|
|---|
Category:Legal-Correspondence
MONTHYEARML0716402202007-06-12012 June 2007
E-mail from John H. O'Neill to the Board and Parties Stating That a Lmited Appearance Session on the Evening of July 16, 2007 Would Be Preferable to Tacking It on to the Oral Argument Session on July 17, 2007
ML0716402182007-06-12012 June 2007
E-mail from John D. Runkle to the Board and Parties Informing That He Is Available for the Oral Argument Scheduled for July 17, 2007
ML0716304772007-06-12012 June 2007
E-mail from Administrative Judge Young to Parties Informing That the Oral Argument Will Be Held on July 17, 2007 Due to the Unavailability of One of the Board Members. the Limited Appearance Session Will Be Held on July 16, 2007
ML0716303792007-06-11011 June 2007
E-mail from John H. O'Neill to the Board and Parties Informing That Progress Energy Can Support the Oral Argument Scheduled for July 19, 2007 and the Limited Appearance Session Scheduled for the Evening of July 18, 2007
ML0716301672007-06-11011 June 2007
E-mail from David Roth to Administrative Judge Young and Parties Informing That the Staff and Counsel Are Available the Evening of July 18, 2007 and Daytime July 19, 2007
ML0716301482007-06-11011 June 2007
E-mail from Administrative Judge Young to Parties Informing That July 19, 2007 Would Be a Good Date for the Oral Argument, with a Limited Appearance Session the Evening of July 18, 2007
ML0716202922007-06-0808 June 2007
Shearon Harris-Certificate of Service to the 06/08/07 Letter from David E. Roth to the Licensing Board
ML0716202852007-06-0808 June 2007
Shearon Harris-Letter from David E. Roth Responding to the Licensing Board'S Order of 06/05/07
ML0712300462007-05-0101 May 2007
G20060793 - John D. Runkle Correspondence Petitioners' Response to Proposed Director'S Decision Under 10 C.F.R. 2.206
ML0217000492002-06-0404 June 2002
Joint Appendix Volume II: Pages 542 - 767, Petition to Review a Final Decision of the Nrc. Case Scheduled for Oral Argument September 5, 2002
ML0217001712002-06-0404 June 2002
Joint Appendix Volume III: Pages 1168 - 1298, Petition to Review a Final Decision of the Nrc. Orange County, Nc V. NRC and Carolina Power & Light Co
ML0209300532002-03-27027 March 2002
Transmittal of Seven Copies of Initial Brief in Proceeding Orange County V. NRC, Nos. 01-1073 & 01-1246.
ML0209803702002-03-27027 March 2002
Orange County, Nc V. NRC & USA
ML0305901752002-03-27027 March 2002
Petition to Review Final Decision of NRC, Dated March 27, 2002
ML0305901602002-01-25025 January 2002
Order Establishing Argument Dale and Merit Panel, Dated January 25, 2002
ML18230A4841979-06-12012 June 1979
Transmitting Affidavit of J. A. Jones, Marked for Identification as Applicant Exhibit Pp, & Revisions to Applicant'S Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law in Form of Supplemental Initial Decision (Construction Permits)
ML18230A4851979-05-22022 May 1979
Applicant'S Reply to the Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the NRC Staff
ML18230A4881979-04-27027 April 1979
Letter Furnishing Information Regarding Carolina Power & Light Company'S Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
ML18230A4911979-04-17017 April 1979
NRC Staff Motion to Accept Transcript Corrections
ML18230A4891979-04-17017 April 1979
Transmitting Applicant'S Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Supplemental Initial Decision (Construction Permits), Which Are Being Distributed This Date in Accordance with Schedule for Findings Ordered by Board
ML18230A4941979-04-0404 April 1979
Applicant'S Response to NRC Staff Motion to Accept Exhibits Into Evidence
ML18230A4951979-03-21021 March 1979
Applicant'S Response to Postcard Request of Kudzu Alliance and Wells Eddleman
ML18230A5031979-02-15015 February 1979
Letter Furnishing Response to Carolina Power & Light Company'S 7 February Ansewer to Appeal Brief and Notice to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board
ML18230A5051979-02-0808 February 1979
Regarding Hearing Scheduled on 2/27 at 9 Am, Letter Advising to Reschedule It in the Evening or on Saturdays
ML18230A5241979-01-23023 January 1979
Applicant'S Response to Conservation Council of North Carolina and Wake Environment, Inc.'S Motion to Remand to Licensing Board for Further Hearings
ML18230A5091979-01-17017 January 1979
Petition for Remanded or Proposed Hearings, Petition to Suspend Construction, & Petition for Order on Further Opportunities for Intervention & Full Publicity
ML18230A5191979-01-0404 January 1979
Further Amendments & Clarification of Petition of Intervene, Kudzu Alliance & Wells Eddleman Respectfully Request ASLB or Lawful Appointee to Hear Petitions
ML18230A5141978-12-19019 December 1978
Applicant'S Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Communication from Wells Eddleman and Kudzu Alliance Dated November 29, 1978
ML18230A5151978-12-18018 December 1978
Applicant'S Response to Amendment to Request for Intervention by Mr. Wells Eddleman and Kudzu Alliance
ML18230A5121978-12-0808 December 1978
Applicant'S Request for Extension of Time for Christmas, New Year Holidays, and year-end Vacation Schedules
ML18230A5431978-11-29029 November 1978
After Receiving Response to Petition to Intervene, Letter Advising Alliance Members Should Be Allowed to Intervene
ML18230A5451978-11-0707 November 1978
Transmitting Letter from Citizen in North Carolina Who Opposes Construction of Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Letter Advising to Provide Comments About the Points Which Are Raised
ML18230A5461978-11-0707 November 1978
Letter Requesting to Become Intervenors & Furnishing Information Concerning Health, Safety, Power Bills, Eater Resources, Environment, Lives Civil Liberties & Right to Pursue Happiness
ML18230A5501978-11-0101 November 1978
Letter Asking Schedule for re-opened Hearing, Requesting Kudzu Alliance Be Intervenor in Hearing & to Learn How to Become Intervenor Status
ML18230A5661978-08-14014 August 1978
Applicant'S Memorandum in Response to ALAB-480 on the Perkins Initial Decision (in the Form of Proposed Findings and Conclusions Related to the Radon Issue)
ML18230A5691978-07-26026 July 1978
Applicant'S Response to ALAB-480 Concerning Use of the Perkins Record on the Radon Issue
ML18230A5791978-03-13013 March 1978
Applicant'S Response in Opposition to Intervenors' Exceptions
ML18230A2111977-12-15015 December 1977
Letter Consisting of Information Re Observance of Minor Geological Feature Near Shearon Harris Site, Which Should Not Be of Concern, & Transmitting Certificate of Service
ML18230A2121977-12-12012 December 1977
Consisting of Information Re Observance of Minor Geological Feature Near Shearon Harris Site, Letter Advising CP&L Is Evaluating Impact of This Feature, & Transmitting Certificate of Service
ML18230B0291977-09-23023 September 1977
Agreement Terminating Carolinas-Virginias Power Pool Agreement
ML18230B3131977-09-16016 September 1977
Applicant'S Proposed Agenda for Resumption of Evidentiary Hearings
ML18230A8111976-12-0101 December 1976
Carolina Power & Light Company - Application for a General Increase in Rates and Notice of Filing Change of Rates
ML18230A0881976-09-20020 September 1976
as Discussed, Letter Transmitting Information Regarding Containment Structure Load Combination, Containment Internal Structure, Seismic Category I Structure, Index to Positions & Regulatory Guides
ML18230A0891976-09-0707 September 1976
Transmitting Joint Wind Frequency Distribution Tables Compiled from On-Site Data Collected Between the Period January 15, 1976 Through July 15, 1976
ML18230A0901976-07-13013 July 1976
Furnishing Meteorological Information to Support Cp&L'S Evaluation of Plant'S Compliance with Appendix I to 10CFR50, & Transmitting Certificate of Service
ML18230B0381976-05-28028 May 1976
Submits Amendment No. 46 to License Application, Consisting of Environmental Report Providing Current Information on Specific Power Needs for Section 4
ML18230A3331976-05-0505 May 1976
to Meet Scheduled Fuel Loading on 6/1/1983 & for Other Submittals, Letter Advising Arrangements to Meet with NRC Staff to Develop Coordinated Schedule Concerning the Financial Status & Amending Environmental Report
ML18230B0981976-02-0303 February 1976
Amended Notice of Appearance
ML18230B1331975-11-0303 November 1975
Responding to Letter of 9/18/1975, Letter Providing Requested Information Necessary to Schedule Review & to Project for Resumption of Public Hearing
ML18230B1341975-08-29029 August 1975
Letter Providing Submission Schedules for Final Acceptance Criteria by 7/11/1975, Loose Parts Monitoring System by 9/16/1975, & Regulatory Guide by 9/22/1975
2007-06-08
[Table view]
Category:Legal-Correspondence/Maintenance
MONTHYEARML0217001712002-06-0404 June 2002
Joint Appendix Volume III: Pages 1168 - 1298, Petition to Review a Final Decision of the Nrc. Orange County, Nc V. NRC and Carolina Power & Light Co
ML0217000492002-06-0404 June 2002
Joint Appendix Volume II: Pages 542 - 767, Petition to Review a Final Decision of the Nrc. Case Scheduled for Oral Argument September 5, 2002
ML0305901752002-03-27027 March 2002
Petition to Review Final Decision of NRC, Dated March 27, 2002
ML0209803702002-03-27027 March 2002
Orange County, Nc V. NRC & USA
ML0209300532002-03-27027 March 2002
Transmittal of Seven Copies of Initial Brief in Proceeding Orange County V. NRC, Nos. 01-1073 & 01-1246.
ML0305901602002-01-25025 January 2002
Order Establishing Argument Dale and Merit Panel, Dated January 25, 2002
2002-06-04
[Table view]
Category:Legal-Order
MONTHYEARML0718003412007-06-29029 June 2007
LB Order (Regarding Questions to Focus on in Oral Argument; Timing of Oral Argument)
ML0717703882007-06-26026 June 2007
LB Order (Regarding Oral Argument and Limited Appearance Session)
ML0716402622007-06-13013 June 2007
LB Order (Regarding Oral Argument and Limited Appearance Session)
ML0715604452007-06-0505 June 2007
LB Order (Regarding Schedule and Guidance for Proceedings)
ML0405103952003-09-30030 September 2003
Final Decision & Order of Remand
ML0232600122002-11-13013 November 2002
Petitions for Review of Orders of the NRC
ML0305901602002-01-25025 January 2002
Order Establishing Argument Dale and Merit Panel, Dated January 25, 2002
ML0305901542002-01-25025 January 2002
Revised Briefing Schedule, Dated January 25, 2002
ML0305901402002-01-22022 January 2002
Order, Dated January 25, 2002
ML0305900932002-01-0707 January 2002
Scheduling Order, Dated 01/07/2002
2007-06-05
[Table view] |
Text
Co 0 pie Shtafes (Turtof pprals District of Columbia Circuit Washington, D.C. 20001-2866 PLEASE READ THIS MEMORANDUM IN ITS ENTIRETY MEMORANDUM TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD RE: Important Information Concerning Cases Set for Oral Argument (1) SCHEDULING ORDER A briefing schedule has now been established in your case. Because the briefing Is keyed to the date of argument, the Court will be unable to grant requests for waiver of time limits for briefs or transcripts except In truly extraordinary situations. The Court now requires that the last brief be filed a minimum of fifty (50) days prior to the first day of the month In which your case Is scheduled for argument. Please review D.C. Cir. Rule 28(f)(3) before filing motions for extensions of time or to exceed page limits for briefs. It Is requested that intervenors notify this office, by letter, If they do not intend to participate in a joint Intervenors' brief or filing a separatc brief. Counsel for appellant(s)Ipetitioner(s) who do not intend to file a reply brief are encouraged to notifythis office by letter before the due date for filing of that brief. Please note that A BRIEFING REMINDER WILL NOT BE SENT.
(2) FORM 72 Form 72 will be mailed to counsel approximately two weeks prior to oral argument It Is your responsibility to complete and return Form 72 at least four (4) business days In advance of oral argument. Only counsel for the principal parties, and other counsel who Intend to argue, must complete and return the form.
(3) TIME FOR ORAL ARGUMENT Approximately two (2) weeks before the oral argument date the Court will enter an order setting forth the amount of time to be allowed for argument. See Fed.R.App.Proc. 34 and D.C. Cir. Rule 34 concerning the apportionment of time allotted. Consolidated cases are considered to be one case for purposes of argument time. The order In which the cases are listed on the calendar Is not necessarily the order in which they will be argued on the day of argument. THE ORDER IN WHICH A CASE SHALL BE HEARD WILL BE AVAILABLE APPROXIMATELY FIVE (5) DAYS PRIOR TO ARGUMENT ON THE COURT'S INTERNET SITE:
(WWW.CADC.USCOURTS.GOV). Counsel on each of the scheduled dates must report to the courtroom by 9:15 a.m. for the morning court session and 1:45 p.m. for the afternoon court session, regardless of their position on the calendar. The court rarely sits In afternoon session. Counsel must refer to the scheduling order Issued by the Court to determine whether argument will be heard during a morning or an afternoon session. The starting time set out In the scheduling order can only be changed by a superceding order of the Court (4) PARTICIPATION IN ORAL ARGUMENT Ordinarily not more than two counsel may be heard for each side. See D.C. Cir. Rule 34. However, the order allotting time may limit the number of counsel to only one per side. If two counsel Intend to present argument for one side, the calendar clerk (202 216-7312) should be notified of the names of the attorneys and the agreed amount of time for each attorney.
(5) MEMBERSHIP IN THE BAR This Court maintains a bar separate from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. An attorney intending to present argument should be a member In good standing of the Bar of this Court. A pending application for admission In proper form will satisfy this requirement. An application for admission may be obtained by calling the Clerk's Office at 202-216-7280. Arrangements for admission to the Bar should be made at least seven (7) days before oral argument F. BARRETT PRETTYMAN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE
- 333 CoNsTrrTUToN AVENUE N.W.
0 0 In some Instances, an attorney who is not a member of the Bar will be admitted pro hac vice for purposes of argument only. To be admitted an attorney must file an appropriate motion at least seven (7) days before oral argument Counsel who litigate regularly before the Court should not make repeated appearances pro hac vice, but should apply for admission. The name of an attorney who is not a member of this Bar or has not argued the case pro hac vice will not appear on any opinion Issued by the Court.
(6) SUBMISSIONS IN CASES WHICH ARE SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT OR WHICH HAVE BEEN ARGUED All submissions in cases scheduled for oral argument shall contain a statement at the top of the first page thereof, In large type, that the case Is scheduled for oral argument on [ Insert date ] or that the case has been argued on [ Insert date ] or submitted without oral argument. See D.C. Cir. Rules 27(a)(4) and 28(a)(').
(7) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT All counsel are strongly encouraged to notify the Court as soon as settlement negotiations begin, when settlement of the case becomes likely, and when settlement Is reached. This notice allows for the more efficient allocation of judicial resources.
Additionally, counsel should promptly notify the Court If settlement negotiations are terminated. Notice must be given in an appropriate motion or by letter to the Clerk.
(8) MOTION FOR POSTPONEMENT Any motion for postponement should be submitted Immediately upon receipt of this notice. Counsel should be aware, however, that the Court looks with disfavor upon such a motion and It will not be routinely granted.
(9) REMOVAL OF CASE FROM CALENDAR In the event the Court determines that argument Is not necessary, an order to that effect will be entered. See D.C. Cir. Rule 340).
ALL COUNSEL ARE ENCOURAGED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE RULES OF THIS COURT. COPIES OF THE RULES CAN BE OBTAINED BY CALLING THE CLERK'S OFFICE AT (202) 216-7280.
MARK LANGER Clerk FORM 71 (8/95; Rev. 05194, 02/98, 09/99)
W WWW. cadc .uscourts, gov E. BARRETT PRrM'MAN UNnTED STATES COURTHOUSE
- 333 CONSTMrnON AVENUE N.W.
