IR 05000498/1993031
| ML20059G995 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 01/18/1994 |
| From: | Beach A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Cottle W HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9401260138 | |
| Download: ML20059G995 (77) | |
Text
.
po Rt ag OfelTED STATES
,.
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
[I R E GION 1V o ,8 611 RY AN PLAZA DRIVE, SullE 400 ,
s - @ AR LINGTON, T EXA5 76011-8064
..... JAN I 8 igot Dockets: 50-498 i 50-499 Licenses: NPF-76 NPF-80 Houston Lighting & Power Company ATTN: William T. Cottle, Group Vice President, Nuclear P.O. Box 289 Wadsworth, Texas 77483 '
SUBJECT: JANUARY 7, 1994, MANAGEMENT MEETING This refers to the meeting conducted at the NRC's request at the South Texas Project site on January 7, 199 This meeting related to your progress in addressing current issues and the status of your activities with respect to ;
resolving the Restart Issues identified in NRC Inspection Report 50-498/93-31, ;
50-498/93-31. The meeting was open to the public and was attended by those on the attached Attendance Lis In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this' letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Roo .
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with yo
Sincerely, j9f AL >
A. Bill Beach, Director Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
Meeting Summary w/ attachments
REGION IV REVIEWS BY INPO AND OTHER OUTSIDE GROUPS IMPROVEMENTS IN SIMULATOR TRAINING
,
RESULTS: DEMONSTRATED HIGHER PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND EXPECTATIONS
. _ , ._ _. ._. -... . . _ - - - - - - - . . . -- . . - . - - - - - . . . . . . . . . - . -
. ..
%
MAINTENANCE TRAINING IMPROVEMENTS CRAFT CERTIFICATIONS SUPERVISORY TRAINING 1993 GOALS MET (60% IN TRAINING ON CONTINUOUS BASIS)
MAINTENANCE PROCESSES IMPROVED WORK CONTROL PROCESS IMPROVED POST MAINTENANCE TEST PROGRAM AND PROCESSES INCREASED EMPHASIS ON PLANNING AND SCHEDULE DISCIPLINE
>
POST MAINTENANCE TEST PROCESS DESIGNED POST MAINTENANCE TESTING MATRICES TRAINING FOR PLANNERS TO isNSURE CONSISTENCY USE ENTIRE POST MAINTENANCE TESTING MATRIX IN WORK PACKAGE EASY ACCESS TO TECH SUPPORT ENGINEERS FOR ISSUE RESOLUTION
\
. .. ._ . . - . .- . . - - . - . .. .. - - - - -. . _ _ , . -- .. -___ - - _ _ - - _ _ _ . . . .
.. . .__ _ . _ .
. .
.
I l _ UNIT 1 i
PREVENTIVE & CORRECTIVE 1 SERVICE REQUESTS
,
.
l l 7,200 l 6,900
,
,
6,600 6,300 ( 6,000 .*t'
5,700 .*.*,.*
5.400 -
"
...*
5,100
...
,.
4,800 4,500 .**,,..**
4,200 ,,..*....
- 3,900 s ..**
,
3,600 3,300
... .,..** .-
"
\
i 3,0 w
,,,,,.................--***..... ....,... .***,..**..
2,700
'... *_,. *....,,,,*~ ~...
,
2,400 2,100
'
..**,..
t800
........... .................
.
1,500
- ,,. **
4 ,...*'.. .............................
..... -
g g g aus Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I OPEN SR'S INCOM!NG SR's CUMULATIVE COMPLETE CUMULATNE INCOMING
............. m .............
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .. .
_ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ - _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
.
. .
'O
-
SERVICE REOUEST BACKLOG MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT OF BACKLOG ACHIEVED CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT IN MATERIAL CONDITION COMPLETING EMERGENT WORK AND PUNCHLIST ITEMS .
COMPLETING OUTAGE ACTIVITIES AND TRANSITIONING TO OPERATIONAL STATUS MAINTENANCE CREWS COMPLETING TRAINING WLL SUPPORT DIVERSION OF WORK FROM UNIT 1 TO UNIT 2 i
.
I i
m__ _ _ _ _ ______._._________.m.____ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . , _ . . . . . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ , , , , _ . . . . _ . . , , _ , , . , , , _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ , . . _ _ _ , . , , , . , , _ , _ _ _ _ , , , , , _ , , . . ,
- !! . '
! l ! l ,
. .
_
.
-
_ - -
- -
~
~
- -
51 07 C 222 i E
. D
. - -
-
_
.
V
-
- O N
R E -
- W -
i C T
.
S 431 O P O
. T EEE DDD%
.
N OOO0 0 MMM1 P
-
E i E S
_
M - -
- UE -
i U G
RC
.
- -
A TI Y - - - -
-
_ L -
H - - - L
.
NR E T
N
_
.
-
-
-
i U J 3
--
-
- -
-
_ I -
- 9 O -
-
-
MS - 9
-
_ -
- -
.
- M -
-
- N1 i U OF
-
.
- - -
-
_
- -
- J OO 1 -
_
T -
- -
-
_
I
-
-
- - Y
_ R-T N U -
- - -
- i A M
.
_ LU -
- -
-
-
-
-
OO -
.
_ - -
_
- - - R R i P
-
_ -
-
-
A
-
- -
-
_ T -
-
-
-
N -
-
-
R
-
- -
-
-
-
-
.
i A O
- - . .
-
M C
-
_
-
-
- -
-
- - - .
.
.
.
- B -
_ -
-
-
-
-
-
i E F
.
.
- -
-
_
-
- - -
-
. -
-
-
-
-
-
- N
-
-
- - - -
- A J
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~ -
-
-
~ - -
- -
_ - - - - - - - - -
.
.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ .
0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
u J0 $ $z BgwZ
_ -
.
, _ _ .
- .
. . .
.
-
CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SERVICE NUMBERS ARE ARTIFICIALLY INFLUENCED BY ONGOING MAINTENANCE AND PLANT CONDITIONS LARGE NUMBER WILL BE CLEARED BY MODE CHANGES GOAL IS ACHIEVABLE TO SUPPORT MODE CHANGES AND RETURN TO OPERATIONS .
, + v- + -s<wa e a. w,- - - --+r e - c. - -#--++ . . .--.w- , -me- e r --.---%m,- e--= w e-- e-- ,e , *-.aw.--. -e.+
- _ - _ - - - _ -. . _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ . - . _ . . - . _
- -
.
_
PLANT OPERATIONS INOPERABLE AUTOMATIC FUNCTIONS UNIT 1 - MONTHLY
MODE 4 5 MODE 3 1 MODE 1 1 100% POWER 0
-
$20- - - --- - - - - - - --- -- ---- -
5 -
1
~
13 AS OF
-
01/03/94 l $
tu
.
10 - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - -
4 0 , i i i i i i i i i i i JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
'
1993
_
t e en INOPERABLE AUTO'MATIC FUNCTIONS OUT OF SERVICE NUMBERS ARE ARTIFICIALLY INFLUENCED BY ONGOING MAINTENANCE AND PLANT CONDITIONS ,
.
LARGE NUMBER WILL BE CLEARED BY MODE CHANGES
GOAL IS ACHIEVABLE TO SUPPORT MODE CHANGES AND RETURN TO OPERATIONS ,
._._ . _ , . _ _ . _. - . _ .__. , ... .,. -. . . _ ,_--....-_..... _ _ _ ...,... _ _ ..-. . ._. . _. _ ._. . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ . . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . _ _ . . _ ___ ..._ . .--_. .
. ,
,
t UNANTICIPATED EOUIPMENT ACTUATIONS/ FAILURE TO ACTUATE BASED ON OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSESSMENT TEAM CONCERN, MANAGEMENT INITIATED AN INVESTIGATION TWELVE OCCURRENCES NOTED IN 1993 ,
PRIMARILY RESULT OF INADEQUATE ASSESSMENT DURING PREPARATION OF WORK PROCEDURES OR INSTRUCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH OUTAGE ACTIVITIES EFFECTIVE ACTION TAKEN FOR THE INDIVIDUAL OCCURRENCES ADDITIONAL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS TREND BEING DEVELOPED POWER ASCENSION PLAN AND ORGANIZATION DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FOCUS AND CONTROL OF ACTIVITIES DURING RETURN TO OPERATIONS
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _
_
- . - -,. - - .
.
.
.
I
_
,
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS EMPHASIS.ON PROBLEM REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR ~UP-FRONT SHIFT SUPERVISOR REVIEW
,
INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION DAILY PEER SCREENING GROUP DAILY PROBLEM REVIEW GROUP (PLANT MANAGER AND DEPARTMENT MANAGERS)
DISCUSSED AT PLAN'OF THE DAY (REGULAR FRIDAY AGENDA ITEM)
IMPROVED ROOT CAUSE ANALYSES
, ,
i
. .
.
-
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM (CONT.)
BACKLOG MANAGEMENT OPEN SPRs SCREENED MODE RESTRAINTS SYSTEM CERTIFICATIONS SELF ASSESSMENTS INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENTS CURRENT OPEN SPRs HAVE BEEN CHARACTERIZED AND ISSUES ARE UNDERSTOOD SAMPLING CLOSED SPRs STARTUP RESTRAINTS ROOT / APPARENT CAUSE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
,
OPERABILITY /REPORTABILITY CLOSED SPRs REVIEWED TO DATE - NO UNIT 1 RESTART ISSUES IN CATEGORY l-4 (SIGNIFICANT SPRs), ONE POTENTIAL ISSUE ON A CATEGORY. 5 SPR - POSSIBLE SAMPLE EXPANSION
. _-=_____ - _- - . . . - . . - . . - . . - -
. ..
.
_
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM (CONT.)
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES AFFECTING RELIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY IDENTIFIED AND ADDRESSED AGE AND INVENTORY ARE BEING REDUCED WHILE MAINTAINING THE INPUT RATES FAIRLY CONSTANT OBJECTIVE IS TO MAINTAIN PROGRESS ON NEW ISSUES WHILE CONTINUING TO REDUCE INVENTORY OF OLD ISSUES - BEING ACHIEVED
.- . . _ . .. - . . . - . - - - .- - . - .-. . . . . - . - .. , .. . . - - .
- _ _ _ -_ _ _ . . . _ . -_
.
.
_
e 0 3EN STATIO \l 3 90 3LE V R E 3OR~~S
- Categories 1 to 5 12/30/93 POD 1000 Ah 900- -
,
- j' %=
~c-x fs
--
/ Mi \ _ _ f' s i 800- - - ~
X ?' Common Units "
/ -
~r - s . ,,,,,, .,,
700- - ;y=w=/ ' ! !,
'
, _ _ _' ,
600- -
-
- -
Both Units
- 500- -
400- -l Unit 2
! 300- -
l l .
i ll 200- -l l S'
l
'
100-Unit 1 f s': <
l
'
'M iiiiie ii ' ' i iiiiiiiiiiiii
' "'
0 i s'7'1"i i i i i i i i i i i i e iiiniiiY Jan-93 Feb-93 Mar-93 Apr-93 May-93 Jun-93 Jul-93 Sep-93 Oct-93 Nov-93 Dec-93
'
,
_ _
-
. _ _ . _ . _ _ - _ _._._,
. ..
,
a OVERALL OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE CONCLUSIONS KEY GOALS HAVE BEEN ACHIEVED TO SUPPORT RETURN TO OPERATIONS PROGRESS ACHIEVED WHILE EXHIBITING CONSERVATIVE DECISION MAKING AND DEDICATION TO QUALITY REFUELING ACTIVITY OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSESSMENT TEAM COORDINATION LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES TESTING POWER ASCENSION PLAN NUCLEAR GENERATION STAFF READY TO SUPPORT SYSTEMATIC AND '
CONSERVATIVE RETURN TO POWER OPERATIONS STARTUP IS NOT THE END OBJECTIVE CONTINUE SYSTEMATIC IMPROVEMENT THROUGH BUSINESS PLAN INITIATIVES
- . - - - . - . - . - . - .. - . - . - - . - .- . . -. . - - - . -
a Ad .d. 4H-.A , .a.d6
.
3. + sd6 .e a. @ @ 4 -c5 ee-@ & --6-.d4 13 L .4L 3
. - 6 i
P h
- . ,.
,
I t
P
.
t
'
- t
!
>
l
'4
.
e s
a f
i t
?
!
!
'!
i t
'-.
O Z
-
-
W Ed Z
-
,
O ,
Z !
W ,
i l
?
F v
!
.f h
t
.
.
I I
i
!
!
i
-
.
b
.
J
4
- ]
l
]
- \
l
!
-
, - _
J
-.
.
.
,
.
ENGINEER.ING ACCOMPLISHMENTS ORGANIZATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION CONTRACTOR CONTROL ISSUES CONCLUSIONS
l l
l'
L-- . - - _ - . - - . . .. .. .- _-_- . .__ . .. .- - . . . . .-, . .-. . . ,_ -
- ;
,
I
- !
!
t i
i T
VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR l ENGINEERING T. H . Cl ON:NCFR Assistant to the Vice President Execut.ive ,
Nuclear Secretary Engineering _ l M D. MFIFR R.D. SCHt f M ANN i
i I 1 i i i Director M noger Manager Direct r Nucleor Nuclear Fuel & " 9 *' D** 9 " systems M"" 9'I Engineerin9 Purebasing &
Anal YS'S Engineerin9 Programs Materio!s :
Department Engineering Support Management Department Department . Div. .ision Division Department _ >
D.A. IFA7AR S.F. THOMAS T.J. JORDAN M; PACY A.C. MetNTYRF R.J. TFNNANT '
l l
- Mgt Comm Fuel *
Disciplines * Fluid Systems *
Testing * Reporting * Contracts Stoff *
Procurement * Elect /l&C Section XI * Business * Purchasing
- Fob Cont Engineering Systems Surveillonce Plan * Materials
- Rx Engr *
MOV Program- * Technical Leak Rote * Tracking * Warehousing
TH Anal *
VETIP Support Rx Pit Perf ** Doc Processing * Support
PRA ** MOD Admi * Computers C Snubber Dudget
Decomm * Reliability / AC *
DotaBoses
Fire Prot * Word TraininO. roc '
.
Pred Molnt * Nuc Not RCM * Welding Codes & Stds :l i MED/MPL Thermal *
Procedures * Possport i
'
Perf * CM Progrcm
- Proi Eng *
Process Proce ;
!
'
t i
..
I
!
i
a
- 0-U"8CD*G *
INTERIM ASSIGNMENT RCV 11 L
, . . - . . . . , , - ._ _ , ~ , . . - - - - . . . . . . , . . , . ...,-.~a i..,,+..,_,, , . . - . . - . . . ,L,,,- - -, , , - . . , , , , -
-O 6 L
&
I-ORGANI7ATION ENHANCEMENTS
-
OBJECTIVES
.
'
BETTER ORGANIZE WORK
,
'
IMPROVE COMMUNICATIONS t
CLARIFY OWNERSHIP AND ACCOUNTABILITY ENHANCE SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROCESS b
--.__a
- _- _ _ _ ..___ _ _ _ _ - _.--s __._,-.-m -
-
_ , , _ ... . . , . .- .- . . w. ' . _. .. _ _ , _ . . . . . . . - . - . . . . _ . - _ .. ,._ . .. .. , . , . . , . _ . _ . _ ~4.,- _ . . . , _
. .
.
b
SYSTEM ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENTS ONE DEPARTMENT
.
ADDITION OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT ENGINEERS SYSTEM ENGINEERING GUIDELINES DOCUMENT
.
ADDITIONAL TRENDING AND COMMUNICATIONS TOOLS i
._ - . . - -- . . . . . . . - . ., .. . - . . ._ -
_ _ ,
,
' ~
. . .
..
.
"
ENGINEERING WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT LARGE INVENTORY OF WORK ITEMS AFFECTED ABILITY TO FOCUS ON :
KEY ISSUES i AS PART OF OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN STRATEGY, AGGRESSIVELY REDLICED WORK ITEMS TO MORE MANAGEABLE LEVELS TRANSITIONING TO LONG TERM MANAGEMENT AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS
'
,
. . . . ,--, , . . _ _ .-- _
-
,<.,m<,- . . . - -,- , -- u -r-,. - . -- . . - . ~ .4 -_%.v ---- - -ww-, + - - .ws- e--W- 4--- -+-- 'w-- -- _ - - - _ a - - - =
a
,
..
ENGINEER NG RESTART ITEMS d
O O
-
18- --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[
. -e E . . . . . - ...., . ~ . . - . . . .
-
H m 14- -- - - - - - -
W
%
Q jg_ . . . . . . . . . .
. _ . . . _ . .
z
-
Q z 10- - -- -- -
/
h
,M 8* A-- A, s D ',
'
O 6- 's N ',-
O '.
~
% 4- -
'\, ,A W , ' ,' 's A-e
-
A
'
.
g 2- --
,A--i, TARoartuvEt o Z M
...................M M M
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . .
M-M..E.E-Mw.............................................
,....... .... .....
'
0 . . . A-A-A-A-A- * , = - = - = - == - = - = - == -
,
05/31 08/01 10/02 12/03 07/01 09/01 11/02 01/03
1-m- MODIFICATIONS --A - BENEFICIAL CHANGES NOTE: INITIAL DATA FOR MODS INCLUDES THOSE ISSUED PRIOR TO 6/1/9 CHANS
_ _ __,._ __ _ _ . _ _._ - - ._ _ -
_- _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ . . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . ._ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . -
.
.
.
.
DESIGN / PHYSICAL PLANT CHANGES-NC PCFs 200 O
I 180- - - - - -- -
-
O 160- - -
<
>-
4 140-- -
120g [ " N =~, -
co 100- - - " -
\ =,"'n A \ m-80- -
m'
u>
u-
\" / = ,"/ set *
60-Q . . . . . . . . . . - - - . . . . . . .
TARGET LEVEL 50 ---------...-----.......-----.-----........---.--------&-------
"
CL 40 --
O
'
20- -- --
Z 0 i , , , , ,
05/31 08/01 10/02 12/03 07/01 09/01 11/02 01/03-m- TOTAL NC PCFs i CHANr3B l
__ . _ - _ . _ _ . - . . _ . . - _ . - _ - . . - - . .-. ._ _ _ _ - . _._ . _._ .-
' '
.
b
.
DESIGN / PHYSICAL PLANT CHANGES a -TEMP MODS J
O 20 '
u)
I 18 -
F- ;
Z o 16-- t 2 "-"-"-"-"-R e 14- -
--
m-a-A
o m-m-m 12- m-u 8 10- N O
EE E ..
aq"
.
8- e \ ;
3 6- -
\ s F- e as a 4 da tu
.w \
$ 2- -
10 o e \
O i (r 0 TAR ET LEVEL 0 , _, b og ,_ i-
% 09/01 11/02 01/03 10/02 12/03 02/03-m- TEMP.-MODS -B- ORIGINAL PROJECTION'- A---CURRENT PROJECTION -
'
CHANr5C
- _ . . . _ . . . . . _ . . . . _ _ . - . . . . _ . . . , . . . _ . . _ - _ -
- . . . - _ _ , _ - . _ . . . . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ . . . . _ - . . . _ . - - - . . _ . ~ - _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ , . _ _ . . . - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
Cd
. g e ,
N i !
N N
.
- v"*
i O
.
a i 4 i I
- 4 i z~ *
p o
-
- - .
'
'
E! 4 Ei 4 + to Q N 4 4 I Z E 2 :
- 4
E!t#
4 4 4lI :
m :
O mema
3'f _%
N 5 o 4 4 4 cn H .
4 [g e
Ia [E *O a Ui 4
-
.
O >
J w ,! .! i, .m m ,
"
4 / / ! % Z y
':> E $ 4 E '04
$
-
r4 m o i tt : :
!
! oo :
.
( ! ! ! l : !
O E t s li $0 4 [!) $
Z
-
\ !
!
- : :
l v-1 i i
\
1B ! k 'h k04 -
d (D C W { ! i ,,- :- i
-
U I i
b
- ,1
,
-
'
- : z Z
-
i
- E N ! !K4 E04 i
J
<0 o
Q
'
'
i 'i !
O \ ;x !
i N : ', ;
!
!
H O
o
!
Z E i j
'
i 4 'E h! O 4
-
g Z ',
N i \ \ :) \ .
! i i
!: 1i g I
g
'
.
, : : *
E i 4 E E C4 l ;
i i i i v-
- : : .
i, ! i O s
O 6 6 6 O
O O
O O
O
O Om O i
O O O (D 4 N O CO (D 4 N 1 r- v- v- v-
!
S.LNBIAlnOOG .-10 8381AlnN
.
. ,
e
, I
,
.
.
.
r
_
.
n a
h 8 c .
/ .
- _
-
- 0
- -
b .
.
.
.
s
~"" s R C R -
x ,,"-
E
.-
-
P S D
.
-
.
-
E -
/
-
- .
-2 mW 2 A-
.
-
A-
.
-
mge - .
.
S .
N "'~ m. w' .
O
~
- -
..
-
I T =- .
A " sw i
- "
.
-
U :
- s s 9 R N L VMEw"0 N r/ E C
-
A
.
.
-
"1 .
O D
-
V
.
n4, -
E \\ M *1 -
\ =
-
-
G . 3;' m= 0 *
-
.
-
N -= -
I R
,x w "
' " s F
-
-
E
.
.
.
.
~ C .
-
E .'
'
Mw" 0 P .
-
N
'
.
I G
N -
r" 1
/ L s
e
-
N m N 0 *'
1 AD
-
~
-
\ " T n -
E y,
-
L E w' O o .
N E V -
-
T N _
r
.
m m g L - -
- -
y - T E "
-
- = =
-
-
-
N" s- k G w R
- -
-
_
-
A 0
- x %0 T 1
-
./ -
- u -
0 9
-
.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 .
.
1 .
.
OI.O .E> " ZC'
.
< "I F m g F <g C}gO.OZ .
.
.
.
.
-
. #
,
.
.
_
ADMINISTRATIVElPROGRAMMATIC CHANGES-VENDOR DOCUMENTS 400
-
@
350-
-
Z -
-
uJ 2 m .N 300--
]
=
250-
"x x" O \,
a 200-z $ 150-h u
o %'a s
100-s o
go _ \'m z xm en,
TARGET LEVEL 0 , , , /31 DWO1 08/01 09/01 10/02 11/02 12/03 01/03-m- VENDOR DOCUMENIS chan3r3A
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _
. _ . . _ . . __ _ ...__:.-__ _ . . . _ _ - . - __
-
. .. _ .. -, . ._ , . . . - _ . .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - _ - -
. .
.
ADMINISTRATIVE / PROGRAMMATIC CHANGES-KEY DRAWINGS OVERDUE
d ;
O 3 50- - --
O
'
>-
LLI M 40-til D
Q
@ 30-
'
>
O o 20-T LLI
$ 10
Z Target Level 0 0=---=-----=---m-=-=-=+=-=-==,==-=-===-===-=
05/31 07/01 08/01 09/01 10/02 11/02 12/03 01/03 l
-=- KEY DWG chan3r3b
- _ _ _ - .. ._ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - . _
--
. . .
.*
ADMINISTRATI7E/ PROGRAMMATIC CHANGES-MPLs Greater Than 60 Days Old 120 '
E
$ 100- - -
8 .
o
- 80- -
\ -
A en
_J g 60- g
"
g .
O tr 40-m CD
3 20
\ TARGET LEVEL 0 0 m>='"'=-= = = = =, == ==
09/03 10/04 11/04 12/05 01/05
-=- MPLs > 60 Days Old chan3r3c
-
. _ - _ . _ _ .._ - ._ _ . _. ,_- . _ . , _ . . . _ , . . _ . . _ . . _ _ - _ . . . _ . . _ , . . _ . . . . _ . . _ . . _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . .
,e'-
m
C
"
D e N %
0 f5
i
/ Y W R
% i '"
U Q : e
% i R h ! c X '
i
"
NN i a m
0 '
/a i M R 2 e
h m' .
>
%
H
/
E'/,/ i i
i cy s-i. -%o Z-
'/ e N ! E 4@'
'% i R
N% \
4 m o
a N
i a
.
i si i
g
-
.
% 'ji o
!
w
.l s
-
5 BI N 6 E k ~b: o i D I H .
' l ,
i I e ,
N i i o >
l E '
% od i i i
<; o o o o o o o o o e o o o o o o o o o o o o N O c 4 M N " ,
Swall A801SlH BS/Wd dO 8B9WnN i
l
.. *
.
. .
.
.
CARRYOVER FROM PAST PROGRAMS 160
@
Z 140- -- --- -- - - - - -
O =
E- 120k- -- - - - - -
@
<C LL 100- -
+ m- -
g; , -- - -
\
[ 'M . . . _ . . .
. . _ . . . _ . .
3g 3 LL 80- ~-- -- - -
N"\- -- - -
O \
Z ID 60- - -- -
-k-5, CO 40- ---- --
~% m...
D 20- - --
\
z _____._____...___...A___.______________......._________.....A._..A._.A.g, s-gg g Qj ,
TARGET LEVEL O ; , '[A4-A -A_FA-_ h 05/31 08;o1 10/02 12/03 07/01 09/01 11/02 01/03
-=- TOTAL + RFAs --*-- FCRs chan4r2
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
.
v o
.
o SYSTEM CERTIFICATION PROGRAM OPERATIONS HAS MAINTAINED CONTROL OF ALL SYSTEMS DURING THE OUTAGE 61 SYSTEMS AND SUBSYSTEMS CHOSEN FOR ADDITIONAL REVIEW (INADDITION TO EXISTING OPS AND ENG SYSTEM HEALTH PROGRAMS)
TWO TIER PROCESS
, SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW (PAPER REVIEW)
SYSTEM CERTIFICATION (PHYSICAL WALKDOWN) .
_ _ , . - _ _ . _ _ _ . ~ , . . . . _ - .
-
, , . ~ , . - . _ . _ , _ _ . . - . - , . . . . _ , - _ _ _ . . . . - . . ._...-._-__-._.______.._..___.____m
-
~__ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ___ _ _ _ _ _. - . . __
. .
.
.
SYSTEM READINESS REVIE1N OTGP03-ZA-0005 Number
61 61 61
60 -
. _#
50 -
~
40 -
30 -
20 -
10 -
'
"' ' ' = ' ' ''''' ' ' ' '''
10/01 10/06 10/11 10/14 10/19 10/22 10/27 11/01 11/04 11/09 11/12 11/17 11/22 11/29 Workday
'
Scheduled Approved Approved for RRC by RRC by PM
- : _
. .. - _ . - _ . . - . , . . . _ . . - - . . _ - . -, -. _ - . _ _ ~ _ . . - . . _ _ _ . - _ . - _ - _ . - _. . . .
i .
. .
-
SYSTEM CERTIFICATION S':a:us as o= '-03-EL NO. OF SYSTEMS
61
-
60 - -
r
57 ,
50 -
,'
.
42 /
40 -
.
s
'
..... .... ' #
.
30 ,- .
,'
- 20, #
~' e 20 ~~~', .. '
,,,,,.... e
, y
"-
10 -
- '... .'
.
.
... -
,
-
m. . _ . - ,. _ . 1 ., - -, , , , , ,
o 11-8 11-15 11-22 11-29 12-6 12-13 12-20 12-27 1-3-94 1-10 1-17 1-24 WALKDOWNS ACCEPTED PLANNED ACCEPTANCE ACTUAL ACCEPTANCE COMPLETE BY SS BY PLT MGR BY PLT MGR
.......... ..-.- --_
_ .- _ - . , , . _ , , . . . .
. _ .
o + .
,
s
- AUGMENTED TESTING FEATURE OF SYSTEM CERTIFICATION PROCESS
'
ADDITIONAL TESTING CALLED OUT FOR 10 SYSTEMS AND SUBSYSTEMS EXAMPLES STANDBY DIESEL GENERATORS - COMPLETE '
ESSENTIAL CHILLERS - UNDERWAY RESULTS POSITIVE AND PROVIDED ENHANCED ASSURANCE OF
. RELIABILITY i
t i
i t
, _ ._-_.____.- _,-_ _ - __ - __ .- -- . ,--.,--,-& .---- --,..- -, o,, e-,,--, - , . - . - . . . . - , - - . ~we~,, -,- - , . . . . .. .----- #. -v.a.-. w m. --o---,+..,.-.,--.--,._,.. , , , . , ,c.-,. , .e,. --ss..- . . . ~ .,
. .
.
.
CONTRACTOR CONTROL ISSUES RECENT EXAMPLES OF SUBSTANDARD WORK PERFORMANCE
,
FREEZE SEAL NOT PROPERLY ESTAB'LISHED MAINTENANCE ON WRONG MOTOR OPERATED VALVES TEMPERATURE SWITCHES INADVERTENTLY SWAPPED ROOT CAUSES GENERIC - PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED FIELD SUPERVISION DEFICIENT OTHER CAUSES - INATTENTION-TO-DETAIL FAILURE TO SELF-CHECK
'
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REINFORCED PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND SELF-CHECKING EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL ADDED TO OVERSEE FIELD ACTIVITIES TRAINING CONTRACTOR TECHNICAL COORDINATORS - COMPLETION SCHEDULED.MID-JANUARY
_ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . . . _ _ . - _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . .
. ...
__
.
CONTRACTOR CONTROL ISSUES (CONT.)
PREPARING PERFORMANCE MONITORING PLANS - COMPLETION SCHEDULED MID-JANUARY COMMUNICATING REQUIREMENTS AND EXPECTATIONS TO APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL - COMPLETION SCHEDULED LATE JANUARY CONCLUSIONS
'
SUBSTANTIAL MANAGEMENT ATTENTION ASSESSMENT OF WORK CREW CAPABILITIES ENHANCED QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES
,
i
!
. . _ . . . - . _ - . . . . . . _ . . . . _ _ _ _ - _ _ . . _ . . . _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
- ..
_
.
OVERALL ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS KEY GOALS HAVE BEEN ACHIEVED
~
SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS IN SYSTEM HEALTH MAINTENANCE ACHIEVED
,
ORGANIZATION IS FUNCTIONING WELL, RESPONDING QUICKLY TO PROBLEMS AND ISSUES, AND IS PROVIDING GOOD SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING IS READY TO SUPPORT THE SYSTEMATIC AND CONSERVATIVE RETURN TO POWER OPERATIONS
'
PLANS, PROGRAMS, AND RESOURCES IN PLACE TO ACHIEVE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS
l l
l l . . .
+ t - . . - _
-
._r..- . . _ .
k
.
,
', h
- e-
,
t
h
'
-t e
r
.
f
,
,
!
.! ,
D
.
!
H
< l H !
M !
t Z r CO -!
W
'
Z
.
!.
O
< >
w ;
,
,
J !
< !
Z 0-
-
H
<
M '
.
W A
O
,
!
l
..
P
l
.I o
!
-
-!
. . - . =
, -y -
-. * ~ k
,
&
OPERATIONAL READINESS STATUS OF RESTART ISSUES SELF ASSESSMENT PROCESS
, I r
i
<
h f
+
b e- :, . . .-,-,+-..e -, mew-cI.-w-- ,,-...r., ...m.rs~,- ,,,,,,,ww ,-w,,.. ,-~,e,,,c ,.w., i-r, .n.;- ,4-7-.,,we,,m. , . ,w.e- , w, -e,-,,. t.. , c e > . - , ...w., ,.,--nE-w, ,,- c ,. #, ...,,,%.......... c.... . . . . $ rd,,i- r.,-. -
, r , i ) 3L L ' ,L j i
.
-
-.
.
.
,
u
-
.
.
.
.
e .
.
.
.
.
.
d -
h
.
$
U
+
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
E
.
.
.
. . .
.
_
,
,
.
,
_
.
~
,
.
.
.
S E .
U S
S ,
.
I .
T
.
.
.
R .
A T . .
S E .
R .
F O
.
S N .
U O T I A T T C S E P
S .
N .
e r
I +
a Y T d w R s
R r O e O a T v P H A l a .
E V R
d n M r a R s s
s
=
.
-
N g e r I
F m a r a
,.
.
-
O n d e s r o p I
i a t u
s e N g t a y o
t T s e p n O g r B C e L r o g e _
T g m n o
d e C P o n n
,
E n m o r l
k l e o .
P e it s a L n c k G
-
S c i f a e C a r e p A o a c a
i t
a n f n c p e i B l N a t a T o i
f r N t c B e s
l o
I n S e i i
m P I F A e g e s e t t
r a c I Y t s d a c e D y e n n i
D r B in n g t e
C c n G v a i r e o
+
a o i r o e N i n e y t a
D M it a B P r
m d a g I t
c e e b w
.
.
,
T e n .
t E r e n r e I r in ig d
n d
.,
S t
s e e e t s r r e
.
A
.
o p r y o m o a n a e
.
O P O i ir T E C M E t
L F F S W S F C A
-
.
-
,
.
J, .
. .
.
.
.
L .
,
i ;- . i il l
- E >
w
-
r
,
m a
,
-,
m g
-
.,
.-
,
,
,-
,
,
. ,
,-
.
.
,
,
r,
-
,.
e,
w
,
,
.
,
-
-
.
.
- .
.
.
m
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
,
,
,
,
.
S ,
E U
.
-
S S =
I T -
R .
A o
,
T -
S E .
R -
-
-
F O .
S U
T s -
A T
S p
m u
P r
t e
a w
d e
G e N F W s m a
I y E s r T r a
I V
e n
g S e o E
i E r l
i v P T x R i u t c n L A s L f e r e
A n r
e A f c N e l
N E n I
v l
i I t o F i h F n C D
r C e G l G m e e
N e a N e y g o i
I I
T in t n T a l p
I br e I n
.
A u s s A a m
.
W T E W M E .
A A
.
, . -
- I , 4 I .
. 3
.
t'
LINE MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT KEY ELEMENTS OF 08/28/93 OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN BACKLOG MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION SELF ASSESSMENT PROCESS DESIGNED TO ASSESS READINESS AT DISCRETE MILESTONES:
PRIOR TO MODE 6 - COMPLETED PRIOR TO MODE 4 - IN PROGRESS PRIOR TO MODE 2 PRIOR TO > 50% POWER PRIOR TO > 90% POWER POST 100% POWER MODE 6 ASSESSMENT IDENTIFIED MANY ISSUES E.G. -MAINTENANCE PAPER CLOSURE CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS ISSUES RESULT:
MANAGEMENT DELAYED CORE RELOAD UNTIL ALL ISSUES RESOLVED
_ _ - _ . - - - - . ._
. .- . - - . . - . . . _ . . - - - . . - . - . - . . - - -
.. . .
. .
,
A P LINE MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT (CONT.)
MODE 6 LESSONS LEARNED BEfNG APPLIED TO MODE 4 STARTING EARLIER MORE DETAILED ASSESSMENTS MORE DETAILED PRESENTATIONS TO OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEW PANEL WALK-IN SESSION SYSTEMATIC AND CONSERVATIVE APPROACH TO RETURN TO POWER :
OPERATIONS
.
J
__ ___m___m..____m__.-__ _ _ _ . _ . _.__________-_-______-___-_m___w_- - -
_ = .e,- -- - - . m.e+-,.-. ,ve,- em eas www -gin-w=se'--- e-=- =w+w e awr
-
tv - v e - hv- - e =- e W w w e-
.
.
,
CONCLUSIONS RESTART ISSUES ARE IN FINAL STAGES OF CLOSEOUT ASSESSMENT PROCESS IS FUNCTIONING WELL READY TO PROCEED WITH SYSTEMATIC AND CONSERVATIVE RETURN TO POWER OPERATION
-
.. . . - - . . - - - - . . . . . . . . - . . - - . . . .. . . - . . . - - _ - . . _ . . - . _ . - _ . . . . . . - . - -
P
-
, i
-
': t .
. t
,
l
.
. % ,
,,
',
_
,c
,
.
,
.
+
,
w w
m e
,
,
-
,
.
,
-
.
m
.
.
M e A r
.
.
R
-
.
G
.
'.
O R _,
,.
P , w T
n
.,.
N w
.
E s
w w
M S
w e
,
.
S -
E S
S A ,
T
.
w
,
N E .
D N
.
.
E P
E ,
D _
N I _
4 _
.
. .
-
u
_
_
m
_
m
_
m m
_
-
_
'-
O
_
_
,G
-
u
. . . .
,
INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 1993 29 AREAS FOR ASSESSMENT ASSESS BOTH QUALITY AND PROCESS PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR EACH AREA REQUIRES GENERAL MANAGER, NUCLEAR ASSURANCE RECOMMENDATION TO GROUP VICE PRESIDENT FOR MODE CHANGES '
-AND RESTART
. .
--__i-._mmm__-__-__-._ ___-.___-__.n_-___ ___m.__. ____ __= u_____.__ _ _ . - __ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ __.._-.a-- - - _ m - -__-r i. __-1-_r' 94 > <Mw *e 4 a-t- .n--._ w u-- rw-- .-W--i 9 e- m6._.-2
-
. .
,
.
INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS (REPORT CARD)
MANAGEMENT TOOL TO PROVIDE SENIOR MANAGEMENT WITH A SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND AREAS REQUIRING CONTINUED OR ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENT ATTENTION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS GREEN - NO PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED WHITE - PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED, NO SIGNIFICANT ISSUES YELLOW - POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ISSUES, IDENTIFIED WHICH IF UNCORRECTED COULD AFFECT ABILITY TO RESTART - REQUIRES CONTINUED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION RED - SIGNIFICANT ISSUES EXIST WHICH AFFECT ABILITY.TO l
RESUME OPERATIONS - ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENT ATTENTION IS
! ESSENTIAL
!
_ ___ _ __ ___ . - .. - .- - . _ . . . .
.<.
,
P INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM STATUS-APPROXIMATELY 30,000 MANHOURS OF INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT
'
SINCE OCTOBER 1993
" REPORT CARD" ISSUED 10 TIMES 3
BEGINNING TO CLOSE ISSUES -
.
I i L
e
')
.
- ,
!
__ . . ___ ._ _ . __ - . . _ _ . . . . , . . . - . . - . . . _ _ __ _ . . _ . . ,_ _ . _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
-
_
- - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - _ - - - - -
.. . . .
_ . . .,
<. .
,
.
AREAS REOUIRING CONTINUED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION SYSTEM CERTIFICATION MOTOR OPERATED VALVE TESTING CORRECTIVE ACTION POST MODIFICATION TESTING ACTIVITY PERFORMANCE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT HIGH IMPACT SURVEILLANCES MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT
-
l
.
.
. .
f STP UNIT 1 OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN - -1-WEEKLY SUMMARY OF IND"oENDENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS
1993 1994 TOPfC 10/07 ~10/14 10/21 10/28 11.04 11/11 11/18 1252 12/16 12/30 01/13 01/2T Business Plan N/A O O O O O O O O O
'
w w w w w w W w w Plant Operations O O g g - O g O O Chemical Operations O WA O O O O ,g O ,g g W W W W W W g Operations Work Control Group OG N/A O O O O O O O mA W W W W W W W Scheduling ~
C
'y
,
y 'y W W W y y
.
~y System Cert. & Con O O O Health Main y -y W Og 'c y -y W W y -y Maintenance Backlog Reduction
, O O O -
, O O-y y W W W 'y 'y 'y W W Preventive Maintenance gg N/A O O O O O n,A gg mA W W W W W Specific Equipment issues N/A O O N/A N/A O O O O n/A W W W W W W Engineering Backlog N/A Reduction W W W 'y 'y ~~
y W W Oc LEGEND: Green = No problems identified White (*) = Problems identified, no significant issues Yellow (*) = Potentially significant issues identified which, if uncorrected, could affect ability to resume operations Red (*) . = Significant, uncorrected issues exist which affect ability to resume operations N/A = No observations made (*) = Explanations must be provided as an attachment C = Closed
- -_____- __ _ _ - _ _ - _ __ _ _ _ _ - _ ____ - _ _ . --. . _ ._ - .. - . .-
. a STP UNIT 1 OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN - -2-WEEKLY SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS
'
1993 1994 TOPfC 1G97 10/14 10/21 10/28 tir - 11/11 11/18 12/02 12/16 12/30 01/13 01/27 Operator Workaround N/A O ma m, O Reduction W y 'y W OG OG O G
Management Oversight -y y y -y y y y y y y Management N/A O O O O Self-Assessment W W W y y y y y W Training O O O O O , O O
'y W W W W W R Y W W Organization. Staning Levels wa O O O O O O O O W W W W W W W y W R so e
^ OG OG OG W W G G G Corrective Action '-
g g g $R Y Y Y _Y R R R Y Y Plant Relabeling N/A N/A N/A N/A g W N/A g g g G G G G Locked Vaive N/A O O O O O O Program W W W -y
-
y W W W OG m tSu il ance
^ ^ bG bG G G G G 'Y LEGEND: Green = No problems identified White (*) = Problems identified, no significant issues Yellow (*) = Potentially significant issues identified which, if uncorrected, could affect ability to resume operations Red (*) = . Significant, uncorrected issues exist which affect ability to resume operations N/A- = No observations made (*) = Explanations must be provided as an attachment C = Closed
F'
. ..
f STP UNIT 1 OPERATIONAL READINESS PLAN - -3-WEEKLY SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS
'
1993 1994 TOPfC 1097 10/14 1G71 10G8 1L94 11/11 11/19 12/02 12/16 12/30 01/13 01177 Post-Maintenance Testing N/A N/A N/A O w -y
-
y y <y y 'y MOV Testing N/A N/A O O O Y Y 'Y W W 'y W y Activity Performance g g g g g Y Y G R R R R Y Y Y Modifications N/A g N/A N/A W g g g G R Y Y G G Component Reviews -
-
O 'c Y 'Y Y Y Y 'Y Y Y \Y Radiological Closeout! Cleanup N/A N/A N/A O gg O O N/A w y
-
y w w Emergent Work N/A N/A N/A g g g g g g C G G G G G G Engineering Support N/A g g g g g O g gg O G G G G G W g W Configuration Management Y
--
Y Y OR OR O OR OR OR R Y I EGEND: Green = No problems identified White (*) = Problems identified, no significant issues Yellow (*) = Potentially significant issues identified which, if uncorrected, could affect ability to resume operations Red (*) = . Significant, uncorrected issues exist which affect ability to resume operations N/A = No observations made (*) = Explanations must be provkfed as an attachment C = Closed
. . _ . . . _ _ __ .. . _ , _ .,, . . - . _ - . . - - . . ..__ _ _ . . . _ . _ ,
4 4 m ,
,
a
,
- INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM CONCLUSIONS LINE MANAGEMENT'S ABILITY TO CRITICALLY SELF-ASSESS ITSELF.HAS IMPROVED
'
INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT AND " REPORT CARD" HAVE BEEN EFFECTIVE f
- AS A TOOL FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT
-
STATION IS MAKING GOOD PROGRESS AS IT PREPARES TO RESTART REMAINING CHA.LLENGES - ADDRESS " SOFT" ISSUES
.
.
. . . . _ _ . _-. ._ . . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . - . . _ . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ - . , . . , . _ . . . . ~ . . . . . - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ -
._. _ . _ . . - -
4 a
!
OVERALL CONCLUSIONS THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS WHICH, AS NOTED IN THE " REPORT CARD" ARE YELLOW,-MEANING THEY REQUIRE SUSTAINED MANAGEMENT-ATTENTION, WHICH IS NOW BEING APPLIED. IF THIS LEVEL OF ATTENTION IS SUSTAINED, THE PLANT SHOULD BE READY FOR RESTART IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR PRESENT SCHEDUL ,
_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _- _ . , . , , - , . , , - , . , , ,r.. n r. _ y.,,g_ ._ ,,_ _ _ .. , _,,y, _ , , , , , , , , , , ,... _. . ,, , _ ., . _ ,, , , _ _ . ,_ ,,
- a 4 mo n <sAI. M w 2m ^" sa ,s ,,J-.L
'.
!
'2 i
!
i
' i
>
'
.
!
i r
i i
r
>
!
N A ;
D l O .
W m -l b
w
!
Z !
O
-
H .
L w .*
/+
D
'
m ;
ta -i I
M .
f I
w .i h
o
%
-
,
' I
$
,!
,
'
P d
"
e b
c A
!
$
t
i
l
-
l
'
, *.
i
. . .
f .
.
!
l
!
l i
'
Power Resumption
- Timeline Restart inspections
___ -__ _
e_
l 11/15 11/2 2 11/29 12/6 12/13 12/20 12/27 1/3 1/10 1/17 1/24 1/31 2/7 2/14 2/21 2/28 3/7 3/14 3/21 3/28 4/4 4/11 4/18 4/25 I I I I I I I
'
!
! 8! ! *
)k )k k i. . . . . . .i i. . . . . .ii.....e ..! ! .... !
-
.
\
OROT1 ORAT 1 OROT 2 O AT 2 Unit 1 Mode 2 Unit 2 Unit 2 Unit 2 Unit 1 Ready for Mode 2 Mode 6 Ready for Modo 4 Mode 4 OROT - STP Intemal Readiness Assessment ORAT - NRC Readiness Assessment
___. _ _ _____._ _ . _ . _ __ . . _ . , _ . . _ , __ . . . ,_
_ ._
.. ,
.
I UNIT 1 STARTUP AND POWER ASCENSION ORGANIZATION Vice President Nuclear Generation Unit 1 Picnt Manager
_7__________
~ ~~
-
Unit 1 I St riup Duty ~ ~l I ~P wer Asce sIon 7 Unit 1 Manager Test Manager Maintenance Operations Manager i }- _ 4 l Manager L(Senior Shif t MGR)J L (Test Sponsor)_3 I
l General Main l l l Supervisors Operations l Shift Work Control l Su perv.isor Group i
_ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ q p _ _ _ _ _L _ _ _ __. q Response Teams I I I Unit p _l l l---
Su pe rv.i s. . - 7 1-Shif t Test ; ; System ,
L _ _ Coordinator _ _,_ _ _ _ J L _ _ Engineers __. _,_
l I Reactor i l Operators Test Teams System (Intermitent) Walkdown Teams (Intermitent'
Auxiliary Operators 12/17/93 QyS f2^ U" Permanent Organization
Startup Augmentation
. . . _ _ . . . _ . _ . . , _ _ _
. . _ , .. _~ , ,_ . . _ , _ . . . _ - _ , _ . _ . ._. . _ _ . . _ _ . . - - _ -
. ..
,
J POWPR ASCENSION PROGRAM SPECIFIC AUGMENTED TESTS AND INSPECTIONS SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE TESTS PERIODIC PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE WALKDOWNS FOR MATERIAL CONDITION, RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION i AND HOUSEKEEPING DURING SYSTEM PRESSURIZATION, HEATUP AND STARTUP CONTROL ROOM ACCESS STRICTLY CONTROLLED
'
STRICT ADHERENCE TO ESTABLISHED WORK CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES PRE-JOB BRIEFS FOR POWER ASCENSION AND TESTING ACTIVITIES (IN ;
BRIEFING AREA SEPARATE FROM CONTROL ROOM)
. . - . . . . . . --- . . ..
.. .
e a
POWER ASCENSION PROGRAM (CONT.)
ASSESSMENT " HOLD POINTS" AT MODE 4, MODE 2,47% AND 90%
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MATERIAL CONDITION PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIVENESS ADMINISTRATIVE AND WORK CONTROL PROCESSES PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND EVALUATION ATTRIBUTES / CRITERI ,
t
. _ . - - . , , - - .- ,. ,. , . . . . - . . . . . . --.. . , _.- - - -. . . - - - . _ . . __ . . - -
J
. 5-
a
_
,
E t
OPERATIONAL READINESS OVERSIGHT TEAM
. ,
, w%.-. s--wwe c -%+ -..w vin-e v + + = = - .4 Ae-ww, 'w w e+- . = -- -w, e-*-- g ,4wog =+> -* '. n m -- w i e -,v,--,e w-we-- , - -+- e ~ e i--a mwr- :-w.<v si- ww-v- - s e<w -
r u w--, y
-
o ..
. OPERATIONAL READINESS OVERSIGHT TEAM INITIAL ASSESSMENT IN MID-NOVEMBER PLANT OBSERVATIONS, INTERVIEWS, AND DOCUMENT REVIEWS ,
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, IN-PLANT OPERATIONS, RESOURCES, EQUIPMENT AND PROCESSES ARE IMPROVING i CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM AND OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PROGRAM SHOULD RECEIVE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
.
, - . -r,,r, s ..w, . - , v , . -....m. -,, w -,. . -e-. .. . w ,+,w - .- y .- - ~ , v w. ~,r .,,,w . , . .--r, ww- , - - - . . _
,
, ._
-
.-
?
OPERATIONAL READINESS OVERSIGHT TEAM (CONT.)
FOLLOWUP ASSESSMENT IN MID-DECEMBER EMPHASIS ON PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES, AREAS NOT FULLY ADDRESSED IN NOVEMBER AND OTHER AREAS WHERE OTHER INDICATORS / ASSESSMENTS SUGGESTED POSSIBLE WEAKNESSES OR DECLINING PERFORMANCE CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT IN GENERAL PLANT PERFORMANCE SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PROGRAM NOT RECEIVING APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION - ACTION PLAN PREPARED AND UNDERWAY REMAINING WEAKNESSES RECEIVING APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION-TEAM SUPPORTS RESTART OF UNIT I
. ___ _ - __ _ __ . - - . . . .- _
. - .
g -- i
.
%
'l t
t
I
-
i i
!
$
t F
,>
,
r i
M -
M
< '
m M
O '
Z
~
-
t O ,
J ;
U
.
k t
I i
i t
n
,
.-j ge e ee e
'
.-.. -. . - .