IR 05000370/1982006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-370/82-06 on 820323-26.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previous Enforcement Items,Ie Bulletins,Electrical Components & Sys & QA Records
ML20052B890
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire
Issue date: 04/08/1982
From: Conlon T, Gibbons T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20052B886 List:
References
50-370-82-06, 50-370-82-6, IEB-80-21, NUDOCS 8205040112
Download: ML20052B890 (4)


Text

..

\\

'[

'of UNITED STATES f

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

+

g a

REGION Il

e 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W SUITE 3100

~'

t ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303

<

..;.,

.a Report No.

I,

/'

'

50-370/82-06

.

p

'

Licensee:

Duke Power Cempany

,

,, ' -

422 South Church Street

'

,

Charlotte, North Carolina 28242

,

Facility Name:.McGuire Unit 2 Docket No. 50-370

?

License No. CPPR-84 In'pection at McGuire site near Charlotte, North Carolina

-"-

P Y" ['I E Inspector: _

T. D. Gibbons Date Signed Approved by:

W U Ofh T. E. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs SUMMARY Inspection on March 23-26, 1982 Areas Inspected

',,

This routine, unannounced inspection involved 24 inspectar-hours on site in the areas of previous enforcement items, licensee identified items, IF Bulletin, Electrical Components and Systems, QA Procedures and Quality Records, Electrical Cable and Termination, Quality Records, InstrumentaJion Components and Systems, Quality Records, Instrumentation Cable and Terminations, Work, Work Activities and Quality Records.

Results Of the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

8 2 0 5 0 40 /1 G-

_

.

.

REPORT DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • J. T. Moore, Project Manager
  • M. 5. Starnes, Senior Construction Engineer
  • J. W. Willis, Project QA Engineer
  • E. B. Miller Senior QA Engineer NRC Resident Inspector
  • P. R. Eemis, SRI
  • P. C. Hopkins, RI
  • Attended exit interview 2.

Exit Interview

'

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 26, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings a.

(Closed) 370-81-21-01 (Violation) Failure to Follow Housekeeping Procedures. The licensee issued a response to this item on January 22, 1982.

The inspector examined the cabinets in the control room and found them acceptable.

The licensee is continuing to inspect these areas routinely.

b.

(Closed) 370-80-16-01 (Violation) Post Installation Damage to Cables.

The licensee response was issued on December 12, 1981. The inspector examined the reworked tray and conduits. The cables are now protected from damage. Temporary plywood covers have been installed to allow the welding machines to be placed on top of the trays.

c.

(Closed) 370-81-15-01 (Unresolved item) Fermanent Tray Marking.

The licensee's specification has been revised to require a permanent metal tag to identi fy the channel separation.

The metal tag will be installed over each non permanent tag.

4.

Unresolved Items

,

Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

-

-

.

.

'

5.

Independent Inspection Effort The inspector examined the cable terminations in several instrument racks in the control room.

The inspector examined the cable installation in the diesel generator rooms. The inspector observed test engineers preparing to start the diesel generators.

6.

Licensee Identified Items a.

(Closed)

Item 370/CDR81-09,

" Defective Rockbestos Cable" (10 CFR 50.55(e)). The final report was submitted on November 2,1981.

The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable. Unit 2 has none of the defective cables installed or in stock. New qualified cable has been requisitioned and will be installed by the cable installation program.

b.

(Closed) Item 370/81-01-03 " Emergency Diesel Generator Potential Transformers" (10 CFR 50.55(e)).

The final report was submitted on September 26, 1980. The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable. The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee personnel, reviewed supporting documentation, and observed representative samples of work to verify that the corrective actions iden ti fied in the report have been completed.

The potential

.

transformers have been replaced. The 8kv cable has been installed and

'

the circuiting changes have been completed.

7.

IE Bulleting (IEB)

(Closed) IE8 No. 80-21, Malcolm Valve Yokes, Unit 2.

Licensee letter of January 5, 1981 reports that the subject type valve yokes are not used for safety-related systems at the station, t

8.

Electrical (Components and Systems) Review of Quality Assurance Procedures and Review of Quality Records The inspector reviewed three relay coordination calculations to assure that they complied with the QAM in the areas of procedures, qualified review and corrective action.

The calculations reviewed included 4160V Motor i

Protection, 4160 switchgear load breaker to incoming line breaker and 600V motor control center to load center.

9.

Electrical (Cables and Terminations) Review of Quality Records

,

The inspector selected eleven non-conformance reports as follows; 13219, 13099, 12946, 12713, 12680, 10917, 10871, 11880, 11774, 12471 and 12207 for examination to assure that the SAR and QAM requirements were complied with

-

in the areas of completeness, legibility, review by management and corrective action status.

The records indicate appropriate corrective actions were take _.

.--

-

_-

i o

-

.

i

.

The inspector examined two QA audits on cable installation to assure that the audits were preformed as required and that corrective action was taken and documented. The corrective action included steps to prevent recurrence.

The audits selected were E-2-3-81 and E-2-4-81.

r 10.

Instrumentation (Components and Systems) Review of Quality Records The inspector selected the calibration records of two level switches, four pressure switches and one pressure gauge.

The records were examined to assure that the SAR requirements were complied with in the areas of calibration.

The level switches selected were 2FDLS 5050, and 2FDLS5051.

The pressure switches selected were 2LDPS 5310, 2LDPS5311, 2LDPS5300 and 2LDPS5301.

The pressure guage selected was 2KCPG5540. Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.

11.

Instrumentation (Cables and Terminations I) Observation of Work and Work Activities The inspector selected cable 2*CF-646 for examination to assure compliance with the requirements of the SAR and QAM in the areas of storage, handling, identification noncomformance control, issue of specified material, identification, work and QC procedure usage, size and type of cable, location routing, separation, protection, raceway identification and loading, terminations and inspections.

Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.

,

12.

Instrumentation (Cables and Termination I) Review of Quality Records The inspector selected cable 2*CF646 for examination of QC record to assure

compliance to the requirements of the SAR and QAM.

The records were examined in the areas of receiving inspection, acceptance, source inspection reports, certified test reports, size and type of cable, location, routing, separation, protection, raceway identi fication,

cable pulling, and terminations.

Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.

i