IR 05000461/1982017
| ML20027D018 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1982 |
| From: | Hayes D, James Keppler, Knop R, Spessard R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027D015 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461-82-17, NUDOCS 8210280174 | |
| Download: ML20027D018 (42) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_
. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COF2iISSION
REGION III
Report No. 50-461/82-17(DPRP) Docket No.
50-461 License No. CPPR-137 Licensee: Illinois Power Company 500 South 27th Street Decatur, IL 62525 Facility Name: Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Meeting At: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III Office 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Meeting Conducted: September 30, 1982 ehD K M egional /6 / hk Meeting Attendecs: ' Adynistrator,j (g ald C. T.4 [ Richard C. Knop, Chief /d Pr ' ects Br nch 1 /s f,Nf /d 6,L D.
, ' ' Projects Section IB-W lOfMO ' Approved By: R. L. Spessard, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs Meeting Summary Meeting on September 30, 1982 (Report No. 50-461/82-17(DPRP)) Subjects Discussed: A meeting was held with corporate officers and staff of the Illinois Power Company at the NRC Region III office in Glen Ellyn, Illinois.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status of stop work recovery and overinspection programs, the master management plan, and significant findings and recommendations from various consultant's audits associated with the Clinton Power Station.
P210280174 821013 PDR ADOCK 05000461
PDR - _ _ _.- - . _ _ ,. _
. DETAILS 1.
Meeting Attendees Illinois Power Company L. S. Brodsky, Assistant Plant Manager W. G. Kelley, Chairman and President W. C. Gerstner, Executive Vice President L. J. Koch, Vice President, Engineering J. O. McHood, Vice President and Project Manager A. J. Budnick, Director of Quality Assurance D. G. Hall, Vice President, Quality Assurance 3aldwin Associates J. E. Findley, Manager, Quality and Technical Services \\ W. J. Harrington, Project Manager WAND Television G. B. Wilson, Reporter T. J. Helmen, Photographer State of Illinois K. Borgstadt, Paralegal U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission C. E. Norelius, Director, Division of Engineering and Technical Programs H. H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector J. G. Keppler, Regional Administrator R. L. Spessard, Director, Division of Project and Resident Programs R. C. Knop, Chief, Projects Branch 1 D. W. Hayes, Chief, Projects Section IB C. C. Williams, Chief, Plant Systems Section A. B. Davis, Deputy Regional Administrator J. H. Williams, NRR Program Manager F. J. Jablonski, Project Inspector 2.
Meeting Details A meeting was held in the NRC Region III office in Glen Ellyn, Illinois, on September 30, 1982, with the aforementioned attendees, to discuss Illinois Power Company's status of matters as follows: Master Management Plan . A summary of experiences and problems relative to ongoing work . -1- .. -- _ _ _ _ _.
_ .- - - ..,.
,
. Recovery and Overinspection Programs . QA involvement with offsite activities of General Electric . and Sargent and Lundy Findings and recommendations of various audits performed by consultants.
. Mr. W. C. Gerstner of Illinois Power Company introduced Mr. D. G. Hall as the new Vice President in charge of Quality Assurance.
Mr. Hall made a presentation outlining an Improvement Program whose objectives include implementation of a central nuclear program management plan to complete i the transition to total nuclear program management. Further, the program will improve and integrate management systems and verify the adequacy of completed work.
Mr. L. S. Brodsky of Illinois Power Company made a presentation including an update of recovery program and overinspection activities, and QA involvement with the architect-engineer and supplier of the nuclear steam supply system. The presentation is included as an attachment to this report.
Mr. Gerstner made a presentation summarizing the plans and actions concerning the findings and recommendations made in management audits performed for Illinois Power Company by independent consultants. Most of the recommendations were in the process of being implemented.
After the presentations were completed, a general discussion took place.
There were no conclusions made nor dates set for forthcoming meetings.
! ! -2- _- _ _ _ _ .. _ .
0 N CO NO MN On .. I-- 4AO.
D H O tu ~) O CE O.
g.
. O H Z e-. - I U o I ) I l .
- -, ,, - - ,,
. . . . AGENDA A.
INTRODUCTION B.
ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY IMPiiOVEMENT PROGRAM C.
RECOVERY PROGRAM - UPDATE D.
CONSTRUCTION STATUS - PROGRESS AND EXPERIENCES E.
VERIFICATION PROGRAM F.
IPC QA INVOLVEMENT IN S&L/GE OFF-SITE ACTIVITIES
%
a O a G ILLIN0IS POWER COMPANY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NUCLEAR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN ' OBJECTIVES IMPLEMENT A CENTRAL NUCLEAR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FUNCTION COMPLETE TRANSITION TO TOTAL NUCLEAR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT IMPROVE AND INTEGRATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INCLUDE ASPECTS NECESSARY FOR TRANSITION TO AND SUPPORT OF OPERATING PHASE VERIFY ADEQUACY OF COMPLETED WORK
.- - -. _.
.. _- ~ . . ELEMENTS FUNCTIONAL CRITERIA - IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS WHICH MUST BE MET TO PROPERLY MANAGE, CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, E.G., SOME SOURCE DOCUMENTS ARE FSAR, QAM, AND CORPORATE POLICY STATEMENTS ORGANIZATION - DEFINITION OF THE ORGANIZATION AND ITS FUNCTIONS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AUTHORITIES, AND ACCOUNTABILITIES TO SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION, STARTUP ACTIVITIES, AND PLANT OPERATION - MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS - IMPROVEMENT AND INTEGRATION OF MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES TO PROVIDE GREATER CONTROL OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT, CONSTRUCTION, TESTING, MAINT!tlANCE, STARTUP, AND OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES ! . % % ! ' <
' . . NUCLEAR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN TASKS EVALUATE RESULTS OF THE FOLLOWING: - NRC LETTER SEPTEMBER 1, 1982 - INPO EVALUATIONS - LRS AUDIT REPORT JUMA REPORT - - VERIFICATION TEAM REPORT F8M REPORT - - NRC AND IP AUDIT REPORTS - RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS DEVELOP A COMPOSITE REPORT WITH ORGANIZATIONAL AND PROGRAMMATIC MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR DECISION IMPLEMENT ORGANIZATION AND PROGRAMMATIC DECISIONS IDENTIFY FUNCTIONAL CRITERIA FOR THE PLAN l l- . _ -. _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _._ ,
. ' . . ESTABLISH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS COMPARE EXISTING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS TO REQUIREMENTS AND IMPLEMENT CHANGES AS NECESSARY IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS REQUIRED AND IMPLEMENT REVIEW DEPARTMENTAL AND CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES FOR CONFORMANCE TO MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROCEDURES; IMPLEMENT CHANGES AS REQUIRED DEVELOP MILESTONE SCHEDULE FOR THIS EFFORT PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE IPC DOCUMENTS l WHICH CODIFY SYSTEM ..
l l l , t l l -. .. ...
. . . IllINDIS POWER CTPANY IfHU/PEliT PROGPAM MllFRT0fES FOR DETAllFn RA DEVFIGREE PRTUCT Scamuis NUCLEAR PROGRAM IMNAGEMENT PLAN Ib.15 OUALIW RECOVERY PROGRAM OCT 19 VERIFICATIONPP.0 GRAM DOCUMENTREVIEw Nov.15 0/ERINSPECTION Id. I l ~ COMBINE INTO A Slff%RY LEVEL DEC I SCHEDULE .-. .
_-_ _ _ - - _ - _ ____ __ . . . . RECOVERY PROGRAM-UPDATE
NEW OBJECTIVE: QEVELOP A RESOURCE PLAN FOR ON-GOING PROJECT MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING, AND UUALITY ACTIVITIES OBJECTIVE I DEVELOP A RESOURCE LOADED, DETAILED, INTEGRATED SCHEDULE FOR RECOVERY PLAN ACTIVITIES.
OBJECTIVE 2 PHASE I DEVELOP A RESOURCE LOADED ACTIVITY SCHEDULE THAT INTEGRATES ON-GOING PROJECT MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING, AND QUALITY ACTIVITIES WITH THE RECOVERY ACTIVITIES.
PHASE 2 EXPAND THE RESOURCE ACTIVITY SCHEDULE DEVELOPED IN STEP TWO, WITH THE PROJECT SCHEDULE, TO A MANGEMENT SCHEDULE FOR LONG RANGE USE.
l l ~ .
i S T R O S L P U I E I T A R E A T C E T E F A V S D O F / R I T E F S E C L O E T E U L N J D L P I B E E M O H V A C C E X R S L E N - - - - - - - - - - . _ , , _ , S _ O
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . - - _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
- y
. . COMPANY ILL INOIS F0WLR COMPANY UPDATE INPUT REPORT PAGE
- P.A.
et ANtalNG C SCHEDULING - -
P30 JECT CPS R ECnVERY PLAN REPORT IPil RUf4 DATL 275EPS2 s' TIME NOW DATE 28SEPS2 s - - - - - - - - SORT Clli-4) P E'4!0TTNT0XTE 035EPh y
SFL ACTf29 E00 'S' AND SS LES THA 120CT82 SEL ACTI28 EQU 'S' AN3 PC EQU 'R' REJ PC EQU 'C' PAGE C111-49 PROJFCT START DATE 16 APR 76 e* 8ALDWIN CCNSTRUCT10*4 DEPT.
.- = _ _ _ _ -- - _ _._ _- -- . ____ _ _..... - ,o - ' ACTIVITY SIART PEECN REM FINISH ORG}NAL
- RESOURCE ******
A
tt ' - ICEAT.
COMP OUR DURATION CODE TV AMOUNT REM CODE CODE is -- - _- _ .__ - - - RS2 Col 262C B A CONS T R FwCVE BOLTS 2A-l EL 737 ID
BCC W
37 s BACSHRC S2001 RS2001262C STA......... PC... RD.... FIN......... 285EP82
04CCraz R S 200126 3C BA CONST INSTALL BOLTS 2A-1 EL 737 10
BCC W
37 8 AC SHRC S2001 ~ R S 200126 30 STA......... PC... R'D.... FIN......... 28SEP 82
04CCT82 R S 200146 2 C BA COL 4 $ T_R E MO V E_BOL T S 2A-1 EL 767 ID
BCC W
6 B AC SHRC 52001 ' RS20014A20 STA......... PC... AD.... FIN......... 28SEP 82
28SEP82 RS2001463C 8A CONST INST ALL BOLT S 2A-1 EL 767 10
BCC W
6 BACSHRC 52001
R S 200146 3 C STA PC... RD.... FIN......... .........
28SEP A2
- 28SEP82 RS2002262C BA CPNST R EMOVE BOLTS 2A-1 EL 737 OD
BCC W
61 BAC5HRC 52001 RS2002262C STA PC...RD.... FIN.........- ' ......... . 28SEP82
0TCCT82 . +. RS2002263C BA CONSI" INSTALL BOLTS 2A-1 EL 737 00
BCC W
60 BACSHRC S2002 R S 200226 3C STA PC... RD.... FIN ......... ......... 28SFP 82
OTOCT82 I I RS2002362C BA CONST PEMOVE BOLTS 2A-1 El 755 OD
RCC W
39 BACSHRC 52002 E.
. RS2002362C STA PC... RD.... FIN......... h ......... 2TSEPill
04CCTil
- a R S 200236 30 B A 65S T INSTALL BOD 1 2A-1 EL 755 00
8CC W
29 8ACSHRC fl6D2 , R S 2002 36 3C STA.......... PC... RD.... FIN......... " - ~ 20$EP B 2
04CCT82 na
18
y . , h a
3 . e-
- _. - - - -.. -.. -. - - . _. - -..~.
- .
... - . t' _ILLIh0IS POWER COMPAt4Y R ESOURCE SCHEOUL ING WORK SCHEDULE PAGE
3 COMPANY _ _ _ _ _ 8,A. PL ANilING C SC HE00(It1G - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - +
O.
PRCJECT CPS RECOVEPY PLAN REP 0di SRE RUN DATE 2FSEP82 s TIME N0h DATE 28SEP82 a ---
50RI C141-4) P WJEC U TlRT DATE 16APh76
(j SfL ACTf23 EQU ' S' AN1 SS 1ES THA 280CTR2 SEL ACTt28 FQU 'S' ANJ PC E QU ' R ' REJ PC EQU 'C' PAGE CitPA0 JECT END OATE 03JAN84 e B ALOw IN CLALI TY CONTROLS DEPT.
e -. - - - - _....._ . - - - - _ - - - _ - --- - __ ___ _ _ _. ,.
AC T [VIT Y ACTIVITV
- DURATION ***
- RESCURCES* SCHEDULE SCHEuutE LATE Late REM.
n IDENT.
DE SC R I P T ION ORIG REN. CURR CODES AMT.T START FINISH START FINISH FLOAT ta __ R S 200239 80 RA QC INSPEC T CONNECT IONS 2A-1 EL 755 00 to
BQC 20 W 28SEP82 110CT82 270 CTS 2 09NOVS2
RS20023920 BA QC TRANSCETEE FIELD INSPECTICN 24-1 EL 755 00
1 80C 3W 110CT82 110CT82 09t:0V82 09NOV82
RS2002393C 84 QC INSPECTC00C INST ALLED ROL TS 24-1 EL 755 OD to
BQC 20 W 28 SE P 8 2 110CT82 270CT82 09NOV82
RS20034910 84 QC INSPECT FIXED CONNECTIONS 2A-2 EL 767 10
4 BOC 8W 190CT82 220CT82 30NOVS2 03DEC82
R S200149 20 RA QC TRANSCRIBE FIELD INSPECTION 2A-2 EL 767 ID
1 80C 2W 2 50C T 82 250CT82 030EC 8 2 0 3DEC82
RS/CC3493C BA CC INS PE C T E DOC INST ALLED BOL TS 2 A-2 EL 767 ID
9 80C 18 W 250CT82 04NOv82 030 EC 82 150EC82
R S20034940 SA QC_I PQP EC T EXPANSN CONNECTIONS 2A-2 EL 767 ID
5 BOC 10 W 190CT82 250CT82 2 9NOV 82 03DEC82
I R S20043910 BA QC INSPECT FIXED CONNECit0NS 24-2 EL 755 CD
1 BQC 2W 2 70CT 82 270CT82 030 EC 82 030EC82
R S2004394C BA QC INSPECT EXPANSN CONNECTIONS 2A-2 EL 755 OD
9 80C 18 W 2 70C T 8 2 08NOV82 19NOV82 03DEC82
' . ~ RS20045720 BA QC REVIEW INSPEC TION DOCUMENIS 2 A-2 EL 778 OD
5 21%T82 270CT82 15NOV82 19NDV82
R S20045910 84 QC INSPECT FIXED CONNEC TIONS 2A-2 EL 778 CD
1 '190CT82 19CC T 82 12NOV82 12NOV82
li R S2004592C B A QC TR ANSCR IBE FIELD INSPECTION 2A-2 EL 778 OD
1 200CT82 200CT82 12NOV8 2 12NOV82
3 ! RS2004593C BA QC IN SP ECT CCOC INST ALLED BOL TS 2A-2 Et. 778 OD
3 200CY 82 220CT82 17NOV 82 19NOV82
j ? = s R S2004594C BA QC INSPETT EiPWSWOIiNTCTIONS 2 A-2 EL 778 OD
2 190CT82 200CT82 10NOV8 2 12NCV82
13
13 e S
8
- s
W
, . . C OM* AW I LL INCIS 8 0WE P CO*8PANY RE SOURCE SCHED'J L ING WORK SCNEDULE BAR CHARI PAGE
.a m 8,A. PLANNING E SC HEDUL ING -- --- --
' PRCJECT CPS RECOVERY PL AN SHOWING NEx1 11 WEEKS RUN D A T E 2TSEP82 o" -
SOP T CIII-46,5SA S - = - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - TIMF NOW DA TE 28SEP82 o RET 0 limit 2 h PROJECT STARI DATL 16APK76
- pace CII I-4)
84LDwlN CLALI TY CONTROLS CEP T.
-- PROJECT END DATE 03JAN84 e" e 1982 --:- -. = = -
-- - SEECCT ~ se NOV OEL st" ACTivtTY ACTIVITY REM. *RESouPCES* 223000000000111111111122222222223100000000011111111I1222222222230000000001111 IDENI.
DESCPIPTION 00R. CODE ANT. I -= - - -- - 6901'TiBTt 8 %I 23456 t~89012 3456 78901123456 7 89012345678901234 56 78 9F2MM8M 12 3 - na - TW TF SS M TW T F SSMT W T F SS MTWTFS SMTW TFSSM T W TFS SM T W TF S SMIW TF SSM TW TF SS M " I I I I I I I I I I I RS10110170 B AQC CONouC t CLASSES 1 80C 1 W I X- - - QCI-203 I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ - RS2001292C BA QC TRANSCRIBE FIELD I 1 BQC 9W I X--~~~~- --L I ! ! I I - NSPECTION 2A-1 EL 737 ID I I I I I I I I I I I
1 I I I I
I I I I i
1 I I I I I I I I R S 10100 7 70 BA QC CONDUCT CLASSES 1 80C 1 W i Ix--- -- - - - - =- PCR TO BAP I I I I I I I I I I I '
I I I I I I i
I I ~ I I I I-I I I I I I I RS2002392C PA QC IRAtiSMTMTIELD 1 1 8QC 3W I IX
== - - - - - - -L I I I l I NSPECTION 2A-1 EL 755 00 I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I E R S2002292C 04 QC'fR 4NSCRIBE FIELD 1 2 80C 4W I I X lx -- L I I I I I
NSPECTION 24-1 EL 737 OD I I I I I I I I I I I i
I I I I I I I I I I I i
1 I I I I I I R S2003491C 84 QC INSPECT FiliED Cot 49 4 80C 8W I I I xxxx----- - - LI I ECTIONS 2A-2 EL 767 ID I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I .I I I I I I - I I I
1 I I I I I I R S20034940 St Qt~iNSPEC T EXPANSN CO 5 80C 10 W l I I XXXX IX -- NNECTIONS 2A-2 EL 767 ID I I I I I I I I I I I LI I --= I I I I I I i
1 I I ~ I I I f I I I I
I I I R S20045910 D A QC I riSP f C i'F ili E'O'C O'NN
7 t I k--=-- L I I I I i ! EC TIONS 2A-2 EL 778 00 I I I I I I I I I I I " I I I I I I I I I I I I R52004594C BA QC~MSFE C T~E3P AN SV~CO
-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I xx - L I I I I I i NN ECTIONS 24-2 EL 778 00 I ! I I I I I I I I I a i F i
I I I I I I I ! I I l' I i
I I I I I i R S 2004592C 8A 0'C~ffAFiSCR i B E~~ ~I E L D'I
I l' I X-- = L I I I I I - ~ F NSPEC T ION 2 A-2 EL 778 OD I I I I I I I I I I I ta i I I I I I I I I I I is i, .
=- -
-- e LEGEND x = SCHEDULED DUR& TION _ __ e - C = CRITIC AL SCHEDULED DU1 ATION - = FLOAT L = L ATEST FINISH E = EARLY START. = DE L AY - - = ~ , __ _ S e
3
O a 4 "6 o 3 eeon, i ' r,e - , .
- Eli.
i 8 I .E
64 i E I dS7S E l PPRN L L L EEPA U U U ' . _ SSAJ D D D T8
E E E
10 H H H E S C C C G U S S S A T _ P E A k F F F T T T O O D AE S E DT L D D D - T A A P A EOD. M E E E O H H H 4AD-T C A A A E W~S EN 0I E C N _
6
IOTT - A _
1
ANCC - I R D IL EJJ ,- A T NP~tO V UIaR nTPP N D O - E I
2
R T
8
l E T V C
_ l L C O E i _ C P C N D - E M
9
- R O
0
- C T S A C N E O A R I
2
2 G-O T
8
8 N F E L P T C I L U E C E T TP J
0 D S NM
7
7 i I EO
2
C L RC R E U N C O I S
E
- 3 L
N s N
I
H-4 =
S _ G R E2 C C C C O S I L L N _S C F F N H I L ,T -- C _ - . U .R -
S D .O-
S E P -
P R R R H E -
I N N N C R - S N A E L C P RU M O A
2 S E - - E T
A
R
2
Y R E E E E S S S V A A H C H H A C P P P . E - R
9
L
1
E
0
- E
8
_ T _ S O O O M _ W W W Y[ T S S S N( _ C Ay _ U Pp _ R M[ _ I OHN N S CGA EO $L NI T T S R P CT I F T E C, TP M I I u _Y - OGR , SI -
L L ER U PNE LC S L L IV IS A A SNO ME & I I T l NC D T T F 0AE P R R I RLR O A A L F L P P E P_ S A E LL 3P F V C C C E R R R I 4C S.
O N N N
) ) ?? C
C C II E
2
4 I T N .
9
3 Y T CC O T
0
0 N C AA T N C
0
A E S E _ C
0
P J TE ED _
0
0
M O FG LI
0
C . O a OA I _ S $ S S C P SP M _
R R R - 3 1 e9 e1 eG 4 3
1 1 t
' i
i '
_ -- - . . OBJECTIVE 2 SCHEDULE / STATUS LEVEL OF DETAIL NRC INTERFACE i O
. . . . ' EXAMPLE FOR OBJECTIVE 2 ACTIVITIES PERFORMED BY NUCLEAR STATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS DESIGN SECTION PROCESS BA NCR'S PROCESS BA FCR'S PROCESS BA FER'S PROCESS BA SPEEDLETTERS PROCESS FPR'S PROCESS NCMR'S REVIEW AND APPROVE PROCEDURES REVIEW AND APPROVE TEST RESULTS (NON-SAFETY) ADMINISTER MONTHLY ENGINEERING / CONSTRUCTION MEET.NG ADMINISTER BI-MONTHLY ENGINEERING /GE MEETING ADMINISTER MONTHLY HVAC MEETING , ADMINISTER MONTHLY ENGINEERING /0PS/ START-UP MEETING PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AS REQUESTED SUPERVISE S & L ONSITE ACTIVITIES PROCESS PART 21'AND 50.55 (E) ITEMS PROCESS NRC IE BULLETINS AND NOTICES PROCESS AUDIT / SURVEILLANCE FINDINGS PROVIDE ENGINEERING INTERFACE FOR OPEN CONTRACTS RESPOND TO LICENSING ISSUES REVIEW DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS PREPARE AND DEVELOP PROGRAMS AND PROCEDURES PLANT MODIFICATIONS (NON-SAFETY) PREPARE REPORTS
- . -. _ _ .
l - . , . RECOVERY PLANS - UPDATE STRUCTURAL STEEL (SWO 19) . SUBMITTAL OF PHASED REINSPECTION PARTIALLY APPROVED BY NRC . PREREQUISITES COMPLETED . REINSPECTION OF FRICTION CONNECTIONS ON LOST DRAWINGS STARTED E/27/82.
ELECTRICAL (SWO 16) . SUBMITTAL OF PHASED CONDUIT INSTALLATION SUBMITTED TO NRC . RECOVERY PLAN PREREQUISITES COMPLETED . DISAPPROVED BY NRC AND IS BEING REVIEWED BY_TP VER!FICATION TEAM REPORT APPROXIMATELY 30% OF ITEMS IN THE REPORT HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY-RESPONDED TO, AS REVIEWED BY THE RECOVERY TEAM.
HVAC (SWO 14, 15, 20.1 . PROJECT APPROVAL COMPLETE; SUBMITTED TO NRC ~ NCR/DR _ . PROJECT APPROVAL COMPLETE; SUBMITTED TO NRC . COMPUTER TRACKING PROGRAM ESTIMATED TO BE FUNCTIONAL IN NOVEMBER . TREND OF OPEN NCR/DR'S IS FAVORABLE SINCE START OF RECOVERY
PROGRAM.
OTHER . PIPING / MECHANICAL, CORRECTIVE ACTION AND TRAINING RECOVERY l PLANS ARE IN APPROVAL CYCLE.
j .. REQUEST TO PERFORM NDE ON REFUELING BELLOWS (SWO 10) IS BEING REVIEWED BY NRC ! . - - - - - - -. - -. -. - . - -.
.. -- . . .
CONSTRUCTION STATUS TRAVELER CONTROL (PRESENT) LARGE BORE PIPING . LARGE BORE PIPE HANGERS , . SMALL BORE PIPING .
SMALL BORE PIPE HANGERS . INSTRUMENTATION . . ELECTRICAL HANGERS , . MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT , TRAVELER CONTROL (FUTURE) . CABLE TRAY . TRAY ATTACHMENTS , . CABLE PULL
i . CABLE TERMINATIONS ' . CONDUIT , ! ! l l l l l l t , l - -.. - - ~ . _. - _ . - . - - - . -.. - - . . . -. - - - -. .. - _. -. . - -
._.
_l - . .
) i .! TRAVELER STATUS . I DISCIPLINE: LARGE B0PE PIPIT!G i ) TRAV. CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW INITIIL IN-CONST.
ENG.
INVEN-
REVIEW PROCESS ENG.
Q & TS
HOLD HOLD TORY I.
, l 9-3-P2
13
294
99
826 1418 9-14-E2
14
307
95
847 1484
, i 9-17-82
13
300 f
92
852 1491 l 9-24-82
15
2P5
105
859 1517 , I I 1, = . I % . _
.. _.. _.
l i i e .. I
l !.
Em6 % N O O C O O O O O O C O .O O J e.f,s t ' . u m N O O .== O
==
=
=
C C C = w
S O' Ors
m es e ee O .- O .- n s O e e C - e.
N ,
Ip, -* '6 M f e N m C O *" O O re o O. *< O O O I m 8.fra
M + e N
O H O O O O O O O O O "
E Or'S N* e e e C e O O O
== C O
- 3 O
C N ma n $s[[.S -
- O
e
- O
- O
C O O O O w N .n h% 9.$ C.
,e
O
O C O O C
== h =* es e me % O.( C C ~ we
O M
- =
O O O O O O O w M "" .. 8.S Pm t*g C.
.= pm = m ao su es se O O O O O
9m me _ Os#[g j e
== ce
O O O O a= c = c O O O
m e
E.8*t
e
== e.
C O O O O O = O O O O I i e >
5 a - m e e a e
l
4
O t Ma g
5
E if
5
' - a
- g a2 a o - . - e
m s
3 = g e a e s m - W t.
3.g ' d".a.
E" 8 W t .1
3
5 d a = = e W W w = . m . C.
. . . . = . . .
. .
- . .. -, - _.. _ _. - -, _ _ _ - _ _,, - _ _ _ - __,__ , - - , - _. _ - _ _.,,. _ _.., _ _ _ _ _m- , _ _ _.-. -_._-,_ ___.- _ _ _... _ -. _
_ _ = _ _. -- . . - _ _ _ _ ___ .. . - , TRAVELER STATUS DISCIPLINE : LARGE BORE PIPE HANGERS - TRAV. CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW INITIAL IN-CONST.
ENG.
INVEN-REVIEW PROCESS ENG.
Q & TS HOLD HOLD TORY l 9-3-82
28 148 1423 100 107 143 1381 3401 i ) 9-14-82
39 228 1356
117 275 1407 3587 i i
9-17-82
39 161 1433 100 123 238 1428 3590 9-24-82
51 161 1401 100 336 213 1450 3590 i ! i l I ! l l -.. -
_ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. __ __ . - - _ __ , _ .
. . . . . LARGE BORE PlPE ilMGER / ? e e a e a e e e e / .f /
$ $ $ $ $ $ j .. TOTAL INSFECTIONS
39
46 M 4% %% %n
17 e
FHASE I - REJECTS n n a s a a i i n a a a FHASE II - 3 EJECTS
6
6 4.
- 3
4
1
j TOTAL BEJECTS
n e a A
a sa a s i , II I 1.95 6.74 12.11 17.19 6.78 7.27 16.4 351
16% 111 9% . TYPES OF REJECTS . '! ANCHot SOLTS
0
2
$
0
0
0 i NUTS / BOLTS TICHT o
2
0
3
1
0
, C1m e OSTENTATION
2
0
0
2
1
0 Tot.ERANCES g
1
1
1
0
1
{ CLEARANCES , t
0 0'
0
0
1
< , . MAT'L SIZE / DIMENSION O O
0
0
0
0
0 HAT'L IDERTIFICATION
0
0
2
1
1
0 , DAHACE O
0
0
0 C.
a
0
i d OTHER
1
2
1
11
1
1 TOTAL
6
8
'4
yn a .,
2 , a 6 are F.F. Mangere . .
.. e i I . , < .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . l l TRAVELER STATUS SMALL BORE PIPING DISCIPLINE.
t TRAV. CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW INITIAL IN-CONST.
ENG.
INVEN-REVIEW PROCESS ENG.
Q & TS HOLD HOLD TORY 9-3-82 215
75 610 100
153 2523 3658
. ' 9-14-82 177
82 674
70
2576 3781 , 9-17-82 216
103 678 100
67 2592 3840 9-24-82 210
111 638 100
84 2607 3824
. cy , . i .
- REDEFINED 1NSTRUMENT AIR FROM INSTRUMENTATION TO SMALL BORE'(2" AND ABOVE) N
. . . % y . . .- -a.
- eg,P.- o , .. w o o o O C C O C C C C C C M . N g e, s m - h .- , C e C.
O e e s C o o o - - . __ _ M n n , N C O wt C C C ^ .C C O O I . Y <r o C C C o O C C C c C C O , '*'ct,, - ' , n N O C C e C e o C o , , - - . . l . l l !E
2 O taa un C M
b g i H U ga.a, <
4 w on b
p.
W o i t
w C tal H A m E hsj
H C ad I w H W m O $
saa
< < M C U A > l % m< . < m > g M
M = t"; E
2 S
Q '
m o - , a mw w m - = a e = i < m mv v C = w > ~ a - > p q A. cd < Z C
4 CE
80 < Q
c w > og taa C C
O M
DE g E pg HA H so O U > Z sa.
am En.
H I , . i l . e - e , -, - -, - ,---,ww,,w,-,,ww-,,n r - -.,,,. -, ~-,--n- -,-m------m-w
,-,-r,
- , - ~ - - - - w- ,- - -
-
. _ - _ _ _ _ _ __ . . ! TRAVELER STATUS l DISCIPLINE * Sf9Ll_ BORE P!PE HANGERS ! . .- TRAV. CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW INITIAL IN-g VAULT TOTAL I CONST.
ENG.
INVEN-REVIEW FROCESS I ENG.
Q&TS HOLD HOLD TORY ' l , 9-3-82 335
89 1506 100
13 383 '2493 _ 9-14-82 406
126
- 1316
24
385
- 2468 l
9-17-82 403
108 1311
25
400 2464 ' '
i i 9-24-82 412
104 1299 100
40 4I3 2470 --, G
- REDUCTION Of, TOTALS DUE To 9-3 C0uNT BEING TAKEN FROM TRANSMITJA(,S & CARDS CAUSING SOME D COUNTING.
HilEREAS THE 9-14 METHOD WAS IMPROVED TO A " HANDS UNIRAVELER LOUNT.
. .. .
_ __ ._ _ . _. _ - - o . a
. - - Si1ALL BORE PIPE HAilGER f.
f f U
t @ ' A S d
v' { ?
7 i o % % o o
' I TOTAL INSPECTIONS '
?n o 'It R . ' i j ! PHASE I - REJECTS
0
0
! ! PHASE II - REJECTS
3
0 0, ,! TOTAL REJECTS
3
0
- } Z REJECTS i 0% 15% 11%
0 I TYPES OF REJECTS ! ANCHOR BOLTS
0
0
,, l i NUTS / BOLTS TICHT n
1
1 3 0
CLAMP ORIENTATION 0-n a n n
TOLERANCES n
0
(
l J CLEARANCES n
0
0 i MAT'L SIZE / DIMENSION n
_ __0
0 , MAT'L IDENTIFICATION . 0
0
0 DAMACE n
0
0
i OTilER O' n i n n TOTAL "O
2 n n '
l .
. . .- __ ._ __ _ _ - . . , . . TRAVELER STATUS l ' i DISCIPLINE: INSTRUMENTATION TRAV CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW INITIAL IN-CONST.
ENG.
INVEN" REVIEW PROCESS ENG.
Q&TS HOLD HOLD TORY } _ \\ _ i 9-3-82 195
10 1140
43 153 383 2039 i , . . ) 9-14-82 199
29 1081
41 141 388 1994 .
i
9-17-82 198
38 1089 S3
133 396 2033 9-24-82 201
97 1039
47 138 397 2040
- REDEFINED IN&TRUMENTATION TO Sf1ALL BORE (2" O AND ABOVE) AND PURGED NON-SAFETY TRAVEL SYSTEM COUNT
INCLUDES 30 TRAVELERS MISSED IN LAST WEEKS COUNT '
. ... . -
.
- l i
)
% C.
E t.
0m%~< , . g l . - M M C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C r $ ?g'Q'S ~ , C C C C C C C C C C C C c' C C C 5&rOf'6 ,
N O C C C C C C C C C C C C C C , , 8sE%g
.
O C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 8% 4'9 C C' C 'C C C C C C C C C C C C C l - i l H b b b 2C M
4 E m H i e u
- o
, p
b < " g u E C C w ~ - x n w H m o M < <
W a < < M C u E > .* g g w t t M M
M M < i a m o C, m
m O C H b W %
ga A Q rJ M DJ W Q
H h O g u Q W.
A
w Z b
i a.
"8'
5 S
4
3
2
= "
i H m e = m u > z w = = - - ' .
. l
l _. _. _ _ _.. _. _ _ _ -... _ - - -.. - - - -- - --- -- - --~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - --' ~ ~ ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ' - ~ ~ " ~ ' ' - ~ '~~
. _ _ - _ __- _ .
) '
. l - TRAVELER STATUS
. ! DISCIPLINE: ELECTRICAL HANGEPS-l .
TRAV. CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW INITIAL IN-CONST.
ENG.
INVEN- , ! VAULT TOTAL REVIEW N.
TS l HOLD HDLD TORY l I 9-3-82 7088
1783 7700 500 4823 1061 11,360 34,365 ' .. .. .. 9-14-82 7448
1621 7406 489 4291 1211 11,582 34,099 . ... .. .. , 9-17-82 7387
1799 7252 497 4061 1135 11,732 33,914 . 9-24-82 7586
1791 7145 498 3661 1512 11,F56 34,222 .
- INCLUDES 6011 DELETED
- DECREASE DUE TO LOWER COUNT OF 95 TRAVELERS ON 9-14-82
.
- A DISCREPANCY HAS BEEN DISCOVERED IN 0C BETWEEN THOSE TRAVELERS BEING COUNTED FOR AND THOSE ON ENGINEERING HOLD.
A." HANDS ON" RECOUNT IS IN PROGRESS AND THIS FIGURE WILL BE ADJUSTED ON THE NEXT ISSUE OF THIS REPOR _ _ _ i - ' . . i a, . . . 1,- ' . . '
FI FfTRICAL F#KB ___ /
' e e
. . . .
4
4 , - e , th , i j TOTAL INSPECTIONS 131
67
130 REJECTS
5
9
_ , % REJECTED 12.21 8.77 11.'08 9.67 14.61 , TYPES OF REJECTS IDCATION
2
1
,
CONFIGURATION
2
4
ORIENTATION O O O O O I ELEVATION
0
0
t f ! "Z" DIMENSION O O O O O l TRACEABILITY
1
1
' ) DEFECTS 2' O
0
i ' TORQUE O O
0
i SHARP EDCES
0
1
. TOUCH-UP 3i.
1
2 ' ' DOCUMENTATION 3,- l
1
1
- .s -
- .
I , l
._ _ - . .
- l
i ' TRAVELER STATUS ! l DISCIPLINE: ELECTRICAL TRAY ATTACHMENT , l TRAV. CONTROL GROUP ! FINAL REVIEW , ' INITIAL IN- ' l VAULT TOTAL CONST.
ENG.
INVEN-REVIEW PROCESS ENG.
Q & TS HOLD HOLD TORY
l ! 9-24-82
1
128 l l l
!
l l . - av ,,. -
.
_ _- - __ --__ __ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
_ _ , . . I ! TRAVELER STATUS DISCIPLINE: FlFCTRICAI CARIF TRAY ,
i TRAV. CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW INITIAL IN- ' VAULT TOTAL CONST.
ENG.
INVEN-i REVIEW PROCESS ENG.
Q & TS . HOLD HOLD TORY l 9-24-82 I,
.
' !]
i i
, ' $ I i
4 i - , . . O
. - . . , TRAVELER STATUS j DISCIPLINE: MECHANICAL E0UIPMENT t l t TRAV. CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW' i INITIAL IN-CONST.
ENG.
INVEN-REVIEW PROCESS ENG.
Q & TS HOLD HOLD TORY
9-17-82
2
114
22
262 447 9-24-82
4
69
43
262 486
i
\\
- ,.
a p" ,'
- (i'
_.,. 'R;; ' - , . .- ! , ,
_.
- . . . . TRAVELER'. STATUS , DISCIPLINE : PIPING E0lllPMENT i i TRAV.~ CONTROL GROUP FINAL REVIEW INITIAL IN- [ VAULT TOTAL CONST.
ENG.
INVEN-REV1EW PROCESS ENG' Q&TS HOLD HOLD TORY 9-24-82
6 11 4
10
.185
) l
1 , - o e . . - - -.
_.
. ._.
_ _ _ _ _ ~ . f VERIFICATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVE VERIFY ADEQUACY OF INSTALLED HARDWARE AND COMPLETED DOCUMENTATION.
i ElFMENTS OVERINSPECTION PROGRAM (SEPARATE FROM THE RECOVERY PROGRAM) VAULT DOCUMENTATION VERIFICATION NOTE: PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PROGRAM WILL BE ADDRESSED BY EXISTING PROJECT PROCEDURES AND INSTRUdTIONS.
i I l
l l ' .
- -. - - - .,. - .,. ,- - ..,, .. - - - - -
. OVERINSPECTION PROGRAM SUMMARY OBJECTIVES REINSPECT A PERCENTAGE OF ACCEPTED WORK WHICH WAS PLACED IN DOCUMENT VAULT PRIOR TO JULY 26, 1982 .. REINSPECT A PERCENTAGE OF ON-GOING WORK.
SAMPLE SIZE THE 20% COMMITMENT REPRESENTS A GENEROUS, BUT NOT - STATISTICAL, SAMPLE OF COMPLETED WORK.
TABLE I COMPARES THE NUMBER OF TRAVELERS BEING OVER-INSPECTED TO THE MIL STD 105D NUMBER.
IN ALL CASES THE 20% SAMPLE IS LARGER.
THE 20% SELECTED ARE A RAND 0M SELECTION OF THE TRAVELERS IN THE VAULT.
THE TRAVELER SELECTION IS PERFORMED BY USI.
. e
. TABLE I COMPARISON OF SAMPLE SIZE OVERINSPECTION MIL STD 105D LARGE BORE 471
50 SMALL BORE 2364 472 315 LARGE SUPPORTS 1007 201
- SMALL SUPPORTS 170
32 ELEC. HANGERS 9793 1959 200 MECHANICAL EQUIP. 175
32 BEAMS 825 LEVEL I44
20 ,
' . e.
. OVERINSPECTION CONDUCT OF REINSPECTION INSPECTION CHECKLISTS ORIGINALLY DEVELOPED BY U.S. TESTING CO.
USING BA QC/TS CHECKLISTS AND VERIFICATION TEAM CHECKLISTS.
INITIAL DATA AND FINDINGS INDICATE THAT REFINEMENTS TO ADMIN!- ~ STRATIVE CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY.
PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES ARE BEING REVISED TO INCORPORATE PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS: A.
PRESCRIPTIVE DETAILS OF INSPECTION CRITERIA B.
MECHANICS FOR INCREASING / DECREASING SAMPLING SIZE C.
ADMINISTRATIVE FLOW PATHS FOR DOCUMENTATION D.
DESCRIPTIONS OF SAMPLE CATEGORIES
E.
CONTROLS FOR TRENDING OF RESULTS INITIAL NONCONFORMANCES HAVE BEEN DOCUMENTED ON NCR'S AND DR'S AND ARE IN PROCESS OF BEING EVALUATED BY ENGINEERING FOR SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE AND DISPOSITION.
. e
. . . . RESULTS TO DATE FIRST STATUS REPORT DUE OCTOBER 8.
EXAMPLES OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS STRUCTURAL STEEL BLDG. - CONTROL ELEVATION 847 SAMPLE SIZE 20 BEAMS NUMBER OF CHECKLISTS UTILIZED (2) UST (CL) QII.IIC22 WELDING UST (CL) QII.06CI6 BOLTED, STRUCTURAL STEEL ~ TOTAL NUMBER OF CHARACTERISTICS EXAMINED I,355 PROBLEMS I) COPE DIMENSIONS (TOLERANCE)
A) DRAWING FAILED TO CONTAIN COPE TOLERANCES 2) WELD SIZE & PROFILE OR CONFIGURATION 105 A) DRAWINGS ONLY REQUIRED VERTICAL FILLET WELDS ON TIE TO EMBEDj NO HORIZONTAL FILLET WELDS WERE REQUIRED.
ACTION I) NCR WAS INITIATED) BRISTOL STEEL AND SARGENT & LUNDY ARE IN PROCESS OF EVALUATING AND DISPOSITIONING.
2) NCR WAS INITIATEDJ BRISTOL STEEL AND SARGENT & LUNDY l ARE IN PROCESS OF EVALUATING AND DISPOSITIONING.
,
_. -, -
. . . LARGE BORE PIPING SUPPORTS BLDG. - CONTAINMENT ELEVATION 739 THRU 764 FUEL ELEVATION,745 SAMPLE SIZE 13 EACH NUMBER OF CHECKLISTS UTILIZED (2) UST(CL) QII 02C09 OVERINSPECTION OF PIPING RUNS UST(CL) 011.11C22 WELDING OVERINSPECTION TOTAL NUMBER OF CHARACTERISTICS EXAMINED 244 .. PROBLEMS I) TRACEABILITY - WELDER ID OR RIR NUMBER
A) WELDER ID AND RIR NUMBER IS INCLUDED IN TRAVELERJ HOWEVER WAS NOT AFFIXED TO HARDWARE.
2) HARDWARE INSTALLATION-INCOMPLETE
A) MISSING NUTS, BOLTS, AND PINS.
> ACTION I) DR WAS INITIATEDj IN PROCESS OF EVALUATION BY BA AND IP FOR DISPOSITION 2) DR WAS INITIATEDJ IN PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF BA AND IP FOR DISPOSITION , i t
QA INVOLVEMENT WITH A/E AND NSSS SUPPLIER IP QA AUDIT TEAMS . PERSONNEL WILL BE SUPPLEMENTED FROM NSED OR CONSULTANTS . ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, ANALYSES, EVALUATIONS, WILL BE REVIEWED IN DEPTH ON A SAMPLING BASIS BY EXPERIENCED TECHNICAL / ENGINEERING PERSONNEL.
IP QA WILL REVIEW AND APPROVE SARGENT & LUNDY PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS _ PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION OF CLINTON-RELATED WORK.
IP - S&L REPORTING CHAINS ARE BEING MODIFIED TO ESTABLISH IP QA AS THE LEAD QA ORGANIZATION.
. S&L QA WILL REPORT.TO S&L MANAGEMENT AND IP QA.
. S&L QA ACTIVITIES WILL MORE CLOSELY BE MONITORED AND DIRECTION WILL BE GIVEN BY IP QA AS NECESSARY.
' . S&L QA WILL ESTABLISH A RESIDENT QA AUDITOR AT CLINTON WHO WILL REPORT TO IP QA AND S&L QA.
IP - GE REPORTING CHAINS ARE BEING MODIFIED TO ESTABLISH IP QA AS THE LEAD SITE QUALITY ORGANIZATION.
. GE SITE QUALITY CONTROL WILL REPORT TO GE MANAGEMENT AND IP QA.
. GE QA ACTIVITIES WILL MORE CLOSELY BE MONITORED AND DIRECTION WILL BE GIVEN BY IP QA AS NECESSARY.
o . .
e (
, . ( I ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY RECOVERY 8 INTEGR/ ' I CLINTON POWER STATION PROJECT RESOURCE E\\ OBJECTIVE 1 - u.,., ... A. DEVELOP gp,a,74 itu-yy,cgat.
gat fe*T. q up,ajcf ja [yggi,t, y,v;tg - INDIVIDUAL w i t==ing' or=tn itaus,c - - '. - ,couwturs - rmat onarv. - enary , RECOVERY PLANS " N
,' -( 'n .<*' i e i '...c. m ic %
B. DEVELOP DETAll eareant - m xvitoe ou a .~evi t SCHEDULE FOR EACH \\jMge"s,/ Uncludes Resources) - g7ff/ '73g o ' __._ ,_ , RECOVERY PLAN - ntsinamTs~ * N acimi C. INTEGRATE '~au t ' RECOVERY N=tg0 '" SCHEDULES cru D. RESOURCE DETERMINATION OBJECTIVE 2 j / p tce. A ESTIMATING caratt..seon ,[g36*(2 ,flMW,,[~- PROCESS c \\ DEVEl OPMENT j e, ...4 f ,o , ,,, , .. >e-e., -
- aw
- >w.=N =inavtpA RAftg , ScHEouLt3 =, - ., - .- . - - . . - ... o. oe., N + ' si \\,/ mj ( .. >.. - %R B. ESTIMATING ateav \\ estma ! C. COMPIL ATION INTEGRATION ANALYSIS - y.1'cli,c'j ' " ['E!I'u'aYr l A. ESTIMATING " - PROCESS
- aast a cal"8 g ;;gg DEVELOPMENT e,,n,,in3 3
,, 3 ) u a n a cc u r =1 ~5 ' a us $(<'s'ou's"EtS.
A }r h' afts / 2' y (:::N=")- y w B. ESTIM ATING i C. COMPIL ATION ' l INTEGRATION i ANALYSIS ,
LEGFF . , ! *?N ! z a = r.
- i*aa *:
o I:lj;it.
-
Yj=.2Y.:
- -..
I'
I* i -- - 5: / i hr3 !!
- :, n,,
. -
l
l
l
i
. - .
(TION PLAN ' 'ALUATION FLOW CHART c iSSut 10 NRC., - t' d- -- CONCumptNCK FCst Atvitw/ < \\
- e
- 44
'
ISOCT 82 FontCAST CCWPLETION - ' C PM INCORPORAft J 'O . - F sN AL OR AF T LES/ CHANGt5INTO -\\ r cpu fi iffA.
UPDAT[ IN COR POm at t $1stasFT3 iNi t Gm at t D ] fin AL OR AFT $CptOULE WITH r iNitRFACES WTO ACES TO ' * STATUS N cpu a
14 D I I Ot it awin t atSOURCES Atoulpf D FOR RECOvtRY EFFQftT tS ISOCT 82 FORICAST COMPttTCN _ 'ORf CiST COWPEETON ' \\ JS ,
23 0CT 02 FontC AST COMPLETION Co urit t s*OJECT AN ALY$33 & Pat $t NT PHA51 & _ IN T E GR ATION (va LU ATION (Situait TO \\(t SfiMaf ts Pa t uis) NRC Fost At=tw/ - - CONCukRENCE
2*
27 29h0V 82 FORfCAST COMPLE TION gt34tt_A/2 hG liCNS O
,N
FhtfAh( l (STiWAft5 N
- Cced Pit t PROJrCT AN ALT $;$ & STlWalt$ INTEGR ATION E VALU ATIOes ( (PhtWISI , ( ~
.
w
lignatt Af A -- _____y- __. _ _ _, g SAttrwN A550CLAf(5 CLHf0N POwta STATION A - POR: ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY . (C rivit y Court t t t o e Activity IN PROCESS noac r nF5ounct s m gricw q oa cwn7 ... ....g.. - Q,Jf f le.ee s s e egmase
[ !=' L ee.L h*.,*L*%* *
l
l
l
. }}