IR 05000424/1981007

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-424/81-07 & 50-425/81-07 on 810622-26. Noncompliance Noted:Failure to Follow Storage/Maint Procedure & Consumption of Food & Drink in Storage Areas
ML20030D351
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/22/1981
From: Upright C, Wright R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20030D340 List:
References
50-424-81-07, 50-424-81-7, 50-425-81-07, 50-425-81-7, NUDOCS 8109010225
Download: ML20030D351 (8)


Text

-

-

--

-

.

-

.

,.

'

p oucoqk UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,

o S

E PEGION 11 0[

101 MARIETTA ST. N.W., SUITE 3100 o,

o ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30303

>

Report Nos. 50-424/81-7 and 50-425/81-7 Licensee: Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30303 Facility Name: Vogtle Docket Nos. 50-424 and 50-425 License Nos. CPPR-108 and CPPR-109 Inspection at Vogtle site near Waynesboro, Georgia

,

Inspector: I d.

k 7 2/ B/

R. W. Wright Date Signed Accompanying Personnel:

A. G. Debbage

'

Approved by: [ M/ //

2&

'

s C. M.~Upri'ghr,~. tion ef fate igned Engineering I ectio ranch

,

Engineering and Technical Inspection Division

'

SUMMARY Inspection on June 22-26, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 74 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of site procurement; receiving, storage and maintenance; independent inspection of general construction activities.

Results

.

Of the three areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in two

'

areas; two violations were found in the storage preventive maintenance area.

(Consumption of food and drink in storage areas paragraph 7.c.; and Failure to follow storage / maintenance procedure paragraph 7.c.)

8109010225 810820 DR ADOCK 05000424 PDR

--. - - _

..

., _.. -.. -. - _ _ _ _

-. -

_. _ _. _.

-

. -,

_.. -_

,

..

. _

_

.-

-

.

-

.

.

.

REPORT DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees K. M. Gilliespie, Project Construction Manager

  • H. H. Gregory, III, Assistant Project Construction Manager
  • J. O. Dorough, Manager Scheduling Support Activities
  • R. W. McManus, Manager QC
  • R. Hollands, Assistant Manager QC
  • T. L. Weatherspoon, Assistant Manager QC
  • M. H. Googe, Manager of Field Operations
  • C. R. Miles Jr., QA Field Supervisor
  • E. D. Groover, QA Site Supervisor
  • R. E. Folker, QA Engineer
  • R. S. McIver, Fielo Supervisor - Procurement

"A. B. Gallant, Mechanical Field Office Engr. Supervisor

  • J. L. Blocker, QC Section Supervisor
  • G. A. McCarley, Assistant Project Section Supervisor - Mechanical R. Osborne, Receiving Inspector - Supervisor R. Darby, QC Receiving Inspector G. Abbot, QC Receiving Inspector J. Mcdonald, Section Supervisor, Warehousing M. Upchurch, Supervisor of Receipt Inspection and Storage L. Hatcher, Concrete - Soils Laboratory Supervisor S. Lambert, Batch Plant QC Inspector J. Sutton, GPC Cadweld Inspector Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, techni-cians and QA/QC members.

Other Organizations Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC)

  • W. G. Uhouse, BRE "N" Stamp Walsh Construction Company (WCC)
  • G. Ryan, QA/QC Coordinator
  • Attended exit interview 2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 26, 1981 with those persens indicated in paragraph 1 abov.-

-

.

-

.

.

.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

5.

Independent Inspection Effort The inspector performed a walk-through inspection of Unit l's reactor building, the auxiliary building, control building, concrete and soils laboratory, the batch plant, the aggregate storage yards and GPC's painting facility.

Areas inspected included completed cadwelds and cadwelding operations in progress, control of weld rod material, calibration of labor-atory and batch plant scales and testing equipment, and observations of various construction activities underway in the above mentioned areas.

No violations or items of deviation were identified in the independent inspection area.

6.

Procurement a.

Documents Examined (1) PSAR Section 1.4, S2, Identification of Agents & Contractors (2) PSAR Section 17, Quality Assurance (3) VNP Quality Assurance Manual (4) Project Procurement Procedures Manual, Rev 4.

!,

(5) Procedure GD-A-24, Rev 3, On-Site Procurement Process (6) Procedure MD-A-03, Rev 1, Mechanical Section Field Procurement l

Procedure (7) Procedure DTP-A-01, Rev 0, Training, Qualification, and Certifi-cation of Technical Inspectors (8) QA Audit of ASME Site Procurement Activities, No. GD10-80/45 (9) QA Audit on Procurement, No. GD10-81/24 (10) Supply Requistion PAVR - 7728T and related Procurement Specifica-tion X4AQ37, Welding Filler Materials (11) Supply Requisition PAVR - 7144T and related Procurement Specifi-cation X4AQ34, Jobsite Service Pipe, Fittings and Flanges in accordance with ASME Boiler & Pressure Code Sectio, III (12) Supply Requisiticn IX2AF01 (Purchase Order PAV-151) and related Procurement Specification X2AF01 for Reinforcing Steel (13) Bechtel Corporation Evaluated Suppliers List (14) GPC Approved Suppliers List i

-

_

._

.

_ - _ _

-

-

.

.

.

.

.

b.

Quality Assurance Program (1) General Georgia Power Company (GPC), a co-owner of the VNP is responsible for the design, construction, and operation of the plant. GPC manages the construction of the VNP utilizing the following on site contractors; Chicago Bridge & Iron (CB&I) - containment fabricator, Pullman Power Products (PPP) - mechanical piping contractor, Walsh Construction - general contractor, Pullman Kennith Fortson - HVAC contractor, Williams Contracting - coatings contractor, Cleveland Electric - electrical contractor, and Raymond Internations piling contractor.

The Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC) has been retained as the subcontractor responsible for the architect-engineering work for toe VNP. BPC also is designing the balance of plant systems.

Westinghouse Electric Corporation (W) is the supplier of the pressurized water nuclear steam supply system (NSSS).

The GPC Construction Department is responsible for the inspect on i

t of work performed at the construction site to ensure that it complies with the applicable contracts, purchase orders, specifi-cations, and drawings.

QC inspection of work activities is performed by the GPC Field construction group and site contractor inspectors. The GPC QC inspection section performs the inspec-tion / monitoring of work being performed by contractor craftsmen, work being performed by contractor QC personnel and the material, receipt, storage, and installation inspection of materials and equipment. GPC, QA field group performs planned and periodic audits of the construction site organizations (GPC and contrac-tors) anc activities.

GPC corporate Project QA Manager (PQAM)

audits of the construction site are conducted primarily at the activities of the QA site group. BPC, W, and Southern Service Company conduct planned audits of suppliers.

In general BPC is responsible to prepare, review, approve and control the engineering requisitions. GPC receives the requi-sition from BPC, transfers the information unchanged to a GPC purchase order and proceeds with administration of procurement.

In certain identified instances the GPC General Office or site will prepare procurement documents. For safety-related materials, the technical requirements will have been previously issued and the QA requirements will be established in accordance with the GPC QA program and are included in the GPC bid package. GPC evaluates the bids, prepares the requisition and awards the purchase order.

For safety-related materials and/or services procured for field

.

..

--

. ---

.

.

_ _.. - -

-

.

.

,

-

.

.

.

<

l

!

construction by GPC from BPC prepared specifications and recom-mendations, the supplier's QA program must be reviewed and

'

'

accepted by the PQAM prior to start of manufacture or erection.

(2) PSAR Commitments

,

In Section S217.1.2 of the PSAR, GPC commits to implement Regula-tory Guide 1.28, " Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Design and Construction - 6/7/72 which in turn endorses ANSI N

45.2-1971.

Additionally the licensee has committed to AEC Extracts from ANSI N 45.2.13, Draft 5/31/73, " Supplementary

-

Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Equipment Materials and Services for Nuclear Power Plants."

c.

Implementation l

The inspector reviewed the documents listed above and discussed pro-curement functions and audits conducted of procurement activities with responsible GPC personnel at the site.

The inspector selected three site procurement specifications and respective supply requisitions (Welding Filler Materials; Service Pipe, Fittings & Flanges; Reinforcing Steel) for review to determine the following:

l that specified design parameters were in accordance with SAR

.

l or other AE/ licensee specifications the procurement specifications identify applicable codes and

,

standards

'

10 CFR 21 requirements wera :mposed

.

i

!

the supplier was on the approved list of suppliers

.

applicable QA requirements were imposed

!

if source inspections were required

.

the information required by the licensee to be cocumented on Certificates of Conformance was acceptable

,

that requisitions were reviewed by QA

.

The inspector conducted discussions with selected GPC procurement personnel concerning procurement procedures to verify that they were

i knowledgeable of there responsibilities and duties.

i

.

., -.,.. _ _

-

..,,,m,.,-.

.......

...,,,-w.,___.x.._,.-m__.--,,-_.,t._,_,.,-~r,-

_, _., - _ -...... -.. -.. -. -

-

_. __

.. _ _

- -

\\

'

.~

)

-

.

,

.

.

,

r

l No items of violation or deviations were identified in the procurement area.

~

7.

Receiving Inspection, Storage and Maintenance a.

Documents Examined (1) PSAR - Supplementary Information

,

Section 17.1.7,S2, Control of Purchase Material, Equipment and l

Services i

Section 17.1.8,S2, Identification and Control of Materials, Parts

and Components l

Section 17.1.13,52, Handling, Storage and Shipping

j (2) Procedure GD-A-30, Rev 2, Receipt, Receipt Inspection, Storage and Handling (3) Procedure GD-T-09, Rev 1, Inspection of Items in Storage and Storage Areas

'

j (4) Procedure GD-T-14, Rev 0, Receipt, Storage and Handling of Welding l

Material

'

(5) Procedure GS-T-01, Rev 7, Nonconformance Control (6) Procedure CD-T-02, Rev 9, Concrete Quality Control (7) Procedure CD-T-06, Rev 3, Rebar & Cadweld Quality Control

,

(8) Procedure CD-T-08, Rev 2, Field Fabrication Miscellaneous Steel (9) Procedure MD-A-02, Rev 3, Trace < bility of Mechanical Materials /

Equipment

(10) Procedure MD-T-12, Rev 3, Receipt Inspection Storage and Issue of Pipe, Pipe Components and Weld Filler Material

!

!

(11) Procedure DC-A-06, Rev 5, Review & Control of QA Documentation (12) Audit MD03-81/21, Storage of Pumps

.

(13) Audit QC 01-81/10, Quality Control-Qualification and Certification Records i

(14) Audit conducted 4/15-30/31, QA Audit of Electrical Equipment Storage and Associated Document Control Activities

'

(15) Audit CD03-81/02, QA Concrete Audit (16) Audit MD05-81/31, QA Audit of Tank Storage (17) Audit MD-04-80/13, Receipt, Storage, and Handling of Valves

'

b.

Quality Assurance Program The PSAR Section S217.1.2 stat s the subject program will meet Regula-

<

i tory Guide 1.38 dated 3/16/73 wh'c, in turn endorses ANSI N45.2.2-1972, as supplemented or modified by paragraph C " Regulatory Position" The

,

licensee receives, stores, and handles equipment and materials at the site for items procured by Westinghouse, GPC or any of its site contrac-

tors.

l

.

. - -

. - - -..

. -

-.. - - - - -,. -..

.. - - - -. - -. - - - -. - -

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

,

.

-

.

.

.

c.

Implementation The inspector examined the licensee's system established as detailed in the above procedures for conducting receiving inspection, handlir.g, storage and maintenance of materials and equipment. The facilities utilized were examined; hoisting, transporting, rigging tools and equipment employed observed; typical documentation for several receiving packages to include equipment / receipt inspection reports, certificates of conformance, materials test reports, quality releases, miscellaneous daily reports, and related nonconforming condition reports were checked for acceptability, legibility, completeness and for review by document control reviewers. The inspector conducted discussions with responsible GPC warehousing, receipt inspection, preventive maintenance and document control supervisory personnel and various associated QC personnel pertaining to their procedural respon-sibilities and found them competent, knowledgeable and experienced in their respective duties performed.

Several certificates of conformance were chosen at random for examina-tion and were found to properly identify the purchased items, identify specific requirements the items met or did not meet, and were signed by an appropriate member of the suppliers QA organization.

The inspector examined the storage facilities of the main site ware-house (Storage Levels A&B), the coatings building (Level B), the cadweld building (Level B), the reactor vessel head storage building (Level C), the main warehouse, NSSS, aggregate, piping, and various reinforcing steel field laydown areas (Level D storage). Random items and materials selected in these areas were found stored in their proper environment as described by ANSI N45.2.2 or the manufacture's recom-mendation.

The subject storage facilities were exami,ed for proper controlled access, that protection from damage during storage was adequate, cleanliness, prcaer stacking, and cribbing of items, proper control of items in storage to include identification and marking, proper use of desiccent humidity absorbers and purging systems for required equipment, that the shelf life of materials was adequately controlled, and that records were being maintained of storage condi-tions and were current.

The inspector examined various completed,

" Periodic Inspection Checklists (PIC's)" pertaining to the inspection of the following storage areas: No.1 & No. 2 pipe warehouses, No.1 &

No. 2 railroad yards, Unit 2 control building and Unit 2 auxiliary building.

In conducting the above storage areas inspection, one violation 50-424-425/81-07-01, Consumption of food and drink in storage areas was identified. ANSI N 45.2.2, Section 6.2.4 states, "the use or storage of food, drinks and salt tablet dispensers in any storage area shall not be permitted." On June 24, 1981 the inspector noted several

_ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

,

.. -

.

.

-.

7 M111 wrights eating their lunches picnic style in the vicinity of storej equipment and materials located in the main warehouse.

Discussions revealed that no apparent controls had been imposed upon these visiting crafts to preclude this from happening. Additionally, on the same date an empty beverage bottle and some soda cans were fcund on the ground in the NSSS storage yard.

The inspector examined the Equipment Maintenance / Storage Lists (EM/SLs)

maintained in the document control vault for the following items:

Pressurizer, Tag 1-1201-V6-002

.

.

Reactor Vessel, Tag 2-1201-V6-001 Electrical Penetration, Tag 1-1818-H3-P39

.

Component Cooling Water Pump, Tag 1-1217-P4-002

.

Boric Acid Transfer Pump, Tag 2-1208-P6-006

.

Procedure GD-T-09 addresses the use of EM/SLs and requires that these maintenance / storage inspections be completed as specified on the EM/SL within plus or minus one week of the required inspection date. EM/SLs examined for the above reactor vessel and boric acid transfer pump revealed there was no documentary evidence to verify that maintenance /

ste-age inspections had been conducted on these items for the months of 9/15/80 and 3/24/79 respectively.

Later discussions with receivi,6 inspection, maintenance inspection and mechanical engineering personnel were unsuccessful in obtaining any assurance that these inspections

'

were implemented. The above example of " Failure to follow storage /

maintenance procedure" was identified to the licensee as violation

,

l 50-425/81-07-02.

!

In summary; no violations or deviations were identified in receiving I

inspection, one violation (both units) for consumption of food and drink in storage areas, and one violation (Unit 2 only) for failure to l

follow storage / maintenance procedure were identified to the licensee.

i i

(

l

<