|
---|
Category:Calculation
MONTHYEARML22087A5002022-03-28028 March 2022 And Palisades Nuclear Power Plant - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) -- Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc ML18152A9312018-05-30030 May 2018 Attachment 5: Second Level Undervoltage Relay Setpoint Calculation ML18152A9322018-05-30030 May 2018 Attachment 6: Second Level Undervoltage Time Delay Relays 162-153 and 162-154 Uncertainty Analysis PNP 2018-010, Attachment 8: LOCA with Offsite Power Available Calculation2018-05-30030 May 2018 Attachment 8: LOCA with Offsite Power Available Calculation PNP 2018-020, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and Big Rock Point ISFSI - Attachment 2, 2017 Radioactive Effluent Release Report2017-12-18018 December 2017 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and Big Rock Point ISFSI - Attachment 2, 2017 Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML18113A2472017-10-31031 October 2017 Enclosure 1 to Pnp 2018-020, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 28 and Revision 29 ML18152A9342017-05-17017 May 2017 Attachment 7: 0098-0189-CALC-OO1, Revision 1, Palisades Slur Time Delay Calculation PNP 2015-076, Relief Request Number RR 4-24 - Proposed Alternative, Use of Alternate ASME Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination2015-09-26026 September 2015 Relief Request Number RR 4-24 - Proposed Alternative, Use of Alternate ASME Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination ML15190A2652015-05-11011 May 2015 1400669.323, Rev. 0, Crack Growth Analysis of the Cold Leg Bounding Nozzle ML15190A2642015-05-11011 May 2015 1400669.313, Rev. 0, Crack Growth Analysis of the Hot Leg Drain Nozzle ML15190A2692015-05-0505 May 2015 1400669.322, Rev. 0, Cold Leg Bounding Nozzle Weld Residual Stress Analysis ML15190A2682015-05-0505 May 2015 1400669.312, Rev. 0, Hot Leg Drain Nozzle Weld Residual Stress Analysis ML15190A2672015-04-0303 April 2015 1400669.320, Rev. 0, Finite Element Model Development for the Cold Leg Drain, Spray and Charging Nozzles ML15190A2662015-03-0909 March 2015 1400669.310, Rev. 0, Finite Element Model for Hot Leg Drain Nozzle ML14301A2552014-10-24024 October 2014 Sargent and Lundy Calculation No. 2007-20168, Revision 00, Palisades Weld Flaw Analysis for Loaded Spent Fuel Cask Msb No. 4. ML14301A2542014-10-24024 October 2014 Calculation No. 1200250.301, Revision 1, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation of Spent Fuel Cask MSB#4 for Palisades Power Plant. ML14099A1612014-04-0404 April 2014 Calculation No. CPC-06Q-303, Revision 1, Analysis of Hypothetical Flaws in VSC-24 Shell and Bottom Plate ML14099A1692014-04-0404 April 2014 Calculation No. 1200250.301, Revision 0, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation of Spent Fuel Cask MSB#4 for Palisades Power Plant ML14070A3422014-03-0606 March 2014 Enclosure 2 - Calculation 1200895.307, Rev. 0, Hot Leg Drain Nozzle Crack Growth Analyses ML14070A3432014-03-0606 March 2014 Enclosure 3 - Calculation 1200895.308, Rev. 0, Hot Leg Drain Nozzle Limit Load Analyses for Flawed Nozzle-to-Hot Leg Weld ML14070A3412014-03-0606 March 2014 Enclosure 1 - Calculation 1200895.306, Rev. 0, Hot Leg Drain Nozzle Weld Residual Stress Analysis and Circumferential Crack Stress Intensity Factor Determination ML1212302952012-04-30030 April 2012 Reply to Request for Additional Information Relief Request - Proposed Alternative - Use of Alternate ASME Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination ML11339A1002011-11-30030 November 2011 Calculation EA-EC31177-01, Rev. 0, Calculation of Overspeed Trip Mechanism Linkage Forces ML1012702802010-01-12012 January 2010 Enclosure 1, Palisades Nuclear Plant, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 23 ML0726801922007-09-14014 September 2007 NAI Report Release - NAI-1 149-018, Rev. 2, Palisades Design Basis Main Steam Line Break AST Radiological Analysis, Revised Calculations ML0726801912007-09-14014 September 2007 NAI Report Release - NAI-1149-002, Rev. 1, Determination of Atmospheric Dispersion Factors for Palisades, Enclosure 2, Revised Calculations ML0722504072007-08-10010 August 2007 Supplement to Request for Relief from ASME Section XI Code Requirements for Repair of Service Water Pipe ML0721305032007-07-31031 July 2007 Request for Relief from ASME Section XI Code Requirements for Repair of Service Water System Pipe ML0716302492007-04-19019 April 2007 Areva Calculation, 51-5049676-002, Palisades Vent Line Nozzle Repair Analysis Summary, April 2007 IR 05000496/19760022007-04-19019 April 2007 Areva Calculation, 51-5049676-002, Palisades Vent Line Nozzle Repair Analysis Summary, April 2007 ML0632602042006-10-19019 October 2006 NMC Calculation (Doc) No: EA-EC7408-02, Revision 0, Re-evaluation of Slope Stability Under ISFSI Pad for Revised Load Due to 24PTH System. ML0628304472006-09-14014 September 2006 NAI Report Release, Calculation NAI-1149-014, Revision 3, Palisades Design Basis AST Mha/Loca Radiological Analysis. ML0628304502006-09-13013 September 2006 NAI Report Release, NAI-1149-024, Revision 3, Determination of Direct Shine Doses for a Design Basis LOCA for Palisades. ML0702306222006-06-28028 June 2006 to VSC-03.3606, Criticality Analysis for Transport of the Palisades Msbs in the Fuelsolutions TS125 Cask. ML0619202402006-06-23023 June 2006 Calculation EA-EC976-09, Determine Post-LOCA Sodium Hydroxide Amount. ML0628304652006-06-0808 June 2006 NAI Report Release, Calculation NAI-1149-015, Revision 2, Palisades Design Basis Control Rod Ejection AST Radiological Analysis. ML0628304592006-06-0808 June 2006 NAI Report Release, Calculation NAI-1149-018, Revision 1, Palisades Design Basis Main Steam Line Break AST Radiological Analysis. ML0628304522006-06-0808 June 2006 NAI Report Release, NAI-1180-002, Revision 2, LOCA Direct Shine Doses from the SIRWT for Palisades. ML0702306142006-01-23023 January 2006 to VSC-03.3605, Palisades Msb Transportation Fuel Depletion Analysis. ML0628304622006-01-18018 January 2006 NAI Report Release, Calculation NAI-1149-019, Revision 1, Palisades Design Basis Steam Generator Tube Rupture AST Radiological Analysis. ML0628304282005-07-19019 July 2005 NAI Report Release, Calculation, NAI-1149-001, Revision 2, Source Terms for Palisades Dose Calculations. ML0712903532005-07-0606 July 2005 Rev. 20 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ML0628304692005-06-22022 June 2005 NAI Report Release, Calculation NAI-1149-026, Revision 0, Design Basis Cask Drop Accident AST Radiological Analysis. ML0517503182005-06-21021 June 2005 Enclosure 4, Proposed Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.68(b)(1), Spent Fuel Pool Dilution Analysis ML0517503162005-06-21021 June 2005 Enclosure 3, Proposed Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.68(b)(1), Criticality Analysis, Calculation 11030-01, Rev 0 ML0628304562005-06-17017 June 2005 NAI Report Release, Calculation NAI-1149-016, Revision 1, Palisades Design Basis Fuel Handling Accident AST Radiological Analysis. ML0628304432005-06-0909 June 2005 NAI Report Release, Calculation NAI-1149-001, Revision 0, Primary Coolant Source Term Determination for Palisades Dose Calculations. ML0628304672005-06-0909 June 2005 NAI Report Release, Calculation NAI-1149-001, Revision 0, Design Basis Small Line Break Outside Containment AST Radiological Analysis. ML0802906742005-04-12012 April 2005 EA-ELEC08-001, Rev. 12, Uncertainty Calculation for Secondary Calorimetric Heat Balance. ML0434503572004-12-0707 December 2004 Framatome Calculation, Areva Document 32-5054514-01, Palisades CRDM Nozzle Idtb Weld Repair Analysis, December 2004 2022-03-28
[Table view] Category:Exemption from NRC Requirements
MONTHYEARML24075A3032024-04-19019 April 2024 Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 (EPID L-2023-LLE-0078 (Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting)) ML23191A1422024-01-0404 January 2024 FRN - Palisades Nuclear Plant Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(W)(1) Concerning Onsite Property Damage Insurance ML23192A1012023-12-28028 December 2023 FRN - Palisades Offsite Insurance Exemption 140.11(a)(4) ML23342A2132023-12-27027 December 2023 FRN Related to Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements ML23192A0772023-12-26026 December 2023 Letter Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 140.11(a)(4) Concerning Offsite Primary and Secondary Liability Insurance ML23191A5222023-12-22022 December 2023 – Exemption Letter from the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(W)(1) Concerning Onsite Property Damage Insurance (EPID - L-2022-LLE-0032) ML23263A9772023-12-22022 December 2023 – Exemption from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements and Related Safety Evaluation PNP 2023-033, Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-12-0606 December 2023 Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation PNP 2022-026, Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1) Concerning Onsite Property Damage Insurance2022-10-26026 October 2022 Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1) Concerning Onsite Property Damage Insurance ML22227A0082022-08-12012 August 2022 Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10CFR50.47(b), 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2), and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV PNP 2022-017, Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b); 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2); and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E2022-07-11011 July 2022 Request for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b); 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2); and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E ML21286A5062021-12-13013 December 2021 Exemption - Palisades Dtf Exemption - ML21195A3672021-11-23023 November 2021 Exemption-Palisades Nuclear Plant (Pnp) Record Retention-L-2021-LLE-0033 ML21195A3722021-11-23023 November 2021 Partial Exemption from Record Retention Requirements ML20358A2392020-12-23023 December 2020 Request for Exemptions from 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) and 10 CFR 50.75(h)(1)(iv) ML20308A6072020-12-0909 December 2020 Temporary Exemption from Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Frequency Requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section Iv.F (EPID L-2020-LLE-0155 (COVID-19)) ML20330A0002020-12-0303 December 2020 Exemption from Annual Force-on-Force Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, General Criteria for Security Personnel, Subsection VI.C.3(I)(1) (EPID L-2020-LLE-0190 (COVID-19)) PNP 2020-037, Request for a One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 73, Appendix B, Section VI, Subsection C.3.(I)(1) Regarding Annual Force-on-Force (FOF) Exercises, Due to Covid 19 Pandemic2020-11-12012 November 2020 Request for a One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 73, Appendix B, Section VI, Subsection C.3.(I)(1) Regarding Annual Force-on-Force (FOF) Exercises, Due to Covid 19 Pandemic PNP 2020-033, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-30030 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic ML20243A0002020-09-23023 September 2020 FRN - Notice of Issuance of Multiple Exemptions Regarding Various Parts of 10 CFR Due to COVID-19 Impacts for August 2020 ML17219A1562017-10-11011 October 2017 Exemption from Provisions in 10 CFR 73.55 to Allow Licensed Senior Operator or Certified Fuel Handler to Approve Suspension of Security Measures in Emergency or During Severe Weather (CAC No. MF9876; EPID L-2017-LLE-0016) ML17216A8022017-10-11011 October 2017 Letter, Exemption from Provisions in 10 CFR 73.55 to Allow Licensed Senior Operator or Certified Fuel Handler to Approve Suspension of Security Measures in Emergency or During Severe Weather (CAC MF9876; EPID L-2017-LLE-0016) NRC-2017-0207, Exemption from Provisions in 10 CFR 73.55 to Allow Licensed Senior Operator or Certified Fuel Handler to Approve Suspension of Security Measures in Emergency or During Severe Weather (CAC No. MF9876; EPID L-2017-LLE-0016)2017-10-11011 October 2017 Exemption from Provisions in 10 CFR 73.55 to Allow Licensed Senior Operator or Certified Fuel Handler to Approve Suspension of Security Measures in Emergency or During Severe Weather (CAC No. MF9876; EPID L-2017-LLE-0016) NRC-2010-0127, Palisades: Exemption - Federal Register Notice2010-03-25025 March 2010 Palisades: Exemption - Federal Register Notice ML1006801532010-03-25025 March 2010 Schedule Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 ML1006802182010-03-25025 March 2010 Exemption - Federal Register Notice ML0625601792006-10-0505 October 2006 Exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 & Appendix K Re Use of M5 Fuel Cladding ML0526400152005-10-0606 October 2005 Exemption from 10 CFR 50.68, Criticality Accident Requirements, for Loading of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Casks ML0527003752005-09-20020 September 2005 Supplement to Exemption Request from 10 CFR 72.2212(b)(7) 10 CFR 72.212(b)(2)(i)(A), and 10 CFR 72.214 ML0528400462005-08-22022 August 2005 Exemption from 10 CFR 72.212(b)(7), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(2)(i)(A), and 10 CFR 72.214 ML0517503162005-06-21021 June 2005 Enclosure 3, Proposed Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.68(b)(1), Criticality Analysis, Calculation 11030-01, Rev 0 ML0517503122005-06-21021 June 2005 Exemption from 10 CFR 50.68(b)(1) for the Palisades Nuclear Plant 2024-04-19
[Table view] |
Text
ENCLOSURE 3 PROPOSED EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50.68(b)(1)
Criticality Analysis 7 Pages Follow
UNCONTROLLED At ACaic. Form 3.2-1 No.: 11030-01 TRANSNUCLEAR Calculation Cover Sheet Rev. No.: 0 Calculation
Title:
Boron Dilution Criticality Analysis for I NUHOMS@-32PT with CE I 5x1 5 Fuel Page: _ of 1 Project No.: 11030 DCR No.:
Project Name: NUHOMS -32PT for Palisades Number of CDs attached: I All the computer cases, spreadsheets and calculation related documents l lare included In the attached CD.l If original Issue, Is Licensing Review per TIP 3.5 required?
ED No (explain) El Yes Licensing Review No._ _
This calculation does not Involve any changes to the design of the NUHOMS-32PT DSC. Moreover, the results of the calculation will be utilized to demonstrate compliance with the applicable section of I0CFR50.68. Therefore, a 10CFR72.48 review Is not required.
Software utilized: SCALE-PC Version: 4.4 Calculation Is complete Originator's Signature: A j Date:06-03-2005 Calculation has been checked for consistency, completeness, and correctness Checker Signature: M::) 3 Date: 'Ps/31or Calculation Is approved for use_ w Project Engineer Signature: Dae 04/03^
A ICalc. No.: 11030-01 TRANSNUCLEAR Calculation Rev. No.: 0 Page: 2 i of i 11 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this calculation package is to determine the minimum soluble boron concentration (SBC) required to maintain subcriticality of the NUHOMS'@-32PT DSC loaded with 32 CE 15x15 fuel assemblies following a boron dilution event. An initial SBC of 2500 ppm was utilized to determine the final boron concentration levels. This calculation is performed for the NUHOMS-32PT DSC with 16 poison plates and no poison rod assemblies (PRAs) with a maximum initial enrichment of 3.5 wt. % U-235. These results are not applicable to the 24 poison plate configuration. The NUHOMS-32PT DSC is not authorized to store CE 15x15 class fuel assemblies with PRAs.
2.0 References 2.1 SCALE-4.4, Modular Code System for Performing Standardized Computer Analysis for Licensing Evaluation for Workstations and Personal Computers, CCC-545, ORNL.
2.2 E-20896, "Test Plan for Qualifying of the SCALE-4.4 Computer Program on the Transnuclear PC with Windows XP."
2.3 E-20897, "Test Report for Qualification of the SCALE-4.4 Computer Program on the Transnuclear PC with Windows XP."
2.4 Transnuclear calculation NUH32PT.0600, Rev. 1, 'NUHOMSk-32PT Transportable Dry Shielded Canister Criticality Analysis."
2.5 Transnuclear calculation 11021 -01, Rev. 0, 'Criticality Analysis of the NUHOMS`-32PT with 16 Poison/Aluminum Plates."
2.6 Transnuclear calculation NUH32PT.0606, Rev. 0, "NUHOMS@-32PT Transportable Dry Shielded Canister Criticality Analysis."
2.7 Letter from Suzanne Leblang, NMC to Glenn Guerra, TN, 'Request for Technical Support - Minimum Boron Criticality Analysis," No. dfs-tn-05-042, dated May 31 s52005.
2.8 CSAS25 input and output files and EXCEL spreadsheets listed in this calculation.
2.9 Transnuclear Calculation 10499-01, Rev. 0, "Boron Dilution Criticality Analysis for NUHOMSS -32PT."
pi I Calc. No.: 11030-01 TRANSNUCLEAR Calculation Rev. No. 0 Page: 3 of I 11 3.0 Methodology, Design Inputs and Assumptions 3.1 Methodology The CSAS25 control module of SCALE4.4 (Ref. [2.1]) computer code with 44 Group ENDF-V cross section library is used to calculate the effective multiplication factor (keff) of the fuel in the NUHOMSe-32PT DSC. The CSAS25 control module allows simplified data input to the functional modules BONAMI-S, NITAWL-S, and KENO V.a.
These modules process the required cross sections and calculate the keff of the system.
BONAMI-S performs resonance self-shielding calculations for nuclides that have Bondarenko data associated with their cross sections. NITAWL-S applies a Nordheim resonance self-shielding correction to nuclides having resonance parameters. Finally, KENO V.a calculates the keg of a three-dimensional system. A sufficiently large number of neutron histories are run so that the standard deviation is below 0.0010 for all calculations.
The final keft that is calculated represents the maximum value of the effective multiplication factor with a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (95/95). Therefore, the "worst case" keff values from the CSAS25 output are adjusted for uncertainty, such that:
2 keff = kkeno + 0'keno A similar calculation - boron dilution criticality analysis for CE 14x14 fuel assemblies, is documented in reference [2.9]. The calculation methodology employed in reference [2.9] is adapted in this calculation.
3.2 Design Inputs The NUHOMS-32PT DSC is designed to store 32 intact PWR fuel assemblies with and without BPRAs (or other non-fuel assembly hardware). A detailed discussion of the design of the NUHOMSe-32PT system is provided in reference [2.4]. All applicable design inputs are identical to those in reference [2.4]. The design basis criticality analysis based on a change in the number and orientation of the poison/aluminum chevrons in the basket is documented in reference [2.5]. The criticality analyses to determine the maximum enrichment as a function of SBC is documented in reference [2.6].
The criteria for subcriticality is obtained from reference [2.7] and is equal to the Upper Subcritical Limit (USL, 0.9411) utilized in reference [2.4], [2.5] and [2.6] without the subcriticality margin of 0.05. The condition for subcriticality is shown below:
keff S 0.9411 (USL) + 0.05 (margin for subcriticality) s 0.9911
A Caic. No.: 11030-01 TRANSNUCLEAR Calculation Rev. No.: 0 Page: 4 of I 11 The maximum initial enrichment for CE 15x15 fuel assemblies at an SBC of 2500 ppm, obtained from Table 6.1-1 of reference [2.61, is equal to 3.5 wt. % U-235.
Per reference [2.7], a conservative initial fuel enrichment of 3.6 wt. % U-235 will be utilized to determine the soluble boron requirements.
3.3 AssumDtions and Conservatism All the assumptions and conservatisms detailed in reference [2.4], reference [2.5] and reference [2.6] are valid for this calculation since there is no significant structural change to the DSC geometry. Additional assumptions, if any, in the KENO models are detailed at the relevant sections wherever they are employed.
A conservative initial enrichment of 3.6 wt. % U-235 will be utilized to determine the soluble boron requirements even though the design basis initial enrichment value from reference [2.6]
is 3.5 wt. % U-235.
4.0 KENO Models The starting KENO model to perform the criticality analysis based on the KENO model (ce15350_16p250 065.in) documented in reference [2.6] for the CE 15x15 fuel assembly for the 16-poison plate basket.
The only change to the KENO model is In the treatment of the annulus between the transfer cask and the DSC. This region is modeled with internal moderator (borated water with varying density) instead of full density unborated water. This change is expected to result in a slightly conservative calculation of keff, particularly, at optimum moderator density. The overall effect of this change is expected to be statistically insignificant.
No other changes were made to the KENO model from reference [2.6] except for variation in the SBC and initial enrichment and the same is utilized in this calculation to evaluate the criticality during boron dilution events. .
A l Caic. No.: 11030-01 TRANSNUCLEAR Calculation Rev. No.: 0 Page: 5 l of I 11 5.0 Analysis and Results All the input decks were run with 500 generations with 1000 neutrons per generation with 5 generations skipped and the results are extracted from the KENO output. These values provided for a well converged solution. All input and output files used in this calculation are included on the attached compact disk. The input file listing corresponding to the worst case is provided in Appendix A of this calculation package.
All the results of this calculation are also shown in the EXCEL spreadsheet file resultsnuh32pL ce15.xls.
5.1 Results for an Initial Enrichment of 3.60 wt. % U-235 The criticality analysis was carried out at an initial enrichment of 3.60 wt. % U-235 to determine the minimum SBC required for subcriticality. Two different SBC values were determined - one corresponding to a configuration including optimum moderator density and the other corresponding to a fully flooded configuration (full moderator density). The results of this evaluation are shown in Table 5.1-1.
Table 5.1-1 Results for the 3.60 wt. % U-235 Cases Model l l I Description kKENO l Ia l kff l Output File Name Full Moderator Density, Boron Concentration = 1750 ppm Full Density @ 0.9852 1 0.0009 1 0.9870 J ce1536 16p175 ol00.out:
Optimum Moderator Density, Boron Concentration = 1850 ppm 60% Density 0.9785 0.0010 0.9805 ce1536 16p185 oO6O.out:
65% Density 0.9825 0.0011 0.9847 ce1536 16p185 oO65.out:
70% Density 0.9858 0.0009 0.9876 ce1536 16p185 oO70.out:
75% Density 0.9860 0.0010 0.9880 ce' 536 16p1 85 oO75.out:
80% Density 0.9844 0.0008 0.9860 ce1536 16p185 oO80.out:
90% Density 0.9796 0.0008 0.9812 ce1536 16p185 oO90.out:
Full Density 0.9742 0.0010 0.9762 ce1536 16p185 olOO.out:
A I Caic. No.: 11030-01 TRANSNUCLEAR Calculation l Rev. No.: 0 Page: 6 of I 11 5.2 Results for an Initial Enrichment of 3.50 wt. % U-235 The criticality analysis was also carried out at an initial enrichment of 3.50 wt. % U-235 to determine the minimum SBC required for subcriticality. This analysis was performed to determine the effect of the conservatism in the analysis performed in Section 5.1. Two different SBC values were determined - one corresponding to a configuration including optimum moderator density and the other corresponding to a fully flooded configuration (full moderator density). The results of this evaluation are shown in Table 5.2-1.
Table 5.2-1 Results for the 3.50 wt. % U-235 Cases Model l Description kKENO l1a keff Output File Name Full Moderator Density, Boron Concentration = 1650 ppm Full Density l 0.9866 l 0.0009 l 0.9884 l ce1535_16p165 o100.out:
Optimum Moderator Density, Boron Concentration = 1750 ppm 60% Density 0.9786 0.0009 0.9804 ce1535_16p175 o060.out:
65% Density 0.9802 0.0009 0.9820 ce1535-16p175 o065.out:
70% Density 0.9858 0.0010 0.9878 ce1535 16p175 o070.out:
75% Density 0.9845 0.0009 0.9863 ce1535 16p175 o075.out:
80% Density 0.9876 0.0009 0.9894 ce1535 16p175 oO80.out:
90% Density 0.9834 0.0010 0.9854 ce1535 16p175 oO90.out:
Full Density 0.9777 0.0009 0.9795 ce1535 16p175 olOO.out:
A Caic. No.: 1103001 TRANSNUCLEAR Calculation l Rev. No.: 0 Page: 7 of 111 6.0 Summary and Conclusions In summary, the minimum SBC required to maintain subcriticality (kff below 0.9911) for the NUHOMS'-32PT DSC loaded with 32 design basis CE 15x1 5 fuel assemblies, for two different fuel assembly enrichments, with an initial SBC of 2500 ppm has been determined.
This analysis is applicable to the NUHOMSk-32PT DSC, loaded with 32 design basis CE 15x15 fuel assemblies, with the 16 poison plate basket configuration containing no PRAs. The results are conservative at lower enrichment and initial SBC levels since the kff is evaluated at the highest enrichment. In other words, these results are conservative for other initial enrichment - SBC level combinations provided the minimum SBC levels (final values following dilution events) are based on the values shown below.
The following is a summary of the results:
. For an initial enrichment of 3.60 wt. % U235 (initial SBC = 2500 ppm), the minimum SBC with optimum moderation is equal to 1850 ppm. The worst case keff value is 0.9880.
- For an initial enrichment of 3.50 wt. % U235 (initial SBC = 2500 ppm), the minimum SBC with optimum moderation is equal to 1750 ppm. The worst case kff value is 0.9894.
- For an initial enrichment of 3.60 wt. % U235 (initial SBC = 2500 ppm), the minimum SBC with full moderation is equal to 1750 ppm. The worst case k1X value is 0.9870.
- For an initial enrichment of 3.50 wt. % U235 (initial SBC = 2500 ppm), the minimum SBC with full moderation is equal to 1650 ppm. The worst case kff value is 0.9884.
Utilizing a conservative initial enrichment of 3.60 wt. % U-235, instead of the design basis initial enrichment of 3.50 wt. % U-235, results in an increase in the final SBC by 100 ppm.
Boron dilution event with optimum moderation is highly conservative since there are no credible physical circumstances that lead to optimum moderation. Boron dilution with full moderation (DSC being fully flooded at all times during the event) is more realistic and results in a reduction in the minimum soluble boron concentration requirements.