Text

Stations, 2003 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML041270105
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/28/2004
From:	Mannon S; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	LR-N04-0116
	Download: ML041270105 (85)
	v • d • e

PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 APR 2 8 2004 o rsEG LR-N04-01 16 ANuclearLLC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 2003 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS DOCKET NOS. 50-272, 50-311 AND 50-354 As required by Section 6.9.1.7 of Appendix A to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 and DPR-75 for Salem Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Section 6.9.1.6 of Appendix A to Facility Operating License NPF-57 for Hope Creek Generating Station, PSEG Nuclear hereby transmits one copy of the 2003 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. This report summarizes the results of the radiological environmental surveillance program for 2003 in the vicinity of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations. The result of this program for 2003 was specifically compared to the result of the pre-operational program.

Ifyou have any questions or comments on this transmittal, please contact Michael Mosier at (856) 339-5434.

Sincerely, Steven R. Mannon Manager Nuclear Safety and Licensing Attachment 95-2168 REV. 7/99

Document Control Desk 2 APR 282004 LR-N04-0116 C Mr. H. Miller, Administrator - Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Salem (X24)

USNRC Senior Resident Inspector- Hope Creek (X24)

Mr. D. Collins, Project Manager - Hope Creek, Salem U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08C2 Washington, DC 20555 Mr. K.Tosch, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering P. O. Box 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 Mr. K.Kille Delaware Emergency Management Agency 165 Brick Store Landing Road Smyrna, DE 19977

O PSEG RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRON MENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

. For Salem Generating Station, Unit 1: Docket No. 50 -272 Salem Generating Station, Unit 2: Docket No. 5031 1 Hope Creek Generating Station : Docket No. 50-354 2003 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR.ONMENTAL OPERATING REFORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER. 31, 2003 Prepared by PSEG SERVICE CORPORATION MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES APRIL 2004

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM & HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS 2003 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2003

TABLE OF CONTENTS

--:: -. i)PAGE

SUMMARY

.1..................... ............................. 1 THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM. 3 Objectives. 4 Data Interpretation ........................... 5 Quality Assurance Program...................... 5 Program Changes . ......................... . 6 Results and Discussion. . . 6 Atmospheric....................................... 6 Direct Radiation. 8 Terre l . .. . .8... ..

Aquatic .............................................. 12 Concu.io.ns .... ...... 1...6.

REFERENCES.................... ........... 26 APPENDIX A - PROGRAM SU4ARY .29 APPENDIX B - SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS . 35 APPENDIX C - DATA TABLES .43 APPENDIX D -

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FROM ANALYTICS & ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMS .73 APPENDIX E - SYNOPSIS OF LAND USE CENSUS .81 APPENDIX F - RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN .85 i

II LIST OF TABLES TABLE NUMB3ER TABLE DESCRIPTION -_ PAGE

1. Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (Program Overview) 17 LIST OF FIGURES' FIGURE -FI.G R .DSR NUMBER .- ... I-' 'FIGURE-DESCRIPTION- -PAGE

1. Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulate 1983, through4.2003 (Quarterly). ................ 20

2. Ambient Radiation - Off-site'vs Control Station 1983 through 2003 (Quarterly)...................... 21

3. Iodine-131 Activity in Milk.

1983 through 2003 (Quarterly)........................ 22

4. 'Gross .Beta Activity in Surface Water 1983 through 20.03 (Quarterly)..................... 23

5. Tritiiirn Activity in Surface Water 1983 through 2003 (Quarterlj)..................... 24

6. Cesium-,137 and Cobqlt-60 Activity in Aquatic Sediment-1983 thfrough 2003.(Semi-Annual) ...................... 25 ii

SUMMARY

During normal operations of 'a'nuclear power generating station--

there are releases of small 'amounts-:of radioactive materia1-to-the environment. - To monitor..and determine the effects of these releases aRadiolog`ical Environmental Monitoring Program. (REMP) has been established for .the environment around Artificial Island where the Salem Generating, Stations (SGS)-and Hope Creek : -I-Generating Station (HCGS) are located. The results of the REMP are published annually, providing a summary and interpretation of the data collected.'

PSEG's Maplewood Testing 'Services.(MTS) has been responsible for the collection and analysis of environmental samples during the

.period.of January 1, 2003,Ithrough:December 31, 2003, and lthe results. are discussed in .this report.- :-.The REMP for SGS/HCGS was conducted in accordance: with -the*.SGS..:and'HCGS'-.Technical-'

Specifications/Offsite DoseCalculation Manual.;- The Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) values required by the'Techpical '

Specifications/ODCM were achieved--for'-this rep6rting period.' The objectives of'the program were'also met during,.this period.' The data -collected assists in demonstrating that SGS 'and HCGS were operated in compliance with'Technical"Specifida.tions/ODCM.

Most of the radioactive-mateiials'.notedin this.-report "are' normally present in the environment,i either naturally, such as potassium-40, or as a result of non-nuclear generating station.

activity, -such as nuclear.boib testing.'Measurements made:.in.the vicinity of.-SGS/HCGS were compared,to' background or -control measurements. and the preoperational REMP study performed before Salem Unit l became operational.;- f Samples of 'air-particulates,-

air iodine, milk, surface, groundand drinking water, vegetables, game, .fodder-crops, fish, 'crabs,',and-sediment were collected and analyzed. :"External radiation dose measurements were also made in

-'the vicinity of SGS/HCGS using..thermoluniinescent dosimeters.

From the results"obtained,-it can:be concluded :that the levels:

and:fluctuations of radioactivity:-.in:environmental samples were as expected for:an estuarine;environment. No unusual radiological characteristics were observed in the environs of --

SGS/HCGS during this reporting period. Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, and with historical results collected since commercial operation, we can conclude that the operation of SGS and HCGS had no significant impact on the radiological characteristics of the environs of these stations.

To demonstrate compliance with Technical Specifications/ODCM (Sections 3/4.12.1 & 6.8.4.h -1,2,3), samples were analyzed for one or more of the following: gamma emitting isotopes, tritium (H-3), iodine-131 (I-131), gross beta and gross alpha.

1

II The results of these analyses were used to assess the environmental impact of SGS:and HCGS operations, thereby demonstrating compliance with Technical Specifications/ODCM (Section 3/4.11) and applicable Federal and State regulations, and to verify the adequacy of radioactive .effluent control systems.

The results provided in this report are summarized below:

N There were a total of 1206 analyses on 1119 environmental samples during 2003. Direct radiation dose measurements were made using 196 thermbluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

In addition to the detection of naturally-occurring isotopes (i.e. B6-7,'K-46, Radium 'and Th-232) trace levels of Cs-137 were also detected. The concentrations of these nuclides were well below the"Technical'"Specification reporting limit.

Dose measurements made with. quarterly TLDsat 31 offsite locations'around the SGS/HCGS'site, averaged 49 millirems for the year 2003'. The average-dose-measurements at the control locations (background) was 53 millirems for the year. This was comparable to the preoperational phase of the program which had an average of 55 millirems per year for 1973 to 1976.

During the 2003 year, PSEG Nuclear continued it's investigation into-the source and.quantity of tritium identified in groundwater at Salem Station.' This investigation.has been conducted in accordance with a Remedial Investigation Work Plan'that was submitted to the New Jersey Departme'nt of'Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering-(NJDEP-BNE) in June, 2003. Several meetings concerning this' work have been-conducted with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The results of this investigation will be found in a Remedial Investigation Report, which is anticipated to be submitted to NJDEP-BNE in the first'-

quarter of 2004. There is no evidence that tritium contaminated water above permissible levels has migrated to the station boundary or the Delaware River.

2

THE RADIOLOGICAL:ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Lower Alloways Creek Township, Salem 'County, New Jersey is the-site of Salem (SGS)and Hope Creek (HCGS) Generating Stations. SGS consists of two operating pressurized water nuclear power reactors.

Salem Unit One has a net rating.of.1133 megawatt electric(MWe) and Salem Unit Two has a net rating of 1134 MWe. The licensed core power for both units is 3459".megawatt thermal-(MWt). - HCGS is a boiling water nuclear power reactor, which has a net rating of 1091 MWe (3339.-MWt) - - -' .:' '-

SGS/HCGS are located'on.a man-~made peninsula on-the..east'bank of the Delaware.River. It was 'created by'the'deposition of :hydraulic fill from dredging operations. ..The; environment .surrounding-.SGS./HCGS is characterized mainly by the.Delaware..River'and"Bay, extensive tidal marshlands, -and--low-.lying.:meadowlahds..'These land types m'ake up approximately.85%-of the.'land.:ar'ea;.within'f"ive'bmiles of-the site.

Most of the remaining land'isused for'agriculture [1,2]. More specific information on the-demography,.,hydroloay,: meteorology,'and land use of the area may be 'fou'd.-inthe EnvironmentaliReports

[1,2], :Environmental...Statements;[3,-4]';.'and',theUpdated Fihal'-Safety Analysis Reports.for SGS.,and'HCGS t5,6]; . '

Since 1968, a radiological'environmental monitoring program (REMP) has been conducted at the SGS/HCGS:Site...Starting in December,

'1972,.:more extensive radiological-.monitoring programs.were. .

initiated.' .The-operational -REMP,.was -initiated in December, .1976,

when SalemnUnit.l.chieved criticality. -' PSEG's'Maplewood'Testing Services (MTS) 'has.been involved in-the.REMP since-its.inc'eption.

MTS is responsible for the collection of all radiological.

.environmental samples and,'-fr6mn 1973 through'-June, '1983, conducted a qual'ity. assurance.program..in'which'duplicates of a'.portion of those samplest.analyzed by the primary laboratory were .also analyzed by:

MTS. '. :.

From January,-.1973, through-June, 1983, Radiation 'Management'.

Corporation:-(RMC)-had-primary.;'responsibility,:for"'the anailsis.of all samples under'the 'SGS/HCGS REMP. and lannual' reporting of;-results..RMC reports for the preoperational and operational phase of the.program are'referenced in this report'[7-9] .On July 1, 1983, MTS assumed primary responsibility.,for the-.analysis of all-samples (except TLDs)

..and.the reporting :of results. .Teledyne.Brown Engineering Environmental -Services: (TBE),-.assumed responsibility for third-party QA analyses'and -TLDs.;-An additional.vendor,.Controls -for -

Environmental -Pollution*^'Inc.- (CEP),- was. retained to .- provide .third-party QA- analyses and certain.,non-routine analyses from May,>.1988, until:June-1,:1992.- Currently,-.Framatome ANP DE&S-Environmental.

Laboratory-(Framatome).-is ;the.--third-party .QA vendor -and the-laboratory which performs.the'--TLD: analyses.--.,MTS -reports-for the.-

operational-phase from'1983.to 2002 -are referenced in this report,

[10]*

II An overview of the 2003 Program is provided in Table 1.

Radioanalytical data from samples collected under this program were.

compared with results from the preoperational phase. Differences between these periods were examined statistically to determine the effects of station operations. This report presents the results from January 1 through December 31, 2003, for the SGS/HCGS REMP.

OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Operational REMP are:

To fulfill the requirements of the Radiological Surveillance sections of the Technical Specifications/ODCM for SGS/HCGS.

To determine whether'any significant increase occurred in.

.the concentration of radionuclides. in critical pathways.

U- To determine if SGS or. HCGS has caused an increase in the

'radioactive inventory of long-lived radionuclides.

To detect any change .in ambient gamma radiation levels.

To verify that SGS and HCGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the

- environment.

This report, as required by Section 6.9. 1.7 of the Salem Technical Specifications/ODCM and Section 6.9.1.6 of the Hope Creek Technical Specifications/ODCM, summarizes the findings-of the.2003 REMP.

Results of the-four-year-preoperational program have been summarized for comparison-with subsequent operational reports [8]..

In order to meet the .objectives,'an operational REMP was developed.

Samples of various media were selected for monitoring due to the radiological dose impact to human and other organisms.' The selection of samples was based on: (1), established critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to man, and, (2), experience gained during the-preoperational phase.

Sampling-locations were determined-based on site meteorology, Delaware estuarine hydrology, local demography, .and land uses.

Sampling locations were divided into two classes, indicator and control.- Indicator stations are those, which are expected to manifest station effects. Control samples are collected at locations which are believed to be unaffected by station operations, usually at 15 to 30 kilometers distance. -Fluctuations in the levels of radionuclides and direct radiation at indicator stations are evaluated with respect to analogous fluctuations at control stations. Indicator and control station data are also evaluated relative to preoperational data. Appendix A describes and summarizes, in accordance with Section 6.9.1.7 of the Salem TS and Section 6.9.1.6 of the Hope Creek TS, the operational program as performed in 2003.

4

Appendix B describes* the coding system which..identifies -sample type and location. Table B-1 lists. the sampl'ing -stations and the types of samples collected,at each station. These;'sampling stations are indicated on Maps -B-1 and B-2. -: - - -

-. , rmr;n f *s t- =v

'DATA-INTERPRETATION ... ----

Results of analyses- are.grouped according to sample type-and presented.in.Appendix C.. Alliresults above'.the.Lower Limit -of_-

Detection (LLD). are at a confidenc'level2of.2 sigma-.- -This represents the: range of-values-into:which 95%:'of -repeated analyses of- the same- sample..should'fall.: -.As!defined. in Regulatory:Guide:4 .8, LLD'-is -the-:smallest concentration- of'radioactive:material in:-a -

sample.that,-will:!yield a net'Lcount .(above-system background) that will be detected with. 95% probability,: with-:only-5% .probability 'of falsely concluding that a.blank.:.observation represents a ."real signal". LLD is normally calculated as 4.66 times the standard deviation of the background'tcountiing'igate, or of the blank sample count, as appropriate, divided by couhting efficiency, 'sample size, 2;2.22 (dpm per picocurie)', ,the radiochemical:yield when.-applicable',

the radioactive decay constant and- the'.elapsed':time between 'sample collection and -time of-counting.- The'Minimum Detectable -

Concentration' (MDC) is defined: as 'the6-smallet concentration -of--

radioactive material that can be detected at a given confidence level. The MDC differs from the LLD in that the MDC takes into consideration the interference'caused'by".the presence of other nuclides while the LLD does nbt..

The grouped data were -aver'aged and standard deviations.'calculated.in

accordance.with-'Appendix B.of.,Reference 16: '-Thus, :the,2 sigma.--

deviations of,.'the averaged data represent.'sample and -not-~analytical variability.'..For-reportingand calculation'of:averages, any.:result occurring. at-..or below theiLLD.:is-.considered:'to betat 'that level.

When-a group of.data was composed'.of 50% or more LLD values, averages were not-calculated. -. - . -

Grab -sampling-is:a -useful- nd+ acceptable procedure for -taking environmental samples.-ofa- medium-.in-which;the concentration of -

radionuclides !is'expected:.to-vary,'slowly with time;-or'.where ' :

intermittent sampling is.Jdeemed:sufficient'to establish the..--:.

radiological Ccharacteristics' of -the -medium.' This method; -however" is only -representative ofr the: sampled:medium-:for that-.specific location and instant of time.. As a-result, variation in the : ---

radionuclide concentrations of the samples will normally occur-.'

Since these variations will tend:to counterbalance vone another; averages based upon repetitive grab samples is considered valid.'-

QUALITY'-ASSURANCE PROGRAM. .. -

MTS has-a 7quality assurance program designed to ensure confidence'in the analytical'-program. Approximately 20%',of the'.total'analytical effort -is -spent .on quality control,. including process quality.'-:

(.5

I I control, instrument quality control, interlaboratory cross-check analyses, and data review.

The quality of the results obtained by MTS is ensured by the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program as described in the Maplewood Testing Services Quality Assurance Plan [11] and the Environmental and Chemical Division Procedures Manual. The internal quality control activity of MTS includes the quality control of instrumentation, equipment and reagents; the use of reference standards in calibration, documentation of established procedures and computer programs, and analysis of duplicate samples. The external quality control activity is implemented through participation in both'the Analytics.and the Environmental Resource Associates Interlaboratory. Comparison Programs. The results of these Interlaboratory Comparison Programs are listed in Tables D-1 through D-4 in Appendix D.-

-PROGRAM CHANGES Due to the tritium contamination of groundwater on the Salem Station site, it was decided to analyze the Delaware River water for tritium on a monthly schedule instead of quarterly as required by Salem and Hope Creek. Tech Specs/ODCM.

-RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The analytical results of the 2003 REMP samples are divided into categories based on exposure pathways: atmospheric, direct, terrestrial, and aquatic. The analytical results for the 2003 REMP are summarized'in Appendix A. The. data for individual samples are presented in Appendix C. The data collected demonstrates that the SGS and HCGS REMP was conducted in compliance with' the Technical Specifications/ODCM.

The REMP for the SGS/HCGS Site has historically included samples and analyses not specifically required.by these Stations' Technical Specifications/ODCM. MTS :continues. to collect and analyze some of these samples in.order to maintain personnellproficiency in performing these:.non-routine analyses. These analyses are referenced throughout the report as Management Audit. samples. The summary tables in this report include these additional samples and analyses.

ATMOSPHERIC Air particulates were collected on Schleicher-Schuell No. 25 glass fiber filters with low-volume air samplers. Iodine was collected from the air by adsorption on triethylenediamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridges connected-.in series-after the air particulate filters. Air sample volumes.'were measured with calibrated dry-gas meters and were corrected to standard temperature and pressure.

6

A * -' -

Air Particulates (Tables C-1, C-2)

-Air particulate samples-were'collected-weekly,- at' 6 locations. Each

.of'the 312 samples..collected-for.'the-year were'analyzed'for gross'.

beta. Quarterly composites of--.the'weekly-'samples-from each' station were analyzed for: specific gamma. emitters.. Total data- recovery' for the 6 sampling stations in 2003 was 99.81:'percent. -

Gross beta activity was detected in'all'-of the-indicator'-:

station samples at concentrations ranging from.7.6.x 10-3 to

.:52 x-1073 pCilm3 andrin all'of:.the.control-'station' samples 7--from 8.9-x10 3 to-55 x'-10-3 ,pCi/m 3 . The averages for! the indicator and control station-sa.mples were 21-and 22x---

...: - pCi-/rn3, respectively,::The1.maximum preoperational level-

.detected was-920-x pCi/m 3, with an'average of 74 x.10-3 pCi/m . Results from 1983'to current.year..are'.plotted on Figure l as quarterly averages.- Includedralong with-this plot,.-for purposes' of comparison, 'is an inset 'depicting a continuation of this plot:f-from'.thecurrent year all the way back to 1973.

.Gammaspectroscopy,,.performe&don..each of'-the 24'quarterly

-.composite-samples analyzed,-:indicated 'the-presence'of the

.naturally-occurring radionuclides Be-7a;.and K-40. "All other gamma-emitters-searched :foriwere below the -LLD.'

0 Beryllium-7, attributed to.cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere,. was .detected-in'all 20 indicator.station composites that.'were danaly zed; at concentrations ranging-'

.from-44x10 3 to-68 x'-.10 pCi/m3, with an'averageof .-

54.x 3 pCi/m . It I0t was detected in the 4:control' station.

composites ranging.from 44 x to 56 x 10- pCi/m3 , with an average of 52 x 10 pCi/m . -. 3 The-maximum preoperational .

level detected was 330 x i0- pCi/m3 , with an average of"109 x 10-3 pCi/m 3 .

- 0 Potass.ium-.40.activity was detected'in -4:of the indicator station samples,.with.-concentrations ranging-from 8-x 310,'

.to 21;..x.-3 pCi/0 3 ;-with'an.average.-of.13.x 10 3 .pCi/m3 . -

K-40. was alsodetected .in-f1"control- station sample, at a:

concentration of 9x 103.pCi/m3 . No preoperational data is

..- .-. available-for'comparison." - -

Air Iodine (Table C-3)

Iodine:in.-filtered air .samples'was -ollected weekly,- at 6'.locations.

Each of the '312 samples collected for the year;was analyzed for o -

I-131.

Iodine-131-was not.detectedtin anyof the weekly-samples analyzed.'

LLD sensitivities for all the .stations, both indicator and'control,

-ranged from 1.0.x.10-3-to'-<15 '!x 10pCi-/m 3 : The maximum ~ *.- :

preoperational level detected was-.42:x 10-3pCi/m 3 .

.7

_____LL DIRECT RADIATION Ambient radiation levels in the environs were measured with energy-compensated CaSO 4 (Ti) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) supplied.

and read by Framatome. Packets containing TLDs for quarterly exposure were placed in the owner-controlled area and around the Site at various distances.

Direct Radiation (Table C-4)

A total of 49.locations were monitored for direct radiation during 2003, including 12 on-site locations, 31 off-site locations within the 10 mile zone, and 6 control locations-beyond 10 miles. Effort was made to locate TLDs at schools and population centers in the area. . .. . .

Five.readings for each'-TLD.(ie; 5 elements).at each location were taken in order to obtain a more statistically valid result. For these measurements, the rad is considered equivalent to the rem, in accordance with 10CFR20.1004.

The average dose rate-for the 31 quarterly off-site indicator TLDs was 4.1 millirads.per standard.month,:while the on-site average was 4.4 millirads.per-standard.month...The-average control rate was 4.4 millirads per standard month. The preoperational average for the quarterly TLD readings was 4.4 millirads per standard month.

In Figure 2, the quarterly average radiation levels of the off-site indicator stations versus the.control stations, are plotted for the period 1983 through 2003, with an inset graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

TERRESTRIAL Milk samples were taken semi-monthly when cows were on pasture and monthly when cows were not-grazing-on open pasture. Animals are considered on pasture from April to November of each year. Samples were collected -in polyethylene containers.and transported.in ice chests with no preservatives added to the milk.

A well water sample was collected monthly. Separate raw and treated potable water samples were composited daily at-the City of Salem water treatment plant-. All samples were collected in new polyethylene containers.

Locally grown vegetable and fodder crops were collected at the time of harvest. Such samples were weighed and packed in plastic bags.

.Game (muskrat) has been collected annually (time of year dependent on weather conditions,' which affect pelt thickness) from local farms after being trapped, stripped of their pelts and gutted. The carcasses were packed in plastic bags and kept chilled in ice chests during transport.

8

Milk (Table C-5). - -

Milk samples were collected at 4 local dairy.farms (2 farms in NJ and 2 in Delaware).' Each sample'was.analyzed-'for I-131 and:gamma emitters. . -

D Iodine-131 was not detected in any of the 80'samples analyzed.

LLD sensitivities for both the indicator and the control station samples ranged from <0.1 to' <1.-O pCi/L;'- The maximum

-preoperational-.level detected.was 65 pCi/L which occurred

. following.a period of-atmospheric nuclear weapons tests.

Results from 1'983:-to 2003 ;are;.plotted on Figure 3,-with an

,inset graph.depictingithe current.year'back.to.1973.

Gamma spectroscopy performed.on each of the 80 samples indicated the presence of the.naturally-occurring'radionuclide K-40. All other. gamma emitters searched for.were.below:the-o -.Potassium-40 was.detected in all-880 sapiiiles --.'Concentrations for the 60 indicator station samples ranged from 1200 to 1520 pCi/L, withan-average.-of.1360 pCi/L. The-20 control

station sample concentrations ranged from 1210 to 1430 pCi/L, with an average'of,.1320 pCi/L-..-'he maximum -

preoperational level~detected was:2000:pCi/L, with an

.average..of 1437-pCi/L.--' -- -

.. .. 'f.: .::. ,i . .. - . .- . ..

Well Water.. (Ground=Water)'.(Tables: C-.6,C-7) :.

Although wells in the-vicinity 'of SGS/HCGS are,not-directly.'affected by plant operations, water samples were collected monthly from one farm's well,-during January..through December of-the year.. Each sample was'analyzed for.gross'alpha; gross beta, tritium,.arid gamma emitters. :. . : : -

Gross alpha activity-was-detected.-in-11of the.well water.

samples at. concentrations ranging from 0.-S to 3.7 pCi/L-and an average-of.-2.,.pCi/L.-. 'The maximum.preoperational'level- -

.detected was 9.6-pCi/L..., There-was -- no preoperational..average

.-.determined for. this analysis.-- --. ..-- :.

- i - . .. f-.,.-. - ,z- .4.- .. . I

-Gross',beta.activity'was detected.in all 12 well water samples.

Concentrations for-the samples ranged from 8.6 to 11-pCi/-L,

'with an average of lO'pCi/L.-:The 2003 gross-beta results are comparable with the .preoperational.results which ranged from

. ' <2.1, to.-38.,pCi/L; with, an-average value of 9-pCi/L...

Tritium activity was not detected in any of the well water

- samples.',The-LLD sensitivities.ranged-from:.<140.to <180 pCi/L.

The.maximum-,preoperational level'detected:.was :380 pCi/L.; -

. *Gamma spectroscopy performed-on each of.the..12 well water,

- samples indicated the~presence-of the naturally-occurring

..- 9^,.. .

IL radionuclides K-40 and Radium. All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

o Radium was detected in all 12 of the well water samples at concentrations ranging from 56 to 146 pCi/L with an average of 94 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2.0 pCi/L.

These values are similar to those found in the past 14 years. However, as with the 1989 through 2002 results, they are higher than those found in the preoperational program.

These results are due to a procedural change for sample preparation. The change results-in less removal of radon (and its daughter products) from the sample. It is reasonable to conclude that values currently observed are typical for this region.

o Potassium-40 was detected in: 4 of the samples at concen-trations ranging from 34 to-87.pCi/L and an average of 56 pCi/L. The- maximum preoperational level detected was 30 pCi/L.

Potable Water (Drinking Water) (Tables -C-8, C-9)

Both raw and treated potable water samples were collected and composited by Salem water treatment plant personnel. Each sample consisted of daily aliquots composited into a monthly sample. The raw water source for this plant is Laurel Lake and adjacent wells.

Each of the 24 individual samples was analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, tritium, iodine-131 and gamma emitters.

41 Gross alpha activity was detected in 9 raw water samples at concentrations of 0.8 to. 1.5 pCi/L and in 6 treated water samples ranging from 0.7 to 1.6 pCi/L. The averages for both raw and treated water samples was 1.1 pCi/L. The maximum pre-operational level detected was 2.7 pCi/L.

Gross beta activity was detected in all 24 samples at concentrations ranging from 2.1 to 4.1 pCi/L for both the raw and treated water. The average concentration for both raw and treated was 3.1 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.0 pCi/L, with an average of 4.2 pCi/L.

Tritium activity was not detected.in any of the-raw or treated water samples. LLD sensitivities ranged from <140 to <180.

pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 350 pCi/L, with an average of 179 pCi/L.

Iodine-131 measurements were performed to a sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/L even though the drinking water supplies are not affected by discharges from the Site since the receiving water body (Delaware River) is brackish and therefore the water is not used for human consumption. Iodine-131 measurements for all 24 samples were below the LLD sensitivities.

10

4 p ,3 ;r ,i . ?'

-E 4 1 These-sensitivities ranged from <0.1 to<.0.4 pCi/L.' There was no preoperational data available for -comparison.

M Gamma spectroscopy performed on each 'of the 24 monthly water samples indicated the'.presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40'. i All other gamma emitters searched for:were below the LLD.

o The radionuclide :K-40,was' detected' in 7'of- the-raw and

.treated potable waters'at. concentrations ranging. from 32-to

.78.pCi/L. The-combined .average'ffor.both;raw.and.treated

... positive-results:was::49pci/LL There-was:-no preoperational

. - . ! available fordc6mparison.

data . - . -.

Vegetables (Table C-10) .

Although vegetables. in the'region-are:not ir.rigated with:water into which liquid.plant-effluents have been discharged,-a-'variety'of: food products grown in the area for human'.consumpLionwere sampled at 4 indicator stations (10 samples). and 3 control- stations (10samples).

The..vegetables collected as management audit samples:were analyzed for gamma-emitters and-included-asparagus, cabbage',' sweet corn, peppers, spinach and tomatoes ;

Gamma spectroscopy performed- -on-each'of the-20 samples'indicated the presence of the'naturally-occurring.'radionuclide K-40. -All.-other

.gamma.emitters searched for were--below the.LLD.'. . ' -

Potassium-40.was detec'ted-.in all-2.0 samples. .'Concentrations -for the 10 indicator station samples ranged'from-1710 to 6400 pCi/kg-wet and averaged 2590 pCi/kg-wet. Concentrations for the 10

-. control station.samples'.-ranged:..from 144.0-.to 2910 pCi/kg-wet, anid

- averaged.-2260 pCi/kg-wet. :.The.average concentration'detected for all, sampl-es,. both .'indicat'or and :control,- was 2420 pCi/kg-wet.'

-- The maximum.preoperational--..evel 'detected-was 4800.pCi/kg-wet, with.an average of 2140:pCi/kg-wet.: : -

Game (Table C-1l) . '.. -. :'. .: --

.,..4'......

Although not 'required'by.-the.-SGS or.HCGS'Technical-.'

Specifications/ODCM,-:samples of:muskrats-inhabiting the: marshlands surrounding the Site, are collected. Local residents consume this game. The samples, when available;: are collected from 2 locations once a year as management audit samples and.analyzed for-gamma -

emitters. - .

r , .. : - , . .- ' - -- 4

I, ¢ Gamma spectroscopy.performed'.on the flesh indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclideuK'40.m All othercgamma emitters searched-for were-below the,.LLD., .'- i - ' . - -

Potassium-40 'was4detected in-:thew-indicator station-sample at a concentration .of 2840.:pCi/kg'wet-and the control station sample at 2670 pCi/kg-wet. .... . ..:

.;1l

I I The average for both muskrat samples was 2755 pCi/kg-wet. The maximum preoperational level detected was 27000 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 4400 pCi/kg-wet.

Fodder Crops (Table C-12)

Although not required by the SGS or HCGS Technical Specifications/ODCM, 6 samples of crops normally used as cattle feed (silage and soybeans) were collected from 2 indicator stations (3 samples) and 2 control station (3 samples). It was determined that these products may be a significant element in the food-chain pathway. Fodder crops are collected as management audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters. All of the locations from which samples were collected this year are milk sampling stations.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 6 samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides Be-7 and K-40.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Beryllium-7, attributed to cosmic-ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in both indicator silage samples at concentrations of 610 and 1030 pCi/kg-wet. It was detected in both the control station silage samples at 890 and 910 pCi/kg-wet. The average for all the silage samples was 860 pCi/kg-wet. The maximum preoperational level detected for silage was 4700 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2000 pCi/kg-wet. Be-7 was not detected in either of the indicator nor control station soybean samples. LLD sensitivities for the soybean samples were <27 and <60 pCi/kg-wet. The maximum preoperational level detected for soybean samples was 9300 pCi/kg-dry.

Potassium-40 was detected in all 6 samples. Concentrations for the 3 indicator station samples ranged from 4010 to 15300 pCi/kg-wet and for the 3 control station samples from 3910 and 15800 pCi/kg-wet. The average concentration detected for the silage samples (both indicator and control) was 4200 pCi/kg-wet.

Preoperational results averaged 7000 pci/kg-wet.

Results for the soybean samples (both indicator and control) averaged 15600 pCi/kg-wet which is comparable to preoperational studies when the average wet/dry factor of 1.2.is used.

Preoperational soybean results averaged 22000 pCi/kg-dry.

AQUATIC Environmental Consulting Services, Inc (ECS) collected all aquatic samples (with the exception of 6S2 shoreline -sediment). Surface water samples were collected in new polyethylene containers that were rinsed .twice with the sample medium prior to collection.

Edible fish and crabs are taken by net and then processed. In processing, the flesh is separated from the bone and shell and 12

,- 'si--i:!.

2C.'s placed in sealed polyethylene-containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests.; ... -

Sediment samples collected.by ECS were taken with a bottom grab sampler and frozen in sealed polyethylene containers before being transported in ice chests. MTS personnel c6llect 'location 6S2 shoreline sediment on the beach behind the observation building.

Surface Water (Tables C-13,:C-14, C-15) '

Surface water.samples were..:collected-monthly at.4 indicator-stations and one.--control-station in:the-Delaware estuary..

One location is at the. outfall ;area* (which-is the-area where-liquid radioactive effluents from the Salem Station are allowed to be discharged into the:Delaware :River) ,:. another.-is downstream from the outfall area, and -another .is-zdirectly-west of .the .outfall'area. at the mouth-of the.Appoquinimink RiveCr.:.Two -upstream locations are in the;Delaware River -and at the -mouth of the Chesapeake and'Delaware Canal,'. the,-latter -being sampled when the 1flow.is:from the. Canal'into the river..",.-Station .12C1r-,at-..the..mouth of.the, Appoquinimink River, serves-as they operational .control.Y All surface water--samples were analyzed monthly -for gross beta',,,tritium and gamma -emitters.-

Gross beta-activity.was detectedin.4-6 of the.indica.tor:-station samples ranging from 6.3 to :101 pCi-/L, with'an average.of: 38-..'-

pCi/L..Beta activity-was:detected in.all 12 of. the control -

station samples with-.concentrations ranging from 7.7. to.69 pCi/L,

--with:-an.average.:of -30,pCi/L..i- The:,maximum preoperational.level detected was 110 pCi/L, with an average of i32 .pCi/L.-, Quarterly results for all locations are plotted on Figure 4, for the years

-.1983. to 2003 .with an inset.-graph depicting :the current -year back

.to-1,973.,-.. ::-: ;- -

Tritium activity.was detected-in one of the control station samples .at a concentration of :185 pCi/L.. It was detected in 6 of the-indicator..station..samples at- concentrations ranging :from 150

-to 800 pCi/L with an average of-330 pCi/L. - LLD sensitivities for

.the remaining, station samples-, both indicator.; and- control, -ranged from.<140 to .<150 pCi/L;-: The: maximum preoperational level .---

detected was .600 pCi/L; -with anaverage of'210 pCi-/L.: -Positive results;from 1983 to-.2003 are-plotted on Figure 5, with an-inset graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the -48 indicator, station and 12 control station surface water samples indicated the presence of\ the natural-ly-occurring-radionuclide K-40.-Alla other:.gamma emitterscsearchedl'-for were below the LLD.

Potassium-40: was -detected -n A2 samples .from the indicator

-stationsratt-concentrationsranging'from 34-to .168 pCi/L -and-in 9-of-the .control --station samples ranging from 46: to 109 pCi/L.

- The!-average-..for-the indicator.`station -locations was 76 pCi/L,

13

while the average for the control station locations was 74 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 200 pCi/L, with an average of 48 pCi/L.

Fish (Table C-16)

Edible species of fish were collected semi-annually at 3 locations and analyzed for gamma emitters in flesh. Samples included catfish, weakfish, white perch and striped bass.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 4 indicator station samples and 2 control station samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40. All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

0 Potassium-40 was detected in all 4 samples from the indicator stations at concentrations ranging from 3460 to 4210 pCi/kg-wet for an average of 3750 pCi/kg-wet. K-40 was detected in both samples.from.*the control location at 3680 and 3890 pCi/kg-wet.' The average for.the control samples was 3785 pCi/kg-wet. The maximum preoperational level detected was 13000 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2900 pCi/kg-wet.

Blue Crab (Table C-17)

Blue crab samples were collected twice during the season at 2 locations, 1 indicator and 1 control, and the edible portions were analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on the flesh of the indicator station samples and the control station samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40. All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD. -

Potassium-40 was detected in both indicator station samples at concentrations of 2770 and 2880 pCi/kg-wet. It was detected in the control station samples at 2290 and 2420 pCi/kg-wet. The average for both the indicator and control..station samples was 2590 pCi/kg-wet. The maximum preoperational level detected was 12000 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2835 pCi/kg-wet.

Sediment (Table C-18)

Sediment samples were collected semi-annually from 7 locations, including 6 indicator stations and 1 control station. (Location 6S2 is the only shoreline sediment and it is directly affected by tidal fluctuations) Each of the 14 samples was analyzed for gamma emitters. Although trace levels of the man-made nuclide, Cs-137, were detected in some sediment samples, these levels were expected and well within the acceptable levels specified in section 3/4.12.1 of the Technical Specifications/ODCM.

14

Gamma spectroscopy was performed on each of the 12 indicator station samples and 2 control station"samples. In addition to the detection of Cs-137, the naturally-occurring radionuclides Radium, K-40 and

- ;Th-232 were'.also detected.- All.other'.gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD. ;-

Cesium-137.was detected .in-6; indicator station samples at concentrations ranging. from .28 -to 100 pCi/kg4-dry-with-an average of 49 pCi/kg-dry. .It was:detected-in-:one of the'-control station samples at a concentration::of 20 'pCi/kg-dry. . The maximum preoperational level detected was 400 pCi/kg-drywith an average of 150 pCi/kg-dry. Results from .1983 to '2003 are plotted. on Figure 6, with an 'inset-.graph'depicting the.current year.back-to 1973. 17..

-... . :'- , A Cobalt-60 .was not detected-in any of-the sediment samples either

'indicator. or control. :LLD:-sensitiviti'es for" the 14 samples,' .

indicator..and-control,: ranged.from <4..to <24:-pCi/kg-dry.' Results of. all the positive-values ifrom.1983, to' 2003-are'plotted on

.Figure 6,--with an:inset.sgraph.'depicting the current year back to 1973. There-was no preoperational: data-'available .for-comparison.

I - - ; - i , '

Potassium-40 was detected in-all 12 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from'1240 to 15400 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 8970 pCi/kg-dry. Concentrations detected in both:of the control station samples were at 14200 and 16400 pCi/kg-dry.

The average for both the indicator and control station samples was 9900 pCi/kg-dry. The maximum preoperational level detected

-was 21000 pCi/kg-dry,.'-with an. average of 15000 pCi/kg-dry.-

Radium was detected in all 12 indicator station samples at'con-centrations ranging from 86 to 950 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 570 pCi/kg-dry. .Concentrations'detected in both of.the control station samples were at 630'and 850.pCi/kg-dry, with an average'

-of.740 -pCi/kg-dry.'.The grand average for.both the indicator and control station samples was'590 pCi/kg-dry.. The maximum pre-operational level detected was 1200 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 760 pCi/kg-dry. . . .' ' - -

Thorium-232 was detected in all 12 indicator'-station samples at concentrations ranging from.'75 to 1230 pCi/kg-dry, with an average-of 770 pCi/kg-dry. Concentrations'detected in both of the control station samples were at 1040 and 1090'pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 1065 pCi/kg-dry. The grand average for both the indicator and control station samples was 810 pCi/kg-dry.

The maximum pre-operational level detected was 1300 .pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 840 pCi/kg-dry.

15 .

--- I I CONCLUSIONS The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations was conducted during 2003 in accordance with the SGS and HCGS Technical Specifications/ODCM. The LLD values required by the Technical Specifications/ODCM were achieved for this reporting period. The objectives of the program were also met during this period. The data collected assists in demonstrating that SGS and HCGS were operated in compliance with Technical Specifications/ODCM.

From the results obtained, it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations of radioactivity in environmental samples were as expected for an estuarine environment. No unusual radiological characteristics were observed in the environs of SGS/HCGS during this reporting period. Since these results were comparable.. to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, which ran from 1973 to 1976, and with historical results collected since commercial operation, we can conclude that the operation of the Salem and Hope Creek Stations had no significant impact on the radiological characteristics of the environs of that area.

16

TABLE 1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (PROGRAM.OVERVIEW) .

STATION CODE . COLLECTION

_MEDIUM INDICATOR. CONTROL FREQUENCY. .... TYPE/FREQUENCY*-OF ANALYSIS I. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT

a. Air Particulate -5S1 5Dl16El 14G1 Weekly ' -'-Gr-oss beta/weekly, .'

liF 2F6 Gamma scan/quarterly

.. 1 . I .

b. Air Iodine 5S1 5Dl-16E1 . 14G1'> Weekly, ;, ' ' Iodine-131/weekly "

¶ r'r..-

1 1F1 2F6' I rs '.1 1. ~

.t-/

. * . %- . - - . . a . > -

.? .

sl .;

e. . #-. .

.. . 3 * . , '.,. _ ...... ... , 4 ., . - ... X

II. DIRECT RADIATION ,. _ # . . @ : ! -

} *; # , *, : '

a. Thermoluminescent lS1 2S4 3S1 4S1 3G1 Quarterly w 4 . ' , ...- Gamma-dose/ quarterly Dosimeters.. ... 2S2 5D1 2E1 l17 1G3 I .. :. ..-, ... . . .-. , , .;, , _ . . . . .. . . .

5S1 lODi 3E1 2F2 100G ,: #.- , : -. . .

6S2 14D1 13Z1 2F6 16G1 :

7S1 15S1 16S1 4F2 14G1 , -

10S1 16E1 3H1 5F1 6F1 , , . - .

11S1 7F2 llF1 13F4 : , . .. . . ... . .. .. .. ..

r . w t *: . t 1 } . < '

4D2 9F1 2F5 3F2 '. ' ' : : " v >

, . , ,, 8 . * * .t, ^ l ',, t ,;

11E2 15D1 12E1 3F3 ..... .... . 1 X . .

16F2 10F2 12F1 13F2 ' t' v + _ . .. .. _ _ .. . . ..

13F3 14F2 15F3 + . , , . , _ . ,

\

.... .... X, .

, 8 . .

III. Terrestrial- Environment .. .

Monthly . Iodine-131/monthly

a. Milk 13E3 1474 203 3Gi (when animals are'not Gamma.scan/monthly

>- .. ' .t on pasture)

- Semi-monthly': Iodine-131/semi-mont hly (when animals are on Gamma scan/semi-mont hly

. pasture)

TABLE 1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

- (PROGRAM OVERVIEW) .. .!'

STATION CODE COLLECTION MEDIUM INDICATOR CONTROL .FREQUENCY ' TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS

b. Well Water 3E1 Monthly Gross alpha/monthly Gross beta/monthly Tritium/monthly Gamma scan/monthly

c. Potable Water 2F3 Monthly Gross alpha/monthly (Raw & Treated) (composited Gross beta/monthly daily) Tritium/monthly e v I Gamma scan/monthly Iodine-131/monthly '"'

d. Vegetables 2F4 2F9 1G4 2G2 Athalir s - Gamma scan/on'collection 6F2 14F3 3H5 - (at harvest)

e. Game IlD1 3E 1' Annually **Gamma scan/on collection (Muskrat)

f. Fodder Crops 13E3 14F4 3G1 Annually **Gamma scan/on collection 2G3 .. ,. -.*,

g. Soil 6S2 2F7 11F3 3G1 Every 3 years Garma scan/on collection 1OD1 2F9 14F4 -' k- - '(2004-2007-2010)

.. '!PI :.*'! . I,: . . . *,I.'- 1.' .}A,4a t6' :5F1 I I . . _. .

TABLE 1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (PROGRAM OVERVIEW)

STATION CODE COLLECTION MEDIUM INDICATOR CONTROL FREQUENCY TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS IV. AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT llAl 7E1 IF2 16F1 12C1 Monthly Gross beta/monthly

a. Surface Water Gamma scan/monthly Tritium/monthly***

b. Edible Fish 11A1 7E1 12C1 Semi- -

Gamma scan- (flesh)/on collection annfially t- I

c. Blue Crabs hlAl 12Cl Semi- Gamma scan (flesh)/on collection annually

d. Sediment llAl 6S2 7E1 12C1 Semi- Gamma scan/on collection 15A1 16F1 annually 16A1

Except for TLDs, the quarterly analysis is performed on a composite of individual samples collected during the quarter. - -

- Management audit analyses, not required by Technical Specifications or by specific commitments to local officials.

- - Tech Specs/ODCM require quarterly analysis but due td the tritium leak at Salem, it was decided to analyze surface waters on a monthly-basis for tritium. ' .

FIGURE 1 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY INAIR PARTICULATE I 1i t .'*Ij ;-

1983 THROUGH 2003 1000 GROSS BETA INAIR PARTICULATE 1973 THROUGH 2003 1000 -

Chemobyl 04-26-86 100RA-j-S, 1 -

100- 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 m

C, ; . , I. . -

._ 10..

0 10 If Hope Creek Criticality 06-28-86 . :I..

r~~~~ . * .. . ._.._.__............__.... .

1 * , , a T ... '.'..'.';..'.'.'.I. .' t.

1984 1986 $9$S~nj7. 0,a.99V: .,t1992-. ;t19-'-.156 tI;19 2000 2002 IQUARTERLY AVERAGEl

4 . '. , . , t,. ,- t- .

FIGURE 2 i 1: 1 $

AMBIENT RADIATION QFFSITE vs CONTROL STATION 1983 THROUGH 2003 10.0 I AMBIENT RADIATION - OFFSITE vs CONTROL STATION 1973 THROUGH 2003 10.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 - 4.0 Chemobyl Q4126-86 2.0 0.0 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000

. = 6.0 I.

0

.2 2 4.0 -

Hope Creek Criticality 06-28-86._... .

2.0 -

- OFF-SITE STATIONS

- l CONTROL STATIONS i3r re

. zf*.

. I-672!.. 8-. I i4'UI '. I,if,,; i--;.I. x 0.0 1984 1986 1988 1990 I S 1996 1998 2000 2002 88-2S'sVT 4IUA!'/ 't ¢!r V;gflf'.i k.i. QUARTERLYAVERAGE

i. i., { ..

j-'. I e 7.t;, I .

FIGURE 3 I I- - . - j !

IODINE -131 ACTIVITY IN MILK 20 - 1983 THROUGH 2003 IODINE-131 ACTMITY IN MILK 1973 THROUGH 2003 30.00 - 1968 1 2000 O000., XX Chernobyl 04-26-86 10 - 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000

-j Hclpe Creek n CCriticality 11/- 06-28-86 i

0

-10 1984 1986 1988 199f0. 1§k I 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

.;

4 ~i A : .ik .1i I I,t

!,- f: - ip Y 'V~

, f IQUARTERLY AVERAGE CIc2

FIGURE 4 1- tf. ._ V.. .I.. .. . - t- ts:

): 1GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER . I . .

- - 1983 THROUGH 2"063 ;(:-

1000 I GROSS BETA ACTVTY IN SURFACE WATER 1973 THROUGH 2003 Chernobyl 04-26-86 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 100 -

-'C.

w 10.

It,

u,?.

10 -

.. . .. t 4.4 1I ~~r~;.^

. . . . ;s.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii v m r. . . . . . . . . . . . . I I . . . I ,.

1984 1986 1988 fft-,'ffE - 1 2T'(AJr1;S94 is ';J!ffjb 6 1998 2000 2002 z! .>(l.99 IQUARTERLY AVERAGE

I . !, 1j FIGURE 5 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1983 THROUGH 2003 10,000 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1973 Through 2003

'10000 -A~S M E W X I.I0-C . ,100 Chernobyl 04-26-86 1,000 - /y 1976 1982 1988 1994

. -.1 .0 0

-... 100

'AI,~

¶.j 1

.'1~\ -. -' %.;

Hope Creek Criticality 06-28-86

- 10 ............................... I...I................. I-I I .- I I -

.I -

I . I. II . . . . IIIIIII 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 QUARTERLY AVERAGE

. 1 I ! : , ;

9 is, . rI !

FIGURE 6 CESIUM-137 & COBALT-60 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1983 THROUGH 2003

. .. i I Ii I 10000 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

CESIU137 & COIALT40 ACTIVITY I AQUATIC SED JENT

- CS-137 1073 THROUGH 2003

- CO-60 1000 100 1000 - l0 n-,

u, 0) 0 CL Chernobyl 04-26-86 100 -

? 1 '

A- !;'I i" , 7 j - " i, ; i i

,-t"

Hope Creek Criticality 06-26-86

- p 2 i .I, 7 I i. . i i X l, , a -

10 I I I I I I I r ~~

I I

~

I

~ r ~r ~

I I

- Tl r9 l l l' l I

1984 1986 1988 - Lb'W-bi "-+-49 "2;' 99;4-1 -!1g'69 1998 2000 2002 t i -b i' "I-lSEMI-ANNUAL AVERAGE c03

IL REFERENCES

[1] Public Service Enterprise Group . "Environmental Report, Operating License Stage - Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2". 1971.

[2] Public Service Enterprise Group . "Environmental Report, Operating License Stage - Hope Creek Generating Station". 1983.

(3] United States Atomic Energy Commission. "Final Environmental Statement -

Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2". Docket No. 50-272 and 50-311. 1973.

[4] United States Atomic Energy Commission. "Final Environmental Statement -

Hope Creek Generating Station, Docket No. 50-354. 1983.

[5] Public Service Enterprise Group . "Updated Final Safety Analysis Report - Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2". 1982.

[6] Public Service Enterprise Group . "Updated Final Safety Analysis Report - Hope Creek Generating Station.

[7] Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Annual Reports 1973 through 1982".

[8] Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Preopeiation Summary - 1973 through 1976". RMC-TR-77-03, 1978.

[9] Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - December 11 to December 31, 1976".

RMC-TR-77-02, 1977.

(10] Maplewood Testing Services. "Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Annual Reports 1983 through 2002".

[11] Maplewood Testing Services. "Quality Assurance Plan."

February, 2004 (12] Public Service Enterprise Group . "Salem Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specifications", Appendix A to Operating License No. DPR-70, 1976, Sections 6.8.4.h'- 1,2,3 and 6.9.1.7.

(13] Public Service Enterprise Group . "Hope Creek Generating Station Technical Specifications", Appendix A to Facility Operating License No. NPF-57, 1986, Sections 6.8.4.h - 1,2,3 and 6.9.1.6.

[14] Public Service Enterprise Group . "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual"

- Salem Generating Station.

26

REFERENQES: :(cont' d)

[15] Public Service Enterprise Group . "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual"

- Hope Creek Generating Station.

[16] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Prescribed Procedures for Measurement of Radioactivity in Drinking Water." EPA-600/4-80-032, August, 1980, "Env'ironme. ta Tec n.cl p ificaio

[17] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. "Environmental Technical Specifications For Nuclear Power Plants." ;Regulatory.Guide 4.8, December, 1975.

if. . . . :.*

*if .!. : H . .. -f ,if, . ;-

.3 -, .if*@- if . !: . . *if' '

f: .

J '. .:.,'. * . f , I ' I .*:. 1

.. . . I ; .. .

~. .I I .: . ' I. ..

i.' if i I

~~ I J' I .3 . ' .:i I. *. .. .. i

-. !* . ,,^ I, I , ,.

I .

t .. f : I.::

I9i :: . . ...

-I .4.' . .

"*-I -

lf.

.i .4i f.

if I.

I

, . : .,I t . 11:1. , r..- -

, I 27

APPENDIX A PROGRAM

SUMMARY

29

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STA XION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANUARY 1, 2003 to DECEMBER 31, 2003 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) of Analyses Detection (Range) Distance and Direction (Range) (Range) Reported Performed (LLD) Measurements I. AIRBORNE Air Particulates Beta 312 6.0 21 (260 /260) 14G1 11.8 ml WNW 22 (52 /52) 22 (52 i52 - 0 iO' pCi/m I I(8-52) (9.55) (9-55) 1F1 5.8 miN 22 (52/52) 0 (9-52)

.¢ ..

2F6 7.3 ml NNE 22 (52/52) 0 19-51)

Gamma . ,., ,, , x .. ,. .. o t-A Be7. 24 6.7 54 (20 /20) 16E1 4.1 ml NNW 59 (4/4) 52 (4/4) 0 (44-68) (52-68) (44-56)

K-40 24 11 13 (4120) 16E1 4.1 mi NNW 18 (2/4) 9 (1 /4) 0 (8-21) :*1(15-21) (9-9)

Air Iodine. 1-131 312 15 - < LLD < LLD -; <LLD 0

. 110O., p~im)l 11DIRECT. - -

Direct Radiation Quarterly. 196 4.2 (172 /172) 2S2 0.4 ml NNE 6.5 (4/4) 4.4 124/24 ) - 0 (mrad/std. month). Badges 1(2.9-7.3) . . - (6.2-7.3) : (3.4-5.6)

III TERRESTRIAL _ .. . . . .. . D..

Milk 1-131 80 1.0 ' <LLD < LLD < LLD 0 (pCI/U Gamma K-40 80 50 1360 (60/60) 13E3 4.9 ml W 1400 (20/20) 1320 (20/20) 0 (1200-1 520) (1330-1520) (1210-1430)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANU'ARY 1, 2003 to DECEMBER 31, 2003 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) of Analyses Detection (Range) Distance and Direction (Range) (Range) Reported Performed (LLD)

Measurements III TERRESTRIAL Well Water Alpha 12 2.9 2.1 (1 1112 1 3E1 4.1 mi NE 2.1 (11 /12 ) No Control 0 (pCi/Li (0.5-3.7) (0.5-3.7) Location Beta 12 1.0-. 10 (12/12) 3E1 4.1 mi NE 10 (12/12) No Control 0 (8.6-11) (8.6-11) Location H-3 12 180 < LLD < LLD No Control 0 Location W Gamma K-40 12 58 56 (4 /12 ) 3E1 4.1mi NE 56 (4/12) No Control 0 (34-87) (34-871 Location RA-NAT 12 6.9 94 (12 /12 ) 3E1 4.1mi NE 94 (12/121 No Control 0 (56-146) (56-146) Location Potable Water Alpha 24 1.5 1.1 (15/24 ) 2F3 8.0 mi NNE 1.1 (15 /24) No Control 0 (pCi/L) (0.7-1.61 (0.7-1.6) Location Beta 24 1.0*.. 3.1 (24 /24) 2F3 8.0 mi NNE 3.1 (24 /24 ) No Control 0 (2.1-4.11 (2.1-4.1) Location H-3 24 180 < LLD < LLD No Control 0 Location Gamma K-40 24 58 49 (7 /24) 2F3 8.0 mi NNE 49 (7 /24 ) No Control 0 (32-78) (32-78) Location 1-131 24 0.4 < LLD < LLD No Control 0 Location RA-NAT 24 6.9 < LLD < LLD No Control 0 Location

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION . DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANUARY 1. 2003 to DECEMBER 31. 2003 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean -.. ... Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number, Limit of . Mean . ! Name ,. .Mean . Mean , Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) of Analyses Detection (Range) Distance and Direction (Range) . (Range)., Reported Performed (LLD) e - .- - . -..- . . I . Measurements III TERRESTRIAL Gamma I ! . I I Fruit & K-40 20 70 2590 (10/10) 2F9 7.5 ml NNE 3170 (4 /4) 2260 (10 /10 ) 0 Vegetables (1710-6400) (1740-64001 (1440-2910) tpCi/Kg-wet) RA-NAT 20 17 <LLD <LLD <LLD 0 Game Gamma Ip Ci/Kg-wet) K-40 2 70 ,2840 (Il./ 3E1 4.1 ml. NE 2840 11 /1) 2670 (.1(1 ) 0 (J)

(2840) (2840) (2670)

Fodder Crops Gamma (pCI/Kg-wet) Be-7 6 60 820 (2 /3 ) 14F4 7.6 mi.WNW 1030(1 /2) 900 (2/3) 0 (610-1030) (1030) (890-910)

K-40 6.: 70 7830 (3 /3 ) 3G1 17 ml NE 10200 (2 /2) 8130 (3/3). 0 (4010-15300) (4680-15800) (3910-15800)

RA-NAT 6 23 < LLD < LLD < LLD 0 IV AQUATIC I , ,

9urface Water S Beta . 60 - 7.0 38 (46.148) 7E1 4,5 ml SE 65 1212) 30 (12/12)

(pCIIL)I _.. 1... . -16.3-l. - - ;*.;.

-.-- - 1(35-101) (7.7-69)

Hi-3 60 '150 330 (6 /48 1 7E1 4.5 ml SE 445 (3/12) 185 (1 /12 ) 0 (150-800 --- --- -- 1210-800[ (185-185)'

Gamma K-40 60 . - 58 76. (42/48) 7E1 4.5 mi SE . .100112/121 74 (9 /12) 0 (3-168) ...44-168) (46-109)

7 ' . f : ' , . . .1 " ' ; . . . i , . " . ... ; . ' I .2-IV AQUATIC i . 1 .. - . ..

, I . , ! ...

Blue Crabs Gamma (pCi/kg-wet) K-40 4 70 2820 (2/2) 11A1 0.2 ml SW 2820 (2 /2 ) 2360 (2 /2) 0 (2770-2880) (2770-2880) (2290-2420)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANU !ARY 1, 2003 to DECEMBER 31, 2003 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) of Analyses Detection (Range) Distance and Direction (Range) IRange) Reported Performed (LLD)

Measurements Edible Fish Gamma (pCi/kg-wet) K-40 6 70 3750 (4 /4 ) 7E1 4.5 mi SE 3840 (2/2) 3780 (2/2) 0 (3460-4210) (3460-4210) (3680-3890)

Sediment (pCi/kg-dry) Gamma Be-7 14 238 < LLD < LLD 0 K-40 14 70 8960 (12/12 ) 12C 1 2.5 mi WSW 15300 (2 /2) 15300 (2 /2) 0 (1240-15400) (14200-16400) (14200-16400)

Co-60 14 24 <LLD < LLD 0 Cs-134 14 16 < LLD < LLD 0 Cs-137 14 13 49 (6 /12 ) 15A1 0.3 mi NW 64 (2/2) 20 1 /2 ) 0 128-100) (28-100) (20-20)

RA-NAT 14 45 570 (12 /12) IIAl 0.2 mi SW 870 (2 12 ) 740 12 /2) 0 (86-895) (848-895) (628-849)

Th-232 14 50 770 (12 /12) 1lA1 0.2 mi SW 1150 (2/2 ) 1060 (2/2) 0 (75-1230) (1080-1220) (1040- 1090)

LLD listed is the lower limit of detection which we endeavored to achieve during this reporting period. In some instances nuclides were detected at concentrations above the LLD values shown.

Mean calculated using values above LLD only. Fraction of measurements above LLD are in parentheses.

Typical LLD values.

r

APPENDIX B I

.I;

.I.

SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND . I LOCATIONS .I :

I ,

t i

i 35

APPENDIX B

. .: '; iSAMPLE DES IGNATION The PSEG'sMaplewood Testing Services identifies samples by a.

three-part code. .The first two-letters are theprogram

'identification code; Becauseof th'e proximity of the Salem and Hope Creek Stations a common environmental surveillance program is being conducted.: The','identification code; "SA",' has been: applied to Salem and Hope Creekstations. The next three letters are for the media sampled' ,.

AIO = Air Iodine IDM = Immersion Dose (TLD)

APT = Air Particulate MLK = Milk

'ECH.= Hard'Sh'ell Blue Crab'.' PWR - Potable Water (Raw)

ESF = Edible' Fish PWT = Potable Water (Treated)

LESS.= Sediment SOL = Soil .'

-FPL = Green Leafy'Vegetables SWA -Surface Water FPV = Vegetables (Various) VGT - Fodder'Crops (Various)

,GAM- =Game,(Muskrat).:. ' ' WWA Well-Water The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from a standard reference point. Of these, the first.two represent each of the sixteefnf-angular sectors of,22.5-degrees centered about' the reactor site.' Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in',a clockwise direction; e.g'.,:-2=NNE, 3=NE, j4,ENE, etc. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the reference' point: .

S On-site location - ."E = 4-5 miles off-site

. A.= 0-1 miles-off-site F = 5-10 .miles off-site B'- 1-2 miles off-site , G = 10-20 miles off-site C '2-3 miles.off-site H = >20 miles off-site

-D =3-4 miles-off-site

.= i-The last number is'th6 station numerical designation within each sector and: zone;,e'.g., 1,2,3.:', *For example,'the designation' SA-WWA-3E1'would indicate a sample in' the .Salem and Hope Creek progra(SA)', consisting oftwell water '(WWA), which had been collected in sector number 3, .centered at"45? (n6rth east)'with respect to the reactor site at a radiaildistance of 4 to 5miles off-site, ,(therefore, radial-.distance -E)." The, number 1 indicates that this is.sampling station'*l in'that particular sector.-

37

TABLE B-1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Specific information about the individual sampling locations are given in Table B-1. Maps B-1 and B-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the Site. A Portable Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to provide the coordinates of sampling locations. The Datem used was WGS 84.

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL SAMPLE TYPE DEG. MIN. SEC DEG. MIN. SEC iS1 0.55mi. N of vent 39 16 75 13 IDM 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE of vent; Lamp Pole 65 Near HC Switch 39 07 75 - 32 - 00 IDM Yard 2S4 0.59 mi. NNE of vent 39 16 75 - 31 - 55 IDM 3S1 0.58 mi. NE of vent 39 08 75 - 31 - 41 IDM 4S1 0.60 mi. ENE of vent 39 02 75 33 IDM 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 39 38 75 - 31 - 08 AIO,APT,IDM Lo 6S2 0.2 mi. ESE of vent; observation building 39 43 75 55 IDM,SOL,ESS 7S1 0.12 mi. SE of vent; station personnel gate 39 44 75 03 IDM 10S1 0.14 mi. SSW of vent; inlet cooling water bldg. 39. 41 75 10 IDM 11S1 0.09 mi. SW of vent; service water inlet bldg. 39 43 75 12 IDM 15SI 0.57 mi. NW of vent 39 10 75 32 IDM 16S1 0.54 mi. NNW of vent 39 13 75 26 IDM 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; outfall area 39 59 75 25 ECH,ESF,ESS,SWA 15A1 0.3 mi. NW of vent; cooling tower blowdown 39 67 75 19 ESS discharge line outfall 16A1 0.7 mi. NNW of vent; south storm drain discharge 39 24 75 58 ESS line 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; west bank of Delaware River 39 - 27 - 22 75 - 34 - 08 ECH,ESF,ESS,SWA 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE of vent; Alloway Creek Neck Road 39 18 75 -32 -11 IDM 5D1 3.5 ml. E of vent; local farm 39 - 28 - 24 75 - 28 - 22 AIO,APT,IDM 1OD1 3.9 mi. SSW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Spur 39 37 75 44 IDM,SOL 11D1 3.5 ml. SW of vent 39 49 75 - 34 - 26 GAM 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW of vent; Bay View, Delaware 39 02 75 - 35 - 31 IDM 15D1 3.8 mi. NW of vent; Rt. 9, Augustine Beach 39 08 75 - 35 - 02 IDM 2E1 4.4 mi. NNE of vent; local farm 39 23 75 26 IDM 3E1 4.1 mi. NE of vent; local farm 39 07 75 - 28 - 41 GAM,IDM,VGT,WWA,FPV

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL SAMPLE TYPE DEG. MIN. SEC DEG. MIN. SEC 7E1 4.5 mi. SE of vent; I mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 39 - 25 - 08 75 64 ESF,ESS,SWA llE2; ' -5.0 'mi.SW'of ve'rt'; Rt. 9 39 - 24 20 75'- 35 33 IDM 12E1 4.4 mi WSW- of-vent; Thomas Landing 39 52 75 - 36 - 59 ' IDM '

13E1 4.2'mi.-W of vent; Diehl House Lab 39 - 27 - 59 75 - 36 - 44 IDM 13E3 4.9 mi. W ,of vent; Joseph Vari, Odessa, DE ' 39 - 27 - 17 75 30, MLK,FPV,VGT.

16E1 4.1'mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 39 -30 - 47 75 - 34 - 34 AIO,APT,IDM,SOL IFl 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg.. 39 - 32 - 45 75 - 31 - 06 AIO,APT,IDM 1F2 7.1 mi;N of vent;'midpoint'of Delaware River 39 - 33 - 08 75 - 32 - 54 SWA 2F2 8'.7 mi. NNE of vent; Corner of 5 th & Howell,- 39 - 34 38 3- 75 - 28 - 04 ' 1DM

-Salem :z 2F3 8.0 mi::NNE-of vent; Salem Water,Company .39'.- 33 --40. .75-- 27-- l PWR,PWT 2F4 6.3 mi. NNE of vent; local farm *33 - 21 75 - 30 - 33 FPV,FPL 2F5- 7.4 mi.- NNE of.vent; Salem HighSchool. - 39;--33 -- :27 75 - 28 - 31 IDM 2F6 :7.*3 mi. NNE of vent; Southern Training Center 39 - :33 -- 43 75- 28 -48 AIO,APT,IDM 2F7 '5.7 mi. NNE of vent; local 'farm .39 - 32 - 40 75 - 30 -- 53 *SOL

'0 2F8 5.3 mi., NNE OF..vent ;local-farm,., 39 - 31 - .54 75 - 18 FPV 2F9--. ;7.5 mk.- NNE of vent;.Tilbury-Farms ,-'45 S. 39.- 33 - 55 .29 -30 FPV, FPLFSOL Tilbury,.Rd, Salem 3F2 5.1 ri., flE of vent;Hancocks Bridge Municipal Bld 39 - 30 - 25 75 - 27 - 36 IDM 3F3 8.6 mi. NE of vent; Quinton Township School 39 - 32- 75 - 24 - 45 IDM 3F6 6'.5 mi. NE of vent; #324 Salem/Hancocks Bridge 39 - 32 - 03 75 -28 - 00 FPV Road '

4F2 6.0 mi."-ENEof vent; Mays Lane, Harmersville 39 - 29 -`58 - 75 - 26 - 03 IDM SF1 6.5 mi. E of vent; Canton 39.- 28 '22 75 - 24 - 59 IDM,SOL 6F1 6.4 mi. ESE of vent; Stow Neck Road 39 ;24 75 - 25.- 09 IDM 6F2 8.2 mi. ESE of vent; RD#3 Box 160 Bridgeton, NJ 39 - 26 - 04 75 - 23 - 09 FPV,FPL 7F2 9.1 mi. SE of vent; Bayside, New Jersey 39 - 22 - 56 75 - 24 - 17 IDM 9Fi 5.3 mi. S of vent; D.P.A.L. 48912-30217 39 - 23 - 03 75 - 32 - 32 IDM 34 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW of vent; Rt. 9 39 - 23 01 75 - - 09 IDM llFl 6.2 mi. SW of vent; Taylor*s Bridge Delaware 39 24 44 75 -37 -37 IDM 12Fi 9.4 mi. WSW of vent; Townsend Elementary School 39- 23 47 75 -41 -18 IDM 13F2 6.5 mi. W of vent; Odessa, Delaware 39 - 18 75 -39 . IDM 13F3 9.3 mi. W of vent;:Redding Middle School, 39 14 75- 42' 32 IDM Middletown, Delaware 13F4 9.8 mi. W of vent; Middletown, Delaware, :39 -- ; 26 - 51 75 - 43 - 07 IDM

TABLE B-1 (cont d)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL SAMPLE TYPE DEG. MIN. SEC DEG. MIN. SEC 14F2 6.6 mi. WNW of vent; Boyds Corner 39 00 75 59 IDM 14F3 5.4 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 39 33 75 55 FPV,FPL 14F4 7.6 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 39 - 30 - 44 75 52 MLK,VGT,SOL 15F3 5.4 mi. NW of vent 39 - 30 - 58 75 36 IDM 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal 39 - 33 - 55 75 25 ESS,SWA 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW of vent; Delaware City Public School 39 - 34 - 18 75 25 IDM 1G 10.3 mi. N of vent; local farm 39 - 36 - 31 75 59 FPV,FPL 1G3 19 mi. N of vent; N. Church St. Wilmington, Del 39 - 44 - 16 75 31 IDM 1G4 10.8 mi. N of vent; (Dads Produce) Rte. 49, South 39 - 37 - 55 75 44 FPV Broadway, Pennsville 2G2 13.5 mi. NNE of vent; Moore's Market; 324 Pointers 39 19 75 10 FPV Auburn Road (Rt. 540), Salem, NJ 08079 2G3 12 mi. NNE of vent; Asa Caldwallader,: Waldac Farms, 39. 21 75 53 MLKFPV,VGT Corner of Routes 540 & 45, Mannington, NJ 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; Mr. Lee Williams Farm 39 - 35 - 56 75 47 IDM,MLK,VGT,SOL 9G1 10.3 mi. S of Vent; Mr. Goldsburrough, 1784 39 - 18 - 47 75 - 33 , 50 FPV Woodland Beach Rd., ,Smyrna, Delaware 0o 10G1 12 mi. SSW of vent; Smyrna, Delaware ! 39 - 18 - 13 75 05 IDM 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of vent; Rte. 286; Bethel Church Road; 39 31 - 18 75 30 AIO,APT,IDM Delaware 14G2 12.1 mi. WNW of venrt; Locust Grove Farm & Garden 39 - 31 - 21 75 57 FPV Center; 1084 Bethel Church Road; Middletown, DE 19709 16G1 15 mi. NNW of vent; Across from Greater Wilmington 39' -. 40 - 38 75 - 35 - 35 IDM Airport 3H1 32 mi. NE of vent; National Park, New Jersey 39 - 51 - 36 75 - 11 - 06 IDM 3H5 25 mi. NE of vent; Sorbello Girl's Market 39 - 41 - 02 75 - 12 - 23 FPL,FPV I.

NOTE: All station locations are referenced to the midpoint of the two Salem Units' Vents. The coordinates of this location are: Latitude N 39° - 27' - 45.3" and Longitude W 750 - 32' - 09.7".

All Game (GAM), Vegetables(FPV & FPL) and Vegetation (VGT), are management audit samples. They are not required by the Salem & Hope Creek Stations' Tech Specs nor listed in the Station's ODCM. Vegetable samples are not always collected in consecutive years from the same farmer since they rotate the type of crop they grow.

s A.. .4, MAP B-1 ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS

- ~ f ;

I 13 5 9

MIT4 G.: 01101/04 %911 4* AV3 FR-n : 6.PIe~ nsI1 atel3ts UI - de lLdo 41

42

."I8 . ,' ' ... I.

- . . . , o. i- l - X - _ I . ! .. ,, . . _. ,:

. ,I

.L,),: I ix "C.

"l' APPENDIX C , I

~~~ . ' .~--. ..- ..

,:t. .

. el .... .

,y I

' . DATA.. TABLES..' _ f

. .. -, *5

. ' '-, . t ,,; - .

* ~-5

- Ni

- 5_ *.,

~~ ~ ~ '5 ~ ~4: ,X I ^i.G t ,

12

.5 , '- ,

.1-2'

t -- I I

/

,t I.-

j7 I

-4.

,

ft .;

11 I*

.1

-- w

1. .

.5.-

}i

-.:A :7 .

f rg.

I I i

- S I j I

. _ _It

-1. J. 1.

. -:1' I.

. :.4

- -5 . 5S.5 - -

43

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES Appendix C presents the analytical results of the 2003-Radio-logical Environmental Monitoring Program for the period of January 1 to December 31, -2003.. --

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE NO. - TABLE DESCRIPTION. - - PAGE ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT AIR PARTICULATES C-1 2003 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Quarterly Composites of Air Particulates.. :-. . . ........ .. ' . 49' C-2 2003 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Air, Particulates. 50 AIR IODINE C-3 2003 Concentrations of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air. ....... .52 DIRECT RADIATION THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS C-4 2003 Direct Radiation Measurements - Quarterly TLD'Results .... 54

- ' TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT MILK - ..

C-5 2003 Concentrations of Iodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Milk... 55 WELL'WATER.- - -

C-6 2003 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters, and Tritium in Well Water ....................................... 57

<45

fLL DATA TABLES (cont'd.)

TABLE NO TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT (cont'd)

C-7 2003 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water .58 POTABLE WATER C-8 2003 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters, and Tritium in Raw and Treated Potable Waters .59 C-9 2003 Concentrations of Iodine 131 and Gamma Emitters in Raw and Treated Potable Water .60 FOOD PRODUCTS C-10 2003 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetables .61 C-11 2003 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Game .62 FODDER CROPS C-12 2003 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fodder Crops .63 AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT SURFACE WATER C-13 2003 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Surface Water 64 C-14 2003 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water .65 C-15 2003 Concentrations of Tritium in Quarterly Composites of Surface Water.......................................................... 67 EDIBLE FISH C-16 2003 Concentrations of Strontium-89, Strontium-90 and Gamma Emitters in Edible Fish .68 46

DATA TABLES (cont'd.)

TABLE NO . TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE BLUE CRABS C-17 2003 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Crabs ................. 69 SEDIMENT C-18 2003 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment . . 70 SPECIAL TABLES LLDs C-19 2003 PSE&G Maplewood Testing Services' LLDs for Gamma Spectroscopy ............. ..:;-. 71 47 ..

Table C-1 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS*

IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES r

I Results in Units of 10 3 pCi/m3 +1- 2 sigma STATION Sampling Period <--- Gamma Emitters --- >

ID Start Stop Be-7: . K-40

- I . I &

I . , , .i . .

'- I r-

.- I;-

SA-APT-5S 11 12/30/2002 to 03/31/2003 55+/-4 <3 SA-APT-1 F1 12/30/2002 to 03/31/2003 51 +/-4 <5 SA-APT-2F6 12/30/2002 to 03/31/2003 54+/-4 <5 SA-APT-5D11 12/30/2002 to 03/31/2003 46+/-3 -. <3 SA-APT-1 6E-1 :i ) (C - :.12/30/2002 to 03/31/2003 60+/ 21 +/-4

, 13 SA-APT-1 4( J1 (C), . I,: . 1i 2/30/2002 I., . '

to 63/31/2003 44+/-4 9+/-2 SA-APT-5S 1 03/31/2003 to 06/30/2003 53+/-4' <3 SA-APT-1 F1 03/31/2003 to 06/30/2003 54+/-4 <3 SA-APT-2F6 03/31/2003 to 06/30/2003 54+/-4 <4 SA-APT-5D1- 03/31/2003- .~

to 06/30/2003 51+/-4 -<3 SA-APT-16E1 -. 03/31/2003, to 06/30/2003 55+/-4 <3 SA-APT-14G1(C) 03/31/2003 to 06/30/2003 51+/-4 <4 SA-APT-5S1 06/30/2003 to 09/29/2003 65+/-4 8+/-2 SA-APT-1 F1 06/30/2003 to 09/29/2003 58+/-4 <3 SALAPT-2F6- 06130/2003 to 09/29/2003 53+/-4 <9 SA-APT-5D1 - -06/30/2003 to .09/29/2003 57+/-4 9+/-2 SA-APT-16E1 06/30/2003 to /.09/30/2003 68+/-4 - 15+/-3 SA-APT-14G1 (C) 06/30/2003 to 09/30/2003 56+/-4 <3 SA-APT-5S1 09/29/2003 to 12/29/2003 44+/-3 <3 SA-APT-lF1 09/29/2003 to 12/29/2003 45+/-4 .: <3 SA-APT-2F6 . O,.9/29/2003 to; 12/29/2003 49+/-3 .- <3 SA-APT-5D 1 09/29/2003 to 12/29/2003 52+/-3 <3 SA-APT-1 6E1 09/30/2003 to 12/30/2003 52+/-4 <6 SA-APT-14G1 (C) 09/30/2003 to 12/30/2003 55+/-4 <4

' AVERAGE :,'53+/-11 :

All other gamriia emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

(C) Control Station

-49

TABLE C-2 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 103 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 sigma

<------------------------------------------- STATION ID ----------------------------------------- >

Control MONTH SA-APT-14G1 SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-1F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-5S1 AVERAGE January 22+/-2 19+/-2 16+/-2 19+/-2 19+/-2 20+/-2 19+/-3 16+/-2 20+/-2 22+/-2 22+/-2 24+/-2 19+/-2 20+/-6 29+/-2 28+/-2 28+/-2 31 +/-2 26+/-2 34+/-3 29+/-5 26+/-2 25+/-2 23+/-2 27+/-2 23+/-2 23+/-2 25+/-3 18+/-2 27+/-2 24+/-2 28i+/- 2 19+/-:2 21 +/- 2 23+/-8 February 27+/-2 25+/-2 26+/-3 28+/-3 25+/-2 25+/-2 26+/-2 19 +/-1 19+2 18+/-2 16+/-2 14+/-2 16+/-2 17+/-4 16+/-2 17+/-2 17+/-2 16+/-2 13+/-2 16+/-2 16+/-3 22+/-2 30+/-2 27+/-3 26i+/- 3 23+/-2 28+/-2 26+/-6 LA March 27+/-3 29+/-3 26+/-2 25+/-2 27+/-3 28+/-3 27+/-3

0) 26+/-3 25+/-2 22+/-2 30+/-2 17+/-2 24+/-2 24+/-9 16+2 14+/-2 18+/-2 15+/-2 15+/-2 14+/-2 15+/-3 17+/-2 15+/-2 16+/-2 17+/-2 12+/-2 14+/-2 15+/-4 April 19+/-2 19+2 18+/-2 17+/-2 15+/-2 17+/-2 18+/-3 19+/-2 18+/-2 17+/-2 18+/-2 14+/-2 20+/-2 18+/-4 33+/-3 27+/-2 27+/-2 29+/-2 20+/-2 25+/-2 27+/-8 17+/-2 17+/-2 14+/-2 17+/-2 15+/-2 20+/-2 17+/-4 24+/-3 22+/-2 27+/-3 24+/-2 22+/-2 21 +/-2 23+/-5 May 18+/-2 14+/-2 15+/-2 15+/-2 13+/-2 15 +/- 2 15 +/- 3 9+/-2 10:+/-2 10+/-2 9+/-2 13+/-2 12i+/-2 11 +/-3 10+/-2 11 +/-2 10+/-2 11 +/-2 8+/-2 10+/-2 10+/-2 132+/-2 12+/-2 15+/-2 12+/-2 13+/-2 14+/-2 13+/-2 June 9+/-2 10+/- 2 9+/-2 10+/-2 10+/-2 11 +/-2 10+/-2 21 +/-2 19+/-2 16+/-2 18+/-2 17+/-2 15+/-2 18+/-4 12+/-2 12+/- 2 14+/-2 11 +/-2 12+/-2 11 +/-2 12+/-2 39+/-3 36+/-3 35+/-3 35+/-3 33+3 32+/-3 35+/-5

TABLE C-2 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of ,10' pCi/m 3 +/- 2 sigma .

<-------------------------------------------- STATION ID -------------------------------------------- >

Control' MONTH SA-APT-14G1 SA-AiT-16E1, SA-APT-1F1.. SA-APT-2F6 . SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-5S1 - AVERAGE July 23+/-2:': 20+/-2 25+/-3 24+/-2 ' 24+/-2 25+/-2 23+/-3 19+/-21' 21 2 21 +/-2 17+/-2 13+/-2 20+/-2 19+/-6 24+/-2.' 23+/-2 21 +/-2 24+/-2 21 +/-2 21+/-2 22+/-3 29+/-2 . 20+/-2 ' 27+/-3 25+/-2 . '30+/-3 29+/-3 26+/-7 19+/-2 16+/-2 17+/-2 16+/-2 15i2 18+/-2 .,17+/-3 August 16+/-2-2 13+/-2 .i 12+/-2 , . 12_2 16+/-2 15+/-2 '14+/-4 26+/-3+/- 3, 24+/-3 -3 ' 30+/-3 28+/-3 .. I 22+/-3 26+/-3 26+/-5 26+/-2 '. 28+/-3 29+/-3 :':. 27+/-3 28+/-3 27+/-3 27+/-2 29+/-2 25i2 30+/-2 28i2 27i2' 28 +/-2 .. 2.+/-4 September 16+/-2-, 12+/-22: ; 15+/-2 15+/-2 ;*' 15+/-2 .15+/-2 15+/-3 n

-I . 14+/-22 18+/-2::. 16+/-2 17+/-2 16+/-2 - ..17+/-2 *16+/-3

' t;, . . . 28+/-2 23+/-2. 25+/-2 26+/-2 21 +/-2 219+/-2 24+/-7 25+/-2 27i+/- 2 30 3 32i3 32+/-3' 33+/-3 ,30+/-6 October 20+/-2 2: 18+/-2 18+/-2 19+/-2 17+/-2 19+/-2 -19+/-2 55i+/-3 47+/ 52+/-3 51:+/-3 47+/--3 r 43_3 49i8 19+/ - 23+/-3 23ih 2 24+/-2 26+/-2 27+/-2. .23+/-5 26+/-2 25++/-2 22+/-3 22+/-2 22+/-2 21 +/-2 23+/-4 33+/-3 23i+/-2 28+/-3 28+/- 2 23+/-2 27+/-8 I.,

November 23+/-2 23+/-2 232+/-2 24+'2 - 1+/-2 2 :: 23+/-2 .,23+/-2 25+/-2 25+/-3 24+/-2 25+/-2 22i2 24'2 24+/-2 December 014 +-3; 25+/-33 23--- ,31-+/-3 --32+/-3

29+/-3 -. 23i3 .. 31+/-4 I . ... 27+/-2. .,25i2.... "25iE2 .... 26+/-2 . 23!' . . .- 25 +/-3

.December _.... .s17:2_ .. 18+/-2 .. _ 18+/-2 ......18i2 -18+/-2 18+/-1 18+/-2 22+/-2 .. 22+/-2 . 18+/-2 17+/-2 18+/-2 - 19+/-4 26+/-2 25+/-2 , .26+/-2 , 23i2 20+/-2 25+/-2 24+/-5 28+/-2 24+/-2 . 24i2 24+/-2 23+/-,2,: ,. 24+/-2 25+/-4 AVERAGE 22+/- 16 21+/-14 22+/-15 22+/-15 20+/-14 21i+/-13 GRAND AVERAGE 22+/-14

TABLE C-3 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 10'3 pCi/M 3

STATION ID --------------------------------------------- >

Control MONTH SA-AIO-14G1 SA-AIO-16E1 SA-AIO-1F1 SA-AIO-2F6 SA-AIO-5D1 SA-AIO-5S1 January <1.7 <2.1 <3.2 < 1.2 <3.4 <3.3

<8.4 <1.9 <2.3 <1.8 <3 <3.1

<2.4 <2 < 1;1 <1.8 <2.5 <3

<2.9 <2.5 <3.3 <2.5 <3.2 <2

<2.9 <4.6 <1.8 <5 <2.4 <1 February <2.5 <2.5 <3.1 <2.3 <4.1 <2.1

<1.9 < 1.3 <2.7 <2.2 <2.3 <2

<2.5 < 1.8 <1.9 <2.9 <2.6 <3.3

<6.3 <2.7 <5 <3 < 2.5 < 1.3 March <4.4 <2.4 <2.7 <3.8 <1.6 <2 in <1.5 <5.9 <3.3 <3.1 <2.8 <3.8

<5.5 <3.8 <5.1 <3.1 <2.1 <3.8

< 1.5 <2.1 <5.9 <2.3 <7.5 <3.5 April <3.8 <2.3 <1.6 <3.2 <2.4

<2.2 <5 <2 <5.5 <3.4 <2.9

<2 <3.2 <2.1 <2 <1.8 <2.1

<1.7 <4.1 <3.7 <3.8 <2.2 <6.8 May <4.7 <2.1 <2.2 <2.7 <3.3 <1.3

<5.5 <4.3 < 1.8 <3.4 <3.9 <5.6

<4.6 <3.2 <3.3 <2.1 <2 <2.3

<3 <3.7 <3.1 <2.6 <3.3 <2.6

<3.5 <2.7 <2.5 <5.4 < 1.4 < 1.9 June <3.8 <3.6 <3.4 <4.6 < 2.3 <3.9

<2 <2.2 <4.7 <3.5 < 1.2 <1.9

<2.3 <2.8 <2.6 <2.3 <1.4 <3.9

<4.2 <7.7 <3 <5.5 <7.4 <4.4

TABLE C-3 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 103 pCi/m3

<,,,-.-- STATION ID ---------------------------------------------- >

Control< ,

MONTH SA-AIO-14G1 ' SA-AIO-16E1 SA-AIO-1F1 SA-A10-2F6 'SA-AI0-D1 SA-AIO-5S1 July <1.8 <2.4 <6.2 <2.7 <3.7 <3.6

<1.7 <2.1 <15 <1.- <3.6, <2.3

" ,-. ' ri ~ , .

-<3, < 5.5 -:,< 2.9 , <1.8 '<3

. i . .

, - , . < 3.4 . . ,< 2.1 , <-

<-1.7 <2.7: <7.4 <2.2

< 3.5 C<5.2 ' '<1.8 -' '- -' '.' ' <2.5

.. . .I ...

<2.6 ' <3.2 August < 1.9 <4.6 <2.1 <1.8 <6.3 < 1.9

<4.9 <4.7 <1.8 <1 .4 <2.4 , <2.6

<21 ,<2.8 < 4.5 <3.4 - <2.8

< 2.3 ,,<6.8 <1.9' <3: <1*

September <2.2 <3.4 -<4.5~ <1.5 <1 .6 <4.1 ' ..

-LO

<2.7 <2.3 <1'.9 <1.2 <2.2 <1.4 ~.I

<2.9 <2.2 <6.1 <1'.7 <1.4

' < 2.9 <1.7 5.7 -3" * <2.5., '.<4.5 , < 3.6

'October " ' <2.3 <1.8 '<2.7 .. 2<1.71 <2.9; <2.4

<3.6 <3 <2.6 <2.5' <2.2 <2.9

<7.4 <3.3 <1.8 <3.8 <3.7 <1.6

<2.9 <1.4 <7.1 <3.5 <4.3 <4 e.. m

-= .

C2;2

<2.2

< 3.2 <3.4 < 4.2 <2.5 November -- <4.4 ,c4.7 < 2.2 : <2.3 <2.3 <4.3

<3.4' <4.1 <1.4 <3.6 <3.7 <3.8

< 1.3 <6.6 <4.5 <2 <2.9 <3.8

<7.9- <4.6 <1.4 <3.4 <2.8 <3.8

- <2.7: <3.6- -

Detemiber- - 5 < 5.2 ";, *<3.3

,<1.6. <7.1 <6.7 <2.1- <2.2

<3.4 . :. :-.- <2.9 ^. .... <2.4

<2.8 <3.5 : ; .< . . , .' - -*<2.6- <4.1. <2.8

1-131 results are corrected for decay to sample stop date. "'

I-L TABLE C-4 2003 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS Results in mrad/standard month* +t- 2 sigma JAN APR JUL OUT QTR STATION to to to to ELEMENTS ID MAR JUN SEP DEC AVG SA-IDM-2S2 6.2:0.8 6.2 +/-0.5 7.3 +/-0.7 6.4 +/-0.8 6.5+/-1.1 SA-IDM-5S1 3.3t +/-0.5 4.0+/-0.3 3.9 +/- 0.3 3.6+/-0.5 3.7 +/-0.6 SA-IDM-6S2 4.7 +/-0.6 5.3 +/-0.5 5.2+/- 0.4 4.9+/-0.8 5.1 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-7S1 5.2 +/-0.6 6.1 +/-0.4 6.1 +/-0.5 5.7 +/-0.7 5.8 +/-0.9 SA-IDM-lOSl 4.0+/-0.6 4.7+/-0.5. 4.5 +/-0.4 4.1 +/-0.7 4.3 +/-0.6 SA.IDM-1 S1 3.6+0.4 3.9 +/-0.3 3.9+/-0.4 3.4 +/-0.6 3.7 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-4D2 3.9+/-0.4 4.7 +/-0.4 4.5 +/- 0.5 4.3+/-0.7 4.3 +/-0.7 SA-IDM-5D1 3.6+/-0.4 4.1 +/-0.4 4.2+/-0.4 3.8 +/- 0.9 3.9+/-0.6 SA-IDM-lODl 4.0t0.5 5.0+/-0.6 4.7 +/-0.5 4.5+/-0.5 4.5 +/-G.8 SA.IDM-14D1 3.6 +/-0.5 4.3 +/- 0.5 4.1 +/-0.3 3.9 +/-0.9 4.0 +/-0.6 SA-IDM-1 5D1 4.3 +/-0.5 4.8+/-0.5 4.7 +/-0.3 4.7 +/-0.7 4.6 +/-0.4 SA-IDM-2E1 3.7 +/-0.5 4.7 +/-0.6 4.3 +/-0.4 4.2 +/-0.6 4.2 +/- 0.8 SA-IDM-3E1 3.3 +/-0.4 3.8 +/-0.4 3.2+/-0.3 3.4+/-0.5 3.5 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-9F1 4.1 +/-0.5 4.9+/-0.6. 4.8+/-0.6 4.6+/- 0.5 4.6 +/- 0.7 SA-IDM-l lE2 4.2+/-0.6 4.7 +/-0.4 4.7 +/-0.5 4.6+/-0.6 4.6 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-12E1 4.2+/-0.6 5.0+/- 0.4 4.9+/-0.4 4.6+/-0.6 4.7 +/-0.7 SA-IDM-13E1 3.3 +/- 0.4 3.9+/-0.3 3.7+/-0.3 3.7+/-0.5 3.6+/- 0.5 SA-IDMI16E1 3.8+/-0.7 4.5 +/-0.5 4.4+/-0.4 4.5 +/-0.6 4.3+/-0.6 SA-IDM-1 F1 3.8+/-0.7 4.5+/-0.5 4.9+/-1.1 4.1 +/-0.6 4.3 +/- 0.9 SA-IDM-2F2 3.3+/-0.4 3.8+/-0.6 3.7 +/-0.4 3.5 +/- 0.6 3.6+/- 0.5 SA-IDM-2F5 3.9+/-0.6 4.6+/-0.4 4.4+/-0.3 4.4 +/-0.6 4.3+/- 0.6 SA-IDM-2F6 3.7 +/-0.5 4.2+/-0.5 4.0+/-0.3 4.0+/-0.5 4.0 +/-0.4 SA-IDM-3F2 3.5+/- 1.2 4.0+/-0.4 3.8 +/-0.4 3.8 +/-0.5 3.8 +/-0.3 SA-IDM-3F3 3.4+/-0.5 4.0+/-0.6 3:8+0.3 3.6+/-0.5 3.7 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-4F2 3.4+/-0.4 3.7+/-0.4 3.7 +/- 0.5 3.5+/-0.5 3.6 +/-0.3 SA-IDM-5F1 3.6 +/-0.5 4.1 +/-0.4 3.9+/-0.3 3.7 +/- 0.5 3.8+/- 0.4 SA-IDM-6F1 3.2 +/-0.4 3.4+/-0.4 3.3 +/-0.3 3.1 +/-0.5 3.3 +/- 0.2 SA-IDM-7F2 2.9 +/-0.5 3.2+/-0.5. 2.9 +/-0.4 2.9 +/-0.5 3.0 +/-0.3 SA-IDM-10F2 4.2 +/-0.4 4.8+/-0.4 4.7 +/-0.5 4.4 +/-0.7 4.5 +/- 0.5 SA-IDM-1 lFl 4.3+/-0.6 4.9+/-0.5 4.8 +/-0.5 4.6+/-0.7 4.6 +/- 0.5 SA-IDM-12i-' 4.0+/-0.5 4.6+/-0.4 4.4 +/-0.4 4.3 +/- 0.6 4.3 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-13F2 4.0+/-0.4 4.5+/-0.8 4.3 +/-0.4 4.2 +/- 0.5 4.2 +/-0.4 SA-IDM-13F3 3.9 +/- 0.4 4.4+/-0.4 4.2 +/-0.3 4.2 +/-0.6 4.2 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-13F4 4.0 +/-0.5 4.3+/-0.4 4.2 +/-0.3 4.2 +/-0.6 4.2 +/- 0.3 SA-IDM-14F2 4.3 +/-0.5 4.9+/-0.6 4.6 +/-0.4 4.6 +/-0.6 4.6+/-0.5 SA-IDM-1 5F3 4.5 +/-0.5 5.1 +/-0.7 4.9+/-0.4 4.7 +/-0.7 4.8 _ 0.5 SA-IDM-16F2 3.6+/-0.5 4.1 +/-0.6 4.0+/-0.3 3.8 +/-0.5 3.9 +/-0.4 SA-IDM-1G3 (CI 5.0+/-t0.5 5.6+/-0.6 5.3 +/-0.4 5.2 +/- 0.6 5.3 +/- 0.5 SA-IDM-3G1 (C) 4.1 0.4 4.7 +/-0.4 4.6+/-0.5 4.5 +/- 0.6 4.5 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-lOGl (C) 4.3+/-0.8 4.6+/-0.6 4.5 +/-0.4 4.5 +/-0.7 4.5 +/-0.3 SA-IDM-16G1 (C) 4.0+/-0.4 4.4+/-0.6 4.2 +/-0.5 4.2 +/-0.7 4.2 +/-0.3 SA-IDM-3H1 (C) 3.4+/-0.4 3.8+/-0.4 3.6 +/-0.4 3.6 +/- 0.5 3.6 +/-0.3 SA-IDM-1 S1 4.2 +/- 0.5 4.7+/-0.4 5.0+/-0.7 4.5 +/- 0.6 4.6 +/-0.6 SA-IDM-3S1 3.2 +/-0.4 3.6+/-0.5 3.4 +/-0.3 3.3+/-0.5 3.4+/-0.3 SA-IDM-2S4 3.4+/-0.5 4.0 +/-0.5 3.7 +/-0.4 3.6+/-0.5 3:7 +/- 0.5 SA-IDM-4S1 3.7+/-0.5 4.3 +/-0.3 4.2+/-0.6 4.1 +/-0.5 4.1 +/-0.5 SA-IDM-15S1 3.5 +/-0.5 3.9+/-0.4 3.7 +/- 0.3 3.6+/-0.5 3.7 +/-0.4 SA-IDM-1651 4.1 +/-0.6 4.6+/-0.4 4.6 +/- 0.6 4.3 +/-0.6 4.4+/- 0.5 SA-IDM-14Gl(C) 4.1 +/-0.6 4.7+/-0.5 4.7 +/- 0.3 4.4 +/-0.7 4.5 +/-0.5 AVERAGE 3.9+/-1.1 4.5+/-1.2 4.3+/-1.5 4.2+/-1.3 GRAND AVG 4.2 _1.3

The standard month = 30.4 days.

Quarterly Element TLD results by Framatome ANP.

(C) Control Station 54

.TABLE C-5 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 'AND GAMMA EMITTERS** IN MILK Results in Units of pCi/L +1- 2 sigma SAMPLING PERIOD .. GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID START ' 'STOP <1-131.. 'K-40' SA-MLK-2G3 01/0512003.' 01/06/2003 <1 1410 +70 SA-MLK-13E3 ' 01/05/2003 01/06/2003 , <0.2., 1340 +80.,

SA-MLK-14F4 - 01/06/2003 01/07/2003 <0.2 1480 +90-'-

SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 01/05/2003 01/06/2003' <0.2 1290 +70 SA-MLK-2G3 02/02/2003 02/03/2003 . .<0.2 1370 +/-70..-

SA-MLK-13E3 - 02/02/2003:, O2/03/2003,. -; , <0 .1 1510 +/-90:;

SA-MLK-14F4 02/03/2003 02/04/2003 , , <0.2 1400 t80 -.

SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 02/02/2003 02/03/2003, - <0.2 1300 +/- 80 03/02/2003 SA-MLK-2G3 03/03/2003 '` <0.3 1290 +/-80, SA-MLK-13E3 03/02/2003. 03/03/2003j "'<0.2 1410 +/-70.

SA-MLK-14F4 03/03/2003'. 03/04/2003' <0.2 1380 +/-70,'

SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 03/02/2003, 03/03/2003 ' - <0.3 1300 +/-90 SA-MLK-2G3 04/07/2003 04/08/2003 :<0.2 1400 +/-80, SA-MLK-13E3 - 04/06/2003' 04/07/2003;' <0.2 1370 +/-70, :

SA-MLK-14F4 04/06/2003 04/07/2003:' :<0.2 1400 +/-70' SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/06/2003 .04/07/2003: '<0.3 1340 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 04/21/2003. ,Q4/22/2003 < ;' <0.2 1380 SA-MLK-1 3E3 04/20/2003 04/21/2003; <0.2 -, 1370 +/-70 SA-MLK-14F4, 04/20/2003 04/21/2003.. <0.3 1310 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/20/2003 04/21/2003, <0.2 1310 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 05/04/2003 '05/05/2003 <0.2 1350 +/-80 SA-MLK-13E3,, -05/04/2003 05/05/2003 <0.3 1340 +/-70 SA-MLK-14F4 05/04/2003 05/05/2003 . <0.2

<'- 1200 +/-70:

SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/04/2003 '05/05i2003 <0.2 1310 +/-80 SA-MLK-2G3 05/19/2003 05/20/2003 ' <0.2 1350 +/-80-'

SA-MLK-13E3 05/19/2003 05/20/2003' <0.2 1380 +70 SA-MLK-14F4,' 05/18/2003' 05/19/2003" : . < 0.2 1260 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)' 05/18/2003' 05/19/2003 <0.3 1310 +/-70

. . - -I

' . --

7 .

SA-MLK-2G3 06/02/2003 06/03/2003',: < 0.2 : 1320 +/-70.

SA-MLK-,13E3 06/01/2003, 06/02/2003, . <0.2 1330 +70 .',,

SA-MLK-14F4 06/01/2003" 06/02/2003 ' <0.2 1280 +/-'80 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)' 06/01/2003' 06/02/2003 <0.2 1290 +/- 80 SA-MLK-2G3 , 06/16/2003 06/17/2003..' - < 0.3 - ', 1310 +/-80 SA-MLK-13E3;, 06/15/2003' :06/16/2003 _ * -<0.2 , -" 1400 +/- 70 SA-MLK-14F4 06/15/2003 -06/16/2003 _ ' <0.2 1270 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/15/2003 06/16/2003 ' <0.1 1210 '80 SA-MLK-2G3 07/06/2003, 07/07/2003 *<0.1 1310 +/-90;,

SA-MLK-13E3 07/07/2003 .07/08/2003 <0.2 1460 +/-70 SA-MLK-14F4 07/07/2003 -_07/08/2003 <0.2 1310 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/06/2003 07/07/2003 <0.3 . -4 " . " :. " - ,I -

1320 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 07/20/2003 07/21/2003 <0.2 1320 +/ ,

SA-MLK-13E3 ' 07/20/2003 07/21/2003 <0.2 1420 +90 -

SA-MLK-14F4 07/20/2003 07/21/2003- *<0.3 '1320 +70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/20/2003 07/21/2003 <0.2 1290 +/-70

,455

LL TABLE C-5 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131

AND GAMMA EMITTERS** IN MILK Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING PERIOD GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID START STOP 1-131 K-40 SA-MLK-2G3 08103/2003 08/04/2003 <0.2 1340 +/-70 SA:MLK-13E3 08/04/2003 08/05/2003 <0.3 1370 +/-70 SA-MLK- 14F4 08/03/2003 08/04/2003 <0.2 1260 +/-80 SA-MLK-3G1 IC) 08/03/2003 08/04/2003 <0.2 1430 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 08/17/2003 08/18/2003 <0.1 1420 +/-60 SA-MLK-13E3 08/18/2003 08/19/2003 <0.1 1380 +/-80 SA-MLK- 14F4 08/17/2003 08/18/2003 <0.2 1310 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 IC) 08/17/2003 08/18/2003 <0.3 1350 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 09/02/2003 09/03/2003 <0.2 1350 +/-70 SA-MLK-13E3 09/02/2003 09/03/2003 <0.1 1380 +/-80 SA-MLK-14F4 09/01/2003 09/02/2003 <0.2 1300 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 IC) 09/01/2003 09/02/2003 <0.2. 1390 +/-80 SA-MLK-2G3 09/14/2003 09/15/2003 <0.2 1270 +/-80 SA-MLK-13E3 09115/2003 09/16/2003 <0.2 1520 +/-80 SA-MLK-14F4 09/15/2003 09/16/2003 <0.2 1260 +/- 70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 09/14/2003 09/15/2003 <0.1 1350 +/-80 SA-MLK-2G3 10/06/2003 10/07/2003 <0.1 1260 +/-80 SA-MLK-13E3 10/07/2003 10/08/2003 <0.2 1400 +/-80 SA-MLK-14F4 10/07/2003 10/08/2003 <0.3 1360 +/-80 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 10/06/2003 10/07/2003 <0.2 1390 +/- 70 SA-MLK-2G3 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 <0.2 1370 +/-80 SA-MLK-13E3 10/19/2003 10/20/2003 <0.3 380 +/-70 SA-MLK-14F4 10/19/2003 10/20/2003 <0.2 1240 +/-80 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 10/19/2003 10/20/2003 <0.2 1310 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 11/03/2003 11/04/2003 <0.2 1330 +/-80 SA-MLK-13E3 11/03/2003 11/04/2003 <0.1 1420 +/-70 SA-MLK-14F4 11102/2003 11/03/2003 <0.3 1330 +/-90 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 11/02/2003 11/03/2003 <0.2 1340 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 11/17/2003 11/18/2003 <0.1 1410 +/-90 SA-MLK-13E3 11/16/2003 11/17/2003 <0.2 1440 +/-80 SA-MLK- 14F4 11/16/2003 11/17/2003 <0.1 1310 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 11/17/2003 11/18/2003 <0.2 1370 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 12/01/2003 12/02/2003 <0.2 1410 +/-80 SA-MLK-13E3 11/30/2003 12/01/2003 <0.3 1390 +/-80 SA-MLK-14F4 11/30/2003 12/01/2003 <0.2 1340 +/-80 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 11/30/2003 12/01/2003 <0.2 1220 +/-80 AVERAGE 1350 +/-130

Iodine-131 results are corrected for decay to midpoint of collection period & analyzed to a sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/L.

^ All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

^

Monthly sample collected during Jan., Feb., March and Dec., when animals are not on pasture (C) Control Station 56

TABLE C-6 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETAEMITTERS, AND TRITIUM IN WELL WATER

- Results in-Units of pCitL-+1- 2 sigma.

SAMPLING - --

' GROSS

. .DAEALH. . --:'

. GROSS ET STATION ID DATE ',ALPHA -- .BETA TRITIUM SA-WWA-3El1 02/04/2003 :1.7i1.3 -. 11 0.8 <180 SA-WWA-3El1 02/25/2003 ; 312 -- 10+/-0.8 <140 SA-WWA-3El 03/31 /2003 'e2.7+/-1.3 , ; 10i.8 :<140' 3%-.7 1-3 10+/-0.8 SA-WWA-3E 1 04/28/2003 <140

~1.9+/-1.2 11+/-0.8 SA-WWA-3El 05/27/2003 .<150 SA-WWA-3El 06/30/2003 <140 SA-WWA-'3El1 07/28/2003 '3.7'1i3 1 -. 11+/-0.8 < 140 SA-WWA-3El 08/25/2003 ' 1.8911.2 11 +/-0.8 <140 SA-WWA-3E1 09/29/2003 .7 0.4 .8. 60.7 <140 SA-WWA-3E1 10/27/2003 0.5+/-0; 3 9.3+/-O.8 < 150 .

SA-WWA-3E1 11/24/2003 -31.7+/-1.3 10+/-0.8 ,<150 SA-WWA-3E1 12/29/2003 <2.9 i 10+/-1.2 <150

.i

z. .

AVERAGE 2.2+/-2.1 . I

.- 10 i1

. .. . . ..1 I. * . . I

-. 1. I..,

57

LL TABLE C-7 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN WELL WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING <-----GAMMA EMITTERS ----- >

-STATION ID' ' - DATE ' K-40' RA-NAT SA-WWA-3E 1 02/04/2003 <25 146+/-5 SA-WWA-3E1 02/25/2003 <58 123+/-4 SA-WWA-3E 1 03/31/2003 87+/-22 73+/-4 SA-WWA-3E 1 04/28/2003 41 +/-12 80+/-4 SA-WWA-3E1 05/27/2003 <36 128+/-4 SA-WWA-3E 1 06/30/2003 <17 66+/-4 SA-WWA-3E1 07/28/2003 60+/-23 139+/-6 SA-WWA-3E1 08/25/2003 34+/-13 72 +/-4 SA-WWA-3E1 09/29/2003 <18 65+/-3 SA-WWA-3E1 10/27/2003 <53 121 +/-4 SA-WWA-3E 1 11/24/2003 <52 56+/-3 SA-WWA-3E1 12/29/2003 <30 64+/-4 AVERAGE 94 +/- 68

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-1 9.

58

'TABLE C-8 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS'ALPHA .AND GROSS BETA'EMITTERS AND TRITIUM

.IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER Results' in Units of pCi/L +1- 2 sigma SAMPLING -GROSS . GROSS-

..TYPE PERIOD ALPHA BETA TRITIUM

-RAW.'- -1/1-31/2003 ---<0.9- '3;1iO.5 ' -<180 *--'

TREATED 1/1-31/2003 <.1 .. 3.3+/-0.5 . <180 RAW . 2/1-28/2003 1.2+/-0.6 3.5+/-0.5 < 140 TREATED 2/1-28/2003 1.6+/-0.7. '3.3+/-0.5 <"il40~

RAW 3/1-31/2003 0.8+/-0.6.. - 3+/-0.5 -<140 TREATED 3/1-31/2003 0.9+/-0.7 2.7+/-0.5 < 140 RAW 4/1-30/2003 1.2+/-0.5,- 2.8+/-0.5 <140 TREATED 4/1-30/2003 0.7+/-0.5 . . S2.1+/-0.4 <140' RAW.-- 5/1-31/2003 1+/-0.6 ., ,, .3+/-0.5 -<150 TREATED 5/1-31/2003 <0.8 -- 2.8+/-0.5 <140 '

RAW. 6/1-30/2003 1.3+/-0.8' 3.5+/-0.5 TREATED 6/1-30/2003, <0.9 " 2.5+/-0.5 < 140 2 RAW - 7/1-31/2003' 1.5+/-0.7; 3.3+/-0.5 < 140 TREATED 7/1-31/2003- 1.1+/-0.8'".' 2.7+/-0.5 '<1540 RAW 8/1-31/2003' 0.9+/-0.6 . 3.5+/-0.5 <140 TREATED 8/1-31/2003 <1.1 3.4+/-0.5 < 140' RAW ., 9/1-30/2003, <0.8 3+/-0.5 .< 140 TREATED 9/1-30/2003 <1.3 2.7+/-0.5 <140 RAW : ,. 10/1-31/2003 1+/-0.6 , 3.3+/-0.5 *<140 TREATED 10/1-31/2003 1+/-0.7 3.4+/-0.5 *<140 RAW ' ' 11/1-30/2003. 1.2+/-0.6--;-4.1+/-0.6 <150 TREATED 11/1-30/2003 0.9+/-0.5_ . 4+/-0.6 <150 RAW - 12/1-31/20.3 <1.3 ' 3.2+/-0.8 <150 TREATED 12/1-31/2003 <1.5 3.1+/-0.8 <140 AVERAGE RAW 1.1+/-0.4 3.3+/-0.7 TREATED 1.1+/-0.6 3+/-1 GRAND AVERAGE. 1.1 +/-0.5 3.1+/-0.9

. . . t_ .

. I . -. , . I . - : '.' . " ',. -- ' , ' ;_, , o:~J

,- . :, . - - , - 1. '4 " : 1_ . , . ..

C.59

iLL TABLE C-9 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS**

IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS TYPE PERIOD 1-131 K-40 RAW 1/1-31/2003 < 0.4 <43 TREATED 1/1-31/2003 <0.3 40+/-14 RAW 2/1-28/2003 <0.3 <20 TREATED 2/1-28/2003 <0.3 41+13 RAW 3/1-31/2003 <0.2 <21 TREATED 3/1-31/2003 <0.1 <16 RAW 4/1-30/2003 < 0.4 <46 TREATED 4/1-30/2003 <0.2 <16 RAW 5/1-31/2003 <0.3 <20 TREATED 5/1-31/2003 <0.3 <15 RAW 6/1-30/2003 <0.2 <16 TREATED 6/1-30/2003 <0.2 78+/-19 RAW 7/1-31/2003 <0.2 <15 TREATED 7/1-31/2003 <0.3 <38 RAW 8/1-31/2003 <0.3 , <24 TREATED 8/1-31/2003 <0.3 52+/- 10 RAW 9/1-30/2003 <0.2 <15 TREATED 9/1-30/2003 <0.2 <44 RAW 10/1-31/2003 <0.3 <29 TREATED 10/1-31/2003 <0.3 53+/-14 RAW 11/1-30/2003 <0.2 48+/-13 TREATED 11/1-30/2003 <0.3 32+/-11 RAW 12/1-31/2003 <0.2 <18 TREATED 12/1-31/2003 <0.1 <20 AVERAGES RAW TREATED GRAND AVERAGE -

Iodine-1 31 analyzed to a sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/L.

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

60

TABLE C-10 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN VEGETABLES

, Results in Units of pCi/kg (Wet) +'- 2 sigma SAMPLING . I . GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE " . SAMPLE TYPE , K-40 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 05/06/2003 Asparagus '. - 2910+/-110 SA-FPV-2F9 05/12/2003 *

> Asparagus. .- 2730+/-220 ...

I .- _ .- .. - ; ..... ". - ***-o--

AVERAGE 2820i250 SA-FPL-2F9 05112/2003 ' Spinach'* 6400 i290 '. " '

SA-FPL-3H5 (C) 07121/2003 Cabbage - 2860 i 150 SA-FPL-6F2 07/22/2003. CabbaSe' 2450+/-130 -

SA-FPL-14F3 08/12/2003 Cabbage. 1960i 160 I I-AVERAGE 3420i4040 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 07/21/2003 Corn - 2500+/-100 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 07/21/2003 Corn 2600 +/-210 SA-FPV-2F4 07/28/2003 Corn 2710i230 SA-FPV-2F9 08/12/2003 Corn 1740i 160 SA-FPV-14F3 08/12/2003 Corn 2350 i160 SA-FPV-1G4 (C) 08/19/2003 Corn 2220+/-180 AVERAGE 2350i690 . *:

SA-FPV-6F2 07/22/2003 Peppers

1710i170 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 07/23/2003 Peppers 1440 i 160 SA-FPV-1 G4 (C) 08/19/2003 Peppers 1720i 150 AVERAGE 1620 +/- 320 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 07/21/2003 Tomatoes 2540 +/- 150 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 07/21/2003 Tomatoes' 1960 +/- 140 SA-FPV-14F3 08/12/2003 Tomatoes; 2030 +/- 150 SA-FPV-1 G4 (C) 08/19/2003 Tomatoes 1820+/-130 SA-FPV-2F9 08/12/2003 Tomatoes 1820+/-70 AVERAGE 2030+/- 590 GRAND AVERAGE 2420 +/-2070

All other gamma emitters searched forwere ,zLLD;i typical'LLDs are given, in Table C-19. .

(C) Control Station 61

TABLE C-11 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN GAME Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +1- 2 sigma SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE SAMPLE TYPE K-40 SA-GAM-3E 1 02/24/2003 Muskrat 2840+170 SA-GAM-11 D1 (C) 03/16/2003 Muskrat 2670+/-190 AVERAGE Muskrat 2755 +/- 240 All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19 62

TABLE C-12 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF'GAMMA EMITTERS*t IN FODDER CROPS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +1- 2 sigma

- ~. ~. ~ 1 ~.R. ~. ~ . ~ ~ . .. . -_ .

SAMPLING . <--GAMMA EMITTERS-->

STATION ID DATE . SAMPLE TYiE . Be-7 . . K-40' J I I L.. "':

. , .t IC. , - :.,

SA-VGT-2G3 (C) 10/04/2003 Silage 910+/-80 3910+/-200 SA-VGT-3G1 (C] 10/03/2003 Silage - 890+/-100 ' '4680+/-260 SA-VGT-13E3 10/03/2003 Silage 610+/-70 ;4180+/-220 SA-VGT-14F4 10/04/2003 Silage 1030+/-130 . ' .4010*240 AVERAGE 860+/-360 4200+/-680 SA-VGT-3G1 (C] 11/1812003 I S oybeans <60 . 15800+/-300 SA-VGT-14F4 11/13/2003 . S;oybeans <27 15300+/-270 1.

AVERAGE 15600 +/- 700 I.'.

. I.,, t-

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

- ...... ... - . , - . r,

' ,63

TABLE C-13 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma

<--------------------------------------------------- STATION ID -------------------------------------------------- >

SAMPLING SA-SWA-11A1 SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-7E1 AVERAGE DATE (Control)

January 36+/-6 18+/-5 10+/-5 11 +/- 5 54+/-7 26+/- 38 February 52+/-7 46+/-7 36+/-6 29+/-6 82+/-8 49 +/-41 March 45+/-7 16+/-5 16+/-5 10+/-5 59+/-7 29 +/-43 April 71 +/- 8 40+/-6 33+/-6 19+/-5 82+/-8 49+/-54 May 50+/-7 30+/-6 26 +/- 5 17+/-5 74+/-8 39 +/- 46

.. June 23+/-6 12+/-5 <7 7+/-5 40+/-7 20+/-29 July 35+/-6 21 +/-5 17+/-5 7+/-4 59+/-7 28+40 August 33i6 27+/-6 11 +/- 5 19+/-5 58+/-7 30 +/- 36 September 64+/-8 53+/-7 44+/-7 27+/-6 79+/-8 54+/-39 October 42+/-6 25+/-5 16+/-5 11 +/-4 59+/-7 30+/-40 November 13+/-3 8+/-3 6+/-2 <3 35+/-4 15+/- 26 December 89+/-6 69+/-5 46+/-4 21 +/- 3 101 +/- 7 65+/- 65 AVERAGE 46 +/- 42 30+/- 36 22+/- 28 15+/- 16 65 +/- 38 GRAND AVERAGE 36 +/- 49 r-

TABLE C-14

. 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS*s IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma

. T,

.. , . I. . -I . SAMPLING - .GAMMA EMITTERS I -

. STATI ON ID '- .... DATE K-40 . .. .. '. .

SA-SWA-1 F2 01/10/2003 , 69i20 SA-SWA-7E1 Olt10/2003, ,104+/-20 SA-SWA-ilAl. 01/10/2003.- 83+/-22 SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C) 01/10/2003 54+/-1E, SA-SWA-1 6F1 01/10/2003 48+/-16 4

SA-SWA-1 F2 02/24/2003 56+/-14 SA-SWA-7E 1 02/24/2003 (

.128+/-27 SA-SWA-1 Al .02/24/2003.' *'48+/-16 SA-SWA-12C1 (C) 02/24/2003 * .46+/-20 SA-SWA-16F1 02/24/2003 52+/-22 SA-SWA-1 F2 03/04/2003 64+/-11 SA-SWA-7E1 03/04/2003 101 +/-16 SA-SWA-1l1 Al ,.03/04/2003

77+/-21 SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C) 03/04/2003 65+/-23 SA-SWA-1 6F1 03/042'003 34+/-18

4 SA-SWA-1 F2 04/13/2003 <16 SA-SWA-7E1 04/13/2003 168+/-41 SA-SWA-11 Al 04/13/2003 101 +/-19 SA-SWA-12C1(C) 04/13/2003. , <43 t,,

SA-SWA-16F1 04/13/2003 .63+/-14 .

SA-SWA-i F2 05/06/2003 93+/-23 - I ,I SA-SWA-7E1 05/06/2003 121 +/-22 q .. I , , 4.

SA-SWA-1i1 Al 05/06/2003 49 +/-18 I I I " -

SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C) 05/06/2003 , ***

<21 ;.. . ' I. i -

SA-SWA-1 6F1 05/06/2003 61 +/-17 SA-SWA-1 F2 .06/06/2003

39+17, SA-SWA-7E1 .06/06/2003 44+/-17 SA-SWA-1 1Al 06/06/2003 39+/-12' '

SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C) 06/06/2003 52+/-12 SA-SWA-i 6F1 06/06/2003 <15 07/08/2003 SA-SWA-i F2 , 07/08/2003 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-11 Al 07/08/2003 84+/-17k SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

07/08/2003 ,.105+/-23 SA-SWA-i 6F1 07/08/2003 ' 75 +/-20

65

- 11 TABLE C-14 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE K-40 SA-SWA-1 F2 08/04/2003 59+/-17 SA-SWA-7E 1 08/04/2003 128+/-22 SA-SWA-1lAl 08/04/2003 75 +/-22 SA-SWA-12C1 (C) 08/04/2003 69+/-17 SA-SWA-1 6F1 08/04/2003 <42 SA-SWA-1 F2 09/05/2003 91 +/-27 SA-SWA-7E1 09/05/2003 116+/-20 SA-SWA-1 Al 09/05/2003 102+/-21 SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C) 09/05/2003 106+/-14 SA-SWA-1 6F1 09/05/2003 70+/-16 SA-SWA-1 F2 10/07/2003 67 +/- 22 SA-SWA-7E 1 10/07/2003 59 +/-14 SA-SWA-1lAl 10/07/2003 58i+/-18 SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C) 1C/07/2003 57+/- 13 SA-SWA-16F1 10/07/2003 50+/- 18 SA-SWA-1 F2 11/06/2003 <18 SA-SWA-7E1 11/06/2003 63+/-15 SA-SWA-1 Al 11/06/2003 41 +/-17 SA-SWA-12C1 (C) 11/06/2003 <12 SA-SWA-16F1 11/06/2003 <21 SA-SWA-1 F2 12/09/2003 58+/-23 SA-SWA-7E 1 12/09/2003 81 +/-24 SA-SWA-11 Al 12/09/2003 121 +/-19 SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C) 12/09/2003 109 +/- 22 SA-SWA-1 6F1 12/09/2003 76 +/-20 AVERAGE 68 +/-66

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

C) Control Station 66

TABLE C-1 5 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma

<---------------------------------------------------- STATION ID ------------ . i > .

SAMPLING SA-SWA- 11A1- SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA:16F1 - SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-7E1. AVERAGE; PERIOD (Control) .. . .

<. . .150

.4 0

January <151O <140 <150 <150 150 February <141O <140 <150 <150 < 150 .- :.

. March <141O <140 <140 <140 < 140 .

i .

.. April <141O <140 <140 <140 < 140. . .

. 4 )

oi .

May <141 20 -90 > b1 5une <141 <140 . <140 ' - 140-, <140 .

July <151O <150 <150 <150 *800+/- 100 August <141 O <140 150+90 <140 <140 .

September 230+1B5 180+/-90 <140 <140- <140 U

. October 240++/-90 <150 <150 <150 ~320+/-90 .

November <141O ;<140 . :'<140 ; - <140 <140 : ,

. December <1510 .. 140: <140 - <150. .<150

-- l L TABLE C-16 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS** IN EDIBLE FISH Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma GAMMA EMITTERS (FLESH)

SAMPLING STATION ID PERIOD K-40 SA-ESF-7E1 5/3-6/2003 3460+/- 210 SA-ESF-1 IAl 5/3-6/2003 3740+/-210 SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 5/3-6/2003 3680+/- 110 AVERAGE 3630 +/- 290 SA-ESF-7E1 9/22-10/31/2003 4210+/-210 SA-ESF- 1 Al 9/22-10/31/2003 3600+/-210 SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 9/22-10/31/2003 3890+/-210 AVERAGE 3900+/-610 GRAND AVERAGE 3760 +/- 520

- All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19 (C) Control Station 68

TABLE C-i17 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN CRABS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +-2 sigma GAMM(FLEMIH) R

- 4 .-.. . - SAMPLING

-STATION ID. -, PERIOD . - K-40

- . .. , I " ., L I I : I SAECH-il1A1 08/0512003 2770+/-180 .

SA-ECH-1 2C-1 (C`) -' 08/07/2003 AVERAGE,', 2530+/-680

,SA-ECH-11A1 $'09/25/2003 -2880+/-210 SA-ECH-12C1 (C) 10/01/2003 2420+/- 160 AVERAGE 2650+/-650,:

GRAND AVERAGE 2590+/-560.

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; Typical LLDs are given in Table C-1 9.

(C) Control Station

-:69

TABLE C-18 2003 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN SEDIMENT Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry) +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING STATION ID DATE K-40 Co-60 Cs-1i37 RA NAT Th-232 SA-ESS-6S2 05/20/2003 1240+/-50 <4 <3 86+/-4 75+/-8 SA-ESS-11 Al 05/15/2003 4750+/- 280 <8 <9 895 +/- 30 1220 +/- 60 SA-ESS-1 5Al 05/15/2003 13100+/-430 <10 100+/-20 498+/- 30 814+/- 80 SA-ESS-1 6A1- 05/15/2003 13200 +/- 400 <24 35 +/-10 510+/- 20 763 +/- 65 SA-ESS-1 2C1 (C) 05/15/2003 14200 +/- 400 <16 20+/-8 849 +/-35 1090+/-60 SA-ESS-7E1 05/15/2003 13400 +/-i360 <9 < 11 838 +/- 20 1030+/- 60 SA-ESS-1 6F1 05/15/2003 14100+/-420 <20 43+/-9 569+/- 20 828 +/- 60 AVERAGE 10600+/-10600 32+/-67 610 +/- 570 830+/-750 SA-ESS-6S2 11/10/2003 1980+/-140 <4 <5 117+/-10 88+/-30 SA-ESS-1 1Al 11/21/2003 4460 +/- 240 <8 <8 848 +/- 20 1080+/- 50 SA-ESS-1 5Al 11/21/2003 6650+/- 260 <6 28+/-11 601 +/-30 787 +/- 50 SA-ESS-1 6A1 11/21/2003 6600 +/- 230 <11 <7 523+/-15 562+/- 50 SA-ESS-1 2C1 (C) 11/21/2003 16400+/- 530 <16 <13 628 +/-40 1040+/-80 SA-ESS-7E 1 11/21/2003 15400 +/- 430 <10 43+/-9 712+/- 30 1140+/- 110 SA-ESS-16F1 11/21/2003 12700 +/-400 <10 45i 12 583+/- 30 877+/- 70 AVERAGE 9200+/- 11300 570 +/-450 800+/-740 GRAND AVERAGE 9900+/-10600 590+/-500 810+/-710

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-1 9 (C) Control Station 70

-TABLE C 2003 MAPLEWOOD-TESTING SERVICES

-LLDs'.FOR 'GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY SAMPLE TYPE: AIR------------>

WATER---------- > ----------

MILK---------

IODINE PARTICULATES GAMMA'SCAN IODINE GAMMA SCAN ' ' IODINE 3

ACTIVITY: 10-3 pCi/m '10-3 pCi/m3; pCi/L . 'pCi/h . pCi/L pCi/L GEOMETRY: 47'ML -13 FILTERS 3.5:LITER. 100 ML . 3.5 LITER ' 100 ML COUNT TIME: 120 MINS - 500 MINS 1000'MIN ' o o MINS 1000 - 500 MINS 1000 MINS DELAY TO COUNT.: -^2 DAYS - : .-.5 DAYS .--- 7 DAYS- " -. - 3 DAYS :' 2 DAYS- - -2 DAYS

~~~~~. 4.,.*,. . , .*.- -

NUCLIDES BE-7 6.7 ,

- 18 NA-22 0.5 4.9 - ,, 6.7 K-40

11 ., 58 -' . 50 o -

CR-51 2.5- 20.42 - - - 17 -

MN-54 0.72 1.3 .. . 2.7 -

CO-58 0.23 3;.-4 - 2j, 2.0 ',

FE-59 0.64 ,5.8. 7.9 , _

CO-60 0.40 .2.9-- , - 4.3~4 --

ZN-65 0.60- 3.8 9.5 -

ZRNB-95 0.46 -3.0 - 8.1 -

MO-99 17 118 - - 47 . ,

RU-103 0.24. 2.6 - - 1.8 RU-106 2.5 28 - , 30 AG-llOM 0.41 3.0 - 5.7 SB-125 0.52- 3.3 - .5.0 TE-129M 8.5.-: 81 , 89 I-131 15 - 0.40 3.0 0.4 3.4, 1-. 0 TE-132 0.98 13.6 - - . 3.0 -

BA-133 0.46 3.0 - , 2.8 CS-134 0.34 - 1.7 v 1.9 CS-136 0.51 4.2 ; - - 6.0 CS-137 0.39. 3.0 ,; - 5.5 -

BALA- 140 1.2 9.8 - 12.0 -

CE-141 0.30. 4.0 - - 2.9 CE-144 0.73 14 - - : 12 RA-NAT 0.58 6.9 - ;. 11.0 TH-232 2.4 16.7 - 22

71

IL TABLE C-19 (Cont'd) 2003 MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES LLDs FOR GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY SAMPLE TYPE: FOOD PRODUCTS VEGETATION GAME FISH & SHELLFISH SEDIMENT & SOIL ACTIVITY: pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pCi/kg DRY GEOMETRY: .500 ml 3.5 LI=ER 500 ml 500Sml 500 ml COUNT TIME: 500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS DELAY TO COUNT: 3 DAYS 7.DAYS 5 DAYS . 5 DAYS 30 DAYS NUCLIDES BE-7 175 ,60

30 36. 238 NA-22 13 32 10 9.8 12 K-40 70 70 70 70 70 CR-51 45 36 28 37 186 MN-54 8.9 6.0 7.0 14 34 CO-58 6.7 5.5 4.0 6.3 26 FE-59 21 21 11 20 73 CO-60 9.5 12 7.5 7.9 24 ZN-65 17 14 9.4 19 24 ZRNB-95 15 17 12 9.4 35 MO-99 80 50 174 1280 51500 RU-103 11 5.6 3.7 5.4 14 RU-106 62 46 36 93 95 AG-llOM 15 22 4.3 9.6 25 SB-125 32 14 9.8 14 24 TE-129M 192 195 93 280 450 I-131 6.2 7.0 4.0 10 125 TE-132 11 15 15 15 7200 BA-133 6.1 5.0 3.9 4.3 11 CS-134 5.9 5.2 2.8 6.5 16 CS-136 14 8.0 5.3 10 50 CS-137 12 8.8 6.5 10 13 BALA-140 35 29 22 22 160 CE-141 10 6.4 4.3 6.0 21 CE-144 43 25 18 20 45 RA-NAT 17 23 8.0 23 45 TH-232 40 68 19 30 50 72

APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FROM ANALYTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES -

INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMS 1.

73

APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Appendix D presents a summary of the analytical results for the 2003 Analytics and Environmental Resource Associates (ERA)

Interlaboratory Comparison Program.

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE NO. TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE D-1 Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters in Water .... 77 D-2 - Gamma Emitters in Water and Milk................. 78 D-3 Gamma Emitters in Air and Soil................... 79 D-4 Tritium Analysis in Water and Iodine Analysis in Air and Water................................. 80 75

TA]BLE:D-1 RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Gross Alpha and Gross Beta-Emitters In Water (pCi/L)

- - ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance

ANALYTICS Criteria DATE PSEG - PSEG - ERA Lower & Upper MM-YY SAMPLE CODE -MEDIUM : ANALYSIS Mean +/- s.d. - - Known Limit Limit 06-2003 ANL-WAT-AB570 Water Alpha' - 41+/-0 i ;. 49 ' '39 59 Beta -, 280+6 268 214 322 f, .

08-2003 ERA-WAT-AB574 Water Alpha 70+/-3 65 37 93 Beta '-., 35+/-2 32 23 40 09-2003 ANL-WAT-AB580 Water Alpha 33+/-0 36 30 42 Beta 278+/-8 246 198 294 12-2003 ANL-WAT-AB585 Water Alpha 37+/-3 51 39 63 Beta 164+/-2 . 141 117 165 L, -

. .:: . S . . i..

iI'- , - I.

, r -,

I r -

4.

s.d. - one standard deviation of-three-individual-analytica1 results

'77

-~ lI TABLE D-2 RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Emitters In Water and Milk (pCi/L)

ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance

ANALYTICS Criteria DATE PSEG. PSEG ERA Lower & Upper MM-YY SAMPLE CODE MEDIUM ANALYSIS Mean +/- s.d. Known Limit Limit 03-2003 ANL-WAT-G565 Water Cr-51 261+/-14 238 190 286 Mn-54 71+/-6 63 51 75 Fe-59 59+/-4 46 34 58 Co-60 159+/-5 157 127 187

Zn-65 113+/-4 90 72 108 I-131 76+/-4 70 58 82 Cs-134 82+/-2 88 70 106 Cs-137 203+/-6 195 153 237 Ce-141 179+1 168 132 204 03-2003 ANL-MLK-G567 Milk Cr-51 282+/-9 246 198 294 Mn-54 78+1 64 52 76 Fe-59 68+3 47 35 59 Co-60 176+5 162 132 192 Zn-65 117+5 93 75 111 I-131 82+/-4 74 62 86 Cs-134 87+/-3 90 72 108 Cs-137 212+/-3 200 158 242 Ce-141 188+/-1 173 137 209 02-2003 ERA-WAT-G569 Water Ba-133 18+/-0.4 20 11 28 Co-60 39+/-0.9 37 29 46 Cs-134 18+/-0.7 18 9 26 Cs-137 47+/-0.4 44 36 53 Zn-65 65+/-0 .9 60 50 71 12-2003 ANL-WAT-G582 Water Cr-51 245+/-13 262 208 316 Mn-54 171+/-3 162 132 192 Fe-59 117+5 96 78 114 Co-60 146+/-4 145 115 175 Zn-65 190+/-10 184 148 220 I-131 71+/-8 61 49 73 Cs-134 119+4 127 103 151 Cs-137 125+/-3 121 97 145 Ce-141 188+6 189 153 225 Co-58 106+/-3 104 86 122

s.d. - one standard deviation of three individual analytical results 78

i TABLE D- 3

'RESULTS OF ANALYTICS AND ERA' INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma' Emitters. In Soil. (pCi/Kg-'dry)

'and Air Particulate Samples'(pCi/m3

- .ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance

ANALYTICS Criteria DATE :-'PSEG . .... PSEG' ERA.. Lower & Upper MM-YY SAMPLE'CODE MEDIUM 'ANALYSIS Meani +/-s.d . Known 'Limit Limit 03 -2003 ANL-SOL-G566 Soil Cr-51 538+/-27 508 406 610

.. w Mn-54 -143+/-5' 133 109 157 Fe-59 116+/-1 98 80 116 Co-60 .,4336+/-11 : ~',335 ' 269 401 Zn-65 -.'193+/-4 192 156 228 Cs-137 - 533+/-9 - ; 497 . 395 -' 599

- Ce-141 -354+/-9 358 286 430 06-2003 ANL-APT-G572 APT Cr-51 176+/-10 175 139 211 Mn-54 145+/-3.: .:.;1J36.,.,-..- 106 166 Co-60 96+/-2 97 79 115 Fe-59 ---. 79i+/-3 73 : 61 -- 85 Zn-65 .'147+/-3 133 109 157 Cs-134 62+/-1':-- I:-~76- -58 94 Cs -137 177+/-4 169 133 205 II :- '56 80 Co-5B * -~ 68+/-1' '68 I . , .. 1 Ce-141 213+/-6 208 166 . 250 09-2003 ANL-SOL-G577 Soil Cr-51 .I559+/-18,,_ . .525_- . 417, 633 Mn-54 - 228+/-7 209 167 251 Fe-59 ; -. 200+/-12 178 142 214 Co-58 -221+/-7 222 180 264 Co-60 .296+/-4 278 224 332 Zn-65 408+/-4 395 317 473 Cs-137

333+/-2 , 305. 245 365 Ce-141 195+/-10 193 157 229 Cs-134 257+/-7 269 215 323

s.d. - one standard deviation, of -three individual analytical results-

'79

.LL TA1BLE D-4 RESULTS OF ANALYTICS AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Tritium Analysis In Water (pCi/L)

Iodine-131 Analysis In Water (pCi/L)

And Iodine In Air Samples (pCi/m3 )

ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance

ANALYTICS Criteria DATE PSEG PSEG ERA Lower & Upper MM-YY SAMPLE CODE MEDIUM ANALYSIS Mean +/- s.d. Known Limit Limit 03-2003 ANL-WAT-H564 Water H-3 4634+107 4463 3569 5357 03-2003 ANL-AIO-I568 AIO I-131 77+4 74 62 86 05 -2 003 ERA-WAT-H575 Water H-3 1239+/-33 1250 677 1823 05 -2003 ERA-WAT-I579 Water I-131 20+/-0.6 21 16 26 06-2003 ANL-AIO-I571 AIO 1-131 67+/-2 62 50 74 06-2003 ANL-WAT-H573 Water H-3 11653+/-30 11953 9565 14341 09-2003 ANL-AIO-I576 AIO 1-131 86+1 86 68 104 09-2003 ANL-WAT-H578 Water H-3 8062+/-109 8000 6200 9800 11-2003 ERA-WAT-I584 Water I-131 27+/-3 28 23 33 12-2003 ANL-WAT-I581 AIO 1-131 84+/-1 78 60 96 12 -2003 ANL-WAT-H583 Water H-3 223 8+/-40 2290 490 4090

s.d. - one standard deviation of three individual analytical results 80

APPENDIX E .

.I.. - .. USE....-..

.. N..S.U...

SYNOPSIS, OLADUE CENSUS a , !, -.1i-, :,-.

. k . . I I ,

81

APPENDIX E SYNOPSIS OF 2003 LAND USE CENSUS A land use census was conducted to identify, within a distance of 8 km (5 miles), the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence, and the nearest garden of greater than 50m2 (500ft2 )

producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the 16 meteorological sectors.

Tabulated below are the results of these surveys:

Milk Nearest Vegetable Animal Residence Garden Meteorological July, 2003 July, 2003 July, 2003 Sector km (miles) km (miles) km (miles)

N None None None NNE None None None NE None 6.4 (4.0) None ENE None 5.8 (3.6) None E

None 8.7 (5.4) None ESE None None None SE None None None SSE None None None S None None None SSW None 5.5 (3.4) None SW None 6.9 (4.3) 7.7 (4.8)

WSW None 7.1 (4.4) None W 7.8 (4.9) 6.5 (4.0) None WNW None 5.5 (3.4) None NW None 5.9 (3.7) None NNW None - 6.8 (4.2) None 83

APPENDIX F RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN 85

" A'PPENDIX F RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN The-calculated individual doses:.in this section are based on:the controlling dose pathways and age groups as described below. The estimated dose represents the maximum radiation dose thaticould be received by a member of the-general public. The population dose impact is based on the evaluation year site-specific data (i.e., food production, milk production, feed for milk animals and seafood production). -

The doses were'calculated using methods described in Regulatory Guide 1.109 and represent calculations for the 12-month reporting interval..

Individual'doses from batch and continuous 'releases were calculated; using the'annual average historic meteorological dispersion factors as described in the respective Offsite Dose Calculation'Manual.

Population doses were calculated'using the meteorological dispersion coefficients for the twelve month'reporting interval.

I I Liquid Pathways Age Group -e G Li Pathway

Location' Total Body --- - Adult ISite Boundary Seafood Ingestion Organ Adult Site Boundary Seafood Ingestion Sit Bondr Salem Unit 1' Type Dose Limit Total Body 7.17E-3 mrem 3 mrem Organ Dose (GI-LI) 1.62E-2 mrem 10 mrem Salem Unit 2 I .. 1.

Tytpe ' -I . Dose - Limit ' '

1. - i .- .. . .

Total Body 5.73E-3 mrem ! ' , - 3 mrem I 1. ..; . .

Organ Dose (GI-LI) 1.29E-2 mrem ' 10 mrem Hope Creek Type - --' a o' _:', . -. - Xi 1Limit

Total Body - - .6.76E-5 mrem 3 mrem Organ Dose (GI-LLI) 5.29E-4 mrem 10 mrem Site Dose Limit Populatiozn (Total) 4.59E-O3yperson-rem N/A -

Population (Average) -A1.19E-06 mrem~ '- '

87

.. . . _ IL Air Pathways Toe Age Group Location Pathway Total Body All Site Boundary Direct Exposure Skin All Site Boundary Direct Exposure Organ Infant 4.9 mi. W. Milk, Ground Plane, Inhalation Salem Units 1&2 Type Dose Limit Total Body 1.72E-02 mrem 500 mrem Skin 4.92E-02 mrem 3000 mrem Organ Dose (Thyroid) 1. 18E-01 mrem 15 mrem Hope Creek Typ Dose Limit Total Body 3.29E-04 mrem 500 mrem Skin 6.43E-04 mrem 3000 mrem Organ Dose (Thyroid) 3.97E-02 mrem 15 mrem Site Dose Limit Population (Total) 4.33E-01 person-rem N/A Population (Average) 8.66E-05 mrem N/A Direct Radiation Direct radiation may be estimated by thermoluminescent dosimetric (TLD) measurements. One method for comparing TLD measurements is by comparison with pre-operational data. It should be noted that the TLDs measure direct radiation from both the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations at Artificial Island, and natural background radiation.

TLD data for the twelve-month reporting period is given below:

TLD Location Measurement 1S-1 0.4 mile NNE 4.63 mrad/std. month SS-1 1.0 mile E 3.81 mrad/std. month These values are interpreted to represent natural background, since the values are within the statistical variation associated with the pre-operational program results which are 3.7 mrad/standard month for TLD 1S-1 and 4.2 mrad/standard month for TLD 5S-1.

88

Total Dose 40CFR190 limits the total dose to members of the. public due to radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources to:

<2.5 mrem total body or any organ and;

<75 mrem thyroid for'a calendar yea'r.

For Artificial Island, the major sources of dose are from liquid and gaseous effluents from the Hope Creek and Salem plants. ;

The following doses to a "hypothetical maximum exposed individual". have been calculated for the twelve-month'.repdrting period. They are the sum of gaseous and liquid pathway doses'for the Salem 1 and..2 and Hope Creek plants:

1.66E-02 mrem Total Body.,,

3.79E-02 mrem Organ (GI-LLI) l.49E-01 mrem Thyroid'-

Dose to members of the public dueto activities inside the site Boundary Dose to members of the public is limited to 100 mrem total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) in a year-in'accordance with 10CFR20i301'. The definition of members of the public changed on September 11, 2001. The various food vendors that have previously comprised the maximally exposed group are no longer allowed on site. For this reporting period, the definition of the members of the public are the members of the New Jersey National Guard to augment the security force at the site. Their typical patrol- spahs- the' site, and the following locations 16S1; CAB and.CA15 (Hope Creek:Barge Slip, Dredge Spoils and Baseball Field) are .averaged to estimate'their dose.' In accordance with the requirements of ODCM 6'.9.1.8 (SGS)' and 6.9.1.7 'lHCGS), the-'dose to --

members of the public inside 'the site boundary has been' calculated' based on the following assumptions:' .' ' -

a. The National Guard works a 40, hour week, therefore all doses are multiplied by 0.25 to assess their dose.

For the" 12-month reporting period,. January 1, 2003 to December

.31, 2003 the calculated doses Lare:

2.13E-01 mrem TEDE Total Body

--1.97E-02.- mrem TEDE . Organ,(Lung): ... :

3. 12E-02 mreM TEDE. 'ThyrOid ' '

89

LR-N04-0116, Stations, 2003 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

LR-N04-0116, Stations, 2003 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search