ML13253A277
| ML13253A277 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/2011 |
| From: | Krieg R Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
| To: | Logan D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2013-0265 | |
| Download: ML13253A277 (7) | |
Text
Craver, Patti From: Krieg, Rebekah <rebekah.krieg@pnnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:11 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana
Subject:
RE: Columbia - draft letter responding to NMFS about section 7 Attachments: Letter to NMFS-Response to non-concurrence (2) (2).docx Here are my edits on top of Dennis'. I just added a bit of technical clarification.
I agree - you did a great job, Briana.
Becky From: Logan, Dennis [mailto: Dennis. Logananrc.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:42 PM To: Balsam, Briana; Krieg, Rebekah
Subject:
RE: Columbia - draft letter responding to NMFS about section 7 Briana and Becky, My suggested edits are in the attachment. Very nice job, Briana.
Dennis From: Balsam, Briana Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 3:21 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Krieg, Rebekah
Subject:
Columbia - draft letter responding to NMFS about section 7 Dennis and Becky, Attached is what I have come up with so far for the response letter to NMFS for Columbia. Please let me know what you think.
Becky-do you think anything else should be described in the section discussing data on juvenile salmonids?
Since I have only been minimally involved in this project, I tried to keep it very brief so that I didn't misrepresent anything, but feel free to add whatever you think is appropriate.
Thanks!
Briana
December XX, 2011 Mr. William W. Stelle, JrR.
Regional Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Regional Office 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97232-1274
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO LETTER OF NON-CONCURRENCE ON BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL OF COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION. (TAC NO. ME3121; NMFS CONSULTATION NO.
F/NWR/2011/05286)
Dear Mr. Stelle:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC; the staff) received your October 24, 2011, letter in response to the staff's draft supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for the proposed license renewal of Columbia Generating Station (CGS) in Benton County, Washington. -Your letter directs NRC to initiate formal consultation under section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). _However, the NRC,taff would like to clarify a few issues raised in your letter Bbefore determining whether formal section 7 consultation is the appropriate next step, the NRC staff would like to clarify a few issues raised in your letter.
I. Entrainment of Juvenile Salmonids Your letter states that the CGS cooling system has the potential to entrain juvenile salmonids during the proposed relicensing period. However, 90f the two ... monid .pce lite under the ESA-,However, juvenile Upper Columbia River spring Chinook (Onocorhynchus tshawytscha) are too large to be entrained into the cooling system at the time that they migrate through the Hanford Reach (as adults migrating upstream or as, typically, one to two year old smolts descending the river from the upper tributaries of the Columbia River). The second salmonid specie listed under the ESA is the Upper Columbia River steelhead. Upper Columbia River steelhead (0. mykiss) historically spawned in the Hanford Reach, although no evidence of steelhead spawning has been observed since 2006 in the Hanford Reach in the vicinity of the CGS intake. Steelhead fry in the Hanford Reach have been well studied and they do not emerge from the river substrate until they are about 2.5 cm long and even then, they will tend to seek cover. Further, ,--aidCGS collected no life stage of Upper Columbia River steelhead ko-rnykiss) were collected in entrainment studies conducted in 1979-1980 and 1985.
If your office has any contradictory information that would indicate that the CGS cooling system is entraining or has the potential to entrain protected iuvenile salmonids, we would welcome that information for our staff's consideration. -Absent of any such additional information, we believe that, consistent with 50 CFR 402.12(k), the staff's conclusion of "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" for both the Upper Columbia River spring Chinook salmon and the Upper Columbia River steelhead in NRC's August 2011 biological assessment (NRC 201 la) does not warrant initiation of formal section 7 consultation.
W. Stelle II. NMFS's Anadromous Salmonid Passage Facility Design Your letter states that you do not concur with the NRC's effect determinations because CGS's intake screen design is not consistent with NMFS's screen criteria in Anadromous Salmonid Passage FacilityDesign (NMFS 2011). _HweIer-4The Forward to this document states, however, that:
W. Stelle "Existing facilities may not adhere to the criteria and guidelines listed in this document.
However, that does not mean these facilities must be modified specifically for compliance with this document. _The intention of these criteria and guidelines is to ensure future compliance in the context of major upgrades and new designs of fish passage facilities."
CGS is an existing facility, and the proposed license renewal would not involve any "major upgrades" or "new designs of fish passage facilities." _Your letter seems to indicate that compliance with NMFS's screen criteria is required, -butH.-wevei,the document containing the criteria makes no such claim. _Therefore, the NRC staff does not believe that non-compliance with this criteriona alone necessitates initiation of formal section 7 consultation.
III. CGS's Cooling Water Intake System Your letter directs the NRC to develop a cooling water intake system design that meets NMFS's screen criteria and to create a schedule for implementing such a design. THowevef-4he identification and implementation of best technology available (BTA) for cooling water intake systems is, however, under the authority of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (the Clean Water Act; henceforth, CWA).
The EPA delegated its authority under the CWA to issue and oversee National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits to the State of Washington in 1973.
The State of Washington authorizes discharge of treated wastewater via three outfalls at CGS, in accordance with special and general conditions of NPDES Permit No. WA-002515-1. _Under this permit, the State of Washington can require mitigation measures, such as requiring that a cooling system meet NMFS's screen criteria, BTA, or other modifications of the cooling system to reduce entrainment and impingement impacts to aquatic life.
The evaluation or implementation of NMFS's screen criterialt is beyond the NRC's regulatory authority to evaluate Or implement NMFS's screen criteria. The NRC previously described limitations to the itsNRG's authority .... pr.sly deScribed. in a June 2011 letter to NMFS's Northeast Regional Office regarding Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, in New Jersey (NRC 2011 b). _This letter is enclosed for your reference. As described in that letter, Congress amended the CWA in 1972 to assign statutory authority over water quality matters to the EPA. Portions of the CWA specifically removed water quality oversight authority from other Federal agencies such aslike the NRC, and, further, sought to prevent duplicative Federal oversight of CWA issues by specifically and solely vesting authority and expertise with EPA.
IV.Conclusion In conclusion, the NRC believes that informal section 7 consultation is the appropriate means of fulfilling NRC's obligations under the ESA for the proposed CGS license renewal. -The EndangeredSpecies Consultation Handbook (FWS and NMFS 1998) also indicates that informal section 7 consultation is sufficient in an instance such as this:
"When action agencies request formal consultation on actions not likely to adversely affect listed species or designated critical habitat, the Services should explain that informal consultation/concurrence letters are adequate to complete section 7 compliance..."
- 1. Package: MLllxxxxxxx
- 2. Letter: ML1 1xxxxxxx
- 3.
Enclosure:
ML1 1xxxxxxxx OFFICE LA:DLR GS:RERB:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR NAME DLogan DDoyle DWrona DATE 12/ /11 12/ /11 12/ /11 12/ /11 Letter from D. Wrona to W. Stelle dated December XX, 2011
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO LETTER OF NON-CONCURRENCE ON BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL OF COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION. (TAC NO. ME3121; NMFS CONSULTATION NO.
F/NWR/2011/05286)
DISTRIBUTION:
E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDIrRpbl Resource RidsNrrDIrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDIrRarb Resource RidsNrrDIrRasb Resource RidsNrrDIrRapb Resource RidsNrrDIrRerb Resource RidsNrrDIrRpob Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource DWrona DDoyle BBalsam DLogan ACunanan MThadani ICouret, OPA LSubin, OGC NOKeefe, RIV GPick, RIV WWalker, RIV RCohen, RIV MHayes, RIV BMaier, RIV VDricks, RIV rebekah.krieqpcDpnl.qov
References:
[FWS and NMFS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. 1998.
Endangered Species Consultation Handbook: Procedures for Conducting Consultation and Conference Activities Under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: FWS and NMFS. March 1998. Available at <http://www.fws.gov/caribbean/es/PDF/Sec%207%20 Handbook.pdf> (accessed 29 November 2011).
[NMFS] National Marine Fisheries Service. 2011. Anadromous Salmonid Passage Facility Design. July 2011. Available at <http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-HydropowerlFERC/upload/Fish-Passage-Design.pdf> (accessed 29 November 2011).
[NRC] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 201 la. Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear PlantsRegarding Columbia Generating Station; Draft Report for Comment. Washington, DC: NRC. NUREG-1437, Supplement 47. August 2011. ADAMS No.
[NRC] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2011 b. Letter from A. Imboden, Branch Chief, to P. Colosi, Assistant Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS.
Subject:
Response
to EFH Conservation Recommendations for Hope Creek and Salem license renewal review.
June 15, 2011. ADAMS No. ML11153A170.