ML11263A042

E-mail with Attachment from D. Doyle, NRR, to L. Stevenson, Adm Et Al, on Hope Creek/Salem Dseis

ML11263A042
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	10/21/2010
From:	Dan Doyle Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Stevenson L Office of Administration
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0113
Download: ML11263A042 (2)

Text

Doyle, Daniel From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 8:18 AM I

To: Stevenson, Linda Cc: Perkins, Leslie

Subject:

FW: Hope Creek/Salem DSEIS Attachments: Draft NUREG 1437 Vol 1 Sup 45 page x.pdf Importance: High Categories: Salem Hope Creek

Linda, Here is the corrected page x for the Salem and Hope Creek draft SEIS.

Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.dovle(anrc.,ov (301) 415-3748 From: Perkins, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 5:17 PM To: Doyle, Daniel

Subject:

Hope Creek/Salem DSEIS Importance: High

Dan, Linda found one more correction that needs to be made:

On Contents page x, at 8.1.1, correct to page 8-4.

I made the change is the word version. If you can swap the page first thing in the morning, then I can email Linda the corrected page and get it to Guy Belts.

Thanks again for assistance.

Leslie Perkins Project Manager Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-2375 77

Table of Contents 1 5.3.2 Estimate of Risk ...................................................................................... 5-5 2 5.3.3 Potential Plant Im provements ................................................................. 5-8 3 5.3.4 Evaluation of Risk Reduction and Costs of Improvements ..................... 5-9 4 5.3.5 Cost-Benefit Com parison ................................................................. 5- 10 5 5.3.6 Conclusions .......................................................................................... 5-13 6 5.4 References ....................................................................................................... 5-13 7 6.0 Environmental Impacts of the Uranium Fuel Cycle and Solid Waste Management ....... 6-1 8 6.1 The Uranium Fuel Cycle ..................................................................................... 6-1 9 6.2 Greenhouse Gas Em issions ............................................................................... 6-2 10 6.2.1 Existing Studies ...................................................................................... 6-2 11 6.2.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 6-8 12 6.3 References ......................................................................................................... 6-9 13 7.0 Environm ental Im pacts of Decom m issioning ................................................................. 7-1 14 7.1 References ......................................................................................................... 7-1 15 8.0 Environmental Im pacts of Alternatives ........................................................................... 8-1 16 8.1 Alternative Energy Sources ................................................................................ 8-3 17 8.1.1 Supercritical Coal-Fired Generation ....................................................... 8-4 18 8.1.1.1 Air Quality ................................................................................. 8-5 19 8.1.1.2 Groundwater Use and Quality .................................................. 8-9 20 8.1.1.3 Surface W ater Use and Quality ............................................. 8-10 21 8.1.1.4 Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology ............................................. 8-10 22 8.1.1.5 Hum an Health ........................................................................ 8-11 23 8.1.1.6 Socioeconom ics ..................................................................... 8-12 24 8.1.1.7 W aste Management ............................................................... 8-16 25 8.1.2 Natural Gas Com bined-Cycle Generation ............................................ 8-17 26 8.1.2.1 Air Quality ............................................................................... 8-18 27 8.1.2.2 Groundwater Use and Quality ................................................ 8-20 28 8.1.2.3 Surface W ater Use and Quality ............................................. 8-21 29 8.1.2.4 Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology ............................................. 8-21 30 8.1.2.5 Hum an Health ........................................................................ 8-22 31 8.1.2.6 Socioeconom ics ..................................................................... 8-23 32 8.1.2.7 W aste Management ............................................................... 8-26 33 8.1.3 Com bination Alternative ........................................................................ 8-27 34 8.1.3.1 Air Q uality .............................................................................. 8-28 35 8.1.3.2 Groundwater Use and Quality ................................................ 8-29 36 8.1.3.3 Surface W ater Use and Quality ............................................. 8-29 37 8.1.3.4 Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology ............................................. 8-29 38 8.1.3.5 Hum an Health ........................................................................ 8-30 39 8.1.3.6 Socioeconom ics ..................................................................... 8-30 40 8.1.3.7 W aste Management ............................................................... 8-34 41 8.2 Alternatives Considered But Dism issed ........................................................... 8-35 42 8.2.1 Offsite Coal- and Natural Gas-Fired ..................................................... 8-35 43 8.2.2 New Nuclear ......................................................................................... 8-35 44 8.2.3 Energy Conservation/Energy Effi ciency ............................................... 8-36 Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 45 X October 2010