IR 05000482/1993013
| ML20044G255 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 05/20/1993 |
| From: | Murray B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20044G236 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-482-93-13, NUDOCS 9306020238 | |
| Download: ML20044G255 (3) | |
Text
DOCUMENT CONTAINS APPENDIX B U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
.
NRC Inspection Report:
50-482/93-13 Operating License:
NPF-42 Docket:
50-482 Licensee: Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P. O. Box 411 Burlington, Kansas 66839 Facility Name:
Wolf Creek Generating Station Inspection At:
Wolf Creek Generating Station Site Coffey County, Burlington, Kansas Inspection Conducted: May 3-7, 1993
,
Inspector:
T. W. Dexter, Senior Physical Security Specialist Facilities Inspection Programs Section N (G
///// @?
8 /)
Approved:
v B. Murray, Chie~f, Fagtpities Inspection Date /
Programs Section
,
inspection Summary Areas inspected:
Routine, announced inspection of the physical security prcgram including: management support and management effectiveness, records and reports, security system power supply, testing and maintenance, assessment
,
aids, compensatory measures, protective area barrier, and security plans and procedures.
.
Results:
Management support for the security program was very good. Security
force staffing was maintained at an appropriate level. This support indicated a strong commitment by senior management to maintain a high quality security program (Section 1.1).
DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS
,
PAGE IS DECONTROLLED 9206020239 930526 PDR ADDCK 05000482 O
_
-2-DOCUMENT CONTAINS i The security program was managed by a highly qualified staff.
The e
turnover rate of the security organization was less than 2 percent (Section 1.2).
,
'
The security staff was correctly reporting security events as required
by regulations (Section 1.3).
Protected and vital area barriers and isolation zones were effectively
maintained to protect the plant (Section 1.4).
Implementing procedures were clear, concise, and appropriate to meet
general performance requirements in accordance with the Physical Security Plan (Section 1.5).
l The security uninterruptible power supply batteries and associated
equipment were properly protected and well maintained (Section 1.6).
Implementation of compensatory measures was very good (Section 1.7).
,
Assessment aids were very effective.
Instrumentation and. controls
technicians repaired problems in a timely manner (Section 1.8).
A violation was identified involving the failure of the intrusion
!
detection system to identify an intruder during a crawl test as specified in _the Physical Security Plan. The licensee took prompt and effective corrective actions in response to the violation. All access control equipment and tamper indicating devices tested performed as required (Section 1.9).
Personnel were properly identified and their authorization verified
before a keycard was issued and access provided.
Vehicle searches were thorough and access authorization verified before vehicles were allowed to enter the protected area.
Searches of handcarried packages and material were being conducted in accordance with established procedures (Section 1.10).
Summary of Inspection Findinos:
Violation 482/9313-01 was identified with no response required
(Section 1.9).
Violation 482/9120-01 was closed (Section 2.1).
- Violation 482/9120-02 was closed (Section 2.2).
- DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INF.0RMATION UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED
e-3-DOCUMENT CONTAIN$ Attachment:
Persons Contacted and Exit Meeting
.
.
f DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS
'
PAGE IS DECONTROLLED