Text

Rev. 1 to Report 12Q0108.80-R-001,Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Unit 1. Part 3 of 4
	ML12359A006
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	11/06/2012
From:	Delaney M; Stevenson & Associates
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML123590007	List: ML12359A005; ML12359A006; ML12359A008; RA-12-116, Day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident;
References
	RS-12-177 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev 1
	Download: ML12359A006 (163)
	v • d • e

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" -SYS. I Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 19.00ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-149 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-20-1A (NZ01A)Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" -SYS. I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-150 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

P-20-11A (NZO1A)(5) Horizontal Pumps CORE SPRAY PUMP "X'- SYS. I Photos MG 1021 MG_1023 MG_1 024 C-151 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-152 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M-j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-002A Rev 1 Anchorage details shown on drawing 4074-4 Rev. 4 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-153 12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-20-2A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Photos MG 0663 MG_0670 MG_0671 C-154 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IS, 6.00 ft, 04 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-155 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-3-3A Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Proximity to handrail is not a seismic interaction issue due to the relatively low mass of the handrail.See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-P-3-003A Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-156 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

P-3-3A (6) Vertical Pumps EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)Photos Photos MG_1217 MG_1221 C-157 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: V] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-158 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: i-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-13 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-159 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

P-39-13 (5) Horizontal Pumps FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Photos Photos MG_1175 MG_1178 C-160 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-161 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-17 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-162 12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

P-39-17 (5) Horizontal Pumps DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Photo IG_1161 C-163 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-164 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of.potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and.found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-165 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-19 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Photos MG_1166 MG_1167 C-166 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 02 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not Applicable Yes C-167 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P-39-25 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-M-39-002 Oil leak is Yellow tagged.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-168 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

P-39-25 (5) Horizontal Pumps AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Photo 1205 C-169 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P1-1 8-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-170 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EIYJ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments US Guage CO. Figure 1980 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-171 12QO108.80-R-0O1, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: P1-18-82 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Photos MG_1315 MG_1316 C-172 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-173 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-174 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: N U Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\06-15 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photo~IMG 0752 C-175 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-176 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PI-305-131\26-03 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-177 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: rYII N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

PI-305-131\26-03 (0) Other ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photos IG_0778 C-178 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet.1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

TB, 36.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-179 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-180 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Ll] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-1 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Photos MG 1103 MG_1106 C-181 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-18-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 I Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-182 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-18-79 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments B070 BARKSDALE CONTROL MODEL D1T-M18SS Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-183 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

PS-1 8-79 (18) Instruments on Racks ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Photo IG_1304 C-184 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-185 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-186 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes Yes Yes C-187 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-IA0083C Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-188 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-RE0017A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-189 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M-j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-RE0017A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-190 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-191 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03)

Rev 000 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-PS-RV0046A Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-192 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [IIY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: PS-RV0046A Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Photo IMG_0685 C-193 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Ei] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RK-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-194 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RK-1 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Q Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-195 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-196 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: RK-3 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03)

Rev 000 Missing bolt is addressed in SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) and determined to be seismically adequate in the current configuration.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-197 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

RK-3 (18) Instruments on Racks INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Photos MG_0694 MG_0680 MG_0694 C-198 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

==

Description:==

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

OB, 35.00 ft, 05 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes C-199 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: ROTARY INVERTER\AC Equipment Class: (13) Motor-Generators Equipment

==

Description:==

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Horizontal restraint modification is consistent with SQUG SEWS and drawings identified within SEWS.See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-ROTARY INVERTER\AC Nearby masonry block Wall is braced. Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-200 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

ROTARY INVERTER\AC (13) Motor-Generators AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Photos MG 1113 MG 1115 MG_1116 MG_1118 C-201 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Ml N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-202 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-203 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Photo IMG_0755 C-204 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-205 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12% Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-206 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Photo IMG_0762 C-207 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP

2) (South)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-208 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP

2) (South)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry blockwalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-209 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP

2) (South)Photo IMG_0817 C-210 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP

3) (South)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-211 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP

3) (South)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-212 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: EiZ] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-117\30-07 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP

3) (South)Photo........ .....IM G _0802 C-213 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Yes C-214 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1,302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-215 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

SO-305-120\06-1 5 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)Photo IG_0756 C-216 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Yes Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-217 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-218 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-120\30-03 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)Photo IMG_0822 C-219 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-220 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-221 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

SO-305-121\06-15 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Photo MG_0760 C-222 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-223 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SO-305-121\06-19 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-224 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

SO-305-121\06-19 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)Photo MG_0763 C-225 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-226 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: EY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-T-39-002 Rev 1 Evaluated by: 0 44 Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-227 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

T-39-2 (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Photos Photos MG_4172 MG_4174 C-228 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-2 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK MrZ A17.r MG_4178 MG_4179 C-229 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-230 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J ' Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-231 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-3 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Photos MG_1137 MG_1 138 C-232 12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EZI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-233 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-234 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: T-39-5 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

==

Description:==

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Photos MG 1153 MG_1155 MG_1 157 C-235 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

==

Description:==

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-236 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

==

Description:==

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. -Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-237 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TI-18-267 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

==

Description:==

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Photo IMG_1294 C-238 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-239 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [FYi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-15-120 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with BS&B Service Instruction Manual for Diaphram Control Valves NS 106 page 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0120 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-240 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-1 5-120 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Photo AG_0834 C-241 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-15-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-242 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M-l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-15-133 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with Flowserve Drawing 94-16252 Rev D See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0133 Rev 0 RTD for V-6-2917 touches valve V-1 5-133. Not an operability issue due to the relative low mass od V-6-2917 and the brass piping which is highly ductile. IR 01403039 Documents-Seismic interaction between valves V-15-133 and V-6-2917.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-243 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: EIII N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-15-133 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Photos MG 0714 MG_0715 MG 0716 C-244 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SDC LOOP A' PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 38.00 ft, 22 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-245 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SDC LOOP 'A' PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Drawing 93-14360 Rev c Evaluated by: ID"'$ Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-246 12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-17-1 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SDC LOOP A PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos KMr, A1A9 MG_4183 MG_4184 C-247 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 23 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-248 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-17-212 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

SDC LOOP'A' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments SEE CONVAL DRAWING 10G2-105 REV B Evaluated by: Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-249 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-1 7-212 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Photos Photos MG_4194 MG_4195 C-250 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [-fl N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-251 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-112 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-252 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-18-112 (0) Other ASFP COOLING PUMP NNO1-D CASING VENT VALVE Photo Photo MG_1308 C-253 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-254 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MZ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

3" Globe Valve Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-255 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-1266 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Photo IMG_1258 C-256 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-257 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1 302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12-Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-258 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: -N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-19 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Photos MG_1264 MG_1265 C-259 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-260 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-261 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-18-2 (0) Other AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Photos MG_1300 MG_1302 C-262 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-263 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-264 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Yi] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-3 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Photo 1 C-265 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-266 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-47 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-267 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V- 18-47 (0) Other DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Photo MG_1249 C-268 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-269 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12* Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-270 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-74 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Photos IMG_1296 IMG_1297 C-271 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-272 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [Y- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-80 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-273 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-1 8-80 (0) Other P-1-i8-88 ISOLATION VALVE Photo MG_1313 C-274 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-1 8-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-275 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-81 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-276 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: MI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-18-81 (0) Other PS-1 8-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Photo IG_1306 C-277 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-278 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-88 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes Comments Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-279 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-I 8-88 (0) Other AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Photo MG_1319 C-280 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-281 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-18-92 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Leakage is tagged.In-line equipment.

See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-282 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-i 8-92 (0) Other AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Photos MG_1261 MG_1262 C-283 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-284 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0012 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-285 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-12 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)Photo IMG_0657 C-286 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE -SYS. I Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-287 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE -SYS. I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Minor leakage.See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0015 Rev 0 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-288 12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: E N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE -SYS. I Photo IMG_0655 C-289 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-290 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing 2065-5 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-291 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-20-3 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Photos MG_1029 MG_1032 C-292 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 19.00 ft, 19 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-293 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-21-75 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing W8321853 Rev A Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-294 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

V-21-75 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Photo MG_1041 C-295 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-296 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-297 12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-109 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1172 MG_1173 C-298 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-299 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-300 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-110 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1172 MG 1173 C-301 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-302 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Wing Ho Date: 10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-303 12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: V-39-2 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment

==

Description:==

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Photos IMU _41ti IMUi 41b5i C-304 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-305 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-VACP-1, Rev 0 Anchor bolts behind panel verified by touch.Above panel is far enough away and has rigid enough support to preclude interaction.

Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/10/12 J'"t Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-306 12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Photos MG_0929 MG_0931 C-307 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Project: Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-308 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-VACP-1 XFMR, Rev. 0 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-309 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 XF Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Photos IMU. Uzu IMG_0921 C-310 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: VACP-1 Equipment Class:. (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

==

Description:==

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ SQUG SEWS 4 ESASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED TwO WOd- Tra6e Center New York, NY 10048 April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention:

Mr. Leon Garibian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output. This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call.. We will be glad to help.Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc: K D Chia C WU C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-311

ML12359A006

Text

Dear Leon:

Navigation menu

Search