IR 05000313/1986024
| ML20203L261 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/1986 |
| From: | Murray B, Nicholas J, Wise R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20203L258 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-2.B.3, TASK-TM 50-313-86-24, 50-368-86-25, NUDOCS 8608250410 | |
| Download: ML20203L261 (15) | |
Text
.
.
,
.
APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
NRC Inspection Report:
50-313/86-24 Licenses:
Dockets:
50-313 50-368 Licensee!
Arkansas Power & Light Company (AP&L)
P. O. Box 551 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Facility-Name:
Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2
_
Inspection At:
ANO Site,'Russellville, Pope County, Arkansas
'
Inspection Conducted:
July 14-23, 1986 Inspectors:
. 6. Nicholas, Senior Radiation Specialist Date Facilities Radiation Protection Section
/
. Wise, Radiation Specialist, Facilities Date Radiological Protection Section
_'
/8,M
,
'
'
/
Approved:
g p
B. M6rray, Chief, Facilities Radiological Date Protection Section Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted July 14-23, 1986 (Report 50-313/86-24; 50-368/86-25)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee's secondary chemistry and radiochemistry programs, including organization, staff qualifications, training, administrative and analytical procedures, facilities and equipment, quality assurance (QA) program for chemistry / radiochemistry activities, postaccident sampling system (PASS), quality control (QC) of analytical measurements, and radiochemistry confirmatory measurements.
Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were ide.nti fied.
One deviation and three previously identified open items were closed.
8608050410 860320 PDR ADOCK 05000313 PDR
,
--
-.
.
..
-
. -. _ - -. -,. -
.
- -.
.-
.
.
.
,
w DETAILS
, :
.,
,
1.
Persons Contacted AP&L
'
-.,
- J.tM.~Levine, Director, Site Nuclear Operations
- T. C. Baker, Technical Analysis Superintendent B. L. Bata, QA Engineer
.-
- P. L. Campbell,-Plant Licensing Engineer
~
' D. R. Coker, Assistant Chemistry Supervisor
-
- G. L. Fiser, Radiochemistry Supervisor
'
M. E. Frala, Assistant Radiochemistry Supervisor
- *R. S. Gillespie, Chemistry / Environmental Supervisor
'
.
- D. C. Harris, Lead Trainer, Chemistry / Radiochemistry L. Hodges, Training Instructor, Chemistry / Radiochemistry
- D. Howard, Manager, Special Projects i
- L. W. Humphrey, General Manager, Nuclear Quality R. L. Jones, Assistant Chemistry Supervisor
,
- D. O. Lomax, Plant Licensing Supervisor R. D. McCormick, Senior Radiochemist
.
W. C. McKelvy, Assistant Radiochemistry Supervisor
- W. R. Pool, Assistant Radiochemis,try Supervisor G. D. Provencher, QA Supervisor P. C. Robbins, Assistant Chemistry Supervisor J. L. Taylor-Brown, QC Supervisor J. D. Vandergriff, Training Manager Others
- W. D. Johnson, Senior NRC Resident Inspector C. C. Harbuck, NRC Resident Inspector
- Denotes those present during the exit briefing on July 23, 1986.
.
2.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Inspection Findings
(Closed) Deviation (313 & 368/8326-01):
Radiochemistry Technician Qualifications - This deviation involved the lack of procedures for the
'
determination of acceptable radiochemistry experience for chemistry and radiochemistry technicians and the hiring of chemistry and radiochemistry technicians who did not meet the experience qualification requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's
,
'
Procedure 1072.006, " Chemist and Radiochemist Shif t Staff Qualification Requirements,"' Revision 0, May 27, 1986, which establishes education and experience criteria for shift qualification of chemistry and radiochemistry personnel.
The NRC inspectors verified that the licensee was meeting the requirements of the above referenced procedure.
This deviation is considered closed.
,
s-7
-w.-y-
- -. -
-
, - - - -- --.
.-p-y
.
,-eyy.9-4----tw--&-
.--ec--
.v.,--
-
--w--w
-.+- -.
%~----,-
,
- +
wa-g w
-
,
,,
,
r
.
.; -
,
o
-
,
~
.
,.
-
,
-
%
(Closed) Open Item (313/8212-02 and 368/8225-02):
Selection and Qualification Criteria for Chemistry and Radiochemistry Personnel - This item involved the lack of procedures to provide acceptable selection and qualification criteria for hiring chemistry and radiochemistry personnel.
The licensee had written and implemented Procedure 1072.006, " Chemist and Radiochemist Shift Staff Qualification Requirements," Revision 0, May 27, 1986, which establishes acceptable selection and qualification criteria for shift chemistry and radiochemistry personnel.
The NRC inspectors verified that the licensee was meeting the requirements of the above referenced procedure.
This item is considered closed.
(Closed) Open Item (313/8212-03 and 368/8225-03):
Chemistry and Radiochemistry Training - This item involved the lack of a formal training and retraining program for chemistry and radiochemistry personnel.
The licensee had written and implemented an approved qualification / training program for ANO chemistry and radiochemistry personnel.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the training program as described by procedures and lesson plans and determined that it was adequate to train and qualify ANO chemistry and radiochemistry personnel.
This item is considered closed.
(Closed) Open Item (313/8214-09 and 368/8211-09):
Postaccident Sampling and Analyzing Capability - This item involved the lack of a fully operational PASS to meet the requiremants of NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3.
The NRC inspectors verified that the licensee had implemented a routine
>
surveillance and preventative maintenance program for Units 1 and 2 PASS and demonstrated operational capability in compliance with NUREG-0737.
This item is considered closed.
.
3.
Inspector Observations The following are observations the NRC inspectors discussed with the licensee during the inspection and at the exit briefing on July 23, 1986.
These observations are neither violations nor unresolved items.
These items were recommended for license.e consideration for progra,m improvement,
,
but they have no specific regulatory requirement.
The licensee stated the
,
items would be reviewed.
.
a.
Technical Analysis Section Personnel Training - The personnel from the Little Rock Technical Analysis Section should consider attending the chemistry / radiochemistry training offered at the ANO training center (see paragraph 6).
b.
Secondary Chemistry Quality Control - The licensee should document the performance of the quarterly response check of the Orbisphere portable oxygen analyzer on an appropriate laboratory log (see paragraph 7).
c.
Radiochemistry Sampling Procedures - The licensee should include in all radiochemistry sampling procedures specific sample volumes to be collected to provide consistency in sampling and procedure format (see paragraph 7).
.
.
4.
Chemistry and Radiochemistry Organization and Management Controls The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's organization and staffing of the chemistry section (CS) and radiochemistry section (RS) to determine adherence to commitments in Chapter 12.1 of the Unit 1 Updated. Safety Analysis Report (USAR) and Chapter 13.1 of the Unit 2 USAR and the requirements in Section 6.2 of Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications (TS).
The NRC inspectors verified that the organizational structure of the CS and RS were as. defined in the USAR, TS, and ANO procedures.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the ANO staff assignments, management controls, and posit' ion descriptions for the assignment of responsibilities for the management and implementation of the ANO chemistry and radiochemistry programs'.
The;NRC inspectors verified that the administrative control responsibilities specified by the ANO procedures were being implemented.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the staffing of the CS and RS and noted that since the previous NRC chemistry / radiochemistry inspection in June 1985, the CS had lost one chemistry technician to the Little Rock Technical Analysis Section and that position had been filled.
The RS had experienced no changes.
The AN0 CS and RS organizational structures and staffing were determined to be in accordance with licensee commitments.
No violations or deviations were identified.
5.
Chemistry and Radiochemistry Personnel Qualifications The NRC inspectors reviewed the qualifications of the chemistry and radiochemistry personnel to determine adherence to commitments in Chapter 12.1.3 of the Unit 1 USAR and Chapter 13.1.3 of the Unit 2 USAR and the requirements in Section 6.3 of Units 1 and 2 TS.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the education and experience backgrounds of the present chemistry and radiochemistry staffs and determined that 5 out of the 16 radiochemistry technicians and that 7 out of the 21 chemistry technicians did not meet the experience qualification requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971.
All present staff members except for one recently hired chemistry technician will meet the experience qualification requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971 by June 1987.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's Procedure 1072.006, " Chemist and Radiochemist Shift Staff Qualification Requirements," Revision 0, May 27, 1986, which establishes selection and qualification criteria for shift chemistry and radiochemistry personnel in accordance with licensee's commitments made to the NRC in the licensee's letter BCAN098503 dated September 6, 1985.
A review of shift staffing for both chemistry and radiochemistry indicated that the licensee was in agreement with the commitments made and agreed to by the NRC in the above referenced letter and procedure.
The NRC inspectors also noted that all five radiochemistry shifts included a member meeting the qualification requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971 and that three of the five chemistry shifts had a member who was ANSI N18.1-1971
_-.
_ _ - _.
.
.
.
qualified.
The two remaining chemistry shifts will include an ANSI qualified member in December 1986.
The NRC inspectors determined that the licensee had an adequate staff to meet shift staffing requirements.
No violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Chemistry and Radiochemistry Training Program The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's chemistry and radiochemistry training program to determine adherence to commitments in Chapter 12.2 of the Unit 1 USAR and Chapter 13.2 of the Unit 2 USAR and the requirements in Section 6.4 of the Units 1 and 2 TS.
The NRC inspector discussed the training program for chemistry and radiochemistry personnel with the lead trainer and instructor for chemistry / radiochemistry.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the training department staf f qualifications, position assignments, facilities,
'
implementing procedures, introductory course outline, and training schedule.
Training which was performed from July 1985 through July 1986 was reviewed.
The NRC inspectors reviewed Procedure.1063.12,
" Chemistry / Radiochemistry Training Sequence," Revision 1, draft, which was in the final stages of approval review and found it adequate to direct and document the training of the chemistry and radiochemistry personnel.
The NRC inspectors noted that the licensee had recently submitted to the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations a self evaluation report describing the training program and objectives as determined by position task analyses.
The NRC inspectors noted during the review of training attendance that personnel from the Little Rock Technical Analysis Section were not attending chemistry / radiochemistry specialized training being conducted at the ANO training center.
Since this technical support staff is performing tasks relative to the AN0 TS, it would seem advantageous for them to receive the ANO specialized chemistry / radiochemistry training.
The NRC inspectors discussed this observation with the licensee at the
'
exit briefing. The licensee agreed to evaluate this observation.
The licensee's training department representative indicated that the training schedule could be made available to the Technical Analysis Section personnel.and th'ey would be welcome to attend any classes at their convenience.
- No violations'or deviations were identified.
.
7.
Chemistry and Radiochemistry Programs The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's chemistry and radiochemistry programs to determine adherence to commitments in Chapters 4, 9, and 11 of the Unit 1 USAR and Chapters 5, 9, and 11 of the Unit 2 USAR and the requirements in Sections 3.1.5, 3.10, and 6.8 of the Unit 1 TS and Sections 3/4.4.7, 3/4.4.8, and 6.8 of the Unit 2 TS.
,
f
-.-
- -,, - -
- -. - -,.. -.
,
- -., _.,,
,,, _.-_,-,-
_-
-.
,
..
.
.
~
.
.
- '
,
.
-
.
_
The NRC inspectors' review of the chemistry and radiochemistry programs found that the licensee had revised and approved administrative
..
procedures,~ surveillance procedures, chemical control procedures, instrument calibration,and. quality control procedures, and analytical procedures.
A review of selected procedures revised and written since the
- previous NRC-inspection in June 1985 and of analytical data indicated that the CS and RS had established sufficient programmatic procedures to meet the requirements of the USAR and TS.
L The NRC inspectors reviewed chemistry logs and records of completed chemical and radiochemical analyses and determined that the required analyses were being performed as required and in accordance with procedure.
The' review also included discussions of the recorded trends of the water quality data with the chemistry personnel and reactor coolant chemistry parameters with the radiochemistry personnel.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the records of out-of-specification chemical and radiochemical parameters and the licensee's corrective actions taken when chemical parameters did not meet established limits.
The NRC inspectors
"
reviewed the effectiveness of the water chemistry program to measure and prevent the introduction of chemical contaminants into secondary water systems and found the licensee's limits established according to the Electric Power Research Institute owner's group guidelines for pressurized water reactor secondary water chemistry.
The NRC inspectors held interviews with CS and RS personnel and determined that staff at all levels understood the importance and need for water chemistry control.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the occupational exposure (person rem) to plant personnel as it relates to water chemistry control and found no increased occupational exposure as a result of poor water chemistry.
A review of recent eddy current testing of Unit 2 steam generator tubes indicated very little, if any, denting and a clean system.
The NRC inspectors noted during the review of radiochemistry sampling procedures that in several procedures the sample volumes to be collected were not specified.
This observation was discussed with the licensee at the exit briefing.
The licensee agreed to evaluate radiochemistry sampling procedures with regard to this observation.
The NRC inspectors verified that the chemistry laboratory instruments and radiochemistry laboratory instruments had been calibrated according to procedures and an instrument QC program had been implemented. The inspectors noted that the quarterly response check of the Orbisphere portable oxygen analyzer was not being documented.
This observation was discussed with the chemistry staff and it was determined that the response check was being performed but that there was no place on the laboratory forms to record the results.
The licensee agreed to evaluate the need for such documentation.
AN0 participates in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
non-radiological crosscheck program for total suspended solids, pH, oil
.
.
.
and grease, and biological oxygen demand.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the EPA crosscheck results for 1985 and 1986.
The RS has implemented an internal laboratory analytical accuracy assessment program to verify
_ performance of radiochemistry technicians on analytical procedures.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the 1985 and 1986 results of the internal
analytical assessment program and found that they demonstrated a high
'
quality, analytical capability.
No v'iolations or deviations were identified.
.
'8.
Facilities and Equipment The NRC inspectors inspected the facilities and equipment used by the CS and RS staff.
The following facilities were inspected:
secondary chemistry laboratory, radiochemistry counting room, PASS area, and chemistry and radiochemistry personnel work areas.
The laboratories were equipped with the necessary chemicals, reagents, labware, and analytical instrumentation to perform the required analytical procedures.
The facilities inspected had not been changed since the previous NRC inspection of these areas in June 1985.
The NRC inspectors noted that several new items of analytical instrumentation had been installed in the chemistry laboratory.
It was also noted that a new secondary chemistry sampling and process instrumentation panel for Unit 1 is scheduled to be installed during the next refueling outage.
Personnel working in the primary chemistry sampling areas and radiochemistry laboratories are no longer routinely required to wear respiratory protection equipment. This should result in less radiation exposure during sampling and analysis, due to increased speed and efficiency.
The NRC inspectors verified that the PASS equipment was operational for Unit 1.
No violations or deviations were identified.
9.
Quality Assurance Audit Program
,
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's QA organization and audit program regarding chemistry and radiochemistry activities to determine adherence to commitments in Chapter 13.4 in the Unit 2 USAR and requirements in Section 6.5 of the Units 1 and 2 TS.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the QA department organization, selected QA audit procedures, audit schedule for 1985 and 1986, QA auditor qualifications, and audit reports.
The NRC inspectors reviewed Quality Assurance Procedure QAP-22 and the audit report QAP-22-85 which was generated from the audit performed of the secondary chemistry and radiochemistry programs dated December 17, 1985.
The NRC inspectors noted that three audit findings had been issued as well as several observations and recommendations.
The NRC inspectors reviewed the corrective actions taken to address the findings and observations and found two of the findings closed and the remaining one scheduled to be closed by July 31, 1986.
The audit observations were reviewed with the CS and RS staffs and most of the observations had been resolved.
The NRC inspectors also
~.
.-
.
-
~
.
.
'
.
,
reviewed QAP-28-86, " Audit of Little Rock General Office Technical Analysis," completed April 3, 1986, for scope and thoroughness of program evaluation.
The licensee was taking corrective action to resolve the four i
audit findings and nine observations..The NRC inspectors found the QA
,
audit program for chemistry and radiochemistry adequate and corrective
. actions and responses to audit findings and observations timely.
No violations or deviations were identified.
10.
Postaccident Sampling System
'
The NRC' inspectors reviewed the licensee's PASS to determine adherence to commitments.in Chapter 9.2 of the Unit 1 USAR and Chapter 9.3.2.2.4 of the
. Unit 2 USAR and the requirements of NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3.
'
The NRC inspectors inspected the PASS building and installed hardware.
The NRC inspectors verified that the equipment and associated procedures
,
satisfied the requirements of NUREG-0737, Item II.B.3, for representative sampling and analysis of reactor coolant and containment atmosphere following a reactor _ incident.
The licensee had completed PASS operator training for all radiochemistry technicians as part of their shift qualification.
Requalification training on PASS was being conducted every 6 months.
The NRC inspectors verified that the licensee had established and implemented a routine surveillance and preventative maintenance program for Units 1 and 2 PASS.
The NRC inspectors reviewed weekly surveillance reports ~for the period June 1985 through July 1986 and found the licensee in agreement with their surveillance requirements.
The licensee demonstrated PASS operability on Unit 1 by collecting an undiluted sample of reactor coolant and performing a boron analysis.
The analytical i
results from the PASS sample were compared with boron analysis results from a reactor coolant grab sample performed earlier in the day.
The
licensee could not demonstrate PASS operability on Unit 2 during the
,
!
inspection due to the refueling outage condition of the unit.
The NRC
/
!
inspectors determined that the licensee's procedures and analytical L
sensitivities were consistent with PASS requirements.
i No violations or deviations were identified.
11.
Quality Control of Radiological Analytical Measurements The NRC inspectors reviewed the radiochemistry program for quality control of radiological analytical measurements to determine adherence to the
requirements in Section 6.8 of the Units 1 and 2 TS.
[
The NRC inspectors reviewed the licensee's records, for the period
'
July 1985 through July 1986, involving instrument surveillance procedures,
,
i
i-m,
- ~<
+
-,-r
-.
-....----..-,e
=-
-.-,--n,.
-,, - -,,.
,.-,n
,,.,
n-n
,,-
w.,.m
-, -. -,,,
p.--,-,---a.--mn,,,,,e
-.e--.nm---
m
, -- m -
y v-
-
y.
.-
- <
,-
.
.
+
,
.
b
'
'
'
g
,
I instrumentscalibration and quality control procedures, counting instrument calibration' and performance check data, and other documentation of
. instrument performance.
No violations or deviations were identified.
..
12.
Analytica1' Measurements a.
Confirmatory Measurements Confirmatory measurements were performed on the following standards and samples in the Region IV mobile laboratory at ANO during the inspection:
(1) Particulate Filter Standard (18788-74)
(2) Charcoal Cartridge Standard (18787-74)
(3) Waste Liquid Tank 16-A (500 al Bottle)
(4) Reactor Coolant Gas (15 cc Serum Vial)
(5) Reactor Coolant Liquid (20 ml Scintillation Vial)
(6) Tritium Sample The confirmatory measurements tests consisted of comparing measurements made by the licensee and the NRC mobile laboratory.
The NRC's mobile laboratory measurements are referenced to the National Bureau of Standards by laboratory intercomparisons.
Confirmatory measurements are made only for those' nuclides identified by the NRC as being present in concentrations greater than 10 percent of the respective isotopic values for liquid.and gas concentrations as stated in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II.
Attachment-1 contains the criteria used to compare results.
b.
Results At the time of the inspection, two detectors were used for comparison with the NRC results.
The licensee performed the tritium analysis on their liquid scintillation counting system.
The individual sample analyses and comparison of analytical results of the confirmatory measurements are tabulated in Attachment 2.
The licensee's gamma isotopic results from the listed samples in Attachment 2 showed 97 percent agreement with the NRC analysis results.
The licensee's tritium result was in agreement with the NRC analysis result.
Confirmatory measurements were performed by the licensee on liquid samples prepared by the Radiological Environmental Sciences
.
-
,
'
.
.
>
,.
\\
.- -
4 c.-
.
.
,, "
-
,
c
,
Laboratory (RESL) in Idaho Falls, Idaho.
The licensee's analytical l
.results were. compared to the known sample activities and the results of the comparisons are presented in. Attachment 2, sample 7.
The licensee's results were 73 percent agreement for sample 7 analyzed in-1986.
'
No violations or deviations were identified.
,
13.
Contractor Activities The NRC inspectors determined that the licensee was not using contractor personnel or laboratories to perform chemical or radiochemical analyses.
No violations or deviations were identified.
14.
Exit Briefing The NRC inspectors met with the NRC senior resident inspector and the licensee representatives identified in paragraph 1 of this report at the conclusion of the inspection on July 23, 1986.
The lead NRC inspector summarized the scope of the inspection, discussed the inspection findings, and presented the results of the confirmatory measurements.
The licensee agreed to review the NRC inspectors' observations listed in paragraph 3.
.
!
,
.. _,.
,, _,., _.. _ _._._.___. - - _ _._...,__
..
-
. -
..,.
._ _ _ _, _ _ _. _ _ _. _. _ _.. -. _ _...,.. _. _ _.,
.
..
..
.....
.-.
.....
.........
........
.
.
ATTACHMENT
Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements The following are the criteria used in comparing the results of capability tests and verification measurements.
The criteria are based on an empirical relationship established through prior experience and this program's analytical requirements.
In these criteria, the judgement limits vary in relation to the comparison of the resolution.
"
^"
Resolution =
NRC UNCERTAINTY LICENSEE VALUE Ratii -
NRC VALUE Comparisons are made by first determining the resolution and then reading across the same line to the corresponding ratio. The following table shows the acceptance values.
RESOLUTION AGREEMENT RATIO
<4 0.4 - 2.5 4-7 0.5 - 2.0 8 - 15 0.6 - 1.66
.
16 - 50 0.75 - 1.33
.
51 - 200 0.80 - 1.25
>200 0.85 - 1.18 The above criteria are applied to the following a'halyses:
(1) Gamma Spectrometry.
(2) Tritium analyses of liquid samples.
.
(3) Iodine on adsorbers.
(4) 895r and 90$r determinations.
(5) Gross Beta where samples are counted on the same date using the same reference nuclid __.
..
.
.
,
,
ATTACHMENT 2
'
CONFIRMATORY MEASUREMENTS RESULTS 1.
Particulate Filter! Standard (18788-74)
(Standardized 09:00 CST, July 15, 1986)
'
a
-
.
ANO Results
-Nuclide (uCi/ sample)-_
NRC Results AN0/NRC Comparison
(uCi/ sample)
Ratio Decision
~109Cd'
7.43410.'040E-1.
7.992 0.028E-1 0.93 Agreement
-
'
_7j15810.057E-1 0.90 Agreement
.,
^
$7Co 1.03110.008E-2 1.13210.007E-2 0.91 Agreement j
9.'87310.152E-3 0.87 Agreement 139Ce 9.54510.105E-3 1.048 0.008E-2 0.91 Agreement 9.19310.141E-3 0.88 Agreement
.
118Sn 1.29510.021E-2 1.43310.016E-2 0.90 Agreement
'
1.31610.030E-2 0.92 Agreement 203 Hg 1.23110.089E-3 1.17810.061E-3 1.05-Agreement 1.14910.110E-3 0.98 Agreament 137Cs 4.70610.038E-2 5.10310.030E-2 0.92 Agreement 4.68410.049E-2 0.92 Agreement 88Y 1.65810.032E-2 1.69110.023E-2 0.98 Agreement 1.58510.039E-2 0.94 Agreement l
80Co 4.14210.044E-2 4.627 0.036E-2 0.90 Agreement 4.115 0.055E-2 0.89 Agreement
,
2.
Charcoal Cartridge Standard (18787-74)
i (Standardized 13:00 CSI, July 15, 1986)
ANO Results NRC Results AN0/NRC Comparison Nuclide (uCi/ sample)
(UCi/ sample)
Ratio Decision S7Co 9.60110.080E-3 9.667 0.043E-3 0.99 Agreement 8.66710.122E-3 0.90 Agreement 109Cd 6.939 0.030E-1 6.69010.018E-1 1.04 Agreement 5.97510.039E-1 0.89 Agreement itaSn 1.25710.019E-2 1.24710.009E-2 1.01 Agreement 1.14510.022E-2 0.92 Agreement
,
139Ce 9.12010.092E-3 9.31610.047E-3 0.98 Agreement 8.33410.128E-3 0.90 Agreement
>
!
<
-
, - - - - - - - ---...-
-,n.
-n- _ ~.
-.~-----,---~c
,v-,-
- -,
,
--
g
-.,<-,-,-vn
,--.n-,-,
. - - - -,
.
.
.
.
_
m 137Cs 4.373 0.032E-2 4.56110.017E-2 0.96 Agreement 4.15410.039E-2 0.91 Agreement 20sHg 1.10510.081E-3 1.13010.034E-3 0.98 Agreement 1.10810.114E-3 0.98 Agreement
<
ssY~
1.43910.028E-2 1.519 0.013E-2 0.95 Agreement 1.332 0.032E-2 0.88 Agreement 60Co'
'4.030 0.037E-2 4.124 0.021E-2 0.98 Agreement
.3.740 0.044E-2 0.91 Agreement
'
3.
Waste Liquid Tank 16-A (500 ml Bottle)
(Sampled 07:45 CST, July 17, 1986)
ANO Results NRC Results AN0/NRC Comparison Nuclide (uCi/ml)
(uCi/ml)
Ratio Decision 54Mn 3.224 0.462E-6 3.63110.353E-6 0.89 Agreement 2.56710.525E-6 0.71 Agreement ssCo 2.913 0.097E-5 3.14510.079E-5 0.93 Agreement 2.98510.107E-5 0.95 Agreement 60Co
.1.13810.068E-5 1.265 0.057E-5 0.90 Agreement 1.14310.068E-5 0.90 Agreement 134Cs 1.185i0.019E-4 1.23810.01GE-4 0.96 Agreement 1.20410.021E-4 0.97 Agreement 137Cs 2.294i0.026E-4 2.64610.022E-4 0.87 Agreement 2.26210.029E-4 0.85 Agreement 4.
Reactor Coolant Gas (15 cc Serum Vial)
(Sampled 09:28 CST, July 16, 1986)
ANO Results NRC Results AN0/NRC Comparison Nuclide (uCi/cc)
(uCi/cc)
Ratio Decision m
8s Kr 2.15310.009E+0 2.25810.006E+0 0.95 Agreement 2.03410.011E+0 0.90 Agreement 87Kr 2.09010.016E+0 2.11610.014E+0 0.99 Agreement 2.04910.021E+0 0.97 Agreement 88Kr 3.94710.019E+0 4.222 0.019E+0 0.94 Agreement 3.79910.031E+0 0.90 Agreement m
laa Xe 8.99410.359E-1 9.72010.279E-1 0.93 Agreement 8.47710.484E-1 0.87 Agreement
.
-
_
_
-
_ - _ -.
..
.
issXe 4.18210.004E-1 4.50710.004E-1 0.93 Agreement 3.90210.006E-1 0.87 Agreement 135"Xe
?610.305E-1 5.315 0.189E-1 1.15 Agreement
,
010.424E-1 1.13 Agreement 135Xe 1.10010.001E-1 1.15310.002E-1 0.95 Agreement 1.03810.002E-1 0.90 Agreement
.
issXe 1.24710.100E+0 1.34510.080E+0 0.93 Agreement 1.17210.119E+0 0.87 Agreement 5.
RhactorCoolantLiquid.(20mlScintillationVial)
(Sampled 08:40 CST, July 17, 1986)
t ANO Results NRC Results AN0/NRC Comparison Nuclide (uCi/ml)
(uCi/ml)
Ratio Decision 24Na 3.52310.063E-2 3.667 0.043E-2 0.96 Agreement 3.61210'066E-2 0.99 Agreement
.
54Mn Not-Identi fied 6.86310.245E-3
Disagreement 5.92210.493E-3 0.87 Agreement 58Co 2.33210.277E-3 2.30910.158E-3 1.01 Agreement 6.32610.484E-3 2.74 Disagreement 88Rb 3.96810.278E-1 4.78410.242E-1 0.83 Agreement 4.52610.307E-1 0.95 Agreement 89Rb 5.11310.785E-2 2.823i0.742E-2 1.30 Agreement 3.66510.907E-2 1.81 Agreement esNb 3.26710.306E-3 2.68710.182E-3 1.22 Agreement 3.40010.399E-3 1.27 Agreement 108Ru 8.71410.394E-2 6.74210.253E-2 1.29 Agreement t
8.342 0.429E-2 1.24 Agreement 131I 3.06210.064E-2 3.21810.033E-2 0.95 Agreement 3.02610.056E-2 0.94 Agreement 1321 1.12310.009E-1 1.14010.008E-1 0.99 Agreement 1.13410.010E-1 0.99 Agreement 132Te 1.373i0.309E-3 9. 710 1. 357E-4 1.41 Agreement 1.28410.386E-3 1.32 Agreement issI 7.43910.065E-2 8.03710.043E-2 0.93 Agreement
,
7.34710.070E-2 0.91 Agreement i
.
....
,
134Cs 1.46410.061E-2 1.48110.033E-2 0.99 Agreement
-
1.37310.060E-2 0.93 Agreement 134I
- 1.28210.016E-1 1.36310.015E-1 0.94 Agreement
'1.31210.017E-1 0.96 Agreement
,
13sl
~ 9.797 0.223E-2 1.10110.016E-1 0.89 Agreement 9.88610.263E-2 0.90 Agreement
.
137Cs 1.464'10.061E-2 2.40010.036E-2 0.61 Disagreement 2.23010.066E-2 0.93 Agreement 138Cs 2.33110.037E-1 2.531 0.026E-1 0.92 Agreement 2.37610.035E-1 0.94 Agreement 138Ba 1.35110.189E-2 1.657 0.089E-2 0.82 Agreement 1.65410.243E-2 1.00 Agreement 144Ce 2.25110.153E-2 1.73810.062E-2 1.30 Agreement 2.29510.344E-2 1.32 Agreement 6.
Tritium Sample (Sampled July 16, 1986)
AN0 Results NRC Results AN0/NRC Comparison Nuclide (uCi/ml)
(uCi/ml)
Ratio Decision 3H 5.851E-2 7.45510.232E-2 0.79 Agreement 7.
RESL Liquid Sample (Standardized 12:00 MST, January 11, 1986)
ANO Results NRC Results AN0/NRC Comparison Nuclide (uCi/ sample)
(uCi/ sample)
Ratio Decision 3H 6.93 0.06E-5 9.5810.19E-5 0.72 Disagreement 88Sr 1.3310.10E-4 1.2110.04E-4 1.10 Agreement 80Sr 1.1210.19E-5 1.1410.05E-5 0.98 Agreement 55Fe 1. 7010.10 E-5 7.1110.14E-5 0.24 Disagreement
,
137Cs 1.8110.03E-5 1.74 0.05E-5 1.04 Agreement 60Co 1.6110.04E-5 1.5510.03E-5 1.04 Agreement 54Mn 1.2610.04E-5 1.0710.02E-5 1.18 Agreement 1/
NRC results were taken from the standard certification supplied to the Region IV office as prepared by RESL and traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.
.