IR 05000341/1978013

Insp Rept 50-341/78-13 on 780830-31 & 0901.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Electrical Raceway & Cable Installations,Training,Qa Program & Action of Previous Insp Findings

ML20062B902
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	09/26/1978
From:	Barrett P, Julie Hughes, Spessard R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062B901	List: IR 05000341/1978013 ML20062B898
References
TASK-OS, TASK-RS-519-1 50-341-78-13, NUDOCS 7811020168
Download: ML20062B902 (10)

Text

a

'

.

.

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

.

Report No. 50-341/78-13 Docket No. 50-341 License No. CPPR-87 Licensee: The Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, MI 48226 Facility Name: Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 Inspection At: Fermi Site, Monroe, MI Inspection Conducted: A ust 30-31 and September 1, 1978 Inspector (s): es

__

"Ib [

v P. A et f*E $~l$

f f'swjvL y> s ,5 -

L Spessard, Chief ' !7f'

MsM Approved By:

Engineering Support Section 1 Inspection Summarv_

Inspection on August 30-31 and September 1, 1978 (Report No. 50-341/78-13)

l Areas Inspected: Electrical raceway and cable installation; l

personnel training; contractor QA program; and licensee action on l

previous inspection findings. The inspection involved a total of

'

44 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspector Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.

!

l N7 2.03 0 ( IoS

l f

'

.

.

DETAILS Persons Contacted

, Principal Liceno?e Emplovees

.

• Everett, Project Superintendent

• R. W. Barr, Project QA Director

• T. A. Alessi, Director QA

• H. A. Walker, Project QA Engineer

• W. A. Fahrner, Proj ect Manager

• L. E. Schuerman, Licensing Engineer

• J. Nunley, Assistant Project Engineer

• A. Alexiou, Assistant Project Superintendent

• C. J. Miller, QA Engineer P. Cribbs, QA Engineer J. D. Ryan, Project Site Quality Assurance Engineer Other Personnel

• E. Seifert, Project Manager, Daniel International Corporation (DI)

• J. G. Bolt, Project QA Manager, DI

• J. T. Blixt, Acting Project QC Manager, DI

• C. W. Kostbade, Electrical QC, DI

L. F. Hack, QC Manager, L. K. Comstock The inspectors also talked with and interviewed several other licensee and contractor employees, including members of the quali;i, technical, and engineering staff * Denotes those attending the exit intervie Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Noncompliance (341/78-08-05) - Inadequate corrective action with regard to noncompliance number 77-10-06 subsections 1.d(2),

l.d(3), and 1.d(7). Noncompliance 77-10-06 identified deficient installation records, (Form 19 - Weld Inspection Checklist), for switchgear buses No. 65E and 72 Also, as identified in IE Report No. 78-08, L. K. Comstock Field Surveillance Correction Reports, FSCR, No. 272 and 281 indicated an installation drawing which referenced an inaccurate standard for grounding. The corrective action taken with regard to noncompliance No. 77-10-06 subsection 1.d(2), 1.d(3), and 1.d(7) has been verified and closed in IE Report No. 78-10. During this inspection, the inspector reviewed additional installation records, Form 19, which had been completed indicating reinspection of the plug welds. Training relevant to Form 19 has been documented as being ecepleted on the Training Attendance Log dated July 24, 1978. New FSCRs (No. 600-606 and 608-612) have replaced FSCR No. 272 and 231 to identify the proper drawings and grounding standard. Design Change Notice No. 1001 har-2-

.

buen written and properly posted to identify the correct grounding standard on installation drawing No. 6E721-2832-5 Revision (Closed) Inspector Followup Item (341/78-08-09) - FSCR No. 486 dated May 5,1978, " Splices on wires at connection terminal points for penetration T23-01-X-103" was closed out without followup documentation. The RIII inspector reviewed nonconformance report

"

DDR(E) 1965. Disposition of the DDR is for Conax Corporation to do a prototype test for environmental conditions of the splice -

materials when Conax performs tests on terminal blocks and boxe The licenses stated that Conax is scheduled to due the prototype test for the electrical penetration terminal blocks and boxes (341/78-08-08) in mid-September. The RIII inspector will review prototype test reports, when they are availabl (Closed) Inspector Followup Item (341/78-08-10) - Electrical penetration assembly T23-01-X-104E was dropped during installatio Disposition of DDR 211(E-1707) was to pressure test the penetration

' to 10 psi for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. However, the RIII inspector expressed concern about using a lower pressure than the original test pressure of 63 psi. The inspector reviewed nonconformance DDR(E)2023 which supersedes DDR(E)1707 to determine if the revised d1sposition was adequate. The Detroit Edison Field Engineering disposition for DDR(E)2023 states in part: "a pneumatic test using Conax leak test procedure (IPS-84.1 paragraph 4.1.7) will be performed on penetration 104E. If the penetration meets this test criteria the penetration will be acceptable."

(Closed) Unresolved Item (341/78-10-04) - L. K. Comstock QA Procedure 4.1.4, Indoctrination and Trsining, not clearly defining the qualification requirements for a level II inspector. The RIII inspector reviewed the revised QA procedure 4.1.4 and determined it to be adequat (Open) Unresolved Item (341/78-08-06) - Electrical contractor's QA/QC program breakdown and Daniel International Corporation (DIC),

show cause letter dated May 24, 1978. DIC issued an extension of the interface program plan and evaluation period on September 1, 197 This extension was granted due to the recent arrival of the new L. K. Comstock QC Manager. The extension letter states in part:

"the Interface Program Plan and evaluation period shall be extended until October 1, 1978. If during this evaluation period it is determined that the nev QC manager has established the necessary discipline and control over the QA Program and corrective action status is adequate, the number of Daniel QA/QC personnel directly involved can be reduced." The RIII inspector reviewed a summary of L. K. Comstock's action plan progress and determined that answers to thirty-four out of thirty-seven Daniel Audit Finding Reports (AFR) have been submitted to Daniel's QA department for close-out; eighteen have been closed by Danic 's QA. L. K. Cemstock has made twelve revisions to their QA Manual to correct deficiencies that were identified in Daniel's QA audits. The inspector reviewed Daniel's QC evaluation reports on L. K. Comstock's training-3-

. __ _-

.

program; the reports indicate the program is adequate. Additionally, the RIII inspector interviewed DECO's site QA Manager and Daniel's Project QA Manager relative to their assessment of LKC's progress during the past two months. The consensus is that L. K. Constock has turned their program around and that with the addition of a new QC Manager full implementation of their program should be evidenced by October 1, 197 .

Functional or Program Areas Inspected Details of functional or program areas inspected are documented in Sections I and I . _ _ _ _ - -

~ __

.

1 .

.

Section I l

Prepared by P. A. Barrett Reviewed by R. L. Spessard, Chief Engineering Support Section 1

,

.

i 1. Observation of Recent Electrical Work Activities a. The RIII inspector observed and discussed with the pertinent QA and craf t personnel the following installed raceway sections for the Control Rod Drive System:

. Wirevay #41-014 per Deco drawing #61721-2866-2 Rev. A

. Wireway d41-006 per DECO drawings #6I721-2866-8 Rev. B and 6E721-2801-9 Rev. B (

. Wirevays #11-006,11-007,11-010 and 11-011 per DECO drawings #6I721-2866-8 Rev. E and #6E721-2801-9 Rev..B The QC and craft personnel were knowledgeable of the installation requirements. The wirevays were tack welded, grounded, and identified in accordance Sargent & Lundy Standard #EB-117.57, Design Change Request #E-0865 Rev. B, and Design Change Notice #393 dated December 15, 1977, respectively. The routing, separation (except as noted),

segregation, absence of sharp edges, hanger spacing, and cleanliness were in accordance with the drawings and L. K. Comstock Work Instruction #000-03-021 dated February 10, 1978. Wireway #11-006, as installed, violated the cable tray separation criteria. The violation was properly documented

,

and controlled on Deviation Disposition Request #295 dated August 14, 197 The RIII inspector observed the following two installed Class IE panels:

l Fuse Panel #C71-P002D, Scram Solenoid Panel l

i Hil-P610, Reactor Protection System Test and Monitoring Panel Both panels, supplied by Ceneral Electric, used spade lugs for internal wire terminations. The pertinent Detroit Edison purchase specification #3071-39 Rev. B i -5-l

,

- - - , - - -. -- -- , - - - , , . - --,,-w- ,.--- - , --

.

dated January 14, 1972, did not specify the type of lugs to be used. The inspector inquired as to whether the spade lugs used in these panels meet the seismic criteria of the Fermi 2 site. The documentation supplied with these panels included only Product Quality Certifications from General Electric which did not indicate whether the

,

spade lugs were seismically qualified or not. The licensee stated that there is a scheduled audit of General Electric by Detroit Edison within the next two months, which would verify the validity of the Product Quality Certifications. The licensee stated that the seismic qualification of the spade lugs would be pursued during that audit. This matter is unresolved. (341/78-13-01) The RIII inspector observed the following four installed Class IE cables in Control Rod Drive wireway: #251102-22, 232015-22, 2000289-2C and 200598A-2C.

I The cables were properly routed in accordance with the pull cards. The raceway was free of sharp edges and grounded. The separation criteria, identification, bend radius, and sealed cable ends were in accordance with L. K. Comstock Work Instruction #000-03-008 dated July 21, 1978 and related document The RIII inspector observed the following completed cable terminations:

Cable #200028B-2C from end Cable #200598A-2C from and (partial)

Cable #200597C-2C to and from ends Cable #2000213-2C to and from ends The following termination chsracteristics were in accordance with the pull cards, L. K. Comstock Work Instruction #000-03-019 dated August 15, 1978, and Detroit Edison Specification

1. 3071-128 Standard #EA-3-1:

Cable supports, color / numeric code, crimped lugs, conductors identified, separation criteria maintained, properly dressed conductors, and tight connection No itecs of noncompliance were identifie . Record Review of Recent Electrical Work Activities The RIII inspector reviewed the following records concerning the aformentioned observed installations: Cable Tray Installation Inspection Check List (L. K. Comstock Form 17) for wireways #41-014,41-006, and 11-00 _ ._

\

.

l

,

,

. Cable Pull Cards and Cable Pull Checklists (L. K. Comstock Form #37) for cables #251102-22, 232015-22, 2000283-2C and 200598A-2 Control / Instrument Cable Termination Inspection Checklist (L. K. Comstock Form #36) for cables #200598A-2C (from and),

200597C-2C (from and to ends), and 2000213-2C (from end).

.

The records identified the inspector, the~ type of observation, the governing documents, the results, the acceptability, and action taken in connection with noted deficiencies. The records were identifiable and retrievabl No items of noncompliance were identified.

l

!

l l

i i

l l

l t-7-l l

,

-

.-

Section II Prepared by J. Hughes Reviewed by R. L. Spessard, Chief Engineering Support Section 1

. Containment (Penetrations) - Work Activities The RIII inspector verified installation of electrical penetration assemblies T23-01-X-102B and T23-01-X-103 Methods of installation of components are consistent with the following:

(1) Design drawings 6E721-2831-8 and 6E721-2831-31; and (2) Conax Installation Manual IPS-84.1. Revision Measures are established to protect the installed components from construction debris, physical damage and hostile environments. Plywood covers are placed over exposed ends of the electrical penetrations inside and outside containmen No testing of the installed components has been done as of this inspection. However, 15 psi of nitrogen is maintained

for an integrity seal during construction of the plan QC inspection activities were being performed in accordance with established procedures (L. K. Comstock's Work Instruction 000-03-014) and by properly qualified personnel.

,

2. Electrical - Observation of Work Activities l

l The RIII inspector observed work areas and activities pertaining to terminations of cables, installation of conduit and valve l

(motor) operators. Results are as follows: Terminations at H1100-P820 (Nuclear Steam Supply Ternination Cabinet): cables were being properly terminated, i.e.,

proper lugs used, calibrated crinping tools used, mini =um bending radius was not exceeded, cable identification tags j

were being installed, and separation criteria inside control panels, i. e. , 6" to 12" being maintained. The cables which

' were selected for observation included: 214221-2C, 214261-2C,

-8-A

, -

.

.

l 214201-2C and 214281-2C. The drawing which was used (61721-2041-1) during the installations was found to be of current revision. L. K. Comstock Cable Termination and Splicing Procedure and Work Instruction 000-03-019 dated August 11, 1978, was used during the installations. The L. K. Comstoc * QC inspector and craf t personnel, who were

~

,

observed, were knowledgeable of the installation requirement During inspection of the 4160V switchgear room, the inspector expressed concern relative to the installation of rigid conduit mounted to seismic Class I equipment. Prior to the completion of the inspection, the licensee's engineering department issued Design Change Notice 1199 to specification 3071-128, STD-ED which states in part: "1il existing conduit terminating at Class I equipment that does not conform with item 8.8.1 of the specification (as of August 30, 1978)

will be analyzed for acceptability." This matter is unresolve (341/78-13-02)

7 Two limitorque valve operations (motors), that were stored in the auxiliary and reactor buildings, were inspected to determine if the stem nuts were secured by locking nuts and that the top thread of lock nuts were crimped or staked in 2 places in accordance with Limitorque Instruction and Maintenance Manual, SMBI-170. The aforementioned' valve operators were staked, as required. However, the inspector expressed concern to the licensee, relative to all QA Level I Limitorque operators which are installed and/or being installed that existing receipt inspection and/or installation procedures do not require a similar inspection. The licensee indicated that, in their view, this inspection was the responsibility of the vendo Prior to the completion of the inspection, twenty limitorque valve operators were inspected at random by Daniel QC personnel and two operators were found that did not have their lock nut staked, as required. As a result, Daniel International Corporation and Wismar-Becker QC personnel issued nonconfornance report DDR(M)2043 which requires in part that this inspection i

be included as a specific check item for each Limitorque

'

operator, that inspection records be available for QC audit, and thzs the vendor be contacted abcut this problem. This matter is unresolved. (341/78-13-03)

Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, item of noncompliance, or deviations. Unlesolved items disclosed during the inspection are discussed in Section I, paragraph 1.b. and Section II, paragraphs 2.b. and .

.

Exit Interview The inspectors met with site staff representatives (denoted in the Persons Contacted paragraph) at the conclusion of the inspection on September 1, 1978. The inspectors summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The licensee acknowledged the finding .

b (

.

a

%

g N

- k

%.

s )

.

m s

s S,

,

h s A

-

'

,

s

\ -

s N' s

I h

%

t t

N

%

%

-

10.-

s

's

. - , , - _ . . . - - - _

w, g - . -- -. _ _

__