IR 05000327/1993006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-327/93-06 & 50-328/93-06 on 930201-05.No Violations Noted.Details Withheld Ref 10CFR73.21.Major Areas Inspected:Security Program Plans, Security Audits & Physical Security Upgrade Program
ML20034F064
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 02/24/1993
From: Mcguire D, Thompson D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20034F057 List:
References
50-327-93-06, 50-327-93-6, 50-328-93-06, 50-328-93-6, NUDOCS 9303020235
Download: ML20034F064 (1)


Text

,([#

%,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISslON

Q UNITED STATES

.

'

n REGION 11

,. $

101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.

$

~s A TLANTA, GEORGt A 30323

%...../

.

.

Report Nos.

50-327/93-06 and 50-328/93-06 License: Tennessee Valley Authority 3B Lookout Place

,

1101 Market Street l

Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 j

Docket Nos.

50-327 and 50-328 License Nos. DPR-77 and DPR-79 i

Facility Name:

Sequoyah I and 2

Inspection Conducted:

Februar 1-5, 1993 Inspector:

h /M4M h Y/

b MONI[

D. Thoinpson, SafeguardsLinspector Date Signed Accompanying Personnel:

D. McGuire February 4-5,'1993

,

0. Masnyk February 4-5, 1993 Approved by:

I2

@2

D. McGuire, Chief Date Signed

~

Safeguards Section

!

Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards i

i SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of Security

!

Program Plans, Security Audits; Protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers; Detection and Assessment Aids; Alarm Station; Training and Qualification and Physical Security Upgrade Program.

j Results:

i

In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identified.

l Management was supportive of the security program. The on-going security q

upgrade was well managed by a security engineer. A weekly working group

meeting was conducted to ensure each individual responsible for selected actions was aware of the status of their projects. The licensee's security

training was effective. Security audits were thorough.

Protected and vital

'

area barriers were adequate.

r

k g{fgM % N

-

$d Ohbh yo

7 G

,

,

-.

- -..

-.

-

.-

. - -.

-