IR 05000302/1989033
| ML20006A941 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/1990 |
| From: | Conlon T, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20006A940 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-89-33, NUDOCS 9001310002 | |
| Download: ML20006A941 (11) | |
Text
.
,..s i
pa maev
' UNITE 3 STATES -
i
- > ' '
'o CUCLEAR 7.EGULATORY COMMisslON -
y
g REGION il
,
it
101 MARIETTA STREET,N.W.
,!
g.....j#[
'
D I
'
ATLANT A, GEORGI A 30323
- t
!
!
' Licensee: Florida Power Corporation 3201 34th Street South-St. Petersburg, FL 33733
Docket No.: 50-302/89-033 License No.: DPR-72
Facility Name: Crystal River 3
'f I
Inspection Conducted: December 11 - 15, 1989 Inspector: M I -
4/
/&
k%
/ - / 2 - 90'
!
Jr R. Harris Date Signed j
Approved by:
(
_
rg p///
/-11-9b T. Conlon, Chief Date Signed Plant Systems Section
,
Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety
,
SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection was in the areas of fire protection and followup of LER Fire Barrier deficiency, personnel failing to buihi masonry fire
'
barriers within design requireraents.
,
Results:
In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identified.
!
During this' inspection, the licensee was very cooperative in providing the
?
inspector with applicable procedures, records and walkdown inspection of fire
'
protection equipment and response to previously -identified 11tems.
No weaknesses were identified during this inspection.
.
!
9001310002 900110 PDR ADOCK 05000302
,
Q PDC
_
_
l
i
..
..
REPORT DETAILS J
1.
Persons Contacted i
Licensee Employees
- J. Cooper, Nuclear Technicai Support Superintendent i
- G. Coweles, Senior Nuclear Results Engineer
- G. Becker, Manager Site Nuclear Engineering
- W. Bandhauer, Operations Superintendent
!
- D. Black, Nuclear Result Specialist
- J. Brandely, Manager Nuclear Internal Planning
.
- S. Johnson, Manager Site Nuclear Services
- H. Moon. Assistant Nuclear Manintenance Superintendent i
- P. Lancaster, Manager Site Nuclear Quality Assurance
- K. McKee, director Nuclear Plant Operations
- J. Russel Senior Nuclear Fire Protection Specialist
- W. Rossfield, Manager Nuclear Compliance i
- R. Thompson, Nuclear Plant Senior Engineer Supervisor
- K. Wilson, Manager Nuclear Licensing
- R. Widell, Director Nuclear Operations Site Support t
- M. Williams, Nuclear Regulator Specialist Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included craftsmen, engineers, operators, technicians, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors
!
- P. Holmes-Ray, Senior Resident Inspector
<
- W. Bradford, Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview
-
l 2.
Fire Protection / Prevention Program (64704)
,
a.
Fire Protection / Administrative Control Procedures AI - 1000, Good Housekeeping AI - 2200, Guidelines for handling use and control of Transient Combustibles EM - 215. Duties of Nuclear Plant Fire Brigade CP - 118, Fire Protection work permit procedure CP -.137, Fire Barrier Penetration Breach Report
t
-
--m,
.
.
..
'
.
'4
l TPD - 307. Revision 9. March 17, 1989, Nuclear Emergency Team Training Program Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the NRC guidelines of the document entitled, " Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Functional Responsibilities, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance," dated June 1977.
b.
Fire Protection Surveillance Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Fire Protection System Surveillance Procedures:
SP-190A SP-190J SP-411A SP-S02 SP-1908 SP-363 SP-11B SP-503
,
'
SP-190D SP-367 SP-4110 SP-800 SP-190E SP-404A SP-411E SP-802 t
SP-190F SP-404B SP-411F SP-804 SP-190G SP-404C SP-411G SP-805 SP-190H SP-407 SP-413 SP-805A-SP-1901 SP-408 SP-501A SP-807 The above surveillance procedures were reviewed to determine if the I
various test outlines and inspection instructions adequately I
implement the surveillance requirements of the plants fire protection l
specifications.
In addition, these procedures.were reviewed to
'
determine if the inspection and test instructions followed general industry fire protection practices, NRC fire protection guidelines and the guidelines of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Fire codes.
Based on this review, it appears. that the above l
procedures are satisfactory.
c.
Fire Protection System Surveillance Inspections and Tests-SP - 363. Fire Protection System Test, performed every 18 months.
SP - 367, Fire Service Valve Alignment and Operability Check Test, performed monthly and semi-annually.
SP - 190A, Functional and Operability Test of the Auxiliary Building Fire Detection Instrumentation, performed every six months, i
SP - 1900, Functional and Operability Test of Technical Specification l
Related Fire Detection Instrumentation, performed every six months.
SP - 190J Functional Operability Test of Cable Spreading Room Fire Detection Instrumentation, performed every six month __
,
i i
- -
,.
(
i SP - 407, Fire Barrier Penetration Seals, performed every 18 months.
SP - 408, Fire System Flow Test, performed every three years.
SP - 502, Fire Pump Diesel Batteries, checked weekly.
SP - 413. Verification of Alarm Function C0 Flow to Protected. Areas,
performed every 18 months.
The surveillance test record data and testing frequency associated with the above fire protection system surveillance test / inspections were found to be satisfactory with regard to meeting the requirements of the plant's Fire Protection Specifications, d.
Fire Protection Audits l
The most recent audit report of the Crystal River 3 fire protection j
program was reviewed. The audit report reviewed was:
Audit report 89-06 conducted by Site Support, June 12 through June 30, 1989.
The audit evaluated the emergency preparedness and fire protectior. programs for conformance to regulatory procedural I
requirements.
This audit also assessed the ' implementation of the I
activities of the Compliance and Licensing Organization as well as Quality Assurance Program presently in place for the Nuclear Operations Site Support Organization.
During the course of this audit, four nonconformances. thirteen audit findings, and six concerns were issued.
All the fire protection findings have been addressed or closed out. The licensee appears to be taking the appropriate corrective actions on these items.
e.
Fire Brigade (1) The fire brigade is composed of approximately 115 personnel from
~
the plant staff.
The on duty fire brigade team consists of a l
fire team leader and four brigade members. The-fire team leader is normally the nuclear assistant shift supervisor and the remaining fire brigade members are composed of operations and building service personnel.
The inspector reviewed the control center log for the period of November 26, 1989 through December 12, 1989, and verified that sufficient fire brigade-personnel were assigned to each on-duty shift to meet the provision of Technical Specification 6.2.2 'and' that they had received the proper training.
l l-i l
'
.
'
..
(2) Training Procedure TDP-307 outlines the fire brigade training program.
Each fire brigade member receives fire brigade training which is designed to provide basic knowledge and manual fire fighting skills.
The initial fire brigade training program is approximately 44 hours5.092593e-4 days <br />0.0122 hours <br />7.275132e-5 weeks <br />1.6742e-5 months <br />.
It includes 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of hands-on-training at the Florida State Fire College and a four hour plar.t familiarization session.
The inspector reviewed the training and drill records for 20 fire brigade shift members and 7 team leaders for 1988 and 1989.
The review indicated the 20 fire brigade shift nembers and 7 team leaders had completed all required initial training, requalification training, and brigade leadership training and participated in the required number of drills.
(3) Fire Brigade Fire Fighting Strategies The inspector reviewed fire fighting strategies (pre-fire-plans)
for the following plant areas:
AB-75-1 RB-95-1 AB-95-1 RB-119-1 AB-95-4 RB-160-1 AB-95-8 TB-95-1 AB-95-9 TB-95-3 AB-95-12 TB-95-5 AB-119-1 TB-119-4 AB-119-4 TB-145-1 AB-119-8 TB-145-2 AB-119-12 CC-95-1 AB-143-2 CC-108-1 AB-143-5 CC-124-6 AB-162-2 CC-134-1 AB-162-3 CC-145-1 Based on this review, the inspector determined that the above fire fighting strategies adequately addressed the fire hazards in the area, the type of fire extinguishments to.be utilized, the direction of attack, systems in the room / area to be managed in order to reduce fire damage, heat sensitive equipment in the room area, and specific fire brigade duties with regard to smoke control and salvage.
(4) Fire Brigade Drill During this inspection, the inspector witnessed an unannounced fire brigade drill.
The drill scenario was that there was a Classes A and C fire in the HVAC equipment room on the first floor
.
_ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - - _
_ _ _ -
.
..
..
.
of the administration building.
Electrical breaker cabinet AHCP-24 was overloaded thus igniting cable insulation. The room was fully engulfed in heavy smoke.
No automatic sprinkler system is installed in the room.
An alarm was sounded at 10:10 a.m.
The building fire alarm was sounded inside the building.
The office personnel began to evacuate the building. The alarm could not be heard on the west side of the building. The fire team leader arrived on the third floor through the turbine building.
Five security guards arrived at the staging area (southwest of the administration building).
One security guard called the control room at 10:12 a.m. and reported smoke escaping from under the doors of the HVAC
-
equipment room.
The fire team leader reported to the control room that he had finished searching the administration building and had found no signs of fire.
He also reported that he had
,
cleared the alarm and was leaving the building'to check the HVAC equipment room.
The fire team leader arrived at the drill scene at 10:14 a.m.
He slowly cracked the door, only for a few seconds, to the HVAC equipment room.
The fire team leader radioed the control room and advised them of the situation. He requested that the power supply to the building be de-energized. He also requested that the fire brigade be called out.
The control room received the message and announced the drill as a fire emergency.
The announcement was made over the plant PA System at 10:15 a.m.
The fire team leader instructed security guards to seal off the area.
The fire team leader at 10:10 a.m. began to reel off a hose line from FH-2 but did not finish.
The fire team leader was informed that at 10:17 a.m. that this was a drill, and not a fire emergency.
He in turn informed the control room and a second announcement was' made over the plant PA system correcting the fire emergency to a fire drill.
The location of the staging area was also announced.
The fire cart driver, and assistant fire team leader and two fire brigade members with bunker gear arrived at the staging area at 10:20 a.m.
The fire team leader ordered a hose line be laid from a hose reel just inside the turbine building.
At 10:21 a.m., the fire brigade members cut a rope that was keeping the turbine building door tied shut. A third fire team leader arrived on the scene and imediately assumed the duties of a second assistant fire team leader.
Two additional fire brigade members arrived fully dressed out.
I
.
-
,
..
..
f
i I
At 10:22 a.m.,
the fire team leader assembled the first four responding fire brigade members and explained his attack
strategy.
A. final inspection of the teams equipment was made by
'
one of the assistant fire leam leaders.
One dry chemical fire extinguisher and a 1-1/2" hose was in place near the entrance to the roorn.
.
At 10:23 a.m., one fire brigade member, with a fire extinguisher
,
was assigned to lead the attack teams.
This man checked the room temperature by feeling the door's surface with the back of
his hand. He opened the door slowly, then entered the room with a fire extinguisher and 1-1/2" hose line.
.
At 10:24 a.m., six fire brigade members arrived. The fire team
!
leader assigned two of them to help man the 1-1/2" attack line.
The other four nembers and one assistant fire team leader were
'
assigned to Fire House 2 to finish laying and to man a 1-1/2" back-up line for the attack team.
At 10:25 a.m., four additional fire brigade members arrived. The attack team advised the fire team leader of the room conditions and that they were going to remove the front panel of: the cabinet.
The fire team leader dispatched three fire brigade members to search the inside of the building for any fire
-
extension.
At 10:26 a.m., two additional fire brigade members arrived. The attack team reported the fire had been extinguished by. first applying a fire extinguisher, then following up with a hose stream.
At 10:30 a.m., the attack team withdrew from the room. The fire.
team leader assigned two other fire brigade members as a ~
-
fire-watch on the 1-1/2" hose line..
,
,
At 10:35 a.m., the fire drill was terminated. All personnel were I
allowed to enter the building.
All equipment was returned to service.
During this drill, the fire team leader demonstrated confidence in himself as a leader and strong tactical knowledge of advanced fire fighting.
His instructions to the team members were clear and to the point.
His response actions were very good.
The fire brigade members demonstrated a high degree of knowledge
and experience with the attack tactics, and familiarity with the equipment and its location. They conducted themselves well as a team.
The overall rating for this drill was very good.
,
w
. - - - - ~. - - - - - - - - - - - -.
- - -
- - -. - - - - - - - - -
.
-
.-
.-
.
..
f.
Plant Tour and Inspection of Fire Protection Equipment l
(1)
Inspection of Fire Brigade Manual Fire Fighting Equipment The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equipment consisting of turnout gear (coats, boots, g(loves, helmets, etc.) and self contained breathing apparatus SCBA's)
stored at the fire brigade ready stores warehouse building north mezzanine on the 120 elevation.
Additional turnout gear, and fire fighting equipment are stored in hose carts on the 119 and 145 elevation of the turbine building were examined by the inspector.
(2) Fire Service Water Supply and Outside Fire Protection Walkdown The inspector verified that the two CR-3 service water storage tanks were in service and met the requirements of the Technical Specification.
The two diesel engine driven and one electric motor driven fire pumps were inspected and found to b3 in service.
The inspector verified that the fire service 30 gpm motor-driven jockey pressure maintenance pump was maintaining a minimum 110 psi in the fire service system.
The following sectional isolation / control valves in the outside fire protection watcr supply system were inspected and verified to be properly aligned and sealed in position.
FSU-20 FSP-1 to FSP-2B Discharge Crosstie
,
FSU-21 FSP-l'to FSP-2A Discharge Crosstie l
FSU-22 Pump Discharge Header Isolation to House Sprinkler FSV-40 Pump Discharge Hydrant Outlet to Fire Main North.
FSU-47 Pump Discharge Hydrant Isolation to Pump Sprinkler FSV-53 Fire Main Isolation to Turbine Building FSV-54 Fire Main Isolation FSV-55 Fire Main Isolation to Turbine Building North FSV-73 Fire Main Isolation to Turbine
,
l Building North FSV-74 Fire Main Isolation FSV-75
. Fire Main Isolation FSV-76 Fire Main Isolation to Turbine Building North FSV-85 Fire Main Isolation FSV-86 Fire Main Isolation i
..
. __
.
. -.
-
-
.
,
!
"
..
t i
The following fire hydrants and fire hydrant equipment houses were inspected.
Fire Hydrant Hose House FH-1
Fire Hydrant Hose House FH-2 Fire Hydrant Hose House Fil-3 Fire Hydrant Hose House FH-4 Fire Hydrant Hose House FH-5 Fire Hydrant Hose House FH-6 Fire Hydrant Hose House FH-7 Fire Hydrant Hose House FH-8 i
The equipment houses contained the minimum equipment requirements of-
,
that specified by NFPA-24, Private Fire service mains and their
.'
Appurtenances, and/or the FSAR Comitments.
The equipment appeared to be adequately maintained.
A tour of the exterior of the plant indicated that sufficient clearance was provided between permanent safety related buildings and
'
structures and temporary buildings, trailers and other transient combustible materials.
The general housekeeping of the areas adjacent to the permanent plant structures was satisfactory.
'
(3) A plant tour was made by the inspector.
During the plant tour the following safe shutdown related plant areas and-their related fire
'
protection features were inspected.
'
Control Complex Elevation 108 Battery Room, Fire Area 3A CC-108-404-
,
'
Control Complex Elevation 108 Battery Room, Fire Area 3B CC-108-103 Control Complex Elevation 108 Battery Charger Room, Fire Area 3B
!
CC-108-106
,
Control Elevation 4160V Switchgear Bus Room, Fire Area 3B-CC-108-107 Control Complex Elevation 4160V Switchgear. Bus Room, Fire Area 3A-CC-108-103 Control Complex Elevation 108 Inverter Room. Fire Area 3B-CC-108-104
~
Control Complex Elevation 108 Inverter Room.-Fire Area 3A-CC-108-110 Control Complex Elevation 124480V Emergency Switchgear Bus Room. Fire Area 3B-CC-124-116 Control Complex Elevation 124V Emergency Switchgear Bus, Fire Area 3A-CC-134-117-A
.
.
.
s
. -
i
-
..
,
Control Complex Elevation 134 Cable Spreading Room, Fire Area 3A-CC-118A Control Complex Elevation Main Control Room Fire Area 3-CC-124-117 Auxiliary Building Elevation 95 North Hallway, Fire area 3 Auxiliary Building Elevation 119 Emergency Diesel Generator Control
)
Room. Fire Area AB-119-7A Auxiliary Building Elevation 119 Emergency Diesel Generator Room, Fire Area AB-119-78 Intermediate Building Elevation 95 Motor Driven Emergency feedwater
Pump Room. Fire Area 18-95-200C j
Turbine Building Elevation 95 Basement Floor. Fire Area IB-95-400A Turbine Building Elevation 119 Turbine Building Mezzanine Floor, Fire Area TB-1194000E j
'
Turbine Building Elevation 145 Turbine operation Floor Fire Area TB-145-600F, The fire / smoke detection systems manual firefighting equipment (i.e.
i portable extinguishers, hose stations, etc.) and the fire area boundary walls floors ceilings associated with the above plant areas
were inspected and verified to be in service or functional.
'
Based on this inspection, it appears that the fire protection features associated with the above plant areas are satisfactorily maintained.
The plant tour also verified the licensee's implementation of the fire prevention administrative procedures.
The control of combustible and flammable materials liquids and gases-l and the general housekeeping were found to be satisfactory in the
'
areas inspected.
3.
LicensedEventReport(LER)(92701)
LER 89-005 Fire Barrier Deficiency caused by construction personnel
failing to build masonry fire barriers in accordance with all design
requirements. This involves doors C-124 and C-105 on the 95 foot elevation of the Auxiliary Building.
The inspector examined ongoing repair to door
C-124.
Completion date for this door is December 16, 1989.. Completion -
date for door C-105 is December 31, 1989.
The completed work will be reviewed during a future inspection.
I q
-.
- -
-
..
-
..
i
i 4.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were sumarized on December 15, 1989, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection results.
The
.
licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided or
)
reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.