ML120250057

Meeting Slides Process Protection System Replacement LAR Acceptance Review Meeting Presentation

ML120250057
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	01/18/2012
From:	Shannon Patterson, Schrader K, Seaman S, Shaffer R Pacific Gas & Electric Co, Invensys Operations Management, Westinghouse
To:	Plant Licensing Branch IV
lynch steven, nrr/dpr, 415-1524
Shared Package
ML120250048	List: ML120250057 ML120250079
References
TAC ME7522, TAC ME7523
Download: ML120250057 (18)

Text

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR DIGITAL REPLACEMENT OF PROCESS PROTECTION SYSTEM January 18, 2012 Scott B. Patterson, PE Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Avila Beach, CA 805-545-4082 Ken Schrader 11 Ken Schrader Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Avila Beach, CA 805-545-4328 Steve Seaman Westinghouse Cranberry, PA 412-374-2206 Roman Shaffer Invensys Operations Management Lake Forest, CA 949-638-8828

Status of ALS Platform Development Westinghouse)

All open items from the NRC Acceptance Letter will be addressed in the response to the letter Use of tools for producing and testing FPGAs Explanation in the Documentation package that has 2

Explanation in the Documentation package that has been submitted Issues identified in audits are being closed Schedule for (any) documentation changes will be included in the response to the NRC Acceptance Letter

Status of ALS Platform Development and FAT (Westinghouse)

First set of documentation - May 2012 Factory Acceptance Test Test E ec tion No ember 2012 3

Test Execution - November 2012 Final Documentation - December 2012

Status of Tricon V10 Platform Development and FAT (Invensys)

Development of DCPP PPS Tricon HDD release in March 2012 SDD release in April 2012 Application Code release in May 2012 4

Application Code release in May 2012 Code Verification completed August 2012 FAT Schedule Dry-Run September 2012 Official run December 2012

PG&E Observations on Effectiveness of ISG-06 to Prepare LAR ISG 6 - Licensing process for Digital I&C System Reviews Allows formal interface with staff on initial digital I&C 5

design and formal staff feedback in meeting minutes Diablo Canyon is pilot plant for use of ISG 6 PG&E held four Phase 0 meetings prior to submittal 2 meetings for diversity, 1 for communications, 1 for LAR PG&E submitted pilot application 10/26/11

PG&E Observations on Effectiveness of ISG-06 to Prepare LAR Staff feedback on initial design was extremely helpful to finalize design, and to minimize risk that a requirement will not be met for proposed design 6

PG&E found ISG 6 to be an excellent roadmap for all requirements and criteria that need to be addressed in LAR

PG&E Global Comments on ISG-06 ISG 6 is oriented toward complete upgrades to protection systems and does not address when a portion of a protection system or safeguards support system is upgraded ISG 6 i i

t d t d

tiliti b

itti LAR 7

ISG 6 is oriented toward utilities submitting LARs and is less well suited for vendors submitting platform Topical Reports PG&E believes ISG 6 will facilitate increased utility requests for protection system upgrades Increased safety to nuclear safety systems

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06

ISG-06 does not provide specific guidance on the level of detail of information to be provided for Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 applications

Reference to information in vendor topic report, versus summary of vendor topical report information 8

versus summary of vendor topical report information, versus providing all vendor information

PG&E requested staff input on level of detail to be provided during the Phase 0 meetings

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06

ISG-06 Section D.1, System Description describes NRC expectations for description of the new system, but does not contain provisions for description of the safety functions that must be performed

The DCPP LAR submittal inserted a new Section 4 1 9

The DCPP LAR submittal inserted a new Section 4.1, PPS Overview, which described the safety functions performed by the Reactor Trip System and Engineered Safeguards Feature Actuation System. This caused the renumbering of subsequent sections.

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06

There is some overlap in the documentation submitted for the Software Safety Plan (D.4.4.1.9), Vulnerability Assessment (D.12.4.1) and SDOE (D.12.2) 10 10 10

Discussions with the vendors were needed to make sure ISG-06 guidance was met

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06

SDS and SDD are equivalent per ISG-06 Enclosure F

D.4.4.3.3 (Enclosure B item 1.13) describes the SDS ISG 06 SDS d i ti t h SDD 11 11 11 ISG-06 SDS description matches SDD functionality per IEEE-1012-1998 SDS is developed from the SRS (Enclosure B Item 1.12; described in D.4.4.3.1)

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06

NUREG/CR-6101 guidance appears more oriented to text-based languages than Function Block Diagrams (FBD)

FBD Custom Function Blocks are collection(s) of programming language statements, which are compiled as a unit, verified and validated once, then used repetitively. Analogous to NUREG/CR 6101 Modules or Subroutines 12 12 12 NUREG/CR-6101 Modules or Subroutines.

FBD Programs are collection(s) of programming language statements, possibly including subroutines, which (are) compiled as a unit Analogous to NUREG/CR-6101 Modules.

FBD Applications are collection(s) of one or more modules, including both application modules and operating system library modules, that (are) capable of independent execution in a computer... Analogous to NUREG/CR-6101 Load Modules.

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06

FBD show exactly how the software requirements will be implemented in software modules and processes

Could a properly documented FBD Program listing be used in lieu of a SDS/SDD to simplify V&V and 13 13 13 be used in lieu of a SDS/SDD to simplify V&V and NRC Review?

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06 The PG&E ISG-06 Enclosure B Matrix submittal resolves terminology differences for the LAR LAR Section 4.5:

DCPP SyVVP (4.5.6.1) and SyQAP (4.5.3.1) follow 14 y

(

)

y

(

)

IEEE 1012-1998: SRS and SDD.

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06 LAR Section 4.5.10:

Triconex SRS submittal (4.5.10.1)

Provides information equivalent to SDS described in ISG-06.

SDD will be available for audit V10 Platform documents submitted separately 15

V10 Platform documents submitted separately

993754-809 Rev 0 10/27/2011 DCPP Application Westinghouse SDS submittal (4.5.10.2)

6002-0011 Rev 6 ML110600671 Platform

6116-0011 Rev 0 9/12/2011 DCPP Application

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06 Per ISG 6 Phase 1 Software Design Specification (SDS) and the Software Test Plan (STP) are documents from the Design Phase Should SDS/SDD and STP be moved to 16 16 16 Phase 2?

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06 The following ISG-06 sections do not appear in the Enclosure B Phase 1 table:

D.9.4.2.1 IEEE-603 Clause 5.1, Single Failure D.9.4.2.2 IEEE-603 Clause 5.2, Completion of Protective Action 17 17 17 Protective Action D.9.4.2.3 IEEE-603 Clause 5.3, Quality D.9.4.2.12 IEEE-603 Clause 5.12, Auxiliary Features D.9.4.3.1 IEEE-603 Clause 6.1, Automatic Controls D.10.4.2.8 IEEE 7-4.3.2 Clause 5.8, Information Displays D.10.4.2.11 IEEE 7-4.3.2 Clause 5.11, Identification

PG&E Specific Comments on ISG-06 ISG-06 Enclosure B Phase 2 Item 2.13, As-Manufactured Logic Diagrams, refers to ISG-06 Section D.9.2 that is System Description (to block diagram level) and is not related to logic diagrams More appropriate reference section may be D.4.4.3.5, S

t B ild D t

D 9 4 2 2 IEEE 603 Cl 18 18 18 System Build Documents, D.9.4.2.2, IEEE 603 Clause 5.2, Completion of Protective Action, and D.9.4.4.3, IEEE 7-4.3.2, Clause 7.3, completion of Protective Action, that discuss logic diagrams