IR 05000443/2018010
| ML18255A263 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook |
| Issue date: | 09/12/2018 |
| From: | Fred Bower Reactor Projects Branch 3 |
| To: | Nazar M NextEra Energy Seabrook |
| References | |
| IR 2018010 | |
| Download: ML18255A263 (10) | |
Text
September 12, 2018
SUBJECT:
SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - NRC BIENNIAL PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORT 05000443/2018010
Dear Mr. Nazar:
On August 9, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1. The NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President - Northern Region and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
The NRC inspection team reviewed the stations corrective action program (CAP) and the stations implementation of the program to evaluate Seabrook stations effectiveness in identifying, prioritizing, evaluating and correcting problems, and to confirm that the station was complying with NRC regulations and licensee standards for CAPs. Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined that your staffs performance in each of these areas adequately supported nuclear safety.
The team also evaluated the stations processes for use of industry and NRC operating experience information and the effectiveness of the stations audits and self-assessments.
Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined that your staffs performance in each of these areas adequately supported nuclear safety.
Finally, the team reviewed the stations programs to establish and maintain a safety-conscious work environment, and interviewed Seabrook station personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs. Based on the teams observations and the results of these interviews the team found no evidence of challenges to your organizations safety-conscious work environment.
Your employees appeared willing to raise nuclear safety concerns through at least one of the several means available.
The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Fred L. Bower, III, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects
Docket Number: 50-443 License Number: NPF-86
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000443/2018010
Inspection Report
Docket Number:
50-443
License Number:
Report Number:
Enterprise Identifier: I-2018-010-0062
Licensee:
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra)
Facility:
Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook)
Location:
Seabrook, NH
Inspection Dates:
July 23, 2018 to August 9, 2018
Inspectors:
C. Lally, Project Engineer, Team Lead
P. Meier, Seabrook Resident Inspector
C. Highley, Millstone Resident Inspector
E. Allen, Project Engineer
Observer:
S. Ghrayeb, Project Engineer
Approved By:
F. Bower, III, Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 3
Division of Reactor Projects
SUMMARY
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring NextEras performance at Seabrook by conducting the biennial problem identification and resolution inspection in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information.
Based on the samples selected for review, the inspection team concluded that NextEra was effective in identifying, evaluating, and resolving problems and that NextEra effectively used operating experience and self-assessments. The inspectors found no evidence of significant challenges to NextEras safety conscious work environment at Seabrook and concluded that NextEra staff are willing to raise nuclear safety concerns through at least one of the several means available.
No findings or more-than-minor violations were identified.
INSPECTION SCOPES
This inspection was conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs)in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess NextEras performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.
OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE
71152 - Problem Identification and Resolution
Biennial Team Inspection (1 Sample)
The inspectors performed a biennial assessment of NextEras corrective action program, use of operating experience, self-assessments and audits, and safety conscious work environment. The assessment is documented below.
- (1) Corrective Action Program Effectiveness - The inspection team evaluated NextEras effectiveness in identification, prioritization and evaluation, and correcting problems, and verified the station was complied with NRC regulations and NextEras standards for corrective action programs.
- (2) Operating Experience - The team evaluated the stations effectiveness in its use of industry and NRC operating experience information and verified the station complied with NextEras standards for the use of operating experience.
- (3) Self-Assessments and Audits - The team evaluated the effectiveness of the stations audits and self-assessments and verified the station complied with NextEras standards for the use of self-assessments and audits.
- (4) Safety Conscious Work Environment - The team reviewed the stations programs to establish and maintain a safety-conscious work environment, and interviewed station personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs.
INSPECTION RESULTS
Evaluation of the Seabrook PI&R Program 71152B
The NRC inspection team reviewed Seabrook stations corrective action program and the stations implementation of the program to evaluate its effectiveness in identifying, prioritizing, evaluating and correcting problems, and to confirm that the station was complying with NRC regulations and licensee standards for corrective action programs. Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined NextEra staffs performance in each of these areas adequately supported nuclear safety. No findings or more-than-minor violations were identified.
The team also evaluated the stations processes for use of industry and NRC operating experience information and the effectiveness of the stations audits and self-assessment.
Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined that NextEras performance in each of these areas adequately supported nuclear safety.
Finally, the team reviewed the stations programs to establish and maintain a safety-conscious work environment, and interviewed Seabrook station personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs. Based on the teams observations and the results of those interviews, the team found no evidence of challenges to NextEras safety-conscious work environment. Site employees appeared willing to raise nuclear safety concerns through at least one of the several means available.
Observation and Minor Performance Deficiency 71152B
Corrective Action Program: The inspectors noted that out of service analytical chemistry equipment was not being documented in the corrective action program through the initiation of condition reports (CRs). The chemistry equipment deficiencies were being tracked in the chemistry department logs, but were not entered into the corrective action program.
Minor Performance Deficiency: The initiation of CRs for out of service chemistry equipment is required by NextEra procedure CS 0904.04, Laboratory Instrument Control Charts, and occurred multiple times during the period of January 2017 to July 2018. The station has documented this in the corrective action program under CR 2275048.
Screening: The failure to implement a procedural requirement had no safety impact under the given situation. Specifically, no out of service laboratory equipment was used to perform analysis to support technical specification requirements, redundant analytical equipment remained available, and no technical specification required samples were missed. Therefore, this performance deficiency is minor.
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS
On August 9, 2018, the inspectors presented the biennial problem identification and resolution inspection results to Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President - Northern Region, and other members of the NextEra staff. Inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Procedures
AD-AA-103, Nuclear Safety Culture Program, Revision 12
CD0913.06, Grab Sample Technique, Revision 10
CS0924.06, Total Particulate Contamination in Emergency Diesel Fuel Oil, Revision 8
CS0904.04, Laboratory Instrument Control Charts, Revision 15
EN-AA-203-1001, Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessment, Revision 30
ER-AA-100-2002, Maintenance Rule Program Administration, Revision 6
ER-AA-101, Equipment Reliability, Revision 8
EX1806.001, RPS and ESF AS Response Time Summation Procedure, Revision 11
LX0563.02, Reactor Coolant Pump Undervoltage Channel Calibration and Relay PM,
Revision 17
MS0535.11, Equipment Hatch Missile Shield Removal and Installation, Revision 5
NA-AA-200-1000, Employee Concerns Program, Revision 1
OS1426.12, Diesel Generator A and B Weekly and Monthly Surveillances,
Revisions 11, 12, and 25
Steam Generator Reference Leg Fill and Transmitter Venting IN1640.920 Revision 0
OX0443.01, Diesel Fire Pump Weekly Test, Revision 16
OX1406.12 18 Month Containment and Containment Spray Recirculation Sump Surveillance,
Revision 9
OX1406.12 18 Month Containment and Containment Spray Recirculation Sump Surveillance,
Revision 14
OX1426.27, DG 1B Semiannual Operability Surveillance, Revision 28
PI-AA-101-1000, Level 2 Independent Assessment, Revision 20
PI-AA-102, Operating Experience Program, Revision 14
PI-AA-104-1000, Condition Reporting, Revision 17
Seabrook Station Administrative Procedure, Classification of Emergencies ER 1.1 Revision 59
Seabrook Station Administrative Procedure, Classification of Emergencies ER 1.1 Revision 56
Seabrook Quality Assurance Topical Report, Revision 21
Seabrook Station Quality Assurance Manual, Revision 54
Condition Reports (*initiated in response to inspection)
1668314
1934562
1942006
1962214
22462
26407
2030152
2040165
2044627
2044707
2049737
2063732
2065314
2069062
2069607
2069801
2075739
2076893
2083685
2092608
2097375
2098733
2100147
2100186
2100199
2100232
2100565
2100572
2100742
2100795
2100846
2101155
2102315
2102565
2103817
2105712
2108355
2108372
2109563
2112715
2113205
2115492
2115531
24899
24957
27066
27145
29116
29382
2132014
2132503
2133415
2135666
2135775
2135836
2136567
2137152
2138579
2142754
2147795
2147873
2148431
2149225
2150494
2153195
2158282
2158283
2158290
2158291
2168202
2169614
2170509
2172204
2182279
2187577
2191791
2196114
2197408
2199166
2199196
2199340
2199855
200100
200254
200705
201450
202358
202648
207372
207905
213342
213584
215058
216373
21606
22634
27559
232291
236176
239906
242073
242592
243460
245862
260177
261891
266072
267214
268628
269068
272373
272500
272682
273163*
273177*
273276*
273387*
273426*
273474*
273521*
273570*
273594*
273613*
273628*
273656*
273659*
273670*
273685*
273974*
274830*
275048*
275282*
Work Orders/Work Requests
40132620
228569
264381
265516
287160
40308888
40316168
40322466
40346955
40422993
40427609
40432772
40441339
40451124
40465916
40505649
40533840
40561380
40563191
40563236
40563259
40563265
40563271
40563283
40563350
40586631
40593072
94139510
94143377
94162598
Calculations
ES-4.003, 125 Volt DC Short Circuit and System Voltage Drop Calculation, Revision 10
Evaluations
2019628
2076893
2092608
2097062
2102315
2103429
2105636
2106893
2114495
2115215
2115331
2116669
2119394
20131
24898
24957
25151
29382
2137168
2140612
2156562
2158284
2169614
2172204
2197408
2199855
200623
200705
202923
207011
210450
239906
23905
236037
242520
248447
Drawings
211630-B-9532 Sheet 1, No. 1 Unit No. 1A, 1B and 1C Vital Buses Safeguard Equipment
Control System Schematic Controls, Revision 8
Operating Experience
70077135, NRC Information Notice 2007-36 EDG Volt Regulator, dated May 16, 2008
24905
26947
2065778
2083865
2112715
2132520
2136567
2199219
22634
265706
Self-Assessment and Audits
277135, Operability Evaluation Focused Area Self-Assessment, dated May 16, 2010
Operating Experience Summary, Manual Reactor Trip in Response to a Feedwater Isolation
Due to High Level in Steam Generator B Seabrook Station - April 29, 2017 (CR 2202358)
OR16 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report SBK-L-14190, dated October 14, 2014
OR17 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report SBK-L-16058, dated April 22, 2016
OR18 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report SBK-L-17166, dated October 17, 2017
SBK-16-003
SBK-16-005
SBK-17-005
SBK-17-008
Miscellaneous
Chemistry logs from January 2017 to July 2018
Structural Integrity Associates, Inc. Report 1600052.401.R0