATER Data Sheet 6G1 09/03/13.PRECISION.

ANCE :Page I of I Revision 0 Project: TMI 4 0 TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE

[ UNIT'I (8.1) Tendon No.: Tendon End: Shop [iField (9.5.1) DURING REMOVAL OF GREASE:CAP Water Detected:

.] Yes [KNo Sample Taken: E]Yes No N/A Moisture

Description:

E] Observable Moisture E] Significant Moisture I Not Applicable Comments:

iV ..(9.6.1) INSIDE GREASE CAP Water Detected:

E] Yes &No Quantity:

," Sample Taken:. E Yes El No [aN/A Moisture

Description:

E] Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture JZ Not Applicable Comments:

NOM (9.71.) AROUND TENDON ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Water Detected:

C1 Yes [. No Quantity:

' Sample Taken: 0l Yes Cl No IZ NIA Moisture

Description:

El Observable Moisture E] Significant Moisture Applicable Comments: (9.9.1) DURING DETENSIONNG/L'/

Water Detected:

El Yes El No Quantity:

Sample Taken: El Yes 0l No El.N!A Moisture

Description:

[E Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture El Not Applicable Comments: (11.*1) NOTIFICATION

/4//1}Exelon Notified:

El.Yes Individual*Name-Date: SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND STORAGE /f/(12.2) Samples adequately identified:.

El Yes (12.3) Samples stored at: 00 Signoff: _______________Level:

-~ Date: q~-, qI- 13 QC Reviewed:

AL L_ Level: ..f Date:. 14 S 6.1.TMI.131 S1 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 358 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 318 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQO8.1 A " INSPECT FOR WATER DataSheet

6.1 09103113

PiECISION S ANCE Page 1. of 1 Revision 0 Project:.

TMI. 4eT YEAR TENDON. SURVEILLANCE 1 UNIT I (8.1) Tendon No.: V. -:15. Tendon End: El Shop "RField (9.5.1) DURING REMOVAL OF GREASE CAP Water Detected:

El Yes [gNo Quantity:

.Sample Taken: El Yes t] No Z..N/A Moisture

Description:

[] Observable Moisture I] Significant.Moisture Ri.Not Applicable Comments:

ALM (9.6.1) INSIDE GREASE CAP Water Detected:

-l Yes I]No Quantity: Sample Taken: El Yes [ No [ N/A MoisturelDescription:

El Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture Jl Not Applicable:

Comments: ,i0A J-(9.7.1) AROUND TENDON ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Water Detected:, E] Yes (.No Quantity: Sample Taken: El-Yes [I No Oý NIA IvioistureDuescripuon:

LilUoservauie Iviosure tJ 5ignincant Moisture pp NOt ,Applicaole Comments:

Aoic (9.9.1) DURING DETENSIONING Water Detected:

E] Yes E] No Quantity:

Sample Taken: E] Yes El No El NA Moisture

Description:

El Observable Moisture i-] Significant.Moisture E[: Not Applicable Comments: (11.1) NOTIFICATION AJ/4 Exelon Notified:

0 Yes Individual Name: Date: SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND STORAGE (12,2). Samples adequately identified:

El Yes (12.3) Samples stored at: QC Signoff: 4', ." Level: Date: _-____"_._

QC Reviewed: Level: .7 Date: q-..2 q- 3 14 SO &.TMI. 13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 359 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 319 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION DATA SHEET 7.1 09103113 Page 1 of : Revision 0 I1 Project: TMI. -40' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: V -J I 5 Tendon End/Buttress No.:.I Anchorage IDo,:2 -) ,Adaptor ID: 011 EQUIPMENT MICROMETER.

WIRE SHIMS Thread Mb IcD= Recal Date ID No. Recal Date I No. Recal Date Ext.Ext.Pich R CA 2 1I4 q_____,1~-3 5L R Ext.Minor !1C Re j7-I4l" *9 ] -13 & fO- li Iflt. N/A N/A Major IntN Minor N MEASUREMENTS THREAD Wire Wire Shim Average Thread Read: 3fa 6t 9V4 Average Constant Diameter Size Diameter Ext. 1 3-11b 7.3717 Major 2 9.37A , 8_Ext. 11 7 Minor (2) 2 2.,--I* a (4 IV 9f!. \1L n. .. A N/A 1 N./Major .2 NIA N/A Int, I NIA N/A N/A Minor 2 N/A N/A N/A Int. Go Gauge ID: N/A Recal Date: N/A Result: N/A Pitch No-Go Gauge N/A Recal Date'. N/A Result: N/A ID: Notes:.(1) External Pitch Diameter = (Average]

-[vvire Lonstantl

-[Snim Sizej (2) External Minor Diameter (Average].

-(2.X Wire Diameter].

-. [Shim Sizel DISPOSITION I TO.ial: I I Trial 2 1. Trial 3 1 Trial 4 1 Adaptor Mark C-.Mid. Minor Diameter from Adaptor Table .Aetble?. (Yes or No) , OC Signoff: I ikA Level: J9. Date: 1145 Level: Date: .z.- ZI) I'QC Reviewed: MI A~ ~ tX.fL '~17 SO 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 360 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 320 of 348 Project" TM 12013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 1 (7.3)Tendon No.: V Tendon End:. .Shop ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA As-Found 0 Post De-Tensioning

! Pre-Wire Removal El Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: 0 (10.1). Cracks C1 Yes(2 i , No C] N/A (9.2) Anchorhead Level: f! (10.1) Crack$s E] Yest68 No El NIA*(9;2) Bushing Level: (10.1) Cracks [l]Yes'2) (9 No El N/A (9,2) Shims Level: .t (101) Cracks [J'Yes C@ No El N/A (9.2) Bearing Plate. Level: (10.1) Cracks El Yes:(2) [llNo El NIA Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. -21 Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and Initiate a NCR.4 4n -1_2 IVT kIUlAfl

• V l r% 1 ' nr"rt* I,*d I Offslze (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated w wire/bultonheads 0 Broken/mIssing wlreibuttonheads 9 Previously:identified as missing[FI Discontinuous

-removed this surveillance

/ /oooooooooooo\

00000000000

.00000000000:

~~~~ O O ) ob o"0J ©,O o ooo b 0000000000000 000000000000

0o

'00000000000010 0000000000000 00000000'000 000 Nx. ".. oo o oo 0 n wire(s) being removed during thip 1 Isurveillance for testing RAP 10 30o1 (11.2) Anchorhead I.D. ,,-, 7.,3 Located on Sketch: I] Yes El No Bushing ID. "z Located on Sketch: 2j Yes El No (11.4) Missing Bultonheads Found'El Yes 0l No Quantity;Additional Information: 44./ 411 ..)_ ,%,/Y,&ý 9 iq- 13 (12,2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, )(12.4) Total of Protruding.+

Missing Buttonheads:

(125) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: 4-(8.3). Illumination source CC 0 C I I .- LA I (12.6) Continuity Test Requested?

E" Yes Z No Wires Identified?

[Ye7 No Customer Notified NCR#: / /V1 (12.7) Overall Results JAcceptabte

[3 UnAcceptable 4?2A 4-ýJ 3 QC Reviewed' iiI 1 L#- Level: Date:: 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.3 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 361 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 321 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.0B 09/03113 Page 1 of I Revision 'Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT I (7.3)Tendon No.: V-/ L .Tendon End: "TO .. Shop ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA 0 As-Found El Post De-Tensioning

/ Pre-Wire Removal EI Post Re-Tensioning.

Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttanheads Level: A (10,1) Cracks r-Yest 2 1 I No r' N/A (9.2) Anchorhead Level: (10.1) Cracks (I Yes) 2 No Cl N/A (9.2) Bushing Level: 0(0.1) Cracks El Yes(2! [0 No E" N/A (9.2) Shims Level: _ 1) (10.1) Cracks .- Yes (=2 W No Cl N/A (9.2) Bearing Plate Level:. S (10.1) Cracks El Yes (2) JR.No El N/A C t, '-Iq-,13 (11- Corrosion Levelof C requires a.NCR. 1,)1Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and initiate a NCR.11.0 -BUTTONHEAD INSPECTION ,si /- .i'- .vx I OffsIze (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated.

EZIZI-I w wire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/buttonheads., 0o-..000000* Previously identified as missing 0 00000000.0 00.00 0 00 0)00 surveillance re v 0000000000000 wie() eig emve dan tisý0000 0_00000000 surveillance for testing .1000000000000 (PO\ 000000000 0000./(11.2) Anchorhead ID. 753 \0 000000.0 '0 0 0 0 \000000 0000 Located on Sketch: I Yes 0 No 0 .00 Bushing I.D. q .000000 0.00 0 3 O000000O Located on Sketch: 0 Yes El No D .0 0 0 0 (1000.(11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: Ko00./El Yes C] No Quanlity/y A.Additional Information: , L " -i " .%Le/iv (12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): Z (8.3) Illumination source te ocut -024.1 (12.3) Number of Missing. Buttonheads (0 ,5): (12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Bultonheads; (12.6) Continuity Test Requested

? El Yes l No (12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: I U_.CL_. Wires Identified?

CY No, (12.7) Overall Results I] Acceptable Cl Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: t,/. q-q .13 QC Reviewed:

d_ -Level: Date: 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.1l ISI 0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 362 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 322 of 348.PR s .,,o N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.0A 09103113 Page I of 1.Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE HUNIT !(7.3)Tendon No,:u Tendon End: ' Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA "" As-Found ' Post De-Tensioning I Pre-Wire Removal '] Post Re-Tensioning:

Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0,- CORROSION,&

CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: A ) (.10.i) Cracks n Yes (2) dl N/A (9.2)Anchorhead Level: V (10.1). Cracks l Yesa(2) 19o l0 N/A (9.2) Shims. Level: A, (10.1) Cracks. El Yes 12 Dl N/A (9.2) Beaflng.Plate Level~: ~ (10.1) Cracks [I Yes VNo nl N/A V,120-15 Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR, 12)Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Slheet 8.0 and init'ate a NCR.11.0 -BUTTONHEAD INSPECTION I Offsize (Malformed)

Protrudinglunrseated W wirelbuttonheads 0 Brokenlmissing wiretbuttonheads

• Previously identified as missing Discontinuous

-removed this surveillance..

i wire(s) removed during this surveillance for testing (1*1.2) Anchorhead I.D. 71T Located on Sketch: 4Yes O" No (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: ji/0l Yes 0l No Quantity:NA/

0000000 00000000 00000000000 000000000000 0000000000000 00000000000000 0000000000000 00000000000000 0000000000000 000000000000,00 0000000000000.

000.000000:00.

ooooooooojoo 0(.00000:00 O0000000 Additional Information:

Js t , ., ,4Atk k4. -/11-Z 77 (12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): ._ .(8.3) source # .i$* (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, 5: _ _(12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads:

0 (12.6) Continuity Test Requested?

C] Yes IN.No (12.5) Total # of Effective Butt0nheads Seated: Wires Identified?

sA 0E. No (12.7) Overall Results (,Acceptable El Un-Acceptable

Customer Notified NCR#: /QC Reviewed:

Al7t (1&J4 Level: Date: IV 18 SQ 8.O.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 363 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 323 of 348 N1091 PSCPROCEDURE SQ 8.3 BEARING PLATE INSPECTION DATA SHEET SQ 8.3 09103113 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 1 Tendon No.: V 5 Tendon End; "T-' 0 Field (7.4) Bearing Plate Identification

1. 4t~fi/L u L-, rC 1.. Orient the bearing plate with the sketch below.2. Locate the beadng plate identification and document the location on the sketch.3. Sketch all cracks, including other defects, existing on the concrete in the area surrounding the tendon anchorage for a distance of 24 inches from the edge of the bearing plate, 4ý For cracks equal to or wider than 0.010 inches, document condition on an Nonconformance Reportin accordance with Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES, for ERelon approval.On Hoop and dome this edge is up..Vertical Tendon, this is toward the center of the containment.

CONCP-4Tt

-;1J~P4-1t

/S P,14,61Y i/ tA/1 Pf/Auxiliary Light Source used: El YesfS No (7.3) illumination source: OCll (7.5) Cracks 0.010" DQNo Quantity,:

Max. Width: AL/_. Max Length: _A_4L. NCR#: /v ,"JC Reviewed:

Level: Date:__. _oI ,o. oo. ,,e: °°19 SQ 8.3 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 364 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 324 of 348 Project:.

TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE l UNIT.Tendon No;: V Tendon End.: C Shop Field* (7.4) Bearing Plate Identification#:

U AA 4p , 44,e , .t i. Orient the bearing plate with the sketch below;2. Locate the bearing plate identification and documentthe location onthe sketch.3.. Sketch all cracks, Including other defects, existing on the concrete In the area surroundItng.

the tendon anchorage for a distance of.24 inches from the edge of.the bearing plate.4. For cracks equal to or wider than 0.010inches, document condition on an Nonconformance Report in accordance with.Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORttANCES, for Exelon approvaL.On Hoop and dome this edgeis Vertical Tendon, this is toward the center of the containment..

2-I.J -A<6-:týW, = ;dC_Auxiliary Light Source used: H YesCJ No (7.3) source: cc 004-% _Nu y .WeN (7.5) Cracks 2: 0.010" 0 Yes 01 No: Quantity:

a.Widh Max Len th: NCRA: CInpco:Level:

Date:.1C Reviewed:( A Level: ._Date: J 19 SQ 8.3TM1.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 365 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 325 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 9.0 MONITOR TENDON FORCE DATA SHEET 9.0 09103113 Page 1 of 1 RevIsion 0 I Project: TMI 4 0 TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE 1 Unit 1 (7.6)Tendon No,: V/- 1I .Tendon End: W__ _ _ _ Shop C0 Field LIFT-OFF INSPECTION CRITERIA Q.G. Signoff (9.3) Temp, of Concrete.

7 70F Thermometer No.: ST 40,? Recal Date: Ambient Temp.: 90 *F Thermometer No.: Pk( /0/ Recal Date: /I/Y./, / P-j .(41,.1 (9.4) Anchothead and Stressing Adapter Threads':

P Acceptable 5 Unacceptable (9.5) Number of Effective Wires: / _(9.6) Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Engagement/Alignment:

C Acceptable

.- Unacceptable (9.7) RAM ID: Recal Date: end ofjob: RAM Area: a3 ..1o,.e K -S., T" -Gauge I1: ..C-.-13 5 -IS Recal Oate:bwl4, op r Daily Check: 0 ..(9.8) Shim Stack Height:. #1 I. 8 In. #2 j,5, R In. Ruler tD: ' Recal Date: I ¶- L Individual Shims: Stack#1:.

Stack #2:i/,4,4

.I. .In. , (9.9) Lift-off Overstress Force (LOSF)' 0L5 kips Pressure:

],,33 ft psi (9.10) PF: 1211 kips 95%oPF: , 5 kips 90% PF: / 1O kips s5 ,3 psi1. 53A.. b- psi .50 "79t K b psi'(9.11.5) As-Found Lift-Off (9.11.13)

C(rcled Values, Stack#1: 1)..jfr', psi Stack#2: 1) 33I, O psi 1) Z'-0.O psi.)S~pp2) )590 s 2) psi: 3)_5!n 11) psi ~4 t~' 3) .5 JZQ psi .3) r30 q2- 0 psi: .&.(9.11.13)

End Average Force (this end): (/t Average: ,g z & *si 'f-q-f3 (9.11.14)

EndAvg. Force (other end): .ps (9.11.15)

Average Liftoff (ALV) ,13-1 ".,51 kips (9,11.16)

Liftoff (ALV) Acceptance Criteria:

Yt. Qv. C f-W A+4 1;P4 0" f, a) rq Acceptable

-ALV is a 95% PF.b) E] Adjacent Tendons to be stressed -ALV is -c 95%PF but a 90%PF. Document on a NCR.c) E5 Unacceptable

-ALV is < 90%PF. Document on a NCR. -,.NCR Required [3 Yes Customer Notified NCR No.: // LAI (9.11.17)

Adiacent Tendon Lift-Offs (Not.,: Use a separate Data Sheet 9.0 to document Liftoff forces.)Ad) Tendon: _ .__ 0 Acceptable

-ALV > 95% of PF, The original scope tendon SHALL be a) This Tendon:: restored to within -01+6% of PF. but in no case, no greater than 0.70 GUTS as Adj Tendon: __ determined for the number of effective wires. ce,,j EXELON Notified:

] Yes 5- No NamelDate-.

AII ,-XCJ-leJ b) .Adj Tendon: C5 Unacceptable

-.ALV < 95% of PF for either tendonm Document the condition l.Adj Tendon': ___ _ on a NCR, I4.(Customer Notified NCR No.: Adj Tendon: _ _ Unacceptable -ALV < 90% of PF for either tendon. Document the condition L, Adj Tendon: on a NCR, .Customer Notified NCR No.: ! -C Reviewed:

Level:_ Date: 21 SQO %0TMIL13 lS19 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 366 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 326 of 348 4d WsGION ACE N1091. PSC PROCEDURESQ

.12,0 REPLACE GREASE CAP Data Sheet 12.0 09103113 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 40. YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: V- I I Tendon End: j-n_ 0 Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA BEARING PLATE SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GREASE CAP SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GASKET MATING SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: STUDIBOLT HOLES PROPERLY PREPARED:, FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCLUSION CONTROLLED:

YES 0 YES.J YES:} YES I YES O NO.I- NO.CNO.CNO: El NO COMMENTS Mt CREW FOREMAN SIGNOFF ~ot:~~--X/ 94W=- 9 QC Reviewed: Level: D Date: 94!ý- 13 30 80 2.0. TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 367 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 327 of 348 Project: TMI 4 0 TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: 15 Tendon End: E,41l E] Shop gJ Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA BEARING PLATE SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GREASE CAP SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GASKET MATING SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: STUD/BOLT HOLES PROPERLY PREPARED: FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCLUSION CONTROLLED:

[IYES erYES EUNO[INO El NO ENO fNO COMMENTS, CREW FOREMAN SIGNOFF t~.I~. ~Date:~QC Reviewed:

d ( " Level: Date: 30 SO 12.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 368 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 328 of 348 Project:, TMI 40"' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: GREASE REPLACEMENT OC SIGNOFFS (8.4). Grease Used C NEW 0- OLD -TEST DATE: 0 ACCEPTABLE E0 APPROVAL LETTER 8.0 PREREQUISITES DATED: (8.5) Total GreaseLoss from Data Sheet 6.0 for TO P tendon end: gal. -.(8,6) Total Grease Loss from Data Sheet 6.0 for tendon end:: , gal. ' Z/3 (8.7) Estimated grease losses from leaks for " .tendon end:-(8.8) Estimated grease losses from leaks for, .. tendon end: gal. (8.9) TOTAL Tendon Grease Loss: gal.1 13.0 POURING AND HAND PUMPING -FIRST END I I I I I I I I I II 1 II *(136) Ambient Temp.: 3S OF Thermometer ID: pI p " Recal Date: -[ , (13.7) GreaseaTemp.:

2,2,0 uF Thermometer ID: Pi< RecalDate;

/./'/li l(13"9)!a Grease Height (a) ;-1..5 in. (13.12) final Grease Height (b)l l in (13.14) Total amountof Grease added: jtp, '1 gal. ta-b)xl.77 into the and (13.16)Quantity of Waste Grease: gal. (1115) W oPured C" Hand Pumped (13.17)Total Grease R this end: , 3 7 gal.C4L)~. '1-f;1 , i_:1n!!qQ PUMPING -SECOND END I (1.3.6) Ambient Te 'F Thermometer ID: , Recal Date: (13.7) Grease Temp.:e -FD: Recal Date: (13.9) Lnitial GreaseHeight (a) inl. 13. .)Final Grease Height (b) in.(1314) Total amount of Grease added: gal, (a-b):x177 he ýe.end (13,16) Quantity of Waste Grease: c r(13.15) [] Poured i. Hand (13.17) Total GreaseReplaced this end: gal.14.0 CALCULATION OF PRESSURE PUMp N.(14.1) Total Tendon Grease Replaced:

j. 1l~31 gal. (13. T J 13.1T)(14.2) Net Tendon Duct Grease Volume: .1 p gal. Rarer to so n -GREASE LUVES, tr I Dud Vol Total Tendon Replaced (14.1) r Total Tendon Loss (8.9)(14.3) Percent Difference:

X 100 = (A..99 % Difference Not-Tendon Duct Grease Volume (.14.2)el (14.4) Grease Leaks: 0- Yes q No 43.(14.5) Refill Acceptable:

I Yes ess than io%, Cl No (greater tha, f0%). ,)9..Jql-/

(146) Comments:

If No -Customer Notified NCR No: (14.6)Commens:

/'QC Reviewed: KX Cafl-Level: Date: ./0/.3 o 13 I 31 SQ 12,.1 TM.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 369 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 329 of 348 N1091 PSC.PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL Data Sheet 6.0 l 09/03113: Pagel of 1 Revision r'Project: TMI 40'M YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT I (7.3) Tendon No.: I ,/-3 (0 Tendon End:: CAjf/ 1 Shop 0 Field Grease Cap Removal (7.6) Date Removal Started: i0 Z 6 Q.C. Signoff (7.7) Dry Ice Used on Grease Cap and/or Anchorage

[3 Yes M No (7.8) Temp. of Concrete:

(00 OF Thermometer No.: SRTe-Cal Date: L Ambient Temp.- 6 O 0 F Thermometer No.: EK. Re-Cal Date: 0, -i (8A) Anchorhead I.D.: /(O Anchorhead Verification:

RZMatch 0 No-Match (8.5) Grease Coating. U Grease Cap -Complete Partial Uncoated %_Buttonheads

-Complete Partial Uncoated %Anchorhead

-Complete V :Partial Uncoated %_" Shims -Complete Partial Uncoated %Bearing Plate.-'" Complete Partial Uncoated % U-Limited within the inside diameter of the grease cap.(8.6) Unusual Conditions:

A/b,/L b&t-z-(8.7) Grease Color Match: KYes [I No: Grease Color: Comments:

A/e,/j ' (0.z.-I (8.8) Quantity of Samples L- Quart Samples identified per Step 8.8.17 (4 Yes [I No Location of IO A.H. 0l B.P. t Shims CK Cap El Duct Removal 107Z-(8.9) Oty. of Grease lost duringremoval of cap: gal gal. I (8.9.1) Grease from cap to be reused? [] Yes KNo Qty. of Grease.removed from cap: gal- gal. Z.(9.6) Cty. of Grease removed from anchorage:

/ 5 gal. 11. Z'13 (9.7) Damage during cap removal or anchorage cleaning?

(3 Yes 21 No Describe:

A_'e.o-z-i3 (10.3) Method of Tendon Protection:

R-;MWJJAII1J-

-4L s. , c'p e/A le 6A.5_ke-+

ug IL-J1 (10.4) Amount of, Grease Loss from Tendon duct: pi"ggal. .z3 (10.5) Total quantity of lost grease (below): (8.6) A)-_ (8.9) 9 + (8.9.1) 3S + (9.6) +.5 (10.4) = _, TOTAL W .Z (11.1.2) Document TOTAL grease lost on Data Sheet 12,1, GREASE REPLACEMENT,.

MYes El No O,2-OC Reviewed:

Level: Date: 13 SQ 6.0 TMI.13 tSI.0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 370 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 330 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL Data:Sheet 6.0 09/03/13 Pagel of 1i RECISION sANCEo Revision P'Project: TMI 4 0 T' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE 1 UNIT I (7.3) Tendon No.: V"do Tendon End: (7.iMJ k El Shop. W,Field-.Grease Cap. Removal (7.6) Date Removal Started: /tO " / I .. Q.C Signoff (7.7) Dry Ice Used on Grease Caj5 and/or Anchorage n Yes No Io'i/If I'3ofdo'(7.8) Temp. of Concrete:

OF ThermometerNo.:

C Re-.Cal Date: Ambient Temp.: 83 OF Thermometer.No.: )K =1. Re-Cal Date: 11 / -, -01, (8.4)Anchorheadt.D.: .jLj'q Anchorhead Verification:

[&XMatch iNo-Match

--(8.5) Grease Coating Grease Cap.- Complete L Partial Uncoated %.Buttonheads-Complete Partial Uncoated %.Anchorhead

-Complete_

Partial _Uncoated

%Shims.- Complete J Partial Uncoated ........ %c" 4/Bearing Plate -Complete L Partial Uncoated % O -/-( LUmited within the inside diameter of the grease cap.(8.6) Unusual Conditions:

./}Q ,-.(8.7) Grease Color Match:. 0 Yes t No Grease Color ) D Comments:

OIL -eiOfA8&ATi

-(8.8) Quantity of Samples 2- Quart Samples identified.per Step 8.8,1? L..Yes fl No Location of E-]A.H. D B.P. 0 Shims Cap .L Duct Removal (8.9) Qty. of Grease lost during removal of cap: gal.(0.9.1) Grease from cap to be reused? Q Yes ' .o Qty. of Grease removed fromcap: .,gal. -/ -(9.6) Oty. of Grease removed from anchorage' r 5 gal. r. 1.(9.7):Damage during cap removal or anchorage cleaning?

0 Yes N. No Describe:

...1-/ 1 (10.3) Method of Tendon Protection:

/+/- G ZA _. / j 8:#" -- /0"'/(10.4) Amount of Grease Loss from Tendon duct: t,7 981-/d, (10.5) Total quantity of lost grease (below): (898) 1 0(8.9)+..9.)(8.911)

+.. 9(0.4) 2 TOTAL .(11.1.2) Document TOTAL grease lost on Data Sheet 121. GREASE.REPLACEMENT.

C] Yes E] No QC Reviewed:

W'~Level:

Date: oc~ov, owo° °13 SQ 6.0 TMh 1.3 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 371 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 331 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER Data Sheet 6.1 09103113.Page 1 of I Revision 0 Project: TMI40m YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT 1 (8.1) Tendon No.: V" I3(, Tendon End; R [ Shop El Field (9.5.1) DURING REMOVAL OF GREASE CAP Water Detected:

E] Yes K No Quantity:

.Sample Taken: E0 Yes El No. t NIA Moisture

Description:

ED Observable Moisture C3 Significant Moisture f&Not Applicable Comments: (9.6.1) INSIDE GREASE CAP Water Detected:

C] Yes RNo Quantity:

o Sample Taken: El Yes: E No (] NIA Moisture Description' E] Observable Moisture Ii Significant Moisture IgNot Applicable Comments:

/O,, (9.7.1).AROUND TENDON ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Water Detected:

0] Yes [No Quantity::

C Sample Taken: El Yes F1 No [] N/A Moisture

Description:

E] Observable Moisture 0I Significant Moisture -Not Applicable Comments: (9.9.1) DURING DETENSIONING Water Detected:

El Yes [J No Quantity:

6 Sample Taken: C1 Yes El No NIA Moisture

Description:

[] Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture Applicable Comments:

,, ut.(11.1) NOTIFICATION

'N/A Exelon Notified:

El Yes Individual Name: Date: SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND STORAGE A/, (12.2) Samples adequately identified:

[] Yes (12.3) Samples stored at: QC Signoff: 6_ Level: ... Date: l OC Reiwd 110tJ 4 Level'. JT Date: /0-3-6!V 14 SQ 6.t.TMI,13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 372 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 332 of 348[. .. "N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER 4 I -Data Sheet 6.1 PMF- 09103113.PRECISION ANCE Page 1 of 1, Revision 0 Project: TMI 4eT YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE I UNIT 1 (8.1) Tendon No.: = Tendon End: ., Shop Field (9.5.1) DURING REMOVAL OF GREASE CAP Water Detected:

E] Yes ENo. Quantity:

.Sample Taken: E] Yes E-]No Moisture

Description:

C1 Observable Moisture El' Significant Moisture [. Not Applicable Comments:

4,/A (9.6.1) INSIDE GREASE CAP Water Detected:

El Yes NNo Quantity:

4,AL Sample Taken: El Yes E] No .N/A Moisture

Description:

El Observable Moisture ] Significant Moisture )] Not Applicable Comments:

• /f (9.7.1) AROUND TENDON ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Water Detected:

El Yes R9 No Quantity:

/V/4: Sample Taken: EC Yes El No M NIA Moisture

Description:

E ]:Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture [ Not Applicable Comments:

_ 1/(9.9.1) DURING DETENSIONING.Water Detected:.

E] Yes QqNo Quantity:

1\/11A Sample Taken: El Yes E] No NIA Moisture.

==

Description:==

E] Observable Moisture, i- Significant Moisture aNot Applicable Comments e t:i___(11; 1) NOTIFICATION/4 Exelon Notified:

El Yes Individual Name: Date: SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND STORAGE/,///q (12.2) Samples adequately identified-El Yes (12.3) Samples stored at: QC Signoff: ._Level: -Date: ,0- 2.QC Reviewed: JAI Level: .Y7 Date: 1e5-Z," (3 14 SO 6.1.TMI1,.31SI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 373 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 333 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1-" INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION DATA SHEET 7.1-5 "09103113 RECIS16N ~ ANCE Page I of I Revision 0 Project: TMI -4&m YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: e-i .Lt rendon End/Buttress No.:- ---o Anchorage ID.: 1/00 Adaptor ID:.w .EQUIPMENT MICROMETER WIRE. SHIMS Thread Mic ID Recal Date ID No. Recal. Date ID No. Recal Date Major _TS I It Ext.Ext.Mat. NIA N/A int.MEASUREMENTS THREAD Averag Wire Wire Shim Average Thread Read 3r Average Constant Diameter Size Diameter Ext; I ¶! L.51A______, o,'.3 74 Pitch (1) 2_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Ext. , V(47 Major 2 N/A ___Int. 1 N/A N/A N/A Minor 2, NA N/A N/A Int. Go Gauge ID: N/A Recal Date: NIA Result; NIA Pitch No-Go Gauge N/A Recal Date: NIA Result: N/A ID: Notes: ki) Exwmal Pitch uiameter LMveragel

-LVVi na -C t IanlI- m bIzel (2) External Minor Diameter I Average).

-(2 X Wire Diameter]

-[Shim Size]DISPOSITION Trial I Trial 2 Trial 3 Tral 4 Adaptor Mark -?-Min. Minor Diameter from Adaptor Table -.5gJ Acceptable? (Yes or No) '<OC Signolf: QC Reviewed: 'ILPh A~4,1.4s 14,1& ZZrdo ýL Level: Level: _Date: /0-Z-tofZC Date: I 17 SO 7.t TML 13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 374 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 334 of 348 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE

!R UNIT I (7.3)Tendon No.: V-I'V Tendon End: "op Shop ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA GM As-Found El Post De-Tensioning

/ Pre-Wire Removal 0 Post Re-Tensioning:

Q.C. Signbff 9.0 & 10.0,, CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION.

(9.2) Buttonheads Level: (4 (10.1) Cracks [3 Yes (2) NIA.(9.2) Anchorhead Level: A 411" (10.1) Craclks 0 Yes (2) 2 0 N/A (9.2) Bushing Level: A(0.1) Cracks 0 s 7 -UI N/A (9.2) Shims Level: A (10.1) Cracks 0l Yes Z11 0} NIA (9.2) Bearing Plate Level: (10.1) Cracks C1 Yes (2) KNo [I N/A Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. 2)- Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and Initiate a NCR.110. Bi 1TTONHF;:An iN,;PFCTtfll 0 Offsize (Malformed)

Protrudinglunseated wire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missingwlre/buttonheads Previously identified as missing.Discontinuous

-removed this surveillance.

wire(s) being removed during this surveillance for testing o0 /ooooooo000

/ooo o 5o0?o~o:ooo>

.000000000o0 000000000000 C 000000000000 00000000000000 o0000000000000/

0k0OQOOOOO0.000 Uoc00.O000,000000)

\000000*000000Z

\000c0000000/

0 0OG 000/* \ 000oo.o(', .ooooooo/'

\ ,/(11.2) Anchorhead I.D. X21 W l I Located on Sketch: 9Q Yes 0 No Bushing I1D. I 1.D Located on Sketch!.:

RYes [I No (111.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: N/CI Yes [I No Quantity:

1,k Addit alInformationn:

kio 4 X 44 V#i, .16.,2, y-(12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): (8.3) Illumination source (12.3) Number of Missing. Buttonheads , (0 : __(12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads::

0 (12.6) Continuity Test Requested

? 0I Yes (9 No (12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: 161 Wires ldentifiedi34 Yes LJ No (12.7) Overall Results ZAcceptable, L- Un-Acceptable.

Customer Notified NCR#: I QC Reviewed:

(~4 ,),-Level: Date:/2~-3-1;I V V 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 375 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 335 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.08 09103/13 Page I of 1 Revision r 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE rUNIT 1 (7.3)Tendon No.: V -/&G Tendon End: " Shop ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA " _'U As-Found f, Post De-Tensioning I Pre-Wire Removal El Post Re-Tensloning Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10,0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: 4 (1. (10.1) Cracks El Yes (2) 1'No E] NIA (9.2) Anchorhead Level: A V) (10.1), Cracks EI Yes (2) 3 N 0 N/A (9.2) Bushing Level: A (10.1) Cracks 0I Yes4 2 3) NjNp ( NiA (9.2) Shims Level: A (10.1) Cracks -Yes 2 1 No 0I NIA (9.2) Bearing Plate Level: A (10.1.) Cracks 0] 1) io C] N/A-Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. (} -Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and Initiate a NCR.11,0 -BUTT'ONHEAD INSPECTION

• Offsize (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated

[1 1 vwire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/buttonheads 2-- -A --o 0000000 Previously identified as missing 0 0 00 0 0000 Discontinuous -removed this 000000000.00 C)surveillance 0000000000(-,D

=/ /oooooooo0 ooo0.o0 0 wire(s) being removed during this 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 surveillance for testing -0 0 0 OO C 0 0 00 0 0 0 0000000000000 (11.2) Anchorhead I.D. XZIWZl 000000000000010 Located on Sketch: 91 Yes C1 No .\ r\0O0 OOO ./Bushing I.D. I\ 0 000000000o Located on Sketch: [! Yes El No o. 000 o00 o0 D (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: At! .[I Yes El No

./Additional Information:

' ' -,7 (12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): O (8.3) Illumination source (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, Kb: ID (12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads:

0 (12.6) Continuity Test Requested

? C] Yes K] No (12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: Wires IdentifiedAAYes LE No (12.7) Overall Results 2[Acceptable C- Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: A QC Reviewed: Level: Dale:/0- 3-1-/18 SO 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 376 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 336 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.UB 09103113 Page 1 of 1 Revision r Project::

TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE 0 UNIT 1 (7.3)Tendon No.: ,,V7 IT Tendon End: I@ Shop ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA[I As-Found C] Post De-Tensioning I Pre-Wire Removal* Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION

& CRACK IN§PECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: A 111 (10.1) Cracks Ell Yes (2) L09N C0 NIA (9.2) Anchorhead Level: A 44, (10.1) Cracks C1 Yes (2) V _o 0-N/A (9.2) Bushing Level: fill (10.1.) Cracks El Yes (2) O N/A (9.2) Shims Level: (10.1) Cracks 0 Yes(2 JNI,' 0-NIA (9.2) Bearing Plate Level: 10 (10.1) Cracks 2E]Yes ( I2) o El N/A-Corrosion Level of iC requires a NCR., 1-Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and Initiate a NCR.1.0. -UTTONNFIAn INSPECTION Offsize (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated wirelbuttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/bultonheads Previously identified as missing Discontinuous

-removed this surveillance

%N 0000,0000\

0000000000 0000000000000.

0.0 000000000000

0000000O000000 100000 00000-) 00001 )0000 0000000000000

/ o_000000000000 ,V /o o0000.0 ooo00 00 .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.'.-.°9 oo o0 00 oo /=',°" ooo o ooo~o~ooi

/wire(s) being removed during this surveillance for testing (111) Anchorhead XD1W Located on Sketch: C? Yes :0 No Bushing I.D.Located*on Sketch: R1 Yes [] No (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: 0 Yes C No Quantity:/A Additional Information:

5 16LA-9h\//'k_ I 1 1 1 I j (12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads

((a: * (8.3) Illumination source ZC+/-,-ao'Q,_, (12,3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, ,: ,r e,*4 (12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads; (12.6) Continuity Test Requested

? C1 Yes 2 No (12.5) Total#of Effective Buttonheads Seated: 1 Wires Identified Yes C3 No (12.7) Overall Results [ Acceptable t Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#* -- _.0_ Reviewed: Level: Date: I-I I 1.8 SO 8.0TMI. 13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 377 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 337 of 348 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT I.(7.3)Tendon No.: V -13(i Tendon End; & L( []Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA '" (] As-Found [I Post De-Tensioning I Pre-Wire Removal C]. Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: ______(10.1)

Cracks [I Yes J ,0 No r] N/A (9.2) Anchorhead Level: (10.1) Cracks El Yes (2) 5No C] N/A (9.2) Shims Level: (10.1) Cracks EL Yes 0 I1 No [- N/A c-6 (9.2) Bearing Plate Level: (10.1) Cracks [I Yes 0) 3 No [I N/A ta4- I, (l Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. tl)Compose a sketch of the cracks 0n:Sketch Sheet 8.0 and Initlate a NCR.11.0 -BUTTONHEAD INSPECTION O ffsize (Malformed)

Protrudinglunseated wire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/buttonheads

/0000000 Previously Identified as missing 00000000 00000000000 Discontinuous.-

removed this .000000000000 surveillance.

"" " 000000000000 wire(s) removed duringthis 00000000000000 surveillance for testing -lI, oo(oo0000o00000 o000 00000000000060 O0000O00Co0OoO (1i.2)Anchorheadt.D.

Ffy/q 000000.00000000 Located on Sketch: [&Yes 0 No O 000000 0000000 (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: .0 0 000 0 0000 0 Yes 0.No Quantity:

0000000 5-Api4o c--fAemse~j l4 Additional Information:

A'1k4.#/ V/ (d"'------.____,____._--____

o .- -! , (12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): .(8.3) illumination source .. 1 ltz t , (12,3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, g ___. _(12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing 8uttonheads:

-(12'6) Continuity Test Requested?

[] Yes I No (12.5) Total N of Effective Buttonheads Seated: Wires Identified? U No (12.7) Overall Results LI Acceptabte

[I Un-Acceptable Customer NoUiled NCR#: t o g- r.Ji o -0 'L. / QC Reviewed:

Level: Date: 18 SQ.8.0,TMI.131S Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 378 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 338 of 348 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE f9 UNIT I (7.3)Tendon'No.:

UJ1, 1 Tendon End: , .Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA 0 As-Found Post DeTensioning I Pre-Wire Removal 0l Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoff 9,0. 0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION.

(912) Buttonheads Level: -(10.1) Cracks. Yes (' No e N/A (9.2).Anchothead Level: A .(10.1) Cracks [ Y e s (tA No 0 NIA (9.2) Shims Level: A (10.1) Cracks: C];Yes [ N] No 0 N/A (9.2) Bearing Plate. Level: t (.10,1) Cracks, El Yes 121 [ No -N/A Cortosion Level of C requires a NCR. t 2)Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and initiate a NCR.I11.0 -RtJTTnNHEAD)

INSPIrCTIOM Offsize (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated w wireibuttonheads 0 Broken/missing wireibuttonheads

• Previously Idenlified as missing Discontinuous

-removed this surveillance.

)wire(s) removed during this surveillance for testing 0000.0000o00 o00.0oooo~oooo:oo 00:0000000000 0000000000000 O000000000000 00000000000000 0000000000000 00000000000000 "00000000000 S00000000oo 0000000 (11.2) Anchorhead I.D. Y1 y'C..W Located on Sketch: [J Yes. E] No (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found:[I Yes M No Quantity: i r- -AdditonalInfomatio:

/07-1.4. lk:. 4o L4_/V0 -WIM5 //V .I ý(12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): .7 __ (8.3)Illumination Source Ic, t I- O2(p < -T (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, ): (12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads;:

I (12.6) Continuity Test Requested?

El Yes EJ No (12.5) Total # of Effective Butllnheads Seated& Wires Identified?

[I Yes C] No (12.7) Overall Results El Acceptable Pk Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: 4C1P- tio 0 1-002 OC Reviewed:.

6, 1e JýAl m Level:, Date:~Y ~ :-.w~'-18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 379 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 339 of 348 N1.091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Shoet 8,0A 09103113.Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE UNIT I (7.3)Tendon No.: Tendon End: L___.L____-"__

Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION.

CRITERIA i_[] As-Found 1 Post De-Tensioning

/ Pre-Wire Removal Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: A (1) (10.1) Cracks 0-Yes:" IkNo 0- N/A (9.2) Anchorhead Level: (10.1) Cracks. 0 Yes:; [qNo 0] NIA (9.2) Shims Level: (10.1) Cracks 0 Yes (2).No 0 N/A (9.2) Beaeing Plate Level: A(101) CracksN A Yes .2 t N o ON /A-Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. 2 1 Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and Initiate a NCR.41 fl -~IiTTAtJH~hfl It~JWF~TIA~J 11 Offsize (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated W, wire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/buttonheads.

• Previously identified as mlssing J Discontinuous

-removed this surveillance.

wire(s) removed during this I _ surveillance for testing O000000 A1011 .QO0 .000 ooooo00000000oo0 v'=tVtH~ 0000000O00000

\~ / ~000000000000, 0000000000000 0000000000000.1I

~oooooooooooo~-1 00000000000:000 0000000000000 00000000000000 0000000000000 000000000000 00000000000 0o0000000 0O000000/N~/7 (11.2) Anchorhead 1.0. ,. A q Located on Sketch: i[Yes OlNo (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: 0 Yes No Quantity: Additional Information:

Aie 4 kLA. -l./9 9 I (12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, 5: '.(12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads:

(12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: (8.3) Illumination source -I ' i iiFt1 (12.6) Continuity Test Requested?

0 Yes N No Wires Identified?

[0 s Y @ No A'J f (12.7) Overall Results [] Acceptable RUn-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: NC h2 lol I -p Z.QC Reviewed:

a, j , Level:_:6E Date: I 18SQ 8.0TMI. 13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 380 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 340 of 348 PRECSIO AN CE N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.3 BEARING PLATE INSPECTION DATA SHEET SQ 8.3 09/03113 Page l of i Revision 0 v Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE W UNIT 1 Tendon No.: Tendon End: I0 Shop E *Field.(7.4) Bearing Plate identification#:

UWAL I n 1~*.4 1. Orient the bearing plate with the sketch below.2, Locate the bearing plate identification and document the location on the sketch.3. Sketch all Cracks. including other defects, existing on the concrete in the area surrounding the tendon anchorage for a distance of 24 inches from the edge of the bearing plate.4. For cracks equal to or wider than. 0.010 inches, document condition on an Nonconformance Report in accordance with Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES, for Exelon approval.On Hoop and dome this edge is up.Vertical Tendon, this is toward tho center of the containment.

4kC~ P-viM AKYA, SI~ACL~gheArlj AIr& t5 coA4ea toi~kjw Auxiliary Light Source used: [- Ye}jo No (7.3) Clluminati.0.

source: ae '(7.5) Cracks>a0.6160" O'Yes SýNo Quantity::

_ _.Max. Width: Max Length: -A NCR#: _QC Inspector:

Level:1 Date:/1) , 'g -=3 J.C Reviewed Level:.Date: 10-5../3 19 SO 8.3 TMI. 13ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 381 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 341 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.3 BEARING PLATE INSPECTION DATA SHEET SQ 8.3 09103113 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON: SURVEILLANCE

[ UNIT 1 Tendon No.: U- 3 -0Tendon End: -- L.L Y. LIShop J Field (7.4) Bearing Plate Identification

1. 4 I/l .W1 I V 5J C) =p'!1. Orient the bearing plate with the sketch below.2. Locate the bearing plate identification and document the location on the sketch.3. Sketch all cracks, including other defects, existing on the concrete in the area surrounding the tendon anchorage for a distance of 24 inches from the edge of the bearing plate.4. For cracks equal to or wider than 0.010 inches,. document condition on an Nonconformance Report in aocoidance with Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES, for Exelon approval, On Hoop and dome this edge is up.Vertical Tendon, this is toward the center of the containment.

AtIAWt~Auxiliary Light Source used: Yes[] No: (7.3) Illumination source: d &/ -O"2, Li (7.5) Cracks z 0.o10o.., Yes .No Quantity:

Max. Width: Max Length: NCR#: QC Inspector:

of.4.. .Level: Date: ,.JC Reviewed:

Level: Date:. / ,. j'19.SQ 8.3 TMI. 13ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 382 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 342 of 348 ANCE N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 9.0 MONITOR TENDON FORCE DATA SHEET 9,0.09103113 Page: 1. of.1 Revision 0 Project:.(7.6)Tendoi TMI 4 0 TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE.

n No.: 19 unit 1.Shop V- 136 Tendon End& ."eon 0l Field LIFT-OFF INSPECTION CRITERIA (9.3)Temp.

of Concrete:

d4j- Thermometer No.: W.J-6A Recal Date: 1'02n-13 Ambient Temp.!. OF Thermometer No.: Recal Date:.(9;4)Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Threads :. [ Acceptable ni Unacceptable (9.5) Number of Effective Wires:. 168.(9,6) Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Engagement/Alignment R.Acceptable

[] Unacceptable:

(9.7) RAM ID: Recall Date: end ofjob RAM Area: 12 3(,EiLj K =Gauge ID: r Recal Date: a-S,#, Daily Check: 4:iiC.(9.8) Shim. Stack Height: #1 in. #2 in. Ruler lD:.. /fRecal Date: ._.Individual Shims: Stack #1: .Stack #2: .,4. " 1g In 31t 12 in.**(9.9) Lift-off.

Overstress Force 4 ICA;- psi ." (9.10) PF.k:.p 95% PF: / 241 kips 90% PF. /1175 kips sz. ,l't psi _614 6,1 psi /f,1 psi 0 3d.a (9:11 5) As-Found Lift-Off Stack #1: 1) , psi 2) psi 3) !511o psi: (g. i1,13) End Average Force (this end);(9:11.14)

End Avg.. Force (other end): Stack #2: 1)2) 7S. 6 3)iSi17 kips\(9.11.13)

Circled Values psi 1) 57&5 psi PSi 2) 176, psi psi 21) .._ _ = psi.Average: !MPO Psi (9.11.15)

Average Liftoff (ALV) t=35,i7 kips (9.11,16)

Liftoff (ALV) Acceptance Criteria: a) Acceptable

-ALV is 2 95% PF.b) El Adjacent Tendons to be stressed -ALV is < 95%PF but-? 90%PF.. Document on a NCR.c) El Unacceptable

-ALV is< 90%PF, Document on a NCR..NCR Required 0" Yes l] No: Customer Notified NCR No.: (9.11:. 17) Adiacent Tendon LifQ-O Adj Tendont __a) This Tendon: Adi Tendon: ___EXELON Notified: ffs Use a separate Date Sheet 9. 0 to document Lifloff forces).0i Acceptable

-ALV > 95% of PF, The original scope tendon SHALL be restored to within -00+6% of PF, but in no case, nogreater than 0.70 Gt31 determined for the. number of effective wires. A Li Yes 0i No. Name/Date:

b) .Adj Tendon: 0L Unacceptable-ALV < 95% of.PF for either tendon.. Document the cond Adj Tendon: on a NCR.Customer Notified NCR No.: M c) --r- Adj Tendon: .... _ L Unacceptable

-ALV.< 90% of PF for either tendon, Document the cof)L Adj Tendon: __ on a NCR. C Customer Notified NCR No'.: _________N QC Reviewed:

t&X /i- J / h.Level: -Date: /9 '/I!m 21 SQ 9.0 TMI.13 ISla Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 383 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 343 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ10.2 TEST WIRE REMOVAL Data Sheet 10.2 09/03113 PRECISION LANCE. Page I of 1 Revision 0 Project; TMI: 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE

[ UNIT 1 Tendon No.: 4 Tendon End: ' Shop E) Field Removal Date: Inspection Date: WIRE REMOVAL INSPECTION CORROSION INSPECTION Q) LENGTH INTERVALS (8.5.4.1.1)

Document the Corrosion Category for each 10' of wire in the increments below. Use Categoriesdescribed in PSC SQ 8.0.For Corrosion Level C document condition on an NCR. NCR Req'd: CRNO L YES NCR#(8.5.4.3.1)

Document the total length of the wire on the diagram below. Completed:

Oi NO ] Ye'S MButtV, head End ..V. ,z-..U, ,,J .ý........

--- .. .... , ... U.,.....,_..............

S, I '-io tIOn 20' 30'30' 40': 0' 60'W V 3K KM KKK A I .KV K U M W X V KA W KV KK K KW 3 3 W 3W33 1C V WV K( X K 60' 70' 80' A9 120' 130' 140' 15'....... 16............0..'

.... ..... ....,.,s...afw..srf.

(...180'. l + +190'. , .t! 200' 2101 210' 220' 230' 240'240' 260' 260' 270'270' 280' 290' 300'300' 310' 320' 330'Cut End (8.5.4.6.2)

Was the wire cut for samples: C1 NO YES document the area Of removal above using symbol X.(8,7) Document the location of wire removed on Data Sheet 8.0, ANCHORAGE INSPECT(ON. ,Completed (8.8) Measuring Device: S (-A ,Al. ID Number: -Recaloate:

/ 3 -1 (8.8) Wire Pull Ram to Number. ,a, Q C Level: Lae l: Inspector:

~Dt:t3 C 1 leviewed .... .Level: Date: 25 SQ 10.2 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 384 of 1008 Project. TM] 40Tl YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE 19 Unit 1 Unit 2 (9.3)Tendon No.: " /.i, .Tendon End:: T"O H Shop [I Field (9.4) Temp. of Concrete:.

8 / OF Thermometer No.: ..-Recal Date: /0 .'Ambient Temp.: Thermometer No.: PK -Io4- Recall ate: (9.5) Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Threads: I Acceptable 0 Unacceptable RETENSIONING DOCUMENTATION QC Signoffs (9.6) Number of Effective Wires: ______________(from Data Sht. 8.0) ~ .~(9,7) .Anchorhead and Stressing Adapter Engagement/Atignment:.

UI Unacceptable (9.7.3) RAM ID: Recal Date: a' 3 RAM Area: g,3 1.147 K , ...Gauge ID:. Recal Date'. b¢i.. Daily Check: .or.Calculated Force for Elongation Measurement and Retensioning using formula below NOTE: Stress: dunng Lift-Off should not exceed 9.425 kips per effective wire or 1592 kips for a 169 wire tendon.(9.8.4) PTF= i' kips Pressure:

_ 50,_psi Step 1 = .00 kips Pressure:

3 LI5 1,71 psi Elongation:

in ,..Step 2 7.... kips LOF kips OSF= 5$61 kips Pressure:

5( 7GAg psi Pressure:

DID Psi Pressure:

A psi Elongation- 05 in, Elongation:

in.pfft/iD.2-13 P=(F-K) x1000 A.Key: F = Force (kips)A = Rain Area (in 2)P Gauge Pressure (psi)K = Constant factor (kips)Q* N: 'K* constants can be either.positive or nega~ve:)W' cAeA I 5 46f 1g"_14rni5 A #4 4 161o4 '~ Ai emacL IJRP 0o.7,6 QC Reviewed:., Level:: Dale: 28 SQ 111,0 TMI. 13 ISI.doc Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 385 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 345 of 348 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 11.0 RETENSION TENDONS DATA SHEET SQ 11.0 09/03/13 Page 2 of 2.:Revision" W Project: TMI40TA YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE X Unit 1 El Unit 2 (9.3)Tendon V,,,, Tendon End: , Shop 0 Field Actual Observed Force and Elongation Measurements using formula below QC Signoffs (9.9.4.1)

PTF = 6t kips Pressure:

psi (fD Elongation:

3_5in.(9.9.5.1)

Step 1 2 kips Pressure:

3450 psi Elongation:

(9.9.6.1)

Step 2 12d0.10 kips Pressure: psi Elongation:

j27 In.(99.7.1) OSF & t7, 0 Z kips Pressure:

A"16 psi Q Elongation:

/iltin.F , C --. Z 1000 (9.9.8) 0 -(D= J2., fg in. Elongation Value (this end)(9.9.9) ,"J/A in. ElongalionValue (opposite end)(9.9.10) in, TOTAL Tendon Elongation Value (9.9.12.1)

Elongation

% Ruler ID: , Recal Date: ,,414J (9.9.12.3)

Elongation Results C4 Acceptable C] Unacceptable Customer Notified NCR No, U/, Options Original Lift-off Values from Data Sheet SO 9.0 A Lift-off <Predicted Force L- Use Predicted Force -0, + 6%B Lift-off > Predicted Force 9J Use Lift-off -0 + 6%C Lift-off > 67% GUTS El Use 70% + 0 -3% GUTS (effective wires)D Lift-off > 70% GUTS 0l Use 70% 4- 0 -3% GUTS (effective wires)(9.10.5) LOF Acceptable Range Min Max As found lift-offlor predicted (highest):

lrSt1l kips ./lit. ZS kips From: 51"J psi To: toloi 0 j psi M2-( 5 (9.10.6) Actual Lift-Off.

(9.10.8) Circled Values Stack/Il:

1) 60qo psi Stack#2: 1 /6 'psi 1) ____i___Psi

2) Q 2 1O sl 2) GOO psi 3) g psi si 3) -..0160 si (9.10.8) Force (this end): t4146.0 kips- % -tual Average: 00 IOC.psi (9.10.9) Force (opposite end):: 4 Lk kips (9110. 10)Tendon ALV Force 41

• kips (9,10.11)

ALV Acceptable:

[&,Yes El No Customer Notified NCR No.:

Additional broken/missing wires: 14 No E[ Yes .Amount: (9.10-16)

Additional Protruding/Unseated wires: JNo El Yes Amount: _,&r'F W62F, I=If Yes -Customer Notified NCR No.: '/-b R101 V f I (9.10.17FinalShimStack Height, -L 4 , /2 %119A SJ 2- & ___ 13_QC Reviewed:

/j h/( //t Level: _---Date: /-3-1/ -I 0 28 SQ 11.0 TMI,13 ISI-doc C7 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 386 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix A, Page 346 of 348 PRECISION!

SU ANCR N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 12.0 REPLACE GREASE CAP Data Sheet 12.0 09103/13 Page I of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: V- I fl, Tendon End: -Shop L] Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA BEARING PLATE SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED:

_EY 0 NO GREASE CAP SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED:

!!r'y C1 NO GASKET MATING SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED:

[ [I NO STUD/BOLT HOLES PROPERLY PREPARED:

y U--0NO FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCLUSION CONTROLLED:

I YES El NO COMMENTS.

Alul, CREW FOREMAN SIGNOFF , Date: ________QC Reviewed: Level: Date: 10__3_1__30 SQ 12.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 387 of 1008 REP- 1098-510 Appendix A, Page 347 of 348 Project: TMI 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: Tendon End: & L,,' C] Shop j]RField ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA BEARING PLATE SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GREASE CAP SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: GASKET MATING SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED: STUD/BOLT HOLES PROPERLY PREPARED: FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCLUSION CONTROLLED:

AYES V YES YES IJ YES J1 YES EQ NO El NO ElNO El NO:] NO COMMENTS ,/9,44 CREW FOREMAN SIGNOFF/ -____________7_

Date: /V . QC Reviewed:

_ _ ___j__.__-"-____, Level:* Date: /-z-r.30 SQ 12.0.TML 13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 388 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix A, Page 348 of 348 Project' TMI 4 0" YEAR'TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.. VL.136 GREASE REPLACEMENT OC SIGNOFFS (8.4) Grease Used NEW 0 OLD -TEST DATE: C0 ACCEPTABLE C] APPROVAL LETTER 8.0 PREREQUISITES DATED: (8.5) Total Grease Loss from Data Sheet 6.0 for tendon end: gal (8.6) Total Grease Loss from Data*Sheet 6.0 for &4 & tendon end: 7, gal.E1: s0 gal.(8.7) Estimated grease losses from leaks for tendon end: Q1 gal.(8.8) Esti -mated grease losses from leaks for tendon endý gal.(8.9) TOTAL Tendon Grease Loss: 12,6 gal.13.0 POURING AND.HAND PUMPING -FIRST END (13.8) AmbientTemp.:

44& F ' Thermometer ID: K .. RecalDate:

iL L (13.7) Grease*Temp.:

100 PF Thermometer ID: _RXA -Recal Date: 14 (13.9) Inta Grease Height (a) , S in. (13.12) Fina I.Grease Height (b) J in.(13.14) Total amount of Grease; added: ! gal. I7 into the end (13.16) Quantityof Waste Grease: D gal.. (J115) ZPoured [I Hand Pumped (13.17) Total Grease R this end: gal.m w PMIG- SECOND END (13.8) Ambie~ntTe OF Thermometer ID: Recal Date: (13.7) GreaseTemp.:

OF ometer ID:. Recal Date: (13.9) Initial. Grease Height (a) in. .12) F I Grease Height (b) in.(13.14) Total amount of Grease added: gal ,a- 1.77 e end (13.16) Quantity of Waste Grease: d, )0 Poured a.Hand (13.17) Total Grease Re0laced this end: gal.4.,0,ALCULATION OF PRESSURE PUMPING (14.1) Total Tendon Grease Replaced:

..gal.. (13.17+ 13.17)(14.2) Net Tendon Duct Grease Volume: /D' gal. Refer toSQoD22-r RASEV',OLiEE,%ibrhe, redon.Nt Cad Volr (14.3) Percent. Differencet Total Tendon Replaced (14.1)- Total Tendon Loss (8.9) %x 100 =. 1,6 % Difference Net Tendon Duct Grease Volume (14.2)(14.4) Grease Leaks: I-l Yes. [ No (14.5) Refill Acceptable:

-1 Yes (less than 10%) 1] No (greaterthan f1%)If No -Customer.Notified NCR No.: AlNl (14.6) Comments:

Af1.qRJ r r,, ;' .1 " QC Reviewed: 1< Li Level: J _ _D_*ate:*/_

t__I m 31 SQ 12.1 TMI,13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 389 of 1008 REP-1 091-510 Appendix B, Page 1 of 31 SUBURBAN LABORATORIES, Inc.1950 S. Batavia Ave., Suite 150 Geneva, Illinois 60134 Tel: (708) 544-3260 .Toll Free (800) 783-LABS Fax (708) 544-:8587 wvwsuburbanlabs.com January 31, 2014 Gerald Bussonc Precision Surveillance Corp.3468 Watling Street East Chicago, IN 46312 TEL: (219) 397-5826 FAX: (219) 397-5867 RE: 1226

Dear" Gerald Bussone:

Suburban Laboratories, Inc. received 38:sample(s) on 1/14/2014 for the analyses presented in the following report.All data for the associated quality control (QC) met EPA, method, or internal laboratory specifications except where noted in the case narrative.

if you are coinparing these results to external QC specifications or compliance limits and have any questions, please contact us.This final report of laboratory analysis consists of this cover letter, case narrative, analytical report, dates report, and any accompanying documentation on, but not limited to, chain of Custody records, raw data, and letters orexplanation or reliance.

This report may not be reproduccd,.except in full, without the prior written approval of Suburban Laboratories, Inc.If you have any questions regarding thesetest results, please call me at (708) 544-3260.Sincerely, Kelly Culhane Prqject Manager 708-544-3260 ext 212 kellyv(suburbanlabs.com.

lH4lo irm Poti Agnc Acdt #1022 Illinois Department of Public Health Accredited

1. 17585 ' 7'; Illnoi Eniomna PrtcinAec.Aceie 102 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 390 of 1008 REP-1 091-510 Appendix B, Page 2 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.1950 S: i aAv,,. S,iic 1,,, a. tLo61., (708) 514-326o Case Narrative Client: Precision Surveillance Corp. Date: Jauiary 31, 2014 Project: 1226 .PO#. 1226 WorkOrder:

1401415 QC. Level: LEVEL I Temperature of samples upon receipt at SLI: 20 C Chain of Custody #: General Comments:-All results reported in wet weight unless otherwise indicated. (di-y = Dry Weight)-Sample results relate only to the analytes of interest.

tested and to sample as received by the laboratory., Environmental compliance sample results meet the requirements of"35 IAC Part 186 unless otherwise indicated.

-Waste water analysis follows the rules set fiorth in 40 CFR part 136 except where otherwise noted.-Accreditationby the State of Illinois is notan endorsement ora guarantee of the validity of data generated.

F:or more infbrmation about the laboratories' scope of accreditation, please contact us at (708) 544-3260 or the Agency at (217) 782-6455.Abbreviations:

-Reporting Limit: The concentration at which an analyte can be routinely detected on a day to day basis, and which also meets regulatory and client needs.-Quantitation Limit: The lowest concentration at which results can be accurately quantitated.

-J: The analyte was positively identified above our Metliod Detection Limit and is considered detectable and usable; however,,the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte inthe sainple;.ATC: Automatic Temperature Correction.

-TNTC: Too Numerous To Cout-in Laboratory:

EPA reco01mends this analyte be analyzed "immediately" (e.g., tests that should be pertbrned in thetfield~within 15 ininutesofrcoulection)..

Analytes with "immediate" hold times are analyzed as soon as possible upon receipt by the laboratory.

-TIC: Tentatively Identified Compound (GCMS library search identification, concentration estimated to nearest internal standard).

.- SS (Surrogate Standard):

Quality control compound added to the sample by the lab.Method Retirences:

For a complete list of method references please contact us.-E: USEPA Referencemethods

-SW: USEVA, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid. Waste. (SW-846)-M: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

-USP: Latestversion of United States Pharmacopeia Workorder Specific Comments:.ft.! ... i .... .... ....Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 391 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 3 of 31~ff Suburban Laboratories, Inc. ! Laboratory Results I 1950 S tItlaia Ave., Sw It/1.. (. IL 60134 (7081 :1.-260 Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: January 31, 2014.Project Name: 1226 Workorder:

1401415 ClienitSample ID: D-143 -East/Field

-Sample I 5 Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1.401415-001 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35.AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor DateAnalyZed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004 Analyst LAP Chloride 0.50 .0.50 c ppm 1 01/27/2014 12A15PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTMWO95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP Moisture Content < 0.10 ,' 0.10 c wt% 1 01/3012014 11:10 AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM,0992-Rei 1978 Analyst anlb Nitrate < 0.50 .- 0.50 ppm 1 01/28J2014 10:00 AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-.0974 Modifled-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb BaseNumber 1,02 ,. 0.500 C mg KOH/g 1 01128/2014 3:00 PM R43339 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA.M427-Rev 15th Edition. 1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide < 0.50 .0.50 c ppm 1 01/27120i4 1:50 PM R43301 Client. Sample ID: D-143 -South/Shop

-Sample IMatrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-002 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Dateý 0It13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Quil. Units Factor [)ate.Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride 0.50 -0.50 c ppm 1 01127/2014 12:15 PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.095-Rev 1990 AnalysL LAP Moisture Content < 0.10. 0.10. c v4Vt 1 01/30/2014 11:10AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst: anb Nitrate <00:50 0,50 ppm 1 01/28/2014 10:00 AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 Modifiet-Rey 1997 Analyst anb Base Number 1.02 " 0.500 C mg KIOHlg 1 01/28/2014 3:00 PM R43339 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edtion, 981 Analyst; anb Sulfide < 0.50 ' 0.50 c ppm 1 01127/2014 1:50 PM R43301 1) " ... J X W J Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 392 of 1008 REP-1 091-510 Appendix B, Page 4 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.. I Laboratory Results I Aw,. Suite IS0 .a I1 'l'60134 1708) 544-3260 Client ID: Precision Surveillance Coro. Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Name: 1226 Workorder:

1401415 Client:Samnple ID: D-146.- East/Field-.

Sample I v Matrix: GREASE.Lab ID: 1401415-003 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM CollectiOn Date:O 1/13/2014 12:0%:AM Report. Dilution Parameter Result Limit, Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Melhod:. ASTM-DS.12-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride 0.50 *, 0.50 c ppr 1 01/27/2014 12:15 PM R43293'MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content < 0.10 .0.10 c vA% 01130/2014 11:10AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method-.ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst: anb Nitrate < 0.50 .e 0.50 ppm 1 01128/2014 10:00AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D974 Mooifled&Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 1.90 ." 0.500 c .mg KOH/g 1 0112812014 3:00 PM R43339 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 151h Edition. 1981 Analyst! anb.Sulfide .<0.50 -.5 0.50 c ppm 1 01/27/2014 1:50 PM R43301.Client Sample. ID: D-146 -South/Shop

-Sample I M Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-004 Date Received:

01/14/20.14 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/201.4 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor DateAnalyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method.: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride 0.50 ,- 0.50 c ppm 01127/2014 12:15 PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-695-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content < 0.10 A- 0.10 v 1 01/3012014 11:10 AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM!0992-Rev 1978 Analyst: anb Nitrate < 0,50 ,.' 0.50 ppm 01?2812014 10:00 AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 2.08 -0.500 c mg KOHg 1 0112812014 3:00 PM R43339 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA M427-Rev 151h Edition 198.1 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 0.50 c ppm 1 0112712014 1:50 PM R43301....: .Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 393 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 5 of 31 SuburbanLaboratories, inc. Laboratory Res 1950 S; Ae- Suifc.11i

..ini , '. II. 6013-1 (708) 5.11-3264)

Client 11)D Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date:. January 31, 2014 Project Name:. 1226. Workorder:

1401415 Client Sample II): D-225 -West/Shop

-Sample. I -Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-005 Date Received:

01/14/20.14 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Limit Dilution Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Parameter Result Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride <0.50 so MOISTURE BY ASTM Moisture Content <.0.10 ,-NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate <0.50 -NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number 38.4 -'SULFIDE BY APHA Sulfide <050 ,0.Client. Sample ID: D-225 -East/Field

-.Sample I Lab ID: 1401415-006 Date Received: Parameter Result Method: ASTM-0512.Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP 0.50 c ppm 1 01127/2014 12;.15 PM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP 0.10 C Vt% 1 0113012014 11:10AM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst ansb 0.50 pprn 1 01/28/2014 10:00 AM Method.: ASTM.D974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb 0.500 C mg KOH/g 1 0112812014 3:00 PM Method: APHA-M427-Rev iSthEdCion, 1981. Analyst anb 0.50 c ppM 1 0112712014 1:50 PM Matrix: GREASE 01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM: Report Dilution Llnmit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Method: ASTM-D5 12-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP 0.50 c ppm 1 01/27/2014 12:15 PM Method' ASTM-D95-Rov 1990 Analyst LAP 0.10 C v4 0/0 1 01130/2014 11:10AM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst anb 0.50 ppm 1 01/2812014 10:00 AM Method; ASTM-D974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst anb 0.500 c mg KOHg 1 0112812014 3:00 PM Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Eddion. 1981 Analyst anb R43293 R43417 R43337 R43339 R033011 CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride MOISTURE BY ASTM Moisture Content NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate NEUTRALIZAT1ON NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number SULFIDE BY APHA Batch ID X 0,50 ,<0.10 .A0< 0.50 -/38A ,.<0.50 /R43293 R43417 R43337 R43339 ROM30 Sulfide 0.50 c Ppm 1 01127/2014 1:50 PM..... ..Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 394 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 6 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.. Laboratory Results Client. ID Precision Surveillace .Corp. Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Name: 1226 Workorder:

1401415 Client Sample ID: D-237 S.. East/Field.-Sample.I V Matrix: GREASE I.ab ID: 1401415-007 Date Received:

01/14/2014"9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report lIimit Dilution factor D~ate Analyzed Parameter Result Qual. Units Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride <0:50 00 MOISTURE BY ASTM Moisture Content <0.10 .NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate < 0.50 v NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number 34.6 j SULFIDE BY APHA Sulfide. 0.50. , Client.Sample ID: D-237 -West/Shop

-Samlple.I V Lab ID: 1401415:008 DateReceived:

Parameter Result Method: ASTM-D512-Rev.2004 Analyst: LAP 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2712014 12:15 PM Method: ASTM-D9g.Rev 1990 Anabel: LAP 0.10 c vA% 1 01/3012014 11:10 AM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst: anb.0.50 ppm 1 01128/2014 10:00 AM Method: ASTM,0974 Modfied-Rev 1991 Analyst: anb 0.500 c mg KOH/g I 0112812014 3:00 PM Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Eltion, 1981 Anatyst: anb 0.50 c ppm 1 01127/2014 1:50 PM Matrix: GREASE 01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Method: ASTM!D512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP 0.50 c ppm 1 01/27/2014 12:15 PM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP 0.10 C wt% 1 01/30/2014 11:10AM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst anb.0.50 ppm 1 01/28/2014 10:00 AM Method: ASTM-D974 Modifled-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb 0.500 c mg KOHIg 1 01/28/2014 3:00PM Method: APHAM427-Rev 151h E-.tion. 1981 Analyst anb R43293 R43417 R4333.7 R43339: R43301 Batch ID): CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride MOISTURE BY ASTM.Moisture Content: NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number SULFIDE BY APHA 0,50<0.10<0 50 2,06 R43293 R43417 R4333.7 R43339 R43301 5~uttittA<n 050 /0.50 C 0Dm 1 01/27/2014 1:50 PM Sulfide <050 -/0.50 C PPM..... ...Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 395 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 7 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc. Laboratory Results 11)0 S. tBta ia Aw.. Suir I15t, It, 6013,1 (708)

Client ID: Precision Surveillan.c Corp. Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Name.: 1226 WVorkorder:

1.401415 Client Sample ID: D-303 -North/Shop

-Sample I v Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415S-009 Date Received:

0 1 i14/2014 9:35.AM Collection Date: 01/ 3/20.14 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BYASTM Method:, ASTM.0512-Rev 2004 Analyst. LAP Chloride 0.50 .0.50 c pprn 1 0112712014 12:15 PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP Moisture Content < 0.10 -. 0.10 c w% 1 01./30/2014 11:10 AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst anb Nitrate < 0.50 ' 0.50 ppm 1 01/28/2014 10:00 AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method; ASTM-0974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number < 0.500 -" 0.500 c mg KOH/g 01/28/2014 3:00 PM R43339 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA.M427-Rev 151hEdiion, 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < J 0.50 c ppm :1 01127/2014 1:50 PM R43301 Client Sample ID: D-303 -S. East/Field

-Sample t V Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-010 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit. Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0512-Rev 2004 Analyst LAP Chloride 0.50 0.50 c ppm I 01/27/2014 12:15 PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content .<0.10 0.10 c VA% 1 01130/2014 11:10AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst: anb Nitrate < 0.50 V7 0.50 ppm 1 01/28/2014 10:00AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 Modfied-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 1.04 v 0.500 c mg KOH/g 1 01/30/2014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA.M427-Rev 15th Edition, 1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide < 0.50 "/ 0.50 c ppM 1 01/27/2014 1:50 PM R43301........ .... ..... ... ..... ... ...........1...... "i ; I , .) ...0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 396 of 1008 REP-1 091-510 Appendix B, Page 8 of 31 SVlSuburban.

Laboratories, Inc. jLaboratory Results ]1950.S., Ba.1iia Ave... Suite 10, Geoa. IL 60134 (708) 5.1443260 Client ID: Precision Surveil!ancc Corp. Report Date: January 3 1', 2014 Project Name: 1226 Workorder:

1401415 Client Sample ID: If13 Butt 3/F'ield -Sample I V Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415"0tl Date. Received:

01,14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Datet 01/13/2014 12:00AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004 Analys: LAP Chloride 0.50 6 0.50 c ppm 1 0112712014 12:15 PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method. ASTM.D95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP Moisture Content <0.10 -0.10 c vA% 1 01/2912014 3:55 PM R43395 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1970 Analyst: anb Nitrate < 0.50 ,' 0.50 ppm 1 01/2812014 10:00AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 Modif5ed-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number < 0.500 ,. 0.500 c mg KOH-g 1 0112912014 5:00 PM R43399 SU LFI DE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev.

15th Edition, 1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide <0.50 , 0.50 c ppm 1 0112712014 1:50 PM R43301 Client Sample ID: 1113-03 -Butt I/Shop -Sample I V Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-012 Date Received:

01/1412014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01U]3/2014 12:00AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004 Analyst LAP Chloride 0,50 V 0.50 c ppm 01/27/2014 12:15 PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-095-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP Moisture Content 0.31 , 0.10 c w1% 01/29/2014 3:55 PM R43395 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM,0992-Rev 1978 Analyst: anb Nitrate < 0.50 / 0.50 ppm 1 0112812014 10:00AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D974 ModifiedtRev 1991 Analyst anb Base Number < 0.500 ,, 0.500 c rng KOK~g 1 0112912014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method:.APHA.M427-Rev 15th Edlton. 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 -' 0,50 c ppm 1 01/27/2014 1:50 PM R43301.....Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 397 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 9 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.1 9'0 S. Baiavi.A e., Sidte 150. Gcnc,., IL 60134 (708) 544-3260 Labor'atory Results Client IDl Precision SurveillanceCorp.

Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Name: 1226 Workorder:

140141.5 Client Sample ID: 1113-08 Butt I/Shop -Sample I ul Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401.41.5-013 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 013/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date*Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004. Analyst: LAP Chloride 0.50 , 0.50 c. ppm 1 01/27/2014.12:15PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev I990 Analysl: LAP Moisture Content <0.10 -0.10 c vw% a 0112912014 3:55 PM R43395 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0992.Rev 1978 Analyst anb Nitrate < 0,50 4 0.50 ppm 1 0112812014 10:00AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D974 Modified-Rev.t097 Analyst: anb Base Number <.0.500 , 0.500 c mg KOH/g 1 01Q2912014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 151h Edlion. 1981 Analyst anbi Sulfide < 0.50 -0.50 c ppm 1 01/2712014 1:50 PM R43301 Client Sample ID: 1113 Butt 3/Field -Sample I V Matrix. GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-014 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Quill. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: AS.TM-D512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride 0.50 -0.50 c ppm 1 01/27/2014 12:15 PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content <0.19 ., 0.10 c VA% 1 01129W2014 3:55 PM R43395 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.O992-ReV 1978 Analyst: anb Nitrate < 0.50 , 0.50 ppm 1 01/28/2014 10:00AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 Modirted-Rew 1997 Analyst. anb Base Number <0.500 ,, 0.500 c mgKOWg 1 01/29/2014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427.Rev 15M1 Edtion, 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 J 0.50 c ppm 1 01127/2014 1:50 PM R43301.: i ..... ... ...Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 398 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 10 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc. I a atory.Results

% j rsOirra mia Aw.. Suile I11), Cwrcla IL 601,14 (708)54.4-,1260 Client ID: Precision.Surveillance Corp. Report Date: January3 1, 2014 Project Name: 1226 Workorder:

14.1415..Client.Sample ID: H113-10 -Butt I/Shop -Sample I V Matrix: GRE ASE La.b ID: 1401415-015 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual, Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride < 0.50 , MOISTURE BY ASTM.Moisture Content 0.10 ,.'NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate < 0.50 ., NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number 1.98 -" SULFIDEBY APHA Sulfide < 0.50 J Client Sample ID: 1124-15 -Butt 4/Shop -Sample I V Lab ID: 1401415-016 Date Received: Parameter Result Method: ASTM-O512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP 0.50 c pprn 1 0112712014 12:15 PM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP 0.10 c wA% 1 01/30/2014 11:10AM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst. anb 0.50 ppm 012812014 10:00 AM Method: ASTM-D974 ModifiedRev 1997 Analyst: anb 0.500 c mg KOHIg 1 01128/2014 3:00PM Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th E dtion. 1 981 Analyst: anb 0.50 c pprn 1 01I27V2014 1:50 PM Matrix: GRFASE 01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/!3/2014 12:00AM Report Dilution Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Method: ASTM.-0512-Rev.

2004: Analyst LAP 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2712014 12:15 PM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP 0:10 c WI% 1 01130/2014 11:10 AM Method: ASTM-O992-Rev 1978 Analyst anb 0.50 ppn 1 01/2812014 10:00 AM Method: ASTM-0974 Modified.Rev 1997 Analyst anb 0.500 c mg KOWg 1 01128W2014 3:00 PM Meth od: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edlion, 1981 Analyst. anb 0.50. c ppm 1 012712014 1:50 PM R43293 R43417 R43337 R43339 R43301 CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride MOISTURE BY ASTM Moisture Content NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number SULFIDE BY APHA Sulfide Batch ID 0,50 ,<0.10< 0.50.1.44 ,,-<0.50 , R43293 R43417 R43337 R43339 R43301 ex.. ... ..Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 399 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 11 of 31~ Suburban Laboratories, Inc. I Laboratory Results I.1950) S.IS aima A ., Suitc I%.0 Gene;va, IL 60134. (708) 544-1260 Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Name: 1226 Workorder:.

1401415 Client Sample ID: H24-15 -Butt 2/Field -:Sample I V' Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 14014.15-017 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/1:3/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual.. Units. Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004 Analyst LAP Chloride 0.50 .0.50 C pprn 1 01127/2014 12:15 PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content < 0. 10 0.10 c wt% 1. 0113012014 11:10 AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D992-Rev 1978. Analyst: anb Nitrate < 0.50 -0.50 ppor 1 01/28/2014 10:00AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 2.26 -0.500 c mg KOH9g 1 01/29/2014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA.M427.Rev 151hEdtion.

1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide < 0.50 .. 0.50 c ppm 1 01127/2014 1:50 PM R43301 Client Sanmple.ID):

1124-22 -Butt 4/Shop -.Sample 1. v ,latrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-0.18 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTIM Method: ASTM.D512-Rev 2004. Analyst: LAP Chloride 0.50 "" 0.50 c ppmn 1 01/27/2014 12:15PM R43293 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-095-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content 0.10 -0.10 c %.A% 1 0112912014 3:55 PM R43395 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D992.Rev 1978: Analyst: anb Nitrate <0.50 ., 0.50 ppm 1 01/2812014 10:00 AM R43337 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 Modified.Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number < 0.500 ... 0.500 c mg KOHt'g 1 01/29/2014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method:.APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edition. 1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide <0.50 -0.50 c ppm 1 01/2712014 1:50 PM R43301.' .............

1. , Y Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 400 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 12 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.I%150 S, Ilialia Glenea, Client ID. Precision Surveillance Corp.Project Name: 1226 Client Sample ID: 1124-22 -Butt 2/Field -Siample I v Lab ID: 1401415-019 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM.Report j Laboratory Results I Parameter Result iinlit Qual CHLORIDE BY AST1W Method: ASTM.151i2 Chloride 0.50 0.50 c MOISTURE BY ASTM Melhod: ASTM-D95-1 Moisture Content <0.10 -0.10 c NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-P992 Nitrate <0:50 , 0.50 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 Base Number 3.70 , 0.500 c SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev Rey*ReA moi-Re Report Date: January 31, 2014 Workorder:

1401415 Matrix: GREASE Colletlion Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Dilution Units Factor Date Analyzed 2004 Analyst: LAP ppnl 1 01/29/2014 12:30 PM 1990 Analyst LAP wlti 1 01/29/2014 3:55 PM 1978 Analyst: LAP ppm 1 01/30/2014.12:00 PM dified.Rev 1997 Analyst anb mg KOH/g .1* 01129/2014 5:00 PM v ISh Edition, 1981 Analyst..

anb Batch ID R43373 R43395.R43424 R433 99 0 Sulfide < 0.50 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2812014 5:30 PM R43357 Client Sample ID): 1135-02 -Butt 3/Fiehd -:SSaimle I v Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-020 Date Received:

0l1/4/20.14 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report: Dilution Parameter Result Linlit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride 0.50 0.50 c ppm 1 01/29/2014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-095-Rev 1990 Anatyst: LAP Moisture Content <0.10 -. 0.10 c wt% 1 01129/2014 3:55 PM R43395 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst: LAP Nitrate < 0.50 .0.50 ppm 1 01/30/2014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number <.0.500 ' 0.500 C mg KOwg 1 01/29/2014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edtion. 1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide < 0.50 ..0.50 c ppm 1 01/28/2014 5:30 PM R43357 IC Y~14~LP Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 401 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 13 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc. ]Laboratory Results[195) S, iHalavi Avo.. Su 1507 Gweva. It. 601 3.1 (709) 54.1-3260 Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: January 3.1, 2014 Project Name. 1226 workorder:

1401415 Clienit Sample ID: H35-02 -Butt 5/Shop -Sample I v Matrix: GREASE Lab I): 1401415-021 Date Received:

01/14/20..149:35 AM Collection Date: 01113/2014.12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor DateAnalyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D512.Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chforide 0:50 ,., 0.50 c ppm I 01/2912014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content <0.10 -' 0.10 c v%4 I 01129/2014 3:55 PM R43395 NITRATE BY ASTM Method. ASTM-D992-Rev 1978' Analyst LAP Nitrate < 0.50 ,-, 0.50 pprn 1 01130/2014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 Modciled-Revt1997 Analystý anb Base Number 2.72

• 0.500 c mg KOHfg 1 01/29/2014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APEIA-M427-Rev I51h Edition..198t Analyst:.

antb Sulfide < 0.50 ,, 0.50 c ppm 1 01/28/2014 5:30 PM R43357 Client Sample ID: H62-26 -Butt 2/Field -.Sample I V Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-022 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM.Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM. Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004 Analyst LAP Chloride < 0,50 ,, 0.50

• ppM 1 01V29/2014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP Moisture Content < 0.10 ..- 0.10 c vA% 1 01/29/2014 3:55 PM R43395 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst LAP Nitrate < 0.50 ,,' 0.50 ppm 1 01/3012014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 Modified.Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base.Number 47.9 , 0.500 c Ing KOH'g 1 01/28/2014 3:00 PM R43339 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th EdVion, 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 -/ 0.50 c ppm 1 01128/2014 5:30 PM R43357.....~~~i .. ....... ... .........

........................

..i1)A.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 402 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 14 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc. ILaboratory Results I 050 s. A- .Suie O. (Oerle%& 11, 601.34 708) 5,1.1-3260I Client ID:. Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: Januta.ry 31., 2014 Project Narme: 1226 Workorder:

1401415 Client Sample ID: 1162-26.m Butt 6/Shop -Sample I V/ Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-023 Date Received:

01/14/2014.9:35.

AM Collectlon Date: 01V13/2014 12:00 AM Report[imit: Dilution Qual. iUnits Factor Date Analyzed Pa ra meter Result Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride < 0.50 L, MOISTURE BY ASTM Moisture Content <0.10 NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate <*0.50 ., NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number 42.1 ., SULFIDE BY APHA Sulfide < 0.50 "'Method: ASTMODS12.Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP 0.50 c ppm 0.129/2014 12:30 PM Method: ASTM..D95,-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP 0.10 c vt% 1 01/30/2014 11:10AM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Ana"Ist: LAP 0.50 ppm .1 013012014 12:00 PM Method: ASTM-0974 ModirfiedRev 199? Analyst: .aob.0.500. C mg KOH/g 1 0112812014 3:00 PM Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Editon, 1981 Anatyst: antb 0.50 C ppm 1 01/2812014 5430 PM R433.73 R43417 R43424 R433 39 R43357 0 Client Samnple ID: H146-34 -Bull 6/Shop.- Sample I Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-024 Date Received:

01/11412014 9:35 AM Collection

]Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report: Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-W512-Rev 2004 Analyst LAP Chloride .< 0.50 V 0,50 c ppm 1 01129/2014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-695-Rev 1900 Analyst LAP Moisture Content <0.10 , .0.10 C wt% 1 01/30/2014 11:10AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.0992-Rev 1978 Ana'yst: LAP Nitrate < 0.50 ,. 0.50 ppn 1 01/30/2014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 Modified-Revl99l Analyst: anb base Number 56.4 .- 0.500. c mg KOlg 1 01129/2014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edlion. 1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide < 0.50 :0.50 c ppm 1 01/28/2014 5:30 PM R43357 r~ ;i?iL TV Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 403 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 15 of 31~7 Suburban Laboratories, Il. I Laboratory ResultsIc 19)56S. lUaia Aw., Suitc IO. (kneva, 116013W1 jibs) 51-3.260 Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: Janmury 31, 2014 Project Name: 1226 Workorder' 1401415 Client Sample ID: H46-34 -Butt 4/Field -Sample I / Matrix: GREASE l.,ab ID: 1401415-025 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Coleclion Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilultion Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units: Factor Dale Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-DS 12-Rev 2004 Analystr LAP Chloride <0.50 " 0.50 c ppm 1 0112912014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95.Rev 1990 Analyst LAP Moisture Content < 0.10 ,/ 0.10 c wt% 1 01130/2014 11:10AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst LAP Nitrate -C0.50 ,. 0.50 ppm 1 01/30/2014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM.0974 Modifled-Rev 1997 Analyst anb Base Number 50.4 , 0.500 c mg KOHg 1 01129/2014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edlion, 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 ,, 0.50 c ppM 1 0112812014 5:30 PM R43357 ID: H151-40 -Butt 5/Field -Sarmple I Matrix: GRF AS E.Lab ID: 1401.415-026 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/ 13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride < 0.50 .- 0,50 c ppm 1 01129/2014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-095-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content <V0.10 -0.10 c vA% 1 01130/2014 11:10AM R43417 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992.Rev 1978 Analyst LAP Nitrate < 0.50 0,50 ppm 1 01/30/2014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTMD0974 Modiied-Rev 1997 Analyst anb Base Number 48.2 .0.500 c mg KO1-/g 1 01129/2014 5:00 PM R43399 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev i5th Edlion, 1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide <0,50 *" 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2812014 5:30 PM R43357.. ...... .... .. ... .... ....... .... ... .... ..... .... ... .... ... ... ... ..... ... .... ......... ...... .. ... .... ... ........ ....... ... .... ... .... .... ..........

....... .."....1)A' 1 /A /f , Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 404 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 16 of 31 Suburban Laboratories,.

Inc. Laboratory Results S1950 S, ,lb1a ,e. , Soile15 (kweiax IL 601.111 (170T 544-.t26(I.Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp.. Report Date: January 31, 2014 ProjectName:

1226 Worknrder:

1401415 Client Sample ID: t151-40 -Butt I/Shop -Sample I M ?latrix: GREASE Lab ID: .140141.5-027..

Date Received:

01/[4/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: .01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Limit I)i~ulutoi Parameter Result Qual. Units Factor Date.Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride < 0.50 MOISTURE BY ASThI Moisture Content < 0.10 -NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate < 0.50 -NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number 46.6 -'SULFIDE BY APHA Sulfide < 0.50 -* Client Sample ID: V-32 -Gallery/Fiehl

-Sample I v Lab ID: 1401415-028 Date Received: Parameter Result CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride MOISTURE BY ASTM Moisture Content NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base Number SULFIDE BY APHA Sulfide Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004. Analyst:.

LAP 0.50 c ppn 1 01/29/2014 12:30 PM R4 Method: ASTM-O95-ReV 1990 Analyst: LAP 0.10 C wVa 1 01/30/2014 11:10AM R4 Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978. Analysl LAP 0.50 ppM 1 01/30/2014 12:00 PM. R4 Method: ASTM-0974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb 0.500 C mg KOH/g 1 01/29/2014 5:00.PM R'Method: APHA.M427-Rev 151h Edition. 1981 Analyst:anb 0.50 c ppm 1 01/28/2014 5:30 PM R, Matrix: GREASE 0 1/1412014 9:35 AM Collection Date:.01/l13/201.4 12:00 AM Report Dilution Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Ba Method: ASTM.D512.Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP 0.50 C ppmn 1 01/29/2014 12:30 PM R Method: ASTM.D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP 0.10 C W/% 1 01/30!2014 11:10 AM R Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst: LAP 0.50 ppm 1 01130/2014 12:00 PM R Method: ASTM-D974 Modified-Rev 1991 Analyst. anb 0.500 c Ing KOH/g 1 0112912014 5:00 PM R Method: APHA.M427.Rev.115li Edition, 1981 Analyst: anb 0.50 C ppmn 1 01/28/2014 5:30 PM R!. I ) .................

(3373 43417 (3424 13399 43357<0.50 0.20<0.50<0.500 y< 0.50 ,, tch ID 43373 43417 43424 43399 43357 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 405 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 17 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc. I Laboratory Resuts I 19500 .t3ataia A% .. Suiiv 150, Gtneva. I. 60I34.(7OS) 5.41-3260 Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Nanme: 1226 Workorder:

1401415 ClieattSample ID.: V 'op/Shop -Sample I ,,. Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-029 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collec-ion Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed.

Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride < 0.50 ,. 0.50 c ppm 1 01l2912014 12'30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTMWD95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content <0.10 , 0.10 c v1% 1 01/3 0/2014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992.-Rev 1978 Analyst:.

LAP Nilrate *< 0.50 6 0.50 ppm 1 01/30/2014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 Modifie-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 53.1 i 0.500 c mg KOHg 1 01/3012014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rov 15th Edlion. 1981 Ana~lsl: anb Sulfide < 0.50 V1 0.50 c ppm I 0128/2014 5:30 PM R43357 Client Sample ID: V-84 -Gallery/Field

-Sample I V Mlatrix::

GREASE L.,ab ID: 1401415-030 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/ 13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-DS12-Rev 2004 Anatyst:LAP Chloride (0.50 ,/ 0.50 c ppm 1 01/29/2014 12:30PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst LAP Moisture Content < 0.10 .0.10 c wt% 1 0113012014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst LAP Nitrate <0.50 / 0.50 ppm 1 01/3012014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 Modilied.Rev 1997

• Analyst anb Base Number 1.61 , 0.500 c mgKOH/g 1 01130/2014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edtion, 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 , 0.50 c ppm 1 01/28/2014 5:30 PM R43357.P ... .... ...( :;..,.... Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 406 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 18 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc. I Laboratory Results[VO. I r 1950 S. U'O aia MeA;. Suilo 1511. (tkneva..

1L66134 (7080)'44-3260 b Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp.. Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Name: 1.226 Workorder:.

1401415 ClientSampleID:

V-108 -Top/Shop

-Sample I V Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-031 Date Received:

01/1.4/2014 Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report L.,imit Dilution Qual.. Units Factor Date Analyzed Paranieter Result Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Chloride < 0.50 , MOISTURE BY ASTM Moisture Content < 0.10 NITRATE BY ASTM Nitrate <0.50 -'NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Base.Number 26.9 .SULFIDE BY APHA Sulfide < 0.50 .7 Method: ASTM-DS12-Rev 2004 Analyst LAP 0.50 c ppm 1 01/29/2014 12:30 PM Method: ASTM-095-Rev 1990 Anetyst: LAP 0.10 :C WI% 1 0113012014 2:00 PM Method. ASTM.0992-Rev 1978 Analysl: LAP 0.50 ppm 1 0113012014 12:00 PM Method: ASTM.0974 Modiied.Rev 1997 Analyst: anb 0.500 c mg KOH/g 1 01/30/2014.5:30 PM Method: APHA.M427-Rev 1981 Analyst: anb 0.50 c PPM 01128/2014 5:30 PM R43373 R43418 R43424 R43461 R43357)Client Sample ID: V-o08 -Gallery/Field

-Sample 1.-/ Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-032:

Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35.AM Collection Date: 01/1.3/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.0512.Rev 2W04 Analyst LAP Chloride 0.50 .0.50 c ppm 1 01/2912014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method; ASTM.D95-Rev.

1990 Analyst LAP Moisture Content <0.10 -0.10 C wl% 1 0113012014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst LAP Nitrate < 0.50 6, 050 ppm 1 .01/3012014 12:00. PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTIMV Method: ASTM-0974 Modified-Re, 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 0.520 " 0.500 C mg KOH/g 1 0113012014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA.M427-Rev 15th Edlion. 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 " 050 c ppm 1 01128/2014 5:30 PM R43357 J 1< 3~.~4 A'~I1~Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 407 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 19 of 31-Suburban Laboratories, Inc.1950 S. Blatavu Avw.. Suis I5b. IL 60134 (703).34.1-3260 I Laboratory Results I Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Name: 1226 Workorder:

1401415 Client Sample ID: V-1 59 -TopiShop-Sample I M/ atrix: GREASE Lab 11): 1401415.033 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35.AM CollectiOn Date: 01/13/201412:00AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units, Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D5i2-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride < 0.50 m 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2912014 12:30 PM R43373.MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content <010 .. 0.10 c wl% 1 01/3012014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst LAP Nitrate < 0.50 ,. 0.50 ppm 1 0113012014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Methodi ASTM-O974 Modifled-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 26.3 v, 0.500 c mg KOWg 1 0113012014 5:30. PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427.Rev 15th EdIjon, 1981 Analyst: anb Sulfide < 0.50 y, 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2812014 5:30 PM R43357 Client Sample ID: V-159 -Gallery/Field -Sample I Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-034 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch iD CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride 0.50 .,. 0.50 c ppm 1 .0112912014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content 0.19 0.10 c WA% 1 01/3012014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0992-Rev 1978 Analyst: LAP Nitrate < 0.50 0.50 ppm 1 01/3012014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-Dg?4 Modified-Reyv1997 Analyst: anb Base Number < 0.500 .0,500 C mg KOH/g 1 0113012014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev

.15th Edtion, 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 ,' 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2812014 5:30 PM R43357.... ..H//~( /1/.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 408 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 20 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc. [ Laboratory Results [61954 S. Icam ia Ae, S tUi 150, G. It. 60134 (708) S.14.3260:

Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: January. 31,20.14 Project Name: 1226 Workorder:.1401415 Client Sample ID: V-I 15 -Callery/Field

-.Sample I Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401.415-035 Date.Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00.AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units. Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTMh Method; ASTM.0512-Rev 2004 Analyst LAP Chloride < 0.50 650 c ppm 1 01/2902014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content <0.10 0.10 c vA1 0113012014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method'.ASTM-D992-Rev 1976 Analyst: LAP Nitrate < 0:50 , 0.50 ppm 1. 01/3012014 12:00 PM. R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM.0974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 28.4 , 0.500 c mg KO.-g 1 O013012014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edition, 1981 Analyst anb Sulfide < 0.50 ,,' 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2812014 5:30 PM R43357.Client Sample ID:. V-I S -Top/Shop -Sample I. V Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-036&

Date Received:

01/14/20149;35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014.

12:00AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit QDal. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method:ASTM-0512-Rev 2004 Analyst: LAP Chloride < 0.50 " 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2912014 12:30 PM R43373 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D95-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content 0.28 ,i 0.10 c V.1% 1 0l/30/2014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D992-Rev 1978 Analyst: LAP Nitrate < 0.50 -, 0.50 ppm 1 0113012014 12:00 PM R43424 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyslt anb.Base Number 57.9 ,. 0.500. c mg KOH/g 1 01130/2014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15hl Edtion 1981 Analyst anb.Sulfide < 0.50 i' 0.50 c ppm 1 .01128/2014 5:30 PM R43357... .. ... ....... .. .... .. ... .. ...... .. .Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 409 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 21 of 31 Subiurban Laboratories, Inc. Laboratory Results0S.1 B a A%.. Suite1I0, gin a, II 60135 070.3 5.4.3260 Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: January 31, 2014 Project Namne:- 1226 Workorder:

1401415 ClientSample ID: V-136.- Gallery/Field-Sample 1 V Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-037 Date Received:

01/14/20.14 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01/13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter lItesult Limit Qual. lhdtis Factor Date Analyzed.

Batch ID CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D512-Rev 2004. Analysl: LAP Chloride.

< 0.50 ,.- 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2912014 12:30 PM R43374 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.095-Rev 1990 Analyst: LAP Moisture Content 0.22 ' 0.10 :c wt% 1 0113012014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D902-Rev 1978 Analyst: LAP Nitrate < 0.50 .., 0.50 ppm 1 01/30/2014 12:15 PM R43425 NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method:.ASTM.0974 Modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 35.2 0.500 C mg KOHtg 1 01130/2014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427.Rev 15th Edtion. 19 81 Analyst: anb Sullide < 0.50 , 0.50 c ppm 1 01/28/2014 5:30 PM R43358 Client Samlple ID: V-136 -Tolp/Shop

-Sample. I M' Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1401415-038 Date Received:

01/14/2014 9:35 AM Collection Date: 01t13/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date.Analyzed Batch iD CHLORIDE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.0512.Rev:2004 Analyst LAP Chloride < 0.50 ,' 0.50 c ppm 1 0112912014 12:30 PM R43374 MOISTURE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D95-Rev 1990 Analyst; LAP.Moisture Content < 0.10 ,- 0.10 c V,1% 1 01/30/2014 2:00 PM R43418 NITRATE BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D992-Rev 1978 Analyst: LAP Nitrate < 0.50 V 0.50 ppm 1 013012014 12:15 PM R43425: NEUTRALIZATION NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D974 Modified.Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Base Number 45.9 0.500 c mg KOHg 1 01130/2014 5:30 PM R43461 SULFIDE BY APHA Method: APHA-M427-Rev 15th Edtion. 1981 Analyst anb Sultide <0,50 ' 0.50 c ppm 1 01/2812014 5:30 PM R43358........ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f ... h..... .... --- ....... ......... ...........

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 410 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 22 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.S, IKamai Ae.. Suite 150 ,C L.a IL 60134. ).541-3260 Qualifier Definitions WOff: 1401415 D are: 1/31/2014 Qualifiers:

• !x Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank c Analyte not .in SLI scope of accreditation E Estimated, detected.

above quantitation range G Refer to case nar'ative page for specific comments H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limit (QL)N Tentatively identified cornmpounds ND Not Detected at tile Reporting Limit P Present..:

R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike Recovery outsideaccepted recovery limits Ity r>-Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 411 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 23 of 31 POC pn PRGIStOlI SURIWIILLAU CE January 13, 2014 0 q Suburban Laboratories, Inc.1950 S. Batavia Ave.,: Ste. 150 Geneva, IL 60134-Attn: Kelly Culhane, Please test the following thirty-eight (38) grease samples per PSC-POi 1226.Tendon End Sam 1 D-143 East/Field X 1cA D-143 South/Shop X 0-146 East/i:eld X D-146 South/Shop X 0-225, West/Shop X-6225 East/Field X 6.537 S. East/.Field X D-3237 West/Shop X D-303 North/Shop X-33 S. a ~t/Fleld..

X H13-03 Butt 3/Field X H13-03 Butt 4/Shop X H13-08. Butt I/Shop X 813-10 Butt 3/Field. X.13-10 Butt 5/Shop X F124-25 Butt 4/Shop X H24 -15 Rlutt 2/Field X.H24-22 Butt 4/Shop X H24-22 Butt 4/Field X H35-O0 Butt 3/Fleld X H3S.O2: Butt 5/Shog..H62-26 Butt 2/Fiehld X__H62-26 ButtB6/Sh10p,_

46-34 Butt o/Shop X H4t t4aButt 4tFieldSI-1151-40 Butt 5/Field"HSI-40 Butt I/Shop X .V-32 Galle /Filed X_

Tot/shop ...X ._Y li~g St~el-East CllIkago,.IH.

463 l2 p1ica)3lReport Ft21 9)39At 58ac* 2 Pagep4sc1 adof Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 412 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 24 of 31* PRSCI8lOJ 8URV6IL(ANC,.Gallery/Field

._X_"___V-.59 Top/Shop _ X v.159 _Gallery/Field V-115 Gallery/Field X.V-115 Top/Shop X V-iA36 .. Gallery/Field k V-136 Top/Shop X We would like results 10-15 days after receipt of samples. Any qutestions orproblems please contact me. The above samples are being shipped to you on.1113/14.

Thank you, Gerald Bussone Quality Assurance Manager 3468 .Vt I ifStfeet -Easi Chicago -IN -46312 P1.2 19)397-5820 F(1219)397-6867 -VVMS~MpsdOnc~n Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 413 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 25 of 31 O. DER00 BY:

SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION

~A~6ATLING ROAD.r'CHIICAGO, IN 46312-1709 ,isA Purchase Order No." W622 Date Issued: 1113 14 Voice: 219-3937-5826 Fax: 219-397-5867 SUBURBAN LAE3ORATORIES INýC t 1950S. BATAVIA AVE. STE. 150.GENEVA.IL.1....

.USA ...":'Good Thru Ship VIA[8hlp To: "_ __ __" __ ___*_PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION 3468 WATLING ROAD EAST CHICAGO, IN.' 4T3121709 Account No. Terms 2/1214 BEST WAY I_114ESWANet 30 Days__Unit Cost Amount Quantity Descrlptlon Test I1htdy-elgIht (30) grease tamples (see attached letter dated 01V114) as per attached procedure SQ 7.0, Rev. 0, dated 09/03113.Test for water soluble chtorides, nlrates, and sulfides, water content and neutralizatbn number as per proceduro sections 5 and 6. Provide results to PSC QA Depaitmet.

Al provisions of the Suburban Quality Assurance:

Manual, Rev. 3, dated t10125113-apply to the contracled services herein.Suburban shal submit a laboratory report Indicating the results of the tests were In conformance with the requirements of this Purchase Order. A member of Suburban's QA Department shall authenlicate the laboratory results. PSC, Indudlng authorized Clients and Contractors shall have rlght-of-accoss to the Suburban facility for the purposes of record re~fw,.and/or audit or surveillance activities.

Suburban shall report any defects or nonconforn~ng conditions from the Purchase Order requirements to the PSC Qualty Department prior to completion of this Purchase.

Order to determine acceptability.

L~AL..-0,00 Authorized Signature

.____.,__,._

1 1,7*V5\avc-Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 414 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 26 of 31 SUBURBAN LABORATORIES, Inc.1950 S. Batavia Ave., Suite 150 Geneva, Illinois 60134 Tel, (708) 544-3260 , Toll Free (800) 783=LABS Fax(708) 544-8587 ww.suburbanlabs.com February 25, 2014 Gerald BuSsone.Precision Surveillance Corp.3468 Watling Street East Chicago, IN 46312 Workorder:

14012811 TEL: (219) 397-5826 FAX: (219) 397-5867 RE: 1232

Dear Gerald Bussone:

Suburban Laboratories,.

Inc. received 10 sample(s) on 2/19/2014 for the analyses presented in the following report.All data for the associated quality control (QC) met EPA, method, or internal laboratory specifications except wherenoted intile case narrative.

If youare comparingthese results to external.

QC specifications or compliance limits and have any questions, please contact Us.This* final report of laboratory analysis consists of this.cover letter, case narrative, analytical report, dates report, and any accompaijying documentation on, but not limited to, chain of custody records, raw data, and letters of explanation or reliance.

This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written approval of Suburban Laboratories, Inc.If you have any questions regarding these test results,.

please call me-at (708) 544-3260.Sincerely, Kelly Culhane Project Manager 708-544-3260 ext 212.elly atsubu rban labs.co rn I " ". .....'i V)" I'I Illinois Department ofPublic Health Accredited

1. 17585 Rpt Ver: Kelly 2125/2014 3:39 PM Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Accredited

1. 100225 1 of 6 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 415 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 27 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.1950 5; Bam Ave., Suite 150, COj,,.. [1.,60134 (708) .5-1,3260[

Case Narrative Client: Precision Surveillance Corp. Date: February 25, 2014 Project: 1232 PON: 1232 WorkOrder:

1402811 QC Level: LEVEL I Temperature of samples upon receiptatSLl:

16 C Chain of Custody #: General Conmnents:

-All results reported in wet weight unless otherwise indicated. (dry = Dry Weight).-Sample results relate only to the analytes of interest tested and tosample as rcccivcd by the laboratory.

-Environmental compliance sample results meet the requirements of 35. IAC Part 186 unless otherwise:

indicated.

-Waste water analysis follows the rules set forth in 40 CFR part 136 except where otherwise:

noted.-Accreditation by the State of Illinois is not an endorsement or a guarantee of the validity of data generated.

-For more information about the laboratories' scope of accreditation, please contact us at (708) 544-3260 or the Agency at (217) 782-6455.Abbreviations:

-Reporting Limit: The concentration at which an analyte can be routinely detected on a day to day basis, and which also meets regulatory and client needs.-Quantitation Limit: The lowest concentration at which results can be accurately quantitated.

-J: The analyte was positively identified above our Method: Detection Limit and is considered detectable and usable; however, the associated numerical valuelis the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.-ATC: Automatic Temperature Correction.

-TNTC: Too Numerous To Count-In Laboratory:

EPA recommends this analyte be analyzed "immediately" (e.g., tests that should be performed in the field within 15 minutes of collection).

Analytes with "immediate" hold times are analyzed as soon as possible upon receipt by the laboratory.

-TIC: Tentatively Identified Compound (GCMS library search identification, concentration estimated to nearest internal standard).

-SS (Surrogate Standard):

Quality control compound added to the sample by the lab.Method

References:

For a complete list of method references please contact Us.-F.: USEPA Reference methods-SW: USEPA, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846)-M: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

-USP: I.atest version of United States Pharmacopcia Workorder Specific Comments: Rpt Ver: Kelly 2/2512014 3:39 PM 2 of 6 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 416 of 1008 REP-1 091-510 Appendix B, Page 28 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.1950.S. aluaaia At.. Suite loO, .Gernevj,lI..60134 (708) 544-3260 I Laboratory Results Client i1): Precision Surveillancc Corp.Project Name: 1232.Report Date: Fcbniary 25,2014 Workorderi.

1402811.ClientSample ID: Dý303 NORTII/SIIOP SAMPLE 2. Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1402811-001 Date Received:

02/19/2014 1.1:05 AM Collection Date: 02/18/2014 12:00 AM Report Limit Panrameter Result Qual. Un its Dilution Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 modified-Rev 1997 Analyst anb Acid Number 0.530 , 0.500 mg KOHIg 1 02/2412014 11:00AM R44164 Client Sample ID: 111.3-03 BU'nr 3/FIELD SAMPLE 2 .Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1402811-002 Date Received:

02/19/2014 11:05 AM Collection Date: 02/18/2014 1,2:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 modiffed-.Rev 1997 Analyst anb Acid Number 0.530 J 0.500 mg KO-lg 1 02/24/2014 11:00AM R44164 Client Sample ID: 111.3-03 BUTT I/SHOP SAM PLE 2 Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1402811-003 Date Received:02/19/2014 11:05 AM Colleclion Date: 02118/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor: Date Analyzed Batch ID i W ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 modified.Rev 1997 Anulyst .anb Acid Number < 0.500 0.500 mg KOHRg 1 02J24/2014 11:00 AM R44164 Client Sample ID: H13-08 BUTT 1SHOP SAMPLE 2 Matrix: GREASE.Lab ID: 1402811-004 Date Received:

.02/19/2014 11:05 AM Collection Date: 02/1.8/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed.

Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method- ASTM.D974 modified-Rev 1997 Analyst: anb Acid Number 1.06 1 0.500 mg KOH/g 1 0212412014 11:00 AM R44164 Client Sample II): 1113-10 BUT' 3/FIFID SANiPLE 2 Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1402811005 Date Received:

02/19/2014 11:05 AM Collection Date: .021.18/2014 12:00 AM.Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method- ASTM-0974 modified-Rev 1997 Analyst anb.Acid Number 0.530 0.6500 mg KOH/g 1 0212412014 11:00 AM R44164 Rpt Ver: Kelly 2125/2014 3:39 PM () ~~ 1"j-i 3 of 6 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 417 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 29 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.1950 S. Batavia Aa,. Suile I.50 (kneva. IL 60134 (708) 514-3260 Laboratory Results Client ID: Precision Surveillance Corp. Report Date: February 25, 2014 Project Name: 1232 Workorder:

1402811 Client SampleID:

H24-22.BUTT 4/SHlOP SAMPLE.2 Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1402811-006 Date Received:

02/19/2014 11:05 AM Collection Date: 02/18/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D974 modified-Rey 1997 Analyst: anb Acid Number < 0.500 0.500 mg KOF~g 1 02/24/2014 11:00 AM R44164 Client.Sample ID: H35-02 BUTT 3/FIELD SAMPLE 2 Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1402811-007 Date Received:

02/19/2014 11:05 AM Collection Date: 02/18/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 modified-Rev 1997 Analyst anb Acid Number 1.06 / 0.500 mg KOI-g 1 02/24/2014 11:00 AM R44164 Client Sample ID: V-32 GALLERYIFIELD SAMPLE 2 Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 14028 1.l008 Date Received:

02/19/2014.11:05 AM Collection Date: 02/18/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM.D974 modified-Rev 1997 Analyslt anb Acid Number 2.64 / 0.500 mgKOWg 1 02/2412014 11:00 AM R44164 Client Sample ID: V-.108 GALLERY/FIELD SAMPLE 2 Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1402811-009 Date Received:

02/19/2014 11:05 AM Collection Date: 02/18/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution.Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Factor Date Analyzed Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-0974 modified-Rev 1997 Analyst anb Acid Number 0,530 ./ 0.500 mg KOHWg 1 0212412014 11:00 AM R44164 Client Sample ID: V-159 GALLERY/FIELD SAMI'LE 2 Matrix: GREASE Lab ID: 1402811-010 Date Received:

02/19/2014 11:05.AM Collection Date:. 02/18/2014 12:00 AM Report Dilution Parameter Result Limit Qual. Units Faclor l)ate Analyzed Batch ID ACID NUMBER BY ASTM Method: ASTM-D974 modified-Rev 1997 Analyst anb Acid Number < 0.500 0.500 mg KOV9g 1 02/2412014 11:00 AM R44164..,V',: KIey I2: Rp'.'r: elly2/2/201 3:3.PM" 01 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 418 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 30 of 31 Suburban Laboratories, Inc.1950 S, Batavi.Ave..Suitc 150,:GQ.ima, 11.60134 (708) 544-3260 Qualifier Definitions woII: 1402811 Date: 2/25/2014 Qualifiers:

x"

• Value exceedsMakimum Contaminant" Level B Analytedetected in the associated Method Blank c :Analytc not in SLI scope of accreditation E Estimated, detected above quantitation range G Refer to case narrative page for specific comments H Holding times for preparation or anaiysisexceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limit (QL).N rentatively identified compounds.ND Not Detected at the Reporting:

Limit P Present R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits Apt Ver; Kelly' 2J2512014 3:39 PM I' ~ //~5 of 6 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 419 of 1008 REP-1091-510 Appendix B, Page 31 of 31 ORDERED BY: PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION 3468 WATLING ROAD EAST CHICAGO, IN 46312-1709 USA Purchase Order No.: 1232 Date Issued: 2118114 Voice: 219-397-5826 Fax: 210-397-5887 To: SUBURBAN LABORATORIES INC 1950 S. BATAVIA AVE. STE. 150 GENEVA, IL 60134 USA Ship To: PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION 3468 WATLI NG ROAD EASTCHICAGO, IN 46312-1709 USA U~ ~~~~. .- .--- ..----..-..

Good Thru I Y20/14 ciuantity Ship Via Account No. Terms BEST WAY Net 30 Day Description' Unit Cos Test for neutralization number using acid test as outlined in ASTM 0974 Modified.

Provide results to PSCQA Department.

Ad provisions of (he Suburban Quality Assurance Manual, Rev. 3, dated .10/25/13 apply to the contracled services herein.. Suburban shall submit a laboratory report indlcaling the results of the tests were In conformance with the requirements of this Purchase Order. A member of Suburban's OA Department shaA authenticate the laborator results. PSC, Including authorized Clients ard Contractors shall have right-of-access to Ihe Suburban facility for the purposes of record review, and/or auditor surveillance activities.

Suburban shall report any defects or nonconforming condlilons from the Purchase Order requirements to the PSC Quality Department prior to completion of this Purchase Order to determine acceptability.

Test Reports will include Test Method used (Includig year).Test (10) grease samples. Idenltified as: D-303 NORTH/SHOP SAMPLE 2 "1 W\HI 3-03 BUTT 3/FIELD SAMPLE 2.H13-03 BUTT I/SHOP SAMPLE 2 HI 3-08 BUTT I/SHOP SAMPLE 2 H1 3-10 BUTT 31FIELO SAMPLE 21 %s vjto H24-22 BUTT 4/SHOP SAMPLE 2 H3 5.02 BUTT 3/FIELD SAMPLE 2.V-32 GALLER Y/FIELD SAMPLE 2 V-108 GALLERYIFIELD SAMPLE 2 V-159 GALLERYIFIELD SAMPLE 2 -O\ 0 E, Amount 0.Authorized Signature.

Rpt Ver: Kelly 2/2512014 3:39 PM 6 of 6 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 420 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix C, Page 1 of 5 194 Qmd He9'6 usA 60139 Test Certificate R: I. I(&'q22 1038 R: +1(630) 221-0796 F, sodee~axoam.cm

%V, WWwqXoy.C*1 0 0 Wli Precision Surveillance Corp 3468 Watling Road East Chicago, IN 46312 Attn: Gerrald Bussone REF No T400547 Page 1..of I Orad No 1228 Date Tested 01117/14 Date Printed 01/17/14 Date. Received 01/ 13114"Issue 1 Item *TENSILE TESTING OF THREE 1/4" DIAMETER TYPE BA WIRE.Tendon# D237, End: Southeast/Field, Length: 0-10', 60'-70', 120'-130V Specification ASTM-A370-12a

& A421/A421M-10 K'A" z Dimensions Area GL 1.00 YS UTS %El 9A Comments[in] (in 2] [In] (psi] [psi]001:Par-ent.

0.2500 0.0491 10.00 223500 25600 5.2 42.2 Sample 1 002:Parent 0.2500 0.0491 10,00 220600 254700 5.2 42.2 Sample 2.003:Parent 0.2500 0.0491. 10.00 219700 253500 5.i1 43.4 Sample 3 Specificat~ion Mini~un Specification Kmoisjmn 204000 2000.*4.0 Elongatlon determined after fracture unless otherwise indicated..

Certificate Comments Sample # Yield, lbs. Tensile, lbs.1. 0' ,-10, 10970 12741 2. 60'- 70' 10829 12505 3, 120' -130' .10.786 12446 The preceding testinX was per ormed in accordance with Exova America:s Mater-ia Is..Dii sion QA Manual Issue 3. 8/15/2011.

Based on the above test results, the material quality conforms to the..requirements of stated specification.

• ~ e&WM I nW Ut. mr--tI .01 bW~ m W, Aftmlt t 1. wkee P1 o1 .1 E-. 199 SWo' 0Ut -d.. Gt e 'gf8 htt. It- USA. 6013v T-Ijh-, 911 I.~Lt ' 8 -o Lto r.(5 W-V...d 89t -MqoIt~Se~tI.nesett,~

tteTte otrýic1',1 5900 S~tSIt tIor~o~ Atot0 ~1*t8.. ... .. .. ...... ý .................

..Mark K Goodyear ...H13&HT Manager/Staff Engineer For and on behalf of Exova Inc.YSnoC E adca t0S13n0 cert. Materials Testing Laboratory& 0154L02 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 421 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix C, Page 2 of 5 194 kdlolloole, Boulevard G&w~dde e;USA 60139 Test Certificate

r. *1 (WO) 22 1 038 r+I~ .(M 0221-0796 E. sdes~eowxcom W. w~wwxocacorn%

0 0 x w i H 7 Precision Surveillance Corp 3468 Watling Road East Chicago, IN 46312 Attn: Gerrald Bussone REF No T 400556 Page 1 of.1 Ord No 1228 Date Tested 01117114 Date Prnted 01/17/14 Date Received 01/13114"Issue I Item -TENSILE TESTING OF THREE 1/4" DIAMETER TYPE BA WIRE.Tendon# H 13-03, End: Butress I/Shop, Length: 0-10', 70'-80',.140'-150*Specification

-ASTM-A370-12a

&A421/A421M-10 t -A -,***** --**-----NP~st 04 4P... ..0imensions Area CL 1.00P5YS UyS %El 9tRA Comments[in] lin 2 l [in] (psi] (psi]001:Parent 0.2490 0,0487 10.00 222100 258900 5,8 43.6 Sample 1 Conforms 002:Parent 0.2490. 0.0487 10.00 219900 258500 6.2 43.6 Sample 2 Conforms 003:Parent 0.2490 0.0487 10.00 219200 257800 5.8 43.6 Sample 3 Conforms.Spec if icat Ion Mi n iun 204000. 246000 4.0.Specification MaxiuIm .... ...Elongation determined after fracture unless otherwise indicated.

Certificate Comments Sample # Yield, lbs.1. 0- 10' 10813 2, 70'.-80, 10710 3, 140' -150' 10673 Tensile. lbs.12586 12553: The preceding testingi was performed in accordance with Exova Americas Materials Division QA Manuaal Issue. 3, 815/2011.Based on the. above test results, the material quality conforms to the requirements of stated specification.

PSCI)JA Vl'It .S Zh~IM iWJ n~to: .-eprods. t o.ia tnai u. I.Iti. l-I 1ý m: Lien aqvwaiofo E,,,. 194 In l a~se 15. QftMA!u "K,)ht, I .USA, 60139 1`0;1ý31j P35Fe csttju:Led t,f st,"nfcalce eaUm 16els 35~ bd'.C1h.i

~ Iteayuose rc~4 t*C441.IýnI,.e~i,, Ttnutv e..'3,. 4w~n~ t. o L nnnA nt L 3~, fW esLile Anv.Wns~ sse ,SL Mark K Goodyear H13&HT Manager/Staff Engineer For and on behalf of Exova Inc.~LTWIZ, Accredited.

0EST0 CERTa 010 ateriats Testing Laboratoiy o 04.o 010 o00o Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 422 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix C, Page 3 of 5 Exoay 194 hkiofondle 8osiori Mandate Hoeghh USA 60139 Test Certificate t.*1.(&W)221-0=8 P 41 (M3) 221.079 W. W"AMMlICOwic

.0 I Precision Surveillance Corp'3468 Watling Road East Chicago, IN 46312 Attn: Gerrald Bussone REF No T400557 Page 1 of 1 Ord No 1228: Date Tested 01/17114.Date Printed 01/17114 Date Received 01113114"Issue 1 Item -TENSILE TESTING OF THREE 114" DIAMETER TYPE BA WIRE.Tendon# H51-40, End: Butress 1/Shop, Length: 0-10', 70'-80', 140'-i150' Specification

-ASTM-A370-12a

& A421/A421M-10.A,.:;.:c<c:.:.,fl::.:O.,x.:.:-z..:&-x.:y~:-:-x-x-s-c ~cc-ycz-:t>x.x-,.t.:

A, ':x.:-. ~ ~ ~ ,4~2c>A:$t.C,~,.-

~ ~ ZcoZ3wZc.

.-:.c.'c-,: , , ,,.: ..c-,.L.. .. ..~ox. :--'4- ...........

x .:-o V:!......~.. ._... _...Dimensions Area GL 1,. 0YS UTS .EI ý,A Comments[in] [ n2] [in] [psi] (psi I_001:Parent 0:..2500 0.0491 10.00 207900 248200 5.2 34.7 Conforms 002.:Parent 0.2500 0.0491 10.00. 209900 249700 5A0 39.8 Conforms.003:Parent 0.2500 0.0491 10.00 212100 248800 5.0 36.0 Conforms Spcification~

FannIum 204000 24c000 4.0 Elongation determined after fracture unless otherwise indicated.

Certificate Comments Sample # Yield. lbs. Tensile, lbs.1 1, -10' 10205 12184 2, 70' -80' 10305 12256 3,. 140' -150' 10411 12213 The preceding testin(l was performed in accordance with Exova .Americas Materials D-ivision QA Manual Issue 3, 8/1.5/2011.

Based on the above test results, the material quality conforms to the requireements of statedl spec.ification".hi. -I&W fff. 2-! -IL OiWf.~t ft l rfo .Air 0 ý ftO, n F.f f -Mtym to4 lnnlml eld GMef H?!jbbt lL UA.0 T WNtooc&..

o c :,-on fftl0tc- fIt0trn r,.JofEo -1 oj~ ,~~' ~cd toc0! I'~'.IL SIOJ'Mark K Goodyear H13&HT ManagarlStaff Engineer For and on behalf of Exova inc.2 A.ccreoditeod 111"d '.adTa p*Tsnt1 i CER1.0 t Testing Laboratory 0t04.01 A 01"02O;Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 423 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix C, Page 4 of 5 194 hiotroflnode Boulevard LISA 60139 Test Certificate k + (6M0)22 1-038 P +1 (M30221-0796 P- $313fw~ccm.wwwo~o 0 X I1 I I Precision Surveillance Corp 3468 Watling Road East Chicago, IN 46312 Attn: Gerrald Bussone REF No T 400558 Page 1 of 1: Ord No 1228 Date Tested 01117114 Date Printed 01117/14 Date Received 0.1/13.14: Issue I Item -TENSILE TESTING OF THREE 1/4,:DIAMETER TYPE BA WIRE.Tendon# V-136, End: Top/Dhop, Length: 0-10', 90'-100', 170'-180'Specification

-ASTM-A370-12a

& A421/A421M-10

~ m4 ~ --~ -~ t<.. .~3~-;W ¶Z'MR Dimensions Area GL 1.00CYS UTS % EI MA Comments i[n] Ein 2] (in] Cpsi] (psi]001:Parent 0.2490 0.0487 .10.00 236100 262800 4.2 45.4 Sample 1I 002:Parent 0.2490 0.0487 10.00 234100 262000 5.4 46.0 Sample 2 003:Parent 0.2490 0.0487 10.00 238200 263400 4.7 45.4 Sample 3 SpretIf tcat ion Miln Imr 204000 24"000 4.0 Specification Elongation determined after fracture.

unless. otherwise.

indicated.

Certificate, Comments Sample # Yield. lbs... Tensile, lbs..1, 01 -10' 11499 12799 2. 90'-100' 11398 12759 3', 170 -180' 11599 12827 The preceding testing was performed in accordance with Exova Americas Materials Division QA Manual Issue 3. 8/15/2011.

Based on the above test results, the material quality conforms to.the requirements of stated specification..

1- V Thmmfn .r,,f.4otra~ek tl.n- ce ~lejW4 wm" e- -,W-1I.Th)AII.Th e od sbmj ha be N d-o, to.ý gse r~a~1~et I as det0ctq in.t fie (C.Io ,'f. ~,IdoJg.....o d e a. r ......................

.Mark K Goodyear H1 3&HT M anager/S t aff Engineer For and on behalf of Exova Inc...A c c r a d , t e d_ Nadcap T 0160CE1T0 Materials Testing Labofarroy Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 424 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix C, Page 5 of 5 194 hnemtlo1We 8odaivad USA 60139 Test Certificate

r. *1(6M0221-038

+.I (6M0)221-06M W swe2eovoycmoon

.0 X Ro f"i i I Precision Surveillance Corp 3468 Watling Road East Chicago, IN 46312 Attn: Gerrald Bussone REF No T 400559 Page 1 of I Ord No 1228 Date Tested 01117114 Date Printed 01/17/14 Date. Received 01/13114:Issue I Item -TENSILE TESTING OF THREE 1/4" DIAMETER TYPE BA WIRE.Tendon#V-159, End: Top/Shop, Length: 0-10', 90'-100, 170'-180*Specification

-ASTM-A370-12a

&A4211A421M-10

.. .. ... .... ....y~; ~ ~ ~Dimensions Area GL 1.O0YS UTS zEI 9RA Comments[in] Cin 2] [in] [psi] [psi]001:Parent 0.2500 0.0491 10.00 210300 249400 5.7 46.4 Sample 1 002:Parent 0.2500. 0.0491 10.00 212700 251600 5.0. 47.0 Sample 2 003:Parent 0.2500. 0.0491 10.00 213300 253500 4.8 46.4 Sample 3 Speciricdtion Hinlijai Specification Piaxst 204000.240000 4,0-I~ A ________ --________ , _______ _____ -. ______ __________________

Elongation determined after fracture unless otherwise indicated.

Certificate Comments Sample.# Yield, lbs. Tensile. lbs.1, 0'- 10' 10321 12241 2, *90 , 100, 1.0441 12350 3. 1.70 -180' 10471 12443 The preceding.

testina was performed in accordance with Exova Americas Materia s uivision QA:Manua.1 Issue 3,, 8/15/2011.

Based on the above test results, the material quality conforms to the requirements of stated specIfication.

Ths W14.tIA., 1-~b-v~ os,.L ý MwfW. AliYt .ft ., arpoL d ý4 CAE .lI" 8~.,,NeBJ, Qvoý lftl.Jfý.

IL, LiSA. 6012t)Tejý)hasklepo cmd,:ted W speai'M, rte-sic IevIa s d,-c.t~d ia .acaý .dc-MCo; c~d~s G W R '6 oo., ye.. ............................

Mark K Goodyear H13&HT Manager/Staff Engineer For and on behalf of Exova Inc.~TI ~~"Accredi~ted TUSII79 CEIRT Materials Testing Laboratory 9104. & 01 O I02 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 425 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: I HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION Jack Calibration Record DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG REVISION #SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE I 1 OF 3 I -~DATE: 08116113 I REVIEWED BY: ",,.0)DATE: 08/16/13 A-" 91-oln Project: PRE-TMI Contract No: 1091 Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9400 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq. in. Max Pressure:

8500 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibratina Gaucqe Used: HEISE Reoister No: S9-27100 Due Date: 03/09!14 Raw Data By: MELISSA LARA Date: 08/16/13 Witness: N/A Mean RamArea: 21.847sq.in.K=

kips Agency: N/A Date: N/A Computed By: Andrew Makinson QC Check: Title: Engineer Date: 08116/13 Title:,,j),t. ) Date: /,5 , Target Pressure (PSI) Gauge Reading (PSI) Load Cell Readout Comments 1000 1050 7.44 RUN: 1 POSITION:

4" 2000 2010 14.20 3000 3020 21.34 4000 4005 28.24 5000 5005 35.34 6000 6005 42.44 7000 7015 49.60 8000 8001 56.54 1000 1002 6.94 RUN: 2 POSITION:

8" 2000 2005 14.04 3000 3020 21.14 4000 4016 28.14 5000 5050 35.40 6000 6020 42.14 7000 7010 49.10 8000 8010 56.04 1000 1040 7.24 RUN: 3 POSITION:

12" 2000 2030 14.20 3000 3012 21.10 4000 4020 28.14 5000 5040 35.34 6000 6030 42.24 7000 7010 49.04 8000 8030 56.14 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 426 of 1008 HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION Linear Regression.

Analysis DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG REVISION # 0 SAFETY RELATED X NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE I 2 OF 3 DATE' 08/16/131 REVIEWE O BY: DATE: 08/16/13 Project: PRE-TMI ContractNo:

f4-1091 aAi Jack

Description:

MAGNUS 1000 Tons Register No: 9400 Theoretical Ram Area: 235ý62 sq. In. Max Pressure:

8500 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 ýConstant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: S9-27100 Due Date: 03/09/14 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) Load Cell Readout Computed Force (kips)1050 7.44 .245.603 2010 14.20 468.759 3020 21.34 704.459 4005 28.24 932.236 5005 35.34 1166.616 6005 42.44 1400.995 7015 49.60 1637.356 8001 56.54 1866.453 1002 6.94 229.098 2005 14,04 463.477 3020 21.14 697.857 4016 28.14 928.035 5050 35.40 1168.596 6020 42.14 1391.092 7010 49.10 1620.850 8010 56.04. 1849.948 1040 *7.24 239.001 2030 14.20 468.759 3012 21.10 696.536 4020 28.14 928;935 5040 35.34 1166.616 6030 42,24 1394.393 7010 49,04 .1618.869 8030 56.14 1853.249 Indicates these readings.have.been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration Error In Standard...................................................................

.........

0.0100 Interpolation in Gauge ................................

....................................

0.0000 Accuracy of Gauge .....................................

...... 0.0000 Errors In Gauge Calibration ksl ksl ksi Interpolation in Master.. .......................

............................

0.6000 Interpolation in Field.Gauge

....................

..... ...........................

0.0050 Accuracy of Master .....................................

.........................

0.0100 Accuracy of Field Gauge ..........................

........................................

0.0275 Errors In Field Use of Gauge ksi ksi ksi k si Interpolation Error ...........................................................................

0,0050 Accuracy Error ......................................

......................

0.0275 Maximum Gauge. Reading Used..........................................................................

8.0300 ksi ksi ksl FORCE (kips)= 231.847 (in 2)X GAUGE READING (ksi) +-0.269 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99994982 N/NO = 1.0000 (Not < 0.66667)Maximum Error Ratio In Jack ......................................

... 0.0127.Maximum Error Ratio In Gauge ..........

.. ....................

.........

0.0052: Maximum TotalError Ratio ......................

h ..............................

0.0137 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 427 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION.

REVISION#

0 Comparison With Previous Calibration SAFETY RELATED.... NON-SAFETY RELATED_ GE 3 OF 3 COMPUTED BY: APM DATE:. 08/16/13 REVIEWED BY: DATE: 08/16/13 A.3- orA 0-0~f Proiect: PRE-TMI Contract No: 1091 Praiect: PRE-TMl Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9400 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq. in. Max.Pressure:

8500 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant, 33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: S9-27100 Due Date: 03/09/14 Data From Current Calibration Area (A 1):. 231.847 sq.in.Constant (Cf): -0.269 kips Max Pressure (P): 8000 psi Data From Previous Calibration Area (A 1): Constant (C 1): 234.041 sq.in.-1.991 kips f x1 00% = 0.846%i WHERE: i = (Ai x P) + (Ci

• 1000)f = (Af x P) + (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 428 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC:

JACK CALIBRATION REVISION #Jack Calibration Record SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY.RELATED

_ _PAGE I B OF 3-COMPUTED BY: NED DATE: 01/10/14 REVIEWED BY: DATE: 01110114 Proiect: POST-TMI.Contract*

No: '1091 Proiect: POST-TMI.

Contract No: 1091 Jack

Description:

MAGNUS **Size:. 1000 Tons Register No: 9400 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq.. in. Max Pressure:

8500 Psi.Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18/14 Raw Data By: GERALD BUSSONE Date: 01/10/14.

Witness: N/A.Mean Ram Area: 234.987 .sq. in. K= .4.091 .kips Agency: NIA Date: NIA Computed By: NICHOLAS DARLAGE QC Check: Title: PROJECT COORDINATOR Date: 01/10/14 Title: (K , Date: 1//3( II t Target Pressure (PSI) Gauge Reading (PSI) Load Cell Readout Comments 1000 1040 7.30 RUN: 1 POSITION:

4" 2000 2023 14.30.3000 3004 21.24 4000 4036 28.64 5000 5021 35.64 6000 6002 42.64 7000 7012 49.84 8000 8034 57.10 1000 1025 7.14 RUN: 2 POSITION:

8" 2000 2014 14.24 3000 3010 21.34 4000 4002 28.14 5000 5003 35.50 6000 6015 42.50 7000 7018 49.90 8000 8008 56.90 1000 1042 7.30 RUN: 3 POSITION:

12" 2000 2002 14.14 3000 3003 21.30: 4000 4012 28.44 5000 5008 35.54 6000 6015 42.74 7000 7002 49.74 8000 8007 56.80 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 429 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION #0 Linear Regression Analysis SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATED I PAGE 1. 2 OF 3!COMPUTED BY: NED DATE: 01110114 1 REVIEWED BY: DATE: 01/t0114 Project: POST-TMI Contract No: 1091 Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9400 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq. in. Max Pressure' 8500 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register Nom 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02118/14 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) Load Cell Readout Computed Force (kips)1040 7.30 240.982 2023 14.30 472.060 3004 21.24 701.158 4036 28.64 945.441 5021 35.64 1176.519 6002 42.64 1407.598 7012 49.84 1645.278 8034 57.10 1884.940 1025 7.14 235.700 2014 14.24 470.079 3010 21.34 704.459 4002 28.14 928. 935 5003 35.50 1171.898 6015 42.50 1402.976 7018 49.90 1647:259 8008 56.90 1878.337 1042 7.30 240.982 2002 14.14 466.778 3003 21.30 703.139 4012 28.44 938.839 5008 35.54 1173.218 6015 42.74 1410.899 7002 49.74 1641.977 8007 56.80 1875.036 Indicates these readings have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration Error In Standard .......................................

........ .........

0.0100 ksi Interpolation in Gauge ..........................................

.........

........ 0.0000 ksi Accuracy of Gauge. ..... .........

I ........................

....... .... 0.0000 ksi Errors In Gauge Calibration Interpolation in M aster ...........................

......................................

.... 0.0000 ksi Interpolation in Field G auge ......................................

....................

0.0050 ksi Accuracy of M aster ...................................

......................................

0.0100 ksi Accuracy of Field Gauge ...................................

0.0275 ksi Errors In Field Use of Gauge Interpolation Error .............................

............................................

A ccuracy E rror ...................................................

.......................

Maximum Gauge Reading Used........................................................

...........

0.0050 0.0275 8.0340 ksi ksi ksi FORCE (kips) = 234.987 (in 2)X GAUGE READING (ksi) + -4.091 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99999100 NINO = 1.0000 (Not < 0.66667)M axim um Error Ratio In Jack ...............................................................................

0.0079 Maximum Error Ratio In Gauge... ...............

.............

........ ..... ..... .. .0.0052 Maximum Total Error Ratio ..................................

....... 0.0095 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 430 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: Cp DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION # 0 Comparison With Previous Calibration SAFETY RELATED. X NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE 3 OF 3 COMPUTED BY: ......NED DATE: 01/10/147 REVIEWED BY: DATE: 01/101/14 jProject:

POST-TMI Contract No: 1091 Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9400 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq. in. Max Pressure:

8500 psi Calibrating Device. Used:. TELEDYNE Register.No:

4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18/14 Data From Current Calibration Area. (A ,): 234.987 sqin.Constant (Cf): -4.091 kips Max Pressure (P): 8000 psi Data From Previous Calibration Area (A): Constant (Ci): 231.847 sq.in.-0.269 kips f 100% --1.148%i WHERE: i = (Ai x P) + (Ci

• 1000).f = (Af x P)+ (Cf* 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 431 of 1008 D)OCUMENT NO;.rDOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION # 0 Jack Calibration Record SAFlE'Y RELATED X* ,NON-SAFETY RELATED Z4_ .A0144PAGE I OF 3 COMPUTED BY: APM DATE: 08119/13 IREVIEWED BY: DATE: 08/19/13?/ I.. .A Project: PRE-TMI Contract No: 1091 Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9401 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq. in. Max Pressure:

8500 psi: Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 29-27100 Due Date: 03109/14 Raw Data By: MELISSA LARA Date: 08/19/13.

Witness: N/A Mean Ram Area: ý233.566 sq. in. K= 5.6.1097 kips Agency: N-A Date: N/A Computed By: ANDREW MAKINSON QC Check: Title: ENGINEER Date: 08/19/13 __Title: (P1 y)Ya.,te-i Date: e ho/3 Target Pressure (PSII Gauge Reading (PSI) Load Cell Readout Comments 1000 1015 6.64 RUN: 1 POSITION:

4" 2000 2013 13.80 3000 3015 20.94 4000 4005 28.54 5000 5010 35.14 6000 6022 42.40 7000 7010 49.40 8000 8018 56.54 1000 1030 7.14 RUN: 2 POSITION:

8" 2000 2030 14.24 3000 3045 21.44 4000 4006 28.30 5000 5020 35.54 6000 6020 42.64 7000 7030 49.80 8000 8010 56.74 1000 1025 6.94 RUN: 3 POSITION:

12" 2000 2020 14.04 3000 3025 21.20 4000 4025 28.24 5000 5015 35.24 6000 6010 42.24 7000 7025 49.34 8000 8020 56.34 0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 432 of 1008 Y ~HYDRAULICJACK CALIBRATION Linear Regression Analysis DOCUMNENT NO J DOCUMENTTYPE:

ENG REVISION # 0 SAFt,.rY RELATED X NON-SAFETY RELAKTIED.

PAGE *2. OF 3.DATE: 08/.19/13 I REVIEWEDBY:

okJZ,0 DATE: 08119/13 Project: PRE-TMI Contract No: N Ai091 g s 8(uiI Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: .1000 Tons Register No: 9401 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq. In. Max Pressure:

8500 psi Calibrating Device Used:. TELEDYNE Register No- 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 29-27100 Due Date: 03/09/14 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) Load Cell Readout [ Computed Force (kips)1015 6.64 219.194 2013 1.3.80 455.555 3015 20.94 691.255 4005 28.54 942.140 5010 35.14 1160.014 6022 42.40. 1399.675 7010 49.40 1630.753 8018 56,54 1866.453 1030 7.14 235.700 2030 14.24 470.079 3045 21 44 707.760 4006 28.30: 934.217 5020 35.54 1173.218 6020 42.64 1407.598 7030 49.80 1643.958 8010 .56.74 1873.055 1025 6.94 229.098 2020 14.04 463.477 3025 21.20 699.837 4025 28.24 932.236 5015 35.24 1163.315 6010 42.24 1394;393 7025 .49ý34 1628.773 8020 56.34 1859.851 Indicates these readings have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration Error In Standard ................

......................

..........................

0.0100 ksi Interpolation in Gauge................

...............................................

0.0000 ksi Accuracy of Gauge...........

...............

............

0.0000 ksi Errors In Gauge Calibration Interpolation in Master ...................................................

.............

0.0000 ksi Interpolation in Field Gauge .................................................................

0.0050 ksi Accuracy of Master ......................................................

0.0100 ksi.Accuracy of Field Gauge .....................................................................

0.0275 ksl.ErrorsIn Field Use of Gauge Interpolation Error ............

...............

................

.......Accuracy Error ........................

4 ....... : .......................

.......Maximum Gauge Reading Used .......................................................

..............

0.0050 0.0275 8.0200 ksl ksi ksi FORCE (kips) = 233.566 (in2)X GAUGE READING (ksi) + -5.197 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99993993 N/NO = 0.8750' (Not < 0.66667)M axim um Error Ratio In Jack .............................................................................

0.0128 Maximum Error Ratio In Gaugo .........................................................................

0.0052 Maximum Total Error Ratio .........................................

0.0138 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 433 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION o Comparison With.Previous Calibration SAFety RELATED X NON-SAFETY RELATED PDTRPAGE [A3 OF 3 COMPUTED BY: APM. DATE: 08119/13 REVIE\VEDBY:

0j10 DATE: 08/19/13.Project: PRE-TMI Contract No: 1091 Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9401 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq. in. Max Pressure:

8500 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 29-27100 Due Date: 03109/14 Data From Current Calibration Area (A,): 233.566 sq.in.Constant (Cf): -5.197 kips Max Pressure (P): 8500 psi Data From Previous Calibration Area (AQ): Constant (CQ): 231.536 sq.in.1.464 kips-f x100% = -0.538%i WHERE: i= (Ai x P) + (Ci

• 1000)f = (Af x P) + (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 434 of 1008 Il)OCUMENT N[O: I HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION Jack Calibration Record MCM.......

DOCUMENT IYPE: ENG RVSIONT #EAE NNSAFETY RELATED IPAGE I I OF 3 NED, ITEI 01/13/14 1 REVIEWED BY: b A 4 DATE: 01/13114.................

Project: POST-TMI Contract No: 1091 Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9401 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62: sq. in. Max Pressure:

8500 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18114 Raw Data By: MELISSA LARA Date: 01113/14 IWitness:

N/A Mean Ram Area: 230.716 sq. in. K= -1.810 -kips 'Agency: N/A Date: N/A.Computed By: NICHOLAS DARLAGE IQC Check:...

tT, Title: PROJECT COORDINATOR Date: 01/13/14 ITitle: DA/- Date: ./q/,lq-, .Target Pressure (PSI) Gauge Reading (PSI) I Load Cell Readout _ _'_Comments 1000 1009 7.00 RUN: 1 POSITION:

4" 2000 2014 14.04 3000 3004 21.04 4000 4036 28.24 5000 5020 35.20 6000 6007 42.04 7000 7014 49.04 8000 8018 56.14 1000 1020 7.10 RUN: 2: POSITION:

8" 2000 2016 14.04 3000 3023 21.20 4000 4010 28.14 5000 5000 35.04 6000 6009 42.14 7000 7000 49.04 8000 8003 56.04 1000 1020 7.00. RUN: 3 POSITION:

.12" 2000 2002 13.84 3000 3009 20.84 4000 4009 27.84 5000 5014 34.80 6000 6020 41.80 7000 7018 48.70 8000 8009 55.54 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 435 of 1008 HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION Linear Regression Analysis DOCUMI.NT NO: IIX)CUMFNT'rYIl_'E:EN REVISION HI 0 SAFETY REtLATED X NON-SAFETY RELATED PAIE 1 2 OF 3 01/13/14 1 REVIEW-) L3: Rt: DATI'E: 01/13/14 Project: PRE-TMI Contract No: t4 1091 JackDescription:

MAGNUS: Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9401 TheoreticalRam Area: 235.62. sq. in. Max Pressure:

8500 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18114 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) Load Cell Readout Computed Force (kips)1009 7.00 231.078 2014 14.04 463.477 3004 21.04 694.556 4036 28.24 932.236 5020 35.20 1161.994 6007 42.04 1387.791 7014 49.04 1618.869 8018 56.14 1853.249 1020 7.10 234.380 2016 14.04 463.477 3023 21.20 699.837 4010 28.14 928.935 5000 35.04 1156.712.6009 42.14 1391.092 7000 49.04 :1618.869 8003 56.04 1849.948 1020 7.00 231.078 2002 13.84 456.875 3009 20.84 687.953 4009 27.84 919.032 5014 34.80 1148.790 6020 41.80 1379.868 7018 48.70 1607.645 8009 55.54. 1833.442 Indicates these readings have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration Error In Standard .........................................

....................

0.0100 ksi Interpolation in G auge ........................................................................

0.0000 ksi Accuracy of Gauge ...................................................

.............

0.0000 ksi Errors In Gauge Calibration Interpolation in Master ........ ...............................

...... ..... 0.0000 ksl Interpolation in Field Gauge ... .... .................................

0.0050 ksi Accuracy of Master......................................0a0100 ksi Accuracy of Field Gauge .............................................

..... ... 0.0275 ksi Errors In Field Use of Gauge Interp olation E rror ..............................................................................

Accuracy Error....;

.............

.....................................................

Maximum Gauge Reading Used .. ....................................

0.0050.0.0275 8.0180 ksi ksi ksi FORCE (kips) = 230.716 (in")X GAUGE READING (ksi) + -1.510 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99995015 NINO= 1.0000 (Not < 0.66667)Maximum Error Ratio In Jack ........................................

0.0117 Maximum Error Ratio InGauge ........................

0.0052 Maximum Total Error Ratio. ..........................

..... ..........

0.0128 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 436 of 1008 I)OCUMENr NO: c~j~DOCUMMYTTYPE:

N;HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION # i Comparison With Previous Calibration SAFETY RELATED X NON-SAFEI'Y RELATED COMPUE B. NPAGE 3 /OF 3/COMPUTED*BY:

NED DATE: 01/13134 REVIEWED 11y: 01/13/14.,,, Project. PRE-TMI Contract No:M1091 i j Jack

Description:

MAGNUS Size: 1000 Tons Register No: 9401 Theoretical Ram Area: 235.62 sq. in. Max Pressure:

8500 psi: Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18114 k Data From Current Calibration Area (Af):: 230.716 sq.in.Constant (Cf): -1.510 kips Max Pressure (P): 8500 psi Data From Previous.

Calibration Area (A,;,Constant.(Cj):

233.566 sq.in.-5.197 kips f x100% = 1,037%.i WHERE: i = (Aix P) + (Cl

• 1000)f = (Ai x P) + (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 437 of 1008

• DOCUMENT TYPE: HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION RE VISION 4 Jack Calibration Record SAFE'TY ZI-i.,'A NON-SAFETY RELATED CPDY N DE I/3PAGE I I1OF 3 com,,u.,a, BY:+ ,NFD ,DI,,:. I ,,,,= VI NVEDy,,,+

.13Y dfj DAM 11/3/1 Project: PRE TMI (POST RE-BUILD)

Contract No: N1091 Jack

Description:

DUDGEON Size: 1200 Tons Register No: 9501 Theoretical Ram Area: 369 sq. in. Max Pressure:

5200 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18/14 Raw Data By: GERALD BUSSONE Date: 11113/13 Witness: N/A Mean Ram Area: 373i666i sq. in. K= 1168.4 kips Agency: NIA Date: N/A Computed By: NICHOLAS DARLAGE QC Check: ...t3aLL (nhAOL, Title: PROJECT COORDINATOR Date: 11/13113 Title: (QC ,ir~rpfvW.'-

-Date: r/13b3I Target Pressure (PSI)] Gauge Reading (PSI) Load Cell Readout Comments 1000 1021 11.54 RUN: I POSITION:

1-1/2" 1500 151.9 17.14 2000 2011 22.80 2500 2508 28.44 3000 3029 34.40 3500 3518 39.84 4000 4006 45.34 4500 4508 51.04 5000 5031 56.80 5200 5220 59.04 1000 1020 11.54 RUN: 2 POSITION:

3" 1500 1505 17.10 2000 2002 22.74 2500 2522 28.64 3000 3005 34.14 3500 3501 39.80 4000 4007 45.44 4500 4522 51.14 5000 5002 56.74 5200 5210 59.04 1000 1004 11.40 RUN: 3 POSITION:

4-1/2" 1500 1514 17.20 2000 2010 22.84 2500 2500 28.40 3000 3000 34.04 3500 3501 39.70 4000 4025 45.64 4500 4502 51.04 5000 5003 56.74 5200 5206 59.04 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 438 of 1008 DOCUMENTr NO:)OCIJMENr TYPE: HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION.

REVISION # 0 Linear Regression.Analysis SA!:ITY.RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE 2 OF. 3 COMPUTr) BY: NE!) DA'Ir: 1/13/13 [REVlIEVEIWE Y: " DATE 11/13/13 Project: PRE TMI (POST RE-BUILD)

Contract No:. N1091 Jack

Description:

DUDGEON Size: 1200 Tons Register No: .9501 Theoretical Ram Area: 369 sq. in. Max Pressure:

5200 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register.No":

44084 Due Date: 02118114 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) Load.Cell Readout Computed Force (kips)1021 11.54 380.949 1519 17.14 565.812 2011 22.80 752.655 2508 28.44 938.839 3029 34.40 1135.585 3518 39.84 1315:166'4006 45.34 14965728 4508 51.04 1684.892 5031 56.80 1875.036 5220 59.04 1948.981 1020 11.54 380.949 1505 17.10 564.492 2002 22.74 750.675 2522 28.64 945.441 3005 34.14 1127.002 3501 39.80 1313.846 4007 45.44 1500.029 4522 51.14 1688.193 5002 56.74 1873.055 5210 59.04 1948.98.1 1004 11.40 376.328 1514 17.20 567.793 2010 22.84 753.976 2500 28.40 937.518 3000 34.04 1123.701 3501 39.70 1310.545 4025 45.64 1506.631 4502 51.04 1684.892 5003 56.74 1873.055 5206 59.04 1948.981 Indicates these readings have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors InJack Calibration Error In S tandard ..............................................................................

0.0100 Interpolation in G auge ..........................

................................

.... 0,0000 Accuracy of Gauge......................................

0.0000 Errors In Gauge Calibration ksi ksi ksi Interpolation in Master..........................

..............

0.0000 Interpolation in Field Gauge .................................

0.0050 Accuracy of M asterý ........................................................................

0.0100 Accuracy of Field Gauge .. ..................................

0.0275 Errors In Field Use of Gauge ksi ksi ksi ksi Interpolation Error ....... ...........

.........................

,.. 0.0050 Accuracy Error ............................................................

...........

0.0275 Maximum Gauge Reading Used.....:

.............

.........................

5.........

..... ........ 5.2200 ksi ksi ksi FORCE(kips)

= 373.666 (in') X GAUGE READING (ksi) + 1.684 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99999124 N/NO = 1.0000 (Not,< 0.66667)Maximum Error Ratio In Jack ..................................................................

0.0061 M axim um Error Ratio In Gauge ..................................................

..................

0.0080 M axim um Total Error Ratio................................................................................

0.0101 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 439 of 1008 HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION Comparison With Previous Calibration DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT'TYPE:

ENG REVISION P 0 SAFETY RELATED X.NON-SAFETY RELAIl'D PAGE 3 OF 3+/-UTED BY: NED DATE: 11/13/13 1 REVIi'WED BY: AM DATE: 11/13/13 Project: PRE TMI (POST RE-BUILD)

Contract No: N1091 Jack

Description:

DUDGEON Size: 1200 Tons Register No:. 9501 Theoretical Ram Area: 369 sq. in. Max Pressure:

5200 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18/14 Data From Current Calibration Area (A,): 373.666 sq.in.Constant (Cf): 1.684 kips.Max Pressure (P): 5200 psi Data From Previous Calibration Area (Aý):..Constant (Ci): 375.811 sq.in.-0.153 kips Ax00% = 0.477%i WHERE: i = (Ai x P) + (Ci

• 1000)f = (Af x P) + (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 440 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: l)ocu MlENTToP I. E HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISIONwti Jack Calibration Record SAIFTY RILATrED x NON-SAFE.TY RI.,.AM.: COMPJI)rEDBY:

NED I DA'rE: 1230/13 1 REVIL. WED BY: A41 DATE: 12130113 Prolect: POST TMI Contract No: NI1091 Jack.

Description:

DUDGEON Size: 1200 Tons Register No:: 9501 Theoretical Ram Area: 369 sq. in. Max Pressure:

5200 psi Calibrating Device. Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18/14 Raw Data By: MELISSA LARA Date: 12/30113 Witness:.

N/A Mean Ram Area: 376.178 sq. in. K= -6.420 kips Agency: N/A Date: N/A Computed By: NICHOLAS DARLAGE QC Check: _ ,_,,_Title: PROJECT COORDINATOR Date: 12130/13 Title: O } Date: i Target Pressure (PSI) Gauge Reading (PSI) j Load Cell Readout Comments 1000 1008 11.34 RUN: I POSITION:

1-1/2" 1500 1517 17.14 2000 2001 23.44 2500 2521 28.60 3000 3002 34.10 3500 3531 40.04 4000 4000 45.44 4500 4504 51.24 5000 5004 56.84 5200 5257 59.80 1000 1004 11.24 RUN: 2 POSITION:

3" 1500 1500 16.84 2000 2001 22.54 2500 2511 28.34 3000 3002 34.00 3500 3521 39.84 4000 4004 45;34 4500 .4503 51.04 5000 5001 56.74 5200 5203 59.10 1000 1018 11.50 RUN: 3 POSITION:

4-112" 1500 1512 17.14 2000 2003 22.74 2500 2503 28.40 3000 3004 34.14 3500 3515 39.94 4000 4004 45.50 4500 4504 51.24 5000 5022 57.14 5200 5201 59.14 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 441 of 1008 DOCUMIENT NO: DOCUMHNr rYPLE:.HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION IvivsIoxN i Linear Regression Analysis sA r RE.`A'-I)NON-SAFEYr RELATEDL)C IIY:,A /1 RPACIE BY2 OF 3 Project: Jack Descrip Theoretical F Calibrating 0 Calibrating G POST TMI Contract No: lion: DUDGEON Size: 1200 Tons: Register No: tam Area: 369 sq. in. Max Pressure: evice Used: TELEDYNE Register No. 4734 Constant: auge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: N1091 9501 5200 psi 33011.2 02`18114 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) J Load Cell Readout Computed Force (kips)1008 11.34 374.347 1517 17.14. 565.812.2001 23.44 773.783 2521 28.60 944.120 3002 34.10 1125.682 3531 40.04 1321.768 4000 45.44 1500.029 4504. 51.24 1691.494 5004 56.84 1876.357 5257 59.80 1974.070 1004 11.24 371.046 1500 16.84 555.909 2001 22.54 744.072 2511 28.34 935.537 3002 34.00 1122.381 3521 39.84 1315.166 4004 45.34 1496.728 4503 51.04 1684.892 5001 56.74 1873.055 5203 59.10 1950.962 1018 11.50 379,629 1512 17.14 565:812 2003 22.74 750.675 2503 28.40 937.518 3004 34.14 1127.002 3515 39.94 1318.467 4004 45.50. 1502.010 4504 51.24 1691.494 5022 57.14 1886.260 5201 59.14 1952.282 Indicates these readings have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration 0 Error In Standard .............................................................................

0.0100 Interpolation in G auge...................................

....................................

0.0000 Accuracy of Gauge ...............

0.0000 Errors In Gauge Calibration ksi ksi ksi Interpolation in Master ...............................

...................

0.0000 Interpolation in Field Gauge ..................................

.. ... ..........

0.0050 Accuracy of Master .............................................

.........

0.0100 Accuracy of Field Gauge ...... .......................................................

0.0275 Errors In Field Use of Gauge ksi ksi ksi ksi Interpolation Error ........................................

0.0050 Accuracy Error .........................................

0.0275 Maximum Gauge Reading Used ..................................

........ 5.2570 ksi ksi ksi FORCE (kips) = 376.178 (ins)X GAUGE READING (ksi) +-5.420 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99999057 NiNO = 0.9667 (Not < 0.66667)M axim um Error R atio In Jack .........................................

.....................................

0.0056 Maximum Error Ratio In Gauge .......................................

0:0080 Maximum Total Error Ratio ..........................................

0.0097 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 442 of 1008

• !" .......DOCUNIE.N'_

No,, HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION #Comparison With Previous Calibration SAFETY REl.Vr-D x.NON-SAIFETIY RIELATEI)PI'AGE 3 OF 3 CON.PUoED BY: N14) DATiE: 12/3W13 ,,REVJEW)D BY: ArM DATE: 12801313 Project: POST TMI Contract No:. N1091 Jack

Description:

DUDGEON Size: .1200 Tons Register No: 9501 Theoretical Ram Area: 369 sq. in. Max Pressure:

5200 psi Calibrating*

Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating -Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02118114 Data From Current Calibration Data From Previous Calibration.Area (A,): 376.Constant (C,): Max Pressure (P): 178 sq.in.-5.420 kips: 5200 psi, Area (A): Constant (Ce): 373.666 sq.in.1.684 kips-f x100% =-0.306%WHERE: i = (Ai x P).+ (Ci

• 1000)f = (Af x P)+ (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 443 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: N HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION 0 Jack Calibration Record SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATED*__IPAGE 1 OF 3 COMPUTED BY: APM DATE:. 08121/13 1 REVIEWED BY: DATE: 081211.13 Proiect: POST ANO/ PRE TMI.Contract No: 1086tN1091 Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-6 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. in. Max Pressure:

9750 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibratinii Gauqe Used: HEISE Reqister No: S9-27100 Due Date: 03/09/14 Raw Data By: MELISSA LARA Date: 08/21/13 Witness: NIA Mean Ram Area: 203.411 ..sq. in. K= 1.802 kips Agency: N/A Date: NIA Computed By: ANDREW MAKINSON QC Check: v7~dLaii7 Title: ENGINEER Date: 08/21/13 Title: Q &1 "(,-C 3 1 Date: 9 ,.Target Pressure (PSI), Gauge Reading (PSI) Load Cell Readout Comments 1000 1040 6.30 RUN: 1 POSITION:

1 1/2" 2000 2025 12.54 3000 3040 18.80 4000 4055 25.14 5000 5015 31.04 6000 6020 37.30 7000 7010 43.34 8000 8025 49.64 9000 9010 55.74 9750 9760 60.24 1000 1040 6.34 RUN: 2 POSITION:

3" 2000 2010 12.40 3000 3030 18.74 4000 4015 24.84 5000 5020 31.10 6000 6006 37.14 7000 7000 43.30 8000 8010 49.44 9000 9015 55.64 9750 9760 60.10 1000 1035 6.24 RUN: 3 POSITION:

4 1/2" 2000 2015 12.30 3000 3050 18.70 4000 4020 24.74 5000 5020 30.94 6000 6005 37.04 7000 7015 43.20 8000 8020 49.40 9000 9005 55.40 9750 9755 59.84 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 444 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC -JACK CALIBRATION REVISION#Linear Regression Analysis SAFETY RELATED* NON-SAFETY RELATED I PAGE I2 OF 3 COMPUTED BY: APM DATE: 08/21/13 1 REVIEWED BY: , /6 DATE: 08/21/13 POST ANOI PRE TMI Contract No: 1086/N1091 tion: TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-6 Ram Area: 205 sq. In. Max Pressure:

9750 psi levice Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant .33011.2 lauge Used: HEISE Register No: S9-27100 Due Date: 03109114 Project: Jack Descrip Theoretical F Calibrating D Calibrating G Actual Gauge Reading (psi) Load Cell Readout Computed Force.(kips) 1040 6.30 207.971 2025 12.54 413.960 3040 18.80 620.611 4055 25.14 829.902 5015 31.04 1024.668 6020 37.30 1231.318 7010 1430.705 8025 49.64 1638,676 901.0 55.74 1840.044 9760 60.24 1988.595 1040 6.34 209'291 2010 12.40 409.339 3030 18.74 618;630 4015 24.84 819.998 5020 31.10 1026.648 6006 37.14 1226.036 7000 43.30 1429.385 8010 49.44 1632.074 9015 55.64 1836.743 9760 60.10 1983.973 1035 6.24 205.990.2015 12;30 406.038 3050 18.70 617.309 4020 24.74 816.697 5020 30.94 1021.367 6005 .37.04 1222.735 7015 43.20 1426.084 8020 49.40 1630.753 9005 55.40 1828.820.9755 59.84 1975.390 Indicates these readings have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration Error In Standard ...........................

............

0.0100 ksi Interpolation in Gauge.........................................

0.0000: ksi Accuracy of Gauge ..........................................................................

0.0000 ksi Errors In Gauge Calibration Interpolation in Master.. ..................................

0.0000 ksi Interpolation in Field Gauge ..........................

...............

.................

0.0050 ksi Accuracy of M aster ..............

0............................................................

0.0100 ksi Accuracy of Field Gauge ....................................................................

0.0275 ksi Errors In Field Use of Gauge Interpolation Error ........................................................................

Accuracy Error ................................................................................

Maximum Gauge Reading Used .........................................

.................................

0.0050 0.0275 9.7600 ksl ksi ksi FORCE (kips) = 203.411 (in 2)X GAUGE READING (ksi) + 1.802 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99997412 N/NO = 0.9000 (Not < 0.66667)Maximum Error Ratio In Jack .................

.....................

0.0137 Maximum Error Ratio In Gauge ..........

......................................

.. ..........

0.0043 Maximum Total Error Ratio .........................................................................

0.0144 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 445 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION#

0 Comparison With Previous Calibration SAFETY RELATED X NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE C:2 E3 OF 3 ,COMPUTED BY: APM DATE: 08/21/13 REVIEWED BY:.# ', DATE: 08/21/13 Project: POST ANO/ PRE TMI Contract No: 1086/N1091 Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-6 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. in. Max Pressure:

9750 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: S9-27100 Due Date: 03/09114 Data From Current Calibration Area (At): 203.411 sq.in.Constant (CO): 1.802 kips Max Pressure (P): 9750 psi Data From Previous Calibration Area (At): Constant (Cl): 203.270 sqin.1.908 kips i-f 100% = -0.064%i WHERE: i = (Ai x P) + (Ci

• 1000)f = (Af x P) + (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 446 of 1008 ii i ii DOCUMENT NO: HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION0 Jack Calibration Record SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATE 0 PAGE I1 OF 3 COMPUTED BY. NED DATE: 0W11414 I REVIEWED BY: DATE: 01/14114 Project: POST TMI Contract No: 1091 Jack

Description:

TROMPLER .Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-6 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. in. Max Pressure:

9750 psi Calibrating Device.Used:

TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18/14 Raw Data By: MELISSA LARA Date: 01/14/14 Witness: N/A Mean Ram Area: 202.444 sq. in. K= 1.293 kips Agency: NIA Date: N/A Computed.By:

NICHOLAS DARLAGE QC Check: Title: PROJECT COORDINATOR Date: 01/14/14 Title: Dai Date_a29+/-t Pressure (PSI) Gauge Reading (PSI) Load Cell Readout [ Comments 1000 1011 6.10 RUN: 1 POSITION:

1 1/2" 2000 2014 12.34 3000 3038 18.74 4000 4027 24.80 5000 5003 30.84 6000 6033 37.20 7000 7031 43.24 8000 8011 49.30 9000 9000 55.34 9750 9753 59.90 1000 1029 6.14 RUN: 2 POSITION:

3" 2000 2032 12.44 3000 3038 18.70 4000 4013 24.80 5000 5011 30.84 6000 6003 36.94 7000 7021 43.14 8000 8012 49.24 9000 9018 55.34 9750 9752 59.80 1000 1031 6.14 RUN: 3 POSITION:

4 1/2" 2000 2001 12.14 3000 3011 18.40 4000 4023 24.60 5000 5009 30.70 6000 6005 36.80 7000 7006 .42.94 8000 8017 49.10 9000 9012 55.14 9750 9751 59.60 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 447 of 1008 HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION Linear Regression Analysis DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG REVISION # 0 SAFETY RELATED X NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE 1 2 OF 3 01114/14 1 REVIEWEDBY:

P14 DATE: 01/14114 Project: POST TMI Contract No: Jiogi Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-6 Theoretical Ram Area: :205 sq. in. Max Pressure:

9750 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 02/18/14 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) J Load Cell Readout Computed Force (kips)1011 6.10 201.368 2014 12.34 407.358 3038 18.74 618.630 4027 24.80 818.678.5003 30.84 1018.065 6033 37.20 1228.017 7031 43.24 1427.404 8011 49.30 1627.452 9000 55.34 1826.840 9753 59.90 1977.371 1029 6.14 202.689 2032 12.44 410.659 3038 18.70 617.309 4013 24.80 818.678 5011 30.84 1018.065 6003 36.94 1219.434 7021 43.14 1424.103 8012 49.24 1625.471 9018 55.34 1826.840 9752 59.80 1974.070 1031 6.14 202.689 2001 12.14 400.756 3011 18.40 607.406 4023 24.60 .812.076 5009 30.70 1013.444 6005 36.80 1214.812 7006 42.94 1417.501 8017 49.10 1620.850 9012 55.14 1820.238 9751 59.60 1967.468 Indicates these readings have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration Error In Standard ...... A ...............

.........................

0.0100 ksi Interpolation in Gauge, ....................................

0.0000 ksi Accuracy of Gauge ................................................................

0.0000 ksi Errors In Gauge Calibration Interpolation in Master..;

I ..........

...................

..........

..........

0.0000 ksi Interpolation in Field G auge ...............................................................

0.0050 ksi Accuracy of Master ...... .................

. .. ........ ....... 0.0100 ksi Accuracy of Field Gauge ....................

......................................

0.0275 ksi Errors In Field Use of Gauge Interpolation E rror ............................................................................

Accuracy Error ...............

..... ......Maximum Gauge Reading Used ....................................

I ....0,0050 ksi 0.0275 ksl 9.7530 ksi FORCE (kips) = 202.444 (in 2)X GAUGE READING (ksi) +1.293 (kips)Correlation.=

0.99997717 N/NO = 0.9000 (Not < 0.66667)Maximum Error Ratio In Jack .. .........................................

0.0138 Maximum Error Ratio In Gauge .......................

.....................

0.0043 Maximum Total Error Ratio ................................................

0.0145 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 448 of 1008 HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION Comparison With Previous Calibration DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG REVISION # 0 SAFETY RELATED X NON-SAFETY RELATED.PAGE 3 OF 3 DATE: 01114114 1 REVIEWED BY: DATE: 01114114 Project: POST TMI Contract No:91091 Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size:. 1000 Tons Register No: TFP,6 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. in. Max Pressure:

9750: psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

..33011.2 Calibrating Gauge. Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due. Date: 02/18/14 Data From Current Calibration Area (Af): 202.444 sq.in.Constant (CI)- 1.293 kips Max Pressure (P): 9750 psi Data From Previous Calibration Area (AQ)Constant (Ci): 203.411 sq.in.1.802 kips xl00% = 0.501%i WHERE: i = (Ai x P) + (Ci

• 1000)f = (Af x P) + (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 449 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE* ENE HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISIONU I 0 Jack Calibration Record SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATED, PAGE O8 1 OF 13 COMPUTED BY: APM DATE: 08/21/13 IREVIEWED BY: NED IDATE: 08/2L3 ai1-14 it Project: POST ANO/ PRE TMI Contract No: N1086/N1091 I-Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-9 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. in. Max Pressure:

9750 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Catibrating Gaucie Used: HEISE Reaister No: S9-27100 Due Date: 03109/14 I.-.Raw Data By: MELISSA LARA Date: 08121/13 Witness: NIA Mean Ram Area: 205.618 sq. in. K= '7.801 ', 1 kips Agency: N/A Date: N/A Computed By: ANDREW MAKINSON QC Check: .7 Title: ENGINEER Date: 08/21/13 ITitle: 42k Date:e Target Pressure (PSI) Gauge Reading (PSI) Load Cell Readout Comments 1000 1040 6.20 RUN: 1 POSITION:

1 1/2" 2000 2015 12.34 3000 3015 18.64 4000 4030 24.94 5000 5020 31.20 6000 6020 37.34 7000 7020 43.64 8000 8010 49.74 9000 9005 55.94 9750 9763 60.60 1000 1010 5.90 RUN: 2 POSITION:

3" 2000 2005 12.20 3000 3040 18.74 4000 4015 24.74 5000 5020 31.04 6000 6015 37.20 7000 7040 43.64 8000 8015 49.70 9000 9030 56.00 9750 9755 60.60 1000 1005 5.84 RUN: 3 POSITION:

4 1/2'2000 2040 12.40 3000 3005 18.44 4000 4015 24.70 5000 5050 31.14 6000 6025 37.20 7000 7020 43.44 8000 8025 49.64 9000 9010 55.80 9750 9750 60.30 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 450 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: I HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION Linear Regression Analysis DOCUMENTTYPE:

ENG REVISIONf 0 SAFETY RELATED MION-SAFETY RELATED PAGE I 2 OF t3 DATE: 08/21113 I REVIEWED BY: NED DATE: 0812J13 Project: POST ANOI PRE TMI Contract No: N1086[N1091 Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons: Register No: TFP-9 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. In. Max Pressure:

9750 psi Calibrating Device:Used:

TELEDYNE:

Register No: 4734 Constant 33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: S9-27.100 Due Date: 03/09114 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) Load Cell Readout Computed Force (kips)1040 6;20 204.669 2015 12.34 407.358 3015 18.64 615.329 4030 24.94 823.299 5020 31.20 1029.949 6020 37234 1232.638 7020 43.64 1440,609 8010 49.74 1641.977 9005 55.94 1846.647 9763 60.60 2000.479 1010 5.90 194.766 2005 12.20 402.737 3040 18.74 618.630 4015 24.74 816.697 5020 31.04 1024.668 6015 .37;20 1228.017 7040 43.64 1440.609 8015 49.70 1640.657 9030 56.00 1848.627 9755 60.60 2000.479 1005 5.84 192.785 2040 12.40 409.339 3005 18.44 608.727 4015 24.70 815.377 5050 31.14 1027.969 6025 37.20 1228.017 7020 .43.44 1434.007 8025 49.64 1638.676 9010 55.80 1842.025 9750 60.30 1990.575 Indicates these readings have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration Error In Standard ..................................

.......................................

0.0100 ksi Interpolation in Gauge ....................................

0.0000 ksi Accuracy of Gauge ....... ...............

• ... ..... ...........

0.0000 ksi Errors In Gauge Calibration Interpo!ation in Master ....................................

0 .0000 ksi Interpolation in Field Gauge ...........

......................

0,0050 ksi Accuracy of Master. 0.0100 ksi Accuracy.

of Field Gauge ................................

................................

0.0275 ksi Errors In Field Use'of Gauge Interpolation Error .....................

0.0050 ksi Accuracy Error ..............................

-..........

0.0275 kst Maximum Gauge Reading Used ..............................................................

9.7630 ksi FORCE (kips)= 205.618 (in 2) X GAUGE READING (ksi) + -7.801 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99998771 N'NO = 0.9333 (Not < 0.66667)Maximum Error Ratio In Jack.......................................................

0.0067 M aximum Error Ratio In Gauge ..............................................................................

0.0043 Maximum Total Error Ratio .........................................

0.0079 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 451 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION.#

0 Comparison With Previous Calibration SAFETY RELATED X NON-SAFETY RELATED.__PAGE I 3 OF .0 COMPUTED BY: APM DATE: 08/21/13 I REVIEWED BY: NED: DATE: 08/2P13 U ,.I.-~Project: POST ANOI PRE TMI Contract No: N1086/N1091 Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-9 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. in. Max Pressure:

9750 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: S9-27100 Due Date: 03109/14 Data From Current Calibration Area (A,): 205.618 sq.in.Constant (C,): -7.801 kips Max Pressure (P): 9750 psi Data From Previous Calibration Area (A 1): Constant (C,): 202.590 sq.in.0.10.0 kips i-f x100% --1.094%i WHERE: i = (Ai x P) + (Ci

• 1000)f = (Af x P) + (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 452 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION1 Jack Calibration Record SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE C U BI OF 3.* COMPUTED BY: NED DATE:. 01/99114 1 REVIEWED BY:. DATE: 01/09/14 Project: POST TMI Contract No: N1091 Jack:

Description:

TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-9 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. in. Max Pressure:

9750 psi Calibrating Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibratinq Gauqe Used: HEISE Reaister No: 44084 Due Date: 02118/14 Raw Data By: MELISSA LARA Date: 01108/14 Witness: N/A Mean Ram Area: 204.161 sq. in. K= -3.966 kips Agency: N/A Date: N/A Computed By: NICHOLAS DARLAGE QC Check: ._,________,_

Title: PROJECT COORDINATOR Date: 01/09/14 Title: 4`y- D ae,,. Date:, !L Target Pressure (PSI) Gauge Reading (PSI) ILoad Cell Readout Comments 1000 1030 6.24 RUN: 1 POSITION:

1 1/2" 2000 2030 12.44 3000 3025 18.60 4000 4008 24.64 5000 5010 30.90 6000 6011 37.04 7000 7010 43.24 8000 8005 49.34 9000 9025 55.64 9750 9770 60;30 1000 1035 6;24 RUN: 2 POSITION:

3" 2000 2000 12.24 3000 3008 18.44 4000 4010 24.70 5000 5010 30.94 6000 6035 37.30 7000 7030 43.40 8000 8015 49.44 9000 9030 55.70 9750 9750 60.24 1000 1002 6.04 RUN: 3 POSITION:

4 1/2" 2000 2014 12.30 3000 3012 18.50 4000 4010 24.74 5000 5002 30.84 6000 6001 37.04 7000 7002 43.20 8000 8003 49.34 9000 9000 55.50 9750 9752 60.14 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 453 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION #Linear Regression Analysis SAFETY RELATED , NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE B 2 OF 3 COMPUTED BY: NED DATE: 01/09114 IREVIEWED BY: -E> DATE: 01109114 Project: POST TMI Contract No: Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size:: 1000 Tons Register No: Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq. in. Max Pressure:.

Calibrating Device Used:: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant: Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Datel: N1091 TFP-9 9750 psi.33011.2 03/09/14 Actual Gauge Reading (psi) Load Cell Readout Computed Force(kips) 1030. 6.24 205.990 2030 12.44 410.659 3025 18.60 614.008 4008 24.64 813.396 5010 30.90 1020.046 6011 37.04 1222.735 7010 43.24 1427,404 8005 49.34 1628.773 9025 55.64 1836.743 9770 60.30 1990.575 1035 6.24 205.990 2000 12.24 404.057.3008 18:44 608.727 4010 24.70 815.377 5010 30.94 1021.367 6035 37.30 1231.318 7030 43.40 1432.686 8015 49.44 1632.074 9030 55.70 1838.724 9750 60.24 1988.595 1002 6.04 199.388 2014 12.30 406.038: 3012 18.50 610.707 4010 24.74 816.697 5002 30.84 1018.065 6001 37.04 1222.735 7002 43.20 1426.084 8003 49.34 1628.773 9000 55.50 1832.122 9752 60.14 1985.294 Indicates these readings.have been omitted from thefinal computations Errors In Jack Calibration Error In Standard ........................................

001 00 ksi Interpolation in G auge ..................................

...................................

0.0000 ksi Accuracy of Gauge;.. ............................

0........................

.............

0,0000 ksi Errors In Gauge Calibration Interpolation in Master ....................................

0.0000 ksi Interpolation in Field G auge.............................................................

0.0050 ksi Accuracy of Master ..... .................................

0.0100 ksi Accuracy of Field Gauge .....................................................

...... 0.0275 ksi Errors In Field Use of Gauge Interpolation E rror ...................................................

.........................

Accuracy Error.....

................... , ....................

-.Maximum Gauge Reading Used.................................................

....................

0.0050 0.0275.9.7700 ksi ksi ksi FORCE (kips) = 204.161 (in 2)X GAUGE READING (ksi) + -3.966 (kips)Correlation

= 0.99999739 N/NO = 1.0000 (NOt -c 0.66667)M axim um .Error. Ratio In Jack ..................................................

0 6 ..........................

.0.0065 Maximum Error Ratio In Gauge ..........................................................................

0.0043 M axim um Total Error Ratio ...............................

,. ................................................

0.0078 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 454 of 1008 DOCUMENT NO: ,C= DOCUMENT TYPE: ENG HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATION REVISION # 0 Comparison With Previous Calibration SAFETY RELATED X NON-SAFETY RELATED PAGE 3 OF 3 COMPUTED BY: NED DATE: 01109114 1 REVIEWED BY: -Dtj,5 DATE: 01/09/14 Project: POST TMI Contract No: N1091 Jack

Description:

TROMPLER Size: 1000 Tons Register No: TFP-9 Theoretical Ram Area: 205 sq..in. Max Pressure:.

9750 psi Calibrating:

Device Used: TELEDYNE Register No: 4734 Constant:

33011.2 Calibrating Gauge Used: HEISE Register No: 44084 Due Date: 03/09114 Data From Current Calibration Area (A,): 204.161 sq~in.Constant (C 1): -3.966 kips Max. Pressure (P): 9750 psi Data From Previous Calibration Area (A4):.Constant (Ci): 205.618 sq.in.-7.801 kips i-f x100% = 0.519%WHERE: i = (Ai x P) + (Ci* 1000)f = (Af x P) + (Cf

• 1000)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 455 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 1 of 415 N1091 PSC TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 2013 MANUAL DISTRIBUTION LIST 09/03/13 DISTRIBUTION LIST -CONTROLLED MANUAL MANUAL ISSUE REV/ DIV. DATE RECPT.NUMBER DATE DATE PROJECT TRANS. DATE 4 .4- 4 4- 4 4 -I + 4 4 4 + 4- + 4- 4 I 4 4 4 4 i 4 -4 11 w Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 456 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 2 of 415 SION LANCE N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM ACCEPTANCE FORM 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 This page shall be removed, and mailed or faxed to: Precision Surveillance Corporation Phone: 219-397-5826 Quality Assurance Fax: 219-397-5867 3468 Watling Street East Chicago, IN 46312 The signed return of this Acceptance form will indicate approval of the Precision Surveillance Corporation In-Service Inspection Tendon Surveillance Manual for document control purposes.RETURN OF THIS FORM CONSTITUTES APPROVAL OF THE CONTENTS HEREIN.Date: Name: Signature:

Title: Company: Project: TMI 40Tl YEAR SURVEILLANCE Contract: In-Service Inspection Manual Issue Date 09-03-13/I4 Revision 1./0 000 ACCEPTANCE FORM Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 457 of 1008 PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION 3468 WATUNG STREET EAST CHICAnO, IN 46312 PHONE: (219)397-5826 FAX. (219)397-5867 EMAIL: INFfl@PSCTENDON.CO3M HTTW:/AAWW.PSCTENDON.C3OM CONTROLLED MANUAL NO: N1091 POST TENSIONING SYSTEM IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MANUAL FOR EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE I I REVISION REVISION REVISION REVISION A A A A 09/03/13 jauj Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by Approved by Title PRESIDENT Title 09/03/13 Date i Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 458 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 4 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT FORM 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 This page shall be removed, and mailed or faxed to: Precision Surveillance Corporation Phone: 219-397-5826 Quality Assurance Fax: 219-397-5867 3468 Watling Street East Chicago, IN 46312 The return of this Acknowledgement form from Control Manual Number: will indicate acknowledgement-of-receipt for document control purposes.

Failure to return this page or otherwise provide similar acknowledgement, SHALL be just cause for terminating the controlled status of this manual.RETURN OF THIS FORM DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF THE CONTENTS HEREIN.If this page is stamped "UNCONTROLLED MANUAL", it is not necessary to return.Date of Submittal:

Date of Receipt: The individual acknowledging Name: receipt will be considered the Name_permanent holder of this manual. Signature:

For more information regarding Title: responsibility of the attendant of this manual, refer to the Manual Company: EXELON Control Policy Statement.

Project: TMI 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Contract: In-Service Inspection Manual Issue Date 09/03/13 Revision Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 459 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 5 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM MANUAL CONTROL POLICY 09/03/13 Page 1 of 2 Revision 0 4 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM MANUAL CONTROL POLICY S Prepared by Q.C. INSPECTOR Title 09/03/13 Date Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by 1r Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title S w 03 MCP.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 460 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 6 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM MANUAL CONTROL POLICY 09/03/13 Page 2 of 2 Revision 0 1.0 Controlled copies of this manual SHALL be submitted for review and approval according to the distribution and quantity requirements established by the Contract Documents.

Where this is not specified, Precision Surveillance Corporation SHALL submit a minimum of one controlled Manual. Where applicable, an uncontrolled copy may be submitted to assist in the review process. To avoid fabrication or construction delays, a line of communication should be established with the personnel responsible for initiating approval for the Manual or Revisions thereto, rather than incurring the delay for gravitation to that level.2.0 Acknowledgement of Receipt is mandatory upon receiving a Controlled Manual and a form is supplied to facilitate this response.

This form or a copy, SHALL be filled in with the information requested and returned in order to activate the Control status of this Manual, otherwise it will be treated as an uncontrolled manual and no attempt SHALL be made to keep it in a current condition.

3.0 The responsibility for keeping the uncontrolled Manuals up to date SHALL be incumbent on the person acknowledging receipt of the Controlled Manual.4.0 Reproduction of the Manual IS NOT AUTHORIZED, except for copies made by Exelon for internal distribution review and use, without the expressed written consent of the Precision Surveillance Corporation Quality Assurance Section responsible for the maintenance of the Manual.5.0 Uncontrolled manuals SHALL be submitted at the pre-bid stage of the project. In the event of non-award of the project to Precision Surveillance Corporation, the uncontrolled Manual SHALL be returned to the Quality Assurance Section.6.0 INTERNAL 6.1 Those Precision Surveillance Corporation personnel receiving Controlled Manuals or revisions thereto, SHALL be responsible for reviewing and understanding those portions of the Quality Program that they and their subordinates are responsible for.The return of the Acknowledgement of Receipt SHALL constitute certification that the person receiving that Program/Revision has reviewed the contents and has taken appropriate action to notify or train those personnel under his control that are affected by that document or the revisions thereto.03 MCP.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 461 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 7 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM INDEX STATUS SHEET 09/03/13 Page 1 of 3 Revision 0 S ORIGINAL ISSUE REVISED STATUS SECTION PAGES REV.DATE REV.DATE I 4 4 4 4 PREFACE Title 1 0 09/03/13 Receipt -To be returned 1 0 09/03/13 Manual Control Policy 1 -2 0 09/03/13 Index Status Sheets 1 -3 0 09/03/13 Revision Control Sheet 1 N/A 09/03/13 Definitions 1 -5 0 09/03/13 PSC PS 1.0 -Personnel Safety 1 -4 0 09/03/13 1301-9.1 Surveillance Procedure 1 -61 23 09/03/13 ER-AA-330-005 1 -11 10 Level 3 -Information Use ER-AA-330-006 1 -50 7 Level 3 -Information Use ER-AA-335-019 1 -17 0 Level 3- Information Use 1410-Y-83 Tendon Cap Installation 1 -11 8 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES SQ 1.0 -Surveillance Purpose 1 -2 0 09/03/13 SQ 2.0 -Surveillance Scope SQ 3.0 -Construction Equipment List 1-6 0 09/03/13-+/- t t I IE~1-2 0 09/03/13 w SQ 4.0 -Q.C. Equipment List 1-4 0 09/03/13 SQ 5.0 -Prerequisite Checklist 1 -3 0 09/03/13 SQ 6.0 -Grease Cap Removal 1 -7 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 6.0 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 6.1 -Inspect For Water 1 -5 0 09/03/13 Water Notification Letter 1 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 6.1 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 6.2 -Water Sample Analysis 1 -3 0 09/03/13 SQ 7.0 -Sheathing Filler Analysis 1 -6 0 09/03/13 SQ 7.1 -Thread Measurement 1 -6 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 7.1 1 0 09/03/13 Appendix 1 1 0 09/03/13 Appendix 2 1 -2 0 09/03/13 Appendix 3 1 -5 0 09/03/13 Appendix 4 1 -6 0 09/03/13 SQ. 8.0 -Anchorage Inspection 1 -8 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 8.OA 1 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 8.0B 1 0 09/03/13 Sketch Sheet 8.0 1 0 09/03/13 0 04 INDEX.TMI.13 ISib Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 462 of 1008 REP-i 098-510 Appendix E, Page 8 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM INDEX STATUS SHEET 09/03/13 Page 2 of 3 Revision 0 Original Issue Revised Status SECTION Pages Rev.Date Rev.Date SQ 8.3 -Bearing Plate Conc. Insp. 1 -3 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 8.3 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 8.4 -Concrete Exterior 1 -7 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 8.4 1 0 09/03/13 Sketch Sheet 8.4 1 0 09/03/13 Gray paper sheet -dark 1 0 09/03/13 Gray paper sheet -light 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 8.5 -Anchorage Cap Inspection 1 -3 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 8.5 1 -20 0 09/03/13 SQ 9.0 -Monitor Tendon Force 1 -8 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 9.0 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 9.1 -Prestress Forces 1 -4 0 09/03/13 SQ 10.0 -Detension Tendon 1 -4 0 09/03/13 SQ 10.1 -Detension Anchorage Insp. 1 -6 0 09/03/13 SQ 10.2 -Test Wire Removal 1-6 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 10.2 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 10.3 -Testing Tendon Wires 1 -2 0 09/03/13 SQ 10.5- Continuity Test 1 -5 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 10.5 1 0 09/03/13 Fig 1.0 -Tendon Wire Puller 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 11.0 -Retension Tendons 1 -10 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 11.0 1 -2 0 09/03/13 Sketch 7.0 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 11.1 -PSC Engineering Data 1 -5 0 09/03/13 SQ 12.0 -Grease Cap Replacement 1-6 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 12.0 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 12.1 -Grease Replacement 1 -10 0 09/03/13 Figure 1.0 -PSC Y Device 1 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 12.1a 1 0 09/03/13 Data Sheet 12.1 b 1 0 09/03/13 SQ 12.2 -Grease Volumes 1-4 0 09/03/13 4 .4. + .4 4.04 INDEX.TMI.13 ISIb Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 463 of 1008 REP-I1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 9 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM INDEX STATUS SHEET 09/03/13 Page 3 of 3 Revision 0 S Original Issue Revised Status SECTION Pages Rev.Date Rev.Date--4 QUALITY ASSURANCE QA 1.0 -Program Purpose 1 -2 0 09/03/13 QA 2.0 -Program Scope 1 -2 0 09/03/13 QA 3.0 -Quality Organization 1 -2 0 09/03/13 QA 4.0 -Q.C. Responsibility 1-2 0 09/03/13 QA 4.1 -Personnel Qualifications 1-3 0 09/03/13 QA 5.0 -Personnel Training 1 -2 0 09/03/13 QA 6.0 -Procurement 1 -2 0 09/03/13 QA 7.0 -Field Change Request 1 -3 0 09/03/13 FCR Form 1 0 09/03/13 FCR Index Log 1 0 09/03/13 QA 8.0 -Document Control 1 -2 0 09/03/13 QA 8.1 -Revision Control 1 -5 0 09/03/13 Revision Control Sheet 1 N/A 09/03/13 QA 9.0 -Nonconformances 1-5 0 09/03/13 qU Tags and Sample Logs 1 0 09/03/13 Sample NC/CA Report 1 0 09/03/13 NC/CAR Form 1 0 09/03/13 NCR Index Log 1 0 09/03/13 Hold Tag Index Log 1 0 09/03/13 Reject Tag Index Log 1 0 09/03/13 QA 10.0 -Calibrations 1 -5 0 09/03/13 QA 10.1 -Calibration Verification 1 -5 0 09/03/13 Gauge Calibration Record Form 1 0 09/03/13 QA 11.0 -Q.C. Inspection 1 -3 0 09/03/13 QA 12.0 -Audits 1-2 0 09/03/13 I- + 4 +4- + 4 .4.+ + 4 +____________

6 a w 04 INDEX.TMI.13 ISIb Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 464 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 10 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM REVISION CONTROL SHEET 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI -4 0 th Year Tendon Surveillance Revision #REVISION CONTROL SHEET 1 # Revision/

Submitted P Page # Revision/

Submitted ProcedureDate Date Procedure#

e Date 4- 4 4 4 -4 4+/- 4 1 4 4 4 4 4- 4 4 4 4 4- 4+ 4 4 4 4 + 4+ 4 4 4- + + +1 4 4 + 4- -I-1 4 4 + 1 I I + + + I +Revision Date IRevision Description ReiinB: Date Approved NoReison.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 465 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 11 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM DEFINITIONS 09/03/13 Page 1 of 5 Revision 0 S EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM DEFINITIONS S INL" dqaX8,)Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by 142, ./Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title a V 06 DEF.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 466 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 12 of 415 ACTIVE CORROSION:

Corrosion on a component that exhibits metal loss that has occurred since fabrication or construction, and/or exhibits pitting visible to the naked eye. Active corrosion usually is a reddish/rust color.AMBIENT TEMPERATURE:

The Temperature of the area near the area of interest.ANCHORHEAD (Stressing Washer): The round machined components at the end of each end of the tendon through which tendon wires are passed.BEARING PLATE (Baseplate, Trumplate):

The steel plate at the end of the tendon, embedded in the concrete.

The tendon is passed through the hole in the plate and the anchorhead bears against the plate or shim which in turn transfers the load to the concrete.BROKEN WIRE: A wire within a tendon assembly that is broken and not capable of accepting post tensioned load. Wires that excessively protrude from the anchorage components are suspected to be broken.BUTTONHEAD:

The end of the tendon wire that was mechanically deformed during construction, which seats on each anchorage.

CONTINUITY TEST: A method of determining if wires are intact and not broken within a tendon. This is an optional test that may be recommended as a corrective action if abnormal degradation is identified.

CORROSION PROTECTION MEDIUM (Grease, Casing Filler): Grease injected into tendon duct and anchorage caps for corrosion protection.

Also referred to as grease or sheathing filler grease.EFFECTIVE WIRE: Tendon wire capable of maintaining required post tensioned force.ELONGATION:

The distance a tendon/wire stretches while under stress.FEELER GAUGE METHOD: The method used to determine lift off during a test that utilizes the placement of feeler gauges within the anchorage components while the tendon is under jack/ram load.FIELD END: The end of the tendon on which buttonheads are formed after the tendon is installed.

The field end usually does not have a bushing.FREE WATER: Any quantity of water collected from a tendon grease cap, anchorage components, shim gaps, or tendon duct.GREASE CAP: Steel container bolted to the bearing plate or anchorhead.

A grease cap encases the anchorage assembly to provide permanent corrosion protection.

06 DEF.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 467 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 13 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM DEFINITIONS 09/03/13-NN --uv U PRECISION LOANCE Revision 0 GUARANTEED MINIMUM ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH (GUTS): The tensile strength of the tendon assembly based upon the tensile strength of the wire used in construction and the quantity of effective wires. The minimum Guaranteed Ultimate Tensile Strength of 0.250 inch (6.35 mm) diameter wire is 240,000 pounds per square inch or 11,781 pounds per wire.INSPECTION PERIOD: The period in which an inspection is completed at a specific site.JACK (Ram): A cylindrical, hydraulic piston used to stress the tendon. Also referred to as a "Ram".JACK CHAIR: That device attached to the front of the ram and bears against the bearing plate, which provides the lift height for the tendon as it is being stressed.LIFT OFF FORCE: The actual force or pressure required to lift the anchor head off the tendon anchorage assembly shim stack.LOCK OFF FORCE: The final seating force of a tendon after tensioning during construction or retensioning thereafter.

MINIMUM DESIGN FORCE (kips): The minimum acceptable average prestress force for a tendon or group of tendons to maintain the design basis of the containment structure.

MISSING WIRE: A wire that is identified as missing from the tendon.MONITORING OF FORCE: That series of operations that determine the force or prestress remaining in the tendon.NET DUCT (GREASE VOID) VOLUME: The volume within a tendon duct that is capable of being filled with corrosion protection medium. This is the gross duct volume minus the volume taken by the tendon wires and components.

OVERSTRESS FORCE: The maximum force that can be applied to a tendon during lift off testing and retensioning.

This force is 80% of the tendon's ultimate tensile strength.For wire specification ASTM A421, 80% of the minimum Guaranteed Ultimate Tensile Strength of the wire is 9,423 pounds for each 0.25 inch diameter wire.POST TENSIONING:

A method of prestressing concrete in which the tendons are tensioned after the concrete has cured.06 DEF.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 468 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 14 of 415 N1091 TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM DEFINITIONS 09/03/13 Page 4 of 5 Revision 0 PREDICTED FORCE: The pre-calculated force (in kips) based upon the measurement of the prestressing forces during installation minus the losses in prestressing forces that were predicted to have occurred since that time because of material and structural characteristics.

This is the calculated minimum force that should be achieved during lift off. This value is the acceptance criteria for measuring pre-stress forces. The as-found value should be equal to or exceed this value.PRESTRESSED CONCRETE:

Reinforced concrete in which internal stresses have been introduced in such magnitude and distribution that the stresses resulting from loads are counteracted to a desired degree.PRETENSIONING FORCE: The force achieved during retensioning where the slack and mechanical clearances have been removed.PROTRUDING OR UNSEATED WIRE: A wire within a tendon assembly that is extending beyond a tendon anchorhead face after stressing and is not seated against the anchorhead.

The wire must be evaluated.

PUMP: A mechanical device used to pump hydraulic fluid into the jack and apply the force required to stress the tendon.RAM: Synonym for Jack. (See Jack)REGRESSION ANALYSIS:

The determination, based upon evaluation of measured forces, of the capability of a tendon or group of tendons to maintain the minimum design prestress force(s) until the next scheduled inspection or beyond.RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER:

A Registered Professional Engineer (RPE) experienced in evaluating the in-service condition of structural concrete.

The RPE shall have knowledge of the design and construction codes and other criteria used in the design and construction of concrete containment structures in nuclear power plants.SHEATHING (Conduit, Duct): The thin-walled tubular steel used for creating a void in the concrete through which the tendon is passed. (Also referred to as: duct, conduit.)SHIM STACK: A series of steel shims installed between the anchor head and bearing plate so that the desired prestress force is obtained.SHOP END: The end of a tendon on which the buttonheads are formed prior to installation.

These buttonheads are formed in a shop environment and not in the field.STRESSING:

Connecting the ram to the tendon and pulling until a predetermined force and elongation is achieved.STRESSING ADAPTOR (Coupler):

That threaded device attached to the pull-rod of the ram, which couples with the anchorhead to be stressed.

This may be for internal or external threaded anchorheads.

06 DEF.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 469 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 15 of 415 TENDON: A separate continuous multi-wire tensioned element anchored at both ends to an end anchorage assembly.

An assembly of prestressing steel and anchorage components which imparts prestressing forces to concrete.TENDON END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY:

That portion of the tendon which extends beyond the bearing plate while in a stressed condition which consists of the bearing plate, shim stack, anchor head and wire.TENDON GROUP (TYPE): Groups based upon geometry and position in the containment structure.

Horizontal, vertical, and dome tendon groups are applicable to TMI Unit 1.TENDON LOCATION NUMBER: The identity of a tendon with regard to its location in the structure.

WIRE: 0.250 inch (6.35 mm) diameter wire manufactured to ASTM A421.06DFTI1 SI 06 DEF.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 470 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 16 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE PS 1.0 PERSONNEL SAFETY 09/03/13 Page 1 of 4 Revision 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE PERSONNEL SAFETY 1%11Wa joa-)Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by z" -r o, Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title 07 PS1-0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 471 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 17 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE PS 1.0 PERSONNEL SAFETY 09/03/13 Page 2 of 4 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this document is to create an awareness for those safety considerations that must be observed by personnel working around or directly involved in Post-Tensioning System operations.

2.0 GENERAL

2.1 All personnel directly involved with the Post-Tensioning System operations shall be made aware of the magnitude of the working forces and safety requirements for the various operations.

3.0 SAFETY

3.1.1 WIRE 3.1.2 The wire used for fabricating the tendons has a minimum breaking strength of 240,000 pounds per square inch. This means that each %" diameter wire is capable of withstanding a minimum breaking load of 11,781 pounds. Multiply this by the number of wires in a tendon and you are dealing with forces of almost 2 million pounds for a 169 wire tendon.NEVER CONNECT A WELDING GROUND, PERFORM WELDING ON, OR STRIKE AN ARC NEAR A STRESSED TENDON.NEVER APPLY AN OPEN FLAME TO THE BUTTONHEADS, THE WIRES OR ANCHORHEADS OF A STRESSED TENDON.NEVER STRIKE THE BUTTONHEADS, THE WIRES OR THE ANCHORHEADS OF A STRESSED TENDON WITH A HAMMER OR ANY OTHER OBJECT.3.1.3 The above actions could cause a button head or wire to fail. During tendon tensile testing, broken wires or button heads have been observed to penetrate hard lumber in excess or 4 inches in thickness, about the equivalent of a .32 caliber bullet.3.2 STRESSING OPERATIONS

3.2.1 During

de-tensioning or stressing operations the following cautions shall be observed.R EXCEED THEO RSTRESS FORC8% I UTS FOR THE AMOUNT OF EFFECTIVE WIRES IN A TENDON. (1592 kips FOR A 169 WIRE TENDON.)07 PS1-0TMIV.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 472 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 18 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE PS 1.0 PERSONNEL SAFETY 09/03/13 Page 3 of 4 Revision 0 LI DO NOT STAND BEHIND THE JACK WHEN IT IS UNDER LOAD.KEEP FINGERS OUT OF ANY PINCH AREAS.BE ALERT DURING SHIM PLACEMENT AND REMOVAL.3.3 STRESSING ADAPTOR (COUPLER)3.3.1 Prior to applying ANY FORCE to the tendon, the stressing adaptor, coupler, must be fully engaged with the anchorage to be stressed or de-tensioned.

No more than 3/8 of an inch of the anchorage shall protrude beyond the bottom face of the stressing adaptor, to constitute full engagement.

3.3.2 During

coupling and uncoupling of the stressing adaptor with the bushing and the small anchor head, and especially where some difficulty is encountered with the actual coupling, there is a possibility that the small anchor head may become partially or completely unthreaded from the bushing. Therefore, where any difficulty has been encountered in coupling the adaptor to any anchorage, especially where repeated thread-on and unthreading is noted, before any load or jacking force is applied to that tendon, the proper engagement of the shop anchor head to the bushing shall be checked. This shall be done visually verifying that the small anchor head does not protrude beyond the bottom face of the bushing. The uncoupling could occur as a result of tight, sticking or slightly damaged threads.3.4 GREASING OPERATIONS DURING GREASING, BE AWARE THAT THE GREASE IS HOT AND MAY BE PUMPED UNDER PRESSURE.3.4.1 During greasing operations the grease may be pumped under pressure and will have temperatures in excess of 200°F and injury could occur through carelessness.

It is therefore essential to avoid direct contact with the hot grease and to make sure all connections are secure.3.4.2 Exercise caution when climbing ladders. The potential for slippery surfaces created by grease on shoes exists. Ladder rung, etc. shall be wiped clean if coated in grease.3.4.2.1 During heating of grease be aware that belt heaters are hot and could cause injury if touched. It is also essential to ensure that no flammable materials are allowed to touch belt heaters when in operation.

07 PS1-0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 473 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 19 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE PS 1.0 PERSONNEL SAFETY 09/03/13 Page 4 of 4 Revision 0 S 3.4.2.2 Belt heaters draw large amounts of current, ensure that power supply and any extension chords used are suitable for the power requirements.

CONSTRUCTION SAFETY 3.5 ii DO NOT STAND UNDER LOADS WHILE STATIONARY OR DURING HOISTING.DO NOT PERMIT OTHERS TO STAND UNDER LOADS.DO NOT THROW OR DROP OBJECTS FROM THE SCAFFOLD.3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4 3.5.5 All Exelon Accident Prevention Procedures shall be rigidly adhered to, to the total satisfaction of the site safety department.

As in other heavy construction, care should be exercised while working from scaffolds, platforms, ladders, high or restricted access locations.

Respect for the safety and well-being of the other trades and personnel in the area must be observed, especially during hoisting operations.

Some work may be near plant equipment required for safe shutdown and/or may cause shutdown if plant equipment is damaged. Use special care therefore when suspending or moving de-tensioning rams or other heavy surveillance equipment.

If required notify site safety organization to obtain air samples in the tendon gallery prior to entry into the gallery. Enter gallery only upon site safety approval.If there are any doubts or questions concerning a point of operation or safety, refer to the PSC Superintendent before starting that operation or proceeding any further. Refer to the Quality Control personnel any questions about quality before starting operations or proceeding any further.For surveillances during plant operation, special precautions must be taken to avoid work in hazardous areas resulting from plant operating conditions.

S 0 w 07 PS1-0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 474 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 20 of 415 Exeton Generation.., Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 Applicability/Scope USAGE LEVEL Effective Date TMI Division 1 06128113 This document is within QA plan scope X.J Yes LJ No 50.59 Applicable X Yes L No List of Effective Pages Paaqe 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Revision 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 Paqe 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 63 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 Revision Paqe Revision Paqe Revision 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 1 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 475 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 21 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Pag 1.0 PURPOSE 4

2.0 REFERENCES

4 3.0 PLANT STATUS 7 4.0 PREREQUISITES 7 5.0 LIMITS AND PRECAUTIONS 8

6.0 DESCRIPTION

AND LOCATION OF SYSTEM/ASSEMBLY 9 7.0 SPECIAL TOOLS, MATERIALS AND PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS 10 8.0 PROCEDURE 13 9.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 24 10.0 REPORTS 27 FIGURES 1. Tendon Detail -Typical Hoop/Dome 28 ATTACHMENTS

1. Data Sheets 29 2. Scope of Each Scheduled Surveillance 53 3. Additional Inspection Commitments Due to Previous Abnormalities 55 4. Safe Access Guidelines for Tendon Work During Power Operation 58 5. Master List of SGRP Affected Tendon and Surveillance Scope 59 DATA SHEETS 1. Lift-Off Force Measurement 29 2. As Found Lift Off Force Summary Results 30 3. Elongation/Tendon Force Record Re-Tensioning Data for De-Tensioned Tendons 31 4. Average of the Normalized Lift-Off Force 35 5. Re-tensioning Criteria Confirmation 36 2 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 476 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 22 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)SECTION Paqe DATA SHEETS (Cont'd)6. Tendon Anchorage Area Moisture/Free Water Inspection 37 7. Tendon Wire Test Results 38 8. Anchorage Assembly Surveillance Inspection Dome Tendons 39 9. Anchorage Assembly Surveillance Inspection Vertical Tendons 40 10. Anchorage Assembly Surveillance Inspection Hoop Tendons 41 11. Tendon Buttonhead Inspection 42 12. Tendon Anchorage Area Concrete Crack Inspection Dome Tendons 43 13. Tendon Anchorage Area Concrete Crack Inspection Vertical Tendons 44 14. Tendon Anchorage Area Concrete Crack Inspection Hoop Tendons 45 15. General Containment Inspection Results 46 16. Examiner Qualification 48 17. Review/Acceptance of Contractor Procedures 49 3 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 477 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 23 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To provide additional TMI specific performance instructions and acceptance criteria to those in ER-AA-330-006, for Reactor Building (RB) tendon inspections as required by TMI-1 Technical Specification, Section 4.4.2. (CM-1, CM-2)1.2 To provide additional TMI specific performance instructions and acceptance criteria to those in ER-AA-330-005, for RB concrete inspections as required by TMI-1 Technical Specification, Section 4.4.2. (CM-1)1.3 Tendon surveillance shall be performed at intervals after initial containment Structural Integrity Test (SIT), as follows: a. One (1) year after SIT. Completed 1975.b.Three (3) years after SIT. Completed 1977.c. Five (5) years after SIT. Completed 1980.d. At successive 5-year intervals for remaining station life.NOTE 21 tendons were inspected at each of first three surveillance periods;see Table 1 of Attachment

2. Prior to Cycle 7, and for subsequent periods, 12 tendons were selected in order to comply with Table IWL-2521-1.

Attachment 2, Tables 1 and 2, and Attachment 5, Tables 1 and 2, provides identification of tendons for past inspection periods.0 1.4 A special one-time event-related tendon surveillance was performed in 2010, one year after (per ASME Code Section Xl, 2004 Edition Table IWL-2521-2 requirements) following the completion of the Reactor Building Containment Opening post-tensioning tendon system repair/replacement activities of ECR 06-00816 in support of the steam generator replacements performed during TI R1 8 2009 refueling outage (SGRP Containment Opening).

This special surveillance satisfied an NRC recommendation from the NRC SER of Tech. Spec. Amendment

1. 259 approving deferral of the ILRT Performance until 2009.

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 TMI Unit 1 Technical Specifications Section 4.4.2, "Structural Integrity" 2.2 SA-AA-0301, Exelon Nuclear Industrial Safety Pocket Guide 2.3 NO-AA-1 0, Quality Assurance Topical Report 2.4 RP-AA-403, Administration of the Radiation Work Permit Program 2.5 WC-AA-1 11, Surveillance Program Requirements 2.6 OP-AA-201-009, Control of Transient Combustible Material 2.7 MA-AA-716-100, Maintenance Alterations Process 4 0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 478 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 24 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301 -9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 2.8 MA-AA-716-025, Scaffold Installation Modification and Removal Request Process 2.9 Inryco, Reactor Building Tendons, VM-TM-2485 2.10 l EN 85-10 and Supplement 1 to same, entitled Post Tensioned Containment Tendon Anchorhead Failure; date February 6, 1985 2.11 TMI-1 Operating manuals and calibration charts for hydraulic stressing jack, pumps, and controls (supplied by vendor).2.12 Building Pre-Stressing System Tendon History, including Tendon Pulling, Buttonheading, and Stressing Records (cards).2.13 Reports from previous surveillance (1) 1974 Structural Integrity Test -GAI Report 1838 (2) 1975 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 -GAI Report 1880 (3) 1977 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 -Report GQL 0204 3.1) 1977 RB Ring Girder Surveillance Three Years After S.I.T. -1303-8.2 (4) 1980 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 -TDR 229 (5) 1985 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 -Topical Report 025 (6) 1990 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 -Topical Report 069 (7) 1995 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 & Topical Report 093 (8) 1999 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 and Topical Report 136 (9) 2004 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 and Topical Report 183 (10) 2009 Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 and Topical Report 203 (11) 2010 Augmented Tendon Surveillance

-1301-9.1 and Topical Report 204 2.14 1410-Y-83, RB Tendon End Cap Installation 2.15 1440-Y-23, RB Concrete Surface Crack Repairs 2.16 C-1 101-1 53-E410-046, TMI-1 Reactor Building Post-Tensioning System In-Service Inspection Program Tendon Force Prediction.

2.17 G/C Calculation 1:01:01.01, "Structural Design Review Book 1" (Source Document)2.18 MA-AA-716-021, Rigging and Lifting Program 2.19 AD-AA-2001, Management and Oversight of Supplemental Workforce 5 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 479 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 25 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance J 23 2.20 10CFR 50.55a, Codes and Standards 2.21 EN-MA-501, Controlled Materials and Hazard Communication Program 2.22 ACI 201.1 R-92 (or later edition), "Guide for Making a Condition Survey of Concrete In Service" 2.23 ACI 349.3R-96 (or later edition), "Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Safety Related Concrete Structures" 2.24 TMI-1 C-1101-153-E410-031, 032, and 033, Tendon Grease Void Calculations for Vertical, Horizontal, and Dome Tendons, respectively 2.25 TMI-1 Relief request Nos. RR-1 thru RR-7, Implementation of Subsections IWE and IWL, Letter No.5928-00-30179, Dated 4/27/00 2.26 Reactor Building Drawings TMI 1-0014/0015/0016, IWE Component Rollout-Outside Containment Concrete 2.27 ER-AA-330-006, Inservice Inspection and Testing of the Pre-stressed Concrete Containment Post Tensioning System 2.28 ER-AA-330-005, Visual Examination of Section XI Class CC Concrete Containment Structures 2.29 ER-AA-335-019, Visual Examination of ASME IWL Class CC Containment Components 2.30 ASME Section XI 2004 Edition (No Addenda)2.31 TMI UFSAR, current revision, Chapter 5 2.32 ECR 06-00816 2.33 1997 Universal Building Code (UBC 97)2.34 ER-AA-335-001, Qualification and Certification of Nondestructive Examination (NDE) Personnel 2.35 CC-AA-309-101, Engineering Technical Evaluations 2.36 SEN 287, Delamination of Concrete Discovered During Hydro-Excavation of Reactor Containment Building Wall 2.37 Commitments CM-1 Action Tracking Item AR 603573.25.06, License Renewal Aging Management ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL. (Step 1.1)CM-2 Action Tracking Item AR 603573.38.04, License Renewal Aging Management Concrete Containment Tendon Prestress. (Step 1.1)6 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 480 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 26 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 3.0 PLANT STATUS 3.1 Operating or Shutdown.NOTE RB entry is not necessary for tendon or concrete inspection.

3.2 For safety reasons, during plant operation no tendons with end caps located above main steam safety valves are to be scheduled for surveillance.

4.0 PREREQUISITES

4.1 CONTRACTOR

shall ensure a testing laboratory equipped to perform the following services is available for this surveillance:

4.1.1 Inspection

of removed wires for corrosion and other defects, and to perform required tensile tests.4.1.2 Inspection of bulk filler grease (Corrosion Protection Medium (CPM)) samples and test for chlorides, sulfides, nitrates, base number and moisture content.4.1.3 Calibration (traceable to NIST) of all hydraulic rams and gauges to be used.4.1.3.1 Stressing ram shall be calibrated per approved CONTRACTOR procedure, see ER-AA-330-006 for requirements.

CONTRACTOR shall submit method for TMI-1 approval at least 30 days prior to start of tendon surveillance and procedure must then be included in CONTRACTOR report.4.1.3.2 Calibrate equipment used to measure tendon force within 3 months prior to the first tendon force measurement and within 3 months following the final tendon force measurement of the inspection period (IWL-2522(b)).

NOTE Any discrepancies found between initial and final equipment calibrations shall be reported to TMI and the Responsible Engineer (RE) at the time of discovery.

4.1.3.3 CONTRACTOR's QA program shall be imposed on testing laboratory.

4.2 CONTRACTOR

shall ensure all necessary inspection, detensioning, retensioning, and greasing equipment is obtained and calibrated as specified herein.4.2.1 CONTRACTOR shall ensure detailed operating instructions and calibration documentation are supplied with rams.4.2.2 CONTRACTOR shall submit calibration records to OWNER at least 15 days prior to start of tendon surveillance work and again within 15 days after demobilization from TMI-1. In no case shall work be allowed to start without TMI approval of calibration records.7 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 481 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 27 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 4.2.3 TMI IWL Program Owner (OWNER) shall verify calibration documentation is acceptable for calibrated inspection and stressing equipment.

4.3 CONTRACTOR

shall field verify proposed stressing rams are of proper configuration for TMI-1 dome tendons.4.4 CONTRACTOR must perform and document training of supervisory personnel with respect to this procedure prior to starting work.4.5 CONTRACTOR shall verify communication equipment (i.e., headsets, walkie talkies) for use in communication between work crews is operable.4.6 IF lifting and handling equipment is to be used, CONTRACTOR shall ensure rigging and lifting devices have been inspected/approved for use per MA-AA-716-021 (2.18).COGNIZANT WORK COORDINATOR (per AD-AA-2001 (2.19)) or designated alternate shall notify on-shift TMI-1 Shift Management of work scope to be performed by CONTRACTOR at beginning of each work day of Tendon Surveillance or related activities.

4.7 Install

required scaffolding per MA-AA-716-025 (2.8).4.8 Work Coordinator shall ensure required indoctrination and training of CONTRACTOR per AD-AA-2001 (2.19) is conducted prior to start of work.5.0 LIMITS AND PRECAUTIONS

5.1 TENDON

SURVEILLANCE CONTRACTOR (CONTRACTOR) shall perform the tendon surveillance in accordance with (lAW) corporate procedures.

5.1.1 RB Concrete Containment Inspections shall be performed to the requirements of ER-AA-330-005 (2.28), perform attachment 1 for each section examined.5.1.2 RB Containment Tendon Inspections shall be performed to the requirements of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27), perform attachments 1 and 2 for each tendon examined as applicable.

5.1.3 This procedure provides additional TMI specific requirements for the performance of the tendon surveillance.

Where this procedure differs from the above listed procedures, this procedure shall govern.5.1.4 Vendor specific procedures for the performance of this surveillance shall be reviewed and approved using datasheet 17 and shall meet the requirements of this procedure, ER-AA-330-005 (2.28), and ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) as applicable.

5.1.4.1 Vendor specific data sheets may be used in place of those contained herein, provided the data sheets contain, at a minimum, all information recorded on those herein and are approved for use.5.1.5 Vendor shall follow this procedure for Lift-off testing, Detensioning, and Retensioning of tendons.8 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 482 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 28 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 5.2 All prerequisites, precautions, and limitations of ER-AA-330-005 (2.28) and ER-AA-330-006 (2.27)shall be met or addressed prior to the performance of this procedure.

5.3 CONTRACTOR

QC/QV personnel shall report to Site Nuclear Oversight and to NDE Manager.5.4 CONTRACTOR Examiners shall use General and Detailed Visual Examination procedures as specified in ASME B & PV Code Section XI (2.30) Paragraph IWL-2310 when conducting visual examinations of concrete and pre-stressing system parts. Contractor examination personnel shall be qualified to a program meeting the requirements of ER-AA-335-001 (2.34) and approved by EXELON NDE Services, the project Responsible Engineer and the Authorized Nuclear In-Service Inspector (ANII).5.5 Conduct this procedure in accordance with MA-AA-716-100 (2.7).5.5.1 IF AS FOUND conditions do not meet acceptance criteria notify Responsible Engineer (RE) as soon as practical and initiate Surveillance Deficiency Report (SDR).5.6 Some work may be near plant equipment required for safe shutdown or which may cause shutdown if damaged. Use special care when suspending or moving stressing rams (jacks) or other heavy surveillance equipment.

5.6.1 TMI WORK COORDINATOR shall work with CONTRACTOR FOREMAN to predict such hazards, and shall keep Operations Shift Management informed when working in such vital areas.5.6.2 Discuss all lifting arrangements inside plant buildings with COGNIZANT WORK COORDINATOR and obtain approval to ensure no damage to plant equipment.

5.6.3 Discuss

routes for transporting heavy equipment through plant buildings with COGNIZANT WORK COORDINATOR and obtain approval.5.7 Minimize transient combustibles per OP-AA-201-009 (2.6). Clearly label all receptacles containing combustibles such as grease (CPM), solvent, used rags, etc.5.8 All chemicals utilized shall be controlled and evaluated per EN-MA-501 (2.21).5.9 No two (or more) tendons of any single group shall be detensioned simultaneously at any point during this surveillance, unless the following condition is met.5.9.1 If two or more tendons in a single group require simultaneous detensioning, a detailed analysis must be performed and approved by RE to ensure resulting containment stresses are acceptable.

6.0 DESCRIPTION

AND LOCATION OF SYSTEMIASSEMBLY 6.1 RB tendons are located within the concrete shell of the RB. Access to tendons is from outside of the RB.6.2 Layout of tendon system, location, and identification can be found in VM-TM-2485 (2.9).9 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 483 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 29 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 NOTE Testing of tendons around Main Steam Safety Valve exhaust area shall not be scheduled during plant operation due to personnel safety concerns. (Refer to Attachment 4)7.0 SPECIAL TOOLS AND MATERIALS 7.1 General NOTE CONTRACTOR must document any substitution of materials along with TMI-1 RE approval.7.1.1 (2) -powered staging assemblies consisting of roof trolley and working platform with hoisting equipment for jack handling.

Platforms suspended from the roof trolley will provide access to tendon ends being inspected.

Jacks will be suspended from either the trolley or the platform as per staging assembly design..7.1.1.1 As temporary structures, these exterior platforms do not have specific design criteria for seismic and wind loading. 90 mph wind loading and seismic loading from UBC 97 (2.33) shall be used in the design of these platforms.

7.1.2 Permanent

460 volt electrical outlets (welding outlets) on top surface of ring girder are available for miscellaneous uses.7.1.3 CONTRACTOR to provide power transformers on working platforms to power hydraulic stressing jack, pumps, and other electrically-powered equipment.

7.1.4 TMI to provide power buggies as required by CONTRACTOR to power hydraulic stressing jack, pumps, and other electrically-powered equipment when permanent power supplies (outlets) are not available.

7.1.5 Electrical

cables or heavy duty extension cords as necessary for lights, hydraulic stressing jack pumps, and other miscellaneous power tools.7.1.6 Lift for two (2) men and hand tools.7.1.7 Portable work platforms for use inside buildings.

7.1.8 Miscellaneous

hand tools.7.1.9 Solvent -for removing grease (CPM) from around tendon anchorage and cleaning any stained concrete.7.1.9.1 CRC Natural Degreaser Aerosol or EPA 2000 are approved for use.7.1.9.2 IF other solvent is to be used, verify the MSDS is approved for use prior to surveillance.

10 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 484 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 30 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 7.1.10 Cleaning rags -approximately 3 bales.7.1.11 Ambient temperature monitoring equipment.

7.2 Detensioning/Retensioning Equipment 7.2.1 (2) -tendon stressing rams (jacks) with 1600 KIPS or greater capacity.(1) Rams body configuration must not conflict with ring girder cut-outs and must have a stroke of at least 6 inches unless clearance and/or weight restrictions require the use of a ram with a shorter stroke.(2) Ram heads (stressing ram adapters) must mate with Inland Ryerson 170 wire threaded anchor head.(3) Ram chair must be of sufficient length to fit TMI dome tendons.(4) Ram chair shall have access openings at 1800 to permit installation and removal of feeler gauges at about 1800 apart under the stressing washer to obtain lift-off readings.7.2.2 Pumps, hoses, pressure gauges, controls, hydraulic fluid, etc. as required for use of stressing ram.7.2.3 Files for dressing threads on damaged anchorage heads.7.2.4 Shims -170 wire split type of the following thicknesses:

1/8", 1/4", 1/2", 3/4", and 1". (5)sets or more of each thickness, as required (Inland-Ryerson part No. 101006-8, 101006-5, 6, 7, and 1 respectively).

(1) Specifications for replacement shims shall require certificate of compliance to ASTM A36 with S2 requirements (material to be silicon-killed fine grain practice) and certified mill test reports showing chemical and physical test results.7.2.5 Wooden or plastic paddles or spatulas to scoop out bulk filler grease (CPM) from around anchorage assembly.7.3 Inspection Equipment NOTE Calibration Documentation required for all measuring equipment in this section.7.3.1 Feeler gages for crack measurements.

Required range of blade sizes is 0.005" to 0.010" by 0.001" increments.

7.3.2 Feeler

gages for lift-off tests. Gage thickness is 0.030" and width 1/2".7.3.3 Optical comparators with 0.001" accuracy for measuring crack widths in concrete or buttonheads.

11 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 485 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 31 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 7.3.4 Grid paper for sketching the pattern of concrete cracks adjacent to vertical and hoop tendon bearing plates.7.3.5 Magnifying glass, 5x (minimum)7.3.6 Wire cutters to cut 1/4 inch diameter, high strength (240,000 PSI) tendon wires.7.3.7 Extraction tool suitable for removing wires subject to tensile tests.7.3.8 Come-along hoist, or similar device, for extracting test wires.7.3.9 Six-foot diameter wire coiler to coil removed wire.7.3.10 Visual inspection equipment to perform General and Detailed inspections per section 4.1.3 (e.g. lighting, binoculars, cameras, etc.).7.4 Equipment for Grease (CPM) and End Cap Replacement

7.4.1 Grease

pump, transmission lines, various fittings mounted on storage tank equipped with heating system to heat grease (CPM) to between 140OF and 200 0 F.(1) Grease pump must be fitted with discharge relief valve set for maximum of 300 PSIG.7.4.2 (12) gallon drums of bulk filler grease (CPM), Visconorust 2090P4, by Viscosity Oil Co., or EQUAL as approved by the RE.NOTE Grease (CPM) quantity is estimate only. More or less may be required.(1) Certified test reports for new grease (CPM) are required, indicating water soluble chlorides, sulfides, and nitrates, reserve alkalinity, and moisture content per ASME Section XI Table IWL-2525-1.

(2) Tests and acceptance limits shall be per ER-AA-330-006 (2.27).7.4.3 (Approx. 12) gallon capacity drums for holding waste grease (CPM).(1) To be clearly labeled on top and side: 'WASTE TENDON GREASE ONLY".7.4.4 (Approximately

10) gallon capacity cans with bails.7.4.5 End Cap Consumables and Hardware per 1410-Y-83 (2.14).12 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 486 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 32 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 8.0 PROCEDURE NOTE The CONTRACTOR may use its own procedures to perform any or all steps of this surveillance.

The CONTRACTOR's procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the TMI Programs Engineer and RE. Data Sheet 17 shall document the review and acceptance of CONTRACTOR's procedures.

8.1 Equipment

Setup 8.1.1 Verify all applicable equipment listed in Section 7.0 available.

8.1.2 Verify

Operating manuals and calibration charts for hydraulic stressing jack, pumps, and controls available for use.(1) Verify all personnel familiar with operating manuals of equipment to be used during inspection.

8.1.3 Verify

stressing jacks, pressure gages, optical comparators, and all other measuring devices have been calibrated and are in good working condition.

(1) Ensure calibration documentation signed, dated, and traceable to NIST.(2) Verify stressing jack-pressure gauge system is capable of measuring tendon force within an accuracy of +/- 1.5% of the specified minimum ultimate strength of the tendon (+/- 30 kips or better).(3) During inspection, check pressure gauge calibration daily against a master pressure gauge used only for this purpose. CONTRACTOR shall document this check in data sheet or table to be included as part of CONTRACTOR report.8.1.4 Verify TESTING LABORATORY prepared to receive wire and grease (CPM) samples.13 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 487 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 33 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance J 23 8.1.5 Complete Data Sheets 1 and 2 for each tendon selected for inspection with: (1) Tendon number, (2) Tendon end (shop/field), (3) Expected lift-off (predicted) force NOTE Value for Predicted/Expected Lift-Off force is Base Value force obtained from applicable Force versus Time curve contained in C-1 101-153-E410-046 (2.16).8.1.6 Complete Rows 1 through 6, 8, 9, 10 and 12 on table 1 of Data Sheet 3 for tendons to be detensioned.

NOTE Original Stressing values to be entered in Rows 1 through 4 of Data Sheet 3, table 1, are given in Table 7 of VM-TM-2485 (2.9).8.1.7 Enter Normalization Factor (NF) obtained from applicable tables contained in C-1101-153-E410-046 (2.16) on Data Sheet 4.8.1.8 Enter predicted force, 0.95 predicted force, and 0.90 predicted force as documented in C-1 101-153-E410-046 (2.16) for all sample tendons on Data Sheet 2.8.1.9 IF working in areas exposed to steam vents, verify plant is shut down. (Refer to Attachment 4)8.2 Hoop and Dome Tendon Inspection NOTE Once inspection of a given tendon has started, it shall be completed as soon as possible to avoid unnecessary exposure of anchorage head.8.2.1 Attachment 1 of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) shall be used to track the inspection of each tendon.8.2.2 Protect roof surface as required prior to starting inspection.

8.2.3 Place

platforms in position at ends of tendon to be inspected.

8.2.4 IF tendon inspection is not completed during a work shift, protect anchorage area and end caps (grease cans) from exposure to moisture, dirt and any other potentially damaging materials.

8.2.5 Tendons

shall be regreased (filled with CPM) within 30 days maximum after removal of an end cap. Unless extension of the 30 day maximum is granted by the Responsible Engineer, as documented in this surveillance package.0 14 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 488 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 34 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance J 23 8.2.6 Corrosion Protection System 8.2.6.1 Perform inspection per ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) and/or vendor procedure.

8.2.6.1.1 Refer to 1410-Y-83 (2.14) for TMI specific requirements for the depressurization and removal of end caps.8.2.6.2 Results shall be summarized using Datasheet 6 or approved vendor data sheet.CAUTION When removing grease (CPM) to make visual inspection, use plastic or wood scrapers to avoid scratching/damage to end anchorage components and resultant corrosion.

8.2.6.3 In addition to testing requirements of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27), PERFORM the following.

8.2.6.3.1 Commercial Grade Dedication of new bulk filler grease (2090-P4)requires that at least 25% of the barrels for each grease lot number be sampled for lab analysis.8.2.6.3.2 Identify grease (CPM) samples for test lab.8.2.6.3.2.1 Old Grease by tendon number.8.2.6.3.2.2 New Grease by barrel ID tag.8.2.7 Inspect Anchorage prior to Lift-Off test.8.2.7.1 Perform visual inspections of the tendon anchorage assemblies and concrete around tendon anchorage per ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) using ER-AA-335-019 (2.29).8.2.7.1.1 Perform Detailed Visual inspection of buttonheads for active corrosion and damage.8.2.7.1.2 Perform Detailed Visual inspection of anchorage washer/shims/bearing plates for cracks and corrosion.

8.2.7.1.3 Perform Detailed Visual examination of concrete for a distance of 2 feet extending outward from the bearing plate, for cracking or voids and for gaps between bearing plate and concrete.

Use an optical comparator or feeler gages to measure crack width.8.2.7.1.3.1 Use grid paper as necessary to identify significant crack patterns and widths.8.2.7.1.4 If broken or damaged wires are detected, the tendon shall be detensioned and the wire removed for testing as specified in Section 8.2.9.15 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 489 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 35 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 8.2.7.2 Complete ER-AA-335-019 (2.29) Attachment 3 for tendon anchorage hardware and Attachment 4 for containment concrete inspection.

8.2.7.3 Results shall be summarized using Data Sheets 8-14 or approved vendor data sheet.8.2.7.3.1 Data sheet 11 shall be used to document the inspection of tendon buttonheads, i.e. protruding or missing buttonheads.

8.2.7.3.2 The presence/quantity of free water shall be documented in the comments section of Data Sheet 11.8.2.7.4 In addition to the acceptance criteria of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) the following shall apply.8.2.7.4.1 IF crack widths >0.050" are identified, investigation of the containment structure and evaluation of its continued integrity shall be required.8.2.7.4.2 Cracks _> 0.050" must be repaired after TMI-1 Engineering evaluation.

Repairs shall be performed in accordance with (lAW)1440-Y-23, "RB Concrete Surface Crack Repairs" (2.15).8.2.7.4.3 Cracks larger than 0.020" shall be monitored in future tendon surveillances until repaired.8.2.7.5 IF any indications exceed the acceptance criteria, record; sketch, photograph, etc. as applicable; and report immediately to the RE.NOTE Crack widths in concrete > 0.010" are potentially reportable per 10 CFR 50.72. RE shall determine by evaluation if the cracks represent unacceptable structural damage/degradation.

8.2.7.6 CONTRACTOR shall ensure TMI-1 has evaluated any out-of-specification condition prior to making condition inaccessible (i.e. reinstalling the end cap over damaged or degraded anchorage hardware).

8.2.7.6.1 A written evaluation shall be included by TMI in the final report (Topical Report).8.2.8 Lift-Off Test 8.2.8.1 Record ram calibration constants and identification number on Data Sheet 1.8.2.8.2 Measure and record thickness of shim stack on Data Sheet 1.8.2.8.3 Lubricate anchor head threads with a small amount of bulk filler grease (CPM) as required.16 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 490 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 36 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 8.2.8.4 Thread ram onto anchor head and align on bearing plate per ram operating instructions.

8.2.8.5 Ensure full thread engagement of the coupler to the stressing washer.8.2.8.6 Visually examine jack prior to each use for damage or deformation.

WARNING Jack is being operated up to 1,600 KIPS of force. Exercise extreme caution and strict adherence to all safety regulations as contained in operating manual. DO NOT stand behind hydraulic jack while stressing a tendon. Exercise extreme caution if fingers or hands are required near tendon anchor head during testing.CAUTION DO NOT exceed 80% of ultimate tensile stress (equivalent to a jack force of 1592 KIPS (for a tendon with 169 effective wires) when performing lift-off test, except as authorized by the RE.8.2.8.7 IF lift-off is not achieved at jack force of 1592 KIPS, STOP, unload jack and immediately notify RE.8.2.8.8 Observe the position of the anchorhead prior to applying pressure.

Count the anchorhead revolutions about the tendon axis, if any, durng lift-off.

Record the number of revolutions on Data Sheet 1.8.2.8.9 Begin applying pressure to jack, and continue applying pressure until stressing washer (anchorhead) lifts off shim pack just enough to insert (2) -0.030" thick feeler gages, located approximately 180 degrees apart, between anchor head and shim pack, shims, or shim pack and bearing plate.8.2.8.10 Reduce jack pressure to achieve corresponding force reduction of approximately 100 KIPS. Obtain relationship between jack pressure and force from Calibration Constants recorded on Data Sheet 1.8.2.8.11 Slowly increase jack pressure until both feeler gages becomes loose enough to move. When this occurs, STOP increasing jack pressure and record jack pressure reading on Data Sheet 1.8.2.8.12 Complete Consecutive Three Trial Pressure Spread and Average on Data Sheet 1.8.2.8.13 Repeat lift-off measurement tests until 3 consecutive pressure measurements (psi) fall within a range of 25,000 lbs / A, where A is ram area recorded on Data Sheet 1.17 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 491 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 37 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301 -9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 NOTE When three consecutive pressure measurements fall within a range of 25,000 lbs / A official lift-off force for tendon end is that determined by the mean of these pressures.

8.2.8.14 CONTRACTOR shall record information on Data Sheet 1.8.2.8.15 Calculate official lift-off force and record on Data Sheet 1.8.2.8.16 Remove feeler gages and slowly decrease pressure on jack to allow stressing washer to reseat onto shims. No additional shims are to be added at this time.NOTE DO NOT detension either end until lift-off has been recorded for both ends. Shop and field end lift-off measurements may be either concurrent or consecutive.

If consecutive, the time between measurements may not exceed a limit as specified by the Responsible engineer.8.2.8.17 Repeat lift-off test at other end of tendon.8.2.8.18 Calculate average of the shop and field end lift-off forces and enter on Data Sheet 2.8.2.8.19 Verify force meets Acceptance Criteria specified in Step 9.3.8.2.8.20 During lift-off testing, record reactor building internal temperature and the temperature of the concrete adjacent to the tendon anchorage on Data Sheet 1.NOTE Use value recorded from RTD TE 6551, TE 655U or TE 655P in Control Room for RB internal temperature.

8.2.8.21 Enter As-Found average lift-off force from Data Sheet 2 in Column (1) of Data Sheet 4 for non-SGRP tendons only.8.2.8.21.1 SGRP tendons include both retensioned and replaced tendons.8.2.8.22 After lift-off tests are completed for all selected tendons in a group, e.g., all dome tendons, complete Data Sheet 4 for non-SGRP tendons. Fill out Data Sheet 5 after all re-tensioned tendon lift-off tests are complete.8.2.8.23 Verify average of all normalized lift-off forces in a group meets Acceptance Criteria of Step 9.3.18 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 492 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 38 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 14Ul-W1.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 8.2.8.24 For all non-SGRP tendons, the RE shall review the results and trends of the measured prestress forces from consecutive surveillances for the control tendons and tendons as a group. Perform a statistical analysis of time dependent lift-off force trends and verify that the criteria of Step 9.3 are satisfied.

Plot lift-off for control tendons on force vs. time curves.8.2.8.25 Perform an as-left visual inspection of anchorage and document on Data sheets 8-14.(1) Inspect for missing or protruding buttonheads.

(2) Verify that shims meet alignment and gap requirements as specified in ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) section 4.4.1.5.8.2.8.26 Unless tendon is to be detensioned, immediately after inspection, butter the end of the anchorhead with clean bulk filler grease (CPM), completely coating all buttonheads to provide temporary corrosion protection until the tendon is bulk filled.8.2.9 Detension Tendon NOTE The following section applies to the following only: 1. Tendons identified for wire removal in Table 5 of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27).2. Tendons identified by the RE for condition evaluation.

CAUTION 1. DO NOT exceed 80% of ultimate tensile stress (equivalent to a jack force of 1592 KIPS (for a tendon with 169 effective wires) except as approved by the Responsible Engineer..

2. During plant operation, detension ONLY ONE tendon at a time.During the T1 R1 8 steam generator replacement (2009), special limits on the number of tendons detensioned during power operation had been applied, consistent with the 50.59 evaluation limitations of SE-000153-021.

NOTE 1. To prevent holding jacks under pressure for periods of time, it is recommended that both ends of tendon be detensioned simultaneously.

2. Shims are paired and must be stacked in pairs.8.2.9.1 Increase pressure to jacks until shims can be removed.19 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 493 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 39 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 8.2.9.2 Remove split shims from shim stacks.8.2.9.3 Slowly decrease pressure (rate < 2000 PSIG/MIN) on jacks to completely detension tendon.NOTE DO NOT uncouple jacks until tendon is completely detensioned.

8.2.9.4 Uncouple jack, while minimizing twisting of tendon to 1/2 of a revolution.

8.2.9.5 Record the number of revolutions of the anchorhead (if any) during uncoupling in the notes section of Data Sheet 1.8.2.9.6 Make note of any buttonheads that protrude much farther than adjoining ones on Data Sheet 11 for re-examination after retensioning.

8.2.9.7 Perform Detailed Visual Examination of the detensioned tendon anchorage assembly for missing, broken, and/or damaged wires, and corrosion on wires visible between the anchor head and bearing plate and record observations on Data Sheet 8, 9 or 10 as applicable.

8.2.9.7.1 Additionally, perform Detailed Visual Examination of tendon anchorage areas NOT accessible while tendon is under tension (i.e. bearing plate under shims, shim bearing surfaces, and shim half mating faces).8.2.10 Remove Wire and Test NOTE This section only applies to tendons selected for wire removal in Table 5 of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27). The steps of section 8.2.9 must be completed prior to beginning this section.8.2.10.1 Randomly select an intact wire for removal and remove following the approved vendor procedure.

8.2.10.2 Also remove all broken or damaged wires (if any) for tensile testing and visual examination to evaluate the cause of breakage or damage.8.2.10.3 Follow procedure ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) or approved vendor procedure for test and examination of all removed wires.8.2.10.4 IF there is rejectable corrosion on the wire, or the wire fails the tensile test, the RE must evaluate.

Each case shall be treated as an abnormal degradation of the containment structure and reported to the NRC.8.2.10.4.1 Summarize results of wire testing on Data Sheet 7 or approved vendor data sheet.20 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 494 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 40 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 8.2.11 Retension Tendon NOTE This step only applies to tendons that have been detensioned in accordance with section 8.2.9.CAUTION DO NOT exceed a wire stress of 192 ksi, which is equal to 80% of the 240 ksi specified minimum ultimate tensile stress (equivalent to a jack force of 1593 KIPS (for a tendon with 169 effective wires).8.2.11.1 Retension both ends of a tendon approximately simultaneously, such that the force difference between ends does not exceed 250 KIPS at any time during retensioning.

8.2.11.2 Prior to starting retensioning, enter header information for tendon to be retensioned on Data Sheet 1, and calculate P'max and P'min and enter on Data Sheet 1. Complete Columns 2 through 5 on Data Sheet 5 by recording the following information.

(1) Number of effective wires.(2) 70% of tendon ultimate strength (8.24 kip x Number of Effective Wires).(3) Predicted Base Force from C-1 101-1 53-E410-046.

(4) Target lock-off force; [70% of ultimate strength + Predicted Base Force]-2.8.2.11.3 Verify Rows 1, 2, 6 through 9 and 12 of Data Sheet 3, tables 2 and 3, have been completed.

8.2.11.4 For the steps 8.2.11.5 -8.2.11.13 record results in table 2 or 3 of data sheet 3 as applicable.

8.2.11.5 At each tendon end, stress tendon to gauge pressure recorded in Row 2.Record actual pressure in Row 3.8.2.11.6 Record ram extension in Row 5.8.2.11.7 Stress tendon to gauge pressure recorded in Row 9, record actual pressure in Row 10.8.2.11.8 Record ram extension in Row 11.8.2.11.9 Stress tendon to gauge pressure recorded in Row 12, record actual pressure in Row 13.8.2.11.10 Record ram extension in Row 14.21 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 495 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 41 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 8.2.11.11 Stress tendon to gauge pressure recorded in Row 7. Record actual pressure in Row 15.8.2.11.12 Record ram extension in Row 17.8.2.11.13 Record tendon force at overstress in Row 16.8.2.11.14 Reduce ram pressure to the lesser of the following and insert shims to fill gap (final gap will be less than the thickness of the smallest shim).(1) 200 psi above (P'min + P'max)/2 from data Sheet 1.(2) P'max force listed on Data Sheet 1.8.2.11.15 Perform lift-off to determine actual tendon force and corresponding gauge pressure and enter all required information on Data Sheet 1.8.2.11.16 Record final lift-off (Lock-Off) force in Column 6 of Data Sheet 5.8.2.11.17 Verify that final lock-off force is between the Predicted Base Force and 70%of ultimate tendon strength and document verification in Col. (7) of Data Sheet 5.8.2.11.18 Complete Data Sheet 5 for all detensioned tendons.8.2.11.19 Record final lift-off force, and shim stack thickness on Data Sheet 1.8.2.11.20 For comparison of tendon elongations occurring at Original Stressing and Retensioning, complete Data Sheet 3, table 4.8.2.11.21 Verify fractional difference in Row 10 on Table 4 of Data Sheet 3 is within+/- 0.1. Indicate, on the line below the table, whether this criterion has been met on Table 4 of Data Sheet 3.NOTE The retensioning procedure (steps 8.2.11.1 thru 8.2.11.21) may be repeated (up to a maximum of 3 trials) if elongation criteria are not met.Elongation shall be acceptable if the criterion is met during the final trial.8.2.11.22 IF NOT within +/- 0.1 after the final trial, immediately notify RE and investigate to determine if cause is wire failure or excessive friction between the tendon and duct. Difference of more than 0.1 requires identification in the ISI Summary Report per ASME Section XI (2.30) Subsection IWA-6000.8.2.11.23 After all lift-off tests on re-tensioned tendons are complete, fill out Data Sheet 5.8.2.11.24 Perform as-left visual inspection outlined in 8.2.8.28.22 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 496 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 42 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 1301-9.1.Title RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance lanc11 Gr- I" cedQU re 1-~Revision No.23 8.2.11.25 Immediately after inspection, butter the end of the anchorhead with clean bulk filler grease (CPM), completely coating all buttonheads to provide temporary corrosion protection until the tendon is bulk filled.8.2.12 Restore Tendon Force NOTE Following steps apply to any tendon which has lift-off force below its specified 90% Base Value, and has not been required to be detensioned.

8.2.12.1 Completely de-tension the tendon following the instructions in Par. 8.2.9.8.2.12.2 Evaluate cause of low force.8.2.12.3 Retension tendon per the instructions in Par. 8.2.11.8.2.13 For each tendon, measure the quantity of grease (CPM) replaced and document in Table 8 of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27). Reinstall end cap and regrease per site specific guidance in 141 0-Y-83 (2.14).8.3 Vertical Tendon Inspection

8.3.1 Follow

same steps for dome and hoop tendons (Section 8.1 and 8.2) with following exceptions:

(1) Access to opposite end of tendon is from tendon gallery.(2) Entire column of grease (CPM) may drain from tendon conduit. Ensure sufficient receptacles available to contain up to 120 gallons of drained grease from each tendon (C-1101-153

-E410-031 (2.24)).(3) Lift-off, detensioning, and retensioning of vertical tendon will be performed from one end only; i.e., from top of ring girder.(4) Shop end data only to be filled in on Data Sheets 1 and 2.8.4 Perform a General Visual Examination of the accessible exterior of the containment including the foundation mat around the bottom vertical tendon anchorages per ER-AA-335-019 (2.29).8.4.1 All the requirements of ER-AA-330-005 (2.28) shall be met.8.4.2 Track performance of exam using Attachment 1 of ER-AA-330-005 (2.28).8.4.3 Summarize results on Data sheet 15, identifying any of the following.

8.4.3.1 Relevant conditions as defined in ACI 201.1R-92 (or later edition) (2.22).8.4.3.2 Large spalling, severe scaling, grease (CPM) leakage, other surface deterioration.

23 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 497 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 43 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance J 23 8.4.4 Visually inspect (General Visual Examination) all tendon end caps for grease (CPM)leakage or deformation.

NOTE This examination is to include the concrete repair from the SGRP Containment Opening.8.5 Perform applicable examinations and tests listed in Attachment 3 and document results.8.6 End Cap Seal Repairs NOTE To maintain tendon grease seals, scope of work includes replacement of leaky seals, even on tendons which are not part of surveillance scope.RE and site engineering shall determine scope of seal replacement activities.

8.6.1 Perform

repairs per 141 0-Y-83 (2.14).8.7 Recalibrate all calibrated equipment at end of tendon surveillance.

9.0 ACCEPTANCE

CRITERIA 9.1 Tendon Anchorages and the surrounding concrete either meet the following criteria, are found to be acceptable following engineering evaluation or meet the stated criteria following repair as specified by the Responsible Engineer.9.1.1 Acceptance criteria of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) for Anchorage Hardware.9.1.2 Acceptance criteria of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) for Concrete surrounding Tendon Anchroage.

NOTE Any crack in the concrete face greater than 0.020" shall be monitored during future Tendon Surveillance performances as specified by the RE.Any crack in the concrete face greater than/equal to 0.050" wide shall be repaired after appropriate engineering evaluation.

9.1.3 There

are no missing, broken, and/or damaged wires that were not documented in construction records or during prior surveillances.

9.2 Tendon

Wire Physical Condition meets criteria specified by ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) and Table 9.9.3 Tendon Prestress Force Confirmation Test (IWL-3221.1).

9.3.1 Measured

tendon forces must meet the acceptance criteria from ER-AA-330-006 (2.27).24 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 498 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 44 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 NOTE SGRP affected tendon forces are not required to be included in the averages nor averaged separately.

See Tech Eval 10408951-02.

NOTE Required minimum average tendon forces are: 1033 Kips for Vertical Tendons 1064 Kips for Dome Tendons 1108 Kips for Hoop Tendons 9.3.2 The Predicted Base Value (Predicted Force) for tested tendons is obtained from C-1 101-153-E410-046 (2.16).NOTE In some cases, tendons adjacent to those selected for examination and lift-off measurements during the current surveillance were included in earlier surveillance samples and are therefore not considered to be'undisturbed tendons'.

When this is the case, Attachments 2 and 5 identify the nearest undisturbed alternates to be examined if a specified sample tendon lift-off force is below 0.95 of the predicted value.Also, the Responsible Engineer may designate alternatives as necessary to satisfy accessibility, safety and other significant concerns.9.3.3 IF the requirements of 9.3.1 are not met, extent of investigation into cause, including additional lift-off testing to determine cause and extent of such occurrence, shall be determined by RE.9.3.4 IF average value of selected tendon end forces required for lift-off falls below 90% Base Value, evaluate condition to determine extent of cause of the low lift-off force and to specify additional examinations deemed necessary to demonstrate acceptability of the pre-stressing system.9.3.5 IF minimum group average normalized tendon force is NOT MET on Data Sheet 4, an additional sample of 4% of the applicable tendon population, see following table, shall be examined.

RE shall specify tendons over and above the minimum required to be examined.Group Ntotal NSGRP Nnon-SGRP Nmin Hoop 330 30 300 12 Vertical 166 39 127 6 Dome 147 0 147 6 Note: (N) represents the number of tendons.25 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 499 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 45 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 9.3.6 IF results of the anchorage force statistical analysis for any tendon group shows that the 95% lower confidence limit of the group mean (force vs log time) will fall below the minimum required value prior to the late finish date of next scheduled surveillance, additional lift-off testing to determine the cause and extent of such occurrence shall be done as directed by the RE. This evaluation shall be reported per Engineering Evaluation Report prescribed in IWL-3300.9.3.7 IF total population of each group of sampled tendons meets criteria, structural integrity of containment shall be considered acceptable.

9.3.8 IF structural integrity of containment has not been demonstrated to be acceptable within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> of condition identification, then be in at least HOT STANDBY within next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.9.4 Corrosion Protection System Inspection.

9.4.1 Grease

(CPM) sample contaminant levels and base numbers meet the criteria specified in ER-AA-330-006 (2.27).9.4.2 Acceptance criteria for the replacement of the tendon filler grease (CPM) is as specified in ER-AA-330-006 (2.27).9.4.3 Presence of free water.9.4.3.1 An evaluation per CC-AA-309-101 (2.35) shall be performed per UFSAR 5.7.5.2.5 if found.9.4.4 Grease (CPM) leakage detected during general examination of the containment exterior surface has been evaluated for housekeeping, fire safety and personnel safety concerns.9.4.4.1 An evaluation per CC-AA-309-101 (2.35) shall be performed per UFSAR 5.7.5.2.5 if found.9.5 General Containment Inspection

9.5.1 Acceptance

criteria of ER-AA-330-005 (2.28) shall be met.9.5.2 Concrete surface indications meeting the criteria in Section 5.1 of ACI 349.3R-96 (or later edition) (2.23) are generally acceptable without further engineering evaluation.

9.5.2.1 All other conditions shall be submitted to RE for evaluation of damage or degradation warranting further evaluation or repair.9.5.3 Tendon end grease caps shall show no evidence of active leakage or deformation.

9.5.3.1 RE shall evaluate any indications of active leakage or deformation.

26 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 500 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 46 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 1 23 9.6 Jack Post Test Calibration

9.6.1 Jacking

force at the 70% GUTS load level when computed using the post-test calibration constants is within 30 kip (1.5% GUTS as specified in ASME Section XI Par. IWL-2522[b])

of that computed using the pre-test calibration constants.

Compute the jack forces as specified per approved vendor procedure.

9.7 All Data Sheets complete and signed off.9.8 IF one or more of the Acceptance Criteria of 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, and 9,6 are not met, it shall be considered as a possible abnormal degradation of the containment structure.

The condition shall be immediately brought to the attention of, and evaluated by the RE. A Surveillance Deficiency Report (SDR) shall be generated and addressed in the tendon surveillance report submitted to the NRC.10.0 REPORTS 10.1 All documentation and reporting requirements of ER-AA-330-006 (2.27) shall be met in addition to the following.

10.2 CONTRACTOR shall prepare written report of test and examination results and submit to the Owner within 30 days of test and inspection completion.

10.2.1 CONTRACTOR shall include pre and post-test calibration records in the final report.10.3 TMI shall ensure Attachment 3 is kept updated with extra commitments for inspections as a result of abnormal conditions in each inspection period.27 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 501 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 47 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Surveillance Procedure 1301-9.1 Title Revision No.RB Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance 23 FIGURE 1 Page 1 of 1 Tendon Details Typical Hoop/Dome Bearing Plate 20-1/2" x 3-3/4" x 20-1/2" Grease Can Holding Ring Wire Washer (2-Piece Shop Washer Shown)Grease Plug l-%" NPT Grease Can Prestressing Tendon-9 Gasket (Closed cell Neoprene Sponge)Grease Cani Hold Down Bolts/Nuts and Grease Seals' I" -8 UNC2B I" Dia. Wires 2" -Deep with Buttonheads NOTE Vertical tendons have a different type of end cap.New end caps have been installed on hoop tendons as they are examined or seals are replaced to prevent future grease leakage.28 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 502 of 1008 REP-1 098-51 *ndix E, Page 48 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET I Lift-Off Force Measurement Predicted Force (Fp) kip 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 1 of 21 Surveillance No.TendonID Tendon End (Circle One): Shop / Field Phase (Circle One): As-found / Re-Tension Ram ID Ram Calibration Constants:

A =No. Effective Wires, N, Date Temp: RB Interior OF / Concrete Surface Shim Stack Ht. in.CAUTION DO NOT EXCEEP A RAM PRESSURE OF [(1,592 x Nw / 169) -k] x 1,000 / A = psig Consecutive Three Trial Pressure Spread psi Consecutive Three Trial Pressure Average pi psig1,2 Stressing Washer Rotation Rotation, Turns CW or CCW For Re-tension Only, List Nominal Thickness of Each Shim Starting at Shim in Contact with Anchorhead Trial 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Lift-Off Pressure, psig At Feeler Gage Insertion NIA N/A At Trial 1 N/A N/A At Trial 2 At Trial 3 At Trial 4 At Trial 6 At Trial 6 At Trial 7 Sum End Lift-Off Force = (A x P' /1,000) = k = __ kip I in.2 N/A if 3 trial pressure spread > 25,000 / A = .psi 2 Re-tension P' range: P'n =(Fp-k)x 1,000/A= __ psig<P'<P'.x=

[(1,394xNw

/169)-k]x1,000/A

=___ psig For Re-Tension Only: Fp < End Lift-Off Force < 1394 x Nw/ 169; -< <Yes / No (Circle One)Notes: Recorded by: Signature Date / Reviewed by: Signature.

Date QV 29 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 503 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 49 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 2 of 21 DATA SHEET 2 As-Found Lift-Off Force Summary Results As-Found Lift Off Force, kip Predicted F > Facc F > Fiiim Tendon Average Force, Fp, Facc= Circle Fim = Circle Group ID Shop End Field End Force, F kip 0.95 Fp Yes or No 0.90 Fp Yes or No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Hoop Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No N/A Yes / No Yes / No N/A Yes / No Yes / No N/A Yes / No Yes / No N/A Yes / No Yes / No Vertical N/A Yes / No Yes / No N/A Yes / No Yes / No N/A Yes / No Yes / No N/A Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Dome Yes / No Yes / No Yes /No Yes /No Yes /No Yes /No Yes /No Yes /No Notes: (Initial & Date)30 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 504 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 50 of 415 ATTACHMENT 1 DATA SHEETS 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 3 of 21 DATA SHEET 3 Page 1 of 4 Elongation I Tendon Force Record Re-Tensioning Data for De-Tensioned Tendons TendonlD Surveillance No.Part 1 Original Stressing Data NOTE PTF removes tendon slack and is the starting point for elongation measurements.

OSF force is 80% (may be less) of tendon ultimate strength.

The tendon is loaded to OSF in order to provide the required force distribution.

It is also the force at which final elongation is measured.

PTF force / elongation, OSF force / elongation and number of effective wires are documented in construction records.Table I Row, R Parameter Value 1 Shop End PTF Force kip 2 Field end PTF force kip 3 Mean PTF Force = (R1 + R2) / 2 kip 4 Shop End PTF Reference Distance in.5 Field End PTF Reference Distance in.6 Net PTF Reference Distance = R4 + R5 in.7 Shop End OSF Force kip 8 Field end OSF force kip 9 Mean OSF Force = (R7 + R8) / 2 kip 10 Shop End OSF Reference Distance in.11 Field End OSF Reference Distance in.12 Net OSF Reference Distance = R10 + Rll in.13 Differential Force = R9 -R3 kip 14 Differential Elongation

= R12 -R6 in.15 Number of Effective Wires 16 Elongation Rate = R14 x R15/ R13 31 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 505 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 51 of 415 ATTACHMENT 1 DATA SHEETS 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 4 of 21 DATA SHEET 3 Page 2 of 4 Elongation

/ Tendon Force Record Re-Tensioning Data for De-Tensioned Tendons Tendon ID Ram ID Part 2 Shop End Re-Tensioning Data Ram Area, A in 2 Surveillance No.Ram k kip NOTE The number of effective wires entered in R1 must be the same as the number entered for the field end in Table 3. Also, the calculations identified in Rows 4, 16, 18 & 19 (shaded) may be done after stressing work at both ends of the tendon is complete.Table 2 Row, R Parameter Value Signature Date 1 Number of Effective Wires 2 PTF Target Pressure psi 3 PTF Actual Pressure psi 4 ~ PTF Actual Force,- = ~R3 x Al11000 -~ k~ kip _______5 PTF Reference Distance in.6 OSF Maximum Force = R1 x 9.4 kip 7 OSF Max. Pressure = 1000 (R6 + k) / A psi 8 1/3 Pressure Interval = R7 / 3 -330 psi 9 Target 1/3 Pressure = 1,000 + R8 psi 10 Actual 1/3 Pressure psi 11 1/3 Reference Distance in.12 Target 2/3 Pressure = R9 + R8 psi 13 Actual 2/3 Pressure psi 14 2/3 Reference Distance in.15 OSF Actual Pressure psi 1 i= OSF Actual Force. R.1 5 x A 000" -k: kip 17 OSF Reference Distance in.18 , Difffential Force = R16~-1R34 '19 ~' Differential, Elongation

= k17A R5 in. .32 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 506 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 52 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 5 of 21 DATA SHEET 3 Page 3 of 4 Elongation

/ Tendon Force Record Re-Tensioning Data for De-Tensioned Tendons TendonID Surveillance No.Part 3 Field End Re-Tensioning Data Ram ID Ram Area, A in2 Ram k kip NOTE The number of effective wires entered in R1 must be the same as the number entered for the shop end in Table 2. Also, the calculations identified in Rows 4, 16, 18 & 19 (shaded) may be done after stressing work at both ends of the tendon is complete.Table 3 Row, R Parameter 1 Number of Effective Wires 2 PTF Target Pressure 3 PTF Actual Pressure 4 PTF Actual Force. = R3 x A/,iOQ0 :- k 5 PTF Reference Distance 6 OSF Maximum Force = R1 x 9.4 7 OSF Max. Pressure = 1000 (R6 + k) / A 8 1/3 Pressure Interval = R7 / 3 -330 9 Target 1/3 Pressure = 1,000 + R8 10 Actual 1/3 Pressure 11 1/3 Reference Distance 12 Target 2/3 Pressure = R9 + R8 13 Actual 2/3 Pressure 14 2/3 Reference Distance 15 OSF Actual Pressure 16 :.OSFActual Force = R1 5 xA000- k 17 OSF Reference Distance 18. j Force = R16 R4.19 ,iffeiential'Elongation

= R5 33 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 507 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 53 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 6 of 21 DATA SHEET 3 Page 4 of 4 Elongation

/ Tendon Force Record Re-Tensioning Data for De-Tensioned Tendons Tendon ID Surveillance No.Part 4 Elongation Comparison Table 4 Row, R Parameter Value 1 Shop End Differential Force from Table 2, R18 kip 2 Field End Differential Force from Table 3, R18 kip 3 Average Differential Force = (R1 + R2) / 2* kip 4 Shop End Differential Elongation from Table 2, R19 in.5 Field End Differential Elongation from Table 3, R19 in.6 Total Elongation

= R4 + R5** in.7 Number of Effective Wires from Table 2, R1 8 Re-Tensioning Elongation Rate = R6 x R7 / R3 9 Original Elongation Rate from Table 1, R16 10 Fractional Difference in Rates = (R8 -R9) / R9 Absolute value of the above Fractional Difference in Rates _ 0.1* For vertical tendon = R1** For vertical tendon = R4 Signature:

Yes No Date: 34 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 508 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 54 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 4 Average of the Normalized Lift-Off Force 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 7 of 21 (4)Acceptance Yes No (1)Lift Off Force (2)Normalizing Factor (NF)(3)Normalized Lift Off (1) + (2)TendonID Dome Tendons 1.2.3.4.5.6.(Average Equal to or greater than 1064 kips)Total Average Vertical Tendons 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.(Average Equal to or greater than 1033 kips)Total Average Hoop Tendons 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.(Average Equal to or greater than 1108 kips)Total Average Date: Cognizant Mech/Struct Engineer Reviewed By: Performed By: Date: 35 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 509 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 55 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 5 Re-Tensioning Criteria Confirmation 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 8 of 21 (1)TENDON ID (2)NUMBER OF EFFECTIVE WIRES (3)70 % OF ULTIMATE STRENGTH[8.24 X (2)](4)PREDICTED BASE FORCE 1 (5)(6)(7)AVERAGE LOCK-OFF (4)<(6)<(3)

[(3)+(4)]-2 FORCE Yes / No DOME SHOP END FIELD END SHOP END FIELD END VERTICAL SHOP END SHOP END SHOP END HOOP TENDONS SHOP END FIELD END SHOP END FIELD END SHOP END FIELD END Cognizant Mech/Struct Engineer Reviewed By: Date: Date: Performed By: 'Predicted Base Force from C-1101-153-E410-046.

36 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 510 of 1008 REP-1 098-51*Gondix E, Page 56 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 6 Tendon Anchorage Area Moisture/Free Water Inspection 0 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 9 of 21 Inspection Period Tendon No. Location 1. _____ ________Moisture/Water (Yes or No)Description of Free Moisture/Water-Quantity, Location Inspect. By Date Insp. (Initials) 2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.NOTE: Location: Hoop Tendons: Vertical Tendons: Dome Tendons: 1 to 6 -Buttress number at end of tendon T or B -Top or Bottom 1 to 6 -Number of buttress nearest to end of tendon Cognizant QV Inspector Verification By: Cognizant Mech/Struct Engineer Review By: Date: Date: 37 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 511 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 57 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 7 Tendon Wire Test Results 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 10 of 21 INSPECTION PERIOD TENDON WIRE 1)SAMPLE NO.DOME LOCATION (2)FROM END OF WIRE YIELD (3)STRESS (ksi)ULTIMATE STRESS (ksi)PERCENT (4)ELONGATION COMMENTS (IDENTIFY MOST CORRODED SECTION)1.2.3.4.VERTICAL 1.2.3.4.HOOP 1.2.3.4.NOTES: (1) See Section 8.2.10.(2) Distance in feet from cut end (opposite end has button head) to center of sample.(3) Yield stress is defined at 1% elongation per ASTM A421.(4) At Ultimate Tensile Strength.Laboratory Technician Prepared By: Laboratory Supervisor Verified By: Cognizant Mech/Struct Engineer Approved By: Date Date Date 38 Topical Report 21 # ment 2 Page 512 of 1008 REP-1 098-51 G*ndix E, Page 58 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 8 Anchorage Assembly Surveillance Inspection Dome Tendons 0 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 11 of 21 INSPECTION PERIOD STRESSING WASHER A. IIT DATE INSP. BY VERIF. BY CONTR. COGNIZANTflVINRP TENDON END BUTTONHEADS NO. OF MISSING, BROKEN, : ANDIOR DAMAGED I.D. Location Corr. WIRES CORR.1 2 3 4 5RIARIIJV.

Pl ATIF SKETCHED CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I. -_____2.3.4.6.-LEGEND GENERAL Y = YES N = NO TENDON END-LOCATION IDENTIFY TENDON END (SHOP OR FIELD) AND NW, NE, SW, SE 39 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 513 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 59 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 12 of 21 DATA SHEET 9 Anchorage Assembly Surveillance Inspection Vertical Tendons INSPECTION PERIOD STRESSING WASHER a 1.1 I INSP. BY VERIF. BY DATE CONTR. COGNIZANT IDU00 1 'nR'RAUTC InODIP1A M yl IUC* innki Ckin..l-^ .... no QLJIUQ I AT: NO. OF MISSING, BROKEN, AND/OR DAMAGED WIRES CORR. SKETCHED CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED I.D. Location Corr.1 2 3 1.2. _ ____3. _ ____4 5 6 8 9 CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 4.5.6.LEGEND GENERAL Y= YES N=NO TENDON END-LOCATION IDENTIFY TENDON END (SHOP OR FIELD) AND TOP (T) OR BOTTOM (B) OF TENDON 40 Topical Report 211ment 2 Page 514 of 1008 REP-1 098-51 0endix E, Page 60 of 415 ATTACHMENT 1 DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 10 Anchorage Assembly Surveillance Inspection Hoop Tendons 0 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 13 of 21 INSPECTION PERIOD STRESSING WASHER& NUT INSP. BY VERIF. BY DATE CONTR. COGNIZANT INSP. COMMENTS FOREMAN QV INSP.TENDON END BUTTONHEADS SHIMS BEARING PLATE NO. OF MISSING BROKEN, ANDIOR DAMAGED I.D. Location Corr. WIRES CORR. SKETCHED CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED CORR. CRACKS SKETCHED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1.2. ____3. ____4.5.6.LEGEND GENERAL Y = YES N=NO TENDON END-LOCATION IDENTIFY TENDON END (SHOP OR FIELD) AND NUMBER OF BUTTRESS (1 TO 6) AT TENDON END 41 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 515 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 61 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 11 Tendon Buttonhead Inspection 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 14 of 21 RB Tendon Surveillance COMMENT: INSPECTED BY CONTRACTOR FOREMAN Date VERIIFIED BY COGNIZANT QV INSPECTOR Date COGNIZANT MECH/STRUCT ENGINEER Date REVIEWED BY INSPECTION PERIOD Tendon #END: FIELD (1 piece washer)SHOP (2 piece washer)42 Topical Report 21 ment2 Page 516 of 1008 REP-1098-510*ndix E, Page 62 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 12 Tendon Anchorage Area Concrete Crack Inspection Dome Tendons 0 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 15 of 21 Inspection Period Tendon No.2.3.4.5.6.Location Remarks about Cracking Pattern Cracks with width >0.01 " Location(A)

Widh IjJ(B)Date Insp.Insp. By Contr.Foreman Verify. By Cognizant QV Insp.NOTE: (A) Location: Identify Tendon End (Shop or Field) and NW, NE, SW, SE (B) If concrete crack width > 0.01 ", provide sketch Cognizant Mech/Struct Engineer Reviewed By: Date: 43 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 517 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 63 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 13 Tendon Anchorage Area Concrete Crack Inspection Vertical Tendons 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 16 of 21 Inspection Period Tendon No.1.2.Location Remarks about Cracking Pattern Cracks with width >0.01" Location(A)

Width (IN.)(B)Date Insp.Insp. By Contr.Foreman Verify. By Cognizant QV Insp.3.4.5.6.7.NOTE: (A) Location: Identify Tendon End (Shop or Field) and T or B -Top or Bottom of Vertical Tendon (B) If concrete crack width > 0.01", provide sketch Cognizant Mech/Struct Engineer Reviewed By: Date: 44 Topical Report 21 # ment 2 Page 518 of 1008 0 REP-1098-51H*ndix E, Page 64 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 14 Tendon Anchorage Area Concrete Crack Inspection 0 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 17 of 21 Inspection Period Tendon No. Location 1.2.3.4._________

5. ________6.7.8.9.10.Remarks about Cracking Pattern Hoop Tendons Cracks with width >0.01" Location(A)

Width (IN.)(B)Date Insp.Insp. By Contr. Foreman Verify. By Cognizant QV Insp.NOTE: (A) Location: Identify Tendon End (Shop or Field) and 1 to 6 -Number of Buttress At End of Tendon (B) If concrete crack width > 0.01", provide sketch Cognizant Mech/Struct Engineer Reviewed By: Date: 45 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 519 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 65 of 415 ATTACHMENT 1 DATA SHEETS 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 18 of 21 DATA SHEET 15 General Containment Inspection Results (Append sketches as necessary)

Page 1 of 2 Mat Foundation in Tendon Gallery Sketch Attached No.Tendon Grease Caps Sketch Attached _ No.Buttress 1 to 2 Sketch Attached _ No.Buttress 2 to 3 Sketch Attached _ No.Buttress 3 to 4 Sketch Attached No.Buttress 4 to 5 Sketch Attached No.46 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 520 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 66 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 15 General Containment Inspection Results Page 2 of 2 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 19 of 21 Buttress 5 to 6 Sketch Attached No.Buttress 6 to 1 Sketch Attached No..Dome Area Sketch Attached _ No.Cognizant Mech/Struct Engineer Reviewed By: Performed By: Date: Date: 47 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 521 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 67 of 415 ATTACHMENT I DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 16 Examiner Qualification Employer 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 20 of 21 Name of Examiner Method Level I have reviewed the records relevant to the experience and training of the above named individuals and have, as necessary, trained these individuals in the requirements applicable to the performance of visual examinations of the containment concrete surface. Based on this review and, if applicable, training, I find that these individuals are qualified to perform said examinations.

Responsible Engineer:

Name Registration State License No.Expiration Signature Date Exelon NDE Services Concurrence Date ANII Concurrence Date 48 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 522 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 68 of 415 ATTACHMENT 1 DATA SHEETS DATA SHEET 17 Review / Acceptance of Contractor Procedures Revision ReviewedlAccepted by 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 21 of 21 Date Procedure Number I Title 49 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 523 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 69 of 415 ATTACHMENT 2 SCOPE OF EACH REGULARY SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 1 of 5 (Random Selection Per GAI DC-5930-225.02-SE)

For Scope of the 2010 Augmented Surveillance and SGRP Tendons, See Attachment 5 This is a History Document and Shall be Updated After Each Inspection TABLE 1 Selected Tendons and Corresponding Inspection Periods VERTICAL TENDONS INSPECTION PERIOD Comments 1 --I Times (Adjacent Tendon 2 131 4 5 16 7 819 10 Ins. Tendons)11 X 1 Done 14 1 Done 16 X 1 Done 18 XI 1 Done 22 X 1 Done 24 X 1 Done 27 X 1 Done 30 X 1 Done 31 X 1 Done 32 X X X X X X 6 29, 33 Control 40 X 1 Done 48 X 1 Done 50 1 Done 53 X 1 52,54 55 X 1 Done 61 X 1 Done 66 X 1 65,67 72 X 1 Done 78 X 1 Done 84 X X 2 Done 86 X 1 Done 90 1 Done 97 X 1 Done 105 X 1 Done 108 X 1 107,109 114 X 1 Done 119 _X1X4 1 Done 126 X 1 Done 132 X 1 Done 138 X 1 Done 140 X 1 139, 141 146 1 Reference TR 203 152 SGR affected, 151, 153 158 X 1 Done 159 X 1 Replacement for 146 160 X 1 Done 164 ------ ---1 Done TOTAL 5 5 5 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 42 X : Lift-Off... .Lift-Off & Wire Test 50 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 524 of 1008 REP-1n098-510 Appendix E, Page 70 of 415 ATTACHMENT 2 SCOPE OF EACH REGULARY SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 2 of 5 TABLE 1 (Cont'd)Selected Tendons and Corresponding Inspection Periods HOOP TENDONS INSPECTION PERIOD Comments-2 3 4 5 I1 8 0 Times (Adjacent Tendon 2, InsP. Tendons)13-03 X 1 Scope Reselection 13-08 1 Scope Reselection 13-11 X 1 13-10, 13-12 13-28 X 1 Done 13-34 X 1 Done 13-36 X1 Done 13-41 1 Done 13-46 X 1 Done 13-50 X 1 Done 24-15 X 1 Scope Reselection 24-19 X1 Done 24-20 X1 Done 24-21 X 1 Done 24-23 Removed from scope 24-26_ _ 24-22, 24-24 24-26 X 1 Done 24-28 X 1 Done 24-30 X 1 Done 24-33 X 1 Done 24-40 X 1 Done 24-47 X 1 1 Done 24-48 X 1 Done 24-49 X 1 Done 24-50 Removed from scope 2451_ __ 24-49, 24-51 24-51 X 1 Done 35-02 X 1 Scope Reselection 35-10 X_ 1 Done 35-11 X 1 Done 35-16 X 1 Done 35-23 X 1 Done 35-26 X 1 Done 35-28 X 1 Done 35-29 X 1 Done 35-33 X 1 Done 35-47 9X 1 Done 35-49 X 1 35-48, 35-50 X = Lift-Off S.=- Lift-Off & Wire Test*Due to the expansion of accessible tendons to include tendons in the alligator pit, a complete Hoop Tendon Scope Reselection was performed for Inspection Period 10.51 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 525 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 71 of 415 ATTACHMENT 2 SCOPE OF EACH REGULARY SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE Table I (Cont'd)Selected Tendons and Corresponding Inspection Periods 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 3 of 5 HOOP TENDONS (Cont'd)INSPECTION PERIOD Comments Times (Adjacent T e n d o n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 0

• In ~s p T e n d o n s )46-24 X 1 Done 46-25 X 1 46-23, 46-26 46-28 X 1 Done 46-30 X'7 1 Done 46-32 X 1 Done 46-34 X .Done 46-37 X 1 Done 46-50 X 1 Done 51-11 X 1 Done 51-12 X 1 Done 51-13 X 1 Done 51-16 Removed from Scope 5143 _ _ 51-15, 51-17 51-43 X 1 Done 51-49 X 1 Done 62-10 X X 2 Done 62-11 X 1 Done 62-13 X 1 Done 62-16 X 1 Done 62-18 X 1 62-17, 62-19 62-26 X X X X X X X 7 62-25, 62-27 Control 62-28 X 1 Done 62-30 X 1 Done 62-41 Removed from Scope 62-47 _62-40, 62-42 62-47 '}X I: Done 62-49 X 1 Done 62-51 X 1 Done 62-53 X 1 Done TOTAL 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 65 X = Lift-Off X Lift-Off & Wire Test* Due to the expansion of accessible tendons to include tendons in the alligator pit, a complete Hoop Tendon Scope Reselection was performed for Inspection Period 10.52 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 526 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 72 of 415 ATTACHMENT 2 SCOPE OF EACH REGULARY SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 4 of 5 Table I (Contd)Selected Tendons and Corresponding Inspection Periods DOME TENDONS INSPECTION PERIOD Comments 1 1 1 Times (Adjacent Tendon 1 12 3 41 5 60 1]0 Insp. Tendons)101 X 1 Done 102 X 1 Done 104 X 1 Done*116 X 1 Done 122 X 1 Done 130 X 1 Done 131 X 1 Done 133 X 1 Done 141 X 1 Done 143 X 1 142,144 145 1X 1 Done 147 X 1 Done 148 X 1 Done 201 X I Done 202 X* 1 Done 203 X 1 Done 213 X 1 212,214 218 X X 2 Done 219 X 1 Done 220 X 1 Done 225 X X X X X X 6 224,226 Control 230 X 1 229,231 237 X__ X A 1 236,238 248 X-]_ 1 Done 301 .__X_. 1 Done 303 [X] 1 302,304 313 X 1 Done 314 X...X 1 Done 316 X 1 Done 322 ._X_ 1 Done 334 X 1 Done 336 1 Done 342 --I X 1 Done 346 X 1 Done 347 X 1 Done 348 X I 1 Done TOTAL 6 6 6 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 42 X= Lift-Off_ =. Lift-Off and Wire Test[X] = For plant on-line, inspect for corrosion, wire breakage and grease quality on end away from main steam relief valve zone. For plant off-line, perform all inspections including lift off measurements.

Plant off-line inspections committed for Inspection Period 9.D104 is exempt from detensioning as insufficient clearance from the adjoining vent stack (Buttress

5) to successfully access the tendon end exists. D102 has been selected as D104's (Cycle 7) substitute tendon per IWL-2521.1.

D104 shall be examined per Sections 8.2.1 through 8.2.6 and associated data sheets completed (IWL-2521.1

.[c]).53 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 527 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 73 of 415 ATTACHMENT 2 SCOPE OF EACH REGULARY SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE TABLE 2 Tendons Selected for Detensioning and Tendon Wire Removal/Lab Tests 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 5 of 5 Inspection Tendon Location Period Vertical Hoop Dome 1 V-27 H-35-10 D-301 2 V-1 19 H-62-47 D-202 3 V-1 8 H-46-30 D-336 4 V-14 H-35-26 D-314 5 V-50 H-46-34 D-145 6 V-78 H-35-47 D-248 7 V-164 H-13-50 D-102 8 V-140 H-46-25 D-230 9 V-90 H-51-49 D-322 10 V-159 H-13-03 D-237 54 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 528 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 74 of 415 ATTACHMENT 3 SCOPE OF EACH REGULARY SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 1 of 3 Inspection Abnormality Period Noted Commitment Comments 1 5/21/75 NONE NONE NONE-7/02/75 2 Tendon H-51-13 had Inspect H-51-13 buttonheads 8/17/77 -numerous cracked in period 3 to determine if NONE 11/11/77 buttonheads.

cracking continues.

3 V31 Lift off 3 Do lift off on V30 and V32 LER 81-010 sub -4/17/80 -kips low and in period 4. Reinspect to document incom-8/6/80 adjacent tendons V1 38 in period 4 to plete inspect, during not lifted off. better document the 1980 surveillance.

V138 Category corrosion and evaluate.

H-51-13 inspection 4 Corrosion showed no continued cracking.4 Lift off of V30 & V32 was 5/85 -NONE NONE performed with acceptable 6/85 results. The corrosion on V138 was evaluated

& found acceptable.

5 Some cracks During period 6 repeat 10/89 -appeared to have the concrete cracks 1/90 grown slightly inspection as required in NONE from previous.

Enclosure 6 (removed from procedure).

6 All SDR's accept condition(s) 9/94 -11/94 As captured in SDR's 1 None found with no further action and 9/95 through 6 required 7* Grout overlay repairs not Consider performing repairs 30 Year Exam completely sound (T.R.136, Sec. 4.3)SE quad above ring girder Reexamine rebar and/or 30 Year Exam-Grout cover coming off & consider grout repair Underlying rebar exposed (T. R. 136, Sec. 4.2)7* Construction joint above reexamine crack & ensure 30 Year Exam ring girder between stable D32ONE & D321 NE -Crack @ .018" wide (T.R.136, Sec. 4.5)Reference Topical Report (T.R.) No. 136, Tendon Surveillance 2 5 th Year (Period 7) for details surrounding the abnormalities noted and commitments made to the regulator in that Topical Report for Period 7.55 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 529 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 75 of 415 ATTACHMENT 3 ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COMMITMENTS DUE TO ABNORMALITIES 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 2 of 3 Inspection Abnormality Period Noted Commitment Comments 7* (Cont'd) Crack @ H46-37 @ .013" reexamine crack & ensure 30 Year Exam wide wlin 2' of base plate stable edge (T.R. 136, Sec. 4.7)Some grease samples Ensure grease samples w/ <.5 30 Year Exam exhibit Reserve Alkalinity retested per Unmodified Version No. < .5 ASTM D974 Sec. 9 for acid number V164 field end w/ nitrates @ Reexam of 2 nd sample found 30 Year Exam 10.3 ppm (T.R. 136, Sec. SAT. Resample V164 field end 4.8) to ensure nitrates stable.V86 -assurance of resample grease @ field end 30 Year Exam complete Tendon void V86 & top off with grease.grease fill not satisfied (T. R.136, Sec. -4.9)Some areas found spalled Reexam spalled areas -ensure 30 Year Exam during IWL exam (T.R. 136, stable and/or grout repair Sec. 4.4)Cracks found over FHB Perform VT-IC exam & ensure 30 Year Exam Roof between buttresses 3 stable w/ no active degradation

& 4 (T.R. 136, Sec. 4.1) Mechanism 8** Repairs required for grout, VT-I/VT-1C exams of all repairs 35 Year Exam 2004 concrete cracks, exposed listed in TR-183, Section 5.1 reinforcing steel, vertical tendon upper end bearing plate corrosion as listed in TR-183, Section 5.1 Overall concrete surface Re-examine VT-I1/VT-1 C of all 35 Year Exam degraded conditions as listed areas previously identified for in TR-183, Section 4.1, 4.2 detailed examination, but not repaired.D-342 tendon exams limited Do full set of tests and 35 Year Exam by location over Main steam examinations, during 2009 Safety Valve Discharge Refueling Outage, for D-342 piping Reference Topical Report (T.R.) No. 136, Tendon Surveillance 2 5 th Year (Period 7) for details surrounding the abnormalities noted and commitments made to the regulator in that Topical Report for Period 7.Reference Topical Report (T.R.) No. 183, Tendon Surveillance 3 0 th Year (Period 8) for details surrounding the abnormalities noted and commitments made to the regulator in that report.56 0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 530 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 76 of 415 ATTACHMENT 3 ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COMMITMENTS DUE TO ABNORMALITIES 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 3 of 3 Inspection Abnormality Noted Commitment Comments Period Containment Opening The surface of new concrete 1 Year SGRP Follow-up Exam Repair placed in the steam generator opening will be VT-1C examined at the new concrete perimeter and corners for evidence of shrinkage cracks /separation.

9*** Containment Opening The tendon gallery will be 1 Year SGRP Follow-up Exam Repair examined for evidence of CPM leakage and the effects of ground water seepage.9*** Incomplete pump through Verify CPM level and add as 1 Year SGRP Follow-up Exam of CPM in V157 necessary to V1 57 9*** Grout overlay of SE quad Perform Detailed Visual exam 40th Year Exam above ring girder, no & ensure stable w/ no active deterioration noted degradation Mechanism 9*** CPM leakage in Tendon Perform Detailed Visual exam 4 0 th Year Exam Gallery Ceiling Area of The tendon gallery ceiling area including base mat concrete, tendon bearing plates and tendon end caps for evidence of CPM leakage, effects ground water seepage on concrete and steel items, deterioration of previously documented exposed reinforcing and, other damage /deterioration.

9*** CPM seepage through Perform Detailed Visual exam 4 0 th Year Exam vertical cracks on lower of the lower wall above the wall above base mat. base mat to determine whether or not corrosion protection medium seepage through the vertical cracks is increasing as evidenced by CPM accumulation on the top of the base mat.9*** Light, inactive rust noted on Perform Detailed Visual exam 4 0 th Year Exam V84 bearing plate of V84 lower end bearing plate including all surface area visible without de-tensioning of the tendon and removal of shims.***Reference Topical Report (T.R.) No. 203, Tendon Surveillance 35th Year (Period 9) for details surrounding the abnormalities noted and commitments made to the regulator in that report.57 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 531 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 77 of 415 ATTACHMENT 4 ADDITIONAL INSPECTION COMMITMENTS DUE TO ABNORMALITIES Safe Access Guidelines for Tendon Work During Power Operations 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 1 of 1 LA 2'-4 w t A-MA.AEtýT C~i0-31A -i43 (1)Dome Insp.OK 771 (0 G)No, 4~NI ~VG('47-*sc d Q0Hmp T 4F 55".L=17.-v0 ld~ dOCH b Ll-i B..-J- --705?k* 1Tf NOTE (1) Additional review with Industrial Safety in 2009 expanded the acceptable work zone at power to include these buttress 6 areas.58 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 532 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 78 of 415 ATTACHMENT 6 MASTER LIST OF SGRP AFFECTED TENDONS AND SURVEILLANCE SCOPE This is a History Document and Shall be Updated After Each Surveillance 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 1 of 3 Table I List and Description of SGRP Affected Tendons and Corresponding Inspection Periods HOOP TENDONS Tendon SGRP Impact Inspection Period Comments 1 Year 10 11 12 13 46-42 Retensioned 46-41 Retensioned X 46-40 Retensioned 46-39 Replaced X ____46-38 Replaced 46-37 Replaced 46-36 Replaced 46-35 Replaced X 46-34 Replaced 46-33 Replaced 46-32 Replaced 46-31 Replaced 46-30 Replaced 46-29 Retensioned 46-28 Retensioned 51-42 Retensioned 61-41 Retensioned 51-40 Retensioned

--51-39 Replaced 51-38 Replaced 51-37 Replaced 51-36 Replaced 51-35 Replaced 51-34 Replaced 51-33 Replaced 51-32 Replaced 51-31 Replaced 51-30 Replaced 51-29 Replaced 51-28 Replaced Total 2 X = Lift-off X = Lift-off & Wire Test 59 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 533 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 79 of 415 ATTACHMENT 5 MASTER LIST OF SGRP AFFECTED TENDONS AND SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 2 of 3 Table 1 (Cont'd)List and Description of SGRP Affected Tendons and Corresponding Inspection Periods Vertical Tendons Tendon SGRP Impact Inspection Period Comments 1 Year 10 11 12 13 VI13 Retensioned V114 Retensioned V115 Retensioned X V116 Retensioned V117 Retensioned V118 Retensioned X.-V119 Retensioned V120 Retensioned V121 Retensioned VI 22 Retensioned V123 Retensioned V124 Retensioned V125 Retensioned V126 Retensioned V127 Retensioned V128 Retensioned V129 Retensioned V130 Retensioned V131 Replaced V1 32 Replaced VI 33 Replaced V134 Replaced X VI 35 Replaced V136 Replaced V137 Replaced V138 Replaced V139 Replaced V140 Replaced V141 Retensioned V142 Retensioned V143 Retensioned V144 Retensioned V145 Retensioned V146 Retensioned V147 Retensioned V148 Retensioned V149 Retensioned V150 Retensioned V151 Retensioned 60 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 534 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 80 of 415 ATTACHMENT 5 MASTER LIST OF SGRP AFFECTED TENDONS AND SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 1301-9.1 Revision 23 Page 3 of 3 Table I (Cont'd)List and Description of SGRP Affected Tendons and Corresponding Inspection Periods Vertical Tendons Tendon SGRP Impact Inspection Period Comments TednGPImat 1 Year 10 11 12 13 V152 Retensioned V153 Retensioned V154 Retensioned V155 Retensioned V156 Retensioned V167 Retensioned Total 2 X = Lift-off= Lift-off & Wire Test Table 2 SGRP Affected Tendons Selected for Detensioning and Tendon Wire Removal/Lab Tests Tendon Location Inspection Period Tical Hoop Vertical Hoop 1 Year V118 46-39 10 V136 51-40 11 12 13 61 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 535 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 81 of 415 QER-AA-330-005 A--_M, _Revision 10 A. -xeton G eneratlon Page 1 of 11 Level 3 -Information Use VISUAL EXAMINATION OF SECTION XI CLASS CC CONCRETE CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES

1. PURPOSE 1.1. The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that the structural integrity of ASME Class CC reinforced concrete is maintained.

Condition Assessment of Class CC reinforced concrete is achieved by the performance of visual examinations of the accessible surfaces.

All examinations will be performed so as to comply with Article IWL of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, 2001 Edition through the 2003 Addenda or the 2004 Edition as incorporated in plant's specific ISI Plan (or part of ISI Program Plan) or NRC approved alternative.(CM-1, CM-2, CM-3)1.2. This procedure is not applicable for the conduct of examination of concrete surrounding specific post tensioning system tendons that are selected for physical testing and visual examination to satisfy IWL-2524.1.2.1. Examination of concrete surrounding specific post-tensioning system is addressed under Exelon procedure ER-AA-330-006.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS Additional definitions may be found in Article IWA-9000 of ASME Section X1 and in ER-AA-330.

2.1. Accessible

Areas -Those areas of the containment reinforced concrete surface that are not covered by the liner, foundation material, or backfill, or otherwise obstructed by adjacent structures, components, parts, or appurtenances.

2.2. Code Class CC -Class CC represents the structural concrete pressure resisting shells and shell components, shell metallic liners, and penetration liners extending the containment liner through the surrounding shell concrete.2.3. Containment

-Structures and components designed to function as a barrier to ensure radioactive material released to the environment does not exceed the acceptable upper limit defined in 10CFRI1O or 10CFR50.67 as applicable, even if a loss of coolant accident were to occur.3. RESPONSIBILITIES

3.1. Responsible

Engineer (RE) shall be designated as provided in ER-AA-330 and is responsible for the following:

3.1.1. Development

of plans and procedures for examination of concrete surfaces Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 536 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 82 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 2 of 11 3.1.2. Approval, instruction, and training of concrete examination personnel 3.1.3. Evaluation of examination results 3.1.4. Preparation or review of Repair/Replacement Plans and procedures

3.1.5. Review

of procedures for pressure tests following repair/replacement activities

3.1.6. Submittal

of a report to the Owner (e.g., Plant Manager or designee, etc.) and Corporate Programs Engineering documenting the results of examinations, repair/replacement activities, and pressure testing in accordance with site procedures.

3.2. Site Program OwnerlManager, IWL Containment Inservice Inspection (CISI)3.2.1. ENSURE that the CISI Program Plan (or part of ISI Program Plan), applicable to Class CC components, is implemented to satisfy all Code and applicable augmented requirements as described in the CISI Program Plan.3.2.2. MAINTAIN and UPDATE IWL information in the CISI Program Plan (or part of ISI Program Plan) and implementing procedures.

Initiate CISI Program Plan (or part of ISI Program Plan) revisions, Requests for Relief, or invoke Code Cases applicable to the IWL Subsection, when necessary.

See ER-AA-330 for additional guidance.3.2.3. ENSURE the preparation/revision of plant drawings as applicable that identify Class CC components subject to IWL rules.3.2.4. ENSURE that any on-line, pre-outage, and/or outage work scopes are transmitted to the NDE organization in time to support the applicable scope freeze date.3.2.5. ENSURE that the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII) is notified in advance of planned examination scope and schedule to permit any inspections by the ANII.3.2.6. MAINTAIN and UPDATE the CISI/IWL information in the appropriate database upon completion of applicable surveillances.

3.2.7. ENSURE

that all applicable CISI Program Plan (or part of ISI Program Plan) or approved alternate requirements are met and the applicable concrete containment structures have been properly tested and examined.3.2.8. PREPARE the CISI/IWL information in the ISI Summary Report and ASME Owners reports (Form NIS-1 or NRC approved alternative forms), when required.

See Exelon procedure ER-AA-330 for additional guidance.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 537 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 83 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 3 of 11 4. MAIN BODY NOTE: NRC approved alternatives (e.g., NRC approved relief requests) are acceptable to implement in lieu of the specific steps identified this procedure to satisfy applicable ASME Section Xl requirements.

4.1. IDENTIFY

applicable examination scope, including any areas or components required augmented examinations.

4.2. ENSURE

the ANII is notified of planned Section XI examination scope and schedule at a time reasonably in advance to permit any inspections by the ANII.4.2.1. The best practice is to forward the Outage Schedule, Revision 0, to the ANII when it is published per Exelon procedure OU-AA-101 (i.e., P1.22 Outage Milestone).

4.3. Personnel

performing examinations to this procedure shall be certified in accordance with ER-AA-335-001, or an alternative Written Practice/Procedure approved by Exelon that complies with IWA-2300 requirements.

4.3.1. NDE certification records of applicable site personnel are maintained by the respective Site NDE Level III Examiner.4.4. The minimum illumination, maximum direct examination distance, and procedure demonstration requirements shall be as specified in ASME Section Xl, Subsection IWL-231 0 for General and Detailed Visual examination.

Alternative to the provisions of IWL-2310 may be used if approved by the NRC.4.5. Necessary equipment certification shall be current and shall not expire prior to the completion of the required examinations.

4.6. All scheduled visual examinations of Class CC concrete surfaces shall be performed in accordance with ER-AA-335-019 or alternative procedure approved by Exelon.4.7. A RE shall be identified to provide direction for the examination and perform necessary evaluations.

4.7.1. VERIFY

that the RE qualification is documented and consistent with the requirements of IWL-2320.4.8. IDENTIFY selected areas, such as those indicating suspect conditions, that shall receive a Detailed Visual examination, or a NRC approved alternative examination method. (Responsible Engineer)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 538 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 84 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 4 of 11 4.9. PERFORM General Visual examination, or NRC approved alternative examination method, of concrete surface areas and concrete surfaces at tendon anchorage areas (if applicable), including coated areas, for evidence of conditions indicative of damage, degradation, deterioration, or distress per IWL-231 0(a).4.9.1. Additional conditions to be examined for unbonded post-tensioning systems.1. Corrosion protection medium leakage from concrete surfaces and tendon anchorage areas.2. Tendon end caps deformation.

Tendon end cap(s) with evidence of deformation shall be removed for examination.

4.9.2. Class

CC concrete surface areas and surface at tendon anchorage areas (if applicable) shall be examined once every 5 years.1. Per 1OCFR5.55a, the date for visual examination of concrete surface may be different than the Section Xl required Containment Structural Integrity Test date.2. The date of the first visual examination of concrete performed prior to September 9, 2001 to satisfy 10CFR50.55a, Expedited Examination of Containment, shall be used to establish subsequent visual examination dates.4.9.3. The 10-year and subsequent examinations should commence not more than 1 year prior to specified dates and should be completed not more than 1 year after such dates.1. All Exelon nuclear sites are in the 10th year examination period or beyond.4.9.4. Concrete surface areas obstructed from direct visual examination are considered inaccessible and, therefore exempted from examination, as follows: 1. Surface areas covered by insulation that is permanently sealed by design to prevent the intrusion of moisture.2. Surface areas sealed by a moisture barrier that is designed to prevent intrusion of moisture, such as flashing and penetration seals boots.3. Access, for the examination personnel and equipment to conduct the direct visual examination of the surface area, is permanently obstructed.

4. Surface areas covered by the metallic liner, foundation material, or backfill.5. Access to the surface areas would require removal of existing plant equipment or structure and the original design did not provide sufficient space for removal and storage of plant equipment or structure.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 539 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 85 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 5 of 11 6. Access to the surface areas would require removal of existing plant equipment or structure and the original design did not provide a permanently installed handling machinery (e.g., hoist) to facilitate removal, disassembly, and storage.4.9.5. Visual examination may be performed from floors, roofs, platforms, walkways, ladders, ground surface, or other permanent vantage points, unless temporary close in access to suspect areas of concrete surface is required.4.9.6. PERFORM a Detailed Visual examination in accordance with IWL-2310(b) or NRC approved alternative examination method on those areas with suspect conditions identified by the General Visual examination.

4.10. EVALUATE all examination results in accordance with IWL-3210 of applicable ASME Section Xl Edition and/or Addenda. (Responsible Engineer)4.10.1. Appropriate documentation in accordance with the corrective action program (CAP)shall be initiated when the applicable Acceptance Standards of IWL-3211 are not met.1. The condition of the concrete surface and tendon end anchorage areas is acceptable if the RE determines that there is no evidence of damage or degradation sufficient to warrant further evaluation or performance of repair/replacement activities.

4.10.2. If the RE determines the as found condition of a containment structure that renders it unacceptable for continued service, then the Shift Manager or designee shall be notified.1. If significant structural degradation or leakage is discovered during inspection activities, then NOTIFY shift operations so they may determine if prompt NRC notification (within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />) is required, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii).

Significant degradation can be defined as serious flaws that significantly degrade plant safety and could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems needed to: A. Shutdown the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition; B. Remove residual heat;C. Control the release of radioactive material; or D. Mitigate the consequences of an accident.4.11. PERFORM an Engineering Evaluation if the examination results do not meet the applicable Acceptance Standards of IWL-321 1. (Responsible Engineer)4.11.1. If the Engineering Evaluation Report is not completed prior to the completion of the visual examination surveillance, then a CAP Tracking item should be initiated to Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 540 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 86 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 6 of 11 track the completion of this evaluation in a timely manner per applicable procedures, such as within 90-days of the completion of the visual examination surveillance.

4.11.2. The Engineering Evaluation Report shall include, as a minimum, the following:

1. The cause of the condition that does not meet the acceptance standards.

2. The applicability of the condition to the other unit at the same site.3. The acceptability of the concrete containment without repair of the item.4. Whether or not repair or replacement is required and, if required, the extent, method, and completion date for the repair or replacement

5. The extent, nature, and frequency of additional examinations.

4.12. The Engineering Evaluation Report shall be retained and be subject to review by the site regulatory and enforcement authorities at each site.4.13. If repairs within the scope of IWL-4000 are required, then 4.13.1. A Repair/Replacement Plan in accordance with IWA-4150 shall be developed under the direction of the RE.4.13.2. The repaired areas shall be examined per IWL-4300.4.14. If non-cosmetic repairs or replacements are required, then DETERMINE if pressure testing in accordance with ASME Section Xl, IWL-5000, is required.4.15. An evaluation per 10CFR50.55a, shall be performed to determine the acceptability of the inaccessible areas, when conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of or result in degradation of inaccessible areas.4.15.1. If the evaluation is not completed prior to the completion of the visual examination surveillance, then a CAP Tracking item should be initiated to track the completion of this evaluation.

4.15.2. The evaluation should be completed:

1. Prior to unit start-up if the condition was identified during a unit outage.2. In a timely manner as directed by applicable procedures, such as within 90-days of the completion of the visual examination surveillance, if the condition is identified when the unit is On-Line.4.16. The following information shall be provided in the evaluation of acceptability of each inaccessible area identified in 4.15.4.16.1. A description of the type and estimated extent of the degradation, and the conditions that led to the degradation; Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 541 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 87 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 7 of 11 4.16.2. An evaluation of each area, and the result of each evaluation, and;4.16.3. A description of the necessary corrective actions.4.17. UPDATE the appropriate CISI program document(s) and the applicable database to incorporate completed examinations and any deferred examinations.

4.17.1. If the update is not completed, then INITIATE a Passport/PIMS Tracking item to track the completion of this update.4.18. Attachment 1, Execution of Examination Checklist, may be used to document detailed examination execution.

5. DOCUMENTATION 5.1. See procedure ER-AA-330, Section 5.0 for documentation requirements.

5.2. REPORT

in the ISI Summary Report as required by ASME Section Xl, IWA-6000, or NRC approved alternative, the evaluation that determines acceptability of inaccessible area(s) if conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of or result in degradation of inaccessible areas. (Step 4.16)6. REFERENCES 6.1. ASME Section Xl Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2001 Edition through 2003 Addenda, and 2004 Edition.6.2. The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50.55(a), Part 50.67, and Part 100 6.3. Exelon Nuclear Site Technical Specifications and Technical Requirements Manuals 6.4. ER-AA-330, Conduct of Inservice Inspection Activities 6.5. ER-AA-335-001, Qualification and Certification of Nondestructive (NDE) Personnel 6.6. ER-AA-335-019, Visual Examination of IWL Class CC Containment Components 6.7. OU-AA-101, Refuel Outage Management

6.8. Station

Commitments

6.8.1. Three

Mile Island CM-1 Action Tracking Item AR 603573.25, License Renewal Aging Management ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL. (Step 1.1)CM-2 Action Tracking Item AR 603573.38, License Renewal Aging Management Concrete Containment Tendon Prestress. (Step 1.1)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 542 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 88 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 8 of 11 6.8.2 Limerick CM-3 T04744 Limerick License Renewal Commitment, ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL Aging Management Program. (Step 1.1)7. ATTACHMENTS

7.1. Attachment

1: Execution of Examination Checklist Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 543 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 89 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 9 of 11 ATTACHMENT I Execution of Examination Checklist Page 1 of 3 1. RECORD the Exelon Nuclear Site/Unit for which this surveillance is being performed.

Exelon Nuclear Site: Unit: 2. VERIFY personnel assigned to perform examinations per this procedure have a minimum of Level II certification in the VT-'IC and/or VT-3C methods in accordance with ER-AA-335-001.

Alternative certification may be used if approved by the NRC.3. VERIFY the procedures have been processed and approved per the appropriate site procedures, if contractor procedures are being used.4. VERIFY contractor personnel certification status has been reviewed and approved per appropriate corporate and/or site procedures, if contractor personnel are used to perform examinations.

5. VERIFY equipment certification is current and will not expire prior to completing the examinations, if certified test equipment is going to be used (e.g. calibrated light meters).6. DEFINE the scope of areas and components selected for examination, utilizing site __administrative procedures, Containment Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program Plan (or part of ISI Program Plan), Database, and selection documents.

1. REVIEW the examination scope. (Responsible Engineer)2. INCLUDE listing of the components and areas selected for examination as an attachment to this procedure.

A computer generated listing is recommended.

7. IDENTIFY any areas or components that require an augmented examination.(Responsible Engineer)1. Results of previous examinations shall be reviewed to identify areas or components that require augmented examination.

8. VERIFY drawings, computer-generated listings, etc. are available for field personnel to use during the examinations.

9. REVIEW examination scope with Radiation Protection, if applicable.

1. VERIFY an approved Radiation Work Permit exists for the examinations that are to be performed.

10. VERIFY Work Requests have been generated to address any scaffold erection that may be required to perform the examinations.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 544 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 90 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 10 of 11 ATTACHMENT I Execution of Examination Checklist Page 2 of 3 11. VERIFY personnel assigned to perform examinations, evaluations and reporting have been briefed and are familiar with examination scope and contents of this procedure.

12. VERIFY the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII) has been provided advance notification of scope of examinations to be performed.

13. OBTAIN permission to perform this surveillance per applicable Site procedures.

14. PERFORM General Visual, Detailed Visual examinations in accordance with ER-AA-335-019, as applicable.

Alternative examination method may be used if approved by the NRC.15. VERIFY all scheduled examinations and augmented examinations assigned by the Responsible Engineer have been completed.

16. VERIFY all examination results have been reviewed, compared to acceptance standards specified for the examinations and evaluated by the Responsible Engineer in accordance with step 4.10 of the MAIN BODY.1. The condition of the concrete surface and tendon anchorage areas is acceptable if the RE determines that there is no evidence of damage or degradation sufficient to warrant further evaluation or performance of repair/replacement activities.

2. INITITATE an IR when required by 4.10.1 of the MAIN BODY.-RECORD IR No.17. VERIFY the Responsible Engineer has completed the Engineering Evaluation Reports (if required) in accordance with step 4.11 of the MAIN BODY 1. RECORD CAP Tracking Number(s): (N/A if CAP Tracking Items are not required.)

18. VERIFY a CAP Tracking Item has been assigned to track completion of evaluation as specified in Step 4.15 of the MAIN BODY.1. RECORD CAP Tracking Number(s): (N/A if CAP Tracking Items are not required.)

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 545 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 91 of 415 ER-AA-330-005 Revision 10 Page 11 of 11 ATTACHMENT 1 Execution of Examination Checklist Page 3 of 3 19. VERIFY a CAP Tracking Item has been assigned to ensure the reporting requirements as specified in step 4.16 of the MAIN BODY are met.1. RECORD CAP Tracking Item Number: (N/A if CAP Tracking Items are not required.)

20. VERIFY a CAP Tracking Item has been assigned for all augmented or special examinations that, as a result of degradation identified during this surveillance, are required to be performed in the future.1. RECORD CAP Tracking Number(s): (N/A if CAP Tracking Items are not required.)

21. GENERATE a Passport/PIMS Action Tracking Item to complete updating the ISI database with the results of this examination as well as successive exams to be completed in future inspection period. The Action Tracking Item shall contain this statement: "If the update is not completed within 12 months, then initiate an IR to track the completion of this update".1. RECORD Passport/PIMS Tracking Number(s): (N/A if Passport/PIMS Tracking Items are not required.)

22. ASSEMBLE the following completed documentation, as a minimum:-Applicable examination forms from ER-AA-335-019.

-Engineering Evaluations and Reports, if applicable.

-Updated listing or computer generated print out of components and areas examined during this inspection period.23. DOCUMENT and ROUTE the completed surveillance package in accordance with applicable corporate and/or site procedures.

COMMENTS: Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 546 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 92 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 E e lqiffftRevision 7 AWI,""n. iPage 1 of 50 Nuclear Level 3 -Information Use INSERVICE INSPECTION AND TESTING OF THE PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE CONTAINMENT POST TENSIONING SYSTEMS 1. PURPOSE 1.1. This procedure describes requirements, instructions and acceptance standards for inservice inspection/testing of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Class CC prestressed concrete post tensioning systems (tendons) for Byron, Braidwood, Three Mile Island (TMI), and LaSalle Stations.

This procedure encompasses only inspection and testing requirements for metallic portion of post tensioning systems and concrete surrounding tendon anchorage components.

The requirements, instructions, and acceptance standards contained here are in accordance with the provisions of Regulatory documents and ASME Section Xl, Subsection IWL, with specific Edition and Addenda stated in site specific Containment Inservice Inspection (CISI). (CM-1, CM-2)1.2. This procedure shall be used for:-Selection of containment tendons for visual examination and physical testing.-Obtaining Tendon Force Data prior to performing physical testing.-Execution and documentation of examinations and tests.-Evaluation of results of examinations and tests.-Resolution of conditions which do not meet acceptance standards.

-Requirements for additional examinations and tests when acceptance standards as specified in this procedure are not met.-Reporting requirements for conditions which do not meet acceptance standards.

1.3. Pursuant

to applicable Site Technical Specifications (Tech Spec) and Tech Spec Technical Requirements Manual (TRM), this procedure is applicable in all modes of plant operation.

2. MATERIAL AND SPECIAL EQUIPMENT The following material are recommended (but not limited to) for use prior to executing this procedure (The required quantities of these materials is dependent upon the quantity of components scheduled for examination.

The quantities should be sufficient to accommodate expanded inspections and tests as applicable.

Allow adequate lead time for material procurement.

Some material may be furnished by the contractors as part of their work scope):-Grease can gaskets-Approved solvents used to clean tendon anchorage components Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 547 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 93 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 2 of 50 0 Anchorage shims of 0.125", 0.250", 0.500", 0.750", and 1.00" thickness should be available for use.ENSURE anchorage shims meet site-specific material specification requirements.

-Sheathing Filler Grease-ENSURE sheathing filler grease meets site-specific material and chemical content specification requirements.

-Swing stages, platforms, and scaffolds-ENSURE scaffolds meet station procedural requirements.

-Communication equipment.

-Rigging and lifting devices.-Calibrated jacks / rams with adequate capacity used to measure lift off forces, detension tendons, and retension tendons.-ENSURE jacks / rams are of proper configuration for specific site application.

-Special equipment used to measure yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and elongation for wire samples that are removed from detensioned tendons.Special inspection equipment such as feeler gauges, dial indicators, micrometers, pit gauges, thread gauges, mirrors, calibrated light meters, specialized lighting, and thermometers used for determining the condition of wire, anchorage components and concrete.Specialized equipment used for installing sheathing filler grease into tendon components, including pumps, hoses, connectors, calibrated gauges and heaters.Special equipment and tools for operating electrical and mechanical components.

3. PRECAUTIONS.

LIMITATIONS.

AND PREREQUISITES

3.1. Precautions

3.1.1. EXERCISE

extreme caution when working around containment tendons or coiled tendon wires since they are stressed to extremely high forces. Do not stand near tendon anchorage when under load with stressing ram or jack.3.1.2. COMPLETE tendon inspection as soon as possible after the start in order to avoid unnecessary exposure of anchorage head. Otherwise, protect anchorage head from dirt, moisture and grease.3.1.3. NEVER STRIKE anchorage components with metallic objects.-USE care to avoid damage to the tendon buttonheads.

-AVOID unnecessary marks on tendon wires when removing.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 548 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 94 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 3 of 50 3.1.4. USE only non-metallic tools such as plastic scrapers to clean tendon anchorage components.

The use of metallic tools that have the potential to scratch anchorage components is prohibited.

3.1.5. ADHERE

to personal safety policies and procedures while executing tests and examinations in accordance with this procedure.

-Contractor personnel shall comply with Exelon Safety and Health Manual while on site conducting test and examinations.

3.1.6. PUT in place contingency plans including escape routes prior to working on containment domes while at power operation.

Extended occupation of areas above Main Steam System Relief Valve discharge piping is prohibited.

-At TMI, access to some areas over the Main Steam Relief Valves are prohibited.

3.1.7. ENSURE

all requirements of applicable Radiation Work Permits are met throughout the inspection period, as required.3.1.8. ENSURE all requirements that pertain to entry into confined spaces are met throughout the inspection period.3.1.9. EXERCISE caution when working near high temperature components as applicable.

-WEAR protective clothing.3.1.10. EXERCISE caution to prevent slips and falls since potential for free standing water in containment tunnels and galleries exist.3.1.11. EXERCISE caution when climbing tendon buttress and gallery ladders. The potential for slippery surfaces created by grease on shoes exists. Ladder rungs, etc.shall be wiped clean if coated in grease.3.1.12. EXERCISE caution when performing surveillances so that plant operating conditions are not jeopardized.

-CONTACT the RE or appropriate individuals immediately when unsafe conditions are encountered before proceeding further.3.1.13. OBTAIN approval prior to transporting heavy equipment through restricted load paths or if using lifting arrangements in unconventional ways.-CONSULT site specific lifting / handling procedures.

3.1.14. ENSURE surfaces on which scaffolds and lifting devices rest on are protected against damage.3.1.15. PROTECT all surfaces from grease, oil and debris as spillage will result in surface degradation.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 549 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 95 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 4 of 50 3.1.16. ENSURE connections are adequate and equipment is in acceptable condition prior to start of greasing operations to prevent accidents since tendon grease is pumped under pressure approaching 150 psig and temperatures approaching 200 0 F.3.1.17. CONSULT site specific fire protection procedures prior to cutting, grinding, or grease heating operations.

3.1.18. TAKE samples of sheathing filler grease from areas from surface of anchorage components such as anchor head face, shims and button heads. Samples collected for analysis shall not contain free water.-Thoroughly MIX samples prior to analysis.

Containers used for samples shall be chemically inert.3.1.19. COMPLETE regreasing in a reasonably timely manner after removal of end caps.3.2. Limitations

3.2.1. REVIEW

Tech Spec, TRM, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), and CISI Plan prior to implementation of this procedure.

NOTE: Each of the Braidwood, Byron, and LaSalle sites have two units. The two units on each respective site utilize the same pre-stressing system, are essentially identical in design, and are similarly exposed to and protected from the outside environments.

Post tensioning operations of the two Braidwood units was completed within a two-year period. Post tensioning operations of the two Byron units was completed within a two-year period.The LaSalle units are considered as twin containment structures even though post tensioning of the two units and the Structural Integrity Tests (SITS) were not completed within a two-year period. Regulatory approval of this position was obtained through an amendment to the LaSalle Technical Specifications.

3.2.2. EXAMINE

tendons, tendon anchorage areas, and corrosion protection medium and free water in accordance with the schedule listed in Table 1.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 550 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 96 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 5 of 50 3.2.3. SELECT tendons randomly to be examined and tested with the exception of the common/control tendons in Table 4.-The population from which random sample is selected shall consist of all tendons not examined during previous inspections.

Tendons included in scope of augmented inspections that were not performed to meet requirements of Table IWL-2521-1 may be included in scope (e.g. annual examinations for free water). The quantity of tendons to be examined shall be based on tendon type (Vertical, Dome, Horizontal), inspection period and previous inspection results.3.2.4. SELECT only one tendon from each sample type to be completely detensioned.

3.2.5. EXAMINE

both shop and field ends of each tendon. Tables 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D specify minimum quantity of tendons to be examined during each unit inspection provided acceptance standards 4.4.5 were met during the last three inspections.

3.2.6. IMPLEMENT

the expanded test sample size for a tendon type if the conditions of 3.2.5 were not met for that tendon type during any previous inspections or during inspection currently being executed.

The sample size shall only be applied for the specific tendon type in the applicable Unit. The sample size as specified in Table 3A, 3B, 30 or 3D shall be applicable for tendon type in the affected Unit during each inspection period for the remaining Unit service life unless relief has been obtained.3.2.7. EXAMINE control tendons during each inspection period to determine if conditions within the prestressed post tensioning systems are changing.

Common tendons shall not be detensioned unless specifically directed as part of a sample expansion due to identified degradation.

-SELECT another tendon of the same type from the first year inspection sample if a common tendon is detensioned.

-INCLUDE common tendon of each tendon type as one of the tendons in the quantities specified for examination.

Table 4 specifies tendons that have been designated as common or control tendons for each unit.NOTE: Byron/Braidwood Dome tendons are not accessible for examination during power operation because of safety or radiological hazards: Unit 1 -Azimuth 201.670 to Azimuth 230.330 Azimuth 312.670 to Azimuth 341.331 Unit 2 -Azimuth 198.670 to Azimuth 227.330 Azimuth 309.670 to Azimuth 338.330 TMI Dome and Hoop tendons with end caps located above the main steam safety valves are not accessible for Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 551 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 97 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 6 of 50 examination during power operation because of safety hazards. (Ref. 7.9)3.2.8. After randomly selecting tendons for examination and testing, IDENTIFY any tendons that are deemed inaccessible for examination due to safety/radiological hazards or structural obstructions and DESIGNATE these tendons as exempt tendons for this examination and test campaign.1. SELECT substitute tendons for all exempt tendons.A. Each substitute tendon shall be selected so it is as close as possible to the exempt tendon.1. Each substitute tendon is subject to the examination requirements of Section Xl IWL-2520.2. In addition to examination and testing of substitute tendons, EXAMINE each exempt tendon during operation or an outage to the extent that the end anchorages of the exempt tendons are accessible.

A. Detailed visual examination of all anchorage hardwares, and surrounding concrete extending outward to a distance of 2 ft, including documentation of free water contained in the anchorage end cap and any water drains from the tendon during the examination process, in accordance with IWL-2524.B. Sample and analysis of corrosion protection medium and free water if present in sufficient quantity for laboratory analysis in accordance with IWL-2525.3. GENERATE Action tracking Item(s) (or equivalent) to ensure these requirements are met during the time in which the tendon anchorage is accessible.

A. RECORD Action Tracking Item Number(s)3.2.9. USE criteria specified in NRC Reg. Guide 1.35.1, 1990 to determine the prestressing forces.1. Additional guidelines applicable to Byron, Braidwood, and LaSalle are provided in Ref. 7.8.3.2.10. USE liftoff or an equivalent method to measure prestressing force in all inspection sample tendons.3.2.11. USE the feeler gauge method to initially measure lift off forces. The alternate method may be used as a supplemental method for performing the test. The Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 552 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 98 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 7 of 50 alternate method may be used without prior use of the feeler gauge method if approved by the RE.3.2.12. For each tendon scheduled for physical testing and wire inspection

/ testing, VERIFY that quantity of effective wires and condition of wires identified during as found examinations (per Attachment 1 of this procedure) are recorded in Table 6 for comparison and evaluation purposes.3.2.13. LIMIT forces achieved during measurement of lift off forces (or detensioning forces)and retensioning forces to less than or equal to 80% of specified minimum ultimate tensile strength of tendons based upon as found quantity of effective wires.3.2.14. RETENSION tendons that have been completely detensioned to at least the predicted force for tendons at the time of test.1. The final force (lock off force) achieved shall not exceed 70% of specified minimum ultimate tensile strength of tendons based on number of effective wires in tendons at the time of retensioning.

3.2.15. ENSURE measured diameter of the test tendon wire is at minimum 0.25" with tolerance of -0.002".3.2.16. CALIBRATE applicable test and measurement equipment used in execution of this procedure in accordance with calibration procedures and national standards.

NOTE: Due consideration shall be given to adverse impact a late post-surveillance equipment calibration verification may have on meeting the scheduling requirements of Table 1.1. CALIBRATE equipment used to measure tendon forces within 6 months prior to the first tendon force measurement and within 3 months following the force measurement of the last tendon measured during inspection period.A. If vendor equipment is used, then ENSURE equipment has not been used at other sites following the calibration that is completed prior to the first tendon force measurement.

B. Accuracy of the calibration shall be within 1.5% of specified minimum ultimate strength of the tendon(s).

C. If the post-test calibration differs from the pre-test calibration by more than the specified accuracy tolerance, the results of the examination shall be evaluated.

2. An Action Tracking Item(s) (or equivalent) should be generated for this purpose.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 553 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 99 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 8 of 50 A. RECORD Action Tracking Item Number(s)3.2.17. PERFORM repair / replacement of concrete and post tensioning systems (tendons)in accordance with requirements of the ASME B&PV Code,Section XI, IWA-4000 and IWL-4000, applicable Edition and Addenda.3.2.18. SUBSTITUTE computerized listings and tables for manual recording of information in tables included in this procedure provided computerized listings are clearly identified as such and listings contain, as a minimum, the required information of applicable table.3.2.19. RECORD initials of individuals performing applicable steps and the dates steps were performed in designated steps in this procedure, tables, and attachments

1. Allow the use of alternative tables and attachments provided they meet the requirements of the table/attachments.

3.2.20. PERFORM a detailed analysis to ensure that the stresses in the containment are acceptable in order to prevent delamination of the concrete wall prior to performing any activities that require detensioning of more than one tendon per group. (Ref.7.11)Unless specified otherwise, the steps in sections 3.3 and 4.1 may be performed out of sequence.3.3. Prerequisites

3.3.1. VERIFY

vendor: 1. has quality assurance programs in place that meet requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, 2. is approved for performing work at the station, 3. procedures used to perform inspections and tests described herein have been approved for use per station procedures.

These procedures and manuals shall be included as attachments to this procedure.

4. is equipped to perform services for performance of tasked surveillances.

5. conducts training and indoctrination, if any, in accordance with station specific requirements.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 554 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 100 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 9 of 50 3.3.2. VERIFY personnel assigned to perform visual examinations on tendon anchorage hardware, including bearing plates, anchor heads, wedges, button heads, and shims have at least Level II certification in the VT-I, Detailed Visual, VT-3, General Visual examination method(s), as applicable.

Alternative certification may be used if approved by the NRC. Refer to procedure ER-AA-335-019 for visual examination requirements.

3.3.3. VERIFY

personnel assigned to perform visual examinations on concrete surrounding immediate areas of post tensioning system tendon bearing plates have at least Level II certification in the VT-1C or Detailed Visual examination method, as applicable.

Alternative certification may be used if approved by the NRC. Refer to procedure ER-AA-335-019 for visual examination requirements.

3.3.4. VERIFY

a RE is available to perform evaluations as required by this procedure.

1. VERIFY that the RE qualification is documented and consistent with the requirements of IWL-2320.3.3.5. VERIFY ANII has been notified of scope of components to be examined and tested during this inspection period. The ANII shall be provided ample notice so he/she may be afforded the opportunity to witness exams and testing.3.3.6. VERIFY calibration records and procedures for all equipment used during execution of this procedure have been provided to ANII for review prior to start of inspections and tests. Include calibration records as attachments to this procedure.

3.3.7. VERIFY

certification and qualification records for personnel performing examinations and tests have been provided to ANII for review. Include certification records as attachments to this procedure.

3.3.8. VERIFY

containers used to collect sheathing filler grease and free water samples are clean, dry, and capable of being tightly closed. The containers shall be chemically inert to ensure reliable laboratory results.3.3.9. VERIFY personnel required to enter confined spaces have received training.3.3.10. VERIFY adequate support from Radiation Protection is available to support execution of this procedure.

3.3.11. VERIFY adequate lighting exists in tendon galleries, tunnels and buttresses.

1. The illumination requirements of ASME Section XI, applicable Edition/Addenda shall be met when performing the required visual examination on tendon anchorage areas, including the surrounding concrete.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 555 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 101 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 10 of 50 3.3.12. CONTACT station hazardous materials coordinator for guidance on type of container (barrel, etc.) to use and logistics pertaining to disposal of waste grease and solvents.1. ENSURE all combustibles receive applicable evaluation prior to use and receptacles containing combustible material are clearly identified with labels as such.3.3.13. VERIFY visual inspection equipment are available for use. Reference visual examination procedure ER-AA-335-019 for specific requirements.

3.3.14. VERIFY personnel have been trained on the use of fall protection devices that may be required during execution of this procedure.

1. VERIFY job hazard analysis has been completed.

3.3.15. VERIFY selection of tendons for examination and testing is complete.1. Complete information in Table 5.2. Include supporting documentation generated to substantiate tendons were selected on a random basis either as attachments to this procedure or reference to a controlled basis document/calculation.

3.3.16. VERIFY population of selected tendons meets requirements of 3.2.3 through 3.2.8.3.3.17. RECORD in Table 6, for all selected tendons, and when necessary, tendons adjacent to those scheduled for physical testing and visual inspection, the following baseline information required to perform this procedure:

1. Quantity of previously identified broken or missing wires that were documented and accepted during construction or previous inspection. (Obtain from construction records or previous inservice inspection records)2. Quantity of unseated or protruding wires that were documented and accepted during construction or previous inspection. (Obtain from construction records or previous inservice inspection records)3. Net duct volume of the tendon. Tendon configurations vary significantly.

Tendons that traverse around penetrations require more sheathing filler grease to fill the duct. Therefore, net duct volume for each tendon shall be determined on an individual basis. Include documentation generated to determine net duct volume of each tendon as attachments to this procedure or reference to a controlled basis document/calculation.

4. Identification of areas of cracking, pitting, corrosion, or shim stack irregularities that were observed and documented during construction or Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 556 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 102 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 11 of 50 previous inspection by reviewing applicable records. Document in"comments" area in Table 6.3.3.18. RECORD in Table 7, for each of tendons selected for physical testing, and when necessary, those adjacent to them, the following design information:

1. Minimum Design Force (kips)2. Predicted Force (kips). See guidelines in Ref. 7.8 for determining prestress losses and predicted forces.3. Quantity of Effective Wires. Obtain by subtracting quantity of broken and missing, protruding, and unseated wires as specified in Table 6 (consult both prior to and after start of inspection tables), from maximum quantity of wires installed in tendons. The maximum is as follows: Braidwood and Byron I Tendons: 170 (min. design requirement is 167 wires fo Byron/Braidwood)

F TIVII rTe_=ndons.:

169 F LaSalle Tendons:=7 90 4. GUTS -This value is equal to number of effective wires in tendon multiplied by wire's ultimate tensile strength.

The ultimate tensile strength of each effective wire is as follows.I Braidwood, Byron, and TMI I I. .1 1 11.779 kips II I.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 557 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 103 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 12 of 50 , LasalleI Varies I 3.3.19. REVIEW results of previous inspections and station commitments.

1. ENSURE augmented exams and tests are included in addition to the scope of tendons selected for inspection and testing during this inspection period.3.3.20. NOTIFY shift manager/control room of the scope of work 1. OBTAIN permission to perform this procedure.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 558 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 104 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 13 of 50 3.4. Terms and Definitions

3.4.1. Active

Corrosion:

Corrosion on a component that exhibits metal loss that has occurred since fabrication or construction, and / or exhibits pitting visible to the naked eye. Active corrosion usually is a reddish / rust color 3.4.2. Alternate Lift Off Method: Alternate method to determine lift off force by measuring jack pressure versus distance the anchorage has moved during stressing.

A plotted graph is used to depict the as found data when performing this method.3.4.3. Anchorage:

The round machined components at the end of each tendon through which the tendon wires are passed. The anchorage contains a field end or shop end component, bushing in some cases, and shims.3.4.4. Broken Wire: A wire within a tendon assembly that is broken and not capable of accepting prestressed load.3.4.5. Buttonhead:

The end of the tendon wire that was mechanically deformed during construction or in the shop, which seats on each anchorage.

3.4.6. Common

or Control Tendon: A tendon from a tendon type (as defined in Table IWL-2521-1) selected from the first year inspection sample.3.4.7. Continuity Test: A method of determining if wires are intact and not broken within a tendon. This is an optional test that may be recommended as a corrective action if abnormal degradation is identified.

3.4.8. Corrosion

Protection Medium: Grease injected into tendon duct and anchorage cans for corrosion protection.

Also referred to as grease or sheathing filler grease.3.4.9. Effective Wire: Tendon wire capable of maintaining required post tensioned force.3.4.10. Elongation:

The distance a tendon / wire stretches while under stress.3.4.11. Feeler Gauge Method: The method used to determine lift off during a test that utilizes the placement of feeler gauges beneath the anchor end while the tendon is under jack / ram load.3.4.12. Field End: The end of the tendon on which buttonheads are formed after the tendon is installed.

The field end usually does not have a bushing.3.4.13. Free Water: Any quantity of water collected from tendon grease cans, anchorage components, shim gaps, or tendon duct.3.4.14. Guaranteed Minimum Ultimate Tensile Strength (GUTS): The tensile strength of the tendon assembly based upon the tensile strength of the wire used in construction and the quantity of effective wires.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 559 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 105 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 14 of 50 3.4.15. Inspection Period: The period in which an inspection is completed at a specific site.3.4.16. Lift Off Force: The actual force or pressure required to lift the anchor head off the tendon anchorage assembly shim stack.3.4.17. Lock Off Force: The final seating force of a tendon after tensioning during construction or retensioning thereafter.

3.4.18. Minimum Design Force (kips): The minimum acceptable prestress force for a tendon or group of tendons to maintain the design basis of the containment structure.

3.4.19. Missing Wire: A wire that is identified as missing from the tendon.3.4.20. Net Duct Volume: The volume within a tendon duct that is capable of being filled with corrosion protection medium. This is the gross duct volume minus the volume taken by the tendon wires and components.

3.4.21. Overstress Force: The maximum force that can be applied to a tendon during lift off testing. This force may be as high as 80% of the tendon's ultimate tensile strength.3.4.22. Post Tensioning:

A method of prestressing concrete in which the tendons are tensioned after the concrete has cured.3.4.23. Predicted Force: The precalculated force based upon the measurement of prestressing forces during installation minus the losses in prestressing forces that were predicted to have occurred since that time because of material and structural characteristics.

This is the calculated minimum force that should be required to achieve lift off. This value is the acceptance standards for measuring pre stress forces. The as found value should be equal to or exceed this value.3.4.24. Prestressed Concrete:

Reinforced concrete in which there have been introduced internal stresses of such magnitude and distribution that the stresses resulting from loads are counteracted to a desired degree.3.4.25. Pretensioning Force: The force achieved during retensioning where the slack and mechanical clearances have been removed.3.4.26. Protruding or Unseated Wire: A wire within a tendon assembly that is extending beyond a tendon anchorage after stressing and is not seated against the anchorage.

The wire must be evaluated.

3.4.27. Repair/Replacement:

A repair or replacement activity as defined in IWA-4000 and IWL-4000.0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 560 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 106 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 15 of 50 3.4.28. Regression Analysis:

The determination, based upon evaluation of measured forces, of the capability of a tendon or group of tendons to maintain the minimum design prestress force(s) until the next scheduled inspection or beyond.3.4.29. Responsible Engineer:

A Registered Professional Engineer as defined in ASME Section XI Subsection IWL experienced in evaluating the inservice condition of structural concrete.

The Responsible Engineer shall have knowledge of the design and construction codes and other criteria used in the design and construction of concrete containment structures in nuclear power plants.3.4.30. Shim Stack: A series of steel shims installed between the anchor head and bearing plate so that the desired prestress force is obtained.

They must be installed in pairs.3.4.31. Shop End: The end of a tendon on which the buttonheads are formed prior to installation.

This buttonheads are formed in a shop environment and not in the field.The shop end of a tendon has a bushing.3.4.32. Tendon: A separate continuous multiwire tensioned element anchored at both ends to an end anchorage assembly.

An assembly of prestressing steel and anchorage components which imparts prestressing forces to concrete.3.4.33. Tendon Group: Groups based upon geometry and position in the containment structure.

Horizontal or hoop, vertical, and dome tendon groups are applicable to Braidwood, Byron, and TMI. Horizontal and vertical tendon groups are applicable to LaSalle.3.4.34. Tendon Type: A tendon type is defined by its geometry and position in the containment structure; e.g., horizontal (hoop), vertical, and dome.3.5. Responsibilities

3.5.1. Responsible

Engineer (RE) shall be designated as provided in ER-AA-330, and is responsible for the following:

1. Development of plans and procedures for examination of concrete surfaces.2. Approval, instruction, and training of concrete examination personnel.

3. Evaluation of examination results.4. Preparation or review of Repair/Replacement Plans and repair/replacement procedures.

5. Review of procedures for pressure testing (e.g., Appendix J) that is performed following repair/replacement activities.

6. Submittal of a report to the Owner documenting results of examinations, repair/replacement activities, and pressure tests.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 561 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 107 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 16 of 50 3.5.2. Site Program Owner is responsible for: 1. Ensuring the requirements of this procedure and applicable requirements of ASME Section XI, 10CFR50.55a, and Technical Specifications/Technical Requirements Manuals are satisfactorily implemented.

2. Preparation of the containment portion of ISI Summary Report and ASME Owners reports (Form NIS-1), as necessary.

Alternative report may be used if approved by the NRC. See ER-AA-330 for additional guidance.4. MAIN BODY NOTE: Approved alternatives and relief granted by the NRC are acceptable to implement in lieu of the specific code paragraphs identified in the steps of this procedure.

4.1. Execution

of Examinations and Tests NOTE: Step 4.1.1 should be performed prior to step 4.1.2.4.1.1. COMPLETE for each tendon selected for visual examination and physical/wire testing the following tasks at both anchorage locations and document in accordance with Attachment 1 (Refer to Table 5 for scope) and Table 8: 1. Detailed Visual, or NRC approved alternate examination of the tendon anchorage hardware, 2. Detailed Visual, or NRC approved alternate examination, as applicable, of tendon anchorage surrounding concrete extending outward a distance of 2 ft from the edge of the bearing plate.3. Collection of sheathing filler grease samples for chemical analysis and examination, and 4. Collection and quantification of free water. Free water shall be chemically analyzed when quantities collected are sufficient for laboratory analysis.4.1.2. COMPLETE for each tendon scheduled for physical/wire testing additional tests and inspections in accordance with Attachment 2.4.1.3. PERFORM chemical analysis of sheathing filler grease samples in accordance with requirements specified in 4.4.3.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 562 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 108 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 17 of 50 4.1.4. VERIFY all free water samples (where sufficient quantities have been collected) have been chemically analyzed for pH level.4.2. Evaluation of Examination and Test Results NOTE: The evaluation of examination and test results may be performed by others knowledgeable in post tensioning systems using this procedure.

However, the RE shall provide concurrence with results of these evaluations by completing 4.2.2.4.2.1. PERFORM evaluation of all inspection, testing, and chemical analysis results on an on-going basis by comparing results to Limitations and Acceptance Standards herein. A review of applicable completed vendor documentation shall be included in this evaluation.

4.2.2. If any Limitations are not met or Acceptance Standards is exceeded, then NOTIFY the RE.1. INITIATE appropriate documentation in accordance with the CAP.2. DETERMINE whether conditions exceeding acceptance standards render the containment unacceptable for continued operation. (RE)3. UPDATE applicable Tables and recording requirements of this procedure when scope of examinations changes.4. REVIEW station documents such as Tech Spec or TRM to determine any additional actions that must be met in the event acceptance standards is not met.5. RECORD signature and the date in spaces provided below to acknowledge completion of required evaluations. (RE)6. If significant structural degradation or leakage is discovered during inspection activities, then NOTIFY shift operations so they may determine if prompt NRC notification (within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />) is required, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii).

Significant degradation can be defined as serious flaws that significantly degrade plant safety and could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems needed to: A. Shutdown the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition; B. Remove residual heat;C. Control the release of radioactive material; or D. Mitigate the consequences of an accident.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 563 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 109 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 18 of 50 7. Responsible Engineer Signature

/ Date: 4.2.3. ENSURE a Regression Analysis for post tensioning system subjected to physical testing has been performed per NRC IN 99-10 after completion of inspection.

This analysis shall include at minimum, justification that post tensioning system for each group of tendons and containment structure will continue to maintain minimum design prestress force until next scheduled exam and test period for that unit.1. INITIATE appropriate documentation in accordance with the CAP if it is determined that minimum design prestress forces will not be maintained for any group of tendons until next inspection period or that it is anticipated minimum design prestress forces will not be maintained for life of the unit.2. COMPLETE this regression analysis within 6 months (or 90 days for TMI per TMI Technical Specification) of completion of this procedure for this inspection period.4.2.4. VERIFY Evaluation Reports as specified in Section 5.1 have been completed.

4.2.5. UPDATE

Inservice Inspection Database, or alternative document, to reflect completed exams/tests.

4.3. Per 10CFR50.55a(b)(2)(viii)(E), PERFORM an evaluation to determine the acceptability of inaccessible areas if conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of or result in degradation of inaccessible areas. For each inaccessible areas identified, the following items shall be addressed.

4.3.1. Description

of the type and estimate extent of degradation and the conditions that led to the degradation, 4.3.2. Evaluation of each area and the result of the evaluation, and 4.3.3. Description of necessary corrective actions.4.4. Acceptance Standards 4.4.1. For Visual Examination of Anchorage Hardware: 1. No cracking in anchor heads, shims or bearing plates shall exist.2. No evidence of active corrosion shall exist.3. No evidence of free water shall exist.4. No broken strands, broken or unseated wires and detached button heads that were not previously identified, documented, and accepted during construction or previous inspection shall exist.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 564 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 110 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 19 of 50 NOTE: The shim gap requirements of section 4.4.1.5 may be waived if new standard is established based on approved engineering evaluations.

For Braidwood, see evaluation No. 2000-IWL-02, Revision 0.5. Uneven shim stack heights or excessive shim gaps shall not exist.For Byron, Braidwood, and TMI: A. The gap between shim halves for the first set of shims under anchorhead shall not exceed an average of 0.25". A maximum gap of 0.50" is acceptable at one gap location if other side of shim halves is in contact. The remaining shims are allowed a maximum gap of 0.50" at each location of shim halves.B. The stacks of pairs of shims may not differ in thickness greater than 1/16". Otherwise, OBTAIN approval from the RE.4.4.2. For Visual Examination Of Concrete Surrounding Tendon Anchorage Components:

1 .Cracks in concrete surrounding tendon anchorage bearing plates for a distance of 24" shall not exceed 0.01" in width. Additional recording criteria are provided in Exelon procedure ER-AA-335-019.

4.4.3. For Free Water and Sheathing Filler Grease Chemical Analysis: 1 .The analysis results of PH levels of free water sample shall be evaluated by the RE (or others knowledgeable) to determine if indications of adverse conditions that may affect tendon components or surrounding concrete exist.2. The sheathing filler grease shall be acceptable when the following acceptance limits are not exceeded.Byron and Braidwood The sheathing filler grease commonly used in post tensioning systems is Visconorust 2090-4 (or 2090P-4) Casing Filler (Types 2090P and 2090P-2 are also in use at TMI). The base number as specified by manufacturer is a minimum of 35. Therefore, minimum acceptable base number for inservice inspection is 17.5. Results with values less than 17.5 shall be evaluated.

I LaSalle and TMI I Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 565 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 111 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 20 of 50 The sheathing filler grease installed in LaSalle and TMI post tensioning systems is not 2090-4. The acceptable base number of corrosion protection medium installed at LaSalle and TMI shall be determined by the applicable RE and documented.

SHEATHING FILLER CHEMICAL ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS CHARACTERISTIC TEST METHOD REVISION DATE OR Acceptable Limits NOTES INDICATOR Water Content ASTM D 95 1970 10% by weight, max N/A Water Soluble ASTM 512 or 1981 10 PPM max See Note 1 Chlorides ASTM D 4327 1988 Water Soluble Nitrates ASTM D 992 or 1978 10 PPM max See Note 1 ASTM D 3867 or 1979 ASTM 4327 1988 Water Soluble Sulfides APHA 427 1981, 15th Edition 10 PPM max See Note 1 (Methylene Blue)or APHA 4500-S -19 Edition Reserve Alkalinity ASTM D 974, 1987 Notes 3, 4 See Note 2 MODIFIED NOTE 1: Water Soluble Ion Tests. The inside (bottom and sides) of a one-liter beaker, outside diameter of -105 mm, height of 145 mm, is thoroughly coated with 100 +/- 10 grams of the sample. The coated beaker is filled with -900 ml of distilled water and heated in an oven at a controlled temperature of 100°F (37.80C) +/- 20 F for four (4) hours.The water extraction is tested by test method for the appropriate water soluble ions. Results are reported as PPM in the extracted water.NOTE 2: ASTM D 974 MODIFIED.

Place a 10 gram sample in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask. Add 10 cc of isopropyl alcohol and 5 cc of toluene. Heat until sample goes into solution.Add 90 cc of distilled water and 20 cc of 1 NH2SO4. Place the solution in a steam bath for 30 minutes. Stir well. Add a few drops of indicator (1% phenolphthalein) and titrate with 1 NNaOH until the lower layer just turns pink. If acid or base solutions are not exactly 1 N, the exact normalities should be used when calculating the base number. The total base number (TBN) expressed as mg of KOH per gram of sample is calculated as: Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 566 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 112 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 21 of 50 TBN = [ (20) (NA) -(B) (NB)l 56.1 NaOH W Where, B = milliliters NA = normality of H 2 SO4 NB = normality of NaOH solution W = weight of sample in grams NOTE 3: The base number shall be at least 50% of the as-installed value, unless the as-installed value is 5 or less, in which case the base number shall be no less than zero. If the tendon duct is filled with a mixture of materials having various as-installed base numbers, the lowest number shall govern acceptance.

Two kinds of bulk filler grease were used for the initial fill at TMI-1. These are 2090P and 2090P-2, both by Viscosity Oil Co. The 2090P was essentially neutral with a Base Number of zero. The 2090P-2 has a Base Number of 3.Expected Base Number for 2090P and 2090P-2 is zero or higher with a tolerance of -.5. Since reserve alkalinity was not reported on the certifications for 2090P and 2090P-2, the testing samples of this grease is primarily to detect significant changes in Base Number over a period of time that might indicate abnormal degradation on the corrosion inhibiting properties, e.g., a trend developing where the grease is progressively becoming acidic over time.NOTE 4 For TMI, grease samples which exhibit reserve alkalinity number of <.5 shall be re-tested per the unmodified version of ASTM D974 Section 9 and an acid number generated for the samples. Both the reserve alkalinity number and the acid numbers shall be reported with the test results when this occurs. Acceptance criteria for Acid Number is that it must be <1.4.4.4. For Removal and Replacement of Corrosion Protection Medium: 1 .The absolute difference between quantity of corrosion protection medium (sheathing filler grease) removed and amount replaced shall not EXCEED 10% of tendon net duct volume.2. It is acceptable to replace corrosion protection medium using a pressurized system or cold pack, by pouring, or by nonpressurized pumping on each end.A. SPECIFY maximum pressure to be used in the pressurized system to minimize the possibility of tearing the sheating joints and opening a way for grease to seep into the concrete. (RE)Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 567 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 113 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 22 of 50 4.4.5. For Tendon Lift Off Forces and Elongation:

1 .The average of all measured tendon forces, including the adjacent tendons measured in accordance with 4.4.5.2.B, if required, for each type of tendon is equal to or greater than the minimum required pre-stress specified at the anchorage for that type of tendon, as specified in Table 7.2. The measured force for each individual tendon shall not be less than 95% of the predicted force as specified in Table 7 unless the following conditions are satisfied:

A. The measured force in not more than one tendon is between 90% and 95 % of the predicted force.B. The measured forces in the two tendons located adjacent to any tendon with a measured force between 90% and 95% of the predicted force are not less than 95% of the predicted force.1. When using ASME Section Xl, 2004 Edition, and for tendons requiring augmented examination following post-tensioning system repair/replacement activities (Table IWL-2521-2, Item L2.10, ASME Section Xl, 2004 Edition) the measured forces in two (2) like tendons located nearest to but on the opposite sides of the tendon described in 4.4.7.2.A are not less than 95% of the predicted force.C. The measured forces in all remaining sample tendons are not less than 95% of the predicted force.3. Prestressing forces for each type of tendon measured in (1) and (2) above, and the measurement from the previous examination, indicate a prestress loss such that predicted tendon forces meet the minimum design prestress forces at the next scheduled examination.

4. The measured elongation of tendon recorded during retensioning shall not differ by more than 10% from that recorded during the last elongation measurement, adjusted for effective wires or strands.4.4.6. For Tendon Wire Examination and Physical Testing: I1. Tendon wires shall be acceptable if they are free of physical damage such as active corrosion and pitting that is visible to the naked eye. See Table 9 for guidance.2. Tendon wires shall be acceptable if the as found ultimate tensile strength and elongation values are not less than the specified minimum values for the wire.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 568 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 114 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 23 of 50 A. At Byron, Braidwood and LaSalle, ASTM A 421 Type BA wire is installed in all tendons inspected and tested in accordance with this procedure.

B. At TMI, ASTM A 421-65T, Type BA wire is installed in all tendons inspected and tested in accordance with this procedure C. The ultimate tensile strength of the wire installed in post tensioning system tendons is 240,000 psi. The minimum acceptable tensile yield strength observed during each tensile strength test shall be 204,000 psi (85% of ultimate tensile strength).

The total elongation of the wire shall not be less than 4.0% of the test specimen gauge length (e.g., the minimum acceptable elongation is 4 inches when measured in a gauge length of 100 inches).5. DOCUMENTATION

5.1. Reporting

Requirements

5.1.1. PREPARE

an Engineering Evaluation Report, maintained at the site and subject to review by regulatory and enforcement authorities any time an acceptance standard in 4.4.1 through 4.4.6 has not been met.1. Engineering Evaluation Reports shall, at minimum, contain the following information:

A. The cause of the condition which does meet the acceptance standards.

B. The acceptability of the containment without repair of the item.C. Whether or not repair or replacement is required and if required, the extent, method, and completion date for the repair or replacement.

D. The extent, nature, and frequency of additional examinations.

E. The applicability of the condition to the other unit at the same site, if required by the code year of reference.

F. The evaluation to determine the acceptability of inaccessible areas if conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of or result in degradation of inaccessible areas.2. Per TMI's Technical Specifications TS 4.4.2.1.6, the Engineering Evaluation Report shall be submitted to the NRC Region I Administrator within 3 months of each tendon surveillance completion.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 569 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 115 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 24 of 50 5.1.2. REPORT the following evaluation in the ISI Summary Report required by the ASME Section XI, IWA-6000, or alternate report approved by the NRC.1. The evaluation to determine the acceptability of inaccessible areas if conditions exist in accessible areas that could indicate the presence of or result in degradation of inaccessible areas. (Step 4.3)5.2. Final Close Out / Documentation 5.2.1. LIST and DESCRIBE all future exams, tests, and corrective actions that are required as a result of degradation identified during this inspection period.1. IDENTIFY Action Tracking item(s) (or equivalent) that has been assigned for each: 5.2.2. GENERATE Action Tracking Item(s) to ensure reports as specified in 5.1.2 will be included in the next summary report for the applicable unit.1. RECORD Action Tracking Item Number(s):

5.2.3. ASSEMBLE

all documentation associated with this procedure, which includes, as applicable, the original or a copy of completed AE documentation, Testing and Inspection Vendor Manuals, Chemical Analysis results, Procedures and Reports, Evaluation Reports, Calculations, Attachment 1 and 2 Checklists and Visual Examination Forms.1. Alternative vendor supplied forms may be used in lieu of Attachments 1 and/or 2, provided that the alternative forms contained at least the information specified in Attachments 1 and/or 2.2. Route the completed procedure and associated documents for record retention in accordance with Section 5 of ER-AA-330.

6. RETURN TO NORMAL NONE 7. REFERENCES 7.1. ASME Section XI, 2001 Edition through 2003 Addenda, and 2004 Edition, Subsection IWL.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 570 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 116 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 25 of 50 7.2. Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR Part 50.55a.7.3. NRC Information Notice 99-10.7.4. ER-AA-330, Conduct of Inservice Inspection Activities.

7.5. ER-AA-335-019, Visual Examination of ASME IWL Class CC Containment Components.

7.6. Applicable

Station Technical Specifications and Technical Requirements Manuals.7.7. Braidwood Station, Napoleon Steel Contractors, Inc. Procedure No. 7D "Stressing Of Post Tensioning Tendons".7.8. S&L CaIc. No. 24.2.9, Design Control Summary for Containment Post-tensioning ISI.7.9. TMI Station, Procedure No. 1301-9.1.7.10. INPO SEN 287, Delamination of Concrete Discovered During Hydro-Excavation of Reactor Containment Building Wall, 10/13/10.7.11. Commitments 7.11.1. Three Mile Island CM-1 Action Tracking Item AR 603573.25, License Renewal Aging Management ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL. (Step 1.1)CM-2 Action Tracking Item AR 603573.38, License Renewal Aging Management Concrete Containment Tendon Prestress. (Step 1.1)8. ATTACHMENTS

8.1. Attachment

1: Containment Tendon Free Water Collection, Grease Sample Collection and Visual Examination Documentation Checklist 8.2. Attachment 2: Containment Tendon Physical Testing and Wire Inspection Documentation Checklist Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 571 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 117 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 26 of 50 TABLE 1 Post Tensioning System Examination and Testing Schedule 1 Page 1 of 2 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Year Braidwood Braidwood Byron Unit Byron Unit LaSalle LaSalle TMI Unit 1 Unit 1 Unit 2 1 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 2000 2001 15th yr. 15th year Visual2 Physical3

&only Visual 2 2002 2003 2 5 th yr. 20' year Physical3

& Visual 2 Visual2 only 2004 2 0 th yr. 20th year 30th yr.Physical3

& Visual 2 only Physical 3 &Visual 2 Visual 2 2005 2006 20th yr. 20th year Physical3

& Visual 2 only Visual 2 2007 2008 30th yr. 25th year Visual 2 Physical 3 &only Visual 2 2009 2 5 th yr. 2 5 th year 3 5th year Visual2 Physical3

& Physical3

&only Visual 2 Visual 2 2010 SGR Augmented Physical 3 &Visual 2 2011 2 5 th yr. 2 5 th year Visual 2 Physical 3 &only Visual 2 2012 2013 35th yr. 3 O0th year Physical 3 & Visual 2 Visual2 only 2014 3 0 th yr. 3 0t' year 40th year Physical3

& Visual 2 Physical3

&Visual 2 only Visual 2 2015 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 572 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 118 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 27 of 50 TABLE I Post Tensioning System Examination and Testing Schedule 1 Page 2 of 2 Year Braidwood Braidwood Byron Unit Byron Unit LaSalle LaSalle TMI Unit 1 Unit 1 Unit 2 1 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 2016 3 0 th year. 30' year Physical 3 & Visual 2 Visual2 only 2017 2018 4 0 th year. 35th year Visual 2 Physical3

&only Visual 2 2019 3 5 th year. 3 5 th year 4 5 th year Visual 2 Physical 3 & Physical 3 &only Visual 2 Visual 2 2020 2021 35th year. 35th year Visual 2 Physical 3 &only Visual 2 NOTES: 1 .Required examination dates are specified in the applicable CISI Plan. Examinations shall commence and be completed within 1 year of the scheduled/required examination date.2. Visual includes: Detailed Visual examination of the tendon anchorage hardwares, concrete extending 2 feet from the edge of the bearing plate, and collection/analysis of corrosion protection medium and free water in accordance with Section XI IWL-2524 and IWL-2525 (or Section XI, Table IWL-2500-1, Category L-B, Items L2.30, L2.40, L2.50).3. Physical includes: Tendon force and elongation measurements in accordance with Section XI IWL-2522 (or Section XI, Table IWL-2500-1, Item L2.10).Tendon wire and strand sample examination and testing in accordance with Section XI IWL-2523 (or Section XI, Table IWL-2500-1, Item L2.20).Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 573 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 119 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 28 of 50 TABLE 2A QUANTITY OF TENDONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR EXAMINATION (BRAIDWOOD)(Provided Requirements of 4.4.5 Have Been Met)AND TESTING Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Ref ASME Sect. Xl, IWL, Table Vertical Tendon Horizontal Tendon Dome Tendon Total Tendons IWL-2521-1 Type Type Type (Each Unit)Total Tendon Population Each 162 201 120 483 Unit (Min 2% to be (Min. 2% to be (Min. 2% to be (Min. 2% to be tested) tested) tested) tested INSPECTION PERIOD SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE (MIN.) (MIN.) (MIN.) (MIN.)1 5 th year (2001) 4 5 3 12 2 0 th year (2006) 4 5 3 12 25th year (2011) 4 5 3 12 30th year (2016) 4 5 3 12 3 5 th year (2021) 4 5 3 12 TABLE 2B QUANTITY OF TENDONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR EXAMINATION AND TESTING (BYRON)(Provided Requirements of 4.4.5 Have Been Met)Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Ref ASME Sect. Xl, IWL, Table Vertical Tendon Horizontal Tendon Dome Tendon Total Tendons IWL-2521-1 Type Type Type (Each Unit)Total Tendon Population Each 162 201 120 483 Unit (Min. 2% to be (Min. 2% to be (Min. 2% to be (Min. 2% to be tested ) tested) tested) tested INSPECTION PERIOD SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE (MIN.) (MIN.) (MIN.) (MIN.)2 0 th year (2004) 4 5 3 12 25th year (2009) 4 5 3 12 30th year (2014) 4 5 3 12 3 5 th year (2019) 4 5 3 12 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 574 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 120 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 29 of 50 TABLE 2C QUANTITY OF TENDONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR EXAMINATION AND TESTING (LASALLE)(Provided Requirements of 4.4.5 Have Been Met)Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Ref ASME Sect. XI, IWL, Table Vertical Tendon Horizontal Tendon Dome Tendon Total Tendons IWL-2521-1 Type Type Type (Each Unit)Total Tendon Population Each 120 188 N/A 308 Unit (Min. 2% to be (Min. 2% to be (Min. 2% to be tested ) tested) tested INSPECTION PERIOD SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE N/A SAMPLE SIZE year Unit I Unit2 (MIN.) (MIN.) (MIN.)20th (1998) (2003) 3 4 N/A 7 2 5 th (2003) (2008) 3 4 N/A 7 30u' (2008) (2013) 3 4 N/A 7 3 5 th (2 0 1 3) (2018) 3 4 N/A 7 TABLE 2D QUANTITY OF TENDONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR EXAMINATION AND TESTING (TMII)(Provided Requirements of 4.4.5 Have Been Met)Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Ref ASME Sect. XI, IWL, Vertical Tendon Type Horizontal Tendon Dome Tendon Total Tendons Table IWL-2521-1 Type Type (Each Unit)Total Tendon Population Each Unit (Min 2% to be tested) (Min. 2% to be tested) (Min. 2% to be (Min. 2% to be tested) tested INSPECTION PERIOD SAMPLE SIZE (MIN.) SAMPLE SIZE (MIN.) SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE Year Unit I (MIN.) (MIN.)3 0 th (2004) 4 5 3 12 3 5 th (2009) 4 5 3 12 Original SGR Original SGR Tendons Tendons Tendons Tendons SGR Augmented (2010) None 2 (4%) None 2 (4%) None 4 4 0 th (2014) 3 2 (4%) 5 2 (4%) 3 15 4 5 th (2019) 3 1 (2%) 5 1 (2%) 3 13 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 575 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 121 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 30 of 50 TABLE 3A -EXPANDED QUANTITY OF TENDONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR EXAMINATION AND TESTING (BRAIDWOOD)(If Requirements of 4.4.5 Have Not Been Met For Each Of the Earlier Inspections)

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Ref ASME Sect. Xl, IWL, Table Vertical Tendon Horizontal Tendon Dome Tendon Type Total Tendons IWL-2521-1 Type Type (Each Unit)Total Tendon Population Each 162 201 120 483 Unit (Min. 4% to be (Min. 4% to be (Min. 4% to be tested)tested) tested)INSPECTION PERIOD SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE (MIN.) SAMPLE SIZE (MIN.) (MIN.)15th year (2001) 7 9 5 21 2 0 th year (2006) 7 9 5 21 25th year (2011) 7 9 5 21 3 0 th year (2016) 7 9 5 21 3 5 th year (2021) 7 9 5 21 TABLE 3B -EXPANDED QUANTITY OF TENDONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR EXAMINATION AND TESTING (BYRON)(If Requirements of 4.4.5 Have Not Been Met For The Last Three Inspections)

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Ref ASME Sect. Xl, IWL, Table Vertical Tendon Horizontal Tendon Dome Tendon Type Total Tendons IWL-2521-1 Type Type (Each Unit)Total Tendon Population Each 162 201 120 483 Unit (Min. 4% to be (Min. 4% to be (Min. 4% to be tested)tested ) tested)INSPECTION PERIOD SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE (MIN.) SAMPLE SIZE (MIN.) (MIN.)2 0 th year (2004) 7 9 5 21 25th year (2009) 7 9 5 21 3 0 th year (2014) 7 9 5 21 3 5 th year (2019) 7 9 5 21 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 576 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 122 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 31 of 50 TABLE 3C -EXPANDED QUANTITY OF TENDONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR EXAMINATION AND TESTING (LASALLE)(If Requirements of 4.4.5 Have Not Been Met For The Last Three Inspections)

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Ref ASME Sect. Xl, IWL, Table Vertical Tendon Horizontal Tendon Dome Tendon Type Total Tendons IWL-2521-1 Type Type (Each Unit)Total Tendon Population Each 120 188 N/A 308 Unit (Min. 4% to be (Min. 4% to be tested ) tested)INSPECTION PERIOD SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE N/A SAMPLE SIZE year Unit 1 Unit2 (MIN.) (MIN.)20th (1998) (2003) 5 8 N/A 13 25th (2003) (2008) 5 8 N/A 13 30th (2008) (2013) 5 8 N/A 13 3 5 th (2 0 1 3) (2018) 5 8 N/A 13 TABLE 3D -EXPANDED QUANTITY OF TENDONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR EXAMINATION AND TESTING (TMI1)(If Requirements of 4.4.7 Have Not Been Met For Each Of The Earlier Inspections)

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Ref ASME Sect. XI, IWL, Vertical Tendon Type Hoop Tendon Type Dome Tendon Total Tendons Table IWL-2521-1 Type Total Tendon Population Each Unit (Min. 4% to be tested (Min. 4% to be tested) (Min. 4% to be) __tested)INSPECTION PERIOD SAMPLE SIZE (MIN) SAMPLE SIZE (MIN) SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SIZE (MIN)30h year 8 10 6 24 35 t year 8 10 6 24 Original SGR Original SGR Tendons Tendons Tendons Tendons SGR Augmented (2010) None 2 None 2 None 4 40th year 5 2 10 2 6 25 45U year 5 2 10 2 6 25 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 577 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 123 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 32 of 50 TABLE 4 DESIGNATED COMMON / CONTROL TENDONS Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 SITE UNIT COMMON COMMON HOOP/ COMMON DOME VERTICAL TENDON HORIZONTAL TENDON TENDON Braidwood 1 V-30 H-50-BA D2-19 Braidwood 2 V-308 H-57-DF D6-22 Byron 1 V-88 H-58-AC Dl-24 Byron 2 V-290 H-60-ED D6-36 LaSalle 1 V-1 5C H-48-AC N/A LaSalle 2 V-215C H-48-EG N/A TMI 1 32 62-26 225 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 578 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 124 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 33 of 50 TABLE 5 TENDONS SELECTED FOR EXAMINATION AND TESTING SITE th Year Inspection (Unit 1)th Year Inspection (Unit 2)Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Unit Tendon Common Tendon Selected For Tendon Selected For Tendon Selected For EPN Control Visual Inspection Visual Inspection and Wire Removal And Tendon (Yes / Only (Yes / No) Physical Testing (Yes / No) Testing (Yes / No', 4 4 + 4 1 4- 4 .4- 4 &4- 4 + 1 4 4- 4 4 I 4 4- 4 4 I 4 4- 4 4 I 4 1 4 4 4+ 4- -1 1 4+ 4- 1 4 4+ 4- 1 4 4 4 4- I 4 4 4 4- I 4 4 4 4- I 4 4-4 4- I 4 4- 1- 4 4-4 1- 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4-4 4 I 4 4-Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 579 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 125 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 34 of 50 TABLE 6 VISUAL INSPECTION BASELINE INFORMATION (To be completed once prior to and once after the start of this inspection)

Site Column 1 Column 2 Column3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 UNIT TENDON QTY. OF QTY. OF NET DUCT COMMENTS (AREAS OF EPN BROKEN & PROTRUDI VOLUME OF CRACKING, PITTING, MISSING NG & TENDONS CORROSION, AND SHIM STACK WIRES UNSEATED (GALLONS)

IRREGULARITIES)

WIRES 4 4 4-~ -t t I I 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4*1* t t I I 4 4- 4 t 1 t I I I t I- I I I 4. 4 i i i i*

• I *I- *1-*

• 4 4 4 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 580 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 126 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 35 of 50 TABLE 7 PHYSICAL TESTING DESIGN INFORMATION Site Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Unit Tendon Minimum Predicted Qty. of Guaranteed 80% Of 70% Of EPN Design Force Effective Ultimate Tensile (GUTS) (GUTS)Force Wires Strength (GUTS)(kips) (kips) (kips) Based upon Qty. of Effective Wires fl £ A A A L L Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 581 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 127 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 36 of 50 TABLE 8 Sheathing Filler Grease Loss Comparison Site: Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9 Column 10 Unit Tendon Net Duct Total Total Grease Total Total Grease Total Grease Difference Absolute EPN Volume Grease Removed; Grease Replaced; Replaced; in Grease Difference Of Removed Gallons Removed; Replaced (%) Between Tendon; ; Gallons (Field End) Gallons Versus That Gallons (Shop Obtain From (Shop End) (Field End That Replaced End, (This Removed; and That (Obtain Obtain Completed Obtain From Obtain From Removed From From Check Lists) Completed Completed Gallons Table 6) Complete Check Lists) Check Lists) (Divide d Check Column 9 by Lists) Column 3)4 .9. 1 t I 4 4 4 W 4 .9. 4 4 4 4 .9. t 4 4 .4' 1 4 4-'-----------.-.---------4

.4. 4 4* 9. 4 4 4 4 + 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4- 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4. 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4. 4 4 4 -4 4 1 4 4 4. 4 4 4 4 4 1 W Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 582 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 128 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 37 of 50 TABLE 9 CRITERIA FOR RATING DEGREES OF CORROSION FOR SELECTED WIRES Condition Cleaning Wire Color Foreign Rust Pitting* Sanding Rating Required Matter Required to for expose Inspection Bright Metal (100 grit sand paper)A None Color None None None None or (Excellent) uniform not more along than 2 length heavy passes B Rag wipe Loss of Small Small None No more (Good) color in Amount quantity of than 5 local areas light rust heavy passes C Rag or Loss of Moderate Large None No more (Fair) steel wool color over amount quantity of than 10 large areas light rust heavy passes D Rag, steel Loss of Large Small None No more (Usable) wool or color over amount quantity of than 20 sand paper most of heavy rust heavy wire length in form of passes red oxide dust E Heavy Loss of Large Areas of Yes 30 or more (Reject) sanding or color over amount hard, heavy scraping entire wire crusty, passes length scaly red oxide* For wires, pits are defined as indications of a depth of 1/64" or deeper and a minimum of 1/32" in diameter.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 583 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 129 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 38 of 50 ATTACHMENT I Containment Tendon Free Water Collection, Grease Sample Collection and Visual Examination Documentation Checklist Page 1 of 7 1. GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 Record

the following information:

1.1.1 Site / Unit: 1.1.2 Tendon EPN: 1.1.3 Buttress Or Location: 1.1.4 Shop Or Field End 2. GREASE CAN REMOVAL AND FREE WATER COLLECTION NOTE: When performing actions associated with grease can removal (cleaning sheathing filler grease out of grease can, cleaning grease off the tendon anchorage, obtaining grease and free water samples), the total grease removed and free water collected must be accumulatively quantified throughout performance of these actions. All free water shall be placed in a clean, closed non-metallic container.

All grease and water sample containers shall be clearly labeled with the tendon anchorage EPN. All samples shall be stored in a clean dry place as chemical analysis will be performed.

Containers shall be chemically inert.2.1 COLLECT and QUANTIFY any free water while removing the pipe plug (vertical tendons only)from the grease can and unbolting/removing the grease can from the tendon bearing plate.Free Water Collected:

ounces 2.2 COLLECT and QUANTIFY any free water that exists in the grease can after removal.Free Water Collected:

ounces NOTE: If this tendon is scheduled to be detensioned, any free water collected while the tendon is being detensioned or in the detensioned condition shall be included in the quantity documented in Step 2.3.2.3 COLLECT and QUANTIFY any additional free water that has flowed or dripped from the tendon anchorage or tendon duct.Free Water Collected:

ounces 2.4 CALCULATE the total quantity of free water that was collected from this tendon end by adding the quantities collected in accordance with Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3.Total Quantity of Free Water Collected:

ounces Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 584 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 130 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 39 of 50 ATTACHMENT I Containment Tendon Free Water Collection, Grease Sample Collection and Visual Examination Documentation Checklist Page 2 of 7 Tendon EPN: 3. SHEATHING FILLER GREASE EXAMINATION AND SAMPLE COLLECTION

3.1 PERFORM

As Found Visual Examination of the internal surface of the grease can, anchorage, tendon button heads, and shims to determine if all components are coated in grease in the as found condition.

Record information on any components that were not identified as 100%coated in the as found condition (e.g. anchorhead face 50% coated).3.2 PERFORM As Found Visual Examination of the sheathing filler grease as follows: 3.2.1 COMPARE the color of the installed sheathing filler grease with that of new sheathing filler grease. Check the applicable Match or No Match box as applicable.

If the colors are significantly different than that of the new sheathing filler grease, then check the No Match box.0 Match 0 No Match Record nature of the differences below: Comments: 3.2.2 COLLECT and store in a dry place, two 1 quart samples of sheathing filler grease from the tendon end in accordance with the following criteria:-The sheathing filler grease samples shall be collected, to the extent practical, from the surfaces of the anchorage, shims, and button heads.-The samples shall be thoroughly mixed.-The samples shall be placed in 1 quart, sealed metal containers.

-Each container shall be clearly labeled with the tendon anchorage EPN.-Free water shall not be included in samples.NOTE: Step 3.3 does not apply to TMI. Reuse of filler grease in the grease can is discouraged at TMI.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 585 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 131 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 40 of 50 ATTACHMENT I Containment Tendon Free Water Collection, Grease Sample Collection and Visual Examination Documentation Checklist Page 3 of 7 Tendon EPN: 3.3 DETERMINE if the existing sheathing filler grease in the grease can is acceptable for reuse per the following:

-The sheathing filler grease that is in the grease can needs to be removed only if it appears to be degraded.-If the color of the sheathing filler grease in the grease can and the color of the new unused grease reasonably match and free water is not mixed in the grease and free water was not collected from the grease can, then the grease need not be removed and can be reused.O Acceptable For Reuse 0 Not Acceptable For Reuse Comments: NOTE: In the event the sheathing filler grease in the can is determined to be acceptable for reuse, the grease and can shall be protected from foreign objects, dust, moisture, etc., until reinstallation.

3.4 REMOVE

all existing sheathing filler grease from the grease can if the sheathing filler grease in the grease can was determined to be unacceptable for reuse per Step 3.3 (N/A if grease was determined to be acceptable for reuse). Quantify the grease removed.Sheathing Filler Grease removed: __ gallons 3.5 CLEAN the grease residue, if required, from the can using an approved solvent. Ensure all solvent residue is removed. N/A if grease is to be reused.3.6 REMOVE and clean sheathing filler grease from tendon anchorage, button heads, shims, and bearing plate as required to perform a Detailed Visual examination, as applicable.

Do not use any tools, materials, etc., that would scratch the surface of the tendon components.

Record quantity of grease removed.Sheathing Filler Grease removed: __ gallons 3.7 RECORD quantity of sheathing filler grease that was lost from the tendon duct during grease can removal and tendon anchorage cleaning.

If this tendon is scheduled to be detensioned, ensure the quantity of sheathing filler grease that was lost during this process and during the time the tendon was in the detensioned condition is included.Sheathing Filler Grease lost: __ gallons 3.8 CALCULATE the total quantity of grease removed and lost from this tendon end by adding the quantities removed in accordance with Steps 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, and 3.7. Ensure the 0.50 gallons taken for samples are included.Total Quantity of grease removed/lost:

__ gallons Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 586 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 132 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 41 of 50 ATTACHMENT I Containment Tendon Free Water Collection, Grease Sample Collection and Visual Examination Documentation Checklist Page 4 of 7 Tendon EPN: 4. TENDON ANCHORAGE EXAMINATION NOTE: In addition to the recording criteria specified in the visual examination procedure ER-AA-335-019, the following shall also be documented during the visual examinations:

As Recordable Indications:

a. Active corrosion:

The item on which the active corrosion exists and location of corrosion on the item.b. Broken or protruding wires: Location shall be documented.

Consistent with method of identification employed under original construction specification, protruding wires shall be identified through visual exam only. Although use of feeler gauges, wire gauges or other measuring devices is not required, they may be used to positively determine distance a broken or unseated wire is projecting from anchor head.c. Missing button heads: Locations shall be documented.

d. Cracks in the tendon anchor head, bushing, shims, bearing plate, or button heads: Split button heads shall not be considered as cracked unless metal is physically cracked. Locations shall be documented.

e. Excessive shim gaps: Record measurements.

f. Any heavy rust or any pitting on tendon anchorage components.

g. Any condition that could challenge the structural integrity of the tendon.h. Uneven shim stack height: Record measurements.

For Information Only: a. Inactive corrosion:

The item on which the inactive corrosion exists, the nature and significance of the corrosion and the location on the item that the inactive corrosion exists shall be documented.

b. Button heads that were split, undersized or malformed during installation process. A description of the condition of the button head and locations of the button head on the anchorage shall be documented.

4.1 PERFORM

Detailed Visual examination, as applicable, per the visual examination procedure ER-AA-335-019 on all components included in the tendon anchorage.

4.2 INCLUDE

the completed visual examination forms as an attachment to this checklist.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 587 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 133 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 42 of 50 ATTACHMENT 1 Containment Tendon Free Water Collection, Grease Sample Collection and Visual Examination Documentation Checklist Page 5 of 7 Tendon EPN: 5. CONCRETE EXAMINATION

5.1 PERFORM

Detailed Visual examination of concrete that surrounds the tendon anchorage per the visual examination procedure ER-AA-335-019.

The examination area shall extend for a distance of 24" from the edge of the anchorage base plate.5.2 INCLUDE the completed visual examination forms as an attachment to this checklist.

NOTE: Unless approved by the RE, all Recordable Indications and Information Only Indications identified during the exams performed per Sections 4 and 5 shall be resolved prior to proceeding to Section 6. If this tendon is scheduled for force monitoring or detensioning, the applicable requirements of ER-AA-330-006

-Attachment 2 shall be completed prior to proceeding to Section 6.6. INSTALLATION OF GREASE CAN 6.1 ENSURE all tendon anchorage components and the bearing plate sealing surface have been cleaned of all debris and excess cleaning solvents.6.2 ENSURE the interior of the grease can has been cleaned of all debris and excess solvents if the grease was determined to be unacceptable for reuse in accordance with 3.3. If grease was determined to be acceptable, then N/A this step.6.3 ENSURE the exterior of the grease can and the gasket retainer, including the gasket seating surface have been cleaned of all debris and excess cleaning solvents.6.4 APPLY a coating of clean sheathing filler grease on all tendon anchorage components including the anchorhead, shims, bushing, and button heads.NOTE: If required, grease can may be partially filled with new sheathing filler grease prior to installation.

If this activity is performed, document the quantity of sheathing filler grease placed in the grease can.6.5. FILL the grease can partially with new, unused sheathing filler grease if required and record amount (N/A if not required).

Sheathing Filler Grease Installed:

gallons NOTE: For horizontal tendons, the grease can be installed in a position where the grease can bushing (inlet, outlet) is orientated at the top of the can. Caution shall be exercised during installation of the grease can to ensure the gasket is not placed or pinched between the grease can and bearing plate. An adhesive (Pliobond 20 or equivalent) may have to be applied to hold the gasket to the grease can flange surface so it does not shift during installation.

6.6 INSTALL

the grease can and gasket retainer (as applicable) over the tendon anchorage using a new gasket.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 588 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 134 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 43 of 50 ATTACHMENT I Containment Tendon Free Water Collection, Grease Sample Collection and Visual Examination Documentation Checklist Page 6 of 7 Tendon EPN: 6.7 ENSURE the gasket is properly compressed to a point where metal-to-metal contact exists between the gasket retainer, flange, and bearing plate.6.8 ENSURE all grease can bolting is wrench tight.7. FINAL GREASE INSTALLATION NOTE: During the final grease installation process, a minimum of the same quantity of grease that was removed or lost during the examination and testing process shall be installed.

The sheathing filler grease that is installed shall be quantified.

The tendon end/duct shall be filled to the extent practical.

7.1 RECORD

the total quantity of grease that was removed or lost during examination of this tendon end by refer to Step 3.8 and.Grease lost/removed from tendon end: __ gallons NOTE: The quantity of sheathing filler grease being installed shall be continually monitored.

When it is suspected that the sheathing filler grease is migrating to points other than the tendon duct (e.g., through a crack in the containment), the greasing process shall stop and the Responsible Engineer shall be immediately notified.NOTE: The process by which sheathing filler grease is installed (hot pumped or cold packed), is detailed in the installing vendor procedures.

In the event the grease is not being installed by a qualified vendor, a Work Request that details the specific instructions and requirements shall be generated.

7.2 VERIFY

the tendon end has been filled with new sheathing filler grease.7.3 RECORD the quantity of sheathing filler grease that was installed prior to (Ref. Step 6.5) and after grease can installation.

Sheathing Filler Grease:_ gallons 7.4 VERIFY grease can bushing and vent plug, as applicable, were reinstalled using new teflon tape.7.5 EXAMINE grease can and the gasket and bearing plate joint to ensure no leakage occurred during the final greasing process.7.6 CALCULATE Total Grease Installed by ADDING total grease installed in Step 6.5 and total grease installed in Step 7.3.Step____ 6. + Step 7.3TotlGeaeIstale Step 6.5 Step 7.3 Total Grease Installed Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 589 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 135 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 44 of 50 ATTACHMENT I Containment Tendon Free Water Collection, Grease Sample Collection and Visual Examination Documentation Checklist Page 7 of 7 Tendon EPN: 8. DETERMINATION OF SHEATHING FILLER GREASE LOSS NOTE: Further evaluation of grease loss shall be performed and documented in ER-AA-330-006, Section 4.2 Evaluation of Test and Examination Results 8.1 CALCULATE the Total Grease added by subtracting the total grease removed from the tendon end (Step 7.1) from that of the total grease installed in tendon end (Step 7.6.).Total Grease Installed Total Grease Removed Total Grease Added 9. SIGNATURE LOG 9.1 All individuals performing inspections per this checklist shall record signatures and initials below: Name (Print) Signature Initials.4.10.0. FINAL CLEANUP AND CLOSEOUT OF EXAMS 10.1 ENSURE all Free Water and Sheathing Filler samples are removed from the work area and stored in a suitable area pending shipment to a laboratory for chemical analysis.10.2 ENSURE work area has been cleaned of all excess grease and other debris and that it has been left in a safe condition.

10.3 FORWARD this completed checklist and visual exam forms to the to the tendon program owner.10.4 INCLUDE this checklist with attachments with completed procedure ER-AA-330-006.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 590 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 136 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 45 of 50 ATTACHMENT 2 Containment Tendon Physical Testing and Wire Inspection Documentation Checklist Page 1 of 6 NOTE: Completion of applicable portions of this checklist can be accomplished by obtaining the results documented in the test vendor's data sheets and reports.1. GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 RECORD

the following information:

1.1.1 Site / Unit: 1.1.2 Tendon EPN: 1.1.3 Buttress Or Location: 1.1.4 Shop Or Field End: 2. PRECAUTIONS and LIMITATIONS See Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of this procedure, respectively.

3. TENDON FORCE MEASUREMENT (LIFT OFF)3.1 VERIFY the applicable portions of Attachment 1 of ER-AA-330-006 have been completed for the applicable anchorage location.3.2 RECORD in Table 1 the information pertinent to this tendon for monitoring lift off forces. This information can be obtained from Tables 6-7, ER-AA-330-006 and, if required, adjusted forces established as a result of reduced quantity of effective wires.TABLE 1 LIFT OFF FORCE MONITORING INFORMATION Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 No. of Effective No. of Effective Original Minimum GUTS Maximum Overstress Min. Predicted Wires, As Wires, Stressing Force (Based on As Force (80% of GUTS) Design Force Found, This Previous Insp. (Obtain From Found No. of (Reduced for Force (kips)Exam (Quantity)

Const. Records) Effective Wires) ineffective wires) (kips)(Quantity)

I (Kips) (Kips) (Kips) I.1. 4 1. 1 ___ ___NOTE: Force measurements for Vertical Tendons may be obtained from one end only. Measurements are usually taken from the top (shop end) anchorage.

Measurements for Dome and Horizontal Tendons are obtained from both (shop and field) ends. The tests may be performed simultaneously on both ends, or on one tendon end at a time, independent of the opposite end of the tendon. Measurement data taken from both ends shall be averaged.

The average lift off force for Vertical Tendons is the single value recorded for measurement that is taken from one end.3.3 COMPLETE tendon force monitoring (lift off measurement) using the criteria in Section 3.2.10 of this procedures.

3.4 RECORD

in TABLE 2 the as found lift off force(s) obtained during testing. RECORD the average lift off force for horizontal and dome tendons. N/A column 4 when a vertical tendon is tested. The force recorded in column 2 or 3, as applicable, is the average lift off force for a vertical tendon.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 591 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 137 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 46 of 50 ATTACHMENT 2 Containment Tendon Physical Testing and Wire Inspection Documentation Checklist Page 2 of 6 Tendon EPN: TABLE 2 AS FOUND LIFT OFF FORCE MEASUREMENTS (kips)Column I Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Tendon As Found Lift As Found Lift As Found Average Lift Off Force EPN Off Force, Shod Off Force, Field For Dome and Horizontal Tendons = [Column 2 + Column 3] / 2 For End (kips) End (kips) vertical tendons = Only one measurement (either shop end or field end)is taken (kips)3.5 RECORD force data and CALCULATE percentage of predicted force value achieved during testing.3.5.1 As found Average Lift Off Force for this tendon as specified in Table 2, Column 4: __ kips.3.5.2 Predicted Force for this tendon as specified in Table 1, Column 7: _ kips.3.5.3 Divide As Found Lift Off Force (kips) by Predicted Force (kips) to determine the percentage of Predicted Force achieved during the test. Record the calculated percentage:

___%NOTE: If the average as found lift off value for this tendon is below 95% of the predicted force, it shall be necessary to adjust the as left tendon force (locked off force) value. The adjustment can be applied to either end of the tendon. The force value is adjusted by adding shims to the shim stacks subject to the force limitations of Section 3.2.13 of this procedure.

3.6 RECORD

new average lock off force value if a new lock off force value had to be established per the preceding note: kips. (N/A if not applicable)

3.7 DETERMINE

if the maximum overstress force achieved during lift off measurement exceeded the maximum overstress force (80% of GUTS) for this tendon (Table 1, Column 5).Maximum Overstress Force: Was Exceeded Was Not Exceeded NOTE: Step 3.8 shall only be performed for tendons that are not scheduled for detensioning and wire removal for inspection and testing. N/A Step 3.8 if the tendon is to be detensioned.

The as left inspection on tendons that are scheduled to be detensioned shall be performed in accordance with Step 6.4.3.8 PERFORM an as left Detailed Visual examination on the anchorage components.

Limit exam scope to quantification of effective wires and positioning of shims. Verify the quantity of effective wires identified prior to performing lift off force measurements matches that identified during as left exam.NOTE: The actions and requirements specified in Section 4 of this checklist shall only be performed for tendons that are scheduled to be detensioned for wire removal, wire inspection, and wire testing. If the tendon is not scheduled to be detensioned, N/A the steps in Sections 4, 5 and 6. Proceed to Section 7.0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 592 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 138 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 47 of 50 ATTACHMENT 2 Containment Tendon Physical Testing and Wire Inspection Documentation Checklist Page 3 of 6 Tendon EPN: 4. DETENSION TENDON AND COMPONENT INSPECTION

4.1 REVIEW

ER-AA-330-006, Table 5 and verify this tendon is scheduled for wire removal / testing.4.2 VERIFY this tendon has been completely detensioned in accordance with vendor procedures.

4.3 EXAMINE

the detensioned tendon anchorage components that are not accessible for visual examination when the tendon is under tension. The anchorage components shall be examined to the extent practical.

This examination is not required to be performed by a certified VT Examiner;however, an individual knowledgeable in the identification of conditions that may indicate degradation shall perform and document the exam. All components shall be examined for signs of excessive stress, corrosion, cracks, and slipped and broken wires.5. WIRE REMOVAL, INSPECTION.

AND TESTING NOTES: a. One wire shall be completely removed from the tendon. Document the location within the anchor heads from which the wire is removed in the as left visual exam performed in accordance with 6.4.Attach a tag indicating the tendon number and other pertinent information identifying the wire location.b. The wire shall be cleaned (by testing vendor) as required and examined over its entire length for corrosion and physical damage (i.e., wedge slippage marks). The area, if any, containing the most severe corrosion shall be identified.

Dimensional verifications and physical testing shall be performed at a minimum of three locations within the length of the wire. The three locations shall be one at each end and one at mid-length.

In the event corrosion is identified during examination of the wire, a fourth test shall be performed at the point where the most severe corrosion exists c. A yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and elongation test shall be performed at each location 5.1 SELECT the wire to be removed for examination and physical testing.5.2 EXAMINE the entire length of the wire as it is being removed from the tendon. Identify and document any areas of physical damage and corrosion.

Any areas of pitting that is visible with the naked eye shall be considered severe corrosion.

Subject the area with the most severe pitting to physical testing. Describe areas with physical damage and corrosion:

5.3 VERIFY

the locations within the wire that will be subjected to physical testing are one at each end, one at mid length, and if applicable, the location containing the most severe corrosion.

Mark and identify sample locations prior to cutting.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 593 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 139 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 48 of 50 ATTACHMENT 2 Containment Tendon Physical Testing and Wire Inspection Documentation Checklist Page 4 of 6 Tendon EPN: 5.4 VERIFY the wire diameter has been measured in accordance with test location within the wire.Corroded areas shall be cleaned as required to obtain an accurate measurement.

Record the as found measurements for each location: 5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3 5.4.4 As measured wire diameter at shop end of tendon: _ inches.As measured wire diameter at field end of tendon: inches.As measured wire diameter at mid-length of wire: _ inches.As measured wire diameter at location containing the most severe corrosion:

inches.(N/A if no corrosion identified).

5.5 VERIFY

yield strength tests have been performed per vendor procedures by the 1.0% extension under load method. Record the yield strength test data for each location: 5.5.1 5.5.2 5.5.3 5.5.4 Yield strength at shop end of tendon: __ psi (MPa)Yield strength at field end of tendon: psi (MPa)Yield strength at mid-length of wire: psi (MPa)Yield strength at location containing the most severe corrosion:

psi (MPa).(N/A if corrosion not identified)

5.6 VERIFY

ultimate tensile strength tests have been performed per vendor procedures.

Record the ultimate tensile strength test data for each location: 5.6.1 5.6.2 5.6.3 5.6.4 Ultimate tensile strength at shop end of tendon: psi.Ultimate tensile strength at field end of tendon: psi.Ultimate tensile strength at mid-length of wire: psi.Ultimate tensile strength at location containing the most severe corrosion:

psi. (N/A if no corrosion identified).

5.7 VERIFY

elongation tests have been performed.

Record the elongation test data for each location: 5.7.1 Data at shop end of tendon: 5.7.2 Data at field end of tendon: 5.7.3 Data at mid-length of wire: 5.7.4 Data at location containing most severe corrosion (N/A if none identified)

Gauge length of specimen:

_ inches.Percent of elongation at failure: __%.Maximum elongation at failure: _ inches.Gauge length of specimen:

inches.Percent of elongation at failure: __%.Maximum elongation at failure: _ inches.Gauge length of specimen:

inches.Percent of elongation at failure: __%.Maximum elongation at failure: _ inches.Gauge length of specimen:

inches.Percent of elongation at failure: __%.Maximum elongation at failure: _ inches.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 594 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 140 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 49 of 50 ATTACHMENT 2 Containment Tendon Physical Testing and Wire Inspection Documentation Checklist Page 5 of 6 Tendon EPN: 5.8 REVIEW the results of all visual examinations and physical tests that were performed on the wire test specimens.

If all acceptance standard was met, proceed to Section 6. If physical damage or pitting was identified during examination of the wire or if the physical test acceptance standard was not met, do not proceed to Section 6 until approved by the Responsible Engineer.6. RETENSION TENDON 6.1 RECORD the quantity of effective wires identified during the as found exam: __RECORD the quantity of effective wires identified at the time of retensioning:

__VERIFY the quantities match, less one that was removed for examination and physical testing__6.2 RECORD in TABLE 3 the data required for retensioning this tendon.TABLE 3 TENDON RETENSIONING DATA Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Maximum Overstress Force that can Maximum Final As Left" Lock Off Minimum Final Total Average Elongation be achieved during retensioning.

Force. As Left Lock During Last Measurement.

Off Force 80% of GUTS, adjusted for quantity of 70% of GUTS, adjusted for quantity of Obtain data from last surveillance effective wires. Reduce the value effective wires. Reduce the value (Predicted inspection or original construction proportionally for each ineffective wire. proportionally for each ineffective wire Force) records as applicable (kips) (kips) (kips) (inches)6.3 VERIFY this tendon has been retensioned in accordance with vendor procedures.

6.4 PERFORM

an as left Detailed Visual examination, as applicable, on the anchorage.

The scope of this examination shall be limited to the identification of any broken, missing, protruding wires and detached buttonheads.

Verify the quantity and location of the effective wires identified prior to retensioning the tendon matches that identified after retensioning as specified in 6.1.6.5 RECORD the maximum overstress force(s) that were achieved during retensioning: (N/A the field end if a vertical tendon was retensioned.

Vertical tendons are retensioned from one end only).6.5.1 Shop End of Tendon: kips 6.5.2 Field End of Tendon: __ kips 6.5.3 Average maximum overstress force this tendon _ kips 6.6 VERIFY the maximum average overstress force(s) did not exceed 80% of the GUTS of the tendon as specified in Table 3, Column 1.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 595 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 141 of 415 ER-AA-330-006 Revision 7 Page 50 of 50 ATTACHMENT 2 Containment Tendon Physical Testing and Wire Inspection Documentation Checklist Page 6 of 6 Tendon EPN: 6.7 RECORD the Final Average As Left Lock Off Force for this tendon: kips.6.8 VERIFY the Final Lock Off Force did not exceed 70% of GUTS as specified in Table 3, Column 2.6.9 VERIFY the Final Average As Left Lock Off Force exceeded the Minimum Force as specified in Table 3, Column 3.6.10 RECORD as found total elongation observed during retensioning of this tendon: _ inches.6.11 RECORD the total elongation observed during the last measurement of this tendon as specified in Table 3, Column 4: inches.6.12 CALCULATE and record the difference in percentage of the total elongation observed during retensioning of this tendon and the elongation recorded during the last measurement.

Difference in percentage, total elongation:

%.NOTE: If any indications of abnormal degradation exist, do not proceed to Section 7 until approved by the RE.7. INSTALLATION OF GREASE CANS AND SHEATHING FILLER 7.1 VERIFY grease cans have been installed and sheathing filler grease has been replenished in accordance with ER-AA-330-006, Attachment

1.8. SIGNATURE

LOG 8.1 All individuals performing inspections per this checklist shall RECORD signatures and initials below: Name (Print) I Signature I Initials++ 4 9. FINAL CLOSE OUT 9.1 FORWARD this completed checklist to the Containment Tendon Program Owner.9.2 INCLUDE this checklist and attachments as applicable with completed procedure ER-AA-330-006 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 596 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 142 of 415 Ar~ft 0ER-AA-335-01 9 n. Revision 0 Page 1 of 17 Nuclear Level 3 -Information Use:VISUAL EXAMINATION OF ASME.IWL CLASS CC CONTAINMENT COMPONENTS 1 PURPOSE 1 A1. This procedure provides the requirements and examiner responsibilities for performing Inservice:

Inspection (1SI).or Repair Replacement for Detailed (conducted by VT-I &. VT-i C personnel) and General (conducted by VT-3C personnel)

Visual Examinations on containment surfaces and components.

1.2. Visual

examinations shall be performed in accordance with Subsection IWL (Class CC) of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME B&PV Code) Section X1, 2001 Edition, 2003 Addenda through the 2004 Edition. as modified by Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (I0CFR) 50.55a Paragraphs (b)(2)(viil)(e).

through (b)(2)(viii)(G).

1.3. This procedure is also applicable for Stations having authorized or granted Code Relief Requests:

for the use of portions of this procedure, as% applicable.

1.4. The definitions.

of discontinuities in concrete and: post tensioning systems (tendons).indications are provided in Attachments I and 2..2. MATERIALS AND SPECIAL EQUIPMENT-Mirrors, Binoculars, Telescopes, Borescopes, Closed Circuit Televisions,, Cameras, etc., if applicable;

-. Flashlight or droplights, if applicable.

2.1.. Borescopes, mirrors, telescopes, closed circuit television, cameras or: other devices may be-used for remote examination, provided such devices or systems have a.resolution capability at least equivalent to that: attainable by direct visual examination.

22. Magnifying glasses, mirrors, depth gages, crack comparators, surface replication techniques and weld gages may be used to supplement direct examination.

2.3. Measuring

and Test Equipment (M&TE) or visual aids used shall be recorded on the.Work Order (WO) and/or on the applicable Visual Examination NDE Report, (Attachments 3 and 4) or equivalent.

3. PRECAUTIONS.

LIMITATIONS, AND PREREQUISITES

3.1. Precautions

-None*3.2. Limitations Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 597 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 143 of 415 ER-AA-335--019 Revision 0 Page 2 of 17 3..2.1. ENSURE that this procedure meets the appropriate code requirements for the scope of examinations to be performed.

3.2.2. ENSURE

that the requirements and criteria contained in authorized or granted site specific Code Relief Requests are met.313. Prerequisites

3.3.1. Personnel

performing Examinations shall be a -minimum Level I qualified and certified in accordance with ER-AA-335-001

'Qualification and Certification of Nondestructive Examination (NDE) Personnel' or in accordance with an .approved vendor qualification and certification procedure.

1. Certified Level I Personnel shall not independently EVALUATE or INTERPRET the results of an examination.

If any conditions exist. as listed in the Acceptance Standards/Criteria stated In Paragraphs

4.3. through

4,5,. a.Responsible Engineer shall be contacted to conduct an evaluation or interpretation of the examination results 2. Certified Level I Personnel shall be qualifiedlto conduct the following:

A. PERFORM specific equipment set-ups;B. PERFORM specific calibrations and examination; C. RECORD data I results to specific written instructions; D. IMPLEMENT written and verbal instructions under the guidance of a certified Level II or Level II Examiner.3. Personnel shall be certified to a Level 11 or Level III Examiner to perform or review results from an examination.

4. A Responsible Engineer shall perform review/evaluation of recordable or suspect areas from an examination.

3.3.2. Examination, Techniques, Examinations shall be performed either directly or remotely.with adequate resolution and illumination.

An examination shall be considered remote when the equipment listed in paragraph

.2.1 is utilized.

Personnel tha!l have visual acuity sufficient to detect evidence of degradation,.

by line of sight from available viewing angles from floors, platforms, walkways, ladders or other permanent vantage points, unless temporary access is required by the inspection plan.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 598 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 144 of 415 ER-AA-335-01 9 Revision 0 Page 3 of 17 3.3.3. A Responsible Engineer shall be a knowledgeable and qualified, individual appointed by management.

The Responsible Engineer shall be a Registered Professional Engineer with knowledge of the design, construction codes and experience in evaluating inservice conditions of structural concrete.

The Responsible Engineer shall be responsible for;:-Development of plans and procedures for examination of ASME Class CC (IWL) containment surfaces and post tensioning systems (tendons);

-Approval, instruction and training of concrete examination.

personnel;

-Evaluation of examination results;.S- Preparation or review of repair/replacement plans and procedures;

-. Review of procedures for pressure tests following repair/replacements;.

-Submittal of reports to the Owner documenting results of examinations, pressure tests and repairs.3.3.4. VERIFY that the. owner defined/site specific acceptance criteria/standards has been established prior to the conduct of examination.

4. MAIN BODY 4.1. Surface Preparation 4.1.1. If necessary, REMOVE.dirt, grease, or other foreign matter that would mask indications or interfere with the examination.

4.1.2. PERFORM

Visual. Examination by direct or remote visual examination technique or a combination thereof.4.1'.3. USE mirrors or other optical aids to improve theangle of vision.*4.1.4. DETAILED VISUAL.(DV)

EXAMINATION

1. Examinations (conducted by a Certified VT-1C Examiner) are conducted to determine.

the. magnitude and extent of any deterioration and distress of the surface/component being examined and on suspect surfaces initially detected.by General Visual Examination or structural condition of areas affected by repair/replacement activities and to determine the condition of concrete extending 2.0 feet beyond the edge of tendon anchorage.

hardware bearing plates for tendons selected in the scope of the periodic containment post-tensioning system surveillance.

4.1.5. GENERAL

VISUAL (GV) EXAMINATION

1. Examinations (conducted by a Certified VT-3C Examiner) are conducted to, assess the general structural condition of concrete containment surfaces and identify:

areas of concrete deterioration and distress, such as described in ACIý201.,1 R-68 and ACI 349.3 R-96.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 599 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 145 of 415 ER-AA-335-.019 Revision 0.Page 4 of 17 A. RECORDABLE INDICATION:

any visually observed abnormal conditions that may potentially impact the integrity of the component design function.B. SUSPECT AREA: an area with a Recordable Indication that has exceeded the owner defined pre-established acceptance criterialstandards.

Suspect areas shall be entered into the plant Corrective Action Program (CAP).C. Recordable Indications are identified as "Attributes" in Attachments 3 and 4 and are also defined by the Responsible Engineer as necessary.

4.2. Standards

for Examination Cateaorv L-A. Class CC Components (Concrete)

4.2.1. Examination

Boundary 1. The examination boundary for the concrete shells shall INCLUDE the ACCESSIBLE surface areas.4.2.2. Standards for Examination of Concrete;1. All Concrete surface areas, including coated areas, except those exempted by IWL-1220(b), shall be General Visual examined (conducted by a Certified VT-3C Examiner) to assess the general structural condition of containments.

PERFORM the General Visual examination in sufficient detail to identify areas of concrete deterioration and distress, such as described in ACI 201.1 R-68 and ACI 349.3 R-96 in accordance with IWL-2310(a).

2. Selected areas, such as those that indicate suspect areas, shall receive a Detailed Visual examination (conducted by a Certified VT-1 C Examiner).

PERFORM the Detailed Visual examination to determine the magnitude and extent of deterioration and distress in accordance with IWL-2310(b).

3. RECORD all indications in accordance with Attachment 4 for reconciliation.

4. All recorded indications meeting the acceptance criteria established by the Responsible Engineer are considered reconciled by initial examination and thus, acceptable for continued operation without further corrective actions.5. All suspect areas shall be considered for reconciliation by either an engineering evaluation, or REPAIR/REPLACE in accordance with IWL-3200.4.3. Standards for Examination Category L-B Unbonded Post Tensionina Systems (Tendons).

4.3.1. Examination

Boundary Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 600 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 146 of 415 ER-AA-335-019 Revision 0 Page 5 of 17 1. The examination boundary shall include containment tendon anchorage surrounding concrete surface areas and hardware including bearing plates, anchor heads, shims, wedges and wire button-heads, grease cans, as a minimum, 4.3.2 Standards for examination of concrete 1. Concrete extending Z-0" from the bearing plate for tendons selected in accordance with IWL-2520 and IWL-2521 shall receive a Detailed Visual examination (conducted by a Certified VT-1C Examiner).

in sufficient detail to, identify areas of concrete deterioration and distress, such as described in ACi 201.1 R-68 and ACI 349.3 R-96.2. RECORD all indications in accordance with Attachment 4 for reconciliation.

3. All recorded indications meeting the acceptance criteria established by the Responsible Engineer are considered reconciled by. initial examination and thus, acceptable for continued operation without further corrective actions.4. All suspect areas shall be considered.

for reconciliation by either an engineering evaluation, or REPAIRIREPLACE in accordance with IWL-3200.4.33. Standards for examination of Unbonded Post Tensioning System (Tendons);

1. PERFORM a Detailed Visual examination (conducted.

by a Certified VT-i Examiner) to determine the condition (e.g., cracks, wear or corrosion) of tendon wires or strands and anchorage hardware asdescribed in IWL-2524.1.2. RECORD all indications in accordance with Attachment 3.3. If free water is observed, then QUANTIFY amount of free water.4. All recorded indications meeting the acceptance criteria established by the Responsible Engineer are considered reconciled by initial examination and thus, acceptable for continued operation without further corrective actions.5. All suspect areas shall be considered for reconciliation by. either an..engineering evaluation, or REPAIRIREPLACE in accordance with IWL-3200.4.4.. Examination of reinforced steel of Concrete Containments 4.4.1., Standards for reinforced steel of Concrete;Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 601 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 147 of 415 ER-AA-335-019 Revision 0 Page 6 of 17 1. Exposed reinforcing steel identified during as found examination or that.exposed during concrete repair shall receive a Detailed Visual Examination (conducted by a Certified VT-1 Examiner), PERFORM a Detailed Visual examination to determine the condition of as found reinforcing steel or that exposed as a result of removal of defective concrete as described in IWL-4220(c).2. RECORD all indications in accordance with Attachment 4.3 All recorded indications meeting the acceptance criteria established by the Responsible Engineer are considered reconciled by initial examination and thus, acceptable for continued:

operation without further corrective actions 4 All suspect areas. shall be considered for reconciliation by either an engineering evaluation, or REPAIR/REPLACE in accordance with IWL-3200.4.5. Evaluation

4.5.1. NOTIFY

the Station Responsible Engineer for recordable indications identified during visual examinations of IWL components for comparison to previously recorded indications.

4.5.2. The Station Responsible Engineer shall PERFORM a reconciliation of suspect areas identified during visual examinations of IWL components.

1.. All suspect areas shall be evaluated per IWL-3300 and each evaluation shall contain as a minimum, the following:

-The cause of the condition that does not meet the acceptance criteria,-The applicability of the condition to any other plants at the same site,-The acceptability of concrete containment without repair of the item,-Whether or not the repair/replacement activity is required and if required, the extent, method, and completion date for the repair/replacement activity,-Extent, nature and frequency of additional examinations.

4A6. Reporting 4.6.1. USE the applicable Attachment 3 or 4 or equivalent, to document examination results. INCLUDE as a minimum in the Visual Examination Report the following information:

-Station;-Unit;-Examination Report number, if applicable; 0 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 602 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 148 of 415 ER-AA-335-O019 Revision 0 Page 7 of.17 Examination Date,;." Examination procedure and revision;-ExaminedrEvaluator printed' name, signature, NDE level and date;-Identification of component (e.g., EIN, EID, System, etc..);.Type of examination (direct or remote);-Illumination used;-Visual aids used;-Examination results;-Location and size of the Recordable Indication (RI);-A sketch or drawing if required.4.6.2, RECORD the Containment Visual Examination results associated:

with ASME Section XI on the Visual Examination Report, Attachment 3 or 4 (or equivalent).

These records shall become part of the final Work. Order (NO) documentation.

416.3. RECORD on Attachment 3 or 4, or equivalent, the Containment Visual Examination performed by the Examiner/Evaluator and FORWARD for a Station Review and Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII) review, as applicable.

TRANSFER to the Program Owner/Engineer for inclusion in the ASME Section XI Program. and Work Order Package In accordance with the applicable procedures.

1.. All Visual Examination NDE Reports identifying a Recordable Indication (RI)shall receive an independent Responsible Engineer Review for resolution, prior to closure of the task and transferring to.ANII for review.2. If any reviews are not applicable to the specific station, the review/date areas shall be completed by placing N/R (Not Required) or N/A (Not Applicable) on the available line, prior to closure of the task.4.7. Final Conditions 4.7.1'. LEAVE the surface of the part or component in a better than found condition.

5. RETURN TO NORMAL -.None 6. REFERENCES

6.1. Commitments

-None 6.2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl,. 2001: Edition, 2003 Addenda through the 2004 Edition, 6.3. ER-AA-330-002, Inservice Inspection of Welds and Components.

• 6.4. ER-AA-330-005, Visual Examination of Section XI Class CC Concrete Containment Structures.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 603 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 149 of 415 ER-AA-335-019 Revision 0 Page 8 of 17 6.5. ER-AA-330-006, Inservice Inspection and Testing of The Pre-Stressed Concrete Containment Post Tensioning Systems.6.6. ER-AA-330-009, ASME Section XI Repair / Replacement Program.6.7. ER-AA-335-001, Qualification and Certification of Nondestructive Examination (NDE) Personnel.

6.8. ER-AA-335-1000, Nondestructive Examination (NDE)6.9. The American Concrete Institute Specification ACI 201.1 R-68, 1984 Edition.6.10. The American Concrete Institute Specification ACI 349.3 R-96, 1996 Edition.6.11. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (1 OCFR) 50.55a Paragraphs (b)(2)(viii)(E) through (b)(2)(viii)(G).

7. ATTACHMENTS

7.1. Attachment

1, Definitions of Discontinuities in Concrete 7.2. Attachment 2, Definitions of Post Tensioning System (Tendons)

Indications

7.3. Attachment

3, ASME IWL (Class CC) Containment Tendon Anchorage Detailed Visual Examination NDE Report 7.4. Attachment 4, ASME IWL (Class CC) Containment Concrete Detailed or General Visual Examination NDE Report Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 604 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 150 of 415 ER-AA-335-019 Revision 0 Page 9 of 17 ATTACHMENT I Definitions Of Discontinulties in Concrete Page 1 of 6 A. 1. CRACK -A complete or incomplete separation, of either concrete or masonry, into two or more parts produced by breaking or fracturing.

A. 1.1. CHECKING -Development of shallow cracks, closely spaced by irregular intervals on the surface of plaster, cement paste, mortar, or concrete.A.1.2. CRAZE CRACKS -Fine random cracks or fissures in a surface of plaster, cement paste, mortar, or concrete.A. 1.2.1. CRAZING -The development of craze cracks; the pattern of craze cracks existing in, a surface.A.1.3. D-CRACKING

-A series of cracks in concrete near and roughly parallel to joints, edges, and structural cracks.A.1 .4. DIAGONAL CRACK -In a flexural member,, an inclined crack caused by shear stress, usually at about 45 deg to the axis; or a crack in a slab, not parallel to either the lateral or longitudinal directions.

A. 1.5. HAIRLINE CRACKS Cracks in an exposed concrete surface having widths so small as to be barely perceptible.

A. 1.6. PATTERN CRACKING -Fine openings on concrete surfaces in the form of a pattern; resulting from a decrease in volume of the material near the surface, or increase in volume of the material below the surface, or both.A. 1.7. PLASTIC CRACKING -Cracking that occurs in the surface of fresh concrete soon. after it is placed and while it is still plastic.A.1.8. SHRINKAGE CRACKING -Cracking of a structure or member due to failure in tension caused by external or internal restraints as reduction in moisture content develops, or as carbonation occurs, or both.A.1.9. TEMPERATURE CRACKING -Cracking due to tensile failure, caused by temperature gradient in members subjected to external restraints or by temperature differential in members subjected to internal restraints, A.1.10. TRANSVERSE CRACKS -Cracks that develop at right angles to the long direction of the member.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 605 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 151 of 415 ER-AA-335-019 Revision 0 Page 10.of 17 ATTACHMENT 1 Definitions of Discontinuities In Concrete Page 2 of 6: A.2l DETERIORATION

-1) Physical manifestation of failure of a material (e.g., cracking, delamination, flaking, pitting, scaling, spalling, straining) caused by environmental or internal autogenous

influences or hardened concrete as well as other materials.

2) Decomposition of material during either testing. or exposure to service.A.2.1. ABRASION DAMAGE -Wearing. away of a surface by rubbing and friction.A.2.2. BLISTERING

-The irregular raising of a thin layer, frequently 25 to 300 mm in diameter, at the surface of placed mortar or concrete during or soon after completion of the finishing operation; blistering is usually attributed to early closing of the surface and may be aggravated by cool temperatures.

Blisters also occur in pipe after spinning or in a finish plastic coat in plastering as it separates and draws away from the base coat.A.2.3. CAVITATION DAMAGE -Pitting of concrete caused by implosion, i.e., the collapse of vapor bubbles in flowing water, which form in .areas of low pressure and collapse as they enter areas of .higher pressure.A.2.4. CHALKING -Formation of a loose powder resulting from the disintegration of the surface of concrete or of applied coating, such as cement paint.A.2.5i CORROSION

-destruction of metal by chemical, electrochemical, or electrolytic reaction with its environment.

A.2.6. CURLING -The distortion of an originally essentially linear or planar member into a curved shape such as the warping of a slab due to creep or to differences in temperature or moisture content in the zones adjacent to its opposite faces.A.2.7. DEFLECTION

-Movement of a point on a structure or structural element, usually measured as a linear displacement transverse to a reference line or axis..A.2.8; DEFORMATION

-A change in dimension or shape..A.2.9. DELAMINATION

-A separation along a.plane parallel to a surface as in the separation of a coating from a substrate or the layers of a coating from each other, or in the case. of a concrete slab, a horizontal splitting, cracking or separation of a slab in a plane roughly parallel to, an generally near, the upper surface; found frequently in bridge decks and other types of elevated reinforced-concrete slabs and may be caused by the corrosion or reinforcing steel; also found in slabs on grade caused by development, during the finishing operation, of a plane of weakness below the densified surface; or caused by freezing and thawing, similar to spalling, scaling, or peeling except that delamination affects.large areas and can often be detected by tapping.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 606 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 152 of 415 ER-AA-335-019 Revision 0 Page 11 of 17 ATTACHMENT I Definitions of Discontinuities In Concrete..

Page 3 of 6 A.2.10. DISINTEGRATION

-Reduction into small fragments and subsequently into, particles.

A.2.11. DISTORTION

-See Deformation.

A.2.12. DUSTING -The development of a powdered material at the surface of hardened: concrete.A.2.13. EFFLORESCENCE -A deposit of salts, usually white, formed on a surface, the substance having emerged in solution from within either concrete or masonry and subsequently been precipitated by evaporation.

A.2.14. EROSION -.Progressivedisintegration of a solid by the abrasive or cavitation action of gases, fluids, or solids in motion.A.2.15. EXFOLIATION

-Disintegration occurring by peeling off in successive layers;swelling up and opening into leaves or plates like a partly opened book.A.2.16.. EXUDATION

-A. liquid or viscous* gel-like material discharged through a pore, crack, or opening. in the surface of concrete.A.2.17. JOINT SPALL -A spall .adjacent toa joint, A.2.18,. PITTING -Development of relatively small cavities in a surface; in concrete, localized disintegration, such as a popout: in steel, localized corrosion evident as minute cavities on the surface.A.2.19. PEELING -A process in which thin flakes of mortar are broken away, from a concrete surface, such as by deterioration or by adherence of surface. mortar to forms as forms are removed.A.2.20. POPOUT -The breaking away of small portions of a concrete surface due to localized internal pressure, which leaves a shallow, typical conical, depression, A.2.20.1.

POPOUTS, SMALL -Popouts leaving holes up to 10 mm in diameter, or the equivalent.

A.2.20.2.

POPOUTS, MEDIUM -Pbpouts leaving holes between. 10 and 50 mm in diameter,.

or the equivalent.

A.2.20.3.

POPOUTS, LARGE -Popouts leaving holes greater than 50 mnm in diameter,.

or the. equivalent.

Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 607 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 153 of 415 ER-AA-3354019 Revision 0 Page 12 of 17 ATTACHMENT I Definitions of Discontinuities in Concrete Page 4 of 6 A.2.21. SCALING -Local flaking or peeling away of the near-surface portion of hardened concrete or mortar; also of a layer from metal..A.2.21.1.

SCALING, LIGHT -Loss of surface mortar without exposure of coarse aggregate.

A.2-21.2.

SCALING, MEDIUM -Loss of surface mortar 5 to 10 mm in depth and. exposure of coarse aggregate.

A.2.21.3.

SCALING, SEVERE -Loss of surface mortar 5 to 10 mm in depth with some. loss of mortar surrounding aggregate:

particles 10 to 20 mm in depth.AX2.21A.4.

SCALING, VERY SEVERE -Loss of coarse aggregate particles as well as mortar, generally to a depth greater than 20 mm.A.2.22.. SPALL -A fragment, usually in the shape of a flake, detached from a larger mass by a blow, by the action of weather, by pressure, or by expansion within the large mass.A.2.22.1.

SMALL. SPALL -A roughly circular depression not greater than 20 mm in depth or 50 mm in any dimension.

A.2.22.2.

LARGE SPALL -May be roughly circular or oval or in some cases elongated, more than 20 mm in depth and 150 mm in greatest dimension.

A.2.23. WARPING -A deviation of a slab or wall surface from its original shape, usually caused by either temperature or moisture differentials or both within the slab or wall.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 608 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 154 of 415 ER-AA-335-"19 Revision,O Page 1:3 of 17 ATTACHMENT I Definitions of Discontinuities in Concrete Page:5 of 6 A.3. Textural features and phenomena relative to their development.

A.3.1. AIR VOID -A space in cement paste, -mortar or concrete filled with air; an entrapped air void is characteristically 1 mm or more.in size and irregular in shape; an entrained air void is typically between 10 mm and 1 mm. in diameter and spherical or nearly so..A.3.2. BLEEDING -The autogenous flow of mixing water within, or its emergence from, newly placed concrete or mortar; caused by the settlement of the solid materials within the mass; also called water gain.A.3.3. BUGHOLES -Small regular. or irregular cavities, usually not exceeding 25 mm in diameter, is resulting from entrapment of air bubbles in the surface of formed concrete during placement and consolidation, A.3.4. COLD-JOINT LINES -Visible lines on the surfaces of formed. concrete indicating the presence of joints where one layer of concrete had hardened before subsequent.

concrete was placed.A.3.5. DISCOLORATION

-departure of color from that-which is normal or desired.A.3.6. HONEYCOMB

-Voids left in concrete due to failure of the mortarto effectively fill the spaces among coarse aggregate particles.

A.3.7. INCRUSTATION

-A crust or coating, generally hard, formed: on the surface of concrete or masonry construction or on aggregate particles.

A.318. JOINT -A physical separation in concrete, whether precast or cast-in-place, including cracks if intentionally made to occur at specified locations; also the region where structural members intersect such as a beam-column joint.A.3.9. LAITANCE -A layer of weak and nondurable material containing cement and fines from aggregates,.

brought by bleeding water to the top of overwet concrete; the amount is generally increased by overworking or over-manipulating concrete at the surface by improper finishing or by job traffic.A.3.10. SAND POCKET -A zone. in concrete or mortar containing fine aggregate with little or no cement.A.3.1 1. SAND STREAK -Astreak of exposed fine aggregate in the surface of formed concrete, caused by bleeding.A.3.12. SEGREGATION

• - The differential concentration of the components of mixed, concrete, aggregate, or the like, results in non-uniform proportions in the mass.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 609 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 155 of 415 ER-AA-336-019 Revision 0 Page 14 of.17 ATTACHMENT I Definitions of Discontinuities in Concrete Page 6 of 6 A.3.13. STALACTITE

-A downward-pointing deposit formed as an accretion of mineral matter produced by evaporation of dripping water from the surface of concrete, commonly shaped like an icicle.A,3.14, STALAGMITE

-An upward-pointing deposit formed as an accretion of mineral matter produced by evaporation of dripping water, projecting from the surface of concrete, commonly conical in shape, A,3415 STRATIFICATION

-The separation of overwet or overvibrated concrete into horizontal layers with increasingly lighter material toward the top; water, laitance, mortar, and coarse aggregate tend to occupy successively lower positions in that order; a layered structure in concrete resulting from placing of successive batches that differ in appearance; occurrence in aggregate stockpiles of layers of differing grading or composition; a layered structure in a rock foundation.

A.3.16 WATER VOID -Void along the underside of.an aggregate particle or reinforcing steel which formed during the bleeding period; initially filled with bleed water.Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 610 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 156 of 415 ER-AA-335-019 Revision 0 Page 15 of 17 ATTACHMENT 2 Definitions:

of Post Tensioning System (Tendons)

Indications Page 1 of I 'CA. ACTIVE CORROSION

-- Corrosion on a component or surface that exhibits metal loss that has occurred since fabrication or construction,and

/ or exhibits pitting, visible to the naked eye. Active corrosion is usually a. reddish / rust color.C.2. BROKEN WIRE -- A wire within a tendon assembly that is broken and not.capable of accepting pre-stress load. Wires that are excessively protrude'from the anchorage components are. suspected to: be broken.C.3.. MISSING BUTTON HEAD -- The end of the deformed portion of a wire that accepts the. pre-stressed force is missing. The end of the wire may be visible within the.anchorage..

C.4. PROTRUDING OR UNSEATED WIRE -- A. wire within a tendon assembly that extends beyond a, tendon anchorage after stressing and is not seated against the anchorage.

C.5, EXCESSIVE SHIM GAPS -- Shims that have slipped .out of position.leaving..gaps in excess of construction tolerances between the halves.C.6. UNEVEN SHIM STACK -- Shims that have shifted out of position creating a condition where the pre stress load is not evenly: distributed over the shim stack assembly.C.7, FREE WATER -Water seeping: or dripping from tendon anchorage components or within the grease can. Quantify all free water. , Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 611 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 157 of 415 ER-AA-335-019 Revision 0 Page 16 of 17 0 ATTACHMENT 3 ASME IWL (Class CC) Containment Tendon Anchorage Visual Examination NDE Report Pae I ot Station: ..Unit: D I Date: Report No: WO No(s).: Tendon Anchorage No.: I Tendon End: E"] Shop El Field Location:

I Tunnel,. Gallery, Buttress:

I Elevation:

1 , Bearing Plate 1.D.: I Bearin Plate l.D. Anchor Head I.D. Bushing I1D.Exam Type: E] Detailed Visual El General Visual Type Of Exam: E]Direct E]Remote[: As Found Exam I As Left Exam Following Retensioning Of Tendons Which Have Been Detensioned Design Drawing(s)

Visual Aids: Illumination Used Attribute RI NRI 10 Explanation

/ Comments Missing Wires, Missing Button Heads Protruding I Unseated Wires Broken Wires Active Corrosion Other Corrosion Evidence Of Free Water (Quanti fy Cracks Pitting Nicks, Gouges, Mechanical Damage Uneven Shim Stack Excessive Shim Gaps Gasket Seating Surface Damage .......Surface Discontinuities, Deflections

...Other (Explain)

......Results Legend: I R- Recordable Indication NRI- No Recordable Indications 10 -Information Only Supplemental information.

-]Yes E]No E3 Sketch E-Photo El]Video El Other (Describe):

Comments:I Documentation of LimitationslObstructions:

Examiner:

Level: Date;Further Evaluation Required:

C] Yes C], No Additional Actions: (Action Request. Work Order, Issue Report, etc. nlrt1lated for Corrective Action) Suspect Areas shall be disposliioned by a Responsble Engineer Reviewer:

DATE: ANII: DATE: Page -.of Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 612 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 158 of 415 ER-AA-335-019.Revision 0 Page 17 of 17 ATTACHMENT 4 ASME IWL (Class CC) Containment Concrete Detailed or General Visual Examination NDE Report Page I of 1 Station: Unit: Date: t Report No: System: Component,.

WO No(s).: Location:

Building:

Elev.: Col: Row: AzimuthiRadlus:

Exam Type:, l Detailed Visual Type Of Exam: ElDirect M ElGeneral Visual E]Remote Design Drawing(s)

Visual Aids:1:....

i Surface: E] OD [] ID ..Surface I .components Coated:L 0] YES El No Illumination UsedI Attribute RI NRI 10 Explanation I Comments Cracks (Characterize and Size)Exposed Reinforcing Steel.Exposed Metallic Items (Other)Evidence Of Grease Leakage Evidence Of Moisture Leaching Or Chemical Attack ....Settlements Or Deflections.

,,, Degraded Patches or Repairs. ...Popouts, Voids, Honeycomb

....S pa lls .............

Cold Joint Lines ............

Corrosion Staining Scaling / Dusting Coating Deterioration

........Abrasion, Cavitation, Wear .....Air Voids I Bug Holes ....Efflorescence Other.(Explain

_Results. Legend: RI.- Recordable Indication NRI.- No Recordable.Indications 10 -Information Only.Supplemental Information

C]Yes C]No :0 Sketch ElPhoto []Video [I Other (Describe):

Examiner:

....._Level: _ Date: Further Evaluation Required:

[I Yes 0 No Additional Actions: (Action Request, Work Otder. IssuaReporl, etc. initiated for Corrective Action) Suspect Areas shall be disposefoned by a Responsible Engineer Reviewer:

Date:: ANII: Date:..Page __ of Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 613 of 1008 loom Exelon Generation.

REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 159 of 415 TMI -Unit 1 Number Corrective Maintenance Procedure 1410-Y-83 Title Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 Applicability/Scope USAGE LEVEL Effective Date TMI Division 2 08/05/13 This document is within QA plan scope XJ Yes L, No Safety Reviews Required [ Yes No List of Effective Pages Paqe 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Revision Page Revision Pace Revision Page Revision 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 1 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 614 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 160 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Corrective Maintenance Procedure 1410-Y-83 T itle Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure provides guidance for the installation and/or modification of the tendon end caps on the TMI-1 Reactor Building.

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 SA-AA-129, "Electrical Safety" 2.2 MA-AA-796-024, "Scaffold Installation Inspection and Removal" 2.3 CMR 93-035, "RB Tendon End Cap Modification" 2.4 1301-9.1, "Reactor Building Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance" 2.5 1410-Y-11, "Threaded Piping and Fitting Maintenance" 2.6 MA-AA-716-021 "Rigging and Lifting Program" 3.0 PLANT STATUS 3.1 Operating or shutdown..4.0 PREREQUISITES

• Obtain Shift Manager/Control Room Supervisor permission prior to commencing this maintenance and request he specify any Tech. Spec. limitations or limitations due to plant operation applicable during performance of this procedure.

• Initiate RWP if working in a radiologically controlled area.* If lifting and handling equipment is to be used, ensure rigging and lifting devices have been inspected/approved for use in accordance with procedure 1407-15.5.0 LIMITS AND PRECAUTIONS

5.1 Tendon

end caps located in the vicinity of the Main Steam safety relief valve discharge stacks may not be worked on while the plant is at power.5.2 Care should be exercised while working from scaffolds, platforms, ladders, high or restricted access locations.

Respect for the safety and well-being of other personnel in the area must be observed.5.3 During grease replacement the grease could be hot and direct contact with the grease should be avoided.5.4 The grease could be under pressure.

Remove plugs and nuts slowly to allow pressure, if any, to vent off.5.5 Spilled grease could create a slipping safety hazard and damage roof surfaces.

During all operations, it should be cleaned up and placed into waste containers.

2 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 615 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 161 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Corrective Maintenance Procedure 141 0-Y-83 Title Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 5.6 Tendons located near hot MS or FW penetrations may contain hot, thin grease which makes end cap work more difficult and possibly hazardous.

It may be preferable to work on those during a plant outage, if practical.

5.7 When conditional step(s) do not apply, the performer shall continue to the next numbered step.

6.0 DESCRIPTION

AND LOCATION OF SYSTEM/ASSEMBLY 6.1 The original RB tendon end cap design is as shown in Attachment 2.6.2 The latest RB tendon end cap design is as in Attachment 3.6.3 All tendon end caps are accessible from outside the Reactor Building.

The end caps for the hoop tendons are located on both sides of each of six buttresses evenly spaced around the Reactor Building.

The end caps for the dome tendons are located on the outside diameter of the dome. The vertical tendon end caps are located in the lower tendon access gallery under the RB mat and under the removable deck plates on top of the ring girder.7.0 SPECIAL TOOLS. MATERIALS AND PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS 7.1 The supervisory personnel for administering the progress of this work and directing manpower shall be fit by skill, training and/or experience to implement this procedure.

7.2 The craft personnel responsible for the physical activities associated with this procedure shall be fit by skill, training or experience to perform their duties.7.3 Miscellaneous hand tools.7.4 Greasing Equipment (only required if end cap is being removed).7.4.1 Come-alongs and associated rigging. The end caps weigh approximately 200# when filled with grease.7.4.2 Drum belt heaters.7.4.3 Hand pump for pumping hot grease from a 55 gallon drum.7.4.4 Thermometer (calibrated) to measure replacement grease temperature 0-300 0 F).7.4.5 Viscosity Oil Co. Visconorust 2090P-4 Casing Filler Grease.7.5 Plastic bags, plastic sheeting, rags, buckets and drums for waste grease.7.6 Solvent -for removing grease and cleaning equipment. (EPA 2000 or CRC Natural Degreaser Aerosol is acceptable to TMI).7.7 Goodyear pliobond adhesive with brush top can or approved equal gasket cement. Commercial grade.7.8 Spray galvanizing type paint made by LPS Research Laboratories, Inc. or approved EQUAL.Commercial grade.3 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 616 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 162 of 415 Number TMI -Unit I Corrective Maintenance Procedure 141 0-Y-83 Title Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 7.9 Modified 1 1/16" socket sets with body approximately 3" long in order to clear end cap hold-down studs on original type end cap hold-down configuration.

7.10 Cleaning rags.7.11 Tendon End Cap fasteners, gaskets, and clamps.7.11.1 Top (Shop End), Vertical End Cap Materials:

• Flat Under-Can Gaskets, 1 per end cap, SS # 286-110-0500-1 (Inland Ryerson Drawing No. 170WAC5) -1/2 inch thick, closed cell neoprene, 17 1/2" O.D. (+1/16, -0) x 14 1/2" I.D. (+0, -1/16), Manufacturer-Rubatex Corp. or equal.* Stud Gaskets, 4 per end cap, SS# 929-031-3000-1.

1/8 inch thick neoprene, 3/8" O.D. x 5/8" I.D. Manufacturer

-J.D. Rohrback Company of Lancaster or equal.* Belleville Spring Washers, 4 per end cap, SS# 000-454-4810-1.

5/8" standard, Manufacturer

-Rolex Co. Hillside, NJ. or equal.7.11.2 Bottom (Field End), Vertical End Cap Materials:

• O-Ring Gaskets, 1 per end cap SS# 459-046-7500-1.

5/8" cross-section, 17 1/4" I.D., 60 -80 durometer neoprene.7.11.3 Hoop and Dome Tendon End Cap Materials:

• Flat Under-Cap Gaskets, 1 per end cap, SS# 286-110-0500-1 (Inland Ryerson Drawing No. 170WAC5) -1/2 inch thick, closed cell neoprene, 17 1/2" O.D. (+1/16, -0) x 14 1/2" I.D. (+0, -1/16), Manufacturer

-Rubatex Corp. or equal.* End Cap Pipe Plugs, 4 per end cap, 1/2" NPT Galvanized.

• End Cap Pipe Plugs, 1 per end cap, 1/4" NPT Galvanized.

• Hold-Down Clamps, 4 per end cap, (Ref. P.O. 0436005), Manufacturer

-Precision Surveillance or equal.* Hold-Down Bolts and Washers, 4 per end cap. 1" -8UNC x 2 1/2" Galvanized.

• POP-A-PLUG, P/N PSC-0750-S, SSN 000-478-0820-1

• POP-A-PLUG Installation Tool* Teflon tape thread sealant 0 4 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 617 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 163 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Corrective Maintenance Procedure 141 0-Y-83 Title Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 8.0 PROCEDURE General: The RB tendon end caps will be re-installed in one of the following configurations depending upon which tendon group they are in: Preferred Configuration for Hoop and Dome (See Attachment

3) The cap is removed and the main gasket is replaced with the conventional Rubatex gasket, The original through-cap mounting bolting is replaced with hold down clamps, and the through-cap holes plugged with Pop-A-Plugs.

A 1/4" vent plug is installed.

The end cap is then filled with new filler grease.Primarily used on the upper end of vertical tendons (See Attachment 2). This alternative makes no changes to the existing design. A Rubatex gasket and "thru-can" bolting are used.Used on vertical tendon lower end caps. This makes no modifications to the existing design. An O-ring is installed in the end cap which is bolted directly into the bearing plate.8.1 On Data Sheet 1, record the tendon identity and the end of the tendon which is having its end cap installed.

8.2 Deleted

8.3 End cap removal and prep (For tendon inspection or for replacement of main gasket).8.3.1 Vent off pressure by slowly removing the grease inlet plug.8.3.2 During the removal of the tendon end cap and until the reinstallation of the cap, keep track of the amount of grease lost or scrapped and record this amount on Data Sheet 1 for the tendon end cap being worked.8.3.3 Remove the four end cap hold down nuts and washer, if they exist. Pull the tendon end cap off and set it down in a secure location.8.3.4 Remove the hold down studs from the anchorage if they exist. If a stud cannot be removed from the anchorage, the entire ring may be removed although it is preferable to leave the ring in place.8.3.5 Clean and discard the old grease from the end cap and from the anchorage head and bearing plate as necessary to provide for proper placement of the new gasket or 0-ring and retaining plate.8.3.6 Clean and dry the gasket seating surface of the tendon end cap and bearing plate using approved solvent or other approved cleaner.8.3.7 Note that this step is not applicable for vertical tendons. If not already installed, in the OD of the cap, approximately 6" from the flange and in line with the fill plug, drill and tap for a 1/4" NPT vent plug.8.3.8 Using a 1"-8 UNC tap or thread chaser, clean up the four bolt holes in the base plate around the end cap.5 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 618 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 164 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Corrective Maintenance Procedure 1410-Y-83 Title Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 8.3.9 If not already done, the four hold down stud holes are to be plugged for hoop and dome tendons. This method of plugging is with Pop-a-plugs, however, 1/2" NPT plugs may be substituted.

8.3.9.1 Prior to installing a Pop-a-Plug, ensure that the hole in the can is free of gouges or scoring that would affect its ability to effect a seal.8.3.9.2 Install the Pop-a-Plug in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Use no pipe sealant.8.3.9.3 If unable to install a Pop-a-Plug, tap the hole to accept a 1/2" NPT Galvanized Pipe plug. Apply teflon tape and install the plug.8.4 Installation of replacement Rubatex Gasket configuration for hoop and dome tendons.8.4.1 Bond the Rubatex gasket to the face of the flange using pliobond.8.4.2 Align the tendon end cap over the anchorage against the bearing plate using care to avoid damaging or misaligning the gasket which has been glued to the end cap flange.8.4.3 Secure four tendon end cap hold down clamps with bolts and washers to the bearing plate holes and hand tighten them.8.4.4 Recheck that the gasket has not slipped or become crimped and that the tendon end cap and hold down clamps are aligned properly.8.4.5 Tighten each bolt, equalizing the load on each as much as possible, to evenly compress the Rubatex main gasket by approximately 1/8". (No torquing is required)8.4.6 Heat grease to 140OF to 200OF using a calibrated thermometer to obtain temperature and record on Data Sheet 1.8.4.7 For horizontal and dome tendons, attach a vendor supplied Y-device to the grease inlet of the tendon end cap and hand pump hot grease (140°F -200 0 F) into the tendon end cap until it reaches a level 1 1/2" to 2" below the vent hole to allow for the expansion of the grease. Record grease level on Data Sheet 1 8.4.8 Apply teflon tape to the grease inlet and vent plug threads and install the grease inlet plug and the vent plug and tighten them securely using an approved thread sealant.8.4.9 Verify that no grease is leaking. If leakage does exist, correct the deficiency.

8.4.10 Record amount of grease added on Data Sheet 1.8.5 Installation of Rubatex gasket with top (shop end) vertical "through-can" bolting.8.5.1 Bond the Rubatex gasket to the face of the flange using Pliobond.8.5.2 Align the tendon end cap over the anchorage against the bearing plate using care to avoid damaging or misaligning the gasket which has been glued to the end cap flange.6 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 619 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 165 of 415 Number TMI -Unit 1 Corrective Maintenance Procedure 1410-Y-83 Title Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 8.5.3 Install the four tendon end cap hold down nuts (with gaskets and conical washers) on the studs and hand tighten them.8.5.4 Recheck that the gasket has not slipped or become crimped and that the tendon end cap is properly aligned.8.5.5 Tighten each nut, equalizing the load on each stud as much as possible, to evenly compress the Rubatex main gasket by approximately 1/8". (No torquing is required.)

NOTE Do not overfill if topping off with grease. Maintain 2" to 3" of air gap below top of can.8.5.6 Refill the tendon end cap as follows: 1. Heat grease to 140OF to 200OF using a calibrated thermometer to obtain temperature and record on Data Sheet 1.2. Attach a vendor supplied Y-device to the grease inlet of the tendon end cap and hand pump hot grease (140°F to 200 0 F) into the tendon end cap until it reaches a level 2" to 3" below the vent hole to allow for the expansion of the grease. Record grease level on Data Sheet 1.3. Apply teflon tape to the grease inlet and vent plug threads and install the 0 grease inlet plug and the vent plug and tighten them securely using an approved thread sealant.4. Verify that no grease is leaking and record it on Data Sheet 1. If leakage does exist, correct the deficiency.

5. Record amount of grease added on Data Sheet 1.8.6 Installation of O-Ring gaskets on lower vertical tendons with bearing plate bolting 8.6.1 Bond the O-Ring gasket in place using Pliobond.8.6.2 Align the tendon end cap over the anchorage against the bearing plate using care to avoid damaging or misaligning the O-ring which has been glued to the end cap.8.6.3 Install the four tendon end cap hold down bolts and hand tighten them.8.6.4 Tighten each bolt, equalizing the load on each bolt as much as possible, to evenly compress the O-ring main gasket. The flange should be pulled up tight against the bearing plate. Bring the bolts to a "snug-tight"*

condition and then tighten the bolts by an additional 1/4 to 1/3 turn of the bolt head. (*"Snug-tight" is defined as the tightness attained by the full effort of a person using an ordinary spud wrench.)0 7 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 620 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 166 of 415 TMI -Unit 1 Corrective Maintenance Procedure Number 141 0-Y-83 Title Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 8.6.5 It is required to refill the tendon duct void from the lower vertical tendon end when most of the tendon has been drained of its grease. The top (shop end) vertical tendon end grease inlet plug shall be removed during filling so that grease passes through the tendon duct void and out the top, until air has been purged from the system. No air gap is required when performing a total refill of the tendon duct void. Record grease temperature on Data Sheet 1.8.6.6 Verify that no grease is leaking and record it on Data Sheet 1. If leakage does exist, correct the deficiency.

8.6.7 Record

amount of grease added on Data Sheet 1.9.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 9.1 No grease leakage from the tendon end cap.9.2 End cap verified to have an air space at the top to allow for expansion of the grease. (8.4.7 and 8.5.6 "Note"))9.3 The work area has been cleaned of all debris and grease spilled during the work process.9.4 Data Sheet 1 (Attachment

1) is completed for each end cap that has had a grease change and is included in the work package. A copy of each data sheet is forwarded to the Lead Mechanical Engineer.10.0 POST MAINTENANCE TESTING 10.1 Visual inspection to verify leak tightness.

No leakage is acceptable.

11.0 ATTACHMENTS 11.1 Attachment 1 -Data Sheet 1 11.2 Attachment 2 -"Original Can Hold-Down Design" 11.3 Attachment 3 -"Hoop and Dome Tendon End/End Can Assembly Latest Design" 8 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 621 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 167 of 415 ATTACHMENT I Data Sheet I Regreasing of RB Tendon End Caps Tendon End: llo rm 141 0-Y-83 Revision 8 Page 1 of 1 8.1 8.3.2 Tendon Identity:_

Amount of grease removed: UaII1JI Ho 8.4 Hoop and Dome Tendons 8.4.6 Replacement grease temperature:

_F (140°F to 200 0 F)8.4.7 Grease level below vent hole inches (1% to 2")8.4.9 Grease leaking Yes No 8.4.9 Amount of grease added gallons 8.5 Top Vertical Tendons 8.5.6(1) Replacement grease temperature OF (140°F to 200 0 F)8.5.6(2) Grease level below vent hole inches (2" to 3")8.5.6(4) Grease leaking Yes No 8.5.6(5) Amount of grease added gallons 8.6 Lower Vertical Tendons 8.6.5 8.6.6 8.6.7 Replacement grease temperature OF (14 Grease leaking Yes No Amount of grease added gallons 0 0 F to 200 0 F)10.0 PMT Sat Comments: Unsat Calibrated Test Equip.:, Cal. Due Date: Supervisor Signoff: Date: Attach filled out and signed copies of this data sheet to the Job Closeout or Tendon Surveillance Report Package for any end caps which have been removed/regreased.

9 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 622 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 168 of 415 TMI -Unit 1 Corrective Maintenance Procedure Number 141 0-Y-83 A*1*~WTitle RB Tendon End Cap Installation Revision No.8 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 1 TENDON GREASE CAN RETENTION RING TENDON GREASE CAN RETENTION STUDS (4 EACH)\UNDER-CAN GASKET 0" RING OR FLAT RUBATEX DESIGN.ORIGINAL CAN HOLD-DOWN DESIGN 10 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 623 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 169 of 415 TMI -Unit 1 Corrective Maintenance Procedure Number 141 0-Y-83 Title Revision No.RB Tendon End Cap Installation 8 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 1 TENDON STRESSING WASHER.THE HYDRAULIC STESSING RAM PJL. ON THIS TENIDON GREASE 2NPT FILL A HOOP & DOME TENDON END/END CAN ASSEMBLY LATEST DESIGN 11 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 624 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 170 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 1.0 PURPOSE 09/03/13 Page 1 of 2 Revision 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0 TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE SURVEILLANCE PURPOSE Oquo Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title 08 SQ 1.0 TMI. 13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 625 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 171 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 1.0 PURPOSE 09/03/139 nf9 LANCE Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The Purpose of the Tendon Surveillance Program is to demonstrate the integrity of the containment pre-stressing system, including containment tendons, tendon end anchorage hardware and adjacent concrete integrity, and evaluation of the corrosion protective (grease) system. Individual inspections of selected tendons, as well as grease sample testing are performed to evaluate the overall integrity of the pre-stressing system.1.2 Tendon surveillance is required at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after the Initial Containment Structural Integrity Test and is to be performed every 5 years thereafter for the life of the plant.1.3 The purpose of this Surveillance I.S.I. Manual is to provide those procedures that will be necessary to perform the Unit 1 Physical 4 0 th Year In-Service Inspection (Surveillance) of the Containment Building Post-Tensioning System Tendons for Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant.1.3.1 The surveillance must conform to the requirements of TMI Procedure 1301-9.1 Rev 23.1.3.2 The SQ procedures provide additional detailed instructions for certain surveillance activities.

1.3.3 In the event of conflict between any TMI Procedure and an SQ, the former governs.1.3.4 Procedures shall be used as shown in PSC Procedure SQ 2.0.1.3.5 In addition, each procedure provides as necessary, the reporting responsibilities for PSC Personnel for notification to TMI Engineering in writing of unacceptable conditions that may have been detected as a result of the Inspections, Tests or Evaluations.

1.4 It shall be the responsibility of Exelon to evaluate the seriousness of the unacceptable condition and to formulate, with the assistance of the PSC Engineering Department as required, or if needed, a means of corrective action.1.4.1 It shall further be Exelon's responsibility to draft and submit a formal report to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission describing the unacceptable condition and the required corrective action.1.5 This Surveillance I.S.I. Manual has been developed in accordance with Exelon's Procedures 1301-9.1 Rev 23, ER-AA-330-005 Rev 10, ER-AA-330-006 Rev 7, ER-AA-335-019 Rev 0 Level 3- Information Use, 1410-Y-83 Tendon Cap Installation Rev 8 and ASME Section Xl, Subsection IWL, 2004 Edition and the applicable amendments as specified in 10CFR50.55a, Codes and Standards.

08 SQ 1.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 626 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 172 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 2.0 SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 09/03/13 Page 1 of 6 Revision 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 1ýYtiý5*0-Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Approved by Approved by Q.A. MANAGER Title 09/03/13 Date PRESIDENT Title 09/03/13 Date U v 09 SQ 2.0.TMI.13 IS[Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 627 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 173 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 2.0 SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 09/03/13 Page 2 of 6 Revision 0 1.0 CONTAINMENT ARRANGEMENT 1.1 The Three Mile Island Unit 1 containment building is a post-tensioned and reinforced concrete structure comprised of a vertical cylinder with a shallow dome containment.

It is supported on a conventional reinforced concrete foundation slab. The containment structure post-tensioning systems provide sufficient external pressure load to balance the internal pressure of the structure as well as the design basis accident internal containment pressure.

The post-tensioning system consist of: 1.2 166 vertical tendons in the cylinder walls anchored at the top surfaces of the ring girders and at the bottom of the base slabs;1.3 330 hoop tendons in the cylinder wall. Each tendon encloses 120 degrees of arc and is anchored at two of the six vertical buttresses;

1.4 Three

groups of 49 dome tendons (total 147 tendons) alternately oriented at 120 degrees to each other and anchored at the vertical faces of the ring girders.1.5 Each tendon consists of nominally 169 -%" diameter high strength wires with buttonhead anchorages.

The vertical and hoop tendons are housed in individual welded seam tubing sheathing connected to steel bearing plates and trumplets at each end. The dome ducts are 5" schedule 40 pipe. The sheathing (pipe) is cast into each containment structures' concrete walls and dome. The tendons are capped at each anchorage with a sheathing filler cap and the tendon sheathing and caps are filled with corrosion preventing grease.2.0 UNIT 1 SCOPE OF WORK 2.1 The required Inspections, Testing and evaluation of the Post-Tensioning System of Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1 during the 4 0 th Year surveillance, shall be performed for the tendons (selected by TMI Engineering) and types of activities shown in Table 1 and Table 2.2.1.1 The surveillance must conform to the requirements of TMI Procedure 1301-9.1 Rev 23.2.1.2 The SQ procedures provide additional detailed instructions for certain surveillance activities.

2.1.3 In the event of conflict between any TMI Procedure and an SQ, the former governs.09 SQ 2.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 628 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 174 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 2.0 SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 09/03/13 Page 3 of 6 Revision 0 VISUAL .PHYSICAL'TENDON END 40 1 COMMENTS 4.,,, .'*i .~ ( g. a ... .. .. % ...D-143 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 * *D-225 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 9 0 0 COMMON D-237 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0

• 0 0 0 0 0 DETENSION D-303 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H13-03 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 DETENSION-SINGLE END STRESSED H13-10 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBSTITUTE FOR H13-08 H24-1 5 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHYSICAL AT BT.2 ONLY, VISUAL BOTH ENDS H24-22 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SINGLE END STRESSED, SUBSTITUTE FOR H24-15 H35-02 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0

• 0 H62-26 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 *

• 0 0 0 COMMON V-32 SHOP/FIELD

• 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMMON-SINGLE END STRESSED V-84 FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VISUAL INSPECTION AT GALLERY END V-.108 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SINGLE END STRESSED V-159 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DETENSION-SINGLE END STRESSED SQ 6.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL SQ 6.1 -INSPECTION FOR WATER SQ 7.0 -GREASE SAMPLE ANALYSIS SQ 8.0- ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SQ 8.3 -CONCRETE INSPECTION (IWL Item L2.50)(IWL Item L2.40)(IWL Item L2.30)(IWL Items L1.10, L1.11, and L1.12)LEGEND SQ 9.0 -MONITOR TENDON FORCE SQ 10.2- TENDON WIRE INSPECTION SQ 10.3 -TESTING TENDON WIRES SQ 11.0 -RETENSION TENDONS SQ 12.0- GREASE CAP REPLACEMENT SQ 12.1 -GREASE REPLACEMENT (IWL Item L2.10)(IWL Item L2.20)(IWL Item L2.20)e -Indicates noted inspection is required at ends indicated t -Indicates noted inspection is required if water is detected during inspection for water or gasket repair Note: All grease leak repairs shall be field verified as leaking. If no leak is present removal of tendon from scope may be recommended to Utility.U U v 09 SQ 2.0.TM1.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 629 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 175 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 2.0 SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 09/03/13 Page 4 of 6 Revision 0 S H46-34 H51-40 SHOP/FIELD SHOP/FIELD 0 6 (0..0 ,, I 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 DETENSION V-115 V-136 SHOP/FIELD 10 0 0 0 0 SHOP/FIELD 0 0 0 0 0* 0SINGLE END STRESSED DETENSION

-SINGLE END STRESSED 0 0 0 LEGEND SQ 6.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL SQ 6.1 -INSPECTION FOR WATER SQ 7.0 -GREASE SAMPLE ANALYSIS SQ 8.0 -ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SQ 8.3 -CONCRETE INSPECTION (IWL Item L2.50)(IWL Item L2.40)(IWL Item L2.30)(IWL Items L1. 10, L1.11. and L1.12)SQ 9.0 -MONITOR TENDON FORCE SQ 10.2 -TENDON WIRE INSPECTION SQ 10.3 -TESTING TENDON WIRES SQ 11.0 -RETENSION TENDONS SQ 12.0 -GREASE CAP REPLACEMENT SQ 12.1 -GREASE REPLACEMENT (IWL Item L2.10)(IWL Item L2.20)(IWL Item L2.20)* -Indicates noted inspection is required at ends indicated t -Indicates noted inspecton is required if water is detected during inspection for water or gasket repair Note: All grease leak repairs shall be field verified as leaking. If no leak is present, removal of tendon from scope may be recommended to Utility.S S~I W 09 SQ 2.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 630 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 176 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 2.0 SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 09/03/13 Page 5 of 6 Revision 0 3.0 TMI UNIT 1 -40TH YEAR ADJACENT TENDONS D-142 D-144 D-224 D-226 D-236 SHOP & FIELD SHOP & FIELD SHOP & FIELD SHOP & FIELD SHOP & FIELD ADJACENT TO D-143 ADJACENT TO D-143 ADJACENT TO 0-225 ADJACENT TO D-225 ADJACENT TO D-237 H46-33 H46-35 H51-39 H51-41 BT 2 & BT 1 BT 2 & BT 1 BT 3 & BT 1 BT 3 & BT I ADJACENT TO H46-34 ADJACENT TO H46-34 ADJACENT TO H51-40 ADJACENT TO H51-40 D-238 SHOP & FIELDO ADJACENT TO D-237 V-1 14 TOP & BOT ADJACENT TO V-1 15 D-302 SHOP & FIELD 1 ADJACENT TO D-303 V-1 16 TOP & BOT ADJACENT TO V-1 15 D-304 SHOP & FIELD ADJACENT TO 0-303 V-135 TOP & SOT ADJACENT TO V-136 V-137 TOP & BOT L ADJACENT TO V-136 H1 3-02 BT I& BT 3 ADJACENT TO H13-03 HI3-0 BT1i&BT3 ADJACENT TO H13-03 H1 3-04 BT 1 & BT 3 ADJACENT TO H 13-03 H13-1i BT 1 & BT 3 ADJACENT TO H13-10 H13-12 BT 1 & BT 3 ADJACENT TO H13-10 H24-23 BT 2 & BT 4 ADJACENT TO H24-22 H24-24 BT 2 & BT 4 ADJACENT TO H24-22 H35-01 BT 3 & BT 5 ADJACENT TO H35-02 H35-05 BT 3 & BT 5 ADJACENT TO H35-02 H62-25 BT 6 & BT 2 ADJACENT TO H62-26 H62-27 BT 6 & BT 2 ADJACENT TO H62-26 V-30 TOP & BOT ADJACENT TO V-32 V-33 TOP & BOT ADJACENT TO V-32 V-107 TOP & BOT ADJACENT TO V-108 V-109 TOP & BOT ADJACENT TO V-108 V-160 TOP & BOT ADJACENTTOV-159 V-161 TOP & BOT ADJACENT TO V-159 Nomenclature:

D= Dome; H = Hoop; V Vertical 3.1 Designated Adjacent Tendons are the closest that meet the following criteria: 3.1.1 Are in the same SGR grouping (i.e. either de-tensioned not during the SGR work).09 SO 2.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 631 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 177 of 415 N 1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 2.0 SURVEILLANCE SCOPE 09/03/13 Page 6 of 6 Revision 0 3.1.2 Are otherwise not previously de-tensioned.

3.1.3 Are accessible.

3.1.4 (Applies to hoop and dome tendons) Are in the same sub group (e.g., H24-xx or D2-XX).4.0 EXPLANATION 4.1.1 "V" are Vertical Tendons, "H" are Hoop Tendons and "D" are Dome Tendons.4.1.2 "e" -means the tendon shown shall be inspected for the stated requirements during this Surveillance.

S S a w 09 SQ 2.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 632 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 178 of 415 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LIST Ixa;6A dowi Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Approved by Approved by Q.A. MANAGER Title 09/03/13 Date PRESIDENT Title 09/03/13 Date 10 SQ 3.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 633 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 179 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 3.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LIST 09/03/13 Page 2 of 2 Revision 0 1.0 EQUIPMENT 1.1 The following list of equipment should be available for use during the Surveillance operations.

This list is only intended as a guide.1.2 Miscellaneous shackles, hooks, chain hoists, Come-A-longs, hoisting slings.1.3 Banding equipment.

1.4 Communications

equipment

-Walkie Talkies or Sound Powered Phones.1.5 Buckets, pails, rags, brushes.1.6 Miscellaneous Tools, hammers, wrenches, ratchets, sockets, bundling wire, screw drivers, pliers, heavy duty wire cutters, files, pry bars, etc.1.7 Miscellaneous nuts, bolts, pins, washers, wooden blocks, rags, lights, extension cords, tape, etc.1.8 Platforms, scaffolding, ladders, man-lifts, cable, ropes, etc.1.9 Plastic Bags, Plastic Sheeting (Visqueen).

1.10 Band or Drum heaters.1.11 Fluid Pump for drum.1.12 Empty 55 Gallon drums.1.13 Grease can gaskets.1.14 Stressing Shims.1.15 55 Gallon drums of Viscosity Oil Visconorust 2090P-4 (Certified).

1.16 55 Gallon drums of Univar Mineral Spirits Rule 66 (Certified).

10 SQ 3.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 634 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 180 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 4.0 Q.C. EQUIPMENT LIST 09/03/13 Page 1 of4 Revision 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE QUALITY CONTROL EQUIPMENT LIST IýL" dami Q.C. INSPECTOR Title 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by Approved by Title PRESIDENT Title 09/03/13 Date 11 SQ4.0TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 635 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 181 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 4.0 Q.C. EQUIPMENT LIST 09/03/13v, .-t i PRECISILANCE Revision 0 1.0 INSPECTION EQUIPMENT 1.1 The following items shall be required for the inspections stated in each procedure.

Each piece of testing and measuring equipment shall be in a currently calibrated condition.

Items in excess of those shown as being required for that procedure, and being used during the Inspections of that procedure, shall be documented on the appropriate Data Sheet where they were used for the following items: Name, Identification and Recalibration Date.2.0 SQ 6.0 2.1 Surface Thermometer 2.2 Pocket-Probe Thermometer

2.3 Sample

of new Visconorust 2090P-4 grease in a closed container (for Color Match)3.0 SQ 6.1 3.1 Suitable quantities of clean, unused non-metallic containers for obtaining water samples 3.2 Clean unused rags or wipers 3.3 Indelible permanent marking devices and/or labels for the sample containers

3.4 Flashlights

and batteries 3.5 Pens, Markers, Data Sheets, Tendon Inspection List 4.0 SQ 7.0 4.1 Suitable quantities of clean, unused 1-quart containers, plastic or steel 5.0 SQ 7.1 5.1 Standard Outside Measuring Micrometer capable of reading to 0.001" or better.5.2 Standard Inside Measuring Micrometer capable of reading to 0.001" or better.5.3 Special Pitch Diameter Go and No-Go Thread Plug Gauges.5.4 A set of three hardened standard stub ACME thread wires (diameter 0.129" to 0.162").5.5 Shims, used in the three-wire method of measurement.

11 SQ 4.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 636 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 182 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 4.0 Q.C. EQUIPMENT LIST 09/03/13 Page 3 of 4 Revision 0 6.0 SQ 8.0 6.1 Magnifying Glasses with suitable illumination

6.2 Optical

Comparator with 0.005" Measuring Reticle 6.3 Steel Ruler, Steel Tapeline 6.4 400 Grit Wet or Dry Sandpaper 6.5 Steel Wool -Medium Coarseness 7.0 SQ 8.3 7.1 Optical Comparator with 0.005" Measuring Reticle 7.2 Feeler Gauges 7.3 Steel Ruler, Steel Tapeline 8.0 SQ 9.0 & SQ 10.0 8.1 Stressing Jacks 8.2 Pressure Gauges 8.3 Steel Ruler 8.4 Caliper (Optional)

8.5 Heise

Digital Gauge (Verification of Pressure Gauge Calibration, refer to Procedure QA 10.1)8.6 Surface Thermometer

8.7 Feeler

Gauges 9.0 SQ 10.2 9.1 Tendon Wire Pulling Ram (Optional)

9.2 Steel

Ruler, Steel Tapeline 9.3 Pressure Gauge, if used with the hydraulic pump for the Pulling Ram 10.0 SQ 10.3 10.1 Steel Ruler, Steel Tapeline oS 10.2 1" O.D. Micrometer 11 SQ 4.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 637 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 183 of 415 N 1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 4.0 Q.C. EQUIPMENT LIST 09/03/13 Page 4 of 4 Revision 0 S 10.3 10.4 11.0 11.1 12.0 12.1 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 Wire Test Apparatus Pressure Gauge, if used with the hydraulic pump for the apparatus SQ 10.5 Steel Ruler, Steel Tapeline SQ 11.0 Refer to Section 7.0 of this procedure

-same equipment SQ 12.1 Surface Thermometer Pocket-Probe Thermometer Steel Ruler, Steel Tapeline Pressure Gauge to be used during pressure pumping of grease Air powered grease pump(s)Hand driven grease pump(s)S w 11 SQ 4.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 638 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 184 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 5.0 PREREQUISITE CHECKLIST 09/03/13 Page 1 of 3 Revision 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE INSPECTION PREREQUISITE CHECKLIST INL" dwjauj Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Approved by 1,c- A/rl" Q.A. MANAGER Title 09/03/13 Date PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title 12 SQ 5.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 639 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 185 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 5.0 PREREQUISITE CHECKLIST 09/03/13 D. -~ I M PRECISION LANCE Revision 0 1.0 CHECKLIST 1.1 The following items should be checked prior to beginning work. This is not a Quality Control Documentation requirement and is only presented as a reminder list to those personnel who will be dependent on these items.1.2 Verify that all the Construction Equipment cited in PSC Procedure SQ 3.0 has been prepared or arrangements made for acquisition.

1.3 Verify

that the Quality Control Equipment cited in PSC Procedure SQ 4.0 has been ordered or is available for use.1.4 Verify that the Grease Testing Laboratory has been qualified and ready to receive the grease samples.1.5 Verify that suitable quantities of the data sheets are available or the means to generate a suitable quantity is available on site.1.6 Verify that controlled copies of the PSC Quality Assurance Manual and the PSC Surveillance I.S.I. Manual are available.

1.7 Verify

that each item supplied as Quality Control Equipment has been calibrated and that suitable documentation accompanies each item.1.8 Verify that all Field Quality Control Personnel are qualified and that copies of certifications exist for each Inspector.

1.9 Verify

the Construction Personnel are familiar with the operating manuals for the equipment and that suitable training has been provided to familiarize them with the Surveillance requirements.

1.9.1 Verify

that the Construction Personnel are familiarized with the Safety Comments for the Surveillance.

1.9.2 Verify

that the Construction Personnel have been familiarized with the OSHA safety requirements and any selective safety measures imposed by Exelon.1.9.3 Verify that the On-Site Radiological Safety Training requirements have been completed if required.1.10 Verify that the identity and location of each tendon to be inspected is correct.1.11 Verify that suitable quantities of Visconorust 2090P-4 Grease and Univar Mineral Spirits Rule 66 or equivalent are available with the required documentation.

2.0 ATTACHMENTS

2.1 Checklist

Form 12 SQ 5.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 640 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 186 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 5.0 PREREQUISITE CHECKLIST 09/03/13 Page 3 of 3 Revision 0 CHECKLIST ITEM STATUS SIGNED DATE 1.2 Verify that all the Construction Equipment cited in PSC Procedure El Yes El N/A SQ 3.0 has been prepared or arrangements made for acquisition.

1.3 Verify

that the Quality Control Equipment cited in PSC Procedure El Yes El N/A SQ 4.0 has been ordered or is available for use.1.4 Verify that the Grease Testing Laboratory has been qualified and El Yes El N/A ready to receive the grease samples.1.5 Verify that suitable quantities of the data sheets are available or El Yes El N/A the means to generate a suitable quantity is available on site.1.6 Verify that controlled copies of the PSC Quality Assurance El Yes El N/A Manual and the PSC Surveillance Quality Control Manual are available.

1.7 Verify

that each item supplied as Quality Control Equipment has El Yes El N/A been calibrated and that suitable documentation accompanies each item.1.8 Verify that all Field Quality Control Personnel are qualified and El Yes El N/A that copies of certifications exist for each Inspector.

1.9 Verify

the Construction Personnel are familiar with the operating El Yes El N/A manuals for the equipment and that suitable training has been provided to familiarize them with the Surveillance requirements.

1.9.1 Verify

that the Construction Personnel are familiarized with El Yes El N/A the Safety Comments for the Surveillance.

1.9.2 Verify

that the Construction Personnel have been El Yes El N/A familiarized with the OSHA safety requirements and any selective safety measures imposed by Exelon.1.9.3 Verify that the On-Site Radiological Safety Training El Yes El N/A requirements have been completed if required.1.10 Verify that the identity and location of each tendon to be El Yes El N/A inspected is correct.1.11 Verify that suitable quantities of Visconorust 2090P-4 Grease and El Yes El N/A Univar Mineral Spirits Rule 66 or equal are available with the required documentation.

11111111111111111F

" v 12 SQ 5.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 641 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 187 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL 09/03/13 Page 1 of 7 Revision 0 S EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE GREASE CAP REMOVAL S lhlrýoqaftj,-)Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title/A~t Ad61~, Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title a w 13 SQ 6.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 642 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 188 of 415 N 1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL 09/03/13 Page 2 of 7 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will establish the requirements for the removal of Grease Caps (End Caps) for purposes of evaluation and visual inspection during the In-Service-Inspection (Surveillance) of the Post-Tensioning System Tendons at Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1.2.0 RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 In the event of conflict between any TMI Procedure and an SQ, the former governs.2.2 As stated in PSC Procedure QA 4.0.3.0 QUALIFICATION 3.1 As stated in PSC Procedure QA 4.1.4.0 EQUIPMENT 4.1 The gauges and test equipment necessary for the Quality Control activities will be itemized in PSC Procedure SQ 4.0.5.0 QUALITY CONTROL 5.1 This procedure contains QCD points. The work shall not progress past or through a QCD without a sign-off or verbal approval from the QC Inspector.

All Quality Control Documentation (QCD) points shall only require documentation of information or evaluation data. The sign-offs and required information or evaluation data shall be documented on Data Sheet 6.0.6.0 PRECAUTIONS 6.1 A tendon grease cap weighs in excess of 50 pounds and may contain 50 pounds of grease. Be prepared to support this weight when the grease cap is unbolted and removed.6.2 The sheathing filler (grease) may be in liquid, gel or solid form. Tendons in the area of steam or feed penetrations in operating plants, may contain hot grease and some caution should be exercised.

It is not necessary to drain all the grease from a tendon void and is to be avoided if possible.CAUTION: NEVER STRIKE THE BUTTONHEADS, THE WIRES, OR THE ANCHORAGES OF A STRESSED TENDON WITH A HAMMER OR ANY OTHER OBJECT.HAVE SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES OR SIZES OF CONTAINERS ON HAND TO CATCH THE GREASE, AS IT MAY FALL FROM THE TENDON VOID, ANCHORAGE OR GREASE CAP.13 SQ 6.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 643 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 189 of 415 IF AT ANY TIME A CRACKED OR BROKEN ANCHORHEAD IS DETECTED AS A RESULT OF THESE INSPECTIONS, ALL WORK SHALL STOP. ALL PERSONNEL SHALL BE MOVED AWAY FROM THAT AREA. THE PSC CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED.

THE CONDITION SHALL BE FORMALLY DOCUMENTED BY A NONCONFORMANCE REPORT. THE WORK AND/OR INSPECTIONS SHALL CONTINUE AFTER A SAFETY EVALUATION HAS BEEN MADE AND ONLY AT THE DIRECTION AND CONTROL OF THE PSC CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR AND TMI ENGINEERING.

6.3 Provide

protection during inclement weather to prevent entry of moisture into the end anchorage.

6.4 Use wooden or plastic paddles or spatulas to scoop out bulk filler grease from around the anchorage.

No metal implements are permitted.

7.0 PREREQUISITES

7.1 Review

SQ 6.1, INSPECT FOR WATER. This procedure SHALL be adhered to in parallel with SQ 6.1.7.2 Position platforms, as required, at the end of the tendon to be inspected.

7.3 QCD- Document the tendon identification, Unit # and tendon end on Data Sheet 6.0 7.4 Provide support for the Grease Cap. Be prepared to catch any grease that may fall during loosening and removal.7.5 It may be advantageous to pack the outside of the grease cap with dry ice to further solidify the grease column. TMI Engineering shall be notified prior to performing any dry ice packing.7.5.1 Once the grease cap has been removed, the tendon end anchorage and shims may be packed with dry ice to further solidify the grease column. Dry ice must not be used in close proximity to loaded pre-stressing system components unless the material NDTT values are shown to be below the temperature (about -78.5 deg C)of the ice. TMI Engineering shall be notified prior to performing any dry ice packing.7.6 QCD- Document the date can removal started on Data Sheet 6.0.7.7 QCD -Document the use of dry ice to solidify the grease column on Data Sheet 6.0, for each occurrence.

13 SQ 6.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 644 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 190 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL 09/03/13 Page 4 of 7 Revision 0 7.8 QCD -Document the ambient temperature as well as the temperature of the concrete surface near the tendon within a 3 foot radius of the center of the grease cap or tendon void, on Data Sheet 6.0. The temperature shall be taken of the normal concrete.

It shall not be necessary to take the temperature again, if dry ice is used.Document the thermometer identification number and recalibration due date for each instrument used.7.9 Care shall be exercised to avoid splashing or spilling grease on concrete and other surfaces.

Spilled grease shall be removed and cleaned using Univar Mineral Spirits Rule 66 Solvent or equivalent, by scrubbing with brushes and wiping the excess with rags. It may be advantageous to tape plastic sheeting around the bearing plate and concrete to lessen the effect of spilled grease.8.0 REMOVAL OF GREASE CAP 8.1 Place a container and/or a protective cover under the tendon grease cap to protect adjacent areas from dripping grease.8.1.1 Bottom vertical and dome caps may have the grease plug removed to relieve pressure.8.1.2 Ensure are protected from spraying grease.8.2 Remove the bolts and washers holding the end cap to the bearing plate ensuring that the end cap is fully supported as the bolts are being removed.8.3 Carefully, remove the grease cap to prevent any foreign matter from dropping into the grease in that cap.8.4 QCD -Detect and record the anchorhead ID#. This ID# should be compared and verified to the original data, providing original data is available.

8.5 QCD -Observe the coating of grease on the inside of the grease cap, on the bearing plate, shims, anchorhead and buttonheads.

Note the completeness of the grease coverage on each item and document that evaluation accordingly on Data Sheet 6.0.8.5.1 Where the coverage is complete, check as complete coverage.8.5.2 Where the coverage is incomplete and bare metal is visible, check as Partial coverage and estimate the Percentage of Uncoated metal for each item.8.5.2.1 Uncoated metal is defined as that area that is dry and without any coating of grease. Some care should be used in judging uncoated metal, as the thickness of the coating has no bearing on acceptability.

Very thin coatings will be slightly tacky and will readily hold fingerprints.

13 SQ 6.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 645 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 191 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL 09/03/13 Dý= f 7 W LANCE Revision 0 8.6 QCQ -Any other unusual conditions shall be documented on Data Sheet 6.0, such as: water or other liquid present or draining during grease cap removal as well as the quantity of liquid (refer to Procedure SQ 6.1); quantities of dirt or other foreign matter in or around the tendon end or grease cap, etc.8.7 QCQ -The color of the grease on or around the tendon shall be compared to a sample of new unused grease for color or other variations from the new sample.While color is not a factor requiring acceptance, significant variations in color could be a sign of degradation of the protection medium. Document the comparison on Data Sheet 6.0.8.7.1 If the colors of the samples are reasonably close to each other, check the Match area on Data Sheet 6.0 and identify the color.8.7.2 If the colors vary greatly, check the No Match area and identify the color and variation, i.e., medium brown, darker than new sample. Document if any of the following items are observed during visual inspection of the grease: 8.7.2.1 Extreme discoloration.

8.7.2.2 Presence of corrosion products and/or dirt mixed within the grease, indicating adjacent metal pitting and metal breakdown.

8.7.2.3 Signs of moisture within the bulk filler (grease).8.7.2.4 Other signs of grease deterioration.

8.8 QCD -If required per SQ2.0, two-one quart samples of grease shall be taken from each end of the tendon prior to cleaning the anchorage and grease cap or using solvent cleaner. It is preferred that the grease be taken from the area of the anchorage, but may also be taken from the grease cap or tendon void. Document the amount of samples taken and the location of removal on Data Sheet 6.0. Refer to PSC Procedure SQ 7.0 for grease sample testing.8.8.1 Each sample can shall be identified by plant name, unit number, tendon number, tendon end, sample number and date.8.8.2 Refer to SQ7.0 for sample storage and retention requirements.

8.9 QCD -Determine the amount of grease that may have been lost during removal of the grease cap on Data Sheet 6.0. The Grease Loss from the tendon duct shall be kept separate and posted as required of Section 10.4 of this procedure.

8.9.1 QCD- If the grease in the grease cap is in satisfactory condition, it may be reused at the discretion of the QC Inspector.

If it is to be disposed of, document quantity of grease that is removed from the grease cap on Data Sheet 6.0.13 SQ 6.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 646 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 192 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL 09/03/13 Page 6 of 7 Revision 0 9.0 ANCHORAGE CLEANUP 9.1 When the tendon is to be visually inspected it will be necessary to perform a cleanup of the tendon end anchorage assembly to permit inspection.

9.2 Any grease removal shall be performed in such a manner to prevent damage, such as scratches on the anchorage or tendon wires. The removal process shall not add any contaminants to the remaining grease or the grease which could be taken for chemical analysis.9.3 Excess grease shall be removed from the tendon anchorage threads using clean non-metallic devices. Use bristle brushes of medium stiffness or rags with suitable quantities of solvent to dilute and wash away the grease. This cleanup must be sufficient to provide satisfactory condition for thread inspection.

9.4 Continue

the cleanup of the remaining portions of the tendon end, to include the shims, buttonheads, anchorage and bearing plate as necessary.

9.5 Univar

Mineral Spirits Rule 66 Solvent or equal shall be used to complete whatever cleanup may be necessary to perform subsequent activities.

9.6 QCD- Document the quantity of grease removed from the anchorage on Data Sheet 6.0.9.7 QCD -Document and describe damage (if any) caused by the removal of the grease cap or cleaning of the anchorage assembly on Data Sheet 6.0.10.0 TENDON PROTECTION 10.1 All tendon ends and anchorages shall be protected by covering with a plastic bag or sheeting whenever the tendon is not being worked on. Smear or brush a light coating of grease onto the wires, buttonheads and anchorhead prior to covering.10.2 It will be acceptable to replace the grease caps as a temporary measure, using the old gaskets, until that tendon inspection can be completed.

10.3 QCD -Document the method of tendon protection on Data Sheet 6.0. If the grease cap is temporarily installed, note if a new gasket or old gasket was used.10.4 QCD -Document the grease losses that are detected from the tendon duct itself.These losses shall be kept separate from the losses that occur from the tendon end anchorage assembly and the grease cap. This total shall not be finalized until the grease cap is installed permanently, as additional grease may be lost after the initial inspection.

10.5 QCD -Total the grease loss from previous sections in order to calculate the total amount of grease lost from this end of the tendon and document on Data Sheet 6.0.13 SQ 6.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 647 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 193 of 415 N 1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL 09/03/13 Page 7 of 7 Revision 0 11.0 DOCUMENTATION 11.1 The items requiring documentation in this procedure shall be documented on Data Sheet 6.0 included with this procedure.

11.1.1 The Data Sheet references the applicable Section or Step number of the procedure for each QCD.11.1.2 QCD- Post the calculated total grease loss (10.5) from this end to Data Sheet 12.1.12.0 ATTACHMENTS 12.1 Data Sheet 6.0.S S a w 13 SO 6.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 648 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 194 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL Data Sheet 6.0 09/03/13 Pagel of 1 Revision 0 TH Project: TMI 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE El UNIT 1 (7.3) Tendon No.: Tendon End: [J Shop El Field Grease Cap Removal (7.6) Date Removal Started: Q.C. Signoff (7.7) Dry Ice Used on Grease Cap and/or Anchorage El Yes [] No (7.8) Temp. of Concrete:

OF Thermometer No.: Re-Cal Date: Ambient Temp.: IF Thermometer No.: Re-Cal Date: (8.4) Anchorhead I.D.: Anchorhead Verification:

E] Match El No-Match (8.5) Grease Coating Grease Cap -Complete Partial Uncoated %Buttonheads

-Complete Partial Uncoated %Anchorhead

-Complete Partial Uncoated %Shims -Complete Partial Uncoated %Bearing Plate -(1) Complete Partial Uncoated %(1) -Limited within the inside diameter of the grease cap.(8.6) Unusual Conditions:

(8.7) Grease Color Match: El Yes [- No Grease Color: Comments: (8.8) Quantity of Samples Quart Samples identified per Step 8.8.1? El Yes El No Location of E] A.H. El B.P. El Shims El Cap El Duct Removal (8.9) Qty. of Grease lost during removal of cap: gal.(8.9.1) Grease from cap to be reused? El Yes [] No Qty. of Grease removed from cap: gal.(9.6) Qty. of Grease removed from anchorage:

gal.(9.7) Damage during cap removal or anchorage cleaning?

[I Yes El No Describe: (10.3) Method of Tendon Protection:

(10.4) Amount of Grease Loss from Tendon duct: gal.(10.5) Total quantity of lost grease (below): (8.8) _ +(8.9) _ +(8.9.1) _ +(9.6) _ +(10.4) = TOTAL (11.1.2) Document TOTAL grease lost on Data Sheet 12.1, GREASE REPLACEMENT.

El Yes [E No QC Reviewed:

Level: Date: 13 SQ 6.0 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 649 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 195 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER 09/03/13 Page 1 of 6 Revision 0 S EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE INSPECT FOR WATER S dami Q.C. INSPECTOR Title 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Approved1by Approved by Approved by Q.A. MANAGER Title PRESIDENT Title 09/03/13 Date 09/03/13 Date 14 SQ 6. 1.TM1. 13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 650 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 196 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER 09/03/13 Page 2 of 6 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will establish the requirements for performing an inspection of the Post-Tensioning Tendon System for evidence of water during the In-Service-Inspection (Surveillance) of the Post-Tensioning System Tendons at Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1.2.0 SCOPE 2.1 This procedure will be limited to performing and documenting the inspection for water from the tendon void or around the tendon anchorage assembly, including the grease cap. This inspection shall be performed just prior to removal of the grease cap and during the physical inspection of the tendon anchorage assembly.3.0 RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 In the event of conflict between any TMI Procedure and an SQ, the former governs.3.2 As stated in PSC Procedure QA 4.0.4.0 QUALIFICATION 4.1 As stated in PSC Procedure QA 4.1.5.0 EQUIPMENT 5.1 The equipment necessary for the Quality Control activities will be itemized in PSC Procedure SQ 4.0.6.0 PRECAUTIONS

6.1 Review

the I.S.I. Tendon Surveillance Program Safety Comments for the items that shall apply both for tendon force control and personnel safety. See PS 1.0.7.0 QUALITY CONTROL 7.1 This procedure contains no HOLD POINTS. All Quality Control Documentation (QCD) points shall only require documentation of information or evaluation data. The required information or evaluation data shall be documented on Data Sheet 6.1.7.2 The Quality Control Inspector shall be responsible for properly identifying any water samples that may have been collected.

The Inspector shall also be responsible for controlling those samples until they are turned over to Exelon or sent out for testing.Per Section 12.1, all water samples are sent out for testing or retained by PSC.8.0 PREREQUISITES 8.1 QCD -Document the Unit #, tendon identification and tendon end on Data Sheet 6.1.14 SQ 6.1.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 651 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 197 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER 09/03/13 PRECISION LANCE Revision 0 8.2 Provide support for the Grease Cap. Be prepared to catch any grease that may fall during loosening and removal.8.3 Care shall be exercised to avoid splashing or spilling grease on concrete and other surfaces.

Spilled grease shall be removed and cleaned using Univar Mineral Spirits Rule 66 solvent or equivalent.

It may be advantageous to tape plastic sheeting around the bearing plate and concrete to lessen the effect of spilled grease.8.4 This inspection will be performed during and after the removal of the grease cap. It is expected that all the tools and preparation for the removal of the grease cap will be in place or have been performed.

As the main purpose of this procedure is to detect the presence of water in the tendon void, the Inspector shall be afforded access to the tendon during loosening of the grease cap bolts to see if water is present.9.0 GREASE CAP REMOVAL IF UPON REMOVAL OF THE GREASE CAP, IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE ANCHORHEAD IS BROKEN, ALL WORK SHALL STOP ON THAT TENDON AND ALL PERSONNEL SHALL LEAVE THE AREA OF THE TENDON. THE PSC SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE NOTIFIED.

THE CONDITION SHALL BE FORMALLY DOCUMENTED BY A NONCONFORMANCE REPORT. THE WORK AND/OR INSPECTIONS SHALL CONTINUE AFTER A SAFETY EVALUATION HAS BEEN MADE AND ONLY AT THE DIRECTION AND CONTROL OF THE PSC SUPERINTENDENT AND TMI ENGINEERING.

9.1 Position

platform, as required, at the end of the tendon to be inspected. (As part of Grease Cap Removal Procedure, SQ 6.0)9.2 Place a container and/or a protective cover under the tendon grease cap to protect adjacent areas from dripping grease. (As part of Grease Cap Removal Procedure, SQ 6.0)9.3 Have a clean dry plastic container available for catching water samples.9.4 As the main purpose of this procedure is to determine the presence of water in the grease cap or around the anchorhead, the Inspector shall be alert to obtain samples of that water as the cap is loosened and removed and to estimate the quantity detected.9.5 Remove the bolts holding the grease cap to the bearing plate. The grease cap must be fully supported as the bolts are being removed. Care should be taken when removing the end cap since the bulk filler may drop off or drip as a liquid of medium viscosity.

Allow the Inspector the opportunity to obtain water samples, if any water is present. (As part of Grease Cap Removal Procedure, SQ 6.0)14 SQ 6.1.TMI.13 IS[Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 652 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 198 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER 09/03/13 Page 4 of 6 Revision 0 9.5.1 QCD -Document if water was detected, the quantity of water detected and if a sample was collected during removal of the grease cap. In addition, document the amount of any water detected in accordance with Section 10.0. Also document any other relevant comments.9.6 Carefully remove the grease cap to avoid spilling the contents.

The Inspector shall inspect the interior of the cap for the presence of water and if possible collect a sample of that water.9.6.1 QCD -Document if water was detected, the quantity of water detected and if a sample was collected from inside the grease cap. Also document any other relevant comments.9.7 Inspect the tendon anchorage assembly, shims, bearing plate, anchorhead and buttonheads for the presence of water.9.7.1 QCD -Document if water was detected, the quantity of water detected and if a sample was collected from around the tendon anchorage components.

Also document any other relevant comments.9.8 Work shall continue for the In-Service Inspection as regularly scheduled or as required by the Procedures in the Surveillance Program I.S.I. Manual.9.9 The next point that water could be encountered would be during or just after Detensioning the Tendon. Therefore, the Inspector shall be especially vigilant during this portion of the In-Service Inspection to detect the presence of water. Inspect for the presence of water during or after Detensioning the Tendon.9.9.1 QCD- Document the quantity of water detected and if a sample was collected.

Also document any other relevant comments.10.0 WATER DOCUMENTATION 10.1 The quantity of water observed in or on the tendon will be described based on the following terms.10.1.1 OBSERVABLE MOISTURE 10.1.1.1 "Observable Moisture" is defined as that quantity of water which has been immediately observed by the Inspector to be concentrated, collected or draining out from the grease cap or tendon anchorage assembly.

While this is intended to describe that moisture condition associated with condensation, it could be present in quantities of less than 8 ounces.14 SQ 6.1.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 653 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 199 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER 09/03/13 LAN CE Revision 0 10.1.2 SIGNIFICANT MOISTURE 10.1.2.1 "Significant Moisture" is defined to be a quantity of water 1/2 pint (8 ounces) or more which has collected, concentrated or observed to be draining out of the tendon anchorage assembly or grease cap. This quantity is considered to be from a condition other than water formed through condensation.

11.0 NOTIFICATION 11.1 QCD -Exelon shall be notified with a formal letter within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> when water, regardless of quantity, has been detected during the In-Service Inspection.

This Notification shall define the condition detected referencing Section 10 of this Procedure and the specific quantity detected.11.2 Exelon shall be responsible for any corrective action and/or Notification to the NRC should that be required.11.3 The work and inspection shall continue until completed or formal notification by Exelon to halt the work is received.12.0 SAMPLE RETENTION/TESTING 12.1 The samples shall be temporarily retained by the PSC Quality Control Inspector until such time that they are sent out for pH testing per PSC Procedure SQ 6.2.12.2 QCD -Verify that the water samples are adequately identified.

Identification includes: Plant Name, Unit #, Tendon Number, Tendon End, and date.12.3 QCD -Document the location of storage for the samples.13.0 DOCUMENTATION 13.1 The items in this procedure requiring documentation shall be documented on Data Sheet 6.1.13.2 The Data Sheet references the applicable section number of the procedure for each QCD Point.14.0 ATTACHMENTS 14.1 Water Notification Letter 14.2 Data Sheet 6.1 14 SQ 6.1.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 654 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 200 of 415 To:

Subject:

PSC Procedure SQ 6.1: Inspect for Water Project: TMI 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE

[] UNIT 1 Tendon No: Tendon End: __ Shop LI Field Notification of Water Per PSC Procedure SQ 6.1 Section 11, "Exelon shall be notified with a formal letter within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> when water, regardless of quantity, has been detected during the In-Service Inspection.

This Notification shall define the condition detected referencing Section 10 of this Procedure and the specific quantity detected." This letter is to notify you that water was found in the tendon mentioned above.Quantity of Sample obtained: Description of Condition:

Per PSC Procedure

6.1 Section

10, the observed water is categorized as follows: D Section 10.1.1 -OBSERVABLE MOISTURE"Observable Moisture" is defined as that quantity of water which has been immediately observed by the Inspector to be concentrated, collected or draining out from the grease cap or tendon anchorage assembly.

While this is intended to describe that moisture condition associated with condensation, it could be present in quantities of less than 8 ounces.D Section 10.1.2 -SIGNIFICANT MOISTURE"Significant Moisture" is defined to be a quantity of water 1/2 pint (8 ounces) or more which has collected, concentrated or observed to be draining out of the tendon anchorage assembly or grease cap. This quantity is considered to be from a condition other than water formed through condensation.

Signature:

Level: Date: 14 SQ 6.1.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 655 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 201 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER Data Sheet 6.1 nQI1'3.111 PRECISION LANCE Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE El UNIT 1 (8.1) Tendon No.: Tendon End: El Shop El Field (9.5.1) DURING REMOVAL OF GREASE CAP Water Detected:

El Yes E] No Quantity:

Sample Taken: E] Yes El No [] N/A Moisture

Description:

El Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture El Not Applicable Comments: (9.6.1) INSIDE GREASE CAP Water Detected:

[] Yes El No Quantity:

Sample Taken: El Yes El No El N/A Moisture

Description:

E] Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture El Not Applicable Comments: (9.7.1) AROUND TENDON ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Water Detected:

E] Yes E] No Quantity:

Sample Taken: El Yes El No El N/A Moisture

Description:

[] Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture El Not Applicable Comments: (9.9.1) DURING DETENSIONING Water Detected:

E] Yes El No Quantity:

Sample Taken: El Yes El No El N/A Moisture

Description:

El Observable Moisture El Significant Moisture El Not Applicable Comments: (11.1) NOTIFICATION Exelon Notified:

El Yes Individual Name: Date: SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND STORAGE (12.2) Samples adequately identified:

El Yes (12.3) Samples stored at: QC Signoff: Level: Date: QC Reviewed:

Level: Date: 14 SQ 6.1.TM1.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 656 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 202 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.2 WATER SAMPLE 09/03/13 Page 1 of 3 Revision 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE WATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS 1Th",,&dauj Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Approved by Approved by Title Q.A. MANAGER Title 09/03/13 Date PRESIDENT Title 09/03/13 Date 15 SQ 6.2 TMI.113 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 657 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 203 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.2 WATER SAMPLE 09/03/13 Dn a If A.PRECISAN CE Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will establish the requirements for laboratory pH analysis of Water samples taken during the 40th Year In-Service-Inspections (Surveillance) of the Post-Tensioning System Tendons of Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1.2.0 RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 The laboratory that performs the testing/analysis shall be responsible for controlling the samples, performing the analysis, documenting the analysis on Laboratory letterhead stationery and submitting the reports to: PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION 3468 Watling Street East Chicago, IN 46312 Attention:

Quality Assurance 2.1.1 The Laboratory shall further be responsible to utilize trained personnel for the analysis and maintain the calibrated status, traceable to the NIST as applicable, for all test or measuring devices that may be used in providing test results.2.1.2 The Laboratory shall provide open access for inspection, survey or audit, as the need might arise, to PSC or its customers.

2.2 The PSC Quality Assurance Section shall be responsible for the qualification of Laboratory sources.2.3 Where specified in the Contract Documents, Exelon shall have the right of approval for Laboratory sources.2.4 The PSC Quality Control and/or Engineering Department shall review the reports for accuracy and content.2.4.1 This report shall be submitted to Exelon with the final Surveillance Report.3.0 SAMPLES 3.1 The Water Samples shall be sent to the Laboratory by any convenient mode of transportation.

The samples will have been marked to show the plant name, unit number, tendon number and the tendon end or buttress identification.

The sample shall be securely closed to prevent leakage and packaged to prevent damage.3.2 The samples shall maintain a form of identification throughout testing that will provide traceability to the original sample identification.

15 SQ 6.2 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 658 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 204 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 6.2 WATER SAMPLE 09/03/13 Page 3 of 3 Revision 0 3.3 The Laboratory shall notify PSC if it appears that the sample container has been damaged, tampered with, or any other occurrence that could contaminate the water sample.4.0 TEST DESCRIPTIONS 4.1 Each sample of Water shall be analyzed for pH 5.0 TEST METHOD 5.1 Each sample of Water shall be tested by the following test method: "pH by ASTM D-1293 or EPA 150.1 or equivalent" 6.0 REPORT 6.1 A copy of the report for the analysis of water shall be submitted to PSC.6.2 The report shall bear the date of testing and sample identification as it appears on each sample container.

6.3 The report shall be signed by the Laboratory Manager, who shall ultimately be responsible for the content.7.0 SAMPLE DISPOSAL 7.1 The remaining water samples may be scrapped 30 days after the issue of the report, unless the Laboratory is requested in writing to hold the samples for a longer period of time.15 SQ 6.2 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 659 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 205 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.0 SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS 09/03/13 Page 1 of 6 Revision 0 S EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS S lyuýjami Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by I,, r& 0A/ 'Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title 0 w 16 SQ 7.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 660 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 206 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.0 SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS 09/03/13 Page 2 of 6 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will establish the requirements for laboratory chemical analysis of Sheathing Filler (Grease) samples taken during the 4 0 th Year In-Service-Inspections (Surveillance) of the Post-Tensioning System Tendons of Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1.2.0 RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 The laboratory that performs the testing/analysis shall be responsible for controlling the samples, performing the analysis, documenting the analysis on Laboratory letterhead stationery and submitting the reports to: PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION 3468 Watling Road East Chicago, IN 46312 Attention:

Quality Assurance 2.1.1 The Laboratory shall further be responsible to utilize trained personnel for the analysis and maintain the calibrated status, traceable to the NIST, for all test or measuring devices that may be used in providing test results.2.1.2 The Laboratory shall provide open access for inspection, survey or audit, as the need might arise, to PSC or its customers.

2.2 The PSC Quality Assurance Section shall be responsible for the qualification of Laboratory sources.2.3 Where specified in the Contract Documents, Exelon shall have the right of approval for Laboratory sources.2.4 The PSC Quality Control and/or Engineering Department shall review the reports for accuracy and content as required by this procedure and for evaluation of the acceptability of those results according to the requirements of this procedure.

2.4.1 This report shall be submitted to Exelon with the Final Report.2.5 Grease Samples which exhibit reserve alkalinity number of <0.5 shall be retested per the unmodified version of ASTM D974 Section 9 and an acid number generated for the sample. Both the reserve alkalinity number and the acid numbers shall be reported with the test results when this occurs. Acceptance criteria for Acid Number is that it must be <1.16 SQ 7.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 661 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 207 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.0 SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS 09/03/13 P~un0 nf R~PRECISION LANCE Revision 0 3.0 SAMPLES 3.1 Sample #1 shall be sent to the testing laboratory for analysis in accordance with this procedure upon project completion unless otherwise notified by TMI Engineering.

Sample #2 may be turned over to Exelon to be held in reserve in the event of loss, retesting or for verification of the results of the original testing. Exelon may be responsible for the control and disposal of Sample #2. It is unlikely that a suitable quantity of Sample #1 shall remain after the original tests to perform supplemental tests, therefore any remainder of Sample #1 will be scrapped.3.2 In the event that the test results for Sample #1 do not meet the stated requirements of Section 8.0 of this Procedure, Exelon shall be immediately notified of the deficiency, with a formal letter to follow shortly thereafter.

Sample #2 shall then be sent to the testing laboratory for confirmation analysis in accordance with this procedure.

3.3 If PSC is required to test Sample #2 and that sample fails to meet the requirements of Section 8.0 of this Procedure, Exelon shall be immediately notified of the deficiency, with a letter to follow shortly thereafter.

3.4 The sample cans will have been marked to show the plant name, unit number, tendon number, and the tendon end or buttress identification and sample number.The can shall be securely closed to prevent leakage and packaged to prevent damage.3.5 The samples shall maintain a form of identification throughout testing, which will provide traceability to the original sample identification.

3.6 The Laboratory shall notify PSC if it appears that the sample container has been damaged, tampered with, or any other occurrence that could contaminate the grease sample.4.0 TEST DESCRIPTIONS 4.1 Each sample of Grease (Sheathing Filler) shall be analyzed for Chemical Properties and Physical Properties as specified in the following sections 5.0 and 6.0.5.0 TEST METHOD -CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 5.1 Each sample of Grease shall be mixed and tested as follows: 5.2 Water Soluble Impurities (ASME Section Xl Table IWL 2525-1)5.3 A water extraction of each sample of grease shall be made and tested as follows: 5.3.1 Using a spatula, coat the inside, bottom and sides, of a one liter glass beaker with 100 (plus or minus 10) grams of the grease.16 SQ 7.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 662 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 208 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.0 SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS 09/03/13 Page 4 of 6 Revision 0 5.3.2 The coated beaker shall be filled with about 900 ml of distilled water at room temperature.

5.3.3 Heat the filled beaker in an oven or by use of an immersion heater to 1 00°F (37.800C) plus or minus 2 0 F for 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. DO NOT HEAT ON A HOT PLATE.5.3.4 Run a blank on distilled water. If titrated, use a microburet, 1 ml or 5 ml with 0.01 -0.05 ml graduation levels.5.3.5 Decant water and analyze for soluble ions. Test only for salts in leached water.5.3.6 The water extraction shall be tested by the below cited test procedures for the appropriate water soluble ions. The results shall be reported as parts per million (ppm) in the extracted water.5.3.6.1.1 Chlorides (CI) by ASTM D-512 5.3.6.1.2 Nitrates (NO 3) by ASTM D-992 5.3.6.1.3 Sulfides (S) by APHA 427C "Methylene Blue Method" 6.0 TEST METHOD -PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 6.1 Each sample of Grease shall be tested as follows: 6.2 Moisture Content by ASTM D-95 6.3 Neutralization No. by ASTM D-974 Modified 6.3.1 The Neutralization Number (Reserve Alkalinity/Total Base Number) shall be performed in accordance with ASTM D-974 and the following modification (per ASME Section Xl, Table IWL-2525-1):

6.3.1.1 Place 10 g of sample in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask. Add 10 cc isopropyl alcohol and 5 cc toluene. Heat until sample goes into solution.6.3.1.2 Add 90 cc Distilled water and 20 cc 1N H 2 SO 4.6.3.1.3 Place in a steam bath for one-half hour. Stir well.6.3.1.4 Add a few drops of indicator (1% phenolphthalein) and titrate with 1N NaOH until the lower layer just turns pink.6.3.1.5 If acid or base solutions are not exactly 1 N, the exact normalities should be used when calculating the base number.16 SQ 7.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 663 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 209 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ L7.SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS 09/03/13 Page 5 of 6 PRECISION LANCE Revision 0 6.3.1.6 The Total Base Number (TBN), expressed as milligrams of KOH per gram of sample, is calculated as follows: TBN = [(20)x(NA)-(B)x(NB)]

x 5 6.1 W where B = milliliters NaOH NA = normality of H 2 SO 4 solution NB = normality of NaOH solution W = weight of sample in grams 7.0 REPORT 7.1 Two copies of each report for the analysis of grease shall be submitted to PSC.7.2 Each report shall bear the date of testing and sample identification as it appears on each can.7.3 Each report shall be signed by the Laboratory Manager, who shall ultimately be responsible for the content.7.4 Accuracy 7.4.1 The concentration of water soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulfides shall be determined within an accuracy of 0.1 ppm.7.4.2 The concentration of water shall be determined within an accuracy of 0.1 percent of dry weight of grease.7.4.3 The Neutralization Number shall be determined within an accuracy of 0.01 mg.KOH per gram of grease.16 SQ 7.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 664 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 210 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.0 SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS 09/03/13 Page 6 of 6 Revision 0 8.0 ACCEPTANCE OF ANALYSIS 8.1 The chemical analysis of the grease samples only concern the concentration of water soluble impurities, water in the samples and where required Reserve Alkalinity (Base Number).8.2 The followinq concentrations shall not be exceeded: 8.2.1 Water soluble Chlorides

-10 ppm 8.2.2 Water soluble Nitrates -10 ppm 8.2.3 Water soluble Sulfides -10 ppm 8.2.4 Water Content (H 2 0) -10% dry weight of filler 8.2.5 Reserve Alkalinity 8.2.5.1 (Base number) -Shall be at least 50% of the as-installed value, unless the as-installed value is 5 or less, in which case the base number shall be no less than zero. If the tendon duct is filled with a mixture of materials having various as-installed base numbers, the lowest number shall govern acceptance.

9.0 NOTIFICATION

NON-ACCEPTANCE 9.1 In the event that Sample #2 does not meet the required controls of Section 8.0 above, Exelon shall be formally notified by PSC Personnel for those unacceptable results after reviewing the reports. If PSC Quality Control is still on site when the tests have been completed, Exelon shall be notified of this deficiency with a nonconformance report.9.2 Exelon shall be responsible for evaluating the significance of the deficiency and to determine if corrective measures are required.10.0 SAMPLE DISPOSAL 10.1 The remaining sample grease may be scrapped 30 days after the issue of the report, unless the Laboratory is requested in writing to hold the samples for a longer period of time.10.2 The PSC Quality Control Department shall retain the option of disposing of the samples in less than 30 days if the results of the grease analysis are acceptable.

16 SQ 7.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 665 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 211 of 415 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM THREAD MEASUREMENT OF ANCHORAGES

~ThLi&&dW t a~)Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by/2,-r./, Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title 0= w 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 666 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 212 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASURING 09/03/13 Page 2 of 6 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will be used as the means of measuring anchorage thread diameters to assure that the external threads of a tendon anchorage meet a minimum strength requirement of 120% of the minimum Guaranteed Ultimate Tensile Strength (GUTS)of a tendon, when coupled with a specific Stressing Adaptor.2.0 SCOPE 2.1 This procedure shall address only those anchorages that have a 4 pitch stub ACME Thread (Class 2G). Design drawings show that the anchorages are a Grade 4140 steel, heat treated to a Brinell Hardness of 355 to 401. Furthermore, this procedure shall be limited to those anchorages of tendons to be monitored for lift-off force or detensioned and retensioned.

2.2 If the anchorage material is not of the type mentioned above, then the thread strength prediction equations shall be adjusted accordingly by the PSC Engineering Department.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITY

3.1 A PSC Quality Control Inspector shall be responsible for taking thread measurements.

The PSC Manager of Engineering, or his designee, shall be responsible for generating tables listing allowable external thread diameters for a specific Stressing Adaptor.4.0 DOCUMENTATION 4.1 All measurements shall be recorded, signed and dated by the Inspector on the form provided with this procedure.

The only Hold Point in this procedure is the acceptability of the measurements and acceptable match up with a stressing adaptor.4.2 QCD- All measurements, gauge identification and calibration status shall be documented on Data Sheet 7.1 as required.5.0 MEASURING INSTRUMENTS 5.1 The following instruments shall be necessary for thread measurements.

5.1.1 Standard

Outside Measuring Micrometer capable of reading to 0.001" or better.5.1.2 Standard Inside Measuring Micrometer capable of reading to 0.001" or better.5.1.3 Special Pitch Diameter Go and No-Go Thread Plug Gauges.5.1.4 A set of three hardened standard stub ACME thread wires (diameter 0.129" to 0.162").17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 667 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 213 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASURING 09/03/13q Af A N LANCE Revision 0 5.1.5 Shims, used in the three-wire method of measurement.

6.0 MEASURING

THREAD DIAMETERS 6.1 Two readings in perpendicular directions shall be taken for each thread measured.

A centering head and rule should be used to assure that the readings are perpendicular to each other. Crayon or soapstone can be used to mark locations, but care should be taken so as not to place the marks exactly where readings are taken, which would interfere with the accuracy of the measurements.

6.2 EXTERNAL

MAJOR DIAMETERS 6.2.1 External Major Diameters shall be measured for the 3rd, 6th and 9th threads.Measurements shall be made with an Outside Micrometer as shown in Figure 1 of Appendix 1.6.2.1.1 The Major Diameter is given directly by the micrometer reading.6.3 EXTERNAL PITCH DIAMETERS 6.3.1 External Pitch Diameters shall be measured for the 3rd and 9th threads.Measurements shall be made with an Outside Micrometer and three stub ACME thread wires of equal diameters as shown in Figure 2 of Appendix 1. Standard stub ACME thread wires of diameters ranging from 0.129" to 0.162" shall be used.Wire diameters shall be selected such that: (1) the wire rests on the tapered sides of the thread, not on the root flat, and (2) the wire protrudes beyond the crest of the thread as shown in Figure 2 of Appendix 1.6.3.1.1 The Pitch Diameter Constant dimension shall be determined from Appendix 2 for the wire diameter used. The shim thickness shall be added to the constant and the total subtracted from the micrometer reading to give the pitch diameter.6.4 EXTERNAL MINOR DIAMETERS 6.4.1 External Minor Diameters shall be measured for the 3rd and 9th threads.Measurements shall be made with an Outside Micrometer and three wires of equal diameters as shown in Figure 3 of Appendix 1. Wire diameter shall be selected such that: (1) the wire rests on the root flat, not on the tapered sides of the thread, and (2) the wire protrudes beyond the crest of the thread as shown in Figure 3 of Appendix 1.6.4.1.1 The sum of twice the selected wire diameter and shim thickness shall be subtracted from the micrometer reading to give the minor diameter.17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 668 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 214 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASURING 09/03/13 Page 4 of 6 Revision 0 6.5 INTERNAL MAJOR DIAMETERS 6.5.1 Internal Major Diameters shall be measured for the 3rd and 9th threads.Measurements shall be made with an Inside Micrometer with needle points as shown in Figure 4 of Appendix 1. Precautions shall be taken to reduce the angularity of the micrometer to a minimum, as shown. The angular reading overestimates the diameter by 0.00013" or less. This small discrepancy shall be ignored.6.5.1.1 The Major Diameter is given directly by the micrometer reading.6.6 INTERNAL PITCH DIAMETERS 6.6.1 Internal Pitch Diameters shall not be measured.

However, a check shall be made using Go and No-Go Plug Gauges to ensure that pitch diameters fall within specified limits. If the Go gauge does not go, or the No-Go gauge goes, that fact shall be recorded.6.7 INTERNAL MINOR DIAMETERS 6.7.1 Internal Minor Diameters shall be measured for the 3rd, 6th and 9th threads.Measurements shall be made with an Inside Micrometer as shown in Figure 5 of Appendix 1.6.7.1.1 The Minor Diameter is given directly by the micrometer reading.7.0 ANCHORAGE DISPOSITION

7.1 STRESSING

ADAPTOR (INTERNAL THREADS)7.1.1 The Stressing Adaptor shall have been accepted by PSC based on acceptance of the NO-GO thread plug gauge test fit. Actual major and minor thread diameters shall be documented.

7.2 BUSHING, FIELD ANCHORHEAD (EXTERNAL THREADS)7.2.1 For purposes of expediency the bushing or field anchorhead external threads shall be identified as external threads in this section of the procedure since the measurements and requirements are identical, but shall be documented for specific identity.7.2.2 Once an adaptor has been measured, the PSC Engineering Department shall generate a Stressing Adaptor Disposition Table for that Adaptor. These tables list allowable external thread diameters for a bushing or field anchorhead to be coupled to a specific adaptor and still meet the minimum strength requirements.

17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 669 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 215 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASURING 09/03/13 r in PRECISIWONLAN-CE Revision 0 7.2.2.1 These tables are based on calculations that consider that it shall be necessary to maintain full engagement with the adaptor and external thread (bushing or field anchorhead) at all times during stressing or detensioning operations.

7.2.3 Select

a stressing adaptor and external thread to be dispositioned.

7.2.4 Select

the Stressing Adaptor Disposition Table, Appendix 4, for the adaptor to be evaluated.

The Adaptor Identification will appear near the top of the table.7.2.5 Using the major diameter of the external thread and referring to the columns under the heading Major Ranges, within the first two lines representing the range of major dimensions, locate that range into which the major dimension of the external thread will fall. This shall establish the Major control vertical column for that external thread.7.2.6 With the pitch diameter of the external thread and using the Pitch Range column at the left edge of the table, read down to that range of dimensions into which the pitch diameter measurement of the external thread will fall. This shall establish the Pitch control horizontal line for that external thread.7.2.7 The intersection of the Pitch control horizontal line with the Major control vertical column shall provide the Minor diameter control dimension.

7.2.7.1 If the Minor diameter control is less than the measured minor dimension of the external thread, then that combination of external thread and stressing adaptor is acceptable.

7.2.7.2 If the Minor diameter control dimension is greater than the measured minor dimension of the external thread, that combination is not acceptable and another stressing adaptor shall be selected to be mated to the external thread.Therefore, Section 7.2.6. shall be repeated until acceptable matches are provided.8.0 DOCUMENTATION 8.1 The items requiring documentation in this Procedure shall be documented on Data Sheet 7.1 as each might apply.9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 Data Sheet 7.1 9.2 Appendix 1 -Figures for Thread Diameter Measurements (These figures are used to illustrate the manner of measuring thread diameters.)

9.3 Appendix

2 -Pitch Diameter Constant For 3 Wire Method(This table lists the pitch diameter constant dimensions necessary for calculating an external pitch diameter.)

17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 670 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 216 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASURING 09/03/13 Page 6 of 6 Revision 0 9.4 9.5 Appendix 3 -NBS Allowable Diameter Ranges(This is a computer generated table of allowable external and internal diameter ranges for 4 pitch stub ACME threads (Class 2G) as specified by Federal Standard Publication FED-STD-H28/13.)

Appendix 4 -Stressing Adaptor Disposition Tables (These tables shall be used for dispositoning a bushing or field anchorhead paired with a specific Stressing Adaptor.One table shall be computer generated for each Adaptor. Since these tables cannot be generated until the Adaptors are measured, it is likely these tables will be added to this procedure at a later date than initial submittal of this procedure.

However, these tables shall be supplied as soon as possible.)

17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 671 of 1008 REP-i 098-510 Appendix E, Page 217 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION DATA SHEET 7.1 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 S Project: TMI -4Qtm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon No.: Anchorage ID.: Project: TMI -40tn YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Tendon End/Buttress No.: Adaptor ID: EQUIPMENT MICROMETER WIRE SHIMS Thread Mic ID Recal Date ID No. Recal Date ID No. Recal Date Ext.Major Ext.Pitch Ext.Minor Int.Int. N/A N/A Minor MEASUREMENTS THREAD Wire Wire Shim Average Thread Read 3rd 6th 9 th Average Constant Diameter Size Diameter Ext. 1 Major 2 Ext. 1I E Pitch (1) 2 _ _Ext. 1 Minor (2) 2 Int. 1 N/A N/A Major 2 N/A N/A Int. 1 N/A N/A N/A Minor 2 N/A N/A N/A Int. Go Gauge ID: N/A Recal Date: N/A Result: N/A Pitch No-Go Gauge N/A Recal Date: N/A Result: N/A ID: Notes: (1) External Pitch Diameter = [Average]

-[Wire Constant]

-[Shim Size](2) External Minor Diameter = [Average]

-[2 X Wire Diameter]

-[Shim Size]DISPOSITION S Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Adaptor MarkIII Min. Minor Diameter from Adaptor Table -Acceptable? (Yes or No)I QC Signoff: QC Reviewed: Level: Level: Date: Date: Adaptor Mark Min. Minor Diameter from Adaptor Table Acceptable? (Yes or No)a S W 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 672 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 218 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 1 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Appendix 1 -Figures for Thread Diameter Measurements MICROMETER STUB SHIM ACME LTtI I V O-VIKAT IA~TnD flTRML'rL%

FIG. 2 EXTERNAL PITCH DIAMETER (NOTE WIRES REST ON SIDE OF THREAD AND PROTRUDE BEYOND CREST)FIG. 3 EXTERNAL MINOR DIAMETER (NOTE WIRES REST ON ROOT AND PROTRUDE BEYOND CREST)FIG. 5 INTERNAL MINOR DIAMETER 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 673 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 219 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 2 09/03/13 Page 1 of 2 Revision 0 Appendix 2 -Pitch Diameter for 3 Wire Method From Federal Standard H28/13 C = w(1 + cosec a) -(cot a) 21n gives CON = 4.993929(M

-0.483392 WIRE SIZE*1290.1291,..1292:.1293.1294.1295.1296.:1297.1.298.129?.1300.1301.1302.1303.1304.1305.1306.1307.1308.1309.1310.1311.1312.1313.1314.1315.1316..1317.1318.1319.1320.1321.1322.1323.1324 CON..161.161.162.162.163.164.165-165.166.166* 166.167.167.168.168.169.169.170* 170.171.171 1- 172.172* 173.173* 174-174.175.175.i7s.176.176-17?.177 17-8 WIRE SIZE.1325.1326.1327.1328.1329.1330.1331.1332.1333.1334.1335.1336.1337.1338.133?.1340.1341.1342.1343.1344.1345.1346.1347.1348.1349 1350.1351.1352.1353.1354.1355.1356..1357.1358.1359 CON..178.179.179.180.180.18.1.182.182.183.04.183.184.184.185* 185* 186.186.187.187.188.188.189.189.190.190.191.191.192* 192.193.193.194* 194.195.196 WIRE SIZE*1360.1361:.1362.1363:.1364.136S.1366.1367.1368.1369.1.370..1371.1372.1373.1374.1375.1376.1377.1378.1379.1380.1381.13B2.1383.1384.1385.1386.1387.1388.1389.1390.1391.1392.1393..1394 CON..196..196 1.97.197.198.198.199.199.200.200 20.1.201.202.202.203.203.204.204.205.205.206.206.207.207.208.208.209.209..210.210.211.211.21.2.212.213.WIRE SIZE.1395..1396.1397.1398.1399.1400..1401.1402.1403.1404.1405.1406.1407.140.8 1.4.09.1410.1411.1412..1413.1414.1415.1416.1417.1418.1419.1420.1421.1422.1423.1424.1425.1426.1427..1428.1429 CON..213.214.214...215.215.216.216.217.217.218.218.219.210.220.220.221.222.222.223.223.224.224.225.225*226.226 K 27.227.228:.228.229.230.230 WIRE*S.IZE.1430.1431.1432.1433.1434.1435 ,.1436.1437.1438 ,1439.1440.1'441.1442.1443.1444.1445.1446.1447.1448.1449.1450.1451.1452.1453.1454 i.455.1456..1457.1458.1459.1460.1461.1462.1463.1464: CON..231.231.232.232.233.233.234.234.235 ,235.236.236.237.237.238.238.239.239.240.240.241.241.242.242.243.243.244.244.245.246.246.246.247.247.248 S S a~I W 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 674 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 220 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 2 09/03/13 Page 2 of 2 Revision 0 Pitch Diameter for 3 Wire Method From Federal Standard H28/13 C = w(1 + cosec a) -(cot a) 21n gives CON = 4.993929(W)

-0.483392 WI RE SIZE CON..1465. 2A8.166 .2'49.1467 .2-49.1,468: .250.i469 .250.1.470 ..251.1/47i .251.1472 .252.1473. .2 52.1474 .253.1475 .253.14.76 .254.1477 .254.1478 .255.1479 !255.1480 .256.1481 .256.1482 .257.1483 ,257.1484 .:258.1485 .258.A1486 .259.1487 .259.1.488 .260.1489 .260.1490 .261.1491 .261.1492 .262.1493 .262.1494 .263.1495 .263.14.96. ..26.w1497 6:266.1458 '265.1499 .26S WIRE SIZE CON..1500 .266.1501 .266.1502 .267.1503 .267.I504 .26(.1505 .268.1506 .269.1507 .269.1508 .270..1509 .270.1510 .271.1.511 .271 4.512 .272.1513. .272.1514 .273.I1SS .273.1516 .274.1517 .274.1518 .275.1519 .275.1520 .276..521 .276.1522 .277.1523 .277.1524 .278.1.525. .278.1526 .279.1527 .279.1528 .280.1529- .280.1530 .281.1531 .281.1532 .282.1533 .282.1534 .283 WIRE SIZE CON..1535 .28-,3.1536 .284.1537 .284.1538 .285.1539' .285.1540 .286.1541 .286.1542 .287..1543 .287.1544 .288.1545 .2.80.1546 .2.89.1547 .289.1548 .290.1549 .290.1550 .291.1551 .291.1552 .292.1553 .292.1554 .293..1555 a293.1556 .294.1557 .2?4.1558 .295.1559 .295.1560 .276.1561 .296.1562 .297.1563 .297.1564 .298.1565 .298.1.566 .299.1567 .279.1.568 .300..1569 .300 WIRE S'I"ZE CON..1570. .301.1571 .301.1572 .302.1573 .302.1574 .30.3.1575 .303.1576 .304.1577 .304.1578 .305.1579 .305.1580 .306.1581 '306.1582 .307.1583 .307.1584 .308.1585 .308.1586 ..309.1587 .309.1588 .310.1589 .310.1590 .311.15V1 .311..1592 .312.1593 .312.1594 .313.1595 .313.1596 .314.1597 .314.1598 .315.1599 .315.1600 .316.1601 .316.1602 '317.1603 .317.160.4 .318 WIRE SIZE CON..1605 .318.1606 ..319.1607 .319.1608 .. 320.1609 .320:.1610 .321.1611 .321.1612 .322.1613 .322.1614 .323..1.615 .323.1616 .324.1617 .324.1618 .325.1:619 .325.1620 .326.1621 .326.1622 .327.1623 .327.1624 .328..1625. .328 o1626 .329.1627 .329.1628 .330.1629 .330.1630 .331.1631 .331.1632. .332.1633 .332.1634 .333.1635 .333.1636 .334 ,1637 .334.1638 .335.1639 .335 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 675 of 1008 v----------

---

EXTERNAL THREADS ........ ----- > < -- -----------

INTERNAL THREADS MAJOR DIAMETER PITCH DIAMETER MINOR DIAMETER MAJOR DIAMETER PITCH DIAMETER MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN NIN MAX MIN MAX-4 0 CD Co 0 (D 0)-O CD 03)0 0 0 oo 0.2500 0.3750 0.5000 0.6250 0. 7500 0.8750 1.0000 1.12S0 1.2500 1.3750 1.5000 1.6250 1.7500 1.8750 2.0000 2.1250 2.2500 2.3750 2.5000 2. 6250 2.7500 2.8750 3.0000 3..1250 3. 500-.3750 3.5000 3.6250 0.2375 0.3625 0.4875 0.6125 0.7375 0.8625 0.9875 1.1125'1.2375 1.3625 1.4875 1.6125 1.7375 1.8625 1.9875 2.1125 2.2375 2.3625 2.4875 2.6125 2.7375 2.8625 2.9875 3.1125 3.2375 3.3625 3.4875 3.6125 0.1710 0.2951 0.4193 0.5437 0.6681 0.7925 0.9170 1.0415 1.1661 1.2906 1.4152 1.5398 1.6644 1.7890 1.9137 2.0383 2.1630 2.2877 2.4124 2.5370 2.6617 2.7864 2.9111 3.0359 3.1606 3.2853 3.4100 3.5348 0.1530 0.2764 0.4001 0.5239 0.6479 0.7719 0.8960 1.0202 1.1443 1.2686 1. 3929 1.5172 1.6415 1.7658 1.8902 2.0146 2.1390 2.2634 2.3879 2.5123 2.6368 2.7613 2.8858 3.0103 3.1348 3.2593 3.3838 3.5083 0.0800 0.2050 0.3300 0.4550 0.5800 0.7050 0.8300 0.9550 1.0800 1.2050 1.3300 1.4550 1.5800 1.7050 1.8300 1.9550 2.0800 2.2050 2.3300 2.4550 2.5800 2. 7050 2.8300 2.9550 3.0800 3.2050 3.3300 3.4550 0.0620 0.1863 0.3106 0.4353 0.5598 0.6844 0.8090 0.9336 1.0583 1.1830 1.3077 1.4324 1.5571 1.6818 1.8065 1.9313 2.0560 2.1808 2.3055 2.4303 2.5551 2.6798 2.8046 2.9294 3.0542 3.1790 3.3038 3.4286 0.2700 0.3950 0.5200 0.6450 0.7700 0.8950 1. 0200 1.1450 1.2700 1. 3950 1.5200 1.6450 1.7700 1.8950 2.0200 2.1450 2.2700 2.3950 2.5200 2.6450 2.7700 2.8950 3.0200 3.1450 3.2700 3.3950 3.5200 3.6450 0.2880 0.4137 0.5392 0.6647 0.7902 0.9156 1.0410 1.1664 1.2917 1.4170.1.5423 1.6676 1.7929 1.9182 2.0435 2.1687 2.2940 2.4192 2.5445 2.6697 2.7949 2.9202 3.0454 3.1706 3.2958 3.4210 3.5462 3.6714 0.1750 0.3000 0.4250 0.5500 0.6750 0.8000 0.9250 1.0500 1.1750 1.3000 1.4250 1.5500 1.6750 1.8000 1.9250 2.0500 2.1750 2.3000 2.4250 2.5500 2.6750 2.8000 2. 9250 3.0500 3.1750 3.3000 3.4250 0.1930 0.3187 0.4442 0.5697 0.6952 0.8206 0.9460 1.0714 1.1967 1.3220 1. 4473 1.5726 1. 6979 1.-8232 1. 9485 2.0737 2.1990 2. 3242 2.4495 2.5747 2.6999 2.8252 2.9504 3.0756 3.2008 3.3260 3.4512 M 0 0 0 0.0 IINOR DIAMETER STRESS MIN MAX AREA 0.1000 0.1125 0.0091 0.2250 0.2375 0.0420 0.3500 0.3625 0.0992 0.4750 0.4875 0.1806 0.6000 0.6125 0.2864 0.7250 0.7375 0.4164).8500 0.8625 0.5708).9750 0.9875 0.7495 1.1000 1.1125 0.9526 1.2250 1.2375 1.1801 1.3500 1.3625 1.4319 1.4750 1.4875 1.7082 1.6000 1.6125 2.0088 1.7250 1.7375 2.3338 1.8500 1.8625 2.6833 1.9750 1.9875 3.0571 2.1000 2.1125 3.4554 2.2250 2.2375 3.8780 2.3500 2.3625 4.3251 2.4750 2.4875 4.7967 2.6000 2.6125 5.2926 2.7250 2.7375 5.8130 2.8500 2.8625 6.3578 2.9750 2.9875 6.9271 3.1000 3.1125 7.5208 3.2250 3.2375 8.1389 3.3500 3.3625 8.7815 SHEAR AREA 0.2605 0. 4692 0.6774 0.8850 1.0922 1. 2988 1.5050 1.7107 1.9160 2.1208 2.3253 2.5293 2.7330 2. 9363 3.1393 3.3419 3.5441 3.7461 3. 9477 4.1490 4.3499 4.5506 4.7510 4.9511 5.1509 5.3504 5.5496 co)0*m'i CL (A A CA CD m CA)z a)CA 0~(D I.;u (D C')m-u p Co co 90 CD m-" (D 0-4 ci,--4-4 m 0 z ic-u M a>mV zo IC)m ;-z 00 00 I m 0D (Ci 0C -.M 3.5500 3.5764 3.4750 3.4875 9.4485 5.7486 p O

--I 0)1.14 co3 m CD CD, 90 CD m CD I0-4.-4 C.

0 v----- EXTERNAL THREADS --------<- INTERNAL THREADS ..........

..AAJUR DIAMETER PITCH DIAMETER MAX him KAX KIN MINOR DIAMETER MAX HMI MAJOR DIAMETER P HIM MAX-I 0*o (D'a*0;0 CY)cD 0 co 0);:)0O 0 0)7.2500 7.3750 7.500 7.6250 7.7500 7,8750 8.0006 9. 1:50 8.2600 a. 3s 8.3750 8.5000 8-6250 8.7600 8.8750 9.0000, 9.1250 9.2500~9,37S0 9.5000 9.6250 9.7500 9.8750 10.0000 10.1250 10.2500 10.3750 10.5 000 7..2375 7.3625 7.4875 7.6125 7.7375 7.8625 7.9875 8. 112s.2375 8. 3625 8.4875 8.6125 9.7375 8.8625 8.9875 9.1125 9.2375 9.3625 9.A87S 9.6125 9.7375 9.8625 9.9875 10.1125 10.2375 10.3625 10.4875 7.1535 7.2783 7.4031 7.5.279 7.6527 7.7776 7.9024 8.0272 8.1520 8.2768 8.,4017 8.5265 8.6513 8.7762 8.9010 9.0258 9.1507 9.2755 Y.4003 9.525S 9.o500 9.7749 9.8997 10.0246 10.1494 1.0. 2742 10.3991 7.1223 7.2470 7.3717 7.4963 7,6210 7.74S7 7.8704 7. 9951 8. 1198 8.2445 8.3692 8.4939 8.8186 8.7433 8.8680 8.9927 9.1174 9.2421 9. 3668 9.4916 9.6163 9.741.0 9.86S7 9.9905 10.1152 10.23?9 10.3646 7.0800 7.0488 7.2060 7.1737 7.3300 7.2984 7.4550 7.4234 7.5800 7.5483 7.7050 7.6732 7.8300 7.7980 7.9550 7.9229 8.0800 8.0478 8.2050. 8.1726 8.3300 8.2975 8.4550 B.4224 8.5800 8.5473 8.7060 8.6721 8.8300 8.7970 8.95s0 8.9219'9.0800 9A0468 9.2050 '9.1716 9.3300 9.2965 9.4550 9.4214 9.5800 9.5463 9.7050 9.4711 9.8300 9.7960 9.9550 9.9209 10.0800 10.0458 10.2050 10.1707 10.3300 10.2958 7.2700 7.3950 7.5200 7.6450 7. 7700 7.8960 8.0200 8.1450 8.2700 8.3950 8.5200 8.64s0 8.7700 8.8950 9.0200.9.1450 9.2700 9.3950 9.5200 9.6460 9. 7700 9.8950 10.0200 10.1450 10.2700 10.3950 10. 5200 7.3012 7.4263 7.5514 7.6766 7.8017 7.9268 8.0520 8.1771 8.3022 8.4274 a.5525 8.6776 8.8027 8.99279 9.0530 9.1781 9.3032 9.4284 9.5535 9.6786 9.8037 9.9,289 10.0540 10.1791 10.3042 10. 4293 10. SB44 1 I 1 PITCH DIAMETER MINOR DIArMETER STRESS MIN MAX' MIN MAX AREA 7.1750 7.2062 7.1000 7.1125 39.4312..3000 7.331 7.2250 7.2375 40.8321?.4250 7.4564 7.3500 7.3625 42.2575 7.5500 7.5816 7.4750 7.4875 43.7073 p.6750 7.7067 7.6000 7.6125 45.1817 7.8000 7.8318 7.7250 7.7375 46.6805 7.9250 7.9570 7.8500 7.8625 48.2038 8.0o00 8.0821 7.9750 7.9875 49.7515 6.1750. 8.2072: 8.1000 8.0.125. 51.3238 8.3000 8.3324 8.2250 8.2375 52.9206 8.4250 8.45751 8.3500 8.3625 54.5417 8.5500 8.5826 8.4750 8.4875 66.1874 8 6750 .8.7077 8.6000 8.612S 57.8575 8.8000 8.8329 8.7260 8,7375 59.5522 8.9250 8.9580 8.8500 8.8625 61.2713 9.0500 9.0831 8.9750 8.9875 63.0149?.1750 9.2082 9.1000 9.1125 64.7830?.3000 9.3334 9.22S0 9.2375 66.57S6 9,4250 9,4585 9.3500 9.3626 68.3926 9 '5500 9.5836 9.4750 9.4875 .7..2342 9.6750 9.7087 9.6000 9.6125 72.1002 9.8000 9.8339 9.7250 9.7375 73.9907 9.9250 9.9590 9.8500 9.962s 75.9057 0.0B0.0 10.0841. 9.9750 9.9875 77.8452 0.1750 10.2092 10.1000 10.1125 .79.8091 0.3.000 10.3343 10.2250 10.2375 81.7976 0.4250 10.4S694 10.3500 10.3625 B3.8105 SHEAR.AREA.+/-1.4146 11.4068 11.7988 11.9906 12.1B22 12.3737 12. s649 12,7560 12. 9469 13.1375 13.3281 13.61S4 13,7086 13.8985 14.0883 14. 2780 14.4674 14.6567 14.8458 15.0347 15..2235 I5.4121 15.6006 15.7888 15.9769 16.1649 16.3526 m=ca 0 0~0-1=r CL LA G)l 0 C,, z w (D M 5.0 0 2-I 0 (D M i n m-u 0 CD co cio"o 0 (D In_0 C3 cO 0-1 m;a zo 3-I MD 0 o C.0(1C)(1 -..-.4 CO;10.6:5Q 10.6125 10.5239 10.4894 1.0.4550 10.4204 10.6450 10.6796 10.5500 10.5846 10.4750 10.4875 85.-8q80.

16.5403 o w w w V ,e-------

EXTERNAL THREADS.M IAJOR DIAMETER PITCH DIAMETER MINOR DIAMETER MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN< ---- ---.- INTERNAL THREADS --.........---

>MAJOR DIAMETER PITCH DIAMETER MINOR DIAMETER MIN MAX MIN MAX H1N MAX--I 0'2.0~0 0 (D CD 0., OD i0.7S00 10. 9750 11.0000 i4.1250 11-25000 li.2So0 11.3750 1-.5000 11.12s0 12.7500 11.3750 12.50000 12.1250 1.2.2500 12. 3750 12.5000 12.6250 12. 7500 13.0000.13. 1250 13. 2500 13.3750 13; 6250 13.7500 13.8750 14.0000 0o. 7375 10.8625 10,9875 1+/-. 1125 11.2375 11.3625 11.4875 11.6125 11.7375 11.8625 11.9875 12. 1125 12.2375 L263625 12.4875 12. 6125 12.7375 12. "625 12.9875 13.1125 13.237S 13. 3625 13.48575 13.6125 13.737S 13.8625 3.Y9875 10.6488 10.7736.10.8985 11.0233 11. 1482 11.2730 11.3979 11.5227 11.6476 11.7724 11.8973 12.0221 12.1470 12.2719 12.3967 12.5216 12.6464 12.7713 12.8962 13.0210 13. 1459 13.2707 13,3956 13.520S 13.6453.13.7702 13.8951 10.6141 10.7388 10.8636 10.9883.11.1130 11.2378.11.3625 11.4873.11.6120 11.7368 11.8615 11.9863 12.1110 12. 2358: 12.3605 12.4853 12.61.00 12.7348 12.8S95 12d9843:13.1090 13.2338 13.3586 13.4833 13,o608 13.7329 13i 8676 10.5800 10.7050 10.6300 11. 0800 11.2050 11.3300 11.4550 11.5800 11.7050 11.8300 11.9550 12.00800 12.2050 12.3300 12.4550 12.5800 12.7050 12.6300 12.9550 13.0800 13,2050 13.3300.13.4550 13.5800 13.7050 13.8300 lo.s4s3 10.6702 10.7951 10.9200 11.0449 111698 11.2947 11.4195 11.5444 11.6693 i.7942 11.9191 12.0440 12 1669 12.2938 12.4187 12.5436 12.7934 12.9183 13.0432 13.1681 13.2930 13.4079 13.5428 13.6677 13.7926 10.7700 1 10.8950 i 11.0200 11. 1450 11.2700 11.3950 11.:6200 11.6450 11.7700 11.8950 12.0200 12.1450 12.2700 12.3950 12.5200 12.6450 12,7700 12.6950 13..0200 13.1450 i3.2700 13.3950 13.6200 13.6450 13.7700 13w8950 14.0200.0-8047.0ý.9293 1. 0549 1.1800 I .305 1 11.4302 11.5553 11.6805 11.8056 11.9307 12.0558 12. 1809 12.1060 12.4311.12e.5562 12. 68123 12.8064 12.9316 13.0566 13.1817 13.306S 13. 431.9 13.5570 13. 682t 13.8072 10.6750 ,10.8000 10.9 250 11.0500 11. 1750 11.3000 11.4250 11.5500 11. 6750 11.8000 11.9250 12.0500.12.1750 12.3000 12. 4250 12. 5500 12.6750 12.8000 12.9250 13.0500 13.1750 13i3000 13.4250 13.5600 13.6750 10.7097 10.1340 10.9599 11.0850 11.2101 11.3352.l.4603 11. 5855 1. 7106 11.8357!1.9606 12. 0889 12.2110 12. 3361 12.4612 12. 5863 12,7114 12.8365 12.9616 13.0867 13.2118 13.4620 13.58v1 13.7122 13.8373 13.9624 10.6000 10. 7250 10.8500 10.9750 11..100 11. 2250 11.3500 11.47?0.11.6000 11.. 7250 11.8500 11.9750 12.1000:12.2250 12.3500 12.4750 12. 6000 12.7250 12.0500 12.9750 13.1000 13.22S.0 13.3500 13. 4750 13.6000 13.17250 13. 8500 10.6125 10.7375 10.8625 10.9875 11. 125 11.2375 11.3625 11.4975 11.6125 11.7375 11. 862S 11.9075 12. 1125 12.2375 12.3626 12.4875 12.6125 12.7375 12.8625 12.9875 a3.1125 13.2375 13.3625 13.4875 13.-6125 S13.7375 13 STRESS AREA 87.9099 1 99.9963 92.1072 94.2425 96.4024 98.5667 100.7956 103. 0289 10s.2867 107.S690 109.8758 112.2071 114. 562?116.9432 1.19.3479 121.7772 124.2309 126.7092 129.2119 131.7391 134.2906 136.8,670 139.,677 142.092?144.7426 147. 4168 150.1155 SHEAR L6.7277 16.9150 17. 102i L7. 2691 17.4759 17.6626 17.8491 18. 0354 18.2216 18.4077 18,59.36 18.7793 18.9649 19.1503 19.3356 19.52.07 19.7067 19?.8906 20.0752 20.2596 20.4442 20.6284 210.8126 20.99.65 21.1804 21.,3640 21. 5476 M (D 0 .(A/)= mO 0 (A AC-0 V4g 0) (-Il QO 0D (1)m m1 90 CD (D ID 0.:tJ CA m ic ,-UC MC 0m E -u 18 A0 m o o.)0 (A' CA) W. -Ci).10 13.9323-13.8000 14.0574 13.9250 14.1250 1A.1125 14.0199 13.9824 13.9550 13.9175 14.1450 14.1825 14.0500 14.0875 13.9750 13M9875 152,B386 21.7310 4:----------...

EXTERNAL THREADS MAJOR DIAMETER PITCH DIAMETER MAX mIN MAX "IH 14.2500 14.2375 14.1445 14.1072 i.-#.37b0 14.3625 14.2697 14.2319........ -.. <.----- INTERNAL THREADS ----- --.------>MINOR DIAMETER MAX MIN--I 3 (_8 (no OD C)0 co C." CD (0 CO 0 o 0 0 o0 14.2500 14. 6250 14,4875 14.3945 14.6125 14.5194 14.7500 14.7375 14.87,0 14.8625 15.0000 .14.9875 15.1250 15.1125 15.2500 15.2375 15.2750 15.3625 15.5000.15.4875 15.1250 15.6125.15.7500 15.7375 16.0000 15.8725 16.0000 15.987s 14.6443 14.7091 14.8940 15.0189 15.1430 15.2686 15.3935'15.5184 15.6433 15.7681 15.8930 14.3547 14.4815 14. 6062 14.7310 14.8558 14.9806 15s 1053 15.2301 15.3549.iS.4797 15.6044 15.7292 15.8540 14.0800 14.2050 14.3300 14.4550 14.5800 14. 7050 14. 8300 14.9550 1s.0800 15.2050 15.3300 15.4550 15.6800 15. 7050 15.8300 14.0424 14.1673 14.2922 14.4171 14.5420 14.6669 14.7918 14.9167 15.04.16 15.1665 15.2914 15.4163 15.5412.15.666t 15.7910 MAJOR.DIAMETER MHN OAX 14.2700 14.3076 14.3950 1.4327 14,5200 14.5578 14.6450 14.6829 14.7700 14.9080 14.8950 14.9331 15.0200 15.0582 i5. 1450 15.1833 S.2700 15.3084 15.3950 15.4335 15.5200 15.5586 15.6450 15.6837 16.7700 15.8088 i5.8950 15.933?16.0200.16.0590

14. 1750 14.3000 14.4250 14.5500 14.6750 14.68000 14.9250 15.0500 15.1750 15.3000 15.4250 15.5500 15.6750 14.2126 14.3377 14.4628 14.5379 14.7130 14.8381 14.9632 15.0883 16.2134 15.3385 15.4636 15.5867 15.7138 14.1000.4.2250 14.3500 14.4750 14.6000 14.7250 14..8500 14.9750 15. 1000 15.2250 15.3500 14. 1125 14.2375 14.3625 14.4875 14.61.25 14.7375 14.8625 14.9875 15.1125 15.2375 15.3625 PITCH DIAMETER MINOR DIAMETER MIN MAX MIN MAX STRESS AREA 155.5863 158.3584 161.1551 163. 9762 166.8219 169.6920 172.5B67 175.5058 178.4494 181,4175 184.4102 187.4273 190.4689 193.5350 196.62S6, SHEAR AREA 21. 9142 22.0774 22. 2803 22.4632 22.6459 22.8284 23.0109 23.1932 23.3753 23.5574 23.7392 23.99210 24.1026 24.2841 24.,4655=r 0 CL 0~A 0)a, 0 C.a)c)0 0 2 cn:;o m C)(D 0 Cl CD 0 m r0 C" rn)0 CD 031 0 15.4750 15.4875 15.6000 15.7250 15. BOOO 15.8389 15.6125 15.7375 ls.e82 15.9250 15.9640 16.8500 m z 3o Cm mC;z0.-ID 1m (a C) M Mm:03 010R00 C) Ln W-4 ci).-1 S REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 226 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 4 09/03/13 Revision 0 DOCUENNO:

ICAL-1091-030 Allowable External Diameter Ranges FEVIION #Minimum Minor Diameter SAFE'Y RELATEDx NON-SAFETY FE:LATED I PAGE T 1 OF 6 PR:EPARED BY: APM DATE. 9/412013 1F RVIBItEDBY:

DJM DATE, 9/5/2013 INPUT PLANT: TMI UNIT: 1 SURVEILLANCE NUMBER: 40th YEAR: 2013 NOMINAL DIAMETER 9.375 in. MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH 150 ksi ENGAGEMENT LENGTH 3.00 in. REQUIRED LOADING 120 % G.U.T.S.NUMBER OF WIRES 169 in.INTERNAL THREAD (STRESSING ADAPTER) INFORMATION IDENTIFICATION MARK A-3 MAJOR DIAMETER 9.4110 in. MINOR DIAMETER 9.2170 in.EXTERNAL THREAD (ANCHORHEAD)

RANGE INFORMATION SMALLEST MAJOR DIAMETER 9.345 in. MAJOR DIA. INCREMENT 0.01 in.SMALLEST PITCH DIAMETER 9.150 in. PITCH DIA. INCREMENT 0.014 in.OUTPUT MAJOR DIAMETER RANGES 9.345 9.355 I 9.365 9.375 I 9.385 9.395 I 9.405 T 9.415 I 9.425 9.435 9.354 9.364 i 9.374 9.384 i 9.394 9.404 t 9.414 9.424 1 9.434 9.444 S150 I I i 9163 8.745 8.710 8.676 8.641 8.606 8.572 8.537 : 8.502 8.467 9.177 8.762 8.726 I 8.690 8.654 I 8.618 8.581 i 8.545 8.509 i 8.473 8.436 I 9.177 ,_ ,. -. ---------. -----9.178 8.744 1 8.706 8.669 8.632 8.594 1 8.557 8.519 1 8.481 8.444 8.406 9.191 I 1 I --I--------------

1------4-----H--

--_9.192- I I I I I 8726 8687 I 8648 8.610 I 8.571 8.532 I 8.493 8.454 I 8.415 8.376-9.205 -------t926 878 I I I I 9.206 8.708 8.668 1 8.628 1 8.588 i 8.547 8.507 1 8.467 8.426 1 8.386 8.345 M _.2_1 ._ L I -_- ---------_L I I WI9.220 8--- --- ---. .jI 9.23 8.691 1 8.649 8.608 I 8.566 8.524 8.483 8.441 8.399 8.357 8.315 0I 9.234 -I -I I IL 9.234 8.673 I 8.630 8.587 I 8.544 8.501 I 8.458 8.415 I 8.372 8.328 8.285 of I 9.247 I I I I-1--I---t 2 8.656 1 I8.611 I8567 I8523 8.478 I 8.434 8.389 I 8.345 8300 8.255 21 9.261 8 8 8.567 8.252< 9.262 E5 9.275 8.638 1 8.592 I 8.547 1 8.501 1 8.455 I 8.409 I 8.363 I 8.317 I 8.271 8.225 8.621 I 8.574 I 8.527 I 8.480 I 8.432 I 8.385 I 8.338 8.291 I 8.243 8.196 FLI 9.289 .I I I 19.290 r S9.30 8.603 1 8.555 I 8.507 1 8.458 I 8.410 1 8.361 I 8.312 8.264 I 8.215 8.166 I 9.303 I I i I 9.0 ----I- ------ --- --- -I- --t9.304 856 I i I I 3 8.586 8.537 I 8.487 8.437 I 8.387 8.337 I 8.287 8.237 I 8.187 8.137 I. ii.I --------" -. -. ------I--4 --I 9.3187 .6 I I I .I 9.318 8.569 I 8.518 1 8.467 8.416 I 8.364 8.313 I 8.262 8.210 1 8.159 8.107 L9.331 L I9.332 8.552 I 8.500 I 8.447 8.395 1 8.342 1 8.289 8.237 8.184 I 8.131 8.078 I 9.345 L I I 9."346 "1"'-8.535 I 8.481 8.427 I 8.373 8.320 1 8.266 8.211 I 8.157 8.103 8.049 I 9.359 I I I 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 681 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 227 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 4 09/03/13 Page 2 of 6 Revision 0 Allowable External Diameter Ranges Minimum Minor Diameter INPUT PLANT: TMI UNIT: 1 SURVEILLANCE NUMBER: 40th YEAR: 2013 NOMINAL DIAMETER 9.375 in. MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH 150 ksi ENGAGEMENT LENGTH 3.00 in. REQUIRED LOADING 120 % G.U.T.S.NUMBER OF WIRES 169 in.INTERNAL THREAD (STRESSING ADAPTER) INFORMATION IDENTIFICATION MARK A-5 MAJOR DIAMETER 9.3780 in. MINOR DIAMETER 9.2150 in.EXTERNAL THREAD (ANCHORHEAD)

RANGE INFORMATION SMALLEST MAJOR DIAMETER 9.345 in. MAJOR DIA. INCREMENT 0.01 in.SMALLEST PITCH DIAMETER 9.150 in. PITCH DIA. INCREMENT 0.014 in.OUTPUT"\- MAJOR DIAMETER RANGES 94g- ,9.355 I 9.365 9.375 I 9.385 9.395 I 9.405 9.415 I 9.425 9.435 9 9.354 I 9.364 I 9.374 9.384 I 9.394 9.404 I 9.414 I 9.424 I 9.434 9.444 I 9.163 8.768 I 8.733 8.699 I 8.664 8.629 8.594 8.559 8.524 8.489 8.454 9.16I I I 9.164 8.750 8.714 8.678 8.641 I 8.605 8.569 I 8.532 8.496 I 8.460 8.423 1 9.177 i I I I 9.178 8.732 8.694 8.657 8.619 I 8.581 8.544 I 8.506 8.468 i 8.430 8.392 9.192 I I I I I 9.2 8.714 8.675 I 8.636 I 8.597 1 8.558 I 8.519 I 8.479 I 8.440 1 8.401 8.362 i 9.20 6 I 4 i i 9.219 8.696 8.655 i 8.615 8.575 i 8.534 8.494 I 8.453 I 8.412 1 8.372 8.331 L / /J L wI 9.220 --- I.S9.20 8.678 8.636 I 8.594 I 8.553 I 8.511 8.469 8.427 8.385 8.343 8.301 S9.233 I I -ýi 9.234 8.660 I8.617 8.574 I8.531 8.487 I8.444 8.401 I8.357 8.314 8.270 w 1 9.247 I I I I-- I 9.248 I I I L9.261 8.642 i 8.598 8.553 i 8.509 8.464 t 8.419 8.375 i 8.330 8.285 8.240_1 4- -4<I 9.262 8 8 i 9.275 1 8.579 8.533 8.487 8.441 t 8.395 8.349 I 8.303 8.256 8.210 9.289 8.607 1 8.560 I 8.513 8.465 1 8.418 8.370 8.323 I 8.275 8.228 8.180 FLI I I I r 9.290 1 I I I 9.303 8.589 1 8.541 I 8.492 8.444 I 8.395 8.346 I 8.297 8.248 I 8.199 8.150------I -----I- -S9.37I852I8429304

8. I I- I I --------857248522 I 8472 8.422 1 8.372 8.322 1 8.272 8.221 I 8.171 8.121 9.31I I I I 9.318 8.555 8.503 I 8.452 I 8.401 I 8.349 8.298 I 8.246 8.194 I 8.143 8.091 t 9.331 I t.9.332 8.537 I 8.485 8.432 8.379 8.326 8.274 8.221 8.168 8.115 8.061 i_ 9.345 _ I I I 9,3Z6 8.520 i 8.466 8,412 i 8.358 8.304 I 8.250 8.195 I 8.141 8.087 8,032 I 9.359 I I I I S S Ii W 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 682 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 228 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 4 09/03/13 Page 3 of 6 Revision 0 MCOhENO: ICAL-1091-030 DOCUN' TYPE, I EM Allowable External Diameter Ranges REVISON# 0 Minimum Minor Diameter SAFT MATE X NON-SAFETY REATE) 1 PAGE 13 OF 6 PREPARED BY: APM DATE 9/4/20131 RVIEWED BY: DJM DATE 9/5/2013 INPUT PLANT: TMI UNIT: 1 SURVEILLANCE NUMBER: 40th YEAR: 2013 NOMINAL DIAMETER 9.375 in. MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH 150 ksi ENGAGEMENT LENGTH 3.00 in. REQUIRED LOADING 120 % G.U.T.S.NUMBER OF WIRES 169 in.INTERNAL THREAD (STRESSING ADAPTER) INFORMATION IDENTIlFICAT1ON MARK D1 MAJOR DIAMETER 9.3530 in. MINOR DIAMETER 9.2340 in.EXTERNAL THREAD (ANCHORHEAD)

RANGE INFORMATION SMALLEST MAJOR DIAMETER 9.345 in. MAJOR DIA. INCREMENT 0.01 in.SMALLEST PITCH DIAMETER 9.150 in. PITCH DIA. INCREMENT 0.014 in.OUTPUT MAJOR DIAMETER RANGES 9.345 9.355 I 9.365 9.375 I 9.385 9.395I 9.405 9415 I 9.425 9.435 9.354 9.364 I 9.374 9.384 I 9.39 I 9.404 I 9.414 I 9.424 I 9.434 9.444 i 9.150 I i II 59163 9.006 I 8.984 8.961 I 8.938 8.914 I 8.891 8.867 i 8.842 I 8.817 8.792 9. 6 1 1 1 , -I I II 9.164 8.858 8.823 I 8.789 8.755 i 8.720 8.686 I 8.652 8.617 1 8.583 8.548 9.177 I I I 9.178 8.842 8.806 i 8.771 8.735 I 8.699 8.663 I 8.628 8.592 I 8.556 8.520 ,1 1i I I I--------- -I ------ -F ----- -I ----9.192 8 27 i I i i 9.2 8.827 8.789 I 8.752 8.715 i 8.678 : 8.641 I 8.604 8.566 i 8.529 8.491 S4- ----- -----------

4 --- ---9.206 8.773 8.734 8.696i 8.657 1 8.618 I 8.580 8.541 1 8.502 8.463 L 9.219 L-..52 8.6 S.0 8.796 8.756 I 8.716 I 8.676 8.636 i 8.596 8.556 i 8.516 8.476 8.435 S2 761- I -T I --I 9.234 8.780 I 8.739 8.698 I 8.657 I 8.615 I 8.574 1 8.532 I 8.491 8.449 8.408 9.247 I-8.765 I 8.723 8.680 I 8.637 8.594 i 8.552 8.509 I 8.466 8.423 8.380-- 9.261------

S9.262 8.750 8.706 8.62 i 8.61 8.574I 8.530 8.485 I 8.441 8.397 8.352 9.2 5078.05862

.7 9.275 L.. IL .L 9.289 8.735 I 8.689 I 8.644 8.599 8.553 8.507 8.462 1 8.416 I 8.370 8.325 E 9.289 ! I i I 9.2903 8.720 i 8.673 I 8.626 8.579 I 8.533 8.486 i 8.439 8.392 I 8.344 8.297 I 93 3I I I I 9.304 ---" --I S 8.705 8657 1 8608 8.560 I 8.512 8.464 I 8.415 8.367 I 8.318 8.270 4- ------- 4--------

4. ---4-- --I --------.--

S9.318 8.68.591 8.4I .9 I t 9.331 I 8.640 1 8.591 8.541 1 8.492 8.442 I 8.392 I 8.342 I 8.293 8.243 8.675 8.624 8.573 I 8.522 I 8.471 1 8.420 1 8.369 I 8.318 8.267 8.216 I 9.345 I I I I 8.660 I 8.608 8.556 I 8.503 8.451 I 8.399 8.346 I 8.294 8.241 8.189 I 9.359 I I I I 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 683 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 229 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 4 09/03/13 Page 4 of 6 Revision 0 S0[DOaJMq-r No: TCAL-109]-030 Allowable External Diameter Ranges iPVSON # 0 Minimum Minor Diameter SAFETY RELATE x INON-SAFENY RELATED I PAGE i 4 OF 6 PREPARED BY: APM DATE 9/4/2013 1IREVIEWED BY: DJM DATE 9/512013 INPUT PLANT: TMI UNIT: 1 SURVEILLANCE NUMBER: 40th YEAR: 2013 NOMINAL DIAMETER 9.375 in. MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH 150 ksi ENGAGEMENT LENGTH 3.00 in. REQUIRED LOADING 120 % G.U.T.S.NUMBER OF WIRES 169 in.INTERNAL THREAD (STRESSING ADAPTER) INFORMATION IDENTIFICATION MARK D2 MAJOR DIAMETER 9.3500 in. MINOR DIAMETER 9.2270 in.EXTERNAL THREAD (ANCHORHEAD)

RANGE INFORMATION SMALLEST MAJOR DIAMETER 9.345 in. MAJOR DIA. INCREMENT 0.01 in.SMALLEST PITCH DIAMETER 9.150 in. PITCH DIA. INCREMENT 0.014 in.OUTPUT MAJOR DIAMETER RANGES 9.3"45 355 I 9.365 ,9.375 I 9.385 9.395 I 9.405 9.415 i 9.425 9.435_ 9.354 9.364 I 9.374 9.384 I 9.394 9.404 I 9.414 9.424 I 9.434 9.444 I 9E10 8.917 i 8.888 8.858 8.828 8.798I 8.767 8.736 I 8.704 1 8.671 8.638 I9.163885879 IIII I 9.19264II

-91177 8.819 8.784 i 8.749 8.714 i 8.679 8.644 8.608 1 8.573 1 8.538 8.503 9.177I I I I 9.178 8.802 8.766 I 8.729 8.693 i 8.657 8.620 I 8.583 1 8.547 I 8.510 8.473 9.191I i I I---" --------" -F -I- ---9.2 786 8.748 I 8.710 8.672 I 8.635 I 8.597 I 8.559 8.521 I 8.483 8.444_I--------

---

1 9.206 8 8.730i 8.691 8.652 8.613 8.573 i 8.534 8.494 1 8.455 8.415 fn- 1 1? ý I I ---- ---------: 9.220 88672 -8.631 -8.591 -8.550 I 8.509 I 8.468 I 8.427 8.3879.233 8.753 8.713 I I...-1 --------- -----L-" 9.234 8.737 1 8.695 I8.653 I8.611 I8.569 1 8.527 I8.485 I8.442 1 8.400 8.358 ,I 9.247 I I 9.248- I t I_ 4 8.721 I 8.677 8.634 I 8.591 8.547 I 8.504 8.460 I 8.417 8.373 8.329 1 9.261 4----------4---------4-------------

< 9.262 -I -I 4 I A1 8.705 i 8.660 8.615 i 8.570 8.526 I 8.481 8.436 I 8.391 8.346 8.301 , 9.275 .I I o 9.2 7 6 1 9.289 8.688 I 8.642 I 8.596 1 8.550 i 8.504 8.458 8.411 1 8.365 i 8.319 8.272 SI 9.2890 _1 I I r -.- -_ _ j ...r ---------"I' ------9.20 8.672 1 8.625 I 8.578 1 8.530 I 8.483 8.435 I 8.387 8.340 I 8.292 8.244 9.303I I I I-' --------- -"- ----S9.3G4 8.5: 9317 8657 8.608 I 8.559 8.510 1 8.461 1 8.412 1 8.363 8.314 1 8.265 8.216 I9.318 8.4 i I 9 8.641 8.591.I 8.540 8.490 I 8.440 8.390 I 8.339 8.289 I 8.238 8.188 9.332 8.625 I 8.573 8.522 8.470 8.419 i 8.367 8.315 8.263 1 8.212 8.160 I 9.345 -I i i 9.346 8.609 I 8.556 8.503 I 8.451 8.398 I 8.345 8.291 I 8.238 8.185 8.132 I 9.359 I I I S 0~I W v 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 684 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 230 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 4 09/03/13 Page 5 of 6 Revision 0 DODOvEJ NNO: ICAL- 1091-030 DOCU~VEWJ TYPE 2'JG Allowable External Diameter Ranges REVSION# 0 Minimum Minor Diameter SAFETY REATED X NON-SAFETY RATED PAGE 5 OF 6 PRPBARD BY: APM DATE 914/2013 I EVIeWB) BY: DJM DATE" 9/5/2013 INPUT PLANT: TMI UNIT: 1 SURVEILLANCE NUMBER: 40th YEAR: 2013 NOMINAL DIAMETER 9.375 in. MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH 150 ksi ENGAGEMENT LENGTH 3.00 in. REQUIRED LOADING 120 % GUTS.NUMBER OF WIRES 169 in.INTERNAL THREAD (STRESSING ADAPTER) INFORMATION IDENTIFICATION MARK D3 MAJOR DIAMETER 9.3520 in. MINOR DIAMETER 9.2320 in.EXTERNAL THREAD (ANCHORHEAD)

RANGE INFORMATION SMALLEST MAJOR DIAMETER 9.345 in. MAJOR DIA. INCREMENT 0.01 in.SMALLEST PITCH DIAMETER 9.150 in. PITCH DIA. INCREMENT 0.014 in.OUTPUT I9.150 i 9.163 I-9.345- 9.355 I 9.365.1 9.354 9.364 I 9.374 MAJOR DIAMETER RANGES 9.375 I 9.385 9.395 I 9.405 9.384 I 9.394 9.404 I 9.414 9.415! 9F4 25 9.435 9.424 1 9.434 9.444"9I "9I " I " I 8.984 I8.959 I8.935 I 8.910 I8.885 I 8.859 I 8.833 I 8.807 I8.780 8.753 i i i i I I I 9.177 8.847 1 8.812 8.778 1 8.743 I 8.709 1 8.674 I 8.639 1 8.605 I 8.570 8.535 I 9 1 7I I I I 9.178 1 1 1 1 9.178 8.831 1 8.795 1 8.759 8.723 I 8.687 1 8.651 t 8.615 1 8.579 i 8.543 8.507 9.191 1iiI'- --I- --- ---9.192 8 15 I I I I 1 8.815 8.778 I 8.740 8.703 I 8.666 8.628 I 8.591 8.553 I 8.516 8.478-- 4 -I I- .-9.206 8.799 8.761 1 8.722 1 8.683 I 8.644 128.606 8.567 18.528 8.489 8.450 L .L I 8 .6 .8 1 -.52 --8.450 8 --9.22 S9.2 8.784 I 8.744 1 8.704 I 8.663 8.623 I 8.583 8.543 1 8.502 1 8.462 8.422 i 9.234 8.768 I 8.727 8.685 I 8.644 8.602 I 8.560 8.519 I 8.477 8.435 8.393 Xt1 9.247 I I I 9u 4 I I I9.9.261 8.753 I 8.710 8.667 I 8.624 8.581 I 8.538 8.495 I 8.452 8.409 8.365 9.I 262I I I t 8.737 I 8.693 8.649 I 8.604 8.560 I 8.516 8.471 I 8.427 8.382 8.338 9.2625 76 8.722 8.676 1 8.631 8.585 1 8.539 8.493 1 8.448 8.402 I 8.356 8.310 F" 9.289 I I I i 9.290 III 930 8.706 8.659 I 8.612 8.565 I 8.518 8.471 I 8.424 8.377 I 8.329 8.282 9.303 j t --937 861I843I854I I I-8691 8643 1 8594 8.546 1 8.498 8.449 1 8.401 8.352 1 8.303 8.255 i 9.318 I I I 9 8.676 1 8.626I 8.576 I 8.527 l 8.477 1 8.427 I 8.377 1 8.327 i 8.277 8.227 9.332 8.661 I 8.610 1 8.559 I 8.508 8.456 I 8.405 8.354 1 8.303 1 8.251 8.200 I_ 9.345 I I I 9.346 r8 8 8-1 8 8.436- 8 8 -I 9.359 8,.646 1 8.593 I8.54l1 t8.488 I8.436 I8.383 1 8.331 I 8.278 1 8.225 .7-Ii w v 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 685 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 231 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 7.1 THREAD MEASUREMENT

-APPENDIX 4 09/03/13 Page 6 of 6 Revision 0-NO: ICAL-1091-030 Allowable External Diameter Ranges EVIION#0 Minimum Minor Diameter SAFE RELATE)NON-SAFETY FE]_ATE 1 PAGE I 6 OF 6 PREPARE BY: APM DATE. 9/4/2013 1 F-VIEVV BY: DJM DATE, 9/5/2013 INPUT PLANT: TMI UNIT: 1 SURVEILLANCE NUMBER: 40th YEAR: 2013 NOMINAL DIAMETER 9.375 in. MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH 150 ksi ENGAGEMENT LENGTH 3.00 in. REQUIRED LOADING 120 % G.U.T.S.NUMBER OF WIRES 169 in.INTERNAL THREAD (STRESSING ADAPTER) INFORMATION IDENTIFICATION MARK D4 MAJOR DIAMETER 9.3740 in. MINOR DIAMETER 9.2330 in.EXTERNAL THREAD (ANCHORHEAD)

RANGE INFORMATION SMALLEST MAJOR DIAMETER 9.345 in. MAJOR DIA. INCREMENT 0.01 in.SMALLEST PITCH DIAMETER 9.150 in. PITCH DIA. INCREMENT 0.014 in.OUTPUT MAJOR DIAMETER RANGES 9.345 9.355 I 9.365 9.375 I 9.385 9.395 I 9.405 9.415 I 9.425 9.435 9.354 9.364 I 9.374 9.384 I 9.394 9.404 I 9.414 9.424 I 9.434 9.444 I 91 8.995I 8.972 8.948 I 8.924 I8.900 8.875 8.850 8.825 8.799 8.773 9.163 8958 0 8.850 9.16 1 1 9117 8.852 8.818 I 8.783 8.749 I 8.715 8.680 8.645 8.611 I 8.576 8.542 9.177 r -------1 ------ -r -------1 9.178 8.836 I 8.801 i 8.765 8.729 1 8.693 8.657 i 8.621 8.585 i 8.549 8.513 9.191 i 9.192 .21 I I I I ---1 9.2 821 8.784 I 8.746 8.709 I 8.672 8.635 I 8.597 8.560 I 8.522 8.485 SI----------------

4 I 9.2 0 5 8.8 I. I I I.1 9.206 I 8.767I 8.728 8.689 1 8.651 8.612 I 8.573 8.534 I 8.496 8.457 L LL/I 9.220 8.790i 8.750 8.710 i 8.670 8.630 i 8.590 8.549 i 8.509 8.469 8.429 zI 9.233 4 1 91 9.234 8.774 I 8.733 8.692 I 8.650 8.609 I 8.567 8.526 I 8.484 1 8.442 8.401 S 9.247 I I-1 9.248 I I I 9.261 8.759 I 8.716 8.673 i 8.631 8.588 1 8.545 8.502 I 8.459 8.416 8.3731 9.262 I I I 925 8.744 I 8.699 8.655 I 8.611 1 8.567 1 8.523 8.478 I 8.434 1 8.389 8.345 9.275 I- 9.2756 1 J l 1 " 19.289 8.728 1 8.683 I 8.637 1 8.592 j 8.546 1 8.500 I 8.455 1 8.409 I 8.363 8.317" -9.2-9 -I -- -"1" I -1 9.290 8.713 8.666 I 8.619 8.572 i 8.525 8.478 I 8.431 8.384 I 8.337 8.290 9I I I i I9.304 8.698 S9.3 698 8.650 1 8.601 8.553 I 8.505 8.456 I 8.408 8.359 I 8.311 8.262-9.317 4 .1 9.318 8.683 8.633 8.584 8.534 l 8.484 8.435 I 8.385 8.335 1 8.285 8.235 L.9.331 ...___ ___9.332 8.668 i 8.617 8.566 i 8.515 1 8.464 i 8.413 8.362 1 8.310 1 8.259 8.208 i_ 9.345 _i I iI 6I -r -:- T -r- -r.8.653 t 8.601 8.548 t 8.496 I 8.443 i 8.391 8.338 1 8.286 8.233 8.181 I 9.359 I 1 I a w 17 SQ 7.1 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 686 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 232 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 1 of 8 Revision 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 1Thkýdau-)Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 687 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 233 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 09/03/13 PRECIOSION LANCE Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will establish the requirements for the visual inspection of the tendon end anchor head, shims, buttonheads, bearing plate and wires during the 2013 In-Service-Inspections (Surveillance) of the Post-Tensioning System Tendons at Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1.2.0 RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 In the event of conflict between any TMI Procedure and an SQ, the former governs.2.2 As stated in PSC Procedure QA 4.0.3.0 QUALIFICATIONS 3.1 The inspector performing this inspection is to be qualified as a Level II examiner as defined in PSC's written certification practice approved by Exelon and each examiner shall be approved by the Exelon Responsible Engineer.4.0 EQUIPMENT 4.1 The gauges and test equipment necessary for the Quality Control activities will be itemized in PSC Procedure SQ 4.0.5.0 QUALITY CONTROL 5.1 This procedure contains QCD points. The work shall not progress past or through a QCD without a sign-off or verbal approval from the QC Inspector.

The sign-off's and required information or evaluation data shall be documented on Data Sheet 8.OA or Data Sheet 8.OB as applicable.

6.0 PRECAUTIONS

CAUTION -NEVER STRIKE THE BUTTONHEADS, THE WIRES OR THE ANCHOR HEAD OF A STRESSED TENDON WITH A HAMMER OR ANY OTHER OBJECT.IF AT ANY TIME A CRACKED OR BROKEN ANCHOR HEAD IS DETECTED AS A RESULT OF THESE INSPECTIONS, ALL WORK SHALL STOP. ALL PERSONNEL SHALL BE MOVED AWAY FROM THAT AREA. THE PSC CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED.

THE WORK AND/OR INSPECTIONS SHALL CONTINUE AFTER A SAFETY EVALUATION HAS BEEN MADE AND ONLY AT THE DIRECTION AND CONTROL OF THE PSC CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR AND TMI ENGINEERING.

18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 688 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 234 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 3 of 8 Revision 0 7.0 PREREQUISITES 7.1 The Anchorage Cleanup will be completed.

7.2 The tendon will be in a stressed condition.

7.3 QCDQ- Document the tendon identification and tendon end on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.08, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION.

8.0 ANCHORAGE

INSPECTION 8.1 The tendon anchorage, including the anchorhead, bearing plate, stressing shims, buttonheads and wires of all selected tendons shall be visually inspected (Detailed Visual Examination) for signs of corrosion, cracking, missing wires, protruding buttonheads and signs of deformation.

8.2 This inspection is to be performed with light conditions supplemented by auxiliary light sources if needed.8.3 QCD- Record the illumination source used on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.0B as applicable.

8.4 For Detailed Visual Examinations, access must be sufficient to place the eye within 24 inches, at an angle not less than 30° to the surface.8.4.1 Mirrors may be used to improve the angle of vision.-v 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 689 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 235 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 4 of 8 Revision 0 9.0 CORROSION INSPECTION NOTE: The tendon will be in a stressed condition.

The areas to be inspected will be somewhat limited, thus only the exposed, visible portions of the anchorage, shims and bearing plate will be inspected.

9.1 The criteria listed in Table #1, will be used to measure the corrosion level of buttonheads, anchorheads, bushings, shims, bearing plates, and tendon wire: Table 1: Corrosion Levels and Descriptions Corrosion Description Level A No visible rust (mill oxide coating is in this category).

B Rust which appears to have formed prior to initial filler installation and show no evidence of having progressed in the interim.C New or progressive rust.NOTE: A Nonconformance Report SHALL be written.9.1.1 9.2 9.2.1 A pit is defined as an indentation in the component due to corrosion visible to the naked eye.QCD -Perform a visual inspection to determine the Corrosion Level of buttonheads, wires, anchorhead, bushing (when applicable), shims and bearing plate and document the results on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.0B, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION.

When a Corrosion Level C is discovered on, Anchora-ges, Bushings, Shims Bearing Plate, Buttonheads or Wires, the Owner shall be notified via a Nonconformance Report in accordance with PSC Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES.

a 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 690 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 236 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 5 of 8 Revision 0 10.0 CRACKS AND DEFORMATIONS 10.1 QCD -Perform a visual inspection of the anchorheads/bushings, shims and bearing plates to determine if cracks and/or deformation are present and document (Yes, No or Not Applicable) results on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.OB, anchorage inspection.

10.2 QCD -When cracks and/or deformations are present (Yes), Compose a sketch of the condition on Sketch Sheet 8.0, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION, and Document the condition with a Nonconformance Report in accordance with PSC Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES, for Exelon evaluation.

11.0 BUTTONHEAD INSPECTION 11.1 General 11.1.1 While the tendon is in a Stressed Condition, wires/buttonheads will be inspected in order to report conditions such as, Previously Missing, Protruding and Broken or Missing.11.1.2 The inspection is performed to acquire information on the function of the tendon since the original installation or previous surveillance.

All conditions for buttonheads and wires, whether missing or defective, will be documented.

11.1.3 Buttonhead evaluation criteria are detailed in Table 2- Buttonhead Evaluation.

This table is to be used as a guideline to detect obvious gross deficiencies in any buttonhead.

During original construction, certain flaws were considered normal and acceptable when buttonheading the original tendons. Thus not all flaws were recorded.11.2 QCD -To correctly orient the wire/buttonheads on the anchorhead, it is necessary to locate the Anchorhead ID and Bushing ID if applicable in order to replicate buttonhead pattern alignment.

Perform a visual inspection of the anchorhead in order to locate the Anchorhead ID and Bushing ID, if applicable, and document it's location on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.0B, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION.

11.3 QCD -Perform a visual inspection of the buttonheads to determine if any of the following conditions exist. Document results on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.0B, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION:

IS O , (Note the Category Code letter)11.3.1 Using symbol: I document malformed or double-headed buttonheads.

Use the Category Code Letters listed in Table 3-"Buttonhead Evaluation" to further identify specific deficiencies, if applicable.

18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 691 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 237 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 6 of 8 Revision 0 Table 2: Buttonhead Evaluation Category Description Code S Split: Crack resulting from maladjustment of the button header.Normally splits are parallel to the axis of the wire.D Double Buttonhead 0 Other, describe if buttonhead is malformed in another way a/I (Note the protrusion dimension 11.3.2 Using symbol: w -document the number of protruding/unseated wire/button heads.11.3.2.1 Use feeler gauges, wire gauges or other calibrated measuring devices to determine if the wire/buttonhead is unseated.

Place an arrow pointing at the protruding button head, with the distance of protrusion measured from the top of the flush buttonheads.

Note on the Data Sheet if protruding/unseated wire is removed.11.3.3 Using symbol: 0 -document the number of broken/missing wire/buttonheads, where those wires are not removed.11.3.4 Using symbol: O0 -document which wire/buttonheads were previously identified as missing; whether from a previous surveillance or from original installation.

11.3.5 Using symbol: 0 -document each of the discontinuous wires that were removed during this surveillance and previously identified as Broken/Missing.

11.3.6 Using symbol: (9 = document each wire that was removed during this surveillance for purposes of physical testing.11.4 QCD -If a buttonhead is missing (compared the original or previous buttonhead inspection records to the current records) and cannot be located around the anchorage, inspect the grease in the grease can or other lost grease. If necessary strain the grease through a mesh screen, not greater than 1/4" grid. Document buttonheads found.18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 692 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 238 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 7 of 8 Revision 0 12.0 EFFECTIVE WIRES 12.1 Protruding or unseated wire/buttonheads are representative of a number of undesirable conditions such as broken wires, incorrect wire length, restrained wires, etc. It is unlikely that individual wire/buttonheads can be verified for continuity while the tendon is stressed.12.2 QCD -Document the total amount of protruding/unseated wire/buttonheads (w) on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.06, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION.

12.3 QCD -Document the total amount of broken/missing wire/buttonheads, not including wires reviously identified as missing or wires removed for scheduled testing (0, [_) on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.0B, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION.

12.3.1 ADD SQUARE TO SHOW WIRE REMOVED THIS SURVEILLANCE FROM BUTTONHEAD END.12.4 QCD -Document the total amount of newly discovered ineffective wires (12.2 +12.3)on Data Sheet 8.OA or 8.0B, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION.

12.4.1 If the total is one (1) or more, document this condition on a Nonconformance Report for Client allpproval in accordance with PSC Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES.

12.5 QCD -Document the total amount of effective wires by subtracting the amount of newly discovered ineffective wires (12.4) as well as any previously identified missing (@0) or removed for testing wires (0) from the nominal 170 wires.12.5.1 TMI-1 tendons have 169 full length wires and a short test wire inserted into the 1 7 0 th hole in the anchor head 12.6 QCD -Document whether or not a continuity test has been requested by Exelon Engineering for this tendon due to protruding/unseated wires/buttonheads.

Also document whether the suspect wires chosen for the continuity test have been properly identified.

12.6.1 TMI-1 tendons have 169 full length wires and a short test wire inserted into the 1 7 0 th hole in the anchor head 12.7 QCD -Record the final inspection results as acceptable or unacceptable.

For unacceptable conditions, ensure the Nonconformance Report number is documented.

18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 693 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 239 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 09/03/13 D..Q~Revision 0 PRECISION LANCE Rvso 13.0 NOTIFICATIONATION 13.1 Exelon Engineering shall be formally notified when each one or more of the following conditions are detected as a result of the inspection of a tendon. Notification shall be by method indicated below.13.1.1 It shall be acceptable to continue working and notify Exelon Engineering within 1 working day.13.2 CATEGORY OF CORROSION C -when detected for Anchorheads, Bushings, Shims, or Bearing plates Exelon Engineering shall be notified by a nonconformance report.13.3 CRACKS -no matter how small, when detected for Anchor Heads, Shims and/or Bearing Plates, Exelon Engineering shall be notified by a nonconformance report.13.4 OFFSIZE BUTTONHEADS

-when detected for Buttonheads, report the quantity of each Category on Data Sheet 8.0. A nonconformance report is not required for this condition.

13.5 PROTRUDING WIRES -when detected for a quantity of 1 or more not previously documented since the original installation or previous surveillance, Exelon Engineering shall be notified by a nonconformance report. It shall be at the discretion of Exelon Engineering as to whether a continuity test shall be performed.

If a continuity test is performed and the wires are still unseated after retensioning, the quantity and length of protrusion shall be reported.13.6 ADDITIONAL MISSING OR BROKEN WIRES/BUTTONHEADS

-when detected for a quantity of 1 or more missing wires, broken wires and missing button heads not previously documented since the original installation or previous surveillance, Exelon Engineering shall be notified by a nonconformance report.14.0 DOCUMENTATION 14.1 The items in this procedure requiring documentation SHALL be documented on Data Sheet 8.0A or 8.OB, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION.

15.0 ATTACHMENTS 15.1 Data Sheet 8.OA, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION

-to be used for Field end anchorheads 15.2 Data Sheet 8.OB, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION

-to be used for Shop end anchorheads.

15.3 Sketch Sheet 8.0, ANCHORAGE INSPECTION 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 694 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 240 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.OA 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE LI UNIT 1 (7.3)Tendon No.: Tendon End: El Field ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA El As-Found [L Post De-Tensioning

/ Pre-Wire Removal EL Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks El Yes (2) El No 0 N/A (9.2) Anchorhead Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks [E Yes (2) El No [L N/A (9.2) Shims Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks EL Yes (2) El No El N/A (9.2) Bearing Plate Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks El Yes (2) El No EL N/A (1)_ Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. (2) Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and initiate a NCR.11.0 -BUTTONHEAD INSPECTION I Offsize (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated W wire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/buttonheads S Previously identified as missing 00000000[ Discontinuous-removed this 000000000000 surveillance.

0000000000000 0 wire(s) removed during this 00000000000000 surveillance for testing 00000000000000 00000OOOOOOO0 000000OOOOO000 (11.2) Anchorhead I.D. 00000000000000 0000000000000 Located on Sketch: ElYes ElNo 000000000000 (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found:0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 El Yes El No Quantity:

0000000 Additional Information:

(12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): (8.3) Illumination source (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0, 0_): (12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads:

(12.6) Continuity Test Requested?

El Yes El No (12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: Wires Identified?

El Yes [] No (12.7) Overall Results El Acceptable

[I Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: QC Reviewed:

Level: Date: 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 695 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 241 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.0B 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE L] UNIT 1 (7.3)Tendon No.: Tendon End: E_ Shop ANCHORAGE INSPECTION CRITERIA EL As-Found El Post De-Tensioning

/ Pre-Wire Removal El Post Re-Tensioning Q.C. Signoff 9.0 & 10.0 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (9.2) Buttonheads Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks E] Yes (2) 0 No E] N/A (9.2) Anchorhead Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks El Yes (2) [] No El N/A (9.2) Bushing Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks El Yes (2) El No El N/A (9.2) Shims Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks El Yes(2) El No El N/A (9.2) Bearing Plate Level: (1) (10.1) Cracks [: Yes(2) El No El N/A (1) Corrosion Level of C requires a NCR. (2) Compose a sketch of the cracks on Sketch Sheet 8.0 and initiate a NCR.11.0 -BUTTONHEAD INSPECTION

• Offsize (Malformed)

Protruding/unseated W wire/buttonheads 0 Broken/missing wire/buttonheads

• Previously identified as missing 00000000[] Discontinuous

-removed this 000000000000 surveillance wire(s) being removed during this 0000000000000 surveillance for testing 00000000000000

~00000000000000J (11.2) Anchorhead I.D. 00000000000000 Located on Sketch: ElYes ElNo 0000000000000 Bushing I.D. 000000 00000 Located on Sketch: El Yes E] No 0000000 (11.4) Missing Buttonheads Found: E] Yes E] No Quantity: Additional Information:

(12.2) Number of Protruding Buttonheads (w): (8.3) Illumination source (12.3) Number of Missing Buttonheads (0 , 51: (12.4) Total of Protruding

+ Missing Buttonheads:

(12.6) Continuity Test Requested

? [I Yes El No (12.5) Total # of Effective Buttonheads Seated: Wires Identified?

E] Yes E] No (12.7) Overall Results El Acceptable El Un-Acceptable Customer Notified NCR#: a QC Reviewed: Level: Date: a w 18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 696 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 242 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE INSPECTION Sketch Sheet 8.0 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: Exelon 2012 TENDON SURVEILLANCE F1 UNIT 1 Tendon No.: Tendon End: [_1 Shop Mi Field (10.2) Sketch each crack as it appears in the anchorheads/bushings, shims and bearing plates. Identify each Unit by number; record the location of the anchorhead or bushing identification and apply to the sketch. Use as many Sketch Sheets as necessary being sure to list the page number below and to apply a Sketch Number to each unit with cracks.Ensure a Nonconformance Report in accordance with Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES, for Exelon approval.i i i i i i i i i i i ! i i i i i i i i i i i ! i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ! i i i i QC Inspector:

Level: Date: QC Reviewed: Level: Date:-i~18 SQ 8.0.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 697 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 243 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.3 BEARING PLATE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 1 of 3 Revision 0 S EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM BEARING PLATE CONCRETE INSPECTION S 17whLa dotai Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Q.A. MANAGER 09/03/13 Date Approved by Approved by Title PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Title m w 19 SQ 8.3 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 698 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 244 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.3 BEARING PLATE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 2 of 3 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will establish the requirements for a detailed visual inspection (Detailed Visual Examination) of the concrete around/adjoining the bearing plate during the 2013 In-Service-Inspections (Surveillance) of the Post-Tensioning System Tendons at Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1.2.0 RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 In the event of conflict between any TMI Procedure and an SQ, the former governs.2.2 As stated in PSC Procedure QA 4.0. This procedure only requires Quality Control actions.3.0 QUALIFICATIONS 3.1 The inspector performing this inspection is to be qualified as a Level II examiner as defined in PSC's written certification practice approved by Exelon and each examiner shall be approved by the Exelon Responsible Engineer.4.0 EQUIPMENT 4.1 As stated in PSC Procedure SQ 4.0.5.0 QUALITY CONTROL 5.1 There are no hold points for this operation.

Quality Control Inspectors shall perform the inspections that are described in this procedure and document those results on Data Sheet 8.3.6.0 PREREQUISITES 6.1 The tendon will be in a stressed condition.

6.2 The Grease Cap may or may not be removed.6.3 The anchorage may or may not be cleaned up or inspected.

7.0 CONCRETE

INSPECTION 7.1 The concrete adjoining the bearing plate (within 2 feet of the edge of the bearing plate) of each selected tendon shall be inspected for cracks or any degradation in accordance with the approved written practice.7.2 This inspection is to be performed with light conditions supplemented by auxiliary light sources if needed.7.3 QCD -Record the illumination source used.19 SQ 8.3 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 699 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 245 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.3 BEARING PLATE INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 3 of 3 Revision 0 7.4 QCD- Locate the bearing plate identification and document the location on the sketch.7.5 QCD- Any crack that is 0.010" in width or wider shall be documented on Data Sheet 8.3. The quantity and size of any cracks > 0.010" shall be documented.

7.5.1 The full length and width of each crack shall be documented as well as sketching the crack pattern.8.0 NOTIFICATION

-UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS

8.1 Exelon

shall be notified with a nonconformance report when any crack width or gaps equal to or greater than 0.010" in width are detected.9.0 DOCUMENTATION 9.1 Data Sheet 8.3 shall be used for documenting the requirements of this inspection.

10.0 ATTACHMENTS 10.1 Data Sheet 8.3 19 SQ 8.3 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 700 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 246 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.3 BEARING PLATE INSPECTION DATA SHEET SQ 8.3 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 TENDON SURVEILLANCE LI UNIT 1 Tendon No.: Tendon End: __ Shop LI Field (7.4) Bearing Plate Identification

1. 1. Orient the bearing plate with the sketch below.2. Locate the bearing plate identification and document the location on the sketch.3. Sketch all cracks, including other defects, existing on the concrete in the area surrounding the tendon anchorage for a distance of 24 inches from the edge of the bearing plate.4. For cracks equal to or wider than 0.010 inches, document condition on an Nonconformance Report in accordance with Procedure QA 9.0, NONCONFORMANCES, for Exelon approval.On Hoop and dome this edge is up.Vertical Tendon, this is toward the center of the containment.

Auxiliary Light Source used: E] YesL] No (7.3) Illumination source: (7.5) Cracks > 0.010" [] Yes LI No Quantity:

Max. Width: Max Length: NCR#: QC Inspector:

Level: Date: QC Reviewed: Level: Date: 19 SQ 8.3 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 701 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 247 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR 09/03/13 Page 1 of 7 Revision 0 4 a EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION OF CONCRETE CONTAINMENT S Prepared by Approved by Q.C. INSPECTOR Title 09/03/13 Date Q.A. MANAGER Title 09/03/13 Date S/62 PRESIDENT 09/03/13 Date Approved by Title I a 20 SQ 8.4.TM1.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 702 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 248 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR 09/03/13 Page 2 of 7 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will establish the requirements for the visual inspection of the exposed accessible exterior surfaces of the containment building during In-Service Inspection (Surveillance) of Post Tensioning System Tendons at Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1.2.0 SCOPE 2.1 This surveillance procedure has been developed to implement the requirements of 1OCFR 50.55a and the 2004 Edition Addenda of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sect. Xl, Subsection IWL.2.2 General Visual Examinations will be performed as required by IWL-2310 except that instead of using the minimum illumination, maximum direct examination distance, and maximum procedure demonstration lower case character height requirements specified in IWA-221 0 and Table IWA221 0-1 for General Visual Examinations, the recommendations of Exelon's Registered Professional Engineer (RPE) for illumination and distance will be implemented.

The requirements for General Visual Examination will be as specified by the Exelon Responsible Engineer.2.3 The instruction and recording criteria contained herein establish the minimum requirements necessary to accomplish the "General Visual" (GV-CC) examination, formally General Visual Examination under 2004 IWL, which is used to determine the general structural condition of concrete surfaces by identifying areas of concrete deterioration and distress, as defined in the American Concrete Institute publication, ACI 201.1 R, 1992 or later edition, "Guide for Making a Condition Survey of Concrete in Service".2.4 Portions of the concrete surface that are covered by the liner, foundation material, or backfill, or are otherwise obstructed by adjacent structures, components, parts, or appurtenances are exempt from the examination requirements.

2.5 All accessible grease caps shall be visually examined to detect significant grease leakage or grease cap deformation.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITY

3.1 In the event of conflict between any TMI Procedure and an SQ, the former governs.3.2 PSC quality control personnel to be responsible for performing the visual inspections required of this procedure.

3.3 Exelon's

Professional Engineer to be responsible for final evaluation and disposition of any deficiencies recorded as a result of the inspections performed.

20 SQ 8.4.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 703 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 249 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR 09/03/13 Page 3 of 7 Revision 0 4.0 QUALIFICATIONS 4.1 PSC Quality Control personnel are to be certified in accordance with the ASME Code,Section XI, Subsection IWA-2300.

Certification per PSC's written procedure or as qualified by Exelon.5.0 QUALITY CONTROL 5.1 This procedure contains no hold points. However, implementation of the requirements of this procedure must be demonstrated to the responsible engineer, to his satisfaction, prior to use. All quality control documentation (QCD) points shall only require documentation of information or evaluation data. The required information or evaluation data shall be documented on Data Sheet 8.4 and Sketch Sheet 8.4.6.0 EQUIPMENT 6.1 Optical aids and artificial lighting shall be used as directed by the responsible engineer.7.0 PREREQUISTES

7.1 Visual

aids, transport and artificial light shall be used to demonstrate and verify that the inspector can complete the general inspection, two different gray paper charts with line pairs of 0.030", 0.050", 0.075" and 0.130" will be used. PSC will provide an initial demonstration to the ANII and Exelon QC to ensure that PSC is meeting requirements for general inspection.

8.0 VISUAL

EXAMINATION 8.1 The concrete surface, including coated areas, shall be visually examined for evidence of conditions, such as defined in ACI 201.1 R, 1992 or later edition, Guide for Making a Condition Survey of Concrete in Service, which may be indicative of damage or degradation.

8.2 The examination may be performed from floors, roofs, platforms, walkways, ladders, ground surface, and other permanent vantage points unless temporary close-in access to suspect areas of concrete surface is required by the responsible engineer.20 SQ 8.4.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 704 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 250 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR 09/03/13 Page 4 of 7 Revision 0 8.3 8.3.1 8.3.1.1 8.3.1.2 8.3.1.3 8.3.1.4 8.3.2 8.3.2.1 8.3.2.2 8.3.2.3 8.3.2.4 8.3.2.5 8.3.2.6 8.3.3 8.3.4 8.3.4.1 8.3.4.2 8.3.4.3 8.3.4.4 8.3.5 QCD- The following conditions require further evaluation and are to be documented on Data Sheet 8.4 in order to judge their acceptability.

A detailed inspection as directed by the Registered Professional Engineer shall be completed and documented on Sketch Sheet 8.4.For concrete surface conditions:

Popouts and voids greater than 2" in diameter.Loss of concrete, whether by spalling or scaling, is the issue. Loss to a depth of% inch and over a linear dimension of at least 8 inches must be evaluated.

Any exposed reinforcing.

Passive cracks greater than 0.040" in maximum width measured below any surface-enhanced widening.For concrete surface conditions (contiguous areas greater than 3 ft2), the appearance of: Leaching Chemical attack Abrasion Erosion Cavitation Coating degradation Any settlement or deflection observed by the examiner.For areas around concrete embedments:

The presence of corrosion; corrosion stains Detached embedments Loose bolts Indications of degradation due to vibratory loads For prestress steel systems, the presence of grease on exposed concrete corrosion on grease cans and other exposed components.

-U v 20 SQ 8.4.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 705 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 251 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR 09/03/13 Dý -rf 7 LANE Revision 0 8.3.6 Detailed Visual Examination shall be performed directly at a distance of 2'0" maximum to determine the extent and severity of the distress or degradation detected during general visual examination and documented on Sketch Sheet 8.4.The Responsible Engineer shall be notified of all areas of detailed inspection for his review at completion.

8.4 The condition of the concrete surface is acceptable if the Responsible Engineer determines that there is no evidence of damage or degradation sufficient to warrant further evaluation or repair.8.5 BASELINE VERIFICATION 8.5.1 It shall be the responsibility of the inspector to disposition the findings of the previously performed baseline examination in order to discern whether noticeable changes are taking place. Reporting, onto data sheet 8.4, shall elaborate on each of the following criteria, as a minimum: 8.5.1.1 Are all previously noted indication present?8.5.1.2 Have they changed?8.5.1.3 Are there new indications?

8.5.1.4 Has some form of restoration process transpired? (Grouting, painting, etc.)8.5.1.5 Is there an undetermined disposition present? (Cannot find previously noted indications, etc.)9.0 NOTIFICATION 9.1 PSC shall notify the ANII and Exelon QC each day prior to starting examinations.

9.2 Exelon's

Responsible Engineer shall be formally notified of the completion and the results of this general visual examination.

9.3 Items

with examination results that are not acceptable by the Responsible Engineer shall be evaluated by Exelon. Exelon shall be responsible for preparation of an Engineering Evaluation Report stating the following:

9.3.1 The cause of the condition which does not meet the acceptance standards; 9.3.2 The acceptability of the concrete containment without repair of the item;9.3.3 Whether or not repair is required and, if required, the extent, method, and completion date for the repair;9.3.4 Extent, nature, and frequency of additional examinations.

20 SQ 8.4.TM1.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 706 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 252 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR 09/03/13 Page 6 of 7 Revision 0 10.0 10.1 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 DOCUMENTATION Data Sheet 8.4 and as applicable Sketch Sheet 8.4 shall be used for documenting the requirements of this procedure.

ATTACHMENTS Data Sheet 8.4 Sketch Sheet 8.4 Gray paper sheet -dark Gray paper sheet -light U v 20 SQ 8.4.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 707 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 253 of 415 VISUAL EXAMINATION

-GENERAL VISUAL EXAMINATION Project TMI Surveillance

1. 40TH Year 2013 Inspection Area: Equipment Used Concrete Surface Condition Containment Surface (Findings and Description)

NI 10 RI[5 ] WEl D1D D DED]El D WEl[EI Ei El E: I] E :i-1:i [ET[ E [ Ei l 1:1 []E El [] El[E [E []4 = 4 4 -Li Li Li W 1:1 E ED I lIF1 LI 1E01E (Use as many sketch sheets (page 2) as needed to report any Recordable Indication (RI) or Information Only (I0) findings for the purpose of documentation and orientation.)

Recordable Indications to be Examined For (PSC Procedure 8.4)Leaching or Chemical Attack Deterioration of any Concrete Coating (if applicable)

Abrasion or Erosion Degradation Tendon Grease on Exposed Concrete Surfaces Popouts and Voids Corrosion on Grease Cans, Bearing Plates or Anchorage Cracks *Excessive Corrosion on Exposed Embedded Metal Surfaces Scaling *Detached Embedments or Loose Bolting Spalls *Indication of Degradation Due to Vibration Corrosion Staining on the Concrete Surface (* The owner/agent must be notified for these noted conditions.)

Exposed Reinforcing Steel Surface Patches or Repairs Comments and Disposition by Responsible Engineer ElAcceptable

[--]Unacceptable Comments: Inspector

& Level: Responsible Engineer: ANII: Date: Date: Date: a 4-20 SQ 8.4.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 708 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 254 of 415 N 1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR SKETCH SHEET 8.4 09/03/13 PRECISION ANCE Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Project: TMI 2013 40TH YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE Inspection Area: 1. Sketch or attach photographs to provide documentation or additional details as necessary.

.. ........... .. ... .... ... ... ....-. ..... .. .. ..... .. ... .. ..... ... .. .... .... ....

............

..... .... ....... ....... .....~ ~~~ .... .4---- --.. ........ ..4............

... .. ... ....... .. ........ i .......... .. ... ... ........ ........ ....... ... ... ..... ....... .. .... .... ...... ... .. ..........

...... .... ... ... ...... ...... .. .......... ...... ..... ........................... .. ....... .... ......T...-.. .. .. .. ... .... ..... ....Comments: QC Inspector:

Level: Date: 20 SQ 8.4.TMI.13 151 Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 709 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 255 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR GREY SHEET-DARK nomIt"41 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 20 SQ 8.4.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 710 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 256 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.4 CONCRETE EXTERIOR GREY SHEET-LIGHT 09/03/13 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 wI 20 SQ 8.4.TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 711 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 257 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 1 of 3 Revision 0 EXELON THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 1 (4 0TH YEAR) PHYSICAL CONTAINMENT BUILDING TENDON SURVEILLANCE PRECISION SURVEILLANCE CORPORATION IN-SERVICE INSPECTION TENDON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION

-0ý jauj Q.C. INSPECTOR 09/03/13 Date Prepared by Title Aa-F4v4aýQ.A. MANAGER Approved by Title 09/03/13 Date 09/03/13 Date PRESIDENT Approved by Title w 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 712 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 258 of 415 N 1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 2 of 3 Revision 0 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure will establish the requirements for General Visual Examinations of all Tendon Anchorage Grease Caps during the 2013 In-Service-Inspections (surveillance) of the Post-Tensioning System Tendons at Exelon's Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant -Unit 1.2.0 RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 As stated in PSC Procedure QA 4.0. This procedure only requires Quality Control actions.3.0 QUALIFICATIONS 3.1 The inspector performing this inspection is to be qualified as a Level II examiner as defined in PSC's written certification practice approved by Exelon and each examiner shall be approved by the Exelon Responsible Engineer.4.0 EQUIPMENT 4.1 Visual aids and artificial lighting may be used as needed.5.0 QUALITY CONTROL 5.1 This procedure requires only documentation of the results of the inspection of the Tendon Anchorage Grease Caps.6.0 PREREQUISITES 6.1 This inspection shall be performed prior to demobilization of the tendon surveillance equipment and personnel.

7.0 VISUAL

INSPECTION 7.1 The General Visual Examination of each grease cap shall be conducted to determine if evidence of free water, grease leakage, degradation from corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability to contain the sheathing filler grease, and deformation that provides evidence that the anchorage hardware may be deteriorated.

7.2 Evidence

of oil at threaded connections is acceptable provided it is not excessive, this is oil that has separated from the grease and is common.7.3 QCD- The examination results shall be recorded on attached Data Sheet 8.5A for Unit 1. Inaccessible grease caps shall be documented as such with the reason for being inaccessible.

Se 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 713 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 259 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION 09/03/13 Page 3 of 3 Revision 0 8.0 NOTIFICATION

-UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS 8.1 8.1.1 8.1.2 8.1.3 8.1.4 TMI Engineering shall be notified with a nonconformance report when any one or more of the following unacceptable conditions are detected during grease cap examinations.

Evidence of free water leaking from the end cap.Evidence of grease leakage.Evidence of deformation that indicates the possible deterioration of the anchorage hardware.Evidence of corrosion that challenges the ability of the grease cap to contain grease.9.0 DOCUMENTATION 9.1 The required information or evaluation data shall be documented on attached Data Sheet 8.5 for Unit 1.10.0 ATTACHMENTS 10.1 Data Sheet 8.5 IS SI I 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 714 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 260 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 1 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE *YES/NO YES/NO YESlNO YES/NO D101 D102 D103 D104 D105 D106 D107 D108 D109 D1 12 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _D1 13 __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _D1 16 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _D1 17__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _D119 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Di120 _______D1 21 ____________

D1 22 ______ ______D1 21 ______ ______D1 22 ______ ______D1 23 ____ __Dl124 Dl25 Dl126 Di127 ___ __Dl128 D129 Dl130 Dl31 Dl132 D133 D1214*Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.**This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.201) SQ 8.5 TMVI.113 IS[Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 715 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 261 of 415 N 1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 2 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE *YES/NO YES/NO_______________YES/NO YES/NO D135 D136 D137 D138 D139 D140 D141 D142 D143 D144 D145 D146 D147 D148 D201 D202 D203 D204 D205 D206 D207 D208 D209 D210 D211 D212 D213 D214 D215 D216 D217 D218 D219 D220 D221*Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.**This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.-Iw v 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 716 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 262 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 3 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YESINO__ YES/NO D222 D223 D224 D225 D226 D227 D228 D229 D230 D231 D232 D233 D234 D235 D236 D237 D238 D239 D240 D241 D242 D243 D244 D245 D246 D247 D248 D249 D301 D302 D303 D304 D305 D306 D307*Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.**This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.,q v 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 717 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 263 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 4 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YSN D308 D309 D310 D311 D312 D313 D314 D315 D316 D317 D318 D319 D320 D321 D322 D323 D324 D325 D326 D327 D328 D329 D330 D331 D332 D333 D334 D335 D336 D337 D338 D339 D340 D341 D342 D343* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.i w 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 718 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 264 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 5 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO_____ __________YES/NO YES/NO___D344 D345 D346 D347 D348 D349 4 4 4 4 4 t 4 4 $ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 .4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 .4 4 4 .4 4* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 719 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 265 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 6 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO_____YES/NO YES/NO H13-1 H13-2 H13-3 H13-4 H13-5 H13-6 H13-7 H13-8 H13-9 H13-10 H13-11 H13-12 H13-13 H1i3-14 H13-15 H13-16 H13-17 H13-17 H 13-18 H 13-19 H 13-20 H13-21 H 13-22 H13-23 H 13-24 H13-25 H 13-26 H1 3-27 H13-28 H13-29 H13-30 H 13-31 H 13-32 H 13-33 H1 3-34 H 13-35*Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.**This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.20b SQ 8.5 TMI.I13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 720 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 266 of 415 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YSN H1 3-36 H13-37 H13-38 H13-39 H 13-40 H1I3-41 H 13-42 H13-43 H 13-44 H1 3-45 H 13-46 H 13-47 H13-48 H 13-49 H13-50 H 13-51 H 13-52 H13-53 H13-54 H13-55 H24-1 H24-2 H24-3 H24-4 H24-5 H24-6 H24-7 H24-8 H24-9 H24-10 H24-11 H24-12 H24-13 H24-14 H24-15* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.lqw v 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 721 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 267 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 8 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO______YES/NO YSN H24-16 H24-17 H24-18 H24-19 H24-20 H24-21 H24-22 H24-23 H24-24 H24-25 H24-26 H24-27 H24-28 H24-29 H24-30 H24-31 H24-32 H24-33 H24-34 H24-35 H24-36 H24-37 H24-38 H24-39 H24-40 H24-41 H24-42 H24-43 H24-44 H24-45 H24-46 H24-47 H24-48 H24-49 H24-50 H24-51* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.d W 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 722 of 1008 RE-0850ApnixEwae28o 1 REP-i 098-510 Appendix E, Page 268 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 9 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE *YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO H24-52 H24-53 H24-54 H24-55 H35-1 H35-2 H35-3 H35-4 H35-5 H35-6 H35-7 H35-8 H35-9 H35-10 H35-11 H35-12 H35-13 H35-14 H35-15 H35-16 H35-17 H35-18 H35-19 H35-20 H35-21 H35-22 H35-23 H35-24 H35-26* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 723 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 269 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 10 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO________ _______YES/NO

____ES_ ______NO_____

H35-27 H35-28 H35-29 H35-30 H35-31 H35-32 H35-33 H35-34 H35-35 H35-36 H35-37 H35-38 H35-39 H35-40 H35-41 H35-42 H35-43 H35-44 H35-46 H35-47 H35-48 H35-49 H35-50 H35-51 H35-52 H35-53 H35-54 H35-55* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.IL A 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 724 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 270 of 415 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO_____YES/NO YES/NO H46-1 H46-2 H46-3 H46-4 H46-5 H46-6 H46-7 H46-8 H46-9 H46-1 0 H46-11 H46-12 H46-13 H46-14 H46-15 H46-16 H46-17 H46-18 H46-19 H46-20 H46-21 H46-22 H46-23 H46-24 H46-25 H46-26 H46-27 H46-28 H46-29 H46-30 H46-31 H46-32 H46-33 H46-34 H46-35 H46-36*Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.**This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.-I 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 725 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 271 of 415 N 1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 12 of 20 Revision 0 S1 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE *YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO H46-37 H46-38 H46-39 H46-40 H46-41 H46-42 H46-43 H46-44 H46-45 H46-46 H46-47 H46-48 H46-49 H46-50 H46-51 H46-51 H46-52 H46-53 H46-54 H46-55 H51-1 H51-2 H51-3 H51-4 H51-5 H51-6 H51-7 H51-8 H51-9 H51-10 H51-11 H51-12 H51-13 H51-14 H51-15* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.I , A 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 726 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 272 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 13 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO_____YES/NO YSN H51-16 H51-17 H51-18 H51-19 H51-20 H51-21 H51-22 H51-23 H51-24 H51-25 H51-26 H51-27 H51-28 H51-29 H51-30 H51-31 H51-32 H51-33 H51-34 H51-35 H51-36 H51-37 H51-38 H51-39 H51-40 H51-41 H51-42 H51-43 H51-44 H51-45 H51-46 H51-47 H51-48 H51-49 H51-50 H51-51* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.Uq1 I v 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 727 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 273 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 14 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE *YES/NO YES/NO____YES/NO YES/NO H51-52 H51-53 H51-54 H51-55 H62-1 H62-2 H62-3 H62-4 H62-5 H62-6 H62-7 H62-8 H62-9 H62-10 H62-11 H62-12 H62-13 H62-14 H62-15 H62-16 H62-17 H62-18 H62-1 9 H62-20 H62-21 H62-21 H62-22 H62-23 H62-24 H62-25 H62-26 H62-27 H62-28 H62-29 H62-30* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease..1W 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 728 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 274 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 15 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO__________YES/NO YES/NO H62-31 H62-32 H62-33 H62-34 H62-35 H62-36 H62-37 H62-38 H62-39 H62-40 H62-41 H62-42 H62-43 H62-44 H62-45 H62-46 H62-47 H62-48 H62-49 H62-50 H62-51 H62-52 H62-53 H62-54 H62-55 4 + + 4 4.4 + 4- 4. *1- 4.4 + + + + 4.* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 729 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 275 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03113 Page 16 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO_________YES/NO YES/NO V-1 V-2 V-3 V-4 V-5 V-6 V-7 V-8 V-9 V-10 V-11 V-12 V-13 V-14 V-1 5 V-16 V-17 V-1 8 V-19 V-20 V-21 V-22 V-23 V-24 V-25 V-26 V-27 V-28 V-29 V-30 V-31 V-32 V-33 V-34 V-35 V-36*Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.**This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.i w 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 730 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 276 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 17 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO___V-37 V-38 V-39 V-40 V-41 V-42 V-43 V-44 V-45 V-46 V-47 V-48 V-49 V-50 V-51 V-52 V-53 V-54 V-55 V-56 V-57 V-58 V-59 V-60 V-61 V-62 V-63 V-64 V-65 V-66 V-67 V-68 V-69 V-70 V-71 V-72 I* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 731 of 1008 REP-1 098-510 Appendix E, Page 277 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 18 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE *YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO V-73 V-74 V-75 V-76 V-77 V-78 V-79 V-80 V-81 V-82 V-83 V-84 V-85 V-86 V-87 V-88 V-89 V-90 V-91 V-92 V-93 V-94 V-95 V-96 V-97 V-98 V-99 V-1 00 V-101 V-102 V-103 V-1 04 V-105 V-106 V-107 V-108* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.F------- j1q1W F 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 732 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 278 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 19 of 20 Revision 0 TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE * **YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO V-1 09 V-110 V-111 V-1 12 V-1 13 V-114 V-115 V-1 16 V-1 17 V-1 18 V-1 19 V-120 V-121 V-122 V-123 V-124 V-125 V-126 V-127 V-128 V-129 V-130 V-131 V-132 V-133 V-134 V-135 V-136 V-1 37 V-138 V-139 V-140 V-141 V-142 V-143 V-144* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 733 of 1008 REP-1098-510 Appendix E, Page 279 of 415 N1091 PSC PROCEDURE SQ 8.5 GREASE CAP INSPECTION Data Sheet 8.5 09/03/13 Page 20 of 20 Revision 0 S TMI UNIT 1 TENDON ANCHORAGE GREASE CAP INSPECTION TENDON LOCATION EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE OF EVIDENCE INSPECTOR'S OR OF FREE OF GREASE CAP OF INITIALS AND ID BUTTRESS WATER GREASE DEFORMATION CORROSION DATE LEAKAGE *YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO_____YES/NO YSN V-145 V-146 V-147 V-148 V-149 V-150 V-151 V-152 V-153 V-154 V-155 V-156 V-157 V-158 V-159 V-160 V-161 V-162 V-163 V-164 V-165 V-166 S+ + + + 4 ++ + + + + ++ + + + 4 ++ + + + 4 ++ + + + 4 ++ 4 4 + 4 +*1* 4 4* Evidence of oil at threaded connection is acceptable providing it is not excessive.

This is oil that has separated from grease and is common.** This is evidence of corrosion that resulted in metal loss and wastage that may affect the ability of the grease cap to contain the sheathing filler grease.0 1W F 20b SQ 8.5 TMI.13 ISI Topical Report 213 Attachment 2 Page 734 of 1008