IR 05000312/1981005
| ML19350C600 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1981 |
| From: | Willett D, Zwetzig G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350C598 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-81-05, 50-312-81-5, NUDOCS 8104060282 | |
| Download: ML19350C600 (3) | |
Text
.
. - -
.-
-
.
h
'
O U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND EtlFORCEMENT
REGION V
Report rio.
50-312/81-05 Docket No.
50-312 License No.
DPR-54 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District P. O. Box __15830 Sacramento, Califorr f a 95813 Facility Name:
Rancho Seco Inspection at:
Clay Station California Inspection conducted:
February 17-20, 1981 b
C J - 3 -/f//
Inspectors:
- h
'[D. J. Willeft, Reactor Inspector Date Signed Date Signed Approved'by: bb dh d/f/
G. h. Zwkzig AStihg Chief, Reactor Projects
/ Date Signed
' Section 2, Mactor Operations Projects Branch Summary:
.
Inspection on Februar/ 17-20, 1981 (Report No. 50-312/81-05)
Areas-Inspected:
Ro; tine, b;1 announced inspection of maintenance activities and independent insoection effort. This inspection involved 24 inspector-hours onsite by one.inspecte.
Results: ' No itemi of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
RV Form 219L(2)
t 8n640'6'0ASA
--
-
-
-
- -
- - -
-
- -
.
_-.
'
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- D. Blachly, Operations Supervisor
- fl. Brock, I&C Maintenance Supervisor
<
'
D. Cass, Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor
- Q. Coleman, Quality Assurance Engineer
- R. Colombo, Technical Assistant
- G. A. Coward, Maintenance Supervisor R. Low, Electrical Engineering Associate
- R. Oubre', Plant Superintentent
- T. Perry, Quality Assurance Supervisor
- R. J. Rodriguez, Manager fluclear Operations
- L. G. Schwieger, Director Quality Assurance j
T. Tucker, Scheduler
'
D. Yount, Electrical Maintenance Supervisor j
- Denotes those present at exit meeting on February 20, 1981.
2.
Main _tenance (Refueling)
The inspection of this area involved review of the administrative records system and documentation associated with the mechanical, electrical and I&C maintenance programs. Specific attention in this review was focused on the vendor equipment technical manual J11braries, equipment history records and test equipment calibration i' i l es. Selected administrative procedures and controls were reviewed and compared with their associated maintenance surveillance and operating manual procedures.- The following procedures were reviewed:
a)
Ac'.ninistrative procedures 1)
- AP.3 Work Request Procedure 2)
AP.29 Use-and Control of Combustible flaterials and Ignition Sources 3)
AP.31 Diesel Generators 4)
AP.33 Calibration and Control of Inspection and Test Equipment-5)
' AP.100-18 Process Standards - Relief' Valves b)
flaintenance Procedures 1).
.M.6 Pressurizer Relief Valve Removal and Replacement 2)
MT.003 Pressurizer Code Relief Set Pressure Verification 3)
MT.006 Safety Valve and Relief Valve Setpoint Verification
'4)
EM.126 Annual Testing and Maintenance of Diesel Generators
.
c)-
Surveillance Procedures-
-1) - SP 206.03 Monthly Diesel -Generator Test
.
_
-
2)
SP 207.03 Surveillance Testing of Pressuiizer Code Safety.
. Valves
.
.
-
,
..,
. -.
-.
.-. = _. - _.
.
.
. _. _.
-
.
j'
O-2-
d)
Plant Operating Manual P0M-A31 Diesel The inspector witnessed a portion of the work performed under llork Request #100082, B-Diesel Test Procedure EM-126. Matters considered
'
in this inspection included:
evidence of work approval, use of
.
properly approved procedures, adherence to conditions and precautions of the procedure, use of proper reference materials and vendor manuals, current calibration dates for test equipment and local
. equipment instrumentation, safety precautions, communications with
~ the control room, housekeeping, qualifications of personnel, quality control records and quality assurance involvement during testing.
'
fio items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Independent Inspection Effort The' inspector toured various areas of the plant, to observe operations and activities in progress, and to inspect the general state of
.
cleanliness, housekeeping and adherence to fire protection and
"
-
- security measures.
No itens of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4..
Exit' Meeting-
. The inspector met with licensee representatives, (denoted in paragraph 1),
'
at the conclusion of the inspection on February 20, 1981.
The
. purpose, the scope, and the findings of the inspection wers discussed
-
as. set forth in paragraphs 2 and 3.
f
^
h
e f
,,
-. -
. ~.
?
s
.
r-
,
.
.
..
.
.