IR 05000327/1993051
| ML20062K314 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 12/13/1993 |
| From: | Mcguire D, Tillman A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062K295 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-327-93-51, 50-328-93-51, NUDOCS 9312220016 | |
| Download: ML20062K314 (2) | |
Text
- _.
,-
.
.. _.
l
' -
o UNITED STATES g#p arc %,t
. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g*
-
E 101 MARIETTA STREET N.W., SUITE 2900 REGloN 11
,
,
p ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 0199 t;
- .:
%,...../
\\
l Report Nos.
50-327/93-51 and 50-328/93-51 l
Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 6N 38A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street
'
Chattanooga, TN. 37402-2801 Docket Nos.
50-327 and 50-328 License Nos. DPR-77 and DPR-79 Facility Name:
Sequoyah 1 and 2 Inspection Con ucted!
NovemberJ5-19,1993
,
Inspector:
/d J-~[( IIN b
/M/f d
/
A.Tilgman%(SafeguardsInspector
' 0' ate Signed Accompanying Personnel: D. Thompson,SafeguardsInspector s
-
/
Approved by:_
D. McGuire, Chief Date Signed Safeguards Section Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, announced inspection was conducted in the areas of Physical Security Program for Power Reactors, specifically: Management Support, Security Program Plans and Implementing Procedures, and Security Program Audit; Physical Barriers, Protected and Vital areas; Access Control -
Personnel, Packages and Vehicles; Compensatory Measures and Communications.
In addition, the status of the licensee's programmed upgrade of physical security systems and facilities was reviewed.
Results:
In the areas inspected, one apparent violation relating to six licensee identified events of failure to comply with procedural requirements for access control was confirmed.
Review and observation of routine security operational activities during the course of the inspection verified that the licensee was in compliance with regulatory requirements and commitments of the approved Physical Security Plan with the exception of the failure to comply with procedural requirements as noted above. The Security Force was adequately staffed and demonstrated an acceptable level of job knowledge and performance canabilitv.
Further review confirmed continued progress in the installation 9312220016 931215 m
PDR ADDCK 05000327
,, w c vn.e-o G
PDR su e ws n
, w, r SAFEGUARDS INFORM /; TION b
~
.
.
..
.
. _
=
.
.
h
.-
..
,
and implementation of the security system upgrade. However, the scheduled completion date of October 30, 1993, had been exceeded and a new schedule for
,
completion of the system upgrade had not been established, due in part to identification of deficiencies in the security system computer software.
Testing by licensee technicians to resolve the deficiencies was observed by the inspectors.
.
i l
f.
_
6AFEGUAR1DS INFogtv A, TION
" - - " - * * " - *
'
" ~ ~ ~ ~ " - ~ ~ - ~
i
- " ~ ' " ~ _ ~ _ ' ~,.,
'
-,- n -
-
-
..
.