ML040620525
| ML040620525 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire  |
| Issue date: | 06/04/2002 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 50-369/02-302 | |
| Download: ML040620525 (16) | |
See also: IR 05000369/2002302
Text
Ad rn i n is t rative Docu men ts
(Yellow Paper)
MCGUIRE JULY/AUGUST 2002
RETAKE EXAM NO . 50-369/2002-302
Exam Preparation Checklist ....................
ES-20 1 -1
Exam Outline Quality Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-281-2
Exam Security Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Administrative Topics Outline (Final) . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-1
Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-through Test Outline
(Final) ....................................
Operating Test Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-3
Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-4
Transient and Event Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-5
Competencies Checklist ......................
Written Exam Review Worksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-401-9
Written Exam Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist . . . . . . . . . . ES-403-7
13 .
Post-Exam Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.-. . a
. .
.- -,,
i
..*.
../
E%-201
hrninattion Outline
Form ES-201-2
Buaiity Checklist
I
I
I
I
1
I
E§-201
Examination Outli~e
Form ES-201-2
Quality Checklist
Task Description
23 of 24
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
"^?.'I
$:?
2 4 ;.,.,.,:(
Examination Security Agreement
Form ES-201-3
1.
Pre-Examinaltlon
I acknowiedge that ! have acqulred specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of
date of my signature. B agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations 80 any persons who have not been authorized
by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be
administered these ilcenslng axaminations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and
authorized by the NRC.Furlhermore, I am aware Of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented In the facility licensee's
procedures) and understand that violation 01 the conditions of this agreement may result In cancellallon of the examinations and/or an enforcement
actlcn against me or the facility Ilcensee. I will Immediately report to facillty management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that
examlnation security may have been compromised.
7-l$-0& .bn g? M-OS
as of the
2.
Post-Examination
To the best ofpy
&&e,
I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered
during the week(;) 6Y.g 24 -0d-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the cornpiellon of examination administration, I did not
instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these kensing examinations, except as specificatly
noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME
JOB TITLE / RESPQNSl5BLlTY
11. a
--
--
12.
-
-
NOTES:
c
22. z - NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
w
24 of 24
...........
..............................
Exarnicatior? Security Agreecent
Form ES-201-3
-
...
1.
Pre-Examination
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week@) of - ? / h i (.I 2 as of the
date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized
by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be
administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration. except as specificaliy noted below and
authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's
procedures) and understand that violation ~f the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement
action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that
examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination
To the best of my knowled e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered
during the week@) of :'.z?-
- .
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations. except as specifically
noted below and authorized by the NRC.
,
I
PRINTED NAME
JQB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY
DATE
SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE
...
4 / 1 / 0 2 '
2.
. .
3
4
5.
6.
...
7.
8.
9.
_______
10
11
12
__________I___________~~_-_________1______1___......,...
__________
13
__________I_____..______--____________.___________I._._________________
__________
14
______
~
~
_____ _____
15
..I-___________-------____
____--
~ . . ~
___-_
.
.
C?
r
- 7
NOTES.
ca
24 of 24
- r
NUREG-1021, Revision 8,
Supplement 1
- ,
i
3
Administrative Topics Outline
Form 36-301-3
v
Facility :
McGuire
Date of Examination:
, 2002
Examination Level (circle one) : RO / SRO
Operating Test Number:
Administrative
TopicjSubj ect
R<
A.l
A. 2
A.3
A.4
_=
ription
Plant
Parameter
Verificati.on
U/A 2.
3.. 7
3 . 7 / 4 . 4
- hift Staffing
Recpirement s
K/A 2 . 1 . 4
2.313.4
Equipment.
Control
K/A 2.2.23
2 . 6 / 3 . 8
Control of
Radiation
Rel.eases
K/A 2.3.6
2 . l/3 . 1
Emergency
Protective
Action
iecommendati on
K/A 2 . 4 . 4 4
2.3./4.0
Describe method of evaluation:
1. ONE Ldminlstrative JPI'1, OR
2 .
TWO Administrative Qcestions
JPM:
Calculate Slxtdown Margin in Modes 3,4 and 5
JPM: Determine if hours worked exceed gdidelines
JPK:
Logbook Entry
Manually Complete Tech Spec Evaluation and
JPM:
Review and authorize a Gaseous Waste Release
JPM:
Determi~ne Protective Action Recommendations
affected counties and perform the init-ial
notification.
NUREG-1021. Revision 8
... . .i
liOE:
- ThelaCai signature is not applicable lor NRC~dsveioped l e .
11 lndepandent NRC reviewer inifiai ilorns in Column e. hiel ?raninet mnwyere? requiren.
-
_*.-
23 of 26
NUREG-1 021. Revision 8, Supplement 1
..
~... . ..
~ . . .
. .
~ ... ..
.
........
~
.
. .-
Written Examination
FOm ES-401-9
Quality Checklist
- .- -
Written Examination
Form ES-401-5
Review Worksheet
-_
Explanation
Expianation
1.
2.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) d each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating Scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable)
3.
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stern lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (R.Q.. lmcieai inte?t. more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractor?. contain cues be., clues. speclflc determlners, phrasing, length, etci.
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated trueifalse statements.
More than one distractor is not credible.
One or more distractors is (are) patlialiy correct (e.g., if the awlicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
Check the appropriate box if ajob content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements 0.e.. the question has a valid &'A but, as written, is not operational in Content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that IS too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it is not required to be known from memoy).
The question contains data with an unrealistic levd of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent vrith question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the )ob requirements.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Chock Questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved WA and those that are designated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
Based on the reviewets judgment, is the question as written (Winacceptable (requiring repair 01 replacement). in need of (E)ditQflal enhancement. or (S)atisfactory?
At a minimum, explain any "W ratings (e.g., how the Appendix 5 psychometric attributes are not being met).
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
44 of 46
2
Form ES-401%
metric Flai
-- -
Explanation
S
N - Requires only knowlEdge of setpoint Question is not higher order.
N - Replace distracfor A with - The reactor coolant systom heats up, the
KC svsi@m is w, effected.
X
X
S
M - reworded Iwo distractors to make then- more plausible. Add: 'The
crew has just completed step 8 &en Ule OATC abserves the foilowing
paramaters: Remove E-1 f r m provided references. Change Diatractor A
to read "Remain in E-I, Stop NS Pumps" D is now the correct answer.
Char~es needed because there were two correct answers.
meets the definition
uires only knowledge of entry conditions for AP-40 Question is
Explanation
stractors to make them mare plausible. NCP
TLET valve, Seal water FLOW, RCP MOTOR bearing
E§-403
Written Examination Grading
Form ES-403-1
Quality Checklist
ns checked for training
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewerr)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*f
d. NRC Supervisor c)
r)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the
5 of 5
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1