ML12359A005

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev. 1 to Report 12Q0108.80-R-001,Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Unit 1. Part 2 of 4
ML12359A005
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 11/06/2012
From: Delaney M
Stevenson & Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML123590007 List:
References
RS-12-177 12Q0108-80-R001, Rev 1
Download: ML12359A005 (148)
v • d • e


Text

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 C Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)Table C-1 provides a description of each item, anchorage verification confirmation, a list of Area Walk-By Checklists associated with each item, comments, and page numbers of each Seismic Walkdown Checklist.

C-1 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Table C-1. Summary of Seismic Walkdown Checklists Anchorage Area Walk-ID DESCRIPTION Configuration Comments Page Confirmed?

by 1A21- MCC 1A21 460V,3PH,3W,60HZ Y 9 Bus Outage 460V FOR TURBINE BUILDING 1A21A- MCC 1A21A460V,3P,3W,60HZ Y 8 C- 8 460V FOR REACTOR BUILDING 1A21 B- MCC 1A21 B 460V,3P,3W,60HZ Y 7 Bus Outage 460V FOR REACTOR BUILDING 1A23- MCC 1A23 460V,3PH,3W,60HZ y 9 Bus Outage 460V FOR REACTOR BUILDING Equipment always energized.

460V UNIT SUBSTATION 1A2 FOR Opening of 1A2-460V N 11 doors will REACTOR BUILDING introduce undue safety and operational hazard 1A2-460V USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER XF 4160-480V/277V 3PH 60HZ 1C 4160V BUS lC SWITCHGEAR N/A 28 Bus Outage 305-305- SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 N/A 13 C -15 125\06-15 305 SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 N/A 13 C -18 125\06-19 305-305- SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 N/A 8 C -21 125\26-11 305- SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 N/A 8 C -24 125\26-19 6R MAIN CONTROL RM PANEL 6R Y 27 C -27 REACTOR PROTECTION CH.1 7R MAIN CONTROL RM PANEL 7R 27 C -29 REACTOR PROTECTION CH.2 BATTER VITAL BANK'C' STATION Y BANK Y25 C -31 C B BATTERY (LEAD ACID)C BTCHG 'C' STATION BATTERY SOLID Y 26 C -37 Cl STATE STATIC CHARGER Cl CIP-3 CONTINUOUS INSTRUMENT PNL Y 12 C -40 NO.3 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Table C-1 Page 1 of 6 C-2 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Anchorage Area Walk-ID DESCRIPTION Configuration Comments Page Confirmed?

by CV-305-126\10-310 CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (North) N/A 13 C -44 CV-305-CV1-39 CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (North) N/A 13 C -47 126\10-39 CV-305- CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE N/A 8 C -50 126\30-03 (South)CV-305- CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE 126\30-07 (South)CV-305- CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE N/A 13 C -56 127\06-15 (North)CV-305- CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE 127\22-31 (North) N/A 13 C-59 CV-305- CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE N/A 8 C -62 127\30-03 (South)CV-305- CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE 127\30-07 (South) N/A 8 C-65 DC-C 125VDC POWER PANEL DC-C 12VCNEY 26 Bus Outage 125V CENTER 'C'__ _ _ _ __ _ _______DC-F 125VDC POWER PANEL DC-F Y 12 C -68 DG-1I DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 BATTER N 1C -72 Y.BATR STARTING BATTERIES Y-BANK DG-1 BATTER DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 Y BATTERY CHARGER N C-75 CHARGE R DG-I DIESEL GENERATOR

  1. 1 UNIT SWGR SWITCHGEAR Y 1 _C-_78 EMERGENCY CONDENSER IB0005A1 NE01A HIGH SYSTEM FLOW Y 6C -81 SWITCH DPT FUEL ZONE LEVEL'B' WIDE IA0091B RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER ER1I8A CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N Y 12 C -87 SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL FN-56-4 "A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Y 14 _C -90 Table C-1 Page 2 of 6 C-3 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Anchorage Area Walk-ID DESCRIPTION Configuration Comments Page Confirmed?

by FN-732-1 LSS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER Y 16 C -93 FN-732-2 1SS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER Y 16 C -96 COOLING FAN USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN FN-732-3 COIGFNY 16 C -99 Y H-18-1C AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SWEL 2 C- 102-HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C) 21 H-21-1A CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS Y 13 C -105 HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 IP-4 120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 -Y 12 C 108 208/120V,3PH,4W IT-4A TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2- 12 C 112 460V TO IP-4 LSKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL N/A POOL LEVEL INDICATOR 20 LIS- REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL Y 15 C- 119 RE0018A INDICATING SWITCH LIS- REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL Y 15 C -121 RE0018C INDICATING SWITCH SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER Y LS-53B 20SWEL 2 C -123 LEVEL SWITCH 20 LS-862- LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL N/A 1 C -126 10B PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 LS-862- HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON N/A 1 C -129 10C TANK T-39-003 LSP-1A2 LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS Y 16 C -132 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL LT- REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER Y 17 C -135 RE0005B LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM EMERGENCY DIESEL M-39-1 GNRTR1Y 1C -137 GENERATOR

  1. 1 SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING Y P-18-1B 21SWEL 2 C- 140 PUMP (NN01-B) 21 AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL Y P-18-1C 21SWEL 2 C -143 PUMP (NN01-C) 21 P-20-1A CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Y 18 C -146 P 1A (NZOIA CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" -SYS. I Y 18 C -149 (NZ01A)P-20-2A CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP Y 6 C -152 NZ03-A P-3-3A EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER Y 4 C-155_PUMP 1-1 (52A)Table C-1 Page 3 of 6 C-4 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Anchorage Area Walk-ID DESCRIPTION Configuration by Comments Page Confirmed?

P-39-13 FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T- N 1 C-158 39-3 P-39-17 DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 N 1 C -161 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING P-39-19 WAE UPN/A 1 C -164 WATER PUMP P-39-25 AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP N 2 C -167 P1-18-82 AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP N/A SWEL 2 C -170 NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE 21 PI-305- ACCUMULATORS GAS 131\06-15 PRESSURE INDICATOR PI-305- ACCUMULATORS GAS 131\26-03 PRESSURE INDICATOR 480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO N 24 C- 179 PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C N/A LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP 21 PS- EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE C -185 IA0083A SWITCH PS- EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE IA0083C SWITCH PS- LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH Y 15 C -189 RE0017A READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES PS- DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE RV0046A SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS REACTOR PROTECTION RK-1 SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT Y 15 C -194_ RACK A,B INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION MSIV'S SOLENOID AIR VALVE &RK-411-1 EQUIPMENT MOUNTING RACK N/A Outage ROTARY AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC INVERTE Y C- 199 R\CSUPPLY FOR CIP-3 R\AC SO-305- CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT 117\06-15 SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP

1) N/A 13 C -202 (North)SO-305- CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT 117\06-19 SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP
2) N/A 13 C -205-(North)Table C-1 Page 4 of 6 C-5 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Anchorage Area Walk-ID DESCRIPTION Configuration Comments Page Confirmed?ato SO-305- CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP
2) N/A 8 C -208 11 7\30-03(S th___ ____(South)SO-305- CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP
3) N/A 8 C -211 (South)SO-305- DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE N/A 13 C -214 120\06-15 (ot)___________(North)SO-305- DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE Y 8 C -217 120\30-03 (ot)____________

____(South)SO-305- DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL 13 C -220 121\06-15 INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL S2-306- INSERT SOLENOID VALVE N/A 13 C -223 121\06-19 (ot)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____(South)T-39-2 DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL 3 C -226 STORAGE TANK T-39-3 DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 N 1 C -230 FUEL OIL DAY TANK T-39-5 M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK N 1 C -233 N TI-18-267 ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C SWEL 2 C -236 OUTLET TEMPERATURE 21 V-1-10 MAIN STEAM LINE'B' OUTLET N/A Outage V-1-10 ISOLATION VALVE(NS04-B)

N/A Outage V-1-106 MAIN STEAM LINE 'A' DRAIN N/A Outage V-1-10 VALVE N/A Outage V-1-160 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE NR28D N/A Outage V-1-16 (SOUTH HEADER) N/A Outage SAFETY RELIEF VALVE NR28H V-1-164 (NORTH HEADER) N/A Outage V-1-173 ELECTROMATIC RELIEF VALVE N/A Outage NR108-A(SOUTH HEADER)V-1-175 ELECTROMATIC RELIEF VALVE N/A Outage V-1-17 NR108-C(NORTH HEADER) N/A Outage V-1-177 ELECTROMATIC RELIEF VALVE N/A Outage V-1-17 NR108-E(SOUTH HEADER) N/A Outage V-15-120 SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR N/A 8 C -239 VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

V-15-133 NORTH SCRAM DISCHG 13 C-242 VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

V-16-1 CU INLET ISOLATION VALVE N/A Outage FROM REACTOR VESSEL N/A Outage Table C-1 Page 5 of 6 C-6 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Anchorage DESCRIPTION Configur Area Walk- Comments Page Confirmed?

by MAIN STEAM LINE'A' OUTLET N/A Outage ISOLATION VALVE(NS03-A)

SDC LOOP 'A' PUMP SUCTION N/A 22 C -245 VALVE L SDC LOOP'A' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE N/A 23 C -248 ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D VCASING VENT VALVE N/A SWEL 2 C -251 21 V FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION SWEL 2 C -254 1266 VALVE N/A 21 AUGMENTED FUEL POOL V-18-19 AGETDFEPOLSWEL 2 C -257 COOLING OUTLET VALVE N/A 21 AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE N/A 21 V-18-3 SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SWEL 2 C -263 SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE N/A 21 V-18-47 DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS N/A 21 AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG V-18-74 PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE SWEL 2 C -269 VALVE N/A 21 V-18-80 P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE N/A 21 SWEL 2 C -272 PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT V-i18-81 N/ 1SWEL 2 C -275 VALVE N/A 21 AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT V-1 8-88 N/A 21 SWEL 2 C -278_ _ _ _VALVE N/A____ 21_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG V-18-92 TRTLVAVN/21SWEL 2 C -281 THROTTLE VALVE N/A 21 CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I) N/A"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE -V-20-15 NA6 C -287 SYS. I N/A V-20-3 CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS N/A CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP N/A V-39-109 EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION N 1 C -296 VALVE V-39-1 10 EDGi PRIMING PUMP N 1 C -299 DISCHARGE VALVE ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET N/A VACP-1 120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL Y 10 C -305 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ VACP-1 120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL Y 10 C -308 XF TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V I Table C-1 Page 6 of 6 C-7 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1A21A-460V EquipmentClass:

(1) Motor Control Centers Equipment

==

Description:==

MCC 1A21A 460V,3P,3W,60HZ FOR REACTOR BUILDING Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-8 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1A21A-460V Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment

==

Description:==

MCC 1A21A 460V,3P,3W,60HZ FOR REACTOR BUILDING Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments External Anchorage was completed during online walk down. External anchorage as documented in SQ-OC-1A2A-460V-MCC External Supports are consistent with Calculation C-1 302-732-5320-014 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/10/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/10/2012 C-9 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

1A21A-460V (1) Motor Control Centers MCC 1A21A 460V,3P,3W,60HZ FOR REACTOR BUILDING Photos MI h!f.: n ,.1 1A Ih/(-z, flu/-, IMG_0976 IMG_0978 C-10 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: E N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1A2-460VXF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER 4160-480V/277V 3PH 60HZ Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 11 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-li 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1A2-460V XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER 4160-480V/277V 3PH 60HZ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments External Anchorage was completed during online walk down. See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-1A2-XFMR-USS Rev 0 Nearby masonry block Wallis braced. Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark S. Etre Date: 10/10/2012 Seth W. Baker 10/10/2012 C-12 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

1A2-460V XF (4) Transformers USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER 4160-480V/277V 3PH 60HZ Photos IMG 0859 IMG_0864 IMG_0869 C-13 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1A2-460V XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER 4160-480V/277V 3PH 60HZ SQUG SEWS 4 EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Two World Trade Cente,. New York, N.Y. 10048 April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention:

Mr. Leon Caribian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you, together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.Very truly yours,"' A -I j-, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chiu G Wu 0 C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-14 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\06-15 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially.

adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-15 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\06-15 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 See Calculation C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 See drawing BR 4059, sheet 3 Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev. 1 C-16 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

305-1 25\06-1 5 (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 SSeth Baker 10/15/12 Photos IMG_0756 C-17 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\06-19 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-18 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: FYl] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\06-19 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Interaction Effects 7. ' Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that'could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Calculation C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 See Calculation C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 See drawing BR 4059, sheet 3 Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev. 1 C-19 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\06-19 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 Photos IMG_0749 C-20 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\26-11 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-21 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\26-11 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Accumulator was missing label.See Calculation C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 See Calculation C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 See drawing BR 4059, sheet 3 Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev. 1 C-22 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

305-125\26-11 (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 Photos IMG_0783 IMG_0784 C-23 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\26-19 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-24 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\26-19 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 See Calculation C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 See drawing BR 4059, sheet 3 Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev. 1 C-25 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 305-125\26-19 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

SCRAM ACCUMULATOR-H20 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 Photos IMG_0829 IMG_0830 C-26 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 6R Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

MAIN CONTROL RM PANEL 6R REACTOR PROTECTION CH.1 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

TB, 46.00 ft, 27 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-27 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 6R Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

MAIN CONTROL RM PANEL 6R REACTOR PROTECTION CH.1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-6R Rev 03 Able to verify accessible anchorage in (inside) back of cabinet. Interior inspection completed during online walkdown.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-28 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 7R Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

MAIN CONTROL RM PANEL 7R REACTOR PROTECTION CH.2 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

TB, 46.00 ft, 27 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-29 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 7R Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

MAIN CONTROL RM PANEL 7R REACTOR PROTECTION CH.2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-7R Rev 02 Able to verify accessible anchorage in (inside) back of cabinet. Interior inspection completed during online walkdown.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-30 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Yi] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BATTERY BANK C Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

VITAL BANK 'C' STATION BATTERY (LEAD ACID)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

TB, 23.00 ft, 25 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-31 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: r-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BATTERY BANKC Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

VITAL BANK 'C' STATION BATTERY (LEAD ACID)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of.potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-BATTERY BANK C Rev 01 Tech Eval A2057072-08 Rev 0, concluded that the 0.5" gap on the end rails is acceptable.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-32 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BATTERY BANK C Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

VITAL BANK 'C' STATION BATTERY (LEAD ACID)Photos 1MG 1052 IMVI_ 1Ubj IMG_1058 IMU- lUti2 C-33 12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BATTERY BANK C Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

VITAL BANK 'C' STATION BATTERY (LEAD ACID)SQUG SEWS PAGE 0001 E C R Printout ECR NUMBER: Oc 04-00923 000 ECR TYPE: IEC ASSIGNED ORG: OWSP PRINT DATE/TIME:

11/04/04 06:11 ASSIGNED INDV: BEEFERMAN, MARVIN REQUIRED DATE: 11/10/04 INITIATOR:

KALENAK ECR STATUS: APPVD REQUEST ORG: OWSP STATUS DATE: 11/04/04 A/R NO: A2008592 INIT. DATE: 11/03/04 PROJECT NO: -A/R STATUS: ASIGND A/R

SUBJECT:

204 12642: REPLACEMENT OF "C" STATION BATTERIES A. IDENTIFICATION:

SYSTEM: 735 COMP ID: OC 1 735 E BT C STATION BATTERIES INIT OPER: QA CLASS: __ POTL REPT: __TECH SPEC: -REQD IN MODES: PAGES ATTACHED:

Y NO. OF PAGES: 3 ID/DATE: MPBO 11/03/04 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION and PROPOSED DISPOSITION:

INSTALLED STATION "C" BATTERIES, GNB MODEL NCX-1200, HAVE BEEN REPLACED BY GNB MODEL NCN-17. THE ORIGINAL AND REPLACEMENT BATTERIES WERE FURNISHED BY NUCLEAR LOGISTICS INC. (NLI). THIS IEC WILL RECONCILE DIFFER-ENCES IN THE TWO MODELS USING THE REPLACEMENT EVALUATION PROVIDED BY NLI (CALC. # ERC-53, REV. I).B. EVALUATION:

50.59 REVIEW REQD: _N_ ORIG 50.59 REVIEW AFFECTED:

_ 50.59 SE REQD: REPORTABLE:

N DATE/TIME:

_STATION PROC/PROGRAM REVIEW COMPLT: __ CAUSE: I FINAL OPERABILITY:

COMP: -SYSTEM: __ PLANT: SSV NAME: SSV DATE/TIME:

SCHED CODE/WINDW:

ADVANCED WORK AUTH: -FINAL DISP: _- INTERIM DISP: APPROVED DISPOSITION:

DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE* ** *** ** * *** ****NOTEI: IT IS UNACCEPTABLE TO PROCESS AN IEC THAT EVAL-UATES CHANGES TO FIT/FORM/FUNCTION AND PROCESS/LOGIC/

PARAMETERS OUTSIDE OF DESIGN TOLERANCES OR PRE-ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS.

THESE CHANGES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO COMPLEX PIPE ROUTING, SEISMIC CALCULATIONS, SETPOINTS, PROCESS PARAMETERS, POWER REQUIREMENTS, ELECTRICAL LOAD-ING, MONITORING, AND OPERATIONS OR LICENSING/DESIGN CRITERIA.

THESE CHANGES WILL BE PROCESSED OR SUPPLEMENTED Pv fl7'Tr2M R'T1FFRTNG THROUGH AN APPROVED DESIGN CHANGE 04-00923, Rev 0, 20041104, BLANKET AR FOR ITEM EQUIVALENCY EVAL (IEEIEC)C-34 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BATTERY BANKC Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

VITAL BANK 'C' STATION BATTERY (LEAD ACID)*** ACTION REQUEST ***A/R TYPE : CM ECR REQUEST ORG : OEPE REQUEST DATE: 10MAR03 REQUESTED BY: HECK, MICHAEL PAGE: 01 A/R NUMBER : A2057072 A/R STATUS : ASIGND STATUS DATE: 03NOV04 LAST UPDATE: 20NOV04 PRINT DATE : 20NOV04 EVALUATION NBR: 08 EVALUATING ORG: OEDM EVAL ASIGND TO: NIOGI. SUJIT EVAL REQUEST ORG: OEPE EVAL REQUESTOR:

HECK, MIKE EVAL RETURNED BY: RAY, F.H.ORIG DATE ASSIGNED: EVAL DUE DATE: 18NOV04 DATE ASSIGNED:

06OCT04 EVAL STATUS : COMPLT E CODE:__ DATE FIXED:_IMPORTANCE CODE:_OEAP:___ SCHEDULE EVAL DESC: PERFROM SOUG WALKDOWN OF NEW C BATTERY AFTER INSTALLATION.

ADD TO YOUR SCHEDULE.

FHR FHR1 060CT(SNN1 18NOV(.ENGINEERING RESPONSE:

SNNI 18NOV(REASON FOR EVALUATION/SCO]

DOWN (ENNi1 3NoVflA FtRTwPRN-THE HORINTALN 18 4 qPTRY CRLT.I_ PTHE RRTqMTC SNNI 1RNOV04 ION-OF THE BATTERY WITH THE RACK WA AT THE WYLE LABORATORIES AND IS TN RPPRRNCE 1- THE REISMIC TF.RT AS qNNI 18NOV04 SNN1 18NOV04 ING WAS SNN1 18NOV04 PERFORMED WITHOUT ANY GAP BETWEEN THEAND THE RACK I IZONTAL RAILS. )EVAL THE IS TO JUSTIFY SEISMIC QUALI Y AND THE BATTERY RACK WITH I FOR THIS SNN1 18NOV04 FICATION OF SNN1 18NOV04 THE 1/2-INCH SNN1 18NOV04 GAP.THIS RESPONSE WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE FORM OF A TECHNICAL EVALUATION PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CC-AA-309-101 REV 7.DETAILED EVALUATION:

SNN1 18NOV04 THE BATTERY RACK IS LOC.231-61. THE RACK IS A AT TURBINE BUILDING EL.4ARILY I AND IS BOLTED TO THE FLOOR (REFERI THE PLAN. SECTIONS AND DETAILS OF ENCE THE I REFERENCE 3 DAMPING VALUE FOR BOLTED STRUCTURE IS 7% FOR SSE. THE PEAK ACCELERATIONS AT THAT LOCATION FOR 7% DAMPING FROM REFERENCE 4 IS 0.35G IN THE HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONS AND 0.24G IN THE XT7P'TCAT.

TECrTTON THE RATTERY CELTS ARE MADE OF 18NOV04 SThN1 1RNOV0A SNN1 18NOV04 E 5). FROM R ICTION BETWEE WRT.TTR Tq n I EFERENCE 6. SNNI 18NOV04 N STEEL AND SNNI 18NOV04-THE WEIOHT OF THE SNNI INOV04 IS 9 POUNDS (RER 5) H SNN1 18OV04 PER RaCWy TH E LENGTH OF THE RACK IS SNNI 18NOV04 ERENCE 2). TOTAL WEIGHT SNNI 18NOV04 4035 POUNDS. THEREFORE, SNNI 18NOV04 CK DUE TO HORIZONTAL SNN1 18NOV04 OF, A2057072 E08, Rev NA, 20041120, PERFORM SQUG WALKDOWN OF NEW C BATTERY C-35 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

ERMS -Department Transmittal BATTERY BANK C (15) Batteries on Racks VITAL BANK 'C' STATION BATTERY (LEAD ACID)Page 2 of 4 Doc Number: SQ-OC-BATTERY BANK C Sheet: Date: 10/17/2011 MJr Rev: 000 Mnr Rev: Dept Trans: D177718 Facility:

OYS SRRS ID: 3A.114 Doc Type: SOB Sub Type: AddI Type: DocTitle: DIVISION C BATTERIES 0900e54e814d1c8f http://edmsapp.exeloncorp.comlermsldeptldepttrans/print 10/21/2011 SQ-OC-BATTERY BANK C, Rev 001, 20111017, DIVISION C BATTERIES C-36 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo.: BTCHG C1 Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment

==

Description:==

'C' STATION BATTERY SOLID STATE STATIC CHARGER Cl Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

TB, 23.00 ft, 26 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-37 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BTCHG C1 Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment

==

Description:==

'C' STATION BATTERY SOLID STATE STATIC CHARGER Cl Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-BT CHG Cl & C2 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-38 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: BTCHG C1 Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment

==

Description:==

'C' STATION BATTERY SOLID STATE STATIC CHARGER C1 Photos MG 1068 MG 1069 MG_1072 MG_1073 C-39 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Ei] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CIP-3 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTINUOUS INSTRUMENT PNL NO.3 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-40 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CIP-3 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTINUOUS INSTRUMENT PNL NO.3 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-CIP-3 Rev 0 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-41 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CIP-3 Equipment Class: (14) Di Equipment

==

Description:==

CONT istribution Panels INUOUS INSTRUMENT PNL NO.3 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Photos IMr: nlR7A MG_0875 MG_0879 C-42 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: E N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CIP-3 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTINUOUS INSTRUMENT PNL NO.3 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ SQUG SEWS EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Two World Trade Cener. New York, N.Y. 10048 April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention:

Mr. Leon Caribian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you, together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chiu G Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-43 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\10-31 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-44 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\1 0-31 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-45 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\10-31 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Photo IMG_0731 C-46 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\10-39 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-47 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\10-39 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-48 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\10-39 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Photo--7 IMG_0734 C-49 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\30-03 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-50 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\30-03 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-51 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\30-03 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Photos MG_0805 MG_0806 C-52 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: F-- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\30-07 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-53 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-126\30-07 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD INLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-54 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

CV-305-1 26\30-07 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves CR0D IN LET SCRAM VALVE (South)Photos MG_0788 MG_0789 C-55 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\06-15 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-56 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\06-15 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-57 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\06-15 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Photo IMG_0743 C-58 12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: LI-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\22-31 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-59 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\22-31 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-60 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\22-31 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (North)Photo IMG_0738 C-61 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\30-03 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-62 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\30-03 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-63 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\30-03 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Photo IMG_0811 C-64 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\30-07 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for. documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-65 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: CV-305-127\30-07 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CRD OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-66 12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

CV-305-1 27\30-07 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves CR0D OUTLET SCRAM VALVE (South)Photo IG_0794 C-67 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DC-F Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

125VDC POWER PANEL DC-F Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (BIdg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-68 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DC-F Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

125VDC POWER PANEL DC-F Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-DC-F, Rev 000 Unsecured thermometer above panel was resolved by Operations and is being tracked by IR 1406823.Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-69 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

DC-F (14) Distribution Panels 125VDC POWER PANEL DC-F Photos Mr. nAIR MG_0897 MG_0904 C-70 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: V] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DC-F Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

125VDC POWER PANEL DC-F SQUG SEWS SQUG SEWS.411 EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Two World Trade Center. New Yolk. N.Y. 10048 April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention:

Mr. Leon Garibian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you, together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.Very truly yours, 61 ('" :j ir E Odar ,'Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chiu G Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-71 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DG-1 BATTERY BANK Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 STARTING BATTERIES Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-72 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DG-1 BATTERY BANK Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 STARTING BATTERIES Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-73 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

DG-1 BATTERY BANK (15) Batteries on Racks DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 STARTING BATTERIES Photos MG 1145 MG_1149 C-74 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DG-1 BATTERY CHARGER Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 BATTERY CHARGER Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-75 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DG-1 BATTERY CHARGER Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 BATTERY CHARGER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-76 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: LXY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

DG-1 BATTERY CHARGER (16) Inverters DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 BATTERY CHARGER Photos Mr, 1184 MG_1185 MG_1 186 C-77 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Ml N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DG-1 SWGR Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR

  1. 1 UNIT SWITCHGEAR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-78 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: L] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DG-1 SWGR Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR

  1. 1 UNIT SWITCHGEAR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-DG-1-SWGR Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-79 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DG-1 SWGR Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR

  1. 1 UNIT SWITCHGEAR Photos Mr, 1196 MG_1195 MG_1 196 C-80 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DPIS-IB0005A1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

EMERGENCY CONDENSER NE01A HIGH SYSTEM FLOW SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

.Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-81 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DPIS-IB0005A1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

EMERGENCY CONDENSER NE01A HIGH SYSTEM FLOW SWITCH Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03)

Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-82 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

DPIS-IBOOO05A1 (18) Instruments on Racks EMERGENCY CONDENSER NE01A HIGH SYSTEM FLOW SWITCH Photo MG_0680 C-83 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DPT-6-1A0091B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

FUEL ZONE LEVEL 'B' WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-84 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: DPT-6-1A0091B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

FUEL ZONE LEVEL 'B' WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03)

Rev 000 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-DPT-6-1A0091 B Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-85 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

DPT-6-1A0091 B (18) Instruments on Racks FUEL ZONE LEVEL 'B' WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Photos MG_0688 C-86 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: ER18A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-87 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: ER18A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-ER-18A Rev 1 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-88 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

ER1 8A (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets CORE SPRAY/AUTO DEPRESS'N SYSTEM RELAY LOGIC PANEL Photos MG_0908 MG_0910 C-89 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 14 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-90 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

"A" 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-FN-56-0004 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-91 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-56-4 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

"AX 480 SWGR RM SUPPLY FAN Photos MG 0981 MG_0982 C-92 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-93 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-732-1 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-94 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

FN-732-1 (9) Fans USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo Photo-IMG_1001 C-95 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting othercomments.

Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-96 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-97 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-732-2 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo IMG_1 002 C-98 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is.the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-99 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: FN-732-3 Equipment Class: (9) Fans Equipment

==

Description:==

USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-ER-732-092 Rev 00 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-100 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

FN-732-3 (9) Fans USS 1A2-460V TRANSFORMER COOLING FAN Photo 1005 C-101 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-102 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Augmented Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Qualification.

C-1302-251-5320-009, Dated 6/11/1984.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-103 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: H-18-1C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER(NN02-C)

Photos MG 1246 MG_1247 MG_1248 C-104 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: H-21-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to. record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-105 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: H-21-1A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Supports are consistent with Calculation C-1 302-241-E310-107 Rev 0 Surface Oxidation on Bolts at the Base Plates. The degraded bolts had previously been identified in 2000 and is being tracked by IR 1403183. Gusset plates were added to the Heat Exchanger base to make up for the deficient bolts. The gusset plate modifications are detailed in Calculation C-1 302-241-E310-107 Rev 0 Movable security barrier adjacent to the Heat Exchanger is chained to the column and chalked.See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-H-21-001A Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-106 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

H-21-1A (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYS HEAT EXCHANGER 1-1 Photos MG 0704 MG_0706 MG_0711 MG_0720 C-107 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 -208/120V,3PH,4W Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-108 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 -208/120V,3PH,4W Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-IP-4, Rev 000 Verification of anchorage by feeling bolts in Unistrut Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-109 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 -208/120V,3PH,4W Photos MG 0883 MG_0884 MG_0885 C-110 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IP-4 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120VAC INSTRUMENT PANEL 4 -208/120V,3PH,4W SQUG SEWS V EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Two World Trade Center, New Yolk. N.Y. 10048 April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention:

Mr. Leon Garibian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.Very truly yours, rj *.>&;-t-/C'1 E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chin G Wu 0 C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-111 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 12 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is providedat the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-112 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-IT-4A Rev 0 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-113 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

IT-4A (4) Transformers TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 Photos Photos MG 0888 MG_0891 MG 0893 C-114 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IT-4A Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

TRANSFORMER FROM MCC 1A2-460V TO IP-4 SQUG SEW 4 EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Two World Trade Center New York. N.Y, 10048 April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention:

Mr. Leon Garibian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call. We will be glad to help.Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chiu G Wu C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-115 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LI-18-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 119.00 ft, 20 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-116 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LI-18-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-Line/Free Standing See VM-OC-0157 Rev 4 Dresser Part Number 60-1379AS-021 15 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-117 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LI-18-170 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SKIMMER SURGE TANK'A'FUEL POOL LEVEL INDICATOR Photo MG_1229 MG_1231 C-118 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-119 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-120 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: E N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,Jis the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-121 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LIS-RE0018C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

REACTOR VESSEL LOW LEVEL INDICATING SWITCH Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-122 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 119.00 ft, 20 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-123 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See VM-OC-5740 Rev 1 Mercoid PG-3-P1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-124 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-53B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL LOW WATER LEVEL SWITCH Photos MG_1237 MG_1238 C-125 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet I of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-126 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-127 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: E N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

LO-LO LEVEL (START NORMAL PUMP) ON TANK T-39-003 Photo IMG_1 141 C-128 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Waikdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-129 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: E_] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-130 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LS-862-10C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

HI-HI LEVEL(PUMP CUT-OFF) ON TANK T-39-003 Photo I M G_1141 C-131 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 16 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes C-132 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LSP-1A2 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

==

Description:==

LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-LSP-1A2 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-133 12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

LSP-1A2 (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets LOCAL SHUTDOWN PANEL- USS 1A2 PUMP/BREAKER CONTROL Photos MG 1009 MG 1010 MG_1011 MG_1015 C-134 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LT-RE0005B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-135 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: LT-RE0005B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

REACTOR VESSEL LOW WATER LEVEL REACTOR SCRAM Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J'Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-136 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: LIII N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)' Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

==

Description:==

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR

  1. 1.Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-137 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: M-39-1 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment

==

Description:==

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR

  1. 1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 C-1302-157-5320-006, Rev. 0 qualifies the unanchored Diesels.Base Corrosion is being tracked by the Plant.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-138 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

M-39-1 (17) Engine-Generators EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR

  1. 1 Photo Photo M G_1 134 C-139 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlD No.: P-18-18 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-140 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: P-18-1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See drawing W-65107-R4 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-141 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-18-1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP (NN01-B)Photo IMG_1255 C-142 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-143 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-18-1C Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED.

SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Augmented Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System Qualification.

C-1 302-251-5320-008, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-144 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [Yi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

P-1 8-1C (5) Horizontal Pumps AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL PUMP (NN01-C)Photos MG 1290 MG_1291 MG_1 293 C-145 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-146 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments'See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-147 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP NZ01-A Photos MG_1021 MG_1023 MG_1 024 C-148

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12359A005&oldid=915909"