ML042180279

Final Qa/Related Forms

ML042180279
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	07/19/2004
From:	Conte R, Wilson M Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
To:	Wilson M Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
Conte R
References
50-423/04-301
Download: ML042180279 (15)

Text

--

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: W&.m&.K g.3 Date of Examination:

Examinations Developed by: Gv>/mircte one)

Target Date*

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a & b) 1 %

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) .

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-901 [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c)l u

-75 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f;

-70

-45 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)

~~~

-30 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)

V

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

I T%4

-7 14. Final applications'reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.9, ES-204)

15. Proctorindwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with I \.

-7 facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

• Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notifiiation letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

, [ ] Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

25 of 25 NUREG-I 021, Draft Revision 9

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facilit)

Initials Item Task Description

- a 'b c#

1. a. Verify that the outlinefs) fit@)the appropriate model per ES-401.

W R

I T

T E

N 2

S I

M 3.

w i

T implement an alternate path 4.

a. Aut

b. Facility Reviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor U

Note: Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. 1. Independent NRC reviewer initial Rems in Column "c;"chief examiner concurrence required.

01 eQvie',d 3f;)fk U a - ovtkd. opo+:yva- be:? ,Jl,,J,I"Ji 9~ [ c NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 24 of 25

ES-201 Examination Outline Qualitv Checklist Form ES-201-2 Millstone Unit 3 -

Date of Examination: 19 23 July 2004 Task Description I Initi; -

a b' C#

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit@) the appropriate model per ES-401. "I, "I,

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with "1, "I, Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

"I, "I,

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate. "I, "I,

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

6 YI

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test@)*,

and scenarios will not be repeated subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline@)conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain@)the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test@), and (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 48564 - 6 (2 - 3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-dant walk-throuah reauires the aaalicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are c o v e r e p

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of amlicants and ensure that no items are dualicated on +uee4vdubseauent davs.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that WA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. IbPFs)

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). 1s IW 1 of25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

~~~ ~

Note:

• Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

V

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ninations to ed for 2r1y tile ~,VF'E.!<(S)of pwsors \ N ~ Ohave

-2l9 /A/ 0.__ a s si thc riot been autiiorized cept as specifically noted beiov! and iioccimenteii in ii:e facilily 1icen:;ee's i he exa cr :;>at ions a ridior 3 n e ri forcernenl exal;iiner any 1nrjicatir;r;s r ) j

2. .Po

.....si-Ex m ~iri,;j ti: :i 0"

?o the bes? of m y Itnowledye, I ciid not dimige lo i:r~yuna:ithorized pet-sor;~any informalion concerning the NRC licensing exarninations administered during t h e week(s) of 7-1 'I- . From the date that I entered into this security ag:'eernent until the completion of examination administration, I did not ii?s?rilct,,evaluate, or provicje performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted beiow and authorized by ;he NRC.

j' 3 j E.I?Tj j !\!AIM E JO3 TITLE / RESPONSlBIi..lTY

.......................... .I.-___

, . -,r TJljREG-IO21, i3raft Revision 9

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7 IL91e.! as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any informationabout these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understandthat I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinationsfrom this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledg , I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered f

during the week(s) of 71 19 04 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performancefeedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SlGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE 27- 9 'f NOTES:

ES-301 ODeratina Test Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: Millstone Unit 3 -

Date of Examination: 19 23 Julv 2004 Ooeratina Test Number: One

1. GENERAL CRITERIA lnitia

-b*

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durina this examination.

C. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).

d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test e&ege&s is within acceptable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH- CRITERIA

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

. initial conditions

. initiating cues

• referencesand tools, including associated procedures

. reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

. specific performance cnteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identificationof critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable eb. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

6. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. S I M U L A T O R W CRITERIA

a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Date

a. Author a Tdcq

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor JoxL,,/ &h% dk-9 I

V NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicablefor NRC-developed tests.

1. 1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

G:\DRS\Osb\Balian\Millstone 3\0utline\MS3 ES301-3.wpd NUREG-1021, Revision 9

tS-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form tS-301-4 the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D M 5 . d )

EOPs enteredlre G:\DRS\Osb\Balian\Millstone 3\Outline\MS3 ES-301-4.wpd NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: Applicant RO-4,5,6 As RO I SRO-I I As SRO I I Normal I I* I Instructions: (I) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should y those that require verifiable actions that provide insight s competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: EA&/--

NRC Reviewer:

G:\DRS\Osb\Balian\Millstone 3\0utline\MS3 ES-301-5.wpd NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: Applicant RO-7, 8 , 9 As RO II SRO-I I I

I I Normal I I I I I

Maior I 1 SRO-U Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled (3)

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

G:\DRS\Osb\BaIian\Millstone3\0utline\MS3 ES-301-5.wpd NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist

~~ ~

Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: Applicant SRO-I, 2, 3 As RO I SRO-I As SRO I I Normal I I I I I 1 I f Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled (3)

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

G:\DRS\Osb\Balian\MiIlstone3\0utline\MS3 ES-301-5.wpd NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Reactivity 0 Normal I*

SRO-U Instrument / 2*

Component Major 1 Instructions: (I) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to (3)

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

G:\DRS\Osb\Balian\MiIlstone3\0utline\MS3 ES-301-5.wpd NUREG-I 021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Competencies

- SCENARIO Competencies Checklist 4 ll 1 FOITI ES-301-6 SCENARIO 3, 5, 6, 7, 9

1, 7, 9,lO 7, ' I Operate Control Boards (2)

Communicate and 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, In t e r a c t w 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, 5,6, 5, 6, 5,6, 7,8, 7 7,8, 9, 9 Demonstrate 1,3, 1,2, Supervisory 4,5, 3,4, Ability (3) 6,7, 5,6, 9 7, 8, Comply With and 2,3, 1.4 1,2, Use Tech. Specs. (3) 4, 4 Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable (i2-k-NRC Reviewer:

G:\DRS\Osb\Balian\Millstone 3\0utline\MS3 ES-301-6.wpd NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-40? Written Examination Form ES-40136 Quality Checklist

1. Independent NRC revlewer initial items in Column IC,chief examiner concurrence required.

--__-_ NUREG-I 021, Draft Revision 9 30 of 34

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist NUREG-7021, Draft Revision 9