IR 05000424/1978006
| ML19256A086 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1978 |
| From: | Herdt A, Vogtle A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256A083 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-78-06, 50-424-78-6, 50-425-78-6, NUDOCS 7811030054 | |
| Download: ML19256A086 (4) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.. ___ . . g k' * f Cvg'c, UNITEo sT ATEs NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION J i ')'y , f 'g
REGION ii
- , g, ;p g
101 M ARiETT A sT RE ET, N.Vs.
- c..g {,
[ ATL ANT A, GEORGI A 30303 %..u.....f . Report Nos.
50-424/78-6 and 50-425/75-6-Docket Nos. : 50-424 and 50-425 License Nos.: CPPR-108 and CPPR-109 Categories: A2, A2 Licensee: Georgia Power Co=pany 270 Feachtree Street, N. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 50302 Facility Name: Alvin W. Vogtle, Units 1 and 2 Inspection at: Waynesboro, Georgia Inspection conducted: August 28-29, 1978 Inspector: J. K.Jausch f 2f [h Reviewed by.
/ ' A. R. Herdt, Chief 'Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on August 28-29, 1978 (Report Nos. 50-424/78-6 and 50-425/7F-b) Arsas Inspected: QA manuals including QC procedures for indoctrination / training program for QA personnel; observation of rebar installation for reacter base slabs; licensee's implementation of 10 CFR Part 21 requirements and followup of IE Bulletins and Circulars by the licensee. The inspection involved 15 inspector-hours on site by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were disclosed.
- . 781.103 cod - - -. . RII Rpt. Nos. 50-424/78-6 and 50-425/78-6 I-1 DETAILS I Prepared b9 I M' /; J. K. Rausch, Principal Inspector Date Projects Section _ . Reactor Construction and Eogineering Support Branch Dates of Inspection: August 28-29, 1978 Reviewed by: '[[ t ' A. h. Herdt, Chief Inte Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch 1.
Persons Cont. acted Georgia Power Company (GPC)
- K. Gillespie, Construction Project Manager
- L. L. Gray, Jr., Assistant Construction Project Manager
- E. D. Groover, QA bite Manager
- R.
S. McIvor, Purchasing, Assistant Buyer
- D.
h. Fiquett, Manager, Field Operations
- Denotes persons attending the exit interview.
2.
Licensee Actions on Previous Inspection Findings (C1ried) Unresolved Iten 424/78-04-01 and 425/78-04-01, Procedures for Part 21 Implementation: Procedures GD-A-06 and QA-04-04 have been revised and approved by GPC management to include Part 21 pesting requirements and site QA examination for P2rt 21 applicability.
3.
Unresolved Items UnrescIved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviations. An unresolved item disclosed during the inspection is discussed in paragraph 7.
4.
Independent Inspection Effort, Units 1 and 2 The inspector examined various. area. of the plant to observe construction work and related activitier in progress. Areas examined included the reactor cavity base areas, the auxiliary buildiag
. ' . RII Rpt. Nos. 50-424/78-6 and 50-425/78-6 I-2 construction, the completed fire protection diesel building, the concrete and soil testing laboratory and the river dock unloading area.
- ' No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Statur. of Inspection and Enforcement Bulletins IEP 78-05 Malfunctioning of Circuit Breaker Auxiliary Contact Mechanism - General Electric Model CE105X GPC committed by a letter dated June 7, 1978, that no GE Type CR105X auniliary contact mechanism will be used at Plant Vogtle. RII has no further questions regarding this matter at this time.
IEB 78_-06 Defective Cutler-Hammer Type M Relays With DC Coils GPC committed by a letter dated July 24, 1978, that no Cutler-Hammer D23MRD Type M relays with D-C coil produced between 1971 and July 1976 will be used at Plant Vogtle. RII has no further questions regarding this c 2tter at this time.
IEB 78-10 Bergen Patterson Hydraulic Shock Suppressor Accumulator Spring Coils GPC committed by a letter dated August 11, 1978, that no Bergen-Patterson Hydraulic Shock Suppressors will be used at Plant Vcgtle.
RII has no further questions regarding this matter at this time.
6.
Review of Nonconformance Reports, Units 1 and 2 The inspection examined the nonconformance reports prepared since mid May 1978.
Since that time approximately 60 QA and non QA nonconformances in civil, 40 in mechanical and 25 in electrical have been written. The QA logbook shows that 11 civil nonconformances, 36 mechanical and all 25 electrical nonconformances are still open. Most of the nonccaformances report on incomplete documentation or shipping damage.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at Nuclear Power Plans, IE Ciccular 78-08 Units 1 and 2 The subject IE Circular written to bring the licensee's attention to deficiencies identified by other licensees and to highlight lessons
~ .. . . RII Rpt. Nos. 50-424/78-o and 50-425/78-6 I-3 learned was reviewed with GPC representatives. The file indicated that GPC normally forwards these IE Circulars to Bechtel for a review and reply. However, Vogtle's Architect-Engineer, Bechtel was not asked by _ - - GPC to evaluate and reply to IE Circular 78-08.
Vogtle management agreed to take steps immediately to correct the condition. This item is considered unresolved and is identified as 424/425/78-08-01, IE Circular 78-08 Evaluation.
8.
Training The inspection reviewed the implementation of training program as established by the Quality Assurance Manual ior the Georgia Fower site QA personnel. The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor has been directed to act as the site training administrator. His function is to assure that training is accomplished for all GPC QA site personnel keeping conplete records of training. The inspector examined the records of the Senior Quality Assurance Field Representative and the Quality Assurance Field Representative.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
9.
Exit Interview A management interview was held on site with those indicated in paragraph one at the conclusion of the inspection. The licensee was apprised of the scope and findings of the inspection which included: warehousing, concrete batch tickets, QC procedures, observations of work in process, and 10 CFR Part 21 considerations.
.. }}