IR 05000289/1976014
| ML19209C404 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/07/1976 |
| From: | Donaldson D, Gallina C, Stohr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19209C403 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-289-76-14, NUDOCS 7910150348 | |
| Download: ML19209C404 (6) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. . - - ,.. -.. . -
IE:I Forn'12 (Jan' 75) (Rev) 4&A UC3 A Matont 2 8 WS [[ure v.r Pe . . ,, U. S. !;UCLEAR REGi LiTORY CC"l4ISSIO:i st OFFICE OF I:;E?ECTION AND E;iFORCC4ENT gz mE:_.
REGION I
}; 15 9 l_T..-n .. IE Inspection Report No: 50-289/76-14 Docket No: 50-289 M Licenece: Metropolitan Edison Conpan7 License No: DPR-50 P. O. Box 542 Priority: - in Reading, Pa.
19603 Category: C ...__
- 2 Safeguards Group:
.i Lcca tion: Three Mile Island - Middletown, Pa.
17057 - of Licensec: ~871 MWe (PWR) . '" ... of Inspec tion: Routine-Announced'E=ergency Planning - Dates of In:spection: June 24, 1976 . Dates of Previous Inspection: May 25 -~28, 1976 Reporting Inspector:
gr3d / J!kL fM"7f D.#E. Donaldson,/"adiation Specialist DAIE Acco=panying Inspectors: / ' d 76 7I / .(TE J.
/ Stohr, Chief. ESSP Section D km,0 r al O.
d' = ^ - <* 1.- 4 L C. O. Gallin[, Investigator DATE _.
DATE 15.1 Other Accompanying Personnel: None =i"4 ~ DATE f =.
- _
=;E.
N 7-7-7G W OnsedBy: y p^...
- ~
P. Stohr, Chief, E&SP Section .
1 48 7910150 1412 549 =
, . ~.~~: - ... EE
- .4..',.
- , g.- .4.~ ^i.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 51.
M:E E.
E!? Enforcement Action _ - - UE A.
Items of Nonco=oliance 1.
Violations {- None Identified 2.
Infractions _
- -.j: -
None Identified
- ;.__
.5]i[- =4 3.
Deficiencies
...
- L".
None Identified -== . --.:# . Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcenent Action
- =
m
- .P '
No prev.ously identified ite=s requiring licensee action with respect -'7" . to Emer: mcy Planning.
Reporta 2e Events
- .__
None Id atified - it.L. ~.C ~i Other Sienificant Findings . sE
-- A.
Current Findings-g . -.. 1.
Plane Status During the inspection, the plant was operttional.
ji 2.
Deviations , . _.. y None Identified 2[ .
3.
Unresolvert Items ._ . 5 55.: None Identified g;-i
- W --
?[; .7 =
1412 350
- ~
... _ _. ... -- ...... .-l..... ' ' _... .: ~ _--- . =. =. _2_
- _
._ 4.
Acceptable Areas .g .5.-. E=ergency drill.
(Detail 3) QM51 ._=_h-B.
Status of Previously Unresolved Itens hfj j_ @Mi No ite=s with respect to emergency planning.
EE: . 7f. - Manage =ent Interviews A.
Entrance Interview A preinspection meeting was conducted on June 24, 1976, with [E _ "~" Mr. A. Tsaggaris. During this =eeting the licensee's representa-tive and inspectors discussed the drill scenario.
jp x 3.
Exit Interview (Detail 3) =i At the conclusion of the drill the inspectors presented a su= mary - of their observations to licensee nanage=ent and stated that sub-sequent inspections would include a review of licensee action taken
regarding drill observer coc=ents.
The licensee stated that folicw-up action would be initiated for all observer coc=ents and any = corrective actions needed would be taken.
. - =- The following personnel were in attendance during this interview: USNRC Inscectors Mr. J. P. Stohr, Chief, Environ = ental and Special Projects Section, IE:I =:- Dr. C. O. Gallina, Investigator, IE:I Mr. D. E. Donaldson, Radiation Specialist, IE:I Three Mile Island Mr. J. Colit: - Unit 1 Superintendent Mr. G. Miller - Unit 2 Superintendent = Mr. R. Dubiel - Health Physicist Mr. K. Beale - Radiation Protection Supervisor Mr. G. Kunder - Operations Supervisor - Mr. J. Romanski - Supervisor of Radiation Protection and Chemistry _ Mr. A. Tsaggaris - Supervisor of Training st '_
Mr. W. Heysek - Quality Control Engineer [jj[ Eh= . m.1-
== G 1412 5.51 ? - e % ' " * - * .m .
- ~
.....
- '
. ._ - 1... TT -. - = - ..- g.. - ' N=. ' (f.. G -. g zg DETAILS ' = - fi Ai:'~ 1.
Persons Contacted g.
Mr. J. Colitz, Unit 1 Superintendent h[ Mr. G. Miller, Unit 2 Superintendent { Mr. R. Dubiel, Health Physicist = Mr. K. Beale, Radiation Protection Supervisor Mr. G. Kunder, Operations Supervisor - Mr. J. Romanski, Supervisor of Radiation Protection & Chemistry .;..,_.
- Mr. A. Tsaggaris, Supervisor of Training
{_ _
- Mr. W. Hesek, Quality Control Engineer
?
- Mr. N. Brown, Nuclear Training Technician
.y.g-
- Mr. F. McCormick, Nuclear Training Technician
-
- Mr. F. Grice, Safety Supervisor
.
- Mr. J. Potter, Plant Quality Control Staff W
- Mr. E. Daniels, Plant Quality Control Staff
= ~
- Mr. M. Johnson, Engineer Dr. W. Conners, Lancaster County Civil Defense G
2.
General _.. =.. The purpose of this inspection was to observe the licensee's
- .;-
respence to a simulated emergency, and thereby evaluate the
== licensee's ability to i=plement the facility emergency plan.
The inspection consisted of direct observation by the inspec- =..,. tors of the simulated response.
= The drill was conducted in accordance with the following scope: The drill primarily involved the licensee's personnel but i:elnded a coc:municatiens and accountability drill _- with construction personnel working at the facility.
In ';ll.
. addition, co=munications were exercised with,2ight out- =' side agencies which would support the licensee in the event of an actual emergency.
E The following outlines the scenario of the drill: . The plant is at 50% power beginning operations with a new b fuel load. The plant is tak.an to 90% power and a large
, fuel element failure occurs, causing the reactor coolant
radiation monitoring instrumentation to alarm. Wen a gg.
reactor coolant sample is taken, a rupture occurs in the Mg O sa=pling line which passes through the Auxiliary Building.
l=
- Denotes drill observer 1412 552
- ~ '
- " '::.""':'*""'
':b.
'::~-::
- =.= =:.
__ .. _....
- "."*:.'."
.
- ~
.. .1 - -. z - - u.:.:.2 '
- ^t~f-4-
- a
. _ - _.:-- O s{ - _- Ek - - - - - - - This rupture results in the release of radioactive coolant h into the Auxiliary Building.
The high te=perature water ~~~ flashes to steam, causing high levels of airborne gaseous and particulate activity with resultant high radiation levels.
-- Installed radiation nonitors alarm.
Atte= pts to isolate the leak by shutting the sanple line isolation valves fail.
(For drill purposes the two isolation valves fail to operate re-
== cotely). Due to the localized stear environ =ent, an elect-2~ trical fire starts in the valves control center.
gi" s-iL 3.
Observation of Enerzenev Traininz Exercise iiEif' -2-a.
Three (3) NRC inspectors and eight (8) licensee observers E.;E made detailed observations of the following energency .._,_ exercise activities: a.a ama (1) Unit 1 Control Room personnel actions concerning
- 5 detection and response to the emergency conditions;
[==_ am.a (2) Notification of plant, personnel and offsite agencies; @[ G r=== (3) Accountability; i.3!y , (4) Activation and operation of the emergency control center; .. _... R (5) Dose assessments; r- -
- .k: ^--
(6) Repair team operations; and gg t5li (7) Fire team operations.
-.g
g= b.
The inspectors determined that: J5 = =- (1) The emergency response was in accordance with approved [.{ plans and procedures; y _ (2) The response was coordinated, orderly and timely; Nit-EE= ...... (3) The licensee used designated, qualified persons to i-1 evaluate the organizational response;
- g.
.M 2..i ' (4) A critique was held shortly following the drill; and [3.1 E555E (5) The drill results and licensee observer cou:nents were _EEl5 documented. The licensee stated that these items
9 . - - would be reviewed by licensee management and supervison.
g- . g.- 1412 553
, . _ - _ =. a.
. .. - ... . _ ... _... _..... ..._.. '* ~ ..,. - -.
- 7'
- .25 .- - - . =. .. - - .E ~~ =
_ _.. -5-7._.. .. _ c.
The folicwing s a rizes ite=s discussed by the inspectors . ~. during the post drill cirtique: isEg =_. :.z . (1) Inoperability of air sa=plers.
Mt.:4
(2) Additional practice by personnel concerning use of EE;t fire suits.
g (3) Physical layout of e=ergency control center with respect to efficiency of cove =ent.
(4) Checklist for the Station Superintendent so that he 55=- may be updated concerning what has been acec=plished; - .. .._...Z (5) Recording of doses to emergency workera entering contaminated = areas.
(6) Proper use of respiratore n airborne contacination -
- .
areas.
(7) Utilization of " buddy system" dressing techniques.
(8) Method of accounting for emergency team members.
. (--;.'. The inspector stated that subsequent inspections would evalu- - - - ate the licensee's resolution of drill identified areas needing further evaluation and/or improvement.
. =:: -- - _ :: [--5T gg9 ~ ' . -..., . ~f a ' 2:' ~. ..
- ... 5.
- ._p?
._. ..... _. ............ - =. ... }}