IR 05000498/1986017
| ML20212C231 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 11/14/1986 |
| From: | Harris R, Kerch H, Strosnider J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212C201 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-498-86-17, 50-499-86-17, NUDOCS 8612290423 | |
| Download: ML20212C231 (16) | |
Text
I
.
,
.
I
-
APPENDIX B i
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report Nos.
50-498/86-17
,
50-499/86-17
!
Docket Nos.
50-498 50-499 i
License Nos. CPPR-128 CPPR-129 Category C
i
.
Licensee: Houston Lighting & Power Company P. O. Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77001 Facility Name:
South Texas Inspection At: Bay City Texas Inspection Conducted:
September 29 - October 9, 1986 Inspectors: G % L' 3 N
//
/
S [,
Har W. Kerch, ead eactor Engineer date
//l/NY6
,
,
'
_-1/hard C Harri's, NDE Technician
/dats Approved by: _
- f[#4
[f.R.StrosniderChief,Materialsand date v Processes Section, EB, DRS Inspection Summary:
Routine, announced inspection conducted September 29 -
October 9, 1986 (Report No. 50-498/86-17,50-499/86-17).
Areas Inspected: A routine, announced NRC independent measurements inspection was conducted using the NRC Mobile Nondestructive (NDE) Laboratory.
Selected safety related piping weldments fabricated to ASME Code,Section III, Class 1, 2 and 3, were inspected. Two regional based inspection personnel assisted by two contracted NDE personnel were utilized during this inspection.
Results: One violation was observed concerning debris in piping.
Paragraph 5.0 discusses a licensee commitment to perform a qualification test for magnetic particle examination on coated surfaces.
8612290423 861219 PDR ADOCK 05000498 G
PDR L
.
---
_. _. - - - - -
- _ _ -. _. _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _.
- _. - - -
_m
,
.
.
DETAILS 1.0 Persons Contacted Houston Lighting & Power Company W. P. Evans, Project Compliance J. E. Geiger, Nuclear Assurance G. B. Rogers, Construction. Management A. C. McIntyre, Engineer T. M. Sobey, Project Compliance C. A. Ayala, Project Compliance T. J. Jordan, Project QA Manager J. T. Westermeier, Project Manager E. B. Miller, Project QA J. L. Haning, Operations Startup Engineer D. W. Gault, Project QA S. K. Hubbard, Operations, QC W. H. Kinsey, NP0D-PH Manager R. L. Beverly, Operations Startup Engineer R. J. Daly, Startup J. Hughes, Startup S. M. Dew, Deputy Project Manager M. A. McBurnett, Site Licensing S. M. Head, Licensing Bechtel Power Corporation (BPCo)
R. W. Miller, Quality Assurance / Control R. H. Medina, Quality Assurance W. P. Murphy, Management South West Research Institute (SWRI)
T. R. Trude, Preservice Inspection J. C. Younger, Preservice Inspection EBASCO V. Lyons, NDE Co-Ordinator F. G. Miller, Welding R. W. Zaist, Construction Manager W. Pardee, Quality Assurance W. J. Lear, Quality Assurance U.S. NRC L. Gilbert, Region IV D. L. Garrison, Region IV
-
..
.
2.0 Independent Measurements - NRC Nondestructive Examination and Quality Records Review of Safety-Related Systems:
During the period of September 15 through September 26, 1986, quality records received from South Texas Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 were reviewed in the regional office for compliance to the licensee's FSAR commitaent to applicable codes, standards, specifications, and regulatory requirements.
Subsequently, an onsite independent verification inspection was conducted September 29 through October 9, 1986, using the NRC Mobile Nondestructive (NDE) Laboratory.
This inspection was performed by NRC regional personnel in conjunction with contracted NDE personnel.
The purpose of this inspection was to verify the adequacy of the licensee's Quality Control program.
This was accomplished by duplicating, as near as possible, those examinations required by codes and regulations, and evaluating the results.
In addition, several confirmatory examinations were performed and compared to quality assurance records.
The NRC inspectors performed the examinations on randomly selected weldments representing samples of piping systems, components, pipe sizes, vendor shop and field weldments fabricated to ASME Code Section III.
The items selected were previously inspected and accepted by the licensee, as indicated by vendor shop and onsite QA/QC records.
2.1 Quality Documents Review The thirty (30) safety-related piping system document packages listed in Attachment 4 were reviewed for compliance with licensee procedures, applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements.
The following type documents were reviewed.
Document Attributes Reviewed Material Certification Material chemical and (base) physical properties compared to standards and Code requirements.
NDE Records Examinations meet Code and standards, licensee procedure and other commitments; appropriate examinations performed.
Fabrication Records Travelers and records were reviewed and compared against other corresponding records and signoff sheets.
Drawings (Isometrics)
Drawings were reviewed for proper designation of weldments, location and classificatio _ _ - _ _ _ _, _ - -
L
.
.
{'
>*
i
-
Procedures Procedures were reviewed for completeness, and licensee's commitment to Code requirements, f'
Welding Material Material certification for welding materials were reviewed for physical and chemical properties as required by licensee's commitment to Code and industry standards.
l Results No violations were identified.
2.2 Nondestructive Examination
}
Nondestructive examination was performed using NRC procedures with i
addenda written specifically to comply with the licensee's FSAR commitment to the ASME B&PV Code.
The intent of these examinations I
was to duplicate, to the extent practicable, the techniques and methods of the original examinations.
The specific items examined are shown in Attachment 1.
The following nondestructive examinations were performed:
Radiographic Examination Thirty safety related pipe weldments were radiographed using an Iridium 192 source.
The technique and procedure used were in I
accordance with NRC procedure, NDE-5, Revision 0 and addenda ST-1/2-5-1, Revision 0.
The weldments examined were ASME Class 1, 2 and 3.
The resulting radiographs were evaluated per applicable code requirements and compared to the licensee's corresponding radiographs.
Included in this examination were twelve socket welds examined for confirmatory purpose (engagement).
Results No violations were identified.
Liquid Penetrant:
Twenty-four safety-related pipe weldments and adjacent base material (1/2 in, either side of weld) were examined using color contrast liquid penetrant method per NRC procedure NDE-9, Revision 0 and addenda ST-9-1, Revision 0.
Samples included ASME Class 1 and 2 stainless steel welds.
Results:
No violations were identified:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
.
Magnetic Particle:
Magnetic particle inspection was performed on three Residual Heat Removal (RHR) pump supports.
Weldments and adjacent base material (1/2 in either side of weld) were examined per NRC procedure NDE-6, Revision 0.
This sample included ASME Class NF, non-integral supports.
,
Results:
No violations were identified.
Thickness Measurements:
Twenty-five safety-related pipe weldments and adjacent base material were examined for minimum wall thickness using a NOVA-D 100 digital thickness gage.
Measurements were performed per NRC procedure NDE-11, Revision 0.
Minimum wall thickness was determined by use of ASTM standard pipe size and nominal thickness chart.
Results:
No violations were identified.
Ferrite Measurements:
Fifteen safety-related pipe weldments were examined for delta ferrite content using a type II ferrite indicator (Severn Gauge).
This test was intended to verify that the welding filler metal composition had achieved adequate (as-deposited) delta ferrite content to eliminate possible hot cracking.
Results:
No violations were identified.
Hardness Test:
,
l Eleven safety related pipe weldments and adjacent base material were tested using the Equo-tip hardness tester per NRC procedure NDE-12, Revision 0.
Measurements taken frcm tM :mpact device were processed into "L" values as a digital readout, the numbers (L" values) were then converted to Brinell hardr;e o le and approximate tensile strength by means of a conversitn c).
Results:
No violations were identified.
I Visual Examination:
'
Thirty-one safety-related pipe weldments and adjacent base material were examined per NRC procedure NDE-14, Revision 0.
The examinations l
,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - -
.
-___ _ _ _ _ _. _._
_
_
,
_
__
?
-
..
..
H~iS_
o -6 L,
u h
iy,
.
~ '
were performed using visual aids such as lights, mirrors and welding.
gages.
These examinations were performed to. determine the general condition'of the pipe weldment and_ adjacent surfaces, specifically, f;
checking for reinforcement, cracks, misalignment or other visual
[
' discontinuities.
Results:
,
No violations were identified.
-
.
Ultrasonic Examination:
,,
Two safety-related pipe weldments were ultrasonically examined using a Sonic Mark 1 ultrasonic flaw detector per NRC procedure NDE-1, 7,
L.3
. Revision 0, and Southwest Research ultrasonic data reports and
I instrument calibration records.
Instrument calibration was performed l
per NRC procedure NDE-2, Revision 0 (Instrument linearity verification).
Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) was constructed using the licensee's
'
calibration blocks, SS-9-STP and SS-21-STP.
Instrument setting and search unit (transducer) were matched as near as possible to those
indicated by the ultrasonic data reports in an attempt to duplicate the original examinations.
Results:
No violations were identified.
j.
Anchor bolt examination:
Forty-eight Hilti concrete anchor bolts as identified in Attachment 3 were ultrasonically inspected for length, and visually examined for location, type, size and length of bolt extended above concrete.
This examination was performed per NRC procedure NDE-9, Revision 0.
Included in this examination were sixteen cable tray supports and thirty-two (32) pipe hanger supports.
.
Results:
t No violations were identified.
3.0 Review of site procedures:
,
The following site procedures were reviewed to verify their technical adequacy and conformance to Code and standards requirements:
Bechtel Radiographic Standards for NDE-002-1 Revision 4 Welds and Components Ultrasonic Examination NDE-005-1 Revision 2-(thickness measurements)
.
...
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _
.
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -
_
.
,
,.
f
Liquid Penetrant NDE-006-1 Revision 2 Examination Procedure Magnetic Particle NDE-007-1 Revision 2
[
Examination Procedure j
Piping System Cleanliness SSP-22 Revision 2 Southwest Research Institute:
Manual Ultrasonic Examination SwRI-NDT-800-114 Revision 1 of Austenitic Pressure Piping p
'
Welds for South Texas Project h
Magnetic Particle SwRI-NDT-300 Revision 1 Results:
No violations were identified.
4.0 Radiographic Review
A sampling of the licensee's radiographs was reviewed. The inspector
reviewed radiographs for 29 shopwelds and 40 field welds to verify
'
compliance with ASME III Code requirements, accuracy of radiographic film interpretation and the adequacy of the licensee's radiographic programs.
l-Additionally, 30 welds were re radiographed by the NRC during this inspection and the resulting films were compared to site file films to independently verify that correct radiographic file films were on hand (see Attachment No. 2, items with asterisk).
Results:
Review of NRC radiographic film for weld Ril 2312-KB2-C disclosed that, within the pipe near the weld, debris such as wire and metal shavings was found.
Similar conditions were found for weld CV 2082-PB2-B, where radiographs disclosed several one-inch diameter metal washers and metal shavings.
Site Piping System Cleanliness procedure SSP-22 requirements have apparently not been met.
The inspector identified this problem as an apparent violation of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion V for Unit 2 (499/86-17-01).
5.0 Preservice Inspection (PSI)
The inspector reviewed a sample of PSI ultrasonic data reports from:
Reactor Coolant System Safety Injection System Chemical Volume Systems Residual Heat Removal System
__
_ __
?
.
.
.1.
During the review of the above PSI ultrasonic data, welds SI1208-BB1 FW1 and RH1101-BB1 SW7 were selected for independent ultrasonic examination by the NRC.
Results:
I During t.his PSI data review, it was revealed that Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) (PSI contractor) informed the licensee, through its customer notification number 058 SwRI, that procedure SwRI-NDT-300-1/30 for magnetic particle examination did not permit examination of welds that have not been made completely free of paint.
The licensee authorized SwRI to magnetic particle examine the welds for preservice inspection without completely removing the thin primer coat.
Welds in question were visually examined by the inspector.
The welds had been wire brushed in order to remove the primer coating.
However, in some areas there was a thin (1/2 mill measured by the licensee) adherent non-insulating, firmly affixed coating.
The inspector determined that this coating would not interfere with the formation of indications and, therefore the inspector considered this surface suitable for magnetic particle examination.
However, during the course of this inspection, a meeting was conducted with the licensee regarding magnetic particle examination over coated welds.
The outcome of this meeting was a commitment from the licensee to perform a qualification test on a surface with conditions similar to that of the welds examined and to verify the adequacy of the examination technique, with a completion date of the first week of January 1987.
This is considered an open inspection followup item and will be tracked by Region IV personnel.
Unit 1 Open Item (498/8617-01)
No violations were identified.
Attachments Attachment No. 1 is a tabulation of specific items examined and the results achieved.
Attachment No. 2 is a list of specific radiograph reviewed and compared to licensee's film.
Attachment No. 3 is a list of specific Hilti bolts examined.
Attachment No. 4 is a list of specific weld documentation packages reviewed.
6.0 Exit Interview An exit interview was held on October 9, 1986, with members of the licensee's staff.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of this inspection.
No written material was provided to the licensee during this inspectio,
s s S
n g
,
.
K i
n R
aii A
stav M
R ipnta E
oeh pcms
-
l l
l I
L
AU C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
T S
C C
C C
C C
~
C C
C C
N I
A A
A A
A A
/
A A
A A
H I
_
E V
M CATTA S
SE ND A
A C
C C
C A
A A
A A
R
/
/
C C
C C
/
/
/
/
/
A N
N A
A A
A N
N N
N N
H A
A C
C C
C C
C C
C C
.
T.
/
/
C C
C C
C C
C C
C N
N A
A A
A A
A A
A A
P l
lliI1I
.
T.
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
U N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
1 I
'
I s
t i
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C n
.
U T.
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
s R
ax
\\
e
!
ll T
h A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
t
.
u T.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
o N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
S M
Ul l
M
A E R T C
I K
O S C
R I
C A
C C
C C
C A
C C
C C
/
C C
C C
C
/
C C
C P
H A
N A
A A
A A
N A
A A
T T
N E
ll I
M E
E R
T U
I C
A C
C C
C C
A A
A A
S R
C
/
C C
C C
C
/
/
/
/
A R
A N
A A
A A
A N
N N
N E
E M
F lo l
l I
.
T N
E D
Y.
N OL A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
E LA
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
P LN N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
E AA D
-
N
.
-
_
I
-
S SA
L
1
2
2
2
2 C
'
'
fo R
E
BMO t
e US n
g NI
4 e
a
/
94
22
32
22
6
m
_
_
P DE
O0 O0 O1
O1
O1
0
h LN
O3 O3 O2
O3
O2 O0
00 c
_
.
E1
O2 O2 O
O2
O O2
02 a
WL WH WH WH W1 Wl WH WH WD WV WV WV t
FR rR FR fS SS fR SR FE fC SC rC t
l1l
,
_
.
_
_
.
_
_
I l
'
3 -
S n g
.
K *
i n U
a A
etsv M
E ipnta oeh R
pcms
lll
.
LAU C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C S
C C
C C
C O
C C
C C
I A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A V
llll I
l S
S E
ND A
A A
C C
C C
A A
A R
/
/
/
C C
C C
/
/
/
A N
N N
A A
A A
N N
N H
.
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
T.
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
P l
.
T.
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
U N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N Q
s t
i C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C n
.
U T.
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
s R
- A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
c
a T
h A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A t
.
u T.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
o N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N S
M i
M
A E R T G
I K
O S C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
R I
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
,
P H
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
T T
N E
M E
E R
T U
I A
A A
C C
C C
C A
C S
R
/
/
/
C C
C C
C
/
C A
R N
N N
A A
A A
A N
A E
E M
l F
T N
E D
Y.
N OL A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A E
LA
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
P LN N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N E
AA D
N l
i li1 I
_
S S
_
A
1
_
L
2
1
2
2 C
dI l
I
,
fc R
E
BMO t
a US n
g NI e
/
99
12
1
2
11 m
_
P DE
01
11
0
0 O0 O0 h
LN
00
14
3
1 O1 O1 c
EI
o2
32
42
21 O1 O1 a
WL WV Wv WV WC WC WH WC aS WS WS t
,(
SC FC SC FR SR SR FR sC FC FC t
'
, A
_
m
!
'
Ii iii I
l
,
i l
l
!
n n
,
.
K,
ic it S
et et R
cc cc A
i2 i3 M
vp vp E
ers ers R
ren ren Psi Psi
.
LA U
C C
C C
C C
C A
A C
C C
I C
C C
C C
C C
/
/
C C
C S
A A
A A
A A
A N
N A
A A
V
.
S S
E ND A
A A
C C
C A
A A
A A
A R
/
/
/
C C
C
/
/
/
/
/
/
A N
N N
A A
A N
N N
N N
N H
,
li
.
C C
A C
C C
A A
A A
A A
T.
C C
/
C C
C
/
/
/
/
/
/
A A
N A
A A
N N
N N
N N
P
.
T.
A A
A A
A A
A C
C A
A A
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
C C
/
/
/
U N
N N
N N
N N
A A
N N
N
&
'
I
'
s t
in
.
C A
C C
C C
C A
A C
C C
U T.
C
/
C C
C C
C
/
/
C C
C A
N A
A A
A A
N N
A A
A s
R exa T
h A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A t
.
T.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
uo N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N S
M l
M
A E R T G
K O
IS C
A A
C C
C C
A A
A A
C C
R I
/
/
C C
C C
/
/
/
/
C C
P H
N N
A A
A A
N N
N N
A A
T T
N II E
M E
E R
T U
I A
A A
C C
C A
A A
A A
A S
R
/
/
/
C C
C
/
/
/
/
/
/
A R
N N
N A
A A
N N
N N
N N
E E
M F
T
_
N
_
E D
Y
.
N OL A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A E
LA
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
P LN N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N E
AA D
N I
S SAL
2
1
1
1
2
2 C
3
' '
L Ii'
fo R
E
1
B D
B MO B
B t
a US
-
-
n g
NI
1
2
e a
/
82
10
22
70
06
0 m
P DE
10 O1
O2 O1
1
S0
h
LN O1 O1 O1
O3 O3 O0 d1 d1 O0 U1
c EI O1 O1 O-
O1 O1 O1 l
-
l
-
O1 O-1 -
a WL W1 W1 WS WC WC WC WF eH eI WW WS WS t
FS FS FM FR FR FR FA WR WS FF fM sM t
4l A
-
<
I
'
,
, ;'
i j
.
.
-
ATTACHMENT 2 Site Radiographs reviewed by NRC SYSTEM /LINE WELD ID ACC SYSTEM /LINE WELD ID ACC ED2121 FW003 J
RH1204 FW0012
/
MS-1002 SW4
AF1010 FW0020
MS-1002 SW6
AF1012 FW0005
MS-1002 SW7 J
SI2123 A SW2 J
MS-1002 SW8 J
SI2123 A SW3 J
NS-1002 SW9 J
CS1101 FW0001 J
RC1302 FW0024
FW1014 G SW2 J
RC2102 FW0005 J
FW1014 G SW5
RH1112 FW6629
CV2006 G SW2
/
RC036 FW0002 J
CV2006 G SW3 J
RH1204 FW0052
/
CV2006 G SW4
RC1036 FW0008
CV2006 G SW5 J
RH1101 FW0001A J
AF1010 FW0020 J
CS2007 FW0006
'FW1014 FWOOO6
S12118 FW0026
AF1004 FW0005 J
EW2205 FW0009 J
CV2082 FW0002
SI2123 FW0001C-1 J
RC1323 FW3 J
RH2312 C SW2 J
RH2312 C SW3 J
AF1010 F SW2
AF1010 F SW3 J
AF1010 F SW4
AF1010 F SW5
/
,
_.
_
. _ _ _ _,. _ _
_.. _, - _ - _.. _
_ _.. _
__
_ _ _...
_
- _.
..
--
,,
..
Attachment 2 SYSTEM /LINE WELD ID ACC COMMENTS RC1320 FW0001
/
MS1002 FW0056 J
MS1002 SW10 J
'RH2304 FWOO31-
/
RH2304 FW0009 J
RH2301 FW0003 J
RH2301 SW4
- SI2123 FW0002
- SI2123 SW3 J
RH2312 FW0003
/
RH2312 SW2
/
- Film area 6-8 has wire and metal shavings shown on the NRC film.
E02124 FW0002
/
CV2006 FW0025
/
CV2006 SW2
- RC2412 FW3111 J
RC2412 SW2
/
CV2082 FW0001
/
CV2082 SW2 J
- Film area 6-8 has several 1" diameter washers and what appears as metal shavings shown on the NRC film.
RC1323 FW0001
/
SI1102 FW0017
/
M51105 FW0005
/
CV2019 G FW0009
/
CV2019 G SW2
- CS1102 FW0006
- CS1102 J SW 2
- CS 1101 FW0001
/
FW1016 FW1010
/
AF1012 FW0010
- RC1312 FW0002
- RC1324 FW0002
/
Licensed file film compared with NRC film to verify correctness of file film.
l
,
.
_
,.
,
Page'1 of 1 Site: South Texas Docket No. 50-499 HILTI BOLT EXAMINATION Equip./
Support Identification Code ACC/Rej.
Comments Total
_
Cable tray supp.
.CIXF2CTHV
ACC FHB-1
Cable tray supp.
AIXF2CTVVA_
L ACC FHB-l'
>
Cable tray supp.
AIF2CTYVA L
ACC.
FHB-1
Cable tray supp.
CIXF2CTHVA L
ACC FHB-1
Cable tray supp.
CIXF2CTXVA L
ACC FHB-1
Pipe Hanger IVC 1270 HS50001 L
ACC RCB-1
Pipe Hanger RH6528 HF5001 J
ACC RCB-1
Pipe Hanger RH6528 HF5009 J
ACC RCB-1
Pipe Hanger SI1112 HF5012 G
ACC RCB-1
Pipe Hanger SI 1112 HF5007 J
ACC RCB-1
Pipe Hanger SI1112 H5005 J
ACC RCB-1
Pipe Hanger RH1303 HL5011 T
ACC RCB-1
Pipe Hanger RH1303 HL5011 P-ACC RCB-1
Pipe Hanger CC1428 HL5026 R
ACC FHB-1
48 Attachment #3 i
a
i i
.. -
.
_. - -,.--.. -.--..
.. -. -.- - -..-,
- - -. -, -.. -.. -.. _..
. _ -.
.
__
.
..
- -.
.
.
Page 1 of 2 Site:
South Texas, Unit 1 '
Docket:
50-498
.
REVIEW 0F DOCUMENTATION PACKAGES Line No.
Weld No.
Review Comments
- Item reviewed in documentation packages for Unit 1, did not have AF 1010 F FW0020 ACC
an independent verification AR 1010 SW2 ACC examination of hardware, due to CS 1102 FW0006 ACC a change in the inspection plan
j CS 1102 J SW2 ACC onsite. These items were
]
CS 1101 FW0001 ACC reviewed in Region I office.
AF 1012 FW0005 ACC l
MS 1002 FW0056 ACC MS 1002 G SW10 ACC MS 1105 FW0005 ACC RH 1204 FW0052 ACC
'
RH 1204 FW0012 ACC RC 1036 FW0008 ACC l
RC 1036 FW0002 ACC i
RH 1101 FW0001A ACC RH 1112 FW6629 ACC
Attachment #4
.
e
-
,-
e
t in U
',
saxe 9 T
h'
-
t
u 5 o
S
t
- e ek tc io SD S
E GAK CAP NO I
TATNEM UCO D
F
s W
t E
n I
e V
m E
m R
o C
we iv C
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
e C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
R A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
.o N
5
9
9
3
0
0
0
0
1 d
0
0
0
0
l
2
2
2
2
0
4
3
e W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
F S
F S
F S
F S
F F
F S
F F
S 4#
t f
A G
B G
n o
.
e o
3
6
2
9
4
1
2
m
N
2
0
8
1
0
0
1
h
1
0
0
0
3
3
4
c e
e
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
a g
n t
a i
I I
V V V V V V H H H H H C C t
P L
S S
C C
C C C C
R R R R R
R R
A