IR 05000369/2013503

IR 05000369-13-503 and 05000370-13-503; 08/05/2013 - 08/08/2013; McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Exercise Evaluation and Baseline Inspection

ML13238A232
Person / Time
Site:	Mcguire, McGuire
Issue date:	08/26/2013
From:	Brian Bonser NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1
To:	Capps S Duke Energy Corp
Linda K. Gruhler
References
IR-13-503
Download: ML13238A232 (8)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ust 26, 2013

SUBJECT:

MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION NRC EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000369/2013503 AND 05000370/2013503

Dear Mr. Capps:

On August 8, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results that were discussed on August 8, 2013, with you and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

No findings were identified based on the results of this inspection.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's

"Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.htmll (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Brian Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-369 and 50-370 License No. NPF-9 and NPF-17

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000369 & 370/2013-503 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

REGION II==

Docket Nos: 05000369 and 05000370 License Nos: NPF-9 and NPF-17 Report Nos: 05000369/2013503 and 05000370/2013503 Licensee: Duke Power Company LLC Facility: McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Location: Huntersville, NC Dates: August 5 - 8, 2013 Inspectors: M. Speck, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector W. Loo, Senior Health Physicist G. Croon, Resident Inspector (Oconee)

J. Laughlin, Emergency Preparedness Specialist Approved by: Brian Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000369/2013503 and 05000370/2013503; August 5 - 8, 2013; McGuire Nuclear Station,

Units 1 and 2; Exercise Evaluation and Baseline Inspection The report covered an announced inspection by one emergency preparedness inspector, one senior health physicist, one emergency preparedness specialist, and one resident inspector. No findings were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP1 Exercise Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the arrival onsite, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation, Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b)(14).

The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:

The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on August 6, 2013, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10)which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.

The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).

Other performance areas, such as: the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.

Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).

The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on August 8, 2013, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the Performance Indicators (PI)listed below for the period October 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.

Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)

Emergency Response Organization Readiness (ERO)

Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS)

For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the ERO PI for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the Attachment.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for each of the three Emergency Preparedness PI, i.e., DEP, ERO, and ANS, on an annual basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

On August 8, 2013, the lead inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. S. Capps, Site Vice President, and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

M. Austin, Fleet Emergency Preparedness Manager

D. Brewer, Organizational Effectiveness Manager

J. Bryant, Licensing Engineer

R. Burris, EP Facilities and Equipment Coordinator

S. Capps, Site Vice President

H. Gibson, Emergency Preparedness Staff Emergency Services

C. Morris, Station Manager

K. Murray, Emergency Preparedness Manager

M. Mulkey, Emergency Preparedness staff

J. Nolin, Engineering Manager

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

None