ML12359A006

Rev. 1 to Report 12Q0108.80-R-001,Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Unit 1. Part 3 of 4

ML12359A006
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	11/06/2012
From:	Delaney M Stevenson & Associates
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML123590007	List: ML12359A005 ML12359A006 ML12359A008 RA-12-116, Day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident RS-12-177, Rev. 1 to Report 12Q0108.80-R-001,Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Unit 1. Part 4 of 4
References
RS-12-177 12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev 1
Download: ML12359A006 (163)

Text

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 19.00ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-149

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-20-1A (NZ01A)

Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" - SYS. I Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing X-8X21AL86X6-A See Drawing 4074-5 Sheet 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-001A Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-150

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

P-20-11A (NZO1A)

(5) Horizontal Pumps CORE SPRAY PUMP "X'- SYS. I Photos MG 1021 MG_1023 MG_1 024 C-151

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-20-2A Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-152

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M-j N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-20-2A Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-P-20-002A Rev 1 Anchorage details shown on drawing 4074-4 Rev. 4 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-153

12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-20-2A Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMP NZ03-A Photos MG 0663 MG_0670 MG_0671 C-154

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-3-3A Equipment Class:

(6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

IS, 6.00 ft, 04 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Yes Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-155

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-3-3A Equipment Class:

(6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

Description:

EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Proximity to handrail is not a seismic interaction issue due to the relatively low mass of the handrail.

See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-P-3-003A Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-156

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

P-3-3A (6) Vertical Pumps EMERGENCY SERVICE WATER PUMP 1-1 (52A)

Photos Photos MG_1217 MG_1221 C-157

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

V] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-13 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4,

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-158

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: i-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-13 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-159

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

P-39-13 (5) Horizontal Pumps FUEL OIL PUMP TO DAY TANK T-39-3 Photos Photos MG_1175 MG_1178 C-160

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-17 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-161

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-17 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-162

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

P-39-17 (5) Horizontal Pumps DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP Photo IG_1161 C-163

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

Y] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-19 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-164

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-19 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of.

potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and.found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-165

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-19 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 LEFT BEARING COOLING WATER PUMP Photos MG_1166 MG_1167 C-166

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EiY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-25 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 02 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not Applicable Yes C-167

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P-39-25 Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-M-39-002 Oil leak is Yellow tagged.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-168

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

P-39-25 (5) Horizontal Pumps AC TURBO LUBE OIL PUMP Photo 1205 C-169

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P1-1 8-82 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-170

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EIYJ N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P1-18-82 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments US Guage CO. Figure 1980 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-171

12QO108.80-R-0O1, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

P1-18-82 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SFP COOLING PMP NN01-C DISCHARGE PRESSURE Photos MG_1315 MG_1316 C-172

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PI-305-131\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-173

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PI-305-131\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-174

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status:

N U Equipment ID No.:

PI-305-131\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photo

~IMG 0752 C-175

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PI-305-131\\26-03 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-176

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PI-305-131\\26-03 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-177

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: rYII N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

PI-305-131\\26-03 (0) Other ACCUMULATORS GAS PRESSURE INDICATOR Photos IG_0778 C-178

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet.1 of 3 Status: Mi N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-1 Equipment Class:

(4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

TB, 36.00 ft, 24 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-179

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-1 Equipment Class:

(4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-180

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Ll] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-1 Equipment Class:

(4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

480/120VAC TRANSFORMER TO PROTECTION SYS PANELS 1&2 Photos MG 1103 MG_1106 C-181

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-18-79 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 I Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-182

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-18-79 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments B070 BARKSDALE CONTROL MODEL D1T-M18SS Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-183

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

PS-1 8-79 (18) Instruments on Racks ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-C LOW SUCTION PRESSURE TRIP Photo IG_1304 C-184

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-IA0083A Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes Yes Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-185

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-IA0083A Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108A HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-186

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:

Y] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-IA0083C Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 17 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes Yes Yes C-187

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-IA0083C Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

EMRV NR108C HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK02 Rev 00 Horizontal Hairline linear indications (Cracks) on Drywell exterior behind RK02. Acceptable per review of the guidelines of ACI-349 guidelines.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-188

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-RE0017A Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Isthe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4,

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-189

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M-j N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-RE0017A Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

LOW REACTOR PRESS. SWITCH READIES CORE SPRAY VALVES Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-190

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-RV0046A Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Yes Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-191

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-RV0046A Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) Rev 000 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-PS-RV0046A Rev 0 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-192

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [IIY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

PS-RV0046A Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

DRYWELL HIGH PRESSURE SWITCH-AUTO STARTS PUMPS Photo IMG_0685 C-193

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Ei] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

RK-1 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 15 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-194

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

RK-1 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM 1A,2A INSTRUMENT RACK A,B Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-RK01 Rev 02 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Q

• -I-Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-195

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

RK-3 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-196

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

RK-3 Equipment Class:

(18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

Description:

INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) Rev 000 Missing bolt is addressed in SQUG SEWS (SQ-OC-RK03) and determined to be seismically adequate in the current configuration.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-197

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

RK-3 (18) Instruments on Racks INSTRUMENT RACK RECIRC'N PUMP REACTOR PROTECTION Photos MG_0694 MG_0680 MG_0694 C-198

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

ROTARY INVERTER\\AC Equipment Class:

(13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

OB, 35.00 ft, 05 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes C-199

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

ROTARY INVERTER\\AC Equipment Class:

(13) Motor-Generators Equipment

Description:

AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Horizontal restraint modification is consistent with SQUG SEWS and drawings identified within SEWS.

See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-ROTARY INVERTER\\AC Nearby masonry block Wall is braced. Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-200

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

ROTARY INVERTER\\AC (13) Motor-Generators AC GENERATOR FOR 120V AC SUPPLY FOR CIP-3 Photos MG 1113 MG 1115 MG_1116 MG_1118 C-201

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Ml N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-202

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-203

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

T N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG_0755 C-204

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\06-19 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraqe

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-205

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\06-19 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-206

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\06-19 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IMG_0762 C-207

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\30-03 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-208

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\30-03 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry blockwalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1 302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-209

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\30-03 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 2) (South)

Photo IMG_0817 C-210

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY-N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\30-07 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-211

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\30-07 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-212

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: EiZ] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-117\\30-07 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CHANNEL I SCRAM AIR PILOT SOLENOID VALVE(GROUP 3) (South)

Photo IM G _0802 C-213

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-120\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Yes C-214

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-120\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1,302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1 302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-215

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

SO-305-120\\06-1 5 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo IG_0756 C-216

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-120\\30-03 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Yes Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-217

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-120\\30-03 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-218

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-120\\30-03 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL WITHDRAW SOLENOID VALVE (South)

Photo IMG_0822 C-219

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M-* N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-121\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-220

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-121\\06-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-221

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: []

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

SO-305-121\\06-15 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo MG_0760 C-222

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-121\\06-19 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-223

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

SO-305-121\\06-19 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation's C-1302-225-E310-049, Rev. 0 and C-1302-225-E310-050, Rev. 0 SQ-OC-HCU-305-XX-XX, Rev 1 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-224

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

SO-305-121\\06-19 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves DIRECTIONAL FLOW CONTROL INSERT SOLENOID VALVE (North)

Photo MG_0763 C-225

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-2 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-226

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: EY] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-2 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-T-39-002 Rev 1 Evaluated by:

0 44 Wing Ho Date:

10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-227

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

T-39-2 (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Photos Photos MG_4172 MG_4174 C-228

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-2 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK MrZ A17.r MG_4178 MG_4179 C-229

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-3 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-230

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-3 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 J '*

Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-231

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [-Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-3 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT #1 FUEL OIL DAY TANK Photos MG_1137 MG_1 138 C-232

12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EZI N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-5 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-233

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-5 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-234

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

T-39-5 Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

M-39-1 COOLING WATER TANK Photos MG 1153 MG_1155 MG_1 157 C-235

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

Y] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).

Equipment ID No.:

TI-18-267 Equipment Class:

(19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-236

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

TI-18-267 Equipment Class:

(19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. - Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-237

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

TI-18-267 Equipment Class:

(19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

Description:

ASFP HEAT EXCHANGER NN02C OUTLET TEMPERATURE Photo IMG_1294 C-238

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-15-120 Equipment Class:

(7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 08 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-239

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [FYi N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-15-120 Equipment Class:

(7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with BS&B Service Instruction Manual for Diaphram Control Valves NS 106 page 2 See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0120 Rev 0 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-240

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-1 5-120 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE HDR VENT VALVE(NC53-A)

Photo AG_0834 C-241

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-15-133 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 13 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-242

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M-l N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-15-133 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments The Valve is Consistant with Flowserve Drawing 94-16252 Rev D See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-15-0133 Rev 0 RTD for V-6-2917 touches valve V-1 5-133. Not an operability issue due to the relative low mass od V-6-2917 and the brass piping which is highly ductile. IR 01403039 Documents-Seismic interaction between valves V-15-133 and V-6-2917.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-243

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: EIII N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-15-133 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves NORTH SCRAM DISCHG VOLUME DRAIN VALVE(NC52-A)

Photos MG 0714 MG_0715 MG 0716 C-244

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-17-1 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP A' PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 38.00 ft, 22 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-245

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-17-1 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP 'A' PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Drawing 93-14360 Rev c Evaluated by:

ID"'$

Wing Ho Date:

10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-246

12QO108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-17-1 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP A PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos KMr, A1A9 MG_4183 MG_4184 C-247

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-17-212 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 23 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-248

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-17-212 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

SDC LOOP'A' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments SEE CONVAL DRAWING 10G2-105 REV B Evaluated by:

Wing Ho Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-249

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-1 7-212 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves SDC LOOPA' OUTLET HEADER VENT VALVE Photos Photos MG_4194 MG_4195 C-250

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [-fl N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-112 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-251

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-112 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ASFP COOLING PUMP NN01-D CASING VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-252

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-18-112 (0) Other ASFP COOLING PUMP NNO1-D CASING VENT VALVE Photo Photo MG_1308 C-253

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EiY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-1266 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-254

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: MZ N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-1266 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

3" Globe Valve Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-255

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-1266 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

FUEL POOL MAKEUP ISOLATION VALVE Photo IMG_1258 C-256

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-19 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-257

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-19 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1 302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12

-Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-258

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: -N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-1 8-19 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL COOLING OUTLET VALVE Photos MG_1264 MG_1265 C-259

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-2 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-260

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-2 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-261

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-18-2 (0) Other AUGMENTED SPENT FUEL POOL SYSTEM INLET VALVE Photos MG_1300 MG_1302 C-262

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-3 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-263

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

Y N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-3 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-264

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

Yi] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-3 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

SFP COOLING PUMP (NN01-A) SUCTION ISOLATION VALVE Photo 1

C-265

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-1 8-47 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-266

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-47 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Calculation C-1302-251-5320-011 Dated 25 Sept 1984 See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-267

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-18-47 (0) Other DRAIN FROM REACTOR WELL BACK TO FUEL POOL PUMPS Photo MG_1249 C-268

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-74 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-269

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-74 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-270

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-74 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTE FUEL POOL CLG PUMP NN01-D DISCHARGE VALVE Photos IMG_1296 IMG_1297 C-271

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

Y N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-80 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-272

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: [Y-N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-80 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

P1-18-88 ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 JSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-273

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-1 8-80 (0) Other P-1-i8-88 ISOLATION VALVE Photo MG_1313 C-274

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-1 8-81 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-275

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-81 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

PS-18-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-276

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: MI-N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-18-81 (0) Other PS-1 8-0080 ISOLATION ROOT VALVE Photo IG_1306 C-277

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-88 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-278

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-88 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes Comments Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-279

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status:

Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-I 8-88 (0) Other AUGMENTED FPC SYSTEM VENT VALVE Photo MG_1319 C-280

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-92 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 75.00 ft, 21 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-281

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-18-92 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Leakage is tagged.

In-line equipment.

See calculation C-1 302-255-E310-005, Rev 000 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-282

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-i 8-92 (0) Other AUGMENTED FUEL POOL CLG THROTTLE VALVE Photos MG_1261 MG_1262 C-283

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-12 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-284

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: EiY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-12 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In-line equipment.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0012 Rev 0 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-285

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-12 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE(SYSTEM I)

Photo IMG_0657 C-286

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 51.00 ft, 06 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-287

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Mi N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Minor leakage.

See Seismic Qualification SQ-OC-V-20-0015 Rev 0 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-288

12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: E N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-15 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

"A" CONTAINMENT ISO. VALVE - SYS. I Photo IMG_0655 C-289

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-3 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 19.00 ft, 18 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-290

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-3 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing 2065-5 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-291

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-20-3 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CORE SPRAY PUMP "A" SUCTION VALVE FROM TORUS Photos MG_1029 MG_1032 C-292

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Mi N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-21-75 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 19.00 ft, 19 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-293

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-21-75 Equipment Class:

(8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Drawing W8321853 Rev A Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-294

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

V-21-75 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR TORUS WATER CLEAN-UP Photo MG_1041 C-295

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-109 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-296

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-109 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 In-Line equipment Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 SSeth Baker 10/10/12 C-297

12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: l N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-109 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP SUCTION VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1172 MG_1173 C-298

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-110 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 23.00 ft, 01 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-299

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-110 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See SQ-OC-M-39-001 Rev 06 Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-300

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-110 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

EDG1 PRIMING PUMP DISCHARGE VALVE Photos MG 1170 MG_1172 MG 1173 C-301

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-2 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG BLDG, 18.00 ft, 03 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-302

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-2 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by:

Wing Ho Date:

10/10/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-303

12Q0108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

V-39-2 Equipment Class:

(0) Other Equipment

Description:

ISOLATION VALVE FOR TANK T-39-002 OUTLET Photos IMU _41ti IMUi 41b5i C-304

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 4 Status:

N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

VACP-1 Equipment Class:

(14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-305

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

VACP-1 Equipment Class:

(14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yes

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments See Seismic Qualification No. SQ-OC-VACP-1, Rev 0 Anchor bolts behind panel verified by touch.

Above panel is far enough away and has rigid enough support to preclude interaction.

Calculation C-1302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/10/12 J'"t Seth Baker 10/10/12 C-306

12QO108.80-R-O01, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

VACP-1 Equipment Class:

(14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ Photos MG_0929 MG_0931 C-307

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

VACP-1 XF Equipment Class:

(4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Project:

Oyster Creek SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 23.00 ft, 10 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-308

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

VACP-1 XF Equipment Class:

(4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Equipment was verified as consistent with SQ-OC-VACP-1 XFMR, Rev. 0 Calculation C-1 302X-322C-A06 qualifies the Oyster Creek safety-related masonry walls for seismic to address NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Evaluated by:

Mark Etre Date:

10/15/12 Seth Baker 10/15/12 C-309

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

VACP-1 XF Equipment Class:

(4) Transformers Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL TRANSFORMER 480/208/120V Photos IMU. Uzu IMG_0921 C-310

12Q0108.80-R-001, Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-177 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: MI N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

VACP-1 Equipment Class:. (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

120V VITAL AC POWER PANEL 208/120V,3PH,4W,60HZ SQUG SEWS 4

ESASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED TwO WOd-Tra6e Center New York, NY 10048 April 29, 1981 GPU Services Incorporated Attention: Mr. Leon Garibian 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Leon:

Re:

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR STATION FINAL SUBMITTAL OF MASONRY WALL EVALUATION CALCULATION BOOKS I am sending to you together with this letter, 20 volumes of calculation books and 11 volumes of computer output.

This will mark the end of our involvement for the re-evaluation of the Safety-Related Concrete Masonry Walls as required by NRC IE Bulletin 80-11.

Should you have any questions regarding the calculations and sketches, please do not hestitate to call.. We will be glad to help.

Very truly yours, E Odar Assistant Chief Civil Engineer GW:dl cc:

K D Chia C WU C1302X322CA06 VOL 1, 19810427, REEVALUATION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALL NRC IE BULLETIN 80-11 GENERAL C-311