ML13003A029

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Report No. MPR-3815, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-157 Through Page C-249
ML13003A029
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/2012
From: Schlaseman C S
MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3815, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A029 (93)
v • d • e


Text

Sheet I of 2N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2BE24 Equip. Class 1 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical) 1Pn11;"VnA"+

)?TJD Mý,-f W-L- R-~.-, lnj)ýLocation:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. /-., Room, Area R2-U4, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] 4 YX NEI U- N/AO YX NE Uc N/AD YX NEI UL N/AE YE NQ UL N/A(YX NO UO Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 C'nrmrnnnr1PnrP.

Nn" R.-1 9-17.C-157 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2BE24 Equip. Class 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX(NEI UE N/A[D YVNEN UD N/Af" Y)(ND UD N/AO, Y) NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ' NE] U]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as~~1. Oi" Aonuq 6 1&J jWIAf 4 6, L.JoOQ¶ V;~ I r~e4~t4J ~5 q~,.c/COn ~ W/OfMLIS (kU/I M40 V-sr, owoý. ) -~o,Rev. 'X Evaluated by:~cIT§Date: -k) -3 1) 20 12----Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrmnnndPnr.-

Nn

  • RR-19-17.C-158 CA 0, c3 m 30 CD m Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2BE55 Equip. Class" 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RCIC Pump Room Cooling Coil B Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El..---eF

' it/g//Z. Room, Area R2-14 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y~NO YRNEI UD NWAD Y) NEI Urn N/A[]Y NEI UEF N/AEl 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-k NA U['] N/A[](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Ice qila'-t I .Ov _.. .^ti71 C I , KONOe our var kwey boo.CE--q-77 1 rvav 6 1 nOUr ýýVF4=f FvAi~k4Arti IF' e4cLCWATIOM#

Pf-q04Z, MUtrv-6 AVI .71(/iM 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yý NO UD Adt,'ALC-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

&'C CO-L'UTI--

"2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.-KC-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 C-160.nrrP~nnnr1PnrcP Nn

  • R.-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2BE55 Equip. Class'2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RCIC Pump Room Cooling Coil B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead -equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO DOJ N/AEO*N0 UC- N/AO Y NO UD, N/AEI NOl UEJ Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NEI UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MueoJ16'am 1-1-A4AWeAt7Jr j srwer V-0 %01411Z'.~. ri T+/- IL~-~ -410111IfL.

Evaluated by: Date: q~ol~d z< C-4 A>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-161

'o-.0* 0 cnJ 0:3 m.0 C CD-4.5 w m 0 CT'dl

-w ooa 0* 0 CD 0 C.0 Nl)m.0 C 3 CD 5 w m 0 (31 (31 .0 z 0 0 3u 0 c m CD 0 ci' OD~CD* 0-. 0 m m 30 CD 0, cJn Sheet 1 of 2 Status:G N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2BE56 Equip. Class 1 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description HPCI Pump Room Cooling Coil B Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. l '"- oom, Area R2-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yg NOJ Y><ND UE] N/AC]iNEI U[I N/AD Y NEI UO N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO] NfW UE- N/AE](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Doer ovor Awu DO Y r-qz72, '1 RCVo 13(V AS'1ttLLT eCotW1,nU94fllT0 W,-C OALCLALAT1#MI 1 ,9"*0 A&,6b N4IWG 0gsL° ie'T O .ar. 4 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YX NEI UE" potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 C-166 r.nrm-nnnr1Pnr.A Nn

  • R.R-1 9-17.1 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2BE56 Equip. Class" 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description HPCI Pump Room Cooling Coil B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block waUls n t likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility, to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO UD N/AE YX ND UE N/AO j Y4NEI UO NIAfl Y(NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C~jjPVt no/ A44M~eC-meN'j-iSSUC 40 Wl I* "F I Evaluated by:~O21&LA~Q Date: 91 ?e, qhIpjz6(7z

-< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 C.nrrPnnrInnr.

NIn

  • RR-19-17R C-167
aý,-~0* 0 m-0 c m 0 CA CD

-00 DD z 0 z 0 0 co m C)cn 0)

Sheet 1 of 2__Status:

()N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2XP037 Equip. Class'2 (06 Vertical PumRs Eouinment DescriDtion Core Snrav Pumn Xi R [Sheet I of 2 N U A W4/) d Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R2-' R 1-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

-M C~e 0 ý- Q- M-- >, () )Re'v.. 3 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X NEI YK NEI Ui N/AD1 YýRNEI/-ND Yý NEI U0 N/AD UDI N/Al!U- N/AD Y,5eND UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn* R5R-19-17.

C-170 7/fr~ ~bh'x~P'Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment-ID-Noa---*2 --E~-uip. Class 2 (061 Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Core Spray Pump X o r Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NEI UD N/AD YKND U' N/AD YX NEI UD N/Ar-Y~qNEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NE UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) h/VA Evaluated by: '. I Date: 4(&120(Lz-< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 (CnrrP..qnnnd1nrp Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-171

-o 0 (4 m-a C 2 (D 5 N, w-o 0 C,,

-U 0 z0 3* 0 r 0D Nl)m C)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2BS377 Equip. Class12 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description Back-up N2 Supply to ADS Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended.)

Room, Area R2-23 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

h, Dk,& 17 5-& -5" 51/'j- bo#I/e 4 6,/4 f-t *6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y]f NEI Y, NEI U'- N/A[l Yff NEI U-- N/AL!YPI NEI UI- N/Al]Y4I NEI -UEI N/AU YW NEIUU 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn ' RR-19-171 C-174 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2BS377 Equip. Class'2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description Back-up N2 Supply to ADS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YFZNEI UL N/AAD YO NEI UO N/AD Y ND. UD N/AD.YRj. ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] ND U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:, Date: YLS ') a'1/2-5hz.'T7ý< C-4 >, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 flnrrmnnndPnr'.PNn-RRq-19-17.

C-175

-CD S'0!.0 c m-3 CD C/).-4.

D-a)~~~~* C,~, -g-CD'3 -~. C,,:3 0 C CO-4

-~0 0 (D 3 0 3U 0 CD N)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2CP042 Equip. Class'2 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description High Pressure Service Water Pump C Location:

Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/H-6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N)<NND YJX NO Un N/AD Y)ýND UD N/AD YX NDI U-- N/AD YX4 NDI UD N/AD Y( NEI UD1'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 tnrrP..nnnr1dnr.p Nr n *P-R.-1-17.

C-179 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2CP042 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description High Pressure Service Water Pump C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

N/o S6ý4 c4z1f Yk NEI UE N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y)( NO Un N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?U[I N/AD YX N[ UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary),JuCu (t.Ci. raC' tos> been? ýPcvcJ w e-o p Ovow/-Evaluated by: Date: Pr'/.I2Q~E~EZ Ml~q e)l7 ,< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP~nnnrimnrýp MIn PRA-19-171 C-180 3- n0 3:5 z S2. o:0 0 C m r0 3 CD (0-u 0 I 2-0)~3 2 iuI~~ S. ~!. 0 9 1* 0 C-)-k 0)'3 -L Co-J Er~ a.0 C 2 NJ m.0 c-o B CD B N)0-u 0 N)

Sheet 1 of 2 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2DD03 Equip. Class1 2 (16) Batte Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Batteg Charger 2D Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T2-172 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments..

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YJKNE1 Y' NDl UOI N/AEl YX NEI UE N/AU YkNE UE- N/AU' ,t 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YJE NO U[] N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.),dC5Al, Rqto te , /o .i*t ,-I~ C .A/. ;q'0 ' vc J c 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y N IN UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3.nrrP..QnnnH1P.nr.P Nn* RR-19-171 C-183 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2DD03 Equip. Class" (16) Battery-Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Battery Charger 2D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YXNDI UEI N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJX NE] UE- N/AD and masonry block wallp not likely to. collapse onto the equipment?

.I3)ok W~OI1) S e 4-rP61kA ecr POAP5 Sfeýc& NO M-11 Re'v, 1.¶3t~k W-ALLS, 4A1C iAj r .~ i~P-~'~ii~

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YND UDI N/AD YAND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX[ ND UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

.(m n (Addiion0 Me.e mayMbe 10 Comments (Additional pages. may be added as necessary) iv/A Evaluated by: 9J~2A~týYo5ý, /14 -5ZQI Date: 0.________I_ý 8lz19 ) 7L, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP..nnnrd-nr.P Nn -R.!- 7.C-184

0 (D< >z a
E;* 0'34-0 c m-a Cw-o CD 5

.0 3 CD re0 CD Nl)m 3 C).0 Sheet I of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2DE24 Equip. Class 1 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical) 1Pn11;"rnf-"+

PMJ? T4,011,f ý n , _ I _,...4 rjtpliffl~ltOWjJA1L AlAS ASfr fI4 l ;, f " Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 1446- V Room, Area R2- P, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,, is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?See COmen* I~p 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEJ )YXNE'I ur] N/AU YX NEI U" N/A[l YX NEI UF N/A5 YE NEI UU]YW NEI -E1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPqnnndPnriA Nn -R 7-19-171 C-187 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2DE24 Equip. Class 1 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

0 Ala j O:4 ;41 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely, to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI UQ- N/All YXNON- UEI' N/AF"1 Y)<NI-q urL. N/A[1 YAX(NE- UE-A Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages maj be added as necessary) o~ c~ocdei ~rf riy O M S C t/.f l l Evaluated by: IV Date:/ta zv Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrP-nnndPnr'.P Nn " Rq-19-17.T C-188

'Jo-T. o~C.M "0 0 rn 4, CD m N)

LO 0 m-a C-o CD 5 r~3 m N, Sheet 1 of 2 Status:) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Ij WI-1011Z (0s) VORrleq4t Equipment ID No. 2DP035 Equip. Class" re'2 r- gantalum Equipment Description RHR Pump D Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R2-8 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

No, S -It 49 ) Rev. 0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NO Y NEI UD N/AO Y,;'NO UO N/AO X NO UO N/AD Y% NE UD N/AD YiND NI"I 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3.orrA~nnndi~nrJ.

Nn

  • RR-19-17.C-191 4 '014911. Sheet 2of 2 Equipment ID No. 2DP035 Equip. Class 1 2 joTatdPumps Equipment Description RHR Pump D Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

NAo sOI 1.,1"e 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles, and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto theequipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX"ND] Uf N/AD YNO UE N/AD YKNE IonC N/ACI Y)Nn UEN Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y 'NEI U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

IV/A Evaluated Date: __ _ / __ _ _V-311-26711Z Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 CrnrrPgnnndrnrPI Nn

  • RR-1 9-171 C-192 7)K-a;5" 0 -u 0 M CD~0 cn

-=r 00c 0* 0 cJ -m~0 C 2 CD B-o 0 C,, (TI Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -2 E] Equip. Class'2 (10) Air Handlers Enuinment Deserdntson B Coolingv Coil E (AI- 4 /WlýLocation:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R2-' 10 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

-Owý. 405~. ýgdc)O A Re'v. 0 ornj 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXN-YX NEI U-' N/AENO U[:] N/AEI YX NEI U" N/AO YXNO U- N/AEl S- U5Re, 0UOl 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPgnnnriP.nr.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-195 Sheet 2 of 2 EquipmentIDNo. a-EEC .Equip. Class'2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description B Cooling Coil E Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y~(NEI UD N/A[]VX ND UD N/AQ*NO UO N/AD YX NEI UE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.GrbnwV I-It Date: SW 1 el/:i zdrz<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPgnnnr1dnrn Nn *-,R-19-17.1 C-196 0 3 j)R* CD 0 c m C)0 43 3 D-4 U:3'J 1)m-3 CD m m C0 01 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O(9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2AE57 Equip. Class 1 2 (10) Air Handlers--.I Equipment Description Core Spray Room X Cooling Coil Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R2-* I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
  • M66w of. No. 5-- Riev. 0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y~X No Yj NEI UD N/AO YX NEI UD N/AD Yý NE] UD N/AD YX NEI UO] N/AD Y'(ND UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rmrqnnndnnr.p Nn* R.R_-1-17q C-199

-Equipment-ID -57 Equip. Class 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description Core Sgray Room X Cooling Cod Sheet 2 of 2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

NE UD N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yý( ND and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

UED N/AC 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YNE1 Ufl N/AD YN ND UE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YX'NO UE1 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: -a E1I211L69-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP.qnnndInr.P Nn RR-1 9-173 C-200 2-0 0CJ 0 ci m 3a CD m C0 C-Il-4 R- w , ;.D P =~ 3 0 z '3~0 co m 30 CD n m C0 C."-4 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O(9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)6 Equipment ID No. 2iE58 8 t,,I.., Equip. Class" 2 (10) Air Handlers 4 " t'Equipment Description RH-R Room Cooling Coilg (0 -, g.. L .Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. -Li Room, Area R2-\ t '1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YoNEI YJk'NO UDn N/A[D YXNO UEJ N/A[I v( ND U[ N/AD YE] N19 U-] N/ALA 41!I4Ot2Ac~c bOtS- *w9r m4ita DwLJe s- 'h6, rz&v. 0,~ LUir A.V-V(41LT Cd~iAipjgpAn#,V W.4Jk evb4Lft4W 1JV CAI-CU..4ý#nO PS'..OQ?.'Z, Reify. AV6Vb il6eD A(X&pr9qfcL.

£[rj CO'.mitJr'

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y§Z NO UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

32 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnnrdpnnP Nn* RR-1?-17.C-203 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.Equip. Class1 2 (10) Air Handlers Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YXNO U[J N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid. damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?)XNO UD N/AD YX ND UD N/AD)0ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)U NEI Ul adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 9X COi'JOP1taAVOA1 mW,,-Jmr Ir ffk 4OpAiTze i~ v " _ .1011-Z Evaluated by: 7k~112+/-Date: q fiI?',DI'< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrm..qnnndrflrP-Nn* RR-19-17.C-204 0 3 z o* 0~. cn

-CD-~0!.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2GT545 Equip. Class 1 2 21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description Instrument N2 Accumulator Location:

Bldg. Drvwell Floor El. 155 Room, Area D/W2-35 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YK/NE" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

_ _Y)>'NE] UEJ W/AD Y)<NE[ UE] N/A[l YX NEI UE N/A[l N*~UEJ N/AC!6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NEI- Ur]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnnr1i~nrPP Nn

  • RR 9-17.1 C-207 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2GT545 Equip. Class 1 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description Instrument N2 Accumulator Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

.-N6o ,-&4 4,r YXNO UO N/AED 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJi(N"I UDI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý/NDI U0 N/AD-Y)N[I UD: Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y) ND' UI" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AI.Nor AWCWOIZAfC OOWS)r-T-ty jyji Dkie

  • 6 -Z S19 -M Z -Z ý-, S' 14 'r, -7 iz -3, Evaluated by: Date: 0 1 -x 9) 1? [Wr~-A C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnndl-nr.i Nn* RR-19-17.1 C-208 S'0-~0 z o* 0 3.0 m 3 (D G)-il Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O(5 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2XfT545 Equip. Class 1 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical Equipment Description Instrument N2 Accumulator Location:

Bldg. Drvwell Floor El. 155 Room, Area D/W2-V \' ?5tys Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Y'(ND UD N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yg N[I UO N/A[oxidation? )A4A 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YP N- U- N/AD YX NO- UD N/AD Y' ND UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnndPnr.p Nn " RR-19-17R C-210 W q "Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2AT545 Equip. Class" 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description Instrument N2 Accumulator Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

-Afo c,46 6 YXNO UI N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI Uti N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y(ND UO N/AD YX NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y. NEI U!]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NIA Evaluated by: Date: 3 / i , Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rlnrrPqnnndPnr.p N

  • R5R-19-171 C-211 2-CD W 0)T J 0 2n I m 3o CD Cn-th.C-1 Sheet 1 of 2N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)033 Equipment ID No. A02-03-0"B
  1. '5 ' Equip. Class'2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description Scram Discharge Volume Inboard Isolation Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R2-24 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD N%YRN- U[ N/AD3 YK ND Ui" N/A'-Y E NE UEI N/ADI YE- NCI UD N/AI&YO ND UD 2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrqnnnrPnrP Nn

  • R.R-19-17R C-213 Sheet 2 of 2 033 00 Equipment ED No. A02-03-O Equip. Class'" (07) Fluid (AirL/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description Scram Discharge Volume Inboard Isolation Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM-NO UD N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YQ NO U[J N/Al]and masonry, block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

b/00,,. ^5,if. ýVtl: /Is<0/,- ce,,,tP s 'qe,,¢r.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction.evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yjq NO UP N/AE.YR Nil U.do Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other. seismic conditions that could YIC NI] UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.Date: t~/o/n/)Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rTnrrPqnnnHPne.P Nn

  • RR-1 9-173 C-214

-0;. (n to co C.)m 3a CD 0 0~0 wD 6D z o* 0 c.2'33 Z. c m 30 CD.0-.0.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:S N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)03ýEquipment ID No. A02-03-32B d Equip. Class" 2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description Scram Discharge Volume Inboard Isolation Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Are a R2-24 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO No YR NE UO N/AE YM NE[ U[ N/AU YIXE NEI UJ N/AU YE NE U'- N/AOL Y.NEI UO1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 flnrr~mnnnr1PnrnA No " RR-19-171 C-217 Sheet 2 of 2 03(o /rlt Equipment ID No. A02-03-O 32"B "'= Equip. Class' (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description Scram Discharge Volume Inboard Isolation Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

tvo 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[q NO UO N/AO YK NO UO N/AD YM NO U0 N/AD YANEI U Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NOI U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:, 6 Date: 443011a 9 / ,a-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 ChnrrqnnnPdnrn'.

Nn -RR-1 9-17,1 C-218

~)~ ww D~~* o~* C,~ -g ci,-~ E~0 C m.0 CA 6 CD Equipment ID: A02-03-036 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 (rnrrA..nnndPnrn.P Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-220 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)4~t-r Equipment Description Inboard Main Steam Isolation Valve ) A ~ q Location:

Bldg. Drvwell Floor El. 134 Room, Area D/W2-'SO I, a' y q1 .Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NX Y)Z(N[E UF- N/A-YK NEI U[ N/Af)X NEI- UE N/AE YE NO UO N/Ag VXNEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrmqnnndr.nr' Nn -R,-19-17.C-221 e -Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. AO2-01-080b Equipý Class'2 ("7) Fluid (Airfvd) Valves Equipment Description Inboard Main Steam Isolation Valve h N \Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

NoJ '56 4 -6 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?4 N"[ U-] N/AQ YX NEl U' N/AD YXNEI UQn N/ADJ YA NEIUE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U"adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MA Evaluated by: D& 4L Date:-q[(3 t2197-<C4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3"rnrriýnnndPnr-.

Nn* RS-19-17.C-222

~)CD 0 3 C.)ci, m 30 CD 0 0~6 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: " N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)-EuipmenpmtD1.u--AO2.

O1--080B Equip. Class 2 (07) Fluid (Airfvdd Valves Equipment Description Inboard Main Steam Isolation Valve B Location:

Bldg. D rwell Floor El. 134 Room, Ar'ea D/W2-18 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YDINX(Y NEI U- N/AD" YXNO UO N/AD YX NEI UO N/AO YOZ NEI UD NlA Y~kNO UO 2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 f.nrrPnnnHinr.P Nn" Rq--71 C-224 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. A02-01-080B Equip. Class 1 2 (07) Fluid (Air/Ilyd)

Valves Equipment Description Inboard Main Steam Isolation Valve B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?.go YXNO UD N/AD UD N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI and masonry block walls not likeely to collapse onto the equipment?

Nhlay /0ý6W Sc la a~nd )oa~ec sporely Morp 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yp4 ND Uf- N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could
  • NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NIA Evaluated by:~923~Z A-Date: Is-1)Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Cnrr~mnnndrnrp Nn

  • RR-19-17.C-225

-oD 0 0* 0 x, -m~0 10 C)0o Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equil~ment TD Nn A0 1 noR6 -~ Eq-pCas2(2)E Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R2-30 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorae f ee of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?L, -tno -3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NJ YM NO UF N/A[]YK NO UD NIAO YX NEI UE N/AE YI-] NEI UE N/Ag YX NEI UE1 12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.-K Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r`nrrmnnndP~nr NnM* RR-19-171 C-227 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. AO2-01-0864A Equip. Class" (07) Fluid (AiriHad)

Valves Equipment Description Outboard Main Steam Isolation Valvex A i Interaction Refts 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

-Aaso4 4eý8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?*/NO UD N/AD YJXNE UI N/AO YXNO UD N/AD Y) ND UNA Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI U['i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A (21f-~L qfAC'd Evaluated bh: Date: /6'/ \4 q/1-31201-Z Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrr~nnnrIidnr.

Nn* R.9-19-171 C-228 (D 3 0 Z5'0~m CD V 0 K.)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DPSN0224-4 Equip. Class1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description HPSW Pump Room DP Sensor Location:

Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/Ht; " t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible-cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YLJNýYX NOJ UE N/AD x) ND UEJ N/AEl YXJ NEI UE N/AD Y-- NI UFI N/AX Y NEI UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPq.nnndPnr.P Nn -R.-19-171 C-230 Sheet 2 of 2"-0 TITAW Equipment ID No. DPS3'0224-4 Equip. Class'2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description HPSWPump Room DP Sensor Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN'ND U0 N/AD NEI UEJ N/AD Y4 NO UO N/AU-YNEI. UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:?i"*--Date: 9/] 'A qU 117/ i0 -<C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 CnrrP.-nnndp.nr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-231

-.0 3 z ~03 Lco m (D sh, og(=r z o):0 3 0D 0 m c'm 30 CD-5 Cl)6 1%)

Sheet I of 2 Status:) N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. H02-23C-4513 Equip. Class 1 2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Stop Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R2-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing-Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEll XNO- UO N/A[]Y' NEI U-Q N/AO-YNOI U[:] N/AQl YEI- NEI UI] N/AN/Y4NO UOI 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn R SA 17.1 C-234 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. H02-23C-4513 Equip. Class 1 2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Stop Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from ipact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX NF[ UI-I N/Afl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y, ND and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

UO N/AO 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of otentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJNE N UD N/AD Y4 NO Uf Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y>ýNQlUD Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

M,)A Evaluated by: Date: 30, 6q;?< C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrA-nnnd~nrP Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-235 00C 0 z* 0 L cn 0 m (D 0 C-)-..v Sheet I of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID O- d3 Equip. Class" 2 (00) Other Equipment Description Hydraulic Control Unit Location:, Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R2-24 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?)qg e M0 q/2*I.YMNEI YýNf y(NEI UD N/Afl UEJ N/AD U' N/AE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YPTNEI UE1 MIC Nlee/Ie1 YK NEI U0 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

SC-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3'nrrPqnnndPnrP.

Nn" RR-t9-171 C-237 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 9 0A3 Equip. Class 1 2_(00) Other Equipment Description Hydraulic Control Unit Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI UD1 NAE1 Y/ND UO N/AU YK ND UD N/AD YN NEI. UNA/TNUF Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YP ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: /4-. o%1 ý-----I I C 'Date: _"/_ 6/ _)&4~<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-238
u 0 C/5'm 3D CD R.0.0

~Jo~~~~CD~ 5. ~~. 0~* 0 C~):u -~(P'3 -~. Cd,-4 ~.C I'3 m.0 C*0 3 (D~0.5 I 0 C CA~0 StaJt I of 2 Status: (.N U Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LI/-2-3-113 Equip. Class" 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Water Level Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area TP-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note; This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEIN9 Y[ýNEI UE N/AO Yjg NE UO N/AO yT NE UE N/AD YEI ND U] N/AEs YWND U 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

ýKC-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn -t R-19-171 C-241 Sheet 2 of 2 Me, Equipment ID No. LIL-2-3-113 Equip. Class" 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Water Level Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles. and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse dihto the equipment?

eo/. &--to,-/ Pa,- ýre Zx_9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?ND NOIE N/AD YRF NOl UI- N/AO NO! Ur N/AD YP NEI U0 /Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y 1N- ULIE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: _________Qicr'-i~'/'? //2~~Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrP'ýnnndnr-.

Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-242 D~ '~0 I)~-. 0~* C~2~ -U CD'3 -'a,-'I ~A 0 C m CD E5 I-rN, 6 Sheet 1 of 2 Status.eN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. L12-3-86 Equip. Class'2 (20 Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Vessel High Water Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T2-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEDN YP NEI UO N/AQ Y;] NE UI] N/AD YJ4 NE U'- N/AD YE NEI UE N/A9 YWNEI UE 12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP.nnndPnrP Nn

  • RR-19-17.C-244 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. L12-3-86 Equip. Class" (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Vessel High Water Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YP NL UD N/At 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YVi NO UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

,4tc, ~ ~ ~ 9 c/,- otiY'aiA.

Co,(- ) '-(2 k4 s-1.-': 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,.is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y18 NO UQ NIAO -YX NE UC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YýO ND Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: C/Date: 1011/, 1 14-(0 ~ /~2~< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrmnnnP~nr-.p Nn -RR-19-17.C-245 CD z ~* 0 L4n m 30 CD 6 6D-4.m Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LI-8027 Equip. Class 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Torus Water Level Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T2-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO N5(YV NEI UL N/AE Y- NO ULi N/A[l NEI UOi N/Al YO NE UIE Y4 NEl U" 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 flnrrA-nnndHnr.Nn-R.-19-17.1 C-247 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LI-8027 Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Torus Water Level Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby. equipment or structures?

YKI ND U" N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YPI ND UEJ N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

04 e-o~ ( ti~d A~2e47 2A 1 a84S/9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YgM ND UD N/AD NO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9L ND U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.Date: / /4 ,/ -C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrqnnndInr.P Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-248
u1-B z ** 0 m C=)-4
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A029&oldid=1362774"