ML12362A043

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Report No. 12Q0108.70-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for Three Mile Island Unit 1, Page C-162 Through Page C-284
ML12362A043
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/07/2012
From: Delaney M
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RS-12-175, TMI-12-161 12Q0108.70-R-001, Rev 1
Download: ML12362A043 (123)
v • d • e


Text

12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-V-0001C Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONT ISOL B OTSG MS ISOL VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IB, 355.00 ft, 44: IN 'C' STEAM RM Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-162 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-V-0001C Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONT ISOL B OTSG MS ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-T1-MS-V-0001C Rev 01 Minor surface crack near support, consistent with the acceptance criteria of ACI-349, therefore OK.C-163 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

MS-V-O001C (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves CONT ISOL B OTSG MS ISOL VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Juan A. 1-6pez 10/9/12 Photos an_ A 1004040 1004041 C-1 64 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-V-0002B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONT ISOL B OTSG ISOL TO ATMOS Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IB, 295.00 ft, 5: EF-P-1 RM ON MS Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-165 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-V-0002B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONT ISOL B OTSG ISOL TO ATMOS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Anchorage check is not applicable.

This is in-line equipment.

See SQ-Ti-MS-V-0002B, Revision 001 C-166 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-V-0002B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONT ISOL B OTSG ISOL TO ATMOS Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3367 100_3368 C-167 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-V-0004B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

ATMOSPHERIC DUMP VALVE FOR 'B' OTSG Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IB, 295.00 ft, 5: EF-P-1 RM ON MS Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-168 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MS-V-0004B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

ATMOSPHERIC DUMP VALVE FOR 'B' OTSG Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Anchorage check is not applicable.

This is in-line equipment.

See SQ-Ti-MS-V-0004B, Revision 001 C-169 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

MS-V-0004B (7) Fluid-Operated Valves ATMOSPHERIC DUMP VALVE FOR 'B' OTSG Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 1u UJitiu C-170 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: V] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-FT-1127 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPI THRU MU-V-16B FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

AB, 281.00 ft, 15 : 3' E. MU VLV ALLEY Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. -Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-171 12Q0108.70-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-FT-1 127 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPI THRU MU-V-16B FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-T1-MU-FT-1127, Revision 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-172 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

MU-FT-1 127 (18) Instruments on Racks HPI THRU MU-V-16B FLOW TRANSMITTER Photos Iu UUts60 C-173 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-FT-1128 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPI THRU MU-V-16C FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

AB, 305.00 ft, 13: ON WALL BY MU-F-4A4' UP Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-174 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-FT-1128 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPI THRU MU-V-16C FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-T1-MU-FT-1128, Revision 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-175 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

MU-FT-1 128 (18) Instruments on Racks HPI THRU MU-V-16C FLOW TRANSMITTER Photos 100_3827 C-176 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-FT-1129 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPI THROUGH MU-V-16D FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 281.00 ft, 31 : W WALL 12' N OF SEAL RET CLR Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-177 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-FT-1129 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPI THROUGH MU-V-16D FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-MU-FT-1 129, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-178 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-FT-1 129 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPI THROUGH MU-V-16D FLOW TRANSMITTER Photos 100_3353 C-179 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

MAKEUP PUMP 1B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

AB, 281.00 ft, 14: MU PUMP RM B Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-180 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

MAKEUP PUMP 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Two linear indications in pad and one on floor is within the ACI-349 acceptance criteria.

Not a potential seismic concern.See SQ-TI-MU-P-O001B, Revision 001 C-181 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

MAKEUP PUMP lB Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3831 C-182 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-V-0003 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL LD COOLER ISOL VLV Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

AB, 281.00 ft, 15: N ON MEZANINE 0 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-183 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: MU-V-0003 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL LD COOLER ISOL VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See SQ-Ti-MU-V-0003, Revision 002 C-184 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

MU-V-0003 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves CONTAINMENT ISOL LD COOLER ISOL VLV Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3859 C-185 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-P-0001B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC SVC COOL RIVER WATER 'B' PUMP Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IPH, 308.00 ft, 28: N PUMP ROOM SOU Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-186 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-P-0001B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC SVC COOL RIVER WATER 'B' PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation FBT-625-001 Rev. 000.The pumps upper restrains are not required for seismic qualification.

They were for thrust purposes and the where removed per ECRs 02-00271, 02-00272, 02-00263 due to the fact that they were not longer needed.The pump seismic' qualification is not longer per SQUG (IE: Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-NR-P-0001B, Rev 001 is no longer applicable), instead there is a new analysis that was performed (FBT-625-001 ROO) during the pump replacement on 2001 (from Peerless to Johnsons Pump) that qualified the new pump to Seismic Class C-187 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-P-0001B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pi Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC SVC CC umps)OL RIVER WATER 'B' PUMP (1) One, per TMI specification (SP-1101-12-148 Rev. 3).Documentation for the removal of upper braces was tracked under IR 1401674 and has been determined to be acceptable per Calculation FBT-625-001 Rev. 000.Three bolts in north brace anchorage per design and SQUG SEWS.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG_1203 IMG_1206 C-188 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-V-0001B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC PUMP RIVER PUMP B DISCH VLV Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IPH, 308.00 ft, 28: NR-P-1B DISCH N Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-189 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-V-0001B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC PUMP RIVER PUMP B DISCH VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -NR-V-0001 B, Rev 000 In-line equipment.

Flexible electrical line is loose at the attachment and is being tracked by IR 1402599. Not an operability issue.C-190 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-V-0001B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC PUMP RIVER PUMP B DISCH VLV Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG_1198 IMG_1199 C-191 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-V-0004B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DEICING MU VALVE B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

AB, 271.00 ft, 16: HT EX VAULT NW Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-192 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-V-0004B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DEICING MU VALVE B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -NR-V-0004B Rev. 0 C-193 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NR-V-0004B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DEICING MU VALVE B Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3905 C-194 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-C-0001B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

NUCLEAR SERVICES CLOSED COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER 11B Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

AB, 271.00 ft, 16: HEAT EXCHANGE VAULT N Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-195 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-C-00011B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

NUCLEAR SERVICES CLOSED COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-T1-NS-C-0001B, Revision 001 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-196 12Q0108.70-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-C-OOO11B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

NUCLEAR SERVICES CLOSED COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER 1B Photos 100_3889 100_3890 C-197 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC SVC CLOSED COOLING WATER 'B' PUMP Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

AB, 305.00 ft, 11 : NS PUMP CUB M6C Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-198 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: EM N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC SVC CLOSED COOLING WATER 'B' PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Two linear indication on concrete pad which are within the acceptance criteria of ACI-349. Not a potential seismic concern.See SQ-T1-NS-P-0001B, Revision 000 C-199 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-P-0001B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

NUC SVC CLOSED COOLING WATER 'B' PUMP Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3786 C-200 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-V-0052B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-11B MTR COOLER SUPPLY Project: TMI SWEL IB, 295.00 ft, 3: IB BASEMENT CUBICLE S OF REACT OR RIVER Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

LOOPS S WALL 8 ABOVE FLR Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the-anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-201 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-V-0052B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-1B MTR COOLER SUPPLY Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing CP-1690, Rev 01 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-202 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [lY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-V-0052B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-1B MTR COOLER SUPPLY Photos 100_3312_52B C-203 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-V-0053B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-1B MTR COOLER RETURN Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IB, 295.00 ft, 3: N/A Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-204 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-V-0053B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-1B MTR COOLER RETURN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-NS-V-0053B, Rev 001 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-205 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

NS-V-0053B (7) Fluid-Operated Valves CONTAINMENT ISOL AH-E-1 B MTR COOLER RETURN Photos 100 3312_53B C-206 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-V-0054B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP ROOM COOLING COIL FLOW CONTROL VLV Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 305.00 ft, 33: IN OVERHEAD BY AIR COOLERS Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting othercomments.

Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-207 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-V-0054B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP ROOM COOLING COIL FLOW CONTROL VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -NS-V-0054B, Rev 000 In-line equipment.

C-208 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: NS-V-0054B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP ROOM COOLING COIL FLOW CONTROL VLV Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3244 C-209 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RC-RV-0002 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

PILOT OPERATED RELIEF VALVE (PORV)Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 346.00 ft, 42 : TOP OF PRESSURIZER Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-210 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RC-RV-0002 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

PILOT OPERATED RELIEF VALVE (PORV)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-T1-RC-RV-0002 Rev 00 In-Line Valve C-211 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RC-RV-0002 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

PILOT OPERATED RELIEF VALVE (PORV)Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Juan A. Lopez 10/9/12 Photos 100 4082 C-212 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RC-V-0002 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

PORV BLOCK VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 346.00 ft, 42 : TOP OF PZR Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-213 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RC-V-0002 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

PORV BLOCK VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-T1 -RC-V-0002 Rev 000 In-Line Valve C-214 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: EIY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RC-V-0002 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

PORV BLOCK VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 K -Juan A. L6pez 10/9/12 Photos 100 4080 C-215 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-P-0001B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

RB EMERG COOL RIVER WTR 'B' PUMP Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IPH, 308.00 ft, 29: PUMP ROOM 'B' S Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-216 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-P-0001B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

RB EMERG COOL RIVER WTR 'B' PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation FBT-625-001 Rev. 000 for similarity.

The pumps upper restrains are not required for seismic qualification.

The restraints were intended for thrust purposes and where removed.Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -RR-P-0001 B, Rev 001 with the upper restraints removed.C-217 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-P-0001B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

RB EMERG COOL RIVER WTR 'B' PUMP Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3686 100_3688 C-218 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-S-00011B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

RB EMERG CLNG RIVER WTR 'B' STRAINER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IPH, 308.00 ft, 29: SOUTH BAY ISPH Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-219 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-S-0001B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

RB EMERG CLNG RIVER WTR 'B' STRAINER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -RR-S-0001 B, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-220 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-S-OOO1 B (0) Other RB EMERG CLNG RIVER WTR 'B' STRAINER Photos 100_3694 100_3697 C-221 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-S-1B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-S-11B CONTROL PANEL Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IPH, 305.00 ft, 29: RIVER WATER PUMP ROOM 'B' SOUTH CUBICLE Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-222 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-S-1B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-S-1B CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -RR-S-001B-PNL, Rev 000 This has External anchorage C-223 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-S-1 B (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets RR-S-1B CONTROL PANEL Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3701 C-224 12Q0108.70-R-O01 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-V-0003A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL RBEC COIL 'A' INLET VLV.Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IB, 295.00 ft, 2 : W OF STAIRWELL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-225 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-V-0003A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOL RBEC COIL 'A' INLET VLV.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Anchorage check is not applicable because equipment is in-line.See SQ-Ti-RR-V-0003A, Revision 000 C-226 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-V-0003A (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves CONTAINMENT ISOL RBEC COIL A INLET VLV.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012

-Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos IMG 1085 IMG-1086 C-227 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-V-0005 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-V-6 RB COOL COIL DISCH BYPASS Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IB, 295.00 ft, 3 : W OF STAIRWELL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-228 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-V-0005 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-V-6 RB COOL COIL DISCH BYPASS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -RR-V-0005, Rev 001 In-Line component C-229 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-V-0005 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves RR-V-6 RB COOL COIL DISCH BYPASS Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100 3278 100_3281 C-230 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-V-0006 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

RB EMERG. COOL COIL BACK PRESSURE REGULATOR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

lB, 295.00 ft, 3 : W OF STAIRWELL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-231 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RR-V-0006 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

RB EMERG. COOL COIL BACK PRESSURE REGULATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -RR-V-0006, Rev 003 In-Line Component IR 1400293 -RR-V-6 VALVE HANDWHEEL APPEARS TO BE SLIGHTLY BENT is tracking this.C-232 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

RR-V-0006 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves RB EMERG. COOL COIL BACK PRESSURE REGULATOR Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3298 100_3301 C-233 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF2-DPT Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P-2 FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 281.00 ft, 30 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-234 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF2-DPT Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P-2 FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments No SQUG Walk down Report exists for this component.

However, this installation anchorage and bracket is the same as those documented and evaluated under SQ-Ti-SF9DPT2 Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-235 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF2-DPT Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P-2 FLOW TRANSMITTER Photos No k nmmmn M- --- m 100_3316 C-236 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF9-DPT-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

B SF POOL COOLING WATER FLOW XMTR Project: TMI SWEL FB, 281.00 ft, 34 : AB 281 NEUT TANK ROOM SW CORNER OF ROOM Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

ON S WALL 5 ABOVE FLOOR Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes C-237 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF9-DPT-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

B SF POOL COOLING WATER FLOW XMTR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -SF9DPT1, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-238 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF9-DPT-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

B SF POOL COOLING WATER FLOW XMTR Photos 100_3326 C-239 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF9-DPT-2 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

A SF POOL COOLING WATER FLOW XMTR Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 281.00 ft, 34 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-240 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF9-DPT-2 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

A SF POOL COOLING WATER FLOW XMTR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-SF9DPT2, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-241 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF9-DPT-2 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

A SF POOL COOLING WATER FLOW XMTR Photos 100_3330 C-242 12Q.108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-C-1B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

B SPENT FUEL COOLER Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 305.00 ft, 33: 305' FUEL BLDG IN SF COOLER ROOM Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-243 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-C-1B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

B SPENT FUEL COOLER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -SF-C-0001 B, Rev 000 Linear indication (cracks) on floor near column base. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern.C-244 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-C-lB Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

B SPENT FUEL COOLER Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3248 100_3249 C-245 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-P-1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

"B" SPENT FUEL COOLING PUMP Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 305.00 ft, 33: 305' FUEL BLDG IN SF COOLER ROOM Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-246 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-P-1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

"B" SPENT FUEL COOLING PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -SF-P-0001 B, Rev 001 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-247 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P-1 B (5) Horizontal Pumps"B" SPENT FUEL COOLING PUMP Photos 100_3208 C-248 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-14 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B DISCH ISOL VLV TO B SF POOL Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 305.00 ft, 33: SF COOLING PUMP ROOM ABOVE THE B COOLER Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-249 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-14 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B DISCH ISOL VLV TO B SF POOL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -SF-V-0014, Rev 000 In-line equipment.

C-250 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-14 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B DISCH ISOL VLV TO B SF POOL Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3217 C-251 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-15 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B DISCH ISOL VLV TO A SF POOL Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 305.00 ft, 33 : SF COOLING PUMP ROOM ABOVE THE B COOLER Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-252 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-15 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B DISCH ISOL VLV TO A SF POOL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See SQ-Ti-SF-V-0015, Revision 000 C-253 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-V-15 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves SF-P 1 B DISCH ISOL VLV TO A SF POOL Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 JSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 10UU3221 C-254 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-16 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B DISCH ISOL VALVE TO FTC Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 305.00 ft, 33: SF COOLING PUMP ROOM ABOVE THE B COOLER Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-255 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-16 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B DISCH ISOL VALVE TO FTC Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. ' Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1 -SF-V-0016, Rev 000 In-line equipment.

C-256 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-16 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B DISCH ISOL VALVE TO FTC Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3228 C-257 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: jY-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-37 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P2 SUCT VLV FROM FUEL POOL A & B Project: TMI SWEL FB, 281.00 ft, 30: FUEL BLDG 281 N OF ELEVATOR ON WEST WALL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

NORTH OF SF-P-2 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Yes C-258 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-37 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P2 SUCT VLV FROM FUEL POOL A & B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Drawing Number 2466-26-M Rev. 0 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-259 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-37 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P2 SUCT VLV FROM FUEL POOL A & B Photos 100_3302 C-260 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-38 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

A SF POOL DRAIN ISOL VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 348.00 ft, 32: SF POOL 3RD FLOOR NORTH END WEST OF POOL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-261 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-38 Equipment'Class:

(0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

A SF POOL DRAIN ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Only the operator from the fuel deck is visible. The body is below the floor and would have required a significant amount of Scaffolding to access.Drawing 2466-26-M Rev. 0 C-262 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [LZI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-38 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

A SF POOL DRAIN ISOL VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3280 C-263 12..108.70-R-O.1 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-4 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM B SF POOL Project: TMI SWEL FB, 305.00 ft, 33: SPENT FUEL COOLING PUMP ROOM ON WEST Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

WALL AT THE B PUMP Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-264 12..108.70-R-.01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-4 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM B SF POOL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-SF-V-0004, Rev 000 In-line equipment.

Localized linear indication (cracks) on floor below valve. Judged not to be a potential seismic concern.C-265 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: MI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-4 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM B SF POOL Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3184 C-266 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-48 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

A SF POOL SIPHON BREAKER ISOL VALVE Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

FB, 348.00 ft, 32: SF POOL 3RD FLOOR NORTH END WEST OF POOL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-267 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. i Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-48 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

A SF POOL SIPHON BREAKER ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See drawing 2471-26-M Rev. 0 C-268 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: [M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-V-48 (0) Other A SF POOL SIPHON BREAKER ISOL VALVE Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3289 C-269 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-5 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM A SF POOL Project: TMI SWEL FB, 305.00 ft, 33: SPENT FUEL COOLING PUMP ROOM ON WEST Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

WALL AT THE B PUMP Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-270 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-5 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM A SF POOL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-SF-V-0005, Rev 000 In-line equipment.

Rigid attached air lines are already addressed under SQUG SEWS.C-271 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-5 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM A SF POOL Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 SSeth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3193 C-272

'12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-6 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM FTC Project: TMI SWEL FB, 305.00 ft, 33: SPENT FUEL COOLING PUMP ROOM ON WEST Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

WALL AT THE B PUMP Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-273 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: EZII N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SF-V-6 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-P1B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM FTC Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments This is the same as SF-V-5. See SQ-Ti-SF-V-0005, Rev 000 In-line equipment.

Only 1/4" gap between the conduit and the shell of the valve. Low mass of conduit is unlikely to damage the valve and is judged to be acceptable.

C-274 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

SF-V-6 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves SF-P1 B SUCT ISOL VLV FROM FTC Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 Photos 100_3202 C-275 12QO108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TRB Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V REG AC INSTR. POWER TRB Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

CB, 322.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes C-276 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TRB Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V REG AC INSTR. POWER TRB Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Internal Inspections for other adverse Seismic conditions has not been performed.

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-TRB, Rev 000 New Anchorage is installed consistent with with modification No. T1-MM-412552-002 and drawings 521-253 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-277 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TRB Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V REG AC INSTR. POWER TRB Photos 100 3489 100_3490 100_3492 C-278 12..108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N F---Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VBD Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL INST DIST PANEL 1D Project: TMI SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

CB, 322.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-279 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N F---Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VBD Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL INST DIST PANEL 1D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Internal Inspections for other adverse Seismic conditions has not been performed.

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-T1-VBD, Rev 000 New Anchorage is installed consistent with modification No. T1-MM-412552-002, Rev 000 and drawing 521-253 Rigid conduits on top of cabinet exhibit enough relative flexibility to preclude any adverse seismic interaction.

Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-280 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: Y N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VBD Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL INST DIST PANEL 1D Photos 100 3482 1 UU3484 100 3487 C-281 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XCLA Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

XCLA RELAY PANEL Project: TMI SWEL CB, 338.50 ft, 23: RELAY ROOM,SOUTH OF CRD CONTROL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

CABINETS Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-282 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XCLA Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

XCLA RELAY PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified to be in accordance with Seismic Qualification No. SQ-Ti-XCLA, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/24/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/24/2012 C-283 12Q0108.70-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

XCLA (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets XCLA RELAY PANEL Photos 100_3577 100_3579 C-284

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12362A043&oldid=908495"