ML13003A034

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Report No. MPR-3812, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-1 Through Page C-67
ML13003A034
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/2012
From: Schlaseman C S
MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3812, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A034 (67)
v • d • e


Text

C Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)Below are the names and signatures of the personnel who performed the seismic walkdowns.

Ben Frazier Kevin Gantz Mojtaba Oghbaei Craig Swanner James Wiggin Caroline Schlaseman

)~A.'/The order of the Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs) for Unit 3 is shown in Table C-1 below and the order of the SWCs for Unit 0 (common) is shown in Table C-2.The "Anchorage Configuration Confirmation" column is described in Section 5.2.1 of this report. The last column in Tables C-1 and C-2 provides the corresponding Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC). (AWCs are included in Appendix D of this report.) AWC identifiers with asterisks

(*) indicate the second or subsequent SWEL item included with a specific Area Walk-By.Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Correspondence No.: RS-12-173 C-1 Table C-1. Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs).Component Anchor AWC-Ux-ID Description Configuration yy Confirmed?

30B010 Emergency Aux Load Center E134 N U3-23*Switchgear 30B013 Emergency Aux Load Center E434 N U3-24*Switchgear 30B324 MO-3-23-015 Motor Control Power Transfer Switch 308325 MO-3-13-15 Motor Control Starter U3-15*Panel 30B338 M03-10-16A Auto Transfer Switch Y U3-15*30C003 Reactor and Containment Cooling and y UO-7*Isolation 30C004C RCIC Vertical Board Y UO-7 30C005A Reactor Manual Control Board Y U0-7*30C095 RCIC Instrument Rack N U3-4*30C32 Egr Safeguard Sub-Sys I Y U3-22*30C33 Egr Safeguard Sub-Sys II Y U3-22*30C34 RCIC Relay Panel Y U3-22*30C722A Accident Monitoring Instrumentation y U3-22*Panel 30C722B Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Y U3-22*Panel 30C87 HPCI Instrument Rack N U3-4 30D043 HPCI Aux Lube Oil Pump Starter N U3-8*30D37 Static Inverter N U3-2 30P038 HPCI Booster Pump, Pump Y U3-8 30P038 30P036 & RCIC Pump & Turbine Y U3-12 30S038 30S037 HPCI Turbine Y U3-8*30S703 120V Inst. Panel 30Y035 Transfer N U3-14*Switch 30X030 Load Center E134 Transformer Y U3-23 30X033 Load Center E434 Transformer N U3-24 30X133 Panel 30Y33 Transformer N U3-5 30Y050 120V AC Distribution Panel N U3-22 30Y35 3PPD 125V DC Distribution Panel 3C N U3-14 3AC65 RPS Instrument Rack N U3-7 3AE058 RHR Room A Cooling Coil A Y U3-17 3AE124 RHR Pump 3A Seal Cooler N U3-16*3AE55 RCIC Room Cooling Coil A Y U3-12*3AE56 HPCI Room Cooling Coil A Y U3-8*3AE57 Core Spray Room A Cooling Coil A Y U3-1 1*3AP035 RHR Pump A Y U3-16 3AP037 Core Spray Pump A Y U3-11 3AV083 HPSW Pump Room Exhaust Fan Y U3-3*Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Correspondence No.: RS-12-173 C-2 Table C-1. Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)Component Anchor AWC-Ux-ID Description Configuration A -ID Confirmed?

YY 3BC270 Steam B Leak Monitor Cabinet N U0-6*3BC65 RPS Instrument Rack B N U3-14*3BDO1 125 VDC Battery 3B Y U3-10*3BD025 3B 125 VDC Distribution Panel N U3-22*3BE55 RCIC Room Cooling Coil B Y U3-12*3BE57 Core Spray Room A Cooling Coil B Y U3-11*3BE58 RHR Room A Cooling Coil B Y U3-16*3CDO01 125 VDC Battery 3C Y U3-21 3CD03 Battery Charger 3C Y U3-9 3CE24 RHR Heat Exchanger C Y U3-19 3CP035 RHR Pump C Y U3-18*3CP042 High Pressure Service Water Pump C Y U3-3*3DC068 RPS SCRAM solenoid fuse panel D N U3-13*3DD01 125 VDC Battery 3D Y U3-10 3DD03 Battery Charger 3D Y U3-1 AO3-03-33 Scram Discharge Volume Inboard N/A U13-13 Isolation Valve AO3-03-36 Scram Discharge Volume Outboard N/A U3-13*Isolation Valve H03-23C-5512 HPCI Turbine Governor Control Valve N/A U3-8*HCU-06-47 Hydraulic Control Unit Y U3-13*HCU-14-35 Hydraulic Control Unit Y U3-13*L13-2-3-113 Reactor Water Level N U0-7*LI-9027 Torus Water Level N UO-7*LRITR-9123B Torus Water Level/Temperature N U0-7*Recorder LS3-23-91A Suppression Pool Level Switch N/A U3-6 LT3-2-3-61 Reactor Vessel Water Level N U3-7*Transmitter LT-9123A Torus Water Level Transmitter N U3-6*MO3-10-013C RHR Pump Torus Suction Valve N/A U3-18 M03-10-015C RHR Pump Shutdown Cooling N/A U3-16*Suction M03-10-89C RHR HX HPSW Outlet Valve N/A U3-19*M03 Unit 3A Sluice Gate Y U3-25 3233A MO-3-32-3803 HPSW Return Valve to ECT N/A U0-1*M03 HPSW Bay Inlet Inner Valve N/A UO-5*3804B MO-3-10-013A RHR Pump Suction Valve A N/A U3-16*POD-3-40H-HPSW Pump Room A Loop Supply N U3-3*30223-03 Damper POD-3-40H-HPSW Pump Room B Loop Exhaust N U3-3 30223-04 Damper Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Correspondence No.: RS-12-173 C-3 Table C-1. Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)Component Anchor AWC-Ux-ID Description Configuration yy Confirmed?

P13-6-90A Reactor Wide Range Pressure N UO-7*Indicator PR/RR3-2 Reactor Pressure/Drywell Gas 404B Recorder N U0-7*PR/TR-5805 Containment PressurefTemp N UO-7*PS30224-2 HPSW Pump Room B Loop Pressure N U3-3*Switch PT3-2-3-404A Reactor Pressure Transmitter N U3-7*PT3-6-53A Reactor Wide Range Pressure N U3-7*Transmitter PT-5805 Drywell Pressure Transmitter N U3-20 RV3-23-034 HPCI Pump Suction Header Relief N/A U3-8*Valve SV3-3-33 Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Y U3-1 3*SV3-3-36 Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Y U3-13*Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Correspondence No.: RS-12-173 C-4 Shýýi Of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)4 -~ , I EquipmentiD No. f134 b3L7 8 O1 Equip. Class12 (0V,~9~sz'jý,-Equipment Descripti on..O -a ' 4IP4/4I v jc'. .. , , -e- <'.',."q Location:

Bldg. RA Floor Ell .."_ Room,' Area R I( -'.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist nay be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used'to reicoid the resultsof judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checkist for documenting other comments.Anchorame 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorag jree of bent, brokeln, missing or loose hardware?

YJ6. NO UD N/AD W, AhAv f5,e t~f/W y A'0i e V t. A ~ 1 ILt e~e"~r CQ~&. t'ft1i(Oe-A(04t4e4, W*~f Ape .5 (-a ftPidZ 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question-only applies if the.item is one of the 50% for which an anicliorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YP[ ND UD N/AD-Y9 ND UD N/ADl Y[O NDi UDI N/AA YfN" UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn ' RR-19-17.C-5 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 613 3 130,0 1&) Equip. Class=Low V4Z I X f-f.r Equipment Description A,4,,,-y -,.,&X L' fr4 (led ,4*C,-",-

',,r., Interaction Effects.7. Are soft tirgets free from impact by,Twarby equipm.nt or.sqwctures?

'., ,,MNlj U[3 N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 105-NI- U'I N/AQI and masonry block walls not likel to collapse onto the equipment?

Mo 1.A1-tlt A rV rc qe rp '( 4p A O eJ M.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?U- N/AO 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?##I f ?i f -'"" Y,$NQ UQ Other Adverse Co.nditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y% Ni3 U[3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)(VV -tt r'" 1ýr it If Evaluated Date:< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP.;nnnrP.nr-.

Nn

  • R.-19-171 C-6
5. ~z ~* ~3* a-a-~ (D'3 -L-4 ~0 C (~)m 3 CD C)cB 0 0 DODC 0 3 cn.:. ci m m0 C.-a.3 CD CA)

She Aof 2 Status: Y(N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)306300 Equipment ID No. 4311. Equip. Class2 nlpowntinn t ".. , AU/iC (o Z) LP -,.-L~I ~-m" " Rom Ar q L Location:

Bldg. Floor El. ,Arek W 4)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to doctimrent the'results Iof thp'Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is proided at the'end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- Nix of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YA NO UO N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YA NE! U- N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? *5 NE! UE! N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ENl UO N/AK YJZNEI UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 CrnrrPqnnndP.n MNn* R.R-17-17.1 C-9 Equipment ID No. 9ýl (sdo, ?3Eup.Cas1.4 Equipment Description J5,A'%e At --'"' ze 1~-i V4* c -4cjv 4~-e-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN3NO UQ' N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and fighting, YANC'3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse o thgefnipment?

9 .DI I'a a tlebility to ao d a "N, s," I VI.evr r."s" ..'9. Do attached lines tllaes ad'e"q-uate flexibility to avoid damage? M1NEI-UD N/A-UO N/AQ3 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?MNO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 1 N'I UQ" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

S'4 Evalu atdby: Date:16& z 1o 6 2.iZ V Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3.nrrP.nnnd~nr.

Nn" RR-19-17, C-10

-ý 0 z W 0 3 m CD C)03 C)J--I-0 r -4 ;=r* 0 0 cn 0 0 c~m.0 C 3 CD 0.0 sI..e iof 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWO )Equipment ID No. 306 ý ýZff Equip. Class's Equipment Descriptioh.

/o52,-. (.Location:

Bldg. Elul Manufacturer, Mode, Ec t recommended)

(') /1C 4'*InstruCtions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seis.mic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the* * ~. 1 .tt ' , .. J .% : A .'f. .SWEL. The space below each of the following questkin's mihy be used'to recofdthe results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one E1--of the 50% of W~ ite s requiring such verification)?

!hJ&'? '- C -J 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y),-,E1 UI- N/AD'Y)SNI U'- N/AD" YAND UDI N/AD-YJNEI UD" N/AF'<,ND UrD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r~nrrPnnnrPn.P.

Nn

  • R.R-19-173 C-13 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID N, o, Equip. Class1 2 (Equipment Descriptio~n

.1 C / ' /t/'t"i".el " l 'Interaction Effects.~ Ar ' g4tt4s~ ~froMý.im~act by nearbyqqrpme'!i't' "rs~ctidieg?

~Y)CN[E Urj N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y, NEI U[ N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

  • t, th l-Z 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yg ND UI- N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipiht fde" NO UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y2a NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated Date: "2-If A?< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 f.nrrP'qnnnr1Pnr.N Nn "R-19-17.C-14

  • 0 CD 3-z 0 0* 0 m 30 C)CA)N5 0th Status: SJkU Seismiic Walkdown Checklisf (SW6)1 I, .-, ,.'~-,/ (jYk~c ag-oe--Equipment ID No. .3 4 .Equip. Class1 2  :,r.I,4, 'E'iqC' 1,.Equipment Descripuior 3 t I'iut recommende/

Location:

Bldg.4 At-ForlU6 Room, -A'reft'.c:-

' ;L~ 5'*Manufacturer, Mod~el, 1'.J Wo but recommended)

_____________________

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YA NEI of the 50% of &WEL items requiring such verification)?

Ve.: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

--': , .'. ..... ... .....; .YJD U"I N/A'# "0 UC- N/AD1 YrNI UE- N/AD NKE]UE- N/AQ 9-N] DU1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

' C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rCnrrP-nnndP~nr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-16 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 306 1 :z Equip. Class12 Equipment Desrtion .g 9 --, .3 "1 .. (1.yfM £%~q,~,A Interaction, Effects,Aresoft'targets free from impact by nearbS, equipment ructures?YgNO U= N/A--*. , ...** .-).8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YfNO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

UD N/AD 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y-NOD UO N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y'ý,N13 UF of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Con.itions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y 11D UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional.

pages may be added as necessary)

Date: _________________________________________

~ ,~ //Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP'-nnndPnr.P Nn* RRZ-12-17.

C-17

-ý 0 a- CD\m 3 CA 0 M cn Sheet I of 2 Status: (f) N U Seismic Walkdown,Checkiit (SWC)..", Equipment ID No. Equip. Class12 _____________________

Equipment Description.

tlo I, ((,/ " " "rj,.r. A(v ,t Location:

Bl FloorEl'..

J' koom, Area.' ."Noe', Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optionI but rcommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to. documentuthe results'of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each o6 the following questions may be tised to record 'th results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y1 NDI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YX 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y NI"ND UED N/Al]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface V ND'I UrI N/Ar'oxidation?, 4. Is the anchorage free, of visible crapks in the concrete near the anchorg? ,YE :Nil -U 1 -.N/AD1 5. Is the anediokaie configuration -consi'Ste.nt with plant documentation?

Y~ NDI UD N/AD1 (Note: This question only applies if the item-is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

.... .. ... .6. Basedo th eaoe anc horaige" evlatos is ........ "nhr reo YfiN]U 1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.(C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 C-19 rnr.qnHn.

N~n -R.R-19-173 ineet 2 0 2 Equipment lD No. _JOt3("3ý Equip. Class.2 Equipment Des"riFition

-'. 6' At Interaction Effects*1 -7. Are sVft.targetsfrt g from tmpac ,y hOearby ecju.ipmni-t or'striictures?

YO .N[: UP1 N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NOi U'I N/ADI and masonry block walls not like y to collapse Vnto the equipment?

/K .,, 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ-'NQ- UDi N/ADI YENEI Ul-i Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could .41Q U[I adversely affect the safeqy functions of the equipment?

%(4~ e~-t o~ tcC% e 4 .1W r ifs Ics -ec.la ' -erf Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

.c/t.Ic-e,4." ,Addresscd t V- 7 M, k4mtýý' t.//-V/Evaluated Date
/ _-9< C-4 )" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrqnnndPnr.P No
  • RR-19-171 0-20 0 r-CD 0U CD 0 5 S. ?: z S2 o co 0-~CD Scn 0:3 c)m.0 3 CD C)0 wJ ('3 (D 0 o -0 0 0. 3 0 op 0 w 0 m CD E5 CA)0 CA)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:1-N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30C003 Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor and Containment Cooling and Isolation Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of.equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?I '!"' -" [4-4, 2sedd M -,fJ , , 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIQ ND YNO&NE UD N/ADl YP NE UEI N/AONEI UI- N/AO YAL NE Ufl N/All YKt NE UmE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment., Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP.mnnnd1.nrP Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-23 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30C003 Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor and Containment Cooling and Isolation Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

AID. _ __r__ -- __ _ (-.T10 2, Y& NO UD N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

_9_ Do atce line hv a f to ao d age Yfi4 NO 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? NE]UL N/AO 6tr/06 -/ e.l,I)'UD N/AE 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE(NI] UI]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIN' U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Ally'Evaluated by: Date: 10/Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3.nrrm..QnnnrJinr.P.

Nn

-ý 0 m z T o L cn c.m CA CA)

X z o 0 3A 0 0 0 C: m.0 C)CD, CJO cor-~0 3 z 0 cn 0J~c m.0 C)Ca).0 00 jý3D;m M~.z 0, 3-ý C CA)C)0 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status.V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30C004C Equip. Class" 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description RCIC Vertical Board Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for.Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie I., Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y -NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YJf ND UQI N/A[],,. .. .. , _ .., 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YX ND UEJ N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UEr N/AD Ei6,dS -&-W cI ,P/ q-Z7316ULt 4.4,'c CAldIA -;ý CflL e. .5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y J ND U- N/AD (5/1 e 6 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YK ND UE-'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r~nrrP..mnnndnPnrP Nn* PS-19-17.C-29 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30C004C Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description RCIC Vertical Board Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

-1 1 1 Yý NO UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling, tiles and lighting, ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

., ,- ,"-,:/0/ /7/r/A-I 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y)D ND UD N/AD Y/9NEINDUO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: * .folqll ao/iq'-4!L Q)4 V-< C4 >-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmnnnrIPnr.M Nn* R5-19-17R C-30 0:)-~0 ze 0 T* 0 0D c m-o CD CD 0 C)0 0

-0* 0:u -c, m-3 CD~0 C)-.C*0 j3 0~CD 0 C, Lcn 0 c m-ao CD C)0 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status; N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30C005A Equip. Class" 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Manual Control Board Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist, This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required)Aý-L, eS" t- -D 01- ,V+ So.,i.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YP NND YPL ND UD N/AI YA NE UQ N/A[YA NEI UI- N/A[l YP NO UQ N/AO YNEI O 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 anrrm.qnnndrnrP Nn ' R5-19-171 C-34 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30C005A Equip. Class" (20) Control. Panels& Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Manual Control Board Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YOI NOi UE- N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NEI Ul] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YQ NO Ul N/Al]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions.

that could Y[X NEI Ul]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:/1'- 0 ~Date: /q! -SC-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 l'nrrm.qnnndPnr.

Nn* RR-1-17.1 C-35

-0 (DB 1))5'm c m 30 CD~0 0 C)C0 0~

Equipment ID: 30C005A Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrp-nnndA1nrp.

Nn -R.R--1-7T C-37 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

306 Oq& Equip. Classl 2 1oA G7 Equipment Description RCw T- T, v-0 fo4i Location:

Bldg. U4 " Floor El. 6 Room, Area -I t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE)YND UE- N/A[D YXNEl UE) N/AEl Yk NE UD N/AD YE) NEI UE) N/Ag" Yg NO UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP-nnnnPEnr~P Nn -RR-19-17.C-38 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 306- 09 Equip. Class 1 2 0 0 m 'Equipment Description I 6., rnM'+ 00.k Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YtKNI- U[-J N/Af 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NO UI N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXNEI U' N/AC]UEI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could )>d NEl UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by:\j Date: I'V>-0I~0~-11 -2 17 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3, rTnrrspnnndPnr.p Nn

  • R-1 9-171 C-39

'D-03 CD m 30 CD*0 0 co CYo

-0w 3 z a.o* 0 m 30 C)C)co~C."

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment DNo. 730 -7),P _ Equip. Class12 ?&) CO,)7Y20L

/4'2 CL '- C 4 X-bf.t/r-TS Equipment Description

.' -- -27cs-J e lw/grQ)Location:

Bldg. IV R Floor El. _ ___ Room, Area C_____-- _Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

-4'! --/--A , -5 ..Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YA>NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4 NOI U0 N/A0 Y,/I NEI U0 N/AQ Y/] NEI U- N/ADl YJ2 NEI U0 N/AQ-IN UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 flnrrPqnnnrPnrP.

Nn

  • RS-1?-171 C-42 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.'30C 3 L Equip. Class 1 2 (;!o rO/?rOL ,041&-4'b

% b 6AdI3/-VC-T Equipment Description

-CcC- t(,Pt) C4AV/tW 4/t--Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YK NOI U- N/AO (2e/lUAY--?

('L / " ") /4ý *7C(L~ 6L) wtA;IM P/ e 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

A 0 eJvoZXX 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?f~i~13 0/JV/r7 0/<10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y'W NQ UO N/AO Y NO UO N/AO Y,K'NO U0 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: / 01f~..' -r~-~-'( C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP..nnndAnr.A.

Nn

  • R5-1 9-173 C-43 D -.0 Ba"0 C/m 30 CD CA)C,, 0 CA)N),

S- R)CA) 0* 0 Scn m-0 C-5 .CD C,, 0 C.0

-uQ j3 0 CD z o~(0 cn m 3D CD C-)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3CC 32) Equip. Classl2 (Z9) 6-roL /4At-2S ,4,6),,e-Equipment Description

(, C/iJ >Location:

Bldg. .FloorEl. /t9/ Room, Area _ _,_ _ _Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

.KV 5 U5 --) Y Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?NO* NEI U0 N/A0 Yo NEI UC N/AC Y NOI UO- N/AQ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YýV NOl UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configtation verification is required.)?9 " / 7 j~us b-xr ',k ~,1,1ZL 'L 5 .- ,f5 5 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I~NQz 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

A C-3>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP~nnnr1.nrP-Nn

  • RR-19-17t.

C-47 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3DC0 3:3 Equip. Class'2 (,;90) (L6/7 OL.& /4AFL4;4/

--Equipment Description Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM NO UO N/AQ Y NO UQ N/AQ Y[N- UO N/AQ Y4NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NQ U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 77 Date: /0 ;t-=< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 CnrrmnnnrIPnr.-

Nn" RR-19-171 C-48

,-. 0~* 0~ -g'.3 -~. ci,.-J E;.5 C m-o CD 0 CA)

-0U-ý 0* 0 33 0 0 c,)m.0-o CD-I.5 0 C~)CA)C,,

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30C34 Equip. Class1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description RCIC Relay Panel Location:

Bldg.. Turbine Floor El. 150 Room, Area T3-81 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y)4NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage confi7ration verification is required.)(qo'557z-r'LI

>/lo6'S // , 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

INEI UL N/A--YX NEI U-- N/A[YPNEI Y NEI U-1 N/AEl UEI N/A--fNEI ULI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rlnrrPqnnndPnr.P Nn -RR-1 9-17.'T C-51 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30C34 Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description RCIC Relay Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

22Xr~1ZAY7L0 l-77AJ6, w72 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?916/,D e/b 1 Or, 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?SNEI] UF] N/AEl SNEI UE] N/AL]Y) NE] Ui- N/AO-SNE-I UE]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NEI U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: /oiq I..-10O3-0421Z

< C-4 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3'.nrr~qnnndfnrP.

Nn -RR-19-17.3 C-52 3 Dn z0~c m-3 CD C)0 W c-N

-z 0 m 3 CD C.0 0 Lo-N

-)o'D ;u o z ~CD m r-CD CD Co Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seistnic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30C722A Equip. Class 1 2 20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Panel Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 150 Room, Area T3-81 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YX NEI Y" ND UO N/AO YQ NI UD N/AO YNEI UD N/Al]I i 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? NO] UD N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YY4 NEI UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<KC-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (rrnrr NAp RR-19-171 C-56 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30C722A Equip. Class" 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

INO 5ý- T7 7'ýYEWNEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YWN"I UD1 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YNI- UD N/ADUFJ Other Adverse Conditions
  • t0 ( k4C ., 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ypq N; U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

a tltas added as' ne ces saE Iry) 7)0)/,51P~ *4ý ý d4~- , A0 7- 275AYI(Z Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: /0 oS.--/Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPmnnndPnr'.-

Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-57 OD a.0 z ~5 0 cW3 0 0 m CD CA)0-4

-CD-.0 z *0* c)CD CA 0 4) 2-CD S~0~ 3 0* 0 C D m C (D C 0-4 2 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

3Q0 --,7 .Equip. Class12 l o) -. e/AJeL Equipment Description

-t9wrop ,iZ /RM-/ Ai6 /)0AJ5 f.Location:

Bldg. 7-V9 FloorEl. [&"2 Room, Area 645L r- 5P912LA6 0]-I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YqNO Y&NEI U.O NIAQ YYNOI UD N/A[3 Y NEI U- N/Ar NO U N/AOA A NO u 1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnndpnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-61 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No..3i 7.ZZ 5 Equip. Class 1 2 OvTZL PfNa'd.S 4I'V CrA1'&7S]Equipment Description ll e-ICAT -,fO4a /rO/4/,r-IAi r f 1-Ard -t- Pvs.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ur' N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo t NI- U[3 N/AO'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

/00 J/% (4C~Q 3 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YONE- UO N/AOU[O Other Adverse Conditions AID, ,.11. Have-you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yu nUO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cmet A t pg may be ade a, ncessary).

Comments Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: IO /91 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rlnrrPsqnnndPnr-.

Nn* RR-19-17.C-62 (D a'D ;.m 3< ?U z &0 3J .cn)m-3 CD C)0-4 OD*ý 0 z, >0 0 C,, m 3o CD C)0 4)

She t 1 of 2 Status:3)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ... J oLo' " Equip. Class 1 2-Tri1 p C" R0e-Jk Equipment Description H PCI " my.V-Id RoA Location:

Bldg. Floor El. .. Room, Area 3 -15 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y)Z'NE- UE N/AE"X NE UE N/AE Y)/ NE UE N/A[YE NEI UE N/AN'Yk NO U-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rTnrrm.qnnnr1Anr.n N" I7A C-65 Sheet 2 of 2 EquipmenteIDNo.

n75C6000 Equip. ClasSE2t Equipiment fescrinticrn WP-I f-6 T.kr e A-+ P,&) -irA6 on-gock Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YA ND U[ N/AD Y)<ND 11U N/ADUE1 N/All Y1(ND 13U[Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NI UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: qr Date: l/lbT /'oI'Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPqnnnrl~nr.c Nn" RR-1-17.1 C-66

-ý 0 0:u -r m C)00-4

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A034&oldid=1362769"